Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-12-2026 Executive Session & Regular Meeting Packet
AGENDA City Council Executive Session Tuesday, May 12, 2026 @ 5:30 PM Anna Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet in an Executive Session on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 5:30 PM, in the Anna Municipal Complex – Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. 2. Executive Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Executive Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.071). City regulations; branding. b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072). c. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.087). CDC incentive agreement. d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.074). The Council further reserves the right to enter into Closed Session at any time throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the Open Meetings Act. 3. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - executive session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. 4. Adjourn. This is to certify that I, Carrie L. Land, City Secretary, posted this Agenda on the City’s Website (www.annatexas.gov) and at the Anna Municipal Complex bulletin board at or before 5:00 p.m. on 05/20/2026. Carrie L. Land, City Secretary 1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed on this Agenda. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, it is the policy of the City of Anna to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format, or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at least 48 working hours in advance of the event by emailing adacompliance@annatexas.gov. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. AGENDA City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 12, 2026 @ 6:00 PM Anna Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 6:00 PM, in the Anna Municipal Complex – Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. Welcome to the City Council meeting. If you wish to speak on an Open Session agenda item, please fill out the Opinion/Speaker Registration Form and turn it in to the City Secretary before the meeting starts. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. American Pledge: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Texas Pledge: Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible. 3. Neighbor Comments. At this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item on this meeting Agenda that is not scheduled for public hearing. Also, at this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item that is not on this meeting Agenda. Each person will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to speak. No discussion or action may be taken at this meeting on items not listed on this Agenda, other than to make statements of specific information in response to a citizen's inquiry or to recite existing policy in response to the inquiry. 4. Presentations. Presentations from Staff or the City Council about items of community interest. Items of community interest include: expression of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen (but not including a change in status of a person's public office or public employment); a reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the municipality; and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the Agenda. a. Proclamation for National Public Works Week, May 17 - 23, 2026 b. Proclamation for National Police Week, May 10 - 16, 2026 c. Award Recognition from Trusted World - Excellence in Community Service Award 5. Consent Items. These items consist of non-controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be considered individually by any Council Member making such request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items. a. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for April 28, 2026. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2026. (Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth) c. Review the Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending March 31, 2026. (Director of Finance Terri Doby) d. Approve the Quarterly Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2026. (Director of Finance Terri Doby) e. Approve a Resolution terminating a water easement originally dedicated to the South Grayson Water System. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) f. Approve a Resolution terminating a sewer line easement held by the City of Anna in Anna Crossing. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) g. Approve a Resolution terminating a water line easement held by the city in Anna Crossing. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) h. Approve a Resolution to execute a partial release of a certain 30-foot sanitary sewer easement. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) i. Approve a Resolution approving a Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum for the sale of "City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects)" (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) j. Approve a Resolution approving the Development Agreement for Thompson Grove. (DA 25-0003) (Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) [ Applicant has withdrawn the request; no action is required.] 6. Items For Individual Consideration and Public Hearings. At the time and place of any public hearing held during this meeting, all persons who desire will have an opportunity to be heard in opposition to or in favor of the ordinance, application, or other proposed item. a. Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance of the City of Anna, Texas, canvassing the returns of a General Election of two City Council Places for four- year terms expiring May 2030. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance approving and adopting the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan Update. (Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth) c. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to annex 10.8± acres of land located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) in accordance with the Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). (ANX 26-0003)(Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) d. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance regarding 10.8± acres of land located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) to change the placetype designation of the Future Land Use Plan from Estate Residential to Suburban Living and amend an existing Planned Development (Ord. No. 1111- 2024-08) Zoning District in accordance with the Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). (PD 26-0002)(Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) e. Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with the Texas Department of Transportation for Ferguson Parkway Extension (Elm St. to Collin County Outer Loop). (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) f. Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement to provide engineering design services for the Ferguson Parkway Extension project with Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc., in the amount not to exceed $3,996,310.00. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) 7. Future Agenda Items. Requests from the City Council for items to be placed on upcoming agendas by a vote of three or more. 8. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.071). City regulations; branding. b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072). c. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.087). CDC incentive agreement. d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.074). The Council further reserves the right to enter into Closed Session at any time throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the Open Meetings Act. 9. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - executive session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. 10. Adjourn. This is to certify that I, Carrie L Land, City Secretary, posted this Agenda on the City’s website (www.annatexas.gov) and at the Anna Municipal Complex bulletin board at or before 5:00 p.m. on 05/06/2026. Carrie L. Land, City Secretary 1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this Agenda. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other statement in this Agenda, the Council shall not take action on any item until after providing an opportunity for public testimony under the "Neighbor Comments" item or after any public hearing held under applicable law. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into closed executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meeting Act. 3. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, it is the policy of the City of Anna to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format, or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at least 48 working hours in advance of the event by emailing adacompliance@annatexas.gov. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Item No. 4.a. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation for National Public Works Week, May 17 - 23, 2026 SUMMARY: Public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to public health, high quality of life, and well-being of the people of Anna. I, Pete Cain, Mayor of the City of Anna, hereby designate the week of May 17 – 23, 2026, as National Public Works Week. I urge all citizens to join with representatives of the American Public Works Association and government agencies in activities, events, and ceremonies designed to pay tribute to our public works professionals, engineers, managers, and employees, and to recognize the substantial contributions they make to protecting our national health, safety, and advancing the quality of life for all. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: 1. Public Works Week Proclamation 2026 City of Anna, Texas Proclamation National Public Works Week May 17–23, 2026 “Rooted in Service, Powered by Community” WHEREAS, public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to public health, high quality of life, and well-being of the people of Anna; and, WHEREAS, these infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees at all levels of government and the private sector, who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our nation’s transportation, water supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders, and children in Anna to gain knowledge of and maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities; and, WHEREAS, the year 2026 marks the 66th annual National Public Works Week sponsored by the American Public Works Association, be it now, RESOLVED, I, Pete Cain, Mayor of the City of Anna, do hereby designate the week of May 17–23, 2026, as National Public Works Week. I urge all citizens to join with representatives of the American Public Works Association and government agencies in activities, events, and ceremonies designed to pay tribute to our public works professionals, engineers, managers, and employees, and to recognize the substantial contributions they make to protecting our national health, safety, and advancing quality of life for all. In witness, whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of May 2026 and called this seal to be affixed. ________________________________________ Pete Cain, Mayor Item No. 4.b. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Tammy Fernandez AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation for National Police Week, May 10 - 16, 2026 SUMMARY: A proclamation to recognize National Police Week 2026 and to honor the service of all law enforcement officers and the sacrifices of the men and women killed in the line of duty in 2025 while guarding our communities and defending our democracy. WHEREAS, the men and women of the Anna Police Department are dedicated to protecting all city residents and visitors with respect and dignity against deception, violence, and disorder. I, Pete Cain, Mayor of the City of Anna, call upon all people to observe May 10, 2026 – May 16, 2026, as National Police Week and show support to the law enforcement officers who devote themselves to delivering exceptional service to this community and in communities across this great nation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: 1. National Police Week 2026 City of Anna, Texas Proclamation National Police Week May 10–16, 2026 This proclamation is to recognize National Police Week 2026 and to honor the service of all law enforcement officers and the sacrifices of the men and women killed in the line of duty in 2025 while guarding our communities and defending our democracy. WHEREAS, Mayor Cain and City Council for Anna, Texas salute the men and women who do the difficult and dangerous work of safeguarding our communities. Police Officers around the nation understand the tremendous responsibility bestowed upon them in protecting the freedom and liberty of all citizens; and WHEREAS, the men and women of the Anna Police Department are dedicated to protecting all city residents and visitors with respect and dignity against deception, violence, and disorder; and WHEREAS, the residents and visitors of the City of Anna recognize the dangers of the law enforcement profession and understand the difficulties in performing the duties and responsibilities of a law enforcement officer; and WHEREAS, more than 800,000 law enforcement officers serve communities across the United States, and WHEREAS, while Officers are ever vigilant, 113 Police Officers died in the line of duty in 2025 amounting to over 27,000 line of duty deaths since the first death was recorded in 1786; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor Cain and the City Council for the City of Anna, Texas call upon all people to observe May 10, 2026 – May 16, 2026, as National Police Week and show support to the law enforcement officers who devote themselves to delivering exceptional service to this community and in communities across this great nation. In witness, whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of May 2026 and called this seal to be affixed. ________________________________________ Pete Cain, Mayor Item No. 4.c. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: AGENDA ITEM: Award Recognition from Trusted World - Excellence in Community Service Award SUMMARY: The Excellence in Community Service Award recognizes an individual, organization, or corporation that has distinguished itself through meaningful contributions that strengthen its community. This award honors sustained service, leadership and a commitment to helping others. The City of Anna has demonstrated a strong spirit of community engagement through its partnership with Trusted World. The team has consistently supported our mission by organizing clothing donations and inviting Trusted World to participate in the city’s annual Earth Day celebration to help collect resources for families in need. These actions reflect a community that is not only willing to help, but one that actively looks for opportunities to support others. It is this spirit of service and collaboration the City of Anna is deserving of this recognition. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: Trusted World began in 2014 with a simple but powerful idea: no one doing the hard work of helping others should be held back by a lack of resources. Our founder, a corporate efficiency expert trained in Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing, saw a gap that needed filling—not just with clothes or food, but with a better way of serving people. What started as a grassroots mission has grown into a sophisticated logistics and software platform that supports schools, police departments, and nonprofit organizations all across North Texas. Today, Trusted World exists to give those on the frontlines the tools they need to act—quickly, accurately, and compassionately. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: Item No. 5.a. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: AGENDA ITEM: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for April 28, 2026. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: 1. 04-28-2026 Executive Session Minutes 2. 04-28-2026 Regular Meeting Minutes City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 @ 5:30 PM Anna Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna met in an Executive Session on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 5:30 PM, in the Anna Municipal Complex – Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. Mayor Cain called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM. Members Present: Mayor Pete Cain Mayor Pro Tem Kevin Toten Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Stan Carver II Council Member Nathan Bryan Council Member Kelly Herndon Council Member Elden Baker Council Member Manny Singh Members Absent: None 2. Executive Session (Exceptions). a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.071). b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072). c. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.087). d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.074). City Council MOTION: Council Member Herndon moved to enter in Executive Session. Council Member Baker seconded. Motion carried 7 - 0. Mayor Cain recessed the meeting at 5:31 PM. Mayor Cain reconvened the meeting at 6:05 PM. 3. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - executive session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. No action taken. 4. Adjourn. Mayor Cain adjourned the meeting at 6:05 PM. APPROVED this 12th day of May 2026. ____________________________________ Mayor Pete Cain ATTEST: _______________________________ City Secretary Carrie L. Land Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM Anna Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna met on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 6:00 PM, in the Anna Municipal Complex – Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. Mayor Cain called the meeting to order at 6:06 PM. Members Present: Mayor Pete Cain Mayor Pro Tem Kevin Toten Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Stan Carver II Council Member Nathan Bryan Council Member Kelly Herndon Council Member Elden Baker Council Member Manny Singh Members Absent: None 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Council Member Baker led the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Neighbor Comments. Sheri Sachs spoke about the Leonard Street construction from Finley to David. Crystal Thomas spoke about water charges for ETJ residential customers. Donella Lyles spoke about a new non-profit organization called Teacher's Closet of North Texas. Interim Director of Economic Development Natasha Roach announced the graduation of Economic Development Manager Salena Tittle from the University of Oklahoma Economic Development Institute. 4. Presentations. a. Proclamation for Sexual Assault Awareness Month, April 2026. Council Member Herndon read a proclamation for Sexual Assault Awareness Month. b. Proclamation for National Small Business Week, May 3 through May 9, 2026. (Economic Development Manager Salena Tittle) Mayor Cain read a proclamation for National Small Business Week. Economic Development Manager Salena Tittle spoke about Anna's small businesses. Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Carver spoke about recent City events and announced upcoming events. 5. Work Session. a. Presentation on Pfetch a Ride, public transportation assistance, by Trippp Consulting. Rick Koch with Trippp Consulting made a presentation on the Pfetch a Ride and Ride Awake Transportation programs. 6. Consent Items. Council Member Herndon requested that Consent Item 6e. be pulled for discussion. MOTION: Council Member Baker moved to approve Consent Items 6a - 6d. Council Member Herndon seconded. Motion carried 7 - 0. a. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for April 14, 2026. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review Minutes of the March 5, 2026, Joint Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation Board Meeting. (Interim Director of Economic Development Natasha Roach) c. Review Minutes of the March 2, 2026, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. (Senior Planner Lauren Mecke) d. Approve a Resolution authorizing the Anna Economic Development Corporation's purchase of real property at 508 S Riggins Street. (Interim Director of Economic Development Natasha Roach) The proposed acquisition of 508 S Riggins Street aligns with the EDC's mission to stimulate economic development, enhance property values, and encourage investment. This property occupies a strategic location within the downtown district and presents a unique opportunity to influence future land use in a manner consistent with community goals. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING THE ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’S PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY. e. Approve a Resolution determining the costs of certain Authorized Improvements to be financed by the Sherley Tract Public Improvement District no. 2; approving a Preliminary Service Plan and Assessment Plan (PSAP), including proposed Assessment Rolls; calling a regular meeting and noticing a Public Hearing for May 26, 2026 to consider an Ordinance Levying Assessments on property located within Improvement Area #2, Improvement Area #3, and Improvement Area #4 of said District; directing the filing of the proposed Assessment Rolls with the City Secretary to make available for public inspection; directing city staff to publish and mail notice of said Public Hearing; and resolving other matters incident and related thereto. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) Shirley Tract has been in development in the Hurricane Creek development for a number of years. The improvements in IA#2, IA #3, and IA #4 have been completed recently, and we are prepared to initiate the bond sale for these improvements. MOTION: Council Member Herndon moved to approve. Council Member Baker seconded. Motion carried 7 - 0. RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE COSTS OF CERTAIN AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FINANCED BY THE SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2; APPROVING A PRELIMINARY SERVICE PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, INCLUDING PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLLS; CALLING A REGULAR MEETING AND NOTICING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 26, 2026, TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA #2, IMPROVEMENT AREA #3, AND IMPROVEMENT AREA #4 OF THE SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2; DIRECTING THE FILING OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLLS WITH THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PUBLISH AND MAIL NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING; AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO. 7. Items For Individual Consideration and Public Hearings. a. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance for a recommendation regarding a request for a Specific Use Permit for an Auto Repair, Light on 1.2± acres on the west side of US Highway 75, 1,000± feet north of W. Rosamond Parkway. (SUP 26-0002) (Senior Planner Lauren Mecke) Mayor Cain opened the public hearing at 7:07 PM. No public comments. Mayor Cain closed the public hearing at 7:13 PM. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Toten moved to approve. Council Member Baker seconded. Motion carried 6 - 1. Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Carver opposed. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING MAP, AND ZONING ORDINANCE AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, REPEALING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 OR THE HIGHEST PENALTY AMOUNT ALLOWED BY LAW, WHICHEVER IS LESS; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. (Property rezoned under this ordinance is generally located on the west side of US Highway 75, 1,000± feet north of W. Rosamond Parkway) b. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution to enter into an Agreement with FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. in an amount not to exceed $902,725 to provide Engineering design services for the Sherley Farms 3.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank (EST) in the City of Anna, Texas. (City Engineer Kevin Bates). The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulation 290.45 (b) (1) (D) (iii) requires 200 gallons of elevated storage per connection. To meet this TCEQ requirement and stay ahead of the growth, the addition of Sherley Farms 3.0MG EST is required. This addition will provide the capacity until around 2030– 2031 at the current growth rate. MOTION: Council Member Herndon moved to approve. Mayor Pro Tem Toten seconded. Motion carried 7 - 0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC FOR THE DESIGN OF 3.0 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK (EST), IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED NINE HUNDRED TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE AND ZERO CENTS ($902,725) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. c. Consider/Discuss/Action on filling a vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission. MOTION: Council Member Herndon moved to appoint Scott Gentry to fill a vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member Singh seconded. Motion carried 7 - 0. 8. Future Agenda Items. No items requested. 9. Closed Session (Exceptions). a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.071). b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072). c. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.087). d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov’t Code §551.074). City Council No Closed Session. 10. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - executive session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. No action taken. 11. Adjourn. Mayor Cain adjourned the meeting at 7:23 PM. APPROVED this 12th day of May 2026. ____________________________________ ATTEST: Mayor Pete Cain _______________________________ City Secretary Carrie L. Land Item No. 5.b. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Jeff Freeth AGENDA ITEM: Review Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Minutes of February 17, 2026. (Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth) SUMMARY: This item provides the City Council with the meeting minutes from the February 17, 2026, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: The City of Anna Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is tasked with two primary objectives: 1. Provide recommendations to the City Council and City staff as requested from time to time on matters relating to the City's parks and recreation activities and facilities; and 2. Assist in the promotion of park-related programs and encourage donations of land, equipment, and resources in support of parks and recreation activities. The board generally meets monthly and is comprised of seven Anna neighbors appointed by the City Council. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Active. The City of Anna promotes an active community through: • A variety of social opportunities for neighbors and visitors • Diverse recreational venues • Well-maintained trails and natural areas • Opportunities for lifelong learning ATTACHMENTS: 1. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Minutes February 17, 2026 MEETING MINUTES ANNA PARKS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Tuesday, February 17, 2026 @ 6:00 PM Anna Municipal Complex 120 W 7th Street Anna, TX 75409 The Parks Advisory Board of the City of Anna met at 6:00 PM, on February 17, 2026, at Anna Municipal Complex, located at 120 W. 7th Street, Anna TX 75409, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Oder, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum Parks Advisory Board Member Susan Jones called the meeting to order at 6:07pm. Quorum was established. Following Parks advisory board members were in attendance Susan Jones, Alastair Hunte, Kennon Weaver,David Colegrove, Madeline Madrid, Sheri Sachs and Scott Gentry. Staff present included Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance a. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member Alastair Hunte led the Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer. 3. Neighbor Comments – No comments. 4. Receive a Report a. Received a report on parks maintenance and recreation programs and events. (memo) 5. Project Update a. Received report on CIP Project Updates.by Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth. 6. Items for Individual Consideration a. Discuss, Consider, Action on recommendation for City Council to adopt 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan. MOTION: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member Scott Gentry made a motion to recommend to City Council to approval of the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan with the suggestion to add the floodplains to the trails map. Second by Kennon Weaver. Motion carried. b. Discuss, Consider, Action on Parks Advisory Board meeting minutes on January 20, 2026. MOTION: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member David Colegrove made a motion to approve the meeting minutes. Second by Madeline Madrid. Motion carried. 7. Items for Future Consideration -None. 8. Adjourn Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member Susan Jones adjourned the meeting at 6:47PM. _________________________________________ Jeff Freeth, Acting Director of Community Services ATTEST: ____________________ Item No. 5.c. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Terri Doby AGENDA ITEM: Review the Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending March 31, 2026. (Director of Finance Terri Doby) SUMMARY: This report covers the financial performance for Fiscal Year 2026 through March 31, 2026. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Information only. BACKGROUND: The City of Anna's financial policies require the publication of a monthly financial report. Enclosed in the report is an executive dashboard that provides a high-level look at major funds along with detailed reporting of sales tax collections. The financial condition of the City remains strong and the reported funds adhere to fund balance requirements. The FY2026 Budget was adopted on September 9, 2025. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY2026 City Council Monthly Financial Report March Positive Positive variance compared to historical trends Warning Negative variance of 3%-5% compared to historical trends Negative Negative variance of >5% compared to historical trends FY2026 FY2026 % Budget TD REVENUES General Fund Property Taxes 14,606,393$ 15,219,823$ 104%Property taxes are collected in Jan. & Feb. Sales Tax 6,030,000 2,671,882 44%Reflects five months of remittances. Franchise and Local Taxes 1,250,000 272,551 22%Franchise fees are collected yearly and quarterly. Charges for Services 1,384,086 1,030,457 74% Fines 400,000 216,374 54% Permits, Licenses and Fees 5,396,000 2,391,317 44% Intergovernmental - 28,600 100% Investment Income 800,000 213,862 27%Interest rates are unpredictable. Other Revenues - 824,025 100% Revenue Total 29,866,479$ 22,868,891$ 77%With 50% of the year expired, revenues recorded in the General Ledger are at 77% of budget. EXPENDITURES General Fund Expense Total 29,858,950$ 14,782,072$ 50%With 50% of the year expired, expenses are 50% of budget. Utility Fund REVENUES Water Sales 14,112,700$ 5,649,833$ 40%Water sales are traditionally lower in winter. Sewer Charges 10,700,000 4,727,647 44%Wastewater sales are traditionally lower in winter. Sanitation Revenue 3,744,000 1,871,114 50% Other Charges for Services 890,000 287,568 32%Lower than expected tap fees and meter install fees. Permits, Licenses and Fees 900,000 1,622,479 180% Investment Income 702,000 825,515 118% Other Revenues - 79,586 100% Utility Fund Total 31,048,700$ 15,063,742$ 49%With 50% of the year expired, revenues recorded in the General Ledger are at 49% of budget. EXPENDITURES Administration 1,127,420$ 852,446$ 76% Includes expense for rate model consultant and one-time expense for property and liability insurance. Water 9,593,543 5,668,000 59%Higher than expected water purchase cost due to restructuring of debt payments. Sewer 14,466,136 6,522,703 45% Sanitation 3,738,000 1,477,913 40% Utility Billing 1,653,539 674,167 41% Engineering 1,111,373 438,516 39% Utility Fund Total 31,690,011$ 15,633,745$ 49%With 50% of the year expired, expenses are 49% of budget. CITY OF ANN GENERAL & UTILITY FUNDS DASHBOARD Through March 31, 2026 Favorable / Unfavorable % Change 2024-26 Collections from 2024-25 Collections Monthly Prior Year Monthly October 820,089$ 5% 780,090$ November 855,966 14% 753,401 December 1,085,565 9% 995,930 January 749,307 10% 682,766 February 764,084 13% 675,214 March 1,873,725 April 779,340 May 780,970 June 867,435 July 817,173 August 761,329 September 844,898 4,275,011$ 10,612,271$ Budget: 9,650,000 44% 8,220,000 CITY OF ANNA Schedule of Sales Tax Collections February 28, 2026 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 Monthly Sales Tax Collections: 3 Year Comparison FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 Item No. 5.d. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Terri Doby AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Quarterly Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2026. (Director of Finance Terri Doby) SUMMARY: In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act (PFIA), the City of Anna is required to submit a quarterly report on the investments of public funds held by the City. The report includes: • Summary of Investments by category • Economic overview with charts showing historical data • Total of investment holdings, including portfolio composition and maturity range • Book and market comparison The fiscal year-to-date average yield for the portfolio equaled 3.81%. Total cash and investments decreased $10.8 million for the quarter. The decrease is attributed to the drawdown of funds for capital project payments. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Interest income for the quarter ending March 31, 2026 equaled $2.03 million. Overall, interest income for the fiscal year-to-date was $4.30 million. BACKGROUND: According to the City of Anna's Investment Policy, funds will be administered and invested in a manner that will preserve the principal, maintain liquidity, and optimize earnings while meeting the daily cash flow requirements of the City and the guidelines to be followed in achieving its objectives. The City of Anna invests funds in several types of instruments, including Checking and Money Market accounts, Certificates of Deposit, and Government Pool funds. Investment funds are currently held in SouthState Bank, American National Bank, Cornerstone Capital Bank and TexPool. The city works with Valley View Consulting, LLC to maximize current interest rates while maintaining a high degree of safety and sufficient liquidity to fund ongoing operations. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Excellent. Anna is a high-performing City that implements best practices and pursues accreditation, demonstrating its commitment to: • Ethical and collaborative decision-making • Continuous improvement and achieving measurable outcomes • Ensuring a positive work environment for Council, staff, and neighbors ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2026 03 Anna Quarterly Investment Report Quarter End Results by Investment Category: Asset Type Ave. Yield Book Value Market Value Ave. Yield Book Value Market Value Bank DDA/MMA 3.95%113,521,215$ 113,521,215$ 3.81%91,704,744$ 91,704,744$ LGIPs 3.83%78,484,482 78,484,482 3.67%79,200,328 79,200,328 Securities/CDs 3.77%30,049,863 30,049,863 3.74%40,348,427 40,348,427 Totals 3.88%222,055,560$ 222,055,560$ 3.75%211,253,498$ 211,253,498$ Average Yield - Current Quarter (1) Fiscal Year-to-Date Average Yield (2) Total Portfolio 3.75%Total Portfolio 3.81% Rolling Three Month Treasury 3.69%Rolling Three Month Treasury 3.75% Rolling Six Month Treasury 3.69%Rolling Six Month Treasury 3.78% Quarterly TexPool Yield 3.67%Quarterly TexPool Yield 3.75% Interest Income (Approximate) Year-to-date Interest Income 4,302,494$ Summary (2) Fiscal Year-to-Date Average Yields - calculated using quarter end report yields and adjusted book values and does not reflect a total return analysis or account for advisory fees. (1) Averge Yield - Current Quarter - based on adjusted book value, realized and unrealized gains/losses and investment advisory fees are not considered. The yield for the reporting month is used for bank, pool and money market balances. March 31, 2026December 31, 2025 City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.1 Economic Overview 3/31/2026 The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) maintained the Fed Funds target 3.50% - 3.75% (Effective Fed Funds trade +/-3.64%) at their Jan meeting. Additional rate cuts during 2026 are uncertain, but could include one late fall. March Non-Farm Payroll added 178k (exceeding the +60k expectation) raising the three month average to +68k. The S&P 500 Stock Index retrenched +/- 8% since touching 7,000. The yield curve is almost fully positive. With the Middle East conflict, Crude Oil continues $100+. Inflation continues above the FOMC 2% target (Core CPI 2.5% and Core PCE +/-3.1%). The uncertain world events still influence volatility. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 S&P 500 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 US Treasury Historical Yields - Since Nov 2018 Six Month T-Bill Two Year T-Note Ten Year T-Note 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 Treasury Yield Curves March 31, 2025 December 31, 2025 March 31, 2026 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 US Treasury Historical Yields - Since 2006 Six Month T-Bill Two Year T-Note Ten Year T-Note All numbers estimated and subject to change.Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.2 Investment Holdings March 31, 2026 SouthState MMA 3.81%04/01/26 03/31/26 91,704,744$ 91,704,744$ 1.00 91,704,744$ 1 3.81% TexPool LGIP AAAm 3.67%04/01/26 03/31/26 79,200,328 79,200,328 1.00 79,200,328 1 3.67% SouthState Bank CD 3.65%06/09/26 12/09/25 25,228,527 25,228,527 100.00 25,228,527 70 3.71% SouthState Bank CD 4.00%09/29/26 09/29/25 5,099,670 5,099,670 100.00 5,099,670 182 4.07% American Nat'l Bank of Texas CD 3.59%11/19/26 02/18/26 5,000,000 5,000,000 100.00 5,000,000 233 3.64% Cornerstone Capital Bank CD 3.60%02/18/27 02/19/26 5,020,230 5,020,230 100.00 5,020,230 324 3.66% 211,253,498$ 211,253,498$ 211,253,498$ 27 3.75% (1)(2) (2) Weighted average yield to maturity - The weighted average yield to maturity is based on adjusted book value, realized and unrealized gains/losses and investment advisory fees are not considered. The yield for the reporting month is used for pool and bank account investments. (1) Weighted average life - For purposes of calculating weighted average life, pool and bank account investments are assumed to have a one day maturity. City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.3 Bank DDA/MMA 43% Pools 38% Securities/CDs 19% Portfolio Composition $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 Total Portfolio (Millions) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Pe r c e n t a g e Total Portfolio Performance TexPool Weighted Average Yield $0 $25 $50 $75 $100 $125 $150 $175 $200 Distribution by Maturity Range (Millions) City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.4 Maturity Cash Flow - Next 12 Months Month Face Amount Interest Total Apr-26 –$ 93,180$ 93,180$ May-26 – 134,914 134,914 Jun-26 25,228,527 142,065 25,370,592 Jul-26 – 15,350 15,350 Aug-26 – 60,594 60,594 Sep-26 5,099,670 66,270 5,165,940 Oct-26 – 15,350 15,350 Nov-26 5,000,000 60,590 5,060,590 Dec-26 – 15,350 15,350 Jan-27 – 15,350 15,350 Feb-27 5,020,230 8,412 5,028,642 Mar-27 – – – $– $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 Face Amount Interest City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.5 Issuer/Description Yield Maturity Date Book Value 12/31/25 Increases Decreases Book Value 03/31/26 Market Value 12/31/25 Change in Market Value Market Value 03/31/26 SouthState MMA 3.81%04/01/26 113,521,215$ –$ (21,816,471)$ 91,704,744$ 113,521,215$ (21,816,471)$ 91,704,744$ TexPool LGIP 3.67%04/01/26 78,484,482 715,846 – 79,200,328 78,484,482 715,846 79,200,328 SouthState Bank CD 3.71%06/09/26 25,000,000 228,527 – 25,228,527 25,000,000 228,527 25,228,527 SouthState Bank CD 4.07%09/29/26 5,049,863 49,807 – 5,099,670 5,049,863 49,807 5,099,670 American Nat'l Bank of Texas CD 3.64%11/19/26 – 5,000,000 – 5,000,000 – 5,000,000 5,000,000 Cornerstone Capital Bank CD 3.66%02/18/27 – 5,020,230 – 5,020,230 – 5,020,230 5,020,230 TOTAL / AVERAGE 3.75%222,055,560$ 11,014,409$ (21,816,471)$ 211,253,498$ 222,055,560$ (10,802,062)$ 211,253,498$ Book & Market Value Comparison City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.6 Allocation March 31, 2026 Book & Market Value Total General Fund Debt Service General Bond Water/Sewer SouthState MMA 91,704,744$ 17,681,032$ 7,917,916$ –$ 44,380,366$ 94,836$ 5,011,630$ 5,592,410$ 11,026,554$ TexPool LGIP 79,200,328 32,712,739 – 40,604,933 – – – – 5,882,655 – 06/09/26–SouthState Bank CD 25,228,527 – – 25,228,527 – – – – – 09/29/26–SouthState Bank CD 5,099,670 – – – 5,099,670 – – – – 11/19/26–American Nat'l Bank of Texas CD 5,000,000 5,000,000 – – – – – – – 02/18/27–Cornerstone Capital Bank CD 5,020,230 5,020,230 – – – – – – – Totals 211,253,498$ 60,414,001$ 7,917,916$ 65,833,460$ 49,480,036$ 94,836$ 5,011,630$ 5,592,410$ 16,909,209$ Allocation December 31, 2025 Book & Market Value Total General Fund Debt Service General Bond Water/Sewer SouthState MMA 113,521,215$ 31,096,492$ 1,341,076$ –$ 58,835,227$ 93,964$ 4,965,574$ 7,581,662$ 9,607,220$ TexPool LGIP 78,484,482 32,417,068 – 40,237,929 – – – – 5,829,485 – 06/09/26–SouthState Bank CD 25,000,000 – – 25,000,000 – – – – – 09/29/26–SouthState Bank CD 5,049,863 – – – 5,049,863 – – – – Totals 222,055,560$ 63,513,560$ 1,341,076$ 65,237,929$ 63,885,090$ 93,964$ 4,965,574$ 7,581,662$ 15,436,705$ City of Anna Valley View Consulting, L.L.C.7 Item No. 5.e. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution terminating a water easement originally dedicated to the South Grayson Water System. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: The easement was dedicated by the original landowners in 1967 to South Grayson Water Supply (SGWS). The City of Anna purchased this section of the SGWS in order to expand our system several years ago. Since that time of dedication, the property has been developed into the Anna Crossing Subdivision. Anna Crossing has dedicated a number of other water easements by plat, which replace this easement. The City is requested to abandon the easement as the acting easement holder. FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell, granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation over and across the real property. Since that time of dedication, the property has been developed into the Anna Crossing Subdivision. Anna Crossing has dedicated several other water easements by plat, which replace this easement. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. Anna's mobility and utility infrastructure consistently meets community needs by: • Focusing on resiliency and the City's ability to recover from upsets • Having a robust multi-modal transportation network • Dependably delivering utility services to the City's neighbors and businesses ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. SouthGrayson Termination WaterLine Easement C03029D20260416CR1 mc ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO._______________ PAGE 1 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), is a home-rule municipality acting under its Charter and the laws of the State of Texas; Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation over and across the real property described therein; South Grayson Special Utility District is the successor to South Grayson Water Supply Corporation; the City has reviewed the Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” which is drafted for execution by South Grayson Special Utility District; and the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the form of Exhibit “A” and authorize the City Manager to take such ancillary, ministerial, and coordinating actions on behalf of the City as may be necessary or convenient in connection with such termination and any related recordation or companion documents approved by the City Attorney; The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. The form of Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby approved. Because Exhibit “A” is drafted for execution by South Grayson Special Utility District, the City Manager is not authorized by this Resolution to sign Exhibit “A” on behalf of South Grayson; however, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any ancillary or companion documents on behalf of the City, and to take such ministerial or coordinating actions as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the termination and any related filing or recordation. ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO._______________ PAGE 2 Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED: ATTEST: EXHIBIT “A” After recording, return to: TERMINATION OF EASEMENT RECITALS A. Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas (the “Easement”), for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation, over and across the real property described therein. B. South Grayson is the successor to South Grayson Water Supply Corporation. C. South Grayson, as the sole beneficiary under the Easement, desires to terminate the Easement. SOUTH GRAYSON: By: ______________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: ______________________________ Item No. 5.f. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution terminating a sewer line easement held by the City of Anna in Anna Crossing. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: Rita P. Warren et al granted an easement pursuant to that instrument dated July 31, 1986, and recorded in Volume 2432, Page 345 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of the City of Anna, Texas, over and across the property for a sanitary sewer line. Since the easement was dedicated, the property has been redeveloped as the Anna Crossing subdivision. Anna Crossing has dedicated several sanitary sewer easements that replace this easement related to new sanitary sewer mains in the development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: Rita P. Warren et al granted an easement pursuant to that instrument dated July 31, 1986, and recorded in Volume 2432, Page 345 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of the City of Anna, Texas, over and across the property for a sanitary sewer line. Since the easement was dedicated, the property has been redeveloped as the Anna Crossing subdivision. Anna Crossing has dedicated several sanitary sewer easements that replace this easement related to new sanitary sewer mains in the development. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. Anna's mobility and utility infrastructure consistently meets community needs by: • Focusing on resiliency and the City's ability to recover from upsets • Having a robust multi-modal transportation network • Dependably delivering utility services to the City's neighbors and businesses ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. Sewer Easement Termination Rita Warren C03029D20260416CR1 mc ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO._______________ PAGE 1 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), is a home-rule municipality acting under its Charter and the laws of the State of Texas; and Rita P. Warren, et al. granted an easement pursuant to that instrument dated July 31, 1986, and recorded in Volume 2432, Page 345 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of the City over and across the real property described therein; and the City, as the beneficiary under such easement, desires to terminate and release the easement by execution of the Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and the City Council finds that authorizing the City Manager to execute Exhibit “A” and any related ancillary documents approved by the City Attorney is in the public interest; The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. The Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute and deliver Exhibit “A,” with such non-substantive changes as the City Manager and City Attorney may approve, and to execute any related or ancillary documents necessary or convenient to effectuate the termination and release described therein. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on the ___ day of ____________________, 2026. ______________________________ Mayor ______________________________ City Secretary EXHIBIT “A” After recording, return to: TERMINATION OF EASEMENT RECITALS A. Rita P. Warren, et al granted an easement pursuant to that instrument dated July 31, 1986, and recorded in Volume 2432, Page 345 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas (the “Easement”), for the benefit of the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), over and across the real property described therein. B. The City, as the sole beneficiary under the Easement, desires to terminate the Easement. CITY: By: ______________________________ Name: Ronda Perez Title: City Manager Item No. 5.g. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution terminating a water line easement held by the city in Anna Crossing. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: Water Line Easement Termination by City - Anna Crossing FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell, granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas (the "Easement"), for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation, over and across their real property. Since that time of dedication, the property has been developed into the Anna Crossing Subdivision. Anna Crossing has dedicated several other water easements by plat, which replace this easement. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. Anna's mobility and utility infrastructure consistently meets community needs by: • Focusing on resiliency and the City's ability to recover from upsets • Having a robust multi-modal transportation network • Dependably delivering utility services to the City's neighbors and businesses ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. WaterLine Easement Termination by City C03029D20260416CR1 mc ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO._______________ PAGE 1 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS the City of Anna, Texas (the "City"), is a home-rule municipality acting under its Charter and the laws of the State of Texas; and Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation over and across the real property described therein; and South Grayson Special Utility District is the successor to South Grayson Water Supply Corporation and has assigned to the City all of its right, title, and interest in and to such easement; and the City, as the holder of the beneficial interest in such easement, desires to terminate and release the easement by execution of the Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and the City Council finds that authorizing the City Manager to execute Exhibit "A" and any related ancillary documents approved by the City Attorney is in the public interest; The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. The Termination of Easement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute and deliver Exhibit "A," with such non-substantive changes as the City Manager and City Attorney may approve, and to execute any related or ancillary documents necessary or convenient to effectuate the termination and release described therein. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its passage. ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO._______________ PAGE 2 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on the ___ day of ____________________, 2026. APPROVED: ATTEST: EXHIBIT "A" After recording, return to: This Termination of Easement (this "Termination") is made effective as of _______________, 2026, by the City of Anna, Texas (the "City"). RECITALS A. Vance E. Powell and wife, Lera Beth Powell granted an easement pursuant to that certain instrument dated August 7, 1967, and recorded in Volume 709, Page 850 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas (the "Easement"), for the benefit of South Grayson Water Supply Corporation, over and across the real property described therein. B. South Grayson Special Utility District, a special utility district ("South Grayson"), is the successor to South Grayson Water Supply Corporation. South Grayson has assigned to the City all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement, and all of its interests in and to the real property covered thereby. C. The City, as the sole beneficiary under the Easement, desires to terminate the Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City hereby terminates the Easement for all purposes and terminates and releases all interests it may have in and to the real property covered thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF ANNA has executed this Termination to be effective as of the date first set forth above. CITY: CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, a municipal corporation By: ______________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: City Manager STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on ____________, 2026, by ____________________, City Manager of the City of Anna, Texas, a municipal corporation, on behalf of said municipal corporation. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires: ____________________ Printed/Typed Name: _______________________ Item No. 5.h. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution to execute a partial release of a certain 30-foot sanitary sewer easement. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: The City possesses certain rights in and to a 30-foot sanitary sewer easement situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas. During the design of the sanitary sewer system for the Liberty Hills development, the sanitary sewer main was required to be relocated from its original alignment within the existing easement. A new sanitary sewer easement has been dedicated to the City along the as- constructed alignment of the sanitary sewer main. Accordingly, partial abandonment of the existing sanitary sewer easement is requested, as the abandoned portion is no longer required due to the rerouting of the sanitary sewer main. FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: The City possesses certain rights in and to a 30-foot sanitary sewer easement situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas. During the design of the sanitary sewer system for the Liberty Hills development, the sanitary sewer main was required to be relocated from its original alignment within the existing easement. A new sanitary sewer easement has been dedicated to the City along the as- constructed alignment of the sanitary sewer main. Accordingly, partial abandonment of the existing sanitary sewer easement is requested, as the abandoned portion is no longer required due to the rerouting of the sanitary sewer main. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. Anna's mobility and utility infrastructure consistently meets community needs by: • Focusing on resiliency and the City's ability to recover from upsets • Having a robust multi-modal transportation network • Dependably delivering utility services to the City's neighbors and businesses ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. Sewer Easement Release C03029D20260416CR1 mc ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 1 the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), is a home-rule municipality acting under its Charter and the laws of the State of Texas; and the City possesses certain rights in and to a 30-foot sanitary sewer easement situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (the “Easement”); and the City Council has reviewed the Easement and determined that the Easement is no longer required for public sanitary sewer purposes; and the City Council further finds that it is in the public interest to abandon and release the Easement and to authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary or convenient to evidence such abandonment and release in the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. The City Council hereby finds that the Easement described in Exhibit “A” is no longer required for public sanitary sewer purposes. Subject to execution of the documents authorized by this resolution, the City hereby abandons and releases the Easement. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute, acknowledge, and deliver, on behalf of the City, all easement abandonment, release, recordation, and other ancillary documents necessary or convenient to effectuate the abandonment and release of the Easement, in a form approved by the City Attorney. The City Manager and City Secretary are further authorized to take such ministerial actions as are necessary to cause the executed documents to be filed in the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas. This resolution takes effect immediately upon its passage. ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on the ___ day of __________________, 2026. APPROVED: ATTEST: EXHIBIT “A” 30' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Item No. 5.i. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution approving a Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum for the sale of "City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects)" (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: Approve a Resolution approving a Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum for the sale of "City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects)" FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. Anna's mobility and utility infrastructure consistently meets community needs by: • Focusing on resiliency and the City's ability to recover from upsets • Having a robust multi-modal transportation network • Dependably delivering utility services to the City's neighbors and businesses ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Approving PLOM (Sherley Tract PID No. 2) v1 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2026-05-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THE SALE OF “CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2026 (SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 PROJECTS)” WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”) intends to issue its City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects) (the “Bonds”) to finance certain public improvements within the City; WHEREAS, FMSbonds, Inc. (the “Underwriter”), with assistance from its counsel, City Staff, the City’s Bond Counsel, and City’s Financial Advisor, has prepared a Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum for dissemination to potential purchasers of the Bonds prior to the availability of the final Limited Offering Memorandum for the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: 1. The Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum for the Bonds, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved with such changes, addenda, supplements or amendments as may be approved by the Finance Director in consultation with the City’s consultants retained by the City to assist in the issuance of the Bonds including Bond Counsel and the Financial Advisor, and the Underwriter is hereby authorized to distribute such document among potential purchasers of the Bonds and other interested persons in connection with the initial marketing and placement of the Bonds; provided that such Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum shall not be released to the public without the approval of the Finance Director, which approval shall be made in consultation with the City’s consultants retained by the City to assist in the issuance of the Bonds including Bond Counsel and the Financial Advisor. 2. Pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12) (“Rule 15c2-12”), the City hereby deems the Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum to be final as of its date, except for the omission of no more than the following information as permitted by Rule 15c2-12: the offering prices of the Bonds, interest rates for the Bonds, selling compensation of the Underwriter, the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the principal amount per maturity of the Bonds, the delivery date for the Bonds, ratings for the Bonds, and the identity of the ultimate purchasers. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY, 2026. ______________________________ Pete Cain, Mayor ATTEST: City of Anna, Texas ______________________________ (CITY SEAL) Carrie Land, City Secretary City of Anna, Texas EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM 717384364v8 NEW ISSUE NOT RATED PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED [PLOM DATE], 2026 PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS ARE ADVISED THAT THE BONDS BEING OFFERED PURSUANT TO THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM ARE BEING INITIALLY OFFERED ONLY TO “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), AND “ACCREDITED INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 501 OF REGULATION D PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT. SEE “LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS” HEREIN. THE BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT IN RELIANCE UPON THE EXEMPTION PROVIDED BY SECTION 3(A)(2) THEREIN. NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO QUALIFY THE BONDS FOR SALE UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE. SEE “LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS” HEREIN. In the opinion of McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P., Bond Counsel to the City, interest on the Bonds will be excludable from gross income for purposes of federal income taxation under statutes, regulations, published rulings and court decisions existing on the date thereof, subject to the matters described under “TAX MATTERS” herein, including the alternative minimum tax on certain corporations. $9,877,000* CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, (a municipal corporation of the State of Texas located in Collin County) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2026 (SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 PROJECTS) Dated Date: Closing Date Due: September 15, as shown on the inside cover Interest to Accrue from Closing Date The City of Anna, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects) (the “Bonds”), are being issued by the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”). The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form, without coupons, in authorized denominations of $25,000 of principal amount and any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof. The Bonds will bear interest at the rates set forth on the inside cover page hereof, and such interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, and will be payable on each March 15 and September 15, commencing March 15, 2027, until maturity or earlier redemption. The Bonds will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York. No physical delivery of the Bonds will be made to the beneficial owners thereof. For so long as the book-entry only system is maintained, the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid from the sources described herein by Regions Bank, as trustee (the “Trustee”), to DTC as the registered owner thereof. See “BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.” The Bonds are being issued by the City pursuant to the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Subchapter A of Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the “PID Act”), an ordinance expected to be adopted by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) on May 26, 2026, and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2026 (the “Indenture”), to be entered into by and between the City and the Trustee. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture. Proceeds of the Bonds will be used to provide funds for (i) paying a portion of the costs of the “Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements” (as defined herein), paying a portion of the interest on the Bonds during and after the period of acquisition and construction of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, (iii) funding a reserve fund for payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, (iv) paying a portion of the costs incidental to the organization of the District, and (v) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds. See “THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS” and “APPENDIX A — Form Indenture.” The Bonds, when issued and delivered, will constitute valid and binding special obligations of the City payable solely from and secured by a pledge of and lien upon the Trust Estate, consisting primarily of Assessments (as defined herein) expected to be levied against assessable properties in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District in accordance with a Service and Assessment Plan and other funds comprising the Trust Estate, all to the extent and upon the conditions described herein. The Bonds are not payable from funds raised or to be raised from taxation. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS.” The Bonds are subject to redemption at the times, in the amounts, and at the redemption prices more fully described herein under the subcaption “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS — Redemption Provisions.” The Bonds involve a high degree of risk and are not suitable for all investors. The Underwriter (identified below) is limiting this offering to Qualified Institutional Buyers and Accredited Investors. The limitation of the initial offering to Qualified Institutional Buyers and Accredited Investors does not denote restrictions on transfers in any secondary market for the Bonds. Prospective purchasers should carefully evaluate the risks and merits of an investment in the Bonds, should consult with their legal and financial advisors before considering a purchase of the Bonds, and should be willing to bear the risks of loss of their investment in the Bonds. The Bonds are not credit enhanced or rated and no application has been made for a rating on the Bonds. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” and “SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT.” THE BONDS ARE SPECIAL, LIMITED OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE PLEDGED REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. THE BONDS DO NOT GIVE RISE TO A CHARGE AGAINST THE GENERAL CREDIT OR TAXING POWER OF THE CITY AND ARE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE SOURCES IDENTIFIED IN THE INDENTURE. THE OWNERS OF THE BONDS SHALL NEVER HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND PAYMENT THEREOF OUT OF MONEY RAISED OR TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION, OR OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE TRUST ESTATE, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. NO OWNER OF THE BONDS SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND ANY EXERCISE OF THE CITY’S TAXING POWER TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE BONDS OR THE INTEREST OR REDEMPTION PREMIUM, IF ANY, THEREON. THE CITY SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO PAY THE BONDS OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE PLEDGED REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE. SEE “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS.” This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of the Bonds. Investors must read this entire Limited Offering Memorandum to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. The Bonds are offered for delivery when, as, and if issued by the City and accepted by the Underwriter, subject to, among other things, the approval of the Bonds by the Attorney General of Texas and the receipt of the opinion of McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P., Bond Counsel, as to the validity of the Bonds and the excludability of interest thereon from gross income for federal income tax purposes. See “APPENDIX C — Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel.” Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by its counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and for the Developer by its counsel, * Preliminary; subject to change. Th i s P r e l i m i n a r y L i m i t e d O f f e r i n g M e m o r a n d u m a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n a r e s u b j e c t t o c o m p l e t i o n a n d a m e n d m e n t w i t h o ut n o t i c e . U n d e r n o c i r c u m s t a n c e s s h a l l t h i s P r e l im i n a r y L i m i t e d O f f e r i n g M e m o r a n d u m c o n s t i t u t e a n of f e r t o s e l l o r t h e s o l i c i t a t i o n o f a n o f f e r t o b u y n o r s h a l l t h er e b e a n y s a l e o f t h e s e s e c u r i t i es i n a n y j u r i s d i c t i o n i n w h i ch s u c h o f f e r , s o l i c i t a t i o n o r s a l e w o u l d b e u n l a w f u l p r i o r t o r e g i s t r a t i o n o r q u a l i f i c a t i o n u n d er t h e s e c u r i t i e s l a w s h e r e u n d e r. Boghetich Law, PLLC. It is expected that the Bonds will be delivered in book-entry form through the facilities of DTC on or about June 23, 2026 (the “Closing Date”). FMSbonds, Inc. i MATURITIES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS, INTEREST RATES, PRICES, YIELDS, AND CUSIP NUMBERS CUSIP Prefix: ____________(a) $9,877,000* CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, (a municipal corporation of the State of Texas located in Collin County) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2026 (SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 PROJECTS) $__________ _____% Term Bonds, Due September 15, 20__, Priced to Yield ____%; CUSIP ___(a) (c) $__________ _____% Term Bonds, Due September 15, 20__, Priced to Yield ____%; CUSIP ___(a) (c) $__________ _____% Term Bonds, Due September 15, 20__, Priced to Yield ____%; CUSIP ___(a) (b) (c) * Preliminary; subject to change. (a) CUSIP numbers are included solely for the convenience of owners of the Bonds. CUSIP is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services, managed by FactSet Research Systems Inc., on behalf of the American Bankers Association. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP Services. CUSIP numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. None of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor or the Underwriter takes any responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. (b) The Bonds maturing on or after September 15, 20__, are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, prior to stated maturity, at the option of the City, on any date on or after September 15, 20__, at the redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the date of redemption as described herein under “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS — Redemption Provisions.” (c) The Bonds are also subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption and extraordinary optional redemption as described herein under “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS — Redemption Provisions.” ii CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CITY COUNCIL Name Place Term Expires (May) Pete Cain Ma o 2027 Kevin Toten Place 1, Ma or Pro Te 2027 athan Br an Place 2 2027 Stan Carver* Place 3, Deput Ma or Pro Tem 2026 Kell Patterson-Herndon Place 4 2028 Elden Bake ** Place 5 2030 Mann Sin h Place 6 2028 * Stan Carver currently holds office in Place 3 of the City Council and serves as the Deputy Mayor Pro Tem. Jessica Walden was elected to Place 3 in an election held on May 2, 2026 and is expected to be sworn in on May 26, 2026. ** Elden Baker was re-elected to Place 5 on May 2, 2026 and he is expected to be sworn in for his term of office ending in 2023 on May 26, 2026. CITY MANAGER CITY SECRETARY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Ronda Perez Carrie Land Terri Doby ADMINISTRATOR P3Works, LLC MUNICIPAL ADVISOR TO THE CITY Hilltop Securities Inc. BOND COUNSEL McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P. UNDERWRITER’S COUNSEL Greenberg Traurig, LLP For additional information regarding the City, please contact: Ronda Perez Jim Sabonis Andre A ala Cit Mana e Hilltop Securities Inc. Hilltop Securities Inc. Cit of Anna, Texas 717 N. Harwood Street 717 N. Harwood Street 120 W. 7th Stree Suite 3400 Suite 3400 Anna, Texas 75409 Dallas, Texas 75201 Dallas, Texas 75201 (972) 924-3325 (214) 953-4000 (214) 953-4000 rperez annatexas.ov Jim.Sabonis hilltopsecurities.co Andre.A ala hilltopsecurities.co iii REGIONAL LOCATION MAP OF THE DISTRICT DISTRICT iv AREA LOCATION MAP OF THE DISTRICT DISTRICT v MAP SHOWING BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENT AREAS * Adjacent commercial and multifamily shown above are not located in the boundaries of the District. Improvement Area #1 Improvement Area #1 Improvement Area #1 Improvement Area #3 Future Improvement Area Improvement Area #2 Improvement Area #4 Future Improvement Area vi FOR PURPOSES OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 15C2-12 OF THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“RULE 15C2-12”), AS AMENDED AND IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THIS PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM, THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES AN “OFFICIAL STATEMENT” OF THE CITY WITH RESPECT TO THE BONDS THAT HAS BEEN “DEEMED FINAL” BY THE CITY AS OF ITS DATE EXCEPT FOR THE OMISSION NO MORE THAN THE INFORMATION PERMITTED BY RULE 15C2-12. THE INITIAL PURCHASERS ARE ADVISED THAT THE BONDS BEING OFFERED PURSUANT TO THE LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM ARE BEING OFFERED AND SOLD ONLY TO “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT OF 1933”) AND “ACCREDITED INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 501 OF REGULATION D PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. SEE “LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS” HEREIN. EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE MERITS AND RISKS OF AN INVESTMENT IN THE BONDS, MUST BE ABLE TO BEAR THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL RISK OF SUCH INVESTMENT IN THE BONDS, AND MUST BE ABLE TO AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF SUCH INVESTMENT. CERTAIN RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PURCHASE OF THE BONDS ARE SET FORTH UNDER “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” HEREIN. EACH PURCHASER, BY ACCEPTING THE BONDS, AGREES THAT IT WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE MADE THE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS DESCRIBED UNDER THE HEADING “LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS.” NO DEALER, BROKER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OR THE UNDERWRITER TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS, OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM, AND IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH OTHER INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY EITHER OF THE FOREGOING. THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY AND THERE SHALL BE NO OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE OF THE BONDS BY ANY PERSON IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR SUCH PERSON TO MAKE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE. THE UNDERWRITER HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS PART OF, ITS RESPONSIBILITIES TO INVESTORS UNDER THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AS APPLIED TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS TRANSACTION. THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY THE CITY AND OBTAINED FROM SOURCES, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPER, WHICH ARE BELIEVED BY THE CITY AND THE UNDERWRITER TO BE RELIABLE, BUT IT IS NOT GUARANTEED AS TO ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A REPRESENTATION OF THE UNDERWRITER. THE INFORMATION AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, AND NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM, NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER, SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE CITY OR THE DEVELOPER SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. NEITHER THE CITY, THE CITY’S MUNICIPAL ADVISOR NOR THE UNDERWRITER MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY FOR USE IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM. THE TRUSTEE HAS NOT PARTICIPATED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM AND ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM OR THE RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DOCUMENTS OR FOR ANY FAILURE BY ANY PARTY TO DISCLOSE EVENTS THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED AND MAY AFFECT THE SIGNIFICANCE OR ACCURACY OF SUCH INFORMATION. THE BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, NOR HAS THE INDENTURE BEEN QUALIFIED UNDER THE TRUST INDENTURE ACT OF 1939, IN RELIANCE UPON EXEMPTIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH LAWS. THE REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION OF THE BONDS UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH THEY MAY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED, IF ANY, SHALL NOT BE REGARDED AS A RECOMMENDATION THEREOF. NONE OF SUCH JURISDICTIONS, OR ANY OF THEIR AGENCIES, HAVE PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF THE BONDS OR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM. CERTAIN STATEMENTS INCLUDED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM CONSTITUTE “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE UNITED STATES PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995, SECTION 21E OF THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE GENERALLY IDENTIFIABLE BY THE TERMINOLOGY USED SUCH AS “PLAN,” “EXPECT,” “ESTIMATE,” “PROJECT,” “ANTICIPATE,” “BUDGET” OR OTHER SIMILAR WORDS. THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH FORWARD- vii LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE CITY DOES NOT PLAN TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ANY OF ITS EXPECTATIONS OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR, OTHER THAN AS DESCRIBED UNDER “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE” HEREIN. NEITHER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE BONDS OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DOCUMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. REFERENCES TO WEBSITE ADDRESSES PRESENTED HEREIN ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY BE IN THE FORM OF A HYPERLINK SOLELY FOR THE READER’S CONVENIENCE. UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, SUCH WEBSITES AND THE INFORMATION OR LINKS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE NOT INCORPORATED INTO, AND ARE NOT PART OF, THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR PURPOSES OF, AND AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN, RULE 15c2-12. . viii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................... 2 PLAN OF FINANCE ............................................... 3 The District ........................................................ 3 Development Plan and Status of Development in Improvement Areas #2-4 .................................................. 3 Prior Bonds ........................................................ 4 The Bonds ......................................................... 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS ........................... 5 General Description ........................................... 5 Redemption Provisions ...................................... 5 BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM ........................... 7 LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS ........................................................ 9 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS ............................. 10 General ............................................................ 10 Pledged Revenues ............................................ 11 Collection and Deposit of Assessments ........... 11 Unconditional Levy of Assessments ............... 12 Perfected Security Interest ............................... 13 Pledged Revenue Fund .................................... 13 Bond Fund ....................................................... 14 Project Fund .................................................... 14 Reserve Fund ................................................... 15 Administrative Fund ........................................ 17 Defeasance....................................................... 17 Events of Default ............................................. 18 Remedies in Event of Default .......................... 18 Restriction on Owner’s Actions ...................... 19 Application of Revenues and Other Moneys After Event of Default ................ 20 Investment or Deposit of Funds ....................... 20 Against Encumbrances .................................... 21 Additional Obligations or Other Liens ............ 21 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ...................... 22 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS .................... 23 OVERLAPPING TAXES AND DEBT .................. 24 Overlapping Taxes and Debt ........................... 24 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES ............................ 26 General ............................................................ 26 Assessment Methodology ................................ 26 Assessment Payer Concentration in Improvement Areas #2-4 .......................... 29 Collection and Enforcement of Assessment Amounts ............................... 29 Assessment Amounts....................................... 30 Prepayment of Assessments ............................ 32 Priority of Lien ................................................ 34 Foreclosure Proceedings .................................. 34 ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION DATA IN THE DISTRICT ..................................................... 35 Collection and Delinquency History of Improvement Area #1 Assessments ......... 35 Foreclosure History ......................................... 35 Prepayment History of Assessments ............... 35 Collection and Delinquency History of Major Improvement Area Assessments ............................................. 35 Foreclosure History ......................................... 36 Prepayment History of Major Improvement Area Assessments .............. 36 THE CITY .............................................................. 36 Background ..................................................... 36 City Government ............................................. 36 City Water and Wastewater System ................ 36 Major Employers ............................................. 37 Historical Employment in Collin County ...................................................... 38 Surrounding Economic Activity ...................... 38 THE DISTRICT ..................................................... 38 General ............................................................ 38 Powers and Authority ...................................... 39 THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS ................................................. 39 General ............................................................ 39 Ownership and Maintenance of Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements ........................................... 44 THE DEVELOPMENT .......................................... 44 Overview ......................................................... 44 Development Plan and Status of Development ............................................ 44 Photographs of Development in the District ...................................................... 45 Concept Plan .................................................... 45 Lot Purchase and Sale Agreements in the District ................................................ 47 Status of Lot and Home Sales in Improvement Area #1 ............................... 48 Expected Build-Out of the District .................. 49 Future Improvement Area Bonds .................... 50 Development Agreement ................................. 50 Improvement Area #1 TIRZ ............................ 51 Zoning ............................................................. 51 Amenities; Private Improvements ................... 52 Education ......................................................... 52 Existing Mineral Rights, Easements and Other Third-Party Property Rights ........... 53 Environmental ................................................. 53 Flood Designation ........................................... 53 ix Utilities ............................................................ 53 THE DEVELOPER ................................................ 54 General ............................................................ 54 Description of the Developer ........................... 54 Executive Biography ....................................... 57 General Development Financing by Centurion .................................................. 58 History and Financing of the District .............. 58 THE ADMINISTRATOR ...................................... 59 APPRAISAL .......................................................... 59 The Appraisal .................................................. 59 BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS ..................................... 60 General ............................................................ 60 Deemed Representations and Acknowledgment by Investors ................. 61 Assessment Limitations ................................... 61 Failure or Inability to Complete Proposed Development............................. 62 Completion of Homes ...................................... 63 Risks Related to the Current Residential Real Estate Market ................................... 63 Risks Related to Current Increase in Costs of Building Materials and Labor Shortages ........................................ 63 General Risks of Real Estate Investment and Development ...................................... 63 Absorption Rate ............................................... 64 Availability of Utilities .................................... 64 State Law Regarding Notice of Assessments ............................................. 64 Potential Future Changes in State Law Regarding Public Improvement Districts .................................................... 65 Direct and Overlapping Indebtedness, Assessments and Taxes ............................ 65 Depletion of Reserve Account of Reserve Fund ............................................ 65 Hazardous Substances ..................................... 66 Exercise of Third-Party Property Rights ......... 66 Regulation ....................................................... 66 No Acceleration ............................................... 66 Bankruptcy ...................................................... 67 Bondholders’ Remedies and Bankruptcy ............................................... 67 Bankruptcy Limitation to Bondholders’ Rights ....................................................... 68 Judicial Foreclosures ....................................... 68 Loss of Tax Exemption ................................... 69 Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds ..................... 69 Management and Ownership ........................... 69 Dependence Upon Developer and Homebuilders ........................................... 70 Use of Appraisal .............................................. 70 Developer Principal Financial Relationships and Other Matters Relating to Developer Affiliates ............... 70 Risk from Weather Events ............................... 71 100-Year Flood Plain ...................................... 71 Competition ..................................................... 72 Limited Secondary Market for the Bonds........................................................ 72 No Credit Rating ............................................. 72 Cybersecurity Risks ......................................... 72 TAX MATTERS .................................................... 73 Opinion ............................................................ 73 Federal Income Tax Accounting Treatment of Original Issue Discount ................................................... 73 Collateral Federal Income Tax Consequences ........................................... 74 State, Local and Foreign Taxes ....................... 75 Information Reporting and Backup Withholding .............................................. 75 Future and Proposed Legislation ..................... 75 LEGAL MATTERS ............................................... 75 Legal Proceedings ........................................... 75 Legal Opinions ................................................ 75 Litigation — The City ..................................... 76 Litigation — The Developer............................ 76 SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT .................... 77 ENFORCEABILITY OF REMEDIES ................... 77 NO RATING .......................................................... 77 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE .............................. 77 The City ........................................................... 77 The City’s Compliance with Prior Undertakings ............................................ 78 The Developer ................................................. 78 The Developer’s Compliance with Prior Undertakings ............................................ 78 UNDERWRITING ................................................. 78 REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION OF BONDS FOR SALE ............................................... 78 LEGAL INVESTMENT AND ELIGIBILITY TO SECURE PUBLIC FUNDS IN TEXAS ................. 79 INVESTMENTS .................................................... 79 INFORMATION RELATING TO THE TRUSTEE ............................................................... 81 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ........................... 82 General ............................................................ 82 Source of Certain Information ......................... 82 Experts ............................................................. 82 Updating of Limited Offering Memorandum ........................................... 82 x FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS .............. 83 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROVAL ................ 83 APPENDIX A Form of Indenture APPENDIX B Form of Service and Assessment Plan APPENDIX C Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel APPENDIX D-1 Form of City Disclosure Agreement APPENDIX D-2 Form of Developer Disclosure Agreement APPENDIX E Appraisal APPENDIX F Reimbursement Agreement APPENDIX G Photographs of Development in Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3 of the District (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.) 2 PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM $9,877,000∗ CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, (a municipal corporation of the State of Texas located in Collin County) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2026 (SHERLEY TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 PROJECTS) INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Limited Offering Memorandum, including the cover page, inside cover and appendices hereto, is to provide certain information in connection with the issuance and sale by the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), of its $9,877,000* aggregate principal amount of Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Areas #2-4 Projects) (the “Bonds”). INITIAL PURCHASERS ARE ADVISED THAT THE BONDS BEING OFFERED PURSUANT TO THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM ARE BEING OFFERED INITIALLY TO AND ARE BEING SOLD ONLY TO “ACCREDITED INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 501 OF REGULATION D PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT OF 1933”) AND “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THE LIMITATION OF THE INITIAL OFFERING TO QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS AND ACCREDITED INVESTORS DOES NOT DENOTE RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERS IN ANY SECONDARY MARKET FOR THE BONDS. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE AWARE OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS, ANY OF WHICH, IF MATERIALIZED TO A SUFFICIENT DEGREE, COULD DELAY OR PREVENT PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL OF AND/OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS. THE BONDS ARE NOT A SUITABLE INVESTMENT FOR ALL INVESTORS. SEE “SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT” AND “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS.” The Bonds are being issued by the City pursuant to the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Subchapter A of Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the “PID Act”), the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Bonds expected to be enacted by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) on May 26, 2026 (the “Bond Ordinance”), and Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2026 (the “Indenture”), entered into by and between the City and Regions Bank as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Bonds will be secured by a pledge of and lien upon the Trust Estate (as defined in the Indenture), consisting primarily of revenue from (i) assessments expected to be levied against assessable property located within Improvement Area #2 (the “Improvement Area #2 Assessments”) of the Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 (the “District”), (ii) assessments expected to be levied against assessable property located within Improvement Area #3 (the “Improvement Area #3 Assessments”) of the District, and (iii) assessments expected to be levied against assessable property located within Improvement Area #4 (the “Improvement Area #4 Assessments” and, together with the Improvement Area #2 Assessments and the Improvement Area #3 Assessments, the “Assessments”) of the District, pursuant to a separate ordinance expected to be enacted by the City Council on May 26, 2026 (the “Assessment Ordinance”). The City created the District pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on December 8, 2020 (the “Creation Resolution”). Reference is made to the Indenture for a full statement of the authority for, and the terms and provisions of, the Bonds. All capitalized terms used in this Limited Offering Memorandum that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Indenture. See “APPENDIX A — Form of Indenture.” Set forth herein are brief descriptions of the City, the District, MM Anna 325, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (the “Developer”), P3Works, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (the “Administrator”), the Assessment Ordinance, the Bond Ordinance, the Service and Assessment Plan (as defined herein), the Development Agreement (as defined herein), and the Remainder Area Funding and Reimbursement Agreement, Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2, entered into and effective as of February 10, 2026 between the City and the Developer, ∗ Preliminary; subject to change. 3 as may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time (the “Reimbursement Agreement”), together with summaries of terms of the Bonds and the Indenture and certain provisions of the PID Act. All references herein to such documents and the PID Act are qualified in their entirety by reference to such documents or such PID Act and all references to the Bonds are qualified by reference to the definitive forms thereof and the information with respect thereto contained in the Indenture. Copies of these documents may be obtained during the period of the offering of the Bonds from the Underwriter, FMSbonds, Inc., 5 Cowboys Way, Suite 300-25, Frisco, Texas, 75034, Phone: (214) 302-2246. The Form of Indenture appears in APPENDIX A and the Form of Service and Assessment Plan appears in APPENDIX B. The information provided under this caption “INTRODUCTION” is intended to provide a brief overview of the information provided in the other captions herein and is not intended, and should not be considered, fully representative or complete as to the subjects discussed hereunder. PLAN OF FINANCE The District The PID Act authorizes municipalities, such as the City, to create public improvement districts within their boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction, and to impose assessments within the public improvement district to pay for certain improvements. The District was created for the purpose of undertaking and financing the cost of certain public improvements within the District, including the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements (as defined herein), authorized by the PID Act and approved by the City Council that confer a special benefit on the District. The District is located entirely within the corporate limits of the City. Development Plan and Status of Development in Improvement Areas #2-4 The District is composed of approximately 289.751 acres which are being developed in phases as a master- planned residential development (the “Development”). The Developer’s plans consist of the development of the District in phases beginning with the concurrent development of the major infrastructure to serve the entire District (the “Major Improvements”), as well as local infrastructure (the “Improvement Area #1 Improvements”) to serve the initial phase (“Improvement Area #1”) of the District, followed by phased development of local infrastructure to serve each additional distinct development area (each, an “Improvement Area”). The Improvement Areas other than Improvement Area #1 are collectively referred to herein as the “Major Improvement Area.” The boundaries of the District, Improvement Area #1 and each additional Improvement Area are shown on the “MAP SHOWING BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENT AREAS” on page v. The Developer purchased an assemblage that included the land within the District on April 10, 2019 for $9,700,000. In order to finance a portion of the purchase of such land, the Developer obtained a loan (the “Acquisition Loan”) in the amount of $5,700,000 from Chambers Bank (the “Acquisition Lender”). The remainder of the purchase price for the land was paid in cash. On July 21, 2021, the Acquisition Loan was refinanced, partially through the use of builder earnest money and partially with a loan (the “Acquisition and Development Loan”) from International Bank of Commerce (the “Lender”). The proceeds of the Acquisition and Development Loan which were not used to refinance a portion of the purchase price of the land funded development in the District. The Acquisition and Development Loan has been repaid from the proceeds of lot closings in the District. The Developer has obtained a second loan (the “Phase 2 Loan”) from the Lender to finance development in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District which is secured by all property in Improvement Areas #2-4. As of April 1, 2026, the Phase 2 Loan is outstanding in the amount of $17,083,139.69. See “THE DEVELOPER – History and Financing of the District.” The Developer has completed lot development in Improvement Area #1 and construction of the Improvement Area #1 Improvements and the Major Improvements. See “THE DEVELOPMENT — Status of Lot and Home Sales in Improvement Area #1.” The Developer is continuing development of the District with the construction of local improvements to serve Improvement Area #2 of the District, which consists of 67 single-family lots (the “Improvement Area #2 Improvements”), local improvements to serve Improvement Area #3 of the District, which consists of 72 single-family lots (the “Improvement Area #3 Improvements”), and local improvements to serve Improvement Area #4 of the District, which consists of 115 townhome lots (the “Improvement Area #4 Improvements” and, together with the Improvement Area #2 Improvements and the Improvements Area #3 Improvements, the “Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements”). The Developer expects to continue development in the District in the future with local infrastructure benefitting the future phases of the District (the “Future Improvement Area”). 4 Construction of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements began in Q4 2024 and was completed in February 2026. Construction of the Improvement Area #3 Improvements began in Q4 2024 and was completed in February 2026. Grading in Improvement Area #4 commenced in December 2025 and construction of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements began in April 2026. Construction of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements is expected to be completed in Q2 2027. As of April 1, 2026, the Developer expended approximately $3,154,316 to complete the Improvement Area #2 Improvements and $2,083,927 to complete the Improvement Area #3 Improvements, which expenditures were financed with proceeds of the Phase 2 Loan. See “THE DEVELOPER — History and Financing of the District.” The City will pay a portion of the project costs for the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements from proceeds of the Bonds. The Developer expects to submit reimbursement requests on a monthly basis for costs actually incurred in developing and constructing the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements and be reimbursed in accordance with the Indenture and the Reimbursement Agreement. See “THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS” and “APPENDIX F – Reimbursement Agreement.” The Developer has entered into lot purchase and sale agreements with Mattamy Texas, LLC (“Mattamy”) (as assigned by New Synergy, LLC), Beazer Homes Texas, L.P. (“Beazer”), First Texas Homes, Inc. (“First Texas”), Lennar Homes of Texas Land and Construction, Ltd. (“Lennar”), Siena Homes, LLC (“Siena”), and DRHI, Inc. (“DR Horton,” and together with Beazer, First Texas, Mattamy, Lennar, and Siena, the “Homebuilders”) (such agreements, collectively, the “Lot PSAs”), for the sale of 861 of the 913 lots in the District, including Lot PSAs for all of the lots in Improvement Areas #2-4 to Mattamy, Lennar, First Texas and Siena. See “THE DEVELOPMENT — Lot Purchase and Sale Agreements in the District.” Prior Bonds The City previously issued its $9,400,000 City of Anna, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2021 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Area #1 Project) (the “2021 IA #1 Bonds”) and its $3,593,000 City of Anna, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Improvement Area #1 Project) (the “2025 IA #1 Bonds”) to finance and reimburse a portion of the costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects. The 2021 IA #1 Bonds and the 2025 IA #1 Bonds are secured by separate assessments levied in Improvement Area #1 of the District, which separate assessments are not pledged to payment of the Bonds. The 2021 IA #1 Bonds are currently outstanding in the amount of $8,845,000 and the 2025 IA #1 Bonds are currently outstanding in the amount of $3,593,000. The City previously issued its $2,896,000 City of Anna, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds (Sherley Tract Public Improvement District No. 2 Major Improvement Area Project) (the “2021 MIA Bonds”) to finance a portion of the costs of the Major Improvement Area Projects. The 2021 MIA Bonds are secured by assessments on property in the Major Improvement Area of the District only (the “Major Improvement Area Assessments”) and are currently outstanding in the amount of $2,782,000. However, the Developer prepaid the Major Improvement Area Assessments on March 17, 2026, and all of the 2021 MIA Bonds are expected to be redeemed and paid in full on May 15, 2026. The Bonds Proceeds of the Bonds will be used primarily to finance (i) paying a portion of the costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, (ii) paying a portion of the interest on the Bonds during and after the period of acquisition and construction of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, (iii) funding a reserve fund for payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, (iv) paying a portion of the costs incidental to the organization of the District, and (v) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds. To the extent that a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds is allocated for the payment of the costs of issuance of the Bonds and less than all of such amount is used to pay such costs, the excess amount may, at the option of the City, be transferred to the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund to pay interest on the Bonds. See “THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS,” “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture,” and “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS.” Payment of the Bonds is secured by a pledge of and a lien upon the Trust Estate, consisting primarily of Assessments expected to be levied against the assessable parcels or lots within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, 5 all to the extent and upon the conditions described herein and in the Indenture. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS,” “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” and “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture.” The Bonds, the 2021 IA #1 Bonds, the 2025 IA #1 Bonds and any Future Improvement Area Bonds (as defined herein) shall never constitute an indebtedness or general obligation of the City, the State of Texas (the “State”), Collin County, or any other political subdivision of the State, within the meaning of any constitutional provision or statutory limitation whatsoever, but the Bonds are limited and special obligations of the City payable solely from the Trust Estate as provided in the Indenture. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City, the State or any other political subdivision of the State is pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The 2021 IA #1 Bonds, the 2025 IA #1 Bonds and any Future Improvement Area Bonds to be issued by the City are not offered pursuant to this Limited Offering Memorandum. DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS General Description The Bonds will mature on the dates and in the amounts set forth on the inside cover page of this Limited Offering Memorandum. Interest on the Bonds will accrue from their date of delivery to the Underwriter (the “Closing Date”) and will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on each March 15 and September 15, commencing March 15, 2027 (each an “Interest Payment Date”), until maturity or prior redemption. Regions Bank is the initial Trustee, Paying Agent and Registrar for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form, without coupons, in authorized denominations of $25,000 of principal and any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof (“Authorized Denominations”). Upon initial issuance, the ownership of the Bonds will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”), and purchases of beneficial interests in the Bonds will be made in book-entry only form. See “BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM” and “SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT.” Redemption Provisions Optional Redemption. The City reserves the right and option to redeem the Bonds before their scheduled maturity dates, in whole or in part, on any date on or after September 15, 20__, such redemption date or dates to be fixed by the city at the Redemption Price. Extraordinary Optional Redemption. The City reserves the right and option to redeem Bonds before their respective scheduled maturity dates, in whole or in part, on any date, at the Redemption Price, from amounts on deposit in the Redemption Fund as a result of Prepayments, Foreclosure Proceeds, unspent balances in other Pledged Funds (including related transfers to the Redemption Fund as provided in the Indenture) or any other transfers to the Redemption Fund permitted or required under the terms of the Indenture, which shall be applied in such a manner so as to reduce the Annual Installments of the particular Assessment(s) to which the respective Prepayments, Foreclosure Proceeds, or other monies relate, as set forth in a City Order delivered to the Trustee. See “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES — Prepayment of Assessments” for the definition and description of Prepayments” and “APPENDIX A — Form of Indenture.” Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. The Bonds maturing on September 15 in each of the years 20__, 20__, 20__ and 20__ (collectively, the “Term Bonds”) are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption prior to their respective maturities and will be redeemed by the City in part at the Redemption Price from monies available for such purpose in the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund pursuant to the Indenture, on the dates and in the respective Sinking Fund Installments as set forth in the following schedules: $__________Term Bonds Maturing September 15, 20__ Redemption Date Sinking Fund Installment September 15, 20 September 15, 20 † 6 $__________Term Bonds Maturing September 15, 20__ Redemption Date Sinking Fund Installment September 15, 20 September 15, 20 † ___________________________ † Stated maturity. At least thirty (30) days prior to each mandatory sinking fund redemption date, and subject to any prior reduction authorized by the Indenture, the Trustee shall select by lot, or by any other customary method that results in a random selection, a principal amount of Bonds of such maturity equal to the Sinking Fund Installment amount of such Bonds to be redeemed, shall call such Bonds for redemption on such scheduled mandatory sinking fund redemption date, and shall give notice of such mandatory sinking fund redemption, as provided in the Indenture. The principal amount of Bonds required to be redeemed on any mandatory sinking fund redemption date pursuant to the first paragraph above shall be reduced, at the option of the City, by the principal amount of any Bonds of such maturity which, at least 30 days prior to the mandatory sinking fund redemption date shall have been acquired by the City at a price not exceeding the principal amount of such Bonds plus accrued unpaid interest to the date of purchase thereof, and delivered to the Trustee for cancellation. The Sinking Fund Installments of Term Bonds required to be redeemed on any mandatory sinking fund redemption date pursuant to the first paragraph above shall be reduced in integral multiples of $1,000 by any portion of such Bonds, which, at least 30 days prior to the mandatory sinking fund redemption date, shall have been redeemed pursuant to the optional redemption or extraordinary optional redemption provisions in the Indenture and not previously credited to a mandatory sinking fund redemption.. Notice of Redemption. Upon written direction from the City to the Trustee of the exercise of any redemption provision provided under the Indenture, the Trustee shall give notice of any redemption of Bonds by sending notice by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, not less than 30 days before the date fixed for redemption, to the Owner of each Bond or portion thereof to be redeemed, at the address shown in the Register. The notice shall state the redemption date, the Redemption Price, the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, and, if less than all the Bonds Outstanding are to be redeemed, and subject to certain provisions of the Indenture, an identification of the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, any conditions to such redemption and that on the redemption date, if all conditions, if any, to such redemption have been satisfied, such Bond shall become due and payable. Any notice given as provided as described above shall be conclusively presumed to have been duly given, whether or not the Owner receives such notice. With respect to any optional redemption of the Bonds, unless the Trustee has received funds sufficient to pay the Redemption Price of the Bonds to be redeemed before giving of a notice of redemption, the notice may state the City may condition redemption on the receipt of such funds by the Trustee on or before the date fixed for the redemption, or on the satisfaction of any other prerequisites set forth in the notice of redemption. If a conditional notice of redemption is given and such prerequisites to the redemption and sufficient funds are not received, the notice shall be of no force and effect, the City shall not redeem the Bonds and the Trustee shall give notice, in the manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that the Bonds have not been redeemed. The City has the right to rescind any optional redemption or extraordinary optional redemption described in the Indenture by written notice to the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for redemption. Any notice of redemption shall be cancelled and annulled if for any reason funds are not available on the date fixed for redemption for the payment in full of the Bonds then called for redemption, and such cancellation shall not constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture. Upon written direction from the City, the Trustee shall mail notice of rescission of redemption in the same manner notice of redemption was originally provided. 7 Additional Provisions with Respect to Redemption. If less than all of the Bonds are to be redeemed pursuant to an optional or extraordinary optional redemption, Bonds may be redeemed in minimum principal amounts of $1,000 or any integral thereof. Each Bond shall be treated as representing the number of Bonds that is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Bond by $1,000. No redemption shall result in a Bond in a denomination of less than an Authorized Denomination; provided, however, if the amount of Outstanding Bonds is less than an Authorized Denomination after giving effect to such partial redemption, a Bond in the principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion, but not less than $1,000, may be issued. If less than all of the Bonds are called for optional redemption pursuant to the Indenture, the Trustee shall rely on directions provided in a City Order in selecting the Bonds to be redeemed. If less than all of the Bonds are called for extraordinary optional redemption pursuant to the Indenture, the Bonds or portion of a Bond to be redeemed shall be allocated on a pro rata basis (as nearly as practicable) among all Outstanding Bonds. If less than all Bonds within a Stated Maturity are called for extraordinary optional redemption pursuant to the Indenture, the Trustee shall call randomly by lot the Bonds, or portions thereof, within such Stated Maturity and in such principal amounts, for redemption. Upon surrender of any Bond for redemption in part, the Trustee in accordance with the Indenture, shall authenticate and deliver an exchange Bond or Bonds in an aggregate principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered, such exchange being without charge. BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM This section describes how ownership of the Bonds is to be transferred and how the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds are to be paid to and credited DTC while the Bonds are registered in its nominee name. The information in this section concerning DTC and the Book-Entry-Only System has been provided by DTC for use in disclosure documents such as this Limited Offering Memorandum. The City and the Underwriter believe the source of such information to be reliable, but neither the City nor the Underwriter takes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness thereof. The City cannot and does not give any assurance that (1) DTC will distribute payments of debt service on the Bonds, or redemption or other notices, to DTC Participants, (2) DTC Participants or others will distribute debt service payments paid to DTC or its nominee (as the registered owner of the Bonds), or redemption or other notices, to the Beneficial Owners, or that they will do so on a timely basis or (3) DTC will serve and act in the manner described in this Limited Offering Memorandum. The current rules applicable to DTC are on file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and the current procedures of DTC to be followed in dealing with DTC Participants are on file with DTC. DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered security certificate will be issued for each maturity of the Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. DTC, the world’s largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. Equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“Direct Participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants’ accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. Securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”). DTCC, is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users 8 of its registered subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. Securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”). DTC has a Standard & Poor’s rating of “AA+.” The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com Purchases of Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Bonds on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Bond (“Beneficial Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants’ records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in Bonds, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Bonds is discontinued. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC’s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. Or such other DTC nominee do not affect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Bonds; DTC’s records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Bond documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Bonds for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all Bonds of the same maturity are being redeemed, DTC’s practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant of such maturity to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC’s Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the City as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.’s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). Principal, interest and all other payments on the Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC’s practice is to credit Direct Participants’ accounts upon DTC’s receipt of funds and corresponding detailed information from the City or Paying Agent/Registrar, on the payment date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC’s records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in “street name,” and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC nor its nominee, the Trustee, the Paying Agent/Registrar, or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of principal, interest and payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the Trustee, the Paying Agent/Registrar or the City, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. 9 DTC may discontinue providing its services as securities depository with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Trustee. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor securities depository is not obtained, Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered. The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, Bond certificates will be printed and delivered. Thereafter, Bond certificates may be transferred and exchanged as described in the Indenture. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from sources that the City believes to be reliable, but none of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor or the Underwriter take any responsibility for the accuracy thereof. NONE OF THE CITY, THE TRUSTEE, THE PAYING AGENT, THE CITY’S MUNICIPAL ADVISOR OR THE UNDERWRITER WILL HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR OBLIGATION TO THE DTC PARTICIPANTS OR THE PERSONS FOR WHOM THEY ACT AS NOMINEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PAYMENTS TO OR THE PROVIDING OF NOTICE FOR THE DTC PARTICIPANTS, THE INDIRECT PARTICIPANTS OR THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE BONDS. THE CITY CANNOT AND DOES NOT GIVE ANY ASSURANCES THAT DTC, THE DTC PARTICIPANTS OR OTHERS WILL DISTRIBUTE PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS PAID TO DTC OR ITS NOMINEE, AS THE REGISTERED OWNER, OR PROVIDE ANY NOTICES TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OR THAT THEY WILL DO SO ON A TIMELY BASIS, OR THAT DTC WILL ACT IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN THIS LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM. THE CURRENT RULES APPLICABLE TO DTC ARE ON FILE WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND THE CURRENT PROCEDURES OF DTC TO BE FOLLOWED IN DEALING WITH DTC PARTICIPANTS ARE ON FILE WITH DTC. LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS Each initial purchaser is advised that the Bonds being offered pursuant to this Limited Offering Memorandum are being offered and sold only to “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. Each initial purchaser of the Bonds (each, an “Investor”) will be deemed to have acknowledged, represented and warranted to the City as follows: 1) The Investor has authority and is duly authorized to purchase the Bonds and to execute any instruments and documents required to be executed by the Investor in connection with the purchase of the Bonds. 2) The Investor is an “accredited investor” under Rule 501 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 or a “qualified institutional buyer” under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, and therefore, has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters, including purchase and ownership of municipal and other tax-exempt obligations, to be able to evaluate the risks and merits of the investment represented by the Bonds. 3) The Bonds are being acquired by the Investor for investment and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution of the Bonds, and the Investor intends to hold the Bonds solely for its own account for investment purposes and for an indefinite period of time, and does not intend at this time to dispose of all or any part of the Bonds. However, the Investor may sell the Bonds at any time the Investor deems appropriate. The Investor understands that it may need to bear the risks of this investment for an indefinite time, since any sale prior to maturity may not be possible. 4) The Investor understands that the Bonds are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and that such registration is not legally required as of the date hereof; and further understands that the Bonds (a) are not being registered or otherwise qualified for sale under the “Blue Sky” laws and regulations of any state, (b) will not be listed in any stock or other securities exchange, and (c) will not carry a rating from any rating service. 5) The Investor acknowledges that it has either been supplied with or been given access to information, including financial statements and other financial information, and the Investor has had the opportunity to ask 10 questions and receive answers from knowledgeable individuals concerning the City, the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, the Bonds, the security therefor, and such other information as the Investor has deemed necessary or desirable in connection with its decision to purchase the Bonds (collectively, the “Investor Information”). The Investor has received a copy of this Limited Offering Memorandum relating to the Bonds. The Investor acknowledges that it has assumed responsibility for its review of the Investor Information and it has not relied upon any advice, counsel, representation or information from the City in connection with the Investor’s purchase of the Bonds. The Investor agrees that none of the City, its councilmembers, officers, or employees shall have any liability to the Investor whatsoever for, or in connection with the Investor’s decision to purchase the Bonds except for gross negligence, fraud or willful misconduct, to the extent permitted by law. For the avoidance of doubt, it is acknowledged that the Underwriter is not deemed an officer or employee of the City. 6) The Investor acknowledges that the obligations of the City under the Indenture are special, limited obligations payable solely from amounts paid by the City pursuant to the terms of the Indenture and the City shall not be directly or indirectly or contingently or morally obligated to use any other moneys or assets of the City for amounts due under the Indenture. The Investor understands that the Bonds are not secured by any pledge of any moneys received or to be received from taxation by the City, the State or any political subdivision or taxing district thereof; that the Bonds will never represent or constitute a general obligation or a pledge of the faith and credit of the City, the State or any political subdivision thereof; that no right will exist to have taxes levied by the State or any political subdivision thereof for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds; and that the liability of the City and the State with respect to the Bonds is subject to further limitations as set forth in the Bonds and the Indenture. 7) The Investor has made its own inquiry and analysis with respect to the Bonds and the security therefor. The Investor is aware that the development of the District involves certain economic and regulatory variables and risks that could adversely affect the security for the Bonds. 8) The Investor acknowledges that the sale of the Bonds to the Investor is made in reliance upon the certifications, representations and warranties described in items 1-7 above. SECURITY FOR THE BONDS The following is a summary of certain provisions contained in the Indenture. Reference is made to the Indenture for a full statement of the terms and provisions of the Bonds. Investors must read the entire Indenture to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. See “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture.” General THE BONDS ARE SPECIAL, LIMITED OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE PLEDGED REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. THE BONDS DO NOT GIVE RISE TO A CHARGE AGAINST THE GENERAL CREDIT OR TAXING POWER OF THE CITY AND ARE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE SOURCES IDENTIFIED IN THE INDENTURE. THE OWNERS OF THE BONDS SHALL NEVER HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND PAYMENT THEREOF OUT OF MONEY RAISED OR TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION, OR OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE PLEDGED REVENUES, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. NO OWNER OF THE BONDS SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND ANY EXERCISE OF THE CITY’S TAXING POWER TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE BONDS OR THE INTEREST OR REDEMPTION PREMIUM, IF ANY, THEREON. THE CITY SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO PAY THE BONDS OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE PLEDGED REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE. SEE “APPENDIX A – FORM OF INDENTURE.” The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds are secured by a pledge of and a lien upon the pledged revenues (the “Pledged Revenues”), consisting primarily of Assessments to be levied against the assessable parcels or lots within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District and other funds comprising the Trust Estate, all to the extent and upon the conditions described herein and in the Indenture. See “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture.” In accordance with the PID Act, the City previously caused the preparation of an Amended and Restated Service and 11 Assessment Plan in connection with the levy of assessments in the District (as further updated, amended and supplemented, the “Service and Assessment Plan”), which describes the special benefit received by the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, provides the basis and justification for the determination of special benefit on such property, establishes the methodology for the levy of the assessments (including the Assessments), and provides for the allocation of Pledged Revenues for payment of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. The Service and Assessment Plan, as amended and restated in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, will be reviewed and updated annually for the purpose of determining the annual budget for improvements and the Annual Installments (as defined below) of Assessments due in a given year. The determination by the City of the assessment methodology set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan is the result of the discretionary exercise by the City Council of its legislative authority and governmental powers and is conclusive and binding on all current and future landowners within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Pledged Revenues The City is authorized by the PID Act, the Assessment Ordinance and other provisions of law to finance the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements by levying Assessments upon properties in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District benefitted thereby. For a description of the assessment methodology and the amounts of Assessments expected to be levied in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, see “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” and “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Under the Indenture, “Pledged Revenues” means, collectively, the (i) Assessment Revenues (excluding the portion of the Assessments and Annual Installments collected for the payment of Annual Collection Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, as set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan), (ii) the moneys held in any of the Pledged Funds and (iii) any additional revenues that the City may pledge to the payment of the Bonds. “Assessment Revenues” means the revenues received by the City from the collection of Assessments, including Prepayments, Annual Installments and Foreclosure Proceeds. “Annual Installment” means the sum of the annual installments on the Assessments, including the annual installment of interest and principal, Additional Interest and Annual Collection Costs. “Assessment” means an assessment levied against Assessed Property based on the special benefit conferred on such Parcels by the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements. The Indenture contains the covenant of the City that it will take and pursue all actions permissible under Applicable Laws to cause the Assessments to be collected and the liens thereof to be enforced continuously. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS — Pledged Revenue Fund.” See also “APPENDIX A — Form of Indenture” and “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” The PID Act provides that the Assessments (including any reassessment, with interest, the expense of collection and reasonable attorney’s fees, if incurred) are a first and prior lien (the “Assessment Lien”) against the property assessed, superior to all other liens or claims, except liens and claims for State, county, school district, or municipality ad valorem taxes and are a personal liability of and charge against the owners of property, regardless of whether the owners are named and runs with the land. Pursuant to the PID Act, the Assessment Lien is effective from the date of the Assessment Ordinance until the Assessments are paid (or otherwise discharged), and is enforceable by the City Council in the same manner that an ad valorem property tax levied against real property may be enforced by the City Council. See “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” herein. The Assessment Lien is superior to any homestead rights of a property owner that were properly claimed after the adoption of the Assessment Ordinance. However, an Assessment Lien may not be foreclosed upon if any homestead rights of a property owner were properly claimed prior to the adoption of the Assessment Ordinance (“Pre-existing Homestead Rights”) for as long as such rights are maintained on the property. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS – Assessment Limitations.” Collection and Deposit of Assessments The Assessments shown on the Assessment Rolls, together with the interest thereon, shall be applied to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as and to the extent provided in the Service and Assessment Plan and the Indenture. In the event the City owes Rebatable Arbitrage to the United States Government, the Assessments shall first be applied to pay the full amount of Rebatable Arbitrage owed by the City, prior to any transfers to the Bond Fund. 12 The Assessments assessed to pay debt service on the Bonds, together with interest thereon, are payable in Annual Installments established by the Assessment Ordinance and the Service and Assessment Plan to correspond, as nearly as practicable, to the debt service requirements for the Bonds. An Annual Installment of an Assessment has been made payable in the Assessment Ordinance in each fiscal year of the City preceding the date of final maturity of the Bonds which, if collected, will be sufficient to first pay debt service requirements attributable to Assessments in the Service and Assessment Plan. Each Annual Installment is payable as provided in the Service and Assessment Plan and the Assessment Ordinance. A record of the Assessments on each parcel, tract or lot which are to be collected in each year during the term of the Bonds is shown on the Assessment Rolls. Sums received from the collection of the Assessments to pay the debt service requirements (including delinquent installments, Foreclosure Proceeds and penalties) and of the interest thereon shall be deposited into the Bond Pledged Revenue Account of the Pledged Revenue Fund. Promptly after the deposit of Foreclosure Proceeds into the Pledged Revenue Fund, the Trustee shall transfer such Foreclosure Proceeds first to the Reserve Fund to restore any transfers from the Reserve Fund made with respect to the particular assessed property to which the Foreclosure Proceeds relate, and second, to the Redemption Fund. After deposit of Foreclosure Proceeds into the Reserve Fund, the Trustee shall deposit such Foreclosure Proceeds first into the Reserve Account if the Reserve Account does not contain the Reserve Account Requirement and if it does contain the Reserve Account Requirement, such Foreclosure Proceeds shall be deposited into the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account. If both the Reserve Account and Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account contain their respective amounts required to be on deposit, the Trustee shall transfer such Foreclosure Proceeds to the Redemption Fund, to be used to prepay the particular Assessment(s) to which the Foreclosure Proceeds relate pursuant to the terms of the Indenture. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS — Pledged Revenue Fund” and “APPENDIX A — Form of Indenture.” The portions of the Annual Installments of Assessments collected to pay Annual Collection Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs shall be deposited in the Administrative Fund and shall not constitute Pledged Revenues. Unconditional Levy of Assessments The City will impose Assessments on the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds scheduled for payment from Pledged Revenues as described in the Indenture and in the Service and Assessment Plan and coming due during each Fiscal Year. The Assessments will become effective on the date of, and strictly in accordance with the terms of, the Assessment Ordinance. Each Assessment may be paid immediately in full or in periodic Annual Installments over a period of time equal to the term of the Bonds, which installments shall include interest on the Assessments. Pursuant to the Assessment Ordinance, interest on the Assessments for each lot within the District began to accrue on the date specified in the Service and Assessment Plan and, prior to issuance of the Bonds, is calculated at a rate specified in the Assessment Ordinance. After issuance of the Bonds, interest on the Assessments for each lot within the District will accrue at a rate specified in the Assessment Ordinance, but may not exceed the interest rate on the Bonds plus the 0.50% additional interest charged on Assessments pursuant to Section 372.018 of the Act (“Additional Interest”). Such rate may be adjusted as described in the Service and Assessment Plan. Each Annual Installment, including the interest on the unpaid amount of an Assessment, shall be calculated on September 1 and shall be billed on or about October 1 of each year. Each Annual Installment together with interest thereon shall be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1 of the following year. The initial Annual Installments will be due when billed on or about October 1, 2026, and will be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1, 2027. As authorized by Section 372.018(b) of the PID Act, the City will calculate and collect each year while the Bonds are Outstanding and unpaid, an amount to pay the annual costs incurred by the City in the administration and operation of the District (the “Annual Collection Costs”). The portion of each Annual Installment used to pay the Annual Collection Costs shall remain in effect from year to year until all Bonds are finally paid or until the City adjusts the amount of the levy after an annual review in any year pursuant to Section 372.013 of the PID Act. The amounts levied to pay Annual Collection Costs shall be due in the manner set forth in the Assessment Ordinance on October 1 of each year and shall be delinquent if not paid by February 1 of the following year. Amounts collected to pay Annual Collection Costs do not secure repayment of the Bonds. There is no discount for the early payment of Assessments. 13 Assessments, together with interest, penalties, and expense of collection and reasonable attorneys’ fees, as permitted by the Texas Tax Code, shall be a first and prior lien against the property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims, except liens or claims for State, county, school district or municipality ad valorem taxes and shall be a personal liability of and charge against the owner of the property regardless of whether the owners are named. The lien for Assessments and penalties and interest began on the effective date of the Assessment Ordinance and continues until the Assessments are paid or until all Bonds are finally paid. Failure to pay an Annual Installment when due will not accelerate the payment of the remaining Annual Installments of the Assessments and such remaining Annual Installments (including interest) shall continue to be due and payable at the same time and in the same amount and manner as if such default had not occurred. Perfected Security Interest The lien on and pledge of the Trust Estate shall be valid and binding and fully perfected from and after the Closing Date, without physical delivery or transfer of control of the Trust Estate, the filing of the Indenture or any other act; all as provided in Texas Government Code, Chapter 1208, as amended, which applies to the issuance of the Bonds and the pledge of the Trust Estate granted by the City under the Indenture, and such pledge is therefore valid, effective and perfected. If State law is amended at any time while the Bonds are Outstanding such that the pledge of the Trust Estate granted by the City under the Indenture is to be subject to the filing requirements of Texas Business and Commerce Code, Chapter 9, as amended, then in order to preserve to the registered owners of the Bonds the perfection of the security interest in said pledge, the City agrees to take such measures as it determines are reasonable and necessary under Texas law to comply with the applicable provisions of Texas Business and Commerce Code, Chapter 9, as amended, and enable a filing to perfect the security interest in said pledge to occur. See “APPENDIX A — Form of Indenture.” Pledged Revenue Fund Immediately upon receipt thereof, the City shall transfer to the Trustee for deposit to the Pledged Revenue Fund each Assessment and Annual Installment, other than the portion of each Assessment and Annual Installment allocated to the payment of Annual Collection Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, which shall be deposited to the Administrative Fund in accordance with the Indenture. Specifically, following the initial deposit to the Pledged Revenue Fund, the City shall transfer or cause to be transferred the following amounts from the Pledged Revenue Fund to the following Accounts: (i) first, to the Bond Pledged Revenue Account of the Pledged Revenue Fund, an amount sufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds next coming due, and (ii) second, if necessary, to the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund, an amount to cause the amount in the Reserve Account to equal the Reserve Account Requirement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Additional Interest shall only be utilized for the purposes set forth in the Indenture and, immediately following the initial deposit to the Pledged Revenue Fund, prior to any other transfers or deposits being made as described in this paragraph, if the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund does not contain the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement and Additional Interest is collected, then all such Additional Interest will be transferred into the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account until the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement is met. In addition, in the event the City owes Rebatable Arbitrage to the United States Government pursuant to the Indenture, the City shall provide written direction to the Trustee to transfer to the Rebate Fund, prior to any other transfer described in this paragraph, the full amount of Rebatable Arbitrage owed by the City, as provided in the Indenture. If any funds remain on deposit in the Pledged Revenue Fund after the foregoing deposits and the deposits of Prepayments and Foreclosure Proceeds, as described below, are made, the City shall have the option, in its sole and absolute discretion, to use such excess funds for any one or more of the following purposes: (1) pay other costs of the Authorized Improvements, (2) pay other costs permitted by the PID Act, or (3) deposit such excess into the Redemption Fund to redeem Bonds as provided in the Indenture. Along with each transfer to the Trustee, the City shall provide a certificate as to the funds, accounts and payments into which the amounts are to be deposited or paid. From time to time as needed to pay the obligations relating to the Bonds, but no later than five (5) Business Days before each Interest Payment Date, the Trustee shall withdraw from the Pledged Revenue Fund and transfer to the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund, an amount, taking into account any amounts then on deposit in such Principal and Interest Account and any expected transfers from the Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account to the Principal and Interest Account, such that the amount on deposit in the Principal and Interest Account 14 equals the principal (including any Sinking Fund Installments) and interest due on the Bonds on the next Interest Payment Date. If, after the foregoing transfers and any transfer from the Reserve Fund as provided in the Indenture, there are insufficient funds to make the payments provided in the preceding paragraph, the Trustee shall apply the available funds in the Principal and Interest Account first to the payment of interest, then to the payment of principal (including any Sinking Fund Installments) on the Bonds. The Trustee shall transfer Prepayments to the Redemption Fund promptly after deposit of such amounts into the Pledged Revenue Fund. Promptly after the deposit of Foreclosure Proceeds into the Pledged Revenue Fund, the Trustee shall transfer such Foreclosure Proceeds first to the Reserve Fund to restore any transfers from the Accounts within the Reserve Fund made with respect to the particular Assessed Property to which the Foreclosure Proceeds relate (first to replenish the Reserve Account Requirement, and second to replenish the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement), and second, to the Redemption Fund to be used to prepay assessments to which the Foreclosure Proceeds relate pursuant to the Indenture. After satisfaction of the requirement to provide for the final payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds and to fund any deficiency that may exist in the Reserve Fund, the Trustee shall transfer any Pledged Revenues remaining in the Pledged Revenue Fund for the purposes set forth in the Indenture, as directed by the City in a City Order. Bond Fund On each Interest Payment Date, the Trustee shall withdraw from the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund and transfer to the Paying Agent/Registrar the principal (including any Sinking Fund Installments) and interest then due and payable on the Bonds, less any amount to be used to pay interest on the Bonds on such Interest Payment Date from the Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account as provided below. If amounts in the Principal and Interest Account are insufficient for the purposes set forth in the paragraph above, the Trustee shall withdraw from the Reserve Fund amounts to cover the amount of such insufficiency pursuant to the Indenture. Amounts so withdrawn from the Reserve Fund shall be deposited in the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund and transferred to the Paying Agent/Registrar. If, after the foregoing transfers and any transfer from the Reserve Fund as provided in the Indenture, there are insufficient funds to make the payments provided in the first paragraph above, the Trustee shall apply the available funds in the Principal and Interest Account first to the payment of interest, then to the payment of principal (including any Sinking Fund Installments) on the Bonds. Moneys in the Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account shall be used for the payment of all interest due on the Bonds with respect to the Improvement Area #4 Assessment on March 15, 2027 and September 15, 2027. Any amounts on deposit to the Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account after the foregoing payments shall be transferred to the Improvement Area #4 Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund, or if the Improvement Area #4 Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund has been closed as provided in in the Indenture, such amounts shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund to be used to redeem Bonds in such a manner so as to reduce the Annual Installments of Improvement Area #4 Assessments and the Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account shall be closed. Project Fund Money on deposit in the Project Fund shall be used for the purposes specified in the Indenture. Disbursements from the Costs of Issuance Account of the Project Fund shall be made by the Trustee to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds pursuant to (i) one or more City Orders or (ii) the instructions on the closing memorandum to be issued by the City's financial advisor as of the Closing Date and signed by the City's financial advisor. Disbursements from the Bond Improvement Accounts of the Project Fund to pay Actual Costs shall be made by the 15 Trustee upon receipt by the Trustee of a properly executed and completed Certificate for Payment. The funds from the respective Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be disbursed in accordance with a Certificate for Payment as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. Each such Certificate for Payment shall include a list of the payees and the payments to be made to such payees as well as a statement that all payments shall be made by check or wire transfer in accordance with the payment instructions set forth in such Certificate for Payment or in the invoices submitted therewith and the Trustee may rely on such payment instructions with no duty to investigate or inquire as to the authenticity of or authorization for the invoice or the payment instructions contained therein. Except as provided in the Indenture, money on deposit in the Improvement Area #2 Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be used solely to pay Actual Costs of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements, money on deposit in the Improvement Area #3 Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be used solely to pay Actual Costs of the Improvement Area #3 Improvements, and money on deposit in the Improvement Area #4 Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be used solely to pay Actual Costs of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements. If the City Representative determines in his or her sole discretion that amounts then on deposit in any Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund are not expected to be expended for purposes of such Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund due to the abandonment, or constructive abandonment, of one or more of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements such that, in the opinion of the City Representative, it is unlikely that the amounts in such Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund will ever be expended for the purposes of the respective Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund, the City Representative shall file a City Order with the Trustee which identifies the amounts then on deposit in the applicable Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund that are not expected to be used for purposes of such Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund. If such City Order is so filed, the identified amounts on deposit in such Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be transferred to the Bond Fund or to the Redemption Fund (to redeem Bonds in such as manner as to reduce the Annual Installments of the applicable Assessment(s)) as directed by the City Representative in a City Order filed with the Trustee. Upon such transfers, the applicable Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be closed. In making any determination pursuant to the Indenture, the City Representative may conclusively rely upon a certificate of an Independent Financial Consultant Upon the filing of a City Order stating that all Improvement Area #2 Improvements, Improvement Area #3 Improvements, or Improvement Area #4 Improvements, as applicable in the relevant context, have been completed and that all Actual Costs have been paid with respect thereto, or that any Actual Costs are not required to be paid from the respective Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund pursuant to a Certificate for Payment, the Trustee shall transfer the amount, if any, remaining within the respective Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund to the Bond Fund or to the Redemption Fund (to redeem Bonds in such as manner as to reduce the Annual Installments of the applicable Assessment(s)) as directed by the City Representative in a City Order filed with the Trustee. Upon such transfer, the respective Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund shall be closed. Upon a determination by the City Representative that all costs of issuance of the Bonds have been paid, any amounts remaining in the Costs of Issuance Account shall be transferred to the Principal and Interest Account and used to pay interest on the Bonds, as directed in a City Order filed with the Trustee, and the Costs of Issuance Account shall be closed. In the event the Developer has not completed the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements by June 23, 2031, then the City may provide written direction to the Trustee to (i) transfer all funds on deposit in the Bond Improvement Accounts of the Project Fund to the Redemption Fund to redeem Bonds pursuant to the Indenture. Upon such transfers, the Bond Improvement Accounts of the Project Fund shall be closed. Reserve Fund The Reserve Account will be held by the Trustee for the benefit of the Bonds, and will be initially funded with proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of the Reserve Account Requirement. Pursuant to the Indenture, the “Reserve Account Requirement” for the Bonds shall be $___________, which is an amount equal to 100% of average Annual Debt Service on the Bonds as of the date of issuance, (excluding payments to be made from the Improvement 16 Area #4 Capitalized Interest Account); however, that such amount shall be reduced by the amount of any transfers made to the Redemption Fund as a result of Prepayments; and provided further that as a result of (1) an optional redemption or (2) an extraordinary optional redemption, the Reserve Account Requirement shall be reduced by a percentage equal to the pro rata principal amount of Bonds redeemed by such redemption divided by the total principal amount of the Outstanding Bonds prior to such redemption. The City agrees with the Owners of the Bonds to accumulate and, when accumulated, maintain in the Reserve Account, an amount equal to not less than the Reserve Account Requirement. All amounts deposited in the Reserve Account shall be used and withdrawn by the Trustee for the purpose of making transfers to the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund as provided in the Indenture. The Trustee will transfer from the Pledged Revenue Fund to the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account on March 15 of each year, commencing March 15, 2027, an amount equal to the Additional Interest until the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement has been accumulated in the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account; provided, however, that at any time the amount on deposit in the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account is less than Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement, the Trustee shall resume depositing the Additional Interest into the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account until the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement has accumulated in the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account. In calculating the amounts to be transferred pursuant to the Indenture, the Trustee may conclusively rely on the Annual Installment as shown on the applicable Assessment Roll in the Service and Assessment Plan unless and until it receives a City Order directing that a different amount be used. The Additional Interest shall continue to be collected and deposited pursuant to the Indenture until the Bonds are no longer Outstanding. The “Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement” means an amount equal to 3.85% of the principal amount of the then Outstanding Bonds. The City has allocated the Additional Interest authorized by the PID Act for this purpose. Whenever a transfer is made from the Reserve Fund to the Bond Fund due to a deficiency in the Bond Fund, the Trustee shall provide written notice thereof to the City, specifying the amount withdrawn and the source of said funds. In the event of an extraordinary optional redemption of Bonds from the proceeds of a Prepayment pursuant to the Indenture, the Trustee, pursuant to prior written directions from the City, shall transfer from the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund to the Redemption Fund the amount specified in such directions, which shall be an amount equal to the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed multiplied by the lesser of: (i) the amount required to be in the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund divided by the principal amount of Outstanding Bonds prior to the redemption, and (ii) the amount actually in the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund divided by the principal amount of Outstanding Bonds prior to the redemption. If after such transfer, and after applying investment earnings on the Prepayment toward payment of accrued interest, there are insufficient funds to pay the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on such Bonds to the date fixed for redemption of the Bonds to be redeemed as a result of such Prepayment, the Trustee shall transfer an amount equal to the shortfall or any additional amounts to permit the redemption of Bonds to be redeemed in minimum principal amounts of $1,000 from the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account to the Redemption Fund to be applied to the redemption of the Bonds. Whenever, on any Interest Payment Date, or on any other date at the request of a City Representative, the value of cash and Value of Investment Securities on deposit in the Reserve Account exceeds the Reserve Account Requirement, the Trustee shall provide written notice to the City Representative of the amount of the excess. Such excess shall be transferred to the Principal and Interest Account to be used for the payment of interest on the Bonds on the next Interest Payment Date in accordance with the Indenture, unless within thirty days of such notice to the City Representative, the Trustee receives a City Order instructing the Trustee to apply such excess: (i) to pay amounts due under for Rebatable Arbitrage, (ii) to the Administrative Fund in an amount not more than the Annual Collection Costs for the Bonds, (iii) to each of the Bond Improvement Accounts of the Project Fund, on a pro rata basis based upon the respective amount initially deposited to each Bond Improvement Account of the Project Fund pursuant to the Indenture, to pay Actual Costs if such application and the expenditure of funds is expected to occur within three years of the date of the Indenture, or (iv) to the Redemption Fund to be applied to the redemption of the Bonds. Whenever, on any Interest Payment Date, or on any other date at the written request of the City Representative, the amounts on deposit in the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account exceed the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Requirement, the Trustee shall provide written notice to the City of the amount of the excess, 17 and such excess shall be transferred, at the direction of the City pursuant to a City Order, to the Administrative Fund for the payment of Annual Collection Costs or to the Redemption Fund. In the event that the Trustee does not receive a City Order directing the transfer of such excess to the Administrative Fund within 45 days of providing notice to the City of such excess, the Trustee shall transfer such excess to the Redemption Fund to redeem Bonds pursuant to the Indenture and provide the City with written notification of the transfer. The Trustee shall incur no liability for the accuracy or validity of the transfer so long as the Trustee made such transfer in full compliance with the Indenture. Whenever, on any Interest Payment Date, the amount on deposit in the Bond Fund is insufficient to pay the debt service on the Bonds due on such date, the Trustee shall transfer first from the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund and second from the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund to the Bond Fund the amounts necessary to cure such deficiency. At the final maturity of the Bonds, the amount on deposit in the Reserve Account and the Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account shall be transferred to the Principal and Interest Account of the Bond Fund and applied to the payment of the principal of the Bonds. If, after a Reserve Account withdrawal, the amount on deposit in the Reserve Account is less than the Reserve Account Requirement, the Trustee shall transfer from the Pledged Revenue Fund to the Reserve Account the amount of such deficiency, but only to the extent that such amount is not required for the timely payment of principal, interest, or Sinking Fund Installments. If the amount held in the Reserve Fund together with the amount held in the Pledged Revenue Fund, the Bond Fund and Redemption Fund is sufficient to pay the principal amount and of all Outstanding Bonds on the next date the Bonds may be optionally redeemed by the City at a redemption price of par, together with the unpaid interest accrued on such Bonds as of such date, the moneys shall be transferred to the Redemption Fund and thereafter used to redeem all Bonds on such date. Administrative Fund Periodically, upon receipt, the City shall transfer to the Trustee, for deposit to the Administrative Fund, the portion of the Annual Installment of Assessments allocated to the payment of Annual Collection Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs as set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan. Moneys in the Administrative Fund shall be held by the Trustee separate and apart from the other Funds created and administered under the Indenture and used as directed by a City Order solely for the purposes set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan, including payment of the Annual Collection Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” THE ADMINISTRATIVE FUND IS NOT PART OF THE TRUST ESTATE AND IS NOT SECURITY FOR THE BONDS. Defeasance Any Outstanding Bonds shall, prior to the Stated Maturity or redemption date thereof, be deemed to have been paid and no longer Outstanding within the meaning of the Indenture (a “Defeased Debt”), and particularly the applicable provisions of the Indenture, when payment of the principal of, premium, if any, on such Defeased Debt, plus interest thereon to the due date thereof (whether such due date be by reason of maturity, redemption, or otherwise), either (1) shall have been made in accordance with the terms thereof, or (2) shall have been provided by irrevocably depositing with the Trustee, in trust, and irrevocably set aside exclusively for such payment, (A) money sufficient to make such payment or (B) Defeasance Securities that mature as to principal and interest in such amount and at such times as will insure the availability, without reinvestment, of sufficient money to make such payment, and all necessary and proper fees, compensation, and expenses of the Trustee pertaining to the Bonds with respect to which such deposit is made shall have been paid or the payment thereof provided for to the satisfaction of the Trustee. Neither Defeasance Securities nor moneys deposited with the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture nor principal or interest payments on any such Defeasance Securities shall be withdrawn or used for any purpose other than, and shall be held in trust for, the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Any cash received from such principal of and interest on such Defeasance Securities deposited with the Trustee, if not then needed for such purpose, shall be reinvested in 18 Defeasance Securities as directed by the City maturing at times and in amounts sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds on and prior to such redemption date or maturity date thereof, as the case may be. Any payment for Defeasance Securities purchased for the purpose of reinvesting cash as aforesaid shall be made only against delivery of such Defeasance Securities. “Defeasance Securities” means Investment Securities then authorized by applicable law for the investment of funds to defease public securities. “Investment Securities” means those authorized investments described in the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code, as amended; and are, at the time made, included in and authorized by the City’s official investment policy as approved by the City Council from time to time. Under current State law, Investment Securities that are authorized for the investment of funds to defease public securities are (a) direct, noncallable obligations of the United States of America, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of America; (b) noncallable obligations of an agency or instrumentality of the United States of America, including obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the agency or instrumentality, and that, on the date the governing body of the City adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds, are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than “AAA” or its equivalent; and (c) noncallable obligations of a state or an agency or a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of a state that have been refunded and that, on the date the governing body of the City adopts or approves the proceedings authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds, are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than “AAA” or its equivalent. There is no assurance that the current law will not be changed in a manner which would permit investments other than those described above to be made with amounts deposited to defease the Bonds. Because the Indenture does not contractually limit such investments, Owners may be deemed to have consented to defeasance with such other investments, notwithstanding the fact that such investments may not be of the same investment quality as those currently permitted under State law. There is no assurance that the ratings for U.S. Treasury securities used as Defeasance Securities or that for any other Defeasance Security will be maintained at any particular rating category. Events of Default Each of the following occurrences or events constitutes an “Event of Default” under the Indenture: 1. The failure of the City to deposit the Pledged Revenues to the Pledged Revenue Fund; 2. The failure of the City to enforce the collection of the Assessments including the prosecution of foreclosure proceedings, in accordance with the Indenture; 3. Default in the performance or observance of any covenant, agreement or obligation of the City under the Indenture, other than a default under (iv) below, and the continuation thereof for a period of ninety (90) days after written notice specifying such default and requiring same to be remedied shall have been given to the City by the Trustee, which may give such notice in its discretion and which shall give such notice at the written request of the Owners of not less than 51% in aggregate Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding; provided, however, if the default stated in the notice is capable of cure but cannot reasonably be cured within the applicable period, the City shall be entitled to a further extension of time reasonably necessary to remedy such default so long as corrective action is instituted by the City within the applicable period and is diligently pursued until such failure is corrected, but in no event for a period of time of more than one hundred eighty (180) days after such notice; and 4. The failure to make payment of the principal of or interest on any of the Bonds when the same becomes due and payable and such failure is not remedied within thirty (30) days thereafter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the Indenture will be viewed to be an Event of Default if it is in violation of any applicable state law or court order. Remedies in Event of Default Upon the happening and continuance of any Event of Default, then and in every such case the Trustee may proceed, and upon the written request of the Owners of not less than fifty-one percent (51%) in principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding hereunder shall proceed, to protect and enforce the rights of the Owners under the 19 Indenture, by action seeking mandamus or by other suit, action, or special proceeding in equity or at law, in any court of competent jurisdiction, for any relief to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, including, but not limited to, the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained herein, or injunction; provided, however, that no action for money damages against the City may be sought or shall be permitted. THE PRINCIPAL OF THE BONDS SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO ACCELERATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. If the assets of the Trust Estate are sufficient to pay all amounts due with respect to Outstanding Bonds, in the selection of Trust Estate assets to be used in the payment of Bonds due under the Indenture, the City shall determine, in its absolute discretion, and shall instruct the Trustee by City Order, which Trust Estate assets shall be applied to such payment and shall not be liable to any Owner or other Person by reason of such selection and application. In the event that the City shall fail to deliver to the Trustee such City Order, the Trustee shall select and liquidate or sell Trust Estate assets as provided in the following paragraph, and shall not be liable to any Owner, or other Person, or the City by reason of such selection, liquidation or sale. Whenever moneys are to be applied pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture relating to Events of Default, irrespective of and whether other remedies authorized under the Indenture shall have been pursued in whole or in part, the Trustee may cause any or all of the assets of the Trust Estate, including Investment Securities, to be sold. The Trustee may so sell the assets of the Trust Estate and all right, title, interest, claim and demand thereto and the right of redemption thereof, in one or more parts, at any such place or places, and at such time or times and upon such notice and terms, specifically, in inverse order of value pursuant to a certified appraisal of real or personal property or market value of investments as set forth in the U.S. Stock Exchange, and as may be required by law and apply the proceeds thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. Upon such sale, the Trustee may make and deliver to the purchaser or purchasers a good and sufficient assignment or conveyance for the same, which sale shall be a perpetual bar both at law and in equity against the City, and all other Persons claiming such properties. No purchaser at any sale shall be bound to see to the application of the purchase money proceeds thereof or to inquire as to the authorization, necessity, expediency, or regularity of any such sale. Nevertheless, if so requested by the Trustee, the City shall ratify and confirm any sale or sales by executing and delivering to the Trustee or to such purchaser or purchasers all such instruments as may be necessary or, in the reasonable judgment of the Trustee, proper for the purpose which may be designated in such request. Restriction on Owner’s Actions No Owner shall have any right to institute any action, suit or proceeding at law or in equity for the enforcement of the Indenture or for the execution of any trust thereof or any other remedy under the Indenture, unless (i) a default has occurred and is continuing of which the Trustee has been notified in writing as provided in the Indenture, or of which it is deemed to have notice, (ii) such default has become an Event of Default and the Owners of not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding have made written request to the Trustee and offered it reasonable opportunity either to proceed to exercise the powers granted in the Indenture or to institute such action, suit or proceeding in its own name, (iii) the Owners have furnished to the Trustee written evidence of indemnity as provided in the Indenture, (iv) the Trustee has for 60 days after such notice failed or refused to exercise the powers granted in the Indenture, or to institute such action, suit, or proceeding in its own name, (v) no direction inconsistent with such written request has been given to the Trustee during such 60-day period by the Owners of not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding, and (vi) notice of such action, suit, or proceeding is given to the Trustee; however, no one or more Owners of the Bonds shall have any right in any manner whatsoever to affect, disturb, or prejudice the Indenture by its, his or their action or to enforce any right under the Indenture except in the manner provided in the Indenture, and that all proceedings at law or in equity shall be instituted and maintained in the manner provided in the Indenture and for the equal benefit of the Owners of all Bonds then Outstanding. The notification, request and furnishing of indemnity set forth above shall be conditions precedent to the execution of the powers and trusts of the Indenture and to any action or cause of action for the enforcement of the Indenture or for any other remedy under the Indenture. Subject to provisions of the Indenture with respect to certain liabilities of the City, nothing in the Indenture shall affect or impair the right of any Owner to enforce, by action at law, payment of any Bond at and after the maturity thereof, or on the date fixed for redemption or the obligation of the City to pay each Bond issued under the Indenture 20 to the respective Owners thereof at the time and place, from the source and in the manner expressed in the Indenture and in the Bonds. In case the Trustee or any Owners of Bonds shall have proceeded to enforce any right under the Indenture and such proceedings shall have been discontinued or abandoned for any reason or shall have been determined adversely to the Trustee or any Owners of Bonds, then and in every such case the City, the Trustee and the Owners of Bonds shall be restored to their former positions and rights under the Indenture, and all rights, remedies and powers of the Trustee shall continue as if no such proceedings had been taken. Application of Revenues and Other Moneys After Event of Default All moneys, securities, funds and Pledged Revenues and the income therefrom received by the Trustee pursuant to any right given or action taken under the provisions of the Indenture with respect to Events of Default shall, after payment of the cost and expenses of the proceedings resulting in the collection of such amounts, the expenses (including Trustee’s counsel), liabilities, and advances incurred or made by the Trustee and the fees of the Trustee in carrying out the Indenture during the continuance of an Event of Default, and notwithstanding the terms of the Indenture related to the immediate remedies for a default, shall be applied by the Trustee, on behalf of the City, to the payment of interest and principal or Redemption Price then due on Bonds, as follows: i. FIRST: To the payment to the Owners entitled thereto all installments of interest then due in the direct order of maturity of such installments, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full any installment, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the amounts due on such installment, to the Owners entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference; and ii. SECOND: To the payment to the Owners entitled thereto of the unpaid principal of Outstanding Bonds, or Redemption Price of any Bonds which shall have become due, whether at maturity or by call for redemption, in the direct order of their due dates and, if the amounts available shall not be sufficient to pay in full all the Bonds due on any date, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the amounts of principal due and to the Owners entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference. The Trustee shall make payments to the Owners of Bonds pursuant to the provisions above within thirty (30) days of receipt of such good and available funds, and the record date shall be the date the Trustee receives such good and available funds. In the event funds are not adequate to cure any of the Events of Default described above, the available funds shall be allocated to the Bonds that are Outstanding in proportion to the quantity of Bonds that are currently due and in default under the terms of the Indenture. The restoration of the City to its prior position after any and all defaults have been cured, as provided above, shall not extend to or affect any subsequent default under the Indenture or impair any right consequent thereon. Investment or Deposit of Funds Money in any Fund or Account established pursuant to the Indenture, other than the Reserve Fund, shall be invested by the Trustee as directed by the City pursuant to a City Order filed with the Trustee in Investment Securities; provided that all such deposits and investments shall be made in such manner that the money required to be expended from any Fund or Account will be available at the proper time or times. Money in the Reserve Fund shall be invested in such Investment Securities as directed by the City pursuant to a City Order filed with the Trustee, provided that the final maturity of any individual Investment Security shall not exceed 270 days and the average weighted maturity of any investment pool or no-load money market mutual fund shall not exceed 90 days. Obligations purchased as an investment of moneys in any Fund or Account shall be deemed to be part of such Fund or Account, subject, however, to the requirements of the Indenture for transfer of interest earnings and profits resulting from investment of amounts in Funds and Accounts. Whenever in the Indenture any moneys are 21 required to be transferred by the City to the Trustee, such transfer may be accomplished by transferring a like amount of Investment Securities. Against Encumbrances Other than Refunding Bonds issued to refund all or a portion of the Bonds, the City shall not create and, to the extent Pledged Revenues are received, shall not suffer to remain, any lien, encumbrance or charge upon the Pledged Revenues or upon any other property pledged under the Indenture, except the pledge created for the security of the Bonds, and other than a lien or pledge subordinate to the lien and pledge of such property related to the Bonds. So long as Bonds are Outstanding under the Indenture, the City shall not issue any bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness other than the Bonds and Refunding Bonds issued to refund all or a portion of the Bonds, secured by any pledge of or other lien or charge on the Pledged Revenues or other property pledged under the Indenture, other than a lien or pledge subordinate to the lien and pledge of such property related to the Bonds. Additional Obligations or Other Liens The City reserves the right to issue obligations under other indentures, assessment ordinances, or similar agreements or other obligations which do not constitute or create a lien on the Trust Estate and are not payable from Trust Estate, or any portion thereof. Other than Refunding Bonds, the City will not create or voluntarily permit to be created any debt, lien or charge on the Trust Estate, or any portion thereof, and will not do or omit to do or suffer to be done or omit to be done any matter or things whatsoever whereby the lien of the Indenture or the priority of the Indenture might or could be lost or impaired; provided, however, that the City has reserved the right to issue bonds or other obligations secured by and payable from the Trust Estate so long as such pledge is subordinate to the pledge of the Trust Estate securing payment of the Bonds. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Indenture, the City shall not issue additional bonds, notes or other obligations under the Indenture, secured by any pledge of or other lien or charge on the Trust Estate or other property pledged under the Indenture, other than Refunding Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue Refunding Bonds, the proceeds of which would be utilized to refund all or any portion of the Outstanding Bonds or Outstanding Refunding Bonds and to pay all costs incident to the Refunding Bonds, as authorized by the laws of the State. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 22 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS The following table summarizes the sources and uses of proceeds of the Bonds: Sources of Funds: Principal Amoun $ Total Sources $ Uses of Funds: Deposit to Improvement Area #2 Bond Improvement Account of the Pro ect Fun $ Deposit to Improvement Area #3 Bond Improvement Account of the Pro ect Fun Deposit to Improvement Area #4 Bond Improvement Account of the Pro ect Fun Deposit to Cost of Issuance Account of the Pro ec Fun Deposit to Improvement Area #4 Capitalized Interes Account of the Bond Fun Deposit to Reserve Account of the Reserve Fun Deposit to Administrative Fun Underwriter’s Discount(1) Total Uses $ (1) Includes Underwriter’s Counsel’s fee of $_______. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 23 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS The following table sets forth the anticipated debt service requirements for the Bonds: Year Ending (September 1) Principal Interest Total 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 Total [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 24 OVERLAPPING TAXES AND DEBT Overlapping Taxes and Debt The land within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District has been, and is expected to continue to be, subject to taxes and assessments imposed by taxing entities other than the City. Such taxes are payable in addition to the Assessments to be levied by the City. In addition to the City, Collin County, Texas, the Collin County Community College District (“Collin College”), and the Anna Independent School District may each levy ad valorem taxes upon land in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District for payment of debt incurred by such governmental entities and/or for payment of maintenance and operations expenses. The City has no control over the level of ad valorem taxes or special assessments levied by such other taxing authorities. The following table reflects the overlapping ad valorem tax rates currently levied on property located in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The District is located within the boundaries of the City and the Anna Independent School District, and within Collin County, Texas. OVERLAPPING TAX RATES Improvement Area #2 Improvement Area #3 Improvement Area #4 Taxin Entit Tax Year 2025 Ad Valorem Tax Rate(1) Tax Year 2025 Ad Valorem Tax Rate(1) Tax Year 2025 Ad Valorem Tax Rate(1) Cit of Anna $0.525073 $0.525073 $0.525073 Collin Count , Texas 0.149343 0.149343 0.149343 Collin Colle e 0.081220 0.081220 0.081220 Anna Independent School Distric 1.239900 1.239900 1.239900 Total Existin Tax Rate $1.995536 $1.995536 $1.995536 Estimated Average Annual Installment of Assessments as tax rate equivalent per Parcel(2) $0.955880 $0.954718 $0.955468 Estimated Total Tax Rate and Average Annual Installment as a tax rate equivalent(2) $2.951416 $2.950254 $2.951004 ________________________________ (1) As reported by the taxing entities. Per $100 in taxable assessed value. (2) Preliminary, subject to change. Source: P3Works, LLC. Derived from information presented in the Service and Assessment Plan and the updated estimated home values provided by the Developer. Source: Collin Central Appraisal District and the City. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 25 As noted above, Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District includes territory located in other governmental entities that may issue or incur debt secured by the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes or assessments. Set forth below is an overlapping debt table showing the outstanding indebtedness payable from ad valorem taxes with respect to property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District and City debt secured by the Assessments: OVERLAPPING DEBT – IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 Taxin or Assessin Entit Gross Outstanding Debt as of 4/15/2026 Estimated Percentage Applicable(1) Direct and Estimated Overlapping Deb (1) The City (Improvement Area #2 Assessments - The Bonds)(2) $ 3,835,000 100.000% $3,835,000 The City (Ad Valorem Taxes) 257,590,000 0.180% 463,417 Collin Count , Texas 910,405,000 0.003% 30,399 Collin Colle e 438,250,000 0.004% 15,649 Anna Independent School District 439,488,846 0.197% 865,772 TOTAL(2) $2,049,568,846 $5,210,237 OVERLAPPING DEBT – IMPROVEMENT AREA #3 Taxin or Assessin Entit Gross Outstanding Debt as of 4/15/2026 Estimated Percentage Applicable(1) Direct and Estimated Overlapping Deb (1) The City (Improvement Area #3 Assessments - The Bonds)(2) $ 2,452,000 100.000% $2,452,000 The City (Ad Valorem Taxes) 257,590,000 0.137% 352,104 Collin Count , Texas 910,405,000 0.003% 23,097 Collin Colle e 438,250,000 0.003% 11,890 Anna Independent School District 439,488,846 0.150% 657,813 TOTAL(2) $2,048,185,846 $3,496,903 OVERLAPPING DEBT – IMPROVEMENT AREA #4 Taxin or Assessin Entit Gross Outstanding Debt as of 4/15/2026 Estimated Percentage Applicable(1) Direct and Estimated Overlapping Deb (1) The City (Improvement Area #4 Assessments - The Bonds)(2) $ 3,590,000 100.000% $3,590,000 The City (Ad Valorem Taxes) 257,590,000 0.149% 384,968 Collin Count , Texas 910,405,000 0.003% 25,253 Collin Colle e 438,250,000 0.003% 13,000 Anna Independent School District 439,488,846 0.164% 719,211 TOTAL(2) $2,049,323,846 $4,732,431 (1) Based on values provided in the Appraisal and on the Tax Year 2025 Net Taxable Assessed Valuations for the taxing entities. (2) Preliminary, subject to change. Sources: Collin Central Appraisal District and Municipal Advisory Council of Texas 26 Homeowner’s Association In addition to the Assessments described above, the Developer anticipates that each lot owner in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District will pay a maintenance and operation fee and/or a property owner’s association fee to a homeowner’s association (the “HOA”). The annual HOA fees are $1,080. ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES General Capitalized terms used under this caption and not otherwise defined in this Limited Offering Memorandum shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Service and Assessment Plan. As required by the PID Act, when the City determines to defray a portion of the costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements through Assessments, it must adopt a resolution generally describing the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements and the land within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to be subject to Assessments to pay the cost therefor. The City has caused an assessment roll to be prepared for each of Improvement Area #2, Improvement Area #3 and Improvement Area #4 (collectively, the “Assessment Rolls”), which Assessment Rolls will show the land within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to be assessed, the amount of the benefit to and the Assessment against each lot or parcel of land and the number of Annual Installments in which the Assessment is divided. The Assessment Rolls were or will be filed with the City Secretary and made available for public inspection. Statutory notice was or will be given to the owners of the property to be assessed and a public hearing will be conducted to hear testimony from affected property owners as to the propriety and advisability of undertaking the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements and funding a portion of the same with Assessments. The City expects to levy the Assessments and adopt the Assessment Ordinance immediately prior to adopting the Bond Ordinance. After such adoption, the Assessments will become legal, valid and binding liens upon the property against which the Assessments have been made. Under the PID Act, the Actual Costs (as defined in the Service and Assessment Plan) of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements may be assessed by the City against the assessable property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District so long as the special benefit conferred upon the assessed property in Improvement Areas #2-4 (the “Assessed Property”) by the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements equals or exceeds the Assessments. The costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements may be assessed using any methodology that results in the imposition of equal shares of cost on Assessed Property similarly benefited. The allocation of benefits and assessments to the benefitted land within the District, including land in Improvement Areas #2-4, is set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan, which should be read in its entirety. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Assessment Methodology The Service and Assessment Plan describes the special benefit to be received by each parcel of assessable property as a result of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, provides the basis and justification for the determination that such special benefit exceeds the Assessments being levied, and establishes the methodology by which the City allocates the special benefit of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements to parcels in a manner that results in equal shares of costs being apportioned to parcels similarly benefited. As described in the Service and Assessment Plan, a portion of the costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements are being funded with proceeds of the Bonds, which are payable from and secured by Pledged Revenues, including the Assessment Revenues. As set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan, the City Council has determined that the Actual Costs associated with the Improvement Area #2 Improvements will be allocated to the parcels against which the Improvement Area #2 Assessments are levied by spreading the entire Improvement Area #2 Assessment across all Assessed Property within Improvement Area #2 of the District on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #2 to the estimated build-out value for all Parcels within Improvement Area #2 of the District. As set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan, the City Council has determined that the Actual Costs associated with the Improvement Area #3 Improvements will be allocated to the parcels against which the Improvement Area #3 Assessments are levied by spreading the entire Improvement Area #3 Assessment across all Assessed Property within Improvement Area #3 of the District on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #3 to the estimated build-out value for all Parcels within Improvement Area #3 of the District. 27 As set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan, the City Council has determined that the Actual Costs associated with the Improvement Area #4 Improvements will be allocated to the parcels against which the Improvement Area #4 Assessments are levied by spreading the entire Improvement Area #4 Assessment across all Assessed Property within Improvement Area #4 of the District on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #4 to the estimated build-out value for all Parcels within Improvement Area #4 of the District. The following table provides additional analysis with respect to special assessment methodology, including the value to assessment burden ratio per unit (lot), equivalent tax rate per unit, and leverage per unit. The information in the tables was obtained from and calculated using information provided in the Service and Assessment Plan and the Appraisal. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 28 VALUE TO LIEN ANALYSIS, ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION, EQUIVALENT TAX RATE AND LEVERAGE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT TYPE UNIT IN IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 OF THE DISTRICT∗ Lot Type Planned No. of Units Estimated Finished Lot Value per unit(1) Projected Average Home Value per unit(2) Assessment per unit Average Annual Installment per unit Tax Rate Equivalent of Average Annual Installment (per $100 Lot Value) Tax Rate Equivalent of Average Annual Installment (per $100 Home Value) Leverage (Lot Value) Leverage (Average Home Value) 50’ (IA #2) 4 $100,000 $450,000 $47,345.68 $4,301.46 $4.3015 $0.9559 2.11 9.50 60’ (IA #2) 63 $120,000 $550,000 $57,866.94 $5,257.34 $4.3811 $0.9559 2.07 9.50 40’ (IA #3) 72 $80,000 $350,000 $34,055.56 $3,341.51 $4.1769 $0.9547 2.35 10.28 TH (IA #4) 115 $57,500 $300,000 $31,217.39 $2,866.40 $4.9850 $0.9555 1.84 9.61 Source: P3Works, LLC, the Developer and information presented in the Service and Assessment Plan (1) Lot value based on the Appraisal. See “APPRAISAL.” (2) Home prices provided by the Developer. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ∗ Preliminary; subject to change. 29 For further explanation of the Assessment methodology, see “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” The City has determined that the foregoing method of allocation will result in the imposition of equal shares of the Assessments on parcels similarly situated within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The Assessments and interest thereon are expected to be paid in Annual Installments as described above. The determination by the City of the assessment methodology set forth in the Service and Assessment Plan is the result of the discretionary exercise by the City Council of its legislative authority and governmental powers and is conclusive and binding on the Developer and all future owners and developers within the District. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Assessment Payer Concentration in Improvement Areas #2-4 The information appearing in the following table illustrates the assessment payer concentration in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. [DEVELOPER TO PROVIDE LOT MIX; ADMINISTRATOR TO COMPLETE TABLE] Pro ert Owner(1) Percentage of Lots Total Outstanding Assessments∗ Percentage of Assessments MM ANNA 325 LLC LENNAR MATTAMY FIRST TEXAS Total 100.00% $9,877,000 100.00% __________________ Source: The Administrator 1 Based on information provided by the Developer as of May 9, 2025. Collection and Enforcement of Assessment Amounts Under the PID Act, the Annual Installments may be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ad valorem taxes of the City. The Assessments may be enforced by the City in the same manner that an ad valorem tax lien against real property is enforced. Delinquent installments of the Assessments incur interest, penalties and attorney’s fees in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes. Under the PID Act, the Assessment Lien is a first and prior lien against the property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims except liens or claims for State, county, school district or municipality ad valorem taxes. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Assessment Limitations” herein. In the Indenture, the City will covenant to collect, or cause to be collected, Assessments as provided in the Assessment Ordinance. No less frequently than annually, City staff or a designee of the City shall prepare, and the City Council shall approve, an Annual Service Plan Update to allow for the billing and collection of Annual Installments. Each Annual Service Plan Update shall include updated Assessment Rolls and a calculation of the Annual Installment for each Parcel. Annual Collection Costs shall be allocated among all Parcels pro rata based on the ratio of the amount of outstanding Assessment remaining on the Parcel to the total outstanding Assessment. In the Indenture, the City will covenant, agree and warrant that, for so long as any Bonds are Outstanding that it will take and pursue all actions permissible under Applicable Laws to cause the Assessments to be collected and the liens thereof enforced continuously, in the manner and to the maximum extent permitted by Applicable Laws, and, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, to cause no reduction, abatement or exemption in the Assessments. To the extent permitted by law, notice of the Annual Installments has been and will be sent by, or on behalf of the City, to the affected property owners on the same statement or such other mechanism that is used by the City, ∗ Preliminary; subject to change. 30 so that such Annual Installments are collected simultaneously with ad valorem taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedures, and foreclosure sale in case of delinquencies as are provided for ad valorem taxes of the City. The City will determine or cause to be determined, no later than February 15 of each year, whether or not any Annual Installment is delinquent and, if such delinquencies exist, the City will order and cause to be commenced as soon as practicable any and all appropriate and legally permissible actions to obtain such Annual Installment, and any delinquent charges and interest thereon, including diligently prosecuting an action in district court to foreclose the currently delinquent Annual Installment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall not be required under any circumstances to purchase or make payment for the purchase of the delinquent Assessment or the corresponding Assessed Property. The City will implement the basic timeline and procedures for Assessment collections and pursuit of delinquencies set forth in Exhibit D of the City’s Continuing Disclosure Agreement set forth in APPENDIX D-1 and to comply therewith to the extent that the City reasonably determines that such compliance is the most appropriate timeline and procedures for enforcing the payment of delinquent Assessments. The City shall not be required under any circumstances to expend any funds for Delinquent Collection Costs in connection with its covenants and agreements under the Indenture or otherwise other than funds on deposit in the Administrative Fund. Annual Installments will be paid to the City or its agent. Annual Installments are due on October 1 of each year, and become delinquent on February 1 of the following year. In the event Assessments are not timely paid, there are penalties and interest as set forth below: Date Payment Receive Cumulative Penalt Cumulative Interes Total Februar 6% 1% 7% March 7% 2% 9% April 8% 3% 11% Ma 9% 4% 13% June 10% 5% 15% Jul 12% 6% 18% After July, the penalty remains at 12%, and interest accrues at the rate of 1% each month. In addition, if an account is delinquent in July, a 20% attorney’s collection fee may be added to the total penalty and interest charge. In general, property subject to lien may be sold, in whole or in parcels, pursuant to court order to collect the amounts due. An automatic stay by creditors or other entities, including governmental units, could prevent governmental units from foreclosing on property and prevents liens for post-petition taxes from attaching to property and obtaining secured creditor status unless, in either case, an order lifting the stay is obtained from the bankruptcy court. In most cases, post-petition Assessments are paid as an administrative expense of the estate in bankruptcy or by order of the bankruptcy court. Assessment Amounts Assessment Amounts. The maximum amounts of the Assessments will be established by the methodology described in the Service and Assessment Plan. The Assessment Rolls set forth for each year the Annual Installment for each Assessed Property consisting of the annual payment allocable to the Bonds for each Assessed Property, which amount includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs; and (4) Additional Interest, if applicable. The Annual Installments for the Assessments may not exceed the amounts shown on the Assessment Rolls. The Assessments will be levied against the parcels comprising the Assessed Property as indicated on the Assessment Rolls. See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan” and “APPENDIX E — Reimbursement Agreement.” If the debt service on issued and outstanding Bonds is reduced as the result of an economic refunding of the Bonds, the Prepayment of the Assessments, or the redemption of the Bonds, then there would be a corresponding reduction in the Assessments and the Annual Installments. See “APPENDIX B – Form of Service and Assessment 31 Plan.” In such case, the reduced Assessment and Annual Installment, as shown on the applicable Assessment Roll for Improvement Areas #2-4, shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by City Council. Method of Apportionment of Assessments. For purposes of the Service and Assessment Plan, the City Council has determined that(i) the Improvement Area #2 Assessments shall be initially allocated to the Parcels consisting of the Assessed Property based on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #2 to estimated build-out value of all Parcels in Improvement Area #2, (ii) the Improvement Area #3 Assessments shall be initially allocated to the Parcels consisting of the Assessed Property based on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #3 to estimated build-out value of all Parcels in Improvement Area #3, and (iii) the Improvement Area #4 Assessments shall be initially allocated to the Parcels consisting of the Assessed Property based on the ratio of estimated build-out value of each Parcel in Improvement Area #4 to estimated build-out value of all Parcels in Improvement Area #4. Division Prior to Recording of Subdivision Plat. Upon the division of any Assessed Property prior to the recording of subdivision plat, the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the division among the newly divided Assessed Properties according to the following formula: A = B x (C ÷ D) Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly divided Assessed Property B = the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to division C = the estimated buildout value of the newly divided Assessed Property D = the sum of the estimated buildout value for all of the newly divided Assessed Properties The calculation of the buildout value of an Assessed Property shall be performed by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council based on information from homebuilders, market studies, appraisals, Official Public Records of the County, and any other relevant information regarding the Assessed Property, as provided by the Owner. The calculation as confirmed by the City Council shall be conclusive. The sum of the Assessments for all newly divided Assessed Properties shall equal the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made separately for each newly divided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation. Any reallocation pursuant to this section shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. Upon Subdivision by a Recorded Subdivision Plat. Upon the subdivision of any Assessed Property based on a recorded subdivision plat, the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the subdivision among the new subdivided lots based on the estimated buildout value according to the following formula: A = [B x (C ÷ D)]/E Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly subdivided lot B = the Assessment for the Parcel prior to subdivision C = the sum of the estimated average buildout value of all newly subdivided lots with same lot type 32 D = the sum of the estimated average buildout value for all of the newly subdivided lots excluding Non-Benefitted Property E= the number of newly subdivided lots with same lot type Prior to the recording of a subdivision plat, the Owner shall provide the City an estimated buildout value as of the date of the recorded subdivision plat for each lot created by the recorded subdivision plat considering factors such as density, lot size, proximity to amenities, view premiums, location, market conditions, historical sales, discussions with homebuilders, and any other factors that may impact value. The calculation of the estimated average buildout value for a lot shall be performed by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council based on information provided by the Owner, homebuilders, third party consultants, and/or the official public records of the County regarding the lot. The sum of the Assessments for all newly subdivided lots shall not exceed the Assessment for the portion of the Assessed Property subdivided prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made separately for each newly subdivided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation. Any reallocation pursuant to this section shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. Upon Consolidation. If two or more lots or Parcels are consolidated, the Administrator shall allocate the Assessments against the lots or Parcels before the consolidation to the consolidated lot or Parcel, which allocation shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. Maximum Assessment. The Service and Assessment Plan establishes a “Maximum Assessment” for each lot type in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, as shown in the table “Value to Lien Analysis, Assessment Allocation, Equivalent Tax Rate and Leverage per Residential lot type Unit in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District” under the subheading “— Assessment Methodology” above. See also “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” For further information about apportionment of the Assessments, See “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Prepayment of Assessments The Indenture and the Service and Assessment Plan provide for certain optional and mandatory prepayments as described below (each, a “Prepayment”). To the extent that any Assessment is prepaid, the lien on real property associated with such Assessment prepayment shall be released and any rights of the Trustee and the bond owners to request the City to proceed with foreclosure procedures for the purpose of protecting and enforcing the rights of the bond owners with respect to such property shall terminate. Voluntary Prepayments. Pursuant to the PID Act and the Indenture, the owner of any property assessed may voluntarily prepay all or part of any Assessment levied against any lot or parcel, together with accrued interest to the date of payment, at any time. Upon receipt of such prepayment, such amounts will be applied towards the redemption or payment of the Bonds. Amounts received at the time of a prepayment which represent a payment of principal, interest, or penalties on a delinquent installment of an Assessment are not to be considered a prepayment, but rather are to be treated as payment of regularly scheduled Assessments. Mandatory Prepayment of Assessments—Transfer to Exempt Entity. If Assessed Property is transferred to a person or entity that is exempt from payment of the Assessments under applicable law or any portion of Assessed Property becomes Non-Benefited Property, the owner transferring the Assessed Property or causing the portion to become Non-Benefited Property shall pay to the City or the Administrator on behalf of the City the full amount of the outstanding Assessment, plus Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, if any, for such Assessed Property, prior to the transfer. If a reallocation causes the Assessment for any successor parcel to exceed the Maximum Assessment, the owner of the Parcel being reallocated must partially prepay the Assessment to the extent it exceeds 33 the Maximum Assessment for such Parcel in an amount sufficient to reduce the Assessment to the Maximum Assessment. True-Up of Assessments if Maximum Assessment Exceeded at Plat. Prior to the City approving a final subdivision plat, the Administrator will certify that such plat will not result in the Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type exceeding the applicable Maximum Assessment. If the Administrator determines that the resulting Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type will exceed the Maximum Assessment for that Lot Type, then (1) the Assessment applicable to each Lot Type shall each be reduced to the Maximum Assessment, and (2) the person or entity filing the plat shall pay to the City, or cause to be paid to the City, the amount the Assessment was reduced, plus Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, if any, prior to the City approving the final plat. The City’s approval of a plat without payment of such amounts does not eliminate the obligation of the person or entity filing the plat to pay such amounts. Prepayment as a Result of an Eminent Domain Proceeding or Taking. Subject to applicable law, if any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is taken from an owner as a result of eminent domain proceedings or if a transfer of any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is made to an entity with the authority to condemn all or a portion of the Assessed Property in lieu of or as a part of an eminent domain proceeding (a “Taking”), the portion of the Assessed Property that was taken or transferred (the “Taken Property”) shall be reclassified as Non-Benefited Property. For the Assessed Property that is subject to the Taking as described in the preceding paragraph, the Assessment that was levied against the Assessed Property (when it was included in the Taken Property) prior to the Taking shall remain in force against the remaining Assessed Property (the Assessed Property less the Taken Property), (the “Remaining Property”) following the reclassification of the Taken Property as Non-Benefited Property, subject to an adjustment of the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. The owner will remain liable to pay in Annual Installments, or payable as otherwise provided by the Service and Assessment Plan, as updated, or the PID Act, the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property, subject to an adjustment in the Annual Installments applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property exceeds the applicable Maximum Assessment, the owner will be required to make a Prepayment in an amount necessary to ensure that the Assessment against the Remaining Property does not exceed such Maximum Assessment, in which case the Assessment and Annual Installments applicable to the Remaining Property will be reduced by the amount of the partial Prepayment. If the City receives all or a portion of the eminent domain proceeds (or payment made in an agreed sale in lieu of condemnation), such amount shall be credited against the amount of Prepayment, with any remainder credited against the assessment on the Remaining Property. In all instances the Assessment remaining on the Remaining Property shall not exceed the applicable Maximum Assessment. By way of illustration, if an owner owns 100 acres of Assessed Property subject to $100 Assessment and 10 acres is taken through a Taking, the 10 acres of Taken Property shall be reclassified as Non-Benefited Property and the remaining 90 acres of Remaining Property shall be subject to the $100 Assessment, (provided that this $100 Assessment does not exceed the Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property). If the Administrator determines that the $100 Assessment reallocated to the Remaining Property would exceed the Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property by $10, then the owner shall be required to pay $10 as a Prepayment of the Assessment against the Remaining Property and the Assessment on the Remaining Property shall be adjusted to $90 and the Annual Installments adjusted accordingly. Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, if the owner notifies the City and the Administrator that the Taking prevents the Remaining Property from being developed for any use which could support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement, the owner shall, upon receipt of the compensation for the Taken Property, be required to prepay the amount of the Assessment required to buy down the outstanding Assessment to the Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property to support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement. The owner will remain liable to pay the Annual Installments on both the Taken Property and the Remaining Property until such time that such Assessment has been prepaid in full. 34 Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, the Assessments shall not, however, be reduced to an amount less than the outstanding Bonds. Priority of Lien The Assessments or any reassessment, the expense of collection, and reasonable attorney’s fees, if incurred, constitute a first and prior lien against the property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims except liens or claims for the State, county, school district or municipality ad valorem taxes, and are a personal liability of and charge against the owners of the property regardless of whether the owners are named. The lien is effective from the date of the Assessment Ordinance until the Assessment is paid, and may be enforced by the City in the same manner as an ad valorem tax levied against real property may be enforced by the City. The owner of any property assessed may pay the entire Assessment levied against any lot or parcel, together with accrued interest to the date of payment, at any time. Foreclosure Proceedings In the event of delinquency in the payment of any Annual Installment, except for unpaid Assessments on homestead property (unless the lien associated with the assessment attached prior to the date the property became a homestead), the City is empowered to order institution of an action in state district court to foreclose the lien of such delinquent Annual Installment. In such action the real property subject to the delinquent Annual Installments may be sold at judicial foreclosure sale for the amount of such delinquent Annual Installments, plus penalties and interest. Any sale of property for nonpayment of an installment or installments of an Assessment will be subject to the lien established for remaining unpaid installments of the Assessment against such property and such property may again be sold at a judicial foreclosure sale if the purchaser thereof fails to make timely payment of the non-delinquent installments of the Assessments against such property as they become due and payable. Judicial foreclosure proceedings are not mandatory. In the event a foreclosure is necessary, there could be a delay in payments to owners of the Bonds pending prosecution of the foreclosure proceedings and receipt by the City of the proceeds of the foreclosure sale. It is possible that no bid would be received at the foreclosure sale, and in such event there could be an additional delay in payment of the principal of and interest on Bonds or such payment may not be made in full. The City is not required under any circumstance to purchase the property or to pay the delinquent Assessment on the corresponding Assessed Parcel. In the Indenture, the City will covenant to take and pursue all actions permissible under Applicable Laws to cause the Assessments to be collected and the liens thereof enforced continuously, in the manner and to the maximum extent permitted by Applicable Laws, and to cause no reduction, abatement or exemption in the Assessments, provided that the City is not required to expend any funds for collection and enforcement of Assessments other than funds on deposit in the Administrative Fund. Pursuant to the Indenture, Foreclosure Proceeds (excluding Delinquent Collection Costs) constitute Pledged Revenues to be deposited into the Pledged Revenue Fund upon receipt by the City and distributed in accordance with the Indenture. See “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture.” See also “APPENDIX D-1 – Form of City Disclosure Agreement” for a description of the expected timing of certain events with respect to collection of the delinquent Assessments. In the Indenture, the City creates the Prepayment and Delinquency Reserve Account under the Reserve Fund and will fund such account as provided in the Indenture. The City will not be obligated to fund foreclosure proceedings out of any funds other than in the Administrative Fund. If Pledged Revenues are insufficient to pay foreclosure costs, the owners of the Bonds may be required to pay amounts necessary to continue foreclosure proceedings. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS – Delinquency and Prepayment Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund,” “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture” and “APPENDIX B – Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” 35 ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION DATA IN THE DISTRICT Collection and Delinquency History of Improvement Area #1 Assessments THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS SET FORTH, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, INFORMATION REGARDING COLLECTION HISTORY FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 OF THE DISTRICT RELATING TO THE IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENTS. THE IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENTS ARE NOT PLEDGED TO AND WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF THE BONDS. NO ASSURANCES CAN BE MADE THAT COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENTS WILL REFLECT THE HISTORICAL COLLECTION OF THE IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENTS. As of May 1, 2026, annual installment delinquencies of Improvement Area #1 Assessments were as follows: (i) delinquent for greater than six months: $0; (ii) delinquent for greater than one year: $0; (iii) delinquent for greater than two years: $0. The following table shows the collection and delinquency history in Improvement Area #1 of the District: COLLECTION AND DELINQUENCY HISTORY OF THE IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENTS IN IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 OF THE DISTRICT Fiscal Year Ending 9/30 Assessment Levie Parcels Levie Delinquent Amount as of 3/1 (following ear) Delinquent Percentage as of 3/1 (following ear) Delinquent Amount as of 9/1 (following ear) Delinquent Percentage as of 9/1 (following ear) Assessments Collected(1) 2022 $82,000.01 5 $0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $82,000.01 2023 $929,656.47 5 $0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $929,656.47 2024 $974,020.61 499 $4,047.70 0.42% 0.00% 0.00% $974,020.61 2025 $939,202.00 499 $17,563.50 1.87% /A /A $921,637.53 2026(2) $939,845.54 499 $14,305.22 1.53% /A /A $925,540.32 __________________ (1) Does not include interest and penalties. (2) Reflects collections as of March 1, 2026. Source: The Administrator Foreclosure History As of May 1, 2026, there has never been a foreclosure sale of any of the assessed property within Improvement Area #1 of the District. Prepayment History of Assessments As of May 1, 2026, there have been no prepayments of the Improvement Area #1 Assessments. Collection and Delinquency History of Major Improvement Area Assessments THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS SET FORTH, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, INFORMATION REGARDING COLLECTION HISTORY FOR THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA OF THE DISTRICT RELATING TO THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS LEVIED WITHIN THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA. THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS ARE NOT PLEDGED TO AND WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF THE BONDS. NO ASSURANCES CAN BE MADE THAT COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENTS WILL REFLECT THE HISTORICAL COLLECTION OF THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS. As of May 1, 2026, Annual Installment delinquencies were as follows: (i) delinquent for greater than six months: $0; (ii) delinquent for greater than one year: $0; (iii) delinquent for greater than two years: $0. The following table shows the collection and delinquency history in the Major Improvement Area of the District: 36 COLLECTION AND DELINQUENCY HISTORY OF THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS Fiscal Year Ending 9/30 Assessment Levie Parcels Levie Delinquent Amount as of 3/1 (following ear) Delinquent Percentage as of 3/1 (following ear) Delinquent Amount as of 9/1 (following ear) Delinquent Percentage as of 9/1 (following ear) Assessments Collected(1) 2022 $49,480.01 6 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 0.00% $49,480.01 2023 $32,092.98 6 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 0.00% $32,092.98 2024 $227,424.10 5 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 0.00% $227,424.10 2025 $231,229.81 5 $0.00 0.00% /A /A $231,229.81 2026(2) $228,579.16 5 $0.00 0.00% /A /A $228,579.16 __________________ (1) Does not include interest and penalties. (2) Reflects collections as of March 1, 2026. Source: The Administrator Foreclosure History As of May 1, 2026, there has never been a foreclosure sale of any of the assessed property within the Major Improvement Area of the District. Prepayment History of Major Improvement Area Assessments As of March 17, 2026, the Developer prepaid the Major Improvement Area Assessments in full in the amount of $2,376,991.67. THE CITY Background The City is located in north central Collin County, 40 miles north of Dallas and 12 miles northwest of the City of McKinney. Access to the City is provided by State Highway 121, State Highway 5, US-75, and Farm Road 455. The City covers approximately 15 square miles. Some of the services that the City provides are public safety (police and fire protection), streets, water and sanitary sewer utilities, planning and zoning, and general administrative services. The 2020 Census population for the City was 16,896, and the current estimated population is 34,100. City Government The City is a political subdivision and municipal corporation of the State, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State, including the City's Home Rule Charter. The City was incorporated in 1913, and first adopted its Home Rule Charter on May 7, 2005. The City operates under a Council/Manager form of government with a City Council comprised of the Mayor and six Councilmembers elected for staggered three-year terms. The City Manager is the Chief Administrative Officer for the City. The current members of the City Council and their respective expiration of terms of office and the principal administrators of the City are listed on page ii hereof. City Water and Wastewater System The City will provide both water and wastewater service to the District. The City’s existing water and wastewater systems are sufficient to serve all of the property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The City is currently served by ground water through nine water wells located at five different sites. These nine wells produce a total of 3.4 million gallons per day. The City has a total elevated storage capacity of 1,500,000 gallons of water and five ground storage tanks with total storage capacity of 2,500,000 gallons. 37 In partnership with the cities of Melissa, Van Alstyne, and Howe, Texas, the City is connected to a large diameter water transmission line managed by the Greater Texoma Utility Authority (“GTUA”). The GTUA line provides a connection to the North Texas Municipal Water District’s (“NTMWD”) water distribution system, providing the City with access to treated surface water. This surface water line is part of the City’s long term water supply plan. Currently the City has a maximum allowable take of 5,040 gallons per minute (“gpm”) from the GTUA connection, providing the City with a maximum peak flow of treated water supply of 6,706 gpm. Both GTUA and the City are working on capital projects which will increase the maximum treated water supply and storage. GTUA expanded its Bloomdale Pump Station vault, which increased the GTUA total maximum flow to over 9,000 gpm. The City has completed an expansion of its Collin Pump Station site, which brought the existing 1- million-gallon ground storage tank and new pumps online with adjacent wells to maximize storage and flow. The City is currently constructing a 4-million-gallon ground storage tank at the Collin Pump Station site to further increase storage capacity to a total of 6.5 million gallons. Additional water system expansion projects are identified in the City’s capital improvement plan and the GTUA/CGMA capital improvement plan. The Development requires the dedication to the City of a 1.5-3 acre site to be used as a site for a water tower and/or a fire station. The site will be dedicated to the City in 2026 and, assuming it is used for a water tower, will increase storage capacity by 2 million gallons. The City’s sanitary sewer system consists of seven lift stations and two wastewater treatment facilities, being the John R. Geren (Slayter Creek) Wastewater Treatment Plant on the east side of US 75 and the newly constructed Hurricane Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant on the west side of US 75. In addition, the City has two large diameter sewer transmission lines that transport wastewater directly into the NTMWD’s wastewater system to the South (Wilson Creek plant). The Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on Slayter Creek, just north of the confluence of Slayter Creek and Throckmorton Creek. The total treatment capacity of the City’s facility is approximately 0.50 million gallons per day (“gpd”). A portion of the NTMWD regional sewer is located along Throckmorton Creek, in the south-central part of the City and the other is located near Clemmons Creek in the southeastern part of the City. The Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently near capacity. The transmission lines will soon be near capacity. The City recently completed the Slayter Creek Interceptor Sewer project which now conveys wastewater flows in excess of the Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment capacity to the NTMWD regional wastewater system. The City recently completed the initial phase of a new Hurricane Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which will significantly expand the City’s ability to collect and treat wastewater required for new development west of US 75. The temporary treatment plan has been operational since March 2025 and can treat up to 0.5 mgd, while the reaming phases are finished. In July 2025, the City issued certificates of obligation to fund the first full phase of the new Hurricane Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is expected to have a capacity to treat 2 mgd of wastewater, with plans to gradually expand the plant’s capacity to 16 mgd. The City will use the new plant to treat wastewater for its own residents as well as provide wholesale treatment for the cities of Van Alstyne and Weston and various water districts in the area. Major Employers The major employers in the City are set forth in the table below. Emplo e Product or Service Emplo ees Anna ISD Education 1,057 Walmar Retail 453 Cit of Anna Governmen 203 Pate Rehab Medical 168 Texas Roadhouse Restauran 143 Home Depo Retail 134 Chic -Fil-A Restauran 97 Brookshire’s Retail 94 Love’s Travel Stop Retail 56 McDonalds Restauran 49 Source: City of Anna 2025 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 38 Historical Employment in Collin County Average Annual 2026(1) 2025 2024 2023 2022 Civilian Labor Force 703,207 703,565 691,133 665,876 636,637 Total Emplo e 676,211 676,281 664,644 641,544 615,503 Total Unemplo e 26,996 27,284 26,489 24,332 21,134 Unemplo ment Rate 3.8% 3.9% 3.8% 3.7% 3.3% _____________ Source: Texas Workforce Commission. (1) Data through March 2026. Surrounding Economic Activity The major employers of municipalities surrounding the City are set forth in the table below. Source: Municpal Advisory Council of Texas THE DISTRICT General The PID Act authorizes municipalities, such as the City, to create public improvement districts within their boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction, and to impose assessments within the public improvement district to pay for certain improvements. The District was created by the Creation Resolution for the purpose of undertaking and 39 financing the cost of certain public improvements within the District, including the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, authorized by the PID Act and approved by the City Council that confer a special benefit on the District property being developed. The District is not a separate political subdivision of the State and is governed by the City Council. A map of the property within the District is included on page v hereof. Powers and Authority Pursuant to the PID Act, the City may establish and create the District and undertake, or reimburse a developer for the costs of, improvement projects that confer a special benefit on property located within the District, whether located within the City limits or the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction. The District is currently located entirely within the corporate limits of the City. The PID Act provides that the City may levy and collect Assessments on property in the District, or portions thereof, payable in periodic installments based on the benefit conferred by an improvement project to pay all or part of its cost. Pursuant to the PID Act and the Creation Resolution, the City has the power to undertake, or reimburse a developer for the costs of, the financing, acquisition, construction or improvement of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements. See “THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS.” Pursuant to the authority granted by the PID Act and the Creation Resolution, the City has determined to undertake the construction, acquisition or purchase of certain road, water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage public improvements within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District comprising the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements and to finance a portion of the costs thereof through the issuance of the Bonds. The City has further determined to provide for the payment of debt service on the Bonds through Pledged Revenues. See “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” herein and “APPENDIX B — Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS General The Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements consist of the costs of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements, the Improvement #3 Improvements and the Improvement Area #4 Improvements. The Developer is responsible for the completion of the construction of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements. The City will pay a portion of the project costs for the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements from proceeds of the Bonds. Improvement Area #2 Improvements. The Improvement Area #2 Improvements, a portion of which are being financed with proceeds of the Bonds, include road, water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements benefitting only Improvement Area #2 of the District. Water improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2. Sanitary sewer improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2. Storm drainage improvements: Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #2. Street improvements: Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for roadways, testing, and barrier-free ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, intersections, and re-vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #2. 40 Soft Costs: Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #2 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #2 Improvements. Improvement Area #3 Improvements. The Improvement Area #3 Improvements, a portion of which are being financed with proceeds of the Bonds, include road, water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements benefitting only Improvement Area #3 of the District. Water improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #3. Sanitary sewer improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #3. Storm drainage improvements: Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #3. Street improvements: Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for roadways, testing, and barrier-free ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, intersections, and re-vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #3. Soft Costs: Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #3 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #3 Improvements. Improvement Area #4 Improvements. The Improvement Area #4 Improvements, a portion of which are being financed with proceeds of the Bonds, include road, water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements benefitting only Improvement Area #4 of the District. Water improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #4. Sanitary sewer improvements: Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #4. Storm drainage improvements: Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #4. Street improvements: Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for roadways, testing, and barrier-free ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, intersections, and re-vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #4. Soft Costs: Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #4 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, 41 contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #4 Improvements. The total costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements (including costs of issuance of the Bonds) are expected to be approximately $10,031,048∗. A portion of such costs is expected to be financed from proceeds of the Bonds. The remainder of such costs has been and will be financed by the Developer. See “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS” and “APPENDIX C – Service and Assessment Plan.” The following table reflects the estimated total costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ∗ Preliminary; subject to change. 42 % Cost % Cost % Cost % Cost % Cost Major Improvements[c] Water 621,765$ -$ 621,765$ 50.96% 316,872$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 49.04% 304,893$ Sanitary Sewer 281,025 - 281,025 50.96% 143,220 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 49.04% 137,805 Storm Drainage 653,700 - 653,700 50.96% 333,147 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 49.04% 320,553 Street 1,673,701 - 1,673,701 50.96% 852,974 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 49.04% 820,727 Soft Costs[b]1,264,720 - 1,264,720 50.96% 644,544 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 49.04% 620,176 Contingency 113,172 - 113,172 50.96% 57,676 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 49.04% 55,496 4,608,083$ -$ 4,608,083$ 2,348,433$ -$ -$ -$ 2,259,650$ Improvement Area #1 Improvements Water 1,130,975$ -$ 1,130,975$ 100.00% 1,130,975$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ Sanitary Sewer 1,515,886 - 1,515,886 100.00% 1,515,886 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Storm Drainage 928,453 - 928,453 100.00% 928,453 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Street 4,120,809 - 4,120,809 100.00% 4,120,809 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Soft Costs[b]1,431,205 - 1,431,205 100.00% 1,431,205 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Contingency 188,896 - 188,896 100.00% 188,896 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 9,316,223$ -$ 9,316,223$ 9,316,223$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement Area #2 Improvements Water 494,147$ -$ 494,147$ 0.00% -$ 100.00% 494,147$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ Sanitary Sewer 444,037 - 444,037 0.00% - 100.00% 444,037 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Storm Drainage 342,204 - 342,204 0.00% - 100.00% 342,204 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Street 1,362,540 - 1,362,540 0.00% - 100.00% 1,362,540 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - District Formation Costs 130,000 - 130,000 0.00% - 100.00% 130,000 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Soft Costs[b]381,388 - 381,388 0.00% - 100.00% 381,388 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 3,154,316$ -$ 3,154,316$ -$ 3,154,316$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement Area #3 Improvements Water 377,616$ -$ 377,616$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 100.00% 377,616$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ Sanitary Sewer 388,073 - 388,073 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 388,073 0.00% - 0.00% - Storm Drainage 234,260 - 234,260 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 234,260 0.00% - 0.00% - Street 645,546 - 645,546 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 645,546 0.00% - 0.00% - District Formation Costs 105,000 - 105,000 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 105,000 0.00% - 0.00% - Soft Costs[b]333,432 - 333,432 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 333,432 0.00% - 0.00% - 2,083,927$ -$ 2,083,927$ -$ -$ 2,083,927$ -$ -$ Improvement Area #4 Improvements Water 392,946$ -$ 392,946$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 100.00% 392,946$ 0.00% -$ Sanitary Sewer 344,196 - 344,196 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 344,196 0.00% - Storm Drainage 244,379 - 244,379 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 244,379 0.00% - Street 1,194,908 - 1,194,908 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 1,194,908 0.00% - District Formation Costs 135,000 - 135,000 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 135,000 0.00% - Soft Costs[b]416,806 - 416,806 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 100.00% 416,806 0.00% - 2,728,234$ -$ 2,728,234$ -$ -$ -$ 2,728,234$ -$ Private Costs Earthwork 2,243,284$ 2,243,284$ -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ 0.00% -$ Retaining Walls 1,994,505 1,994,505 - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Screen Walls and Entry Monument 500,000 500,000 - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Landscaping and Irrigation 800,000 800,000 - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - Miscellaneous[b]1,443,640 1,443,640 - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 6,981,429$ 6,981,429$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Bond Issuance Costs - IA#1 Initial Bonds and MIA Bonds Debt Service Reserve Fund 773,690$ -$ 773,690$ 575,460$ -$ -$ -$ 198,230$ Capitalized Interest 705,464 - 705,464 409,547 - - - 295,917 Underwriter's Discount 245,920 - 245,920 188,000 - - - 57,920 Underwriter's Counsel 122,960 - 122,960 94,000 - - - 28,960 Cost of Issuance 763,286 - 763,286 569,883 - - - 193,404 2,611,321$ -$ 2,611,321$ 1,836,890$ -$ -$ -$ 774,431$ Bond Issuance Costs - IA#1 Additional Bonds Debt Service Reserve Fund 278,451$ -$ 278,451$ 278,451$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Underwriter's Discount 107,790 - 107,790 107,790 - - - - Cost of Issuance 269,918 - 269,918 269,918 - - - - PID Administration Bond Preparation 12,290 - 12,290 12,290 - - - - 668,450$ -$ 668,450$ 668,450$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Bond Issuance Costs - Improvement Area #2-4 Bonds Debt Service Reserve Fund 718,502$ -$ 718,502$ -$ 278,977$ 178,371$ 261,154$ -$ Capitalized Interest 266,667 - 266,667 - - - 266,667 - Underwriter's Discount[d]296,310 - 296,310 - 115,050 73,560 107,700 - Cost of Issuance 663,092 - 663,092 - 257,463 164,615 241,015 - 1,944,571$ -$ 1,944,571$ -$ 651,489$ 416,546$ 876,536$ -$ Other Costs Deposit to Administrative Fund 190,000$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 35,000$ 190,000$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 35,000$ Total 34,286,555$ 6,981,429$ 27,115,125$ 14,204,996$ 3,845,805$ 2,540,473$ 3,644,770$ 3,069,081$ Private Costs Improvement Area #1 Projects Major Improvement Area ProjectsTotal Costs[a] Improvement Area #2 Projects Improvement Area #3 Projects Improvement Area #4 ProjectsAuthorized Improvements 43 Footnotes: [a] The costs of the Improvement Area #1 Improvements and the Major Improvements are as provided and determined in the 2018 Assessment Ordinances and updated in the 2025 Amended and Restated Service and Assessment Plan. The costs of Improvement Area #2 Improvements, Improvement Area #3 Improvements, and Improvement Area #4 Improvements are as provided in the Engineer's Report dated 11/4/2025 and subject to change, attached hereto as Appendix A. Authorized Improvement costs are estimates and will be updated with each Annual Service Plan Update, or the Service and Assessment Plan as amended. [b] Miscellaneous costs and soft costs include entitlements, development agreement, district creation, engineering & surveying, SWPPP, preliminary platting fee, final platting fee, maintenance bond, engineering review fee, inspection fee, and geotechnical testing. [c] The Major Improvements were allocated between Improvement Area #1 and the Major Improvement Area at the time the City Council approved the 2018 Assessment Ordinance based on the ratio of Estimated Buildout Value of each area to the Estimated Buildout Value of the District. [d] Includes the fee of counsel to the Underwriter. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 44 Ownership and Maintenance of Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements The Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements have been or will be dedicated to and accepted by the City and constitute a portion of the City’s infrastructure improvements. The City will provide for the ongoing operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements constructed and conveyed, as outlined in the Service and Assessment Plan. THE DEVELOPMENT The following information has been provided by the Developer. Certain of the following information is beyond the direct knowledge of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor and the Underwriter, and none of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor or the Underwriter have any way of guaranteeing the accuracy of such information. Overview The Development is an approximately 290-acre master planned project located within the corporate limits of the City, west of US-75 and north of Farm-to-Market Road 455, and north of the existing Villages of Hurricane Creek Public Improvement District. It is anticipated that the existing W. Rosamond Parkway will be extended westward across US-75 and through the District. The City, located in the north-central region of the Dallas-Fort Worth- Arlington, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (the “DFW MSA”), is poised for significant growth as the overall DFW MSA continues its growth trajectory. The Development is located within the Anna Independent School District. The land within the Development is owned by the Developer, which is an affiliate of Centurion American Custom Homes Inc. d/b/a Centurion American Development Group Inc. (“Centurion”), as described below in “THE DEVELOPER — Description of the Developer.” The Developer develops infrastructure and community improvements (amenities, parks, trails, etc.) and sells residential lots to high-quality production homebuilders under lot takedown contracts. The Development will include a variety of parks, trails, an amenity center and open space areas for its residents and others to enjoy. This combination will provide residents with a community environment in which to live. Development Plan and Status of Development The Developer expects to complete the Development in phases over a 7-year period, with the expected completion of the infrastructure serving the District in Q1 2028. The Developer’s plans consist of the development of the District in phases beginning with the concurrent development of the Major Improvements and the Improvement Area #1 Improvements, followed by phased development of local infrastructure to serve each additional Improvement Area. Construction of the Improvement Area #1 Improvements and the Major Improvements began in Q3 2021 and was completed in Q2 2023. The Improvement Area #1 Improvements and the Major Improvements have been dedicated to and accepted by the City. In addition to the Improvement Area #1 Improvements and the Major Improvements, the Developer has completed construction of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements and the Improvement Area #3 Improvements. Construction of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements began in Q4 2024 and was completed in February 2026. Construction of the Improvement Area #3 Improvements began in Q4 2024 and was completed in February 2026. Grading in Improvement Area #4 commenced in December 2025 and construction of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements began in April 2026. Construction of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements is expected to be completed in Q2 2027. As of April 1, 2026, the Developer expended approximately $3,154,316 to complete the Improvement Area #2 Improvements and $2,083,927 to complete the Improvement Area #3 Improvements, which expenditures were financed with proceeds of the Phase 2 Loan. See “THE DEVELOPER – History and Financing of the District.” Proceeds of the Bonds are expected to pay for a portion of the costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements. See “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS.” The Developer will pay the remainder of the costs of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements without reimbursement from the City. 45 Photographs of Development in the District See APPENDIX G for photographs of completed development within Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3 of the District. Concept Plan On the following page is the current concept plan of the Development as approved by the City. The concept plan is conceptual and subject to change consistent with the City’s zoning and subdivision regulations. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 46 47 Lot Purchase and Sale Agreements in the District The Developer has entered into the Lot PSAs with Mattamy, Beazer, First Texas, Lennar, DR Horton, and Siena for the sale of 861 of the 913 lots in the District, including Lot PSAs for all of the lots in Improvement Areas #2-4 to Mattamy, Lennar, First Texas and Siena, as further described below. As of May 9, 2026, the Developer has sold 484 of the 499 lots in Improvement Area #1, and 51 of the 139 lots in Improvement Areas #2-4 to homebuilders. [DEVELOPER TO CONFIRM MATTAMY CLOSING] Under the Lot PSAs, Beazer, First Texas, Mattamy, and Lennar have previously advanced a total of approximately $5,466,332 in earnest money which was released to the Developer and utilized as part of the funds used to refinance the Acquisition Loan as described under “THE DEVELOPER – History and Financing of The District.” Additionally, DR Horton advanced a total of $90,000 in earnest money under its Lot PSA for Improvement Area #1, which has been released to the Developer. Mattamy has separately deposited $1,217,100 in earnest money at a title company for the benefit of the Developer under the Mattamy Lot PSA, which has been released to the Developer. Such earnest money is secured by a second lien earnest money deed of trust. First Texas has separately deposited $579,600 in earnest money at a title company for the benefit of the Developer under the Lot PSA relating to First Texas’ lots located in Improvement Area #2, which has been released to the Developer. Upon the release of such earnest money, it is expected that the Developer will execute a second lien deed of trust encumbering the applicable property to be purchased in Improvement Area #2. Siena is expected to deposit $500,000 in earnest money under its Lot PSA no later than June 1, 2026 for the townhome lots in Improvement Area #4, which earnest money will be used as a credit at closing of the townhome lots in Improvement Area #4 under the Siena PSA. The Siena PSA also requires the Developer to complete the Amenity Center within 36 months after substantial completion of the lots. Siena is owned and controlled by Mehrdad Moayedi, a Developer principal. See “THE DEVELOPER – Executive Biography” herein The following tables provide a summary of the terms of the Lot PSAs and the takedown schedule in Improvement Areas #2-4 and the Future Improvement Areas. LOT PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENTS IN IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENT AREA Improvement Areas #2-3 Improvement Area Homebuilder Total Lots Lot Size Base Price per Lot* Fees Assessment Limitations Lots per Takedown Lots Closed as of May 9, 2026 2-3 Mattamy 26 40’ $70,000 $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee N/A 15 lots at initial closing; 15 lots at or before 120 days after initial closing, 15 lots each 90-day period thereafter** 15 4 50’ $87,500 23 60’ $105,000 2 Lennar 46 40’ $70,000 $2,000 additional Lot Fee, $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee, $2,000 per lot amendment fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee Assessment shall not exceed $43,000 7 lots at initial closing; 7 lots at or before 120 days after initial closing; 7 lots each 90-day period thereafter** 16 2 First Texas 40 60’ $105,750.00 if under takedown schedule or $100,750.00 if bulk takedown $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee Assessment shall not exceed $65,000 6 lots at initial closing; 6 lots each 90-day period thereafter** 40 Total 139 71 48 * Excludes 6% annual escalator for Mattamy and Lennar and 7% annual escalator for First Texas. **If homebuilder acquires more than the minimum number of lots required to be purchased during any period, then homebuilder shall receive a credit toward homebuilder’s minimum purchase obligations in the immediately following period. Improvement Area #4 Improvement Area Homebuilder Total Lots Lot Size Base Price per Lot* Fees Assessment Limitations Lots per Takedown 4 Siena 115 TH $75,000 $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee N/A 15 lots at initial closing; 15 lots each 90-day period thereafter Total 115 * Excludes 7% annual escalator **If homebuilder acquires more than the minimum number of lots required to be purchased during any period, then homebuilder shall receive a credit toward homebuilder’s minimum purchase obligations in the immediately following period. Future Improvement Area Improvement Area Homebuilder Total Lots Lot Size Base Price per Lot* Fees Assessment Limitations Lots per Takedown Future Lennar 52 60’ $110,000 $2,000 additional Lot Fee, $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee, $2,000 per lot amendment fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee Assessment shall not exceed $65,000 and Annual Installment shall not exceed $3,400 13 lots at initial closing; 13 lots at or before 120 days after initial closing; 13 lots each 90-day period thereafter** Future Beazer 55 70’ $105,000 $1,500 per lot amenity fee, a $500 per lot marketing fee and a $3,400 per lot PID fee Assessment shall not exceed $33,000 7 lots at initial closing, 7 lots each 90-day period thereafter** 5 80’ $120,000 Total 112 * Excludes 6% annual escalator **If homebuilder acquires more than the minimum number of lots required to be purchased during any period, then homebuilder shall receive a credit toward homebuilder’s minimum purchase obligations in the immediately following period. Status of Lot and Home Sales in Improvement Area #1 Set forth below is information regarding home and lot sales in Improvement Area #1 of the District as of March 31, 2026. Status of Home and Lot Sales in Improvement Area #1 Lot Type Qty. Completed Lots Average Lot Price Lots Closed to Homebuilders(2) Homes Under Construction Completed Homes(1) Homes Closed to End Users Average Home Price 40’ 69 69 $46,000 66 5 58 39 $375,000 50’ 340 340 $57,000 338 8 298 285 $400,000 60’ 18 18 $68,000 18 0 18 18 $425,000 Townhome 72 72 $42,000 58 0 47 43 $350,000 Total 499 499 /A 480 13 421 385 /A (1) Includes homes closed to end users. (2) Information excludes 4 additional lots closed to builders after March 31, 2026. 49 Expected Build-Out of the District The Developer expects to complete the Development in multiple phases over a seven-year period. The following tables provide the Developer’s actual and expected build-out schedule for the District. ACTUAL/EXPECTED BUILD-OUT OF THE DISTRICT Improvement Area Sin le-Famil Lots Actual/Expected Start of Internal Infrastructure Actual/Expected Internal Infrastructure Completion Date Expected Final Lot Sale Date 1 499 Q3 2021 Q2 2023 Q4 2025 2 67 Q4 2024 Q1 2026 Q4 2027 3 72 Q4 2024 Q1 2026 Q3 2027 4 115 Q4 2025(1) Q2 2027 Q3 2028 Future 160 Q3 2026 Q1 2028 Q1 2030 Total 913 (1) Grading commenced in Improvement Area #4 in Q4 2025. Construction of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements began in April 2026. The following table sets out the actual (for lots previously conveyed) and expected (for lots not yet conveyed to builders) takedown schedule based on takedown obligations in the Lot PSAs. ACTUAL/EXPECTED ABSORPTION OF LOTS IN THE DISTRICT Improvement Area #1 Improvement Areas #2-3 Actual/Expected Final Sale Date Total Lots Expected Final Sale Date Total Lots Q2 2023 23 Q2 2026 28 Q3 2023 58 Q3 2026 28 Q4 2023 113 Q4 2026 28 Q1 2024 89 Q1 2027 21 Q2 2024 78 Q2 2027 13 Q3 2024 39 Q3 2027 13 Q4 2024 18 Q4 2027 8 Q1 2025 24 Total 139 Q2 2025 20 Q3 2025 20 Q4 2025 17 Total 499 Improvement Area #4 Future Improvement Area Expected Final Sale Date Total Lots Expected Final Sale Date Total Lots Q2 2027 15 Q1 2028 20 Q3 2027 15 Q2 2028 20 Q2 2027 15 Q3 2028 20 Q3 2027 15 Q4 2028 20 Q4 2027 15 Q1 2029 20 Q1 2028 15 Q2 2029 20 Q2 2028 15 Q3 2029 20 Q3 2028 10 Q4 2029 20 Total 115 Total 160 The actual home prices in Improvement Area #1 along with Developer’s current expectations regarding estimated home prices in Improvement Areas #2-4 and the Future Improvement Areas of the District are as follows: 50 ACTUAL/ESTIMATED LOT AND HOME PRICES IN THE DISTRICT Improvement Area # Lot Size (Width in Ft.) Quantity Base Lot Price* Estimated/Actual Average Base Home Price** 1 40’ 69 $46,000 $375,000 50’ 340 $57,000 $400,000 60’ 18 $68,000 $425,000 Townhome 72 $42,000 $350,000 2 50’ 4 $87,000 $450,000 60’ 63 $105,000 $550,000 3 40’ 72 $70,000 $350,000 4 Townhome 115 $60,000 $300,000 Future 60’ 52 $72,000 $575,000 70’ 55 $105,000 $675,000 80’ 26 $120,000 $775,000 Senior Livin 27 $120,000 $603,000 * Excludes annual escalator and additional fees. ** Developer estimates for Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3. Future Improvement Area Bonds Bonds (“Future Improvement Area Bonds”) to finance the cost of local improvements benefitting Future Improvement Areas (“Future Improvement Area Improvements”) are anticipated to be issued in the future. The estimated costs of the Future Improvement Area Improvements will be determined at the same time the Future Improvement Areas are developed, and the Service and Assessment Plan will be updated to identify the Future Improvement Area Improvements to be constructed within the applicable Future Improvement Area and financed by each new series of Future Improvement Area Bonds. Such Future Improvement Area Bonds will be secured by separate assessments levied pursuant to the PID Act on assessable property within the applicable Future Improvement Area. The Developer anticipates that Future Improvement Area Bonds will be issued over a four-year period. The Bonds, the 2021 IA #1 Bonds, the 2025 IA #1 Bonds, and any Future Improvement Area Bonds issued by the City are separate and distinct issues of securities. The City reserves the right to issue Future Improvement Area Bonds for any purpose permitted by the PID Act, including those described above. Development Agreement The City, BFB Ana 40 Acres, LLC (“BFB Ana”) and the Developer entered into the Sherley Tract Subdivision Improvement Agreement effective as of June 9, 2020, as amended by the First Amended Sherley Tract Subdivision Improvement Agreement effective as of July 14, 2020, as amended by the Second Amended Sherley Tract Subdivision Improvement Agreement, effective as of October 11, 2022, as amended by the Third Amendment to Sherley Tract Subdivision Improvement Agreement, effective as of June 24, 2025 (together, the “Development Agreement”) which sets forth certain agreements between the City and the Developer relating to the development of all property within the District, including the Developer’s and the City’s respective contributions to the Development, and agreements relating to the TIRZ (as defined herein) and the issuance of public improvement district bonds for development in the District. The Development Agreement also contains provisions relating to the property owned by BFB Ana which is being developed as commercial development adjacent to the Development. Under the Development Agreement, the Developer is obligated to: • Fund and construct all water, road, and sanitary sewer improvements required to serve the Development not constructed by the City pursuant to the Development Agreement; • Prior to the issuance of a residential building permit for Improvement Area #1, fund and construct Standridge Parkway, the E-W Collector and Shadybrook Trail waterlines described in the Development Agreement. 51 • On or before 150 days after final City acceptance of the Public Infrastructure for each phase, complete construction of the landscaping, screening and entryways for such phase in accordance with City regulations. • Within six (6) years following the effective date of the Development Agreement, obtain building permits and commence construction of a minimum of 10,000 square feet of additional non- residential space to be located on the BFB Ana property. • Prior to the City’s issuance of a building permit for the 401st single-family residential building permit as pertains to residences in the Development, complete construction on the Amenity Center, which shall have exterior masonry of not less than 80% (the “Amenity Center Completion Deadline”). The Developer has completed construction of the Amenity Center. • Within ten (10) months after the City’s acceptance of the Authorized Improvements for each phase, fund and construct the trails for such phase. • Fund and construct a community and botanical garden before the earliest of (i) the City’s issuance of a building permit for the 801st single family residential building permit as pertains to residences in the Development, (ii) six (6) months after construction of the Public Infrastructure necessary to provide access to the community and botanical garden site is completed, or (iii) twelve (12) months after the City’s acceptance of the Public Infrastructure for the third phase of the development. Under the Development Agreement, the City is obligated to fund and construct a 36” regional sewer line known as the Hurricane Creek Regional Trunk Sewer Improvements, and until such construction is finalized, fund pump and haul sanitary sewer service in the Development and the neighboring Villages of Hurricane Creek Public Improvement District, as needed. The City has funded and constructed such improvements. The Development Agreement also sets forth the City’s commitment with respect to the use a portion of funds generated by tax increment reinvestment zones formed within the District, including the TIRZ. The Development Agreement provides that the “Maximum TIRZ Contribution” is an amount estimated to be $14,751,553, which amount is subject to a TIRZ par amount of $6,638,200 plus interest and excluding TIRZ administrative expenses. In addition to the listed Authorized Improvements (as defined in the Development Agreement) in the Development Agreement, qualified public improvement projects such as roads, sewers, drainage, water, right-of-way, real estate acquisition projects, and costs of issuance, capitalized interest, and reserve amounts, totaling $6,638,200 are included in the Maximum TIRZ Contribution and the Authorized Improvements to the extent not already included therein. Improvement Area #1 TIRZ The City has created the TIRZ and was presented with the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number Three, City of Anna (the “TIRZ”) within the District coterminous with the boundaries of Improvement Area #1 of the District and intends to use annual tax increment revenues collected, which tax increment will consist of approximately 50% of all real property taxes levied, assessed and collected within the TIRZ on all real property in the TIRZ taxable by the City therein, to pay that portion of the costs of the infrastructure benefiting Improvement Area #1 of the District on a parcel-by-parcel basis. Such tax increment revenue, to the extent available, is expected to be used by the City to offset Improvement Area #1 Assessments used to pay principal of and interest on the 2021 IA #1 Bonds and the 2025 IA #1 Bonds. Zoning The District is zoned as a planned development district in accordance with Ordinance 932-2021 adopted by the City Council on August 24, 2021 (the “PDD Ordinance”). The PDD Ordinance allows for single-family development with the SF-Z Single Family Residence District – Zero lot line homes, SF-TH Townhome District, SF- 60 Single-Family Residence District, SF-72 Single-Family Residence District, and SF-84 Single-Family Residence District zoning districts within the District. 52 Amenities; Private Improvements The Developer has and will construct certain amenities within the development as part of the costs of the private improvements to serve the District, including hike and bike trails, open space improvements, a dog park, a community and botanical garden, and an amenity center (collectively, the “Amenities”). The amenity center will consist of a swimming pool, a children’s pool, a playground with seating area, ornamental metal fencing, landscaping, a clubhouse with fitness center with weight room and cardiovascular equipment, a kitchen, a meeting area, and restrooms. Construction of the Amenities other than the amenity center and applicable to each phase will be completed on a phase-by-phase basis as each phase is developed. Construction of the Amenities applicable to Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3, excluding the amenity center, were completed in February 2026. Construction of the Amenities allocable to Improvement Area #4 is expected to be completed in Q2 2027. The total costs to complete the Amenities allocable to Improvement Areas #2-4 (excluding the amenity center) are expected to be approximately $1.5 million, which costs have been and will be funded with the Phase 2 Loan and Developer equity. As of April 1, 2026, the Developer had expended $1,035,310 on the Amenities allocable to Improvement Areas #2-4. The Developer began construction of the amenity center in Q2 2024 and completed the amenity center in February 2026. The Developer expended approximately $1,500,000 on constructing the amenity center, which costs were funded with the Acquisition and Development Loan, the Phase 2 Loan and builder amenity fees. The Development Agreement requires the neighborhood trails to be constructed as required or necessary for each phase of the Development, and the Developer shall complete construction of each portion of the Neighborhood Trails within ten (10) months after the City’s acceptance of the Authorized Improvements for the applicable phase. The Development Agreement requires that the community and botanical garden shall be completed on or before the earliest of the following occurrences: (1) the City’s issuance of a building permit for the 801st single-family residential building permit as pertains to residences on the Property, (2) six months after construction of the Public Infrastructure necessary to provide access to the Community and Botanical Garden site is completed, or (3) twelve months after City acceptance of the Public Infrastructure for the third phase of the Development. In addition to the Amenities, the Developer has constructed certain private improvements consisting of earthwork, retaining walls, screen walls and entry monuments, landscaping and irrigation, and other improvements (the “Private Improvements”). The total costs to complete the Private Improvements allocable to Improvement Areas #2-4 are expected to be approximately $2,437,789.40. The Private Improvements allocable to Improvement Areas #2-4 have been and will be financed with the Phase 2 Loan and Developer equity. As of April 1, 2026, the Developer has expended $1,989,685 on the costs of the Private Improvements. The Amenities and Private Improvements have been or will be dedicated to the HOA and the HOA will provide for the ongoing operation, maintenance and repair of the Private Improvements and Amenities through the administration of a maintenance and operation fee and/or a property owner’s association fee to be paid by each lot owner within the District. Education Children in the District will attend schools in the Anna Independent School District (“AISD”) which encompasses 64 square miles. AISD serves the community of Anna and other portions of Collin County. AISD enrolls over 6,000 students in one high school, two middle schools, four elementary schools, and a special programs center. Children in the Development will attend Sue Evelyn Rattan Elementary School (2.8 miles from the District), Clemons Creek Middle School (5 miles from the District), and Anna High School (4.2 miles from the District). According to the Texas Education Agency (“TEA”), AISD, Sue Evelyn Rattan Elementary School and Clemons Creek Middle each received an accountability rating of “C”, and Anna High School received an accountability rating of “A” from the TEA for the 2024-2025 school year. Greatschools.org rates Anna High School a 5/10 and Sue Evelyn Rattan Elementary School a 6/10. Clemons Creek Middle School has not yet received a rating from Greatschools.org. It is expected that a school will be built on site to serve the District in the future, and the Developer and CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC (a Developer affiliate) collectively deeded approximately 15.3 acres to AISD for the 53 construction of such school in May 2025. AISD has begun construction of the school, which is expected to open in Fall 2027. Existing Mineral Rights, Easements and Other Third-Party Property Rights Third parties hold title to certain rights applicable to real property within and around the District (the “Mineral Owners”), including reservations of mineral rights and royalty interests and easements (collectively, the “Third-Party Property Rights”) pursuant to various instruments in the chain of title for various tracts of land within and immediately adjacent to the District. Some of these reservations of mineral rights include a waiver by the Mineral Owners of their right to enter onto the surface of the property to explore, develop, drill, produce or extract minerals within the District. If the waiver is applicable, such Mineral Owners may only develop such mineral interests by means of wells drilled on land outside of the property of the District. The Developer is not aware of any ongoing mineral rights development or exploration on or adjacent to the property within the District. The Developer is not aware of any interest in real property (including mineral rights) owned by the Mineral Owners adjacent to the District. Certain rules and regulations of the Texas Railroad Commission may also restrict the ability of the Mineral Owners to explore or develop the property due to well density, acreage, or location issues. Although the Developer does not expect the above-described Third-Party Property Rights, or the exercise of such rights or any other third-party real property rights in or around the District, to have a material adverse effect on the Development, the property within the District, or the ability of landowners within the District to pay Assessments, the Developer makes no guarantee as to such expectations. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Exercise of Third- Party Property Rights.” Environmental A Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (a “Phase One ESA”) of an assemblage, which included the land within the District, was completed on April 4, 2019. Based on the information presented in the Phase One ESA, there was no evidence that the Development was under environmental regulatory review or enforcement action. The site reconnaissance, regulatory database review and historical source review revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions involving the site. According to the website for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the whooping crane is an endangered species in Collin County. The Developer is not aware of any endangered species located on District property. Flood Designation According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 48085C0155J, revised on June 2, 2009, Panel 155 of 600 (the “FIRM Map”), the special flood hazard area as defined by the FIRM Map is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. The majority of the District is located in Zone X (unshaded), which is not designated a special flood hazard area according to the FIRM Map. According to the FIRM Map legend, Zone X unshaded is defined as areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. However, an approximately 35.7-acre portion of the property, the areas along the Hurricane Creek Tributary, crossing the northwest portion of the District are located in special flood hazard areas subject to inundation by the 100-year flood, defined as Zone A. Zone A is defined as areas within the Special Flood Hazard Area where no base flood elevations have been determined. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply in areas designated as Zone A. All property designated as Zone A in the District is expected to be undeveloped open space and the Developer does not intend to reclaim any such land. A portion of such land, approximately 60.496 acres is located in Improvement Areas #2-4. All land located in the floodplain in Improvement Areas #2-4 is expected to be used as open space. Utilities Water and Wastewater. The City will provide both water and wastewater service to the District. The City’s 54 water distribution system and wastewater collection and treatment system currently have sufficient capacity to provide water and wastewater service to the District. See “THE CITY – City Water and Wastewater System.” Other Utilities. The Developer expects additional utilities to be provided by: (1) Phone/Data - AT&T Spectrum; (2) Electric – Greyson-Collin Electric Cooperative; (3) Cable – AT&T Spectrum; and (4) Natural Gas - Atmos Energy. THE DEVELOPER The following information has been provided by the Developer. Certain of the following information is beyond the direct knowledge of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor and the Underwriter, and none of the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor or the Underwriter have any way of guaranteeing the accuracy of such information. General In general, the activities of a developer in a development such as the District include purchasing the land, designing the subdivision, including the utilities and streets to be installed and any community facilities to be built, defining a marketing program and building schedule, securing necessary governmental approvals and permits for development, arranging for the construction of roads and the installation of utilities (including, in some cases, water, sewer, and drainage facilities, as well as telephone and electric service) and selling improved lots and commercial reserves to builders, developers, or other third parties. The relative success or failure of a developer to perform such activities within a development may have a material effect on the security of revenue bonds, such as the Bonds, issued by a municipality for a public improvement district. A developer is generally under no obligation to a public improvement district, such as the District, to develop the property which it owns in a development. Furthermore, there is no restriction on the developer’s right to sell any or all of the land which the developer owns within a development. In addition, a developer is ordinarily the major tax and assessment payer within a district during its development. Description of the Developer The Developer is an affiliate of Centurion and was created by Centurion for the purpose of managing and ultimately conveying property in the District to third parties, as described under the caption “THE DEVELOPMENT.” The Developer is a nominally capitalized limited liability company, the primary asset of which is unsold property within the District. The Developer will have no source of funds with which to pay Assessments or taxes levied by the City or any other taxing entity other than funds resulting from the sale of property within the District or funds advanced to the Developer by an affiliated party. The Developer’s ability to make full and timely payments of Assessments or taxes will directly affect the City’s ability to meet its obligation to make payments on the Bonds. Since 1990, Centurion has developed over 100,000 single-family lots in dozens of communities surrounding North Texas. It has worked closely with investors, land-owners, financial institutions, and vendors to acquire over 50,000 acres of land inventory for a diverse mix of developments in size and scope. Centurion’s communities include amenities such as parks, golf courses, water park themes, and hiking and biking trails. Over the past thirty years, Centurion has demonstrated the ability to successfully deliver master-planned communities that have been recognized in the real estate industry. Mr. Mehrdad Moayedi has ultimate control of Centurion and its affiliates. Centurion maintains a staff of approximately 50 employees. Centurion creates single-asset limited liability companies to own development sites and contracts with developers and other professionals in the delivery of its communities. In addition, Centurion works closely with local municipalities, commercial developers, and public school systems as part of its overall master plan. Centurion works with North Texas’ top builders to deliver the latest concepts ranging from upscale, luxury homes in secluded neighborhoods to affordable housing communities for first-time home buyers. Centurion purchases and develops land in prime locations with the right mix of natural land settings, strong job growth, good school systems and access to local community shopping. A snapshot of some of the communities Centurion has developed is presented below. 55 Name County Property Type Starting Home Price Status of Development Alpha Ranch Wise/Denton Single-family $400,000 Excavation starting in May 2025 Anna Hurricane Creek* Collin Single-family $390,000 PID Bonds issued; Phase 1: Started 9/2018, Currently Being Develope Anna Hurricane North* Collin Single-family $390,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Arboretum Estates* Kaufman Mixed-use $390,000 Excavation underway. Bear Creek Dallas Single-family $280,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Bryson Ranch* Denton Mixed-use $390,000 Excavation underway. Cartwright Ranch* Kaufman Single-family $290,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Chalk Hill* Collin Single-family $390,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building City Point* Tarrant Mixed-use $390,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Collin Creek Redevelopment* Collin Mixed-use $515,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Cottonwood* Grayson Mixed-use $400,000 Utilities underway. Creekside of Crowley Tarrant Single-family $350,000 Development Ongoing - Mattamy Building Creekview Meadows* Denton Single-family $420,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building "Chaparral Ridge* (Duck Point)" Denton Single-family $390,000 Pre-development process. Edgewood Creek* Denton Single-family $670,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Enchanted Creek Collin Single-family $1,000,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Entrada at Westlake Tarrant Mixed-use $1,100,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Erwin Farms Collin Single-family $529,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Taylor Ranch* Grayson Single-family $400,000 Pre-development process Frisco Hills Denton Single-family $720,000 Development Complete / HB Finishing Up Harper Estates* Collin Single-family $1,280,000 PID Bonds issued; HB Building "Highpoint Village* (Mantua Tract)" Grayson Single-family $380,000 Excavation underway. Iron Horse Village* Dallas Mixed-use $250,000 Development Ongoing / HB Complete Kensington Gardens Dallas Single-family $750,000 Development Ongoing / HB Building "Lakeside Crossing* (Fronterra)" Denton Townhome/Multi- family $365,000 PID Bonds issued; Development Ongoing / Closed all TH lots Lily Creek at Sutton Fields* Collin Single-family $500,000 PID Bonds issued; Development Ongoing Mercer Crossing* Dallas Mixed-use $590,000 Last Phase Going - HB Building Mobberly Farms* Denton Single-family $278,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Montalcino Estates Denton Single-family $1,500,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Northlake Estates* Denton Single-family $570,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Polo Ridge* Kaufman Single-family $480,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Saddlebrook Estates Ellis Single-family $320,000 Next Phase Going Through Engineering Spiritas Ranch East* Denton Single-family $390,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Spiritas Ranch* Denton Single-family $460,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Sutton Fields East* Collin Single-family $490,000 PID Bonds issued; Development Ongoing Sutton Fields* Denton Single-family $480,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Swan Lake Estates Dallas Single-family $850,000 Utilities underway. 56 The Bridges at Preston Crossings Grayson Single-family $700,000 Development Ongoing; New Phase Being Developed "The Estates at Eagle Mountain* (Sheelin)" Tarrant Single-family $490,000 Pre-development process. The Estates at Southfork Ranch Collin Single-Family $2,000,000 Pre-development process. The Resort on Eagle Mountain Lake Tarrant Single $550,000 Development Ongoing - Builder Doing Takedowns Thunder Rock* Burnet Mixed-use $320,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Travis Ranch Kaufman Single-family $290,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building University Hills Dallas Single-family $390,000 Pre-development process Valencia on the Lake* Denton Single-family $500,000 Next Phase Going Through Engineering Verandah Rockwall Single-family $250,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Wade Settlement Collin Single-family $600,000 Last Phase Going - Mattamy Building Walden Pond Kaufman Single/Multi-family $320,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Water’s Edge Denton Single/Multi-family $450,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Waterfront at Enchanted Bay Tarrant Single-family $400,000 Phase 1: Started 5/2005 * Phase 1: Delivered 2/2007 Phase 2: Being Engineered Whitewing Trails* Collin Single-family/Multi- family $400,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Barcelona Collin Single-family $450,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Bloomridge Collin Single-family $400,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Bonds Ranch Tarrant Single-family $250,000 Purchased all Finished Lots / All Lots sold in Q4 2017 Brookfield Denton Single-family $280,000 Sold Land Carter Ranch Collin Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Chateaus of Coppell Dallas Single-family $1,300,000 Development Ongoing - HB Building Creeks of Legacy Denton/Collin Single-family $450,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Crestview at Prosper Creek Collin Single-family $350,000 Complete - Megatel Finishing Construction Crown Valley Parker Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / Sold Phase / Pod Sale Deer Creek North Tarrant Single-family $225,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Dominion Estates Tarrant Single-family $225,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Dove Creek Collin Single-family $450,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Estancia Tarrant Single-family $550,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Estancia Estates Denton Single-family $500,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Falls of Prosper Collin Single-family $500,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Founders Parc Tarrant Single/Multi-family 480,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Frisco Ranch Denton Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Garden Springs Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Hickory Farms* Dallas Single-family TBD Development Complete / HB Complete Highlands Glen Denton Single-family $400,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Hills of Lake Country Tarrant Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Hillstone Pointe* Denton Single-family $350,000 Phase 1: Delivered 12/2017, Remainder Raw Land Sold to Horton & Lenna Kings Ridge (Denton) Denton Single/Multi-family $250,000 Sold Land to DR Horton 57 Knox Ranch Hood Mixed-use $550,000 HB Complete Lakewood Hills Denton Single-family $550,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Lexington Parke Travis Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Llano Springs Tarrant Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete McKinney Greens Collin Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Mountain Creek Dallas Multi-family $325,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Northpointe Crossing Collin Single-family $200,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Oak Hollow Collin Single-family $200,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Ownsby Farms Collin Single-family $400,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Palomar Estates Tarrant Single-family $850,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Preston Hills Collin Single-family $400,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Prestwyck Collin Mixed-use $390,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Residences at the Stoneleigh Dallas Condo $750,000 Development Complete Rolling Meadows Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Phase1: Completed * Phase 2A2 & 3 HB Completed Rosemary Ridge Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Rough Hollow Travis Single-family $600,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Sendera Ranch Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Centurion Owns Future Land / Banking Land Shahan Prairie Denton Single-family $250,000 Sold Land Shale Creek Wise Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Silver Ridge Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Spring Creek Tarrant Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Steeplechase Denton Single-family $500,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Sweetwater Crossing Collin Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Tenison Village at Buckner Terrace Dallas Single-family $450,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Terracina Denton Single-family $500,000 Completed The Dominion Dallas Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / HB Complete The Highlands at Trophy Club Denton Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / HB Complete The Villas at Twin Creeks Collin Single-family $400,000 Completed The Villas of Indian Creek Denton Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Thornbury Travis Single-family $300,000 Development Complete / HB Complete University Place Dallas Single-family $500,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Villages of Woodland Springs Tarrant Single-family $250,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Water’s Edge at Hogan’s Glen Denton Single-family $580,000 Completed/Ashton Finishing Construction Windmill Farms Kaufman Single-family $300,000 HB Complete Williamsburg Rockwall Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / HB Complete Winn Ridge* Denton Single-family $350,000 Development Complete / HB Complete * — developments utilizing public improvement districts Executive Biography Mehrdad Moayedi is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Centurion. Mr. Moayedi has more than thirty years of direct experience in the development industry. With a background in construction and real estate, Mr. Moayedi employs a comprehensive approach to each Centurion development. Mr. Moayedi has extensive knowledge 58 of the interconnection of all parts of residential real estate development, which provides Centurion with a unique advantage over other residential developers. Before forming Centurion in 1990, Mr. Moayedi completed several construction and fee development projects in Northeast Tarrant County, Texas subdivisions as well as various construction and remodeling projects. Centurion has become broadly diversified, with residential developments ranging from upscale high-rise residential towers to affordable housing communities for first-time home buyers. General Development Financing by Centurion Centurion and its various affiliated special purpose entities, including the Developer, utilize a variety of funding sources for the purchase of land and subsequent development or redevelopment thereof. Typically, the applicable Centurion affiliate will obtain an acquisition loan from a lender to fund the acquisition of land. To fund horizontal development of such land, Centurion affiliates use a combination of developer equity, builder earnest money, builder payments under lot contracts, development loans from lending institutions, incentives from local governments (including tax increment grants), public/private partnerships, funds from tax-exempt bonds issued by local governments and backed by special assessments on the developable land and other sources of capital. In 2021, Centurion completed a financing (the “Financing”) under which acquisition loans relating to certain projects (the “Financing Projects”) owned by various Centurion affiliates were refinanced with the proceeds of securities issued by an unaffiliated newly-formed limited liability company created for the purpose of (i) acquiring the property relating to such Financing Projects, (ii) providing funds for limited infrastructure development by the Centurion affiliates related to such Financing Projects and (iii) issuing the bonds secured by inter alia, the property relating to such Financing Projects and certain proceeds derived from lot contracts relating to such Financing Projects. The Financing was completed for the purpose of refinancing loans related to the Financing Projects at a lower rate and achieving debt service savings, terminating certain covenants and freeing up certain collateral related to the refinanced loans, and providing additional funds for development of a portion of the Financing Projects, which funds are expected to be provided at a lower interest rate than development loans typically available relating to the Financing Projects from traditional lenders. Property relating to the Financing Projects is cross-collateralized under the Financing. No property in the District is subject to the Financing. History and Financing of the District The Developer purchased two tracts of land comprising property in the District and certain additional property on April 10, 2019, for $9,700,000 as follows: Tract 1 consisting of 290.877 acres (referred to herein as the “Anna Sherley Property”) and Tract 2 consisting of 34.299 acres. In order to finance a portion of the purchase of the such land, the Developer obtained the Acquisition Loan from the Acquisition Lender. The remainder of the purchase price for the land was paid in cash. The property in Tract 2 was simultaneously sold to BFB Ana 40 Acres, LLC, an unaffiliated entity, on April 10, 2019, for development of commercial property adjacent to the District. In order to finance a portion of the purchase of such land, the Developer obtained the Acquisition Loan in the amount of $5,700,000 from Chambers Bank, the Acquisition Lender. The remainder of the purchase price for the land was paid in cash. On July 21, 2021, the Developer obtained the Acquisition and Development Loan from International Bank of Commerce (the “Lender”), the proceeds of which (i) refinanced a portion of the purchase price of the land and (ii) funded development in the District. The remaining portion of the Acquisition Loan was refinanced using earnest money delivered by homebuilders. The Acquisition and Development Loan has since been repaid with the proceeds of lot sales in Improvement Area #1 of the District. On September 4, 2024, the Developer obtained an additional loan from the Lender for the second phase of development in the District in the principal amount up to $19,768,784.00 (the “Phase 2 Loan”). The Phase 2 Loan is secured, inter alia, by the deed of trust originally filed for the Acquisition and Development Loan as supplemented to refer to the note for the Phase 2 Loan. Such deed of trust includes all of the Developer’s property in the District, including all property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The Phase 2 Loan is personally guaranteed by Mehrdad Moayedi. 59 As of April 1, 2026, the balance of the Phase 2 Loan is $17,083,139.69. Payments on the Phase 2 Loan are interest only payments monthly, with the principal due at maturity. The Phase 2 Loan bears interest at the New York Prime Rate, with a floor of 8.0%. The Phase 2 Loan matures on August 13, 2027. The PID Act provides that the Assessment Lien is a first and prior lien against an Assessed Property within the District and is superior to all other liens and claims except liens or claims for State, county, school district, or municipality ad valorem taxes. Additionally, prior to delivery of the Bonds, the Lender will consent to and acknowledge the creation of the District, the levy of the Assessments and the subordination of the lien securing the Phase 2 Loan to the assessment liens on property within the District securing payment of the Assessments. As a result, the lien on the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District securing the Assessments has priority over the lien on the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District securing the liens in favor of the Lender. THE ADMINISTRATOR The City has selected P3Works, LLC (“P3Works”) as the Administrator for the District. The City has entered into an agreement with the Administrator to provide specialized services related to the administration of the District needed to support the issuance of the Bonds. P3Works will primarily be responsible for preparing the annual update to the Service and Assessment Plan. P3Works is a consulting firm focused on providing district services relating to the formation and administration of public improvement districts, and is based in Austin and North Richland Hills, Texas. The Administrator’s duties will include: • Preparation of the annual update to the Service and Assessment Plan • Preparation of assessment rolls for City billing and collection • Establishing and maintaining a database of all City parcel IDs within the District • Trust account analysis and reconciliation • Property owner inquiries • Determination of Prepayment amounts • Preparation and review of disclosure notices with Dissemination Agent • Review of developer draw requests for reimbursement of authorized improvement costs. The information regarding the Service and Assessment Plan in this Limited Offering Memorandum has been provided by P3Works and has been included in reliance upon the authority of such firm as an expert in the field formation and administration of public improvement districts. APPRAISAL The Appraisal General. Integra Realty Resources – Dallas (the “Appraiser”), prepared an appraisal report for the City effective February 15, 2026 with respect to Improvement Area #2 and Improvement Area #3 and March 15, 2027 with respect to Improvement Area #4, based upon a physical inspection of the District conducted on January 17, 2026 (the “Appraisal”). The Appraisal was prepared at the request of the City and the Underwriter. The description herein of the Appraisal is intended to be a brief summary only of the Appraisal as it relates to Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The Appraisal is attached hereto as APPENDIX E and should be read in its entirety. The conclusions reached in the Appraisal are subject to certain assumptions, hypothetical conditions and qualifications, which are set forth therein. See “APPENDIX E — Appraisal.” Value Estimates. The Appraiser estimated the prospective market value of the simple interests in the various tracts of land in Improvement Area #2 of the District upon completion of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements, Improvement Areas #3 of the District upon completion of the Improvement Area #3 Improvements, and Improvement 60 Areas #4 of the District upon completion of the Improvement Area #4 Improvements. See “PLAN OF FINANCE” and “THE DEVELOPMENT – Development Plan and Status of Development.” The Appraisal does not reflect the as-is condition of the Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District as the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements have not yet been constructed. Moreover, the Appraisal does not reflect the value of the Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District as if sold to a single purchaser in a single transaction. See “APPENDIX E — APPRAISAL.” The estimate of the prospective market value for the various parcels of assessable property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District using the methodologies described in the Appraisal and subject to the limiting conditions and assumptions set forth in the Appraisal, as of their respective effective dates are as follows: Property Valued Estimated Cumulative Retail Market Value Prospective Cumulative Retail Market Value of Improvement Area #2 as of February 15, 2026 $7,960,000 Prospective Cumulative Retail Market Value of Improvement Area #3 as of February 15, 2026 $6,048,000 Prospective Cumulative Retail Market Value of Improvement Area #4 as of March 15, 2027 $6,612,500 Total $20,620,500 The value estimates for the assessable property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District utilize the methodologies described in the Appraisal and are subject to the limiting conditions and assumptions set forth in the Appraisal. See “APPENDIX E — Appraisal.” None of the City, the Developer, the Municipal Advisor, or the Underwriter makes any representation as to the accuracy, completeness assumptions or information contained in the Appraisal. The assumptions and qualifications with respect to the Appraisal are contained therein. There can be no assurance that any such assumptions will be realized and the City, the Developer and the Underwriter make no representation as to the reasonableness of such assumptions. BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS Before purchasing any of the Bonds, prospective investors and their professional advisors should carefully consider all of the risk factors described below which may create possibilities wherein interest may not be paid when due or that the Bonds may not be paid at maturity or otherwise as scheduled, or, if paid, without premium, if applicable. The following risk factors (which are not intended to be an exhaustive listing of all possible risks associated with an investment in the Bonds) should be carefully considered prior to purchasing any of the Bonds. Moreover, the order of presentation of the risks summarized below does not necessarily reflect the significance of such investment risks. General THE BONDS ARE SPECIAL, LIMITED OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE PLEDGED REVENUES AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. THE BONDS DO NOT GIVE RISE TO A CHARGE AGAINST THE GENERAL CREDIT OR TAXING POWER OF THE CITY AND ARE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE SOURCES IDENTIFIED IN THE INDENTURE. THE OWNERS OF THE BONDS SHALL NEVER HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND PAYMENT THEREOF OUT OF MONEY RAISED OR TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION, OR OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE TRUST ESTATE, AS AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN THE INDENTURE. NO OWNER OF THE BONDS SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND ANY EXERCISE OF THE CITY’S TAXING POWER TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE BONDS OR THE INTEREST OR REDEMPTION PREMIUM, IF ANY, THEREON. THE CITY SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL OR 61 MORAL OBLIGATION TO PAY THE BONDS OUT OF ANY FUNDS OF THE CITY OTHER THAN THE PLEDGED REVENUES, AND OTHER FUNDS COMPRISING THE TRUST ESTATE. The ability of the City to pay debt service on the Bonds as due is subject to various factors that are beyond the City’s control. These factors include, among others, (a) the ability or willingness of property owners within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay Assessments levied by the City, (b) cash flow delays associated with the institution of foreclosure and enforcement proceedings against property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, (c) general and local economic conditions which may impact real property values, the ability to liquidate real property holdings and the overall value of real property development projects, and (d) general economic conditions which may impact the general ability to market and sell the lots within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, it being understood that poor economic conditions within the City, State and region may slow the assumed pace of sales of such lots. The rate of development of the property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District is directly related to the vitality of the residential housing industry. In the event that the sale of the lands within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District should proceed more slowly than expected and the Developer is unable to pay the Assessments, only the value of the lands, with improvements, will be available for payment of the debt service on the Bonds, and such value can only be realized through the foreclosure or expeditious liquidation of the lands within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. There is no assurance that the value of such lands will be sufficient for that purpose and the expeditious liquidation of real property through foreclosure or similar means is generally considered to yield sales proceeds in a lesser sum than might otherwise be received through the orderly marketing of such real property. The Underwriter is not obligated to make a market in or repurchase any of the Bonds, and no representation is made by the Underwriter, the City or the City’s Municipal Advisor that a market for the Bonds will develop and be maintained in the future. If a market does develop, no assurance can be given regarding future price maintenance of the Bonds. The City has not applied for or received a rating on the Bonds. The absence of a rating could affect the future marketability of the Bonds. There is no assurance that a secondary market for the Bonds will develop or that holders who desire to sell their Bonds prior to the stated maturity will be able to do so. Deemed Representations and Acknowledgment by Investors Each Investor will be deemed to have acknowledged and represented to the City the matters set forth under the heading “LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO INITIAL PURCHASERS” which include, among others, a representation and acknowledgment that the purchase of the Bonds involves investment risks, certain of which are set forth under this heading “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” and elsewhere herein, and such Investor, either alone or with its purchaser representative(s) (as defined in Rule 501(h) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933), has sophisticated knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and the capacity to evaluate such risks in making an informed investment decision to purchase the Bonds, and the Investor can afford a complete loss of its investment in the Bonds. Assessment Limitations Annual Installments of Assessments are billed to property owners in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. Annual Installments are due and payable, and bear the same penalties and interest for non-payment, as for ad valorem taxes as described under “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” herein. Additionally, Annual Installments established by the Service and Assessment Plan correspond in number and proportionate amount to the number of installments and principal amounts of Bonds maturing in each year, the annual payment of the payment obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement, and the annual collection costs for such year. See “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” herein. The unwillingness or inability of a property owner to pay regular property tax bills as evidenced by property tax delinquencies may also indicate an unwillingness or inability to make regular property tax payments and Annual Installments of Assessment payments in the future. In order to pay debt service on the Bonds, it is necessary that Annual Installments are paid in a timely manner. Due to the lack of predictability in the collection of Annual Installments in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, 62 the City has established a Reserve Account in the Reserve Fund, to be funded from the proceeds of the Bonds, to cover delinquencies. The Annual Installments are secured by the Assessment Lien. However, there can be no assurance that foreclosure proceedings will occur in a timely manner so as to avoid depletion of the Reserve Account and delay in payments of debt service on the Bonds. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Bondholders’ Remedies and Bankruptcy” herein. Upon an ad valorem tax lien foreclosure event of a property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, any lien securing an Assessment that is delinquent will be foreclosed upon in the same manner as the ad valorem tax lien (assuming all necessary conditions and procedures for foreclosure are duly satisfied). To the extent that a foreclosure sale results in insufficient funds to pay in full both the delinquent ad valorem taxes and the delinquent Assessments, the liens securing such delinquent ad valorem taxes and delinquent Assessments would likely be extinguished. Any remaining unpaid balance of the delinquent Assessments would then be an unsecured personal liability of the original property owner. Based upon the language of Texas Local Government Code, §372.017(b), case law relating to other types of assessment liens and opinions of the Texas Attorney General, the Assessment Lien as it relates to installment payments that are not yet due should remain in effect following an ad valorem tax lien foreclosure, with future installment payments not being accelerated. Texas Local Government Code § 372.018(d) supports this position, stating that an Assessment Lien runs with the land and the portion of an assessment payment that has not yet come due is not eliminated by foreclosure of an ad valorem tax lien. The Assessment Lien is superior to any homestead rights of a property owner that were properly claimed after the adoption of the Assessment Ordinance. However, an Assessment Lien may not be foreclosed upon if any Pre-existing Homestead Rights were properly claimed prior to the adoption of the Assessment Ordinance for as long as such Pre-existing Homestead Rights are maintained on the property. It is unclear under Texas law whether or not Pre-existing Homestead Rights would prevent the Assessment Lien from attaching to such homestead property or instead cause the Assessment Lien to attach, but remain subject to, the Pre-existing Homestead Rights. Under Texas law, in order to establish homestead rights, the claimant must show a combination of both overt acts of homestead usage and intention on the part of the owner to claim the land as a homestead. Mere ownership of the property alone is insufficient and the intent to use the property as a homestead must be a present one, not an intention to make the property a homestead at some indefinite time in the future. As of the date of adoption of the Assessment Ordinance, no such homestead rights will have been claimed. Furthermore, the Developer is not eligible to claim homestead rights and the Developer has represented that it will own all property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District as of the date of the Assessment Ordinance. Consequently, there are and can be no homestead rights on the Assessed Parcels superior to the Assessment Lien and, therefore, the Assessment Liens may be foreclosed upon by the City. Failure by owners of the parcels to pay Annual Installments when due, depletion of the Reserve Fund, delay in foreclosure proceedings, or the inability of the City to sell parcels which have been subject to foreclosure proceedings for amounts sufficient to cover the delinquent installments of Assessments levied against such parcels may result in the inability of the City to make full or punctual payments of debt service on the Bonds. THE ASSESSMENTS WILL CONSTITUTE A FIRST AND PRIOR LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ASSESSED, SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER LIENS AND CLAIMS EXCEPT LIENS AND CLAIMS FOR STATE, COUNTY, SCHOOL DISTRICT OR MUNICIPALITY AD VALOREM TAXES AND WILL BE A PERSONAL OBLIGATION OF AND CHARGE AGAINST THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 OF THE DISTRICT. Failure or Inability to Complete Proposed Development Proposed development within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District may be affected by changes in general economic conditions, fluctuations in the real estate market and interest rates, changes in the income tax treatment of real property ownership, unexpected increases in development costs and other similar factors as well as availability of utilities and the development or existence of environmental concerns with such land. See “– Hazardous Substances” below. There can be no assurances that other similar projects will not be developed in the future or that existing 63 projects will not be upgraded or otherwise able to compete with the Development. A slowdown of the development process and the related absorption rate within the Development because of any or all of the foregoing could affect adversely land values. THE TIMELY PAYMENT OF THE BONDS DEPENDS UPON THE WILLINGNESS AND ABILITY OF THE DEVELOPER AND ANY SUBSEQUENT OWNERS TO PAY THE ASSESSMENTS WHEN DUE. ANY OR ALL OF THE FOREGOING COULD REDUCE THE WILLINGNESS AND THE ABILITY OF SUCH OWNERS TO PAY THE ASSESSMENTS AND COULD GREATLY REDUCE THE VALUE OF PROPERTY WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 OF THE DISTRICT IN THE EVENT SUCH PROPERTY HAS TO BE FORECLOSED. In that event, there could be a default in the payment of the Bonds. Completion of Homes The cost and time for completion of homes by the homebuilders is uncertain and may be affected by changes in national, regional and local and economic conditions; changes in long and short term interest rates; changes in the climate for real estate purchases; changes in demand for or supply of competing properties; changes in local, regional and national market and economic conditions; unanticipated development costs, market preferences and architectural trends; unforeseen environmental risks and controls; the adverse use of adjacent and neighboring real estate; changes in interest rates and the availability of mortgage funds to buyers of the homes yet to be built in the Development, which may render the sale of such homes difficult or unattractive; acts of war, terrorism or other political instability; delays or inability to obtain governmental approvals; changes in laws; moratorium; force majeure (which may result in uninsured losses); strikes; labor shortages; energy shortages; material shortages; inflation; adverse weather conditions; subcontractor defaults; and other unknown contingencies and factors beyond the control of the Developer. Risks Related to the Current Residential Real Estate Market The real estate market is currently experiencing a slowdown in new home sales and home closings due in part to rising inflation and higher mortgage interest rates. Inflation and interest rates remain subject to volatility stemming from energy price fluctuations, geopolitical instability in the Middle East, and the uncertain effects of tariffs and retaliatory trade actions. Downturns in the real estate market, mortgage rates, and other factors beyond the control of the Developer, including general economic conditions, may impact the timing of lot and home sales within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. No assurances can be given that projected home prices and buildout values presented in this Limited Offering Memorandum will be realized. Risks Related to Current Increase in Costs of Building Materials and Labor Shortages As a result of low supply and high demand, shipping constraints, and the ongoing trade war (including tariffs and retaliatory tariffs), there have been substantial increases in the cost of lumber and other materials, causing many homebuilders and general contractors to experience budget overruns. Further, the federal administration’s on-again, off-again tariffs, threatened impositions of tariffs, and the imposition or threatened imposition of retaliatory tariffs against the United States will impact the ability of the homebuilders to estimate costs. If the cost of materials remains elevated, it may impact the ability of homebuilders to construct homes in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The federal administration’s immigration policies may impact the State’s workforce. Undocumented construction workers make up a large percentage of construction workers in the State. Mass deportations or immigration policies that make it challenging for foreign workers to work in the United States may result in labor shortages, particularly in construction. Labor shortages will impact the homebuilders’ ability to construct homes within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. General Risks of Real Estate Investment and Development Investments in undeveloped or developing real estate are generally considered to be speculative in nature and to involve a high degree of risk. The Development will be subject to the risks generally incident to real estate investments and development. Many factors that may affect the Development, including the schedule for and/or the costs of the various improvements to be constructed within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District necessary to serve residents therein, as well as the operating revenues of the Developer, including those derived from the Development, are not within the control of the Developer. Such factors include changes in national, regional and local economic conditions; changes in long and short term interest rates; changes in the climate for real estate purchases; changes in 64 demand for or supply of competing properties; changes in local, regional and national market and economic conditions; unanticipated development costs, market preferences and architectural trends; unforeseen environmental risks and controls; the adverse use of adjacent and neighboring real estate; changes in interest rates and the availability of mortgage funds to buyers of the homes to be built in the Development, which may render the sale of such homes difficult or unattractive; acts of war, terrorism or other political instability; delays or inability to obtain governmental approvals; changes in laws; moratorium; acts of God (which may result in uninsured losses); strikes; labor shortages; energy shortages; material shortages; inflation; adverse weather conditions; contractor or subcontractor defaults; and other unknown contingencies and factors beyond the control of the Developer. A slowdown of the development process and the related absorption rate within the Development because of any or all of the foregoing could affect adversely land values. The timely payment of the Bonds depends on the willingness and ability of the Developer and any subsequent owners to pay the Assessments when due. Any or all of the foregoing could reduce the willingness and ability of such owners to pay the Assessments and could greatly reduce the value of the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District in the event such property has to be foreclosed. If Annual Installments of Assessments are not timely paid and there are insufficient funds in the accounts of the Reserve Fund, a nonpayment could result in a payment default under the Indenture. Absorption Rate There can be no assurance that the Developer will be able to achieve its anticipated absorption rates. Failure to achieve the absorption rate estimates will adversely affect the estimated value of the Development, could impair the economic viability of the Development and could reduce the ability or desire of property owners in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay the Assessments. Availability of Utilities The progress of development within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District is also dependent upon the City providing an adequate supply of water and sufficient capacity for the collection and treatment of wastewater. If the City fails to supply water and wastewater services to the property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, the development of the land in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District could be adversely affected. See “THE DEVELOPMENT — Utilities” and “THE CITY – City Water and Wastewater System.” Portions of the State, including the City and its surrounding area, are experiencing significant growth, which has produced and is expected to continue to produce a growing demand for water and wastewater service. The ability of the City to provide an adequate supply of water and sufficient capacity for treatment of wastewater, as applicable, is dependent on many factors, including, but not limited to, supply and demand of materials to complete necessary water and wastewater improvements, compliance with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality regulations, the effects of extreme weather events on such entities’ water and wastewater systems, and the construction of developments competing with the District. See “THE DEVELOPMENT – Utilities,” “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS – General Risks of Real Estate Investment and Development,” “– Risks Related to Current Increase in Costs of Building Materials and Labor Shortages, “– Competition,” “– Regulation,” and “– Risk from Weather Events.” None of the City, the Municipal Advisor, the Underwriter, or the Developer can predict the impact that such growing demand may have on the City, the District, the projected buildout schedule, availability of water and wastewater service to the District or an investment in the Bonds. State Law Regarding Notice of Assessments The 87th Legislature passed HB 1543, which became effective September 1, 2021, and requires a person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property within a public improvement district to provide to the purchaser of the property, before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, written notice of the obligation to pay public improvement district assessments, in accordance with Section 5.014, Texas Property Code, as amended. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller providing the notice, the intended purchaser is entitled to terminate the contract or purchase and sale. If the Developer or the homebuilders within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District do not provide the required notice and prospective purchasers of property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District terminate a purchase and sale contract, the anticipated absorption schedule 65 may be affected. In addition to the right to terminate the purchase contract, a property owner who did not receive the required notice is entitled, after sale, to sue for damages for (i) all costs relative to the purchase, plus interest and reasonable attorney’s fees, or (ii) an amount not to exceed $5,000, plus reasonable attorney’s fees. In a suit filed pursuant to clause (i), any damages awarded must go first to pay any outstanding liens on the property. In such an event, the outstanding Assessments on such property may be prepaid. In the event of such prepayment, a partial redemption of the Bonds could occur. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS – Redemption Provisions.” On payment of all damages respectively to the lienholders and purchaser pursuant to clause (i), the purchaser is required to reconvey the property to the seller. Further however, if the Developer or homebuilders within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District do not provide the required notice and become liable for monetary damages, the anticipated buildout and absorption schedule may be affected. No assurances can be given that the projected buildout and absorption schedules presented in this Limited Offering Memorandum will be realized. The form of notice to be provided to homebuyers is attached to the Service and Assessment Plan. See “APPENDIX B – Form of Service and Assessment Plan.” Potential Future Changes in State Law Regarding Public Improvement Districts During prior Texas legislative sessions and interim business of the Texas legislature, various proposals and reports have been presented by committees of Texas Senate and Texas House of Representatives which suggest or recommend changes to the PID Act relating to oversight of bonds secured by special assessments including adopting requirements relating to levels of build out or adding State level oversight in connection with the issuance of bonds secured by special assessments under the PID Act. The 89th Legislative Session of the State (the “89th Regular Session”) concluded on June 2, 2025, without any legislation being passed by either chamber of the Texas legislature recommending oversight of bonds secured by assessments. When the regular Legislature is not in session, the Governor of Texas may call one or more special sessions, at the Governor’s direction, each lasting no more than 30 days, and for which the Governor sets the agenda. The Governor called two special sessions, the first of which began on July 21, 2025 and ended on August 15, 2025 and the second of which began on August 15, 2025 and ended on September 4, 2025. No legislation relating to special assessments was proposed for the special sessions. It is impossible to predict what new proposals may be presented regarding the PID Act and the issuance of special assessment bonds during any upcoming legislative sessions, whether such new proposals or any previous proposals regarding the same will be adopted by the Texas Senate and House of Representatives and signed by the Governor, and, if adopted, the form thereof. It is impossible to predict with certainty the impact that any such future legislation will or may have on the security for the Bonds. Direct and Overlapping Indebtedness, Assessments and Taxes The ability of an owner of property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay the Assessments could be affected by the existence of other taxes and assessments imposed upon the property. Public entities whose boundaries overlap those of Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District currently impose ad valorem taxes on the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District and will likely do so in the future. Such entities could also impose assessment liens on the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The imposition of additional liens, or for private financing, may reduce the ability or willingness of the landowners to pay the Assessments. See “OVERLAPPING TAXES AND DEBT.” Depletion of Reserve Account of Reserve Fund Failure of the owners of property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay the Assessments when due could result in the rapid, total depletion of Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund prior to replenishment from the resale of property upon a foreclosure or otherwise or delinquency redemptions after a foreclosure sale, if any. There could be a default in payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds if sufficient amounts are not available in the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund. The Indenture provides that if, after a withdrawal from the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund, the amount in the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund is less than the Reserve Account Requirement, the Trustee shall transfer an amount from the Pledged Revenue Fund to the Reserve Account of the Reserve Fund sufficient to cure such deficiency, as described under “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS — Reserve Fund” herein. 66 Hazardous Substances While governmental taxes, assessments and charges are a common claim against the value of a parcel, other less common claims may be relevant. One of the most serious in terms of the potential reduction in the value that may be realized to the assessment is a claim with regard to a hazardous substance. In general, the owners and operators of a parcel may be required by law to remedy conditions relating to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, sometimes referred to as “CERCLA” or “Superfund Act,” is the most well-known and widely applicable of these laws. It is likely that, should any of the parcels of land located in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District be affected by a hazardous substance, the marketability and value of such parcels would be reduced by the costs of remedying the condition, because the purchaser, upon becoming owner, will become obligated to remedy the condition just as is the seller. The value of the land within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District does not take into account the possible liability of the owner (or operator) for the remedy of a hazardous substance condition on the property in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. The City has not independently verified, and is not aware, that the owner (or operator) of any of the parcels within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District has such a current liability with respect to such property; however, it is possible that such liabilities do currently exist and that the City is not aware of them. Further, it is possible that liabilities may arise in the future with respect to any of the land within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District resulting from the existence, currently, of a substance presently classified as hazardous but which has not been released or the release of which is not presently threatened, or may arise in the future resulting from the existence, currently, on the parcel of a substance not presently classified as hazardous but which may in the future be so classified. Further, such liabilities may arise not simply from the existence of a hazardous substance but from the method of handling it. The actual occurrence of any of these possibilities could significantly negatively affect the value of a parcel that is realizable upon a foreclosure. See “THE DEVELOPMENT – Environmental” for discussion of the previous Phase One ESA performed on property within the District. Exercise of Third-Party Property Rights As described herein under “THE DEVELOPMENT — Existing Mineral Rights, Easements and Other Third- Party Property Rights,” third parties hold title to certain Third-Party Property Rights applicable to real property within and around the District, including reservations of mineral rights and royalty interests and easements, pursuant to various instruments in the chain of title for various tracts of land within and around the District. The Developer does not expect the existence or exercise of such Third-Party Property Rights or other third- party real property rights in or around the District to have a material adverse effect on the Development, the property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, or the ability of landowners within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District to pay Assessments. However, none of the District, the City’s Municipal Advisor, the Underwriter, the Developer or the Administrator provide any assurances as to such Developer expectations. Regulation Development within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District may be subject to future federal, state and local regulations. Approval may be required from various agencies from time to time in connection with the layout and design of development in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District, the nature and extent of public improvements, land use, zoning and other matters. Failure to meet any such regulations or obtain any such approvals in a timely manner could delay or adversely affect development in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District and property values. No Acceleration The Indenture expressly denies the right of acceleration in the event of a payment default or other default under the terms of the Bonds or the Indenture. 67 Bankruptcy The payment of Assessments and the ability of the City to foreclose on the lien of a delinquent unpaid Assessment may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws generally affecting creditors’ rights or by the laws of the State relating to judicial foreclosure. Although bankruptcy proceedings would not cause the Assessments to become extinguished, bankruptcy of a property owner in all likelihood would result in a delay in prosecuting foreclosure proceedings. Such a delay would increase the likelihood of a delay or default in payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds, and the possibility that delinquent Assessments might not be paid in full. Bondholders’ Remedies and Bankruptcy In the event of default in the payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds or the occurrence of any other Event of Default under the Indenture, the Trustee may, and upon the written request of at least 51% the owners of the Bonds then outstanding, the Trustee shall proceed to protect and enforce its rights and the rights of the owners of the Bonds under the Indenture by such suits, actions or special proceedings in equity or at law, or by proceedings in the office of any board or officer having jurisdiction, either for mandamus or the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained therein or in aid or execution of any power granted or for the enforcement of any proper legal or equitable remedy, as the Trustee shall deem most effectual to protect and enforce such rights. The issuance of a writ of mandamus may be sought if there is no other available remedy at law to compel performance of the City’s obligations under the Bonds or the Indenture and such obligations are not uncertain or disputed. The remedy of mandamus is controlled by equitable principles, so rests with the discretion of the court, but may not be arbitrarily refused. There is no acceleration of maturity of the Bonds in the event of default and, consequently, the remedy of mandamus may have to be relied upon from year to year. The owners of the Bonds cannot themselves foreclose on property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District or sell property within Improvement Areas #2-4 the District in order to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The enforceability of the rights and remedies of the owners of the Bonds further may be limited by laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization or other similar laws of general application affecting the rights of creditors of political subdivisions such as the City. In this regard, should the City file a petition for protection from creditors under federal bankruptcy laws, the remedy of mandamus or the right of the City to seek judicial foreclosure of its Assessment Lien would be automatically stayed and could not be pursued unless authorized by a federal bankruptcy judge. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Bankruptcy Limitation to Bondholders’ Rights” herein. Any bankruptcy court with jurisdiction over bankruptcy proceedings initiated by or against a property owner within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District pursuant to the Federal Bankruptcy Code could, subject to its discretion, delay or limit any attempt by the City to collect delinquent Assessments, or delinquent ad valorem taxes, against such property owner. In addition, in 2006, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in Tooke v. City of Mexia, 197 S.W.3d 325 (Tex. 2006) (“Tooke”) that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be provided for by statute in “clear and unambiguous” language. In so ruling, the Court declared that statutory language such as “sue and be sued,” in and of itself, did not constitute a clear and unambiguous waiver of sovereign immunity. In Tooke, the Court noted the enactment in 2005 of sections 271.151-.160, Texas Local Government Code (the “Local Government Immunity Waiver Act”), which, according to the Court, waives “immunity from suit for contract claims against most local governmental entities in certain circumstances.” The Local Government Immunity Waiver Act covers cities and relates to contracts entered into by cities for providing goods or services to cities. In Wasson Interests, Ltd. v. City of Jacksonville, 489 S.W.3d 427 (Tex. 2016) (“Wasson”), the Texas Supreme Court (the “Court”) addressed whether the distinction between governmental and proprietary acts (as found in tort-based causes of action) applies to breach of contract claims against municipalities. The Court analyzed the rationale behind the Proprietary-Governmental Dichotomy to determine that “a city’s proprietary functions are not done pursuant to the ‘will of the people’” and protecting such municipalities “via the [S]tate’s immunity is not an efficient way to ensure efficient allocation of [S]tate resources.” While the Court recognized that the distinction between governmental and proprietary functions is not clear, the Wasson opinion held that the Proprietary- Governmental Dichotomy applies in a contract-claims context. The Court reviewed Wasson for a second time and issued an opinion on October 5, 2018 clarifying that to determine whether governmental immunity applies to a breach of contract claim, the proper inquiry is whether the municipality was engaged in a governmental or proprietary 68 function when it entered into the contract, not at the time of the alleged breach. Therefore, in regard to municipal contract cases (as in tort claims), it is incumbent on the courts to determine whether a function was proprietary or governmental based upon the statutory and common law guidance at the time of inception of the contractual relationship. Texas jurisprudence has generally held that proprietary functions are those conducted by a city in its private capacity, for the benefit only of those within its corporate limits, and not as an arm of the government or under authority or for the benefit of the State; these are usually activities that can be, and often are, provided by private persons, and therefore are not done as a branch of the State, and do not implicate the state’s immunity since they are not performed under the authority, or for the benefit, of the State as sovereign. Notwithstanding the foregoing new case law issued by the Court, such sovereign immunity issues have not been adjudicated in relation to bond matters (specifically, in regard to the issuance of municipal debt). Each situation will be prospectively evaluated based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the contract in question to determine if a suit, and subsequently, a judgement, is justiciable against a municipality. The City is not aware of any State court construing the Local Government Immunity Waiver Act in the context of whether contractual undertakings of local governments that relate to their borrowing powers are contracts covered by such act. Because it is unclear whether the Texas legislature has effectively waived the City’s sovereign immunity from a suit for money damages in the absence of City action, the Trustee or the owners of the Bonds may not be able to bring such a suit against the City for breach of the Bonds or the Indenture covenants. As noted above, the Indenture provides that owners of the Bonds may exercise the remedy of mandamus to enforce the obligations of the City under the Indenture. Neither the remedy of mandamus nor any other type of injunctive relief was at issue in Tooke, and it is unclear whether Tooke will be construed to have any effect with respect to the exercise of mandamus, as such remedy has been interpreted by State courts. In general, State courts have held that a writ of mandamus may be issued to require public officials to perform ministerial acts that clearly pertain to their duties. State courts have held that a ministerial act is defined as a legal duty that is prescribed and defined with a precision and certainty that leaves nothing to the exercise of discretion or judgment, though mandamus is not available to enforce purely contractual duties. However, mandamus may be used to require a public officer to perform legally-imposed ministerial duties necessary for the performance of a valid contract to which the State or a political subdivision of the State is a party (including the payment of moneys due under a contract). Bankruptcy Limitation to Bondholders’ Rights The enforceability of the rights and remedies of the owners of the Bonds may be limited by laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization or other similar laws of general application affecting the rights of creditors of political subdivisions such as the City. The City is authorized under Texas law to voluntarily proceed under Chapter 9 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 901-946. The City may proceed under Chapter 9 if it (1) is generally not paying its debts, or unable to meet its debts, as they become due, (2) desires to effect a plan to adjust such debts, and (3) has either obtained the agreement of or negotiated in good faith with its creditors, is unable to negotiate with its creditors because negotiation is impracticable, or reasonably believes that a creditor may attempt to obtain a preferential transfer. If the City decides in the future to proceed voluntarily under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, the City would develop and file a plan for the adjustment of its debts, and the Bankruptcy Court would confirm the plan if (1) the plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code, (2) all payments to be made in connection with the plan are fully disclosed and reasonable, (3) the City is not prohibited by law from taking any action necessary to carry out the plan, (4) administrative expenses are paid in full, (5) all regulatory or electoral approvals required under Texas law are obtained and (6) the plan is in the best interests of creditors and is feasible. The rights and remedies of the owners of the Bonds would be adjusted in accordance with the confirmed plan of adjustment of the City’s debt. The City cannot predict a Bankruptcy Court’s treatment of the Bondholders’ creditor claim and whether a Bondholder would be repaid in full. Judicial Foreclosures Judicial foreclosure proceedings are not mandatory; however, the City has covenanted (subject to the provisions set forth in the Indenture) to order and cause such actions to be commenced. In the event a foreclosure is necessary, there could be a delay in payments to owners of the Bonds pending prosecution of the foreclosure proceedings and receipt by the City of the proceeds of the foreclosure sale. It is possible that no bid would be received 69 at the foreclosure sale, and, in such event, there could be an additional delay in payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds or such payment may not be made in full. Moreover, in filing a suit to foreclose, the City must join other taxing units that have claims for delinquent taxes against all or part of the same property; the proceeds of any sale of property within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District available to pay debt service on the Bonds may be limited by the existence of other tax liens on the property. See “OVERLAPPING TAXES AND DEBT.” Collection of delinquent taxes, assessments and the Assessments may be adversely affected by the effects of market conditions on the foreclosure sale price, and by other factors, including taxpayers’ right to redeem property within two years of foreclosure for residential and agricultural use property and six months for other property, and by a time-consuming and expensive collection procedure. Loss of Tax Exemption The Indenture contains covenants by the City intended to preserve the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. As discussed under the caption “TAX MATTERS” herein, interest on the Bonds could become includable in gross income for purposes of federal income taxation, retroactive to the date the Bonds were issued, as a result of future acts or omissions of the City in violation of its covenants in the Indenture. Tax legislation, administrative actions taken by tax authorities, or court decisions, whether at the Federal or state level, may adversely affect the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds under Federal or state law and could affect the market price or marketability of the Bonds. Any such proposal could limit the value of certain deductions and exclusions, including the exclusion for tax-exempt interest. The likelihood of any such proposal being enacted cannot be predicted. Prospective purchasers of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding the foregoing matters. Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds As further described in “TAX MATTERS” below, failure of the City to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) and the related legal authorities, or changes in the federal tax law or its application, could cause interest on the Bonds to be included in the gross income of owners of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes, possibly from the date of original issuance of the Bonds. Further, the opinion of Bond Counsel is based on current legal authority, covers certain matters not directly addressed by such authorities, and represents Bond Counsel’s judgment as to the proper treatment of interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. It is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or the courts. The IRS has an ongoing program of auditing obligations that are issued and sold as bearing tax-exempt interest to determine whether, in the view of the IRS, interest on such obligations is included in the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. The IRS has focused certain of its audit efforts in the past on “developer-driven bond transactions,” including certain tax increment financings and certain assessment bond transactions. In some audits, the IRS has asserted that interest on such “developer-driven” obligations can be taxable, in certain circumstances. It cannot be predicted if this IRS focus could lead to an audit of the Bonds or what the result would be of any such audit. If an audit of the Bonds is commenced, under current procedures parties other than the City would have little, if any, right to participate in the audit process. Moreover, because achieving judicial review in connection with an audit of tax-exempt obligations is difficult, obtaining an independent review of IRS positions with which the City legitimately disagrees, may not be practicable. Any action of the IRS, regardless of the outcome, including but not limited to selection of the Bonds for audit, or the course or result of such audit, or an audit of obligations presenting similar tax issues, may affect the market price for, or the marketability of, the Bonds. Finally, if the IRS ultimately determines that the interest on the Bonds is not excluded from the gross income of Bondholders for federal income tax purposes, the City may not have the resources to settle with the IRS, the Bonds are not required to be redeemed, and the interest rate on the Bonds will not increase. Management and Ownership The management and ownership of the Developer and related property owners could change in the future. Purchasers of the Bonds should not rely on the management experience of such entities. There are no assurances that such entities will not sell the subject property or that officers will not resign or be replaced. In such circumstances, a new developer or new officers in management positions may not have comparable experience in development projects comparable to that of the Development. 70 Dependence Upon Developer and Homebuilders [TO BE UPDATED PENDING UPDATES TO ASSESSMENT PAYER CONCENTRATION] As of May 9, 2026, (i) the Developer was responsible for __% of the Assessments, (ii) First Texas was responsible for __% of the Assessments, (iii) Lennar was responsible for ___% of the Assessments, and (iv) Mattamy was responsible for ___% of the Assessments. The ability of the Developer, First Texas, Mattamy and Lennar to make full and timely payment of the Assessments will directly affect the ability of the City to meet its debt service obligations with respect to the Bonds. The only assets of the Developer are its land within the District, related permits and development rights, and minor operating accounts. The source of funding for future land development activities and infrastructure construction to develop the lots proposed for the District also consists of proceeds of the Bonds and proceeds of lot sales, as well as possible bank financing and equity contributions by the Developer. There can be no assurances given as to the financial ability of the Developer, Lennar, Mattamy, or First Texas to advance any funds to the City to supplement revenues from the Assessments if necessary, or as to whether such parties will advance such funds. None of such parties will guarantee or otherwise be obligated to pay debt service on the Bonds. The City will pay the Developer, or the Developer’s designee, from proceeds of the Bonds for project costs actually incurred in developing and constructing the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements within Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. See “THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS – General” and “THE DEVELOPMENT – Development Plan and Status of Development.” There can be no assurances given as to the financial ability of the Developer to complete such improvements. Use of Appraisal Caution should be exercised in the evaluation and use of valuations included in the Appraisal. The Appraisal is an estimate of market value as of a specified date based upon assumptions and limiting conditions and any extraordinary assumptions specific to the relevant valuation and specified therein. The estimated market value specified in the Appraisal is not a precise measure of value, but is based on a subjective comparison of related activity taking place in the real estate market. The valuation set forth in the Appraisal is based on various assumptions of future expectations and while the Appraiser’s forecasts for properties in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District is considered to be reasonable at the current time, some of the assumptions may not materialize or may differ materially from actual experience in the future. The Bonds will not necessarily trade at values determined solely by reference to the underlying value of the properties in Improvement Areas #2-4 of the District. In performing its analysis, the Appraiser makes numerous assumptions with respect to general business, economic and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the Appraiser’s, Underwriter's and City’s control, as well as certain factual matters. Furthermore, the Appraiser’s analysis, opinions and conclusions are necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other circumstances and conditions existing prior to the valuation and date of the Appraisal. The intended use and user of the Appraisal are specifically identified in the Appraisal as agreed upon in the contract for services and/or reliance language found in the Appraisal. The Appraiser has consented to the use of the Appraisal in this Limited Offering Memorandum in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. No other use or user of the Appraisal is permitted by any other party for any other purpose. Developer Principal Financial Relationships and Other Matters Relating to Developer Affiliates Set forth below is a summary of certain litigation and other matters involving certain affiliates of Centurion. No assurances can be given as to the result of the following lawsuits or any charges related thereto or the impact, if any, of such result on one or more of Mehrdad Moayedi’s (“Moayedi”), the operations of Centurion, and the Developer’s ability to continue funding the Development. Investigation of United Development Funding. Subsidiaries of Centurion American are involved in the development of master planned residential community and mixed-use projects. Some of these projects have previously been developed using funding provided by various entities associated with United Development Funding (“UDF”), including United Development Funding IV, a publicly traded real estate investment trust (“UDF IV”). In connection with governmental investigations of UDF (the “UDF Investigations”), Centurion and some of its 71 employees were contacted in mid-2016 to provide certain information to such governmental fact-finders as part of an information gathering process on the UDF Investigations. Centurion and its employees fully complied with the information gathering process. Neither Centurion nor any of its employees or affiliates have received any information indicating that they are either targets or subjects of any governmental investigation. Megatel Homes III, LLC v. Wilbow-Windhaven Development Corporation v. Centurion Windhaven, LP, et al.; in Denton County Texas. Plaintiff Megatel Homes III, LLC (“Megatel”) brought claims against both Defendant Wilbow Windhaven Development Corp. (“Wilbow”), Defendant Centurion Acquisitions, LP (“CA”), and Defendant CADG Windhaven, LLC (“CADG,” collectively with CA, “Centurion Defendants”). Megatel’s claims against Wilbow consist of request for Declaratory Judgment; Breach of Contract (failure to allow Megatel to acquire any lots in Phase 2 and the remaining lots in Phase 1 development (12 lots: A1-8, B15-18) and failure to achieve substantial completion of all phase 1 lots by 12/31/2016); and Indemnity. Megatel’s claims against CA and CADG consist of Breach of Contract; Fraud; and Indemnity. A Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens was granted by court on October 2, 2020. Megatel re-filed the Lis Pendens and Wilbow responded by filing a Motion to Expunge. The court granted the Motion to Expunge the Lis Pendens on May 19, 2021. On June 4, 2021, LMSM Holdings, LLC filed suit and brought claims against Megatel Homes III, LLC for breach of promissory note and breach of contract in a case styled LMSM Holdings, LLC v. Megatel Homes III, LLC. This suit brought by LMSM was later consolidated with Megatel Homes III, LLC v. Wilbow-Windhaven Development Corporation v. Centurion Windhaven, LP, et al. Subsequently, at the pre-trial hearing, a Motion for Separate trials was granted and the case was separated into a jury trial for LMSM’s Breach of Promissory Note and Breach of Contract causes of action, and a non-jury trial on the contract causes of action related to the Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) and associated claims. On June 23, 2025, the jury returned a verdict in favor of LMSM on the Breach of Contract and Breach of Promissory Note causes of action and awarded damages in the amount of $590,087.99 and $700,000.00 in attorneys’ fees. The parties have briefed the court with respect to the non-jury trial causes of action, and a trial date has not yet been set; however, counsel is working diligently to find and set a trial date that works for all parties and counsel of record. Megatel Claims. Megatel has brought additional causes of action against Moayedi, Centurion (and certain of its affiliates) and UDF as listed below. Megatel has asserted various allegations of fraud, RICO violations, conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, and others in what Centurion believes to be an attempt to force Moayedi, Centurion and UDF to settle with Megatel. In addition to the filing of the below lawsuits, Megatel has also filed Lis Pendens against property owned by third-parties, has sent letters to Megatel’s competitors attempting to interfere with their relationship with Centurion and has possibly partnered with parties believed to be adversarial to Moayedi, Centurion and UDF. Centurion continues to aggressively fight against these actions and against what it believes to be the baseless claims made in the lawsuits. 1. Cause No. 3:20-CV-00688-L: Megatel Homes, LLC, et al. v. Mehrdad Moayedi, et al., in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas. Risk from Weather Events All of the State, including the City and the District, is subject to extreme weather events that can cause loss of life and damage to property through strong winds, flooding, heavy rains, extreme heat and freezes, including events similar to the severe winter storm that the continental United States experienced in February 2021, which resulted in disruptions in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas power grid and prolonged blackouts throughout the State. It is impossible to predict whether similar events will occur in the future and the impact they may have on the City or the District. 100-Year Flood Plain According to the FEMA FIRM Map 48085C0155J, revised on June 2, 2009, Panel 155 of 600, an approximately 35.7 acre portion of the property, the areas along the Hurricane Creek Tributary, crossing the north west portion of the District are located in special flood hazard areas subject to inundation by the 100-year flood, defined as Zone A. Zone A is defined as areas within the Special Flood Hazard Area where no base flood elevations have been determined. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply in areas designated as Zone A. All property designated as Zone A in the District is expected to be undeveloped open space and the Developer does not intend to reclaim any such land. None of such land is located in Improvement Areas #2-4. 72 Competition The housing industry in the Dallas-Fort Worth area is very competitive, and none of the Developer, the City, the City’s Municipal Advisor or the Underwriter can give any assurance that the building programs which are planned will be completed in accordance with the Developer’s expectations. The competitive position of the Developer in the sale of developed lots or of any other homebuilder in the construction and sale of single-family residential units is affected by most of the factors discussed in this “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” section, and such competitive position is directly related to maintenance of market values in the District. There can be no assurances that other similar projects will not be developed in the future or that existing projects will not be upgraded or otherwise be able to compete with the Development. Below is a list of a few competitive projects in the area. Pro ect Name # of Units Proximity to District Miles Develo e Builders Prices Anna Towne Square 1,915 6.8 miles Windsor Pulte, Megatel, Windsor, DR. Horton, Pacesetter $370,000+ Anna Ranch 556 8 miles Brightland Brightland, Meritage $385,000+ AnaCapri 1,239 4.5 miles Megatel Megatel $390,000+ Limited Secondary Market for the Bonds The Bonds may not constitute a liquid investment, and there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for the Bonds in the event an Owner thereof determines to solicit purchasers for the Bonds. Even if a liquid secondary market exists, there can be no assurance as to the price for which the Bonds may be sold. Such price may be lower than that paid by the current Owners of the Bonds, depending on the progress of development of Improvement Areas #2-4 subject to the Assessments, existing real estate and financial market conditions and other factors. No Credit Rating The City has not applied for or received a rating on the Bonds. Even if a credit rating had been sought for the Bonds, it is not anticipated that such a rating would have been investment grade. The absence of a rating could affect the future marketability of the Bonds. There is no assurance that a secondary market for the Bonds will develop or that holders who desire to sell their Bonds prior to the stated maturity will be able to do so. Occasionally, because of general market conditions or because of adverse history or economic prospects connected with a particular issue, secondary market trading in connection with a particular issue is suspended or terminated. Additionally, prices of issues for which a market is being made will depend upon then generally prevailing circumstances. Such prices could be substantially different from the original purchase price. Cybersecurity Risks The City, like other municipalities in the State, utilizes technology in conducting its operations. As a user of technology, the City potentially faces cybersecurity threats (e.g., hacking, phishing, viruses, malware, and ransomware) on its technology systems. Accordingly, the City may be the target of a cyber-attack on its technology systems that could result in adverse consequences to the City. The City employs a multi-layered approach to combating cybersecurity threats. While the City deploys layered technologies and requires employees to receive cybersecurity training, as required by State law, among other efforts, cybersecurity breaches could cause material disruptions to the City’s finances or operations. The costs of remedying such breaches or protecting against future cyber-attacks could be substantial. Further, cybersecurity breaches could expose the City to litigation and other legal risks, which could cause the City to incur other costs related to such legal claims or proceedings. 73 TAX MATTERS Opinion On the date of initial delivery of the Bonds, McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P., Bond Counsel to the City, will render its opinion that, in accordance with statutes, regulations, published rulings and court decisions existing on the date thereof (“Existing Law”), (1) interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes will be excludable from the “gross income” of the holders thereof and (2) the Bonds will not be treated as “specified private activity bonds” the interest on which would be included as an alternative minimum tax preference item under section 57(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Except as stated above, Bond Counsel to the City will express no opinion as to any other federal, state, or local tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds. See “APPENDIX C – Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel.” In rendering its opinion, Bond Counsel to the City will rely upon (a) the City’s federal tax certificate and (b) covenants of the City with respect to arbitrage, the application of the proceeds to be received from the issuance and sale of the Bonds and certain other matters. Failure of the City to comply with these representations or covenants could cause the interest on the Bonds to become includable in gross income retroactively to the date of issuance of the Bonds. The Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder contain a number of requirements that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds in order for interest on the Bonds to be, and to remain, excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Failure to comply with such requirements may cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income retroactively to the date of issuance of the Bonds. The opinion of Bond Counsel to the City is conditioned on compliance by the City with the covenants and the requirements described in the preceding paragraph, and Bond Counsel to the City has not been retained to monitor compliance with these requirements subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds. Bond Counsel’s opinion represents its legal judgment based upon its review of Existing Law and the reliance on the aforementioned information, representations and covenants. Bond Counsel’s opinion is not a guarantee of a result. The Existing Law is subject to change by the Congress and to subsequent judicial and administrative interpretation by the courts and the Department of the Treasury. There can be no assurance that such Existing Law or the interpretation thereof will not be changed in a manner which would adversely affect the tax treatment of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds. A ruling was not sought from the Internal Revenue Service by the City with respect to the Bonds or the facilities financed or refinanced with the proceeds of the Bonds. Bond Counsel’s opinion represents its legal judgment based upon its review of Existing Law and the representations of the City that it deems relevant to render such opinion and is not a guarantee of a result. No assurances can be given as to whether the Internal Revenue Service will commence an audit of the Bonds, or as to whether the Internal Revenue Service would agree with the opinion of Bond Counsel. If an audit is commenced, under current procedures the Internal Revenue Service is likely to treat the City as the taxpayer and the Bondholders may have no right to participate in such procedure. No additional interest will be paid upon any determination of taxability. Federal Income Tax Accounting Treatment of Original Issue Discount The initial public offering price to be paid for one or more maturities of the Bonds may be less than the principal amount thereof or one or more periods for the payment of interest on the Bonds may not be equal to the accrual period or be in excess of one year (the “Original Issue Discount Bonds”). In such event, the difference between (i) the “stated redemption price at maturity” of each Original Issue Discount Bond, and (ii) the initial offering price to the public of such Original Issue Discount Bond would constitute original issue discount. The “stated redemption price at maturity” means the sum of all payments to be made on the Bonds less the amount of all periodic interest payments. Periodic interest payments are payments which are made during equal accrual periods (or during any unequal period if it is the initial or final period) and which are made during accrual periods which do not exceed one year. 74 Under Existing Law, any owner who has purchased such Original Issue Discount Bond in the initial public offering is entitled to exclude from gross income (as defined in section 61 of the Code) an amount of income with respect to such Original Issue Discount Bond equal to that portion of the amount of such original issue discount allocable to the accrual period. For a discussion of certain collateral federal tax consequences, see discussion set forth below. In the event of the redemption, sale or other taxable disposition of such Original Issue Discount Bond prior to stated maturity, however, the amount realized by such owner in excess of the basis of such Original Issue Discount Bond in the hands of such owner (adjusted upward by the portion of the original issue discount allocable to the period for which such Original Issue Discount Bond was held by such initial owner) is includable in gross income. Under Existing Law, the original issue discount on each Original Issue Discount Bond is accrued daily to the stated maturity thereof (in amounts calculated as described below for each six-month period ending on the date before the semiannual anniversary dates of the date of the Bonds and ratably within each such six-month period) and the accrued amount is added to an initial owner’s basis for such Original Issue Discount Bond for purposes of determining the amount of gain or loss recognized by such owner upon the redemption, sale or other disposition thereof. The amount to be added to basis for each accrual period is equal to (a) the sum of the issue price and the amount of original issue discount accrued in prior periods multiplied by the yield to stated maturity (determined on the basis of compounding at the close of each accrual period and properly adjusted for the length of the accrual period) less (b) the amounts payable as current interest during such accrual period on such Original Issue Discount Bond. The federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, redemption, sale or other disposition of Original Issue Discount Bonds which are not purchased in the initial offering at the initial offering price may be determined according to rules which differ from those described above. All owners of Original Issue Discount Bonds should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the determination for federal, state and local income tax purposes of the treatment of interest accrued upon redemption, sale or other disposition of such Original Issue Discount Bonds and with respect to the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, redemption, sale or other disposition of such Original Issue Discount Bonds. Collateral Federal Income Tax Consequences The following discussion is a summary of certain collateral federal income tax consequences resulting from the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds. This discussion is based on Existing Law, which is subject to change or modification, retroactively. The following discussion is applicable to investors, other than those who are subject to special provisions of the Code, such as financial institutions, property and casualty insurance companies, life insurance companies, individual recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, individuals allowed an earned income credit, certain S corporations with Subchapter C earnings and profits, foreign corporations subject to the branch profits tax, taxpayers qualifying for the health insurance premium assistance credit, and taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase tax-exempt obligations. THE DISCUSSION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY NOT BE EXHAUSTIVE. INVESTORS, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE, SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE TAX TREATMENT WHICH MAY BE ANTICIPATED TO RESULT FROM THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BEFORE DETERMINING WHETHER TO PURCHASE THE BONDS. Interest on the Bonds may be includable in certain corporation’s “adjusted financial statement income” determined under section 56A of the Code to calculate the alternative minimum tax imposed by section 55 of the Code. Under section 6012 of the Code, holders of tax-exempt obligations, such as the Bonds, may be required to disclose interest received or accrued during each taxable year on their returns of federal income taxation. 75 Section 1276 of the Code provides for ordinary income tax treatment of gain recognized upon the disposition of a tax-exempt obligation, such as the Bonds, if such obligation was acquired at a “market discount” and if the fixed maturity of such obligation is equal to, or exceeds, one year from the date of issue. Such treatment applies to “market discount Bonds” to the extent such gain does not exceed the accrued market discount of such Bonds; although for this purpose, a de minimis amount of market discount is ignored. A “market discount bond” is one which is acquired by the holder at a purchase price which is less than the stated redemption price at maturity or, in the case of a bond issued at an original issue discount, the “revised issue price” (i.e., the issue price plus accrued original issue discount). The “accrued market discount” is the amount which bears the same ratio to the market discount as the number of days during which the holder holds the obligation bears to the number of days between the acquisition date and the final maturity date. State, Local and Foreign Taxes Investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the tax implications of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds under applicable state or local laws. Foreign investors should also consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences unique to investors who are not United States persons. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Subject to certain exceptions, information reports describing interest income, including original issue discount, with respect to the Bonds will be sent to each registered holder and to the Internal Revenue Service. Payments of interest and principal may be subject to backup withholding under section 3406 of the Code if a recipient of the payments fails to furnish to the payor such owner’s social security number or other taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), furnishes an incorrect TIN, or otherwise fails to establish an exemption from the backup withholding tax. Any amounts so withheld would be allowed as a credit against the recipient’s federal income tax. Special rules apply to partnerships, estates and trusts, and in certain circumstances, and in respect of foreign investors, certifications as to foreign status and other matters may be required to be provided by partners and beneficiaries thereof. Future and Proposed Legislation Tax legislation, administrative actions taken by tax authorities, or court decisions, whether at the Federal or state level, may adversely affect the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds under Federal or state law and could affect the market price or marketability of the Bonds. Any such proposal could limit the value of certain deductions and exclusions, including the exclusion for tax-exempt interest. The likelihood of any such proposal being enacted cannot be predicted. Prospective purchasers of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding the foregoing matters. LEGAL MATTERS Legal Proceedings Delivery of the Bonds will be accompanied by (i) the unqualified approving legal opinion of the Attorney General to the effect that the Bonds are valid and legally binding obligations of the City under the Constitution and laws of the State, payable from the Trust Estate and, (ii) based upon their examination of a transcript of certified proceedings relating to the issuance and sale of the Bonds, the legal opinion of Bond Counsel, to a like effect. McCall, Parkhurst & Horton L.L.P. Serves as Bond Counsel to the City. Greenberg Traurig, LLP serves as Underwriter’s Counsel. The legal fees paid to Bond Counsel and Underwriter’s Counsel are contingent upon the sale and delivery of the Bonds. Legal Opinions The City will furnish the Underwriter a transcript of certain certified proceedings incident to the authorization and issuance of the Bonds. Such transcript will include a certified copy of the approving opinion of the Attorney General of Texas, as recorded in the Bond Register of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State, to the effect that the Bonds are valid and binding special obligations of the City. The City will also furnish the legal opinion of 76 Bond Counsel, to the effect that, based upon an examination of such transcript, the Bonds are valid and binding special obligations of the City under the Constitution and laws of the State. The legal opinion of Bond Counsel will further state that the Bonds, including principal thereof and interest thereon, are payable from and secured by a pledge of and lien on the Pledged Revenues. Bond Counsel will also provide a legal opinion to the effect that interest on the Bonds will be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103(a) of the Code, subject to the matters described above under the caption “TAX MATTERS,” including the alternative minimum tax consequences for certain corporations. A copy of the opinion of Bond Counsel is attached hereto as “APPENDIX C — FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL.” Except as noted below, Bond Counsel did not take part in the preparation of the Limited Offering Memorandum, and such firm has not assumed any responsibility with respect thereto or undertaken independently to verify any of the information contained therein, except that, in its capacity as Bond Counsel, such firm has reviewed the information describing the Bonds in the Limited Offering Memorandum under the captions or subcaptions “PLAN OF FINANCE — The Bonds,” “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS,” “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS” (except for the second paragraph under the subcaption “General”), “ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES” (except for the subcaptions “Assessment Methodology” and “Assessment Amounts”), “THE DISTRICT,” “TAX MATTERS,” “LEGAL MATTERS — Legal Proceedings,” “LEGAL MATTERS — Legal Opinions,” “SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT,” “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE – The City,” “REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION OF BONDS FOR SALE,” “LEGAL INVESTMENTS AND ELIGIBILITY TO SECURE PUBLIC FUNDS IN TEXAS,” “INVESTMENTS” and “APPENDIX A – Form of Indenture” and such firm is of the opinion that the information relating to the Bonds, the Bond Ordinance, the Assessment Ordinance and the Indenture contained therein fairly and accurately describes the laws and legal issues addressed therein and, with respect to the Bonds, such information conforms to the Bond Ordinance, the Assessment Ordinance and the Indenture. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds express the professional judgment of the attorneys rendering the opinions as to the legal issues explicitly addressed therein. In rendering a legal opinion, the attorney does not become an insurer or guarantor of that expression of professional judgment, of the transaction opined upon, or of the future performance of the parties to the transaction. Nor does the rendering of an opinion guarantee the outcome of any legal dispute that may arise out of the transaction. Litigation — The City At the time of delivery and payment for the Bonds, the City will certify that, except as disclosed herein, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, regulatory agency, public board or body, pending or overtly threatened against the City affecting the existence of the District, or seeking to restrain or to enjoin the sale or delivery of the Bonds, the application of the proceeds thereof, in accordance with the Indenture, or the collection or application of Assessments securing the Bonds, or in any way contesting or affecting the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Assessment Ordinance, the Indenture, any action of the City contemplated by any of the said documents, or the collection or application of the Pledged Revenues, or in any way contesting the completeness or accuracy of this Limited Offering Memorandum or any amendment or supplement thereto, or contesting the powers of the City or its authority with respect to the Bonds or any action of the City contemplated by any documents relating to the Bonds. Litigation — The Developer At the time of delivery and payment for the Bonds, the Developer will certify that, except as disclosed herein, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, regulatory body, public board or body pending, or, to the best knowledge of the Developer, threatened against or affecting the Developer wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Developer or its officers or would adversely affect (1) the transactions contemplated by, or the validity or enforceability of, the Bonds, the Indenture, the Bond Ordinance, the Service and Assessment Plan, the Development Agreement, or the Bond Purchase Agreement, or otherwise described in this Limited Offering Memorandum, or (2) the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds (individually or in the aggregate, a “Material Adverse Effect”). Additionally, Mr. Mehrdad Moayedi and his affiliated entities have been and are parties to pending and threatened litigation related to their commercial and real estate development activities. Such litigation occurs in the ordinary course of business and is not expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 77 For a description of litigation and other matters related to affiliated entities of the Developer, see “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Developer Principal Financial Relationships and Other Matters Relating to Developer Affiliates.” SUITABILITY FOR INVESTMENT Investment in the Bonds poses certain economic risks. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS.” The Bonds are not rated by any nationally recognized municipal securities rating service. No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the City or the Underwriter to give any information or make any representations, other than those contained in this Limited Offering Memorandum, and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by either of the foregoing. Additional information will be made available to each prospective investor, including the benefit of a site visit to the City and the opportunity to ask questions of the Developer, as such prospective investor deems necessary in order to make an informed decision with respect to the purchase of the Bonds. ENFORCEABILITY OF REMEDIES The remedies available to the owners of the Bonds upon an event of default under the Indenture are in many respects dependent upon judicial actions, which are often subject to discretion and delay. See “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS — Bondholders’ Remedies and Bankruptcy.” Under existing constitutional and statutory law and judicial decisions, including the federal bankruptcy code, the remedies specified by the Indenture and the Bonds may not be readily available or may be limited. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds will be qualified, as to the enforceability of the remedies provided in the various legal instruments, by limitations imposed by governmental immunity, bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors, including the exercise of judicial discretion, and enacted before or after such delivery. NO RATING No application for a rating on the Bonds has been made to any rating agency, nor is there any reason to believe that the City would have been successful in obtaining an investment grade rating for the Bonds had application been made. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The City Pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Rule”), the City, the Administrator, and Regions Bank (in such capacity, the “Dissemination Agent”) will enter into a Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the “City Disclosure Agreement”) for the benefit of the Owners of the Bonds (including owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds), to provide, by certain dates prescribed in the City Disclosure Agreement, certain financial information and operating data relating to the City (collectively, the “City Reports”). The specific nature of the information to be contained in the City Reports is set forth in “APPENDIX D-1 — Form of City Disclosure Agreement.” Under certain circumstances, the failure of the City to comply with its obligations under the City Disclosure Agreement constitutes an event of default thereunder. Such a default will not constitute an event of default under the Indenture, but such event of default under the City Disclosure Agreement would allow the Owners of the Bonds (including owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds) to bring an action for specific performance. The City has agreed to update information and to provide notices of certain specified events only as provided in the City Disclosure Agreement. The City has not agreed to provide other information that may be relevant or material to a complete presentation of its financial results of operations, condition, or prospects or agreed to update any information that is provided in this Limited Offering Memorandum, except as provided in the City Disclosure Agreement. The City makes no representation or warranty concerning such information or concerning its usefulness to a decision to invest in or sell the Bonds at any future date. The City disclaims any contractual or tort liability for damages resulting in whole or in part from any breach of the City Disclosure Agreement or from any statement made pursuant to the City Disclosure Agreement. 78 The City’s Compliance with Prior Undertakings During the last five years, the City believes it has substantially complied in all material respects with all continuing disclosure agreements made by it in accordance with the Rule. The Developer The Developer, the Administrator, and the Dissemination Agent expect to enter into a Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the “Developer Disclosure Agreement”) for the benefit of the Owners of the Bonds (including owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds), to provide, by certain dates prescribed in the Developer Disclosure Agreement, certain information regarding the Development and the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements (collectively, the “Developer Reports”). The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Developer Reports is set forth in “APPENDIX D-2 — Form of Developer Disclosure Agreement.” Under certain circumstances, the failure of the Developer or the Administrator to comply with its obligations under the Developer Disclosure Agreement constitutes an event of default thereunder. Such a default will not constitute an event of default under the Indenture, but such event of default under the Developer Disclosure Agreement would allow the Owners of the Bonds (including owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds) to bring an action for specific performance. The Developer Disclosure Agreement is a voluntary agreement made for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds and is not entered into pursuant to the Rule. The Developer has agreed to provide (i) certain updated information to the Administrator, which consultant will prepare and provide such updated information in report form and (ii) notices of certain specified events, only as provided in the Developer Disclosure Agreement. The Developer has not agreed to provide other information that may be relevant or material to a complete presentation of its financial results of operations, condition, or prospects or agreed to update any information that is provided in this Limited Offering Memorandum, except as provided in the Developer Disclosure Agreement. The Developer makes no representation or warranty concerning such information or concerning its usefulness to a decision to invest in or sell the Bonds at any future date. The Developer disclaims any contractual or tort liability for damages resulting in whole or in part from any breach of the Developer Disclosure Agreement or from any statement made pursuant to the Developer Disclosure Agreement. The Developer’s Compliance with Prior Undertakings The Developer believes it has complied with its reporting requirements under its prior continuing disclosure undertakings, except that the Developer omitted information relating to the Phase 2 Loan from its 3rd quarter 2024 quarterly report filed for the 2021 IA #1 Bonds and the 2021 MIA Bonds. UNDERWRITING FMSbonds, Inc. (the “Underwriter”), has agreed to purchase the Bonds from the City at a purchase price of $__________ (the par amount of the Bonds, less an original issue discount of $_________, and less an underwriting discount of $_________, which includes Underwriter’s Counsel’s fee of $__________). The Underwriter’s obligations are subject to certain conditions precedent and if obligated to purchase any of the Bonds the Underwriter will be obligated to purchase all of the Bonds. The Bonds may be offered and sold by the Underwriter at prices lower than the initial offering prices stated on the inside cover page hereof, and such initial offering prices may be changed from time to time by the Underwriter. REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION OF BONDS FOR SALE The sale of the Bonds has not been registered under the federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon the exemption provided thereunder by Section 3(a)(2); and the Bonds have not been qualified under the Securities Act of Texas in reliance upon various exemptions contained therein; nor have the Bonds been qualified under the securities acts of any other jurisdiction. The City assumes no responsibility for qualification of the Bonds under the securities laws of any jurisdiction in which the Bonds may be sold, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise transferred. This disclaimer of responsibility for qualification for sale or other disposition of the Bonds shall not be construed as an interpretation of any kind with regard to the availability of any exemption from securities registration provisions. 79 LEGAL INVESTMENT AND ELIGIBILITY TO SECURE PUBLIC FUNDS IN TEXAS The PID Act and Section 1201.041 of the Public Security Procedures Act (Chapter 1201, Texas Government Code, as amended) provide that the Bonds are negotiable instruments and investment securities governed by Chapter 8, Texas Business and Commerce Code, as amended, and are legal and authorized investments for insurance companies, fiduciaries, trustees, or for the sinking funds of municipalities or other political subdivisions or public agencies of the State. With respect to investment in the Bonds by municipalities or other political subdivisions or public agencies of the State, the PFIA requires that the Bonds be assigned a rating of at least “A” or its equivalent as to investment quality by a national rating agency. See “NO RATING” above. In addition, the PID Act and various provisions of the Texas Finance Code provide that, subject to a prudent investor standard, the Bonds are legal investments for state banks, savings banks, trust companies with capital of one million dollars or more, and savings and loan associations. The Bonds are eligible to secure deposits to the extent of their market value. No review by the City has been made of the laws in other states to determine whether the Bonds are legal investments for various institutions in those states. No representation is made that the Bonds will be acceptable to public entities to secure their deposits or acceptable to such institutions for investment purposes. The City made no investigation of other laws, rules, regulations or investment criteria which might apply to such institutions or entities or which might limit the suitability of the Bonds for any of the foregoing purposes or limit the authority of such institutions or entities to purchase or invest in the Bonds for such purposes. INVESTMENTS The City invests its funds in investments authorized by State law in accordance with investment policies approved by the City Council. Both State law and the City’s investment policies are subject to change. Under Texas law, the City is authorized to invest in (1) obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities, including the Federal Home Loan Banks; (2) direct obligations of the State or its agencies and instrumentalities; (3) collateralized mortgage obligations directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality of the United States, the underlying security for which is guaranteed by an agency or instrumentality of the United States; (4) other obligations, the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by or backed by the full faith and credit of, the State or the United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities, including obligations that are fully guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or by the explicit full faith and credit of the United States; (5) obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any state rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm not less than A or its equivalent; (6) bonds issued, assumed or guaranteed by the State of Israel; (7) interest- bearing banking deposits that are guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund or its successor, (8) interest-bearing banking deposits other than those described by clause (7) if (A) the funds invested in the banking deposits are invested through: (i) a broker with a main office or branch office in this State that the City selects from a list the governing body or designated investment committee of the entity adopts as required by Section 2256.025, Texas Government Code; or (ii) a depository institution with a main office or branch office in the State that the City selects; (B) the broker or depository institution selected as described by (A) above arranges for the deposit of the funds in the banking deposits in one or more federally insured depository institutions, regardless of where located, for the investing entity's account; (C) the full amount of the principal and accrued interest on the banking deposits is insured by the United States or an instrumentality of the United States; and (D) the City appoints as its custodian of the banking deposits issued for its account: (i) the depository institution selected as described by (A) above; (ii) an entity described by Section 2257.041(d), Texas Government Code; or (iii) a clearing broker dealer registered with the SEC and operating under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c3-3; (9) certificates of deposit and share certificates (i) issued by or through an institution that either has its main office or a branch office in the State, and are guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Insurance Fund, or are secured as to principal by obligations described in clauses (1) through (8) or in any other manner and amount provided by law for City deposits, or (ii) where (a) the funds are invested by the City through (I) a broker that has its main office or a branch office in the State and is selected from a list adopted by the City as required by law or (II) a depository institution that has its main office or a branch office in the State that is selected by the City; (b) the broker or the depository institution selected by the City arranges for the deposit of the funds in certificates of deposit in one or more federally insured depository institutions, wherever located, for the account of the City; (c) the full amount of the principal and accrued 80 interest of each of the certificates of deposit is insured by the United States or an instrumentality of the United States, and (d) the City appoints the depository institution selected under (a) above, a custodian as described by Section 2257.041(d) of the Texas Government Code, or a clearing broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and operating pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c3-3 (17 C.F.R. Section 240.15c3-3) as custodian for the City with respect to the certificates of deposit; (10) fully collateralized repurchase agreements that have a defined termination date, are fully secured by a combination of cash and obligations described in clause (1) above and clause (13) below, which are pledged to the City, held in the City’s name, and deposited at the time the investment is made with the City or with a third-party selected and approved by the City and are placed through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a financial institution doing business in the State; (11) securities lending programs if (i) the securities loaned under the program are 100% collateralized, a loan made under the program allows for termination at any time and a loan made under the program is either secured by (a) obligations that are described in clauses (1) through (8) above, (b) irrevocable letters of credit issued by a state or national bank that is continuously rated by a nationally recognized investment rating firm at not less than A or its equivalent or (c) cash invested in obligations described in clauses (1) through (8) above, clauses (13) through (15) below, or an authorized investment pool; (ii) securities held as collateral under a loan are pledged to the City, held in the City’s name and deposited at the time the investment is made with the City or a third-party designated by the City; (iii) a loan made under the program is placed through either a primary government securities dealer or a financial institution doing business in the State; and (iv) the agreement to lend securities has a term of one year or less, (12) certain bankers’ acceptances with the remaining term of 270 days or less, if the short-term obligations of the accepting bank or its parent are rated at least A-1 or P-1 or the equivalent by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency, (13) commercial paper with a stated maturity of 365 days or less that is rated at least A-1 or P-1 or the equivalent by either (a) two nationally recognized credit rating agencies or (b) one nationally recognized credit rating agency if the paper is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a U.S. or state bank, (14) no-load money market mutual funds registered with and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission that provide the City with a prospectus and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Investment Company Act of 1940 and comply with federal Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 2a-7, and (15) no-load mutual funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission that have an average weighted maturity of less than two years, and have a duration of one year or more and are invested exclusively in obligations described in this paragraph or have a duration of less than one year and the investment portfolio is limited to investment grade securities, excluding asset-backed securities. In addition, bond proceeds may be invested in guaranteed investment contracts that have a defined termination date and are secured by obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities in an amount at least equal to the amount of bond proceeds invested under such contract, other than the prohibited obligations described in the next succeeding paragraph. The City may invest in such obligations directly or through government investment pools that invest solely in such obligations provided that the pools are rated no lower than “AAA” or “AAA-m” or an equivalent by at least one nationally recognized rating service. The City may also contract with an investment management firm registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Section 80b-1 et seq.) or with the State Securities Board to provide for the investment and management of its public funds or other funds under its control for a term up to two years, but the City retains ultimate responsibility as fiduciary of its assets. In order to renew or extend such a contract, the City must do so by order, ordinance, or resolution. The City is specifically prohibited from investing in: (1) obligations whose payment represents the coupon payments on the outstanding principal balance of the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and pays no principal; (2) obligations whose payment represents the principal stream of cash flow from the underlying mortgage-backed security and bears no interest; (3) collateralized mortgage obligations that have a stated final maturity of greater than 10 years; and (4) collateralized mortgage obligations the interest rate of which is determined by an index that adjusts opposite to the changes in a market index. Under Texas law, the City is required to invest its funds under written investment policies that primarily emphasize safety of principal and liquidity; that address investment diversification, yield, maturity, and the quality and capability of investment management; and that includes a list of authorized investments for City funds, the maximum allowable stated maturity of any individual investment, the maximum average dollar-weighted maturity allowed for pooled fund groups, methods to monitor the market price of investments acquired with public funds, a requirement for settlement of all transactions, except investment pool funds and mutual funds, on a delivery versus payment basis, and procedures to monitor rating changes in investments acquired with public funds and the liquidation of such investments consistent with the PFIA. All City funds must be invested consistent with a formally adopted “Investment Strategy Statement” that specifically addresses each fund’s investment. Each Investment Strategy 81 Statement will describe its objectives concerning: (1) suitability of investment type, (2) preservation and safety of principal, (3) liquidity, (4) marketability of each investment, (5) diversification of the portfolio, and (6) yield. Under Texas law, City investments must be made “with judgment and care, under prevailing circumstances, that a person of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would exercise in the management of the person’s own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital and the probable income to be derived.” At least quarterly the investment officers of the City shall submit an investment report detailing: (1) the investment position of the City, (2) that all investment officers jointly prepared and signed the report, (3) the beginning market value, the ending market value and the fully accrued interest for the reporting period of each pooled fund group, (4) the book value and market value of each separately listed asset and fund type invested at the beginning and end of the reporting period by the type of asset and fund type invested, (5) the maturity date of each separately invested asset, (6) the account or fund or pooled fund group for which each individual investment was acquired, and (7) the compliance of the investment portfolio as it relates to: (a) adopted investment strategy statements and (b) state law. No person may invest in City funds without express written authority from the City Council. Under Texas law the City is additionally required to: (1) annually review its adopted policies and strategies; (2) adopt a rule, order, ordinance or resolution stating that it has reviewed its investment policy and investment strategies and records any changes made to either its investment policy or investment strategy in the respective rule, order, ordinance or resolution; (3) require any investment officers with personal business relationships or relatives with firms seeking to sell securities to the City to disclose the relationship and file a statement with the Texas Ethics Commission and the City Council; (4) require the registered principal of firms seeking to sell securities to the City to: (a) receive and review the City’s investment policy, (b) acknowledge that reasonable controls and procedures have been implemented to preclude investment transactions conducted between the City and the business organization that are not authorized by the City’s investment policy (except to the extent that this authorization is dependent on an analysis of the makeup of the City’s entire portfolio, requires an interpretation of subjective investment standards or relates to investment transactions of the entity that are not made through accounts or other contractual arrangements over which the business organization has accepted discretionary investment authority), and (c) deliver a written statement attesting to these requirements; (5) perform an annual audit of the management controls on investments and adherence to the City’s investment policy; (6) provide specific investment training for the officers of the City; (7) restrict reverse repurchase agreements to not more than 90 days and restrict the investment of reverse repurchase agreement funds to no greater than the term of the reverse repurchase agreement; (8) restrict the investment in no-load mutual funds in the aggregate to no more than 15% of the entity’s monthly average fund balance, excluding bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service; (9) require local government investment pools to conform to the new disclosure, rating, net asset value, yield calculation, and advisory board requirements; and (10) at least annually review, revise, and adopt a list of qualified brokers that are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE TRUSTEE The City has appointed Regions Bank, an Alabama state banking corporation, to serve as Trustee. The Trustee is to carry out those duties assignable to it under the Indenture. Except for the contents of this section, the Trustee has not reviewed or participated in the preparation of this Limited Offering Memorandum and assumes no responsibility for the contents, accuracy, fairness or completeness of the information set forth in this Limited Offering Memorandum or for the recitals contained in the Indenture or the Bonds, or for the validity, sufficiency, or legal effect of any of such documents. Furthermore, the Trustee has no oversight responsibility, and is not accountable, for the use or application by the City of any of the Bonds authenticated or delivered pursuant to the Indenture or for the use or application of the proceeds of such Bonds by the City. The Trustee has not evaluated the risks, benefits, or propriety of any investment in the Bonds and makes no representation, and has reached no conclusions, regarding the value or condition of any assets or revenues pledged or assigned as security for the Bonds, the technical or financial feasibility of the project, or the investment quality of the Bonds, about all of which the Trustee expresses no opinion and expressly disclaims the expertise to evaluate. 82 Additional information about the Trustee may be found at its website at www.regions.com. Neither the information on the Trustee’s website, nor any links from that website, is a part of this Limited Offering Memorandum, nor should any such information be relied upon to make investment decisions regarding the Bonds. SOURCES OF INFORMATION General The information contained in this Limited Offering Memorandum has been obtained primarily from the City’s records, the Developer and its representatives and other sources believed to be reliable. In accordance with its responsibilities under the federal securities law, the Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Limited Offering Memorandum in accordance with, and as part of, its responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of the transaction, but the Underwriter does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Limited Offering Memorandum or any sale hereunder will create any implication that there has been no change in the financial condition or operations of the City or the Developer described herein since the date hereof. This Limited Offering Memorandum contains, in part, estimates and matters of opinion that are not intended as statements of fact, and no representation or warranty is made as to the correctness of such estimates and opinions or that they will be realized. The summaries of the statutes, resolutions, ordinances, indentures and appraisal and other related reports set forth herein are included subject to all of the provisions of such documents. These summaries do not purport to be complete statements of such provisions and reference is made to such documents for further information. Source of Certain Information The information contained in this Limited Offering Memorandum relating to the description of the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements, the Development and the Developer generally and, in particular, the information included in the maps included herein and in the sections captioned “PLAN OF FINANCE” (excluding the subcaptions “– The Bonds” and “– Prior Bonds), THE IMPROVEMENT AREAS #2-4 IMPROVEMENTS,” “THE DEVELOPMENT,” “THE DEVELOPER,” “BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” (only as it pertains to the Developer, the Improvement Areas #2-4 Improvements and the Development), “LEGAL MATTERS — Litigation — The Developer,” “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE – The Developer’s Compliance with Prior Undertakings,” “SOURCES OF INFORMATION – Source of Certain Information,” “APPENDIX D-2,” “APPENDIX F” and “APPENDIX G” has been provided by the Developer has been provided by the Developer, and the Developer warrants and represents that the information contained herein is true and correct and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. At the time of delivery of the Bonds to the Underwriter, the Developer will deliver a certificate to this effect to the City and the Underwriter. Experts The information regarding the Service and Assessment Plan in this Limited Offering Memorandum has been provided by the Administrator and has been included in reliance upon the authority of such firm as experts in the field of development planning and finance. The information regarding the Appraisal in this Limited Offering Memorandum has been provided by the Appraiser, and has been included in reliance upon the authority of such firm as experts in the field of the appraisal of real property. Updating of Limited Offering Memorandum If, subsequent to the date of the Limited Offering Memorandum, the City learns, through the ordinary course of business and without undertaking any investigation or examination for such purposes, or is notified by the Underwriter, of any adverse event which causes the Limited Offering Memorandum to be materially misleading, and unless the Underwriter elects to terminate its obligation to purchase the Bonds, the City will promptly prepare and supply to the Underwriter an appropriate amendment or supplement to the Limited Offering Memorandum satisfactory 83 to the Underwriter; provided, however, that the obligation of the City to so amend or supplement the Limited Offering Memorandum will terminate when the City delivers the Bonds to the Underwriter, unless the Underwriter notifies the City on or before such date that less than all of the Bonds have been sold to ultimate customers; in which case the City’s obligations hereunder will extend for an additional period of time (but not more than 90 days after the date the City delivers the Bonds) until all of the Bonds have been sold to ultimate customers. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Limited Offering Memorandum constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “budget” or other similar words. THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED HEREIN TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE CITY DOES NOT PLAN TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ANY OF ITS EXPECTATIONS, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR, OTHER THAN AS DESCRIBED UNDER “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE” HEREIN. AUTHORIZATION AND APPROVAL The City Council will authorize this preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum to be used by the Underwriter in connection with the marketing and sale of the Bonds and will approve its form and content in the Bond Ordinance. (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.) APPENDIX A FORM OF INDENTURE (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.) APPENDIX B FORM OF SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX C FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX D-1 FORM OF CITY DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX D-2 FORM OF DEVELOPER DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX E APPRAISAL (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX F REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX G PHOTOGRAPHS OF DEVELOPMENT IN IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 AND IMPROVEMENT AREA #3 OF THE DISTRICT (THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Item No. 5.j. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Kaleb Kentner AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution approving the Development Agreement for Thompson Grove. (DA 25-0003) (Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) [ Applicant has withdrawn the request; no action is required.] SUMMARY: This item was tabled from the April 14, 2026 Council agenda. The applicant has requested to withdraw the request. No action needs to be taken. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item has no strategic connection. ATTACHMENTS: Item No. 6.a. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Carrie Land AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance of the City of Anna, Texas, canvassing the returns of a General Election of two City Council Places for four-year terms expiring May 2030. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: A canvass is a mandatory, ministerial duty. City Council shall convene to conduct the local canvass not later than the 11th day after the Election. Section 67.004 of the Election Code provides that the presiding officer of the canvassing authority shall note the completion of the canvass in the minutes or in the recording required by Section 551.021 of the Government Code: City Council, Place 3 - Four-Year Term o Mike Olivarez 190 32.26% of Votes o Jessica Walden 399 67.47% of Votes City Council Place 5 - Four -Year Term o Susan Jones 249 42.06% of Votes o Elden Baker 343 57.94% of Votes FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: A general election was held in the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”) on May 2, 2026 for the purpose of electing two city council members, each for a four-year term. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item has no strategic connection. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ord Election Canvass 2026 2. May 2 2026-Joint Election- Election Night Summary Report--Unofficial Final CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS (May 2, 2026 Election Canvass) a general election was held in the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”) on May 2, 2026, for the purpose of electing two city council members, each for a four-year term; and , the City Council of the City of Anna (the “Council”) has reviewed and investigated all matters pertaining to said general election returns thereof; and the Council hereby canvasses the returns of said general election, at which there was submitted to all resident, qualified electors of the City for their action thereupon, the election of two city council members each for a four-year term; and , the Council has diligently inquired into the poll lists and the official election returns which were duly and lawfully made to this Council by the judges, officials, and clerks holding and conducting said general election, the poll lists, and the official election returns showing separately the votes cast in said election; and from the returns, this Council hereby finds that the following votes were cast in said general election by voters who were resident, qualified electors of the City; and , each of the candidates in said election received the following votes: City Council, Place 3 - Four-Year Term Mike Olivarez 190 32.26% of Votes Jessica Walden 399 67.47% of Votes City Council, Place 5 - Four-Year Term Susan Jones 249 42.06% of Votes Elden Baker 343 57.94% of Votes . The Council officially finds, determines, and declares that the election was duly and properly ordered, that proper legal notice of such election was duly given in the English language and the Spanish language, that proper election officers were duly appointed prior to the election, that the election was duly and legally held, that all resident, qualified electors of the City were permitted to vote at the election, and due returns of the results of the election had been made and delivered, and that the City of Anna has duly canvassed such returns, all in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and of the United States of America and the Ordinance calling the election. SECTION 2. Subject to being duly qualified and taking the oath of office as provided by the laws of the State of Texas and the City of Anna Home-Rule Charter, the following persons are elected as Council Member, Place 3 of the City for a term of four (4) years: Jessica Walden; and Council Member, Place 5 of the City for a term of four (4) years: Elden Baker. ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this 12th day of May 2026. Summary Results Report Joint General and Special Election May 2, 2026 UNOFFICIAL RESULTS 21 of 21 Vote Centers Reporting Collin County Mayor – City of Allen Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE %Ballot By Mail Early Voting Election Day Chris Schulmeister 3,278 81.10%235 2,042 1,001 Dave Shafer 764 18.90%54 448 262 Total Votes Cast 4,042 100.00%289 2,490 1,263 Overvotes 0 0 0 0 Undervotes 14 2 10 2 Contest Totals 4,056 291 2,500 1,265 Councilmember, Place 2 - Allen Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE %Ballot By Mail Early Voting Election Day Tommy Baril 3,185 100.00%235 1,990 960 Total Votes Cast 3,185 100.00%235 1,990 960 Overvotes 0 0 0 0 Undervotes 871 56 510 305 Contest Totals 4,056 291 2,500 1,265 City Council, Place 3 – City of Anna Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE %Ballot By Mail Early Voting Election Day Mike Olivarez 190 32.26%8 104 78 Jessica Walden 399 67.74%34 237 128 Total Votes Cast 589 100.00%42 341 206 Overvotes 0 0 0 0 Undervotes 5 0 3 2 Contest Totals 594 42 344 208 City Council, Place 5 – City of Anna Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE %Ballot By Mail Early Voting Election Day Susan Jones 249 42.06%22 139 88 Elden Baker 343 57.94%20 204 119 Total Votes Cast 592 100.00%42 343 207 Overvotes 0 0 0 0 Undervotes 2 0 1 1 Contest Totals 594 42 344 208 Mayor – City of Carrollton Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE %Ballot By Mail Early Voting Election Day Steve Babick 0 0 0 0 Zul Mohamed 0 0 0 0 Total Votes Cast 0 0 0 0 Overvotes 0 0 0 0 Undervotes 0 0 0 0 Contest Totals 0 0 0 0 Election Summary - 05/02/2026 10:29 PM 2 of 19 Report generated with Electionware Copyright © 2007-2020 Collin County Seal Watermark Seal for Collin County. Collin County Government Item No. 6.b. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Jeff Freeth AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan Update. (Acting Director of Community Services Jeff Freeth) SUMMARY: Review, approve, and adopt the draft of the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the 2025 park master plan update was appropriated in the FY2025-2026 Community Investment Program budget in the amount of $350,000 from the Park Development Fund. BACKGROUND: The Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 27, 2021. Typically, park master plans are updated every five to seven years so that the evolving recreational needs of the community are considered and accounted for. Though it has been less than four years since adoption, Anna's unprecedented growth and changing demographics warrant an update. In addition, many of the projects specifically identified in the current park master plan have been completed or are underway, including the skatepark, pickleball courts, trail segments, and Bryant Park. Finally, some of the larger projects envisioned in the current plan are ready for refinement through additional public input. The two most significant future projects are a recreation center and a sports complex. The City Council considers updating the park system master plan to be beneficial to the neighbors of Anna, Texas, meeting several goals and objectives set forth in the Strategic Plan. On January 14, 2025, Council approved a resolution approving an amendment to the Master Agreement for Professional Services 2021-2026 with Freese & Nichols, Inc., with a Professional Services Project Order (PSPO) for planning work associated with an update to the park system Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan. The update to the Master Plan was used to gather up-to-date feedback from the community, appointed officials, and elected officials, identify new and changing community needs, and re-prioritize the remaining projects identified in the current plan. The plan update included input from our neighbors, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, local partnered organizations such as the Greater Anna Chamber of Commerce, Anna Independent School District, Anna Sports Group, Economic Development, and local businesses, developers, Community Services staff, and department leaders from Development Services, Economic Development, Public Works, and Finance. These efforts included the following: Survey The survey was open to neighbors from May 17 to June 19th. The survey was promoted through the City's weekly newsletter, email invitation to any past or present recreation program participant, mailed postcards to all households with an Anna zip code, a booth at the May 17th, 2025 Touch-a-Truck Event, and signs with QR codes at all the city's parks. This resulted in a remarkable 814 submitted surveys. Virtual input meetings • Youth Sports Coaches and Partnered Organizations – (May 28, 2025, at 6 pm and June 17, 2025, at 6 pm) • Developers and Anna ISD — (May 29, 2025, at 6 pm) • Economic Development and Local Businesses — (June 3, 2025, at 6 pm) • General Public (June 5, 2025, at 6 pm) In-person Meetings at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board • May 19, 2025 — Brainstorming and input • June 16, 2025 — Presentation of inventory/existing facilities • August 18, 2025 — Discussion of survey results • September 15, 2025 — General open house and input session • January 20, 2026—Discussion of needs assessment, recommendations, and implementation At its meeting on February 17th, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended the approval of the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan. The Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan was then presented to the City Council during a work session on March 10, 2026. On April 6, 2026, the Planning & Zoning Commission approved the recommendation for approval by City Council. The Plan is now before the City Council for formal review and adoption. Next steps in implementing the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan include receiving feedback and direction from the Parks Advisory Board and the Council on project priorities, funding strategies, grants, and park development policies. The project priorities will be covered during the upcoming FY26-27 budgeting process in the Parks Capital Improvement Plan. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Active. The City of Anna promotes an active community through: • A variety of social opportunities for neighbors and visitors • Diverse recreational venues • Well-maintained trails and natural areas • Opportunities for lifelong learning ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - 2050 Parks Open Space Trails and Recreation Master Plan (05-12- 2026) 2. City of Anna PROST Plan DRAFT (2026.05.04) CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS . , on April 27, 2021, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the “City Council”), after a duly noticed public hearing, adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the City by Ordinance 903-2021; and , the Comprehensive Plan includes the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan for the City of Anna; and , the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan should be reviewed and amended from time to time to reflect the changing needs of the community; and , the Existing 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan has—with the input of the public, been updated and reviewed by City staff, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the City Council; and , said updated plan (the “Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan”) is comprised of the documents attached to this ordinance as Exhibit A and further described herein; and , the City Council has held the required public hearing, during which the public was given the opportunity to give testimony regarding the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, all in compliance with applicable state law; and , the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Anna to approve and adopt the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, which is in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare; . The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council with respect to the amendments described herein. . The City Council of the City officially finds, determines, and declares that the City of Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan as set forth in the original 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan adopted under Ordinance No. 903-2021 by replacing the Existing 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan with the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan set forth in the attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein for all purposes; provided, however that this ordinance does not amend, repeal or affect: (a) Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Plan (b); the Downtown Master Plan, the Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan (collectively, the “Retained Plans”); or (c) any appendices to the “Retained Plans”. The City Council further grants the City’s Director of Community Services full authority to correct all non-substantive clerical or typographical errors in the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, and make other necessary formatting, heading and numbering changes, provided that such corrections and changes do not change the meaning or effect of the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan and are approved by the City Attorney. Section 3. Notwithstanding any provision of the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, said plan shall serve as a set of guidelines, not requirements or mandatory regulations, for the City’s adoption of, or amendment(s) to the City’s various Parks, Open Space, Trails, Special Event and Recreation regulations. Only to the extent required by state law, parks, open space, trails, special event and recreation regulations and amendments thereto shall hereafter be adopted in accordance with the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan. Section 4. Upon adoption and execution of this ordinance, the City Secretary is directed to attach same and its exhibits to the original City of Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan in all places where said 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan is filed as of public record or posted for public inspection. Section 5. All ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed to the extent of that conflict. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional provision had never been a part hereof. The City declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this 12th day of May 2026. CITY OF ANNA, TX Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update DRAFT | May 2026 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. _______________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE 903-2021 APPROVING AND ADOPTING UPDATES TO THE 2050 PARKS, OPEN SPACE, TRAILS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN. WHEREAS, on April 27, 2021, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the “City Council”), after a duly noticed public hearing, adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the City by Ordinance 903-2021; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan includes the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan for the City of Anna; and WHEREAS, the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan should be reviewed and amended from time to time to reflect the changing needs of the community; and WHEREAS, the Existing 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan has—with the input of the public, been updated and reviewed by City staff, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the City Council; and WHEREAS, said updated plan (the “Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan”) is comprised of the documents attached to this ordinance as Exhibit A and further described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held the required public hearing, during which the public was given the opportunity to give testimony regarding the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, all in compliance with applicable state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Anna to approve and adopt the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, which is in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA,TEXAS: Section 1. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council with respect to the amendments described herein. Section 2. The City Council of the City officially finds, determines, and declares that the City of Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan as set forth in the original 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan adopted under Ordinance No. 903-2021 by replacing the Existing 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan with the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan set forth in the attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein for all purposes; provided, however that this ordinance does not amend, repeal or affect: (a) Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Plan (b); the Downtown Master Plan, the Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan (collectively, the “Retained Plans”); or (c) any appendices to the “Retained Plans”. The City Council further grants the City’s Director of Community Services full authority to correct all non-substantive clerical or typographical errors in the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, and make other necessary formatting, heading and numbering changes, provided that such corrections and changes do not change the meaning or effect of the 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan and are approved by the City Attorney. Section 3. Notwithstanding any provision of the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan, said plan shall serve as a set of guidelines, not requirements or mandatory regulations, for the City’s adoption of, or amendment(s) to the City’s various Parks, Open Space, Trails, Special Event and Recreation regulations. Only to the extent required by state law, parks, open space, trails, special event and recreation regulations and amendments thereto shall hereafter be adopted in accordance with the Updated 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan. Section 4. Upon adoption and execution of this ordinance, the City Secretary is directed to attach same and its exhibits to the original City of Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan in all places where said 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan is filed as of public record or posted for public inspection. Section 5. All ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed to the extent of that conflict. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional provision had never been a part hereof. The City declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this 12th day of May 2026. ATTEST: APPROVED: __________________________ __________________________ City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Pete Cain ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mayor & City Council Pete Cain, Mayor Kevin Toten, Place 1 Nathan Bryan, Place 2 Stan Carver II, Place 3 Kelly Patterson-Herndon, Place 4 Elden Baker, Place 5 Manny Singh, Place 6 City Staff Ronda Perez, City Manager Jeff Freeth, Acting Director of Community Services Dalan Walker, Park Planning and Development Manager Joseph Cotton, Director of Public Works Kaleb Kentner, Director of Development Services Natasha Roach, Interim Director of Economic Development Terri Doby, Director of Finance Lauren Mecke, Planning Manager Parks Board David Colegrove, Place 1 Madeline Madrid, Place 2 Nichole Hunt, Place 2 (former) Alastair Hunte, Place 3 Kennon Weaver, Place 4 Choya Morrison, Place 5 (former) Sheri Sachs, Place 5 Scott Gentry, Place 6 Rachel Sinagra, Place 6 (former) Susan Jones, Place 7 Consultant Team Wilson Kerr, AICP, Project Manager Daniel Harrison, AICP, Senior Advisor Gail Ferry Katalenas, PLA, AICP, ASLA, Senior Parks Planner Karen Chavez, Project Planner Christopher Sison, Project Planner Community Services Staff Brent Armstrong Susan Bibb Trenton Borchardt Luke Carter Jacob Dickson Daniel Herbert Amy Lacey Daniel Lewis Marc Marchand Denny Mitchell Casey Moore Major Mosier Elijah Nelms Tristen Pierce Barbara Smith Heather Standerfer Meredith Tillett Cody Vaquera Christian White 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & COMMUNITY ANALYSIS ...............................................................................6 PARKS & RECREATION INVENTORY .............................................................................................20 NEEDS ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................................64 RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................90 IMPLEMENTATION ..........................................................................................................................108 APPENDI X.............................................................................................................................................PAGE 119 5 1 INTRODUCTION & COMMUNITY ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE Parks and recreation opportunities are important community amenities that enhance the quality of life for City of Anna (City) neighbors. As the City continues to experience rapid growth, it is increasingly essential to maintain and expand the parks and recreation system to meet the evolving needs of current and future populations. High-quality, well-maintained parks and a diverse range of recreational venues and programs offer meaningful social opportunities for neighbors and visitors. These assets support the community’s physical and mental well-being and reinforce Anna’s identity as a strong and livable city. This Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan Update (Plan) establishes a strategic framework for developing, maintaining, and programming Anna’s parks and recreation system and builds upon the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This PROST Master Plan: • Identifies the implications of current community demographics and projected population growth as they relate to parks and recreation. • Analyzes the current state of the City’s parks, recreation facilities, open spaces, and trails. • Identifies parks and recreation deficiencies and needs. • Establishes goals, objectives and recommendations for the next five to 10 years. • Prioritizes improvements to the parks and recreation system. • Provides recommendations for additional funding opportunities. City staff, elected and appointed officials, neighbors, and the private developers will use this document as a planning tool to understand local needs and move toward long-term community success. The Plan is intended to support local coordination efforts for Anna alongside Collin County, area school districts, local organizations, and sports leagues. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)8 BENEFITS OF PARKS Access to quality parks and recreation is an integral part of promoting livability in a community, as they provide a wide array of benefits, including: Overall Well-Being • Contact with nature helps improve overall well-being by providing spaces for recreation, relaxation, and connection to nature. • Recreation provides multi-generational opportunities for mental, physical, social, and emotional stimulation. • Parks serve as a third space where neighbors can meet and further strengthen community bonds. Health Benefits • Access to nature and recreation increases physical and psychological health. • Play provides crucial developmental opportunities for children. • Parks provide a place where people can be physically active to reduce stress, which in turn, can improve their mental and physical health. Environmental Benefits • Parkland helps to mitigate climate, air, and water pollution impacts. • Preserved open space protects vital habitat for plants and wildlife. • Parks foster environmental stewardship in neighbors. Economic Benefits • Parkland increases property values. • High-quality parks and recreation can attract new residents and businesses. • Unique park and recreation amenities can encourage tourism and associated economic benefits. Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 9 PLANNING AREA The study area outlined in this Plan encompasses Anna’s city limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ), as indicated on the map on the following page. The City of Anna is the primary governmental entity responsible for providing parks and recreation facilities for its neighbors. While the City will largely lead implementation, everyone in the community has a vested interest in seeing parks and recreation improve and succeed. Potential partners on implementation may include other governmental entities, local industry and businesses, and the neighbors of Anna. In 2025, the City of Anna commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc. to prepare a complete update to its PROST Master Plan. The Plan’s analysis, vision and goals, recommendations, and prioritization were developed to create this overall guiding document for parks and recreation development. The planning process included a variety of public engagement opportunities to allow public input to help shape all elements of the Plan. Engagement opportunities included Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings, stakeholder listening sessions, a public workshop, and an in-depth online public survey. Detailed documentation of the public input process can be found in Appendix A. This Plan addresses parks and recreation needs over the next five to 10 years. Recommendations should be periodically re-evaluated to remain responsive to community needs and priorities. In alignment with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) master plan guidelines, the City should formally update the Plan every five years or sooner if significant growth or changes in community needs occur. PLANNING PROCESS & TIME FRAME CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)10 Map 1. Planning Area Anna City Limits Anna ETJ Parks Trails 100 year floodplain Regulatory floodway Streams City Hall Point of Interest Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 11 COMMUNITY CONTEXT BRIEF HISTORY The City of Anna traces its roots to the late 19th century during the extension of the Houston and Texas Central Railway through north-central Collin County. The railway reached the area in 1872, and the community that formed along the line was named Anna. By the time the town was formally platted in 1883, it had a population of about 20, along with a few stores, a steam gristmill, a Baptist church, and a post office. Growth continued steadily, and by 1890 the population had reached between 100 and 200 residents. Anna was officially incorporated in 1913, and John Flavel Greer, who built the town’s first home and store, served as its first mayor. The early economy was closely tied to agriculture and rail transport, with additional rail lines introduced in the early 20th century. Over the decades, Anna remained a small rural community until the late 20th and 21st centuries, when growth from the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex began extending northward. Map 2. Regional Context REGIONAL CONTEXT Anna is located in northern Collin County, approximately 45 miles north of downtown Dallas, along US 75 and SH 5. It is adjacent to Van Alstyne, Melissa, Westminster, and Weston. Its location within the rapidly expanding Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex has positioned Anna to be one of the fastest-growing cities in the United States. Its strategic location near high-growth communities such as McKinney, Melissa, and Sherman, enhances its regional connectivity. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)12 PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS Anna 2050 Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan In 2021, the City initiated a process to update the Anna 2050 Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan to obtain and organize input from the community into a comprehensive document that has guided park development and recreational programming over the past four years. The planning effort included a detailed inventory and assessment of existing park conditions, programming, and community needs, including feedback from City staff and neighbors. The plan identified specific recommendations for improvements to the City’s existing parks and facilities and strategic priorities for acquiring new parkland, enhancing recreational facilities, and expanding the trail network. In addition to physical improvements, the plan outlined an operational and organizational framework to support future staffing and resource needs. The strategies from the 2021 plan will inform the PROST Update planning process. While this Plan is technically a five-year update of the 2021 plan, the growth the City has experienced in the last five years has warranted a complete planning evaluation. Some key accomplishments during the last five years include: • New play structure and parking lot at Natural Springs Park. • Design of Bryant Park. • Pecan Grove Trail construction and connection to existing Park Place trail. • Substantial renovations and additions to Slayter Creek Park (e.g., skatepark, shaded fitness court, and splash pad renovation, new restroom, redesigned disc golf course, parking lot expansion, and various new lighted sport courts). • Improvements to Yank Park including, a new lighted half-court basketball court and playground lighting. • Accessible playground, ballfield upgrades and lighting, and parking improvements at Johnson Park. • Feasibility study for a recreation center. • Activation of recreation programming (youth, adults, adult 50+), special events, and adding adaptive programming. • Partnership with Anna ISD for youth sports programs. • Design of Finley Park in Anna Town Square. • Added developer-designed and construction neighborhood parks (Carol Park, John Flavel Greer Park, Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park, and Sherley Farms Park). Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update (2025) In Fall 2024, the City launched an update to the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan in response to the rapid growth and change the community has experienced since the last planning effort in 2021. The update refines key land use recommendations and includes an updated Future Land Use Plan. The plan serves as a guiding document for managing growth, shaping development, and ensuring that Anna remains a vibrant community until 2050. Key recommendations that impact parks and recreation include: • Improve existing City-owned parks to better serve residents and support community wellness. • Acquire developable properties based on key service criteria to expand the parks and recreation system. • Consider incorporating standards, where appropriate, to evaluate new private development proposals on their efforts to provide outdoor open space with amenities and community gathering places. • Identify and prioritize sidewalk and trail projects that connect the downtown core, neighborhoods, schools, and nearby amenities. • Establish priorities for citywide facility development. • Establish development incentives for the construction of new recreation facilities. Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 13 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2024 Po p u l a t i o n Year DEMOGRAPHICS Understanding population growth is essential for planning the future of parks and recreation facilities. As Anna’s population increases, so does the demand for parks, playgrounds, sports fields, walking trails, and other amenities that serve residents of all ages. In recent years, Anna has experienced rapid growth to an estimated population of 29,353 in 2025, an increase of nearly 10,000 people since 2021 (see Figure 1). Although this trend is expected to slow over time, growth will continue to shape the City’s recreational needs. Figure 2 and Figure 3 present the future population projections through 2045 using different Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) scenarios. A high-growth scenario of 5.5% CAGR estimates a population of approximately 86,000 by 2045, while a more moderate 3.5% CAGR projects around 57,300 residents. Linear Growth Rates Year 3.5%4.5%5.5% 2025 28,797 29,075 29,353 2030 34,202 36,233 38,364 2035 40,621 45,153 50,140 2040 48,245 56,268 65,530 2045 57,300 70,121 85,646 Figure 1. Anna Historic Population Growth The 5.5% scenario closely aligns with projections from the Texas Water Development Board. As Anna continues to grow, monitoring these trends will be key to ensuring parks and recreation facilities evolve to meet future demand. For the sake of this Plan, a 10-year projection to a population of 50,140 (5.5% CAGR) will be used when determining parks and recreation needs. Figure 2. Linear Growth Rates* 29,353 Year Po p u l a t i o n 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Po p u l a t i o n Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Scenarios 3.50%4.50%5.50%Source: ACS, 5-Year Estimates *These growth rates were created using a base population of 27,823 from the 2024 ACS-5 Year Estimates, the most up-to-date numbers available during the planning process. Figure 3. Anna Population Projection Scenarios* CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)14 15%10%5%0%5%10%15% 0-5 15-19 20-24 25-59 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ Male %Female % 10-14 6-9 Age Distribution Parks and recreation amenities play a vital role in enhancing the quality of life for residents of all ages, offering spaces for physical activity, social interaction, and community building. Facilities such as playgrounds and sports fields are particularly valued by families with young children, while walking trails and open spaces serve a wide range of age groups, making them key multi-generational assets. In the City of Anna, the median age is 32.4 years, slightly younger than the Texas state median, indicating a relatively youthful population. The City’s largest population cohorts are adults, ages 30 to 39. Notably, Anna has a higher-than-average proportion of children under the age of five and, more broadly, a strong presence of youth under age 14 (see Figure 4). As these children grow, it will be essential for the City to plan for their changing recreational needs by providing offerings for teens and young adults. With the City’s rapid population growth and increasing appeal to young families, Anna is likely to continue attracting a younger demographic. At the same time, it is important to maintain a balance by ensuring that amenities also serve adults of all ages and long-time residents. This indicates a need for a highly diverse parks and recreation system that can meet the varying and ever-changing needs of the community. Figure 4. Age Distribution Source: ACS, 5-Year Estimates Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 15 White 73.1% Black or African American 16.2% American Indian and Alaska Native 0.7% Asian 0.9%Some Other Race 2.9% Two or More Races 6.2% ANNA $99,375 COLLIN COUNTY $119,115 TEXAS $76,292 Figure 6. Median Household Income Source: ACS, 5-Year Estimates Race and Ethnicity Despite significant population growth in the last several years, Anna’s racial and ethnic composition has remained relatively consistent over the last decade. White residents make up the largest share of the population at 73.1%, followed by Black or African American residents at 16.2%. Individuals identifying as Hispanic or Latino account for 19.4% of the population. The City should continue to provide programs and events that reflect the cultural and recreational preferences of all community members. Figure 5. Race and Ethnicity Source: ACS, 5-Year Estimates 19.4% Hispanic or Latino* Household Income According to recent data, the median household income in Anna is $99,375, which is slightly lower than the median for Collin County ($119,115) but higher than the state of Texas ($76,292). This indicates that Anna residents generally have a moderate to above-median income compared to the state, but slightly below the regional median. Income is an important consideration when determining the mix of fee-based versus free recreation opportunities offered to the community. *Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity, not a race. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)16 Educational Attainment The educational attainment levels of Anna’s residents reflect a diverse range of academic backgrounds. The largest group of residents, 24.2%, are high school graduates (including those with equivalency diplomas). A significant portion of the population, 22.0%, have attended some college but have not obtained a degree. Additionally, 12.1% hold an Associate’s degree, while 23.8% have completed a Bachelor’s degree. Graduate or professional degrees are held by 11.3% of the population. These numbers highlight the importance of offering accessible recreational and educational opportunities that meet the needs of all residents, such as after-school programs and educational initiatives. Employment Anna’s workforce is diverse, with the largest sector being educational services, healthcare, and social assistance (26.5%), followed by retail trade (13.4%) and professional services (11.7%). Other notable sectors include wholesale trade, manufacturing, and arts, entertainment, and recreation. This variety underscores the importance of offering flexible, inclusive recreation programs that accommodate residents’ diverse work schedules and interests. Source: ACS, 5-Year Estimates Figure 7. Educational Attainment Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 17 ANNA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Community Services Department oversees both recreation services and parks maintenance through its Parks Maintenance and Programs and Events Divisions. The department is staffed by 15 full-time and one part-time staff member, with 11 dedicated to park maintenance. The Programs and Events Division includes a supervisor and two coordinators, each responsible for distinct program areas: recreation, special events, adult, adult 50+ and outdoor programming. Current Program Coordinators also assist in all departmental programs and events, including collaborative efforts with the library. Volunteers ASST. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Director of Community Services PARKS MAINT. Parks Superintendent Parks Supervisor Irrigation & Chemical Application Technician Parks Maintenance I RECREATION General Maintenance Crew Leader Parks Maintenance I (3) Athletics Parks Maintenance II Parks Maintenance I (2) Special EventsVolunteers Adult and Outdoor Programs Program Coordinator (PT) Athletics Program Coordinator LIBRARY Library Services Mgr. Librarian (2) COMMUNITY SERVICES COORDINATOR ENGINEERING Park Planning and Development Manager Recreation Supervisor Circulation Supervisor Library Assistant Public Works Community Services Figure 8. Anna Community Services Organizational Chart Parks maintenance personnel are tasked with the upkeep of all City-owned parks and facilities and support community organizations that provide sports and recreational opportunities for residents. Approximately 25-30% of park maintenance staff’s time is spent on the upkeep of non-parkland areas. While current staffing levels are sufficient to manage existing responsibilities, the department is proposing the addition of new staff to support current and additional programming efforts. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)18 GROWTH AREAS As Anna’s population continues to grow, the demand for housing will rise, necessitating the development of additional residential areas. A coordinated effort to meet housing needs while also providing adequate parks and recreational spaces will be crucial to enhancing quality of life for the Anna community. Figure 9 shows the residential growth areas in the City, including locations where current or future development may include a residential component. While parkland is needed in all residential areas, it is often more easily dedicated and/or developed in areas of new growth. As the City plans for the future of its park system, it is important to locate parks near residential areas. Future parkland acquisitions and development should aim to provide sufficient park resources to serve any underserved neighborhoods. Figure 9. Residential Growth Areas Introduction & Community Analysis | CHAPTER 1 19 2 PARKS & RECREATION INVENTORY INTRODUCTION CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)22 This chapter provides a comprehensive list of existing parks and recreation assets in the City of Anna. The inventory includes City-owned parks and facilities. There are also a variety of privately owned parks (such as those provided by an HOA) and facilities owned by the school district (ISD) that provide recreational benefits to select groups throughout the community. This Plan primarily focuses on the public parks and recreation resources that are available to the whole community. Following an overview of the parks system, a series of 13 park profiles provides more detailed information about each park. At the time of this Plan, there are a variety of parks, trails, and properties proposed for future development. These details will be noted in the applicable parks, but the primary intent of the inventory is to describe a snapshot of the existing parks and recreational system available for community use today. Finally, an overview of recreational programming is provided to highlight existing programs throughout the City. PARKS AND FACILITIES INVENTORY Neighborhood Parks (N) Neighborhood parks are the foundation of a well-balanced park system and provide the daily park experiences for residents. They are designed to be located within walking or biking distance of the surrounding neighborhoods and serve as the social centers for residential districts in an active and passive capacity for a wide variety of age groups. Sherley Heritage Park is a local example of a neighborhood park. Typical Size: 1 to 15 acres Service Area: 1/4 to 1/2 mile radius Characteristics and Considerations: These parks should be located in the center of neighborhoods with good public access. At least one side of the park should front a residential street. Sites should drain properly and be suitable for a variety of uses, such as playgrounds, sports courts, trail access, and areas for family functions. Community Parks (C) Community parks are large and versatile park types developed to serve the broader community. They are intended to meet the recreational needs of several neighborhoods. Park development should protect desirable natural amenities and include active and passive activities for all ages. Natural Springs Park is a local example of a community park. Typical Size: 25 to 300 acres Service Area: 1 to 3 mile radius Characteristics and Considerations: These parks should be adjacent to desirable natural resources and have amenities such as athletic fields, pools, playgrounds, sports courts, picnic areas, and restrooms. Community parks should be connected to citywide trail networks and be conveniently accessed by cars. Park programming should include adequate space for off-street parking. PARK CLASSIFICATIONS Parks and open space systems include a variety of different types of parkland that meet the varying recreational needs in a community. Types vary by size, function, typical amenities, and service area. As the City grows and new park spaces are acquired, an adopted classification system should be used to guide the development of each type of park. Sherley Heritage Park Natural Springs Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 23 Regional Parks (R) Regional parks are the largest type of park in a typical community’s park system. The size varies depending on the purpose and character of the site. Regional parks provide recreational amenities for the entire community and even serve as a hub for surrounding communities. Slayter Creek Park is a local example of a regional park. Typical Size: Varies from 10 acres to several thousand acres Service Area: Up to 50 mile radius, depending on site features and amenities Characteristics and Considerations: These parks can be located almost anywhere in the community. They should be accessible by car and connected to citywide trail networks for locals. Typical amenities include destination playgrounds, athletic courts and fields, trail systems, water activities, unprogrammed open space, and preserved natural areas. Linear Parks (L) Linear parks are typically located alongside linear natural features such as creeks or man-made features like utility easements. They often serve as connectors between multiple parks or points of interest within a city. They also safeguard wildlife routes and ecosystem function, or facilitate floodways and stormwater drainage. Typical Size: Varies based on surrounding environment Service Area: Varies based on amenities Characteristics and Considerations: Linear parks include amenities for walking, jogging, bicycling and hiking. Trails may be paved or natural. At key nodes or trailheads, benches, water fountains, restrooms, and trash cans may be provided. Splash Pad at Slayter Creek Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)24 Special Use Parks (S) Special use parks include a broad range of specialized park and recreation facilities, often with a single major use. Typical examples of special use parks include dog parks, golf courses, skate parks, aquatic facilities, tennis complexes, ballfield complexes, or historic sites. There are no special use parks in Anna because the special use amenities (e.g., skate park) are integrated into other park types. Typical Size: Varies Service Area: Varies Characteristics and Considerations: Special use parks serve varying user groups based on their programming. The location of these parks within the community and amenities will vary based on available land and appropriate adjacent uses. Open Space (OS) Open space typically refers to areas of land that are undeveloped, natural, or minimally developed. These areas may include nature parks, nature reserves, meadows, forests, and other natural landscapes. Geer Park serves as a local example of open space. Typical Size: Varies Service Area: Varies Characteristics and Considerations: The location of open space and accompanying amenities will vary based on available land and appropriate adjacent uses. Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 25 ANNA PARKS AND FACILITIES The City of Anna currently maintains a diverse array of parks, special-use facilities, and trails designed to serve the recreational needs of its residents and visitors. The system encompasses approximately 256 acres across several developed parks, trails, and recreation facilities, as well as undeveloped City-owned lands and parcels earmarked for future park development. The parks vary in size from 1 to 86 acres and are strategically distributed throughout the City, with a notable concentration along Slayter Creek. The park system includes opportunities for active and passive recreation. Active recreation refers to structured activities that often require significant infrastructure for sports such as baseball, soccer, and football, while passive recreation includes activities like jogging, picnicking, and bird watching that generally do not require specialized equipment. To further augment recreational offerings, the City should explore partnering with the Anna Independent School District (ISD) to utilize facilities on school properties, thereby providing additional space for both active and passive recreation beyond regular school hours. Moreover, opportunities exist to connect many of the City’s parks through an integrated trail network as well as expand park programming into undeveloped parks. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)26 Pa r k M a p L a b e l Park or Facility Name Address Ac.Pa r k C l a s s i f i c a t i o n * Active Recreation Water Recreation Passive Recreation Misc. Di a m o n d F i e l d s St a n d a l o n e B a c k s t o p So c c e r F i e l d Fo o t b a l l F i e l d Mu l t i p u r p o s e P r a c t i c e F i e l d Ba s k e t b a l l C o u r t Te n n i s C o u r t ( # ) Vo l l e y b a l l C o u r t - S a n d Vo l l e y b a l l C o u r t - I n d o o r Pi c k l e b a l l C o u r t Co n c e s s i o n S t a n d Sk a t e P a r k Di s c G o l f C o u r s e Wa l k i n g / B i k i n g T r a i l ( m i l e s ) Fi t n e s s E q u i p m e n t Go l f C o u r s e ( p u b l i c ) Fi s h i n g P i e r Ca n o e / K a y a k L a u n c h Bo a t R a m p Sw i m m i n g P o o l Sp l a s h P a d Do g P a r k Pl a y g r o u n d Ho r s e s h o e P i t s Pi c n i c T a b l e s BB Q G r i l l Pi c n i c S h e l t e r / P a v i l i o n Ou t d o o r E v e n t S p a c e Co m m u n i t y R e c . C e n t e r Re s t r o o m s Pa r k i n g 1 Baldwin Park 1235 Lakeview Dr 9.63 N 0.8 1 Y 1 Y Y 2 Carol Park*1456 Persimmon Dr 15.14 N 2 0.5 1 Y 1 Y 3 Finley Park°1600 E. Finley Blvd 28.36 N 0.5 Y 1 1 Y 1 Y Y 4 Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park*2841 Olympic Dr.20.51 N 1 Y 1 Y Y 5 Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park 636 Banbury Dr 1.00 N 0.5 1 Y 6 John Flavel Greer Park 1701 W. Rosamond Pkwy 19.80 N 1.1 1 3 Y 3 Y 7 Johnson Park 320 N. Sherley Ave 3.21 N 2 1 Y 1 Y Y 8 Sherley Heritage Park 101 S. Sherley Ave 0.96 N 1 Y 1 Y Y 9 Bryant Park°2501 Bryant Farm Rd 5.29 C Y 0.3 Y 1 Y Y 10 Natural Springs Park 1201 W. White St 26.72 C 1.5 1 1 1 Y 1 Y Y 11 Slayter Creek Park 425 W. Rosamond Pkwy 85.56 R 4 1 2 2 2 9 1 1 3.1 Y 1 1 Y 1 Y 12 Pecan Grove Park*2328 Luscombe Dr 15.28 L 0.5 Y 1 Y 13 Geer Park 505 E. 6th St 24.89 OS 6 1 Y TOTAL 256.34 6 1 6 0 3 3 2 0 0 11 0 1 1 8.25 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 11 1 12 0 13 0 0 8 12 ° In Design * Under Construction N = Neighborhood C = Community R = Regional L = Linear OS = Open Space Figure 10. Anna Existing Parks and Facilities Inventory Table Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 27 Map 3. Anna Existing Parks Map 1 Baldwin Park 2 Carol Park 3 Finley Park 4 Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park 5 Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park 6 John Flavel Greer Park 7 Johnson Park 8 Slayter Creek Park 9 Sherley Heritage Park 10 Bryant Park 11 Natural Springs Park 12 Pecan Grove Park 13 Geer Park 10 11 8 13 12 3 4 5 6 7 12 9 Anna City Limits Anna ETJ Parks Trails 100-year floodplain Regulatory floodway Streams City Hall Point of Interest CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)28 Map 4. Anna Existing Trails Map Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 29 BALDWIN PARK Location and Access Baldwin Park, previously known as Lakeview Park, is located within the Lakeview Estates subdivision. Access to the parking lot is available via Lakeview Drive. The park is also accessible via the trails from Natural Springs Park. Existing Conditions Baldwin Park, developed alongside the subdivision, offers several key amenities. It features a playground, gazebo, restrooms, trail connection to Natural Springs Park, and a soil conservation lake with permitted use of non-motorized boats and fishing. The lakeshore floods during storm events and can inundate portions of fence and trails. Opportunities for Improvement • Perform ongoing maintenance and improvements to park restrooms. • Manage and reduce encroachment of lake-related activities onto adjacent private properties. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 1235 Lakeview Drive Playground Gazebo Restrooms Picnic Tables Parking Lot Trail Connection to Natural Springs Park Soil Conservation Lake with Permitted Use of Non-Motorized Boats and Fishing 9.6 Acres Neighborhood Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)30 Aerial View of Baldwin Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 31 CAROL PARK Location and Access The Carol Park site is situated on the southern side of W. White Street, next to established commercial properties. The southern side of W. White Street lacks sidews, limiting pedestrian access. Existing Conditions The existing site is currently undeveloped, but a plan for future development has been created. Carol Park will ultimately include pickleball courts, a dog park, trail, small pavillion, and parking lot. The park improvements will be completed in 2026. Opportunities for Improvement Construction for the park is anticipated to be completed in Fall 2026. The City should implement the development plan shown on the following page to introduce amenities and recreational programming. Opportunities for future improvements could include trail access leading to upcoming residential developments. Park Location Park Type Park Size Proposed Park Features 1456 Persimmon Drive Pickleball Courts Dog Park Trail Parking Lot Small Pavilion 15.1 acres Neighborhood Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)32 BU D D Y H A Y S T T T T S T UN I T A D 2 UN I T B 1 UN I T B 1 UN I T A D 2 SR R ID F ER R C UN I T B 1 A D A UN I T A 1 UN I T A 1 UN I T A 1 UN I T A 1 UN I T A 1 BUILDING 10 FFE 690.50 YH LOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LOC LO C LO C LOC LO C LOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LOC LOC LOC LO C LOC LO C LOC LO C LOC LOC LOC LOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOC LOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOCLOC LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LO C LS HW YI CI CI CI CI JB FH FH 1 L-232 PAVILION M2 6' CHAINLINK FENCE A5 PET WATER FOUNTAIN A3 BENCH M2 6' CHAINLINK GATE A4 PET WASTE STATION SOD SOD SOD AREA TO REMAIN NATURAL M2 10' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH BLACK WINDSCREEN M4 LINE PAINT M5M5 M5M5 M6 M6 M5M5 M5M5 M6 M6 M8 POST+NET M8 POST+NET M3 PAVILIONA1 WASTE RECEPTACLE A2 PICNIC TABLE YARD HYDRANT C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 S1 PLANTING AREA GRAVEL C1 C1 STEPS AREA TO REMAIN NATURAL NATIVE SEEDWITH EROSION BLANKET M2 10' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH BLACK WINDSCREEN M1 LANDSCAPE EDGING M7 M7 LIGHT POST LIGHT POST A1 WASTE RECEPTACLE A4 PET WASTE STATION A5 PET WATER FOUNTAIN A8 DOG HOOP A9 WEAVE POSTS A7 DOG CRAWL A6 DOG RUN CO N S T R U C T E D BY O T H E R S 10' C O N C R E T E W A L K , B Y O T H E R S CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS 3 L-231 2 L-231 4 L-231 TRANSFORMER, REF. CIVIL POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE SLAB SOD AREA - REF.PLANTING SHEETS CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS SOD AREA - REF. PLANTING SHEETS SOD AREA - REF. PLANTING SHEETS SOD AREA - REF.PLANTING SHEETS 1405 W KOENIG LN AUSTIN, TX 78756 artis-atx.com 512.689.0627 NO.DESCRIPTION DATE L-222 IFC SET 03.14.2025 MERYL ST. PARKLAND ANNA, TEXAS PROJ. 3285 1 100% DD 4/26/2024 03.14.2025 KEYMAP - NTS CI CI JB HW YI CI CI JB JB YI CI CI HW HW CICI CI CI CI CI JB JB FH FH FH FH FH LS LS LS LS LS SSMHSSMH SSMH SSMH SSMH SSMH NO . DA T E RE V I S I O N DE S I G N DR A W N DA T E SC A L E NO T E S FIL E NO . (S U B J E C T T O R E V I S I O N P R I O R T O C O N S T R U C T I O N ) IS S U E D F O R P R E L I M I N A R Y P R I C I N G P U R P O S E S O N L Y WA T E R S C R E E K TR A I L I M P R O V E M E N T S CO N S T R U C T I O N D O C U M E N T S CI T Y O F A N N A , C O L L I N C O U N T Y , T E X A S WATERS CREEK - TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS We s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . we s t w o o d p s . c o m NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N C1 . 1 BE N C H M A R K L I S T TY P I C A L P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N Concept plan for Carol Park Aerial view of Carol Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 33 FINLEY PARK Location and Access The site is located within the Anna Crossing community but will also serve nearby neighborhoods. Construction of the park will begin in Winter 2026. Existing Conditions Surrounded by newly constructed residences, the site remains undeveloped, distinguished by a central expanse of open land framed by mature trees. A plan for future park improvements has been created. Opportunities for Improvement The City should implement the concept plan on the following page to introduce amenities and recreational programming. Proposed elements include a playground, fitness court, dog park, and trail network, while restrooms, shade structures, and trail lighting will enhance comfort and accessibility. Park Location Park Type Park Size 1600 E. Finley Drive 28.36 acres Neighborhood Park Pond Playground Trails Pavilion Arbor Shade Structures Charcoal Grills Fitness Court Disc Golf Pedestrian Bridge Restrooms Parking Lot Dog Park Proposed Park Features CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)34 Concept plan for Finley Park Aerial view of Finley Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 35 HASSIE LAWRENCE MORGAN PARK Location and Access The site is located within the Anna Ranch community. Existing Conditions The site is currently being developed and will soon be surrounded by newly built residences. Construction of the park will be completed Summer of 2026. Opportunities for Improvement • Future park improvements will include a parking lot along E. Foster Crossing, additional trails on the south and east sides of the park and additional irrigated, soccer/multipurpose fields. Park Location Park Type Park Size Proposed Park Features 2841 Olympic Dr. 20.5 acres Neighborhood Park Playground Trails Parking Lot Restrooms Pavilion Soccer Fields Parking Along E. Foster Crossing Additional Trails CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)36 3 8 5 11 6 //// X X EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E //////////////// EX OHE EX OHE EX OHE X //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> X X EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E EX O H E //////////////////////////////////// X X X X X 3 8 8 692 693694 695 691 691 69 2 69 2 693 69 4 695 696 690 689 690 688 689 688 687 686 687 686 685 684 690 689 688 688 687 686 688 685 688 687 686 685 684 683 682 681 689 690 686 685 684 683 682 681 680 679 678 677 676 675 678 677 676 675674 674 673 675 676 674 675 676 676 675 675676 676675 674 687 674 673 675 676 677678 679 678 678 677 676 675 674 674 680 686687 687 688 688 688 689 690 69069 1 689 691 687 686 689 685 689 690 689 689 688689 687 689 688 689 689 688 687 GARDENDALE HOLLOW LANE 312315 7 37 302214 6 36X 292113 5 41X 282012 4 35271911 3 34261810 1 332517 9 2 40X 39X EEEF F D D E E A E E E E 36X E 38X E OL Y M P I C D R I V E EAST FOSTER CROSSING ROAD 3 2 1 9 15 12 13 14 4 1 10 11 6 5 3 2 8 7 15 123 AMENITY CENTER LOT 17 322416 8 .HIO OD JSTE C C CT TE SAET STA I REG 3 OF 28 ETX N RLDRECAANDS L EPAHSON Y 3 April 08, 2025 N BEING 20.507 ACRESSITUATED IN THE DAVID E.W. BABB SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 33G. STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 IN THECITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS OVERALL SITE PLAN THE PARKS AT FOSTER CROSSING PHASE I BLOCK E, LOT 36X Preparation: April 08, 2025 JOHNSON VOLK CONSULTING 704 CENTRAL PARKWAY, SUITE 1200 PLANO, TEXAS 75074 PH.(972) 201-3100 CONTACT: CODY JOHNSON, RLA, ASLA, LI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC 8840 CYPRESS WATERS BOULEVARD SUITE 100 COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 PH. (919) 219-8635 CONTACT: STEVEN COOK OWNER / DEVELOPER: SP2 LOT 36X, BLOCK E SITE INFORMATION HANDICAP PARKING IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCEWITH ADA STANDARDS TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:55,022.00 SF, 6.15%INTERIOR LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: (893,284.92 X 10%)= 89,328.49 SFINTERIOR LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 593,287 SF SITE DATA SUMMARY TABLE GENERAL SITE DATA (LOT 36X, BLOCK E) PARKING PARKING RATIO (FROM ZONING ORDINANCE)MINIMUM 35 SPACES PERSUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)35 REQUIRED PROVIDED PARKING SPACES (# SPACES)35 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)2 PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA (INCLUDINGTURF AREAS) REQUIRED INTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREA(SQUARE FEET - 8 SQUARE FEET PER PARKINGSPACE)280 S.F. REQUIRED ADDITIONAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAPROVIDED (SQUARE FEET)593,007 TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (SQUARE FEET)593,287 SITE PLAN NOTES: · ·NO PROTECTED TREES EXIST ON DEVELOPMENT SITE.·LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BECONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OFANNA CODE OF ORDINANCES.·FOR ALL BARRIER FREE RAMPS NOTED ON PLAN, REFERENCE THE CITY OF ANNA STANDARDCONSTRUCTION DETAILS.·ALL SIDEWALKS IN FRONT OF HEAD-IN PARKING SHALLBE 6'-0" WIDTH. N0 0 ° 1 3 ' 1 1 " W 4 6 5 . 4 7 ' N89°46'49"E 941.65' N0 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 7 " W 7 6 . 0 1 ' N0 0 ° 1 3 ' 1 1 " W 1 5 7 . 1 7 ' N89°46'49"E 355.97' N0 0 ° 1 3 ' 1 1 " W 3 5 0 . 0 0 ' S0 1 ° 3 4 ' 4 0 " W 3 0 4 . 7 2 ' S0 1 ° 3 4 ' 4 0 " W 1 5 5 . 2 9 ' S89°46'58"W 173.82' N89°46'49"E 16.72' S89°46'58"W 184.46' N0 1 ° 3 4 ' 4 0 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' N0 1 ° 3 4 ' 4 0 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' N0 1 ° 3 4 ' 4 0 " E 1 4 1 . 7 0 ' S88°25'20"E 70.00' S88°25'20"E 70.00' S88°25'20"E 214.47' N89°29'43"W 353.65'S89°29'43"E 110.00'S0 0 ° 3 0 ' 1 7 " W 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S0 0 ° 3 0 ' 1 7 " W 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' N89°29'43"W 561.20'N89°29'43"W 295.15' N0 0 ° 1 3 ' 1 1 " W 1 0 4 . 0 0 ' N89°46'49"E 120.00'N00°13'11"W 46.00' N00°30'17"E 40.00' N89°46'49"E 130.90' PROPOSED CONCRETE PARKING LOT. 35 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED. PROPOSED FUTURECONCRETE PARKING LOT. PROPOSEDPLAYGROUNDFACILITY PROPOSED RESTROOM FACILITY FFE 689.16 24' FIRELANE, TYP. 10'-0" WIDTH CONCRETE TRAILPER CITY STANDARDS. REFER TOCIVIL PLANS FOR DETAILS, TYP. 10'-0" WIDTH CONCRETETRAIL PER CITYSTANDARDS. REFER TOCIVIL PLANS FORDETAILS, TYP. 5'-0" BUILDING LINE, TYP. BL O C K E , TH E P A R K S A T F O S T E R CR O S S I N G P H A S E 1 BL O C K D , TH E P A R K S A T F O S T E R CR O S S I N G P H A S E 1 BLOCK E,THE PARKS AT FOSTER CROSSING PHASE 1 N00°30'17"E 80.59' S67°10'46"E 216.79' S26°19'36"E 82.25' N89°46'49"E 172.95'N74°43'54"E 1 2 5 . 6 3 ' N00°30'17"E 107.65' 5'-0" BUILDING LINE, TYP. 25'-0" BUILDING LINE,TYP. 25'-0" BUILDING LINE,TYP. 25'-0" BUILDING LINE,TYP. 25'-0" BUILDING LINE, TYP. BLOCK F,THE PARKS AT FOSTERCROSSING PHASE 1 20'-0" LANDSCAPE BUFFER, TYP. 20'-0" LANDSCAPEBUFFER, TYP. 20'-0" LANDSCAPEBUFFER, TYP.20'-0" LANDSCAPEBUFFER, TYP. 5'-0" BUILDING LINE,TYP. PROPOSED FUTURE 10'-0"WIDTH CONCRETE TRAIL, TYP. PROPOSED U20SOCCER FACILITY225' x 360' PROPOSED FUTURESOCCER FACILITY LANDSCAPE AREA.REFER TO LANDSCAPEPLANS, TYP. Concept plan for Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park Aerial view of Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 37 HENRY CLAY “YANK” WASHINGTON PARK Location and Access Henry Clay “Yank” Washington Park, previously known as West Crossing Park, is located along Banbury Drive within the residential West Crossing subdivision. On-street parking is available along Banbury Drive. Existing Conditions Henry Clay “Yank” Washington Park, constructed by the developer of the subdivision, offers several key amenities. It features a playground, a half-court basketball area, and portions of the Slayter Creek Disc Golf Course, which extends along the park’s eastern side. In 2024, a drinking fountain and benches were added, enhancing its accessibility. The facilities remain in excellent condition, and despite a large drainage channel running along the north and eastern edges, the park has no significant flooding issues. Opportunities for Improvement • Maintain playground by replenishing safety surfacing. • Provide signage to clearly communicate park rules and regulations. • Construct a parking lot to enhance site accessibility. • Install restroom facilities to support park users. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 636 Banbury Drive Playground Half-Court Basketball Court Trail1 acre Neighborhood Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)38 Aerial view of Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 39 JOHN FLAVEL GREER PARK Location and Access John Flavel Greer Park, situated within the woods at Lindsey Place residential community and approximately half a mile west of Anna High School, is bisected by Rosamond Parkway. Dedicated parking is available on Mossy Lake Lane for the northern portion and on Rosamond Parkway for the southern portion. Existing Conditions Designed in collaboration with the developer of the Woods at Lindsey Place, this park features a dog park, playgrounds, pavilions, and trails, all while preserving the site’s mature trees. Opportunities for Improvement • As a new park, facilities at Greer Park are in good condition. Opportunities for future improvements could include restrooms and trail connections leading to upcoming residential developments and to Slayter Creek Trail.Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 1701 W. Rosamond Parkway 19.8 acres Neighborhood Park Playgrounds Dog Park Trail Drinking Fountain Parking Lot Mature Trees Pavilions Picnic Tables Open Lawn CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)40 Th e W o o d s a t L i n d s e y P l a c e An n a , T e x a s HO E 3 1 9 Oc t o b e r 3 , 2 0 2 3 0 SC A L E : 1 ” = 8 0 ’ - 0 ” 40 80 16 0 N PA R K M A S T E R P L A N ROSAM O N D P K W Y FE R G U S O N P K W Y HO A OP E N S P A C E HO A OP E N SP A C E OP E N L A W N 8 9 2 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 1313 13 13 12 12 12 6 7 7 11 11 3 3 3 1 2 6 7 7 10 10 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 1 1 DO G P A R K ±7 . 5 A C R E FO R E S T P A R K 12 . 3 2 A C R E LE G E N D SH E L T E R / S H A D E S T R U C T U R E PL A Y G R O U N D PI C N I C A R E A SE A T I N G A R E A / S E A T W A L L SE C L U D E D S E A T I N G A R E A 8’ C O N C R E T E T R A I L 6’ C O N C R E T E P A V I N G SM A L L B R E E D D O G P A R K LA R G E B R E E D D O G P A R K PA R K E N T R Y S I G N PA R K I N G ( 7 0 S P A C E S ) UN D E R B R U S H T O E N H A N C E V I E W UN D I S T U R B E D W O O D E D A R E A 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11435 12 13 PL A Y G R O U N D TE N S I L E F A B R I C S T R U C T U R E SH E L T E R / S H A D E S T R U C T U R E SE A T I N G A T P L A Y G R O U N D ST O N E B O U L D E R S E A T I N G PI C N I C A R E A S DO G P A R K W I T H T O Y S SE C L U D E D S E A T I N G A R E A Aerial view of John Flavel Greer Park Concept plan for John Flavel Greer Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 41 JOHNSON PARK Location and Access Nestled just east of Sherley Avenue at 1st Street, Johnson Park lies less than a quarter-mile north of Anna's downtown core. Access to the parking lot is available via Sherley Avenue. Existing Conditions Johnson Park is a small neighborhood park that features the only fully accessible playground in the City, two ballfields, and a pavilion/restroom building. Drainage issues occur along the outfield fence lines. Due to the park’s location along a tight curve along Sherley Avenue, a guardrail was installed to shield the playground from vehicles that could veer off the road. Opportunities for Improvement • Pave and enlarge the parking lot. • Establish trail connections linking to downtown and surrounding parks. • Replace park benches. • Install concrete pads adjacent to benches for wheelchair accessibility. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 320 N. Sherley Avenue 2 lighted Baseball Fields All-Inclusive Playground Pavilion Restrooms Parking Lot 3.2 acres Neighborhood Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)42 Aerial view of Johnson Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 43 SHERLEY HERITAGE PARK Location and Access Located at the corner of Sherley Avenue and 4th Street, Sherley Heritage Park is situated toward the eastern end of the downtown core and northeast of City Hall. Parking stalls are available on the northern end of the park along 4th Street. There are no sidewalks providing access to the downtown core or the surrounding neighborhoods. Existing Conditions Anna’s most historic park, Sherley Heritage Park, celebrates Anna’s location along the rail line with a train-themed playground, a newly restored train depot, and a Mogul locomotive. The park is heavily used by residents for a variety of events. The southern portion of the park contains a prominent water tower and several utility structures, which are enclosed by a fence and separated from the park's primary recreational areas. Opportunities for Improvement • Clear the wooden fence and water utility structures from the park’s southern edge to allow for expansion up to 5th Street. • Prepare a new master plan to guide development of the expanded park area. • Implement ADA upgrades across the site, with a focus on the parking lot, restrooms, depot building, and benches. • Provide additional parking spaces. • Provide sidewalks to improve pedestrian access. • Consider an area within the future expanded park for a farmers market. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 101 S. Sherley Avenue Pavilion Train-Themed Playground Restored Train Depot Restrooms Historic Mogul Locomotive Parking Fire Pit Collin McKinney Statue 0.96 acres Neighborhood Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)44 Aerial view of Sherley Heritage Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 45 BRYANT PARK Location and Access Bryant Park is situated on the north side of CR 371, directly south of Joe K. Bryant Elementary School. Access to both the park and the school is exclusively provided via Bryant Farm Road. Sidewalk connections from surrounding neighborhoods are not present. Existing Conditions Bryant Park serves as a designated soccer practice facility. It includes multiple goals to support various field configurations and is enclosed by a chain-link fence around its perimeter. The fields are impacted by a range of site conditions, including poor soil, insufficient irrigation, uneven turf, and surface disruptions caused by burrowing rodents. In addition, the northern portion of the site is subject to poor drainage. Opportunities for Improvement • Install ADA-compliant parking facilities. • Address the site’s drainage issues and explore creative stormwater management solutions such as integrating a rain garden. • Enhance the condition and usability of the fields. • Implement a new irrigation system. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 2501 Bryant Farm Road Soccer Practice Fields 5.3 acres Community Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)46 Aerial view of Bryant Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 47 NATURAL SPRINGS PARK Location and Access Natural Springs Park is located just south of W. White Street (FM 454), behind Brookshire’s grocery store, with parking lot access provided through a shared driveway with neighboring commercial properties. The park's trail network extends southward, providing a direct connection to Baldwin Park. Existing Conditions Natural Springs Park features an open lawn ideal for passive recreation, along with walking trails, a gazebo, and a man-made pond equipped with a fishing pier. Notable attractions include the treehouse-themed playground and Paw Park - an enclosed off-leash area designed for dogs to enjoy freely. Portions of the dog park need to be regraded to address drainage issues. South of the primary recreational areas, the creek banks exhibit visible signs of erosion. Opportunities for Improvement • Mitigate erosion along the creek banks. • Improve drainage within Paw Park. • Expand the Paw Park for increased capacity. • Resolve algae buildup in the pond. • Carry out ADA and accessibility enhancements throughout the site. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 1201 W. White Street Playground Walking Trails Gazebo Pond and Fishing Pier Restrooms Open Lawn Dog Park 26.7 acres Community Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)48 Aerial view of Natural Springs Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 49 SLAYTER CREEK PARK Location and Access Slayter Creek Park is located on Rosamond Parkway, east of Anna High School and directly adjacent to the new Anna ISD administration building. Parking is provided at the park entrance along Rosamond Parkway, with an additional lot situated to the south and directly adjacent to the baseball field four-plex. Existing Conditions Slayter Creek Park is an expansive athletic facility comprising numerous sports fields and courts, as well as amenities including a playground, skatepark, disc golf course, splash pad, and pedestrian trails. There are security concerns involving vandalism in the restrooms that must be addressed. In addition, there are drainage issues at multiple locations including the baseball fields. where stormwater flows toward the concession stand, and south of the pickleball courts. Opportunities for Improvement • Evaluate and implement measures to enhance restroom security and mitigate vandalism. • Address poor drainage of the site including flooding concerns in the vicinity of the maintenance shed, pickleball courts, and ball fields. • Assess the existing irrigation system and consider consolidating to one central controller. • Evaluate slope stabilization strategies for the creek and a drainage channel. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 425 W. Rosamond Parkway 18-Hole Disc Golf Course Four Lighted Ball Fields Lighted Multipurpose Fields Tennis Courts Basketball Courts Pickleball Courts Large Pavilion Playground Skatepark with Pump Track Walking Trail Splash Pad Restrooms Fitness Court Parking Lots 85.6 acres Regional Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)50 Aerial view of Slayter Creek Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 51 PECAN GROVE PARK Location and Access Pecan Grove Park is located within the Pecan Grove residential community and runs adjacent to Slayter Creek. The trail begins at its southern entrance on Luscombe Lane and ends at Leslie Drive to the north, where it connects to the Park Place residential community via a pedestrian bridge over Slayter Creek. Existing Conditions As an undeveloped open space located within the 100-year floodplain, Pecan Grove Park's primary feature is the trail that connects the cul-de-sacs at each end of Pecan Grove Park, crossing Slayter Creek to link with the existing trail in the Park Place development. This project is a key part of Anna’s trail system expansion. Opportunities for Improvement • Expand coverage of the irrigation system across the park. • Identify locations along the trail suitable for wildflower planting areas to add seasonal interest and ecological value. Park Location Park Size Park Features 2328 Luscombe Drive Open Space 10' Walking Trail Pedestrian Bridge Parking Lot15.3 acres Park Type Linear Park CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)52 Aerial view of Pecan Grove Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 53 GEER PARK Location and Access Geer Park is located just east of the intersection of Sixth and Smith Streets. Existing Conditions Geer Park is currently an undeveloped parcel that provides temporary multipurpose practice fields for soccer, baseball, and softball. Opportunities for Improvement • Develop a master plan to define and formalize the site’s amenities and recreational programming. Park Location Park Type Park Size Park Features 505 E. Sixth Street Multipurpose Practice Fields Soccer Goals Bleachers Temporary Parking 24.89 acres Open Space CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)54 Aerial view of Geer Park Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 55 ANNA RECREATIONAL PROGRAMMING The City of Anna is committed to ensuring that everyone in the community has access to fun, enjoyable, and healthy recreational activities. The City offers various seasonal and year-round recreational programs, events, and sports leagues for the community. The majority of recreational programming has been geared towards children, specifically through the offering of sports and camps. There exist opportunities to expand recreational programming geared toward adults. Figure 11 lists recreation programming available to the Anna community. The City should regularly review its list of programs and make changes as needed based on demographics, level of attendance/usage, funding, and similar programs offered by other entities in the community. Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Kids Leagues Adaptive Soccer - Soccer Stars McKinney X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer/Fall Fee-Based 1 All 4 All Studio Art Camps X X Caspian eQuest Summer Fee-Based 6 8 Art 4 All Studio Art Lessons X X Caspian eQuest Summer/Winter Fee-Based 0 0 AYSES Soccer Club X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 13 Basketball Skills & Games X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer Fee-Based 5 Disc Golf with Nolan Grider X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Dodgeball & Agility Games X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Fall Co-ed Soccer League (4U)X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Fall Fee-Based 50 62 107 108 Fall Co-ed Soccer League (6U)X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Fall Fee-Based 33 48 80 113 Fall Co-ed Soccer League (8U)X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Fall Fee-Based 0 0 40 60 61 Fall Co-ed Soccer League (10U)X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Fall Fee-Based 0 0 0 48 48 Fall Co-ed Soccer League (12U)X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Fall Fee-Based 0 0 0 0 10 Figure 11. Recreation Programs Table CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)56 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Flag Football & QB Skills X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Health Training X X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 7 Homeschool Soccer X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 6 Kids and Teens Pickleball X X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer/Fall Fee-Based 12 Kids Art Camp X City Council Chambers & Sherley Heritage Park Spring Fee-Based 3 7 Multi-sport Camp X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 1 Parent and Me Soccer X Slayter Creek Park Multipurpose Fields Spring/Summer/Fall Fee-Based 12 Run, Jump, And Throw w/ Runner2runner X X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Skyhawk Soccer and Mini-hawk Soccer Clinics X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 6 3 Skyhawks Baseball Clinics X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer/Fall Fee-Based 15 5 Skyhawks Basketball X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer/Fall Fee-Based 13 4 Skyhawks Sports Camps X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 8 Skyhawks T-ball Clinics X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer/Fall Fee-Based 0 Soccer Skills & Game X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Soccer Skills and Drills - Soccer Stars McKinney X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer/Fall Fee-Based 10 Spring Youth Baseball (8U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 49 52 52 Spring Youth Baseball (10U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 45 48 43 Spring Youth Baseball (12U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 29 26 24 Spring Youth Softball (8U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 33 13 13 Spring Youth Softball (10U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 25 0 12 Spring Youth Softball (12U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 15 13 10 Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 57 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Spring Youth T-ball (4U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 85 77 77 Spring Youth T-ball (6U)X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring Fee-Based 0 0 76 77 77 Successful Students & Athletes Camps X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Teen Art Camp X City Council Chambers & Sherley Heritage Park Spring Fee-Based 0 0 Teen Easter X Slayter Creek Park Spring Free 3 47 97 60 Teen Game Night X City Hall Spring Free 12 Teen Program (Gaming Party)X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 6 Tennis X X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Spring/Summer/Fall Fee-Based 0 0 0 31 Tennis Camp X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer/Fall Fee-Based 0 0 1 Youth Activities Campfire Teen S'Mores Night X Sherley Heritage Park Winter Fee-Based 2 5 Cheer Prep (K-2nd) & (3rd-5th)X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Crayola Experience X Anna High School Makerspace (CTE West Entrance)Summer Free 150 Friday Fun Day X Sherley Heritage Park Fall Fee-Based 0 Mommy & Me Yoga X Natural Springs Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Recreation School Holidays X Slayter Creek Park Fall Fee-Based 0 Storybook Saturday X Slayter Creek Park Summer/Fall Free 18 Summer Dance X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Train Depot Day X X Sherley Heritage Park Summer Free 27 Teen Blacklight Paint Party X City Hall/Sherley Heritage Summer Fee-Based 9 6 Teen Blacklight Pumpkin Paint Party X Sherley Heritage Park Fall Fee-Based 1 Youth - Painting X Sherley Heritage Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Spring Break Camps X X Sherley Heritage Park Spring Fee-Based 3 7 3 Summer Art Camps X Sherley Heritage Park Summer Fee-Based 12 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)58 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Youth Sports Archery - Beginner/Advanced X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring/Fall Fee-Based 32 18 7 E-Sports by GG Leagues X X Online Fall Fee-Based 1 Run Jump Throw X X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Fall Fee-Based 0 Festivals & Events 12 Days of Anna Christmas Tree Lighting X X X X City Hall & Sherley Heritage Park Fall/Winter Fee-Based for Vendors 2,500 2,500 3,000 1,500 Annafest/Harvest Festival X X X X City Hall Fall Fee-Based for Vendors 900 1,200 2,500 3,000 3,000 Boots & Booms X X X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based for Vendors 3,900 5,000 7,400 6,400 7,500 Easter Eggstravaganza X X X X Slayter Creek Park Spring Fee-Based for Vendors 2,800 2,800 3,000 3,500 4,000 125 70 Juneteenth X X X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 250 200 250 300 275 Movie Nights X X X X Various Parks Year Round Free 10 103 Music in the Park Series X X X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 26 5 Splash Bash X X X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 250 300 Touch-a-Truck X X X X Slayter Creek Park Spring Fee-Based for Vendors 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,500 1,600 Adult Classes Adult Blacklight Paint Night X X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 4 Adult Evening Hike X X Baldwin Park Summer 2023 Fee-Based 0 Art 4 All Studio for Adults - Pottery X X Caspian eQuest Spring/Winter Fee-Based 1 Art 4 All Studio for Adults - Tapestry X X Caspian eQuest Spring/Winter Fee-Based 0 Art 4 All Studio for Adults - Weaving X X Caspian eQuest Spring/Winter Fee-Based 0 Decades Trivia Night X X City Hall Winter Fee-Based 14 Family DIY Christmas Sweater X X X X City Hall Fall Fee-Based 0 Faux Calligraphy and Brush Pens X X City Hall Winter Fee-Based 3 Game Night - Are you Smarter than a Fifth Grader X X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 15 Gentle Flow - Yoga X X Natural Springs Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 59 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Holiday Wreath Making X X City Hall Fall Fee-Based 9 National Pickleball Day Celebration X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 7 Paint Night X X City Hall Year Round Fee-Based 10 13 29 6 Painting X X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 0 Restorative Yoga X X Natural Springs Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Restorative Yoga X X Natural Springs Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Speed Puzzling X X City Hall Fall Fee-Based 35 Tennis - Adult X X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer Fee-Based 0 Valentines Beginner Hoop Art and Simple Embroidery X X City Hall Winter Fee-Based 0 Women's Self-Defense Classes X X Offsite Spring/Fall Free 7 17 Zumba X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 0 Adult Leagues Adult Cornhole X 3 Nations Brewing Spring Fee-Based 19 Adult Cornhole Tournaments X Slayter Creek Park Spring/Summer Fee-Based 0 Adult Kan Jam League X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Adult Softball X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer/Fall Fee-Based 265 455 319 465 Adult Spikeball League X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 0 Adult Tennis X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Fall Fee-Based 0 Disc Golf with Nolan Grider X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 0 E-sports X On-line Summer/Fall/Winter Fee-Based 5 Recreation Programs An Evening with Moths X X X X Natural Springs Park Fall/Winter Free 18 Anna Celebrates Everyday X X Slayter Creek Park Summer 66 Army Games X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 5 Caspian eQuest Horseback Riding X X Offsite Summer Fee-Based 1 0 Dog Training - Ears Up K9 Training X Slayter Creek Park Year Round Fee-Based 0 12 Explore Archery X X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Summer Fee-Based 3 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)60 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Family Hikes X X X X Various Parks Summer Free 42 Fitness at the Park X X Slayter Creek Park Spring/Summer/Fall Free 132 162 Fri-Yay Drop-in Craft X City Hall Spring/Fall/Winter Free 184 59 45 Goat Yoga X X Slayter Creek Park Fall Fee-Based 13 Health Training X X X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 8 HIIT with Sagan X Slayter Creek Park Spring Fee-Based 0 Intro to Pickleball Clinics X X X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Spring/Summer/Fall Free 95 Jump Start Sports Clinics X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Winter Fee-Based 12 Nature Walks X X X X Various Parks Year Round Free 29 115 94 Pickleball Clinics X Slayter Creek Sports Courts Winter Free 2 Pickleball Paddle Battle X Slayter Creek Sports Courts Summer/Fall Free 53 Pound Fitness X X Slayter Creek Park Fall Fee-Based 1 4 Running Club X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 12 Shining Stars X Slayter Creek Park Ball Fields Spring/Summer/Fall Fee-Based 1 0 Storybook Saturday X Slayter Creek Park Year Round Free 145 Studio Art Lessons X X X X Caspian eQuest Fall Fee-Based 4 Teens and Adults Introduction to Pickleball X X Slayter Creek Park Sports Courts Summer/Fall Fee-Based 25 Tinkergarten with Julie X Natural Springs Park Year Round Fee-Based 31 7 Workout Wednesdays X X Slayter Creek Park Spring/Summer/Fall Free 35 41 Yoga at the Park X X Slayter Creek Park Year Round Free 1 11 42 Zumba X X Slayter Creek Park Fall Fee-Based 0 80 Adults 50+ Programs Book Club X Sherley Heritage Park Year Round Free 7 10 62 69 45 Christmas Lights Tour X Offsite Winter Free 11 10 10 City Updates X City Hall Year Round Free 18 18 Dog Days of Summer Walking Group X Natural Springs Park Summer Free 6 Foodie Troop X Offsite Year Round Free 25 129 187 155 Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 61 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Galentine's Day Party X City Council Chambers Winter Fee-Based 9 Grandparents Day X City Hall Fall Fee-Based 0 Hometown Cookout X City Hall Summer Free 1 Lucky Charm Potluck X City Hall Spring Free 5 Luncheon & Parks Speakers X City Hall Summer Free 4 Luncheon w/ Speaker X City Hall Spring Free 2 National Senior Citizens Day X City Hall Summer Free 20 15 12 New Year's Potluck X City Council Chambers Winter Free 8 Online Lectures with Collin College X Offsite Spring Free 2 Prize Bingo X Library Year Round Free 13 Quarterly Holiday Meals X Offsite Year Round Fee-Based 33 92 80 61 Scavenger Hunt X Offsite Summer Free 1 Senior Christmas Sweater Breakfast X City Hall Fall Free 6 Senior Halloween Breakfast X Sherley Heritage Park Fall Free 14 Senior Trips X Offsite Year Round Fee-Based 69 167 157 160 Summer Centerpiece X City Hall Summer Fee-Based 0 Talks & Talents X City Hall Year Round Free 58 The Crafting Corner X City Hall Year Round Fee-Based 14 87 80 113 Walk & Talk X Natural Springs Park Spring Free 3 3 Pop-Up Recreation Bubble Show X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 113 62 Celebration of National Train Day X Sherley Heritage Park Spring Free 51 Creature Teacher - Creepy Crawlies X City Hall Spring Free 50 Creature Teacher - Animal Adventure X Slayter Creek Park Fall Free 43 Creature Teacher - Invertebrates!X City Hall Fall Fee-Based 24 Dart Painting X X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 58 Farm Day X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 50 Fiesta X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 50 Fire X Fire Station Winter Free 42 Halloween Hoopla X Slayter Creek Park Fall Free 100 Kidsgiving X City Hall Fall Free 39 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)62 Program Name Age Group Location Season Fee Estimated Annual Attendance Adaptive Participants Age 12 and under Age 13 to 18 Adults Adults 50+2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2024 2025 Magic Show X Slayter Creek Park Fall Free 48 Meet our Local Heroes: Anna Fire Rescue X Fire Station Winter/Summer Fee-Based/Free 28 65 Meet our Local Heroes: Anna Police Department X City Hall Winter Fee-Based/Free 27 34 Police X Fire Station Winter Free 33 Pop-Up Recreation Christmas Spectacular X Sherley Heritage Park Winter Free 6 Princesses & Princes Tea Party X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 47 Puppet Playtime: Hands-on Puppetry Workshop X City Hall Spring Free 28 S.T.E.M. Day X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 50 STEMtastic Saturday X City Hall Fall Free 8 Summer Rec-ess X City Hall Summer Fee-Based/Free 103 353 499 Taking it Easy X Slayter Creek Park Summer Fee-Based 51 Teddy Bear Picnic X Slayter Creek Park Summer Free 51 Parks & Recreation Inventory | CHAPTER 2 63 3 NEEDS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)66 This Plan uses a multifaceted analysis to help determine the parks and recreational needs of the Anna community. The needs assessment analyzes whether those needs are being met and what types of improvements or changes would be beneficial for Anna. Existing parks and recreation opportunities are analyzed in terms of public opinion, the location and quantity of parkland, the quantity of facilities within parks, and natural resources in the City. The needs assessment includes three parts. These include demand-based, standards-based, and resource-based assessments. The use of multiple assessment methods helps to establish an understanding of key parks and recreation needs and informs Plan recommendations to address those needs. Slayter Creek Park Splash Pad Figure 12. Three Elements of the Needs Assessment Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 67 DEMAND -BASED ASSESSMENT The needs assessment starts with a demand-based assessment. This includes an analysis and summary of public feedback to identify what the community wants and expects from the parks and recreation system, and how this compares to its current state. STANDARDS -BASED ASSESSMENT The standards-based assessment then analyzes parkland acreage, location, and amenities in comparison with the needs and location of the current population and future growth areas. This is used to determine an appropriate target level of service for the Anna community and identify surpluses or deficits. RESOURCE -BASED ASSESSMENT Lastly, the resource-based assessment evaluates the City's existing physical, man-made and natural resources to identify opportunities to leverage for public recreation benefit. Demand-Based Standards-Based Resource-Based The demand-based assessment is a reflection of the community's needs and desires for their parks system as expressed directly by residents through public engagement opportunities. Community engagements utilized for this assessment included: • Stakeholder focus groups (6) • Tabling at the City's Touch-a-Truck event • Community survey The following pages present highlights from the community input received. These highlights are opinions from Anna residents and/or park users and may differ between the various engagement opportunities and questions. Additional public engagement information and details can be found in Appendix A. STAKEHOLDER LISTENING SESSIONS Stakeholders provided feedback during a series of six focus group sessions held throughout the process. Stakeholders in these focus groups included representatives from youth sports organizations, developers, business owners, residents, and council members. Participants were asked to consider the existing parks and recreation system and explain their likes, dislikes, and desires for change and/or improvements to the system as a whole. The following are key themes that were identified during these meetings, many of which were reiterated by participants in other engagement opportunities. DEMAND-BASED ASSESSMENT DESIRES: • Expanded trails network. • Inclusive playgrounds and ADA-compliant features for all ages and abilities. • Indoor recreation center and activities. • Host large sporting events and support traveler needs. • Enhanced amenities like fishing ponds, restrooms, and shaded areas. • Walkable downtown park spaces with picnic areas and water features. • A public pool or aquatic center. CONCERNS: • Underserved areas, especially on the south side of Anna that are lacking investment and visibility. • Safety and supervision issues at parks and fields. • Lack of sports team continuity. • Limited field space and off-season access. • Lack of activities geared toward teenagers. • Lack of prioritization of improvements and amenities based on rapid growth. • Missed opportunities for grants and partnerships, especially in trail development and recreation facilities. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)68 COMMUNITY PARKS SURVEY To help shape the future of parks and recreation in Anna, an online community survey was conducted to gather input. The survey was available from May 17 to June 20, 2025, and was promoted through the City’s website, social media platforms, and word of mouth through stakeholder participants and members of the Parks Advisory Board. Additionally, postcards announcing the survey were mailed to 11,694 households across Anna. A total of 814 responses were received. Respondents represented a broad cross-section of the community. Nearly 95% of all participants were Anna residents, with the majority residing in Area 2 (see Figure 15). Most respondents were between the ages of 35 to 44, and approximately 64% of total respondents indicated they have children under the age of 18 living at home. The following pages present the most notable takeaways from the survey. The full survey results report are included in Appendix A. 14-17 yrs old1% 18-24 yrs old2% 25-34 yrs old24% 35-44 yrs old33%45-54 yrs old18% 55-64 yrs old 12% 65 yrs old +10% Figure 13. Age of respondents taking the survey 0%10%20%30%40% No children Children under the age of 4 Children ages 5-8 Children ages 9-12 Children ages 13-18 Figure 14. Age of children in respondent households (Choose all that apply) Figure 15. Based on the map, what part of Anna do you live in? 1 2 3 4 5 7(ETJ) 6 Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 69 Overall Rating of the Parks and Recreation System Overall Satisfaction with Parks and Recreational Opportunities Various factors impact a community’s perception, use, and approval of a parks and recreation system, as is reflected in the mixed responses from Anna residents (see Figure 16). The majority of respondents expressed satisfaction with the opportunities available, suggesting that the current offerings generally meet expectations. Some also noted feeling neutral, suggesting there is still room for improvement in addressing community needs. Very Dissatisfied 5% Dissatisfied 16% Neutral 29%Satisfied 39% Very Satisfied 11% Figure 16. How satisfied are you with the parks and recreational opportunities in Anna? Rating the Quality of Parks and Recreation Opportunities in Anna When evaluating specific amenities offered, respondents identified the overall maintenance, safety, and appearance of parks as key strengths. Accessibility for all ages and abilities also received generally favorable responses, though some indicated that improvements could be made. On the other hand, the amenities offered and amount of publicly accessible natural areas received mixed feedback, suggesting that current offerings may not fully address the community’s needs and the potential for further improvements. 0%20%40%60%80%100% The amount of publicly accessible naturalareas The variety of amenities offered in parks The quality of athletic amenities (i.e., fieldsand courts) Having parks conveniently located in all areasof the City Having parks that are accessible/useable forall ages and all abilities The overall appearance of parks The overall safety of parks The overall maintenance of parks Great!Pretty good Could be better Needs work Severely lacking Figure 17. How would you rate the City in the following categories? CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)70 One Thing As Anna continues to grow, understanding residents’ priorities for improvement provides valuable insight into how the community envisions its future recreational opportunities. Feedback from respondents revealed the desire for improved trails, walking opportunities, and bike paths, highlighting the desire for enhanced mobility and access. Consistent with other feedback, respondents also noted the need for pools, shade, and indoor fields, pointing to a need for amenities that allow for recreation throughout the year. The need for more diverse and inclusive facilities that accommodate a wide range of ages and lifestyle was also a common note of improvement. Greatest Parks and Recreation Assets Identifying Anna’s greatest assets is an important piece in determining areas or amenities that should be preserved and possibly further enhanced. Figure 19 illustrates responses, with the largest words displaying the most commonly repeated answers. Notably, Slayter Creek and parks as a whole, stood out as the most valued asset among the community, indicating how valuable they are to residents. Figure 18. If you could improve only one thing about Anna's parks and recreation system, what would you improve? Figure 19. What are the City's greatest parks and recreation assets? Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 71 Figure 20. In the past year, how often have you or your family participated in or utilized the following? 0%20%40%60%80%100% Attended a community event in a park Used a shelter or picnic pavilion in city parks Used the skate park at Slayter Creek Park Participated in a youth athletic league Used the splash pad at Slayter Creek Park Used an athletic field/court at a city park Used a playground in city parks Visited a natural area Visited a city park Multiple Times a Week Weekly Monthly Yearly Never or Rarely Used the dog park at Natural Springs Park 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Lack of maintenance I do not feel safe in the parks Don’t have time or not interested I use parks or facilities in other cities instead The parks and facilities don’t meet my needs There are no parks near me Other (please specify) Figure 21. What keeps you from using parks and recreation facilities in Anna more often? (Choose all that apply) Frequency of Use for Anna's Parks and Recreation Facilities Usage of Parks and Facilities When evaluating the use of parks and recreational facilities, respondents demonstrated a preference for city parks and natural areas. Playgrounds and splash pads also receive moderate use, highlighting their importance to families with young children. In contrast, amenities such as dog parks, skate parks, athletic fields, and picnic pavilions saw less frequent use. This difference in reported use may reflect nuances such as the age of respondents, varying household needs, or limited accessibility rather than lack of demand. Insights overall indicate that traditional parks remain central to community life, while also highlighting opportunities to expand connectivity, enhance amenities, and create spaces that better serve a range of users. Barriers to Park and Facility Use When asked what prevents individuals from using parks and recreation facilities more often, most respondents noted the “Other” category (see Figure 21). Responses revealed insights such as the lack of awareness about existing parks, limited connectivity via sidewalks and trails, and weather-related challenges like extreme heat without adequate shade. Safety-related responses focused on the lack of supervision at Slayter Creek Park and general concerns for toddler safety at playgrounds. Many respondents suggested adding a playground specifically designed for toddlers to alleviate this concern. Additional feedback indicated the lack of amenities such as restrooms, drinking fountains, and the lack of indoor recreation opportunities such as a city gym or pools. Overall, responses highlight the need to improve accessibility, connectivity, and the development of indoor facilities, consistent with themes observed in other survey responses. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)72 Parks and Recreation System Priorities Most Important Amenities in Parks and Recreation Facilities Anna provides a variety of parks and recreational amenities that serve as valuable community assets. When asked to rank the importance of future amenities, respondents prioritized restrooms, shade trees, and paved walking paths. Natural walking trails, playgrounds, and indoor recreation opportunities also ranked in the top 10 priorities, revealing a strong interest in both outdoor and indoor options for recreation. 0%20%40%60%80%100% Dog parks Picnic amenities, grills Quiet seating areas Water, splash pads Outdoor event space (e.g., amphitheater) Multipurpose fields Playground, ADA accessible Sports courts/fields Pavilions, multipurpose Water, swimming pools Landscaping, general greenery Playgrounds Indoor recreation opportunities Walking paths, natural trails Walking paths, paved Shade trees Restrooms Very Important Important Neutral Not Important Unwanted Figure 22. How important is it for the following amenities to be provided in Anna parks and recreation facilities? Most Important Parks & Recreation Functions Performed by the City of Anna Anna has many opportunities to continue improving its parks and recreation offerings. When asked about the importance of offering a variety of improvements, respondents expressed strong support for trail connections to neighborhoods, parks, and other community amenities. Respondents also emphasized support for recreational programming for children and youth, emphasizing the demand for activities geared toward younger age groups. The addition of new amenities to existing parks and development of new parks also received similar levels of support. Notably, all programming options were ranked as very important or important by more than 50% of survey respondents. This shows a strong desire for additional parks and recreation improvements of all types. 0%20%40%60%80%100% Provide more athletic fields Build an amphitheater/outdoor event space Support recreational programs for adults, Support recreational programs for adults Provide more special events and festivals Renovate existing park amenities to improvecondition, lighting and accessibility Develop new parks Add new amenities to existing parks Build trails to connect neighborhoods, parks, schools and retail Very Important Important Undecided Not Important Not Important at All Support recreational programs forchildren and youth ages 50+ Figure 23. How important do you consider each of the following potential actions the City could take? Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 73 Funding for Parks and Recreation Securing additional funding for parks and recreation may be essential to meeting the needs of Anna residents. When asked about their support for various financing strategies, respondents were most supportive of raising funds for new facilities through a bond initiative and increasing fees for those who use maintenance-intensive or specialized recreation facilities. As the City considers various funding options, it should maintain transparent communication with the public and strive to also evaluate community support from a larger respondent group. Figure 24. To meet the needs of Anna residents, the City may require additional funding for parks and recreation. How strongly would you support or oppose the following financing strategies? Parks and Recreation Programming Recreational Programming Priorities Understanding the community’s favorite recreational activities is important when designing parks and programs that align with residents’ interests and priorities. Among the responses provided, two of the top three involve the use of trails. Other top ranking activities include swimming, concerts and music events, and playing on playgrounds. Figure 25 represents the top 10 highest ranking recreational activities amongst respondents. 0%25%50%75% BMX biking Swimming competitively Hunting Boating (motor) Skateboarding Other (please specify) Tennis Disc golf, frisbee golf Horseback riding Volleyball (indoor) Playing in an adult athletic league Volleyball (sand) Dance Basketball Baseball, softball Soccer Yoga Birding, wildlife watching Playing in a youth athletic league Picnicking Exercising, group fitness classes Pickleball Canoeing, kayaking, paddle boarding Art & crafts classes Bicycling Exercising, at a private gym Gardening Book reading/Board games Playing on a splash pad Playing on playgrounds Concerts, music events Swimming for leisure Running, jogging or walking on paths Hiking or walking on nature trails Figure 25. What are you or your family's favorite recreational activities? (Top 10) (Choose all that apply) CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)74 Recreational Programming amongst Age Groups Providing recreational options for all age groups is essential to ensure that the needs of everyone in the community are met. Survey results show the highest satisfaction with programs for children up to age 8 (see Figure 26). In contrast, programming for young adults, adults, and adults ages 50+ received the lowest satisfaction levels, indicating a gap in engagement with older age groups. It is also important to note that most survey respondents fall within the 25-44 age range, and a majority do not have children. This context is helpful when interpreting satisfaction levels, as it highlights that respondents are evaluating programming across age groups even if they may not personally participate in or have direct experience with certain programs. In terms of which age group has the greatest need for recreational programming moving forward, responses suggest that overall, children and teens have the greatest need for programming (see Figure 27). Across stakeholder meetings and general engagement conducted thus far, programming for teens remains a consistent priority for Anna residents as the children population gets older. Teens can be a challenging age group to engage. The City should consider additional outreach strategies in the future to gain feedback about potential programming from local youth. Figure 26. How satisfied are you with recreational programming opportunities in Anna for people in the following age groups? 0%20%40%60%80%100% Young Children Children, ages 5-8 Children, ages 9-13 Teens, ages 14-18 Young Adults, ages 19-30 Adults, ages 30-50 Adults, ages 50+ Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 12 3 Childrenages 9-12 Teensages 13-18 Childrenages 5-8 Figure 27. Which age group do you think has the greatest need for recreational programming? (Top three) Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 75 STANDARDS-BASED ASSESSMENT Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 77 The standards-based assessment analyzes parkland in terms of acreage, location, and number of park facilities. It identifies the current level of service and whether it is meeting the community's needs. Levels of service represent a specific acreage of parkland or number of facilities needed per given population. The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) publishes its Agency Performance Review annually. It presents data and insights from 1,000 parks and recreation agencies around the country. This information was referenced throughout the standards-based assessment as a baseline comparison. Three types of standards were examined in this assessment: acreage, location, and facilities. ACREAGE LEVEL OF SERVICE The acreage level of service defines the quantity of parkland acreage as a ratio to population. The results are expressed as park acreage per 1,000 residents. The analysis examines whether there is sufficient parkland for residents today and in the future. SPATIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE The spatial level of service looks at the location and distribution of different park types to identify underserved areas and where new parks may be needed. FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE The facility level of service defines the number of park facilities needed to meet the community's recreational needs. Standards are expressed as a ratio of facility per population size (e.g., one baseball field per 4,500 residents). Figure 28. Acres of Parkland per 1,000 Residents CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)78 ACREAGE LEVEL OF SERVICE The City's park system is composed of various types of parks that serve different needs. Neighborhood parks and community parks, cumulatively thought of as close-to-home parks, are focused on recreational benefits for nearby residents. In addition to local residents, regional parks serve a population beyond the immediate community. Linear parks/greenbelts and open space provide passive recreation opportunities for the whole community, while special purpose parks serve a focused user group (e.g., dog park). According to the 2025 NRPA Agency Performance Review (Figure 28), the median community with 20,000-49,999 people had 10.9 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. A median community with 50,000-99,999 people had 9.2 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. A target level of service has been defined for Anna through comparison with the NRPA Agency Performance Review, and an understanding of the community's goals, opportunities, and challenges. Anna's parks system includes 256.3 acres of parkland, with 130.6 acres designated as close-to-home parks and 125.7 acres of all other park types. Existing and target levels of service per park type are listed in Figure 29. The City's total combined level of service today is 9.2 acres per 1,000 residents, which is lower than the median for communities cited in Figure 28. Considering the total of all park types (including those without target levels of service), there is a current parkland deficit of 63.6 acres, with a future deficit that grows as the population increases toward its projected 2035 population. The City is primarily lacking in community and regional parks today and in the future, as listed in the "surplus/deficit acreages" columns in the table. As Anna continues to develop in the future, the City should consider opportunities for additional close-to-home parks in areas with new development. It will be important to enhance park amenities (e.g., playground, basketball court, picnicking) within these parks to ensure that they can meet the daily recreational needs for residents in the vicinity. Additionally, regional parks remain an area of need both now and in the future. As the City considers future park investments, it should prioritize identifying sites large enough to accommodate a range of activities and natural features that define regional parks. These spaces should be suitable to offer opportunities for sports tournaments and large-scale community gatherings that will balance usage with Slayter Creek Park, the City's only existing regional park. Greenbelts/linear parks also play a critical role in enhancing connectivity between neighborhoods and parks. While there is no set standard for the level of service for greenbelts/linear parks, expanding these areas can expand opportunities for walking and biking, and integrate natural open spaces into the community. National Recreation & Parks Association (NRPA) 2025 Agency Review1 Total Parkland per 1,000 Residents (for communities 20,000-49,999 people): • Lower Quartile = 5.7 acres/1,000 people • Median = 10.9 acres/1,000 people • Upper Quartile = 17.5 acres/1,000 people Total Parkland per 1,000 Residents (for communities 50,000-99,999 people): • Lower Quartile = 4.7 acres/1,000 people • Median = 9.2 acres/1,000 people • Upper Quartile = 16.5 acres/1,000 people 1 https://www.nrpa.org/publications-research/research-papers/agency-performance-review/ Park Classification Existing Level of Service (LOS)Recommended Level of Service (2025)Recommended Level of Service (2035) Existing Acreage (2025) Current LOS (based on 27,823 population) Recommended Target LOS (2025-2035) 2025 Recommended Acreage (based on 27,823 population) Surplus/Deficit Acreages (2025) 2035 Recommended Acreage (based on 50,140 population) Surplus/Deficit Acreages (2035) Close-to-Home Parks Neighborhood Parks 98.6 2.9 Ac/1,000 Residents 1.5 Ac/1,000 Residents 41.7 56.9 75.2 23.4 Community Parks 32 0.9 Ac/1,000 Residents 5.0 Ac/1,000 Residents 139.1 -107.1 250.7 -218.7 Close-to-Home Parks Subtotal 130.6 3.8 Ac/1,000 Residents 6.5 Ac/1,000 Residents 180.8 -50.2 325.9 -195.3 Other Parks Regional Parks 85.6 3.1 Ac/1,000 Residents 5.0 Ac/1,000 Residents 139.1 -53.6 291.2 -165.1 Greenbelts/Linear Parks 15.3 0.5 Ac/1,000 Residents Varies N/A N/A N/A N/A Open Space 24.9 0.9 Ac/1,000 Residents Varies N/A N/A N/A N/A Special Use Parks 0 0.0 Ac/1,000 Residents Varies N/A N/A N/A N/A Other Parks Subtotal 125.7 4.5 Ac/1,000 Residents Varies N/A N/A N/A N/A All Park Types 256.3 9.2 Ac/1,000 Residents 11.5 Ac/1,000 Residents 320.0 -63.6*576.6 -320.3* *The bottom row includes all park types and an overall recommended level of service of 11.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The total 2025 and 2035 surplus and deficit calculations are based on all park types combined (e.g., 256.3 existing acres - 320.2 recommended acres in 2025 = -63.6 deficit acres). Negative numbers = acreage deficits Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 79 Figure 29. Parkland Acreage Level of Service CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)80 SPATIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE Access to Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks typically serve residents within a 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile radius. These parks are intended to serve daily recreational needs for nearby residents and are often accessed by foot or bike. These service areas equate to approximately a 5-minute (1/4 mile) to 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk. Neighborhood parks should be generally located away from major arterial streets and should be accessible without requiring residents to cross major roadways. Map 5 illustrates the service areas of existing neighborhood parks in Anna. Service areas are clipped where major roadways, rivers, or other natural features create barriers that limit pedestrian access. While existing neighborhood parks serve large portions of Anna, many residential growth areas lack access to neighborhood parks. Need areas are those areas within the growth area that are not currently serviced with appropriate parks. Primary parkland need areas are located throughout the City, with the eastern and western portions of the City having the largest areas lacking access to neighborhood-serving parkland. As the City considers locations for new close-to-home parks, priority should be given to residential areas located within the primary parkland need areas. As the City considers improvements to its sidewalk and trail network, priority should be given to streets within a 1/2 mile distance of existing parks to allow nearby residents to safely walk and bike to the parks. Henry Clay 'Yank' Washington Park is a local example of a neighborhood park. Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 81 Map 5. Service Area of Neighborhood Parks CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)82 Access to Community Parks Community parks are designed to serve several neighborhoods and typically offer a wide range of amenities, such as playgrounds, picnic pavilions, athletic fields and courts, trails, and splash pads. Residents are often willing to drive farther to visit community parks because they typically provide more options than smaller neighborhood parks. Map 6 shows a 1 to 2 mile service area around parks that could function as community parks based on their size, amenities, or how they are currently used. Bryant Park and Natural Springs Park are the City's two existing community parks. Natural Springs Park sits near the center of Anna, while Bryant Park is located toward the northern edge. When these service areas are compared to areas of residential growth, it is clear that the west and east sides of the City have the greatest need for additional parkland. As development in these parts of the City continues, there may be opportunities to add new community parks to better serve these neighborhoods. Paw Park at Natural Springs Park Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 83 Map 6. Service Area of Community Parks CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)84 Access to Regional Parks Regional parks are designed to serve the entire community as well as visitors from the surrounding region. They often host large events, tournaments, and provide access to significant natural or protected areas. Due to their size and variety of recreational amenities, regional parks have an extensive service area. Slayter Creek Park serves as Anna's sole regional park. With its substantial size of approximately 86 acres, and diverse recreational amenities, the park serves residents across the region. As the service area includes the entire City, it is not mapped in this Plan. Access to Trails Like pocket and neighborhood parks, trails are typically accessed by foot or bicycle and share a similar service area of 1/4 to 1/2 mile. While the proposed trail network will eventually provide citywide coverage, the current system contains notable gaps—particularly in central areas within the established service area. Existing trails in Anna primarily follow a north-south alignment near Slayter Creek, presenting opportunities for new connections, including potential links between Baldwin Park Trail and Pecan Grove Trail. Given strong community support, expanding and improving the trail network should be prioritized for future implementation. Slayter Creek Park Fields Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 85 Map 7. Service Area of Trails *Park Place Trail, Oak Hollow Trail, and Arden Park Trail are located on HOA properties. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)86 FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE In addition to considering the different types of parkland, it is important to consider what types of facilities are available for resident use. The 2025 NRPA Agency Performance Review also provides comparison data of the prevalence for outdoor park and recreation facilities per population. The facility target levels of service were determined through a baseline comparison of the 2025 NRPA Agency Performance Review results for communities with populations between 20,000-49,999 people and 50,000-99,999 people. Targets were then tailored to Anna based on community input, goals, and an understanding of parkland and staffing opportunities and challenges. The Facility Level of Service table on the next page illustrates the current level of service for each type of facility based on the current estimated population. Targets are applied to the facility categories to determine current and future deficits. The two far right columns display the findings from the 2025 NRPA Agency Performance Review for communities with 20,000-49,999 people and 50,000-99,999 people, when available. There are currently deficiencies in the following facilities: ▪Diamond fields ▪Stand-alone backstops ▪Basketball courts ▪Multipurpose practice fields ▪Tennis courts ▪Trails ▪Volleyball courts ▪Amphitheater/outdoor event space ▪Picnic facilities ▪Publicly accessible swimming pool/aquatic facility ▪Splash pad ▪Recreation Center Looking out toward 2035, without the addition of new facilities there will also be deficiencies in: ▪A fitness equipment circuit ▪Rectangular fields (soccer, football) ▪Picnic pavilions ▪Playgrounds Most other current deficits increase by 2035. Facility/Amenity Current Available Current LOS (1 Facility per # Residents) Target LOS (Per Residents) 2025 Need (based on 27,823 pop.) 2025 Deficit or Surplus 2035 Need (based on 50,140 pop.)2035 Deficit or Surplus 2025 NRPA Agency Review (some facility categories are not included in the Agency Review) Cities 20,000-49,999 Cities 50,000-99,999 Ac t i v e Diamond Fields (baseball, softball)6 4,637 1 per 4,500 7 -1 12 -6 1 per 3,408 1 per 4,560 Backstop 2 9,274 1 per 6,000 5 -3 9 -7 Basketball Courts (outdoor)3 9,274 1 per 8,000 4 -1 7 -4 1 per 8,000 1 per 8,447 Disc Golf 1 27,823 1 per city 1 0 1 0 1 per 32,519 1 per 56,150 Fitness Equipment Circuit 2 13,912 1 per 20,000 2 0 3 -1 1 per 21,468 1 per 32,500 Multipurpose Practice Fields 3 9,274 1 per 6,000 5 -2 9 -6 Rectangular Fields (soccer, football)7 3,975 1 per 4,000 7 0 13 -6 1 per 4,002 1 per 4,659 Pickleball Courts 11 2,529 1 per 7,000 4 7 8 3 1 per 7,333 1 per 8,592 Skate Park 1 27,823 1 per city 1 0 1 0 1 per 35,000 1 per 61,384 Tennis Courts 2 13,912 1 per 7,000 4 -2 8 -6 1 per 6,284 1 per 5,818 Trails: City-owned + HOA (miles)* 9.55 2,913 1 per 2,500 11.1 -1.6 20.1 -10.5 Median 10 total miles Median 16 total miles Volleyball Courts (outdoor)0 0 1 per 16,000 2 -2 4 -4 1 per 16,487 1 per 29,214 Pa s s i v e Amphitheater/Outdoor Event Space 0 0 1 per city 1 -1 1 -1 1 per 34,275 1 per 60,594 Dog Park 2 13,912 1 per 30,000 1 1 2 0 1 per 26,534 1 per 55,250 Picnic Pavilions 13 2,140 1 per 3,000 10 3 17 -4 Picnic Facilities (e.g., tables) 12 2,319 In all publicly accessed parks In all publicly accessed parks -1 In all publicly accessed parks -1 Playgrounds 11 2,529 1 per 3,000 10 1 17 -6 1 per 3,320 1 per 3,643 Wa t e r Fishing Piers 1 27,823 Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Publicly Accessible Swimming Pool/Aquatic Facility 0 0 1 per city 1 -1 1 -1 Pool: 1 per 26,900 Center: 1 per 32,000 Pool: 1 per 48,064 Center: 1 per 60,770 Splash Pad 1 27,823 1 per 20,000 2 -1 3 -2 1 per 29,804 1 per 51,000 Mi s c . Recreation Center 0 0 1 per 30,000 1 -1 2 -2 1 per 27,517 1 per 31,805 Park Restrooms 8 3,478 Where feasible Where feasible Varies Where feasible Varies Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 87 Figure 30. Facility Level of Service *Trails located on HOA Properties: Park Place Trail (0.63 miles), Oak Hollow Trail (0.48 miles), and Arden Park Trail (0.19 miles) RESOURCE-BASED ASSESSMENT CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)88 The resource-based assessment is the third analysis for the needs assessment. This exercise recognizes key physical, man-made, or natural resources within the community that may provide potential recreational opportunities. These areas can either support active recreational pursuits or provide opportunities for passive enjoyment. The following areas have potential to be further leveraged for recreation or open space preservation. Floodplains and Waterbodies Waterbodies and floodplains are areas that are inherently unsuitable for most types of development. They are also often beautiful natural areas that wind through cities. Anna’s creeks, such as Sweetwater, Sister Grove, Throckmorton, and Hurricane, and associated floodplains extend throughout the City. With strategic development of trail infrastructure, these natural areas could be used as a key element in a citywide trail network. Utility Corridors Utility corridors are great opportunities for multipurpose facilities, for example, implementing trails in utility rights-of-way that would otherwise remain underutilized land. Development of structures is largely prohibited in utility corridors. While these areas need to remain clear of vertical development, they are great locations for extensive trail segments. As the City develops additional trails, consideration should be given to best leveraging utility corridors for connectivity. To the extent possible, shrubs or small trees should be integrated to provide shade for users. Topography The west side of Anna contains topographical changes that are ideal for future parks and trails. With the topographical changes and available undeveloped land on the west side of US 75, the City could implement a mountain bike trail network and establish new improved and unimproved hiking trails. Trails at John Flavel Greer Park Needs Assessment | CHAPTER 3 89 SUMMARY OF NEEDS The needs assessment and public engagement process reveal the high importance and value of parks and recreation for the City of Anna. In order for Anna to maintain its high level of parks and recreation quality and services, there are some identified needs for additional distribution of parkland, increased connectivity, new and improved facilities, and expanded recreational programs that should be addressed in the coming years. These needs include services that are currently lacking for existing residents as well as expected needs as Anna's population grows through 2035. PARKLAND ACREAGE AND DEVELOPMENT • Connect major park spaces and neighborhoods through an improved trail network. • Increase shade along trails and walking paths. • Connect parks with greenbelts and safe pedestrian pathways. • Address service area gaps in residential-growth areas with additional close-to-home and regional parks. • Maximize the use of existing parks through upgrades and better amenities. • Develop inclusive playgrounds for children of all ages and abilities. • Distribute services throughout the City, specifically on the east, west, and south portions. PARKLAND ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY PARK FACILITIES • Expand recreational programming geared toward teenagers. • Increase indoor recreation activities throughout the year. • Provide coaching and roster continuity for recreational sports teams. • Address shortages in sports fields to increase capacity for hosting larger sporting events and overall usage throughout the year. • Provide publicly accessible pools or aquatic facilities throughout the City. • Enhance existing parks with amenities such as shade and restroom facilities. • Provide an additional splash pad and dog park to meet public demand in the future. RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS 4 RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION This chapter details the recommendations formulated as part of this Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan Update. These recommendations are based on the assessment of current conditions, input from the public and stakeholders, and a needs assessment. They encompass a combination of strategies for maintaining and improving the existing parks and recreation infrastructure, as well as introducing new facilities where a need has been identified. GOALS FOR THE PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM The following goals provide overall direction for Anna’s parks and recreation system to achieve the community’s vision and aspirations. These goals should be used to help guide the City’s decision-making processes and form the basis of the PROST Master Plan’s recommendations. 1. Proactively acquire parkland and open space acreage to provide physical access to all existing and future residents of Anna. 2. Enhance and diversify existing parks and develop new amenities to best meet the needs and desires of the community. 3. Improve and expand the City’s trail network to enhance connectivity between neighborhoods, parks, schools, and destinations. 4. Provide a diverse range of recreational opportunities for all ages, abilities, and interests. 5. Ensure all parks are safe, welcoming, and well-maintained for all users to enjoy comfortably. 6. Pursue partnerships and secure diverse funding sources to support park development, improvements, and ongoing operations. Skateboarding legend Tony Hawk with Anna neighbors at Slayter Creek Park on June 10, 2025 Source: City of Anna CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)92 Goal #1: Proactively acquire parkland and open space acreage to provide physical access to all existing and future residents of Anna. 1.1 Proactively pursue the acquisition of additional parkland acreage in the target areas. While some of the City is currently served with nearby access to park and recreation amenities, there is a need to proactively plan for additional parkland that addresses the needs of underserved areas within the Residential Growth Area as shown on Map 8. These areas primarily include the developable areas west of US 75 and east of the currently developed area inside city limits. The City should proactively pursue acquisition in these areas through parkland dedication, purchase of parcels, or partnerships. Neighborhood parks should be prioritized in all new residential growth areas to allow easy access to outdoor space for new Anna residents. Additionally, a new community park should be prioritized on the west side of US 75. When evaluating land for recreational use, consider factors like proximity to residential areas, accessibility, topography, and size. Additionally, based on the staffing and funding needs associated with additional parkland, properties that can provide the greatest diversity of benefits should be prioritized. Map 8. Parkland Need Areas Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 93 Figure 31. Parkland Dedication & Fee Analysis 1.2 Review the parkland dedication ordinance and associated fees and modify as needed. The chart in Figure 31 compares the City of Anna’s parkland dedication ratios and parkland fees with those of nearby cities, McKinney, Melissa, Prosper, and Princeton. For both single-family and multifamily developments, Anna currently requires a dedication rate of 1 acre per 50 dwelling units, which is notably less stringent than McKinney (1:37), Melissa (1:30), Prosper (1:35), and Princeton (1:30). By requiring less parkland space per unit, Anna may experience increasing pressure on existing park infrastructure as development and population continue to increase. When comparing parkland fees in lieu of dedication, Anna charges $1,500 per single-family unit and $2,000 per multifamily unit. While the single-family fee aligns with Prosper and Melissa’s rates, it remains lower than McKinney’s ($1,993) and City Parkland Dedication - Single Family (Acre : Dwelling Unit) Parkland Dedication - Multifamily (Acre : Dwelling Unit) Parkland Fee in Lieu - Single Family ($ per Dwelling Unit) Parkland Fee in Lieu - Multifamily ($ per Dwelling Unit) Anna, TX 1:50 1:50 $1,500 $2,000 McKinney, TX 1:37 1:37 $1,993 $1,631 Melissa, TX 1:30 1:30 $1,500 $1,250 Prosper, TX 1:35 1:35 $1,500 $2,000 Princeton, TX 1:30 1:30 $1,540 $1,540 only slightly below Princeton’s ($1,540). The multifamily fee, however, is higher than McKinney, Melissa, and Princeton, which positions Anna near the upper end of the range for that category. Anna’s fees in lieu of dedication are generally comparable with surrounding cities and may not need to be updated. Anna should consider updating its parkland dedication ratios to fall within the regional average of 1 acre per 35–40 dwelling units. This adjustment would help create adequate parkland and open space as the population continues to increase. Additionally, Anna should continue to review and update its fees in lieu of dedication to keep pace with inflation and land acquisition costs. These updates would position Anna’s policy more competitively within the region and provide a sustainable funding mechanism for future parks and open space development. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)94 Goal #2: Enhance and diversify existing parks and develop new amenities to best meet the needs and desires of the community. 2.1 Improve Baldwin Park. In order to enhance the recreation potential of Baldwin Park, the following improvements are recommended: • Perform ongoing maintenance and improvements to the park restrooms. • Manage encroachment of lake-related activities onto adjacent private properties. 2.2 Implement the Carol Park Development Plan. Following completion of the Carol Park Development Plan, the City has initiated phased construction of the planned improvements, with work currently underway and expected to be completed in 2026. 2.3 Implement the Finley Park Concept Plan. The City has completed the Finley Park Concept Plan and is preparing to move the project into construction. 2.4 Implement the Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park Development Plan. Following completion of the Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park Development Plan, the City has initiated phased construction of the planned improvements, with work currently underway and expected to be completed in Summer 2026. 2.5 Improve and develop Henry Clay “Yank” Washington Park. Henry Clay “Yank” Washington Park offers a range of community amenities. However, opportunities exist to enhance the recreational offerings within and around the park. Potential improvements include: • Maintain the playground by replenishing the safety surfacing. • Provide signage to clearly communicate park rules and regulations. • Add a picnic pavilion. • Construct a parking lot to enhance site accessibility. • Provide shaded seating or picnic areas with tree cover or a shade structure. 2.6 Improve John Flavel Greer Park. John Flavel Greer Park is a recently dedicated park in the City. While existing facilities are in good condition, future improvement opportunities include enhancing trail connections to nearby residential developments and the Slayter Creek Trail. Ongoing maintenance should be prioritized to preserve the quality and usability of park amenities. 2.7 Improve Johnson Park. In order to enhance the recreation potential of Johnson Park, the following improvements are recommended: • Pave and enlarge the parking lot. • Establish trail connections linking to downtown and surrounding parks. • Replace park benches. • Install concrete pads adjacent to benches for wheelchair accessibility. Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 95 2.8 Prepare a concept plan for further development of Sherley Heritage Park. Sherley Heritage Park is the City’s most historic park and has the potential to better serve the community through targeted upgrades and new amenities. To ensure future improvements align with a long-term vision, the City should prepare a conceptual plan before making major investments to ensure that improvements on this small site best address recreation needs and deficiencies in the community. The conceptual plan should consider and evaluate the following elements for feasibility: • Expand the site to allow for expansion up to 5th Street by removing the wooden fence and water utility structures from the park’s southern edge. • Implement ADA upgrades across the site with a focus on parking lot, restrooms, depot building, and benches. • Provide additional parking spaces. • Provide sidewalks to improve pedestrian access. • Provide shade over the playground. • Evaluate the feasibility of incorporating a farmers market location on the site. 2.9 Implement the Sherley Heritage Park Concept Plan. After developing the Sherley Heritage Park Concept Plan, the City should move forward with phased implementation of the improvements as funding becomes available. 2.10 Finalize design drawings for the improvement of Bryant Park. The City has completed the Bryant Park Concept Plan and should finalize design drawings to begin implementing the planned improvements. In order to enhance the recreation potential of Bryant Park, the following improvements are recommended for incorporation into the ongoing design drawings: • Install ADA-compliant parking facilities. • Address the site’s drainage issues and explore creative stormwater management solutions. • Enhance the condition and usability of the fields. • Implement a new irrigation system. 2.11 Improve Natural Springs Park. Natural Springs Park is among the City’s most visited parks and has several opportunities to improve accessibility and user experience. Recommended improvements include: • Add shade trees and benches along walking paths, to the extent possible. • Mitigate erosion along the creek banks. • Improve drainage within Paw Park. • Expand the Paw Park for increased capacity. • Carry out ADA and accessibility enhancements throughout the site. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)96 2.12 Improve Slayter Creek Park. Slayter Creek Park is the City’s only regional park and one of its most heavily used. The City is currently making progress on several improvements, including the addition of a new playground, to enhance the park’s overall condition and usability. Additional upgrades are recommended to address ongoing maintenance and operational needs, including: • Evaluate and implement measures to enhance restroom security and mitigate vandalism. • Address poor drainage of the site, including flooding concerns in the vicinity, pickleball courts, and ballfields. • Add shade trees and benches along walking paths, to the extent possible. • Assess the existing irrigation system and consider consolidating to one central controller. • Evaluate slope stabilization strategies for the creek and drainage channel. 2.13 Improve Pecan Grove Park. In order to enhance the recreation potential of Pecan Grove Park, the following improvements are recommended: • Expand coverage of the irrigation system across the park. • Identify locations along the trail suitable for wildflower planting areas to add seasonal interest and ecological value. 2.14 Prepare a Geer Park Master Plan. Geer Park currently stands as an undeveloped parcel that serves as a multipurpose practice field for different sports. In order to define and formalize the site’s amenities and recreational programming, it is recommended the City prepare a master plan to solidify the vision for the park. 2.15 Implement the Geer Park Master Plan. After developing the Geer Park Master Plan, the City should move forward with phased implementation of the improvements as funding becomes available. 2.16 Systematically address recreation amenity deficiencies. As the City further amenitizes existing parks or develops new parks, it should prioritize providing amenities with identified deficits as defined in the facility level of service assessment in Chapter 3. These do not need to be the only amenities included, but should be a starting point for all discussions about adding recreation options to parks. Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 97 Goal #3: Improve and expand the City’s trail network to enhance connectivity between neighborhoods, parks, schools, and destinations. 3.1 Continue expanding the City’s trail network. Across all engagement activities conducted during the parks planning process, trails and connectivity emerged as a top priority for the City’s future park system. To address this community priority, it is recommended that the City continue to expand its trail network to connect residents with parks, schools, and retail destinations. The Trails Master Plan (see Map 9 on the next page) illustrates potential trail corridors that could strengthen connectivity. Some of the identified segments include existing sidewalks that can be leveraged to fill network gaps, while others would require coordination and easements from private landowners and developers. Priority implementation should focus on establishing 1/2 mile connections between neighborhoods and nearby parks. Through the private development process, the City can require dedication of right-of-way for trail construction and continue to consider using park development fees to support ongoing trail development. Prior to future development, the City may evaluate opportunities for trail reassessment and realignment to better address site conditions, connectivity goals, and long-term public access needs. Where appropriate, the City should also explore opportunities to highlight historic corridors and culturally significant routes within the trail system. Interpretive and wayfinding signage along existing or future trails can help tell the story of the community while enhancing navigation and creating recreation experiences that celebrate the City’s cultural and historic assets. 3.2 Require all new and upgraded trail segments to meet the trail design standards adopted in 2021. The Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan adopted in 2021 established specific trail guidelines. As Anna continues to grow, new public and private trails will be developed to connect residential areas to parks, schools, and commercial districts. These new trails should be required to follow the design standards laid out in the previous plan and listed in Figure 32 on page 100. 3.3 Leverage floodplain and utility easements for trail expansion. To strengthen the City’s trail network and improve connectivity, opportunities should be explored to extend trails within existing floodplain and utility easements. Trails and associated amenities built in the floodplain should be designed for longevity and to minimize the potential of washout during heavy rain events. 3.4 Incorporate shade, trees, and benches on all new trails and other amenities. The need for amenities that improve comfort and usability along the trail network also emerged as a community priority throughout engagement activities. To address this need, it is recommended that the City incorporate features such as shade, trees, benches and drinking fountains, if the opportunity exists, throughout the trail system to enhance comfort and safety for users. 3.5 Develop solutions where future trails cross major thoroughfares. As the trail network expands, crossings at major thoroughfares will become critical points for safety, comfort, and connectivity. The City should proactively evaluate locations where existing or planned trails intersect high-volume roadways and develop context-sensitive solutions such as enhanced crosswalks or signalized crossings to prioritize visibility and pedestrian safety. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)98 Map 9. Trails Master Plan Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 99 Figure 32. Trails and Sidewalks Design Guidelines Community Trails: 10’ - 12’ Concrete Future community trails that extend from the Regional Veloweb trails will create a city trail system that connects many key destinations in Anna and establishes longer distance, off-street trail routes for recreation uses. Trailheads with a variety of trail amenities will be located along these trails. Community trails should be constructed of concrete. These trail types are a minimum of 10-feet wide and a maximum of 12-feet wide depending on the level of anticipated use. The Trail Master Plan (see Map 9) identifies opportunities for future trails to connect areas of the City as development occurs and identifies priority community trails for development. Regional Veloweb: 12’ Concrete The purpose of the Regional Veloweb trail type, which is defined and recognized by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), is to provide regional and interregional routes. NCTCOG describes the Veloweb as “a 644-mile interconnected network of off-street trails designed to provide safe, efficient mobility to pedestrians and cyclists.” The intention of the Veloweb in Anna is to provide access throughout the City to destinations in adjacent communities and, ultimately, to connect to the DFW metro area. Trails designated as part of the Regional Veloweb should be concrete and a minimum of 12-feet in width. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)100 Nature Trails: 4’-12’ Wide Trails can be constructed of hard, soft or a mix of surface materials depending on surrounding conditions and expected usage. Although typically found in parks and open spaces, more residential developments are incorporating soft-surface trails into the design of their communities. Sidewalks: 6’-8’ Concrete Sidewalks link neighborhood blocks to larger street and trail networks. The minimum width of sidewalks in Anna is 6 feet, with wider, 8-foot sidewalks recommended adjacent to major roads. Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 101 Goal #4: Provide a diverse range of recreational opportunities for all ages, abilities, and interests. 4.1 Expand recreational programming for teenagers. As noted in the Introduction & Community Analysis chapter, Anna has a large population of children under the age of nine. As this cohort grows older, it will be important for the City to expand and diversify recreational programming to meet the needs of teenagers. Survey results indicate that youth and teen programming has room for improvement and should be a priority in the coming years. Programs to consider include: • Athletic leagues and clinics • Art and music classes and camps • Technology classes and camps • Inclusive programs for children with all abilities • Non-traditional sports programs (e.g., skateboarding, disc golf) 4.2 Expand recreational programming for adults 50+. Among community feedback, expanded recreational programming for adults 50+ ranked highly among priorities for residents. The City should consider expanding or supporting a greater diversity of recreation options for people over 50. Some considerations could include game nights, picnics in the park, and fishing days. The City should also continue to solicit input from residents in this age group to better tailor programs and events to their interests. 4.3 Develop new multipurpose practice fields to address space deficits and expand the capacity to host tournaments. To address existing field space deficits and expand the City’s capacity to host leagues and tournaments, the City should identify locations for new multipurpose practice fields. 4.4 Pursue opportunities to provide a recreation center in Anna. The community expressed a desire for indoor recreation options including a recreation center. The City has begun to explore opportunities to develop or partner on the development of a recreation center. Following identification of a preferred strategy, the City should proceed with development of a recreation center. 4.5 Identify and designate a site for a playground designed specifically for toddlers and young children. Community input noted a concern for child safety due to the lack of playgrounds designed for children ages two to five. As the City considers the installation of new playground equipment, consideration of more playgrounds for younger children should be a priority. All community and regional parks should include playgrounds for children ages two to five and children ages five to 12. Where there is sufficient space, this should be the goal for neighborhood parks as well. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)102 4.6 Review the organization of youth sports programs and consider restructuring team formats to enhance continuity for both coaches and participants across seasons. Throughout the engagement process, participants expressed a desire to restructure youth sports programming to allow teams to remain together across seasons. The City should evaluate the current organization of youth sports and consider restructuring team formats to enhance continuity for both coaches and participants. Sherley Heritage Park Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 103 Goal #5: Ensure all parks are safe, welcoming, and well-maintained for Anna neighbors to enjoy comfortably. 5.1 Conduct a staffing assessment to determine needs for expanded headcount. The City should conduct a Community Services Department staffing assessment to determine needs for additional staff. This assessment should consider NRPA standards for staffing levels, increased maintenance regularity, capacity to quickly address safety and security concerns, and handle recreational programming as the parks and recreation network in the City expands. 5.2 Hire a grant writer to pursue parks funding. The City should consider hiring a grant writer to pursue external funding opportunities for the park system. This role would focus on identifying and applying for state, federal, and private grants that support park improvements and other system needs identified in this Plan. 5.3 Ensure that adequate funding and staffing accompany park system expansions. This Plan includes recommendations for each park as well as potential acquisition of additional parkland in the future. As the City develops additional park facilities, it is also crucial to budget adequate funding and staffing to allow for increased park system maintenance and repairs. It is recommended that any park additions or renovations that cannot be adequately maintained be postponed until appropriate funding and staffing are available. 5.4 Develop a park system management plan. In order to improve the appearance and maintenance of the park system and expand existing offerings, the City should develop and adhere to a park system management plan or proactive maintenance plan. At a minimum, this plan should include: • An inventory of park assets • Proactive park maintenance plans for amenities • Replacement plans and schedules for amenities • Required training necessary to develop the specialized skill sets needed to maintain the parks (e.g., irrigation system maintenance, playground inspection) CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)104 5.5 Continue to address ADA-accessibility issues on a prioritized basis. The City has a reasonably good understanding of ADA-accessibility issues in the park system. It is recommended that the City continue to address these issues on a prioritized basis. If there are any park areas that have not been assessed (i.e., trails, playgrounds, parking areas, picnic facilities, etc.), the City should conduct an ADA assessment and incorporate the issues into its ongoing prioritized list. 5.6 Ensure signage for park rules and regulations is consistently and clearly communicated across all parks. Consistent park signage, including construction materials and graphic content, helps residents and visitors navigate to/within parks, visually recognize City-owned parkland, and understand allowable behaviors. The City should develop a consistent parks branding strategy and update entry and wayfinding signs at all parks accordingly. Each park should have signs with the park name, rules, and contact information for maintenance and other requests. Entry signs should be located in prominently visible locations and have park names at an easily legible size. Park rules signage should be provided, where needed. 5.7 Increase shade in all parks and prioritize hard-top structure over fabric to reduce long-term maintenance. Providing ample shade throughout the park system is key to encouraging greater use throughout the year. It is recommended that the City provide additional shaded areas in each park, with a priority on hard-top shade structures in high-use locations to reduce long-term maintenance needs. Shade can also be provided through additional trees and limited use of shade fabric where appropriate. These efforts should be focused in gathering areas and along walking trails. 5.8 Evaluate opportunities for increased security in parks. Vandalism is a challenging issue in many of the City’s parks. It is recommended that the City evaluate opportunities to increase security in all City parks. This could be through things such as enhanced lighting, security cameras, open sight lines, and increased police patrols, among others. 5.9 Develop Park Design Guidelines. In addition to signage, incorporating consistent materials, furnishings, and maintenance standards across all City parks will strengthen the overall identity of the park system and improve efficiency in future design decisions. The City is currently developing park design guidelines to help guide the design and construction of new and renovated parks and recreation facilities. Once developed, these guidelines should be adhered to and updated as necessary over time. Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 105 Goal #6: Pursue partnerships and secure diverse funding sources to support park development, upgrades, and ongoing operations. 6.1 Pursue a Parks and Recreation bond. City staff are actively pursuing a Parks and Recreation bond to fund system-wide improvements and new facilities. This effort builds on strong community support, as nearly 60% of survey respondents indicated they would support or strongly support raising funds through a bond initiative for new parks and recreation facilities. As the bond process advances, the City should continue to identify priority projects, refine cost estimates, and engage residents to ensure transparency and sustained public backing. 6.2 Pursue grant funding from diverse sources and strengthen internal grant capacity. In order to maximize park system development potential, the City should consistently evaluate and pursue appropriate grant funding opportunities. This includes Texas Parks and Wildlife Grants as well as a variety of other recreational grants available to cities. To improve competitiveness and ensure timely applications, the City should support the addition of dedicated grant writing capacity to identify opportunities, prepare applications, and manage reporting requirements. Slayter Creek Park Skatepark CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)106 6.3 Evaluate opportunities for public-private partnerships to create a recreation center or community pool in Anna. Partnerships between cities and private-sector companies can be powerful tools to finance, build, or operate parks and recreation facilities. The City should evaluate public-private partnership opportunities to leverage resources and expand community offerings, including potential collaborations for a recreation center, community pool, or local business sponsorships. 6.4 When warranted, establish joint maintenance agreements with athletic leagues. While the City’s athletic facilities are primarily used for local programming, opportunities may arise for outside leagues to utilize these spaces as the parks system continues to grow. When this occurs, the City should establish joint maintenance agreements with participating leagues to clearly define responsibilities, ensure proper facility upkeep, and confirm that league fees adequately offset maintenance costs. 6.5 Coordinate and/or partner with local organizations and entities to provide additional parks and recreation opportunities for the community. The City should continue to pursue partnership opportunities to support the improvement and expansion of parks and recreation offerings in Anna. Potential collaborations could include: • Outdoor education programs in partnership with local schools, the library, and community organizations. • Indoor recreation programs coordinated with the library, civic groups, and other local partners. 6.6 Update the PROST Master Plan every five years. The community’s parks and recreation needs and desires will change as the population grows and demographics shift. The City should plan to update the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan periodically to ensure that it reflects current needs and priorities. The TPWD recommends updating the Plan every five years or before any new major developments occur that significantly change the parks and recreation needs of residents. This can also help the City during a TPWD grant funding evaluation, as TPWD places a higher point value on submittals that demonstrate that a plan has been updated within the previous five years. All Plan updates should include a public involvement process. 6.7 Maintain current parks inventory and GIS data to ensure accurate information is available for future Plan updates. It is recommended that the City update their parks inventory to include additional information about all of the parks. This includes park addresses, location maps, additional photos, and complete lists of amenities. Recommendations | CHAPTER 4 107 5 IMPLEMENTATION INTRODUCTION The City of Anna’s Community Services Department is responsible for planning, upkeep, and improvement of the public parks, trails, and recreation facilities in the City. The department also plans and manages recreational programs, special events, and youth sports. The department will work with the Anna community and respective stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the PROST Master Plan. HIGH PRIORITY NEEDS This Plan includes a variety of recommendations to improve and expand the parks, facilities, trails and recreational programming in Anna. The Plan meets the TPWD’s requirements for a parks, recreation, and open space master plan, and can help increase the City’s competitiveness when applying for TPWD grant funding. Anna’s top priority parks facility needs are summarized in the table at the right. These are based on community input, needs assessments, consultant evaluation, and staff input. Future parks and recreation efforts should work toward fulfilling these community needs. New Facilities Needed Based on Community Input New Facilities Needed Based on Level of Service Upgraded Facilities Needed Based on Existing Condition 1. Trails 2. Publicly accessible pool/aquatic facility 3. Recreation Center 4. Indoor sports facilities 5. Playgrounds 1. Trails 2. Baseball/softball fields 3. Multipurpose practice fields 4. Publicly accessible pool/aquatic facility 5. Recreation Center 1. Shade, generally 2. Trails 3. Improved accessibility, generally 4. Restroom facilities 5. Improved soccer fields Top Cumulative Outdoor Facility Needs Top Cumulative Indoor Facility Needs 1. Trails 2. Access to nature areas 3. Baseball/softball fields 4. Multipurpose practice fields 5. Publicly accessible pool 6. Basketball courts 7. Splash pad 8. Improved playground equipment/inclusive playgrounds 9. Shaded picnic facilities, shelters, and pavilions 10. Events pavilion and amphitheater 1. Recreation center with programming and services 2. Indoor sports facilities 3. Indoor fitness Figure 33. Top Priority Facility Needs CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)110 PRIORITIZED ACTION PLAN Prioritization The recommended actions of this Plan have been prioritized based on the following criteria: • Level of need based on community input • Level of need based on the level of service • Existing conditions evaluations • Less complex actions that can create early wins Potential Cost Ranges Order of magnitude potential cost ranges are provided where possible in the action plan. These planning level cost ranges were created in 2025, based on a current understanding of the industry. Ultimate costs will be dependent on detailed design and construction plans, industry trends, and timing of implementation. Considering current high levels of inflation, costs should be re-evaluated closer to budgeting and implementation phases. Final costs will be dependent on future planning decisions made by the City. Time Frames Actions have been organized into short-term (1-3 years), mid-term (4-7 years), and long-term (8-10+ years), time frames, with an indication of actions that will be ongoing. Some actions will be initiated and completed within their designated time frame, while others may be initiated during their designated time frame and then completed over time. Actions have been ranked according to priority, however, long-term actions should be reevaluated and further prioritized in subsequent Plan updates. The priorities set forth in the Prioritized Action Plan on the following page are intended to guide staff and the City Council as they improve and operate the parks and recreation system for the next five to 10 years. This does not, however, preclude the City from initiating an action sooner than recommended if opportune circumstances arise. IMPLEMENTATION | CHAPTER 5 111 Rank #Action Initiation Time Frame (years) Potential Cost RangeShort-term (1-3) Mid-term (4-7) Long-term (8-10+) On-going Goal 1: Proactively acquire parkland and open space acreage to provide physical access to all existing and future residents of Anna. 1 1.1 Proactively pursue the acquisition of additional parkland acreage in the target areas. TBD 2 1.2 Review the parkland dedication ordinance and associated fees and modify as needed. Staff Hours Goal 2: Enhance and diversify existing parks and develop new amenities to best meet the needs and desires of the community. 1 2.16 Systematically address recreation amenity deficiencies. TBD 2 2.12 Improve Slayter Creek Park.$2,500,000-$3,500,000 3 2.2 Implement the Carol Park Development Plan. TBD 4 2.4 Implement the Hassie Lawrence Morgan Park Development Plan. TBD 5 2.3 Implement the Finley Park Concept Plan. TBD 6 2.10 Finalize design drawings for the improvement of Bryant Park. TBD 7 2.14 Prepare a Geer Park Master Plan.$55,000-$75,000 8 2.8 Prepare a concept plan for further development of Sherley Heritage Park.$35,000-$60,000 9 2.15 Implement the Geer Park Master Plan.$2,500,000-$3,500,000 10 2.9 Implement the Sherley Heritage Park Concept Plan.$500,000 - $750,000 11 2.7 Improve Johnson Park. $1,500,000 - $1,250,000 12 2.11 Improve Natural Springs Park. $2,000,000 - $3,000,000 Figure 34. Prioritized Action Plan CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)112 Rank #Action Initiation Time Frame (years) Potential Cost RangeShort-term (1-3) Mid-term (4-7) Long-term (8-10+) On-going 13 2.5 Improve and develop Henry Clay “Yank” Washington Park.TBD 14 2.1 Improve Baldwin Park.$1,750,000 - $2,500,000 15 2.13 Improve Pecan Grove Park.$500,000 - $750,000 16 2.6 Improve John Flavel Greer Park.$500,000 - $750,000 Goal 3: Improve and expand the City’s trail network to enhance connectivity between neighborhoods, parks, and destinations. 1 3.1 Continue expanding the City's trail network. $1,500,000-$2,500,000 Per Mile 2 3.2 Require all new and upgraded trail segments to meet the trail design standards adopted in 2021. Staff Hours 3 3.5 Develop solutions where future trails cross major thoroughfares. TBD 4 3.4 Incorporate shade, trees, and benches on all new trails. $4,000-$6,000 per 1/4 mile 5 3.3 Leverage floodplain and utility easements for trail expansion. TBD Goal 4: Provide a diverse range of recreational opportunities for all ages, abilities, and interests. 1 4.3 Develop new multipurpose practice fields to address space deficits and expand the capacity to host tournaments.$3,500,000-$4,500,000 2 4.4 Pursue opportunities to provide a recreation center in Anna. TBD 3 4.1 Expand recreational programming for teenagers.Staff Hours 4 4.2 Expand recreational programming for adults 50+.Staff Hours IMPLEMENTATION | CHAPTER 5 113 Rank #Action Initiation Time Frame (years) Potential Cost RangeShort-term (1-3) Mid-term (4-7) Long-term (8-10+) On-going 5 4.6 Review the organization of youth sports programs and consider restructuring team formats to enhance continuity for both coaches and participants across seasons.Staff Hours 6 4.5 Identify and designate a site for a playground designed specifically for toddlers and young children. $500,000-$750,000 Goal 5: Ensure all parks are safe, welcoming, and well-maintained for Anna residents to enjoy comfortably. 1 5.8 Evaluate opportunities for increased security in parks.TBD 2 5.5 Continue to address ADA-accessibility issues on a prioritized basis.TBD 3 5.3 Ensure that adequate funding and staffing accompany park system expansions.TBD 4 5.2 Hire a grant writer to pursue parks funding. TBD 5 5.4 Develop a parks system management plan.Staff Hours 6 5.6 Ensure signage for park rules and regulations is consistent and clearly communicated across all parks.Staff Hours 7 5.7 Increase shade in all parks and prioritize hard-top structure over fabric to reduce long-term maintenance. $350,000-$500,000 8 5.2 Conduct a staffing assessment to determine needs for expanded headcount.Staff Hours 9 5.9 Develop Park Design Guidelines. TBD CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)114 Rank #Action Initiation Time Frame (years) Potential Cost RangeShort-term (1-3) Mid-term (4-7) Long-term (8-10+) On-going Goal 6: Pursue partnerships and secure diverse funding sources to support park development, upgrades, and ongoing operations. 1 6.1 Pursue a Parks and Recreation bond.Staff Hours 2 6.2 Pursue grant funding from diverse sources and strengthen internal grant capacity.Staff Hours 3 6.5 Coordinate and/or partner with local organizations and entities to provide additional parks and recreation opportunities for the community.Staff Hours 4 6.3 Evaluate opportunities for public-private partnerships to create a recreation center or community pool in Anna.Staff Hours 5 6.7 Maintain current parks inventory and GIS data to ensure accurate information is available for future plan updates.Staff Hours 6 6.4 When warranted, establish joint maintenance agreements with athletic leagues.TBD 7 6.6 Update the PROST Master Plan every five years.$60,000 - $100,000 IMPLEMENTATION | CHAPTER 5 115 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund This source of funding is supported by ad valorem tax revenues, which is capped by the state and is generally the primary source of funds for maintenance and operation of the existing park system. It is important to include funding for ongoing maintenance and staff requirements for new trails, park improvements, and recreation facilities. Bonds Bonds are generally the most common source used by cities for the purchase of land and for providing development monies. Debt financing through the issuance of municipal bonds is one of the most common ways to fund park, recreation and open space projects. This type of funding is a strategy wherein a city issues a bond, receives an immediate cash payment to finance projects, and must repay the bond with interest over a set period of time ranging from a few years to several decades. A general obligation bond, which must be approved by voters at an election, is amortized using ad valorem taxes and is used to fund capital projects that are not supported by a revenue source. These projects include water service, sanitary sewer service, and park acquisition and development. The availability of bonding for parks is often dependent upon the overall municipal needs financed by this source. Capital items such as purchase of land and physical improvements with a usable life expectancy of 15 to 20 years can be funded with general obligation bonds. A revenue bond finances projects that produce enough revenue to retire their debt, such as golf courses, batting cages and enterprise-oriented park projects. Developer Requirements This involves requiring new residential development to provide a dedication of land for parks (or fee in lieu of land), park development fees, and trail rights-of-way or easements to offset the City’s costs. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Outdoor Recreation Grants The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s Local Park Grant Program includes multiple programs that assist local governmental entities with the acquisition and/or development of public recreation areas and facilities. In general, these grants provide percentage matching grant funds to local units of government to acquire and develop parkland, renovate existing public recreation areas, or construct recreation centers, nature centers and other indoor recreation-related buildings. Current grant requirements can be found at https://tpwd.texas.gov/business/grants/recreation-grants/about-local-parks-grants. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Community Outdoor Outreach Program (CO-OP) Grants The CO-OP grant helps to introduce underserved populations to the services, programs and sites of TPWD. This is not a land acquisition or construction grant; this is only for programs. Grants are awarded to non-profit organizations, schools, municipalities, counties, cities and other tax-exempt groups. Funds may be used for direct program costs for outdoor recreation or environmental education and conservation programs. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Recreational Trail Grants TPWD administers the National Recreational Trail Grants in Texas under the approval of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This federally funded program receives its funding from a portion of federal gas taxes paid on fuel used in non-highway recreational vehicles. CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)116 Private Donations Financial assistance may come from individuals, organizations, or businesses interested in supporting the park system. Land dedication commonly occurs during development and can enhance the value of nearby residential areas, particularly neighborhoods with families and children. When land is acquired through this method, the City should be prepared to develop the park within a reasonable time frame and assume long-term maintenance responsibilities. Private donations may also include funds, facilities, recreation equipment, public art, and in-kind services. Sponsorships from local and regional businesses for events or facilities should be encouraged. A Parks Improvement Trust Fund may be established to manage donations from service organizations, benevolent citizens, estates, and other sources, creating a permanent funding resource in which the principal is preserved and interest is used to support park development. Partnerships with the School District and County The City can investigate opportunities to share park facilities and their associated cost with both the local school district and county as they have many common goals. Additionally, assets and costs can be shared between the entities to help meet each of their specific needs. For example, the City may purchase land next to a future school site and a school district may install the facilities, such as a playground, which can be enjoyed by the entire community. As a result, the entire community benefits. IMPLEMENTATION | CHAPTER 5 117 APPENDIX A SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Engagement Advertisements - Instagram Online Survey Instagram Advertisement: May 23, 2025 Open House Instagram Advertisement: September 2, 2025 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)120 Engagement Advertisements - Facebook Online Survey Facebook Advertisement: June 18, 2025Online Survey Facebook Advertisement: June 17, 2025 Open House Facebook Advertisement: August 25, 2025 Appendix A 121 Public Survey CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)122 Appendix A 123 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)124 Appendix A 125 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)126 Appendix A 127 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)128 Appendix A 129 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)130 Community Engagement Touch-A-Truck Event - May 17, 2025 Appendix A 131 Community Open House - September 15, 2025 Community Engagement CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)132 Stakeholder Interviews Developers & Schools Interview Questions - May 25, 2025 Economic Development & Businesses Interview Questions - June 3, 2025 Appendix A 133 Youth Sports Interview Questions - June 17, 2025Residents Interview Questions - June 5, 2025 CITY OF ANNA | Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan Update (DRAFT)134 City Council Interview Questions - June 24, 2025 Appendix A 135 Prepared By: Freese and Nichols, Inc. 12770 Merit Drive Suite 900 Dallas Texas, 75251 214.217.2200 www.freese.com Item No. 6.c. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Lauren Mecke AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to annex 10.8± acres of land located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) in accordance with the Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). (ANX 26-0003)(Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) SUMMARY: Veritas Communities has submitted a petition to annex 10.8± acres of land. The Service Plan Agreement was previously approved as part of the associated Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). The zoning request is also on this agenda. This Item requires a Public Hearing. Public Hearing Note: At the time and place of the public hearing, all persons who desire will have an opportunity to be heard in opposition to or in favor of the ordinance, application, or other proposed items. This item is recommended for approval in accordance with the associated Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no direct financial impact. However, annexation of the property will make it subject to City of Anna property taxes. Properties located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) are not taxed by the City. BACKGROUND: Veritas Communities is seeking to develop the property in accordance with the Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873) and the companion zoning request on this agenda. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Unique. Anna is designed to be unique as it transforms from a bedroom community to a thriving city, with: • Deliberate planning for the future • A vision for innovative development and positive growth • A variety of housing, jobs, and educational opportunities ATTACHMENTS: 1. Locator - Liberty Hills Church Tract (ANX 26-0003 PD 26-0002) 2. Ordinance (Annexation) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (ANX 26-0003) 3. Exhibit A1 (Metes & Bounds) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 4. Exhibit A2 (Boundary Exhibit) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 5. Exhibit B (Dev Agreement) - Liberty Hills Church Tracts (ANX 26-0003) Me l issa AllDia.A -Subject Property • I . D Parcels -• I . 0 65 130 260 390 • I • ETJ - • I ■ City Limits - 520 Feet City of Anna, Texas Ordinance No. ____________ Page 1 of 2 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS , Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes the annexation of territory, subject to the laws of this state; and , the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”) is a Texas home-rule municipality; and , Section 43.0671 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes a municipality to extend the boundaries of the municipality and annex areas by request of the owner(s) of the areas; and , the procedures prescribed by the Texas Local Government Code and the laws of this state have been duly followed with respect to the City’s annexation of following described territory, to wit: Being a tract of land situated in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760 and being a re-tracement survey of the “called” 10.669 called” 10.669 10.669 acre tract conveyed by Warranty Deed from Raymond Powell and Alma Powell to Delmore A. M. Church and Joyce Church on January 5, 1968 as recorded in Volume 702, Page 585, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; and , the land being annexed under this ordinance (the “Annexation Tract”) is described in EXHIBIT A1 and depicted more specifically in EXHIBIT A2, attached hereto; and , the Annexation Tract is wholly located with the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction; and , on or about February 4, 2026, the respective owner of the Annexation Tract submitted a written request to the City for annexation of said tract into the corporate limits of the City and the City and said owners have entered into a written agreement regarding municipal services to be provided by the City in accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 43.0672 and said written agreement is as set forth in EXHIBIT B, attached hereto; and , the City timely published notice and held a public hearing on this annexation at a duly noticed public meeting in accordance with the laws of this state; City of Anna, Texas Ordinance No. ____________ Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if set forth in full for all purposes. SECTION 2. The Annexation Tract is hereby annexed into the corporate boundary limits of the City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and that said corporate boundary limits of the City of Anna be and the same are hereby extended to include the above described territory within the corporate limits of the City, and the same shall hereafter be included within the territorial limits of the City, and the inhabitants thereof shall hereafter as set forth be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other similarly situated citizens of the City of Anna and they shall be bound by the acts, ordinances, resolutions, regulations and all other legal acts of said city. SECTION 3. The official map and boundaries of the City of Anna are hereby amended and revised so as to include the area annexed, and to reflect the expansion of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction resulting from such annexation and the City Manager is directed to take all actions necessary to make said changes to the official boundary map of the City. SECTION 4. The City Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and the amended official boundary map referenced in Section 3 with the with the County Clerk of Collin, Texas and the Texas Comptroller’s Office. SECTION 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance be severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, and the remainder of this ordinance shall be enforced as written. SECTION 6. All ordinances and parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby expressly repealed insofar as they conflict herewith. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the date and time of its adoption and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2026. SITUATED in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760 and being a re-tracement survey of the “called” 10.669 called” 10.669 10.669 acre tract conveyed by Warranty Deed from Raymond Powell and Alma Powell to Delmore A. M. Church and Joyce Church on January 5, 1968 as recorded in Volume 702, Page 585, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows to-wit: BEGINNING at a mag-nail found in the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey, in at a mag-nail found in the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey, in the pavement of County Road 290, a public road, in the South line both the John Batterton Survey, Abstract No. 94 and the 666.61 acre tract (Tract 1) conveyed to MM Mantua 701, LLC, as recorded in Doc. No. 2024000100812, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, at a Northwesterly corner of the 341.162 acre tract conveyed to VC Liberty Hills, LLC, as recorded in Inst. No. 2024000150080, said Official Public Records, and being the Northeast corner of said Church “called” 10.669 ac.; called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 01 deg. 14 min. 31 sec. East, with a Westerly line of said VC Liberty South 01 deg. 14 min. 31 sec. East, with a Westerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and an Easterly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., PASSING a PASSING a a 1/2 inch capped rebar set (RPLS 6578) at 30.00 ft. and continuing for a TOTAL distance TOTAL distance distance of 251.92 ft. to the Northwest base of 12-inch wood post at an Ell corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the most Easterly Southeast corner of said Church called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 86 deg. 35 min. 40 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty South 86 deg. 35 min. 40 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and a Southerly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., a distance of 587.48 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at a Northwesterly corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac., and an Ell corner of said Church “called” 10.669 ac.; called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 01 deg. 19 min. 24 sec. East, with an Easterly line of said Church South 01 deg. 19 min. 24 sec. East, with an Easterly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., a distance of 628.00 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Church 10.669 ac., FROM which a 1/2 inch capped FROM which a 1/2 inch capped which a 1/2 inch capped rebar found (RPLS 6578) at an Ell corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. bears South 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. East, 3.61 ft.; THENCE North 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty North 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the Southerly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., PASSING a PASSING a a 1/2 inch rebar found at 321.96 ft., which bears South 0.29 ft., and continuing for a TOTAL TOTAL distance of 350.70 ft. to a mag-nail found in or near the centerline of said County Road 290, in the West line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and in the East line of both the Joseph Britten Survey, Abstract No. 72 and the "called" 103 acre tract conveyed to James R. Thornton & Lauriel L. Thornton, Trustees of the Thornton Family Trust, as recorded in Inst. No. 20210430000877560, said Official Public Records, at the most Westerly Northwest corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the Southwest corner of said Church called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE North 01 deg. 10 min. 35 sec. West, with or near the centerline of said North 01 deg. 10 min. 35 sec. West, with or near the centerline of said County Road 290, the East lines of both said Joseph Britten Survey and Thornton Family Trust 103 ac. and the West lines of both said Zachariah Roberts Survey and Church “called” called” 10.669 ac., a distance of 890.19 ft. to a mag-nail with flasher set at the Northeast corner of both said Thornton Family Trust 103 ac. and Joseph Britten Survey and a Southeasterly corner of said MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac., lying at the intersection of said County Road 290 and County Road 1101, a public road to the West; THENCE North 01 deg. 20 min. 48 sec. West, continuing with the Westerly line of both North 01 deg. 20 min. 48 sec. West, continuing with the Westerly line of both said Zachariah Roberts Survey and Church "called" 10.669 ac.,, a distance of 5.80 ft. to a mag- nail with flasher set at the Northwest corner of both said Church “called” 10.669 ac. called” 10.669 ac. 10.669 ac. and Zachariah Roberts Survey and an Ell corner of said MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac.; THENCE North 89 deg. 27 min. 08 sec. East, along the pavement of said County Road North 89 deg. 27 min. 08 sec. East, along the pavement of said County Road 290, with the South lines of both said John Batterton Survey and MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac. and the North lines of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and said Church “called” called” 10.669 ac., a distance of 935.50 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 10.828 PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 10.828 and containing 10.828 10.828 ACRES of land. of land. Da t e \ T i m e : 11 / 6 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 7 P M U s e r N a m e : No a h C o o p e r P a t h \ N a m e : s: \ n t x - l a n d \ 0 4 5 1 \ 4 0 0 l a n d \ 4 0 2 e x h i b i t s \ c h u r c h t r a c t e x h i b i t s \ c h u r c h t r a c t e x h i b i t s . d w g FEET 0 100 200 LJA Engineering, Inc. CHURCH TRACT BOUNDARY EXHIBIT LIBERTY HILLS 6060 North Central Expressway Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75206 Phone 469.621.0710 FRN - F-1386 Controlling Name of InterestedParty4 Nature of interest City, State, Country (place of business) Intermediary check applicable) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 1295FORM 1 of 1 1 OFFICE USE ONLY 2 01/21/2026 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. VC Liberty Hills, LLC Dallas, TX United States Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 3 City of Anna, Texas Development Services CHURCHTRACTDA 2026-1411047 01/29/2026 Date Filed: Date Acknowledged: Certificate Number: CERTIFICATION OF FILING Ryan Building Group XWinnetka, IL United States Ryan, William XWinnetka, IL United States Greenberg Traurig, LLP Dallas, TX United States X 6 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity My name is _______________________________________________________________, UNSWORN DECLARATION Check only if there is NO Interested Party.5 My address is _______________________________________________, _______________________, and my date of birth is _______________________. Executed in ________________________________________County, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. state)(zip code)(country) year)(month) State of ________________, on the _____day of ___________, 20_____. city) Declarant) Version V4.1.0.22701b2awww.ethics.state.tx.usFormsprovidedbyTexasEthicsCommission Item No. 6.d. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Kaleb Kentner AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance regarding 10.8± acres of land located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) to change the placetype designation of the Future Land Use Plan from Estate Residential to Suburban Living and amend an existing Planned Development (Ord. No. 1111-2024-08) Zoning District in accordance with the Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873). (PD 26- 0002)(Director of Development Services Kaleb Kentner) SUMMARY: Establish zoning of 10.8± acres at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) and modify the future land use plan placetype designation to Suburban Living. This item is associated with the previous annexation petition. This Item requires a Public Hearing. Public Hearing Note: At the time and place of the public hearing, all persons who desire will have an opportunity to be heard in opposition to or in favor of the ordinance, application, or other proposed items. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the zoning at their April 6, 2026, meeting and recommended approval of the Future Land Use Plan amendment at their May 4, 2026 meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This item has no financial impact. BACKGROUND: Request to establish zoning and amend an existing Planned Development (Ord. No. 1111-2024-08) on 10.8± acres located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) for single-family residential development. This item is associated with the annexation petition in the previous agenda item. As shown in Exhibit B (Concept Plan), the 10 acres have been incorporated into the Liberty Hills development for single-family residential uses. Date Submitted 02/04/2026 Jurisdiction ETJ Owner VC Liberty Hills LLC Representative/Applicant Kevin Lazares Requested Action Recommend approval, adding 10 acres to the Liberty Hills Planned Development for single-family residential Purpose Establish zoning & modify the Future Land Use Plan Land Area 10.8± acres Location The southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) Comp Plan Designation From Estate Residential to Suburban Living Existing Zoning ETJ Public Notice 3/17/2026 Surrounding Properties Land Use Zoning Comp Plan Designation North Vacant Tract Van Alstyne ETJ Van Alstyne ETJ East Vacant Tract Liberty Hills Planned Development - Single Family Residential Suburban Living South Vacant Tract Liberty Hills Planned Development - Single Family Residential Suburban Living West Vacant Tract Liberty Hills Planned Development - Single Family Residential Suburban Living History 2011: Property abutted the original Mantua Planned Development Zoning 2024: Development Agreement, Annexation and Zoning of Liberty Hills 2025: Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873) approved by Council COMPATIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS Future Land Use Plan (FLUP): Estate Residential: Estate Residential neighborhoods are predominantly large lot single-family housing developments on the urban-rural fringe. Suburban Living: Suburban Living neighborhoods are predominantly less than an acre lot single-family housing in platted subdivisions with connections to public utilities, residential streets and sidewalks, open space, parks and amenities. Master Thoroughfare Plan: • County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway) is identified as a Major Arterial (120') right-of-way. VC Liberty Hills LLC is working with the developer of the property within the Van Alsytne ETJ for the design and construction of Mantua Parkway. • County Road 290 (North-South segment on the west side of the tract) is identified as a Minor Collector (60') right-of-way. Utilities The Liberty Hills development will be bringing sewer to and beyond this site as well as replacing the small, rural water lines with larger capacity lines. CONCERNS Tree Preservation Neighbors and the Planning & Zoning Commission raised concerns regarding tree preservation. By incorporating these 10.8 acres into the Liberty Hills Planned Development, the applicant is also requesting that this tract be included in the provision that waives the requirement of a Tree Preservation Plan (survey) and mitigation for trees removed. In Exhibit C (Tree Removal Plan), the applicant has highlighted the tree canopy to be removed. Under Article 9.07 (Tree Preservation) trees within the street right-of-way pavement or sidewalks would be exempt from mitigation requirements, these areas are highlighted in pink on Exhibit C. It should be noted that due to the complexity of state laws regarding "permits" and "fines" in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), that Article 9.07 (Tree Preservation) is not applied to the ETJ. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval to amend Ordinance No. 1111-2024-08, incorporating the Church Tract into the Planned Development as shown on the previously approved concept plan and changing the placetype designation from Estate Residential to Suburban Living. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the zoning at their April 6, 2026, meeting and recommended approval of the Future Land Use Plan amendment at their May 4, 2026 meeting. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Unique. Anna is designed to be unique as it transforms from a bedroom community to a thriving city, with: • Deliberate planning for the future • A vision for innovative development and positive growth • A variety of housing, jobs, and educational opportunities ATTACHMENTS: 1. Locator - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 2. Ordinance (Zoning & FLUP) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 3. Exhibit A1 (Metes & Bounds) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 4. Exhibit A2 (Boundary Exhibit) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 5. Exhibit B (Approved Concept Plan) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) 6. Exhibit C (Tree Removal Plan) - Liberty Hills Church Tracts (PD 26-0002) 7. Reference (Dev Agreement) - Liberty Hills Church Tracts (ANX 26-0003) 8. Reference (PD 1111-2024-08) - Liberty Hills Church Tract (PD 26-0002) Me l issa AllDia.A -Subject Property • I . D Parcels -• I . 0 65 130 260 390 • I • ETJ - • I ■ City Limits - 520 Feet 1 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS , the City of Anna, Texas (“City”) has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing the zoning in the City as set forth in Article 9.04 of The Anna City Code of Ordinances (“Article 9.04”); and the City has received a requested zoning amendment from Anna Group, LLC on Property described in Exhibit A1 and depicted in Exhibit A2 (“Property”) attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth in full; and , the applicant has entered into that certain Church Tract Development Agreement associated with City of Anna Resolution No. 2025-12-1873 (the “Development Agreement”) governing certain aspects of development of the Property including without limitation development standards that are enforceable independent of this ordinance; and said Property generally located at the southeast corner of County Road 290 and County Road 290/County Road 1101 (future Mantua Parkway); and , the purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the Property into existing Planned Development (Ord. No. 1111-2024-08) after being annexed into the city's corporate limits; the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City and the City Council of the City of Anna (“City Council”) have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise and have held the public hearings as required by law and afforded a full and fair hearing to all property owners and generally to all persons interested in and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the City Council has concluded that the Zoning Ordinance of the City should be amended as set forth below. Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. 2 Zoning Change Official Zoning Map and Future Land Use Plan Savings, Repealing and Severability Clauses Penalty Publication of the Caption and Effective Date 3 This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the City Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to implement such posting and/or publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas this 12th day of May 2026. ATTESTED: APPROVED: ________________________________ _________________________ Carrie L. Land, City Secretary Pete Cain, Mayor SITUATED in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah in the County of Collin, State of Texas, being a part of the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760 and being a re-tracement survey of the “called” 10.669 called” 10.669 10.669 acre tract conveyed by Warranty Deed from Raymond Powell and Alma Powell to Delmore A. M. Church and Joyce Church on January 5, 1968 as recorded in Volume 702, Page 585, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows to-wit: BEGINNING at a mag-nail found in the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey, in at a mag-nail found in the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey, in the pavement of County Road 290, a public road, in the South line both the John Batterton Survey, Abstract No. 94 and the 666.61 acre tract (Tract 1) conveyed to MM Mantua 701, LLC, as recorded in Doc. No. 2024000100812, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, at a Northwesterly corner of the 341.162 acre tract conveyed to VC Liberty Hills, LLC, as recorded in Inst. No. 2024000150080, said Official Public Records, and being the Northeast corner of said Church “called” 10.669 ac.; called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 01 deg. 14 min. 31 sec. East, with a Westerly line of said VC Liberty South 01 deg. 14 min. 31 sec. East, with a Westerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and an Easterly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., PASSING a PASSING a a 1/2 inch capped rebar set (RPLS 6578) at 30.00 ft. and continuing for a TOTAL distance TOTAL distance distance of 251.92 ft. to the Northwest base of 12-inch wood post at an Ell corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the most Easterly Southeast corner of said Church called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 86 deg. 35 min. 40 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty South 86 deg. 35 min. 40 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and a Southerly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., a distance of 587.48 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at a Northwesterly corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac., and an Ell corner of said Church “called” 10.669 ac.; called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE South 01 deg. 19 min. 24 sec. East, with an Easterly line of said Church South 01 deg. 19 min. 24 sec. East, with an Easterly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., a distance of 628.00 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Church 10.669 ac., FROM which a 1/2 inch capped FROM which a 1/2 inch capped which a 1/2 inch capped rebar found (RPLS 6578) at an Ell corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. bears South 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. East, 3.61 ft.; THENCE North 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty North 88 deg. 23 min. 28 sec. West, with a Northerly line of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the Southerly line of said Church "called" 10.669 ac., PASSING a PASSING a a 1/2 inch rebar found at 321.96 ft., which bears South 0.29 ft., and continuing for a TOTAL TOTAL distance of 350.70 ft. to a mag-nail found in or near the centerline of said County Road 290, in the West line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and in the East line of both the Joseph Britten Survey, Abstract No. 72 and the "called" 103 acre tract conveyed to James R. Thornton & Lauriel L. Thornton, Trustees of the Thornton Family Trust, as recorded in Inst. No. 20210430000877560, said Official Public Records, at the most Westerly Northwest corner of said VC Liberty Hills, LLC 341.162 ac. and the Southwest corner of said Church called” 10.669 ac.; 10.669 ac.; THENCE North 01 deg. 10 min. 35 sec. West, with or near the centerline of said North 01 deg. 10 min. 35 sec. West, with or near the centerline of said County Road 290, the East lines of both said Joseph Britten Survey and Thornton Family Trust 103 ac. and the West lines of both said Zachariah Roberts Survey and Church “called” called” 10.669 ac., a distance of 890.19 ft. to a mag-nail with flasher set at the Northeast corner of both said Thornton Family Trust 103 ac. and Joseph Britten Survey and a Southeasterly corner of said MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac., lying at the intersection of said County Road 290 and County Road 1101, a public road to the West; THENCE North 01 deg. 20 min. 48 sec. West, continuing with the Westerly line of both North 01 deg. 20 min. 48 sec. West, continuing with the Westerly line of both said Zachariah Roberts Survey and Church "called" 10.669 ac.,, a distance of 5.80 ft. to a mag- nail with flasher set at the Northwest corner of both said Church “called” 10.669 ac. called” 10.669 ac. 10.669 ac. and Zachariah Roberts Survey and an Ell corner of said MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac.; THENCE North 89 deg. 27 min. 08 sec. East, along the pavement of said County Road North 89 deg. 27 min. 08 sec. East, along the pavement of said County Road 290, with the South lines of both said John Batterton Survey and MM Mantua 701, LLC 666.61 ac. and the North lines of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and said Church “called” called” 10.669 ac., a distance of 935.50 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 10.828 PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 10.828 and containing 10.828 10.828 ACRES of land. of land. Da t e \ T i m e : 11 / 6 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 7 P M U s e r N a m e : No a h C o o p e r P a t h \ N a m e : s: \ n t x - l a n d \ 0 4 5 1 \ 4 0 0 l a n d \ 4 0 2 e x h i b i t s \ c h u r c h t r a c t e x h i b i t s \ c h u r c h t r a c t e x h i b i t s . d w g FEET 0 100 200 LJA Engineering, Inc. CHURCH TRACT BOUNDARY EXHIBIT LIBERTY HILLS 6060 North Central Expressway Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75206 Phone 469.621.0710 FRN - F-1386 DETENTION +/-1.7 ACRES PRELIMINARY LAND USE TABLE I I I J ) ' LAND USE TYPE SUBTOTAL \ ) ' r AME NI TY CENTER +/-1.4 ACRE L DETENT ION +/-1.0 ACRE ('{- r ( I l ilf--:i '------+-----<'t-----i----1 50' TEMPORARY CO NSTRUCTION EASE M ENT - [-.J,.-Y,'-t-',...,......H-~J-.J.. KET PARK 1.1 ACRE ' ,. '-t:" • ' 50' W ASTEW EASEMEN .J' ,_ ~ t ~-;. ~---· ,,.. ~ ~-MUNICIPAL-FIRE STATION +/-2 .6 ACRES ~ ~-~; § t------+----------t----------; ~Lem~ ~~{@:;.,' .0 ;;--".P.~/~ "2P.;JI!': RETAIL +/-40 .0 ACRES I I I +/-80.5 ACRES ,, MIXED USE MULTI-FAMILY +/-13.7 ACRES I I 1c=========r====~~~~I~~~~~~====c==~~~~~~~~~~~=JL_:~_.::....:~ _______ _:_~----------~~~~'--_.:.:.~~ti~~~~~~~~~~~sf.L.~fi!:.'lf!:_~~1 't,_ -y!i l """~-'-"--'"'=--="-'"--=-,___._......,=----='--~----="-"-=..,'-"'------'--'-== ~ PRELIMINARY LOT COUNT TABLE OUNT D TION SI NGLE FAMILY +/-554.1 ACRES I I I I C i riR~E~s"ir1o~E~NITT1t1Ai°ILTTVYPIPE~IPpi=i°HAAs~E~111rp;-i:HuiA~s~E?2T;;ipH~Ae0s~E~3tlPP~HAA~sE~441Ppi=iHAA~sE~s~A~PPIH:j""iA~s~E~s~sTrP;-i:HuiA~s~E~6TPlpH~Ae0s~E~7rTPP~HAA~sE~sT"ipPIH:j""iA~s~Eq9~PPIH:j""iA~s~E,1rio1Ppi=i°HAAs~E~1111ilrp;-i:HuiA~s~E,1?2Tos~ulisnT~on=TAAilL r;P;-i:H;-;;A~s~E,1~-2~P;-i:HuiA~s~E~3~-911PP"i=iHAA~sE~1110~-,:11i"TipPiH~A~s~E,1?2T ----=rm~-~~=; TOTAL -~ t----------+------+------+------+-----+------t-----t-------+------t------+------t------+------+------+------+------------+-------------+-------· ~ 40 ' X 120' 33 6 35 47 46 73 76 172 488 240 24 .8% 24 8 55 .6% 488 25 .2% O.f------t------t------+------;-------t-----t-------t-----t------+------t-----+------;------+------t------+------t---+----+----t-----+---t-----t----+----t----t----i I I I ::; 45' X 120 37 37 ~f-----~~.:.;~-}----:~---+----=~-+-~=--+--~:---f--~---l--~--l-----:~-+-~=--+-~:---t--~---lf----:~---+----=~-+-_::__+_~~-+~+~~+~+--:-::-~--+~-=---f-~-::-:-+-=---+--=--1----:~-~~~l.;::1~~~ el 50' X 120' 139 70 66 59 46 43 53 83 40 79 122 76 876 198 44.4% 37 8 .2% 209 46 .3% 469 48.5% 37 2.0 % 876 45 .3% ~t------t------t------+------+------t-----+------t-----t------+------t-----+------;'------+------t------+-----+---+----+---+-----+---+-----+----+-----+---t----i 60' X 120' 81 64 49 28 34 25 40 15 26 38 69 469 69 100 .0 % ~t-----t-----+------+------+------+-----+------t-----t-------+------t------+------t------+------+------+------t---+----+----+-----+---+-----+----+----t----t---i i 70 's X 120' 12 48 3 63 ~t-----+-----+------+------+------+-----+------t-----t------+------t------+------t------+------+------+------+---+----+---+-----+---+-----+----+-----+---t----i 145 32.2 % 255 26.4 % 60 13.3% 3 0.3% 469 24 .3% 63 3.2 % ! TOTAL LOT 269 182 148 96 115 115 93 144 139 117 198 248 69 1933 451 967 446 69 1933 ,{' I SINGLE FAMILY +/-24.2 ACRES MIXED USE +/-29.2 ACRES MULTI-FAMILY +/-13.7 ACRES ,t---u MIXED USE +/-26 .7 ACRES MIXED USE +/-27.5 ACRES c.,,,,...,, ~~~-s{,f---ff,•[i:~ ND BO LilmJ & Ma,lt, Pla rm i11~ I anrl l Jsp/fpasihilil'/ _<,,-u<li~s '>u<tainable L'<asign Urbon Ocs ign Landsca pe Architecture :.!1',U South Cestral b<.pro,sway Suite 380, McKinney, Texas 75070 P 21~.620.27~1 LIBERTY HILLS CONCEPT B CITY OF AN NA ETJ, COLLIN CO UNTY, TEXAS DRWN BY: AM R CH KD BY : JP DATE 10/17/2025 PROJ ECT NUM BER NT2 678-0451 NT5 880-04 51 li!llopyright llJlY UA ~ngineo,i ng, Inc. LJrawings, written mater,a l, and de,ign concept, pro-,ided isccesidered property of UA& shall not be reprnduced in part or who le in any form o r form>: wjchout ,.,.-~ten coaoent oi UJ\. Thi, exhi~it is an illust rative repr e ,entat ion io, presentation purposes ody a.-.:1 ,hould not be used fo r co:nputation o r comlrunbn purposes. The informat ion pro,,ided within ,lwu lU ~eu,i,s iUt,~U ,a ~••vhic ,~µ,e>tnlaliu-i lu aU ;., del~1rniriin~ ula11 com~u1 ·,t 11l,,amJ ,~lalk,:o,l,iµ,,m<l i, ,uLj~cl Lu d,augewilhuu l m,Lit:te. All µ1uµe,l·1 LucmJa,i~, . .,.,,er11t11l,,, road a 'ignm~nt,, drainag@. floodp lain<, @n•,imnm@nlal ;, ..... , and oth@r information shown is approximate and s hould not ti.. <E l,ad upon fo e anl pu,pos!!. No warranti@s, @>P""' or imp lied, concerning the actual design, accuracy, bcation. a nd character of H,e facil ities shown on this exhibit are intended. ' L_ ________ __j_ ____ _j_ ____ __L_ ____ ...[_ ____ L_ ___ __[ ____ _j_ ____ _[_ ____ --'---____ j__ ___ __[c__ ___ _j_ ____ _J__ ____ --'---------'------'------'------'----_j_--L_-----'---_j_--_j_---'----L----'-"'"----"'-------'l.'---------'------"'==---'.L..l"---'---"--'h..l-------------------------___J Controlling Name of InterestedParty4 Nature of interest City, State, Country (place of business) Intermediary check applicable) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 1295FORM 1 of 1 1 OFFICE USE ONLY 2 01/21/2026 Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties. Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties. Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place of business. VC Liberty Hills, LLC Dallas, TX United States Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is being filed. Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract. 3 City of Anna, Texas Development Services CHURCHTRACTDA 2026-1411047 01/29/2026 Date Filed: Date Acknowledged: Certificate Number: CERTIFICATION OF FILING Ryan Building Group XWinnetka, IL United States Ryan, William XWinnetka, IL United States Greenberg Traurig, LLP Dallas, TX United States X 6 Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity My name is _______________________________________________________________, UNSWORN DECLARATION Check only if there is NO Interested Party.5 My address is _______________________________________________, _______________________, and my date of birth is _______________________. Executed in ________________________________________County, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. state)(zip code)(country) year)(month) State of ________________, on the _____day of ___________, 20_____. city) Declarant) Version V4.1.0.22701b2awww.ethics.state.tx.usFormsprovidedbyTexasEthicsCommission EXHIBIT A-1 Metes and Bounds Description of Liberty 800 Property Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A-1 TRACT ONE 694.344 Acres SITUATED in the County of Collin, State of Texas, and being a part of the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760, the John Batterton Survey, Abstract No. 94, the W.P. Burns Survey, Abstract No. 100, the J.C. Burge Survey, Abstract No. 106 and the Jonas Whitaker Survey, Abstract No. 981 and being a part of the 2,304.493 acre tract of land (Tract F) conveyed from Viola Lordsmeer, L.P. to Risland Mantua, LLC by Special Warranty Deed dated June 25, 2018 and recorded in Instrument No. 20180625000783630, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch rebar found in or near the centerline intersection of County Road 370, a public road, with County Road 368, a public road, in the South line of said Henry Smith Survey and the North line of the John Elliott Survey, Abstract No. 296, at the Northwest corner of the remainder of the 16.215 acre tract of land conveyed to Sheikh M. Alam, recorded in Volume 4335, Page 955, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and the most Southerly Southwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 01 deg. 13 min. 07 sec. West, with the pavement of said County Road 368 and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 2,021.14 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the most Easterly Northeast corner of Hurricane Creek Estates, an unrecorded Plat, and an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Westerly, with a North line of said Hurricane Creek Estates and a South line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 80 deg. 49 min. 43 sec. West, a distance of 212.73 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 2. South 81 deg. 00 min. 36 sec. West, a distance of 212.18 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an 3. South 79 deg. 47 min. 15 sec. West, a distance of 215.41 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 4. South 79 deg. 47 min. 48 sec. West, a distance of 211.76 ft. to a 1 inch pipe found at an angle point; 5. South 80 deg. 49 min. 08 sec. West, a distance of 220.15 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an Ell corner of said Hurricane Creek Estates, a Southwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Northerly, with an East line of said Hurricane Creek Estates and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 00 deg. 47 min. 59 sec. West, a distance of 95.57 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 2. North 00 deg. 53 min. 28 sec. East, a distance of 242.25 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 3. North 01 deg. 07 min. 11 sec. East, a distance of 264.53 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at an angle point; 4. North 01 deg. 48 min. 05 sec. East, a distance of 76.53 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at an angle point; 5. North 02 deg. 27 min. 54 sec. East, a distance of 99.19 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at the most Northerly Northeast corner of said Hurricane Creek Estates, at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 deg. 45 min. 34 sec. West, with a North line of said Hurricane Creek Estates and a South line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 51.65 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578”at the most Southerly Southeast corner of the 179.55 ac. tract of land conveyed to Grayson-Collin Recreational Association, Inc. in Volume 705, Page 90, said Deed Records, at a Southwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; Page 2 of 10 THENCE Northerly, with an East line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 17 deg. 52 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 782.45 ft. to a 42 inch Elm tree at an angle point; 2. North 22 deg. 57 min. 03 sec. East, a distance of 424.80 ft. to a 1 inch pipe found at an angle point; 3. North 22 deg. 16 min. 10 sec. West, a distance of 763.52 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at an angle point; 4. North 12 deg. 31 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 690.34 ft. to a 1 inch pipe found at an angle point; 5. North 35 deg. 44 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 668.76 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; 6. North 03 deg. 14 min. 16 sec. East, a distance of 279.04 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the most Westerly Southwest corner of the 7.493 ac. tract of land conveyed to Grayson-Collin Recreational Association, Inc. in Volume 738, Page 342, said Deed Records, at an angle point; THENCE Southeasterly, with the Southwest line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 7.493 ac. and a Northeast line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 60 deg. 30 min. 30 sec. East, a distance of 753.00 ft. to a 1 inch pipe found at an angle point; 2. South 38 deg. 05 min. 22 sec. East, a distance of 416.65 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; 3. South 20 deg. 05 min. 14 sec. East, a distance of 393.25 ft. to a 1 inch pipe found at the most Southerly Southwest corner of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 7.493., at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 64 deg. 28 min. 26 sec. East, with the South line of said Grayson -Collin Recreational Association 7.493 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 48.14 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; THENCE North 71 deg. 32 min. 49 sec. East, continuing with the South line of said Grayson - Collin Recreational Association 7.493 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 175.44 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at the Southeast corner of said Grayson Collin Recreational Association 7.493 ac., the most Easterly Southeast corner of said Grayson- Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and an angle point of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Easterly, Northerly, then Northwesterly, along the common property line of both said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 68 deg. 39 min. 59 sec. East, a distance of 279.42 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; 2. North 16 deg. 00 min. 07 sec. East, a distance of 631.15 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; 3. North 43 deg. 56 min. 13 sec. West, a distance of 1,122.16 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at an angle point; 4. North 66 deg. 25 min. 20 sec. West, a distance of 1,304.43 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS at the most Northerly corner of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and an angle point of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 31 deg. 00 min. 14 sec. West, with the West line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and an East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 345.00 ft. to Page 3 of 10 a point in the East bank of a pond, at an angle point; THENCE Southwesterly, with the East bank of a pond, along the West line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and an East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 the following calls and distances: 1. South 65 deg. 09 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 350.00 ft.; 2. South 59 deg. 44 min. 48 sec. West, a distance of 390.00 ft.; 3. South 32 deg. 52 min. 18 sec. East, a distance of 100.00 ft.; 4. South 40 deg. 29 min. 25 sec. West, a distance of 55.00 ft.; 5. North 59 deg. 49 min. 47 sec. West, a distance of 150.00 ft.; 6. South 89 deg. 36 min. 28 sec. West, a distance of 190.00 ft.; 7. South 25 deg. 45 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 190.00 ft.; 8. South 31 deg. 50 min. 15 sec. West, a distance of 265.00 ft.; 9. South 16 deg. 52 min. 45 sec. West, a distance of 500.00 ft.; 10. South 81 deg. 20 min. 55 sec. East, a distance of 205.00 ft.; 11. South 25 deg. 08 min. 27 sec. East, a distance of 200.00 ft.; 12. South 06 deg. 15 min. 31 sec. East, a distance of 85.00 ft.; 13. South 24 deg. 28 min. 32 sec. West, a distance of 150.00 ft.; 14. South 20 deg. 37 min. 55 sec. West, a distance of 205.00 ft.; 15. South 09 deg. 56 min. 57 sec. East, a distance of 120.00 ft.; 16. North 64 deg. 36 min. 06 sec. West, a distance of 115.00 ft.; 17. South 19 deg. 23 min. 16 sec. East, a distance of 200.00 ft.; 18. South 37 deg. 19 min. 08 sec. West, a distance of 70.00 ft.; 19. South 60 deg. 56 min. 07 sec. West, a distance of 110.00 ft.; 20. South 29 deg. 09 min. 31 sec. West, a distance of 250.00 ft.; 21. South 17 deg. 58 min. 21 sec. West, a distance of 290.00 ft.; THENCE South 86 deg. 05 min. 16 sec. West, with the South bank of a pond, along a North line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and a South line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 165.01 ft. to a point in line with a creek to the South; THENCE Southerly, with the center of a creek, the West line of said Grayson -Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and an East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 02 deg. 18 min. 45 sec. West, a distance of 180.00 ft.; 2. South 07 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. East, a distance of 142.55 ft.; 3. South 20 deg. 21 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 68.44 ft.; 4. South 37 deg. 03 min. 53 sec. West, a distance of 61.49 ft.; 5. South 64 deg. 30 min. 25 sec. West, a distance of 68.25 ft.; 6. South 21 deg. 56 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 127.43 ft.; 7. South 10 deg. 33 min. 50 sec. East, a distance of 186.00 ft.; 8. South 23 deg. 42 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 180.15 ft.; 9. South 29 deg. 18 min. 26 sec. East, a distance of 118.28 ft.; 10. South 50 deg. 34 min. 40 sec. West, a distance of 65.47 ft.; 11. South 35 deg. 56 min. 57 sec. West, a distance of 74.91 ft.; 12. South 51 deg. 20 min. 01 sec. West, a distance of 137.86 ft.; 13. South 30 deg. 41 min. 01 sec. West, a distance of 59.61 ft.; 14. South 01 deg. 39 min. 28 sec. West, a distance of 48.43 ft.; 15. South 15 deg. 38 min. 49 sec. West, a distance of 59.78 ft.; 16. South 32 deg. 29 min. 33 sec. West, a distance of 70.38 ft.; 17. South 18 deg. 00 min. 15 sec. West, a distance of 87.06 ft.; 18. South 33 deg. 07 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 87.26 ft. to a point at the Southwest corner of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac., at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 80 deg. 55 min. 18 sec. East, with the South line of said Grayson-Collin Recreational Association 179.55 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” (for witness) at 104.23 ft. and continuing on said course for a TOTAL Page 4 of 10 distance of 898.20 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at the Northwest corner of said Hurricane Creek Estates and the most Southerly Northeast corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Southerly, with the West line of said Hurricane Creek Estates and an East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 01 deg. 30 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 234.97 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set stamped “RPLS 6578” at an angle point; 2. South 01 deg. 40 min. 21 sec. East, a distance of 100.03 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 3. South 01 deg. 26 min. 53 sec. East, a distance of 230.25 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 4. South 02 deg. 34 min. 04 sec. East, a distance of 240.01 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found at an angle point; 5. South 02 deg. 31 min. 27 sec. East, a distance of 193.14 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar found at the Northeast corner of the 59.73 ac. tract of land conveyed to MM Anna 325, LLC, recorded in Instrument No. 2019041100386110, said Official Public Records, at a Southeast corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 deg. 01 min. 06 sec. West, with the general course of a wire fence maintaining the North line of said MM Anna 325 59.73 ac. and a South line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing a 1/2 inch capped rebar found (for Witness) at the end of said fence at 938.20 ft. and continuing on said course for a TOTAL distance of 1,215.59 ft. to a point in the center of a creek, in the East line of the 48.900 ac. tract of land conveyed to Donna Gail Peeler in Volume 4972, Page 5535, said Deed Records, at the Northwest corner of said MM Anna 325 59.73 ac., at a Southwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Northwesterly, with the center of a creek, the East line of said Peeler 48.900 ac. and the 52.77 ac. tract of land conveyed to Janis Real Estate, recorded in Instrument No. 20220420000632060, said Official Public Records and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 34 deg. 56 min. 42 sec. East, a distance of 103.29 ft.; 2. North 25 deg. 27 min. 55 sec. East, a distance of 87.41 ft.; 3. North 14 deg. 15 min. 11 sec. West, a distance of 109.46 ft.; 4. North 09 deg. 26 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of 44.80 ft.; 5. North 25 deg. 25 min. 55 sec. East, a distance of 68.17 ft.; 6. North 10 deg. 58 min. 09 sec. East, a distance of 44.27 ft.; 7. North 48 deg. 07 min. 28 sec. East, a distance of 65.89 ft.; 8. North 76 deg. 04 min. 15 sec. East, a distance of 77.19 ft.; 9. North 05 deg. 59 min. 38 sec. East, a distance of 80.43 ft.; 10. North 16 deg. 36 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 25.15 ft.; 11. North 55 deg. 07 min. 32 sec. West, a distance of 46.80 ft.; 12. North 72 deg. 50 min. 00 sec. West, a distance of 123.19 ft.; 13. South 81 deg. 44 min. 01 sec. West, a distance of 41.34 ft.; 14. North 70 deg. 40 min. 03 sec. West, a distance of 39.93 ft.; 15. North 18 deg. 54 min. 48 sec. West, a distance of 46.24 ft.; 16. North 30 deg. 12 min. 42 sec. East, a distance of 86.17 ft.; 17. North 55 deg. 20 min. 43 sec. West, a distance of 26.95 ft.; 18. North 83 deg. 50 min. 31 sec. West, a distance of 22.50 ft.; 19. South 68 deg. 54 min. 13 sec. West, a distance of 27.87 ft.; 20. North 22 deg. 54 min. 12 sec. West, a distance of 86.02 ft.; 21. North 26 deg. 45 min. 33 sec. East, a distance of 14.91 ft.; 22. North 50 deg. 40 min. 12 sec. East, a distance of 42.50 ft.; 23. North 10 deg. 24 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 17.30 ft.; 24. North 72 deg. 20 min. 36 sec. West, a distance of 44.01 ft.; 25. North 44 deg. 49 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 31.13 ft.; 26. North 87 deg. 03 min. 39 sec. West, a distance of 12.89 ft.; 27. South 64 deg. 02 min. 23 sec. West, a distance of 41.90 ft.; 28. North 86 deg. 18 min. 51 sec. West, a distance of 19.60 ft.; Page 5 of 10 29. North 13 deg. 04 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 18.21 ft.; 30. North 53 deg. 06 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 15.77 ft.; 31. North 77 deg. 43 min. 43 sec. East, a distance of 16.69 ft.; 32. North 43 deg. 03 min. 46 sec. East, a distance of 28.01 ft.; 33. North 17 deg. 12 min. 14 sec. West, a distance of 18.36 ft.; 34. North 71 deg. 22 min. 19 sec. West, a distance of 21.59 ft.; 35. North 22 deg. 14 min. 44 sec. East, a distance of 25.85 ft.; 36. North 81 deg. 00 min. 45 sec. East, a distance of 25.03 ft.; 37. North 20 deg. 24 min. 50 sec. East, a distance of 33.04 ft.; 38. North 27 deg. 26 min. 38 sec. West, a distance of 22.31 ft.; 39. North 83 deg. 06 min. 16 sec. West, a distance of 148.69 ft.; 40. North 25 deg. 25 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 47.53 ft.; 41. North 67 deg. 01 min. 29 sec. West, a distance of 30.30 ft.; 42. North 84 deg. 50 min. 03 sec. West, a distance of 47.00 ft.; 43. North 74 deg. 58 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 33.79 ft.; 44. South 76 deg. 58 min. 39 sec. West, a distance of 33.35 ft.; 45. North 35 deg. 23 min. 19 sec. West, a distance of 27.57 ft.; 46. North 11 deg. 56 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 54.69 ft.; 47. North 43 deg. 24 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 52.00 ft.; 48. South 55 deg. 10 min. 00 sec. West, a distance of 27.34 ft.; 49. South 78 deg. 02 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 27.52 ft.; 50. North 67 deg. 40 min. 27 sec. West, a distance of 74.72 ft.; 51. North 74 deg. 50 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 51.31 ft.; 52. North 61 deg. 04 min. 09 sec. West, a distance of 43.45 ft.; 53. North 41 deg. 31 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 71.57 ft.; 54. North 26 deg. 20 min. 00 sec. West, a distance of 52.30 ft.; 55. North 48 deg. 41 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 61.74 ft.; 56. North 78 deg. 02 min. 53 sec. West, a distance of 43.15 ft.; 57. North 45 deg. 16 min. 16 sec. West, a distance of 161.73 ft.; 58. South 70 deg. 57 min. 23 sec. West, a distance of 52.72 ft.; 59. South 61 deg. 06 min. 37 sec. West, a distance of 35.06 ft.; 60. South 72 deg. 45 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 40.53 ft.; 61. South 87 deg. 34 min. 10 sec. West, a distance of 28.77 ft.; 62. North 67 deg. 42 min. 02 sec. West, a distance of 33.33 ft.; 63. North 23 deg. 39 min. 03 sec. West, a distance of 52.95 ft.; 64. South 89 deg. 23 min. 21 sec. West, a distance of 70.36 ft.; 65. North 74 deg. 15 min. 03 sec. West, a distance of 25.54 ft.; 66. North 51 deg. 05 min. 09 sec. West, a distance of 29.41 ft.; 67. North 20 deg. 44 min. 38 sec. East, a distance of 41.42 ft.; 68. North 31 deg. 24 min. 12 sec. West, a distance of 45.13 ft.; 69. South 77 deg. 29 min. 33 sec. West, a distance of 63.04 ft.; 70. North 33 deg. 59 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 11.78 ft. to a point at the Northeast corner of said Janis Real Estate 52.77 ac., at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 88 deg. 29 min. 46 sec. West, with the North line of said Janis Real Estate 52.77 ac. and a South line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing a 1/2 inch rebar found (for witness) at 1,917.45 ft. and continuing on said course for a TOTAL distance of 1,940.65 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found in the pavement of County Road 290, a public road, in an East line of both the 103.991 ac. tract of land conveyed to Mohammad Ali Manouchehripour in Volume 5200, Page 5012, said Official Public Records and the Joseph Britton Survey, Abstract No. 72 and the West line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey, at the Northwest corner of said Janis Real Estate 52.77 ac., at the most Westerly Southwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 01 deg. 12 min. 42 sec. West, with the pavement of said County Road 290, an East line of both said Manouchehripour 103.991 ac. and the Thornton Family Trust “called” 103 acre tract of land conveyed in Instrument No. 2021043000877560, said Official Public Records and the East line of said Joseph Britton Survey and a West line of both said Zacharia Roberts Survey and Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. passing the Northeast corner of said Manouchehripour 103.991 ac. and continuing on said course for a distance of 1,130.77 ft. to a PK nail set at the Southwest corner of the 10.669 ac. tract of land conveyed to Delmore A. M. Church and Joyce Church in Volume 702, Page 585, said Deed Records, at a Page 6 of 10 Northwest corner of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the most Western Northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 88 deg. 26 min. 45 sec. East, with a South line of said Church 10.669 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing a 1/2 inch rebar found (for witness) at 27.59 ft. and continuing for a TOTAL distance of 353.22 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Church 10.669 ac. and an Ell corner of both said Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 01 deg. 36 min. 46 sec. West, with an East line of said Church 10.669 ac. and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 628.19 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped RPLS 6578” at an Ell corner of said Church 10.669 ac., at a Northwest corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 86 deg. 35 min. 25 sec. East, with a South line of said Church 10.669 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 587.02 ft. to a 12 inch wood corner post at the most Easterly Southeast corner of said Church 10.669 ac., at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 01 deg. 14 min. 35 sec. West, with an East line of said Church 10.669 ac. and a West line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., a distance of 251.70 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found in the center of said County Road 290, in the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and the South line of said John Batterton survey, at the Northeast corner of said Church 10.669 ac. and an Ell corner of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., at a Northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 89 deg. 18 min. 25 sec. East, along or near the center of said County Road 290, over and across Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., with the North line of said Zachariah Roberts Survey and the South line of said John Batterton Survey, passing the Southeast edge of pavement of said County Road 290, and continuing on said course for a distance of 797.98 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an Ell corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 00 deg. 49 min. 03 sec. West, continuing over and across said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing the Southeast edge and re-entering the pavement of said County Road 290, continuing on said course along or near the center of said road, passing the Northwest edge of pavement of said road, and continuing on said course for a distance of 1,687.21 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at the most Northern Northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 88 deg. 20 min. 33 sec. East, continuing over and across said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing the Northwest edge and re-entering the pavement of said County Road 290, and continuing on said course along or near the center of said County Road 290 for a distance of 772.49 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found in the West line of the 18.632 ac. tract of land conveyed to Mohammed Rehman, recorded in Instrument No. 20210322000563200, said Official Public Records, in an East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., in the West line of said W.P. Burns Survey and the East line of said John Batterton Survey, at a Northeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 00 deg. 54 min. 38 sec. East, with the West line of both said Rehman 18.632 ac. and W.P. Burns Survey and the East line of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and John Batterton Survey, a distance of 191.05 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found in the center of a draw, at the Southwest corner of said Rehman 18.632 ac. and an Ell corner of the herein described tract; THENCE Southeasterly, with the center of a draw and creek, with the South line of said Rehman 18.632 ac. and the West line of Lots 1 and 3 of Triple I Ranch Addition to the Collin County, Texas, recorded in Instrument No. 2003-0183169, Map Records, Collin County, Texas, and the North and East lines of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 85 deg. 33 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 38.17 ft.; 2. South 56 deg. 34 min. 17 sec. East, a distance of 114.66 ft.; 3. South 73 deg. 39 min. 14 sec. East, a distance of 29.10 ft.; 4. North 80 deg. 55 min. 30 sec. East, a distance of 49.80 ft.; 5. North 84 deg. 10 min. 17 sec. East, a distance of 35.20 ft.; 6. South 71 deg. 30 min. 51 sec. East, a distance of 6.41 ft.; 7. South 23 deg. 37 min. 31 sec. East, a distance of 11.94 ft.; Page 7 of 10 8. South 48 deg. 57 min. 54 sec. East, a distance of 22.31 ft.; 9. South 78 deg. 22 min. 44 sec. East, a distance of 11.77 ft.; 10. South 44 deg. 57 min. 16 sec. East, a distance of 23.99 ft.; 11. South 72 deg. 03 min. 20 sec. East, a distance of 36.45 ft.; 12. North 83 deg. 45 min. 09 sec. East, a distance of 60.49 ft.; 13. South 45 deg. 51 min. 25 sec. East, a distance of 42.03 ft.; 14. South 88 deg. 20 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 17.06 ft.; 15. South 70 deg. 55 min. 50 sec. East, a distance of 17.71 ft.; 16. North 79 deg. 53 min. 05 sec. East, a distance of 13.68 ft.; 17. North 62 deg. 26 min. 21 sec. East, a distance of 46.40 ft.; 18. North 43 deg. 42 min. 20 sec. East, a distance of 14.49 ft.; 19. North 13 deg. 18 min. 36 sec. East, a distance of 11.48 ft.; 20. North 82 deg. 07 min. 05 sec. East, a distance of 10.03 ft.; 21. South 86 deg. 09 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 11.23 ft.; 22. South 49 deg. 44 min. 51 sec. East, a distance of 13.10 ft.; 23. South 70 deg. 30 min. 13 sec. East, a distance of 13.52 ft.; 24. South 84 deg. 22 min. 03 sec. East, a distance of 23.33 ft.; 25. South 35 deg. 35 min. 31 sec. East, a distance of 20.91 ft.; 26. South 84 deg. 29 min. 02 sec. East, a distance of 15.59 ft.; 27. South 51 deg. 00 min. 33 sec. East, a distance of 27.17 ft.; 28. South 78 deg. 25 min. 01 sec. East, a distance of 15.92 ft.; 29. North 58 deg. 51 min. 30 sec. East, a distance of 16.62 ft.; 30. South 49 deg. 41 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 32.18 ft.; 31. South 29 deg. 08 min. 01 sec. East, a distance of 14.80 ft.; 32. South 05 deg. 40 min. 16 sec. East, a distance of 30.35 ft.; 33. South 51 deg. 27 min. 12 sec. East, a distance of 16.84 ft.; 34. North 55 deg. 07 min. 54 sec. East, a distance of 35.31 ft.; 35. North 89 deg. 52 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 29.08 ft.; 36. South 31 deg. 29 min. 55 sec. East, a distance of 19.97 ft.; 37. South 47 deg. 09 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 27.66 ft.; 38. South 18 deg. 55 min. 35 sec. East, a distance of 20.76 ft.; 39. South 63 deg. 16 min. 02 sec. East, a distance of 9.33 ft.; 40. North 87 deg. 41 min. 54 sec. East, a distance of 12.80 ft.; 41. North 49 deg. 59 min. 39 sec. East, a distance of 43.53 ft.; 42. North 77 deg. 10 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of 43.67 ft.; 43. South 57 deg. 38 min. 18 sec. East, a distance of 10.00 ft.; 44. South 05 deg. 42 min. 20 sec. East, a distance of 16.81 ft.; 45. South 42 deg. 16 min. 02 sec. East, a distance of 18.23 ft. at the centerline intersection of draw and creek; 46. South 06 deg. 44 min. 28 sec. West, a distance of 37.06 ft. 47. South 38 deg. 50 min. 25 sec. East, a distance of 22.72 ft.; 48. North 57 deg. 28 min. 10 sec. East, a distance of 27.21 ft.; 49. South 50 deg. 28 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of 39.42 ft.; 50. South 16 deg. 41 min. 39 sec. West, a distance of 23.29 ft.; 51. South 23 deg. 04 min. 58 sec. East, a distance of 57.84 ft.; 52. South 49 deg. 49 min. 02 sec. West, a distance of 11.63 ft.; 53. North 64 deg. 30 min. 49 sec. West, a distance of 30.50 ft.; 54. South 50 deg. 42 min. 11 sec. West, a distance of 13.78 ft.; 55. South 15 deg. 45 min. 26 sec. East, a distance of 89.36 ft.; 56. South 10 deg. 53 min. 35 sec. West, a distance of 43.60 ft.; 57. South 12 deg. 28 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 31.05 ft.; 58. South 88 deg. 00 min. 34 sec. West, a distance of 34.12 ft.; 59. South 56 deg. 01 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 51.74 ft.; 60. North 84 deg. 06 min. 45 sec. West, a distance of 43.29 ft.; 61. South 16 deg. 45 min. 37 sec. West, a distance of 21.78 ft.; 62. South 18 deg. 30 min. 22 sec. East, a distance of 15.05 ft.; 63. South 70 deg. 51 min. 54 sec. East, a distance of 17.06 ft.; 64. North 77 deg. 40 min. 40 sec. East, a distance of 15.14 ft.; 65. South 63 deg. 09 min. 50 sec. East, a distance of 20.43 ft.; 66. South 27 deg. 41 min. 10 sec. East, a distance of 19.98 ft.; 67. South 31 deg. 30 min. 58 sec. West, a distance of 9.86 ft.; 68. South 83 deg. 47 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 51.58 ft.; Page 8 of 10 69. South 38 deg. 54 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 29.87 ft.; 70. South 07 deg. 53 min. 15 sec. West, a distance of 13.82 ft.; 71. North 65 deg. 47 min. 39 sec. West, a distance of 19.26 ft.; 72. North 78 deg. 08 min. 54 sec. West, a distance of 76.63 ft.; 73. South 08 deg. 27 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 53.59 ft.; 74. South 20 deg. 42 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 26.91 ft.; 75. South 25 deg. 09 min. 45 sec. East, a distance of 31.09 ft.; 76. South 00 deg. 12 min. 02 sec. West, a distance of 31.14 ft.; 77. South 71 deg. 20 min. 53 sec. East, a distance of 29.06 ft.; 78. South 18 deg. 54 min. 03 sec. East, a distance of 13.15 ft.; 79. South 32 deg. 18 min. 04 sec. West, a distance of 25.49 ft.; 80. South 72 deg. 43 min. 07 sec. West, a distance of 15.31 ft.; 81. North 64 deg. 42 min. 33 sec. West, a distance of 23.37 ft.; 82. South 63 deg. 34 min. 24 sec. West, a distance of 18.33 ft.; 83. South 10 deg. 14 min. 08 sec. West, a distance of 43.90 ft.; 84. South 26 deg. 13 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 34.33 ft.; 85. South 27 deg. 13 min. 02 sec. East, a distance of 20.15 ft.; 86. South 49 deg. 22 min. 10 sec. East, a distance of 24.64 ft.; 87. North 69 deg. 07 min. 38 sec. East, a distance of 21.11 ft.; 88. North 32 deg. 40 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 40.78 ft.; 89. North 52 deg. 43 min. 43 sec. East, a distance of 44.54 ft.; 90. South 79 deg. 02 min. 31 sec. East, a distance of 17.91 ft.; 91. South 25 deg. 14 min. 13 sec. East, a distance of 10.50 ft.; 92. South 36 deg. 33 min. 49 sec. West, a distance of 45.96 ft.; 93. South 18 deg. 38 min. 57 sec. East, a distance of 60.30 ft.; 94. South 23 deg. 11 min. 17 sec. West, a distance of 22.34 ft.; 95. South 12 deg. 06 min. 39 sec. East, a distance of 59.69 ft.; 96. South 10 deg. 53 min. 13 sec. West, a distance of 48.67 ft.; 97. South 18 deg. 15 min. 42 sec. East, a distance of 38.78 ft.; 98. South 49 deg. 42 min. 55 sec. West, a distance of 38.39 ft.; 99. South 12 deg. 09 min. 41 sec. West, a distance of 41.04 ft.; 100. South 18 deg. 18 min. 43 sec. East, a distance of 46.98 ft.; 101. South 36 deg. 12 min. 31 sec. East, a distance of 41.45 ft.; 102. South 04 deg. 18 min. 51 sec. West, a distance of 40.66 ft.; 103. South 17 deg. 20 min. 59 sec. East, a distance of 18.23 ft.; 104. South 71 deg. 38 min. 45 sec. East, a distance of 27.15 ft.; 105. South 42 deg. 57 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 11.61 ft.; 106. South 44 deg. 03 min. 41 sec. West, a distance of 29.44 ft.; 107. South 59 deg. 56 min. 34 sec. West, a distance of 26.44 ft.; 108. South 47 deg. 10 min. 58 sec. West, a distance of 23.76 ft.; 109. South 31 deg. 19 min. 02 sec. West, a distance of 37.17 ft.; 110. South 01 deg. 44 min. 52 sec. West, a distance of 35.97 ft. to a point at the Southwest corner of said Lot 1 and an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE North 87 deg. 26 min. 24 sec. East, with the South line of said Lot 1 and a North line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., passing a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” (for witness) at 853.90 ft., and continuing on said course for a TOTAL distance of 953.68 ft. to a point in the West bank of pond, at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1 and an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE Northerly and Northeasterly, with the West bank of pond, an East line of said Lot 1, the East line of the 27.745 ac. tract of land conveyed to M&T Holding Company, LLC, recorded in Instrument No. 20141105001213360, said Official Public Records, the South and East lines of the 16.952 ac. (Tract 1) tract of land conveyed to MJLA Adams, Ltd., recorded in Instrument No. 20110505000462580, said Official Public Records, and the North and West lines of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 03 deg. 01 min. 38 sec. West, a distance of 565.00 ft.; 2. North 33 deg. 47 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 475.00 ft.; 3. North 42 deg. 00 min. 46 sec. East, a distance of 350.00 ft.; 4. North 65 deg. 07 min. 09 sec. East, a distance of 500.00 ft.; Page 9 of 10 5. North 20 deg. 08 min. 52 sec. East, a distance of 73.50 ft. to a 20 inch tree at bank of pond; 6. North 00 deg. 39 min. 26 sec. East, leaving said pond, a distance of 212.97 ft. to an angle point in fence; 7. North 01 deg. 46 min. 16 sec. West, with the general course of a wire fence, a distance of 327.25 ft. to an angle point in fence; 8. North 01 deg. 36 min. 16 sec. West, with the general course of a wire fence, a distance of 474.99 ft. to an angle point in fence; 9. North 02 deg. 12 min. 44 sec. West, with the general course of a wire fence, passing an 8 inch tree at fence corner (for witness) at 374.52 ft. and continuing on said course for a TOTAL distance of 412.36 ft. to a PK nail with metal flasher set in or near the center of County Road No. 372, a public road, in the East line of said W.P. Burns Survey and the West line of said Jonas Whitaker Survey, at the Northeast corner of said MJLA Adams 16.952 ac. and the most Northerly Northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE Easterly, along or near the center of said County Road 372, over and across said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 49 deg. 39 min. 30 sec. East, a distance of 128.05 ft.; 2. North 57 deg. 41 min. 04 sec. East, a distance of 150.00 ft.; 3. North 74 deg. 45 min. 46 sec. East, a distance of 135.00 ft.; 4. North 89 deg. 48 min. 47 sec. East, a distance of 127.43 ft.; 5. South 86 deg. 46 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 506.20 ft.; 6. South 87 deg. 57 min. 09 sec. East, a distance of 172.41 ft.; 7. South 77 deg. 53 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 93.44 ft.; 8. South 63 deg. 12 min. 34 sec. East, a distance of 108.68 ft.; 9. South 63 deg. 13 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 129.45 ft.; 10. South 67 deg. 28 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 91.86 ft.; 11. South 69 deg. 30 min. 37 sec. East, a distance of 290.88 ft.; 12. South 86 deg. 32 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 86.89 ft.; 13. North 53 deg. 44 min. 03 sec. East, a distance of 92.86 ft.; 14. North 36 deg. 53 min. 20 sec. East, a distance of 133.56 ft.; 15. North 34 deg. 02 min. 26 sec. East, a distance of 211.93 ft.; 16. North 32 deg. 02 min. 27 sec. East, a distance of 165.42 ft.; 17. North 37 deg. 58 min. 13 sec. East, a distance of 103.89 ft.; 18. North 69 deg. 36 min. 45 sec. East, a distance of 94.23 ft.; 19. South 75 deg. 13 min. 37 sec. East, a distance of 120.32 ft.; 20. South 69 deg. 40 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 136.84 ft.; 21. South 67 deg. 26 min. 05 sec. East, a distance of 118.48 ft.; 22. South 72 deg. 05 min. 15 sec. East, a distance of 97.50 ft.; 23. South 87 deg. 33 min. 06 sec. East, a distance of 63.37 ft.; 24. North 86 deg. 07 min. 56 sec. East, a distance of 85.23 ft.; 25. North 86 deg. 33 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 55.99 ft.; 26. North 87 deg. 25 min. 04 sec. East, a distance of 51.63 ft.; 27. North 89 deg. 27 min. 50 sec. East, a distance of 282.63 ft. to a PK nail set with metal flasher in or near the center of said County Road 372, in the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 75 and the East line of said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., at the most Northerly Northeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE Southerly, with the West right-of-way line of said U.S. Highway No. 75 and an East line said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. South 00 deg. 19 min. 57 sec. West, a distance of 157.21 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found 2. South 07 deg. 56 min. 42 sec. West, a distance of 260.00 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 3. South 13 deg. 01 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 90.77 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 4. South 13 deg. 19 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 158.38 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 5. South 06 deg. 40 min. 27 sec. West, a distance of 690.13 ft. to a 10 inch wood corner post; 6. South 27 deg. 29 min. 40 sec. West, a distance of 226.76 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; Page 10 of 10 7. North 88 deg. 16 min. 00 sec. West, a distance of 27.13 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 8. South 01 deg. 31 min. 42 sec. East, a distance of 99.77 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar found, stamped RPLS 6578”; 9. South 88 deg. 15 min. 12 sec. East, a distance of 76.93 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 10. South 19 deg. 29 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 125.64 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 11. South 00 deg. 19 min. 57 sec. West, a distance of 92.58 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 12. South 10 deg. 47 min. 37 sec. East, a distance of 305.87 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 13. South 06 deg. 13 min. 39 sec. East, a distance of 402.64 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 14. South 01 deg. 22 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 299.50 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 15. South 04 deg. 03 min. 47 sec. West, a distance of 588.55 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 16. South 18 deg. 07 min. 48 sec. West, a distance of 100.58 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped RPLS 6578”; 17. South 02 deg. 24 min. 25 sec. West, a distance of 293.51 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 18. South 01 deg. 18 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of 197.35 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 19. South 07 deg. 36 min. 33 sec. West, a distance of 295.70 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 20. South 15 deg. 51 min. 34 sec. West, a distance of 202.09 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 21. South 07 deg. 39 min. 54 sec. West, a distance of 299.90 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 22. South 00 deg. 36 min. 24 sec. East, a distance of 202.34 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 23. South 07 deg. 35 min. 05 sec. West, a distance of 467.60 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 24. North 88 deg. 37 min. 42 sec. West, a distance of 15.83 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 25. South 00 deg. 49 min. 45 sec. West, a distance of 175.19 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 26. South 07 deg. 52 min. 40 sec. West, a distance of 113.17 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 27. South 88 deg. 30 min. 43 sec. West, a distance of 53.68 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 28. South 00 deg. 38 min. 27 sec. East, a distance of 69.59 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 29. North 89 deg. 26 min. 06 sec. East, a distance of 39.82 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 30. South 46 deg. 34 min. 09 sec. East, a distance of 4.94 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 31. South 07 deg. 38 min. 58 sec. West, a distance of 1,318.58 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 32. South 13 deg. 06 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 200.42 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 33. South 07 deg. 01 min. 13 sec. West, a distance of 249.88 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 34. South 18 deg. 21 min. 18 sec. West, a distance of 584.03 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 35. South 07 deg. 40 min. 57 sec. West, a distance of 186.12 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 36. South 45 deg. 20 min. 37 sec. West, a distance of 79.29 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 37. South 83 deg. 25 min. 55 sec. West, a distance of 209.32 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 38. South 00 deg. 36 min. 48 sec. East, a distance of 56.51 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found in the pavement of said County Road 370, the North line of both said Alam 16.215 ac. and John Elliott Survey and the South line of said Henry Smith Survey, at the most Southerly Southeast corner of both said Risland Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 deg. 11 min. 17 sec. West, with the pavement of said County Road 370, the North line of both said Alam 16.215 ac. and John Elliott Survey and a South line of both said Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and Henry Smith Survey, a distance of 254.37 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an angle point; THENCE South 88 deg. 36 min. 37 sec. West, continuing with the pavement of said County Road 370, the North line of both said Alam 16.215 ac. and John Elliott Survey and a South line of both said Mantua 2,304.493 ac. and Henry Smith Survey, a distance of 375.33 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 694.344 ACRES of land. Kate A. Wagner, R.P.L.S. No. 6578 September 8, 2022 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit A-1 Tract Two (92.667 ACRES) SITUATED in the County of Collin, State of Texas, and being a part of the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, the J.C. Burge Survey, Abstract No. 106, and being a part of the 555.801 acre tract of land (Tract B) conveyed from Viola Lordsmeer, L.P. to Risland Mantua, LLC by Special Warranty Deed dated June 25, 2018 and recorded in Instrument No. 20180625000783630, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch rebar found in the North line of both the Eli Witt Survey, Abstract No. 997 and the D.R. Horton, LTD 275.00 acre tract of land conveyed by Instrument No. 20210212000310470, said Official Public Records and the South line of said J.C. Burge Survey, at the Southwest corner of the 42.81 acre tract of land conveyed by Instrument No. 200610030014246640, said Official Public Records, at a Southeast corner of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac. and the most Easterly Southeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 86 deg. 36 min. 27 sec. West, with the North line of both said Eli Witt Survey and D.R. Horton, LTD 275.00 ac. and the South line of both said Burge Survey and Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., a distance of 774.67 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found, at the most Eastern Northeast corner of said Henry Smith Survey, the Northwest corner of both said D.R. Horton 275.00 ac. and said Eli Witt Survey, at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 00 deg. 33 min. 34 sec. East, with the West line of both said Eli Witt Survey and D.R. Horton, LTD 275.00 ac. and the East line of both said Henry Smith Survey and Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., a distance of 509.75 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at the most Southerly Southeast corner of the herein described tract; FROM which a ½ inch rebar found at the most Southerly Southeast corner of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac. bears South 00 deg. 33 min. 34 sec. East, 4,146.43 ft.; THENCE South 32 deg. 09 min. 36 sec. West, over and across Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., a distance of 1,399.64 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” in the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 75 and the West line of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., at the most Southerly Southwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE in a Northeasterly direction, with the East line of said U.S. Highway No. 75 and West lines of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., the following calls and distances: 1. North 09 deg. 09 min. 44 sec. East, a distance of 468.21 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578”; 2. North 04 deg. 48 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of 166.27 ft. to a brass capped monument found; 3. North 08 deg. 00 min. 27 sec. East, a distance of 570.88 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 4. North 07 deg. 33 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 204.07 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578”; 5. North 04 deg. 56 min. 12 sec. East, a distance of 408.10 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found; 6. North 08 deg. 50 min. 26 sec. East, a distance of 201.65 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 7. North 03 deg. 46 min. 37 sec. West, a distance of 157.48 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 8. North 02 deg. 24 min. 26 sec. East, a distance of 297.71 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 9. North 01 deg. 17 min. 34 sec. West, a distance of 373.25 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 10. North 03 deg. 24 min. 38 sec. East, a distance of 157.01 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; Page 2 of 3 11. North 10 deg. 51 min. 17 sec. East, a distance of 626.29 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 12. North 39 deg. 04 min. 49 sec. East, a distance of 143.29 ft. to a 5/8 inch rebar found; 13. North 08 deg. 29 min. 33 sec. East, a distance of 132.69 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 14. South 88 deg. 41 min. 18 sec. East, a distance of 29.74 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 15. North 01 deg. 36 min. 08 sec. East, a distance of 109.73 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 16. North 88 deg. 24 min. 26 sec. West, a distance of 31.11 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 17. North 06 deg. 46 min. 11 sec. West, a distance of 159.76 ft. to a 1/2 inch capped rebar found, stamped “RPLS 6578”; 18. North 34 deg. 41 min. 30 sec. West, a distance of 153.89 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 19. North 06 deg. 06 min. 32 sec. West, a distance of 469.93 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 20. North 14 deg. 15 min. 34 sec. West, a distance of 166.73 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 21. North 00 deg. 20 min. 02 sec. East, a distance of 570.00 ft. to a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found; 22. North 02 deg. 17 min. 36 sec. East, a distance of 48.36 ft. to a ½ inch capped rebar set, stamped “RPLS 6578” at the most Northerly Northwest corner of the herein described tract, FROM which a 5/8 inch aluminum capped rebar found at an angle point of said U.S. Highway No. 75 bears North 02 deg. 17 min. 36 sec. East, 331.91 ft.; THENCE North 88 deg. 46 min. 19 sec. East, over and across said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., a distance of 473.58 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the most Westerly Northwest corner of the “called” 60.94 acre tract of land conveyed to LHJH Properties, Ltd., recorded in Instrument No. 20061003001424620, said Official Public Records, an Ell corner of said Mantua 555.801 ac. and the most Northerly Northeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 00 deg. 57 min. 02 sec. East, with a West line of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac., an East line of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., entering the pavement of County Road 374 and continuing with the pavement, a distance of 913.62 ft. to a PK nail set at an angle point; THENCE South 00 deg. 56 min. 52 sec. East, continuing with the pavement of said County Road 374, a West line of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac. and an East line of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., a distance of 689.52 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at the centerline intersection of said County Road 374 with Mantua Road, a public road, at the most Westerly Southwest corner of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac., at an Ell corner of both said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac. and the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 deg. 39 min. 31 sec. East, with the pavement of said Mantua Road, a South line of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac. and a North line of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., leaving the pavement of said Mantua Road and continuing on said course for a distance of 755.15 ft. to a 1/2 inch rebar found at an Ell corner of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac. and a Northeast corner of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., at the most Easterly Northeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 01 deg. 06 min. 31 sec. West, with a West line of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac., an East line of said Risland Mantua 555.801 ac., re-entering of the pavement of said Mantua Road, continuing with and leaving the pavement of the same and continuing, passing the most Southerly Southwest corner of said LHJH Properties “called” 60.94 ac. and the Northwest corner of said LHJH Page 3 of 3 Properties 42.81 ac. and continuing now with a West line of said LHJH Properties 42.81 ac. for a distance of 2,239.97 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 92.667 ACRES of land. Kate A. Wagner, R.P.L.S. No. 6578 September 8, 2022 Revised: February 16, 2023 EXHIBIT A-2-1, A-2-II and A-2-III Metes and Bounds Descriptions of Liberty 75 Property 1 EXHIBIT A-2-I MIDDLE TRACT BEING a tract of land situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 74.451-acre tract of land described in a deed to Liberty 75, LP, as recorded in Instrument No. 2024000024415 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for the southerly corner of a visibility clip at the westerly, southwest corner of said 74.451-acre tract, same being on the easterly right of way line of U. S. Highway 75, a variable width right of way, as described in a called 9.306-acre tract of land, conveyed to the State of Texas, as recorded in Instrument No. 20170920001260330 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE in a northerly direction, along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, the following: North 43°05'07" West, along said visibility clip, a distance of 74.58 feet to a point for corner; North 01°01'07" West, a distance of 669.59 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears South 84°27’ East, 0.85 feet; North 05°53'54" East, a distance of 300.13 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears North 04°56’ East, 0.37 feet; North 06°23'15" East, a distance of 700.16 feet to a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for corner; North 07°36'56" East, a distance of 123.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE North 07°36'56" East, continuing along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, a distance of 976.04 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears South 73°31’ East, 1.17 feet; THENCE North 09°45'02" East, continuing along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, a distance of 94.61 feet to the northwest corner of said 74.451-acre tract, same being on the southeasterly line of a 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement as recorded in Volume 1155, Page 356 & Volume 1306, Page 763, both of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, from which, a found 1/2-iron rod bears North 07°37’ East, 0.71 feet; THENCE North 32°09'34" East, departing the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, along the northwest line of said 74.451-acre tract and the southeast line of said 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement, a distance of 52.03 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89°26'28" East, departing the northwest line of said 74.451-acre tract and the southeast line of said 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement, crossing said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 688.50 feet to a point for corner; 2 THENCE South 00°33'32" East, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 1,102.97 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89°26'28" West, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 872.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 20.064 acres of land, more or less. 1 EXHIBIT A-2-II NORTH TRACT BEING a tract of land situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 74.451-acre tract of land described in a deed to Liberty 75, LP, as recorded in Instrument No. 2024000024415 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for the southerly corner of a visibility clip at the westerly, southwest corner of said 74.451-acre tract, same being on the easterly right of way line of U. S. Highway 75, a variable width right of way, as described in a called 9.306-acre tract of land, conveyed to the State of Texas, as recorded in Instrument No. 20170920001260330 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE in a northerly direction, along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, the following: North 43°05'07" West, along said visibility clip, a distance of 74.58 feet to a point for corner; North 01°01'07" West, a distance of 669.59 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears South 84°27’ East, 0.85 feet; North 05°53'54" East, a distance of 300.13 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears North 04°56’ East, 0.37 feet; North 06°23'15" East, a distance of 700.16 feet to a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for corner; North 07°36'56" East, a distance of 1,100.00 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears South 73°31’ East, 1.17 feet; North 09°45'02" East, continuing along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, a distance of 94.61 feet to the northwest corner of said 74.451-acre tract, same being on the southeasterly line of a 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement as recorded in Volume 1155, Page 356 & Volume 1306, Page 763, both of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, from which, a found 1/2-iron rod bears North 07°37’ East, 0.71 feet; THENCE North 32°09'34" East, departing the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, along the northwest line of said 74.451-acre tract and the southeast line of said 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement, a distance of 52.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE North 32°09'34" East, continuing along the northwest line of said 74.451-acre tract and the southeast line of said 170’ wide Texas Power & Light Easement, a distance of 1,273.79 feet to a point for corner, from which, a 1/2-inch iron rod with an orange cap, stamped “RPLS 6578” bears North 32°09'34" East, 74.00 feet; THENCE South 00°33'32" East, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 1,071.69 feet to a point for corner; 2 THENCE South 89°26'28" West, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 688.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4.469 acres of land, more or less. 1 EXHIBIT A-2-III SOUTH TRACT BEING a tract of land situated in the Henry Smith Survey, Abstract No. 822, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 74.451-acre tract of land described in a deed to Liberty 75, LP, as recorded in Instrument No. 2024000024415 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for the southerly corner of a visibility clip at the westerly, southwest corner of said 74.451-acre tract, same being on the easterly right of way line of U. S. Highway 75, a variable width right of way, as described in a called 9.306-acre tract of land, conveyed to the State of Texas, as recorded in Instrument No. 20170920001260330 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE in a northerly direction, along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, the following: North 43°05'07" West, along said visibility clip, a distance of 74.58 feet to a point for corner; North 01°01'07" West, a distance of 669.59 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears South 84°27’ East, 0.85 feet; North 05°53'54" East, a distance of 300.13 feet to a point for corner, from which, a found brass disk TXDOT right of way monument bears North 04°56’ East, 0.37 feet; North 06°23'15" East, a distance of 700.16 feet to a brass disk TXDOT right of way monument found for corner; North 07°36'56" East, a distance of 123.96 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89°26'28" East, departing the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, crossing said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 872.33 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00°33'32" East, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 1,787.92 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right with a radius of 790.00 feet, a central angle of 04°10'17", and a chord bearing and distance of South 87°04'49" West, 57.50 feet; THENCE in a westerly direction, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, with said non-tangent curve to the right, an arc distance of 57.52 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89°09'58" West, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, a distance of 427.84 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1,260.00 feet, a central angle of 12°43'32", and a chord bearing and distance of South 82°48'12" West, 279.27 feet; THENCE in a westerly direction, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, with said tangent curve to the left, an arc distance of 279.85 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right with a radius of 1,139.84 feet, a central angle of 06°32'52", and a chord bearing and distance of South 79°42'50" West, 130.19 feet; 2 THENCE in a westerly direction, continuing across said 74.451-acre tract, with said reverse curve to the right, an arc distance of 130.26 feet to a point for corner on the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75; THENCE North 84°51'36" West, along the westerly line of said 74.451-acre tract and the easterly right of way line of said U. S. Highway 75, a distance of 61.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 40.045 acres of land, more or less. EXHIBIT A-3 Metes and Bounds Description of the Thornton Property Exhibit A-3 Thornton Tract BEING a tract of land situated in the Joseph Britton Survey Survey, Abstract No. 72, Collin County, Texas, and being all of a called 103-acre tract of land described in a deed to The Thornton Family Trust, recorded in Instrument No. 20210430000877560, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of said 103-acre tract, common to the westernmost southwest corner of a called 694.344-acre tract of land described as Tract One in a deed to Liberty 800, LP, recorded in Instrument No. 2023000025691, said Official Public Records, common to the northwest corner of a called 52.771-acre tract of land described in a deed to Janis Real Estate, recorded in Instrument No. 2022040000632060, said Official Public Records, common to the northeast corner of a called 103.991-acre tract of land described in a deed to Mohammad Ali Monouchehripour, recorded in Volume 5200, Page 5012, Land Records, Collin County, Texas, same also being in County Road No. 290 (public use right-of-way, no record found); THENCE South 89°51'39" West, departing said County Road No. 290 and with the common line of said 103-acre tract and said 103.991-acre tract, a distance of 1,815.28 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with plastic cap “Illegible” found for the northwest corner of said 103.991-acre tract, common to the northeast corner of a called 11.000-acre tract of land described in a deed to Mathew T. Benton, et ux, recorded in Instrument No. 20170316000337930, said Official Public Records; THENCE South 89°46'58" West, with the common line of said 103-acre tract and said 11.000- acre tract, a distance of 491.25 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with red plastic cap stamped “KHA” set for the southwest corner of said 103-acre tract; THENCE North 01°49'44" East, departing the northerly line of said 11.000-acre tract and with the westerly line of said 103-acre tract and the easterly lines of a called 10.000-acre tract of land described in a deed to Angela Reston, recorded in Instrument No. 20130816001163630, said Official Public Records, and a called 45.002-acre tract of land described in a deed to Angela Reston, recorded in Instrument No. 20130816001163610, said Official Public Records, and generally along the center of County Road No. 289 (public use right-of-way, no record found), a distance of 617.13 feet to a PK nail set for corner; THENCE North 00°56'55" East, continuing with the westerly line of said 103-acre tract and the easterly line of said 45.002-acre tract, and with the easterly line of a called 25.2172-acre tract of land described in a deed to Shawn C. & Latricia G. Smith, recorded in Instrument No. 20210112000065970, said Official Public Records, and continuing generally along the center of said County Road No. 289, a distance of 751.13 feet to a PK nail set for corner; THENCE North 00°23'27" West, continuing with the westerly line of said 103-acre tract and the easterly line of said 25.2172-acre tract, and with the easterly line of a called 9.213-acre tract of land described in a deed to Timothy J. Kennedy and Thomas W. Kennedy, recorded in Instrument No. 20140814000866610, said Official Public Records, and continuing generally along the center of said County Road No. 289, a distance of 628.28 feet to a PK nail set for the northwest corner of said 103-acre tract, common to the southwest corner of a called 105-acre tract of land described in a deed to The Thornton Family Trust, recorded in Instrument No. 20210430000877690, said Official Public Records; THENCE North 89°12'22" East, departing the easterly line of said 9.213-acre tract and said County Road No. 289, and with the northerly line of said 103-acre tract and the southerly lines of said 105-acre tract and a called 40-acre tract of land described in a deed to The Thornton Family Trust, recorded in Instrument No. 20210430000877470, said Official Public Records, and a called 2304.493-acre tract of land described as Tract F in a deed to Risland Mantua, LLC, recorded in Instrument No. 20180625000783630, said Official Public Records and in Instrument No. 2018- 14251, Official Public Records, Grayson County, Texas, and generally along the center of County Road No. 1101 (public use right-of-way, no record found), a distance of 2,235.58 feet to a PK nail set for the northeast corner of said 103-acre tract, common an angle point in the southerly line of said Tract F, same being on the westerly line of a called 10.669-acre tract of land described in a deed to Delmore A.M. Church and Joyce Church, recorded in Volume 702, Page 585, said Land Records, same also being the intersection of said County Road No. 1101 and the aforementioned County Road No. 290; THENCE South 01°14'56" East, departing the southerly line of said Tract F and with the common line of said 103-acre tract and said 10.669-acre tract, and generally along the center of said County Road No. 290, a distance of 890.33 feet to a PK nail set for the southwest corner of said 10.669-acre tract, common to the westernmost northwest corner of the aforementioned Tract One, from which a PK nail found for witness bears North 75°05'07” West, 1.12 feet; THENCE South 01°12'42" East, with the common line of said 103-acre tract and said Tract One, and continuing generally along the center of said County Road No. 290, a distance of 1,130.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4,544,381 square feet or 104.325 acres of land, more or less. EXHIBIT A-4 Metes and Bounds Description of the Janis RE Property Exhibit A-4 Janis RE Tract BEING a tract of land situated in the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being all of a called 52.771-acre tract of land, described in a Warranty Deed to Janis Real Estate, recorded in Instrument No. 20220420000632060 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron rod found in County Road 290, an apparent public use right of way, no record found, for the northwest corner of said 52.771-acre tract, same being the westerly, southwest corner of Tract One (called 694.334-acres), described in a deed to Liberty 800, LP, recorded in Instrument No. 2023000025691 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas THENCE North 88°29'13" East, departing said County Road 290, along the northerly line of said 52.771-acre tract and a southerly line of said Tract One (called 694.334-acres), passing at a distance of 22.66 feet, a found 1/2-inch iron rod, passing at a distance of 1,915.36 feet, a found 5/8-inch iron rod, continuing for a total distance of 1,940.95 feet to a point for corner in an unnamed stream; THENCE in a southeasterly direction, along a southwesterly line of said Tract One (called 694.334-acres), and along the meanders of said stream, the following: South 33°10'55" East, a distance of 12.05 feet to a point for corner; North 77°29'33" East, a distance of 63.05 feet to a point for corner; South 31°24'12" East, a distance of 45.14 feet to a point for corner; South 20°44'38" West, a distance of 41.43 feet to a point for corner; South 51°05'09" East, a distance of 29.42 feet to a point for corner; South 74°15'03" East, a distance of 25.54 feet to a point for corner; North 89°23'21" East, a distance of 70.37 feet to a point for corner; South 23°39'03" East, a distance of 52.95 feet to a point for corner; South 67°42'02" East, a distance of 33.33 feet to a point for corner; North 87°34'10" East, a distance of 28.77 feet to a point for corner; North 72°45'56" East, a distance of 40.53 feet to a point for corner; North 61°06'37" East, a distance of 35.06 feet to a point for corner; North 70°57'23" East, a distance of 52.73 feet to a point for corner; South 45°16'16" East, a distance of 161.75 feet to a point for corner; South 78°02'53" East, a distance of 43.16 feet to a point for corner; South 48°41'18" East, a distance of 61.75 feet to a point for corner; South 26°20'00" East, a distance of 52.30 feet to a point for corner; South 41°31'56" East, a distance of 71.58 feet to a point for corner; South 61°04'09" East, a distance of 43.45 feet to a point for corner; South 74°50'18" East, a distance of 51.31 feet to a point for corner; South 67°40'27" East, a distance of 74.73 feet to a point for corner; North 78°02'05" East, a distance of 27.52 feet to a point for corner; North 55°10'00" East, a distance of 27.35 feet to a point for corner; South 43°24'18" East, a distance of 52.01 feet to a point for corner; South 11°56'26" East, a distance of 54.70 feet to a point for corner; South 35°23'19" East, a distance of 27.58 feet to a point for corner; North 76°58'39" East, a distance of 33.36 feet to a point for corner; South 74°58'05" East, a distance of 33.79 feet to a point for corner; North 84°50'03" East, a distance of 47.01 feet to a point for corner; South 67°01'29" East, a distance of 30.31 feet to a point for corner; South 25°25'26" East, a distance of 47.54 feet to a point for corner; South 83°06'16" East, a distance of 148.71 feet to a point for corner; South 27°26'38" East, a distance of 22.31 feet to a point for corner; South 20°24'50" West, a distance of 33.05 feet to a point for corner; South 81°00'45" West, a distance of 25.03 feet to a point for corner; South 22°14'44" West, a distance of 25.85 feet to a point for corner; South 71°22'19" East, a distance of 21.59 feet to a point for corner; South 17°12'14" East, a distance of 18.36 feet to a point for corner; South 43°03'46" West, a distance of 28.01 feet to a point for corner; South 77°43'43" West, a distance of 16.69 feet to a point for corner; South 53°06'48" West, a distance of 15.77 feet to a point for corner; South 13°04'46" East, a distance of 18.22 feet to a point for corner; South 86°18'51" East, a distance of 19.60 feet to a point for corner; North 64°02'23" East, a distance of 41.91 feet to a point for corner; South 87°03'39" East, a distance of 12.89 feet to a point for corner; South 44°49'18" East, a distance of 31.14 feet to a point for corner; South 72°20'36" East, a distance of 44.01 feet to a point for corner; South 10°24'46" East, a distance of 17.30 feet to a point for corner; South 50°40'12" West, a distance of 42.51 feet to a point for corner; South 26°45'33" West, a distance of 14.91 feet to a point for corner; South 22°54'12" East, a distance of 86.03 feet to a point for corner; North 68°54'13" East, a distance of 27.87 feet to a point for corner; South 83°50'31" East, a distance of 22.51 feet to a point for corner; South 55°20'43" East, a distance of 26.96 feet to a point for corner; South 30°12'42" West, a distance of 86.18 feet to a point for corner; South 18°54'48" East, a distance of 46.25 feet to a point for corner; South 70°40'03" East, a distance of 3.83 feet to the southeast corner of said 52.771-acre tract, same being on the northerly line of a called 48.900-acre tract of land described in a deed to Donna Gail Peeler, recorded in Volume 4972, Page 5535 of the Land Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE South 88°38'34" West, departing said stream, along the southerly line of said 52.771- acre tract and the northerly line of said 48.900-acre tract, a distance of 1,014.81 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “PRECISE LAND SURVEY” found for a southwest corner of said 52.771-acre tract; THENCE North 05°10'28" East, departing the northerly line of said 48.900-acre tract and along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 536.25 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for a corner; THENCE South 88°39'14" West, along a southerly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 644.48 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “PRECISE LAND SURVEY” found for corner; THENCE South 03°09'12" East, along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 467.12 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with an unreadable plastic cap found for corner; THENCE South 88°38'34" West, along a southerly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 1,253.06 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for corner; THENCE North 00°58'35" West, along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 606.39 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for corner; THENCE South 89°01'25" West, along a southerly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 455.00 feet to a MAG Nail found for the westerly, southwest corner of said 52.771-acre tract, same being in aforesaid County Road 290; THENCE North 00°58'35" West, along the westerly line of said 52.771-acre tract and along said County Road 290, a distance of 389.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 52.750 acres (2,297,787 square feet) of land, more or less. EXHIBIT A-5 Metes and Bounds Description of the Janis Property Exhibit A-5 Jay and Irene Janis Tract (16 ac) BEING a tract of land situated in the Zachariah Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 760, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a portion of a called 68.835-acre tract of land, described in a Warranty Deed, recorded in County Clerk’s File No. 96-0069284 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a MAG nail found in County Road 290, an apparent public use right of way, no record found, for the southwest corner of said 52.771-acre tract, same being the northwest corner of a called 48.900-acre tract of land described in a deed to Donna Gail Peeler, recorded in Volume 4972, Page 5535 of the Land Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE North 00°58'35" West, along the westerly line of said 68.835-acre tract and along said County Road 290, a distance of 675.42 feet to a MAG Nail found for the westerly, southwest corner of a called 52.771-acre tract of land, described in a Warranty Deed to Janis Real Estate, recorded in Instrument No. 20220420000632060 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE North 89°01'25" East, departing the westerly line of said 68.835-acre tract and said County Road 290, along a southerly line of said 52.772-acre tract, a distance of 455.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for corner; THENCE South 00°58'35" East, along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 606.39 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for corner; THENCE North 88°38'34" East, along a southerly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 1,253.06 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with an unreadable plastic cap found for corner; THENCE North 03°09'12" West, along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 467.12 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “PRECISE LAND SURVEY” found for corner; THENCE North 88°39'14" East, along a southerly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 644.48 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “NTS” found for corner; THENCE South 05°10'28" West, along an easterly line of said 52.771-acre tract, a distance of 536.25 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with a plastic cap, stamped “PRECISE LAND SURVEY” found for a southwest corner of said 52.771-acre tract, same being on the southerly line of said 68.835- acre tract and the northerly line of said 48.900-acre tract; THENCE South 88°38'34" West, along the southerly line of said 68.835-acre tract and the northerly line of said 48.900-acre tract, a distance of 2,277.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 16.348 acres (712,115 square feet) of land, more or less. EXHIBIT B Depiction of the Property LIBERTY HILLS - ANNA, TEXASJANUARY2024 ZONING DISTRICT MAP - EXHIBIT B EXISTING LAKE EXISTING GOLF EXISTING LAKE ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: MU, MF, C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, DUPLEX, MF ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: MF, C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU, I-1, I-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU, I-1, I-2 ALLOWED USES: MF, C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: MF, C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: I-1, I-2. C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: MF, MU, C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: MU, MF, C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: MF, C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: MF, C-1, C-2, MU ALLOWED USES: I-1, I-2. C-1, C-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2 ALLOWED USES: MF, MU, C-1, C-2 EXISTING GOLF AMENITY CENTER ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU, MD ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME AMENITY CENTER ALLOWED USES: SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MD-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED GARDEN HOME 0’ Scale: 1”= 400’ 800’1600’400’0’ Scale: 1”= 400’ 800’1600’400’ GOLFEXTENSIONGOLFEXTENSION US-75 NUS-75 NUS-75 NALLOWED USES:C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2 ALLOWED USES:C-1, C-2, I-1, I-2, MF, MU ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, MF, MU, I-1, I-2 ALLOWED USES: C-1, C-2, EXHIBIT C Illustrative Layout LIBERTY HILLS - ANNA, TEXASJANUARY2024 0’ Scale: 1”= 400’ 800’1600’400’ 1.8 AC) 5.2 AC) 6.5 AC) 28.8 AC) 25.5 AC) EXISTING LAKE 8.8 AC) OPEN SPACE 22.1 AC) 8.47 AC) 17.0 AC) 44.0 AC) GOLF EXTENSION EXISTING GOLF 33.1 AC) 20.0 AC) 40.0 AC) 25.5 AC) 5.3 AC) 5.8 AC) 51.3 AC) 65.2 AC) 15.0 AC) 14.4 AC) 31.8 AC) 15.8 AC) 52.8 AC) 16.1 AC) EXISTING LAKE FIRE STATION (4.1 AC) GOLF EXTENSION EXISTING GOLF ILLUSTRATIVE LAYOUT - EXHIBIT E 22.1 AC) 22.9 AC) (12.8 AC) (11.0 AC) 53.1 AC) 8.65 AC) 2.3 AC) 2.6 AC) 13.8 AC) EXISTING LAKE OPEN SPACE GOLF EXTENSION EXISTING GOLF US- 75 NUS-75 NUS-75N0’ Scale: 1”= 400’ 800’1600’400’ 1.8 AC) 5.2 AC) 6.5 AC) 28. 8 AC)25.5 AC) EXISTING LAKE 8.8 AC)OPEN SPACE 22.1 AC) 8.47 AC) 17.0 AC)44. 0 AC)GOLF EXTENSION EXISTING GOLF 33.1 AC) 20. 0 AC)40.0 AC)ROSAMOND CROSSING 25.5 AC) 5.3 AC) 5.8 AC) 51.3 AC) 65.2 AC) 15.0 AC) 14.4 AC) 31.8 AC) 15.8 AC) 52. 8 AC)16. 1 AC) EXISTING LAKE GOLF EXTENSION EXISTING GOLF22.1 AC)22.9 AC) ( 12.8 AC) ( 11.0 AC) 53.1 AC) 8.65 AC) 2.3 AC)2.6 AC) AMENITY CENTER 13. 8 AC) EXISTING LAKE OPEN EXHIBIT D Development Standards 1 EXHIBIT D DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR LIBERTY HILLS The permitted uses and standards for development of the Property shall be in accordance with the Single- Family Residential District (SF-8.4), Single-Family Residential District (SF-7.2), Single-Family Residential District (SF-6.0), Mixed-Density Residential District (MD - Single-Family Garden Home, Single-Family Attached, Single-Family Duplex), Multi-Family Residential District (MF), Local Commercial District (C-1), Regional Commercial District (C-2), Mixed-Use District (MU), Light Industrial District (I-1), and Heavy Industrial District (I-2) of the Zoning Ordinance and applicable City Regulations, except as amended and modified in these Development Regulations and this Agreement including without limitation the City’s Planning and Development Regulations. Disclaimer: Zoning Ordinance modifications set forth herein are specifically related to the Property associated with this Development Agreement and shall not apply to any additional areas within or outside of the city limits. Illustrative Layout; Conflicts and Terms. 1. Development shall generally comply with Exhibit C – “Illustrative Layout”. Where there is a conflict between the Illustrative Layout and these Development Regulations, these Development Regulations shall control. 2. Changes to the Illustrative Layout which do not significantly alter the basic relationship of the proposed single-family development area to adjacent property and which do not significantly alter the uses permitted or significantly increase the density, building height, or coverage of the site and which do not significantly decrease the off-street parking ratio, reduce the yards provided at the boundary of the site, all as indicated in these Development Regulations, may be authorized by the Director of Development Services or his/her designee when the revised Concept Plan generally conforms to the intent of the original Planned Development. Significant changes to the Illustrative Plan shall be approved by City Council. A Concept Plan will be required as part of the zoning process and be approved by City council. Where there is a conflict between the Illustrative Layout and the Concept Plan, the concept Plan shall control. 3. These Development Regulations and the City’s Ordinances in effect at the time these Development Regulations were prepared shall control development of the project. Where there is a conflict between these Development Regulations and the City’s Zoning Ordinance, these Development Regulations shall control. Upon approval of a Planned Development District in accordance with these Development Regulations, the Planned Development shall control. 4. Terms that are not defined in these Development Regulations shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the City’s Zoning Ordinance or the Development Agreement, as applicable. When there is a conflict between the City’s Zoning Ordinance and the Development 2 Agreement, the Development Agreement shall control. 5. Allowable land uses are identified on Exhibit B – “Zoning District Map” of the Development Agreement. 6. Multi-family residential units shall be setback a minimum of 200’ from the approximate centerline of U.S. Highway 75. Single-family residential uses shall be setback a minimum of 800’ from the approximate centerline of U.S. Highway 75. A. Multi-family residential includes multi-family dwellings and dwellings within mixed-use buildings, and live-work units, B. Single-family uses include attached and detached single-family dwellings, two family dwellings, single-unit or duplex-unit park, and townhome units. 7. Maximum number of residential units (combined total of S-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, MF, MD, and MU districts): 5,000 units. A. Maximum number of MF and MU units 60% B. Maximum number of Single-Family and MD units 40% i. Maximum number of MD units 30% ii. Maximum number of SF-6.0 units 45% iii. Minimum number of SF-7.2 units 20% iv. Minimum number of SF-8.4 units 58 Lot sizes may be mixed within each area to provide additional options and character to the project. 8. Fencing: A. All fences backing or siding onto Standridge Boulevard, Mantua Parkway, CR 290 and CR 289 shall be solid masonry construction. B. All fences backing or siding on to creek corridors (greenbelts), linear park areas, or open space areas shall be ornamental metal fences, such as wrought iron or tubular steel. All wood privacy fencing between residences shall be at least six feet in height. Wood fencing shall be stained and sealed. Plastic and chain link fencing is prohibited. C. All fences backing or siding on to pocket parks, common areas and the project perimeter shall be uniform wood (board on board) construction measuring at least six feet in height. D. Allowable fencing materials are further identified on Exhibit D-1– “Fence Exhibit” of these Development Standards. 9. A minimum 20-foot-wide common area tract to be owned and maintained by the homeowners’ association will be required along both sides of Mantua Parkway, Standridge Boulevard, CR 290 and CR 289 as shown on the Illustrative Layout. Within the 20-foot-wide common area tract, Developer shall be required to plant one large tree (minimum of three-inch caliper and 3 seven feet height at the time of planting) per 50 linear feet of screening wall and one ornamental tree per 30 feet of screening wall. Trees may be grouped or clustered to facilitate site design. 10. Private Amenities: A. The creek corridors (greenbelts), pocket parks, and linear park areas shall be provided in the general locations shown on the Illustrative Layout; provided, however, that the final locations of the greenbelt, pocket parks and linear park areas shall be determined at the time of Concept Plan approval and may be approved in phases per platting approval. The Director of Development Services or his/her designee is authorized to administratively approve modifications to the locations of the creek corridors, pocket parks and linear park areas during the platting stage or the permitting stage. Developer may receive credit against Park Development and Park Dedication Fees for these areas as set forth in the Development Agreement. B. The location of the trail system shall be in general conformance with the Illustrative Layout; provided, however, that the final locations of the trail system shall be determined at the time of civil engineering plan approval and may be approved in phases per platting approval. The Director of Development Services or his/her designee is authorized to administratively approve modifications to the locations of the trail system during the platting stage or the permitting stage. C. Two private amenity center facilities shall be provided as part of the single- family development in the general locations shown on the Illustrative Layout. 11. Public Parks and Amenities: A. The creek corridors (greenbelts), linear park areas and trail system shown on the Illustrative Layout shall be accessible and open to the general public. Upon approval of the Park Board, City Council, and City staff of park land dedication documents and construction plans for park amenities and trail system improvements in-line with the Anna 2050 Parks, Open Space, Trails, & Recreation Master Plan, the Developer will receive credit against Park Development and Park Dedication Fees for these areas as set forth in the Development Agreement. 12. Infrastructure Improvements: As shown on the Illustrative Layout Mantua Parkway shall be dedicated with a 120’ R.O.W. as a 6 lane divided principal arterial; Rosamond Parkway shall be dedicated with a 120’ R.O.W. as a 6 lane divided principal arterial; Standridge Parkway shall be dedicated with a 90’ R.O.W. as a 4 lane divided arterial; Buddy Hayes Boulevard, between Rosamond Parkway and Mantua Parkway, shall be dedicated with an 80’ R.O.W. as a 4 lane undivided arterial; Buddy Hayes Boulevard, north of Mantua Parkway, shall be dedicated with an 80’ R.O.W. as a 4 lane undivided arterial; CR 289 shall be dedicated with a 120’ R.O.W. as a 6 lane divided principal arterial; CR 290 shall be dedicated with a 60’ R.O.W. 4 as a 2 lane undivided minor collector; and CR 371, west of Buddy Hayes Boulevard, shall be dedicated with a 60’ R.O.W. as a 2 lane undivided minor collector. 5 ARTICLE 9.02 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS For the purpose of this document, Deletions of certain regulation provisions that are not applicable are indicated in strikethrough text and Additions or Changes (i.e., added or revised development standards that are in addition to or differ from existing regulation provisions) are indicated with Green text.) 1. Sec. 9.02.086 Sidewalks a) Provided in Residential and Nonresidential Areas 1) Pedestrian concrete walkways (sidewalks) not less than the following width shall be provided along both sides of newly constructed streets as follows: Street Type Sidewalk Width Arterial 6 feet Divided and undivided collector 6 feet Neighborhood collector 6 feet Local residential 6 feet 5 feet 2) Construction standards for sidewalks shall be as set forth in the City’s design standards. 3) Concrete trails identified on the Illustrative Layout shall be 10 feet wide. 6 ARTICLE 9.03 DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Sec. 2 Streets Table 2.1 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS Design Element Principal Arterial Divided Minor Arterial Divided Minor Arterial Undivided Major Collector Undivided Minor Collector Undivided Local Number of Traffic Lanes 6 4 4 4 2 2 Maximum Lane Width Feet) 12 12 12 11 11+ 15 Minimum RW Width * Feet) 120 90 80 80 60 50 Design Speed MPH) 45 40 40 40 35 25 Stopping Sight distance (Feet) 400 325 325 325 325 325 Median Width Feet) 16 14 14 - - - Minimum Lateral Clearance feet) 6 6 6 6 6 - Parking Permitted No No No No Com. Some / Res. Yes Res. Yes Minimum Horizontal Centerline Curvature Feet) 1200 850 850 Com. 700 Res. 600 Com. 500 Res. 350 Res. 200 Elbow 50’ RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE HIGHWAY AND/OR THE PROVISION OF RIGHT TURN LANES OR OTHER INTERSECITON IMPROVMEENTS MAY EXCEED THIS MINIMUM RW STANDARDS. LARGER MEDIANS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVDE FOR MULTIPLE TURN LANES. LOCAL RESIDNETIAL CULD-DE-SACS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RW RADIUS OF FIFTY FEET 50’). 7 ARTICLE 9.04 ZONING ORDINANCE 1. Sec. 9.04.014 Single-Family Residential (SF-8.4) District c) Dimensional Standards. Development in the Single-Family Residential (SF-8.4) district shall follow Table 7: Single-Family Residential (SF-8.4) District Dimensional Standards. Table 7: Single-Family Residential (SF-8.4) District Dimensional Standards Single-Family Residential (SF-8.4) District Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 8,400square feet 1 B Lot Width (min.) 70 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 120 feet 1 D Lot Coverage (max.) 50% 65%1 Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 15 feet 2 F Rear Yard (min.) 20 feet 3 G Side Yard (min.) 7 5 feet H Corner Side Yard (min.) 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage4 100% - 2,200 sf 50% - 2,800 sf Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards 1 For lots located in cul-de-sacs or at knuckles lot area shall be reduced to 7,000 square feet; lot depth shall be reduced to 100 feet; and lot coverage shall be increased to 70%. 2 Front facing garage doors shall be no closer than 20 feet from the front property line. 3 Covered, non-enclosed patios may encroach up to 5’. 4 Minimum Building Square Footage shall mean the net internal building square footage of air-conditioned interior space. 8 2. Sec. 9.04.015 Single-Family Residential (SF-7.2) District c) Dimensional Standards. Development in the Single-Family Residential (SF-7.2) district shall follow Table 8: Single-Family Residential (SF-7.2) District Dimensional Standards. Table 8: Single-Family Residential (SF-7.2) District Dimensional Standards Single-Family Residential (SF-7.2) District Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 7,200 square feet 1 B Lot Width (min.) 60 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 120 feet 1 D Lot Coverage (max.) 50% 60% 1 Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 15 feet 2 F Rear Yard (min.) 20 feet 3 G Side Yard (min.) 5 feet H Corner Side Yard (min.) 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage4 100% - 1,800 sf 75% - 2,200 sf 50% - 2,400 sf Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards 1 For lots located in cul-de-sacs or at knuckles lot area shall be reduced to 7,000 square feet; lot depth shall be reduced to 100 feet; and lot coverage shall be increased to 70%. 2 Front facing garage doors shall be no closer than 20 feet from the front property line. 3 Covered, non-enclosed patios may encroach up to 5’. 4 Minimum Building Square Footage shall mean the net internal building square footage of air-conditioned interior space. 9 3. Sec. 9.04.016 Single-Family Residential (SF-6.0) District c) Dimensional Standards. Development in the Single-Family Residential (SF-6.0) district shall follow Table 9: Single-Family Residential (SF-6.0) District Dimensional Standards. Table 9: Single-Family Residential (SF-6.0) District Dimensional Standards Single-Family Residential (SF-6.0) District Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 6,000 square feet 1 B Lot Width (min.) 50 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 120 feet 1 D Lot Coverage (max.) 50% 65% 1 Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 20 15 feet 2 F Rear Yard (min.) 20 feet 3 G Side Yard (min.) 5 feet H Corner Side Yard (min.) 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage4 100% - 1,700 sf 75% - 2,000 sf 50% - 2,200 sf Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards 1 For lots located in cul-de-sacs or at knuckles lot area shall be reduced to 7,000 square feet; lot depth shall be reduced to 100 feet; and lot coverage shall be increased to 70%. 2 Front facing garage doors shall be no closer than 20 feet from the front property line. 3 Covered, non-enclosed patios may encroach up to 5’. 4 Minimum Building Square Footage shall mean the net internal building square footage of air-conditioned interior space. 10 4. Sec. 9.04.017 Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District c) Dimensional Standards. Development in the Mixed-Density Residential (MD) district shall follow Table 10: Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District Single-Family Garden Home, Single-Family Attached, Duplex Dimensional Standards. Table 10: Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District Dimensional Standards Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District Single-Family Garden Home Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 4,500 4,800 square feet B Lot Width (min.) 25 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 80 feet D Lot Coverage (max.) 60% 70% Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 10 15 feet 1 F Rear Yard (min.) 10 20 feet 2 G Side Yard (min.) 5 feet H Corner Side Yard (min.) 10 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage 3 100% - 1,500 sf 75% - 1,800 sf 50% - 2,000 sf Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards 11 Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District Single-Family Attached Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 4,500 2,400 square feet per unit B Lot Width (min.) 25 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 80 70 feet D Lot Coverage (max.) 60% 70% Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 10 15 feet 1 F Rear Yard (min.) 10 15 feet 2 G Side Yard (min.) 5 0 feet / 10 feet between buildings or 10 feet for each end-unit lot H Corner Side Yard (min.) 10 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage 3 1,800 square feet per unit Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards Mixed-Density Residential (MD) District Duplex Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 4,500 2,400 square feet per unit B Lot Width (min.) 25 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 80 feet D Lot Coverage (max.) 60% Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 10 15 feet 1 F Rear Yard (min.) 10 15 feet 2 G Side Yard (min.) 5 0 feet / 10 feet between buildings H Corner Side Yard (min.) 10 15 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 35 feet J Minimum Building Square Footage 3 1,500 square feet per unit Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards 1 Front facing garage doors shall be no closer than 20 feet from the front property line. 2 Covered, non-enclosed patios may encroach up to 5’. 3 Minimum Building Square Footage shall mean the net internal building square 12 footage of air-conditioned interior space. 5. Sec. 9.04.018 Multi-Family Residential (MF) District c) Dimensional Standards. Development in the Multi-Family Residential (MF) district shall follow Table 11: Multi-Family Residential (MF) District Dimensional Standards. Table 11: Multi-Family Residential (MF) District Dimensional Standards Multi-Family Residential (MF) District Dimensional Standards Lot Requirements A Lot Area (min.) 5,000 square feet B Lot Width (min.) 50 feet C Lot Depth (min.) 120 90 feet D Lot Coverage (max.) 50% 90% Setback Requirements E Front Yard (min.) 25 feet F Rear Yard (min.) 20 feet G Side Yard (min.) 10 5 feet H Corner Side Yard (min.) 25 feet Building Requirements I Building Height (max.) 70 feet Additional Applicable Requirements within the Zoning Ordinance Sec. 9.04.041 – Dimensional Regulations Sec. 9.04.042 – Site Design Requirements Sec. 9.04.043 – Parking Sec. 9.04.044 – Loading Sec. 0.04.045 - Landscaping Sec. 9.04.046 – Screening and Fencing Sec. 9.04.047 – Outdoor Lighting Sec. 9.04.048 – Trash Sec. 0.04.049 – Performance Standards d) Special Regulations. 1. Minimum lot areas for attached single-family and two-family dwellings shall be 2,400 square feet per dwelling unit. 2. Lot width for a lot containing attached single-family and two-family dwellings shall be no less than 20 feet per ground floor unit plus side yard requirements. 3. No lot containing multi-family dwelling units shall contain less than 10,000 5,000 square feet. 4. No lot containing a Single-Unit or Duplex Unit Park shall contain less than 20,000 10,000 square feet. 5. No building in a Single-Unit or Duplex Unit Park, attached single-family dwelling, two-family dwelling, or Townhome Unit shall exceed a height of 35 65 feet. 6. Any building with multiple stories and greater than 35 45 feet tall shall comply with the regulations specified in Sec. 9.04.041(h). 7. When a multi-family dwelling exceeds one story in height, automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in accordance with existing fire codes and each building shall have two points of entry or exit. 8. The maximum density for a multi-dwelling is 25 units per acre. 9. The maximum density for a Townhome Unit or Single-Unit or Duplex Unit Park is 12 18 units per acre. 10. The corner side yard for “key lots” shall meet the minimum front yard setback requirements. 13 6. Sec. 9.04.025 Thoroughfare Overlay (THOR) District c) Dimensional Standards. 1) Building lots along a highway, as designated by the Master Thoroughfare Plan, shall be a minimum of 0.75 one acre. 2) The nonresidential minimum lot width is 60100 feet. 3) The nonresidential minimum front yard setback is 50 feet (for front yards facing the thoroughfare). 7. Sec. 9.04.028 Use Table Table 19: Use Table Land Use MF MU DT ND Use-Specific Standards Parking Standards Multi-Family Dwelling P P S Sec. 9.04.029(c) 1/1 BRU; 2/2 & 3 BRU +0.25/Unit for visitors (50 25% of required parking is covered, not including visitor parking) Land Use I-1 I-2 Use-Specific Standards Parking Standards Self Storage Mini- Warehouse) P Sec. 9.04.035(b) 1/30 storage units 1/20,000 gross floor area at least 5 spaces required) Land Use SF8.4 SF- 7.2 SF- 6.0 MD MF C-1 C-2 MU I-1 I-2 Radio, TV, or Microwave Operations, Commercial S S S S S P S P S P S P S P S P S P 8. Section 9.04.041 Dimensional Regulations h) Stepback Regulations 1) Stepback regulations apply to all new building construction and all additions with multiple stories and a height greater than 35 45 feet located adjacent to residential zoning districts (SF-8.4, SF-7.2, SF-6.0, & MD) and existing single-family uses but do not apply when an improved public street or railroad right-of-way separates the new building construction from the existing residential zoning district or single- family residential use. 14 2) A 25-foot stepback applies for each additional story after the second third story exceeding 35 45 feet in height (See Figure 7: Stepback Exhibit). 9. Section 9.04.042 Site Design Requirements c) Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Standards. 5) House Repetition. A) Within residential developments, single-family and two-family dwellings with substantially identical exterior elevations can only repeat every four (4) lots when fronting the same right-of-way including both sides of the street. B) Homes side by side or across the street within one house (directly across the street or “caddy corner’ across the street) shall not have substantially identical exterior elevations. 6) Building Materials A) Exteriors. The exterior of each primary residence on a Lot shall be constructed in accordance with the Building Material Guidelines table below. B) “Masonry” may include brick or stone stacked and mortared in place (stone means granite, limestone, marble, or other naturally occurring stone), stucco consisting of exterior Portland cement, hand-applied in three coats to a minimum thickness of three-quarters of an inch (3/4”), concrete tilt-wall or other concrete finish techniques, or other similar products. For all exterior plan types, cementitious siding products may be used in areas where it is not structurally feasible to support brick or stone. Building Material Guidelines First Floor A minimum of 85 percent masonry is required. The front and sides of each elevation must be masonry, with only the rear to have other materials. Rear masonry is required on any house that backs to Mantua Parkway or Standridge Parkway. Front Elevation In addition, second floor side elevations shall have the masonry turn the corner and continue a minimum of two (2) feet on interior lots and four (4) feet on corner lots, unless the sidewall is over a roof. 15 Masonry Materials o Brick Brick shall meet specifications established by the Brick Institute of America. Concrete brick is not allowed. Jumbo bricks are not allowed. o Mortar Joints Mortar joints shall be tooled; no “slump” joints are permitted. Non-Masonry Materials o Siding Siding material may be cementitious Hardie-Plank or fiber planking. Plywood, particle board and vinyl are prohibited. o Trim/Wood All trim and wood shall be smooth and painted or stained. Stained wood must be sealed. o Metal Exposed metals must be anodized aluminum, bronze, copper or painted galvanized steel. Exclusions. Roofs, eaves, dormers, soffits, windows, gables, doors, garage doors, decorative trim, and trim work are not required to be constructed of masonry. Prohibited Elements. Highly reflective finishes on exterior surfaces (other than non- mirrored glass or on surfaces of hardware fixtures). Mirrored glass. 7) Roofs & Chimneys A) Accepted Roof Materials. Roofing materials shall be limited to architectural shingles of weathered wood or black colored, non-reflective metal, clay, tile or architectural composition shingles with a minimum rating of 30 years. All shingles must meet or exceed applicable local, FEMA, FHA and VA regulations. No three- tab shingles are permitted. B) Chimneys. Chimney style must be appropriate for the style of the home and may be brick or other masonry matching with the same permitted colors and materials as permitted on the body of the house; provided however, that any chimney located on the interior portion of the roof may also include cementitious materials solely or in addition to the brick or other masonry. If a chimney or fireplace chase is located on the side of a residence, then it is required to be constructed of masonry. 8) Gutters/Downspouts/Drains A) All residences shall be constructed with gutters and downspouts. Gutters and downspouts shall match the color of the existing trim of the residence. Downspout drains shall be placed to convey stormwater in accordance with the grading and drainage plans for the lot and the development. 16 9) Floor Plate A) The minimum Plate height for the first floor shall be nine (9) feet; 8 -ft floor plate along a side elevation that are disguised across the front elevation and that “pop- up” to 9-feet within the residence is allowed. In addition, the minimum combined plate height for two story elevations shall not be less than eighteen (18) feet. 10) Landscape A) A minimum of two (2) trees is required per lot. All introduced vegetation shall be trees, shrubs, vines, ground covers, seasonal flowers or sodded grasses that are commonly used in North Texas for landscaping purposes. Landscape borders shall be constructed with steel edging, bender board or mortared masonry that is comparable to the masonry of the home. 11) Screening and Placement A) Mechanical equipment, trash receptacles, equipment, wood piles and other miscellaneous outdoor storage must be visually screened from public view and neighboring Lots by a solid screening wall/fence or landscaping sufficient for screening. d) Multi-Family Residential Standards 1) Building Materials A) The exterior of each multi-family building shall be a minimum of: a. 80 percent masonry on the front façade of the first floor b. 70 percent on the side façade of the first floor c. 30 percent on the rear façade of the first floor d. 25 percent on all facades for all other floors B) “Masonry” may include brick or stone stacked and mortared in place stone means granite, limestone, marble, or other naturally occurring stone), stucco consisting of exterior Portland cement, hand-applied in three coats to a minimum thickness of three-quarters of an inch (3/4”), or other concrete finish techniques, or other similar products. For all exterior plan types, cementitious siding products may be used in areas where it is not structurally feasible to support brick or stone. C) Brick a. Brick shall meet specifications established by the Brick Institute of America. b. Concrete brick is not allowed. D) Mortar Joints a. Mortar joints shall be tooled; no “slump” joints are permitted. E) Non-Masonry Materials a. Siding – Siding material may be cementitious Hardie-Plank or fiber planking. Plywood, particle board and vinyl are prohibited. b. Trim/Wood – All trim and wood shall be smooth and painted or 17 stained. Stained wood must be sealed. c. Metal - Exposed metals must be anodized aluminum, bronze, copper or painted galvanized steel. 2) Building Articulation C) Horizontal wall plans longer than 40 85 feet in length shall be segmented into smaller sections by a structural or ornamental minor façade offset (recess or projection) of a minimum 2 feet deep and 810 feet wide. B) The height of those offsets is equal to the building’s height at the location of the offset. 3) Roof Treatment A) Pitched or flat roofs are permitted. B) A parapet wall is allowed if constructed to prevent flat roof visibility. 4) Fenestration A) Any glass with a visible light reflectance rating of 25% or greater is prohibited. 5) Elements. A multi-family development is required to provide at least two two of the following elements: A) At least one dormer is provided for each roof plane over 1,000 square feet in area that faces a street. The dormer must be appropriately scaled for the roof plane and shall not be wider than the windows on the building elevations; B) All windows feature shutters. The shutters provided must be operational or appear operational and must be in scale with the corresponding window; C) All windows are emphasized through the use of molding / trim around the windows, plat ledge, sills, shaped frames, awnings, or another similarly related architectural elements; D) Downspouts associated with gutters are internally incorporate into the building’s construction rather than attached to the building after the construction of the façade is complete. E) Other similar architectural features as approved by the Director. E) The primary entrance for all buildings shall feature a protected entry through the use of a recessed entry, porte-cochere, awning, canopy, or similar feature that serves the same purposes. The covering shall be at least three feet in depth when measured from the face of the adjoining façade. Not required for accessory buildings. 18 F) Screening fence: Border fencing material shall be either masonry construction or wrought iron, tubular steel, or tubular aluminum with masonry columns. Additionally, an irrigated landscape screen, minimum height of 6 feet, shall be installed within a 10-foot landscape buffer along the property line on any perimeter not abutting a public street or right-of-way. The landscape screen must grow to a height of at least 10 feet within 2 years of installation. G) Other similar architectural features as approved by the Director. 6) Amenities. A) A multi-family development shall provide the required amount of amenities prescribed in Table 23: Required Amenities. Table 23: Required Amenities Number of Units Required Amenities 1 – 10 None 11 – 50 1 51 – 100 2 101 – 200 3 201 – 300 4 301 + 5 B) The amenities below may be used to fulfill the requirements of Table 23: Required Amenities. Each amenity counts as one required amenity towards the requirements in Table 23: Required Amenities. However, multiples of the same amenity do not count towards the requirements in Table 23: Required Amenities. Additionally, to provide flexibility in development design, the Director may approve different amenities that agree with the purpose of this Sec. 9.04.042. i. Swimming pool (minimum 1,000 square foot surface areas) with cooling deck (minimum ten feet wide in all areas); ii. Jacuzzi or hot tub area (minimum 50 square foot area); iii. At least four barbeque grills or one grill per 100 units, whichever is greater, with shaded seating areas, all barbeque grills shall be: a. Serviced with propane or other gas, and b. Be built into a structure incorporated into an adjacent amenity i.e., pool or seating areas); iv. Ramada(s), arbor(s), and/or trellis(es) covering at least 1,000 400 square feet of recreation space; 19 v. Child play lot (minimum 3,000 1,000 square foot areas) with equipment specifically designed to meet the following three age cohorts: 0-2 years old, 2-5 years old, and 5-12 years old; vi. A splash pad (water play amenity for children) that is a minimum of 1,000 square feet in areas that: 1. Is enclosed by a gated and access limited minimum five-foot tall vinyl-coated chain link fence or other decorate fencing material approved by the Director of Development Services. vii. A dog park that is at least 5,000 2,500 square feet in areas that: a. Is enclosed by a minimum five-foot tall vinyl-coated chain link fence; b. Uses grass, wood chips, or a combination of the two as surface materials, and c. Provides at least two dog waste stations that includes a bag dispenser and waste receptacle installed along the perimeter of the enclosure for every 2,400 square feet of the associated dog park. viii. Regulation-size volleyball, basketball, tennis, or similarly related playing court. ix. Golf putting green (minimum 1,000 square feet); x. Fitness center/weight room (minimum 500 square feet); xi. Business center (minimum 500 square feet); xii. Media room (minimum 500 square feet). f) Nonresidential Standards 7) Building Articulation D) Single- and multi-tenant buildings < 50,000 square feet i. All buildings shall utilize façade offsets and appropriate fenestration, to add variation and visual interest to an elevation and to break up long uninterrupted walls or elevations. ii. Elevations that are 50 feet or longer in horizontal length require at least two offsets (projection or recess) from the primary façade plane of at least 18 inches deep and 4 feet wide. 20 iii. The height of those offsets is equal to the building’s height at the location of the offset . E) Single- and multi-tenant buildings 50,000 square feet and larger i. All buildings shall utilize either façade offsets and appropriate fenestration, color variations, alternative building materials, or other architectural treatments, to add variation and visual interest to an elevation and to break up long uninterrupted walls or elevations. ii. Elevations that are 50 feet or longer in horizontal length require at least one of the following: at least two offsets (projection or recess) from the primary façade plane of at least 18 inches deep and 4 feet wide, color variations, alternative building materials, or other architectural treatments. iii. The height of those offsets, color variations, alternative building materials, or other architectural treatments is equal to the building’s height at the location of the offset application. 8) Roof Treatment C) Long uninterrupted roof lines and planes shall be broken into smaller segments through the use of scaled gables or dormers, change in height, changes in roof form, type or planes that typically correspond to offsets in the building’s façade, or other appropriate architectural elements. D) Parapet roof lines shall feature a well-defined cornice treatment or another similar element to visually cap each building elevation. 9) Fenestration A) Single- and multi-tenant buildings < 50,000 square feet : The use of recessed windows, awnings, sills, drip caps, projecting trim casing or surrounds, projecting muntins or mullions, and other elements is required. B) Single- and multi-tenant buildings 50,000 square feet and larger do not require fenestration. C) Any glass with a visible light reflectance rating of 25% or greater is prohibited. 10) Elements. All buildings or developments shall be required to provide at least two of the following elements: B) The primary entrance for all buildings shall feature a protected entry through the use of a recessed entry, porte-cochere, awning, canopy, or similar feature that serves the same purposes. The covering shall be at least three feet in depth when measured from the face of the adjoining façade. C) All building elevations shall feature at least two facade offsets (recess or projection) five feet in depth for every 50 feet of horizontal length. 21 D) All building elevations shall feature at least three two distinct roof lines or a roof parapet with cornice design or similar element. E) All primary and secondary building entrances, excluding emergency exits and service doors, feature a recessed entry, canopy, awning, or similar sheltering feature of at least 50 square feet. F) Single- and multi-tenant buildings greater than 50,000 square feet shall provide least one of the following: at least two offsets (projection or recess) from the primary façade plane of at least 18 inches deep and 4 feet wide, color variations, alternative building materials, or other architectural treatments. 10. Section 9.04.044 Loading d) Standards. 11) Location. A loading space: B) Must be located within the same development as the building or use served; C) Is prohibited from projecting into a sidewalk, street, or public right -of-way, including any maneuvering area; D) Is prohibited from being located between the front building line and the lot line; E) Must be placed to the rear or side of buildings in visually unobtrusive locations; F) Must be set back a minimum distance of 100 feet (35 feet for Self-Storage (Mini- Warehouse) from any adjacent residential zoning district or use; G) Must be se back a minimum distance of 50 feet from any public street or front property line; and H) Must be oriented away from the street frontage. 11. Section 9.04.045 Landscaping f) Minimum Landscaping Requirements. 2) Parking Lots. A) Landscape areas within parking lots shall be at least 180 162 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 10 9 feet wide by 18 feet deep. h) Tree Preservation. 22 1) All tree preservation shall comply with the regulations of this subsection (h) in addition to the requirements established in Article 9.07. Trees located with the tree preservation areas identified on Exhibit D-2 "Tree Preservation Exhibit” shall be preserved with the exception of trees that must be removed to allow for the construction of public infrastructure improvements. 2) The Developer shall plant one large tree (minimum of three-inch caliper and seven feet height at the time of planting) per 50 linear feet of screening wall and one ornamental tree per 30 feet of screening wall. Trees may be grouped or clustered to facilitate site design. 3) The Developer shall plant a minimum of two front yard trees on each residential lot at the time of home completion. Front yard trees shall measure a minimum three - inch caliper and seven feet height at the time of planting and shall conform with the City’s approved plant list. 4) Any trees preserved on a site meeting these specifications may be credited toward meeting the tree requirement of any landscaping provision of this section for that area within which they are locate, according to Table 28: Tree Preservation Credits, depending on the applicant’s preference to accept or decline the credit. For purposes of this section, caliper measurement shall be taken at DBH above the ground and rounded to the nearest whole number. 5) Existing trees may receive credit if they are not on the City’s approved plant material list but are approved by the Director; however, trees must be located within the landscape areas to which credit is applied. 6) Any tree perseveration proposed shall designate the species, size, and general location of all trees on the conceptual or general landscape plan. The final landscape plan shall show the species, size, and exact location. 7) During any construction or land development, the developer shall clearly mark all trees to be maintained and may be required to erect and maintain protective barriers around all such trees or groups or trees. The applicant shall not allow the movement of heavy equipment or the storage of equipment, materials, debris, or fill to be placed within the drip line of any trees. This is not intended to prohibit the normal construction requirement within parking lots. 8) During the construction stage of development, the applicant shall not allow the cleaning of equipment or material under the canopy of any tree or group of trees to remain. Neither shall the applicant allow the disposal of ay waste materials, such as, but not limited to, paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, etc., under the canopy of any tree to remain. No attachment or wires of any kind, other than those of a protective nature, shall be attached to any tree. ARTICLE 9.05 SIGN ORDINANCE 1. Section 9.05.018 Detached Signs 23 d) Subdivision Entry Signs 1) Definition. Subdivision Entry Sign. A sign which may be a freestanding monument or attached to a subdivision wall located at the entry of a platted subdivision from a local, collector, or arterial street. 2) Standards. Generally. Table 3-7 establishes the standards for subdivision entry signs. Table 3-7: Subdivision Entry Sign Standards Sign District Requirement AE SF MR CM MU DT IN General Allowed? Y Y Y N Y N Y Permit Required? Y Y Y -- Y -- Y Number per entrance (max.) 1 2 2 -- 2 -- 2 Dimensions Sign Area (max.) 150 sf 200 sf 150 sf -- 150 sf 200 sf -- 150 sf Sign Height max). 6 ft 6 ft 15 ft 6 ft -- 6 ft 15 ft -- 8 ft Setbacks 24 From ROW 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft -- 5 ft -- 5 ft Features Electronic Message Center N N N -- N -- N Changeable Copy N N N -- N -- N Channel Letters Y Y Y -- Y -- Y Internal Illumination N N N -- N -- N External Illumination Y Y Y -- Y -- Y Halo Illumination Y Y Y -- Y -- Y Additional Information Key Y = yes, a permit is required or the feature is allowed | N = no/ not allowed | NR = the sign type or characteristic is allowed for nonresidential uses only | sf = square feet | ft = feet | “-“ = the standard does not apply Sign District Summary AE = AG district and ETJ | SF = SF-20.0- SF-6.0 districts | MR = MD and MF districts | CM = C-1 and C-2 districts |MU = MU district | DT = DT district | IN = I-1 and I-2 districts B) Number and Location i) Two (2) subdivision entry signs may be located at the intersection of a collector or arterial street and an entry street or private driveway into a subdivision. The signs shall be configured as follows. a. Two (2) signs with one (1) sign face each located on opposite sides of the entry street private driveway; b. One (1) sign with two (2) faces located within a landscaped areas dividing two (2) one-way entry streets or private driveways; c. One (1) sign located on one (1) side of the entry street or private driveway; or d. One (1) sign located on an archway above the entry street or private driveway ii) Subdivision entrances from a right-of-way greater than 60 feet shall require signage. Secondary entrance connecting to other neighborhoods may be 25 allowed but are not required. C) Design and Installation. i) Subdivision entry signs shall be constructed with stone, brick, concrete, metal, routed wood planks or beams, or similar durable, weatherproof materials. ii) All subdivision entry signs shall be landscaped around the base of the sign in an area equal to four square feet for each square foot of sign areas. In case where the location of the sign could not accommodate such landscape areas, the area may be reduced up to 50% at the Directors’ discretion. iii) When electrical service is provided to a subdivision entry sign, all electrical service shall be underground. ARTICLE 9.07 TREE PRESERVATION The tree preservation ordinance is removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: Trees located with the tree preservation areas identified on Exhibit D-2 "Tree Preservation Exhibit” shall be preserved with the exception of trees that must be removed to allow for the construction of public infrastructure improvements. The Developer shall plant one large tree (minimum of three-inch caliper and seven feet height at the time of planting) per 50 linear feet of screening wall and one ornamental tree per 30 feet of screening wall. Trees may be grouped or clustered to facilitate site design. The Developer shall plant a minimum of two front yard trees on each residential lot at the time of home completion. Front yard trees shall measure a minimum of three-inch caliper and seven feet height at the time of planting and shall conform with the City’s approved plant list. PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 4 PHASE 3 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 PHASE 9 PHASE 10 PHASE 11 PHASE 12 PHASE 13 PHASE 14 PHASE 15 PHASE 16 PHASE 8 PHASE 10 PHASE 16 STANDRIDGE BLVDROAD B ROAD A ROAD DBUDDY HAYES BLVDROAD CMANT U A P K W Y MANTUA PKWY ROAD E MANTUA PKWY CR 290BUDDY HAYES BLVDUS HWY 75COLLINMCKINNEYPKWYCR 289THORNTON CR 371 LIBERTY HILLS FENCE EXHIBIT SCALE: NTS NORTH EXHIBIT D-4 ROSAMOND PKWY FENCE TYPE WOOD FENCE ORNAMENTAL METAL MASONRY FENCE TYPES ARE CONCEPTUAL LIBERTY HILLS SCALE: NTS NORTHEXHIBITD-2 TREE PRESERVATIONEXHIBITPRESERVEDCANOPY REMOVED CANOPY CANOPY IN FLOODPLAIN 100-YR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS Item No. 6.e. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with the Texas Department of Transportation for Ferguson Parkway Extension (Elm St. to Collin County Outer Loop). (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: In the Spring of 2021, the City Council approved the Local Government Project Advanced Funding Agreement (LPAFA) with TxDOT, which identified the scope and funding allowed for the environmental analysis and engineering design. Over the past year, the City has worked with TxDOT and NCTCOG to identify all of the project requirements and complete the necessary processes in accordance with State and Federal guidelines. The Local Government Project Advanced Funding Agreement (LPAFA). The attached resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) With the Texas Department Of Transportation for Ferguson Parkway Extension (Elm st to Collin County Outer Loop). FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for Ferguson Parkway will be the subject of future bond issue. BACKGROUND: Staff recommends approval. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 0918-24-249 AFA Amendment 2_City of Anna 2. Resolution - Authorizing City Manager to Execute an AFA WITH TXDOT TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development AFA Amend Page 1 of 3 Rev. 10/03/2024 ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT For Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program Project Off-System AMENDMENT #2 THIS AMENDMENT is made by and between the State of Texas, acting through the , called the “State”, and the City of Anna, acting by and through its duly authorized officials, called the “Local Government”. The State and Local Government shall be collectively referred to as “the parties” hereinafter. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties executed a contract on 3/5/2021 to effectuate their agreement to ; and, WHEREAS, the parties executed Amendment # to the contract on 1/16/2024 to ; and, WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend that contract in order to ; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties, the parties do agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Article 1, Responsible Parties, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with: For the Project covered by this Agreement, the parties shall be responsible for the following work as stated in the article of the Agreement referenced in the table below: TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development AFA Amend Page 2 of 3 Rev. 10/03/2024 2. Article 3, Scope of Work, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with: The scope of work for the Project consists of preliminary engineering, environmental, utilities, design, and plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E), and reconstruction and widening of a 2-lane roadway to a 4-lane urban divided roadway, with future widening to a 6-lane urban divided roadway, that will include new sidewalks and the construction of a 6-lane bridge over Slayter Creek along Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to The Collin County Outer Loop in the City of Anna as shown on Attachment B, Project Location Map. 3. Attachment A-1, Resolution, Ordinance, or Commissioners Court Order, is supplemented by adding Attachment , Resolution, Ordinance, or Commissioners Court Order. The resolution outlined funding changes and the Local Government approval of the AFA Amendment #2. 4. Attachment -, , is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment , , which is attached to and made a part of this Amendment. The total estimated cost of the Project by $ 47,506,444, from $ 3,758,651 to $ 51,265,095, due to . All other provisions of the original contract are unchanged and remain in full force and effect. TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development AFA Amend Page 3 of 3 Rev. 10/03/2024 Signatory Warranty Each signatory warrants that the signatory has necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the entity represented. Each party is signing this Agreement on the date stated under that party’s signature. THE STATE OF TEXAS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development Page 1 of 2 AFA Amend Attachment A-2 ATTACHMENT A-2 RESOLUTION, ORDINANCE, OR COMMISSIONERS COURT ORDER TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development Page 1 of 2 AFA Amend Attachment C-2 ATTACHMENT C-2 PROJECT BUDGET 0918-24-249 Costs will be based on 80% Federal funding and 20% Local Governement funding until Federal funding reaches the maximum obligated amount. The Local Government will then be responsible for 100% of cost overruns. Description 0918-24-249 TxDOT:: Federal Highway Administration: CCSJ # 0918-24-249 AFA ID Z00001962 CFDA No. 20.205 Project Name Street to the Collin County Outer AFA Not Used For Research & Development Page 2 of 2 AFA Amend Attachment C-2 0918-24-312 Cost will be based on 100% Federal funding and 0% Local funding until Federal funding reaches the maximum obligated amount. The Local Government will then be responsible for 100% of cost overruns. -24-312 Transportation Development Credits (TDCs) in the amount of 8,030,000 will be used for the Local Government’s 20% match contribution. Initial payment by the Local Government to the State: $22,188.($14,386 received) Payment by the Local Government to the State before construction: $0. Estimated total payment by the Local Government to the State: $22,188.($14,386 received) This is an estimate. The final amount of Local Government participation will be based on actual costs. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS , on May 12, 2026, the Texas Transportation Commission authorized Ferguson Parkway project to receive Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds for Engineering, ROW and Construction and Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) oversight; and, , the City of Anna commits to provide the match. The local match is comprised of cash (roadway impact Fee); and, , the City of Anna is responsible for all nonreimbursable costs and 100% of overruns, if any; and , WHEREAS, the Governing body of City of Anna desires to reaffirm its support of the Project, approve and authorize the execution of an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with TxDOT for the Project. Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Approval of Amendment #2 of the Advanced Funding Agreement. The City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, hereby approves Amendment number two to the Advanced Funding Agreement For Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Project Off -System ( Advanced Funding Agreement) by and between the City of Anna, Texas, and the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, and authorizes, ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of the Advanced Funding Agreement on behalf of the City of Anna, Texas. by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this ___ day of May 2026. ATTEST: APPROVED: __________________________ __________________________ City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Pete Cain Item No. 6.f. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: Joseph Cotton AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement to provide engineering design services for the Ferguson Parkway Extension project with Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc., in the amount not to exceed $3,996,310.00. (Director of Public Works Joseph Cotton) SUMMARY: This item is to approve the execution of a professional service agreement with Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc., to design Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop. Full plans and specifications, and provide construction phase services. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this professional services agreement for the Ferguson Parkway project is available in the amount of $3,996,310 from the Roadway Impact Fee Service Area 1 Fund. BACKGROUND: The Ferguson Parkway Extension from Elm Street to the Collin County Loop is shown as a major arterial in the City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan. The City has been working with the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to prepare partnerships and a funding agreement to receive federal funding for the project. In the Spring of 2021, the City Council approved the Local Government Project Advanced Funding Agreement (LPAFA) with TxDOT, which identified the scope and funding allowed for the environmental analysis and engineering design. Over the past year, the City has worked with TxDOT and NCTCOG to identify all of the project requirements and complete the necessary processes in accordance with State and Federal guidelines. Staff will seek to partner with NCTCOG and TxDOT to fund the right-of-way acquisition and construction phases of the project, which is anticipated to begin in late 2028 to early 2029. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing the strategic outcome area: Resilient. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Authorizing City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Professional Services with TNP 5.1.26 2. CONTRACT_2026-05-01_Part_Exec CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS , the City of Anna shows Ferguson Parkway to be a major arterial roadway extension to the Collin County Outer Loop on the City’s Master Thoroughfare Plan; and, , the design will include detailed full plans specifications and engineering design, as well assist with construction phase services; and, , the project has been identified by the North Central Texas Council of Governments to receive an 80% funding match of federal funding; and, , Teague Nall & Perkins Inc is a highly qualified architect and engineering firm with a long history of involvement in designing public safety projects like this for other agencies. The City of Anna selected TNP to perform these services in the multidisciplinary RFQ process completed in 2021. Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Payment and Funding. The City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement for professional services with TNP in the amount of $3,996,310.00, for the Ferguson Parkway on behalf of the City of Anna, Texas. That funding for the project shall come from Roadway Impact Fees ($3,996,310.00). PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this ___ day of May 2026. Project Name: Fergurson Parkway Client: City of Anna TNP Project #: ANN 22218 Date: 5/1/2026 Page 1 AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT NAME: Fergurson Parkway TNP PROJECT NUMBER: ANN 22218 CLIENT: City of Anna ADDRESS: 120 W. 7th St. Anna, TX 75409 The City of Anna (the CLIENT, CITY) hereby requests and authorizes Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., (the CONSULTANT, ENGINEER) to perform the following services: Article I SCOPE: The CONSULTANT’s contract for Fergurson Parkway is amended to include engineering services required for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) with related bid documents, provide Utility Engineering and Coordination Services, and ROW Acquisition Services for Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop in Collin County and the City of Anna (City). Teague Nall and Perkins shall assist the City’s compliance with TxDOT’s – Texas Department of Transportation’s (State or TxDOT) Project Delivery Process. The Engineer shall provide engineering services required for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) and related documents, for Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop in Collin County (1.553 miles). These services may include, but are not limited to, preparing roadway and bridge design, hydrologic and hydraulic design, survey, water & sanitary sewer design, illumination, ROW acquisition, subsurface utility engineering and geotechnical data collection, flood plain study of Slayter Creek, and if requested, provide design support, and construction phase services necessary to support the design process. The project within the limits described is referred to as Fergurson Parkway. A detailed scope of services is included as Exhibit ‘A’ and is made a part hereto. Article II COMPENSATION to be on the basis of the following: A. Basic Services: The CONSULTANT’s compensation for Basic Services included in Exhibit ‘A’ shall be based on a Fixed Fee of $3,996,310.00 which includes expenses such as prints, plots, photocopies, plans or documents on CD, DVD or memory devices, mileage, and other related expenses. Payment to the CONSULTANT shall be due in monthly installments based on the CONSULTANT’s estimate of the percentage of the contract completed during the billing period. TNP Firm Registrations Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors | Engineering Firm No. F-230 | Surveying Firm No. 10011600 | 10194381 | 10011601 Texas Board of Architectural Examiners Firm No. BR 2673 Project Name: Fergurson Parkway Client: City of Anna TNP Project #: ANN 22218 Date: 5/1/2026 Page 2 The original contract amount of $2,027,162.13 is amended to add $3,996,310.00. The new total compensation amount is $6,023,472.13. B. Additional Services: Services requested for the project but not included in the fixed fee for Basic Services are considered Additional Services. The CONSULTANT’s compensation for Additional Services included in Exhibit ‘B’ may be on a Fixed Fee, Hourly Reimbursable, or Unit Cost basis. Refer to Exhibit ‘C’ - Attachment 'A’ Compensation Summary for the compensation basis for Special Services. Fixed Fee Compensation for Additional Services: Payment shall be as described above for Basic Services. Hourly Reimbursable Compensation for Additional Services: Payment shall be due in monthly installments based on the amount of hours worked by each employee and the CONSULTANT’S current standard rates presented in Exhibit ‘B’ – Attachment ‘A’ Schedule of Fees. Unit Cost Compensation for Additional Services: Payment to CONSULTANT shall determined by the quantity (per Each or per LF) completed times the Unit Price reflected in Exhibit ‘B’ – Attachment ‘A’ Schedule of Fees. Payment shall be due in monthly installments based on the quantity completed during the billing period. C. Additional Services: Any service provided by the CONSULTANT which is not specifically described in the scope of work for this contract as defined above or delineated in an attachment shall be considered additional services. Additional services shall include, but shall not be limited to: 1.) Preparation of additional plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) delivery packages with related documents, for a multi-phase delivery with multiple PS&E delivery packages for Fergurson Parkway 2.) Separate municipal utility plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) and or separate utility letting. 3.) Route Study Alternative Analysis. 4.) Construction staking; and/or 5.) Construction inspection. Upon written authorization from the CLIENT, the CONSULTANT will perform Additional Services. Payment to the CONSULTANT for Additional Services shall be on a Fixed Fee or Hourly Reimbursable basis, as described above. D. Fees: Any permit fees, filing fees, or other fees related to the project and paid on behalf of the client by the CONSULTANT to other entities shall be invoiced at 1.15 times actual cost. E. Payment Terms: CLIENT shall be billed monthly for services rendered and pay promptly upon receipt of invoice. Delays of transmitting payments to CONSULTANT more than 30 days from invoice date may result in cessation of services until payment is received. If CONSULTANT stops work due to nonpayment, additional time equal to the delay shall be added to the project schedule described in Article III. F. Compensation Summary: A summary of project fees is included in Exhibit ‘C’. Project Name: Fergurson Parkway Client: City of Anna TNP Project #: ANN 22218 Date: 5/1/2026 Page 3 G. Funding: Agreement to this contract acknowledges available funding for the services to be provided by the CONSULTANT. Payment for the CONSULTANT’s services shall not be contingent upon the CLIENT’s available project-specific funds or anticipated future funding. Article III SCHEDULE: The proposed services shall begin within 10 working days of authorization to proceed. A project schedule is included as Exhibit 'E’ and made a part hereto. Article IV CONTRACT PROVISIONS: The document entitled “Contract Provisions” which are attached hereto is made a part hereof. This Authorization of Professional Services, together with the Contract Provisions and all other exhibits attached hereto are collectively referred to as the “Agreement”. Please execute and return a signed copy for our files. Receipt of an executed copy of this contract will serve as notice to proceed. No work shall commence on the project until CONSULTANT receives an executed copy of this contract. By signing below, the signer warrants that he or she is authorized to execute binding contracts for the CLIENT. Approved by CLIENT: Accepted by CONSULTANT: City of Anna Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc. By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: Firm Contact Information: Daniel McCullough, P.E. 5237 N. Riverside Drive, Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76137 817-336-5773 TNP Firm Registrations Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors | Engineering Firm No. F-230 | Surveying Firm No. 10011600 | 10194381 | 10011601 Texas Board of Architectural Examiners Firm No. BR 2673 5/1/2026 Principal, Director of Transportation Services Project Name: Fergurson Parkway Client: City of Anna TNP Project #: ANN 22218 Date: 5/1/2026 Page 4 CONTRACT PROVISIONS 1 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED Signing this agreement shall be construed as authorization by CLIENT for CONSULTANT to proceed with the work, unless otherwise provided for in this agreement. 2. DIRECT EXPENSES For Hourly Reimbursable payment terms, a fee equal to 3% of labor billings shall be included on each monthly invoice for prints, plots, photocopies, plans or documents on CD, DVD or memory devices, and mileage. No individual or separate accounting of these items will be performed by TNP. Fixed Fee totals include expenses such as prints, plots, photocopies, plans or documents on CD, DVD or memory devices, mileage, air fare, and lodging. 3. OUTSIDE SERVICES When technical or professional services are furnished by an outside source, subject to reasonable, timely and substantive objections of CLIENT, an additional amount shall be added to the cost of these services for CONSULTANT's administrative costs, as provided herein. 4. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST In providing opinions of probable cost, the CLIENT understands that CONSULTANT has no control over costs or the price of labor, equipment, or materials, or over the Contractor’s method of pricing, and that the opinions of probable cost provided to CLIENT are to be made on the basis of the design professional’s qualifications and experience. CONSULTANT makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. 5. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS The standard of care for all professional engineering and services performed or furnished by CONSULTANT shall be the care and skill ordinarily used by other members of the relevant profession in the same circumstances and type of work in the State of Texas, and with the same level of professional and technical soundness, accuracy, and adequacy of all design, drawings, specifications, and other work and materials furnished under this Authorization as other members of the same profession in the same circumstances and location. CONSULTANT makes no other warranty, expressed or implied. Subject to the above standards of care, CONSULTANT may use or rely upon design elements and information ordinarily or customarily furnished by others, including, but not limited to, specialty contractors, manufacturers, suppliers, and the publishers of technical standards. 6. TERMINATION Either CLIENT or CONSULTANT may terminate this authorization by giving 10 days written notice to the other party. In such event CLIENT shall forthwith pay CONSULTANT in full for all work previously authorized and performed prior to effective date of termination. If no notice of termination is given, relationships and obligations created by this Authorization shall be terminated upon completion of all applicable requirements of this Authorization. 7. LEGAL EXPENSES In the event legal action is brought by CLIENT or CONSULTANT against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs and expenses as may be set by the court. 8. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT Monthly invoices will be issued by CONSULTANT for all work performed under the terms of this agreement. Invoices are due and payable on receipt. If payment is not received within 30 days of invoice date, all work on CLIENT’s project shall cease and all work products and documents shall be withheld until payment is received by TNP. Time shall be added to the project schedule for any work stoppages resulting from CLIENT’s failure to render payment within 30 days of invoice date. Interest at the rate of 1½% per month will be charged on all past-due amounts, unless not permitted by law, in which case, interest will be charged at the highest amount permitted by law. 9. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Services not specified as Basic Services in Scope and Attachment ‘A’ will be provided by CONSULTANT as Additional Services when authorized by the CLIENT. Additional services will be paid for by CLIENT as indicated in Article II, Compensation. 10. SALES TAX In accordance with the State Sales Tax Codes, certain surveying services are taxable. Applicable sales tax is not included in the fee set forth and will be added on and collected when required by state law. Sales tax at the applicable rate will be indicated on invoice statements. 11. SURVEYING SERVICES In accordance with the Professional Land Surveying Practices Act of 1989, the CLIENT is informed that any complaints about surveying services may be forwarded to the Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 1917 S. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas 78741, (512) 440-7723. 12. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SERVICES The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners has jurisdiction over complaints regarding the professional practices of persons registered as landscape architects in Texas. The CLIENT is informed that any complaints about landscape architecture services be forwarded to the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, Hobby Building: 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-350, Austin, Texas 78701, Telephone (512) 305-9000, Fax (512) 305-8900. 13. INVALIDITY CLAUSE In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be held illegal, the enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not be impaired thereby. 14. PROJECT SITE SAFETY CONSULTANT has no duty or responsibility for project site safety. Project Name: Fergurson Parkway Client: City of Anna TNP Project #: ANN 22218 Date: 5/1/2026 Page 5 15. CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS AND JOBSITE SAFETY Means and methods of construction and jobsite safety are the sole responsibility of the contractor. CONSULTANT shall not: (I) at any time supervise, direct, control, or have authority over any contractor’s work, or (ii) be responsible for construction site safety, the means and methods of construction or the safety precautions a selected or used by any contractor. CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for any decisions, acts or omissions of any constructor. 16. OWNER RESPONSIBILITY CLIENT shall be responsible for all requirements and instructions that it furnishes to CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, and for the accuracy and completeness of all programs, reports, data, and other information furnished by CLIENT to CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement CONSULTANT may use and rely upon such requirements, programs, instructions, reports, data, and information in performing or furnishing services under this Agreement, subject to any express limitations or reservations applicable to the furnished items. CLIENT shall give prompt written notice to CONSULTANT whenever CLIENT observes or otherwise becomes aware of: (i) any hazardous materials or matters that affect the scope or time of performance of CONSULTANT's services; or (ii) any defect or nonconformance in CONSULTANT’s services or the contractor’s work. 17. SITE VISITS In the event the Scope of work requires CONSULTANT to make site visits to observe contractor’s work on a Project, such visits and observations are not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the Work or to involve detailed inspections of the work, but rather are to be limited to spot checking, selective sampling, and similar methods of general observation of the work based on CONSULTANT’s exercise of professional judgment. CONSULTANT will have no responsibility for any defects in the work not actually discovered by CONSULTANT during such site visits. 18. CHOICE OF LAW; VENUE This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas without regard to applicable principles of conflicts of law. Each of the parties hereto irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of any federal or state court located within Tarrant County, Texas, in connection with any matter based upon, arising out of, or contemplated in this Agreement or the matters. 19. DOCUMENTS A. All documents prepared by CONSULTANT (“Documents”) are instruments of service, and CONSULTANT shall retain an ownership and property interest therein (including the copyright and the right of reuse at the discretion of the CONSULTANT) whether or not the subject project (“Project”) is completed. CLIENT may make and retain copies of Documents for information and reference in connection with the use of the Documents on the Project., and will have a limited license to use the Documents only on the Project, extensions of the Project, and for related uses, subject to receipt by CONSULTANT of full payment due and owing for all services relating to preparation of the Documents, may not be used unless completed and not for any work or purpose not intended. B. CLIENT and CONSULTANT may transmit, and shall accept, Project-related correspondence, Documents, text, data, drawings, information, and graphics, in electronic media or digital format, either directly, or through access to a secure Project website, in accordance with a mutually agreeable protocol. 20. ATTORNEY FEES In the event that any suit or action over the enforcement, interpretation or other matter emanating from this Agreement, the prevailing party in such dispute shall be entitled to recover from the losing party all fees, costs and expenses of enforcing any right of such prevailing party under or with respect to this Agreement, including without limitation, such reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys and accountants, which shall include, without limitation, all fees, costs and expenses of appeals. 21. MISCELLANEOUS This Agreement is binding on and will inure to the benefit of each of the parties and their respective successors and legal representatives. Neither party may assign this Agreement in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the other party. There are no third party beneficiaries. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon the parties. non- enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 1 of 50 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A BASIC SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER TO THE CITY FERGUSON PARKWAY from ELM STREET to COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP CSJ: 0918-24-249 Collin County, Texas Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (Engineer or Provider) shall provide engineering services required for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) with related bid documents, provide Utility Engineering and Coordination Services, and ROW Acquisition Services for Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop in Collin County and the City of Anna (City). Teague Nall and Perkins shall assist the City’s compliance with TxDOT’s – Texas Department of Transportation’s (State or TxDOT) Project Delivery Process. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Engineer shall provide engineering services required for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) and related documents, for Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop in Collin County (1.553 miles). These services may include, but are not limited to, preparing roadway and bridge design, hydrologic and hydraulic design, survey, water & sanitary sewer design, illumination, ROW acquisition, subsurface utility engineering and geotechnical data collection, flood plain study of Slayter Creek, and if requested, provide design support, and construction phase services necessary to support the design process. The project within the limits described is referred to as Fergurson Parkway. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 2 of 50 Exhibit A PROJECT LOCATION MAP BASIC SERVICES (SUMMARY) See corresponding function code (FC) sections for detailed scope descriptions. A. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 110 - ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 1. The Engineer shall acquire all necessary data to prepare the project PS&E. The PS&E developed following TxDOT Dallas District’s delivery process and procedure as administered by the TxDOT Dallas LG office. 2. The Engineer shall confirm design criteria consistent with the Schematic’s DSR and AFA federal requirements. 3. The Engineer shall provide a preliminary project delivery cost opinion (ASED). 4. The Engineer will host a Design Concept Conference (DCC) or Project Kickoff Meeting with TxDOT Dallas LG Office to seek concurrence for design criteria. B. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 120 – SOCIAL / ECON / ENV STUDIES 1. The Engineer shall assist with up to 4 informal stakeholder meetings. 2. Engineer shall incorporate EPIC sheets. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 3 of 50 Exhibit A 3. Engineer shall complete PS&E Stage Gate Checklists. C. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 130 – RIGHT-OF-WAY SURVEY / MAPPING 1. The Engineer shall provide ROW mapping services. D. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 135 – UTILITY ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION 1. The Engineer shall complete Utility Engineering Investigation. 2. The Engineer shall assist the City’s responsible lead providing utility adjustment coordination services. E. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 145 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 1. The Engineer shall provide up to 19 months of project management and coordination services. F. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 150 - DESIGN SURVEY 1. The Engineer shall provide design survey for the project. 2. The Engineer shall provide a post-construction survey of the Slayter Creek Bridge. G. FUNCTION CODE 160 – ROADWAY DESIGN 1. The Engineer shall refine the Schematic’s Geometric Design per City direction and TxDOT’s concurrence prior to 30% PS&E submittal. 2. The Engineering shall develop Roadway Plan and Profiles drawings. 3. The Engineer shall develop Roadway Typical Sections. 4. The Engineer shall develop Intersection Layouts for side streets. 5. The Engineer shall develop a 3D model of the proposed roadway to determine cut and fill quantities. 6. The Engineer shall develop Supporting Roadway Plan Sheets. 7. The Engineer will select applicable roadway standards. 8. The Engineer will develop a pavement design. 9. The Engineer shall develop roadway quantities. H. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 161 – DRAINAGE DESIGN 1. The engineer shall provide drainage data collection services. 2. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydrologic modeling to accommodate the final roadway design for the Slayter Creek Bridge. 3. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydraulic modeling and technical memo to accommodate the final bridge design for Slayter Creek Bridge. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 4 of 50 Exhibit A 4. The Engineer shall develop a longitudinal storm drain system design consistent with the approved schematic design. 5. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic modeling and technical memo to accommodate the final roadway design for 4 Non-Bridge Class Culverts. 6. The Engineer will develop temporary drainage facilities to accommodate construction sequencing. 7. The Engineer will develop a Scour Analysis for Slayter creek bridge. 8. The Engineer will notify the City of necessary USACOE permits. 9. The Engineer will develop necessary Plan Sheets for the drainage design. 10. The engineer will complete a Slayter Creek Flood Plain Study consisting of a CLOMR, LOMR, and Dam Breach Analysis. I. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 162 – SIGNING / PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1. The Engineer shall prepare drawings, specifications, and details for all signs and pavement markings. J. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 163 – MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY DESIGN 1. The Engineer shall complete a Geotechnical Investigation and provide a Geotechnical Report and provide a pavement design. 2. The Engineer shall develop a Retaining wall Design(s) and Retaining Wall Layouts. 3. The Engineer shall prepare traffic control plans (TCP) including TCP typical sections, for the project. 4. The Engineer shall provide an Illumination Design and Layouts. 5. The Engineer shall develop SWP3, in conformance with the TCP, to minimize potential impact to receiving waterways. 6. The engineer shall develop and assemble plans for the following TxDOT Milestones: PBLR, 30%, 60%, 95%, and 100%. 7. The Engineer will provide support for up to 5 ROW Hearings. 8. The Engineer shall independently develop and report quantities necessary to construct the contract in the standard State bid format at the specified milestones and final PS&E submittals. 9. The Engineer shall prepare a detailed contract time estimate. 10. The Engineer shall identify necessary standard specifications, special specifications, special provisions, and the appropriate reference items and provide them in the format required by the State. 11. The Engineer shall provide quality review of the constructability of the PS&E sets. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 5 of 50 Exhibit A K. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 170 – BRIDGE DESIGN 1. The engineer shall prepare a bridge layout plan sheet for Slayter Creek Bridge and submit a 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM). 2. The Engineer shall prepare Slayter Creek Bridge structural design and develop detailed structural drawings of all required details. 3. The Engineer shall prepare a Bridge Detail Summary. L. TXDOT FUNCTION CODE 351 – CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1. The Engineer shall provide construction phase services at the written request of the City. The written request must include a description of the work requested, a mutually agreed upon time limit, and any special instructions for coordination and submittal. 2. The Engineer shall provide record drawings based on contractor red-line plans to the City upon completion of construction effort. M. TASK 500: RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISTION SERVICES 1. ROW acquisition tasks will be completed according to TxDOT & federal standards to ensure compliance for reimbursement purposes. N. TASK 600: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DESIGN 1. The Engineer shall provide Design of approximately 6,400 LF of 12” water line and 580 LF of 12” sanitary sewer line relocations along Ferguson Parkway from Taylor Blvd. to Collin County Outer Loop. For the purposes of this scope, it is assumed that the existing 12” water line along the Pecan Grove development will be replaced with a 12” water line. It is also assumed that the new 12” water line will be installed by bore under Slayter Creek. ITEMS PROVIDED BY THE CITY The City of Anna shall provide available information and assist the Engineer with Project Delivery Responsibilities. See Exhibit E for a description of items and services to be provided by the City. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional Services not included in Basic Services include but are not limited to the following list. See Exhibit B for a description of Additional Services. 1. Additional PS&E Deliveries for phased delivery or separate utility letting. 2. Environmental Reevaluation 3. Public Involvement 4. Environmental Exhibits. 5. Signal Design Services Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 6 of 50 Exhibit A 6. Landscaping / Irrigation Design Services 7. Primary Utility Coordination Responsibility 8. Utility Agreements 9. Utility Verification. 10. Engineering Testimony for ROW Hearings 11. Construction Engineering / Inspection Services. COMPENSATION Based on the Project Description above and our understanding of the project paraments, we have prepared an itemized scope of services. The following represents our proposed fees for the various tasks associated with the project. Unless stated, the proposed fee is a maximum amount. The sum of the fees is the recommended amount for the contract. A description of each item can be found on the following pages. See Exhibit C Schedule of Fees for an itemized fee schedule. Basic Services FC 110 Route and Design Studies $60,140.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 120 Social, Economic, and Environmental Studies $21,340.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 130 ROW Survey / Mapping $83,870.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 135 Utility Engineering Investigation $324,240.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 145 Project Management and Administration $180,080.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 150 Design Survey $61,745.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 160 Roadway Design $726,040.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 161 Drainage Design $683,520.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 162 Signing / Pavement Markings $64,930.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 163 Miscellaneous Design $754,520.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 170 Bridge Design $149,165.00 (Fixed Fee) FC 351 Construction Phase Services $48,220.00 (Fixed Fee) Task 500: ROW Acquisition Services $658,500.00 (Fixed Fee) Task 600: Water and Sanitary Sewer Design $180,000.00 (Fixed Fee) Total: $3,996,310.00 (Fixed Fee) Additional Services Fees for additional services will be negotiated at the time those services are requested by the City. Contract rates used for Basic Services are valid for 2026. Since the date at which the additional services will be requested is uncertain, listed rates will be escalated for subsequent calendar years. See Exhibit C – Attachment A for additional services fees. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 7 of 50 Exhibit A 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. 1.1. Design Criteria. The Engineer shall prepare all work in accordance with applicable AASHTO & TxDOT procedures, specifications, manuals, guidelines, standard drawings, and standard specifications or previously approved special provisions and special specifications, which include: A. PS&E Preparation Manual, published by TxDOT. B. TxDOT Local Government Projects Toolkit. C. (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, (7th Edition, 2018). D. Proposed Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way (PROWAG). E. AASHTO Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities. F. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges (latest Edition), published by TxDOT. G. FHWA’s Urban Drainage Design Manual (HEC-22). H. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), (2025 Edition) I. (AASHTO), Drainage Manual, (2014 Edition) J. Geotechnical Manual - LRFD, published by TxDOT. K. (AASHTO), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, (10th Edition) L. Bridge Project Development Manual, published by TxDOT. M. TxDOT Bridge Detailing Guide, N. Bridge Design Manual-Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), published by TxDOT. O. (AASHTO) Roadway Lighting Design Guide, (7th Edition) P. Traffic and Safety Analysis Procedural Manual (TASP), published by TxDOT. Q. TxDOT Survey Manual, published by TxDOT. R. other TxDOT-approved manuals and guides. The Engineer shall follow the TxDOT district guidelines in preparing the plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) package and prepare each PS&E package in a form suitable for letting through City of Anna’s construction contract bidding and awarding process. The Engineer shall design the project according to the above listed AASHTO or TxDOT design criteria. The Engineer shall supply project-specific design criteria (e.g., typical sections, estimate, design exceptions) to be inserted into the design elements form for discussion at the design concept conference (DCC). 1.2. Coordination. The Engineer shall coordinate issues and communications with the State’s (Texas Department of Transportation or TxDOT) internal resource areas through TxDOT’s Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 8 of 50 Exhibit A project manager. The State will communicate the resolution of issues and provide the Engineer direction through the State’s project manager. The Engineer shall notify the City and coordinate with adjacent engineers on all controls at project interfaces. The Engineer shall document the coordination effort, and each engineer must provide written concurrence regarding the agreed project controls and interfaces. In the event the Engineer and the other adjacent engineers are unable to agree, the Engineer shall meet with the City and each adjacent engineer for resolution. The City will have authority over these disagreements and the City’s decision will be final. 1.3. Progress Reporting and Invoicing. The Engineer shall invoice according to Function Code breakdowns shown in Exhibit A – Services to be Provided by the Engineer, of this contract, and Exhibit C – Fee Schedule. The Engineer shall submit each invoice in a format acceptable to the State. The Engineer shall prepare a design time schedule. The schedule must indicate tasks, subtasks, critical dates, milestones, deliverables, and review requirements in a format that depicts their interdependence. The Engineer shall assist City & State personnel in interpreting the schedule. The Engineer shall schedule milestone submittals at 30%, 60%, 95% and final project completion phases. The Engineer shall advise the City & State in writing if the Engineer is not able to meet the scheduled milestone review date. 1.4. Traffic Control. The Engineer shall provide all planning, labor, and equipment to develop and to execute each traffic control plan (TCP) needed by the Engineer to perform services under this contract The Engineer shall comply with the requirements of the 2025 edition of the TMUTCD. The Engineer shall submit a copy of each TCP to the City for approval prior to commencing any work on any City roadway. The Engineer shall notify the City in writing 24 hours in advance of executing each TCP requiring a lane closure and shall have received written concurrence from the City prior to beginning the lane closure. The Engineer’s field crew must possess a copy of the approved TCP on the job site at all times and shall make the TCP available to the City for inspection upon request. The Engineer shall assign charges for any required traffic control to the applicable function code. 1.5. Right-of-Entry. The Engineer shall notify the City and secure permission utilizing the City’s current form to enter private property to perform any surveying, environmental, engineering, or geotechnical activities needed off City right-of-way. The Engineer shall not commit acts that would result in damages to private property. The Engineer shall make every effort to comply with the wishes and address the concerns of affected private property owners. Prior to entering private property, the Engineer shall contact each property owner and obtain written approval from the City. Right of entry permission must be written and signed by the property owner. The Engineer shall not distribute letters or other materials seeking right of entry without prior approval of the City. Letters or other materials seeking right of entry must Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 9 of 50 Exhibit A state the kinds of activities for which right of entry is requested and indicate the impacts (if any) that might result from performance of the activities. 1.6. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC). The Engineer shall provide the Engineer’s QA and QC manual, guide, or process to the City. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of their internal review and mark-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red line mark-ups are submitted. The City’s project manager may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal mark- up (red lines) or comments developed as part the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal mark-ups are requested by the City in advance, the City may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal mark-up document. 1.7. Organization of Plan Sheets. The Engineer shall complete and organize the PS&E package in accordance with the latest edition of the TxDOT PS&E Preparation Manual. The Engineer shall ensure that the PS&E package is suitable for the bidding and awarding of a construction contract and that the PS&E package is in accordance with the latest TxDOT & City policies and procedures, and the district’s PS&E checklist. 1.8. Underground excavation. If necessary, the Engineer shall contact the Texas Excavation Safety System, Inc. (DIGTESS) or call telephone number 811 to have underground utilities marked prior to digging holes for right of way monuments, utility engineering investigation, geotechnical investigation, or other purposes. The Engineer shall separately contact utilities that are not a part of the DIGTESS organization. The Engineer shall maintain documentation of all notification calls. The Engineer shall comply with Texas’ excavation laws. 1.9. Preventative Measures to Prevent the Spread of Oak Wilt Disease Contamination. The Engineer shall take the following preventive measures while cutting, pruning, or removing oak trees in counties that have confirmed cases of oak wilt disease or when directed by the State: A. When possible, employ alternative methods instead of pruning or cutting oak trees. B. When possible, perform necessary pruning and cutting of healthy trees during January or February when sap beetles are least active. C. Treat wounds with pruning paint in oak wilt disease infected counties to discourage insects, especially during warm weather. D. Sterilize all pruning tools between each use on each tree with either Lysol spray or a 70 percent rubbing alcohol solution. E. Dispose of the tree cuttings by burning, burying, or another approved method. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 10 of 50 Exhibit A 1.10. Training Requirements. A. Each key staff member of the Engineer’s project team that is performing or overseeing design or plan review tasks must complete the Environmental Management System (EMS) courses prescribed by the State prior to working on the project. The required training for key staff members on the design project team is listed on the EMS training matrix, which may be accessed at: https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/env/ems/070-04-fig.pdf. The courses listed on the EMS training matrix are e-learning (online), unless otherwise noted as classroom learning. Information about these online courses may be accessed at: https://www.txdot.gov/inside- txdot/division/environmental/ems-courses.html. The Engineer shall ensure that each key staff member of the Engineer’s project team that will be performing or overseeing design or plan review tasks has completed the required training listed on the EMS training matrix prior to working on the project. In addition, the Engineer shall ensure that the required training is repeated by each key staff member of the project team based on the repeat requirements stated in the EMS training matrix. TASK DESCRIPTIONS AND FUNCTION CODES The Engineer shall categorize each task performed to correspond with the Function Codes (FC) and Task Descriptions. FUNCTION CODE 110 – ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 110.1. Data Collection and Field Reconnaissance. The Engineer shall collect, review, and evaluate data described below. The Engineer shall notify the City in writing whenever the Engineer finds disagreement with the information or documents. A. Data, if available from the City, including as-built plans, existing schematics, right of way maps, utility engineering investigation mapping, existing cross sections, existing planimetric mapping, environmental documents, existing channel and drainage easement data, existing traffic counts, accident data, bridge inspection records, project management information system (PMIS) data, identified endangered species, identified hazardous material sites, current unit bid price information, current special provisions, special specifications, and standard drawings. B. Documents for existing and proposed development along proposed route from local municipalities and local ordinances related to project development C. Utility plans and documents from appropriate municipalities and agencies D. Flood plain information and studies from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), local municipalities, and other governmental agencies E. Conduct field reconnaissance and collect data including a photographic record of notable existing features. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 11 of 50 Exhibit A 110.2. Design Criteria. The Engineer shall develop the roadway design criteria based on the controlling factors specified by the City. In addition, the Engineer shall prepare the Design Summary Report (DSR) and submit it electronically at each deliverable milestone. 110.3. Preliminary Cost Estimates (ASED). The Engineer shall update and maintain a preliminary cost opinion using the average low bid unit price. The Engineer shall estimate the total project cost including preliminary engineering, final engineering, right of way (ROW) acquisition, environmental compliance and mitigation, construction, utility relocation, and construction engineering inspection (CEI). 110.4. Design Concept Conference (or TxDOT PS&E Kickoff Meeting). The Engineer shall plan, attend, and document the Design Concept Conference (DCC) or TxDOT Kickoff Meeting to be held prior to the 30 percent milestone submittal. In preparation for the DCC, the Engineer shall complete a TxDOT Design Summary Report (DSR) to serve as a checklist for the minimum required design considerations. DEL.110. Deliverables for FC 110. A. Documents collected B. Preliminary DSR C. Final DSR D. Preliminary cost estimate (ASED) E. Documentation of DCC (or TxDOT PS&E Kickoff Meeting) FUNCTION CODE 120 (120) – SOCIAL / ECON / ENV STUDIES 120.1. Informal Meetings (Up to 4). The Engineer shall provide technical assistance with, preparation of exhibits for, and minutes of informal meetings with individual stakeholders to discuss the pending impacts to neighborhoods and businesses due to roadway shutdowns, detours and access restrictions, or deemed necessary by the City. 120.2. Environmental Permits Issues and Commitments (EPIC) Sheets. The Engineer shall incorporate the latest version of the EPIC sheets using information developed for the environmental documentation. 120.3. Review Environmental Documentation. The Engineer shall review the final environmental document for implementation into the PS&E package. The Engineer shall consider constructability issues as they relate to the environmental impacts. The engineer shall complete PS&E Stage Gate Checklist (FORM 2443). DEL.120. Deliverables for FC 120. A. Stakeholder Meeting exhibits and minutes B. EPIC Sheet C. Stage Gate Checklist Form 2443 (30%, 60%, 95%, Final) Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 12 of 50 Exhibit A FUNCTION CODE 130 – RIGHT-OF-WAY SURVEY / MAPPING 130.1. Right of Way (ROW) Mapping. The Engineer shall provide ROW mapping services including the following tasks. A. Abstracting The Engineer shall obtain copies of all existing ownership documents for the parent tracts along with all subdivision plats and recorded documents defining existing easements within, along or intersecting the existing ROW, and prepare an abstract map. B. Field Surveys The Engineer shall locate and set additional horizontal and vertical control points, as necessary, at a maximum spacing distance of 1,500 feet; field locate property corners, existing ROW markers, improvements, and visible utilities; verify and update the planimetric file; and, as directed by the State, perform the following: 1. Obtain right of entry to survey on private property and prepare a spreadsheet of the information. 2. Locate existing horizontal and vertical control and verify the control information, locate property corners, and update the planimetric information with any missing visible improvements or visible utilities. The Engineer shall base all field work and calculations on the current controls and datum provided by the State. C. Property Description The Engineer shall prepare a property description for each parcel or tract in the form of a preliminary and a final deliverable. Each part of a property description must be signed and sealed by a registered professional land surveyor (RPLS). The Engineer shall prepare preliminary property descriptions for review by the State. 1. Metes and bounds descriptions The Engineer shall prepare a metes and bounds description for each parcel of land to be acquired. The Engineer shall follow the standard formats for metes and bounds descriptions that TxDOT has developed. 2. Parcel plats The Engineer shall prepare a parcel plat for each parcel of land to be acquired. The Engineer shall follow the standard formats for parcel plats that the State has developed. If requested by the Engineer, the State will provide copies of the standard formats. Parcel plats must include all items of information shown on the ROW map that concerns the individual parcel. D. Final Deliverables The Engineer shall prepare final deliverables. The Engineer shall set appropriate monuments on the proposed ROW lines at intersecting property lines, and at all points of curvature (PC), points of Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 13 of 50 Exhibit A tangency (PT), angle points, intersecting ROW lines of side streets, and at 1,500 foot stations. The Engineer shall set appropriate monuments on the existing ROW lines in areas of no acquisition at all PCs, PTs, angle points, and 1,500 foot stations, and as directed by the State. The Engineer shall set appropriate monuments at intersecting property lines with the new ROW lines. The Engineer shall prepare the final ROW (ArcGIS) database template “ROW_Parcels Edits” populated with the final parcels, final alignment, and project control points in ArcGIS 10.6.1 format or the current version in use by the State. The Engineer shall prepare final, signed, sealed, and dated Property Descriptions. E. Traditional ROW Map The Engineer shall prepare a traditional ROW map for the specific work location consisting of the existing and proposed ROW lines. The Engineer shall work closely with adjoining engineers to incorporate all relevant information. The Engineer shall prepare the following: 1. a preliminary ROW map for review purposes; 2. an initial ROW map for review purposes; and 3. a final ROW map. F. The Engineer shall prepare a ROW project cover sheet using the Microsoft Word document template. The ROW project cover sheet must contain the highway, project limits, county, RCSJ, CCSJ, length of project, equations and exceptions, begin and end project information, datum statement, utility table, and signature lines for acquisition. G. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA and QC) The Engineer shall conduct a QA and QC review and prepare a check list for each task performed. The Engineer shall prepare a surveyor’s report regarding their survey procedures, findings, and decisions made. DEL.130. Deliverables for FC 130. A. Scanned copies of the ownership documents B. One paper copy of the abstract map and the associated MicroStation graphics files C. Spreadsheet showing property owners and right of entry information D. Scanned copies of the field notes, control data sheets and a graphics file of all field survey data E. One paper copy of the preliminary property descriptions and an electronic copy in PDF format Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 14 of 50 Exhibit A F. One paper set of the final property descriptions, signed and sealed by an RPLS, and the associated electronic files in PDF and Word formats G. Bentley MicroStation parcel plat graphics files and master reference files (MRF) H. One 11” x 17” paper copy of the preliminary ROW map and the associated MicroStation and GIS graphics files I. One 11” x 17” paper copy of the final ROW map and the associated MicroStation and GIS graphics files J. PDF of the final ROW map K. Two 8.5” x 11” paper copies of the ROW project cover sheet and the associated Word document file. L. Documentation stating that the appropriate monuments were set on the existing and proposed ROW lines M. A copy of TxDOT’s ROW map checklist signed by the surveyor N. A copy of the surveyor’s report signed by the surveyor FUNCTION CODE 135 – UTILITY ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION 135.1. Utility Engineering Investigation (Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)). A. Existing Records (Quality Level D) The Engineer shall: 1. Perform records research from all available resources. Sources might include: Texas811, Railroad Commission of Texas (Texas RRC), verbal recollection, as-built information from plans, plats, permits and any other applicable information provided by the utility owners or other stakeholders. 2. Document utility owners and contact information 3. Create a utility drawing of information gathered B. Surface Visible Feature Survey (Quality Level C) The Engineer shall: 1. In combination with existing Quality Level D information, utilize surveyed above-ground utility features and professional judgement to upgrade Quality Level D information to Quality Level C. For those utilities unable to be upgraded, retain as Quality Level D. 2. Gather and depict overhead utilities information. Sag elevations of lowest utility must be documented at road crossings, per best practices document 3. Gather storm and sanitary sewer information from Level D and upgrade to Level C as possible, unless otherwise directed by the State 4. Include mapping of underground vaults Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 15 of 50 Exhibit A 5. Create composite utility drawing of information gathered C. Designate (Quality Level B) The Engineer shall: 1. Compile as-built information from plans, plats, and other location data as provided by the utility owners 2. Coordinate with utility owner when utility owner's policy is to designate their own facilities at no cost for preliminary survey purposes. Examine utility owner's work to ensure accuracy and completeness 3. Designate, record, and mark the horizontal location of the existing utility facilities and their service laterals to existing buildings using non- destructive surface geophysical techniques. Use a non-water base paint, utilizing the American Public Works Association (APWA) color code scheme, on all surface markings of underground utilities. 4. Correlate utility owner records with designating data and resolve discrepancies using professional judgment. Prepare and deliver to the State a color-coded composite utility facility plan with utility owner names, quality levels, line sizes and subsurface utility locate (test hole) locations. Deliver the electronic file in a format acceptable to the State. Submit a hard copy of the utility facility plan that has been signed, sealed, and dated by the Engineer to the State. When requested by the State, overlay the designated utility information on the State’s design plans. 5. Determine and inform the State of the approximate utility depths at critical locations as determined by the State 6. Provide a monthly summary of work completed and in process with adequate detail to verify compliance with agreed work schedule 7. Close-out permits as required and provide documentation of close-out to the State. 8. Clearly identify all utilities that were discovered from quality levels C and D investigation that cannot be depicted in quality level B standards. These utilities must have a unique line style and symbology in the designate (Quality Level B) deliverable. 9. Comply with all applicable State policy and procedural manuals D. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Service (Quality Level A) The Engineer shall: 1. Review requested test hole locations and advise the State in the development of an appropriate locate (test hole) work plan relative to the existing utility infrastructure and proposed highway design elements. 2. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as required by law or utility owner policy. 3. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole data sheet that has been sealed and dated by the Engineer: Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 16 of 50 Exhibit A a. Elevation of top and bottom of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan b. Minimum of two benchmarks utilized. Elevations must be within an accuracy of 15mm (.591 inches) of utilized benchmarks c. Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location d. Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum e. Outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks and configuration of non-encased multi-conduit systems f. Utility facility material g. Utility facility condition h. Pavement thickness and type i. Coating/wrapping information and condition j. Unusual circumstances or field conditions 4. Excavate test holes in such a manner as to prevent any damage to wrappings, coatings, cathodic protection, and other protective coverings and features. Water excavation must not be utilized without prior written approval from the appropriate City of Anna district office. 5. Back fill all excavations with appropriate material, compact backfill by mechanical means, and restore pavement and surface material. The Engineer is responsible for the integrity of the backfill and surface restoration for a period of three years. Install a marker ribbon throughout the backfill. 6. Furnish and install a permanent above ground marker (as specified by the State, directly above center line of the utility facility. 7. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material. Provide complete restoration of worksite and landscape to equal or better condition than before excavation. If a worksite and landscape is not appropriately restored, the Engineer shall return to correct the condition at no extra charge to the State. 8. Submit plans, profiles, and test hole data sheets to the State. Conduct a review of the findings with the State. 9. Close-out permits as required 10. Plot utility location position information to scale and provide a comprehensive utility plan signed and sealed by the responsible engineer. 135.2. Utility Adjustment Coordination. The Engineer shall provide utility adjustment coordination services as described below: A. Utility Base Map The Engineer shall obtain information on existing utilities from utility owners and shall conduct investigations to identify and evaluate all known existing and proposed public and private utilities. The Engineer shall identify potential conflicts Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 17 of 50 Exhibit A and attempt to minimize the potential adverse utility impacts in the preparation of the schematic design. The Engineer shall prepare a base map depicting the utility locations. The Engineer shall create and maintain a utility conflict matrix along with a utility conflict exhibit through the duration of the contract identifying potential known conflicts. The format of the matrix and exhibit must be consistent with the latest version of the Dallas District Utility Conflict Matrix and Utility Conflict Exhibit or other examples provided by the State. B. Utility Coordination 1. Review Utility Relocation and Traffic Control Plans (up to 7 utility adjustments). 2. Attend Utility Coordination Meetings (Monthly up to 18 months, and at each submittal - Total of 22). 3. Attend monthly Progress Meeting with Design Team (up to 18 months). C. Attend monthly Progress Meeting with Design Team (up to 18 months).Deliverables 1. Utility Conflict Matrix along with Utility Conflict Exhibit. The Utility Conflict Exhibit must be on 11x17 sheets and include callouts to indicate the conflict ID#, utility owner, type of line (water, sewer, high pressure gas, etc.), material (if it is an AC pipeline), and size (if known). 2. Utility Contacts list in excel and pdf format 3. Utility Summary to indicate major utility facilities or time sensitive items pertaining to utilities that need to be addressed in PS&E. 4. Prepare and send Notice of Proposed Construction (NOPC) letters to each utility company. 5. Prepare ASED for estimated utility relocations at each submittal DEL.135. Deliverables for FC 135. A. A utility drawing showing the information gathered during the utility engineering investigation, including all underground utilities and all above ground appurtenance locations B. Initial project notification letters C. Utility contact list FUNCTION CODE 145 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 145.1. Project Management and Coordination. The Engineer assumes up to 19 months of project management and shall: A. Direct and provide communication with the City, TxDOT, and internal project team for all activities associated with the project to comply with City & State policies and procedures and deliver that work on time. 1. Meet on a scheduled basis with the City to review project progress. Prepare, distribute, and file both written and electronic correspondence. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 18 of 50 Exhibit A 2. Coordinate with Right of Way Services on negotiations, property owner disputes, and property access. B. Manage and oversee all subconsultant activity including quality of and consistency of plans and administration of the monthly progress reports. C. Prepare monthly invoicing and written progress reports. D. Develop and maintain on a monthly basis a detailed project schedule to track project conformance to Exhibit C, Work Schedule. E. TxDOT EMS Training DEL.145. Deliverables for FC 145. A. Monthly progress reports B. Project schedule, updated monthly C. Meeting minutes D. Documentation of phone calls E. Monthly Invoices FUNCTION CODE 150 – DESIGN SURVEY 150.1. Survey Tasks to be Completed. A. Design Surveys 1. The Engineer shall perform design surveys for roadway segments in Table 150.1 – Design Surveys. Survey supplemental topo will be collected and incorporated into a continuous final planimetric survey deliverable. Table 150.1 – Design Surveys Roadway Beginning Station Ending Station Ferguson Parkway 10+00 97+00 2. The Engineer shall perform tasks including the following: a. Obtain or collect data to create cross-sections and digital terrain models (DTMs) b. Locate existing visible utilities c. Locate topographical features and existing improvements d. Provide details of existing bridge structures e. Provide details of existing drainage features, (e.g., culverts, manholes, inlets) f. Locate wetlands as marked by other Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 19 of 50 Exhibit A g. Establish additional and verify existing control points. Horizontal and Vertical control ties must be made and tabulated, to other control points in the vicinity, which were established by other sources such as, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS), and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and other entities as directed by the State h. Locate existing right of way i. Review right of way maps j. Locate boreholes k. Perform hydrographic cross-section surveys l. Update existing control data and prepare survey control data sheets, as directed by the State for inclusion into a construction plan set m. Prepare a survey control index sheet and horizontal and vertical control sheets, which must be signed, sealed and dated by the professional engineer in direct responsible charge of the surveying and the responsible RPLS for insertion into the plan set n. ENGINEER will provide all the office and field work necessary to perform As-Built Survey of Ferguson Parkway over Slater Creek DEL.150. Deliverables for FC 150. A. TxDOT Form 2462 for each primary and secondary control point. This form must be submitted electronically in PDF format and in the original format of its creation. This must be signed and sealed by the responsible RPLS. B. Digital Terrain Models (DTM) and the Triangular Irregular Network (TIN) files in a format acceptable by the State. C. Maps, plans, or sketches prepared by the Engineer showing the results of field surveys D. Computer printouts or other tabulations summarizing the results of field surveys E. Digital files or media acceptable by the State containing field survey data (ASCII Data files) F. Maps, plats, plans, sketches, or other documents acquired from utility companies, private corporations, or other public agencies, the contents of which are relevant to the survey G. Field survey notes, as electronic and hard copies H. An 8 ½ -inch by 11-inch survey control data sheet for each control point I. A digital and hard copy of all computer printouts of horizontal and vertical conventional traverses, GPS analysis and results, and survey control data sheets J. All OpenRoads files K. Survey reports in a format requested by the State Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 20 of 50 Exhibit A L. Bridge As-Built Survey FUNCTION CODE 160 – ROADWAY DESIGN 160.1. Geometric Design. A. Refine Schematic When a schematic is provided by the City, the Engineer shall: 1. Refine the horizontal and vertical alignment of the design schematic in U.S. customary units for main lanes, ramps, direct connectors, frontage roads, side streets, including grade separation structures. The Engineer shall determine vertical clearances at grade separations and overpasses, taking into account the appropriate percent grade and super-elevation rate. Minor modifications in the alignment must be considered to provide optimal design. Modifications must be coordinated with the State and adjacent Engineers. 2. Not proceed to the 30% milestone submittal or start working on the bridge layouts until the State has approved the refined schematic. 160.2. Roadway – Plan and Profile Drawings. The Engineer shall prepare roadway plan and profile drawings that consist of a planimetric file of existing features and files of the proposed improvements. The roadway base map must contain line work that depicts existing surface features obtained from the schematic drawing. Existing major subsurface and surface utilities must be shown if requested by the State. Existing and proposed right of way lines must be shown. Depending on the width of the pavement, the plan view and profile view may be shown on separate sheets or the same sheets for the following roadways: A. Mainlanes B. Side Streets C. Trail Facilities 160.3. Typical Sections. A. The Engineer shall prepare existing typical sections for all existing roadways. Existing typical sections must reflect existing pavement structures. B. The Engineer shall prepare proposed typical sections for all proposed roadways. 160.4. Side Street Intersection Layouts. The Engineer shall provide an intersection layout detailing the pavement design and drainage design at the intersection of each side street. The layout must include the horizontal alignments, curb returns, geometrics, transition length, stationing, pavement, contours, drainage details, and Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) and PROWAG compliance items. The Engineer shall design for full pavement width to the ROW and provide a transition to the existing roadway. The Engineer shall prepare intersection layouts for the side streets shown in Table 160.5 -Side Streets. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 21 of 50 Exhibit A Table 160.5 – Side Streets Side Street Name Left or Right Taylor Blvd/CR 367 Right Pistachio Dr Left Burl Ln Right Fosters Crossing Left/Right Collin County Outer Loop Left/Right 160.5. Cut and Fill Quantities. A. The Engineer shall develop an OpenRoads generated 3D corridor model to be used for an earthwork analysis to determine cut and fill quantities. B. The Engineer shall provide final design cross sections at 50’ intervals for mainlanes and major side streets. Cross sections must be created from the 3D corridor model and must be delivered in the standard TxDOT format on 11”x17” sheets or roll plots and electronic files. The Engineer shall provide all templates and corridors used to generate the design cross sections. Cross sections and quantities must include existing pavement removals. Annotation must include, at a minimum, existing and proposed ROW, side slopes (front & back), and profiles. Existing utilities must be shown on the cross sections. C. The Engineer shall submit the current OpenRoads generated 3D corridor model for each submittal. 160.6. Supporting Roadway Plan Sheet Preparation. The Engineer shall prepare the necessary supporting roadway plan sheets for the proposed improvements for the following: A. Title Sheet B. Index of Sheets C. Project Layouts D. Removal Plans E. Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets F. Miscellaneous Paving Details G. Driveway Plan & Profiles H. Sidewalk Retaining Wall Elevation Layouts I. Summary of roadway quantities 160.7. Roadway Standards. The Engineer shall select roadway standards. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 22 of 50 Exhibit A 160.8. Pavement Design. A. Perform Pavement Design The Engineer shall provide the pavement design and submit a pavement design report to the City for city approval. 160.9. Roadway Quantities. The Engineer shall calculate roadway quantities. DEL.160. Deliverables for FC 160. A. Roadway plan and profile drawings B. Existing typical sections C. Proposed typical sections D. Intersection layouts E. OpenRoads 3D corridor model used for computing cut and fill quantities F. Final design cross sections G. Cut and fill quantities H. Supporting roadway plan sheets I. Roadway standards selected by the Engineer J. Pavement design report, if applicable K. Sidewalk retaining wall elevation layouts L. Roadway quantities FUNCTION CODE 161 – DRAINAGE DESIGN 161.1. Data Collection. The Engineer shall provide the following data collection services: A. Conduct field inspections to observe current conditions and the outfall channels, the cross drainage structures, drainage easements, the tributary channel, and land development projects that contribute flow to the tributary. Document field inspections with digital photos. B. Collect available applicable data including GIS data and maps, site survey data, construction plans, previous reports and studies, and readily available rainfall history for the area. Particular sources of data collected must include, but are not limited to, the State, County, and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). C. Collect available Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), Flood Insurance Study (FIS) study data, and models. D. Review survey data and coordinate any additional surveying needs with State. E. Present existing drainage structures in a 3D corridor-MicroStation model. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 23 of 50 Exhibit A 161.2. Hydrologic Studies. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydrologic modeling to accommodate the final roadway design for the Slayter Creek Bridge with the following services: A. Incorporate in the hydrologic study a thorough evaluation of the methodology available, comparison of the results of two or more methods, and calibration of results against measured data, if available. B. Calculate discharges using appropriate hydrologic methods and as approved by the State. C. Consider the pre-construction and post-construction conditions in the hydrologic study. D. Obtain the drainage area boundaries and hydrologic parameters such as impervious covered areas, and overland flow paths and slopes from appropriate sources including, but are not limited to, topographic maps, GIS modeling, construction plans, and existing hydrologic studies. The Engineer shall not use existing hydrologic studies without assessing of their validity. If necessary, obtain additional information such as local rainfall from official sites such as airports. E. Include, at a minimum, the “design” frequency to be specified in this contract and the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) storm frequency. The report must include 4% and 1% AEPs. F. Compare calculated discharges to the effective FEMA flows. If calculated discharges are to be used in the model instead of the effective FEMA flows, full justification must be documented. 161.3. Complex Hydraulic Design and Documentation. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydraulic modeling and technical memo to accommodate the final roadway design for Slayter Creek Bridge with the following services: A. Gather information regarding existing drainage facilities and features from existing plans and other available studies or sources. B. Perform hydraulic design and analysis using appropriate hydraulic methods, which may include computer models such as HEC-RAS, unsteady HEC-RAS or 2D models such as SWMM. 2D models shall not be developed without the express permission of the State. Data entry for appropriate hydraulic computer programs shall consist of a combination of both on-the-ground survey and other appropriate sources including but not limited to topographic maps, GIS modeling, and construction plans and existing hydrologic studies. C. Use the current effective FEMA models, where appropriate, as a base model for the analysis. If a “best available data” model is provided by the local floodplain administrator, it must be utilized accordingly for this analysis. Review the provided base model for correctness and updated as needed. If Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 24 of 50 Exhibit A the provided effective model is not in a HEC-RAS format, convert it to HEC- RAS for this analysis. D. If the appropriate hydrologic model requires storage discharge relationships, develop HEC-RAS models or other State’s approved models that will compute these storage discharge relationships along the channel. E. Consider pre-construction, present and post-construction conditions, as well as future widening. F. Quantify impacts, beneficial or adverse, in terms of increases in peak flow rates and water surface elevations for the above listed hydraulic conditions and hydrologic events. Impacts will be determined both upstream and downstream of the bridge crossings. G. If required, compute right of way corridor 1% AEP flood plain volumes for existing and proposed roadway elevations. The Engineer shall provide mitigation to offset a decrease in 1% AEP flood plain volumes. H. Use hydrograph calculations and peak flows to determine the storage required. I. If necessary, present mitigation measures along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Each method must consider the effects on the entire area. Include approximate construction costs in the report. J. Provide hand calculations which quantify the cut and fill within the 1% AEP flood plain, if any. K. Update the previous Drainage Technical Memo summarizing the methodologies, analyses, and results of the hydrologic and hydraulic studies for each Bridge. L. Calculate floodplain fill. 161.4. Storm Drains. The Engineer shall provide the following services: A. Design and analyze storm drains using software as approved by the State. B. Size inlets, laterals, trunk line and outfall. Develop designs that minimize the interference with the passage of traffic or incur damage to the highway and local property in accordance with the State’s Hydraulic Design Manual, District criteria and any specific guidance provided by the State. Storm drain design software shall ORD DU or GeoPak Drainage at the discretion of the Engineer. C. Determine hydraulic grade line starting at the outfall channel for each storm drain design. Use the design water surface elevation of the outfall as the starting basis (tailwater) for the design of the proposed storm sewer system. D. Calculate manhole head losses. Compute manhole head losses as per FHWA’s HEC-22. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 25 of 50 Exhibit A E. Identify areas requiring trench protection, excavation, shoring, and de- watering. Storm drain detention and routing design is not included. 161.5. Cross-Drainage Structures. The Engineer shall review the previously prepared Drainage Technical Memo and update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic modeling and technical memo to accommodate the final roadway design for 4 Non-Bridge Class Culverts with the following services: A. Determine drainage areas and flows for cross culvert drainage systems. B. Determine the sizing of the drainage crossings. Develop designs that minimize the interference with the passage of traffic or cause damage to the highway and local property in accordance with the State’s Hydraulic Design Manual, District criteria and any specific guidance provided by the State. Cross drainage design shall be performed using HY-8 or HEC RAS. C. Update the previous Drainage Technical Memo summarizing the methodologies, analyses, and results of the hydrologic and hydraulic studies for each non-Bridge Class culverts. 161.6. Temporary Drainage Facilities. The Engineer shall provide the following services: A. Develop plans for all temporary drainage facilities necessary to allow staged construction of the project and to conform with the phasing of adjacent construction projects without significant impact to the hydraulic capacity of the area. Drainage area maps are not required for temporary drainage. 161.7. Scour Analysis. The Engineer shall provide the following services: A. Complete Form 2606 for Slayter Creek Bridge. 161.8. Environmental Permits. The Engineer shall notify the City and TxDOT project manager when site conditions may require environmental permits such as Nationwide Permit, §404 Individual Permits (including mitigation and monitoring) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) §10 Permits. Coordination of permits with USACOE, if required, is not included. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 26 of 50 Exhibit A 161.9. Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Development for Hydraulics. The Engineer shall provide the following services: A. Prepare the PS&E package in accordance with the applicable requirements of the State’s specifications, standards, and manuals, including the PS&E Preparation Manual. Include the following sheets and documents, as appropriate: 1. Hydrologic Data Sheets 2. Hydraulic Data Sheets 3. Culvert Layout Sheets 4. Storm Drain Plan/Profile Sheets B. Prepare culvert layouts C. Identify areas requiring trench protection, excavation, shoring and de- watering. D. Prepare overall drainage area maps. E. Prepare culvert hydrologic data sheets. F. Prepare plan and profile sheets for storm drain systems and outfall ditches. G. Prepare channel layout sheets for proposed channel easements. H. Select any necessary standard details from State or District’s list of standards for items such as inlets, manholes, junction boxes and end treatments. I. Prepare details for non-standard inlets, manholes and junction boxes. J. Prepare drainage details for outlet protection, outlet structures and utility accommodation structures. K. Identify pipe strength requirements. L. Prepare drainage facility quantity summaries. 1. Crossing Culverts 2. Storm Drain M. Identify potential utility conflicts and, if feasible, design to mitigate or avoid those identified conflicts. 1. Crossing Culverts 2. Storm Drain N. Consider pedestrian facilities, utility impacts, driveway grades, retaining wall and concrete traffic barrier drainage impacts. O. Identify existing ground elevation profiles at the ROW lines on storm sewer plan and profile sheets. P. Prepare Hydraulic Data Sheets all cross drainage structures. Q. Develop a 3D model of the proposed drainage structures utilizing Geopak Drainage & OpenRoads Designer. 1. Crossing Culverts Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 27 of 50 Exhibit A 2. Storm Drain R. Coordinate with roadway engineers. S. Coordinate with railroad on common ditch. 161.10. SLAYTER CREEK FLOOD PLAIN STUDY Preparation of FEMA Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and post- construction Letter of Map Revision for Slayter Creek, merging existing upstream and downstream studies with project hydraulic model to form a single continuous model for Slayter Creek. A. DATA COLLECTION: 1. Topographic Survey: a. Survey of finished floor elevations 2. Perform up to two (2) field visits to evaluate the site conditions and understand drainage patterns, and identify potential construction constraints. 3. Obtain record drawings for existing infrastructure and developments in the area, as necessary. B. CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) ENGINEER will assist CLIENT in securing a CLOMR from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that depicts the revised floodplain of Slayter Creek through the development: 1. Update the Slayter Creek Proposed hydraulic model to reflect the post- construction topography as designed and assemble the required technical data to support the proposed CLOMR (i.e., flood study report, hydrologic and hydraulic computer models and associated exhibits). 2. CLIENT shall provide ENGINEER with a copy of the Deed or Plat of the property showing the recording information (e.g., Book/Volume and Page numbers or Document/Instrument number) and containing the recorder’s seal and recording date. 3. Prepare a draft public notice describing the proposed revisions to the effective floodplain. The draft public notice will be included in the CLOMR submittal to FEMA and upon FEMA’s approval of the notice, it will be published in a local newspaper. The cost of publishing the public notice is not included in this Scope of Services and shall be paid by CLIENT. 4. Submit a draft copy of the CLOMR request package to the City of Anna floodplain administrator for review prior to submitting to FEMA and revise the information in the CLOMR submittal per the floodplain administrator’s review comments, if any. 5. FEMA requires that a review and processing fee be submitted for a map revision and requests related to modifications of the floodplain limits. The current FEMA review fee associated with CLOMRs of this type (Physical Map Revision Base on a Bridge, Culvert, Channel, Hydrology, Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 28 of 50 Exhibit A or Combination Thereof) is $6,500. The FEMA review fees are subject to change. 6. Submit the CLOMR request package to FEMA for review and revise the information in the CLOMR submittal per review comments for FEMA, if any. C. LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) ENGINEER will assist CLIENT in securing a LOMR from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that depicts the revised floodplain of Slayter Creek through the development: 1. Attend a pre-development conference with the City staff to discuss the proposed project, proposed changes within the Slayter Creek floodplain, and any issues that will need to be addressed in the LOMR flood study. 2. Update the hydraulic model of Slayter Creek developed with the relevant CLOMR Flood Study to reflect the post-construction topography per the as-built survey data referenced above and assemble the required technical data to support the proposed LOMR (i.e., flood study report, hydrologic and hydraulic computer models and associated exhibits). 3. CLIENT shall provide ENGINEER with a copy of the Deed or Plat of the property showing the recording information (e.g., Book/Volume and Page numbers or Document/Instrument number) and containing the recorder’s seal and recording date. 4. Prepare a draft public notice describing the proposed revisions to the effective floodplain. The draft public notice will be included in the LOMR submittal to FEMA and upon FEMA’s approval of the notice, it will be published in a local newspaper. The cost of publishing the public notice is not included in this Scope of Services and shall be paid by CLIENT. 5. Submit a draft copy of the LOMR request package to the City of Anna floodplain administrator for review prior to submitting to FEMA and revise the information in the LOMR submittal per the floodplain administrator’s review comments, if any. 6. FEMA requires that a review and processing fee be submitted for a map revision and requests related to modifications of the floodplain limits. The current FEMA review fee associated with LOMRs of this type (Physical Map Revision Base on a Bridge, Culvert, Channel, Hydrology, or Combination Thereof) is $8,000. The FEMA review fees are subject to change. 7. Submit the LOMR request package to FEMA for review and revise the information in the LOMR submittal per review comments for FEMA, if any. D. DAM BREACH ANALYSIS ENGINEER will perform one simplified dam breach analysis for the SCS Site 46 Reservoir immediately upstream of the proposed Ferguson Parkway crossing of Slayter Creek in order to classify the hazard level of the existing dam. The analysis will be performed in accordance with City of Anna and TCEQ Standards. ENGINEER will perform the following tasks associated with the analysis: Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 29 of 50 Exhibit A 1. Acquire relevant survey and LIDAR data for the analyzed dam indicating size and top of pond elevation. 2. Update the hydrologic model created in the Drainage Study to include the analyzed dam and acquire flow rates to use in the Dam Breach Analysis. 3. Create a hydraulic scenario in the hydraulic model to simulate potential dam failure. 4. Map the dam breach inundation limits to determine risks for downstream structures, and to classify the hazard level based on the number of structures, lives, and roads at risk including the proposed Ferguson Parkway extension. 5. The dam breach inundation mapping, summary of methodology, and breach analysis results will be incorporated into the Drainage Study report described in the Drainage Design task. FUNCTION CODE 162 – SIGNING / PAVEMENT MARKINGS 162.1. Signing and Pavement Markings. The Engineer shall prepare drawings, specifications, and details for all signs and pavement markings. A. The Engineer shall: 1. Coordinate with the State (and other Engineers as required) for overall interim and final signing and pavement marking strategies and placement of signs outside contract limits 2. Prepare existing signing layouts, to reflect existing signs to be removed by the contractor 3. Prepare signing and pavement marking layout sheets for interim and final signing strategies and placement of signs outside contract limits. The layouts must designate the shields to be attached to guide signs. Proposed signs must be illustrated and numbered on layout sheets. 4. Prepare sign detail sheets for guide signs showing dimensions, lettering, shields, borders, corner radii, and other relevant details 5. Designate the shields to be attached to guide signs 6. Select a foundation for each sign based on TxDOT sign standards B. The Engineer shall prepare detail sheets to show: 1. Sign details 2. Dimensioning (letters, shields, borders, and other relevant dimensions) C. The Engineer shall prepare a summary of quantities for each of the following: 1. Signs to be removed, relocated, or replaced 2. Small signs 3. Pavement markings and delineation Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 30 of 50 Exhibit A D. The Engineer shall select signing and pavement marking standards. DEL.162. Deliverables for FC 162. A. Signing and pavement marking layout sheets B. Summary of quantities for: 1. Small signs 2. Pavement markings C. Specifications and special provisions D. Estimate of costs FUNCTION CODE 163 – MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN 163.1. Geotechnical Borings and Investigations. A. The Engineer shall determine the location of proposed soil borings for pavement design, bridge design, embankment settlement analysis, retaining walls, slope stability and proposed culvert structures. The Engineer shall prepare a boring layout showing the general location and depths of the proposed borings. The Engineer shall provide the boring layout to the City for review and comment. The following table summarizes the field exploration plan. Number of Borings Boring Depth (feet) Purpose 7 20 Pavement 3 30 Pavement/Culvert 4 80 Bridge 15 25 Retaining Wall In addition, two samples will be collected at the creek for testing to assist with the scour analyses and two bulk samples to perform standard Proctor and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests. B. The Engineer shall perform soil borings, rock coring, piezometric readings, testing and analysis to support pavement designs, bridge design, embankment settlement analysis, retaining walls and slope stability analysis. Spacing boring shall be in accordance with the latest version of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual - LRFD . The Engineer shall perform geotechnical borings and investigations for the structures and pavements summarized in Table 163.2 (A) – SUM – Boring/Coring Summary and detailed in the tables referenced within this summary table. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 31 of 50 Exhibit A Table 163.2(B)-SUM – Boring/Coring Summary (this table Summarizes the 163.2(B) tables) Soil Borings Total Quantity Total Feet Bridge (Table 163.2(B)-BRG) 4 240 Retaining Wall (Table 163.2(B)-RW) 15 375 Pavement (Table 163.2(B)-NW) 7 140 Culvert (Table 163.2(B)-CUL) 3 90 TOTAL 29 845 Pavement Coring Total Quantity Total Feet Existing (Table 163.2(B)-EP) 2 2 TOTAL 2 4 Table 163.2(B)-BRG – Soil Borings: Bridge Structure Approximate Limits Quantity Depth (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station Bridge 48+75.00 52+50.00 4 60 Table 163.2(B)-RW – Soil Borings: Retaining Wall Structure Approximate Limits Quantity Depth (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station RW1 – RW6 28+00.00 57+00.00 15 25 Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 32 of 50 Exhibit A Table 163.2(B)-NW – Pavement Structure Approximate Limits Quantity Depth (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station 10+00.00 96+00.00 7 20 Table 163.2(B)-CUL – Soil Borings: Culvert Structure Approximate Limits Quantity Depth (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station 10+00.00 96+00.00 3 30 Table 163.2(B)-EP – Pavement Coring: Existing Structure Approximate Limits Quantity Depth (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station 10+00.00 96+00.00 2 2 C. The Engineer shall provide a signed, sealed and dated geotechnical report. D. If applicable, the Engineer shall perform scour analysis to include grain size distribution curves with D50 value for each soil layer and a D50 grain size for a sample in the stream bed at the upstream face of the bridge in the upper 1- foot of the stream bed. In addition, the Engineer shall provide a subsurface profile including the following information for each layer: 1. Particle Size Analysis (Tex-110-E) including: a. Percent clay (percent passing No. 200 sieve) b. Soil type based on grain dimensions of cohesionless materials 2. Liquid Limit (Tex-104-E) as required for clayey soils 3. Plastic Limit (Tex-105-E) as required for clayey soils 4. Plasticity Index (Tex-106-E) as required for clayey soils 5. USCS Soil Classification (Tex-142-E) as required for clayey soils 6. The Engineer shall prepare and sign, seal, and date soil boring sheets to be used in the PS&E package. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 33 of 50 Exhibit A 163.2. Retaining Walls and Miscellaneous Structures. A. Retaining wall design Prior to preparation of retaining wall layouts, the Engineer shall prepare a comparative cost analysis of different types of retaining walls versus roadway embankment, pavement, soil stabilization, retaining walls type, and available ROW to determine optimum selection based on economics, construction time duration, ROW encroachments (need for construction easements) and construction feasibility, including temporary shoring layouts and detailed, if required by the State. The Engineer shall notify the City & State of the type of retaining walls that will be used for each cut and fill location. B. Retaining wall layouts and details The Engineer shall provide layouts (scale 1”=40’), elevations, quantity estimate, summary of quantities, typical cross sections and structural details of all retaining walls within the project. Approximate lengths of the retaining walls as shown on the schematic are provided in Table 163.3(B) – Proposed Retaining Walls. The Engineer shall determine if any additional walls are required and verify the need for and length of the retaining walls as shown on the schematic. Table 163.3(B) – Proposed Retaining Walls Retaining Wall Name Approximate Limits Wall Type Wall Length (feet) Beginning Station Ending Station RW-33 33+25.00 36+50.00 CIP 325 RW-34 34+25.00 37+00.00 CIP 275 RW-52 52+35.00 56+57.00 CIP 422 RW-53 53+08.00 56+54.00 CIP 346 C. The Engineer shall develop each retaining wall design. The Engineer shall: 1. The Engineer shall perform any needed retaining wall analyses to include the settlement analysis. This analysis must include the computation for bearing capacity, global stability, overturning and sliding. In addition, the Engineer shall include allowable bearing pressure, passive earth pressure, friction angles, settlement analysis (consolidation report) and lateral earth pressure for the retaining wall 2. Calculate retaining wall quantities 3. Provide retaining wall summary sheets 4. Select retaining wall standards for insertion into the plan set Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 34 of 50 Exhibit A 163.3. Traffic Control Plan, Detours, Sequence of Construction. The Engineer shall prepare traffic control plans (TCP) including TCP typical sections, for the project. The Engineer shall complete Form 2229-Significant Project Procedures along with Page 4 of Form 1002, specifically titled Accelerated Construction Procedures and Form 1204. The Engineer shall interface and coordinate phases of work, including the TCP, with adjacent engineers. The Engineer shall: A. Prepare Traffic Control Plans (TCP) for the project Determine the existing and proposed traffic control devices (e.g., regulatory signs, warning signs, guide signs, route markers, construction pavement markings, barricades, flag personnel, temporary traffic signals) to be used to handle traffic during each construction sequence. B. Prepare TCP typical sections for the project. C. Provide a written narrative of the construction sequencing and work activities per phase that: 1. Describes the type of work to be performed for each phase of sequence of construction and any special instructions (e.g., storm drain, culverts, bridges, railing, illumination, signals, retaining walls, signing, paving surface sequencing or concrete placement, ROW restrictions, utilities) that the contractor should be made aware including limits of construction, obliteration, and shifting or detouring of traffic prior to the proceeding phase. 2. Includes the work limits, the location of channelizing devices, positive barrier, location and direction of traffic, work area, stations, pavement markings, and other information deemed necessary for each phase of construction. D. Prepare layouts and show the limits for temporary shoring on the applicable TCP E. Prepare detour plans to maintain continuity during construction phasing. F. Design temporary drainage to replace existing drainage disturbed by construction activities or to drain detour pavement G. Identify and delineate any outstanding ROW parcels H. Calculate traffic control quantities I. Provide traffic control summary sheet(s) J. Select traffic control standards for insertion into the plan set Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 35 of 50 Exhibit A 163.4. Illumination. The Engineer shall: A. Integrate existing illumination within the project limits into the proposed design. B. Coordinate with the State to determine the location of proposed lighting for the following lighting types: 1. conventional C. Provide a preliminary layout for initial review and approval by the State. D. Prepare layouts and details including circuit wiring diagrams showing the number of luminaires on each circuit, electrical conductors, length of runs, and service pole assemblies E. Calculate illumination quantities F. Prepare illumination summary sheet(s) G. Select illumination standards for insertion into the plan set 163.5. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWP3). The Engineer shall: A. Develop SWP3, in conformance with the TCP, to minimize potential impact to receiving waterways. The SWP3 must be shown on separate sheets from the TCP unless the State specifically directs the Engineer to show the SWP3 and the TCP on the same set of sheets. B. Calculate SWP3 quantities C. Prepare SWP3 summary sheet(s) D. Select SWP3 standards for insertion into the plan set 163.6. Plan Preparation. The Engineer shall prepare and assemble plans for the proposed improvements for each of the following milestones: A. Preliminary Bridge Layout Review (PBLR) B. 30% C. 60% D. 95% E. 100% Refer to the Milestone Design Deliverables section of this attachment for the contents of these deliverables. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 36 of 50 Exhibit A 163.7. Miscellaneous Structural Details. The Engineer shall provide necessary details required to supplement standard details. 163.8. Testimony for Right of Way Hearings (Support for up to 5 Hearings). The Engineer shall support City attorneys for up to 5 right of way hearings. As requested by the City, the Engineer shall: A. Research, study, analyze and review the project and the assigned parcels for acquisition if requested. B. Prepare litigation designs and standard 8.5 x 11-inch, 11 x 17-inch, or 24 x 36- inch paper exhibits. These deliverables are litigation documents (i.e., not engineering documents) so are not required to be sealed by a professional engineer if requested. C. Be available to assist and consult with city staff or attorneys, for case preparation if requested. Testimony is not included. 163.9. Estimate. The Engineer shall independently develop and report quantities necessary to construct the contract in standard State bid format at the specified milestones and final PS&E submittals. The Engineer shall prepare each construction cost estimates using Estimator or any approved method. The Engineer shall provide the estimate at each milestone submittal or in electronic (TxDOTCONNECT) format at the 95% and final PS&E submittals per State’s district requirement. 163.10. Contract Time Determination (CTD). The Engineer shall prepare a detailed contract time estimate to determine the approximate time required for construction of the project in calendar and working days (based on the State standard definitions of calendar and working days) at the 60%, 95% and final PS&E milestone. The Engineer shall provide assistance to the State in interpreting the schedule. 163.11. Specifications and General Notes. A. The Engineer shall identify necessary standard specifications, special specifications, special provisions, and the appropriate reference items and provide them in the format required by the State. B. The Engineer shall prepare general notes from the district’s master list of general notes, for inclusion in the plans and bidding documents. C. Project Manual and Bid Documents D. Required TxDOT Forms 163.12. Constructability Review. The Engineer shall provide quality review of the constructability of the PS&E sets. The Engineer shall perform constructability reviews at major project design milestones (e.g., 30%, 60%, 95%, and final plan) to identify potential constructability issues and options that would provide substantial time savings during construction. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 37 of 50 Exhibit A DEL.163. Deliverables for FC 163. A. Special provision and special provisions report, if applicable B. Boring layout C. Geotechnical report D. Soil boring sheets E. Pavement design F. OpenRoads 3D corridor model that includes retaining walls G. Retaining wall layouts H. Retaining wall details I. Retaining wall standards J. Retaining wall quantities K. Traffic control plans L. Traffic control typical sections M. Traffic control narrative N. Temporary shoring layouts, if applicable O. Plan and profile layouts for temporary roadways, ramps, and structures P. Traffic control standards Q. Traffic control quantities R. Illumination layouts S. Illumination details T. Illumination standards U. Illumination quantities V. SWP3 layouts W. SWP3 summary sheets X. SWP3 standards Y. SWP3 quantities Z. Miscellaneous structural details (if applicable) AA. Litigation exhibits (if applicable) BB. Construction Cost Estimate CC. Contract time estimate Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 38 of 50 Exhibit A FUNCTION CODE 170 – BRIDGE DESIGN 170.1. Bridge Layout. The Engineer shall: A. Prepare a bridge layout plan sheet for each bridge and submit a 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM). When the 3D bridge model is referenced into the 3D corridor, the bridge must align, both vertically and horizontally, in the bridge location of the 3D corridor. The 3D bridge model must consist of 3D elements for slab, beams, abutments, wingwalls, caps, columns, and foundations. Quantities and geometry from OBM 3D bridge model must be verified by other means. Prepare Bridge Layouts and 3D models for the locations shown in Table 170.3(A) – Bridges. Table 170.3(A) – Bridges Bridge Name Control-Section- Job (CSJ) Number Girder Type Length (feet) Width (feet) Slayter Creek Bridge 0918-24-249 TX54 375 108 B. The Engineer shall incorporate aesthetics as directed by the State & City including the following: form-liners, decorative retaining walls, painting, and other aesthetic elements. 170.2. Bridge Structural Details. The Engineer shall prepare each structural design and develop detailed structural drawings of all required details: A. Perform calculations and determine elevations for design of the bridge foundation. B. Perform calculations and determine elevations for design of the bridge superstructure C. Perform load rating calculations. D. Prepare necessary foundation details and plan sheets. E. Prepare plan sheets for abutment and bent design and additional abutment and bent details. F. Prepare framing plan, slab plan sheets, and perform calculations for bridge slab design. G. Prepare tables for slab and bearing seat elevations, dead load deflections, and other necessary bridge information. H. Prepare beam design tables. I. Prepare special provisions and special specifications, if required. J. Prepare any additional required details specific to the project Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 39 of 50 Exhibit A K. Prepare bridge summary sheet(s) L. Select bridge standards for insertion into the plan set. 170.3. Bridge Detail Summary. The Engineer shall prepare total bridge quantities, estimates, and summary sheets for each bridge. DEL.170. Deliverables for FC 170. A. Bridge layouts B. Bridge typical sections C. 3D bridge model D. Bridge design calculations E. Bridge special provisions and special specifications F. Bridge detail sheets G. Bridge standards H. Summary of bridge quantities I. Bridge cost estimate FUNCTION CODE 351 – CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 351.1. Construction Phase Services. The Engineer shall provide construction phase services at the written request of the City’s project manager. The written request must include a description of the work requested, a mutually agreed upon time limit, and any special instructions for coordination and submittal. The Engineer shall provide the following construction phase services: A. Assist the City in their Letting Process 1. Respond to RFI’s during Letting 2. Issue Addendums, if required 3. Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 4. Attend Bid Opening 5. Provide a Bid Tabulation Analysis and Provide an Award Recommendation B. Attend preconstruction meeting C. Attend field meetings and make visits to site (up to 2) D. Calculate quantities and assist the City engineer in preparing change orders (up to 2) E. Review and approval of shop drawings F. Review and approval of forming details Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 40 of 50 Exhibit A G. Respond to requests for information (RFIs) H. Provide minor redesign (major redesign should be handled with a contract supplement), which will include changes to the affected plan sheets and an updated copy of the 3D corridor model. I. Attend field meetings for potential issues (up to 2 meetings) J. Produce Record Drawings based on Contractor Red Line plans post construction. This effort does not include construction inspection, materials testing, construction record keeping, construction oversight, construction surveys, construction scheduling, coordination, or reporting. DEL.351. Deliverables for FC 351 A. Meeting minutes or notes B. Change order documentation and quantities C. Responses to RFIs D. Minor redesign sheets and quantities E. OpenRoads 3D corridor model, updated to show minor redesigns MILESTONE DESIGN DELIVERABLES DELIVERABLES FOR PS&E DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES The Engineer shall submit the following deliverables to TxDOT: DEL.1. 30% Plans Submittal. A. An electronic set of 11” x 17” plan sheets for the City & State review. B. Estimate of construction cost C. Engineer’s internal QA and QC markup set D. Updated Design Summary Report, Form 1002 with existing and proposed typical sections, location map, and design exception exhibits E. A preliminary 3D corridor model, in the most current format, created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools, and with enough detail to verify the design of the 30% plan sheets F. If applicable, a preliminary 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM), and with enough detail to verify the design of the 30% plan sheets. When the 3D bridge model is referenced into the 3D corridor, the bridge must align, both vertically and horizontally, in the bridge location of the 3D corridor. DEL.2. Between 30% Submittal and 60% Submittal, PBLR Submittal. A. An electronic set of 11” x 17” bridge layouts and retaining wall layouts including bridge typical sections for the City & State review and PS&E approval. External stability analysis for retaining walls B. Engineer’s internal QA and QC marked up set Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 41 of 50 Exhibit A C. For division hydrologic and hydraulic review of existing and proposed bridges and bridge class culverts, five sets of 11” x 17” preliminary bridge and bridge class culvert plan and profile sheets, hydrology & hydraulics sheets, scour analysis, project title sheet, and project layout sheet D. A preliminary 3D corridor model, in the most current format, created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools, and with enough detail to verify the design of the bridge and retaining wall layouts. E. If applicable, a preliminary 3D bridge model utilizing Bentley’s OpenBridge Modeler (OBM), and with enough detail to verify the design of the bridge and retaining wall layouts. DEL.3. 60% Plans Submittal. A. An electronic set of 11” x 17” plan sets for the State review. B. Estimate of construction cost. C. Updated Design Summary Report and Form 1002. D. Engineer’s internal QA and QC marked up set. E. One set of a roll format TCP phasing layouts, one .pdf of plan sheets for TCP concept, and significant project procedures form (State Form 2229) to present at the TCAT for the State review. F. A preliminary 3D corridor model, in the most current format, created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools, and with enough detail to verify the design of the 60% plan sheets. The level of detail of the surface and subsurface features must be at the direction of the State. G. If applicable, a preliminary 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM), and with enough detail to verify the design of the 60% plan sheets. When the 3D bridge model is referenced into the 3D corridor, the bridge must align, both vertically and horizontally, in the bridge location of the 3D corridor. The 3D bridge model must consist of 3D elements for slab, beams, abutments, wingwalls, caps, columns, and foundations. The level of detail of the bridge elements must be at the direction of the State. DEL.4. District Review Submittal (95%). A. An electronic set of 11” x 17” plan sheets for the State review B. Estimate of construction cost in Excel and TxDOTCONNECT C. List of governing specifications and special provisions in addition to those required D. Marked up general notes E. Form 1002 F. New special specifications and special provisions if applicable G. Triple zero special provisions H. Engineer sign, seal, and date supplemental sheets (8.5” x 11”) I. Contract time determination summary J. Significant project procedures form Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 42 of 50 Exhibit A K. Temporary road closure letters L. Construction speed zone request M. Engineer’s internal QA and QC marked-up set N. Other supporting documents O. A detailed 3D corridor model, in the most current format, created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools, and with enough detail to verify the design of the 95% plan sheets. The level of detail of the surface and subsurface features must be at the direction of the State. P. If applicable, a 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM), and with enough detail to verify the design of the 95% plan sheets. When the 3D bridge model is referenced into the 3D corridor, the bridge must align, both vertically and horizontally, in the bridge location of the 3D corridor. The 3D bridge model must consist of 3D elements for slab, beams, abutments, wingwalls, caps, columns, and foundations. The level of detail of the bridge elements must be at the direction of the State. DEL.5. Final submittal (100%). A. PDF portfolio of all plan sheets B. Revised supporting documents that address the 95% review comments C. A final 3D corridor model, in the most current format created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools. The level of detail of the surface and subsurface features will be at the direction of the State. D. A final 3D earthwork model in either .XML or .ICM format (as directed by the State) created using Bentley’s OpenRoads tools. The level of detail of the surface and subsurface features will be at the direction of the State. E. If applicable, a final 3D bridge model utilizing OpenBridge Modeler (OBM). When the 3D bridge model is referenced into the 3D corridor, the bridge must align, both vertically and horizontally, in the bridge location of the 3D corridor. The 3D bridge model must consist of 3D elements for slab, beams, abutments, wingwalls, caps, columns, and foundations. The level of detail of the bridge elements must be at the direction of the State. F. The Engineer shall prepare a letter report which includes the findings of the comparison of OBM 3D bridge model geometry and quantities verified by alternate methods. The report must include a detailed discussion of the differences and proposed enhancements and issues in OBM software. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 43 of 50 Exhibit A TASK 500: RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISTION SERVICES ROW acquisition tasks will be completed according to TxDOT & federal standards to ensure compliance for reimbursement purposes. 501 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 501.1.1 Communication 501.1.1.1 Prepare and deliver monthly invoice to CLIENT. Prepare invoices utilizing CLIENT standard payment submission forms with supporting documentation. 501.1.1.2 Attend status meetings with CLIENT. Date, time and location are determined by CLIENT. 501.1.1.3 Provide bi-monthly written report to CLIENT on the status of service tasks completed and service tasks remaining in order to bring the parcel(s) into possession of the CLIENT. The reporting format will be determined by CLIENT. 501.1.2 File Management 501.1.2.1 Primary project and parcel files will be kept in the PROVIDER’S Office with permanent records transferred to the CLIENT as Office of Permanent Record. 501.1.2.2 Maintain records of all payments including, but not limited to, warrant number, amount, date paid, etc. 501.1.2.3 Maintain copies of all correspondence and contacts with property owners. 502 APPRAISAL SERVICES All appraisal services must comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”) and Texas Law. 502.1 Real Estate Appraisal Services 502.1.1 Appraisers must provide advance notice of the date and time of their appraisal inspections of the subject property to the PROVIDER’s Project Manager in order to coordinate the Appraiser’s inspection with (if applicable and practical) the initial interview with the Displacee by the Relocation Assistance Agent. 502.1.1.1 Appraiser shall prepare and conduct personal pre-appraisal contact with interest owners or their designated representative for each parcel and offer opportunity to accompany the Appraiser and Relocation Agent on the inspection of the subject property. The written contact documents must use acceptable TxDOT forms and the records of contact must be part of the parcel file. 502.1.1.2 Appraiser must secure permission from the owner to enter the property from which real estate is to be acquired. If after diligent effort the Appraiser is unable to secure the necessary permission from the property owner, Appraiser will inspect from public rights of way. 502.1.2 The assignment for an initial and update appraisal are two separate and distinct appraisal assignments. The fee for each assignment must be reflective of the complexity of the specific individual assignment. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 44 of 50 Exhibit A 502.1.3 For an initial appraisal assignment, the Appraiser must prepare an appraisal report for each parcel to be acquired utilizing applicable TxDOT forms. These reports must conform to TxDOT policies and procedures along with the USPAP as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation. 502.1.4 For an updated appraisal, the Appraiser must prepare an updated appraisal report for each parcel to be acquired utilizing applicable TxDOT forms. These reports must conform to TxDOT policies and procedures along with the USPAP. 502.1.5 As necessary, PROVIDER shall prepare written notification to the State of any environmental concerns associated with the right of way to be acquired, which could require environmental re-mediation. 502.1.6 All completed appraisals must be administratively reviewed and recommended for approval by CLIENT. 502.1.7 PROVIDER will communicate with the Review Appraiser (if applicable) regarding revisions, comments, or additional information that may be required. The Review Appraiser will then coordinate with the Appraiser. The turn-around for this portion of the process will be: 502.1.1.7.1 Three business days for the Review Appraiser to complete the review and contact the Appraiser for revisions or additional information. 502.1.1.7.2 Three business days for the Appraiser to complete and deliver the revisions and provide the required additional information. 502.2 Real Estate Appraisal Review Services 502.2.1 Review Appraiser must review all appraisal reports for each parcel to determine consistency of values, supporting documentation related to the conclusion reached, compliance with TxDOT policies and procedures and the USPAP. 502.2.2 Review Appraiser must prepare and submit applicable TxDOT forms for each appraisal review assignment. 502.2.3 The assignment for the review of an initial and update appraisal are two separate and distinct appraisal review assignments. The fee for each review assignment must be reflective of the complexity of the specific individual review assignment. 502.3 Real Estate Appraisal Preparation and Testimony Services Beyond delivery of the appraisal assignments, the Appraiser may be called to provide preparation and testimony for a Special Commissioners Hearing (Hearing). For this appraisal assignment, the fee for the preparation time and testimony are separate from the initial and update assignment. 503 NEGOTIATION SERVICES 503.1 Analyze preliminary title report to determine potential title problems, propose and inform CLIENT of methods to cure title deficiencies. This includes analysis of access easements. 503.2 Analyze appraisal and appraisal review reports and confirm the CLIENT’S approved value prior to making offer for each parcel. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 45 of 50 Exhibit A 503.3 Prepare and send the letter transmitting the Landowners’ Bill of Rights by Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested (CMRRR). 503.4 PROVIDER shall prepare all documents required or requested by the CLIENT on applicable TxDOT forms. (i.e., the initial offer letter, memorandum of agreement, instruments of conveyance) 503.5 PROVIDER shall send the written offer, appraisal report, and required brochures to each property owner or the property owner’s designated representative through CMRRR; maintain coordination of all closing activities, including but not limited to following-up on contacts and securing the necessary instruments upon acceptance of CLIENT’s offer; and retain copies of the unsigned CMRRR receipt and the appraisal as support for billing purposes. 503.6 PROVIDER shall respond to property owner inquiries verbally and in writing within two business days. 503.7 PROVIDER shall prepare a separate negotiator contact report for each parcel on applicable TxDOT forms. 503.8 Copies of all conveyance documents received by the PROVIDER must be delivered to CLIENT. PROVIDER must maintain parcel files of documentation related to the purchase of the real property or property interests. 503.9 PROVIDER shall advise property owner of the administrative settlement process, assist them with the preparation of a counteroffer package, and shall transmit to CLIENT any written counteroffer from property owners including applicable TxDOT forms, supporting documentation and written comments with regard to Administrative Settlements in accordance with TxDOT policy and procedures. 503.10 After concurrence of CLIENT, prepare final offer letter, and mail the documents of conveyance by CMRRR. 504 TITLE SERVICES 504.1 PROVIDER shall analyze preliminary Title Commitment report to determine potential title problems, propose and inform CLIENT of methods to cure title deficiencies. This includes analysis of access easements. 504.2 PROVIDER shall secure Title Commitment updates in accordance with insurance rules and requirements for parcel payment submissions. 504.3 The curative services necessary to provide a clear title to the State are the responsibility of the PROVIDER and thus are part of the PROVIDER’s fee for Negotiation Services and Condemnation Support Services. Curative services do not include costs that qualify as payment of incidental expenses to transfer real property to the CLIENT. Incidental expenses not paid to the title company are reimbursed as a pass-through cost. 504.4 PROVIDER shall provide closing services in conjunction with the title company. In the event of a closing by mail, title work must be reviewed prior to the closing by mail and again prior to recording of the instrument. 504.5 Any fee related to obtaining certified court documents and fees for recording same which are not collected at the closing of the parcel shall be direct pass through fees at the exact cost supported by the county court receipts. 504.6 PROVIDER shall cause the recordation all original instruments immediately after closing at the respective County Clerk’s Office. The cost of the recording fees and filing fees are paid by CLIENT and must not be included in the Provider’s negotiated fee schedule. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 46 of 50 Exhibit A 505 RELOCATION SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, OR PERSONAL PROPERTY 505.1 Provide advance notice of the date and time of the initial meeting with the Displacee regarding the Appraiser’s and Relocation Agent’s inspection of the subject property. 505.2 Notify all approved Displacees of eligibility for relocation assistance and provide Displacees, that are approved by the CLIENT with a Relocation Assistance Packet consisting of the following approved forms: 505.1.2.1 Parcel advisory services record 505.1.2.2 Certificate of eligibility 505.1.2.3 Relocation Assistance Brochure 505.1.3 Provide on-going relocation assistance and advisory services to Displacees affected by the acquisition of right of way and deliver required TXDOT forms to CLIENT. On-going advisory services include monitoring the move and any necessary relocation activities taken by the Displacee. Frequency and manner for monitoring the move must match the complexity of the relocation, however, the expectation is multiple in-person site visits, which is standard practice, and must be documented in the contact log to be submitted at close out. 505.1.4 Locate, evaluate, and maintain files on comparable available housing as well as listings for non-residential properties, for the duration of the project. These files are subject to review by CLIENT. 505.1.5 Compute and submit the request for relocation housing/rental supplement to CLIENT on the appropriate TxDOT form with supporting photos attached for each property. 505.1.6 Deliver the 90-day notice and benefits package at the same time as the written offer to purchase is delivered. 505.1.7 Not deliver the 90-day notice prior to a personal interview with the Displacee during which time the Relocation Agent determines the type, needs, and eligibilities of the Displacee, or before the issuance of the initial offer. 505.1.8 Provide 30-day notice to vacate once the CLIENT has possession of the property. The Displacee must be given a minimum of 90 days’ notice prior to being required to vacate. 505.1.9 PROVIDER shall immediately notify CLIENT if the Displacee does not vacate the premises after 30-day notice expires. 505.1.10 Perform a decent, safe, and sanitary (DSS) inspection of replacement housing in accordance with Federal policy. Complete the appropriate forms and submit to CLIENT. 505.1.11 Relocation Agent must: 505.1.11.1 Attend closings on replacement property and ensure supplemental payment is properly distributed. 505.1.11.2 Process and compute increased interest payments as required. 505.1.11.3 Be available for any relocation appeals and meetings. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 47 of 50 Exhibit A 505.1.11.4 Prepare all relocation payment claim submissions for all Displacees in accordance with TxDOT guidelines. 505.1.11.5 Deliver warrants in accordance with TxDOT guidelines. 505.1.11.6 Issue Relocation Assistance Program Surveys to all Displacees. 505.1.12 Provide an executed certification of eligibility with all Displacee claims. 506 CONDEMNATION SERVICES 506.1 PROVIDER shall prepare the final offer letter and mail the documents of conveyance by CMRRR. 506.2 PROVIDER shall request an updated Title Commitment for eminent domain from the title company. 506.3 PROVIDER shall prepare, if applicable, Bisection, Drainage Easement, Access Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement clauses for the original set of Legal Descriptions supplied by CLIENT. 506.4 PROVIDER shall use the information from the Title Commitment and other sources to join all interested parties on the request for eminent domain proceedings. Spouses of owners must be joined. 506.5 Upon completion of the request for eminent domain proceedings by the PROVIDER, the PROVIDER shall prepare a packet containing all documents listed in the eminent domain package submission checklist. Submit to CLIENT for use by Attorney handling eminent domain case. 506.6 The CLIENT’S Attorney files the petition and related documents. Prior to filing the petition, the CLIENT’S Attorney coordinates with the PROVIDER. The PROVIDER is then responsible to file the lis pendens within the legal timeline. 506.7 PROVIDER shall record the lis pendens upon receipt of the cause number with the county clerk’s office. 506.8 PROVIDER shall send a copy of the filed lis pendens and the petition via CMRRR and first class mail to all named parties within three days of the filing of the lis pendens. 506.9 Following appointment of Special Commissioners (Commissioners) by the judge, the PROVIDER shall send via CMRRR the document appointing the Commissioners to the named defendants or their attorneys if represented. The PROVIDER shall secure the following documents: 506.9.1 Oath of Commissioners signed by the Commissioners, 506.9.2 Order Setting Hearing, and 506.9.3 copies of the Notice of Hearing signed by the Commissioners. NOTE: Notification to the CLIENT & CLIENT’S Attorney may be sent via email. 506.10 Provide documents to CLIENT’S Attorney for E-filing with the court. 506.11 PROVIDER shall coordinate the date and time for the Special Commissioners Hearing. If there is an increase in value to the appraisal, the PROVIDER shall send a copy of the updated appraisal along with the post-petition letter to the appropriate parties by CMRRR. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 48 of 50 Exhibit A 506.12 PROVIDER shall coordinate with CLIENT to reserve a location for Hearings. 506.13 PROVIDER shall coordinate the Hearing date with the CLIENT, CLIENT’s Attorney, Appraiser, Engineer, appropriate CLIENT witnesses, three Commissioners, and a court reporter. Reasonable effort must be made to accommodate the property owner and their representatives. 506.1.14 PROVIDER shall coordinate a pre-hearing conference prior to the Hearing (the day before or earlier) to discuss facts of the case with the CLIENT, CLIENT’s Attorney, Appraiser, Engineer, and appropriate CLIENT witnesses. 506.1.15 After the Hearing is set, the PROVIDER shall serve Notices of Hearing to the indicated parties in accordance with the methods and time frames set out in Chapter 21 of the Texas Property Code, but in no instance less than twenty days prior to the Hearing. If it is necessary to join a federal agency, be advised that they have an additional sixty days after service of the Hearing to prepare. The scheduling of the Hearing must allow for any additional time frame required by law. 506.1.16 Service of the Notices of Hearing, shall be reimbursed as pass-through cost. 506.1.17 Once the notices have been served, provide to CLIENT’s Attorney for e-filing with the court. 506.1.18 PROVIDER shall send a reminder, via email, 2-3 weeks in advance to the CLIENT’S Attorney, Appraiser, three Commissioners, court reporter, and CLIENT concerning Hearing dates. 506.1.19 PROVIDER shall prepare Special Commissioners Hearing data sheet and submit to the CLIENT within two business days of the award being signed. 506.1.19.1 PROVIDER shall acquire from the Commissioners their hours worked on the case and shall enter said hours in the Award. The Judge determines the amount paid to the Commissioners. 506.1.19.2 PROVIDER shall secure a completed W-9 for all Commissioners and Court Reporters. 506.1.20 The PROVIDER shall obtain the signatures of Commissioners on the Award of Commissioners and submit to CLIENT’S Attorney for E-filing with the court. 506.1.21 PROVIDER shall submit the judge signed award and Commissioners’ W-9s to CLIENT to process Commissioners’ fees. 506.1.22 PROVIDER shall deposit Award Funds in the registry of the court and file a Notice of Deposit with the court and send copies to each defendant notifying them of the date of the deposit. NOTE: The Date of Deposit is the Date of Possession. 506.1.23 PROVIDER shall take photographs of the interest to be acquired on the day of deposit for relocation verification and date of take appraisal purposes. 506.1.24 PROVIDER shall send written notices of the date of deposit to CLIENT and all interested parties. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 49 of 50 Exhibit A TASK 600: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DESIGN Design of approximately 6,400 LF of 12” water line and 580 LF of 12” sanitary sewer line relocations along Ferguson Parkway from Taylor Blvd. to Collin County Outer Loop. For the purposes of this scope, it is assumed that the existing 12” water line along the Pecan Grove development will be replaced with a 12” water line. It is also assumed that the new 12” water line will be installed by bore under Slayter Creek. Plan sheets will be incorporated into the TxDOT PS&E plans as a unified PS&E delivery package. A. Conceptual Design Phase (30%) 1. Conduct project kickoff meeting with Consultant project team. 2. Review City design standards, specifications, construction details, and other pertinent information that may impact the design. 3. Develop alignment for the proposed 12” water line. Develop alignment for the proposed 12” sanitary sewer line relocations to address conflicts with the proposed Ferguson Pkwy roadway improvements. 4. Prepare 11”x17” plan and profile sheets of the water and sanitary sewer improvements. A water line vertical profile will not be included on the 30% conceptual design plans. 5. Prepare an estimate of construction quantities and develop the preliminary statement of probable construction cost. 6. Conduct a 30% Internal QC review workshop to review key design concepts and revise design as necessary. 7. Conduct a 30% review workshop with City staff to review key design concepts and revise design as necessary. B. Preliminary Design Phase (60%) 1. Incorporate comments and feedback from City staff during the 30% conceptual design presentation and review meeting. 2. Develop potable water system design, including the following: a) Review and confirm City standard specifications and details b) Revise horizontal alignment as necessary c) Create water line profile d) Evaluate potential conflicts e) Design creek crossing f) Locate, verify, and address all water services and water meter locations g) Check valve spacing and address as necessary h) Check hydrant spacing and address as necessary 3. Develop sanitary sewer system design, including the following: a) Review and confirm City standard specifications and details b) Revise horizontal alignment as necessary c) Revise vertical alignment as necessary d) Evaluate potential conflicts 4. Prepare 60% construction plans. Prepare/revise the following sheets at the engineering scale indicated: a) Water line plan and profile sheets. Scale 1”=20’ b) Water line detail sheets c) Sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets. Scale 1”=20’ d) Sanitary sewer detail sheets 5. Revise the estimate of construction quantities and statement of probable construction cost. Ferguson Parkway Exhibit A Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Basic Services City of Anna Page 50 of 50 Exhibit A 6. Consultant to perform internal QC review of plans and estimate, and revise as necessary. 7. Submit PDF of the 60% plans and preliminary statement of probable construction cost to the City for review. 8. Meet with City staff to discuss City comments on 60% plans and cost estimate. C. Pre-Final Design Phase (95%) 1. Incorporate City 60% comments into the plans. 2. Prepare 95% construction plans for proposed improvements. Prepare and/or revise the following sheets at the engineering scale indicated: a) Water line plan and profile sheets. Scale 1”=20’ b) Water line detail sheets c) Sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets. Scale 1”=20’ d) Sanitary sewer detail sheets 3. Prepare draft copy of bid item descriptions. 4. Prepare any necessary special technical specifications that are not covered by standard City specifications. 5. Revise the estimate of construction quantities and statement of probable construction cost. 6. Consultant to perform internal QC review of plans, technical specifications, and estimate, and revise as necessary. 7. Submit PDF of the 95% plans, special technical specifications (if any), bid item descriptions, and statement of probable construction cost to the City for review. 8. Meet with City staff to review City comments. D. Final Design Phase (100%) 1. Incorporate City 95% plan comments into the plans and bid documents. 2. Submit PDFs of the final plans, special technical specifications (if any), and final probable construction cost to the City. E. Construction Administration 1. Review shop drawings. 2. Site visits by the design engineer. For the purposes of this proposal, we have estimated 2 site visits. 3. Provide written responses to requests for information or clarifications. 4. Prepare plan and quantity revisions to process any necessary change orders. 5. Assist the City staff in conducting the final inspection and issue a punch list to contractor if necessary. 6. Prepare and revise construction “Record Drawings” based upon mark-ups provided by the contractor. Submit a PDF containing the final “as constructed” blackline drawings (with “record drawing stamps” bearing the signature of the Engineer and the date). Ferguson Parkway Exhibit B Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Additional Services City of Anna Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER FERGUSON PARKWAY from ELM STREET to COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP CSJ: 0918-24-249 Collin County, Texas Services not explicitly described in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A, are considered additional services and are not included in the scope of Amendment 1. These services may include but are not limited to the following list. Under subsequent work authorizations, the engineer may provide some or all of the following: • Preparation of additional plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) delivery packages with related documents, for a multi-phased delivery with multiple PS&E delivery packages for Ferguson Parkway. • Separate Municipal Utility plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) and or separate utility letting. • Route Study Alternative Analysis. • Environmental Reevaluation. • Value Engineering Study • Public Involvement including publishing notices, securing venues, exhibits, attendance, reporting and minutes, and public comment responses (beyond individual stakeholder meetings). • Preparing Environmental Exhibits • Cut and Fill Exhibits • Signal Warrant Studies and Signal Design • Environmental Permits (exclusive of CLOMR / LOMR) • Preparation of Right-of-Way maps • Property Access Management • Design Exceptions, Waivers, and Deviations • Preliminary Geometric Project Layout • Profile Workshop • DSRT Meeting • Coordinating with ISD’s, Major Utilities, & the USPS • Storm Drain Detention and Routing • Watershed Studies • Bridge condition Survey Report • Bridge Cost Comparative Study • Bridge Independent Analysis • Landscaping / Irrigation Design Services, • Primary Day-to-Day Utility Adjustment Coordination Responsibility, • 3D Modeling of existing utilities, • Prepare and Maintain Utility Relocation Schedule, • Prepare and Maintain Proposed Utility Layout, Ferguson Parkway Exhibit B Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Additional Services City of Anna Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B • Preparation of Detailed Utility Management Plan, • Hold Individual Meetings with Utilities (beyond the meetings identified in Exhibit A), • Prepare Utility Certification or Special Provisions Report, • Engineering Testimony for ROW Hearings • Preparing Utility Agreements for Utility Adjustments, • Verification of Eligibility for Reimbursement, • Buy America Compliance, • Review of Cost Estimates and Reimbursement, • Approving RULIS Permits, • Utility Adjustment Monitoring and Verification, • Prepare and Distribute Notice of Required Accommodation (NORA’s), • Construction Survey (Excluding Slayter Creek Bridge) • Construction Engineering, Inspection, Oversight, Record Keeping, Scheduling, Reporting, or Materials Testing. Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna TNP HVJ Function Code Lump Sum Lump Sum 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 60,140.00$ 60,140.00$ 120 SOCIAL/ECNON/ENVIRON STUDIES 21,340.00$ 21,340.00$ 130 RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) MAPPING 83,870.00$ 83,870.00$ 135 UTILITY ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION 324,240.00$ 324,240.00$ 145 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 180,080.00$ 180,080.00$ 150 DESIGN SURVEYS 61,745.00$ 61,745.00$ 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS 726,040.00$ 726,040.00$ 161 DRAINAGE 683,520.00$ 683,520.00$ 162 SIGNING & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 64,930.00$ 64,930.00$ 163 MISCELLANEOUS 555,740.00$ $198,780.00 754,520.00$ 170 BRIDGE DESIGN 149,165.00$ 149,165.00$ 351 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 48,220.00$ 48,220.00$ SUBTOTAL 2,959,030.00$ 198,780.00$ 3,157,810.00$ TASK 500: ROW $658,500.00 658,500.00$ TASK 600: WL & SS DESIGN 180,000.00$ 180,000.00$ SUBTOTAL $838,500.00 $838,500.00 Total 3,797,530.00$ 198,780.00$ 3,996,310.00$ Percent of Fee 95.03% 4.97% Total Firm Page 1 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 110.1 DATA COLLECTION AND FIELD RECONNAISSANCE Roadway Data: As-Built Plans / Corridor Data / TxDOT Data 8 8 16 $3,600.00 Existing & Proposed Development Data (incorporate) 8 8 8 24 $5,040.00 Survey Coordination (Drainage, Misc Topo)8 8 $1,960.00 ROW Data: As-built Plans / ROW Maps (incorporate) 8 8 8 24 $5,040.00 SUE Utility Data (incorporate) 8 8 16 $3,600.00 Local Government /FEMA/USACE/Agencies Data 4 8 12 $2,420.00 Field Investigations / Site Visits 8 16 8 8 40 $9,720.00 110.2 DESIGN CRITERIA Establish Design Criteria 2 8 8 8 26 $5,720.00 Submit DSR (PLBR, 30%, 60%, 90%, 100%) 6 6 $1,470.00 110.3 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE (ASED)2 4 8 8 8 6 36 $8,770.00 110.4 DESIGN CONCEPT CONFERENCE (or TxDOT PS&E Kickoff Meeting) Plan & Prepare Exhibits 4 8 16 16 44 $9,480.00 Attend DCC (or TxDOT PS&E Kickoff Meeting) 4 4 8 $2,340.00 Documentation of DCC (or TxDOT PS&E Kickoff Meeting) 4 4 $980.00 110 SUBTOTAL 20 4 98 0 72 8 0 56 0 0 6 264 $60,140.00 120 SOCIAL/ECON/ENV STUDIES 120.1 INFORMAL MEETINGS (UP TO 4)16 4 24 4 16 64 $16,220.00 120.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS ISSUES AND COMMITMENTS (EPIC) SHEETS (Incorporate)4 4 8 $1,800.00 120.3 REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION 4 8 12 $3,320.00 120 SUBTOTAL - SOCIAL/ECON/ENVIRON STUDIES 20 4 36 0 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 84 $21,340.00 145 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 145.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/COORDINATION (UP TO 19 MONTHS) PM / Coordination (City of Anna, TxDOT, Internal Team) 40 8 266 314 $81,170.00 Status and Coordination Meetings w/ City of Anna (19 Months) 32 70 102 $28,030.00 Coordination with Right of Way (Relocation Services) 8 40 48 $12,520.00 PM / Coordination (Subs) 32 64 96 $26,560.00 Invoice and Progress Reports 8 40 48 $12,520.00 Prepare / Maintain Project Work Schedule 8 32 40 $10,560.00 TxDOT Training Compliance (EMS) 8 8 8 8 32 $8,720.00 145 SUBTOTAL - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 136 16 520 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 680 $180,080.00 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS 160.1 GEOMETRIC DESIGN - Refine Schematic Plan Design 4 20 60 60 144 $29,360.00 Profile Design 4 40 120 120 284 $57,360.00 Geometric Design- 3D Corridor Model Develop Additional 3D Corridor Features 2 40 80 80 202 $41,280.00 Upgrade DGN files to ORD 10.12 16 40 40 96 $19,320.00 160.2 ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS Mainlane (7 Sheets) 2 8 36 40 86 $17,220.00 Side Streets (8 Sheets) 2 8 40 48 98 $19,480.00 Trail Facilities (3 Sheets) 2 24 56 40 122 $25,240.00 160.3 TYPICAL SECTIONS (11 Mainlanes, 13 Side streets) Mainlane (11) & Side Street (13) 16 48 48 112 $22,400.00 160.4 SIDE STREET INTERSECTION LAYOUTS Side Streets (5) 4 56 80 80 220 $45,880.00 160.5 CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES Cross Section Sheets (30%, 60%, 95%, and 100%) 4 60 80 80 224 $46,860.00 3D Modeling & Earthwork - Mainlane 4 44 64 80 192 $39,660.00 3D Modeling & Earthwork - Side Streets 4 40 64 60 168 $35,080.00 160.6 SUPPORTING ROADWAY PLAN SHEET PREPARATION Title Sheet 4 8 8 20 $4,060.00 Page 2 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 Index of Sheets 12 16 24 52 $10,540.00 Project Layouts (7 Sheets) 16 40 40 96 $19,320.00 Removal Plans (9 Sheets) 32 40 40 112 $23,240.00 Horizontal Alignment Data 16 16 16 48 $10,080.00 Miscellaneous Paving Details 24 24 24 72 $15,120.00 Driveway Plan & Profiles (7 Driveways) 32 48 48 128 $26,320.00 Sidewalk Retaining Wall Elevation Layouts 16 24 24 64 $13,160.00 Summary of Roadway Quantities 8 20 20 48 $9,660.00 QA/QC Performance (PBLR, 30%,60%, 95%, and 100%) 60 24 40 60 60 244 $60,980.00 Address TxDOT Comments (PBLR, 30%,60%, 95%, and 100%) 8 100 120 120 348 $73,420.00 160.7 ROADWAY STANDARDS 16 16 16 48 $10,080.00 160.8 PAVEMENT DESIGN (Incorporate)4 8 8 20 $4,060.00 160.9 ROADWAY QUANTITIES 4 60 80 80 224 $46,860.00 160 SUBTOTAL - ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS 104 0 736 40 1288 0 0 1304 0 0 0 3472 $726,040.00 161 DRAINAGE 161.1 DATA COLLECTION Field Investigations / Site Visits 8 8 8 8 32 $7,760.00 Collect Applicable Data: As-Built Plans 4 4 $980.00 FEMA Flood Studies / FIRM Maps & Data / Hydrologic & Hydraulic Models 2 6 10 18 $3,630.00 Review Survey Data 8 8 16 $3,600.00 Present Existing Drainage Structures in 3D Model (3 Culverts) 8 16 16 40 $8,120.00 161.2 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Delineate Bridge drainage area boundaries (1 Bridge) 2 4 6 2 6 6 26 $5,650.00 Develop Hydrology for cross drainage structures (1 Bridge) 4 4 8 6 6 28 $6,650.00 161.3 COMPLEX HYDRAULIC DESIGN and DOCUMENTATION Develop existing conditions HEC-RAS models (1 bridge) 6 12 14 12 14 58 $13,630.00 Develop proposed conditions HEC-RAS models (1 bridge) 2 12 16 20 12 62 $14,100.00 Update Drainage Technical Memos (1 bridge) 4 12 16 20 16 68 $15,380.00 Floodplain Fill Calculations 2 2 4 4 12 $3,080.00 161.4 STORM DRAINS (Design / Modeling) Design Storm Drain Inlets 4 8 20 40 60 132 $27,660.00 Design Storm Drain Trunkline 4 8 20 40 60 132 $27,660.00 Identify Trench Protection, Excavation, Shoring, Dewatering at Storm Sewer 4 8 8 16 16 52 $11,880.00 161.5 CROSS - DRAINAGE (Design / Modeling) Delineate Culvert drainage area boundaries (3 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Develop Hydrology for cross drainage structures (3 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Develop existing conditions C.M. models (1 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) 4 4 4 2 14 $3,360.00 Develop proposed conditions C.M. models (3 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Update Drainage Technical Memos (3 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) 2 4 8 12 12 38 $8,460.00 161.6 TEMPORARY DRAINAGE Cross Culvert TCP Phasing 4 12 4 20 $4,160.00 161.7 SCOUR ANALYSIS Prepare Scour Analysis 1 2 4 8 15 $3,560.00 Complete Form 2606 for Bridge (1 Location) 2 2 2 8 14 $3,410.00 Riprap Design (Bridge Abutment) 2 4 6 12 $2,810.00 161.8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Notify Need for Environmental Permits 4 4 4 4 16 $4,320.00 Page 3 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 161.9 PS&E HYDRAULICS (Sheets) Hydrologic Data Sheets Develop Overall Drainage Area Map 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Update Culvert hydrologic data sheets (3 locations)4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Hydraulic Data Sheets Update Non-Bridge Class Culvert Hydraulic Data Tables (3 locations) 2 4 6 12 $2,390.00 Develop Bridge hydraulic data sheets (1 location, 4 sheets per location) 4 16 16 16 40 92 $17,400.00 Culvert Layout Sheets (3 Non-Bridge Class Culverts) Update Culvert Layouts (3 layouts) 8 16 24 40 88 $18,440.00 Prepare Channel Layout Sheets for proposed Channel easements (Up to 4 locations) 8 8 8 12 36 $8,160.00 Identify Trench Protection, Excavation, Shoring, Dewatering (3 cross culverts) 4 4 8 12 28 $5,980.00 Present Proposed Drainage Structures in 3D Model (3 cross culverts) 4 16 32 24 76 $16,000.00 Prepare Drainage Details for outlet protection 8 8 8 8 32 $7,440.00 Select Standard Details 4 4 4 4 16 $3,720.00 Develop Non-Standard Details (1 details) 2 4 8 8 8 30 $6,920.00 Prepare Quantity Summaries 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Identify Utility Conflicts 4 4 8 8 24 $5,260.00 Coordinate with roadway design 8 8 $1,960.00 Coordinate with Structures for Retaining walls 4 12 4 20 $4,960.00 Storm Drain Plan and Profile Sheets Prepare Drainage Area Maps (8 sheets) 12 16 40 40 108 $22,920.00 Develop Drainage Plan and Profile Sheets (16 sheets) 16 32 140 160 348 $70,140.00 Identify Standard Details (4) 2 4 8 8 22 $4,660.00 Develop Non-Standard Details (2 details) 4 4 8 16 $3,980.00 Prepare Storm Drain Quantities 4 4 16 16 40 $8,340.00 Prepare Storm Drain Calculation Sheets 4 8 24 24 60 $12,400.00 Mitigate Storm Drain Design for Utility Conflicts 8 8 16 16 48 $10,520.00 Develop Layout for Subsurface Drainage at Retaining Walls 4 8 8 4 24 $5,520.00 Present Proposed Drainage Structures in 3D Model (Storm Drain) 8 24 24 56 $11,200.00 Tabulate Quantities 8 16 40 40 104 $21,720.00 QA/QC Performance TNP Internal QC Review 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% 40 32 40 40 24 24 200 $53,840.00 Address TxDOT Review Comments 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% Submittals 24 24 16 96 96 256 $55,640.00 161.10 SLAYTER CREEK FLOOD PLAIN STUDY CLOMR 72 30 12 114 $31,410.00 LOMR 72 30 12 114 $31,410.00 Breach Analysis (Simplified) 32 16 8 56 $15,160.00 161 SUBTOTAL - DRAINAGE 119 428 548 60 900 0 0 810 70 46 0 2981 $668,910.00 161 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE FEMA Fee for LOMR 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 FEMA Fee for CLOMR 1 EA $6,610.00 $6,610.00 161 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT COST $14,610.00 Page 4 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 162 SIGNING & PAVEMENT MARKINGS (PERMANENT) 162.1 SIGNING & PAVEMENT MARKINGS Signing Layout 4 40 40 84 $16,380.00 Small Sign Summary 4 24 40 68 $13,100.00 Sign Details 4 40 44 $9,180.00 Pavement Marking Layouts 4 40 40 84 $16,380.00 Required Standards 2 4 8 14 $2,750.00 Summary of Pavement Markings 4 16 16 36 $7,140.00 162 SUBTOTAL - SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION (PERMANENT)0 0 22 0 164 0 0 144 0 0 0 330 $64,930.00 163 MISCELLANEOUS 163.2 RETAINING WALLS AND MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES SIDEWALK WALL Retaining Wall Design Establish Wall Alignments, Roadway Offset Stationing, X-Section Grading 4 16 16 36 $7,140.00 Miscellaneous Wall Detail Sheets (2 Sheets) 12 12 24 $4,620.00 Prepare Open Roads 3-D Retaining Wall Corridor Models 24 24 48 $9,240.00 Incorporate/ Assemble TxDOT Retaining Wall Standards & Details 4 8 12 $2,620.00 FILL WALL Retaining Wall Design Coordinate with Geotech, Civil Grading & Drainage Design Engineers 6 6 12 $3,240.00 Develop Final Wall Type (CIP, MSE) Based on X-Sections 2 2 4 $1,080.00 Establish Wall Alignments, Roadway Offset Stationing, X-Section Grading 4 4 16 8 32 $6,240.00 RW1, RW2, RW3, &RW4 CIP Concrete Retaining Wall Plan, Elevations & Typical Sections & Flume Drainage Patterns, Quantity Tables (8 Sheets)14 10 52 34 110 $20,840.00 Miscellaneous Wall Detail Sheets (2 Sheets) 6 4 20 14 44 $8,350.00 Retaining Wall Boring Log Sheets (4 Sheets) 4 2 6 10 22 $4,150.00 Prepare Open Roads 3-D Retaining Wall Corridor Models 8 4 30 20 62 $11,540.00 Incorporate/ Assemble TxDOT Retaining Wall Standards & Details 2 2 2 4 10 $2,040.00 Quantity Summary Tables 1 4 4 8 17 $3,345.00 QA/QC PERFORMANCE QAQC Cost Estimates at 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% 2 6 6 8 22 $4,540.00 TNP Internal QC Review 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% 8 12 10 14 44 $9,400.00 ADDRESS TxDOT REVIEW COMMENTS 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% Submittals 8 10 12 14 44 $9,170.00 163.3 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, DETOURS, SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION Traffic Control Plans TCP Narrative (Up to 3 phases) 4 16 16 8 8 52 $13,160.00 TCP Plan Layouts (Up to 3 phases) (8 sheets per phase) 24 40 96 100 260 $54,680.00 TCP Typical Sections (Main Lanes) 4 8 24 16 52 $10,960.00 TCP Typical Sections (Side Streets)(5 side streets)4 8 32 16 60 $12,600.00 TCP Quantities 4 4 16 16 40 $8,340.00 TxDOT Coordination Significant Project Procedures (Form 2229) 1 1 2 $545.00 Temporary Drainage 4 8 12 8 32 $7,060.00 Page 5 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 Maintain Property Access (8 Driveways) Property Access Design 4 2 6 6 18 $4,000.00 Property Access List / Exhibits 4 2 6 6 18 $4,000.00 ROW Impacts Construction Easements / ROE 2 4 2 8 16 $4,010.00 Verify Clear Utilities 4 4 8 4 20 $5,340.00 Sequencing Road User Cost Calculation / Add. Admin. Liquidated Damages 8 8 $1,960.00 TCP STANDARDS 4 4 4 12 $2,520.00 163.4 ILLUMINATION Photometric Analysis to Establish Spacing (30%) 8 8 $2,400.00 Illumination Layout (30%/60%/95%/100%) 20 60 80 $18,300.00 Lighting Schedule, Cable and Conduit Quantities, and Electrical Service Specifications (60%/95%/100%)8 24 32 $7,320.00 Voltage Drop Calculations (60%/95%/100%) 12 32 44 $10,160.00 Illumination Details (30%) 4 8 12 $2,840.00 QA/QC (30%/60%/95%/100%) 2 16 18 $5,480.00 Addressing Comments (60%/95%/100%), Comment Responses 12 40 52 $11,800.00 163.5 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SW3P)(8 sheets per phase) Develop SW3P 4 8 12 48 48 120 $25,180.00 Calculate SW3P Quantities 4 4 24 24 56 $11,420.00 Prepare SW3P Summary Sheets 2 12 12 26 $5,110.00 Select SW3P Standards 2 4 4 10 $2,030.00 163.6 PLAN PREPARATION Assemble Plans (PBLR, 30%, 60%, 95%, 100%) 2 16 80 88 88 274 $58,960.00 163.7 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURAL DETAILS Design, Draft, and Detail Miscellaneous Structural Details 4 8 8 4 4 28 $6,940.00 163.8 ROW HEARINGS (Support for 5 Hearings) Research Parcels 2 12 12 26 $6,080.00 Prepare Litigation Designs 8 24 16 48 $11,880.00 Assist & Consult with City Staff or Attorneys 8 20 28 $7,620.00 163.9 ESTIMATE Develop and Submit Estimate (30%, 60% 95%, 100%) 2 12 32 32 78 $15,940.00 163.10 CONTRACT TIME DETERMINATION (CTD) Develop and Submit CTD (60%, 95%, 100%) 4 24 28 $5,900.00 163.11 SPECIFICATIONS AND GENERAL NOTES Identify Necessary Specifications 2 16 8 26 $6,040.00 Prepare General Notes 2 24 26 $6,560.00 Project Manual & Bidding Documents 4 40 24 68 $16,080.00 Required TxDOT Forms (PBLR, 30%, 60%, 95%, 100%) 2 6 4 12 $2,970.00 163.12 CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW Quality Review of Constructability of PS&E Set 16 8 16 8 8 56 $16,440.00 Addressing Comments & Revising 16 24 24 64 $13,160.00 163 SUBTOTAL - MISCELLANEOUS 64 193 482 8 760 78 4 630 134 0 0 2233 $513,340.00 163 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE Direct Cost 1.00 EA $35,000.000 $35,000.00 TxDOT Training & Compliance 32 hour $75.00 $2,400.00 ADA COST: TDLR Registration and RAS Inspection 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 163 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT COST $42,400.00 Page 6 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Director Project Project Senior Project Structural Structural EIT EIT CAD ROW Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Agent Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $295.00 $240.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $155.00 170 BRIDGE DESIGN 170.1 BRIDGE LAYOUT Bridge Layout-Refine Schematic Coordination with Geotech., Survey, H&H, Civil Grading Alignment & Profile 8 8 16 $4,320.00 Attend four (4) Coordination Meetings with TxDOT and County officials 10 10 20 $5,400.00 Bridge Layout (Assume Moderate Revisions to Schematic Bridge Layout) (1 Sheet)6 4 26 36 $7,330.00 Bridge Typical Sections (1 Sheet)4 2 12 18 $3,730.00 TNP Internal QC Review 30%, 60%, 95%, 100%8 22 36 66 $14,930.00 ADDRESS TxDOT REVIEW COMMENTS 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% Submittals 10 10 36 56 $11,880.00 170.2 BRIDGE STRUCTURAL DETAILS Bridge Boring Logs Sheets (2 Sheets)2 1 10 13 $2,585.00 Bridge Quantity Summary Table and Bearing seat elevations (1 Sheet)8 6 28 42 $8,770.00 Foundation Layout Plans (1 Sheet)6 4 28 38 $7,690.00 Abutment 1 Plan & Elevation (1 Sheet)6 4 28 38 $7,690.00 Abutment 4 Plan & Elevation (1 Sheet)3 2 16 21 $4,205.00 Abutment Details, Quantity & Control Elevation Tables (1 Sheet)4 4 16 24 $5,040.00 Bents 2 & 3 Plan & Elevation (1 Sheet)6 4 24 34 $6,970.00 Bents 2 & 3 Details, Quantity & Control Elevation Tables (1 Sheet)4 2 16 22 $4,450.00 Framing Plan (1 Sheet)6 4 28 38 $7,690.00 Prestressed I-Girder Unit Plans (1 Sheet)6 4 32 42 $8,410.00 Bridge Deck Section & I-Girder DL Deflection Tables (1 Sheets)6 4 26 36 $7,330.00 TxDOT IGND Beam Design Tables (1 Sheet)5 2 12 19 $3,975.00 Open Bridge Modeler (OBM) 3D Bridge Model 10 6 38 54 $11,060.00 Compile TxDOT bridge standards, Specifications & General Notes 4 2 20 26 $5,170.00 170.3 Bridge Total Quantities and Cost Estimates for 30%, 60%, 95%, 100% Submittal 6 10 34 50 $10,540.00 170 SUBTOTAL - BRIDGE DESIGN 0 0 128 0 0 115 0 466 0 0 0 709 $149,165.00 351 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (REIMBURSABLE) 351.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Assist City in Letting Process Respond to Letting RFI's & Issuing Addendums 2 4 4 2 4 16 $3,790.00 Pre Bid-Meeting 2 4 6 $1,660.00 Bid Opening 2 4 6 $1,660.00 Bid Tabulation Analysis / Award Recommendation 2 4 6 $1,660.00 Attend Preconstruction Meeting 4 8 4 16 $4,500.00 Review and approval of shop drawings 12 4 12 28 $6,280.00 Review and approval of forming details 1 1 2 4 $900.00 Responding to requests for information (RFIs) 2 16 4 16 38 $8,660.00 Attend field meetings (up to 2) 4 4 4 12 $3,520.00 Calculate quantities and assist the City engineer in preparing change orders (up to 2)2 2 2 8 14 $3,200.00 Providing minor redesign (major redesign should be handled with a contract supplement), which will include changes to the affected plan sheets and an updated copy of the 3D corridor model.2 12 2 16 32 $7,090.00 Produce Record Drawings from Contractor Red Lines 4 24 28 $5,300.00 351 SUBTOTAL - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (REIMBURSABLE)22 0 75 0 4 23 0 82 0 0 0 178 $48,220.00 Page 7 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Ferguson Parkway Total Total Code Task Description Labor Labor Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $280.00 $170.00 $220.00 $295.00 $160.00 $145.00 $165.00 $55.00 $95.00 130.1 RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) MAPPING Field - Set Primary Control & Recover Exisitng City Control Field - Boundary Survey Ex. ROW Field - Boundary Survey Adj. Properties 10 10 $2,200.00 Field - Stake ROW 30 30 $6,600.00 Office - Project Kick Off and Coordination 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 $1,310.00 Office - Research (20 Properties) 1 1 2 4 8 $1,520.00 Office - Deed Sketch 1 2 4 7 $1,180.00 Office - Right of Entry Letters and Tracking (20 Owners) 1 1 2 4 $940.00 Office - Control Planning 1 1 2 1 1 6 $1,250.00 Office - Process Control Data 1 1 4 8 14 $2,420.00 Office - Process Boundary Data 2 6 8 $1,190.00 Office - Create Parcel Exhibits (20) 1 40 32 60 133 $25,360.00 Office - Create Legal Descriptions (20) 2 50 52 $14,680.00 Office - Create ROW Map 1 4 16 24 45 $7,500.00 Office - Verify Boundaries (20) Office - Boundary Analysis (20 Properties) 2 40 42 $11,880.00 Office - QA/QC Deliverables 2 8 10 $2,920.00 Office - Project Management 2 8 10 $2,920.00 130.1 SUBTOTAL 15 156 0 41 0 63 108 2 0 0 385 $83,870.00 FUNCTION CODE 160 (150) ROADWAY DESIGN 150.1 DESIGN SURVEYS Field - Supplemental Design Survey 25 25 $5,500.00 Field - Channel Sections 25 25 $5,500.00 Flight Field - Set Ground Control Field - RTK Ground Control 5 5 $1,100.00 Field - Ground Truthing 5 5 $1,100.00 Field - Mobilization 2 2 $440.00 Field - Imagery Flight 4 4 $880.00 Field - Lidar Flight 4 4 $880.00 Field - De-Mobilization 2 2 $440.00 Office - Process Topo Data 4 8 12 $1,800.00 Office - Merge Aerila Data & Supplemental Data 4 12 16 $2,380.00 Office - Base Mapping 4 12 16 $2,380.00 Create 2d, 3d, DTM & tin 24 40 64 $9,640.00 Office - Control Sheets 1 2 2 8 13 $2,380.00 Office - Project Planning 1 1 2 $620.00 Office - Lidar Processing 8 8 $1,280.00 Office - Lidar Ground /Off Ground Segmentation 5 5 $800.00 Office - Lidar Cleanup and create DTM 8 8 $1,280.00 Office - Imagery Processing 5 5 $800.00 Office - Orthomosic Editing Office - Project Management 4 5 9 $2,760.00 150.1 SUBTOTAL 6 8 0 72 0 64 80 0 0 0 230 $41,960.00 150 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE Mileage 1600 mile $0.725 $1,160.00 Aerial Panels 5 EA $25.00 $125.00 sUAS 8 hr $500.00 $4,000.00 Bridge As-Built Survey 1 EA $14,500.00 $14,500.00 150 SUBTOTAL $19,785.00 TOTAL $145,615.00 SURVEY TECHNICIAN FIELD COORDINATOR FLAGGER ABSTRACTORSURVEY MANAGER RPLS (PM) 1-MAN CREW 2-MAN CREW 3-MAN CREW S.I.T. OR SR. SURVEY TECHNICIAN Page 8 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Support Engineer Engineer EIT SR Utility Utility Survey Surveyor Admin Total Total Code Task Description Manager Senior (Project) Coordinator Coordinator Technician Senior (RPLS) Clerical Labor Labor Hours Labor Rates $340.00 $310.00 $205.00 $180.00 $250.00 $170.00 $145.00 $280.00 $100.00 135 Utility Engineering Investigation 135.1 Utility Engineering Investigation Review assignment/SUE Internal Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 2 8 $2,070.00 Develop and Coordinate Project Schedule 6 6 12 $3,120.00 Verify Survey Control with Field Staff and Office Staff 4 4 4 12 $2,940.00 Work Plan - Traffic Control Details and Permitting w/ City 4 16 20 40 $9,920.00 135.2 Utility Coordination (Assist TxDOT's Responsible Lead) Obtain Design Files, Create Combined Design/SUE CAD Basefile 4 12 16 $3,400.00 Determine Utility Conflicts (30%, 60%, 95%, 100% plans) 4 16 40 40 100 $23,520.00 Prepare Initial Utility Conflict Matrix 8 20 20 2 50 $11,280.00 Update Utility Conflict Matrix (60%, 95%, 100%) 8 24 24 56 $12,800.00 Provide Updated UCM to PM at Each Submittal 8 8 16 $3,840.00 Establish contact with Utility Companies 8 12 12 32 $7,520.00 Develop and provide Utility Contact List 4 4 4 12 $2,920.00 Provide NOPC letters to Utility Companies 2 10 10 22 $4,820.00 Prepare NORA at Plans Adequate Deliverable for Utilities 2 10 10 22 $4,820.00 Review Utility Relocation and Traffic Control Plans (5 utility adjustments) 2 20 10 32 $6,580.00 Attend Utility Coordination Meetings (Monthly up to 18 months, and at each submittal - total of 22 Meetings) 44 22 22 88 $23,650.00 Monthly Progress Meeting with Design Team (Monthly up to 18 months, and at each submittal - total of 22 Meetings) 44 44 88 $21,560.00 Assist in Preparing Utility Relocation Cost 8 40 40 88 $25,120.00 135 SUBTOTAL 26 210 44 178 182 44 4 4 2 694 $169,880.00 135 UNIT COST QUAN UNIT RATE SUE (Quality Level D) - includes labor and equipment for records research, CADD, and mapping. 10500 LF $0.85 $8,925.00 SUE (Quality Level C) - includes labor and equipment for records research, CADD, and mapping. 15000 LF $0.95 $14,250.00 SUE (Quality Level B - Utility Designation) - includes labor and equipment for records research, designating, engineering, surveying, CADD, mapping and limited traffic control 29000 LF $2.10 $60,900.00 Two (2) Designating Person with equipment 40 Hour $235.00 $9,400.00 SUE Mobilization/Demobilization - vacuum excavation truck, equipment, travel time for 2-man crew, fuel. Mileage log to be provided. 300 Mile $6.00 $1,800.00 SUE (Quality Level A - Utility Locate, Test Holes) - includes labor and equipment for records research, designating, engineering, surveying, CADD, mapping and limited traffic control 0' to 5.0' 8 EA $2,000.00 $16,000.00 5' to 8' 8 EA $2,400.00 $19,200.00 8' - 13' 3 EA $2,700.00 $8,100.00 13' - 20' 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 >20' 1 VF $270.00 $270.00 135 SUBTOTAL - UNIT COST $141,845.00 135 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE Mileage 2250 mile $0.700 $1,575.00 Toll Charges 0 day $50.00 $0.00 Overnight Mail - letter size 10 each $30.00 $300.00 Photocopies Color (11" X 17") 1000 each $1.25 $1,250.00 Photocopies Color (8 1/2" X 11") 1000 each $1.00 $1,000.00 Environmental Field Supplies (lathes, stakes, flagging, spray paint, etc.) 10 day $35.00 $350.00 Traffic Control Services, Arrow Boards and Attenuator trucks - Medium Project (Includes labor, equipment and fuel) 4 day $2,000.00 $8,000.00 USB Flash Drive 4 each $10.00 $40.00 135 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT COST $12,515.00 TOTAL $324,240.00 Page 9 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Team Leader Project Project Senior Project EIT EIT CAD Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Clerical LS Hours Labor Rates $310.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $100.00 1 TASK 600 WATER & SANTIARY SEWER DESIGN 30% DESIGN KICKOFF MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM 1 1.5 1 3.5 $910.00 WEEKLY TEAM COORDINATION MEETINGS 0.5 2 2 4.5 $1,055.00 REVIEW CITY STANDARDS 2 2.5 4.5 $975.00 DEVELOP ALIGNMENT FOR 16" WL 2 31 80 113 $21,920.00 CALCULATE QUANTITIES, PREPARE OPCC 3 6 9 $1,800.00 30% INTERNAL QC REVIEW WORKSHOP 2 2 2 6 $1,520.00 MEETING WITH CITY TO REVIEW COMMENTS 2 3 2 7 $1,820.00 60% DESIGN WEEKLY TEAM COORDINATION MEETINGS 0.5 4 4 8.5 $1,955.00 REVIEW AND CONFIRM CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS 1 2 3 $600.00 REVISE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT AS NECESSARY 2 8 16 26 $5,420.00 CREATE WATER LINE PROFILE 20 40 60 $12,000.00 EVALUATE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS 2 4 6 $1,200.00 DESIGN CREEK CROSSING, BORE 3.5 11.5 30 45 $9,035.00 LOCATE, VERIFY, AND ADDRESS ALL WATER SERVICES AND WATER METER LOCATIONS 1 2.5 3.5 $675.00 CHECK VALVE SPACING AND ADDRESS AS NECESSARY 0.5 2.5 3 $525.00 CHECK HYDRANT SPACING AND ADDRESS AS NECESSARY 1.25 2.5 3.75 $750.00 PREPARAE PLANS WATER RLINE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS 18 80 98 $17,400.00 WATER RLINE DETAIL SHEETS 1.5 2.5 4 $825.00 CALCULUATE QUANTITIES, PREPARE OPCC 4 4 8 $1,800.00 INTERNRAL QC REVIEW 7.5 8 15.5 $4,725.00 ADDRESES QC COMMENTS 16 40 56 $10,800.00 PLOT P LANS 1 1 $150.00 MEET W ITH CITY STAFF TO REVIEW COMMENTS 2 2 4 $900.00 COORDINATION WITH STRUCTURAL TEAM 4 4 $1,200.00 95% DESIGN WEEKLY TEAM COORDINATION MEETINGS 0.5 3 3 6.5 $1,505.00 PREPARE PLANS: WATER LINE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS 26 60 86 $16,800.00 WATER LINE DETAIL SHEETS 8 17 25 $4,950.00 CALCULATE QUANTITIES, PREPARE OPCC 4 6 10 $2,100.00 INTERNAL QC REVIEW 8 8 16 $4,880.00 ADDRESS QC COMMENTS 20 40 60 $12,000.00 PLOT PLANS 2 2 $300.00 MEET WITH CITY STAFF TO REVIEW COMMENTS 2 2.5 2 6.5 $1,670.00 COORDINATION WITH STRUCTURAL TEAM 2 0.5 2.5 $675.00 100% DESIGN ADDRESS CITY COMMENTS, REVISE PLANS 16 40 56 $10,800.00 CALCULATE QUANTITIES, PREPARE OPCC 2 4 6 $1,200.00 INTERNAL QC REVIEW 4 4 8 $2,440.00 ADDRESS QC COMMENTS 8 19 27 $5,250.00 PLOT PLANS 1 1 $150.00 PREPARE LIST OF BID ITEMS 4 6 10 $2,100.00 PREPARE BID ITEM DESCRIPTIONS 4 12 16 $3,000.00 Page 10 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) Func Senior Senior Total Total Code Task Description Team Leader Project Project Senior Project EIT EIT CAD Labor Labor Manager Manager Engineer Engineer III/IV I/II Tech Clerical LS Hours Labor Rates $310.00 $300.00 $245.00 $290.00 $205.00 $180.00 $150.00 $165.00 $100.00 1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES REVIEW SHOP DRAWINGS 2 8.5 10.5 $1,875.00 SITE VISIT DURING CONSTRUCTION 4 4 8 $1,800.00 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATIONS. 4 2 6 $1,500.00 PREPARE PLAN AND QUANTITY REVISIONS TO PROCESS ANY NECESSARY CHANGE ORDERS. THE CONSULTANT WILL PREPARE THE CHANGE ORDER AND GET IT EXECUTED BY THE CONTRACTOR 2 4 6 $1,200.00 ASSIST THE CITY STAFF IN CONDUCTING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ISSUE A PUNCH LIST TO CONTRACTOR IF NECESSARY 4 4 8 $1,800.00 PREPARE AND REVISE CONSTRUCTION “RECORD DRAWINGS” BASED UPON MARK-UPS PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SUBMIT A PDF CONTAINING THE FINAL “AS CONSTRUCTED” BLACKLINE DRAWINGS (WITH “RECORD DRAWING STAMPS” BEARING THE SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AND THE DATE). 2 8 10 $1,800.00 TASK 600 SUBTOTAL WATER & SANITARY SEWER DESIGN 31.5 220.75 0 0 0 0 459 0 0 883.75 $179,755.00 TASK 600 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE PLOT PLANS 220 EA $1.00 $220.00 MILEAGE 34 EA $0.725 $25.00 TASK 600 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT COST $245.00 Page 11 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: HVJ North Texas - Chelliah Consultants, Inc. Func Total Total Code Task Description Labor Labor Hours Labor Rates $225.00 $180.00 $115.00 $115.00 $65.00 160.9 Pavement Design (see FC 163 - Geotechinical Report) 163.1 Geotechnical Borings and Investigation Project Setup, Project Kick off and Document Review 2 4 10 8 4 28 $3,240.00 Boring Plan Preparation, Preparation for Staking, Staking 4 12 24 8 48 $6,740.00 Site Clearance, Utility Clearance and meeting with Utility Locators Field Coordination, ROW Permits, TCP Letters 4 12 24 30 10 10 90 $9,920.00 Soil Sample Logging and Field Supervision 4 8 24 30 192 258 $21,030.00 Field Log Review and Laboratory test Assignment, Performing, Laboratory Result Review and Wincore Log Preparation 8 20 40 20 88 $10,000.00 Retaining Walls External Stability Analyses and Design 8 20 30 58 $8,850.00 Bridges Axial Capacity Recommendations, Lateral Capacity Recommendation, and Design Recommendations 8 14 24 46 $7,080.00 Culvert Design Parameters 4 8 12 24 $3,720.00 Draft Geotechnical Report - Bridges, Walls, Culverts, Pavement Design 10 20 32 6 6 74 $9,920.00 Final Geotechnical Report - Bridges, Walls, Culverts, Pavement Design 4 8 12 4 4 32 $3,980.00 SUBTOTAL 56 126 232 76 212 44 0 0 0 746 $84,480.00 163.1 UNIT COST QUAN UNIT RATE Moisture Content - ASTM D 2216 147 Each $15.00 $2,205.00 Atterberg Limits - ASTM D 4318 99 Each $75.00 $7,425.00 Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve - ASTM D 1140 97 Each $55.00 $5,335.00 Sieve and Hydrometer Analysis - ASTM D6913 2 Each $200.00 $400.00 One Dimensional Consolidation Testing ASTM D2435 4 Each $550.00 $2,200.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial ASTM 4767 1 Each $2,100.00 $2,100.00 Direct Shear Testing ASTM 3080 3 Each $800.00 $2,400.00 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial - ASTM D2850 9 Each $150.00 $1,350.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength in Soil - ASTM D2166 55 Each $80.00 $4,400.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength in Rock - ASTM D2938 24 Each $90.00 $2,160.00 Lime Series (PI) - TEX-112-E 5 Each $350.00 $1,750.00 Sulfate Testing - TEX-145-E 10 Each $145.00 $1,450.00 Free Swell Test - ASTM D4546 25 Each $150.00 $3,750.00 California Bearing Ratio ASTM 1883 2 Each $500.00 $1,000.00 Standard Proctor Test ASTM 698 2 Each $300.00 $600.00 Organic Tests ASTM 2974 4 Each $400.00 $1,600.00 Backfilll borings with Grout/bentonite chips & Pavement patching 470 Per foot $15.00 $7,050.00 Pavement Coring (Assumed up to 10-inch Cores) 2 Each $250.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL - UNIT COST $47,675.00 163.1 DIRECT COST QUAN UNIT RATE Mobilization of Drill Rig 4 LS $1,000.000 $4,000.00 Support Truck Mobilization/Demobilization 8 LS $300.00 $2,400.00 Daily Drill Rig Rate for Drilling and Sampling of Soil/Rock 16 Per day $2,800.00 $44,800.00 Private Utility Locator 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Site Clearing 4 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 Vehicle Trip 19 $75.00 $1,425.00 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT COST $66,625.00 Senior Engineer Project Manger Staff Engineer (EIT) Senior Drilling Coordinator Field Logger Engineering Assistant Page 12 of 13 Ferguson Parkway CSJ: 0918-24-249 Exhibit C Schedule of Fees LUMP SUM Amendment 1 City of Anna Provider: Teague Nall & Perkins, Inc. (TNP) TASK 500 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION SERVICES QUAN UNIT RATE Project Administration 9 1 month $6,000.00 $54,000.00 Appraisal Services 520 1 hour $250.00 $130,000.00 Apprisal Review Services 200 1 hour $250.00 $50,000.00 Appraisal Prep and Testimony Services 250 1 hour $250.00 $62,500.00 Title Services 20 1 parcel $700.00 $14,000.00 Negotiation Services 20 1 parcel $11,000.00 $220,000.00 Business Relocation Services 2 1 parcel $11,000.00 $22,000.00 Residential Relocation Services 1 1 parcel $11,000.00 $11,000.00 Personal Property Relocation Services 3 1 parcel $5,000.00 $15,000.00 Condemnation Services 10 1 parcel $8,000.00 $80,000.00 TASK 500 SUBTOTAL - UNIT COST $658,500.00 Page 13 of 13 Ferguson Parkway Exhibit C – Attachment A City of Anna CSJ: 0918-24-249 Schedule of Fees Collin County Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT C – ATTACHMENT A Exhibit C – Attachment A SCHEDULE OF FEES ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop CSJ: 0918-24-249 Collin County, Texas Fees for additional services will be negotiated at the time those services are requested by the City. Contract rates shown as follows are valid until December 31st, 2026. Since the date at which the contingent additional services will be requested is uncertain, the listed rates will be escalated for subsequent calendar years. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Ferguson Parkway Exhibit C – Attachment A City of Anna CSJ: 0918-24-249 Schedule of Fees Collin County Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT C – ATTACHMENT A Ferguson Parkway Exhibit C – Attachment A City of Anna CSJ: 0918-24-249 Schedule of Fees Collin County Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT C – ATTACHMENT A Ferguson Parkway EXHIBIT D Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Information to be Provided by the City City of Anna Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT D INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY TO THE ENGINEER Ferguson Parkway from Elm Street to Collin County Outer Loop CSJ: 0918-24-249 Collin County, Texas Subject to availability, the items and services to be provided or performed by City of Anna, to and for the Engineer, will include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Name, address and phone number of the City’s and State’s project manager. 2. Review of recommendations offered by the Engineer and approval or rejection of any or all work performed under this contract. 3. Review of progress of work and final acceptance of all documents. 4. Processing of all periodic payment requests submitted by Engineer. 5. Processing and submittal of all invoicing to the State for reimbursements. 6. Submittal of documentation to regulatory agencies for review and comment when specified. 7. Assistance in the coordination and scheduling of site visits 8. Assistance in contacting and securing Right of Entry responses from non-responsive property owners. 9. Review and approval of typical roadway and bridge cross sections created by the Engineer. 10. Approval of pavement design to be used for cost estimation purposes. 11. Available planimetric mapping, aerial photography and Digital Terrain Model (DTM) for the corridor. 12. Available horizontal control points, benchmark elevations and descriptions for vertical control in the project area. 13. Existing subsurface utility engineering (SUE) mapping, if available 14. Available existing Right-of-Way (ROW) maps, plats, and or surveys of state highway facilities, city Streets, and subdivisions in the project corridor. 15. Available interface data for any projects adjacent to the project corridor. 16. Current average bid prices for construction, maintenance, and operation costs. 17. Assistance as necessary in obtaining the required data and information from other local, regional, state, and federal agencies. Ferguson Parkway EXHIBIT D Amendment 1 CSJ: 0918-24-249 Information to be Provided by the City City of Anna Page 2 of 2 18. Timely reviews of deliverables in accordance with “Schedule” of the project and decisions necessary for the Engineer to maintain the project work schedule. 19. Examples of acceptable format for the deliverables required by the contract. 20. Distribution of environmental document and schematic layout to the appropriate agencies and the public. 21. Cost estimate method for any required ROW and associated improvements. 22. Crash Data from at least 3 previous years if available. 23. For any website needs (e.g., public involvement, project information, etc.) the State will work with its Communication Division to request the creation and maintenance of the website. This includes the completion of the State’s “Website Needs Request” form 2199 and ensuring the website conforms to state law, Texas Department of Information Resources requirements, TxDOT policies and procedures, and TxDOT Brand Guidelines. 24. Value Engineering study, if available. 25. Develop Project Funding for all Project Phases in a timely manner. ID Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors 1 2 Notice To Proceed 0 days Mon 5/18/26 Mon 5/18/26 3 ROW & Utilities 494 days Mon 5/18/26 Thu 4/6/28 4 ROW Mapping 20 days Mon 5/18/26 Fri 6/12/26 2 5 SUE Investigation 20 days Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/26/26 2,4SS+10 days 6 ROW Acquisition (18mo for ROW AQU with ED)315 days Mon 6/15/26 Fri 8/27/27 4 7 UTILITY COORDINATION 140 days Thu 3/25/27 Wed 10/6/27 20 8 UTILITY CLEARANCE 150 days Thu 9/9/27 Wed 4/5/28 7FS-20 days,6FS-100 days 9 ROW CLEAR 1 day Thu 4/6/28 Thu 4/6/28 6,8 10 PS&E DESIGN 524 days Mon 5/18/26 Thu 5/18/28 11 Begin PS&E 0 days Mon 5/18/26 Mon 5/18/26 2 12 PBLR 43 days Mon 5/18/26 Wed 7/15/26 11 13 PBLR Submittal 0 days Wed 7/15/26 Wed 7/15/26 12 14 Bridge Design 100 days Thu 7/16/26 Wed 12/2/26 13 15 TxDOT Review 20 days Thu 12/3/26 Wed 12/30/26 14 16 30% Design 83 days Mon 5/18/26 Wed 9/9/26 2 17 30% PS&E Submittal 0 days Wed 9/9/26 Wed 9/9/26 16,4,5 18 TxDOT Review 20 days Thu 9/10/26 Wed 10/7/26 17 19 60% Design 120 days Thu 10/8/26 Wed 3/24/27 18 20 60% PS&E Submittal 0 days Wed 3/24/27 Wed 3/24/27 19,14 21 TxDOT Review 20 days Thu 3/25/27 Wed 4/21/27 20 22 95% Design 70 days Thu 4/22/27 Wed 7/28/27 21 23 95% PS&E Submittal 0 days Wed 7/28/27 Wed 7/28/27 22 24 TxDOT Review 20 days Thu 7/29/27 Wed 8/25/27 23 25 100% Final Design 60 days Thu 8/26/27 Wed 11/17/27 24 26 100% Final PS&E Submittal 0 days Wed 11/17/27 Wed 11/17/27 25 27 TxDOT Review 20 days Thu 11/18/27 Wed 12/15/27 26 28 Ready to Let 0 days Thu 5/18/28 Thu 5/18/28 27FS+30 days,8,9FS+30 days 5/18/2026 4/6/2028 5/18/2026 7/15/2026 9/9/2026 3/24/2027 7/28/2027 11/17/2027 5/18/2028 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2026 2027 2028 Task Split Milestone Summary Project Summary Inactive Task Inactive Milestone Inactive Summary Manual Task Duration-only Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Start-only Finish-only External Tasks External Milestone Deadline Baseline Baseline Milestone Baseline Summary Progress Manual Progress CSJ: 0918-24-249 Ferguson Parkway Exhibit E Schedule Amendment 1 City of Anna Page 1 Project: SCHEDULE_2023-1 Date: Mon 4/27/26 Item No. 7. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 5/12/2026 Staff Contact: AGENDA ITEM: Future Agenda Items. SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: ATTACHMENTS: