HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZmin2020-09-01MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 1, 2020
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Anna held a meeting at 7:00 p.m. on September 1,
2020, at 111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna City Hall, to consider the following items.
Call to Order and Establishment of Quorum
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m.
Members present were Wayne Barton, Alonzo Tutson, Danny Ussery, Donald Henke, Brent
Thomas, and Nick Rubits. Staff present were Ross Altobelli, Lauren Mecke, Olivia Demings, Kevin
Johnson. City Attorney, David Overcash was present via speakerphone.
2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
Commissioner Thomas gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Citizen Comments: At this time, any person may address the Planning and Zoning Commission
regarding an item on this meeting agenda that is not scheduled for public hearing. Also, at this time
any person may address the Commission regarding an item that is not on this meeting agenda.
Each person will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to speak. No discussion or action may be taken
at this meeting on items not listed on this agenda, other than to make statements of specific factual
information in response to a citizen's inquiry or to recite existing policy in response to the inquiry.
There were no citizen comments.
4. Location Map
5. Consider/Discuss/Action on a recommendation regarding the White Oaks Addition Block A, Lot 1-
5 Final Plat. Applicant: Tyler Rank.
Mrs. Demings gave a brief presentation and answered questions from the Commission. This
submittal is a Final Plat creating 5 lots and is located in the ETJ. It is recommended for approval
subject to the addition of language from the on -site sewage facility review by Collin County
Development Services.
Commissioner Henke clarified with staff that the applicant was intending to divide the land into 5
lots.
A motion was made by Commissioner Barton seconded by Commissioner Thomas to recommend
approval of the final plat subject to the on -site sewage facility review by Collin County Development
Services. The vote was unanimous.
6. Consider/Discuss/Action on a recommendation regarding The Villages of Hurricane Creek Revised
Preliminary Plat. Applicant: Jay Reissig
Ms. Mecke gave a brief presentation and answered questions from the Commission. The purpose
of this plat is to realign the roads in order to submit the project to the north. It is recommended for
approval as submitted.
Page 1 of 4
Commissioner Barton questioned if it was just two roads being altered.
Commissioner Ussery asked, as well, if lots were being changed.
Ms. Mecke responded that some lots were reconfigured.
Marc Paquette, 11000 Frisco St, Frisco, TX, Peloton Land Solutions, was present to respond as
the applicant. He explained that the revision was in order to line up streets for better connection.
Some configurations have been changed to do this, but none of the area that is part of a recorded
plat is being modified.
Commissioner Rubits asked if there was anticipation that any of the lots changed would create
future variance requests.
Mr. Altobelli answered that none would be created.
A motion was made by Commissioner Thomas seconded by Commissioner Rubits to recommend
approval of the revised preliminary plat. The vote was unanimous.
7. Consider/Discuss/Action on a recommendation regarding The Villages of Hurricane Creek- North
Preliminary Plat. Applicant: Jay Reissig.
Ms. Mecke gave a brief presentation and answered questions from the Commission. This submittal
is for a new subdivision. The request includes two waivers, one for overlength streets and one for
cul-de-sac length in excess of 600 ft. Staff is in support of the overlength street requirement waiver
and are seeking commission guidance on the points system of the Neighborhood Design
Guidelines.
Mr. Altobelli added that the Director of Public Works is concerned with the waiver for increased
length and will work with developers during design and construction to introduce elements that will
keep speed down. The developer will also work with the Fire Department to meet their
requirements.
Chairman Tutson asked if the Neighborhood Design Guidelines' points system was not met would
it hold up the platting process.
Mr. Altobelli clarified that at this time we are simply presenting to the council the evaluation and
asking for input on how to handle the calculation and reporting of the system.
Commissioner Rubits clarified with staff that the points table present was filled out by Peloton Land
Solution. He also questioned who validates that what they are saying is true.
Mr. Altobelli responded that staff will be able to validate during the site plan, landscape plan, and
civils plans process.
Mr. Paquette added that the project has a development agreement already in place that covers the
elements in the Design Guidelines, as well.
Commissioner Rubits expressed his concern with developers making promises they do not intend
to follow through on.
Page 2 of 4
Nathan Bryan was present as a City Council representative and stated that that was the purpose
of the formation of the guidelines, to provide a way to enforce quality development.
Mr. Altobelli stated that staff was intending to make sure this form of calculating is what the
Commission wants to see. It is only preliminary, and guarantees will follow.
Commission Barton added that he did not have a problem with the street length waivers. He
understood need to work with the floodplain. He stated that in his experience the most effective
speed deterrent is alignment changes.
Mr. Paquette elaborated that between a curvilinear road and the natural topography the engineers
will be able to control traffic speed.
Commissioner Barton asked applicants for the reasoning behind the cul-de-sac length waiver.
Mr. Paquette answered that the intend is to keep the topography as a natural as possible.
Commissioner Barton confirmed with staff that it is set forth in the ordinance that the Neighborhood
Design Guidelines are check at the preliminary platting stage.
Chairman Tutson thanked staff for ensuring the points system was utilized.
A motion was made by Chairman Tutson seconded by Commissioner Henke to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat to include the waiver requests. The vote was unanimous.
8. Consider/Discuss/Action to approve minutes of the August 3, 2020 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
The commission thanked staff for detailed minutes.
A motion was made by Commissioner Thomas seconded by Commissioner Tutson to approve the
August 3,2020 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes.
9. A) Conduct a public hearing regarding a request to amend Article 9.04 Zoning Ordinance and
Article 9.05 Signs of Chapter 9 Planning & Development Regulations of the City of Anna Code of
Ordinances in order to amend regulations pertaining to sign variances.
The public hearing opened at 7:42 p.m.
Mr. Altobelli gave a brief presentation and answered questions from the commission. The City of
Anna adopted signage regulations on January 9, 2001 (Ord. No. 2001-01). On March 11, 2008 the
City Council amended the sign ordinance and zoning ordinance (Ord. No. 370-2008) by eliminating
the Sign Board and amending the duties of the Board of Adjustments to hear all appeals or
variances to the sign regulations. Included within both ordinances was language that gave final
authority to City Council on all signage related variance requests. When the City of Anna
Ordinances were recodified later in 2008 that section/language which gave City Council final
authority and review of signage variance requests was not included. The intent of the ordinance
amendment is to give the City Council exclusive authority to hear appeals and variances on all sign
issues.
Commissioner Thomas asked if City Council wants to be a part of this process.
Page 3 of 4
Mr. Altobelli responded that staff is aware that signage is going to be changed on Hwy 75. Council
wants to see these request and have an input in the decision to ensure the vision of the City is
being met.
Commissioner Henke questioned why we are going from one extreme to the other, from the Board
of Adjustments only to City Council only. It should be a two-step process.
Commissioner Ussery added that he'd like to be able to discuss this at Planning & Zoning.
Mr. Altobelli clarified that P&Z would be able to evaluate a signage request if it is brought forward
as part of site plan or planned development.
Commissioner Barton elaborated that that he spoke with staff and the City Attorney and confirmed
that signage does not have to be a zoning issue. A sign can be a part of a Planned Development
and then it will go through P&Z and City Council. If it is a variance the final say currently is the BOA.
Presenting the sign variances before council will eliminate grey area.
Commissioner Rubits clarified with staff and Commissioner Barton that the Board of Adjustments
is to determine if a hardship would be imposed if zoning was enforced.
Commissioner Barton stated that he likes the revisions as staff has presented it.
Commissioner Henke asked staff what happened to the sign board.
Staff responded that at the time there most likely wasn't enough requests.
The public hearing closed at 7:57 p.m.
B) Consider/ Discuss/Action on a recommendation regarding a request to amend Article 9,04
Zoning Ordinance and Article 9.05 Signs of Chapter 9 Planning & Development Regulations of the
City of Anna Code of Ordinances in order to amend regulations pertaining to sign variances.
A motion was made by Commissioner Barton seconded by Commissioner Thomas to recommend
approval of the text amendment in accoradance with the language that was presented in the
September 1, 2020 packet. The vote was unanimous.
10. Adjourn
A motion was made by Commissioner Ussery seconded by Commissioner Rubits to adjourn the
meeting. The vote was unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 7:59 p.m.
ATTEST:
A onzo Tutson
Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman
Page 4 of 4