HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-10-23 Work Session & Regular Meeting Packet
AGENDA
City Council Work Session
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 @ 6:30 P M
A nna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. P owell P arkway, Anna, Texas 75409
T he C ity Council of the City of A nna will meet in Work S ession at 6:30 P M, on October
23, 2018, at the Anna C ity Hall, L ocated at 111 North Powell P arkway (Hwy 5), to
consider the following items.
1.Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum
2.Discuss/Consider/Action on appointing boards and commissions Council Member
liaisons. (City Manager)
a
3.C L O S E D S E S S I O N (E X C E P T I O NS )
Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Counci l may enter into closed
session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this agenda under the
following exceptions:
a.Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or
on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the
Texas Disciplinary Rules of P rofessional C onduct of the S tate B ar of Texas
clearly conf licts with C hapter 551 of the Government C ode (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.071).
a
b.Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
(Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072); city facilities; acquisition of easements
a
c.Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. G ov’t Code §551.074); Council
board appointments.
a
d.Discuss or deliberate E conomic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or
deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has
received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or
expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the C ity is
conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer
of a f inancial or other incentive to a business prospect described by
subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t C ode §551.087); possible incentive agreements
with property developers; pending negotiations on development agreements.
a
e.Deliberation regarding security devices or security audits. (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.076 and §551.089).
a
The Council further reserves the ri ght to enter into executive session at any time
throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the
Open Meetings Act.
4.Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda—work session, regular
meeting, or closed session—that is duly posted by the C ity of A nna for any City
Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda.
(I f there is no need to address any other such agenda item, the Mayor shall adjourn
this meeting).
5.A djourn. There being no f urther business bef ore the Council, we will consider this
meeting adjourned at ___________ p.m.
T his is to certify that I , Carrie L . S mith, City S ecretary, posted this agenda at a place
readily accessible to the public at the A nna C ity Hall and on the City Hall bulletin board at
or before 5:00 p.m. on October 19, 2018.
___________________________________
Carrie L . S mith, City Secretary
1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session c oncerning any of the items listed on
this agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meeting Act.
3. Persons with a disability who want to attend this meeting who may need assistance should contact
the City Secretary at 972 924-3325 two working day s prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
Item No. 2.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Discuss/Consider/Action on appointing boards and commissions Council Member liaisons. (City
Manager)
S UM M ARY:
I n an effort to expedite the assignment of Council L iaison to each of the boards and commissions,
Council members may designate their personal interest and preference to each of the boards to
which they may individually have an interest in serving. I n doing so, staff can compile that list for
Council consideration and provide this information for discussion at the Council meeting.
T he idea of assigning a Council L iaison is a best practice that will enable that assigned Council
member to observe and participate (but not vote on that board or commission) and report back to
City Council on matters of Council interest.
Once a month the City Council agenda will provide for a time in the meeting for the L iaison
reports, where brief updates on key issues can be mentioned. This will provide better
communication for Council and identify issues where Council may have to provide a board or
commission strategic direction.
F or the purpose of the C D C and E D C staff would suggest that the L iaison be the same person
for convenience of the board and the staff, since they meet concurrently and the they are the same
group of members too.
Additionally if the Council desires staff would suggest we designate an A lternate L iaison in the
event that the designated liaison cannot make the meeting. I n any case attendance by the L iaison
or the Alternate is not required, but having this conduit in place allows for the board, the staff
liaison and the remaining Council opportunity to transmit required information.
A brief description of the boards is provided as follows (from the website).
Neighborhood Design Advisory C ommittee - The Neighborhood Design A dvisory Committee has
been commissioned by Council to ensure community input into the process of preparing a
Neighborhood D esign Manual. T he date and time has not yet been determined but it will meet
monthly in the evening on a weekday. I f interested in participating, please f ill out a boards and
commissions application and return it to the City S ecretary.
Anna Community Development Corporation - T he Anna Community Development Corporation
(C D C) works in cooperation with the Economic Development Corporation to coordinate efforts
that expand the city's business tax base. The corporations have provided incentives that resulted
in much of the retail development that has occurred in A nna since 2008. The Corporations
recently purchased and are developing an 85 acre business park located at the northeast corner
of the Collin C ounty O uter L oop and S tate Highway 5 (Powell Parkway). T he A nna Community
Development Corporation (C D C) also works with the City to identify and fund community facilities
and related projects that maintain and enhance the quality of lif e in A nna. T he membership
consists of seven volunteers who serve f or two-year staggered terms. Meetings normally occur on
the first Thursday of each month at 5 p.m.
Anna Economic Development Corporation - The Anna Economic D evelopment Corporation
(E D C) works in cooperation with the Community Development C orporation to coordinate efforts
that expand the city's business tax base with a f ocus on creating primary jobs within the City of
Anna. T he corporations have provided incentives that resulted in much of the retail development
that has occurred in Anna since 2008. The E D C owns and has remodeled the Old P ost Office
located in our downtown area which now serves as a small business incubator, I nc-C ube. The
membership consists of seven volunteers who serve f or two-year staggered terms. Meetings
normally occur on the first T hursday of each month following the C ommunity Development
Corporation meeting at 5 p.m.
Board of A djustment - The B oard of A djustment in a quasi-judicial board that serves as an appeal
body f or individuals seeking variances to the Z oning Ordinance and sign regulations; and to
persons who wish to appeal a decision made by an administrative of f icial enforcing the Z oning
Ordinance. Membership consists of five regular members and two alternates who serve for two-
year staggered terms. T he board schedules meetings as needed.
Parks Advisory B oard - The Parks Advisory Board advises the City C ouncil on park-related
matters. T he B oard assists in the development of the parks master plan and reviews and
recommends approval of the concept plan for new parks. Members assist with the f inancing and
construction recommendations of new park facilities and recreations programs including the
development of grant applications. Membership consists of five volunteers who serve f or two-year
staggered terms. Meetings normally occur on the third Monday of each month at 7 p.m.
Planning and Z oning C ommission - T he P lanning and Zoning Commission is responsible for
reviewing all new commercial and residential developments that locate within the C ity. T hey review
and make recommendations to the C ity Council on subdivision plats, site plans, Z oning Ordinance
amendments, Comprehensive P lan amendments, specif ic use permits and rezoning requests.
Membership consists of seven volunteers who serve f or two-year staggered terms. Meetings
normally occur on the first Monday of each month at 7 p.m.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 @ 7:30 P M
A nna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. P owell P arkway, Anna, Texas 75409
T he City Council of the City of A nna will meet in R egular S ession at 7:30 P M, on
October 23, 2018, at the Anna City Hall, L ocated at 111 North Powell P arkway (Hwy 5),
to consider the following items.
Welcome to the City Council Meeting. Please sign the Sign-In-Sheet as a record of
attendance. If you wi sh to speak on an open-session agenda i tem, please fill out the
Opinion/Speaker Registration Form and turn it in to the Ci ty Secretary before the
meeting starts.
1.Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
2.I nvocation and P ledge of A llegiance.
3.Citizen Comments.
Citizens are allowed three mi nutes to speak. The Council is unable to respond
to or discuss any issues that are brought up during this section that are not on
the agenda, other than to make statements of specific factual informati on in
response to a citizen's inquiry or to reci te existing poli cy i n response to the
inquiry.
4.Receive reports from Staff or the City Council about items of community interest.
Items of communi ty i nterest include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; i nformation regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen (but not
including a change in status of a person's public office or publ ic empl oyment); a
reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing
body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or communi ty event organized
or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is
scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or
employee of the municipality; and announcements involving an imminent threat
to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after
the posting of the agenda.
a.Proclamation for Municipal Court Week
a
b.Recognition of Mayor Pike for receiving the 40 under Forty Award
a
c.Anna Harvest Fest, October 27, 2018, 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
a
5.Consent I tems.
These items consist of non-controversial or "housekeeping" items required by
law. Items may be considered individually by any Council member making such
request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items.
a.Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for October 9, 2018. (City S ecretary)
a
b.Review the meeting minutes of the Economic Development Corporation from
J une 7, 2018; J uly 12, 2018; and August 2, 2018. (J essica P erkins)
a
c.Review the meeting minutes of the C ommunity Development Corporation
from J une 7, 2018; J uly 12, 2018; and August 2, 2018. (J essica P erkins)
a
d.Review Quarterly I nvestment Report (Dana Thornhill)
a
e.Approve an Ordinance approving the 2018 Tax Roll (Dana T hornhill)
a
f.Approve a Resolution I dentif ying the C ity Manager as the Authorized Official
on the C hild Abuse/F amily Violence I nvestigator Grant No. 3076603. (Chief
Caponera)
a
g.Approve a Resolution I dentif ying the C ity Manager as the Authorized Official
on the S chool R esource Officer Program, G rant No. 2921203. (Chief
Caponera)
a
h.Approve a Resolution I dentif ying the C ity Manager as the Authorized Official
on the R MS E nhancements for NI B R S Compliance, Grant No. 3679601.
(Chief Caponera)
a
i.Approve a resolution setting a public hearing under Sec. 372.009 of the Texas
L ocal Government Code on the advisability of the creation of a public
improvement district and improvements f or the Villages of Hurricane Creek
within the C ity of A nna, Texas; and authorizing the issuance of notice by the
city secretary of A nna, Texas regarding the public hearing. (City A ttorney)
a
6.Conduct a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on
proposed amendments to the C ity's Water & Wastewater Capital I mprovements
P lan, L and Use Assumptions, and I mpact Fees. (J oseph J ohnson)
a
7.Conduct a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on
proposed amendments to the C ity's Roadway Capital I mprovements Plan, L and
Use Assumptions, and I mpact Fees. (J oseph J ohnson)
a
8.Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a R esolution of the C ity Council of the C ity of
A nna, Texas, setting forth its support to the approval of the 2018 B ond Program
proposed by Collin County. (J oseph J ohnson)
a
9.Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a R esolution authorizing the C ity Manager to
execute an engineering task order with Cobb F endley & Associates, I nc. for the
Rosamond Parkway Project. (J oseph J ohnson)
a
10.C L O S E D S E S S I O N (E X C E P T I O NS )
Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Counci l may enter into closed
session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this agenda under the
following exceptions:
a.Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or
on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the
Texas Disciplinary Rules of P rofessional C onduct of the S tate B ar of Texas
clearly conf licts with C hapter 551 of the Government C ode (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.071).
a
b.Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
(Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072); city facilities; acquisition of easements
a
c.Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. G ov’t Code §551.074); Council
board appointments.
a
d.Discuss or deliberate E conomic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or
deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has
received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or
expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the C ity is
conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer
of a f inancial or other incentive to a business prospect described by
subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t C ode §551.087); possible incentive agreements
with property developers; pending negotiations on development agreements.
a
e.Deliberation regarding security devices or security audits. (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.076 and §551.089).
a
The Council f urther reserves the right to enter into executive session at any time
throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the Open
Meetings A ct.
11.Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda—work session, regular
meeting, or closed session—that is duly posted by the C ity of A nna for any City
Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda.
(I f there is no need to address any other such agenda item, the Mayor shall adjourn
this meeting).
12.A djourn. There being no f urther business bef ore the Council, we will consider this
meeting adjourned at ___________ p.m.
T his is to certify that I , Carrie L . S mith, City S ecretary, posted this agenda at a place
readily accessible to the public at the A nna C ity Hall and on the City Hall bulletin board at
or before 5:00 p.m. on October 19, 2018
___________________________________
Carrie L . S mith, City Secretary
1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session c oncerning any of the items listed on
this agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meeting Act.
3. Persons with a disability who want to attend this meeting who may need assistance should contact
the City Secretary at 972 924-3325 two working day s prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
Item No. 4.a.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
P roclamation for Municipal Court Week
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Proclamation 10/3/2018 Staff Report
City of Anna, Texas
ProclamationProclamationProclamationProclamation
MUNICIPAL COURT WEEK
November 5 - November 9, 2018
WHEREAS, the Municipal Court of Anna Texas, a time honored and vital part of local government,
has existed since 2005.
WHEREAS, more people, citizens and non-citizens alike, come in personal contact with municipal
courts than all other Texas courts combined, and
WHEREAS, public impression of the entire Texas judicial system is largely dependent upon the public’s
experience in municipal court,
WHEREAS, Municipal Judges and court support personnel have pledged to be ever mindful of their
neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all, and conform to the standards
set by the Canons of Judicial Conduct,
WHEREAS, the Municipal Courts play a significant role in preserving the quality of life in Texas
communities through the adjudication of traffic offenses, ensuring a high level of traffic
safety for our citizens,
WHEREAS, the Municipal Courts serve as the local justice center for the enforcement of local
ordinances and fine-only state offenses that protect the peace and dignity of our
community,
WHEREAS, the Municipal Judges and Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of justice
through participation in judicial education programs, seminars, workshops and the
annual meetings of their state and local professional organizations. Therefore, it is most
appropriate that we recognize the accomplishments of the 937 Texas Municipal Courts,
and salute their critical role in preserving public safety, protecting the quality of life in
Texas communities, and deterring future criminal behavior,
Now, I Nate Pike, Mayor of the City of Anna, do recognize the week of November 5 - November 9, 2018,
as Municipal Court Week, and further extend appreciation to all Municipal Judges and
court support personnel for the vital services they perform and their exemplary
dedication to our community. I call upon all residents of Anna to join with the City
Council in recognizing the vital service they perform and their exemplary dedication to
the communities they represent.
In witness, whereof I have hereunto set my hand this
23rd day of October, 2018 and called this seal to be
affixed.
________________________________________
Nate Pike, Mayor
Item No. 4.b.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Recognition of Mayor P ike for receiving the 40 under F orty Award
S UM M ARY:
Texoma Marketing and Media Group has selected our Mayor, Nate Pike, as a recipient of the
inaugural 40 under 40 awards. T he recognition highlights the achievements, leadership and
service of burgeoning community advocates who will set the direction of the area in the coming
decades.
“40 under 40 is a way to recognize those who are dedicated to their neighbors and driven to
serve,” T MMG Senior G roup P ublisher Nate Rodriguez said. To be eligible, individuals must live
or work in Grayson C ounty and be under the age of 40. Award winners are recognized for the
individual’s service and involvement in the community. The honorees were chosen f rom the
nominations by a panel of local T MMG leaders and business and community leaders from
throughout Grayson County and based upon civic contributions, career accomplishments and
letters of reference or recommendation.
“We’re honored to facilitate the recognition of the men and women who will continue Grayson
County’s skyrocketing trajectory for decades to come,” Rodriguez said.
We are honored and excited to have our Mayor, Nate P ike, to receive this honor and wish to
publicly recognize him for this prestigious accomplishment.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Recognize Mayor Nate P ike for the Grayson County 40 Under 40 Award!
Item No. 4.c.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A nna Harvest F est, October 27, 2018, 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Item No. 5.a.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove City Council Meeting Minutes for October 9, 2018. (City Secretary)
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Work Session 10/15/2018 Exhibit
Regular Session 10/16/2018 Exhibit
A NNA C I T Y C O UNC I L
M I NUT E S
W O R K S E S S I O N
October 9, 2018
T he City Council of the City of Anna met in Work S ession on the above date at A nna
City Hall, located at 111 North Powell Parkway (Hwy 5), to consider the following items.
1.Call to Order, Roll Call and E stablishment of Quorum
Mayor Pike called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.
A ll members were present.
2.Briefing/Discussion regarding the proposed Collin County Transportation
Bond that is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. (Corbett Howard)
On May 7, 2018, the Collin County C ommissioners C ourt unanimously agreed to
hold a $750 million transportation bond election on November 6, 2018. Mr. Corbett
Howard represents the E xecutive B ond C ommittee and provided a presentation
regarding the proposed transportation bond.
3.Briefing/Discussion regarding transportation projects. (J oseph J ohnson)
S taff provided an update on the status of the following projects:
1. F erguson P arkway
2. Hackberry Drive
3. Rosamond P arkway
4.Briefing/Discussion regarding an emergency purchase for the Wastewater
Treatment P lant. (J oseph J ohnson)
Under the C ity's P urchasing P olicy the City Manager is authorized to make or
approve an emergency purchase under certain conditions. A dditionally, when the
City Manager determines that conditions warrant an emergency purchase, he/she
shall advise the City Council of such purchase.
S taff provided a brief ing on the condition of the Ultraviolet (UV ) Disinfection system
and the conditions that warrant an emergency repair.
5.C L O S E D S E S S I O N (E X C E P T I O NS )
Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Counci l may enter into closed
session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this agenda under the
following exceptions:
a.Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or
on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the
Texas Disciplinary Rules of P rofessional C onduct of the S tate B ar of Texas
clearly conf licts with C hapter 551 of the Government C ode (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.071);
a
b.Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
(Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072); city facilities; acquisition of easements
a
c.Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. G ov’t Code §551.074); Council
appointments.
a
d.Discuss or deliberate E conomic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or
deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has
received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or
expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the C ity is
conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer
of a f inancial or other incentive to a business prospect described by
subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t C ode §551.087); possible incentive agreements
with property developers; pending negotiations on development agreements.
a
MO T I O N: C ouncil Member Miller moved to enter closed session. Council
Member B ryan seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
Mayor Pike recessed the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
Mayor Pike reconvened the meeting at 7:25 p.m.
The Council further reserves the ri ght to enter into executive session at any time
throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the
Open Meetings Act.
6.Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda—work session, regular
meeting, or closed session—that is duly posted by the C ity of A nna for any City
Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda.
None.
7.A djourn. There being no f urther business bef ore the Council, we will consider this
meeting adjourned at ___________ p.m.
Mayor Pike adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m.
Approved on the October 23, 2018.
________________________
Mayor Nate Pike
AT T E S T:
__________________________
City Secretary Carrie L . Smith
A NNA C I T Y C O UNC I L
M I NUT E S
R E G UL A R S E S S I O N
October 9, 2018
1.Call to Order/Roll Call and E stablishment of Quorum
Mayor Pike called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
A ll members were present.
2.Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Pike led the I nvocation and P ledge.
3.Citizen Comments.
Citizens are allowed three mi nutes to speak. The Council is unable to respond
to or discuss any issues that are brought up during this section that are not on
the agenda, other than to make statements of specific factual informati on in
response to a citizen's inquiry or to reci te existing poli cy i n response to the
inquiry.
None.
4.Receive reports from Staff or the City Council about items of community
interest.
Items of communi ty i nterest include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; i nformation regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen (but not
including a change in status of a person's public office or publ ic empl oyment); a
reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing
body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or communi ty event organized
or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is
scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or
employee of the municipality; and announcements involving an imminent threat
to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after
the posting of the agenda.
Mr. P aul L indsey, 3115 N. P owell, B ig Brother P est Control donated $600 to the
P olice Department.
Harvest Fest, formerly Glow Fest, will be held October 27 at Slayter Creek P ark.
Council Member Tutson noted October is Breast Cancer Awareness and Domestic
Violence month.
5.Consent Items.
These items consist of non-controversial or "housekeeping" items required by
law. Items may be considered individually by any Council member making such
request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items.
MO T I O N: C ouncil Member Beazley moved to approve C onsent A genda I tems a.,
b., and c. Council Member B ryan seconded. Motion carried 7-0
a.Approve C ity C ouncil Meeting Minutes for S eptember 25, 2018. (City
Secretary)
b.Approve a Resolution Amending the A uthorized Representatives f or the
TexP ool Participant Services. (Dana Thornhill)
Due to recent staf f ing changes, the City needs to amend the A uthorized
Representatives listed with TexP ool Participant S ervices. T he authorization
will establish the individuals who are allowed to transmit funds f or investment,
withdraw funds, issue letters of instruction, and to take all actions deemed
necessary or appropriate for the investment of city funds. I n addition, this
action authorizes one person to view account information only.
The resolution for consideration will remove all authorized representatives
currently on record and authorize new representatives for the City.
The recommended Authorized Representatives are as follows:
J im P roce Regular Representative
Dana Thornhill Regular Representative
A lesia Thornhill Regular Representative
S heila Alexander View or I nquiry Only
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA , T E X A S A ME ND I NG T HE
A UT HO R I Z E D R E P R E S E NTAT I V E S A UT HO R I Z E D TO T R A NS A C T
B US I NE S S W I T H T HE T E X A S L O C A L G O V E R NME NT I NV E S T ME NT
P O O L , “T E X P O O L /T E X P O O L P R I ME ”, A P UB L I C F UND S
I NV E S T ME NT P O O L .
c.Approve a Resolution approving the B. Roper A ddition Final P lat. (Maurice
Schwanke)
The B . Roper Addition Final P lat is located in the J ohn C. F arris S urvey,
A bstract No. 331. T he plat contains approximately 1.915 acres consisting of
one lot and located at 916 W. W hite St. T his plat conforms to the site plan
that has been previously approved by the P lanning and Z oning Commission
and City Council.
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA , T E X A S A P P R O V I NG A
F I NA L P L AT O F B. R O P E R A D D I T I O N.
d.Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign a Contract
Amendment to the original I nter-L ocal A greement with Collin C ounty for
Animal S helter services (Chief Caponera).
E ach year Collin County reviews the established I nter-L ocal A greements with
partnering cities and establishes a contribution amount f or animal shelter
services. Amendment Twelve to the initial Contract sets the F Y 2019
contribution at $27,028. T his A greement shall remain in effect from October
1, 2018 to September 30, 2019.
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA, T E X A S A P P R O V I NG
E X T E NS I O N O F T HE A G R E E ME NT S W I T H C O L L I N C O UNT Y F O R
A NI MA L S HE LT E R S E RV I C E S .
MO T I O N: Council Member B eazley moved to approve. Council Member
Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
e.Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an I nter-L ocal
Agreement with Collin County for Animal Control services (Chief Caponera).
E ach year Collin County reviews the established I nter-L ocal A greements with
partnering cities and establishes a contribution amount f or animal control
services. A mendment E leven to the initial Contract sets the F Y 2019
contribution at $47,652. T his A greement shall remain in effect from October
1, 2018 to September 30, 2019.
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA, T E X A S A P P R O V I NG
E X T E NS I O N O F T HE A G R E E ME NT S W I T H C O L L I N C O UNT Y F O R
A NI MA L C O NT R O L S E RV I C E S .
MO T I O N: Council Member B eazley moved to approve. Council Member
Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
6.Consider/Discuss/Action on filling vacancies on Boards and Commissions.
(City S ecretary)
a
MO T I O N: Council Member Miller moved to appoint Danny Ussery to P lace 7 of
the P lanning and Z oning Commission with a term ending J une 2019. Council
Member Tutson seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
MO T I O N: C ouncil Member Toten moved to appoint Eirick Hansen to Place 6 of
the P arks Advisory Board with a term ending J une 2020. C ouncil Member B ryan
seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
7.A ) Conduct a public hearing to consider public comments regarding a
request by J .R. Douglas, the representative for Anil Dhudshia, the owner of
the property. T he property is currently zoned Single F amily Residential
E state (S F -E). T he owner requests to replace the existing zoning to a
proposed Planned D evelopment for S ingle F amily Residential (S F -72). T he
property is located North of Lakeview E states subdivision off Ferguson Rd
and S outh of Rattan Elementary.(M aurice S chwanke)
B ) Consider/Discuss/Action on a recommendation regarding the request
by the applicant and owner of the property to replace the existing zoning
with a new P lanned Development zoning.
a
The requested Planned Development for this tract will be an extension of the
L akeview subdivision. The requirements set forth are identical to phase I and phase
I I of L akeview and will extend streets that were stubbed out when phase I and
phase I I were constructed. A general layout has been attached f or reference only, it
shows the lot pattern anticipated and forthcoming. T he staf f has asked the
developer to make several changes to enhance the development.
The P lanning and Z oning Commission recommended unanimous approval of this
request.
Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m.
Developer J im Douglas requested approval.
Dan Dickson would like to see nice homes.
Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m.
A N O R D I NA NC E O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA , T E X A S , A ME ND I NG T HE
Z O NI NG MA P O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA TO P R O V I D E F O R R E Z O NI NG O F
C E RTA I N P R O P E RT Y; P R O V I D I NG A R E P E A L E R C L A US E; A ND
P R O V I D I NG A N E F F E C T I V E D AT E
MO T I O N: C ouncil Member Miller moved to approve. C ouncil Member Beazley
seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
8.A) C onduct a public hearing to consider public comments regarding a
request by J .R. Douglas, the representative for Anil Dhudshia, the owner of
the property. T he property is currently zoned Single F amily Residential
E state (S F -E). T he owner requests to replace the existing zoning to a
proposed Planned D evelopment for the specific use of a Daycare using C-1
Commercial standards. T he property is located North of L akeview Estates
subdivision off F erguson Rd and South of Rattan Elementary. (M aurice
S chwanke)
B) Consider/D iscuss/Action on a recommendation regarding the request
by the applicant and owner of the property to replace the existing zoning
with Planned Development zoning for only a daycare.
a
This proposed zoning change would allow for a daycare facility to be placed on the
property. No other commercial uses would be allowed. I f a daycare f acility is not
constructed the property would need to be rezoned to residential uses. A daycare
facility next to an elementary school has benefit, however, increased traffic at this
location could be experienced at peak hours. We have received a response back
from the A I S D stating that they have no opinion regarding the proposed zoning
change and two responses from adjacent property owners indicating their favor
towards the case.
Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
A N O R D I NA NC E O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA , T E X A S , A ME ND I NG T HE
Z O NI NG MA P O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA TO P R O V I D E F O R R E Z O NI NG O F
C E RTA I N P R O P E RT Y; P R O V I D I NG A R E P E A L E R C L A US E; A ND
P R O V I D I NG A N E F F E C T I V E D AT E.
MO T I O N: Council Member Beazley moved to approve. Council Member Tutson
seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
9.Consider/Discuss/Action approving a Resolution regarding authorizing the
execution of a purchase contract for a fire engine.(Deputy Chief Isom)
a
From 9/24/17 to 9/20/18, the F ire Department has spent $12,438.61 to repair
mechanical f ailures with E ngine 901 (a 2010 E -One). I n this time frame, an
additional $15,061.10 was spent in ongoing repairs and maintenance. Engine 901
is/was the Department's primary response unit and is currently in reserve status due
to ongoing mechanical challenges. Engine 902 (a 2002 Ferrara),which is normally
the reserve unit, has become our primary response vehicle. A reas of concern
include the following:
E ngine 901 is a 2010 model E-One and was purchased for $269,500 in
2011.
The total estimated repair costs since the time of purchase are unknown,
however, the unit has had to be taken out of service f or extended periods of
time on multiple occasions. Parts f or E -One apparatus are difficult to obtain
and available service centers are not supported.
E ngine 901 has a coolant leak inside the engine (quote for repair is $30,000).
This repair would also remove the unit f rom service f or an extended period of
time.
Reoccurring problems include: repetitive air leaks in the braking system
($4,232.24 spent),A C repair ($3,109.79 spent), head gasket repair
($2,699.35 spent), various electrical problems especially when the engine is
exposed to moisture, the ladder rack will not extend downward, and an
undefined engine “knocking” sound.
The most ef f ective platf orm given A nna’s current resources and protection needs is
a“Rescue/Pumper” style configuration. As a practical matter, the Department’s
primary objective in purchasing a fire engine involves selecting the most appropriate
manufacturer and creating a long term relationship with said company. E qually as
important is the rapidly approaching need for a L adder Truck or Quint given the
growth rate and multi-story construction occurring within our city. At this juncture,
selection of the proper manufacturer is crucial in order to prepare f or the future
based on needs assessments.
The criteria f or fire apparatus selection has centered around the f ollowing factors:
L ocation of service centers, P reventative maintenance options, Utilization of
certified mechanics, Availability of mobile repair service personnel, Availability of
loaner and/or lease apparatus in the event of a major or long-term repair, P roven
track record of reliability and saf ety, Meeting or exceeding industry standards,
Warranty coverage, Manufacturer reputation and Overall build quality.
Unfortunately, we find ourselves in a situation that, in the event of a mechanical
failure of Engine 902 (our current primary unit), Engine 901 will be f orced to
respond to calls in a primary capacity.G iven the condition of Engine 901, this would
likely result in a reduction in services to our citizens and the public.
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA, T E X A S A P P R O V I NG A
C O NT R A C T A ND A UT HO R I Z I NG E X E C UT I O N O F S A ME F O R T HE
P UR C HA S E O F A F I R E E NG I NE F R O M S I D D O NS -MA RT I N E ME R G E NC Y
G R O UP.
MO T I O N: C ouncil Member B eazley moved to approve. Council Member B ryan
seconded. Motion carried 7-0.
10.Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution Authorizing a Financing
Agreement with Government Capital Corporation. (Dana T hornhill)
a
Finance staf f has evaluated several financing options in order to procure the F ire
E ngine and related equipment. I t was determined that the lowest cost option f or the
City was to enter into a capital lease f inancing agreement with Government Capital
Corporation. T he capital lease agreement will be for a term of ten years at a rate of
3.86%. T he annual payment will be $57,611.26. T he funds for the f irst annual
payment was included in the F Y 2019 operating budget for the F ire Department.
A R E S O L UT I O N O F T HE C I T Y C O UNC I L O F T HE C I T Y O F A NNA, T E X A S ,
A P P R O V I NG A L E A S E P UR C HA S E A G R E E ME NT F O R T HE P UR P O S E O F
F I NA NC I NG A F I R E A P PA R AT US.
MO T I O N: Mayor P ike moved to approve. C ouncil Member Beazley seconded.
Motion carried 7-0.
11.C L O S E D S E S S I O N (E X C E P T I O NS )
Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Counci l may enter into closed
session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this agenda under the
following exceptions:
a.Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or
on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the
Texas Disciplinary Rules of P rofessional C onduct of the S tate B ar of Texas
clearly conf licts with C hapter 551 of the Government C ode (Tex. Gov’t Code
§551.071).
a
b.Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
(Tex. Gov’t Code §551.072); city facilities; acquisition of easements
a
c.Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. G ov’t Code §551.074); Council
appointments. Council board appointments.
a
d.Discuss or deliberate E conomic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or
deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has
received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or
expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the C ity is
conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer
of a f inancial or other incentive to a business prospect described by
subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov’t C ode §551.087); possible incentive agreements
with property developers; pending negotiations on development agreements.
a
None.
12.Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on the posted agenda or any
closed session occurring during this meeting, as necessary
None.
13.Adjourn.
Mayor Pike adjourned the meeting at 8:48 p.m.
Approved on the October 23, 2018.
________________________
Mayor Nate P ike
AT T E S T:
__________________________
City Secretary Carrie L . Smith
Item No. 5.b.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Review the meeting minutes of the E conomic Development Corporation from J une 7, 2018; J uly
12, 2018; and A ugust 2, 2018. (J essica Perkins)
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
6-7-2018 E D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
7-12-2018 E D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
8-2-2018 E D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
Anna Economic Development Corporation Meeting Minutes
Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 5:00 pm
INC CUBE BUILDING
s, 312 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
CDC Board Members Present:
Jim Gurski, Anthony Richardson, Connie Stump, Brent Thomas, Josh Vollmer
Staff Present: Ashley Stathatos, David Overcash
1. Call to order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
The meeting was called to order by Connie Stump at 7:44 pm.
2. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizens comments.
3. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding accepting Alonzo Tutson's resignation.
Brent Thomas made a motion to accept the resignation of Alonzo Tutson. Anthony
Richardson seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed.
4. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding appointing a Vice President.
A motion was made to appoint Josh Vollmer as Vice President. The motion was
seconded. All were in favor. Motion passed.
5. Consider, Discuss, Action about moving the July 5th EDC meeting date.
The EDC Board decided to move the meeting to July 12In, 2018. The EDC Attorney said
there was no need for a motion.
6. Consider, Discuss, Action approving the minutes from May 3, 2018.
Brent Thomas made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Jim Gurski
seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed.
IMPORANT LLGAL NO'IICB: i lie Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972 -924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
06-7-2018 Reg EDC Meeting — Page 1
7. Finance Report— Review Only.
The EDC reviewed the Finance Report.
8. Adjourn.
Jim Gurski made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:54 pm. Brent Thomas seconded
the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed.
APPROVED:
President of EDC
ATTESTED:
of EDC
IMPORANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vole and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
06-7-2018 Reg EDC Meeting — Page 2
Anna Economic Development Corporation Meeting
I'"'' : Minutes
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 5:00 pm
CORPORATION
Anna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
CDC Board Members Present:
Anthony Richardson, Jim Gurski, Bruce Norwood, Stan Carver, Shelby Miles, Josh
Vollmer, Doug Hermann
Staff Present: Jessica Perkins, Ashley Stathatos
Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
Meeting called to order at 7:23 pm.
2. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizen comments.
3. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding appointment of a President.
Stan Carver and Anthony Richardson volunteered for the President position. Jim Gurski
made a motion to nominate both Stan Carver and Anthony Richardson and Bruce
Norwood seconded the motion. Stan Carver received two votes and Anthony
Richardson received three votes. Anthony Richardson is the President.
4. Consider/Discuss/Action on reviewing the proposal from Bella Firma for the entry
feature and sign for Anna Business Park.
The Board likes the design of the entry feature and sign for Anna Business Park. They
would like to see what the options are as far as the landscaping to save costs. No action
is needed on this item.
5. Closed Session.
The Board did not go into closed session.
6. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding Termination of Business Development
Incentive Grant for Capital Investment Performance Agreement.
'NOT] CE REGARDING MEETING TIME: In the event that the Anna Economic Development Corporation meets at the same
time and place scheduled for this meeting. then this meeting will be delayed and will begin immediately after the conclusion of the
meeting of the Anna Commtmity Development Corporation.
IMPORANr LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each ofthe items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
7-12-18 Reg EDC Meeting — Page 1
Stan Carver made a motion to terminate the business development incentive grant for
the Capital Investment Performance Agreement. Shelby Miles seconded the motion. All
in favor. Motion carried.
7. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding minutes from June 7, 2018.
Jim Gurski made a motion to approve the minutes from June 7, 2018. Stan Carver
seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried.
8. Finance Report —review only.
Review Only.
9. Adjourn.
Doug Hermann made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 pm. Bruce Norwood
seconded the motion. All in Favor. Motion carried.
President of EDC
ATTESTED:
Jim Porski
SecMary of EDC
NOTICE REGARDING MEETING TIME: In the event that the Anna Economic Development Corporation meets at the same
time and place scheduled for this meeting, then this meeting will be delayed and will begin immediately after the conclusion of the
meeting of the Anna Community Development Corporation.
IMPORANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
7-12-2018 Reg EDC Meeting — Page 2
f`
Anna Economic Development Corporation Meeting
Minutes
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMCORPORAT ou Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 5:00 pm
Anna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
CDC Board Members Present:
Anthony Richardson, Jim Gurski, Bruce Norwood, Shelby Miles, Josh Vollmer, Doug
Hermann
Staff Present: Jessica Perkins, Ashley Stathatos
Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
Meeting called to order at 7:08 pm.
2. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizen comments.
3. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a preliminary marketing plan and promotion of
Anna Business Park and the Collin County Outer Loop.
Developing a clear vision of Anna Business Park will assist staff in finding and
responding to leads. It will, also, help determine future employment centers in Anna.
The marketing/vision plan proposed includes developing a vision, determining future
boundaries, making a list of primary and secondary industries, electronic marketing
package, promotion, developer/broker roundtable and more. The Board would like to
refine the marketing plan and rearrange some of the components included in it. More
discussion on the Anna Business Park marketing/vision plan will take place at the
upcoming workshop meeting.
4. Consider/Discuss/Action on a date to conduct a workshop to develop a workplan
for the Economic Development Corporation.
The workshop to develop the workplan for the Economic Development Corporation was
set for August 23rd at 5:00 pm.
5. Closed Session.
'NOTICE REGARDING MEETING TIME: I the event that the Anna Economic Development Corporation meets at the same
lime and place scheduled far this meeting, then this meeting will be delayed and will begin immediately after the conclusion or tile
meeting orthe Anna Community Development Corporation.
IMPORAN'r LEGAL NOTICE: 7'hc Corporation may vote and/or act upon each orthe items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972 924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
8-2-18 Reg EDC Meeting — Page 1
No closed session.
6. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding minutes from July 12, 2018.
These minutes will be provided at a future meeting.
7. Adjourn.
A motion was made by Josh Vollmer and seconded by Bruce Norwood to adjourn the
meeting at 7:20 pm. All were in favor. Motion passed.
IUZ
Anthohi Richardson
President of EDC
ATTESTED:
Jim Gus i
Secret of EDC
NOTICE REGARDING MEETING TIME: In the event that the Anna Economic Development Corporation meets at the same
time and place scheduled for this meeting, then this meeting will be delayed and will begin immediately after the conclusion of the
meeting of the Anna Community Development Corporation.
IMPORANT LEGALNOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The Corporation
reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered
necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. Disabled person who want to attend the meeting and may need
assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
8-2-2018 Reg EDC Meeting— Page 2
Item No. 5.c.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Review the meeting minutes of the Community Development Corporation from J une 7, 2018; J uly
12, 2018; and August 2, 2018. (J essica P erkins)
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
6-7-2018 C D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
7-12-2018 C D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
8-2-2018 C D C Minutes 10/15/2018 Backup Material
Anna Community Development Corporation Meeting Minutes
Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 5:00 pm
Inc. Cube Building
312 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
CDC Board Members Present:
Jim Gurski, Anthony Richardson, Connie Stump, Brent Thomas, Josh Vollmer
Staff Present: Ashley Stathatos, David Overcash
1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
Meeting called to order by Brent Thomas at 5:05 pm.
2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
Invocation and pledge of allegiance led by Brent Thomas.
3. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizen comments.
4. Item 6 moved up. Presentation/Demo Bryan Beatty, Director of Sales, GIS
Planning, Zoom Prospector.
Bryan Beatty, Director of Sales, GIS Planning, provided an online demonstration of
ZoomProspector. ZoomProspector can provide the City with an online real estate
database and mapping service. Features of ZoomProspector include but are not limited
to property search, sites and building database, demographic data and business data.
The cost for ZoomProspector is $3,240 per year.
5. Item 7 moved up. Presentation/Demo Nicole D'Souza, Business Development
Manager, Impact Data Source, Impact Dashboard.
The board was unable to connect with Impact Data Source for the presentation. Their
Impact Dashboard product's purpose is to evaluate economic development projects,
their fiscal impact and return on investment in both direct and indirect benefits to the
community.
6. Item 4. Consider, Discuss, Action accepting Alonzo Tutson's resignation.
IMPORTANT LGGAL NO'fICB: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda_ The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this aeenda whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
5-3-2018 Regular CDC Minutes.doc 1
Alonzo Tutson is resigning due to being appointed to City Council. The board accepts
his resignation. There is no motion.
7. Item 5. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding appointing a CDC Board President.
Brent Thomas, Connie Stump and Anthony Richardson were considered for the CDC
Board President position. Brent Thomas and Connie Stump both received one vote
each for Board President. Anthony Richardson received three votes for Board
President. Anthony Richardson became the new CDC Board President. He
relinquished his position of CDC Board Secretary which fell to Jim Gurski.
8. Item 8. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding approving a resolution for a license
agreement with GIS Planning to provide their Zoom Prospector Enterprise Local
Edition.
No action taken for legal to review the contract with ZoomProspector.
9. Item 9. Update from Metro Study.Residential Reports.
MetroStudy completed two residential reports. One report includes only the City of
Anna. The other report includes Anna, Melissa and Van Alystyne. The purpose of the
reports is to provide data to developers, brokers and prospective businesses on the
growth occurring in the area. Findings from the reports include:
✓ 455 Annual Starts, 437 Annual Closings
✓ Most new homes fall between $250,000 to $299,999
✓ Average new home cost is $295,087
✓ Housing inventory is 5.4 months
✓ To date, there are 4,005 occupied lots and 4,544 future lots
✓ Top homebuilders in Anna are Bloomfield, Express, and LGI
✓ Other homebuilders include DR Horton, Lennnar, Windsor, Highland, Megatel
and Gehan
10. Item 10. Update from Trade Area Analysis.
A trade area analysis was conducted by EarthVision at the northeast corner of 1-75 and
FM 455. The analysis focused on a weekday/daytime primary trade area and a
night/weekend primary trade area. Findings from the reports include:
✓ Weekday/Daytime Demographics: 81,988 Population, 35.8 Median Age,
$67,798 Household Income.
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
5-3-2018 Regular CDC Minutes.doc
✓ Weekend/Night Demographics: 45,899 Population, 36.7 Median Age, $68,826
Household Income.
✓ Leakage: Everything is being leaked except gas stations, convenience stores,
and liquor stores.
✓ Up & Coming Families and the Middleburgs have the highest customer
segmentation profiles.
11. Item 11. Update from ICSC.
Staff provided an update on ICSC, the schedule for the event, retailers & restaurants
visited and provided information on prospective businesses to continue to follow-up.
The CDC Board felt like ICSC was a worthwhile trip.
12. Item 12. CLOSED SESSION
At 6:13, Connie Stump made a motion to go into executive session. Jim Gurski
seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. At 6:53, Brent Thomas made a
motion to come out of executive session. Jim Gurski seconded the motion. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
13. Item 13. Consider, Discuss, Action on Closed Session Items.
There was no discussion or action on closed session items.
14. Item 14. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding approving a resolution for a
professional service agreement with Impact Data Source to provide Impact
Dashboard.
Brent Thomas made a motion to approve the resolution authorizing the Chief
Administrative Officer to enter into a contract with Impact Data Source to provide Impact
Dashboard for $4,750 subject to legal review. Josh Vollmer seconded the motion. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
16. Item 15. Consider, Discuss, Action regarding minutes from May 3, 2018.
Brent Thomas made a motion to approve the May 3, 2018 minutes. Josh Vollmer
seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried.
16. Item 16. Finance Report — review only.
The CDC Board reviewed the Finance Report.
17. Item 17. Discussion about moving the July 5th, 2018 CDC meeting.
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
5-3-2018 Regular CDC Minutes.doc 3
The CDC Board decided to move the meeting to July 121, 2018. The CDC Attorney said
there was no need for a motion.
18. Item 18. Adjourn.
Brent Thomas made a motion to adjourn at 7:40 pm. Jim Gurski seconded the motion.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
CDC President
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
5-3-2018 Regular CDC Minutes.doc
Anna Community Development Corporation Meeting
Minutes
. -CU „ u a , Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 5:00 pm
DEVELOPMCORPORAT oN Anna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
CDC Board Members Present:
Anthony Richardson, Jim Gurski, Bruce Norwood, Stan Carver, Shelby Miles, Josh
Vollmer
Staff Present: Jessica Perkins, Ashley Stathatos
1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
Meeting called to order at 5:09 pm.
2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
Invocation and pledge of allegiance led by Anthony Richardson.
3. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizen comments.
4. Update on new CDC Board Members.
Council appointed three new CDC Board Members: Bruce Norwood, Stan Carver and
Shelby Miles.
5. Orientation/Presentation for new and existing CDC Board Members.
Staff did a presentation for new and existing CDC Board Members. Topics covered
included: What is Economic Development, Role of the CDC & EDC, CDC & EDC
Accomplishments & Goals, City Council Strategic Plan, Strategic Theme #1 Economic
Development and Current & Future Projects.
6. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding appointment of a Vice President.
Jim Gurski made a motion to nominate Josh Vollmer for Vice President. Stan Carver
seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried.
7. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Work Plan for Economic Development.
Staff announced there would be an upcoming work planning meeting to come prepared
and ready to bring wants, needs and desires regarding future business development in
Anna.
8. Update on Traffic Counts
Gramm Traffic completed new traffic counts in Anna. Traffic counts have increased on
most all major roadways and are approximately 80,000 vehicles on US 75.
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act_ Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
7-12-2018 Special CDC Minutes.doc
9. Closed Session.
Josh Vollmer made a motion to go into closed executive session at 6:29 pm. Jim Gurski
seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried.
Josh Vollmer made a motion to come out of closed executive session at 7:10 pm. Stan
Carver seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried.
10. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding Termination of Business Development Incen-
tive Grant for Capital Investment Performance Agreement.
Bruce Norwood made a motion to terminate the business development incentive grant
for the Capital Investment Performance Agreement. Josh Vollmer seconded the motion.
All in favor. Motion carried.
11. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding minutes from June 7, 2018.
Jim Gurski made a motion to approve the minutes from June 7, 2018. Josh Vollmer
seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried.
12. Finance Report — review only.
Review Only.
13. Adjourn.
A motion was made by Anthony Richardson and Josh Vollmer seconded the motion to
adjourn the meeting at 7:20 pm. All were in favor. Motion passed
zc� ATTESTED:
aon Jim Gu ki
President of CDC
Secretary of CDC
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vole and/or act upon each of -the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legallyjustified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting acid
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
7-12-2018 Special CDC Minutes.doc
Anna Community Development Corporation Meeting
Minutes
C_OMUNITY =- Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 5:00 pm
DEVELOPMENT
Id CORPORATION Anna City Hall, Council Chambers
111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409
CDC Board Members Present:
Anthony Richardson, Jim Gurski, Bruce Norwood, Shelby Miles, Josh Vollmer, Doug
Hermann
Staff Present: Jessica Perkins, Ashley Stathatos
Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum.
Meeting called to order at 5:02 pm.
2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
Invocation and pledge of allegiance led by Anthony Richardson.
3. Citizen Comments.
No citizens came forward to speak at citizen comments.
4. Presentation to Outgoing Board Members.
Connie Stump served 10 Years, and Brent Thomas served 4 Years on the CDC Board.
Anthony Richardson commended Connie and Brent for being great mentors and stated
that the projects they worked on and accomplished will continue moving forward.
Connie and Brent thanked the Board for their recognition and offered words of
encouragement to currently serving Board Members.
5. Consider/Discuss/Action on Glowfest, a local festival put on by the Anna Chamber
of Commerce.
Kevin Hall and Mike Dixon represented the Anna Chamber of Commerce on this item.
Kevin Hall explained Glowfest is being changed to HarvestFest. There will not be
balloons this year because not many have been going up in recent years due to weather
conditions. Guests will get more from other festival activities such as two stages for
music, a pumpkin painting contest, costume contest and additional bounce houses. The
Board thanked Kevin Hall and Mike Dixon for their great work on behalf of the Anna
Chamber of Commerce.
6. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding Zoom Prospector Local Edition, an online real
estate database and mapping solution.
Zoom Prospector will put an unlimited number of the city's properties on the city website.
The cost for Zoom Prospector is $3,240 per year. The board believes Zoom Prospector
will be a great addition to the City's website. No action taken.
IMPORTANT LEGAL NO "LICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretory at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements- can be made.
8-2-2018 Special CDC Minutes.doc
Consider/Discuss/Action regarding the approval of a resolution for a license
agreement with GIS Planning to provide their Zoom Prospector Local Edition.
Passing the resolution approving the contract and funds for Zoom Prospector will enable
staff to begin working on inputting properties into Zoom Prospector so the addition to the
website can go live sooner. Josh Vollmer made a motion to pass the resolution and
authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to execute a contract with GIS Planning for
Zoom Prospector Local Edition with language reviewed and approved by the CDC
Attorney. Shelby Miles seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed.
8. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a preliminary marketing plan and promotion of
the four corners at US 75 and FM 465.
Developing a clear vision of the four corners will assist staff in working with the land
owners, developers and brokers to more aggressively market the properties, get the
sites developed and end -users in place. The Board would like to refine the marketing
plan and rearrange some of the components included in it. More discussion on the four
corners marketing plan will take place at the upcoming workshop meeting.
9. Consider/Discuss/Action on a date to conduct a workshop to develop a workplan
for the Community Development Corporation.
The workshop to develop the workplan for the Community Development Corporation
was set for August 23rd at 5:00 pm.
10. Closed Session.
A motion was made and seconded to go into closed session at 6:45 pm.
Bruce Norwood made a motion and Doug Hermann seconded the motion to come out of
closed session at 7:02 pm. All were in favor. Motion passed.
11. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding minutes from July 12, 2018.
These minutes will be provided at a future meeting.
12. Finance Report — review only.
Review Only.
13. Adjourn.
A motion was made by Doug Hermann and James Gurski seconded the motion to
adjourn-tre meeting at 7:07 pm. All were in favor. Motion passed.
President of CDC
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: The Corporation may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. The
Corporation reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is
considered necessary and legally justified under the Opening Meetings Act. Disable persons who want to attend this meeting and
who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972-924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
8-2-2018 Special CDC Minutes.doc
Item No. 5.d.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Review Quarterly I nvestment Report (Dana T hornhill)
S UM M ARY:
I n accordance with the P ublic F unds I nvestment A ct, the C ity of Anna is required to submit a
quarterly report on the investment of all P ublic Funds held by the City. T he report includes the
following:
• Review of the City’s holdings
• Comparison of book vs. market value
• A llocation information
• Other information related to the P F I A.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
No action by the City Council is required.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Quarterly I nvestment Report for the Quarter E nding
September 30, 2018 10/18/2018 Staff Report
THE CITY OF
manna
QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
For the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2018
The
i�estment�rtfo
i/t
io of the City of Anna is in compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act and the
Inve
ent Poli
y aye6
Strategies.
�l1YI�l
Finance Director
Accountantll
Summary
Investment Report
July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
Quarter End Results by Investment Category:
September 30, 2018
June 30, 2018
Asset Type Ave. Yield
Book Value
Market Value
Book Value
Market Value
Bank DDA 1.63%
$ 7,828,988
$ 7,8281988
$ 71782,135
$ 717823135
Texpool 1.94%
40,115,680
$ 40J15,680
431903,934
431903,934
CDs 2.67%
4,7531305
$ 41753,305
Totals
$ 52,697,973
$ 62,697,973
$ 51,6867069
$ 51,6861069
Current Quarter Average Yield
Total Portfolio 2.00%
Quarterly Interest Income $83,787
Year-to-date Interest Income $220,344
Fiscal Year -to -Date Average Yield
Total Portfolio 1.29%
Investment Report
July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
Summary of Total Investment Book Value by Fund Group
9130118
General Fund
$ 51344,501
Debt Service Funds
727,045
General Capital
Projects Non Bond
765,280
General Capital
Projects Bond
31,7935970
Special Revenue
Funds
212705239
Water & Sewer
Fund
516933183
Utilities Funds -
Restricted
5,3471660
EDC
211,125
CDC
544,970
TOTAL
$ 52,697,973
6130/18
$ 55926,342
838,049
4652405
321003,994
2,102, 759
52029,727
4,479,355
2065271
634,167
$ 511686,069
Investment Holdings
Investment Report
July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
Coupon/
Maturity
Purchase
June
30. 2017
March 31.
2017
Qtr to Qtr
Description
Discount
Date
Date
BookValue
Market Value
Book Value
Market Value
Change
Independent Bank
1.63%
10/112018
$ 71828,988
$ 71828,988
$ 737823135
$ 717822135
$ 462853
TexPool
1.94%
10/1/2018
40,1152680
40,115,680
43,903,934
43,903,934
(3,788,254)
Legacy Texas
CD #6092
2.42%
3/20/2019
9/20/2018
21001,326
22001,326
2,0011326
Legacy Texas
CD #6094
2.93%
9/21/2020
9/20/2018
250,201
250,201
250,201
American Nat'l
Bank CD #1729
2,53%
6/20/2019
9/20/2018
21001,386
2,0011386
22001,386
American Nat'l
Bank CD #1737
2.63%
9/19/2019
9/19/2018
250,198
250,198
250,198
American Nat'l
Bank CD #1745
2.83%
3/20/2020
9/20/2018
250,194
260,194
250,194
TOTAL
$ 52,697,973
$ 52,697,973
$ 51,686,069
$ 51,686,069
$ 1,011,904
Portfolio Comparison
14.86Y
Bank 60,0000000
so,oaa,oao
40,000,000
30,000,000
Total Portfolio
zo,BoO,000
1o,a00,000 I I I I I
0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 Sep-17 Dec-17 Mar48 Jun-18 Sep-18
Total Portfolio Performance
z.s
z
1
o.s
0
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 lun-17 Sep-17 Dec-17 Mar-18 lun-18 Sep-18
�Texpool Weighted Average Yield
Item No. 5.e.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove an Ordinance approving the 2018 Tax Roll (Dana Thornhill)
S UM M ARY:
T he Collin County Tax A ssessor Collector recently submitted the Tax Roll summary for the City of
Anna. The report from the county is attached. Texas P roperty Tax Code, S ection 26.09, requires
the City to pass an ordinance approving the 2018 Tax Roll.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance approving the 2018 Tax
Roll for the City of A nna.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Tax Roll Ordinance 10/10/2018 Ordinance
Exhibit 1, 2018 Tax Roll Summary 10/10/2018 Exhibit
L etter from County Tax Assessor 10/10/2018 Backup Material
Ord. _________________ PAGE 1 OF 1
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO._____________
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE 2018 TAX ROLL FOR THE CITY OF ANNA,
TEXAS
WHEREAS, the Collin County Tax Assessor Collector has submitted the 2018 Tax Roll
for the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”) to the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the
“City Council”) for approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is required by statute (Texas Property Tax Code Section
26.09) to approve or disapprove said Tax Roll; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the 2018 Tax Roll Summary as provided by
the Collin County Tax Assessor Collector, now therefore;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT:
SECTION 1. Recitals Incorporated.
The above-referenced recitals are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all
purposes.
SECTION 2. Tax Roll Approved.
The Council hereby approves the 2018 Tax Roll Summary attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, this, the 23rd
day of October, 2018.
ATTESTED:
___________________________
Carrie L. Smith, City Secretary
APPROVED:
________________________________
Nate Pike, Mayor
Run Date: September 24, 2018 Collin County Tax Office
2018 TAX ROLL SUMMARY
NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS
MARKET VALUES
ROLLCODE: MOBILE HOME
Improvement
Improvement Non -Home Site
ROLLCODE: PERSONAL
Personal
ROLLCODE: REAL
Agriculture
Improvement
Improvement Non -Home Site
Land
Land Ag Land
Land Non -Home Site
TOTAL
MARKET VALUE
DEFERRALS
Ag
TOTAL DEFERRALS
EXEMPTIONS
Autos, XO , PPV , XO , PPV
Cap Adjustment, XT , XT
Disabled
Disabled Veteran
Historic Site
Miscellaneous, XV , XV
Nominal Value
Over 65
TOTAL EXEMPTIONS
GRAND TOTAL FOR DEFERRALS AND EXEMPTIONS
TOTAL MARKET VALUE
TAXABLE VALUE
TAX RATE
ROLLCODE: MOBILE HOME
Levy
ROLLCODE: PERSONAL
Levy
ROLLCODE:REAL
Levy
LEVY
TOTAL
LEW LOST DUE TO FROZEN
OTHER LOST LEW
TOTAL LOST LEVY
Amount
$370,901
$56,201
$49,632,736
$14114851784
$7071621,819
$2083062,046
$239,891,378
$921,379
$99,0932212
Page 10 of
133
07 - ANNA CITY
Count
6,188
$1,447,135,456
$14114852004 214
$141,485,004
$6,123,559
$231135,292
$0
$111446,988
$0
$156,111,036
$5,567
$13,677,170
$2,525.49
$257,216.85
$6,215,752.84
18
1,525
105
156
1
263
21
487
$210,499,612
$3519984,616
$1,447,1351456
$1,095,1501840
0,591288
111
283
5,794
$6,475,495.18
$0.00
$0,00
$0,00
TaxRollSummary.rpt Revised September 24, 2018
Run Date: September 24, 2018 Collin County Tax Office Page 11 of
2018 TAX ROLL SUMMARY 133
07 - ANNA CITY
Calculation Analysis
Calc Levy - Tax Amount Diff, Market Value Exemption Taxable Value
Frozen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
DV100 (Excl. Frozen) 1,517.83 1,517.83 0.00 111028,204 10,534,154 494,050
Prorated (Excl. Frozen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other 61473,977,35 61473,977.35 0.00 11436,107,252 341,450,462 11094,656,790
Total 61475,495.18 624753495.18 0.00 1,44711351456 351,984,616 1,095,1501840
.
0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
DV100 (IntlFrozen) 0
Prorated (Intl. Frozen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
TaxRollSummary.rpl Revised September 24, 2018
KENNETH L. MAUN
TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR
COLLIN COUNTY
2300 Bloomdale Road, Suite 2366
P.O. Box 8066
McKinney, TX 75070-8006
(972)547-5020
Fax: (214) 4914808
Email: kmaun@collincountytx.gov
October 1, 2018
Nate Pike, Mayor
City of Anna
P.O. Box 776
Anna, TX 75409
Dear Mayor Pike,
Attached is the 2018 Tax Roll Summary for City of Anna.
Submission of the 2018 Tax Roll to your governing body for approval, in accordance with Texas
Property Tax Code, Section 26.09, will constitute the 2018 Tax Roll for City of Anna.
Please provide my office a copy of your ordinance approving the Tax Roll at your earliest
convenience. While this is a formality in the Texas Property Tax Code, we do want to fulfill the
requirements of the law and do appreciate your cooperation.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
1�- /U4AA�,
Kenneth L. Mann
Tax Assessor Collector
KLM:ket
Enclosure
cc: Maurice Schwanke
Dana Thornhill
Item No. 5.f.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove a Resolution I dentifying the City Manager as the Authorized Official on the Child
A buse/F amily Violence I nvestigator Grant No. 3076603. (Chief Caponera)
S UM M ARY:
T he purpose of this Resolution is to change the C ity's A uthorized Official on grants awarded
through the Office of the Governor's C riminal J ustice Division. I nterim City Manager Maurice
Schwanke was identif ied as the A uthorized Of f icial on a previous Resolution. T his Resolution
identifies City Manager J im Proce as our new Authorized Official.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends approval.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/16/2018 Staff Report
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
RESOLUTION NO. ___________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND
DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE GRANTEE'S AUTHORIZED
OFFICIAL OF THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CHILD ABUSE/FAMILY
VIOLENCE INVESTIGATOR PROJECT TO THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR,
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Anna finds it in the best interest of the citizens
of the City of Anna that the Child Abuse/Family Violence Investigator Project be operated
for the FY 2019; and
WHEREAS, The City Manager of the City of Anna agrees that in the event of loss or
misuse of the Criminal Justice Division funds, the City Council of the City of Anna assures
that the funds will be returned to the Criminal Justice Division in full.
WHEREAS, City Council of the City of Anna designates City Manager, Jim Proce as the
grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept,
reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anna approves
submission of the grant application (Grant Number: 3076603) for the Child Abuse/Family
Violence Investigator Project to the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of October, 2018.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________
Carrie Smith, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor
Item No. 5.g.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove a Resolution I dentifying the City Manager as the Authorized Official on the School
Resource Officer Program, Grant No. 2921203. (Chief Caponera)
S UM M ARY:
T he purpose of this Resolution is to change the C ity's A uthorized Official on grants awarded
through the Office of the Governor's C riminal J ustice Division. I nterim City Manager Maurice
Schwanke was identif ied as the A uthorized Of f icial on a previous Resolution. T his Resolution
identifies City Manager J im Proce as our new Authorized Official.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends approval.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/19/2018 Staff Report
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND
DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE GRANTEE'S AUTHORIZED
OFFICIAL OF THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE SCHOOL RESOURCE
OFFICER PROJECT TO THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, CRIMINAL JUSTICE
DIVISION.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Anna finds it in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Anna that the School Resource Officer Project be operated for the
FY 2017; and
WHEREAS, The City Manager of the City of Anna agrees that in the event of loss or
misuse of the Criminal Justice Division funds, the City Council of the City of Anna
assures that the funds will be returned to the Criminal Justice Division in full.
WHEREAS, City Council of the City of Anna designates City Manager, Jim Proce as the
grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for,
accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anna
approves submission of the grant application (Grant Number: 2921203) for the
School Resource Officer Project to the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice
Division.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of October, 2018.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________
______________________________
Carrie Smith, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor
Item No. 5.h.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove a Resolution I dentifying the City Manager as the Authorized Official on the R MS
E nhancements for NI B R S Compliance, Grant No. 3679601. (Chief Caponera)
S UM M ARY:
T he purpose of this Resolution is to change the C ity's A uthorized Official on grants awarded
through the Office of the Governor's C riminal J ustice Division. I nterim City Manager Maurice
Schwanke was identif ied as the A uthorized Of f icial on a previous Resolution. T his Resolution
identifies City Manager J im Proce as our new Authorized Official.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends approval.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/16/2018 Staff Report
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND
DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE GRANTEE'S
AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE
RMS EHANCEMENTS FOR NIBRS COMPLIANCE GRANT TO THE
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Anna finds it in the best interest of the citizens of
the City of Anna that the Records Management System Enhancement for NIBRS Compliance
Project be operated for the FY 2018 & FY 2019; and
WHEREAS, The City Manager of the City of Anna agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of
the Criminal Justice Division funds, the City Council of the City of Anna assures that the funds
will be returned to the Criminal Justice Division in full.
WHEREAS, City Council of the City of Anna designates City Manager, Jim Proce as the
grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept,
reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anna
approves submission of the grant application (Grant Number: 3679601) for the Records
Management System Enhancement for NIBRS Compliance Project to the Office of the
Governor, Criminal Justice Division.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of October 2018.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ ______________________________
Carrie Smith, City Secretary Mike Crist, Mayor
Item No. 5.i.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
A pprove a resolution setting a public hearing under Sec. 372.009 of the Texas L ocal Government
Code on the advisability of the creation of a public improvement district and improvements for the
Villages of Hurricane Creek within the City of A nna, Texas; and authorizing the issuance of notice
by the city secretary of Anna, Texas regarding the public hearing. (City Attorney)
S UM M ARY:
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff is recommending approval.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/19/2018 Resolution
Exhibit A 10/19/2018 Exhibit
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
RESOLUTION NO. ___________________
A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING UNDER SEC. 372.009 OF
THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE ON THE ADVISABILITY OF
THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS; AND
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE BY THE CITY SECRETARY
OF ANNA, TEXAS REGARDING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the “City”), is authorized under Chapter 372 of the Texas
Local Government Code (the “Act”), to create a public improvement district within its corporate limits;
and
WHEREAS, on October ___, 2018, CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC, a Texas limited liability
company, the owner of (1) taxable real property representing more than 50 percent of the appraised
value of taxable real property liable for assessment under the proposal, as determined by the current
roll of the appraisal district in which the property is located and (2) record owner of real property liable
for assessment under the proposal who: (A) constitute more than 50 percent of all record owners of
property that is liable for assessment under the proposal; or (B) own taxable real property that
constitutes more than 50 percent of the area of all taxable real property that is liable for assessment
under the proposal (the “Petitioner”), within the corporate limits of the City, submitted and filed with
the City Secretary of Anna (the “City Secretary”) a petition (“Petition”), attached as Exhibit A,
requesting the establishment of the Hurricane Creek Public Improvement District for 368.2 acres of
property within the City (the “District”); and
WHEREAS, said petition described public improvements that the property desires to be made
within the public improvement district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Anna, Texas (the “City Council”) will hold a public hearing
in accordance with Section 372.009 of the Act regarding the advisability of establishing the District,
the nature of the improvements contemplated, the estimated costs of the improvements, the boundaries
of the District, the method of assessment, and the apportionment, if any, of the costs; and
WHEREAS, it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this
resolution was considered was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of
said meeting was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code; and
WHEREAS, in order to hold a public hearing for the creation of a public improvement district,
notice must be given in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality before the 15th day before
the date of the hearing, and written notice must be mailed to the current address of each owner, as
reflected on the tax rolls, of property that would be subject to assessment under the proposed public
improvement district; and
WHEREAS, both newspaper notice and mailed notice must contain the information required
for notice as provided for in Section 372.009 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to hold a public hearing on November 13, 2018
on the creation of a public improvement district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the passage of this Resolution is in the best interest
of the citizens of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANNA, TEXAS:
Section 1: All of the above recitals are hereby found to be true and correct factual
determinations of the City and are hereby approved and incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
Section 2: City Staff reviewed the Petition and determined that the same complied with the
requirements of the Act and the City Council accepts the Petition.
Section 3: That a public hearing is hereby called for November 13, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. at Anna
City Hall Administration Building, 111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409, for the purpose of
hearing public testimony with respect to the advisability of establishing the District, the nature of the
improvements contemplated, the estimated costs of the improvements, the boundaries of the District,
the method of assessment, and the apportionment, if any, of the costs.
.Section 4: At such time and place the City Council will hear testimony regarding the creation
of the proposed public improvement district and the City Council may, within its sole discretion,
consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing the creation of the proposed public improvement
district.
Section 5: Attached hereto as Exhibit A is the Petition for the Creation of a Public
Improvement District within the City for the Hurricane Creek Public Improvement District, which
includes a metes and bounds description for the District.
Section 6: Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a form of the Notice of Public Hearing (the
“Notice”) the form and substance of which is hereby adopted and approved.
Section 7: Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a legal description of the 368.2 acres of property
to be included in the proposed public improvement district.
Section 8: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause said Notice to be
published in substantially the form attached hereto, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City,
and to mail a copy of said Notice to all landowners within the boundaries of the proposed public
improvement district as required by law. The City Secretary shall provide Notice on or before October
26, 2018, which is before the 15th day before the November 13, 2018 hearing.
Section 9: If any portion of this resolution shall, for any reason, be declared invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof and the
City Council hereby determines that it would have adopted this resolution without the invalid provision.
Section 10: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is
accordingly so resolved.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2018.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
___________________________ __________________________
Carrie L. Smith, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
Petition for the Creation of a Public Improvement District
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT
Pursuant to Section 372.009(c) and (d) of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the “Act”),
notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (“City”), will hold a public hearing to
accept public comments and discuss the petition (the “Petition”), filed by CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC, a
Texas limited liability company (the “Petitioner”), requesting that the City create the Hurricane Creek Public
Improvement District (the “District”) to include property owned by the Petitioner and further described herein
(the “Property”).
Time and Place of the Hearing. The public hearing will start at 7:00 p.m. on November 13, 2018 at Anna
City Hall Administration Building, 111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409.
General Nature of the Proposed Authorized Improvements. The general nature of the proposed public
improvements (collectively, the "Authorized Improvements") may include: (i) street and roadway
improvements, including related sidewalks, drainage, utility relocation, signalization, landscaping, lighting,
signage, off-street parking and right-of-way; (ii) establishment or improvement of parks and open space, together
with the design, construction and maintenance of any ancillary structures, features or amenities such as trails,
playgrounds, walkways, lighting and any similar items located therein; (iii) sidewalks and landscaping, including
entry monuments and features, fountains, lighting and signage; (iv) acquisition, construction, and improvement
of water, wastewater and drainage improvements and facilities; (v) projects similar to those listed in subsections
(i) - (iv) above authorized by the Act, including similar off-site projects that provide a benefit to the property
within the District; (vi) special supplemental services for improvement and promotion of the district; (vii)
payment of costs associated with operating and maintaining the public improvements listed in subparagraphs (i)
- (vii) above; and (viii) payment of costs associated with developing and financing the public improvements
listed in subparagraphs (i) - (vii) above, and costs of establishing, administering and operating the District. These
Authorized Improvements shall promote the interests of the City and confer a special benefit upon the Property.
Estimated Cost of the Authorized Improvements. The estimated cost to design, acquire and construct the
Authorized Improvements, together with bond issuance costs, eligible legal and financial fees, eligible credit
enhancement costs and eligible costs incurred in establishment, administration and operation of the District is
not to exceed $30,000,000.
Proposed District Boundaries. The District is proposed to include approximately 368.2 acres of land generally
located north of FM 455, west of U.S. Highway 75, and east of the City’s western city limits, located within
the City and as more particularly described by a metes and bounds description available at Anna City Hall
located 11 N. Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409 and available for public inspection.
Proposed Method of Assessment. The City shall levy assessments on each parcel within the District in a
manner that results in imposing equal shares of the costs on property similarly benefited. All assessments may
be paid in full at any time (including interest and principal), and certain assessments may be paid in annual
installments (including interest and principal). If an assessment is allowed to be paid in installments, then the
installments must be paid in amounts necessary to meet annual costs for those Authorized Improvements
financed by the assessment, and must continue for a period necessary to retire the indebtedness of those
Authorized Improvements (including interest).
Proposed Apportionment of Cost between the District and the City. The City will not be obligated to provide
any funds to finance the Authorized Improvements, except for assessments levied on real property within the
District and possible tax reinvestment zone revenue. No municipal property in the District shall be assessed. All
of the costs of the Authorized Improvements will be paid from assessments and from other sources of funds, if
any, available to the Petitioner.
During the public hearing, any interested person may speak for or against the establishment of the District and
the advisability of the improvements to be made for the benefit of the property within the District.
EXHIBIT C
PETITION FOR THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WITHIN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS FOR THE HURRICANE CREEK PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
This petition ("Petition') is submitted and filed with the City Secretary of the City of Anna,
Texas ("Citf"), by CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, owner of a
majority of the real property (the "Petitioner') located within the proposed boundaries of the
District, as hereinafter defined. Acting pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 372, Texas Local
Government Code, as amended (the "Act"), the Petitioner requests that the City create a public
improvement district (the "District'), to include property located within the city limits of the City
(the "Property'), more particularly described by a metes and bounds description in Exhibit A and
depicted in Exhibit B. In support of this Petition, the Petitioner would present the following:
Section 1. General Nature of the Authorized Improvements. The general nature of the
proposed public improvements (collectively, the "Authorized Improvements") may include: (i)
street and roadway improvements, including related sidewalks, drainage, utility relocation,
signalization, landscaping, lighting, signage, off-street parking and right-of-way; (ii) establishment
or improvement of parks and open space, together with the design, construction and maintenance
of any ancillary structures, features or amenities such as trails, playgrounds, walkways, lighting
and any similar items located therein; (iii) sidewalks and landscaping, including entry monuments
and features, fountains, lighting and signage; (iv) acquisition, construction, and improvement of
water, wastewater and drainage improvements and facilities; (v) projects similar to those listed in
subsections (i) - (iv) above authorized by the Act, including similar off -site projects that provide a
benefit to the property within the District; (vi) special supplemental services for improvement and
promotion of the District; (vii) payment of costs associated with operating and maintaining the
public improvements listed in subparagraphs (i) - (vii) above; and (viii) payment of costs
associated with developing and financing the public improvements listed in subparagraphs (i) -
(vii) above, and costs of establishing, administering and operating the District. These Authorized
Improvements shall promote the interests of the City and confer a special benefit upon the
Property.
Section 2. Estimated Cost of the Authorized Improvements. The estimated cost to design,
acquire, and construct the Authorized Improvements, together with bond issuance costs, eligible
legal and financial fees, eligible credit enhancement costs and eligible costs incurred in the
establishment, administration, and operation of the District is $30,000,000.00. The City will pay
none of the costs of the proposed improvements from funds other than such assessments. The
remaining costs of the proposed improvements will be paid from sources other than the City or
assessments of property owners.
Section 3. Boundaries of the Proposed District. The District is proposed to include the
Property.
Section 4. Proposed Method of Assessment. The City shall levy assessments on each
parcel within the District in a manner that results in imposing equal shares of the costs on property
similarly benefited. All assessments may be paid in full at any time (including interest and
principal), and certain assessments may be paid in annual installments (including interest and
principal). If an assessment is allowed to be paid in installments, then the installments must be
paid in amounts necessary to meet annual costs for those Authorized Improvements financed by
the assessment, and must continue for a period necessary to retire the indebtedness of those
Authorized Improvements (including interest).
Section 5. Proposed Apportionment of Costs between the District and the Citv. The City
will not be obligated to provide any funds to finance the Authorized Improvements, other than
from assessments levied on the District, and possible tax increment reinvestment zone revenue.
No municipal property in the public improvement district shall be assessed. The Petitioner may
also pay certain costs of the improvements from other funds available to the Petitioner.
Section 6. Management of the District. The Petitioner proposes that the District be
managed by the City, with the assistance of a consultant, who shall, from time to time, advise the
City regarding certain operations of the District.
Section 7. The Petitioner Requests Establishment of the District. The person signing this
Petition requests the establishment of the District, is duly authorized, and has the corporate
authority to execute and deliver the Petition.
Section 8. Advisory Board. The Petitioner proposes that the District be established and
managed without the creation of an advisory board. If an advisory board is created, the Petitioner
requests that a representative of the Petitioner be appointed to the advisory board.
Section 9. Landowner(s). This Petition has been signed by (1) the owners of taxable real
property representing more than 50 percent of the appraised value of taxable real property liable
for assessment under the proposal, as determined by the current roll of the appraisal district in
which the property is located; and (2) record owners of real property liable for assessment under
the proposal who: (A) constitute more than 50 percent of all record owners of property that is liable
for assessment under the proposal; or (B) own taxable real property that constitutes more than 50
percent of the area of all taxable real property that is liable for assessment under the proposal.
This Petition is hereby filed with the City Secretary of the City, or other officer performing
the functions of the municipal secretary, in support of the creation of the District by the City
Council of the City as herein provided. The undersigned request that the City Council of the City
call a public hearing on the advisability of the Authorized Improvements, give notice thereof as
provided by law and grant all matters requested in this Petition and grant such other relief, in law
or in equity, to which Petitioner may show itself to be entitled.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, on this the 19th day of October, 2018.
PETITIONER:
CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: CADG Holdings, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
Its: Member
By: MMM Ventures, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
Its: Manager
By: 2M Ventures, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Manager
By: {"� /� Z'
Name: Mehrdad Moayedi
Its: Manager
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 10&y of
2018 by Mehrdad Moayedi, Manager of 2M Ventures, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
as Manager of MMM Ventures, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, as Manager of CADG
Holdings, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, as Member of CADG Hurricane Creek, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said company.
y��WJWI\
`tppY PVB� SHARON JARRELLS ,
_i;' �n= Notary Public, State of Texas NotaryPublic, State of exas
SV*'," Comm. Expires 08-23-2022
Notary ID 131695192
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
368.2 ACRES
BEING all that certain tract of land situated in then Joseph Boyle Survey, Abstract
Number 105, the John Coffman Survey, Abstract Number "97 the J. M. Kincade Survey,
Abstract Number 509 J. W. Mitchel Survey, Abstract Number 565 the W. Rattan
Survey, Abstract Number 752 and the T_ Rattan Survey, Abstract Number 785, Collin
i aunty, Texas and being all of a called 262.41 acre tree as described by deed to
Villages of Hurricane Creek, lP recorded in Volume 5430, Paga 9864 of County
Records, Coilin County, Texas and being part of a celled 114.252 acre of land described
by deed to Don Collins, et lrecorded in Volume 5257, Page 4877 of said County
ReccXds and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said 262.41 acre tract,, in the west line of said
114.252 acre tract:
THENCE 5 89°54'24"W, 2687.94 feet;
THENCE N 00'04'27"W, 387,21 feet;
THENCE N 89-58''14"W, 849.21 feet;
THENCE N 03-33.44"E, 3188.OBfeet;
THENCE N 98026W.1 26", 3655 feet;
THENCE N 23'08'27"W, 67.47 feet;
THENCE N 02-48'15"E, 1930.31 feet;
THENCE N 89'52'55" E, 465.63 feet;
THENCE N 89'15'32"E, 74256 feet;
THENCE 5 90°00'00"E, 1755.97 feet to the northeast corner of said 262.41 acre tract of
land and being the northwest comer of said 114.252 acre _ract;
THENCE N 89*11004E, 794.06 feet;
THENCE S 00°10'57"W, 232.18 feet;
THENCE N 89 W12"E,1184.36feet,
THENCE S 01°06'39"E, 55.96 feet to the beginning of a curse to the right;
THENCE with said curve to the right, an arc distance of 205.39 feet, through a central
angle of 16`48'41", having a radius of 700.00 feet, the long chord which bears S
07"17'41 W, 204.65 feet;
THENCE S 15042'02"W,12L60 feet;
THENCE with said curve to the left, an arc distance of 205.39 feet, through a central
angle of 16`48'41", having a radius of 700.00 feet, the long chord which bears S
07*17'41"W, 204.65 feet;
THENCE S 01°06'39"E, 201.55 feet;
THENCE with said curve to the right, an arc distance of 116A3 feet, through a central
ankle of 09`31'48", having a radius of 699.99 feet, the long chord which bears S
03 39'15"W, 116.30feet;
THENCE S 08'25'09"W, 393.86 feet;
THENCE with Gaud riirve to the left, an arr digfanrP of 1ol.Sc) feet, thrmi h a rantral
angle of 08"19'23", having a radius of 700.03 feet, the long chord which bears S
04 15' 28"W, 101.60 feet;
THENCE S 00005'44"W,1035.62 feet;
THENCE with said curve to the right, an arc distance of 530,61 feet, through a central
angle of 43'25'S2", having a radius of 700.00 feet, the long chord which bears $
21 43'40"W, 518.00 feet;
THENCE S 43'31'37"W, 241,38 feet;
THENCE with said curve to the right, an arc distance of 25,41 feet, through a central
angle of 00"02'48", having a radius of 400.00 feet, the long chord which bears 5
43 47'02"W, 25.41 feet,
THENCE N W44'50"W, 655,06 feet;
THENCE S OW56'11"E, 265.80 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 16,037,378
square feet or 368.2 acres of land more or less.
EXHIBIT B
PROPERTY DEPICTION
N 89'52'55'E
S00°10'57"W
466.63'
N89'11'00"E
23218'
794,Ce
N89°15'32'E1 742.56
S90'00M(M, 1755.9T
NS?°56'12 184,36'
S01'6'9E
R=700.00'55,6
=02=0156..3498'
'd1'
C8=S7'1T41'W
CD2-04.65
1
S 15°42'02'W, 121,6•
g°
�w
R=700,00
3
�05.3T
D=16'4
opm'+j
C8=5T
CD=20
azu-n
R=699.99'
m
N23'08'27-W
=116.43'�
N88'2626'W
C8=S3'39-,5"W
m
365,15'
CD=116.30
R=700.03'
=10169'
-
D&'19'23'
Fw
a
C&mS4115'28'W
m
C0K101,60
ea
Ry0000'
=530.61'
D=43'25.52'
CB--S21°48'401W
CON18.Ofl
o
R-�00.00'
&4a 31'37-W, 310.13
z
D=0�0'0n•oa'46-
C8=S43'40'02'W
N8915814'l'J 849.21'
CD=25,41
-•�—'
S00'S6'19°E
p
265.80,
NW*V50
_.
587,
307.
T
75
1
Item No. 6.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Conduct a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on proposed amendments
to the City's Water & Wastewater Capital I mprovements Plan, L and Use A ssumptions, and I mpact
Fees. (J oseph J ohnson)
S UM M ARY:
I mpact f ees are authorized under Chapter 395 of the L ocal Government C ode and may be
imposed upon new developments to fund both existing and proposed infrastructure that is
necessary to provide service to a development. T he last water and wastewater impact f ee update
was completed in March 2017. B y statute, the City is required to review the L and Use
Assumptions and Capital I mprovement P lan (C I P) at least once every 5 years but may update
them sooner as growth patterns, land use and infrastructure needs change.
Over the past several months, staff has worked with our engineering consultant to identify water
and wastewater infrastructure projects that should be added to our C I P. S ubsequently, land use
assumptions, population projections, and calculated maximum fees were evaluated with new
recommendations for the population projections and calculated maximum fees.
On September 10, 2018, the updated Water & Wastewater I mpact F ee R eport was presented to
the I mpact F ee A dvisory C ommittee which subsequently took action approving a letter addressed
to the C ouncil concurring with the findings of the report and f inding that the report is in general
compliance with Texas L ocal Government Code Chapter 395. A t the Council Meeting held on
September 11, 2018, Council approved a Resolution setting a P ublic Hearing f or October 23,
2018 at 7:30 p.m. f or the purpose of receiving public comment. A dditionally, the report was made
available to the public.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends conducting a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on
proposed amendments to the City's Water & Wastewater Capital I mprovements Plan, L and Use
Assumptions, and I mpact Fees.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
I mpact F ee Committee Recommendation L etter 10/18/2018 Exhibit
Water & Wastewater I mpact Fee Report 10/18/2018 Exhibit
City of Anna, Texas
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
111 N. Powell Parkway
Anna, Texas 75409
September 10, 2018
Re: Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Recommendation
Honorable Mayor Pike and the City of Anna City Council:
The City of Anna Impact Fee Advisory Committee, established in accordance with Section 395.058
of the Texas Local Government Code, met on this date for reviewing the 2018 Roadway, Water and
Wastewater impact fee update.
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee reviewed dw both the 2018 updated Roadway and the Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions prepared by the City of Anna Planning and
Development Staff; and the 2018 updated Roadway, Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement
Plans, and the calculated Maximum Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fees prepared by
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P. Professional Engineers.
On behalf of the Advisory Committee, we find the updated Impact Fee Land Use Plan to be
consistent with the City's current Comprehensive Plan, and the updated Roadway, Water and
Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans to be consistent with the land use plan.
Further, the updated maximum Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fees presented in the 2018
Roadway Impact Fee Update Report and the 2018 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report
prepared by Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, LLP are in general conformance with the requirements of
Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee offers no
objections.
Sincerely
Chairman, Impact Fee Advisory Committee
WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
2018 - 2028
Prepared For
THE CITY OF
1111EI
Prepared By
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS — TBPE Firm No. 526
I DALLAS, TEXAS
r =
September 2018 i *�
GARY C. HENDRICKS
65226
S T `r
1061
ei ��l�tL�► �`r
Zola
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\03-index.docx - i -
CITY OF ANNA
WATER AND WASTEWATER 2018-2028 IMPACT FEE UPDATE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1
· Table No. 1 – Historic Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided by City of Anna) ....................................................... 3
· Table No. 2 – 2018 -2028 Population Projections
III. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT – WATER AND WASTEWATER ............................... 3
· Table No. 3 – LUE for Various Types & Sizes of Water Meter
IV. CALCULATION OF WATER & WASTEWATER – LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS ............ 4
· Table No. 4 – 2018-2028 Water Living Unit Equivalents by Meter Size
· Table No. 5 – 2018-2028 Wastewater Living Unit Equivalents by Meter Size
V. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 6
A. Existing Facilities ................................................................................................................. 6
B. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects .................................................. 6
· Figure No. 1 – Water Distribution System: Existing Facility Recovery
· Figure No. 2 – Water Distribution System: Capital Improvement Plan
· Table No. 6 – 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan
C. Utilized Capacity ................................................................................................................ 11
· Table No. 7 – Summary of Eligible Capital Cost & Utilized Capacity Cost
· Table No. 8 – Existing Facility Recovery – Water Lines & Water Facilities
· Table No. 9 – Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Water Lines
· Table No. 10 – Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Water Distribution Facilities
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\03-index.docx - ii -
Page No.
VI. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. General ............................................................................................................................... 16
B. Existing Wastewater System .............................................................................................. 16
C. Proposed Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan .............................................................. 17
· Figure No. 3 – Wastewater Collection System: Existing Facility Recovery
· Figure No. 4 – Wastewater Collection System: Capital Improvement Plan
· Table No. 10 – 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan
D. Utilized Capacity ................................................................................................................ 20
· Table No. 11 – Summary of Eligible Capital Cost & Utilized Capacity Cost
· Table No. 12 – Existing Facility Recovery – Wastewater Lines & Facilities
· Table No. 13 – Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater Lines
· Table No. 14 – Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater Facilities
VII. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES –
WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM ............................................................................. 26
· Table No. 15 – Allowable Maximum Fee Per LUE and Per Meter Size & Type
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 1 of 27
CITY OF ANNA
2018-2028 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Anna retained the services of Birkhoff, Hendricks and Carter, L.L.P for the purpose
of updating the impact fees for the water distribution system and the wastewater collection
system. These impact fees are required for funding the construction of specific capital
improvement projects to serve new development. The Table 1 below shows previous maximum
impact fees calculated and the impact fees imposed by the City:
Table 1
Historic Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
Calculated
Maximum
Fee
Fees
Imposed
Calculated
Maximum
Fee
Fees
Imposed
Calculated
Maximum
Fee
Fees
Imposed
Calculated
Maximum
Fee
Water $2,712.50 $2,000 $4,674.00 $2,000 $3,984.89 $3,200 $4,510.14
Wastewater $2,643.50 $2,000 $4,610.00 $2,000 $3,999.05 $3,200 $4,078.50
Fees
Imposed
TBD
2018
TBD
201720082014
Since the 2014 and 2017 updates of the Impact Fee, the City of Anna has expanded its water and
sewer service. The Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Collection Master
Plan were refined in 2017 by Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P., and are consistent with the
City’s Comprehensive Plan.
In accordance with the requirements of Chapter 395.052 of the Local Government Code, this
impact fee update report reflects the City of Anna’s Land Use Assumptions, Water Capital
Improvement Plan and Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan.
Chapter 395, of the Local Government Code is an act that provides guidelines for financing
capital improvements required for new development in municipalities, counties, and certain other
local governments. Based on the most current Master Plan documents for the Water Distribution
and Wastewater Collection Systems; 10-year Capital Improvement Plans were developed to
reflect projected infrastructure needs. The City’s Future Land Use Plan was unchanged from the
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 2 of 27
previous evaluation, and population growth assumption, provided by the City Planning
Department, was the basis for the maximum impact fees calculated.
The Act allows the maximum impact fee to be charged if revenues from future ad valorem taxes,
and water and sewer bills are included as a credit in the analysis. If not, the Act allows the
maximum fee to be set at 50% of the calculated maximum fee. Calculations herein provide for
the 50% reduction.
The following items were included in the impact fee calculation:
A. The cost of the new infrastructure that is to be paid by the City, including engineering,
property acquisition and construction cost.
B. Existing excess capacity in lines and facilities that will serve future growth and which were
paid for in whole or part by the City.
C. Engineering and quality control fees for construction projects.
D. Interest and other finance charges on bonds issued by the City to cover its portion of the cost.
E. Planning Cost.
The engineering analysis portion of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee evaluation determines
utilized capacity cost of the major water distribution and wastewater collection facilities between
the year 2018 and the year 2028. Facilities in this analysis include, water pump stations, water
storage tanks, water disinfection systems, water transmission lines, water distribution lines,
wastewater lift stations, wastewater collection lines, the Slayter Creek wastewater treatment plant
and the regional water and wastewater systems. The study period is a ten-year period with 2018
as the base year. Impact fee calculations for the water and wastewater systems account for a
portion, or entirety, of costs of new projects required to serve new developments as well as a
portion of the cost of existing infrastructure that is to be utilized to serve new developments.
Growth and usage rates are standardized in calculations by applying living unit equivalency
factors, which in this analysis conform to the latest American Water Works Association
Standards (C700 - C703).
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 3 of 27
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (BY THE CITY OF ANNA)
The City of Anna Planning Department prepared the Land Use Assumptions used for the 2018 impact fee
update, and they were not modified since the past evaluation. A revised 10-year population growth
projection was provided by the City for this update as shown in Table 2
Table 2
2018-2028 Population Projections.
2018 2028 Buildout
Population 13,240 26,045 250,000
% of Buildout 5.3% 10.4% 100.0%
2018 to 2028 Population Growth:96.7%
Note:
Population Projections provided by the City of Anna Planning Department
III. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT – WATER AND WASTEWATER
Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires that impact fees be based on a defined service unit.
A “service unit” means a standardized measure of consumption, use generation, or discharge attributable
to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or
planning standards. This update defines a water and wastewater service unit to be a 3/4-inch water meter
and has referred to this service unit as a Single Family Living Unit Equivalent (SFLUE). The SFLUE is
based on the continuous duty capacity of a 3/4-inch water meter. This is the typical meter used for a
single family detached dwelling, and therefore is considered to be equivalent to one “living unit”. Other
meter sizes can be compared to the 3/4-inch meter through a ratio of water flows as published by the
American Water Works Association as shown in Table No. 3 below. This same ratio is then used to
determine the proportional water and wastewater impact fee amount for each water meter size.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 4 of 27
TABLE NO. 3
LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENCIES
FOR VARIOUS TYPES AND SIZES OF WATER METERS
Meter Type Meter Size
Continuous Duty
Maximum Rate (gpm) (a) Ratio to ¾” Meter
Simple ¾” 15 1.0
Simple 1” 25 1.7
Simple 1½” 50 3.3
Simple 2” 80 5.3
Compound 2” 80 5.3
Turbine 2” 100 6.7
Compound 3” 160 10.7
Turbine 3” 240 16.0
Compound 4” 250 16.7
Turbine 4” 420 28.0
Compound 6” 500 33.3
Turbine 6” 920 61.3
Compound 8” 800 53.3
Turbine 8” 1,600 106.7
Compound 10” 2,300 153.3
Turbine 10” 2,500 166.7
Turbine 12” 3,300 220.0
(a) Source: AWWA Standard C700 (1995) - C703 (1996)
IV. CALCULATION OF WATER & WASTEWATER - LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS
The City of Anna provided the existing water meter count by size category as of July 2018. In
total, there were 5,032 water meters serving the existing population of 13,240 residents and
businesses. Table No. 4 shows the number of existing water meters and Single Family Living
Unit Equivalents (SFLUE) conversions. The table also shows the projected meter counts and
SFLUEs for 2028 which were based on the population growth assumption.
Similarly, the City provided meter counts by size of the 4,428 water service accounts that also
utilize the wastewater collection system. Table No. 5 illustrates the existing wastewater account
and SFLUE’s.
Using the growth rate provided by the City, water meters and wastewater accounts were
extrapolated to the year 2028. The City’s Planning Department projects the population of the
City of Anna to nearly double over the next ten years; anticipating a residential population of
26,045 in 2028.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 5 of 27
Living unit equivalents were then applied to the water meters and wastewater accounts for 2018
and 2028 resulting in a total number of living units for the beginning and end of this fee period.
The difference in the total number of 2018 and 2028 SFLUE’s results in the new living unit
equivalents during the impact fee period.
TABLE NO. 4
2018 – 2028 WATER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS BY METER SIZE
New
Meter Size Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used(a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used(a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
Living Units
During
Impact Fee
Period
¾”4,868 1.0 4,868 9,576 1.0 9,576 4,708
1”69 1.7 115 136 1.7 226 111
1½”11 3.3 37 22 3.3 72 35
2”56 6.7 373 110 6.7 734 361
3”23 16.0 368 25 16.0 400 32
4”4 28.0 112 4 28.0 112 0
6"1 61.3 61 1 61.3 61 0
Totals 5,032 5,934 9,874 11,182 5,248
2018 2028
(a) Source: AWWA Standard C700 (1995) - C703 (1996)
TABLE NO. 5
2018 – 2028 WASTEWATER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS BY WATER METER SIZE
New
Meter Size Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" (a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used(a)
Total
Number
of Living
Units
Living Units
During
Impact Fee
Period
¾”4,284 1.0 4,284 8,427 1.0 8,427 4,143
1”61 1.7 101 119 1.7 199 98
1½”10 3.3 32 19 3.3 63 31
2”49 6.7 329 97 6.7 646 318
3”20 16.0 324 25 16.0 400 76
4”4 28.0 99 4 28.0 112 13
6"1 61.3 54 1 61.3 61 7
Totals 4,428 5,222 8,692 9,909 4,687
2018 2028
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 6 of 27
V. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
This update includes additional capital improvement plan (CIP) projects that will tentatively serve
new developments, and modifies previous CIP projects that have since been constructed. The
proposed CIP projects are shown schematically in Figure No. 2, and are summarized in Table
No. 6. Existing facilities, applicable for reimbursement under Chapter 395 of the Local
Government Code are shown in Figure No. 1. Eligible facilities include major distribution lines,
pump stations, treatment facilities, ground and elevated storage reservoirs as well as regional
systems participation. Utilized capacities were based on ten-year growth system demands.
A. Existing Facilities
As of 2018, the City of Anna has participated financially in the construction of the facilities
shown on Figure No. 1, the Existing Facility Recovery Map. These distribution lines and
facilities have capacity to serve new developments, and the portion of capacity expected to be
absorbed by the new developments has been included, as a percentage of the total 20-year
project cost, in the value of the maximum impact fee calculation.
Actual capital costs, including construction, engineering and easements of the various
elements of the existing water distribution system, were utilized where the information was
known. The existing costs of facilities were determined from records provided by the City of
Anna. Where actual costs were not known, an average cost in 2018 dollars was calculated.
B. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects
In order to meet the demands of the anticipated growth over the next 10-years to 2028,
certain water distribution system improvements are required. Figure No. 2 shows the
recommended system improvements and Table No. 6 itemizes each project and the project
cost. These recommended improvements, along with certain existing facilities, form the
basis for the Water System Impact Fee Calculation.
Costs for CIP projects were estimated using average unit costs from projects which have
been bid recently, plus an estimated cost for engineering and easements, and were amortized
to include the additional cost of issuing 20-year bonds at 5% annual interest rate. Projects
determined to involve developer financing were estimated with a lesser unit value. In these
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 7 of 27
cases, the developer will be responsible for the cost of the first 8-inches and the City will be
responsible for the additional cost associated to construct the larger-diameter line to the size
shown on the CIP exhibit.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 8 of 27
FIGURE 1
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 9 of 27
FIGURE 2
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 10 of 27
TABLE NO. 6
10-YEAR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Water Lines
Project Size
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Cost (1)
Debt
Service (2)
Total
Project
Cost
Water Line #1 12" $2,344,650 $1,418,166 $3,762,816
Water Line #2 12" X $1,403,400 $848,849 $2,252,249
Water Line #3 12" X $421,700 $255,066 $676,766
Water Line #4 12" X $632,750 $382,720 $1,015,470
Water Line #5 12" $1,618,950 $979,225 $2,598,175
Water Line #6 24" $1,880,800 $1,137,605 $3,018,405
Water Line #7 12" X $422,950 $255,822 $678,772
Water Line #8 12" X $82,100 $49,658 $131,758
Water Line #9 12" X $694,900 $420,311 $1,115,211
Water Line #10 12" X $172,950 $104,609 $277,559
Water Line #12 12" X $60,100 $36,352 $96,452
Water Line #13 12" X $807,650 $488,509 $1,296,159
Water Line #14 8",12",16" $2,149,100 $1,299,887 $3,448,987
Water Line #15 12",16" $2,105,080 $1,273,261 $3,378,341
Water Line #17 12" X $165,700 $100,224 $265,924
Water Line #19 12" X $255,000 $154,237 $409,237
Water Line #20 12" $2,623,200 $1,586,647 $4,209,847
Water Line #21 12" X $1,017,500 $615,437 $1,632,937
Water Line #22 12" $996,000 $602,432 $1,598,432
Water Line #23 12" X $1,403,150 $848,698 $2,251,848
Water Line #24 24" $1,282,800 $775,904 $2,058,704
Water Line #25 12" X $633,800 $383,355 $1,017,155
Water Line #26 16" X $117,950 $71,342 $189,292
Water Line #27 18" X $1,776,330 $1,074,416 $2,850,746
Water Line #28 18" $1,424,685 $861,723 $2,286,408
Water Line #29 18" $1,718,465 $1,039,417 $2,757,882
Water Line #30 12" X $162,450 $98,258 $260,708
Water Line #31 18" $1,146,260 $693,317 $1,839,577
Water Line #32 12" $895,350 $541,554 $1,436,904
Water Line #33 12" $226,500 $136,999 $363,499
Water Line #34 12" X $65,200 $39,436 $104,636
Water Line #35 12" $585,000 $353,838 $938,838
Water Line #36 12" X $380,100 $229,904 $610,004
Water Line #37 12" X $217,400 $131,495 $348,895
Water Line #38 12" X $228,250 $138,057 $366,307
Water Line #39 16" X $192,990 $116,730 $309,720
Water Line #40 16" $690,030 $417,366 $1,107,396
Water Line #41 12" $154,950 $93,722 $248,672
Water Line #42 16" X $407,120 $246,247 $653,367
Water Line #43 18" X $482,460 $291,817 $774,277
Subtotal: Water Lines $34,045,720 $20,592,613 $54,638,333
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 11 of 27
Utilized Capacity
The portion of City-funded project costs that may be reimbursed by impact fee revenue is
relative to the portion of facility capacity that is anticipated to be absorbed by new
developments during the fee period. This portion, or utilized capacity, was determined for
existing facilities and for proposed CIP projects. For existing facilities, available capacities
were found under current, 2018, demands, and were compared to the available capacity
remaining under the predicted 2028 demand scenario. The difference in available capacities,
by percentage, was applied to the 20-year total project cost to determine the allowable
recovery dollar amount. The same procedure was utilized to determine utilized capacity
during fee period for proposed CIP projects, however, in this case, the 2018 demand is null.
Table No. 7 below summarizes project costs and utilized costs over the impact fee period,
2018 – 2028, for each element of the Water Distribution System. The utilized capacity for
each water distribution facility, both existing and proposed, is presented in detail in Impact
Fee Capacity Calculation Table No. 8 through Table No. 10.
TABLE NO. 7
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST & UTILIZED CAPACITY COST
Notes:
(1)Opinion of Cost includes:
a) Engineer's Opinion of Construction Cost
b) Professional Services Fees (Survey, Engineering, Testing, Legal)
c) Cost of Easement or Land Acquisitions
(2)Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 5%
(3) Planning Expense includes current and all past impact fee evaluations.
$8,345,229
$29,723,454
$47,336,752
$94,000
Utilized Capacity During
Fee Period
($)
$94,000
$17,613,298
$21,378,225
Water System
$35,380,857
Total 20-Year Project Cost
($)
$17,519,298
TOTAL:
Existing Water Facilities
$105,680,252
$70,205,395
$15,567,062
$54,638,333
$35,474,857
Proposed Water System Subtotal:
Proposed Water Facilities
Proposed Water Lines
Existing Water System Subtotal:
Planning Expenses
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 12 of 27
TABLE NO. 8
EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY - WATER LINES & WATER FACILITIES
* Average Unit costs are based in 2018 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Total
Capacity
(MG/MGD) Date of Const.
Total Capital
Cost ($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
3.25 2005 $700,000 $423,396 $1,123,396 0.50 3.25 2.75 15% 100% 85% $172,830 $1,123,396 $950,566
3.25 2005 $700,000 $423,396 $1,123,396 $172,830 $1,123,396 $950,566
3.25 2005 $760,000 $459,687 $1,219,687 0.50 3.25 2.75 15% 100% 85% $187,644 $1,219,687 $1,032,043
3.25 2005 $760,000 $459,687 $1,219,687 $187,644 $1,219,687 $1,032,043
4.00 2005 $1,700,000 $1,028,248 $2,728,248 0.00 2.20 2.20 0% 55% 55% $0 $1,500,536 $1,500,536
4.00 2005 $1,700,000 $1,028,248 $2,728,248 $0 $1,500,536 $1,500,536
1.50 2005 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 0.00 0.80 0.80 0% 53% 53% $0 $1,283,881 $1,283,881
1.50 2005 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 $0 $1,283,881 $1,283,881
4.50 2005 $620,000 $375,008 $995,008 0.00 2.25 2.25 0% 50% 50% $0 $497,504 $497,504
4.50 2005 $620,000 $375,008 $995,008 $0 $497,504 $497,504
0.30 2005 $600,000 $362,911 $962,911 0.30 0.30 0.00 100% 100% 0% $962,911 $962,911 $0
0.30 2005 $600,000 $362,911 $962,911 $962,911 $962,911 $0
0.50 2005 $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 0.35 0.50 0.15 70% 100% 30% $561,698 $802,426 $240,728
0.50 2005 $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 $561,698 $802,426 $240,728
0.91 2005 $1,000,000 $604,852 $1,604,852 0.91 0.91 0.00 100% 100% 0% $1,604,852 $1,604,852 $0
0.91 2005 $1,000,000 $604,852 $1,604,852 $1,604,852 $1,604,852 $0
0.35 2005 $525,000 $317,547 $842,547 0.25 0.35 0.11 70% 100% 30% $589,783 $842,547 $252,764
0.35 2005 $525,000 $317,547 $842,547 $589,783 $842,547 $252,764
1.00 2005 $100,000 $60,485 $160,485 - - - 5% 40% 35% $8,024 $64,194 $56,170
1.00 2005 $100,000 $60,485 $160,485 $8,024 $64,194 $56,170
0.50 2013 $200,000 $120,970 $320,970 0.00 0.50 0.50 0% 100% 100% $0 $320,970 $320,970
0.50 2013 $200,000 $120,970 $320,970 $0 $320,970 $320,970
1.25 2014 $850,000 $514,124 $1,364,124 0.00 1.25 1.25 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,364,124 $1,364,124
1.25 2014 $850,000 $514,124 $1,364,124 $0 $1,364,124 $1,364,124
4.00 2016 $303,300 $183,452 $486,752 0.21 0.42 0.20 5% 10% 5% $25,778 $50,710 $24,931
4.00 2016 $303,300 $183,452 $486,752 $25,778 $50,710 $24,931
1.00 2016 $2,607,907 $1,577,397 $4,185,304 0.70 1.00 0.30 70% 100% 30% $2,929,713 $4,185,304 $1,255,591
1.00 2016 $2,607,907 $1,577,397 $4,185,304 $2,929,713 $4,185,304 $1,255,591
N/A 2016 $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 - - - 0% 10% 10% $0 $80,243 $80,243
N/A 2016 $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 $0 $80,243 $80,243
1.00 2016 $750,000 $453,639 $1,203,639 0.00 1.00 1.00 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,203,639 $1,203,639
1.00 2016 $750,000 $453,639 $1,203,639 $0 $1,203,639 $1,203,639
2.50 2016 $1,163,163 $703,541 $1,866,704 0.00 1.25 1.25 0% 50% 50% $0 $933,352 $933,352
2.50 2016 $1,163,163 $703,541 $1,866,704 $0 $933,352 $933,352
2.50 2016 $1,184,620 $716,519 $1,901,139 0.00 1.13 1.13 0% 45% 45% $0 $855,513 $855,513
2.50 2016 $1,184,620 $716,519 $1,901,139 $0 $855,513 $855,513
2.00 2016 $328,800 $198,875 $527,675 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $290,221 $290,221
2.00 2016 $328,800 $198,875 $527,675 $0 $290,221 $290,221
2.00 2016 $1,900,000 $1,149,218 $3,049,218 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $1,677,070 $1,677,070
2.00 2016 $1,900,000 $1,149,218 $3,049,218 $0 $1,677,070 $1,677,070
2.00 2016 $1,469,694 $888,947 $2,358,641 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $1,297,253 $1,297,253
2.00 2016 $1,469,694 $888,947 $2,358,641 $0 $1,297,253 $1,297,253
2.00 2016 $1,265,250 $765,289 $2,030,539 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $1,116,796 $1,116,796
2.00 2016 $1,265,250 $765,289 $2,030,539 $0 $1,116,796 $1,116,796
2.00 2016 $901,950 $545,546 $1,447,496 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $796,123 $796,123
2.00 2016 $901,950 $545,546 $1,447,496 $0 $796,123 $796,123
2.00 2016 $342,000 $206,859 $548,859 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 45% 45% $0 $246,987 $246,987
2.00 2016 $342,000 $206,859 $548,859 $0 $246,987 $246,987
2.00 2016 $274,500 $166,032 $440,532 0.00 1.10 1.10 0% 55% 55% $0 $242,292 $242,292
2.00 2016 $274,500 $166,032 $440,532 $0 $242,292 $242,292
$22,046,184 $13,334,673 $35,380,857 $7,043,234 $24,562,532 $17,519,298
Existing Waterline Facility 1A & 1B
(MGD or MG) Utilized Capacity (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Pipe
Number
Existing Waterline Facility 3
CGMA Treated Surface Water System - Bloomdale PS and GSR
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 1C
CGMA Treated Surface Water System - Treated Water S upply Line
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 2A
South Take Point - PS
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 2B
South Take Point - GSR
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 6B
18" WL From South Take Point to FM 455
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 4
West Well & GSR
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 5
West Well EST
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 6A
South Grayson System - Water Wells
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 9
South Grayson System - .35 MG EST
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 6C
South Grayson System - CCN Area
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 7
South Well Surface Water
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 8
North & West Wll Surface Water
Subtotal:
C.R. 1106 Waterline
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 10
Hackberry EST - 1.0 MG
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 11
U.S.-75 Parallel Water Line North of F.M. 455 (w/DEV)
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 16
U.S.-75 Parallel Water Line South of F.M. 455
Disinfection
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 12
Initial South Pump Station
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 13
South Distribution Line From West Well EST (w/DEV)
Water Facilities - Project CIP Total
Water Line for C.R.422 (w/DEV)
East-West Water Line along West Foster (w/DEV)
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 19
Water Line C.R.371 to Rosamond Pkwy. (w/DEV)
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 20
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 21
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 17
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 18
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 14
East-West Water Line along future Hackberry Ln. West
Subtotal:
Existing Waterline Facility 15
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 13 of 27
TABLE NO. 9
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WATER LINES
2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
15,631 12 $150.00 $2,344,650 $1,418,166 $3,762,816 0% 15% 15% $0 $564,422 $564,422
15,631 $2,344,650 $1,418,166 $3,762,816 $0 $564,422 $564,422
9,153 12 $150.00 $1,372,950 $830,431 $2,203,381 0% 11% 11% $0 $242,372 $242,372
609 12 X $50.00 $30,450 $18,418 $48,868 0% 11% 11% $0 $5,375 $5,375
9,762 $1,403,400 $848,849 $2,252,249 $0 $247,747 $247,747
2,678 12 $150.00 $401,700 $242,969 $644,669 0% 15% 15% $0 $96,700 $96,700
400 12 X $50.00 $20,000 $12,097 $32,097 0% 15% 15% $0 $4,815 $4,815
3,078 $421,700 $255,066 $676,766 $0 $101,515 $101,515
2,888 12 $150.00 $433,200 $262,022 $695,222 0% 23% 23% $0 $159,901 $159,901
3,991 12 X $50.00 $199,550 $120,698 $320,248 0% 23% 23% $0 $73,657 $73,657
6,879 $632,750 $382,720 $1,015,470 $0 $233,558 $233,558
10,793 12 $150.00 $1,618,950 $979,225 $2,598,175 0% 13% 13% $0 $337,763 $337,763
10,793 $1,618,950 $979,225 $2,598,175 $0 $337,763 $337,763
9,404 24 $200.00 $1,880,800 $1,137,605 $3,018,405 0% 100% 100% $0 $3,018,405 $3,018,405
9,404 $1,880,800 $1,137,605 $3,018,405 $0 $3,018,405 $3,018,405
8,459 12 X $50.00 $422,950 $255,822 $678,772 0% 63% 63% $0 $427,626 $427,626
8,459 $422,950 $255,822 $678,772 $0 $427,626 $427,626
1,642 12 X $50.00 $82,100 $49,658 $131,758 0% 96% 96% $0 $126,620 $126,620
1,642 $82,100 $49,658 $131,758 $0 $126,620 $126,620
4,069 12 $150.00 $610,350 $369,171 $979,521 0% 93% 93% $0 $907,037 $907,037
1,691 12 X $50.00 $84,550 $51,140 $135,690 0% 93% 93% $0 $125,649 $125,649
5,760 $694,900 $420,311 $1,115,211 $0 $1,032,686 $1,032,686
3,459 12 X $50.00 $172,950 $104,609 $277,559 0% 23% 23% $0 $63,839 $63,839
3,459 $172,950 $104,609 $277,559 $0 $63,839 $63,839
1,202 12 X $50.00 $60,100 $36,352 $96,452 0% 21% 21% $0 $20,255 $20,255
1,202 $60,100 $36,352 $96,452 $0 $20,255 $20,255
5,210 12 $150.00 $781,500 $472,692 $1,254,192 0% 52% 52% $0 $652,180 $652,180
523 12 X $50.00 $26,150 $15,817 $41,967 0% 52% 52% $0 $21,823 $21,823
5,733 $807,650 $488,509 $1,296,159 $0 $674,003 $674,003
1,485 8 $100.00 $148,500 $89,820 $238,320 0% 62% 62% $0 $147,759 $147,759
2,038 12 $150.00 $305,700 $184,903 $490,603 0% 26% 26% $0 $127,557 $127,557
9,970 16 $170.00 $1,694,900 $1,025,163 $2,720,063 0% 29% 29% $0 $788,818 $788,818
13,493 $2,149,100 $1,299,887 $3,448,987 $0 $1,064,134 $1,064,134
9,445 12 $150.00 $1,416,750 $856,924 $2,273,674 0% 44% 44% $0 $1,000,416 $1,000,416
4,049 16 $170.00 $688,330 $416,338 $1,104,668 0% 44% 44% $0 $486,054 $486,054
13,494 $2,105,080 $1,273,261 $3,378,341 $0 $1,486,470 $1,486,470
3,314 12 X $50.00 $165,700 $100,224 $265,924 0% 83% 83% $0 $220,717 $220,717
3,314 $165,700 $100,224 $265,924 $0 $220,717 $220,717
5,100 12 X $50.00 $255,000 $154,237 $409,237 0% 25% 25% $0 $102,309 $102,309
5,100 $255,000 $154,237 $409,237 $0 $102,309 $102,309
17,488 12 $150.00 $2,623,200 $1,586,647 $4,209,847 0% 63% 63% $0 $2,652,204 $2,652,204
17,488 $2,623,200 $1,586,647 $4,209,847 $0 $2,652,204 $2,652,204
4,616 12 $150.00 $692,400 $418,799 $1,111,199 0% 42% 42% $0 $466,704 $466,704
*** 6,502 12 X $50.00 $325,100 $196,637 $521,737 0% 42% 42% $0 $219,130 $219,130
11,118 $1,017,500 $615,437 $1,632,937 $0 $685,834 $685,834
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
12", east-west water line from S.P.R.R. to Slayter Creek, south of Taylor Blvd.
12" water line following F.M. 455, east of S.P.R.R.
Water Line #7
12" north-south water line from Taylor Blvd. to Outer Loop
Water Line #8
12" water line running south from Taylor Blvd. and South Ferguson Pkwy. to Outer Loop
(%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Water Line #1
12" water line along Collin Outer Loop and F.M.455 to South Plant
Line
Identification
Length
(Ft.)
Diameter
(Inches)
Developer
Participation
Avg. Unit Cost
($/Ft.)
Total Capital
Cost
($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)
Subtotal:
* Average Unit costs are based in 2018 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Water Line #2
12" water line - F.M. 455 southern offset wrapping back to SH 5, west of CR 419
Subtotal:
Water Line #3
12" water line north of the Outer Loop, along CR 422
Subtotal:
Water Line #4
12" Water Line north of the Outer Loop, towards Anna Crossing Subdivision
Water Line #5
Water Line #6
24", north-south water line along CR 369, from South Grayson's North Plant towards West Well
Water Line #9
Subtotal:
8", 12" & 16" water lines along SH 5, south from CR 1106 and continuing onto Fern St. near High school
Water Line #10
12" water line along Taylor Blvd. between U.S. 75 and S. Ferguson Pkwy.
Water Line #12
12" water line along CR 1106 between Dumas Dr. and CR 426
Water Line #13
12" water line along CR 426, South from CR 1106 to near Camden Park Subdivision
Water Line #14
Water Line #11
Not used
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
12" water line traversing between intersections CR 290 and CR 288 to CR 284 and U.S. 75
Water Line #15
12" & 16" water lines along Rosamond, west of SH 5, and turning south to CR 370
Water Line #17
12" water line along U.S. 75, south of CR 370
Water Line #19
12", north-south water line between west Rosamond Pkwy. and CR 371, west of West Well
Water Line #20
Water Line #21
Water Line #16
Water Line #18
Not used
Not used
12" water line parallel to CR 368 and CR 286, west of U.S. 75, from CR 370 to CR 284
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 14 of 27
TABLE NO. 9 (Continued)
2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
6,640 12 $150.00 $996,000 $602,432 $1,598,432 0% 45% 45% $0 $719,295 $719,295
6,640 $996,000 $602,432 $1,598,432 $0 $719,295 $719,295
28,063 12 X $50.00 $1,403,150 $848,698 $2,251,848 0% 14% 14% $0 $315,259 $315,259
28,063 $1,403,150 $848,698 $2,251,848 $0 $315,259 $315,259
6,414 24 $200.00 $1,282,800 $775,904 $2,058,704 0% 8% 8% $0 $164,696 $164,696
6,414 $1,282,800 $775,904 $2,058,704 $0 $164,696 $164,696
12,676 12 X $50.00 $633,800 $383,355 $1,017,155 0% 55% 55% $0 $559,435 $559,435
12,676 $633,800 $383,355 $1,017,155 $0 $559,435 $559,435
1,685 16 X $70.00 $117,950 $71,342 $189,292 0% 8% 8% $0 $15,143 $15,143
1,685 $117,950 $71,342 $189,292 $0 $15,143 $15,143
20,898 18 X $85.00 $1,776,330 $1,074,416 $2,850,746 0% 25% 25% $0 $712,687 $712,687
20,898 $1,776,330 $1,074,416 $2,850,746 $0 $712,687 $712,687
7,701 18 $185.00 $1,424,685 $861,723 $2,286,408 0% 45% 45% $0 $1,028,884 $1,028,884
7,701 $1,424,685 $861,723 $2,286,408 $0 $1,028,884 $1,028,884
9,289 18 $185.00 $1,718,465 $1,039,417 $2,757,882 0% 45% 45% $0 $1,241,047 $1,241,047
9,289 $1,718,465 $1,039,417 $2,757,882 $0 $1,241,047 $1,241,047
3,249 12 X $50.00 $162,450 $98,258 $260,708 0% 80% 80% $0 $208,567 $208,567
3,249 $162,450 $98,258 $260,708 $0 $208,567 $208,567
6,196 18 $185.00 $1,146,260 $693,317 $1,839,577 0% 40% 40% $0 $735,831 $735,831
6,196 $1,146,260 $693,317 $1,839,577 $0 $735,831 $735,831
5,969 12 $150.00 $895,350 $541,554 $1,436,904 0% 45% 45% $0 $646,607 $646,607
5,969 $895,350 $541,554 $1,436,904 $0 $646,607 $646,607
1,510 12 $150.00 $226,500 $136,999 $363,499 0% 100% 100% $0 $363,499 $363,499
1,510 $226,500 $136,999 $363,499 $0 $363,499 $363,499
1,304 12 X $50.00 $65,200 $39,436 $104,636 0% 100% 100% $0 $104,636 $104,636
1,304 $65,200 $39,436 $104,636 $0 $104,636 $104,636
3,900 12 $150.00 $585,000 $353,838 $938,838 0% 75% 75% $0 $704,129 $704,129
3,900 $585,000 $353,838 $938,838 $0 $704,129 $704,129
7,602 12 X $50.00 $380,100 $229,904 $610,004 0% 15% 15% $0 $91,501 $91,501
7,602 $380,100 $229,904 $610,004 $0 $91,501 $91,501
4,348 12 X $50.00 $217,400 $131,495 $348,895 0% 15% 15% $0 $52,334 $52,334
4,348 $217,400 $131,495 $348,895 $0 $52,334 $52,334
4,565 12 X $50.00 $228,250 $138,057 $366,307 0% 15% 15% $0 $54,946 $54,946
4,565 $228,250 $138,057 $366,307 $0 $54,946 $54,946
2,757 16 X $70.00 $192,990 $116,730 $309,720 0% 15% 15% $0 $46,458 $46,458
2,757 $192,990 $116,730 $309,720 $0 $46,458 $46,458
4,059 16 $170.00 $690,030 $417,366 $1,107,396 0% 25% 25% $0 $276,849 $276,849
4,059 $690,030 $417,366 $1,107,396 $0 $276,849 $276,849
3,099 12 $50.00 $154,950 $93,722 $248,672 0% 25% 25% $0 $62,168 $62,168
3,099 $154,950 $93,722 $248,672 $0 $62,168 $62,168
5,816 16 X $70.00 $407,120 $246,247 $653,367 0% 15% 15% $0 $98,005 $98,005
5,816 $407,120 $246,247 $653,367 $0 $98,005 $98,005
5,676 18 X $85.00 $482,460 $291,817 $774,277 0% 15% 15% $0 $116,142 $116,142
5,676 $482,460 $291,817 $774,277 $0 $116,142 $116,142
299,225 $34,045,720 $20,592,613 $54,638,333 $21,378,225 $21,378,225
Diameter
(Inches)
Developer
Participation
Avg. Unit Cost
($/Ft.)
Total Capital
Cost
($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)
(%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
J-### : Reference to Water System Master Plan Map- Node Number
P-### : Reference to Water SystemMater Plan Map-Water Line Number
"X" : Developer Participation
12-inch P-935
Subtotal:
Water Line #42
16-inch P-769
Subtotal:
Water Line #43
18-inch P-828, P-760
Subtotal:
Water Lines - CIP Total
TOTAL
12-inch J-725, J-727
Subtotal:
Water Line #39
16-inch P-563
Subtotal:
Water Line #40
16-inch P-588
Subtotal:
Water Line #41
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Water Line #37
12-inch P-809
Subtotal:
Water Line #38
Water Line #36
12-inch P-524, P-790, P-803
12" water lines crossing south of proposed western T-02 EST
Water Line #24
18" water line continuation along future western Collin County Outer Loop, west of S.H. 5
Water Line #25
12", north-south water line, generally parallel to and east of U.S.75 between CR 371 and F.M. 455
Water Line #26
16" water line crossing U.S. 75 at CR 371
Water Line #27
18" water line along future western Collin County Outer Loop and north to CR 285
Water Line #28
12-inch P-742
Subtotal:
Water Line #35
Water Line #33
Subtotal:
Water Line #34
12-inch P-528
12-inch P-931
12-inch P-610, P-611, P-847
18-inch P-758
Subtotal:
Water Line #29
18" water line along F.M. 455 between the creek near CR. 419 to near S.H. 121
Water Line #30
12" water line along S.H. 5 and CR 423, south of F.M. 455
Water Line #31
Subtotal:
24" water line running west from South Grayson's North Plant to near U.S. 75
Water Line #32
Subtotal:
Water Line #22
12", east-west water line between CR 368 and CR 370 to CR 290 and CR 288
Water Line #23
* Average Unit costs are based in 2018 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Line
Identification
Length
(Ft.)
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 15 of 27
TABLE NO. 10
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WATER FACILITIES
* Average Unit costs are based in 2018 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Total
Capacity
(MG/MGD)
Total Capital
Cost ($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)2018 2028
During
Fee
Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
1.00 $3,000,000 $1,814,555 $4,814,555 0.00 0.75 0.75 0% 80% 80% $0 $3,851,644 $3,851,644
1.00 $3,000,000 $1,814,555 $4,814,555 $0 $3,851,644 $3,851,644
5.00 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 0.00 1.00 1.00 0% 20% 20% $0 $481,456 $481,456
5.00 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 $0 $481,456 $481,456
N/A $1,000,000 $604,852 $1,604,852 0.00 2.00 2.00 0% 10% 10% $0 $160,485 $160,485
N/A $1,000,000 $604,852 $1,604,852 $0 $160,485 $160,485
N/A $2,000,000 $1,209,703 $3,209,703 0.00 2.00 2.00 0% 10% 10% $0 $320,970 $320,970
N/A $2,000,000 $1,209,703 $3,209,703 $0 $320,970 $320,970
1.50 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 0.00 1.50 1.50 0% 100% 100% $0 $2,407,278 $2,407,278
1.50 $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278 $0 $2,407,278 $2,407,278
0.50 $700,000 $423,396 $1,123,396 0.00 0.50 0.50 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,123,396 $1,123,396
0.50 $700,000 $423,396 $1,123,396 $0 $1,123,396 $1,123,396
$9,700,000 $5,867,062 $15,567,062 $0 $8,345,229 $8,345,229
CGMA Sherman Connection
(MGD or MG) Utilized
Capacity (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Pipe
Number
1 MG EST
Subtotal:
South Plant Pump Station Expansion
Subtotal:
Water Facilities - CIP Total
Subtotal:
CGMA Bloomdale Pump Station
Subtotal:
South Grayson Take Point - 1.5 MGD Pump
Subtotal:
South Grayson Take Point - 0.5 GSR
Subtotal:
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 16 of 27
VI. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
General
At this time, based on projections provided by the City, the City of Anna will approximately
double in population over the ten-year period. The most significant growth, that affects the
wastewater collection needs of the City, will occur in the Slayter Creek Basin, along the US
75 corridor, east of SH 5 and along Hurricane Creek west of US 75.
The wastewater collection system is partially in place to serve the new development. The
existing Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), as well as the Point Of Entry
(POE) to the NTWMD system, provide treatment for the sewage. Conveyance from the new
developments to these existing facilities will be required. The City of Anna’s flow is
metered at the WWTP and at two Points of Entry into the regional NTMWD lines.
New developments in certain areas of the City will require wastewater lift stations and force
mains to convey sewage towards the existing collection system
A. Existing Wastewater System
Figure No. 3, the Existing Wastewater Facility Recovery Map, shows projects that have been
constructed in part by the City, and are eligible for some financial recovery. Summaries of
major project undertakings for the City are listed below.
· Throckmorton Creek 21-inch Collection: In approximately 2003, the City staff
entered into a contract to construct approximately 4,500 linear feet of 21-inch PVC
collection line. This facilitated the construction of single family homes adjacent to
FM 455. It also picked up flow from the commercial development located at the
intersection of US 75 and FM 455.
· Slayter Creek 24-inch Collection Line: In approximately 2005, the City staff entered
into a contract to construct approximately 7,000 linear feet of 24-inch PVC
collection line. This facilitated the construction of single family homes in the Slayter
Creek basin north of FM 455.
· Clemmons Creek Point of Entry: In approximately 2005, the City staff entered into a
joint contract with the City of Melissa to construct a 15-inch regional sanitary sewer
collector line. The existing line terminated approximately one-half mile south of the
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 17 of 27
City of Anna City Limit lines. Around 2016, this line was extended into the City of
Anna to facilitate growth east of SH 5.
· Throckmorton Creek Point of Entry: In approximately 2009, the City staff entered
into a joint contract with the City of Melissa to construct a 21-inch regional sanitary
sewer collector line. A large percentage of the projected growth will be conveyed to
the Throckmorton Creek POE.
B. Proposed Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan
Figure No. 4 illustrates the proposed wastewater system improvements based on meeting the
10-year, future demands of new developments for the City of Anna. The expectation is that
each line will be engineered based on the demands associated with the current land use plan
and any special circumstances particular to a business or operation that might potentially
overload the system due to specific demand issues.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 18 of 27
FIGURE 3
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM : EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 19 of 27
FIGURE 4
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM : CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 20 of 27
TABLE NO. 10
10-YEAR WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Project Size
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Cost (1)
Debt
Service (2)
Total Project
Cost ($)
Throckmorton Creek Parallel Line #1 VARIES (27)"" $3,788,325 $2,291,375 $6,079,700
Sanitary Sewer Line #2 36"" X $7,895,360 $4,775,522 $12,670,882
Sanitary Sewer Line #3 18" X $2,399,265 $1,451,200 $3,850,465
Sanitary Sewer Line #4A $3,087,500 $1,867,480 $4,954,980
Sanitary Sewer Line #4B 12"" X $3,935,000 $2,380,092 $6,315,092
Sanitary Sewer Line #5 12"" X $684,900 $414,263 $1,099,163
Sanitary Sewer Line #6 12"" X $490,950 $296,952 $787,902
Sanitary Sewer Line #7 15"" X $1,445,000 $874,011 $2,319,011
Sanitary Sewer Line #8 8"" X $326,700 $197,605 $524,305
Sanitary Sewer Line #9 18"" $241,425 $146,026 $387,451
Sanitary Sewer Line #10 12"" $639,450 $386,772 $1,026,222
Sanitary Sewer Line #11 (Camden Park Offsite Gravity) 8",12"" X $304,780 $184,347 $489,127
Sanitary Sewer Line #12 (Sweetwater F.M.) 10"" X $504,000 $304,845 $808,845
Sanitary Sewer Line #14 (F.M.) 12"" X $1,479,850 $895,090 $2,374,940
Sanitary Sewer Line #15 (F.M.) 20"" X $2,544,000 $1,538,743 $4,082,743
Sanitary Sewer Line #16 12" $1,150,000 $695,580 $1,845,580
Sanitary Sewer Line #17 12" $700,000 $423,396 $1,123,396
Subtotal: Wastewater Collection Lines $31,616,505 $19,123,298 $50,739,803
$50,739,803
Wastewater System Facilities
Project
Size
(MG/MGD)
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Cost (1)
Debt
Service (2)
Total Project
Cost ($)
Sweetwater Lift Station (#18) 1.30 X $498,200 $301,337 $799,537
Jacobs Lift Station (#19)1.60 $750,000 $453,639 $1,203,639
WS2 Lift Station (#20)9.01 X $2,250,000 $1,360,916 $3,610,916
NTMWD Meter Station (#22) N/A $350,000 $211,698 $561,698
Trinity Meter Station (#23)N/A $500,000 $302,426 $802,426
Subtotal: Wastewater Collection Facilities $4,348,200 $2,630,016 $6,978,216
Wastewater Master Plan $50,000 $0 $50,000
Wastewater CIP Grand Total $36,014,705 $21,753,315 $57,768,020
C. Utilized Capacity
Utilized capacity for the wastewater collection system was calculated based on land
absorption from population growth projections provided by the City. The population and
employment growth in each wastewater drainage basin was determined utilizing the City’s
growth projections. These growth rates were utilized to calculate 2018 and 2028 design
flows.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 21 of 27
The following summarizes each design flow component utilized to calculate the wastewater
design flows.
1) Population Based Flow: For the purpose of this wastewater impact fee study an average
per capita flow of 100 gallons per day (gpcd) is a reasonable basis for the design of the
wastewater collection and treatment facilities.
2) Non-Population Based Flow: Non-residential average flows are estimated based on an
average flow per acre for each non-residential land use category. Commercial base unit
flows were estimated to be 1,500 gallons per acre per day (gpad) to simulate dry weather
conditions. The City also has a public component to consider. The unit for public
components was estimated to be 1,000 gpad.
3) Infiltration and Inflow: Groundwater can infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system through
faulty sewer pipe joints, breaks in sewer pipes and manholes and faulty service lines.
This infiltration creates an average day flow related burden on the wastewater collection
system and the wastewater treatment plant. Infiltration is a constant that is not
necessarily based on temporary storm based environmental conditions. Normal plant
capacity must be designed to handle these infiltration related conditions. The City can
embark on programs to rehabilitate lines that contribute significant infiltration volumes
when economically and environmentally feasible, and/or desirable.
Inflow is generally related to storm based events that increase groundwater and surface
water flow into the sanitary system. The additional flow is generally recognized to enter
through manholes, service lines, roof drains and storm drains. Inflow related surges
could cause surcharged sewers, overflows at manholes and peak flows that surpass the
capacity of the treatment plant. It is estimated, for wastewater collection system
planning purposes, that the combined infiltration and inflow is 800 gallons per acre per
day (gpad) for the existing wastewater collection system and 600 gpad for the new lines
proposed in the build-out wastewater collection system.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 22 of 27
4) The calculation of peak flows requires the development of a unit hydrograph (Diurnal
Curve). At the time of this report, a sufficient amount of wastewater flow data was not
available to allow for a feasible approach for the development of a diurnal curve specific
to the City of Anna. However, unit hydrographs from other cities monitored in the past
were evaluated and compiled into a diurnal curve that reasonably represents the peak
flow in the City of Anna. Diurnal curves are applied to the hydraulic model to simulate
a 24-hour temporal cycle in a wastewater system. The diurnal curve was applied system
wide to the base flows. The base flow calculated for inflow and infiltration is an
independent variable that is not affected by the Diurnal Pattern.
The percent utilized capacity was calculated for the design flow of each study year based on
the build-out capacity. The utilized capacity for each facility during the Impact Fee period is
the difference between the year 2028 available capacity and the year 2018 available capacity.
Table No. 11 below summarizes the project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period
of 2018 - 2028 for each element of the wastewater system (impact fee eligible). The utilized
capacity for each existing and proposed wastewater collection line is presented in detail in
Impact Fee Capacity Calculation Tables No. 13, No. 14, and No. 15.
TABLE NO. 11
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST & UTILIZED CAPACITY COST
Wastewater System Master Plan
Existing Wastewater Facilities
Wastewater System
$82,713,493
$57,768,020
$6,978,216
$50,739,803
$24,945,474
$50,000
$24,945,474
Total 20-Year Project Cost
($)
TOTAL:
Proposed Water System Subtotal:
Proposed Wastewater Facilities
Proposed Wastewater Collection Sewer Lines
Existing Wastewater System Subtotal:
$50,000
$8,167,784
Utilized Capacity During
Fee Period
($)
$38,233,015
$30,065,231
$5,723,222
$24,292,009
$8,167,784
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 23 of 27
TABLE NO. 12
EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY - WASTEWATER LINES & FACILITIES
* Average Unit costs are based in 2014 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
2018 2028
During
Fee
Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
9.60 2005 $2,050,000 $1,239,946 $3,289,946 0.13 1.40 1.27 1% 15% 13% $46,051 $479,784 $433,733
9.60 2005 $2,050,000 $1,239,946 $3,289,946 $46,051 $479,784 $433,733
5.60 2008 $1,090,000 $659,288 $1,749,288 0.23 1.40 1.17 4% 25% 21% $71,957 $437,322 $365,365
5.60 2008 $1,090,000 $659,288 $1,749,288 $71,957 $437,322 $365,365
6.07 2016 $1,453,145 $878,937 $2,332,082 0.00 1.52 1.52 0% 25% 25% $0 $583,021 $583,021
6.07 2016 $1,453,145 $878,937 $2,332,082 $0 $583,021 $583,021
4.80 2015 $900,000 $544,367 $1,444,367 0.00 4.80 4.80 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,444,367 $1,444,367
4.80 2015 $900,000 $544,367 $1,444,367 $0 $1,444,367 $1,444,367
1.00 2005 $1,105,000 $668,361 $1,773,361 0.84 0.91 0.07 84% 91% 7% $1,486,980 $1,615,484 $128,504
1.00 2005 $1,105,000 $668,361 $1,773,361 $1,486,980 $1,615,484 $128,504
3.00 2008 $1,715,000 $1,037,321 $2,752,321 0.00 0.70 0.70 0% 23% 23% $0 $642,208 $642,208
3.00 2008 $1,715,000 $1,037,321 $2,752,321 $0 $642,208 $642,208
3.00 2016 $1,376,210 $832,403 $2,208,613 0.06 0.90 0.84 2% 30% 28% $44,172 $662,584 $618,412
3.00 2016 $1,376,210 $832,403 $2,208,613 $44,172 $662,584 $618,412
2.00 2015 $680,000 $411,299 $1,091,299 0.04 0.60 0.56 2% 30% 28% $21,826 $327,390 $305,564
2.00 2015 $680,000 $411,299 $1,091,299 $21,826 $327,390 $305,564
2.00 2015 $320,000 $193,553 $513,553 0.04 0.60 0.56 2% 30% 28% $10,271 $154,066 $143,795
2.00 2015 $320,000 $193,553 $513,553 $10,271 $154,066 $143,795
0.50 2005 $1,965,000 $1,188,534 $3,153,534 0.35 0.50 0.15 70% 100% 30% $2,207,474 $3,153,534 $946,060
0.50 2005 $1,965,000 $1,188,534 $3,153,534 $2,207,474 $3,153,534 $946,060
0.50 2014 $651,832 $394,262 $1,046,094 0.35 0.50 0.15 70% 100% 30% $732,266 $1,046,094 $313,828
0.50 2014 $651,832 $394,262 $1,046,094 $732,266 $1,046,094 $313,828
6.00 2018 $1,577,600 $954,214 $2,531,814 0.50 3.00 2.50 8% 50% 42% $202,545 $1,265,907 $1,063,362
6.00 2018 $1,577,600 $954,214 $2,531,814 $202,545 $1,265,907 $1,063,362
6.00 2018 $1,750,000 $1,058,491 $2,808,491 0.50 3.00 2.50 8% 50% 42% $224,679.24 $1,404,245 $1,179,566
6.00 2018 $1,750,000 $1,058,491 $2,808,491 $224,679 $1,404,245 $1,179,566
$16,633,787 $10,060,975 $24,945,474 $4,976,263 $13,216,005 $8,167,784
Slayter Creek WWTP Headworks Lift Station
Subtotal:
Wastewater Facilities - Project Recovery Total
Anna Crossing Lift Station
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #10
Slayter Creek WWTP
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #11
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #12
16 inch Force Main
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #13
WAS1 Lift Station
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #9
Upper Slayter Creek Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #6
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #7
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #8
Anna Crossing L.S. Force Main
Subtotal:
(MGD) Utilized Capacity (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #5
Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #2
Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #3
Throckmorton L.S. Relief Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #4
Slayter Creek Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #1
Pipe
Number
Total
Capacity
(MGD) Date of Const.
Total Capital
Cost ($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 24 of 27
TABLE NO. 13
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WASTEWATER LINES
* Average Unit costs are based in 2014 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
2018 2028
During
Fee
Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
9.60 2005 $2,050,000 $1,239,946 $3,289,946 0.13 1.40 1.27 1% 15% 13% $46,051 $479,784 $433,733
9.60 2005 $2,050,000 $1,239,946 $3,289,946 $46,051 $479,784 $433,733
5.60 2008 $1,090,000 $659,288 $1,749,288 0.23 1.40 1.17 4% 25% 21% $71,957 $437,322 $365,365
5.60 2008 $1,090,000 $659,288 $1,749,288 $71,957 $437,322 $365,365
6.07 2016 $1,453,145 $878,937 $2,332,082 0.00 1.52 1.52 0% 25% 25% $0 $583,021 $583,021
6.07 2016 $1,453,145 $878,937 $2,332,082 $0 $583,021 $583,021
4.80 2015 $900,000 $544,367 $1,444,367 0.00 4.80 4.80 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,444,367 $1,444,367
4.80 2015 $900,000 $544,367 $1,444,367 $0 $1,444,367 $1,444,367
1.00 2005 $1,105,000 $668,361 $1,773,361 0.84 0.91 0.07 84% 91% 7% $1,486,980 $1,615,484 $128,504
1.00 2005 $1,105,000 $668,361 $1,773,361 $1,486,980 $1,615,484 $128,504
3.00 2008 $1,715,000 $1,037,321 $2,752,321 0.00 0.70 0.70 0% 23% 23% $0 $642,208 $642,208
3.00 2008 $1,715,000 $1,037,321 $2,752,321 $0 $642,208 $642,208
3.00 2016 $1,376,210 $832,403 $2,208,613 0.06 0.90 0.84 2% 30% 28% $44,172 $662,584 $618,412
3.00 2016 $1,376,210 $832,403 $2,208,613 $44,172 $662,584 $618,412
2.00 2015 $680,000 $411,299 $1,091,299 0.04 0.60 0.56 2% 30% 28% $21,826 $327,390 $305,564
2.00 2015 $680,000 $411,299 $1,091,299 $21,826 $327,390 $305,564
2.00 2015 $320,000 $193,553 $513,553 0.04 0.60 0.56 2% 30% 28% $10,271 $154,066 $143,795
2.00 2015 $320,000 $193,553 $513,553 $10,271 $154,066 $143,795
0.50 2005 $1,965,000 $1,188,534 $3,153,534 0.35 0.50 0.15 70% 100% 30% $2,207,474 $3,153,534 $946,060
0.50 2005 $1,965,000 $1,188,534 $3,153,534 $2,207,474 $3,153,534 $946,060
0.50 2014 $651,832 $394,262 $1,046,094 0.35 0.50 0.15 70% 100% 30% $732,266 $1,046,094 $313,828
0.50 2014 $651,832 $394,262 $1,046,094 $732,266 $1,046,094 $313,828
6.00 2018 $1,577,600 $954,214 $2,531,814 0.50 3.00 2.50 8% 50% 42% $202,545 $1,265,907 $1,063,362
6.00 2018 $1,577,600 $954,214 $2,531,814 $202,545 $1,265,907 $1,063,362
6.00 2018 $1,750,000 $1,058,491 $2,808,491 0.50 3.00 2.50 8% 50% 42% $224,679.24 $1,404,245 $1,179,566
6.00 2018 $1,750,000 $1,058,491 $2,808,491 $224,679 $1,404,245 $1,179,566
$16,633,787 $10,060,975 $24,945,474 $4,976,263 $13,216,005 $8,167,784
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #1
Pipe
Number
Total
Capacity
(MGD) Date of Const.
Total Capital
Cost ($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)
(MGD) Utilized Capacity (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #5
Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #2
Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #3
Throckmorton L.S. Relief Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #4
Slayter Creek Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #9
Upper Slayter Creek Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #6
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #7
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper)
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #8
Anna Crossing L.S. Force Main
Subtotal:
Slayter Creek WWTP Headworks Lift Station
Subtotal:
Wastewater Facilities - Project Recovery Total
Anna Crossing Lift Station
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #10
Slayter Creek WWTP
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #11
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #12
16 inch Force Main
Subtotal:
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #13
WAS1 Lift Station
Subtotal:
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 25 of 27
TABLE NO. 14
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WASTEWATER FACILITIES
* Average Unit costs are based in 2014 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Total
Capacity
Total Capital
Cost ($)
20 Year Debt
Service @ 5%
Simple Interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period 2018 2028
During
Fee Period
1.30 $498,200 $301,337 $799,537 0.00 1.30 1.30 0% 100% 100% $0 $799,537 $799,537
1.30 $498,200 $301,337 $799,537 $0 $799,537 $799,537
1.60 $750,000 $453,639 $1,203,639 0.00 1.60 1.60 0% 100% 100% $0 $1,203,639 $1,203,639
1.60 $750,000 $453,639 $1,203,639 $0 $1,203,639 $1,203,639
9.01 $2,250,000 $1,360,916 $3,610,916 0.00 9.01 9.01 0% 100% 100% $0 $3,610,916 $3,610,916
9.01 $2,250,000 $1,360,916 $3,610,916 $0 $3,610,916 $3,610,916
N/A $350,000 $211,698 $561,698 N/A N/A N/A 0% 8% 8% $0 $44,936 $44,936
N/A $350,000 $211,698 $561,698 $0 $44,936 $44,936
N/A $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 N/A N/A N/A 0% 8% 8% $0 $64,194 $64,194
N/A $500,000 $302,426 $802,426 $0 $64,194 $64,194
$4,348,200 $2,630,016 $6,978,216 $0 $5,723,222 $5,723,222
(MGD) Utilized Capacity (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
Pipe
Number
WS2 Lift Station (#20)
Sweetwater Lift Station (#18)
Subtotal:
Jacobs Lift Station (#19)
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Wastewater Facilities - Project CIP Total
Subtotal:
NTMWD Meter Station (#22)
Subtotal:
Trinity Meter Station (#23)
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 26 of 27
VII. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES - WATER & WASTEWATER
SYSTEM
The maximum impact fees for the water and wastewater systems are calculated separately by
dividing the cost of the capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated and attributable
to new development in the service area within the ten year period by the number of living units
anticipated to be added to City within the ten year period as shown on the following tables. To
simplify collection, we recommend the fee remain fixed throughout the 5-year period, unless
changed by Council.
=
=$17,613,298 +$29,723,454 =$47,336,752
5,248
=$9,020.28 Use:$9,020
$9,020 x 50%=$4,510
5,248
Eligible Existing Utilized Cost + Eligible Proposed Utilized Cost
Number of New LUE's over the Next 10 Years
Calculated Water Impact Fee
Maximum Water Impact Fee Allowable:
=
=$8,167,784 +$30,065,231 =$38,233,015
4,687
=$8,157.46 Use:$8,157
$8,157 x 50% $4,079
Calc. Wastewater Impact Fee Eligible Existing Utilized Cost + Eligible Proposed Utilized Cost
4,687
Number of New LUE's over the Next 10 Years
Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee Allowed:
Based on the Allowable Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Water and Wastewater, Table
No. 15 calculates the maximum water and wastewater (sewer) impact fee for the various sizes of
water meters.
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-133 w&ww impact fee update 2018\reports\04-report.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 27 of 27
TABLE NO. 15
ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM FEE PER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENT
AND
PER METER SIZE AND TYPE
$4,510
$4,079
Meter Meter Maximum Impact Fee
Type Size LUE Water Wastewater Total
Simple 3/4" 1 $4,510 $4,079 $8,589
Simple 1" 1.7 $7,667 $6,933 $14,601
Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $14,883 $13,459 $28,343
Simple 2" 5.3 $23,904 $21,616 $45,520
Compound 2" 5.3 $23,904 $21,616 $45,520
Turbine 2" 6.7 $30,218 $27,326 $57,544
Compound 3" 10.7 $48,259 $43,640 $91,898
Turbine 3" 16 $72,162 $65,256 $137,418
Compound 4" 16.7 $75,319 $68,111 $143,430
Turbine 4" 28 $126,284 $114,198 $240,482
Compound 6" 33.3 $150,188 $135,814 $286,002
Turbine 6" 61.3 $276,472 $250,012 $526,484
Compound 8" 53.3 $240,391 $217,384 $457,775
Turbine 8" 106.7 $481,232 $435,176 $916,408
Compound 10" 153.3 $691,405 $625,234 $1,316,639
Turbine 10" 166.7 $751,840 $679,886 $1,431,726
Turbine 12" 220 $992,231 $897,270 $1,889,501
Land Use
Maximum Water Impact fee per LUE
Maximum Wastewater Impact fee per LUE
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Commercial/Retail
Commercial/Retail
Commercial/Retail/Multi Family
Commercial/Retail/Multi Family
Commercial/Retail/Multi Family
Commercial/Retail/Multi Family
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Note: Selection of the meter size and type shall be dependent on application, and with the input of both
the applicant and City staff.
2018-2028
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS - TBPE Firm No. 526
11910 Greenville Ave., Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75243
Phone (214) 361-7900
September 2018
Item No. 7.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Conduct a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on proposed amendments
to the City's Roadway Capital I mprovements P lan, L and Use Assumptions, and I mpact Fees.
(J oseph J ohnson)
S UM M ARY:
I mpact f ees are authorized under Chapter 395 of the L ocal Government C ode and may be
imposed upon new developments to fund both existing and proposed infrastructure that is
necessary to provide service to a development. T he last roadway impact fee update was
completed in 2014. B y statute, the City is required to review the L and Use A ssumptions and
Capital I mprovement Plan (C I P ) at least once every 5 years but may update them sooner as
growth patterns, land use and infrastructure needs change.
Over the past several months, staf f has worked with our engineering consultant to identify street
infrastructure projects that should be added to our C I P. Subsequently, land use assumptions,
population projections, and calculated maximum fees were evaluated with new recommendations
for the population projections and calculated maximum fees.
On September 10, 2018, the updated Roadway I mpact F ee Report was presented to the I mpact
F ee A dvisory Committee which subsequently took action approving a letter addressed to the
Council concurring with the f indings of the report and finding that the report is in general
compliance with Texas L ocal Government Code Chapter 395. A t the Council Meeting held on
September 11, 2018, Council approved a Resolution setting a P ublic Hearing f or October 23,
2018 at 7:30 p.m. f or the purpose of receiving public comment. A dditionally, the report was made
available to the public.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends conducting a P ublic Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on
proposed amendments to the City's Roadway Capital I mprovements Plan, L and Use
Assumptions, and I mpact Fees.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
I mpact F ee Committee Recommendation L etter 10/18/2018 Exhibit
Roadway I mpact F ee Report 10/18/2018 Exhibit
City of Anna, Texas
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
111 N. Powell Parkway
Anna, Texas 75409
September 10, 2018
Re: Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Impact Fee Advisory Committee Recommendation
Honorable Mayor Pike and the City of Anna City Council:
The City of Anna Impact Fee Advisory Committee, established in accordance with Section 395.058
of the Texas Local Government Code, met on this date for reviewing the 2018 Roadway, Water and
Wastewater impact fee update.
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee reviewed dw both the 2018 updated Roadway and the Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions prepared by the City of Anna Planning and
Development Staff; and the 2018 updated Roadway, Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement
Plans, and the calculated Maximum Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fees prepared by
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P. Professional Engineers.
On behalf of the Advisory Committee, we find the updated Impact Fee Land Use Plan to be
consistent with the City's current Comprehensive Plan, and the updated Roadway, Water and
Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans to be consistent with the land use plan.
Further, the updated maximum Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fees presented in the 2018
Roadway Impact Fee Update Report and the 2018 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report
prepared by Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, LLP are in general conformance with the requirements of
Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee offers no
objections.
Sincerely
Chairman, Impact Fee Advisory Committee
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE UPDATE
2018 - 2028
Prepared For:
THE CITY OF
manna
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS - TBPE Firm No. 526
DALLAS, TEXAS
September 2018
w V041
f
r* *..i
� GARY C. HENQRICKS �
1tt``�
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 roadway impact fee\reports\03-index.docx - i -
CITY OF ANNA
2018-2028 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE UPDATE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided by City of Anna) ....................................................... 1
· Table No. 1 – Summary of Land Use Data .................................................................................. 1
III. ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS .................................................................................................. 2
IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................ 2
· Figure No. 1 – Capital Improvement Plan Project Map .......................................................... 4
· Table No. 2 – Capital Improvement Plan Project List ............................................................ 4
V. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION .................................................................................................. 6
· Table No. 3 – Service Unit Calculation by Land Use Type .................................................... 7
· Table No. 4a – Vehicle Mile Calculation by Land Use and Service Area .............................. 8
· Table No. 4b – Summary of Vehicle Miles by Service Area and Development Period ......... 8
· Table No. 5 – Summary of Capital Improvement Cost by Service Area ................................ 9
· Table No. 6 – Land Use Equivalency ..................................................................................... 9
· Table No. 7 – Impact Fee Calculation by Service Area ........................................................ 10
VI. SUMMARY OF IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ..................................... 10
· Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Service Area 1.......................................................... 11
· Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Service Area 2.......................................................... 11
VII. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION EXAMPLES ........................................................................ 11
· Table No. 8 – Common Roadway Land Use Equivalencies ................................................ 12
· Service Area 1 and Service Area 2 Example Impact Fee Calculation .................................. 13
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 1 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
CITY OF ANNA
THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
ROADWAY IMPACT FEES
I. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for the financing of capital improvements
by municipalities through the implementation of impact fees. The land use assumptions and capital
improvement plans utilized to develop the roadway impact fees must be reviewed and updated every
five (5) years. The update of the impact fees is performed following these basic steps:
1. Development of land use assumptions to identify types and intensities of land use within the
City.
2. Development of a Capital Improvement Plan to include improvements planned for the next
10-year period to accommodate growth in the City.
3. Development of the calculated and the maximum impact fee.
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
One of the initial steps in developing roadway impact fees includes the identification of data related
to the planned land uses for land within the City of Anna city limits. The land use data provided by
the City of Anna included projected growth by land use type and the locations they are expected to
occur over the next 10 years (2018-2028) and at build-out. A summary of the land use data provided
for the land within the city limits of Anna is provided in Table 1.
Table 1- Summary of Land Use Data
Unit
Service
Area
Service
Area 1
Service
Area 2 Total Service
Area 1
Service
Area 2 Total Service
Area 1
Service
Area 2 Total Service
Area 1
Service
Area 2 Total
2018 3,667 1,347 5,014 23 15 38 85 25 110 25 10 35
2028 6,164 3,200 9,364 45 65 110 140 40 180 115 45 160
Ultimate 15,938 7,638 23,576 84 125 209 550 250 800 250 130 380
Notes:
1)Utlimate Residential and Non-Residential Development Capacity is limited to Build-Out in the current 2018 City Limits
2) 20%
Land Use Residential
Non- Residential Uses
Industrial Retail Office
Dwelling Units Acres Acres Acres
of non-residential area is assumed developable for the Vehicle-Mile Calculation
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 2 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS
For the purpose of roadway impact fees, the roadway service area is limited to the now current City
Limits. Additionally, the roadway service areas can not extend in any direction more than 6-miles.
The City’s’ original roadway impact fee calculation and report identified and defined two (2)
roadway services. These service areas are generally divided by State Highway 5 (Powell Parkway)
and are shown in Figure 1.
IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
After the land use assumptions within the City have been identified, and with the help of the City's
Thoroughfare Plan, a 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is developed. This capital
improvement plan includes projects intended for construction by the City of Anna in the next 10
years to serve both existing and future development. In order to be funded by roadway impact fees, a
roadway project must be included in the 10-year CIP.
Existing Facilities
The City of Anna major roadway and collector street system is partially developed at this time.
Several roadways in developed areas are partially built to current thoroughfare plan standards. Many
existing streets are two-lane (20' - 40' width) asphalt roadways with open surface drainage. Many of
the proposed roadway segments on the thoroughfare plan do not currently exist.
The existing major roadways within the City include US Highway 75 (US 75), State Highway 5 (SH
5)/Powell Street, FM 455/White Street, and SH 121. Existing major collectors include segments of
Rosamond Parkway and Ferguson Parkway. The major roadways identified above (US 75, SH 5, FM
455, and SH 121) are under the operation and maintenance jurisdiction of the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT).
Proposed Facilities
The City of Anna adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 2010, including a thoroughfare plan that is the
basis for development of the future street system. The thoroughfare system is a conventional network
conforming to a hierarchical, functional classification system developed to support the forecast traffic
demands of future land use.
The highest classification of roadway is the Major Roadway type facility. These roadways are
generally multiple lanes (4 or 6) with medians that serve the function of controlling access, separating
opposing traffic movements and providing an area for the storage of left turning vehicles. The lower
classifications are the collector facilities that are developed to serve the adjoining developments. The
character of the developments served should determine the sizes and alignments of collector
roadways.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 3 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
The thoroughfare facilities determined for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Plan of this study are
tabulated in Table 2 and graphically illustrated in Figure 1. Each listed project includes a description
of the planned improvements, the approximate project length, and an engineer's opinion of probable
cost to the City. In addition, under existing State Statute, a municipalities' cost associated with
TxDOT facilities can be financed with impact fees. All roadways included in the 2018 CIP are
identified in the City of Anna Thoroughfare Plan.
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 4 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028 Figure 1
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 5 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Project # Road Name From ToSegment Length (ft)Planned ConfigurationExisting Condition Notes Capital Cost Debt Service (1)Total Project CostService 1-1 Rosamond Western City Limit US 75 2250 6 Lane Divided 1000' of gravel road US 75 Overpass by TxDOT $2,925,000 1,769,191$ $4,694,1911-2 FM 455 Western City Limit US 75 14400 6 Lane Divided2 lane unimproved, 4700' new alignment$18,720,000 11,322,825$ $30,042,8251-3 FM 368/286 Rosamond FM 455/White 6650 6 Lane Divided 2350' of gravel road$8,645,000 5,228,943$ $13,873,9431-4 FM 368/286 FM 455/White Southern City Limit 1250 6 Lane Divided 2 lane unimproved$1,625,000 982,884$ $2,607,8841-5 FM 368/286 Northen City Limit Southern City Limit2050 6 Lane Divided 800' of 2 lane unimproved$2,665,000 1,611,930$ $4,276,9301-6 Taylor Western City Limit US 75 2100 4 Lane Divided Gravel road$2,310,000 1,397,208$ $3,707,2081-7 US 75 FM 455/White Southern City Limit 9750 Urban Freeway 4 Lane Divided with 2-way frontage roads ROW/Utilities $1,000,000 604,852$ $1,604,8521-8 Rosamond US 75 Powell/SH 5 10500 4 Lane Divided 4800' of 2 lane improved, rail bridge not existingBridge over railroad, split with Zone 2$11,550,000 6,986,038$ $18,536,0381-9 Hackberry US 75 Ferguson 2673 4 Lane Divided Not existing Excludes 1,800 LF not annexed $2,940,300 1,778,446$ $4,718,7461-10 Hackberry Ferguson Powell/SH 5 5250 4 Lane Divided2100' of 4 lane divided, 800' of 2 lane improved, 1000' of 2 lane unimproved$5,775,000 3,493,019$ $9,268,0191-11 "Street C" Rosamond FM 455/White 6450 4 Lane Divided 1050' of gravel road$7,095,000 4,291,423$ $11,386,4231-12 Ferguson Rosamond FM 455/White 7400 6 Lane Divided Not existing$9,620,000 5,818,674$ $15,438,6741-13Bridge over Dart Railroad & SH 51000 4-lane divided Not existing 1/2 of Project in Service Area 2 $3,750,000 2,268,194$ $6,018,1941-14 Taylor US 75 Ferguson 5723 4 Lane Divided 4000' of 2 lane unimproved$6,295,300 3,807,723$ $10,103,0231-15 Taylor Ferguson Powell/SH 5 8844 4 Lane Divided Not existing$9,728,400 5,884,240$ $15,612,6401-16 W. Foster Crossing Ferguson City Limit 600 6 Lane Divided Not existing$780,000 471,784$ $1,251,7841-17 W. Foster Crossing Southern City Limit Powell/SH 5 3750 6 Lane Divided 1500' of 2 lane unimproved$4,875,000 2,948,652$ $7,823,6521-18 Ferguson FM 455/White City Limit 3650 6 Lane Divided 1780' 2 lane improved, rest 2 lane unimproved with 4-lane bridge at Slayter Cr $7,245,000 4,382,151$ $11,627,1511-19 Ferguson City Limit City Limit 2350 6 Lane Divided Not existing$3,055,000 1,847,822$ $4,902,8221-20 E-W Collector FM 368/286 US 75 3200 Minor CollectorNon existing$2,400,000 1,451,644$ $3,851,6441-TSNumber of Proposed Traffic Signals in Service Area 1:8 Each$2,400,000 1,451,644$ $3,851,644Roadway Service Area 1 Subtotal:$115,399,000 69,799,286$ $185,198,286Service Area 22-1 FM 376/427 Powell/SH 5 Eastern City Limit 3550 6 Lane Divided 950' 2 lane improved, 1650' 2 lane unimproved$4,615,000 2,791,391$ $7,406,3912-2 Rosamond Powell/SH 5 City Limit 850 6 Lane Divided 2 lane improved, rail bridge not existingBridge over railroad, split with Service Area 1$1,105,000 668,361$ $1,773,3612-3 Hackberry Powell/SH 5 FM 2862 1150 6 Lane Divided 650' of 2 lane unimproved$1,495,000 904,253$ $2,399,2532-4 FM 425/422 City Limit Rosamond 1700 6 Lane Divided 2 lane unimproved$2,210,000 1,336,722$ $3,546,7222-5 FM 425/422 Rosamond Houston 1700 6 Lane Divided 2 lane unimproved$2,210,000 1,336,722$ $3,546,7222-6Bridge over Dart Railroad & SH 54-lane divided1/2 of Project in Service Area 1 $3,750,000 2,268,194$ $6,018,1942-7 Hackberry FM 2862 City Limit 2000 6 Lane Divided Not existing$2,600,000 1,572,615$ $4,172,6152-8 FM 425/422 Houston Southern City Limit 600 6 Lane Divided Not existing$780,000 471,784$ $1,251,7842-9 FM 425/422 Northern City Limit Houston 600 6 Lane Divided Not existing$780,000 471,784$ $1,251,7842-10 Taylor Powell/SH 5 Eastern City Limit 8500 4 Lane Divided Not existing$9,350,000 5,655,364$ $15,005,3642-11 Highland Rd. Powell/SH 5 Eastern City Limit 6450 6 Lane Divided 5000' of gravel road$8,385,000 5,071,682$ $13,456,6822-12 FM 425/422 FM 455/White Collin Co. Outer Loop 10735 6 Lane Divided 2650' of gravel road$13,955,500 8,441,009$ $22,396,5092-TS Number of Proposed Traffic Signals in Service Area 2: 6 Each$1,800,000 1,088,733$ $2,888,733Roadway Service Area 2 Subtotal:$53,035,500 32,078,615$ $85,114,115Grand Total (Roadway Service Area 1 + Service Area 2)$168,434,500 $101,877,901 $270,312,401Notes:(1)Debt Service Cost calculated with a 20 year term at a 5% annual interest rateTABLE 22018 -2028 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCapital Improvements by Roadway Impact Service Area
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 6 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
The engineer's opinions of probable construction cost were prepared without the benefit of a detailed
preliminary engineering study for each project. The project costs are based on data provided by the
City of Anna and on roadway project construction bids. Costs of these projects included only those
costs that will be paid for by the City of Anna. Financing costs for the projects in the CIP were also
included in the total estimated cost and the interest rate of 5% was provided by the City of Anna.
V.- IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
After the land use assumptions and CIP have been finalized, this information is used to determination
the maximum fee per service unit (impact fee) that can be charged by the City for new developments.
The fee is calculated by dividing the costs of the capital improvements identified as necessary to
serve growth forecast to occur during the 10-year planning period (CIP) by the number of service
units of growth forecast to occur (using the land use assumptions). The specific steps, as described in
following paragraphs of this section include:
1. Determination of a standard service unit;
2. Identification of service areas for the City;
3. Analysis of the total capacity, level of current usage, and commitment for usage of
capacity of existing improvements;
4. Identification of that portion of the total capital improvements necessary to serve the
projected growth over the next 10-year period;
5. Determination of the "standard service unit" and equivalency tables establishing the ratio of
a service unit to the types of land use forecast for growth;
6. Calculating the resulting eligible costs per service unit (impact fee) for new developments
in each service area.
Service Unit
To determine the impact fee rate applied to thoroughfare facilities the standard service unit selected
was "PM Peak Hour Vehicle-Miles." This service unit can be obtained by multiplying the number
of trips generated by a specific land use type during the PM peak hour (vehicles) by the average trip
length (miles) for that land use. The PM peak hour was chosen because it is usually considered the
critical time for roadway analyses. The trip generation data were directly obtained or derived for each
defined land use type from "Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition" of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers, which is the standard data reference to determine vehicle trip
generation characteristics of particular land use types and densities. Trip length information for each
land use specified was based on data developed for the Dallas-Fort Worth area by the North Central
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 7 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The trip length was set at a maximum of three (3) miles
for any land use, as this trip length was assumed to be the maximum average distance a trip would
travel on roadways within each service area in the City of Anna. Table 3 shows the typical service
units for each land use type used in developing the roadway impact fees.
Table 3 - Service Unit Calculation by Land Use Type
Service Areas
The State Statute governing the imposition of development impact fees require that collection and
expenditure of fees imposed for street facilities "...is limited to an area within the corporate
boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six miles." To comply with this State
Law, two service areas (Service Area 1 and Service Area 2) were established for the City of Anna to
ensure that funds are spent within six miles of where they are collected. The two service areas were
shown in Figure 1, with SH 5/Powell Avenue serving as the breakpoint between the two service
areas. The service areas include most of the developable land within the existing city limits of Anna.
Analysis of 10-Year and Ultimate Growth
The land use assumption data provided by the City of Anna was converted to the standard service
unit (vehicle-miles) by applying the trip generation and trip length data provided in Table 3. These
results were used to provide an estimate of the existing service units (vehicle-miles) within each
service area, as well as to forecast the growth in service units for both the next 10-year period (2018-
2028) and the ultimate development of the City of Anna. Table 4a shows the vehicle-mile calculation
for each category of land use. Table 4b shows the portion of ultimate build-out service units that will
be attributable to growth within the next 10 years.
PM Peak Trips
(vehicles)
(1)
Trip Length
(miles)
(2)
PM Peak Hour
Vehicle-Miles
Residential 1 3.00 3.00
Industrial 1,000 Sq. Ft. 0.97 3.00 2.91
Commercial / Retail 1,000 Sq. Ft. 3.71 2.40 8.90
Office 1,000 Sq. Ft. 1.49 3.00 4.47
(1) Based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
(2) Based on NCTCOG data
Variable
Dwelling Unit
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 8 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Table 4a
Vehicle-Mile Calculation
By Land Use and Service Area
Table 4b-Summary of Vehicle-Miles
by Service Area and Development Period
Capital Improvements Costs Necessary to Serve 10-Year Growth
The total costs for implementing the roadway CIP were identified previously in Table 2. The street
facility improvements identified in the CIP will logically serve all existing and future growth by
improved safety and drainage characteristics. Therefore, the 10-year eligible costs have been
proportioned as the ratio of the 10-year growth to the total number of service units determined for
FAR
PM Peak
Unit
Vehicle
Miles
Total
Vehicle
Miles
Total
Vehicle
Miles
Total
Vehicle
Miles
Residential N/A 3.00 per 3,667 Dwellings 11,001 6,164 Dwellings 18,492 15,938 Dwellings 47,813
Industrial 20% 2.91 per 1,000 Sq. Ft 23 Acres 583 45 Acres 1,141 84 Acres 2,130
Commercial 20% 8.90 per 1,000 Sq. Ft 85 Acres 6,591 140 Acres 10,855 550 Acres 42,645
Office 20% 4.47 pre 1,000 Sq. Ft 25 Acres 974 115 Acres 4,478 250 Acres 9,736
Total 19,149 34,966 102,323
Residential N/A 3.00 per 1,347 Dwellings 4,041 3,200 Dwellings 9,600 7,638 Dwellings 22,915
Industrial 20% 2.91 per 1,000 Sq. Ft 15 Acres 380 65 Acres 1,648 125 Acres 3,169
Commercial 20% 8.90 per 1,000 Sq. Ft 25 Acres 1,938 40 Acres 3,101 250 Acres 19,384
Office 20% 4.47 pre 1,000 Sq. Ft 10 Acres 389 45 Acres 1,752 130 Acres 5,063
Total 6,748 16,101 50,531
Units Units
2018 Vehical Mile Variables
Land UseService
Area
2
Dwelling Unit
Unit Variable
Dwelling Unit
1
2028
Units
Ultimate
Vehicle - Miles
2018
Portion of
Ultimate
Vehicle - Miles
2028 Total
Vehicle Miles
Vehicle - Miles
Added 2018 -
2028
Portion of
Ultimate
Vehicle - Miles
Ultimate
Vehicle - Miles
Vehicle - Miles
Added 2028 -
Ultimate
1 19,149 18.71% 34,966 15,817 15.46% 102,323 67,357
2 6,748 13.35% 16,101 9,353 18.51% 50,531 34,430
Total 25,897 16.94%51,067 25,170 152,854 101,787
Note:20%
Year 2028 - Ultimate
of non-residential area is assumed developable for the Vehicle-Mile Calculation
Service
Area
Existing Year 2018- 2028
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 9 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
build-out, as provided in Table 4. Table 5 presents a summary of the roadway capital improvement
costs for the two service areas.
Table 5 - Summary of Capital Improvement Cost by Service Area
In order to maintain the equity of impact fee assessment, the cost for streets included in the 10-year
Capital Improvement Plan will include the total cost of the street facilities, not reduced by any
expected participation. Rather, construction by a developer of an arterial facility within or off-site
should be treated as a credit to the impact fee assessment.
Determination of Standard Service Unit Equivalency
Table 6 presents the derivation of service unit equivalents for each of the four defined land use types.
The service unit equivalents are referenced to and based on the residential land use.
Table 6 -Land Use Equivalency
Land Use
Veh-Miles/
Development
Unit (1) SU Equivalency (2)
Residential 3.00 1.00
Office 1,000 per Sq. Ft.4.47 1.49
Commercial / Retail 1,000 per Sq. Ft.8.90 2.97
Industrial 1,000 per Sq. Ft.2.91 0.97
Notes:
1)
2) Ratio of non-residential use to service unit of Residential
Development
Unit
Dwelling Unit
Based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and
NCTCOG
Service Area Service Area CIP
Portion of Capacity of
Thoroughfare
Attributed to Growth
(2018-2028)
Cost of Thoroughfare
Attributed to Growth
(2018- 2028)
1 $185,198,286 15.46% $28,627,660
2 $85,114,115 18.51% $15,754,221
Totals $270,312,401 $44,381,881
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 10 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Cost Per Service Unit (Impact Fee) Calculation
Table 7 presents a summary of the calculations and resulting capital improvement costs attributable
to growth per service unit, which represents the maximum calculated impact fee. This fee is
calculated by taking the cost of the CIP attributable to growth in the next 10 years (Table 5) and
dividing it by the estimated growth, or the number of new service units (Table 4), in the next 10
years.
Table 7 - Impact Fee Calculation by Service Area
Under current State law, municipalities are required to administer a detailed financial analysis to
support the use of an impact fee higher than 50 percent of the eligible costs. As an alternative to
performing the financial analysis, the impact fee can be set at or below 50 percent of the total eligible
costs, which are shown in Table 7. The City has chosen to use 50 percent of these calculated impact
fee.
VI. SUMMARY OF IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
The methodology for calculating the maximum allowable impact fee for roadway facilities can be
summarized in the following three steps and is summarized for both Service Areas 1 and 2 on the
following pages. First, the cost of the roadway facilities (existing roadways eligible for recuperation
of construction cost and proposed roadways) that can be attributed to new growth over the 10-year
period is determined.
Roadway Service
Area
Cost of
Thoroughfare
Attributed to
Growth
(2018-2028)
Number of New
Service Units
(2018-2028)
Cost Per Service
Unit
Cost Per Service
Unit (Rounded)
1 $28,627,660 15,817 $1,809.93 $1,810
2 $15,754,221 9,353 $1,684.40 $1,684
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 11 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Service Area 1
The second step is to determine the calculated impact fee. The maximum calculated impact fee is the
ratio of the total cost for roadway facilities attributable to growth in the next ten years (2018-2028)
divided by the total growth in equivalent service units (ESU). Finally, the maximum impact fee is
determined by multiplying the calculated fee by 50%.
Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Service Area 2
= $185,198,286
= $28,627,660Roadway Facilities Attributable to Growth (2018- 2028)
Cost of Roadway Facilities (Table 2 - Service Area 1)
Proportion of Capacity Attributable to New Growth
(Table 4 - Service Area 1)x 15.46%
=
= $28,627,660.29
15,817
= $1,809.93 Use: $1,810
Maximum Roadway Impact Fee Allowed: $1,810 x 50% = $905.00
Total Growth in Equivalent Service Units (Table 4)
Calcualted Roadway Impact Fee Eligible Thoroughfare Cost Attributed Growth (Table 5)
Service Area 1
= $85,114,115
Roadway Facilities Attributable to Growth (2018 - 2028) = $15,754,221
Cost of Roadway Facilities (Table 2 - Service Area 2)
Proportion of Capacity Attributable to New Growth
(Table 4 - Service Area 2)x 18.51%
=
= $15,754,220.59
9,353
= $1,684.40 Use: $1,684
Maximum Roadway Impact Fee Allowed: $1,684 x 50% = $842.00
Total Growth in Equivalent Service Units (Table 4)
Calculated Roadway Impact Fee Eligible Thoroughfare Cost Attributed Growth (Table 5)
Service Area 2
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 12 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
VII. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION EXAMPLE
A land use equivalency table is provided in Table 8 and represents an expansion of the basic land
uses used for calculating the impact fee. This table identifies the total service units generated by
specific uses within each land use category and includes land uses which may develop over the next
10-year period. To obtain the impact fee to be charged for a particular land use, the impact fee per
service unit adopted by the City and the service units per development unit generated for that
particular land use from Table 8 are used. Examples for calculating the impact fee for both a single
family dwelling unit and a 50,000 ft2 shopping center (commercial / retail facility) assuming
maximum allowable impact fees of $905.00 per service unit (Service Area 1) and $842.00 per service
unit (Service Area 2) are shown on page 12
Table 8 – Common Roadway Land Use Equivalencies
1 GFA = Gross Floor Area
2 (Vehicles); Based on ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition
(Miles); Based on NCTCOG Data
Percentage of traffic already passing by site - land use is an intermediate destination
(Vehicle-Miles)
* The land uses and trip generation characteristics listed in this chart are intended as examples. The complete table of land uses and trip generation
characteristics is contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers "Trip Generation, Ninth Edition," which is incorporated herein by reference.
CATEGORY
1.16
7.35
2.91
0.32
0.22
6.93
21.89
3.36
1.80
13.47
0
0.9
0
SERVICE UNITS(5)
3.00
1.86
4.47
0.48
0
0.43
0.34
0
2.1
PASS-BY TRAFFIC(4)
0
0
0
0.66
0.47
3.0
3.0
2.1
2.7
0.4
1.7
3.0
3.0
2.4
TRIP LENGTH(3)
3.0
3.0
3.0
0.97
0.15
0.81
0.55
24.30
2.33
0.60
9.85
3.71
1.00
0.62
1.49
50.92
1,000 ft GFA
1,000 ft GFA
Students
Students
1,000 ft GFA
ITE TRIP RATE(2)
1,000 ft GFA
1,000 ft GFA
1,000 ft GFA
1,000 ft GFA
Rooms
1,000 ft GFA
OFFICE
RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT UNITS(1)
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Unit
Industrial
School
Day Care Center
House of Worship
INSTITUTIONAL
INDUSTRIAL
Office Building
Convenience Stores/Gas Pumps
Drive-in Bank
Home Improvement Store
Hotel
Restaurant
COMMERICAL
Single- Family Detached
Shopping Center
LAND USE
Apartment
j:\clerical\anna\2018-137 Roadway impact fee\reports\03-report Page 13 of 13- Roadway Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Service Area 1 - Example Impact Fee Calculations
Service Area 2 - Example Impact Fee Calculations
=3.00 Service Units
Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $8,371.5 / Service Unit: (3.00) Vehicle-Miles) x ($8,371.50/ Vehicle-Miles)905.00$ x 3 Service Units = 2,715.00$
367.5
Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = 905.00$ 368 Service Units =
SERVICE AREA 1
per service unit x 332,587.50$
50,000 Sq.Ft SHOPPING CENTER (Service Area 1)
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING (Service Area 1)
(50,000 Sq. Ft) x (7.35 Vehicle-Miles/ 1,000 Sq.Ft.) =
Vehicle-miles per Development Unit for Shopping Center
Service Units
per service unit
Vehicle-Miles per Single- Family Dwelling Unit (1 Dwelling Unit) x (3.00 Vehicle-Miles/Dwelling Unit)
SERVICE AREA 2
=3.00 Service Units
Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $8,371.5 / Service Unit: (3.00) Vehicle-Miles) x ($8,371.50/ Vehicle-Miles)842.00$ x 3 Service Units = 2,526.00$
367.5
Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = 842.00$ 368 Service Units =per service unit x 309,435.00$
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING (Service Area 2)
Vehicle-Miles per Single- Family Dwelling Unit (1 Dwelling Unit) x (3.00 Vehicle-Miles/Dwelling Unit)
per service unit
50,000 Sq.Ft SHOPPING CENTER (Service Area 2)
Vehicle-miles per Development Unit for Shopping Center
(50,000 Sq. Ft) x (7.35 Vehicle-Miles/ 1,000 Sq.Ft.) = Service Units
2018-2028
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE UPDATE
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS - TBPE Firm No. 526
11910 Greenville Ave., Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75243
Phone (214) 361-7900
September 2018
L
Item No. 8.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a Resolution of the City Council of the City of A nna, Texas,
setting forth its support to the approval of the 2018 B ond Program proposed by Collin County.
(J oseph J ohnson)
S UM M ARY:
On May 7, 2018, the Collin County Commissioners Court unanimously agreed to hold a
transportation bond election on November 6, 2018. At the O ctober 9, 2018 C ity C ouncil Meeting,
Mr. C orbett Howard, who represents the E xecutive Bond Committee, provided a presentation
regarding the proposed bond program.
T he Resolution, if approved, would indicate the C ity of A nna's support for the proposed bond
election f or transportation improvements called by Collin County for November 6, 2018. The
proposition is estimated to be over $600 million, and is expected to include funding for local
roadways, including limited-access roads (L A R S ). I t is expected that the passage of the bond
program will not result in a tax increase for property owners.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution of the C ity Council of the C ity of Anna, Texas,
setting forth its support to the approval of the 2018 Bond P rogram proposed by Collin County.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/15/2018 Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. _________________ Page 1 of 1
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
RESOLUTION NO. __________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS SETTING
FORTH ITS SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED BOND PROGRAM ELECTION FOR
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CALLED BY THE COLLIN COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS COURT FOR NOVEMBER 6, 2018; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, a more robust transportation network is critical for the future of Collin County,
which includes improvements to community arterial roadways of regional significance and
limited-access highways; and,
WHEREAS, the Anna City Council is aware of the planning effort put in place by the Collin
County Planning Board and the Commissioners Court, whose purpose is to review the capital
needs of the County; and,
WHEREAS, the Collin County Commissioners Court has weighed the matter, heard from
elected officials, and discussed specifics of a proposed bond election at publicly posted
meetings; and,
WHEREAS, over the past 11 years, Anna taxpayers have benefited greatly from essential
transportation projects sponsored by Collin County; and,
WHEREAS, a proposition estimated to be in excess of $600 million may be considered, and
it is expected that the passage of the 2018 Collin County Bond Program will not result in a tax
increase for property owners;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. Recitals Incorporated.
The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes.
Section 2. Approval.
The City Council hereby encourages and supports the Collin County Commissioners Court
to order a 2018 Collin County Bond Election for essential Transportation Improvements for
November 6, 2018. Proposed propositions relating to transportation will benefit residents of
both the City of Anna and Collin County and ensure that our quality of life will be maintained
during this period of rapid growth and development.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 23rd day
of October 2018.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ ____________________________
City Secretary Carrie L. Smith Mayor Nate Pike
Item No. 9.
City Council A genda
S taff Report
Meeting Date: 10/23/2018
AG E ND A IT E M :
Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an
engineering task order with Cobb F endley & A ssociates, I nc. for the Rosamond P arkway P roject.
(J oseph J ohnson)
S UM M ARY:
T he Rosamond P arkway P roject consists of approximately 5,800 linear feet of 4-lanes of an
ultimate 6-lane divided thoroughfare within a 120-foot right of way from the current terminus of
Rosamond Parkway near the A nna High School to US 75. The project, when constructed, will
provide an additional east-west route from US 75 to the C ity's population center, relieving the
intersections of F M 455 with US 75 and S H 5. T he project aligns with the City's adopted S trategic
Plan goal "B uild Transportation I nf rastructure" in which the comprehensive strategy is to design
and build transportation projects that relieve traf f ic congestion. T he R osamond P arkway P roject is
listed as a specific project within the Strategic P lan.
T he project meets certain eligibility criteria for various funding opportunities and moving the project
forward to "shovel-ready" status further positions the project for funding from outside sources.
Tasks I through V are f or a total not-to-exceed amount of $696,500. F unding is available for the
project design in the City of Anna 2018 Certificate of Obligation B ond issue.
S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution authorizing the C ity Manager to execute an
engineering task order with Cobb Fendley & Associates, I nc. for the Rosamond Parkway Project.
AT TAC HM E NT S :
Description Upload Date Type
Resolution 10/17/2018 Resolution
Exhibit A - Rosamond E ngineering Task Order 10/18/2018 Exhibit
RESOLUTION: Rosamond Parkway Task Order PAGE 1 OF 1 10/23/18
CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT ON THE CITY'S BEHALF IN
EXECUTING AN ENGINEERING TASK ORDER WITH COBB FENDLEY & ASSOCIATES,
INC. FOR THE ROSAMOND PARKWAY PROJECT.
WHEREAS; The City of Anna, Texas (the City) has negotiated an engineering service task
order with Cobb Fendley & Associates, Inc. for the Rosamond Parkway Project (the Project);
and,
WHEREAS; the task order provides the necessary engineering services for full design of the
Project and positions the project for funding opportunities as directed in the City’s adopted
Strategic Plan; and,
WHEREAS; the engineering services fee for Tasks 1 through 5 are for a total not-to exceed
amount of $696,500; and,
WHEREAS; funds are available for the project in the 2018 Certificate of Obligation; and,
WHEREAS; the Project supports the City’s adopted Strategic Plan goal of building
transportation infrastructure with emphasis on projects that relieve traffic congestion;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANNA, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. Recitals Incorporated.
The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes.
Section 2. Authorization.
The City Council hereby approves Tasks I through V of the Agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit A, and authorizes, ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of same. The
City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions
necessary to finalize, act under, and enforce the task order agreement.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 23rd day
of October 2018.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_____________________________ ____________________________
Mayor Nate Pike City Secretary Carrie L. Smith
�° CobbFendley
TASK ORDER
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT (MSA), Task Order No. 17-04
Pursuant and subject to the above captioned MSA dated April 11, 2017 between Cobb Fendley &
Associates, Inc. and the City of Anna Texas . CLIENT hereby requests that CONSULTANT performs
the work described below upon the terms set forth:
CLIENT PROVIDED INFORMATION:
Work Site: West Rosamond Parkway (I.H. 75 to Anna High School)
Work to Be Performed: Paving & Drainage Design for Approximately 5,800 LF of Roadway
Drawings, plans, specifications () (are not) attached: N/A
Date and Time to Commence: Date of Task Order acceptance
Date and Time to Complete: See Attached Exhibit C
Equipment, vehicles, tools, materials, supplies to be furnished or obtained through third parties by
CLIENT (if any): N/A
Invoice Mailing Instructions
Per MSA
Other Requirements or Variance from MSA (if any): N/A
Compensation: See Attached Exhibit B
(IF THE CITY IS SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT FROM A DEVELOPER OR THIRD PARTY, THE CITY
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THE ENGINEER WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INVOICE AND SEEKING
REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE THIRD PARTY. PAYMENT TO THE ENGINEER IS NOT
CONTINGENT ON THE CITY RECEIVING REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE THIRD PARTY)
Scope of Work: See attached Exhibit A.
ACCEPTANCE:
The foregoing TASK ORDER is accepted on the terms set forth as indicated by the signatures below.
CONSULTANT
Cobb, Fendley & Itsociates, Inc.
By:
Print dNa e:
J. Cal Bostwick,
CLIENT
City of Anna, Texas
By:
Printed Name:
Title: Senior Vice President Title:
Date: 61,1111 Date:
M 0
d" CobbFendley
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AND
COBB, FENDLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WEST ROSAMOND PARKWAY
FROM I.H. 75 TO ANNA HIGH SCHOOL
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc. (CobbFendley) will provide professional engineering
design for paving, drainage, and miscellaneous improvements to:
• West Rosamond Parkway from I.H. 75 to Anna High School (5,800' +/-)
CobbFendley will provide professional engineering services as follows:
Project includes:
• Design a 6 lane divided roadway in a 120' ROW
• Roadway will be concrete curb and gutter with underground drainage system
• Storm sewer system including curb inlets, underground piping, culverts, and
headwalls
• Box culvert at creek crossing
• Sidewalk and ADA compliant ramps at all existing developments that
currently do not have existing compliant sidewalks
• Construction phasing plans
• Traffic control plans
• Topographic survey
• Preparation of right-of-way metes and bounds required to establish a min 120'
ROW
• Preparation of construction easement documents
• Level B SUE designation for entire length of project
• Level A SUE potholes on identified possible conflicts
• Geotechnical Investigation for soil stability and pavement design
II. PROJECT MANAGER
Paul Carline, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
2804 Network Boulevard, Suite 800
Frisco, Texas 75034
972-335-3214
Pcarline@cobbfendley.com
Q CobbFendley
III. TASK SUMMARY
Task 1 — Design Services
A. Conceptual Engineering (30%)
1. Conduct a project kick-off meeting with City staff.
2. Perform detailed site Investigation with design team and City staff.
3. Obtain record drawings, studies, and planning documents from the City that
may have an impact on the project. Incorporate this data into the planning
and design of the project.
4. CobbFendley will contact the franchise utility companies and use the
information they provide to show their existing and proposed facilities on the
design plans to help identify conflicts so early coordination for the relocation
of the franchise utilities can be performed to help avoid conflicts during
construction.
5. CobbFendley will prepare the concept engineering plans including horizontal
and vertical layouts and typical sections for the paving.
6. Initial right-of-way acquisition requirements will be made and presented to the
City for approval. Once approved, the legal metes and bounds including
exhibits will be prepared.
7. Provide the City three half size and two full size copies of the concept plans
for review and approval. Meet with the City to review the design.
B. Preliminary Engineering (60%)
Upon approval of conceptual engineering plans, CobbFendley will prepare
preliminary construction plans as follows:
1. Prepare preliminary project plan and profile sheets showing limits of
pavement, driveways, elevations at all PVI's and PI's; high and low points,
horizontal and vertical curve information, and pertinent calculations. Profiles
for existing ground at the right-of-way lines will be shown.
2. Known existing utilities and utility easements will be shown on the roadway
plan and profile sheets. CobbFendley will coordinate with utility companies
and the City to ascertain what, if any, future improvements are planned that
�° CobbFendley
may impact the Project. Submit pertinent plan sheets to private utility
companies for review and utility clearance.
3. CobbFendley will review the drainage patterns of the local streets and
contributing offsite drainage areas and determine the preliminary horizontal
and vertical layout of the storm sewer system, location and size of inlets, size
of drainage pipes, and the location of the storm sewer outfall. CobbFendley
will prepare a drainage area map and drainage calculations showing street
ponding, pipe sizes, inlet sizes and HGL's.
4. Preliminary roadway cross -sections will be developed, from the survey notes,
at intervals not to exceed 50 foot along the project length. Additional cross -
sections at important features including driveways, PI's of intersecting
streets, etc. will also be provided.
5. Prepare plan layouts for sidewalks and ADA compliant ramps at all existing
developments that currently do not have existing compliant sidewalks.
6. CobbFendley will deliver three half size and two full size preliminary
construction plans to the City for review. Generally, plan sheets will be
organized as follows:
Cover Sheet
General Notes
Project Layout
Typical Section
Paving Plan & Profile Sheets
Pedestrian Plan sheets
Drainage Area Map
Drainage Calculations
Storm Drain Plan & Profile Sheets
Culvert Crossing Layout
Driveway Profiles
Cross Sections
7. CobbFendley will submit an updated preliminary estimate of probable
construction cost.
8. CobbFendley will meet with the City to discuss review comments for
preliminary submittal.
9. Any major change in the project horizontal or vertical alignment or drainage
system design requested by the City after the submittal of the 60% plans that
results in a major redesign of the project will be cause for the request of
additional services.
W CobbFendley
C. Pre -Final Phase (90%)
Upon approval of preliminary engineering plans, CobbFendley will further develop
the plans and provide the following additional tasks for the pre -final construction
plans:
1. CobbFendley will prepare a horizontal control with any required easements or
rights -of -way shown.
2. Prepare a horizontal and vertical control plan that locates all proposed and
known existing facilities. Legal descriptions (Lot Nos., Block Nos., and
Addition Names) along with property ownership will be provided on the plan
view.
3. Prepare an Erosion Control Data Sheet and Erosion Control Plan. It is the
contractor's responsibility to prepare and submit the SWPPP and the NOI.
4. Prepare a suggested construction sequencing plan in accordance with
MUTCD requirements.
5. Prepare final cross -sections showing centerline station, profile grades and
centerline elevations, roadway section (existing and proposed), right-of-way
limits. Excavation and embankment volumes and end area computations will
also be provided.
6. Prepare final drive -way profiles showing the proposed driveway grade
transitioning into the existing driveway grade and limits of tie back.
7. Prepare final cross -street tie-in profiles showing the proposed driveway grade
transitioning into the existing side street grade and limits of tie back.
8. CobbFendley will deliver three half size and two full size sets of pre -final
construction plans to the City for review. Generally, plan sheets will be
organized as follows:
Cover Sheet
General Notes
Quantity Summary
Project Layout
Typical Section
Paving Plan and Profile Sheets
Pedestrian Plan sheets
Drainage Area Map
Drainage Calculations
Storm Drain P&P
Culvert Crossing Layout
�° CobbFendley
Construction Sequencing
Erosion Control Narrative
Erosion Control
Paving Details
Storm Drain Details
Misc. Details
Driveway Profiles
Cross Sections
9. CobbFendley will submit a pre -final estimate of probable construction cost
with the plans.
10. The project contract documents (front end), general conditions, and special
conditions will be provided by the City. Project Specifications will be
prepared in accordance with the North Central Texas Council of Governments
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Any required
specifications not included in the North Central Texas Council of
Governments Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction will be
prepared separately and included in the bid documents.
11. CobbFendley will prepare the bid proposal forms (Project quantities) of the
improvements to be constructed and included in the contract documents.
12.Attend two plan review meetings. The review meetings will be conducted to
address review comments and to take action on items to produce the final
construction documents. Two full size sets of review plans and specifications
will be provided for the review meetings.
D. Final Design
Upon approval of pre -final engineering plans, CobbFendley will further develop the
plans and provide the following additional tasks for the pre -final construction plans:
1. Address all City comments and finalize all engineering drawings.
2. CobbFendley will finalize the bid proposal forms (Project quantities) of the
improvements to be constructed, showing any alternate bid items and
summary sheets.
3. CobbFendley will finalize the contract documents and technical specifications.
4. CobbFendley will submit a final estimate of probable construction cost.
5. Furnish three half size and two full size sets of drawings, specifications, and
bid proposals marked "Preliminary" for approval by the City. Upon final
. :N
° CobbFendley
approval, CobbFendley will provide three half size and two full sets of plans,
stamped "Bid Documents", and a cd containing the pdf files for the plans and
specifications.
Excluded... Updating of utility locations, utility verification, and topographic survey is
excluded from this scope. Due to the potential development that may occur in the area
while this project is dormant, the level of effort required to update the topographic
survey cannot be determined at this time. At the time the project is revitalized to
complete the final design and proceed to the bid and construction phase, a
determination will be made for the level of effort, if any, required to update the
topographic survey and utility locations and a scope and fee will / may be submitted as
an additional service.
Task 2 — Topographic Field Surveying
A. Project Control
GPS observations utilizing the Western Data Systems VRS network will be
performed to reference the project datum to the Texas State Plane
Coordinate System, North Central Zone (4202), NAD83(2011), Epoch
2010.00. Elevations will be referenced to NAVD88 and computed using
GEOID12A.
2. Grid coordinates will be converted to surface values using a Combined
Surface Adjustment Factor unless otherwise specified by the City of Anna.
3. Four Primary Control Points will be set, two on the West end and two on the
East end of the project. Primary Control will be mag nails set in asphalt or
crosses cut in concrete.
4. Horizontal and Vertical coordinates will be based on four 180 Epoch session
on each point (two AM observations and two PM observations) with the final
values based on an average of the data between the four observations.
5. Secondary Control Points will be set as required to perform the survey.
6. A differential level loop will be run through all Primary and Secondary Control
Points to verify elevations.
B. Right -Of -Entry
1. Property ownership will be determined for approximately 6 properties by
obtaining data from the Collin County Appraisal District.
.: ° CobbFendley
2. Right -of -Entry request letters will be prepared for each of the parcels requiring
R.O.W or Easement Parcel Plats and Legal descriptions. Upon approval by
the City of Anna the letters will be mailed to the individual property owners.
3. A spreadsheet will be prepared to monitor the status of each right -of -entry
request.
C. Topographic Survey
1. Stations will be set on 100 foot intervals along the corridor.
2. Spot elevations will be taken on 100 foot cross -sections from apparent ROW
to apparent ROW.
3. The topographic survey will extend for a distance of 200 feet East and West
of the intersections of I.H. 75 and Anna High School.
4. Additional visible features (utilities, fire hydrants, mail boxes, power poles,
aerial crossings, driveways, and fences) will be located as well as any
additional spot shots needed to accurately plot one foot contours.
5. Locate visible evidence of utilities based on above ground, visible evidence of
utilities or utility markings placed by others. Flow line elevations of utilities will
be determined if accessible.
6. Cross section of the existing creek will be taken at the shadow line and at 50
foot intervals on each side of future West Rosamond Parkway for a distance
of 250 feet each side (a total of 12 cross sections).
7. The limits or outlines of tree areas will be tied. Trees 6" diameter and larger
will be tied.
8. Prepare an AutoCAD drawing of the topographic survey showing all features
tied and one foot contours.
D. Exclusions
The following items are excluded from this scope of services:
1. The resolution of any boundary conflicts observed during the course of the
survey.
2. The location of utilities by SUE services or any means other than described
above.
.MH
.:: CobbFendley
3. Performing a title search or abstracting any properties or easements.
4. Full construction staking services.
Task 3 - ROW Parcels, Permanent and Temporary Construction Easements
A. ROW and Easement Preparation
The following services will be provided in order to prepare a maximum of six
proposed ROW Parcel Exhibits, and a maximum of six Temporary Construction
Easement Exhibits and a maximum of six Permanent Easement Exhibits:
1. Copies of the deed and plats to the current property owners will be obtained
from the Collin County deed records based upon the ownership information
obtained as stated above.
2. Compile the deed and plats into a Working Sketch to be used to search for
property corners and in the final boundary analysis.
3. Existing property corners will be located.
4. A boundary analysis will be performed to determine the location of boundary
lines.
5. A Parcel Plat and Legal Description will be prepared for each required parcel
exhibit referenced above.
6. Property corners will be set for each parcel take, excluding the Permanent
Easements and Temporary Construction Easements.
7. From property corners found and research performed, determine the ROW
alignment for the entire corridor and show on the topographic drawings.
B. Exclusions
The following items are excluded from this scope of services:
1. The resolution of any boundary conflicts observed during the course of the
survey.
2. Performing a title search or abstracting any properties or easements.
Task 4 - Geotechnical Investigation and Pavement Design
A. Project Description and Scope
. �° CobbFendley
The new pavement will likely comprise a new lime treated or aggregate base
subgrade with reinforced concrete pavement.
2. The object of the geotechnical investigation will be to obtain subsurface data
and develop pavement and earthwork recommendations for the roadway
improvements. All services provided will be performed in accordance with
generally accepted engineering standards prevailing at the time and in the
area that the work is performed.
B. Field Services
A total of four (4) borings for the roadway and two (2) borings for the creek
crossing will be drilled. The roadway borings will be drilled for the new
pavement along the proposed alignment to depths of 10 feet. Two (2) borings
will be drilled near the creek crossing to depths of 40 feet, or 20 feet into rock,
whichever is willower. The borings will be drilled and sampled using a truck -
mounted drilling rig.
2. Conventional tube or split -barrel (standard penetration test) samples will be
collected as appropriate for the soils encountered. The recovered subsurface
samples will be preserved and labeled as to the appropriate boring number
and depth in the field. These materials will be described in further detail in
the laboratory by a staff geologist or engineer. Groundwater, if observed, will
be recorded during and at the completion of drilling. The borings will be
backfilled with bentonite chips.
C. Laboratory Services
Selected laboratory testing of the obtained samples will be performed to evaluate
soil index properties, strength, volume change potential and other characteristics
of the subsurface materials and provide data for analysis. These tests include
but may not be limited to the following:
• Moisture content
• Atterberg limits
• Percent passing No. 200 mesh sieve
• Soluble Sulfate Testing
• Lime PI series
D. Engineering Analysis and Report
Data obtained from the field investigation, laboratory tests and past experience
will be used in the engineering analysis and development of recommendations.
Information to be provided includes the following:
0 A plan of borings indicating the approximate location of each boring
. ° CobbFendley
• A log of each boring with the boring number, depth of each stratum,
material description, soil classification with laboratory test results, and
groundwater information
• A discussion of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, if
encountered
• A brief discussion of the site geology
• Estimates of expansive soil movement related to settlement and
expansive soils
• A brief discussion of previous construction activity
• Outline of the engineering properties of any existing fill
• Recommendations for subgrade preparation
• Earthwork recommendations, including material type(s) and backfill
requirements
• Pavement recommendations including pavement thickness, concrete
strength, rebar size, rebar spacing, joint spacing, subgrade treatment
and subgrade thickness.
• Recommendations for culvert or bridge support
• Electronic copy of the report.
Task 5 — Subsurface Utility Engineering
A. Level B - Subsurface Utility Engineering
Perform Level B Subsurface Utility Engineering designation of buried utilities
along the 5,800 linear foot corridor. Per a street view survey and a site visit,
anticipated utilities are as follows: water, gas, copper and fiber communication
cables, electric, gravity sewers, and CAN.
Designation involves the application of appropriate surface geophysical
methods to determine the existence and horizontal position of utilities within
the project limits. A variety of electromagnetic equipment will be used to
complete this process. CobbFendley will contact the 811 system to identify
utility owners. A request for utility records from owners identified will be made.
A not to scale color coded field sketch will be drafted by the designating crew
and will used as guide by surveyors when collecting the utility designation as
well as the CAD department compiling the data. This service does include the
location of gravity sewer. No approximate electronic depths from utility
locating equipment will be provided. Un-locatable lines will be depicted as per
records (Quality Level C or D) if available.
2. Limitations: Above ground geophysical techniques cannot guarantee that all
buried utility lines will be found. The results are dictated by soil conditions,
depth of utility's, material type, utility congestion, etc. CobbFendley will
exercise all reasonable and customary care in the performance of SUE
services. However, a possibility exists that some utilities may not be detected
Hlo CobbFendley
using standard SUE procedures as noted. While uncommon, utilities
possessing characteristics mentioned below can be missed while using the
standard SUE procedures:
• Utilities buried excessively deep, beyond detection limits of standard
locating equipment.
• Abandoned, inactive utilities and non-conductive utilities.
• Utilities with no apparent surface features and or no record drawings are
provided by the owner.
3. Notes and Assumptions:
• Any obstructions within the work area will be moved within 48 hours from
notification, including locked gates, parked cars, etc.
• Irrigation lines will not be traced out or mapped unless it is required to
confirm a target utility or an unknown conductor.
• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) will not be used in this investigation due
to the soil conditions in North Texas, which are typically not conducive to
this technology.
B. Level A - Subsurface Utility Engineering
1. Perform Level A Subsurface Utility Engineering locations on up to 6 individual
locations along the roadway corridor.
2. Level A SUE Locate means to obtain precise horizontal and vertical position,
material type, general condition, size and other data that may be obtainable
about the utility facility and its surrounding environment through exposure by
non-destructive excavation techniques.
3. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as may be required by law or utility
owner policy.
4. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material and or soil, in a 12" by 12"
square, unless unusual circumstances exist.
5. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole
data sheet.
a. Elevation of top and/or bottom (bottom elevation only applies to concrete
encased ducts) of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan.
b. Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location.
c. Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum
..� CobbFendley
d. Approximate outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks (if utility width
is attainable in one hole) and configuration of non -encased multi -conduit
systems.
e. General material type of the utility.
f. Pavement thickness and type.
g. Unusual circumstances or field conditions.
6. Back fill all excavations with material removed from the hole, compact backfill
by mechanical means, and restore pavement and or surface material.
7. Provide survey grade test hole data sheets and a scatter plot showing the
hole locations with X, Y and Z coordinates.
8. Plot utility location position information to scale on the utility mapping file. This
information will be provided in an applicable CAD format.
9. Notes and assumptions:
• All test holes will be accessible via vacuum excavation truck.
• Multiple holes may be required for large pipes or concrete encase duct
systems.
• Exploratory (those that no signal is attainable on) holes will be
coordinated with the client before excavation begins.
IV. DELIVERABLES
Task 1 — Design Services
Two (2) 22x34 bond copy of design drawings
Two (2) 11x17 bond copy of design drawings
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost
The items above will be submitted at 30%, 60%,
90% and Final
Franchise utility contact letters (at 30%)
Opinion of Construction Cost (at 60%, 90% and
Final)
Project Specifications (at 60%, 90% and Final)
Bid Schedule (at 90% and Final)
Task 3 — ROW Parcels & Easements Legal metes and bounds description with
exhibits.
Task 4 — Geotechnical Geotechnical Report w/ soil borings and
pavement design recommendation.
.0 ° CobbFendley
Task 5 — SUE Level B CAD files containing utility surface
locations
Level A Pothole sheets containing X, Y, & Z
coordinates and field sketch of utility location
. ° CobbFendley
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AND
COBBFENDELY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WEST ROSAMOND PARKWAY
FROM I.H. 75 TO ANNA HIGH SCHOOL
Basic Services (Lump Sum) Amount
Task 1 — Design Services $585,000
Task 2 — Topographic Field Surveying $14,300
Task 4 — Geotechnical Investigation $5,500
Total Basic Services: $604,800
Special Services
(Hourly/Per Each/Unit Price, Not to Exceed)
Amount
Task 3 — ROW Parcels & Exhibits
— ROW Metes & Bounds
$35,400
(6 Parcels @$5,900 each)
— Permanent Easement Exhibits
$12,600
(6 Parcels @$2,100 each)
—Temporary Easement Exhibits
$9,000
(6 Parcels @$1,500 each)
— ROW Map
$7,500
Task 5 — Subsurface Utility Engineering
— Level B
$11,300
— Level A
$7,900
(5 holes up to 9 ft deep @ $1,580 ea)
Total Special Services:
$83,700
Expenses
Amount
Mileage
$3,000
Reproduction
$2,500
Miscellaneous
$2,500
Total Expenses (Not to Exceed):
$8,000
. ° CobbFendley
EXHIBIT C
COMPLETION SCHEDULE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AND
COBBFENDELY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WEST ROSAMOND PARKWAY
FROM I.H. 75 TO ANNA HIGH SCHOOL
Item
Completion Date
Notice to Proceed
October 2017
Task 1
— Design Services
March 2019
Task 2
— Topographic Field Surveying
December 2017
Task 3
— ROW Parcels & Exhibits
March 2019
Task 4
— Geotechnical Investigation
December 2017
Task 5
— Subsurface Utility Engineering
March 2019
City of Anna
West Rosamond Parkway Paving and Drainage Improvements ®��� CobbFendley
®.
I.H. 75 to Anna High School
6 Lane Divided Ultimate Roadway in 120' ROW, 4 Lane Divided Now
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSRUCTION COST Prepared By: PAC
Date: 5/17/2017
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
100
Mobilization
1
LS
$200,000
$200,000
101
Preparing Row Including Removing Trees, Fences, Etc..
58
STA
$2,000
$116,000
102
Remove Existing Driveway Pavement (All Depths)
224
SY
$10
$2,240
103
Remove Exist Storm Culverts (All Sizes)
8
EA
$500
$4,000
104
Remove Existing Street Signs
12
EA
$100
$1,200
105
Remove and Provide Temporary Mailboxes
1
EA
$200
$200
106
Remove and Reset Existing Brick Mailboxes
1
EA
$1,000
$1,000
107
Unclassified Street Excavation (Assumes No Rock)
11,048
CY
$17.50
$193,340
108
Compacted Earth Fill
5,524
CY
$20
$110,480
109
8" Reinf. Concrete Pavement - Roadways
40,052
SY
$50
$2,002,600
110
6" Reinf. Concrete Pavement - Driveways
112
SY
$50
$5,600
111
6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade
40,081
SY
$4
$160,324
112
Lime
595
TN
$150
$89,250
113
6" Integral Curb
23,200
LF
$3
$69,600
114
6' Reinforced Sidewalk
46,400
SF
$4
$185,600
115
Install New Mailboxes
1
EA
$350
$350
116
Install New Street Signs
22
EA
$750
$16,500
117
Install New Pavement Markings
1
LS
$25,000
$25,000
118
Sodding of Median and Parkway
200,000
SY
$5
$1,000,000
119
Erosion Control
1
LS
$10,000
$10,000
120
Traffic Control
1
LS
$55,000
$55,000
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
200
18" RCP Storm Sewer
3789
LF
$80
$303,120
201
24" RCP Storm Sewer
1933
LF
$90
$173,970
202
30" RCP Storm Sewer
1933
LF
$100
$193,300
203
3-10'X5' Box Culvert
160
LF
$1,100
$176,000
204
10' Curb Inlet (Spaced One Every 300-feet)
39
EA
$8,500
$331,500
205
"Y" Inlet
6
EA
$5,000
$30,000
206
Trench Safety & Support for Storm Sewer
7655
LF
$3
$22,965
207
lConcrete Lined Drainage Channel
110
SY
$100
$11,000
Sub Total $5,490,139
20% Contingency $1,098,028
Design $696,500
PROJECT TOTAL $7,284,667
Basis for Cost Projection:
F-, 1 No Design Completed
❑ Preliminary Design
❑ Final Design
The Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or over the Contractors methods of determining prices or over competitive bidding or
market conditions. Opinions of probable costs provided herein are based on the information known to Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's
judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction
costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs.
Controlling
Name of Interested Party4 Nature of interest
City, State, Country (place of business)
Intermediary
(check applicable)
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 1295FORM
1 of 1
1
OFFICE USE ONLY
2 10/16/2018
Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties.
Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties.
Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place
of business.
Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc.
Frisco, TX United States
Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is
being filed.
Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a
description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract.
3
City of Anna, Texas
Professional Engineering Services
316
2018-415173
Date Filed:
Date Acknowledged:
Certificate Number:
CERTIFICATION OF FILING
6
Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity
My name is _______________________________________________________________,
UNSWORN DECLARATION
Check only if there is NO Interested Party.5
X
My address is _______________________________________________, _______________________,
and my date of birth is _______________________.
Executed in ________________________________________County,
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
(street)(state) (zip code) (country)
(year)(month)
_______, ______________, _________.
State of ________________, on the _____day of ___________, 20_____.
(city)
(Declarant)
Version V1.0.6711www.ethics.state.tx.usForms provided by Texas Ethics Commission
Jennifer Taylor 03/03/1976
2801 Network Boulevard, Suite 800 Fricso TX 75034 U.S.
Collin Texas 16 October 18
Controlling
Name of Interested Party4 Nature of interest
City, State, Country (place of business)
Intermediary
(check applicable)
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 1295FORM
1 of 1
1
OFFICE USE ONLY
2 10/16/2018
Complete Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 if there are interested parties.
Complete Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 if there are no interested parties.
Name of business entity filing form, and the city, state and country of the business entity's place
of business.
Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc.
Frisco, TX United States
Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is
being filed.
Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract, and provide a
description of the services, goods, or other property to be provided under the contract.
3
City of Anna, Texas
Professional Engineering Services
316
2018-415173
10/16/2018
Date Filed:
Date Acknowledged:
Certificate Number:
CERTIFICATION OF FILING
6
Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity
My name is _______________________________________________________________,
UNSWORN DECLARATION
Check only if there is NO Interested Party.5
X
My address is _______________________________________________, _______________________,
and my date of birth is _______________________.
Executed in ________________________________________County,
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
(street)(state)(zip code)(country)
(year)(month)
_______, ______________, _________.
State of ________________, on the _____day of ___________, 20_____.
(city)
(Declarant)
Version V1.0.6711www.ethics.state.tx.usForms provided by Texas Ethics Commission