Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-08-10 Regular Meeting PacketITEM 8. Consider action on recommendation of Planning and Zoning Commission regarding preliminary plat for Villages of Hurricane Creek. The PZC has scheduled action on this plat at its meeting of August 9. The plat was originally reviewed by the PZC at its meeting of July 6. The primary concern raised at that meeting related to the presence of driveways on minor collectors, particularly the primary north -south collector street. There is no hard and fast rule on this issue; it is to a large extent a judgment call. The developer has submitted a letter from his traffic consultant, Mr. Jack Hatchell, that supports his contention that the design of the subdivision is such that the driveway locations are not a problem. Your planning consultant, Mr. Maurice Schwanke, supports this view. We have also asked Mr. Tom Walton, our traffic engineer, to review and comment on the issue. I am attaching the original Schwanke comments. The developer has responded to these comments in a manner satisfactory to the PZC i42p City ate`: Rnn`a rc-�c�t-cr�cu r DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Plat (� Final Plat • �Ian p Landscape•Ptan • , f • l�f. Addition tal N mbar of ❑ Replat ❑ Site Plan ❑ ❑ Land Study ❑ w�CA, 4 3. Zoning Classifications) xi..MWr) Q r-9jneip:LL•Vf 4_ Total Number of Lots, by Type_ s+ �! & t f^ tL�:1, t y* Cam 5. tocatian of B. Applicants se List thopersons you wish to be contartP_d about this reauIsL) �p apty�JL?' 1. Owner. �t i at A. � ti kftNW 20. Appircant: �o� Address: 2?os �v� r t�-aaz. Address: Q'7 C City. State, Zlp:W c3CAgtkz Tx '?s�o 7o City,, State, Zip: �i r t r try ^r-1 Phone: 21y - $ olZ- �SZta4 Phone: q �2\r{-gp2 "- Zic 4. Submitted By'. Phone: Z 1y -'-1 %- Ot ' BEFORE ME, an authorized of8ctal of the City of Anna, on this day personally appeared . the undersigned applicant, who ceRifles the "1 h eby • -fy tha m the owner, or duty authorized agent of the owner for the purposes of this app cation, o the o rty herein described, that al! information submitted herein is true and correct. I at_ h reby fy at a appPeatign fee of $ 'Sj'3%.0Q to cover the cost of this application, has been pai t the Ann date- /t /0/ A t Date City Secretary t ate k _ 4 1iLeeLlwreg=\C&ivelt44%tlTooiy'Piat.Preeesskv%m4 latApp Fwm.doc F'89t 1 of 2:. .. IF FvIF : - -IF Ir IF - IF It IF IF IF, I 41 MAURIC.E' SCHWANKE & COMPANY 1209 Southwood Blvd. Arlington, Texas 76013 Phone (817) 4694927 Fax (817) 274-3943 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. rl 8. 9. 10. 14. 15, r• � Village of Hurricane Creek Preliminary Plat Review Comments Digital submittal was not received with this plat as required. What happens to the 30' and 157 utility easements at the southwest terminus of Lot 12 Block JJ and Lot 22 of Block KY, Perhaps a lift station. If so, it should be shown on some identifiable lot. Contours should be labeled. Please identify the rear property lines of all lots. Label the tract west of Street O Street K on is labeled as 60' of right-of-way; however, it is drawn as 50' of right- of-way. Adjust Street K and change the lots accordingly. Please coordinate Sheet 2 with Sheet 5. Renumber lots, perhaps adjust lot lines, and adjust right -of --ways. Street O street name is duplicated on Sheet 5. Street M is labeled as 60' of right -of --way; however, it is drawn as 50' of right-of- way. Adjust Street M and change the lots accordingly. Lot 11 of Block O is a keyhole lot and does not meet the minimum lot width as measured at the front building line. According to section 8.5.2. of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations the Lot Width Definition is as follows "The lot width is the minimum distance between the side lot lines of a building lot measured along a straight line at the rear of the required front yard and parallel to the street line or a line tangent thereto, unless otherwise defined." IIF 10 & 11 of Block N are dimensioned incorrectly. According to section 5.1.3.4. the location of building lines shall be shown. The limits of the property shall be clearly indicated on the eastern edge of the property. Additionally, the match line reference on the southwest corner of this plat should be removed. Reference to parkland and or should be removed from this and future plats within this subdivision. A tract number should be assigned along with approximate acreages. The status of the 170' electric easement should be clarified. If it is an easement who owns the property and has responsibility for maintenance? If it is owned by Villages of Hurricane Creek L.P. then individual tract designations should be indicated and the back of the lots adjacent to it. should be shown,: Due to the excessive length of Blbcks. A, AA, K, and B 1 S -' crosswalk.easements•= shoulilbe considered as .per section; 8 6.3 -of the SRR:. FF `1 t u. l;oormnate lot numbers across Match lutes 19. Please verify placement of Street F at Match line (Two different dimensions). 20. What is the intent of the extra lines on Lot 44 Block AA. 21. An additional utility easement is needed on Lot 55 Block A. An easement needs to be shown for the lift stations. 22. Either a bearing call on the north side of the plat has been left out or a drafting error along north line of plat has been made (apparent jog in property line north of Lot 1 Block U)? 23. According to section 5.1.3.1 of the SRR the following. "I'he proposed name of the subdivision. The proposed mane shall not have the same spelling as or be pronounced similarly to the name of any other subdivision located within the city or within two miles of the city." An unrecorded subdivision exists to the north called Hurricane Creek Estates. The City may want the name of this subdivision changed because of this conflict. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Y ITEM . Consider action on recommendation of Planni Sin and Zoning Commission regarding final plat for Hurricane Creek Boulevard. The PZC has scheduled action on this plat at its meeting of August 9. No major problems with this plat have been identified by the City's planning consultant or consulting engineer. _� -�._ ; Os.ti� of� Aricia `� - � r c-mac ter- co cu Y -: c �, p 1 03 42p - - - .. , ��;� . � DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION _ �� ,Preliminary Plat ❑ Final Plat ® Replat ❑ Site Plan � - Circulation Flan ❑ Landscape Plan j�j Land �Y � A. Descriatian of Pro 1. Addition Name gu�icane � Creek Boulevard 2. Totat Number of Acres � 0.870 3. - 2oning Classifications} PD � • 4. Total Number of Lots, bN Type R/A� RQR Plat 5. t.acation of Property •Northwest corner of intersection of 17S 75 and �t 455 H. A Rcants: List those erso ou wish to be can e'�P�t at�nut thu es o Hurricane :'_. _ _ _ 'l. Owner_ Creek,--.h_P. _ :_ ::- � 2. � Applicant: Don Collins Address: 2705 Club Lake Trail Address: 2705 Club Lake Trail City, State, Zip:1!icR.inney, T% 75070 City,�State, Zip:��ey, T% 75070 . Phone: 214-802-8264 Phone: 214-802-8264 3. Repre.�.ntative: Carter � Burgess, Inc«4, Submitted t3y: - D�Collins Address: 7950 Elmbrook Drive Name (Please Print) City, State, Zp: D�-� � T% 75247 [3�Owner ❑ �+pp1►�m ❑ t�eptesentati�Q Phone: 214-638-0145 Date: Ma 6, 2004 Attu: Rathan Thompson - BEFORE ME, an authorized offictoi of the City of Anna, on this day personalty appeared the undersigned applicant, who ceRifies the following: .1 also paid f� Y. _ r N that I a owner, or duly authorized agent of the owner for the purposes of thrs the props erein described, that ail information submitted herein is We and correct. t rtifv that e a pl'�tian fee of $ . , to cover the cost of this applicatron, has been on ,r , ,. Mr. Lee Lawrence, City Administrator - - � . City of Amia -- P.O. Box 776- � . Anna, Texas 75409-0776 - Re: Hurricane Creek Boulevard, Final Plat and Construction Plans ,. Dear Lee: - . - • ! 1 . • .11 • • 1 • 1 t 1 • i t . �• 1 1 1 � • • + i • .1 11 •lull :If b Hurricane Creek Boulevard is being platted to connect the Villages of Hurricane Creek addition to State Highway FR 455. It is located on the north side of FR 455 and is approximately 1,200 feet west of the intersection of the west service road of U.S. Highway 75 and FR. 455. The developer is Villages of Hurricane Creek, L.P.-The engineer is Carter & Burgess. Final Plat • The plat is for a street right-of-way. The developer is platting the east ha}f of a divided 4-lane street A portion of the future west hall of the sheet right-of-way will cross onto an adjacent property owner. Anna's Thoroughfare Plan shows this street to be a major collector. The typical right-of-way width for a major collector is 130 feet The proposed right-of-way for the half street is 40 feet. • The "L2" dimension for Street M on the final plat is in error. The preliminary_ plat and the construction plans show a 60 feet wide dimension at :this intersection. 1 1/ 1 l i t • I' 1' •1 . •1 1 - • •i 1"' if . • 1.11 � • 1- 1 . • 1 . ► � .11 1 • • ! 1 11 vll • . >` . 1' • t I ' 11 } t � t 1 1 1 i1 • � 1 1 • • A i ' • 1 ' • I ' / • • t! • .1 1 • • I11 1 ' t ' III Y • 1 • 11 ' 1 1 1 1 1 ' • nl • 11 Y. I • U I • ' • 1 • - • 1 • 1 • :./ / • 11 1 .1 •t .i f • ' ' t1 I • �• N • •1 i I • • 1 " • " fl • • it " • / • i • / 1 1 �'>iit-�i 7 •ii'� � • Add street construction details. Sincerely, ���� Tmnothy L. ivloms, PE ITEM 10. Consider action on recommendation of Planning and Zoning Commission regarding combination plat for Joe Bryant Elementary School Addition. The PZC has scheduled action on this plat at its meeting of August 9. No major problems with this plat have been identified by the City's planning consultant or consulting engineer. MAURICE SCHWANKE &. COMPANY 1209 Southwood Blvd. LAND PLANNING Arlington, I exas 76013 ZONING CONSULTANT Phone (817) 46M927 MUNICIPAL CONSULTANT Fax (817) 274-3943 GRANT CONSULTANT Joe Bryant Elementary School Review Comments 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit this property should be platted. 2. What is the deal with the 4' reservation and a 52' reserved for row designation? 3. Is the 4' so the neighbor cannot access it? If so then the road should be a private road maintained by the AISD. If it is a public road as noted then it should be located on the property line. Additionally, if it is a public road then it should be built to City Street Standards. 4. I have definite concerns about fire protection for the rear of the building. What is your usual hose lay distance. Usually they are 150' from where a truck can park. If this is the case modification of the site plan needs to occur. 5. The fire lane circle on the north side of the school is not adequate to turn most large fire trucks around in. 6. A recommendation may be to put a fire lane completely around the building. The way the drainage is configured on the southwest and west corner of building, access to the building may be limited if a recent rain has occurred and ground has not had adequate time to dry. Perhaps some type of hidden surface such as grasscrete can be used for emergency purposes. 7. If 700+ students are expected at this facility another emergency situation potential is apparent. During times that students are being dismissed or arriving a potential of numerous vehicles and buses will be using the east drive (the only drive). If for some reason an emergency situation occurs at the school, especially during inclement weather, an emergency vehicle may not be able to get to the School (school is a significant distance from County Road). Perhaps another entrance on the west side for emergency purposes only (do not enter signs on both ends) is appropriate and necessary. 8. Minimum inside radius on fire lanes should be a minimum of 30' and an outside radius of 54. Most of the striping shown is less than 30'r and some are 90 degrees. 9. The soccer field dimensions are those used bhigh school stu3: rats ardautIthy 1uls.s us e purpose for them? 10. How many Staff members will occupy this building? One parking Space per each faculty and staff member (teachers, counselors, nurse, custodians, kitchen workers, and administrators) is required per zoning ordinance. Additional spaces for visitors should be provided (parent teacher conferences, award ceremonies, etc). fl 11. Currently 122 plus 4 handicapped spaces are shown. When the total spaces in a parking lot is between 101 and 150 the required number of handicapped spaces is 5. Therefore, an additional handicapped space needs to be shown (Texas Accessibility Standards — Table 2). If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, A Maurice Scliwanke ITEM 11. Public Hearing. A public hearing will be held to consider an annexation request by Sarita Land Partners, Ltd., petition submitted by Mr. Dean Owen, Tract 1 of said property consisting of 184.41 acres located in the Samuel Moore Survey, Abstract No. 627, and the Robert Whitaker Survey, Abstract No. 1011, and Tract 2 of said property consisting of 5.04 acres located in the Samuel Moore Survey, Abstract No. 627, and the Robert Whitaker Survey, Abstract No. 1011, property being located along the east and west sides of the DART rail line between CR 1011 and CR 376. Speakers at the hearing will be heard according to their order on a listing available at the council meeting. The property is located to the east of and across N. Powell Parkway and the DART rail from Tara Farms. This is the second of two required public hearings. JUL-08-2004 09�55 Jul-07-•S34 10 ; 34A Nat;'i ona l Homes 8177321974 `it, W71 F, FOR ANNMTWN ,i l r• ...t Y Yf , h • t1 f• t T• hem4o a• bovin ,i W t ..a t.- Md • f• • r:'u- it ad t t tj '7A xru.�l'r.1% . 1NART(N QOQlEY C�x»mi� � 1ZBF�f�r wt i�totary PubQc - C�siamter P.02 P . 432 JUL-08 2004 09=56 P.03 _e FJC BrBrr A LEGAL DESCRg.''I'iON OF THE FRt3FERTY CAMy Domnen&Ama - Cenftirioa K mvZ 05fi M doe Last revise#: 0"8/04. 24 Pe04 JUL-0&0 2004 09 56 TSrXft IE A . • Sol Description ofProwty AJ.I that eertai.0 tract or parcel of lana, being a part or the . Samuel. Moore Survey, Abstract•Nns 627, and the Robert Whitaker Survey, New Abstract No. 1011, and being part of that called 188.971 acre'tract described in Deed dated May 16, 1973, from L.L. Leslie, Xar,l*Leslie, 731112.e 8tiMson DeArman and husband, Wilson L. Duman to Kerry E. ' Burleson and. Kenneth S. Burleson as. recorded in VoX=e ebb, Page sib of the Deed Records .of Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNIN6r at a point at the Northwest corner' of said 188.9'71 acre .tx'act • beIZg in the center of County Road go. 1106. Said point , also. being the Northeast corner of a called 34.81 acre tract described .in Deed from. Naomi Morris -to Milton Lentz as recorded in Volume 798, Page 269•of said Deed Records, Said point being on the South line of the William Creager Survey, Abstract No. 164, the Northeast corner of the Z.F. Lester Survey, Abstract No. 546 and the Northwest corner of said Robert. Whitaker Survey, abstract. No. 1.01.1; �-- . THWCE, S 87 degrees 38 minutes 33 seconds E, with the• North boundary line of said 188.971 acre tract and the center of said road,•1,699,44' tc a paint for corner at the Northeast corner of said tract. Said% point being''the Northwest corner of the Collin County Estates, an unrecorded additiori' as shown on slide 4533 of the Plat Records of Collin County, texas* Z..Q2.si gxeea..AZ_mi uutao..3A..s:econds_W, (Basis .of bearing)•, with Gie East boundary line of •said 188.971P acre tract and the West boundaxyc line of said Collin County l states, at 30,721 pass'a a 1/2 # iron rod with - yellow plastic capstamped "EC&D RPLS '4084" (set) , for .wiliness at the base of a broken' fence corner post (found) , and in all, 4, 2R3.52' to a• 1/24° iron rod found for corner. Said 1oint being the Northeast corner of a called 5.'00 acre tract described in Clerk's',File No. • 97-•04002873, said Deed Records; , THENCE,'N 86 degrees 56 minutes 47 seconds W, with the North boundary line of said 5.00 .acre tract, 466.64' to a. 2/2# iron rod (found) for corner; . TFIENCE,,S 02 degrees 54 minutes 05 seconds W, with .the West boundary lime of said 5.00 acre tract,. et �36.9'7', pass a 1/2° iron rod (found} for witness and continuing for a total distance of 469.25' to a point for corner in the center of County Road No. 3764 said point. being on the South line of the Robert Whitaker Survey, Abstract No. 1011 and can, the North line of the J.C. Brantley Survey, Abstract No. 11.4; THENCE, N 87 degrees 3.5 minutes 44 seconds AT, along the center o,E said road and the Sou'tk-i }aaundary line o= sazd 9ra acre cx-act., to a point for corner at the Southwest corner of said•188.971 acre tract and in them East rigki.t-of�way line of the Union Pacific Railroad (100' W .right-bf-way) ; TFiFNG"E, .N 21 degrees 00 minutes 32 seconds. W, with said East ra.ghG-of- way, at 30.3.9' pass a 1./2" -iron rod with yellow' Mastic cap stamped . "E'CSeI3 RFLS �#4$g" (set} , for Wj.�,xl�,ss, and COi1t3.nulAg for a t©tal distance of 2927.06' to a 1/20 iron rod with yellow plastic cap JUG-08-2004 09z57 P..05 OF FIF IF Legal Descri Rion ofFr_op *w-stamped "EC&D RPLS 40840 (set) , . for corner. Said point being the most F. Westera caner of . this tract and .located on the truth line of the Samuel Moore Survey, Abstract No. 627 •and the south line of said Z.p, Lester Sursrey, Abstract No. 5.46; TiikiMCE, S ss degrees 58..m14jute0 o7 seconds E, with saki Survey lines and the South boundary, line 'of said 34.81 acre tract 654.64' , to a 1./2a iron tod with yellow plastic cap stamped ,rEC&D PXW 4084" .(set), at base of a fence. corner post for an inside corner of this tract and . being the' Southeast corner of said 34.81 acre tract; THENCE, N 02 degrees 55 minutes 49 seconds E. with the West' boundary line of said 168.971. acre tract and the East boundary line of said • 34.81 acre tract along an -old fence, at 2044.05'•, pass 1/211 iroi% rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "EC&D RPLS 4084tt (set) for witness at% the base of a 2" fence corner post. and continuing for a total distance of 2,063.041 to.the POINT OF BEGINNING and•containing 184=41 acres of land, All trhat: certain tract or parcel of land, being. a part of the. Samuel • Moore•Survey, Abstract No. 627, and the Robert Whitaker Survey, Abstract No. loll and being that same called 5.0IFF040acre tract described'in Deed dated May 220 1974, from Keriz rE. Durleson,. ..T...... �...�w...ww•.w.l+.wiL,i.w.....--.vcsc4-4+faa*�:er�aha• w.CF�.•40%MAf1"M�GE1 .=dram-_Exliiie•�-•�LSJ�•L`CE��r 274, �Cf the Deed Records of Collin County,, •Texas and being mare paxt:icularly •described icy metes •and bounas fol7,ow�s : - BEGm7NING at a paint for comer at the Souti�.east Conner of said* 5.01 acre. tract being in the center of CountyRoad Na.• 376. $aid point being on the South line of the Robert WTixtakEr survey, Abstract No .' 1011,. the North line of the J.C. Brantley Survey, -Abstract No. 1.1.4, and the West. right-of-way of • the U4ion Pacific Railroad, (100 t right - of way) ., T1 WCE, N 87• degrees' 15 minutes 40 seconds W, with the South boundary line of said tract and the center of said road,. elm 941 to point for corner. Said point being in the East right--of-way of State Highway No. 5, (100, right-of-way);• T%MICE, N 21 degrees 00 minutes 32 seconds W,•with said East right- ' ofat 31:4It.' pass a 81./2" iron rod witch yel3.ow plastic cap stamped "EC&D RPLS 4084" (set), for witness, and in all,•2928012, to.a 1/2", iron rod with yellow plastic Cap Stamped "L-`C&D IZ.PLS 40840 (sets) for Garner. Said point beiri�T the Yortbveat Lorne Of this 4, 1tract and located on the worth boi. nda,rY A.ar4.e o� Survey, AbstractNo. 627 and the South boundary line of said 2.F. Lester Survey, Abstract No. 546,• TF:F.CE, S 86 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds E, with the North boundary ;line of said 5.01 acre tract and with said survey limes, 82.]2�, to a 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "EC&D RPLS 4ft84p at the Northeaat corner of this tract" and located in said West right- JJL-08-2004 09157 P.06 i+,A bit A aI Desan turn of Pi" b ertv of "way of the Uh. on •Pacific Railroad (200!. right -a way) THi"sN'CE, S 21 degrees 00 minutes 32 seconds E, with said Railroad ' right=ofwway, at 2896.701 1Sasa a 1120 iron Tad with yellOw Plastic cap stain ed "EC&U RPLS 4084N (set), for witness and. contiauw.ag for a total Stance of 2927,67' to the polwT QF BEGINNING and 00=4. MUaw 5.04.acres of land. Schedule of Annexation Activities for Santa Land Partners 189.45 Acres Tract. 45 A 8 C 1 Scheduled Actual 2 City Council sets date, time, and place for first -and second public hearing 7/13/2004 9 11 e " 3 (2 hearings to be held not more than 40 days nor less than 20 days prior to oliklal council action) 4 5 Print notice for first PH (Newspaper Article) 7/16/2004 7 a 6 (Not more than 20 days nor less than 10 days poor to heating) 7 8 City Council holds first public hearing 7/27/2004 L777 o 9 10 Print notice for second PH (Newspaper Article) 7/30/2004 11 (Not more than 20 days nor less than 10 days prior to hearing) 12 13 City Council holds second public hearing 8/10/2004 14 15 City Council institutes annexation proceedings and 9/14/2004 16 City Council adopts annexation ordinance and service plan 17 (Not more than 40 days after first hearing nor less than 20 days after second public hearing) 18 19 Annexation ordinance submitted to U.S. Department of Justice, Texas 9/15/2004 20 Department of Housing and Community Affairs, and State Comptroller 21 22 Ordinance is filed with County Clerk 9/15/2004 23 24 Ordinance is sent to Collin Appralsai District 1 9/15/2004 C:1Documents and SeitingslLee1lMy Documents�Anna MgtlCity Counci1120041Agendas119-July 131Sariia Partners Annex Scheduie.xls August 10, 2004 TO: Mayor and Councilmen of the City of Anna RE: Placement of old depot along DART line on 4t1i Street, Anna FROM: Jan Miller, Chairman of the Anna Area Historical Preservation Society Having contacted DART, I was told that the AAHPS with support of the city of Anna must file a formal request with DART in order for them to consider our use of their property. The items in Column 1 need to be addressed. In Column 2 you will find the beginnings of the Society's plans to move and restore the depot. 1. Identify the structure 2. Size 3. Shape 4. Materials l . Original depot built in 1885 for the Houston and Texas Central RR (1873). Later the Southern Pacific RR 2. 35 feet x 20 feet with 3-foot eaves 3. Rectangular 4. Wood with composition roof 5. Historic significance 5. This was the first and only depot (1885) in the city of Anna. It is a viable historic structure representative of early Texas railroad depots. 6. Current location 6. 1/4 mile east of Hwy 75 and 1 mile west of Anna in afield on the south side of FM 455 7. Proposed location 7. The original site of depot on 4a' St., on the southwest corner bordering the railroad line. 8. How it will be secured 9. How it will be maintained 10. What will be its use 9. 10. Several options: information center, museum, meeting rooms, educational tool Others? Mayor Kenneth Pelham Anna, Texas Dear Mr. Pelham, 8 August 2004 Recent discussions compel us to write to you now to revisit the subject of County Road 366. We do not think there is any material difference in our impressions of the agreement reached on May 28th when members of the Luscombe family, yourself, Ryan Betz, representing the Skorburg Company, and the county commissioners met. Our portion of the land comprises just over ten acres and lies along the private road running north off 366. The alternate route 2 will separate our land from the rest of the Luscombe homes. We left the May 28th meeting having agreed to donate one half of the land needed to attain the 110 feet right of way along the southern end of our property, contingent upon our negotiating an agreement with the Skorburg Company to acquire the land at the junction of 366 and the private road. This triangle of land is created by the curvature of the proposed road, and would no longer be contiguous to the Skorburg development. We met with Ryan Betz on June 2, as soon as practicable after the May 28th meeting, to offer a possible solution. In fact, we made an offer, the details of which we will not go into here, which was received by Ryan with evident goodwill and the promise to get back to us right away. We advised Mr. Betz that we would be leaving on a mission trip on June 12'h. Mr. Betz and Mr. Skorburg were reminded again on June 8 at the Anna City Council meeting that we were leaving and we were told that they would get back to us before we left. We have since heard nothing from the Skorburg Company. We consider our offer to remain on the table and we would appreciate a reply. We are aware that expressions of displeasure have been conveyed from the Skorburg Company to the City of Anna regarding our proposal. We think our offer was fair. If not, we would like to hear any objections. When we last spoke we were prepared to donate the land for the road. We remain so prepared, but this will not occur until a mutually satisfactory agreement is reached with the Skorburg Company. We wanted to write to assure you that we, too, are anxious for a resolution to this issue. Thank you for the effort you have expended to achieve a solution acceptable to all concerned. Sincerely, J. Marcus Downs Ca,,a X Cal�th� Carol Lee Luscombe Downs cc: Anna City Council Members To: Anna City Council From: Martha Luscombe McDowell P O Box 338 Anna, TX 75409 My name is Martha Luscombe McDowell and I own property and live on CR 366. In the absence, due to other commitments, of Marc and Carol Lee Downs (my niece) I would like to personally deliver their letter addressed to the mayor. I believe it conveys to the council their desire for an answer from the Skorburg Company in order to hasten the resolution of the CR 366 situation. Next, I have a comment from my own perspective. I would like to be assured that the Skorburg Company has donated the agreed 55' to 110' of ROW for the new Thoroughfare so that I might donate the 55' to 60' where so required (and where the error in measurement by Skorburg was made). This would be a distance south of CR 366 from Skorburg property to the curvature shown in our engineer's drawing of the north Thoroughfare Plan. I would like to see this project concluded. Thank you, Councilmen, for your time and efforts to satisfy all parties concerned. Martha Luscombe McDowell door 7w /OZ e 1/� �7�. / � Al,ell 1/4 0 V