Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-08-23 Regular Meeting Packet
AGENDA City Council Meeting THE; CITY OF Anna Tuesday, August 23, 2022 @ 6:30 PM Anna ISD Board Room 201 E. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet at 6:30 PM, on August 23, 2022, at the Anna ISD Board Room, located at 201 E. 7th Street, to consider the following items. Welcome to the City Council meeting. Please sign the Sign -In Sheet as a record of attendance. If you wish to speak on an Open Session agenda item, please fill out the Opinion/Speaker Registration Form and turn it in to the City Secretary before the meeting starts. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Neighbor Comments. At this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item on this meeting Agenda that is not scheduled for public hearing. Also, at this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item that is not on this meeting Agenda. Each person will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to speak. No discussion or action may be taken at this meeting on items not listed on this Agenda, other than to make statements of specific information in response to a citizen's inquiry or to recite existing policy in response to the inquiry. 4. Reports. Receive reports from Staff or the City Council about items of community interest. Items of community interest include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen (but not including a change in status of a person's public office or public employment); a reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body, information regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the municipality; and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the Agenda. a. Lee Lewis staff will provide an update on the status of the City Hall construction. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) b. Drought Update (Director of Public Works, Greg Peters, P.E.) C. Report on August 15, 2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting. (Recreation Manager Jeff Freeth) 5. Work Session. a. Discussion on revising the City Ordinances pertaining to construction hours within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters P.E.) b. Discuss a potential Memorandum of Understanding with Anna ISD pertaining to construction and inspection responsibilities. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) 6. Consent Items. These items consist of non -controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be considered individually by any Council Member making such request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items. a. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for August 9, 2022. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review the Minutes from the July 18,2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand). C. Review Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending July 31, 2022. (Budget Manager Terri Doby) d. Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve an updated interlocal agreement for jail services between Collin County and the City of Anna. (Police Chief Dean Habel) e. Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an updated interlocal agreement for emergency dispatch services between Collin County and the City of Anna. (Police Chief Dean Habel) f. Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an updated interlocal agreement for emergency dispatch services between Collin County and the Anna Fire Department (Fire Chief Ray Isom) g. Approve a Resolution entering into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Collin County for Road and Bridge Improvements for 2022-2026. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) 7. Items For Individual Consideration. a. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to rezone 26.2± acres on the east side of County Road 419, 370± feet north of E. Foster Crossing Road from SF-E Single -Family Residential — Large Lot to 1-2 Heavy Industrial with Specific Use Permit for a permanent concrete, asphalt batching plant. (Planning Manager Lauren Mecke) b. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution regarding Burnco Addition, Block A, Lot 1, Site Plan. (Planning Manager Lauren Mecke) C. Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance amending Article 5.03 (Alcoholic Beverages) within Chapter 5 (Business Regulations) of the City of Anna Code of Ordinances to allow for a Mixed Beverage Late Hours permit. (City Secretary Carrie Land) d. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Professional Service Project Orders to amend Master Professional Services Agreement # 2021-2026 with Jacobs for design work associated with four park projects. (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand) e. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution adopting a Street Naming Policy for the City of Anna. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) f. Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider/Discuss/Action on the adoption of ordinances implementing updated Roadway, Water, and Wastewater Impact Fees for the City of Anna, Texas. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) g. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution awarding the subgrade construction of the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train project to WOPAC Construction, Incorporated, in the amount not to exceed $78,875.00. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) h. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution awarding the rail construction for the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Project to Track -Work, Incorporated, for an amount not to exceed $71,448.98. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) i. Consider/Discuss/Action a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an impact fee reimbursement agreement to fund the engineering design of Leonard Avenue from Foster Crossing to the Collin County Outer Loop in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) j. Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance changing the name of Throckmorton Boulevard. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) k. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution approving an Incentive Agreement for New Economic Development between the City of Anna and Palladium USA. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution of the City of Anna, Texas, determining the costs of certain authorized improvements to be financed by the AnaCapri Public Improvement District; approving a preliminary service plan and assessment plan, including proposed assessment rolls; calling a regular meeting and noticing a public hearing for September 13, 2022, to consider an ordinance levying assessments on property located within the AnaCapri Public Improvement District; directing the filing of the proposed assessment rolls with the City Secretary to make available for public inspection; directing city staff to publish and mail notice of said public hearing; resolving other matters incident and related thereto; and a Resolution approving a minimum value to lien ratio. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) 8. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071). b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072). C. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087). ETJ Development d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov't Code §551.074). City Manager Annual Review; City Secretary Annual Review; City Attorney Annual Review The Council further reserves the right to enter into Executive Session at any time throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the Open Meetings Act. 9. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - work session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. 10. Adjourn. This is to certify that I, Carrie L. Land, City Secretary, posted this Agenda on the City's website (www.annatexas.gov) and at a place readily accessible to the public at the Anna City Hall and on the City Hall bulletin board at or before 5:00 p.m. on 08/19/2022. Carrie L. Land, City Secretary 1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meeting Act. 3. Persons with a disability who want to attend this meeting who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972 924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters AGENDA ITEM: Lee Lewis staff will provide an update on the status of the City Hall construction. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: This item is to provide the City Council with an update on the status of the construction of the new City Hall. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 THE CITY OF Anna �IMM1 ►1'.Xl:7 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters AGENDA ITEM: Drought Update (Director of Public Works, Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: Staff will provide an update on the status of the drought and water use during Stage 2 Restrictions this month. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Jeff Freeth AGENDA ITEM: Report on August 15, 2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting. (Recreation Manager Jeff Freeth) SUMMARY: Staff will provide Council with a report on the August 15, 2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting. The report will cover agenda items that were presented/discussed in the meeting. This includes reports from staff, project updates, and individual consideration items. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Jeff Freeth, Recreation Manager Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 THE CITY OF Anna i00►r•1M City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters AGENDA ITEM: Discussion on revising the City Ordinances pertaining to construction hours within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna Code of Ordinances has four distinct sections which reference construction hours, including: • Article 4.01.002 Building Regulations - Construction Times • Article A3.008 Development Fees - Weekend Construction • Article 8.03.002 Loud Noises enumerated • Article 10.03.009 Construction Standards The language is attached in Exhibit A. While currently enforceable, these sections of City Code are not consistent across the board for all types of construction. As such, some contractors have expressed confusion regarding the regulations and how they are applied. Staff will give a presentation with options for discussion and consideration. Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council on potential changes to the language and the regulations in order to provide a consistent and streamlined set of guidance for all construction activity in the City. Clear and consistent standards will benefit Anna Neighbors, the construction industry, and City staff. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is seeking feedback and direction from the City Council. This item is for discussion only. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Current Ordinances - Construction Hours and Activity APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 Construction Hours — Code References § A3.008 Weekend construction. Construction may not start earlier than 7:00 a.m. on weekdays nor continued after dark without prior permission from the city. Construction on Saturday may not start before 7:00 a.m. and work on Sunday is prohibited without special permission. A fee of $150.00 must be paid to the city by Thursday noon prior to Saturday work, if city inspection is required. § 4.01.002 Construction times. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings described below: Construction includes inside or outside new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation, and demolition of a structure; the term also includes any on -site or off -site improvements (including but not limited to grading, excavation, landscaping, paving, and similar activity). Delivery and loading/unloading of materials or equipment is considered "construction" for the purposes of this section if said activities involve use of a forklift, dump truck, backhoe, or other similar heavy equipment. Emergency shall have the same meaning as defined under section 10.03.003 of this code. Utility service provider means any person, firm or corporation legally providing electricity, natural gas, telephone, cable television, internet, water, sewer, or any other such item or service for use by the general public. (b) Restrictions on times of construction; penalty. (1) On weekdays and Saturdays, construction may not take place after 7:00 p.m. or before 7:00 a.m. (2) Construction on Sunday is prohibited. (3) Construction in violation of the restrictions created by subsection (1) or (2), above, is declared to be a nuisance if it results in loud and raucous noise occurring inside or within 5,000 feet of the corporate limits of the city. (4) A culpable mental state is not required for the commission of an offense under this section and need not be proved. Reckless, intentional, or knowing violations of this section may be punished by a fine not to exceed $2,000.00 per violation. Violations of this section without allegation or proof of any culpable mental state may be punished by a fine not to exceed $500.00 per violation. It is no defense to prosecution under this section that the person was ignorant of the provisions of this subsection after this section has taken effect. (c) Exceptions. (1) Permit. Construction may be lawfully conducted outside the times defined by this section if the person performing the work obtains a valid after-hours construction permit issued by the city manager or his or her designee in writing. To be valid, the permit must identify the persons or entities authorized to perform the construction, list the dates and times on which construction may be conducted outside of the times set forth by this section, and briefly describe the type of construction to be performed. Said permit must be displayed upon demand by any peace officer or city representative. Issuance of permits under this subsection is generally limited to circumstances where compliance with the construction time restrictions set forth in subsection (b) of this section would result in an undue hardship or when construction is required due to an emergency. Determinations of undue hardship shall be made in the discretion of the city manager or his or her designee in accordance with guidelines developed by the city manager, but exceptions will generally be limited to cases of urgent necessity in the interest of public health and safety. (2) Certain entities exempt. The construction restrictions created by this section shall not apply to the city or county, state, and federal government entities or agents thereof, or to public works projects being performed on behalf of public such entities. Utility service providers may also conduct construction outside of the restrictions provided by this section if the construction being performed is to restore or maintain services to existing customers but shall not be exempt from application of this section for construction activity to expand services to additional customers or include additional products. (3) Emergency construction. It is a defense to prosecution for a violation of this section that the construction was necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency. (4) Construction in public rights -of -way. This section does not apply to construction in public rights -of - way when a valid construction permit has been issued for such construction under article 10.03 (Public Right -of -Way Management). When this exception applies, the times for construction shall be as stated under section 10.03.009. § 8.03.002 Loud noises enumerated. The following enumerated acts are declared to be loud, disturbing, and unnecessary noises in violation of this article, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive: (7) The operation of any pile driver, steam shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, electric hoist or other appliances or equipment, the use of which is attended by a loud or unusual noise, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (8) The operation of any motor -driven or power -operated lawnmower or to engage in any construction or demolition work within the city between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (9) The harboring or keeping on his premises or in or about his premises or premises under his control any animal or bird which by causing frequent or long -continued noise or any dog which by loud or unusual barking or howling shall disturb the comfort or repose of any person in the vicinity. (10) The operation of any construction equipment the use of which is attended by loud or unusual noise between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturdays and any time on Sundays. §10.03.009 Construction Standards. (o) Hours of operation for non -emergency work. Construction may not start earlier than 7:00 a.m. on weekdays nor continue after dark without prior permission from the city. Construction on Saturday may not start before 7:00 a.m. and must be approved by the director by noon on the Thursday prior to the proposed Saturday. Unless otherwise expressly permitted herein or as specifically provided for in a permit issued under this article, construction shall not continue after 7:00 p.m. or prior to 7:00 a.m. Work on Sunday is prohibited without special permission by the city manager or his/her designee. An after-hours fee must be paid to the city prior to Saturday work, if city inspection is required. The Saturday inspection fee must be paid prior to noon on Thursday prior to the Saturday in which the work is to be performed. Construction work on recognized city holidays is prohibited. The additional fees described in this subsection are not applicable to installation or collocation of network nodes. THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lila'i7►1'.N01111:7 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Discuss a potential Memorandum of Understanding with Anna ISD pertaining to construction and inspection responsibilities. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna and Anna Independent School District have a strong relationship and rely on the success of each other to perform at a high level. As such, both organizations are striving to work together to enhance and grow the community with a family focus and a goal of providing excellent municipal and educational services. The incredible growth the City is experiencing has necessitated the construction of many new Anna ISD facilities - they anticipate at least 8 new major facility construction projects over the next 5 years. Timelines are critical for public school construction, as the school calendar requires a school to be ready to open on -time before the fall semester begins. Anna ISD and City of Anna staff have been in discussions on ways the City and School District can work together to ensure that new school facilities are streamlined as much as possible and are always able to open on -schedule. Staff will give a brief presentation on potential ways the City can work with Anna ISD through some unique processes and policies which are mutually agreed upon in a Memorandum of Understanding. Staff is seeking feedback on the potential items to include in an MOU. Once feedback is received, City staff will work with Anna ISD staff to reach a consensus on a final document which can be approved by both the City COuncil and the School Board. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council on the interest in an MOU, and what specific items should be included. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: AGENDA ITEM: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for August 9, 2022. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. CCmin20220809 DRAFT APPROVALS: Carrie Land, City Secretary Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 THE CITY OF Ahha Regular City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes Tuesday, August 9, 2022 @ 6:30 PM Anna ISD Board Room 201 E. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet at 6:30 PM, on August 9, 2022, at the Anna ISD Board Room, located at 201 East 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. Mayor Pike called the meeting to order at 6:33 PM. All City Council Members were present. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Council Member Carver led the Invocation. Mayor Pike led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. Reports a. Proclamation recognizing Ethen Hansen (Mayor Pike) Mayor Pike declared August 9, 2022 as Ethen Hansen day. b. Update on the City of Anna Municipal Complex with Lee Lewis Construction. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) Justin Hall, Lee Lewis representative, stated the front porch and lobby are on track to be completed by September 6, 2022. The City Council Chambers will be completed in late September. The consensus of the City Council was that the September 6, 2022 meeting will be held in the Council Chambers. 5. Work Session. a. Zoning Discussion - Northwest corner of Rosamond Parkway and State Highway 5. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Land Use discussion and direction for a tract of land that is currently zoned for Planned Development (Ord. No 797-2018). Within the PD Ordinance, it specifically identifies a minimum/maximum acreage requirement. The Future Land Use Plan identifies this area as Community Commercial within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan. b. Zoning Discussion - Northeast corner of S Central Expressway and Collin County Outer Loop. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Land Use discussion and direction for a tract of land that is currently located within the ETJ. The tract of land is located within the Anna Business Center, which is identified as one of the four Key Centers identified on the Preferred Scenario Diagram within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the Future Land Use Plan identifies this area as Professional Campus (PC). C. Zoning Discussion - East and West sides of S Throckmorton Blvd, south of W. White Street. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Land Use discussion and direction for a tract of land is located within the 75 Center which is identified as one of the four Key Centers identified on the Preferred Scenario Diagram within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use plan has identified this tract of land as "Community Commercial". 6. Consent Items. These items consist of non -controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be considered individually by any Council Member making such request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items. Consent Items 6k. and n were removed for individual consideration. MOTION: Council Member Toten moved to approve consent items 6 a-j, I, m, and o. Council Member Ussery seconded. Motion carried 7-0. a. Approve the City Council Minutes for the July 26 meeting. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review Minutes from the April 5, 2022, May 3, 2022, and June 21, 2022 Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission Meetings. (Assistant to the City Manager Kimberly Winarski) C. Review Minutes of the July 7, 2022, Joint Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation Board Meetings. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) d. Review the Minutes from the May 16th, 2022 and June 20th, 2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand). e. Acting as the Anna Public Facility Corporation Board of Directors, engage and enter into an Agreement for financial and accounting services with Brown, Graham & Company P.C. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) Staff recommended the Anna Public Facility Corporation (PFC) enter into an Agreement with Brown, Graham, & Company for accounting services related to PFC projects. PFC funds will be used to pay for these services. f. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anna Town Square, Block A, Lot 1, Final Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Multiple -family residences on one lot on 13.4± acres located at the northwest corner of Finley Boulevard and Florence Way. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 943-2021 & Ord. No. 627-2013). The purpose of the final plat is to dedicate lot and block boundaries and easements necessary for the creation of a multiple -family development. The Final Plat is in conformance with the city's Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANNA TOWN SQUARE, BLOCK A, LOT 1, FINAL PLAT. g. Approve a Resolution regarding the DHI Anna, Block A, Lots 1-3, Final Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Multiple -family residences on three lots on 39.7± acres located at the northeast corner of future Throckmorton Boulevard and future Rosamond Parkway. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 881-2020). The purpose of the Final Plat is to dedicate right-of-way, lot and block boundaries, and easements necessary for the multiple -family residential development. The Final Plat is in conformance with the adopted Planned Development standards and with the city's Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING DHI ANNA, BLOCK A, LOTS 1-3, FINAL PLAT. h. Approve a Resolution regarding the DHI Anna, Block A, Lot 1, Site Plan. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Multiple -family residences on one lot on 11.7± acres located at the northeast corner of future Throckmorton Boulevard and future Rosamond Parkway. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 881-2020). The purpose of the Site Plan is to show the proposed multiple -family residential development site improvements. The Site Plan is in conformance with the city's Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING DHI ANNA, BLOCK A, LOT 1, SITE PLAN. Approve a Resolution regarding the Henbest Addition, Block A, Lots 1 & 2, Replat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Two lots on 5.0± acres located on the east side of S. Bowden Avenue, 780± feet south of W. Bailey Street. Zoned: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The purpose of the Replat is to subdivide one lot into two lots, dedicate lot and block boundaries, easements, and right-of-way necessary for future development. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING HENBEST ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOTS 1 & 2, REPLAT. Approve an Ordinance amending Sec. A2.002 (Residential construction permit fees) within Appendix A (Fee Schedule) of the City of Anna Code of Ordinances. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Staff recently completed a simple market assessment to ensure Anna's fees remain competitive with neighboring cities while at the same time covering costs associated with growth and development. The city currently charges a flat building permit fee of $2,400 per unit (Single Family, Duplex, Townhouse, Condominium) whereas the neighboring communities of Celina and Prosper, which face the same development pressures, charge building fees based on proposed square footage. Celina: $1.00 per square foot under roof Prosper: a. $1040.30 for the first 1,000 sq ft plus .713 for each additional one sq ft up to and including 4,900 sq ft b. $3,824.11 for the first 4,901 sq ft plus .509 for each additonal one sq ft up to and including 7,999 sq ft c. $5403.00 for the first 8,000 sq ft plus .30 for each additional one sq ft The average size for a new single-family residential home in 2020 has been 2,900 square feet. Below are a couple examples of the existing fee comparison between Anna, Celina, and Prosper in relation to different -sized homes. 2,900 Square feet - Anna: $2,400 - Celina: $2,900 - Propsper: $2,395 3,250 square feet - Anna: $2,400 - Celina: $3,250 - Prosper: $2,644.55 3,750 square feet - Anna: $2,400 - Celina: $3,750 - Prosper: 3,001.05 Based on these assessments, and to ensure the city maintains it's established base line building permitting fee, staff is recommending modifying the fee structure for structures over 2,700 square feet to be based on square footage to ensuring taxpayers are not subsidizing the cost of private development within the City of Anna. The proposed fee being recommended is $0.90 per square foot for single family, duplex, townhouse, and condominium units over 2,700 square feet. The building permit fee for structures 2,700 square feet and below will maintain the existing fee requirement of $2,400. Further, staff is recommending that these updated fees go into effect on October 1, 2022. This will allow ample time to notify the development community and time for the development community to plan for the change in fee structure. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING APPENDIX A (FEE SCHEDULE) PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 OR THE HIGHEST PENALTY AMOUNT ALLOWED BY LAW, WHICHEVER IS LESS; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. k. Approve an Ordinance amending Article A2.000. Building Related Fees, Sec. A2.004 Miscellaneous permit fees and Sec. A2.008 Annual rental registration within Appendix A (Fee Schedule) of the City of Anna Code of Ordinances. Neighborhood Services is requesting to increase the Annual Rental Registration fee from $100 to $250, beginning October 1, 2022. The proposed changes are represented by fees that are revenue neutral and fairly compensate the City for costs incurred for the services provided. These fees are revenue neutral and fairly compensate the City for costs incurred for the services provided in FY2023. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A, ARTICLE A2.000 BUILDING RELATED FEES, SECTION A2.004 AND SECTION A2.008; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 OR THE HIGHEST PENALTY AMOUNT ALLOWED BY LAW, WHICHEVER IS LESS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to approve, subject to increasing the fee to $300. Council Member Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Approve a Resolution approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Collin County for participation in the Downtown Anna Tax Reinvestment Zone Number Six. (Asst. Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough) On May 2, 2022 the Collin County Commissioners Court held a public hearing and voted to unanimously approve participating in the City of Anna TIRZ #6 for Downtown Anna by contributing 50% of the tax increment for a period of 30 years. The City of Anna City Council approved creation of TIRZ #6 on December 14, 2021 with a contribution of 50% of the city's tax increment for 30 years ending on December 31, 2051. This item allows the City Manager to enter into an interlocal agreement with Collin County for the County to contribute an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of its Tax Increment to the Tax Increment Fund up to the maximum reimbursement amount. The taxable value of the Zone is expected to be $500 million by the end of its 30-year term. The maximum reimbursement amount is $8,121,145 of the County's tax increment over the 30 year term of TIRZ #6. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER SIX, CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ("ZONE") ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA ("CITY") AND THE COUNTY OF COLLIN ("COUNTY"); AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. M. Approve an Ordinance establishing school zones for Sherley Elementary. (Director of Pubic Works Greg Peters, P.E.) Anna ISD is opening a new elementary school located at 3000 FM 2862 in Anna, Texas. The school is named Sherley Elementary and will provide public education for children in grades K-5. The City is working with Anna ISD to install the equipment and establish a school zone for the adjacent streets. This item is for the approval of an Ordinance establishing a school zone for Sherley Elementary. This ordinance is required for the enforcement of reduced speeds during the school zone time period, which is during the school arrival and release periods. The school zones will be enforced anytime the lights are flashing, which will generally be from 30 minutes prior to school start and up until 30 minutes after school dismissal. School zones will generally not be in effect during the middle part of the day except as necessary to accommodate early releases and changing schedules AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING PART II, ARTICLE 59, SECTION 3 RELATED TO SCHOOL SPEED ZONES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION THEREOF. n. Approve a Resolution rejecting all bids for the Sherley Heritage Park Train Display Improvements. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) The City of Anna conducted a bid process for the Sherley Heritage Park Train Improvement project. Bids were opened on July 21, 2022, and only one bid was received. Typically, the City prefers to receive a minimum of three bids so we can ensure the taxpayer is receiving the best value for the project cost. the City will be changing direction in our procurement strategy. We will separate out the standard civil construction items from the railroad specialty construction, and put them through separate bid processes. We believe this will increase bidder response and improve our ability to receive competitive pricing for the project. Staff is working on this right now and plans to move forward with the bidding processes in the next 30 days. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE SHERLEY HERITAGE PARK HISTORIC TRAIN DISPLAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE BID OPENING ON JULY 21, 2022; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MOTION: Council Member Toten moved to approve. Council Member Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. o. Approve a Resolution declaring items as surplus inventory for disposition. (City Manager Jim Proce) City staff have vacated the old offices located at 111 N. Powell Parkway. Furniture and appliances that were no longer needed, or required, have been left behind. Before disposing of the furniture and appliances, the City Council needs to approve the items as surplus and authorize the City Manager to dispose of such items as necessary. The following items are no longer needed, or required: ❑ L-shaped Receptionist Desk ❑ Small Floor Cabinet w/Drawers ❑ Small 2 Door Floor Cabinet ❑ Rolling Office Chairs (10) ❑ Misc Waiting Room Chairs (7) ❑ 6' Bookcases (2) ❑ Large U-Shaped Desks (2) ❑ Apartment Sized GE Refrigerator ❑ 3'X6' Freestanding Desk A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SALE OR DISPOSAL OF SAID PROPERTY. 7. Items For Individual Consideration. a. Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider/Discuss/Action of an Ordinance adopting water and sanitary sewer utility rates for Fiscal Year 2023. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) The City of Anna charges for water consumption, wastewater collection, and other fees related to providing consumers with utility services. As an enterprise fund, the revenues charged should, at a minimum, cover the fund's operating expenses and debt service, as well as any other policy goals defined by the City Council including funding for capital projects, capital equipment replacement, and conservation efforts. For the past several years, the City of Anna has utilized a rate study with the assistance of a consulting firm, NewGen Strategies, to set utility rates. This process includes a review of all utility costs incurred by the city, all personnel, maintenance, and operations costs, along with anticipated rising costs of purchasing wholesale water from Greater Texoma Utility Authority (GTUA) and the North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD). In addition, the sewer treatment costs the City pays to NTMWD and the sewer transportation costs the City pays to the City of Melissa are also evaluated. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING A 5-YEAR RATE PLAN FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A, ARTICLE A6.000 UTILITY FEES, SECTION A6.009 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION THEREOF. Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 8:12 PM. There were no public comments. Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 8:12 PM. MOTION: Council Member Carver moved to approve. Council Member Cain seconded. Motion carried 7-0. b. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution approving annual contract rate adjustments for solid waste and recycling services by and between the City of Anna, Texas and CARDS Dallas, Inc. for fiscal year 2022-2023 in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) The City of Anna is entering the third year of our 7-year contract with CARDS Dallas, Inc. for solid waste and recycling services in the City. In accordance with the contract, the rates paid to CARDS by the City are subject to annual adjustments up to the Consumer Price Index annual change. This year the CPI annual change was 9.1 %, and fuel prices for diesel fuel have increased 60% year over year. Based on these factors, CARDS is requesting a 7% rate increase, which is in line with the contract language. This item is to set the rates the City of Anna pays CARDS for solid waste and recycling services. This item does not set the residential and commercial rates charged to Anna neighbors and businesses. Staff has reviewed the contract language and found no changes are necessary at this time. In addition, staff finds that allowing CARDS Dallas, Inc. to continue to lease space in the Public Works Building is a benefit to Anna Neighbors through the reduction in contract pricing for residential service, which is passed through to Anna neighbors. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT AN ANNUAL RATE INCREASE PER THE CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND CARDS DALLAS, INCORPORATED, A TEXAS CORPORATION, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" AND "B" ATTACHED HERETO, IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MOTION: Council Member Miller moved to approve. Council Member Atchley seconded. Motion carried 7-0. C. Conduct a public hearing and Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance establishing rates for solid waste and recycling services in the City of Anna, Texas for fiscal year 2022- 2023 in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 8:18 PM. There were no public comments. Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 8:18 PM. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A, ARTICLE A6.001 GARBAGE COLLECTION CHARGES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION THEREOF. MOTION: Council Member Carver moved to approve. Council Member Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. d. Presentation of the Proposed FY2022-2023 Budget (City Manager Jim Proce) Section 7.02 of the City Charter states that on or before the 15th day of August of the fiscal year, the City Manager must submit to the City Council a budget for the ensuing fiscal year. Staff will provide a brief presentation of the proposed FY2022-2023 Budget. A hard copy of the draft budget will be provided to each City Council member for review. A copy of the draft budget will be posted on the City's website on August 10th. e. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution setting the date and place of a public hearing on the FY2022-2023 budget. (City Manager Jim Proce) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS NAMING THE DATE AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FY2022 — 2023 BUDGET. MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to set the public hearing for September 6, 2022, at 6:30 at the Municipal Complex, 201 W. Seventh Street. Council Member Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Approve a Resolution to propose a property tax rate of 0.540964 per $100 of property valuation for the City that the Council may adopt for the 2022 tax year and setting date and time for a public hearing on the tax rate. (City Manager Jim Proce) After properties are appraised by the Collin County Appraisal District, the Collin County Tax Assessor -Collector calculates both the No -New -Revenue tax rate and the Voter - Approval tax rate for the City of Anna as the designated officer to complete the tax rate calculation forms created by the Texas Comptroller and to certify the calculations as accurate. No -New -Revenue tax rate: The No -New -Revenue tax rate is a calculated rate that would provide the taxing unit with the same amount of maintenance and operations property taxes on existing property as the previous year after taking into account changes in appraised value. If property values rise, the No -New -Revenue tax rate will go down and vice versa. The No-NewRevenue tax rate for FY2023 is $0.464098 per $100. Voter -Approval tax rate: The Voter -Approval tax rate provides the taxing unit with the same amount of maintenance and operations property taxes on existing property as the previous year plus a 3.5 percent increase for those operations, in addition to sufficient funds to pay debts in the coming year. If a taxing unit adopts a tax rate higher than the Voter -Approval tax rate, a tax rate approval election must be held on the November uniform election date. The Voter -Approval tax rate for FY2023 is $0.533333 per $100. De minimis rate: The De minimis rate is the rate equal to the sum of the taxing unit's current debt rate, the no -new -revenue maintenance and operations rate, and the rate that when applied to a taxing unit's current total value, will impose an amount of taxes equal to $500,000. The de minimis rate is an option for small cities with a population of 30,000 or less. The De Minimis rate for FY2023 is $0.540964 per $100. The proposed budget is supported by a tax rate of $0.540964. Under the Texas Property Tax Reform and Transparency Act of 2019, a city that adopts a rate exceeding the lower of the nonew-revenue tax rate or the voter -approval tax rate must hold one public hearing. The following table is a comparison between the proposed tax rate, last year's rate, the No -New -Revenue rate, the De Minimis rate and Voter -Approval tax rate Proposed FY2023 Tax Rate $0.540964 per $100 Preceding FY2022 Tax Rate$0.569500 per $100 No -New -Revenue Tax Rate $0.464098 per $100 Voter -Approval Tax Rate $0.533333 per $100 De Minimis Tax Rate $0.540964 per $100 Approval of the attached Resolution would set $0.540964 as the Tax Year 2022 (FY2023) proposed rate. The Resolution also calls for the public hearing to be held on September 6, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. The public hearing notice will run in the Anna Melissa Tribune on August 18th. The Notice of Public Hearing must conform to the prescribed format from the Texas Comptroller's office and contain how each member of the governing body voted on the proposed tax rate. A draft copy of this notice is attached to this agenda item. FY2022 FY2023 Change Total tax rate (per $100 of value) $0.569500 $0.540964 (0.028536) Average homestead taxable value S246,777 $332.179 $85,402 Tax on average homestead $1,405.40 S 1,796.97 $391.57 Total tax levy on all properties $10,026,841 $12,989,044 $2,962,203 The budget and tax rate are scheduled for adoption at the September 13th Council meeting. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS NAMING THE PROPOSED TAX RATE THE COUNCIL MAY ADOPT FOR THE 2022 TAX YEAR AND SETTING THE DATES AND TIMES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE TAX RATE MOTION: Council Member Miller moved to set the public hearing for September 6, 2022, at 6:30 at the Municipal Complex, 201 W. Seventh Street. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0. 8. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071). Municipal Ordinances; Charter Revisions; Incentive Negotiations. b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072). C. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087). d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov't Code §551.074). City Secretary Annual Review MOTION: Council Member Carver moved to enter closed session. Council Member Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pike recessed the meeting at 8:55 PM. Mayor Pike reconvened the meeting at 10:05 PM. City Council returned to items 7e. and 7f. on the agenda. MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to change the address for the public hearings to 120 W. Seventh Street. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0. 9. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - work session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. No action taken. 10. Adjourn. Mayor Pike adjourned the meeting at 10:07 PM. Approved on August 23, 2022. Mayor Nate Pike ATTEST: City Secretary Carrie L. Land THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Review the Minutes from the July 18,2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand). SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: 1+3IFMa0N=10101LhI►Ti1=1z117_11Is] LIF I_'I i r_[91:I►y,14011 &1 1. 7-18-2022 Parks Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (Signed) APPROVALS: Jeff Freeth, Recreation Manager Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 Minutes •rtrF CM� Or Anna Parks Advisory Meeting Anna Monday, July 18, 2022, 6:00 pm Anna City Hall, 111 N Powell Parkway MINUTES ANNA PARKS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Monday, July 18, 2022 @ 6:00 PM te Anna City Hall 111 N. Powell Parkway Anna, T"as 75409 The Parks Advisory Board of the City of Anna met at 6:00 PM, on July 18, 2022, at the Anna City Hall, located at 111 North Powell Parkway (Hwy 5), to consider the following items: 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum Parks Advisory Board MembecEirik Hansen call�dthe meetingto ordedat 6:00 pm. Parks Advisory Board Member Staci Martin was absent. Staff present included Neighborhood Services Director Marc Marchand, Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker, Parks Superintendent Matt Lewis and City Council Members Pete Cain and Stan Carver, 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance � i Parks Advisory Board Member Andrew Michrina led the Invocation. Parks Advisory Board Member Eirik Hansen led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Reports Staff presented a report on the revised CIP budget (Park Planning and Development Manager Dolan Walker). 4. Project Updates a. Staff and the Parks Advisory Board discussed the Community Center Project (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand and Director of Public Works Greg Peters). 5. Individual Consideration a. Discuss, Consider and Act on Parks Advisory Board meeting minutes from June 20, 2022. MOTION: Parks Advisory Board Member Eirik Hansen moved to approve the Minutes as presented. Parks Advisory Board Member Elden Baker seconded. Motion carried. 6. Adjourn Parks Advisory Board Member Eirik Hansen adjourned t e meeting at 7:10 pm. Marc Marchand, Director of Nei orhood Services ATTEST: THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Terri Doby AGENDA ITEM: Review Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending July 31, 2022. (Budget Manager Terri Doby) SUMMARY: The City of Anna's financial policies require the publication of a financial report monthly. This report covers the financial performance for Fiscal Year 2022 through July 31, 2022. Enclosed in the report is an executive dashboard that provides a high level look at major funds along with detailed reporting of sales tax collections. The financial condition of the City remains strong and the reported funds adhere to fund balance requirements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Information only STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY2022 City Council Monthly Financial Report July APPROVALS: Terri Doby, Budget Manager Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 REVENUES General Fund Property Taxes Sales Tax Franchise and Local Taxes Charges for Services Fines Licenses, Permits & Fees Investment Income Other Revenues Intergovernmental Revenue Total EXPENDITURES General Fund Expense Total Utility Fund REVENUES Water Sales Sewer Charges Sanitation Revenue Other Charges for Services Licenses, Permits & Fees Investment Income Other Revenues Utility Fund Total EXPENDITURES Administration Water Sewer Sanitation Utility Billing Utility Fund Total CITY OF ANNA GENERAL & UTILITY FUNDS DASHBOARD Through July 31, 2022 MMMI Positive variance compared to historical trends Warning Negative variance of 3%-5% compared to historical trends �- Negative variance of >5% compared to historical trends $ 8,015,000 $ 8,018,150 100.0% 3,296,370 2,798,420 84.9 % 485,000 504,339 104.0 % 111,600 108,660 97.4% 90,000 188,830 209.8% 3,703,060 4,845,721 130.9% 30,000 43,427 144.8% 16,300 30,101 184.7% 48,395 47,640 98.4% $ 15,795,725 $ 16,585,288 105.0% $ 15,309,784 $ 11,990,783 78.3% $ 6,000,000 $ 5,535,553 92.3% 3,600,000 3,700,119 102.8% 1,100,000 1,485,694 135.1 % 745,000 545,381 73.2% Connection / Reconnect Fees are lower than expected. 505,000 1,984,503 393.0% 20,000 31,843 159.2% 188,700 217,313 115.2% $ 12,158,700 $ 13,500,406 111.0% 0' of bt $ 1,219,038 $ 1,218,037 99,9% Electricity and legal expenses higher than expected; one-time payment for insurance. 5,654,073 4,812,577 85.1% 4,712,683 3,059,616 64.9% 1,100,000 1,313,040 119.4% Growing number of customers resulting in higher expenses. 560,311 275,394 49.2% $ 13,246,105 $ 10,678,664 80.6% •' ScheduleCITY OF ANNA ChangeFor the month June 30, 2022 2021-22 Collections from 2020-21 Collections Monthly Prior Year Monthly October $ 417,343 24.4% $ 335,454 November 483,556 42.2% 340,156 December 552,138 31.7% 419,319 January 435,037 28.4% 338,879 February 416,044 42.3% 292,405 March 583,700 32.4% 441,021 April 494,472 31.6% 375,823 May 511,309 32.7% 385,457 June 583,874 24.8% 467,686 July 432,097 August 406,214 September 453,292 $ 4,477,473 $ 4,687,804 Budget: 4,526,370 98.9% 4,300,000 Monthly Sales Tax Collections: 3 Year Comparison $700,000 $600,000 .. ......... ......... ......... .............. .... $500,000 $400, 000 $300,000 $200,000 $100, 000 $0 z cc�(bt ei �ac� c1 a�Gr P��\ �a� ,J�� A F��� N FY2021-22 u FY2020-21 u FY2019-20 OF ANNA ReceivedCITY Building Permits Fiscal Year i2020-21 Monthly Monthly October 75 98 November 89 124 December 68 83 January 102 53 February 208 125 March 141 104 April 137 117 May 44 60 June 19 95 July 25 114 August 154 September 120 908 1,247 .Budget FY2022 Budget: 1,100 82.5% Monthly Building Permits Received: 2 Year Comparison 250 200 150 100 50 14 0 oG�o,Q��,��o����jac1 0 FY2021-22 0 FY2020-21 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: iIff,711111►r9=11541 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve an updated interlocal agreement for jail services between Collin County and the City of Anna. (Police Chief Dean Habel) SUMMARY: The Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 791) authorizes any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act. Collin County has proposed certain updated amendments to the Agreement, to include payment for County expenses in providing jail service for inmates, comprised of a "Basic Charge" of $XX per day or part of day per inmate that the City requests be confined on charges brought by the City's peace officers, and additional charges for reimbursement of County expenses for health-care services, such that the updated Agreement shall be comprised of the terms set forth in the attached Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2. Approval would extend the agreement through September 30, 2023 FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: High Performing Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY2023 Inmate Housing Fees 4-19-22 2. FY23 Jail Services Amendment 2 - City of Anna 3. ILA Jail Services - FY2023 extension APPROVALS: Dean Habel, Police Chief Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 Proposed Inmate per day Expense Entity Impact Entity Anna Anna ISD Baylor Scott & White Celina Collin Co. Community College Community ISD DART Fairview Farmersville Farmersville ISD Josephine Lavon Lucas McKinney Melissa Murphy Parker Princeton Prosper Prosper ISD St Paul Westminister Wylie Rates # City Days Federal Inmate Housing # Federal Days FY 2016 Actual Paid FY 2017 Actual Paid FY 2018 Actual Paid FY 2019 Actual Paid FY 2020 Actual Paid FY 2021 Actual Paid FY 2021 Inmate Days Utilizing FY 2023 Adopted Rate $ 3,489.50 $ 3,768.66 $ 4,606.14 $ 4,395.09 $ 4,543.88 $ 4,296.27 $ 3,597.61 1,674.96 3,210.34 1,674.96 3,589.86 2,271.94 822.69 $ 688.90 - - 139.58 - - 274.23 $ 229.63 - - 209.37 - 188.94 - $ 1,186.43 1,326.01 1,256.22 188.94 98.78 639.87 $ 535.81 5,443.62 3,140.55 3,000.97 3,873.27 1,284.14 1,462.56 $ 1,224.72 69.79 209.37 - - 98.78 $ 907.27 348.95 837.48 1,133.64 790.24 $ 348.95 - - 94.47 - - $ 88,005.19 73,349.29 63,090.16 70,285.68 36,977.85 33,090.42 $ 27,709.22 5,024.88 2,512.44 3,768.66 3,495.39 3,457.30 5,119.06 $ 4,286.59 2,652.02 4,885.30 3,419.71 3,400.92 4,642.66 1,279.74 $ 1,071.63 139.58 209.37 418.74 - 395.12 - $ 5,652.99 12,283.04 5,304.04 7,935.48 5,926.80 4,753.32 $ 3,980.33 1,884.33 1,954.12 2,372.86 3,684.33 4,247.54 914.10 $ 765.45 - 2,931.18 3,978.03 7,179.72 2,271.94 91.41 $ 76.54 $ 116,479.51 $ 110,128.62 $ 94,076.92 $ 109,256.79 $ 67,195.91 $ 52,743.67 $ 44,166.43 $ 69.79 $ 69.79 $ 69.79 $ 94.47 $ 98.78 $ 91.41 $ 76.54 1,669 1,578 1,348 1,157 680 577 $ 905,525.25 $ 919,901.99 $ 821,360.10 $ 952,492.33 $ 1,179,869.74 $ 510,154.19 $ 510,154.19 12,975 13,181 11,769 13,648 1 11,944 4,859 Facility Utilization • County 95.54% 95.99% 96.41% 96.16% 96.39% 98.41% % City 0.51% 0.43% 0.37% 0.30% 0.19% 0.17% % Federal 3.95% 3.58% 3.22% 3.54% 3.41% 1.42% NOTE: CARES Act funding was used in FY 2020 to cover a portion of Public Safety salaries. This savings has translated into a lower daily rate for FY 2022. We expect the expenditures to return to normal over the course of FY 2021 and FY 2022. COLLIN COUNTY I Contract Modification Document Vendor: City of Anna Item #1 Item #2 101 S. Powell Parkway Anna, TX 75409 Office of the Purchasing Agent Collin County Administration Building 2300 Bloomdale Rd, Ste 3160 McKinney, TX 75071 972-548-4165 Contract No. 2020-409 Contract: Jail Services, City of Anna YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATION TO THIS CONTRACT The agreement will be renewed for a period of one (1) year, beginning October 1, 2022, through and including September 30, 2023, at the rate below. Charges for fiscal year 2023: $76.54 per day, per inmate Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect and may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. Amendment No. 2 has been accepted and authorized by authority of Collin County Commissioners Court by Court Order No. effective on 10/1/2022. ACCEPTED BY: SIGNATURE (Print Name) TITLE: DATE: SIGNATURE Michelle Charnoski, NIGP-CPP, CPPB (Print Name) TITLE: Purchasing Agent DATE: 1 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Awarded by Court Order No. 2020-884-09-21 Amendment No. 1 Court Order No. 2021-948-09-27 Summary Amendment No. 2 Court Order No. Summary Renewal 1 Agreement extended and fees CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AN UPDATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL SERVICES BETWEEN COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANGER TO EXECUTE SAME. WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 791, "the Act") authorizes any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the "City Council") has approved an interlocal agreement between Collin County, Texas (the "County") and the City of Anna, Texas (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Interlocal Jail Services Agreement (the "Agreement") with the County should be extended for the period of October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023 (the "Extension"); and WHEREAS, the County has proposed certain updating amendments to the Agreement, to include payment for County expenses in providing jail service for inmates, updating the "Basic Charge" amount to $76.54 (seventy-six dollars and fifty-four cents) per day or part of day per inmate that the City requests be confined on charges brought by the City's peace officers, plus any additional charges for reimbursement of County expenses for health-care services, such that the updated Agreement is now modified by the terms set forth in the attached Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 (incorporated herein for all purposes); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its citizens to authorize, ratify, and approve the City Manager's execution of the updated Agreement and Extension; and WHEREAS, the City shall make all payments under the Agreement only from its current revenues; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Approval and Authorization of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the amendments and extension attached hereto as Exhibit 1 to extend the Agreement and ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of same. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions necessary to finalize and enforce the Agreement and the Extension. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this _ day of , 2022. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor Nate Pike City Secretary Carrie Land THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Dean Habel AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an updated interlocal agreement for emergency dispatch services between Collin County and the City of Anna. (Police Chief Dean Habel) SUMMARY: The Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 791) authorizes any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act. The City of Anna contracts with Collin County to provide emergency dispatch services for the police department. Collin County has proposed certain amendments to the interlocal Agreement, to include payment of dispatch service charges for FY2023 in the amount of $167,154.00 for the extension, and an annual connection fee of $108.00 for each radio registered on the system. The total cost quoted by Collin County to extend the agreement to September 30, 2023 is $172,230.00. FINANCIAL IMPACT: $172,230.00 for FY2023 STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: High Performing Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution-FY2023 Extension and Amendment 2. Exh 1-FY2023 Dispatch Services ILA Amendment No 1 - City of Anna 3. Exh 2 - FY2023 Dispatch Services ILA -Fees APPROVALS: Dean Habel, Police Chief Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AN UPDATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY DISPATCH SERVICES BETWEEN COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANGER TO EXECUTE SAME. WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 791, "the Act") authorizes any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the "City Council") has approved an interlocal agreement between Collin County, Texas (the "County") and the City of Anna, Texas (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Interlocal Dispatch Services Agreement (the "Agreement") previously designated as Contract No. 2021-382, with the County should be extended through September 30, 2023 ("Amendment No. 1"); and WHEREAS, the County has proposed certain amendments to the Agreement, to include payment of dispatch service charges for contract year October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023 in the amount of $167,154 (one hundred and sixty-seven thousand, one hundred and fifty-four dollars and zero cents) for the Extension, plus an annual connection fee assessed by Plano, Allen, Wylie, and Murphy (PAWM) operators for each radio registered on the system, such that the updated Agreement shall use the terms set forth in the attached Exhibit 1 (incorporated herein for all purposes); and WHEREAS, the PAWN connection fee for the term of Amendment No. 1 has been set as $108 (one hundred and eight dollars and zero cents) per radio, as set forth in the attached Exhibit 2 (incorporated herein for all purposes); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its citizens to authorize, ratify, and approve the City Manager's execution of Amendment No. 1 to extend the Agreement for another twelve-month contract and update its terms; and WHEREAS, the City shall make all payments under the Agreement only from its current revenues; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Approval and Authorization of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Amendment No. 1 attached hereto as Exhibit 1 to extend the Agreement and ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of same. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions necessary to finalize and enforce the Agreement and the Extension. All other provisions of the Agreement which are not expressly referenced as amended by the parties shall remain in full force and effect, provided that in the event of any conflict, the terms of Amendment No. 1 shall be controlling over other terms of the Agreement as may be necessary to accomplish the extension described above. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of , 2022. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor Nate Pike City Secretary Carrie Land Office of the Purchasing Agent Collin County Administration Building COL L I N COUNTY Contract Modification Document 2300 Bloomdale Rd, Ste 3160 . McKinney, TX 75071 972-548-4165 Vendor: City of Anna Contract No. 2021-382 111 N Powell Pkwy Contract: Dispatch Services, City of Anna Anna, TX 75409 YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATION TO THIS CONTRACT Item #1 Renew contract for a twelve (12) month period at the same terms and conditions of the contract from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Item #2 Update Section 5.01 Compensation clause of the agreement to the following - Payment for contract year October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023, is $167,154. Payments will be made in four quarterly installments of $41,788.50. In addition to the fee schedule, each radio registered on the system will be assessed an annual connection fee by Plano, Allen, Wylie, Murphy (PAWM) operators for access to their system. From The dispatch service charges for FY2022 in the amount of $140,563.00 shall be paid by the City in four quarterly installments of $35,140.75. The fees will be based on the fee schedule formulas adopted by Commissioners' Court on August 6, 2018 (Court Order No. 2018-628-08-06). In addition to the fee schedule, each radio registered on the system will be assessed an annual connection fee by Plano, Allen, Wylie, Murphy (PAWM) operators for access to their system. In FY2022, the fee will be $108 per radio and may be updated annually by PAWM. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect and may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. Amendment No. 1 has been accepted and authorized by authority of Collin County Commissioners Court by Court Order No. effective on 10/1/2022. ACCEPTED BY: SIGNATURE (Print Name) SIGNATURE Michelle Charnoski, NIGP-CPP, CPPB (Print Name) TITLE: TITLE: Purchasing Agent DATE: DATE: HISTORICAL INFORMATION Awarded by Court Order No. 2021-938-09-27 Amendment No. 1 Court Order No. Summary Agreement extended and fees updated. FY 2023 Radio Cost (excluding FD) Outside Agency PD Radios as of 03/01/22 PAWM Fee per Radio PAWM Cost Collin County Radio/Dispatch Fee Grand Total Anna Anna ISD 47 4 $ $ 108 108 $ 5,076 $ 432 $ $ 167,154 8,541 $ 172,230 $ 8,973 Celina 70 $ 108 $ 7,560 $ 216,643 $ 224,203 Celina ISD 12 $ 108 $ 1,296 $ 24,052 $ 25,348 Community ISD 6 $ 108 $ 648 $ 12,298 $ 12,946 Fairview 41 $ 108 $ 4,428 $ 126,605 $ 131,033 Farmersville 26 $ 108 $ 2,808 $ 81,731 $ 84,539 Farmersville ISD 7 $ 108 $ 756 $ 15,017 $ 15,773 Josephine 16 $ 108 $ 1,728 $ 48,130 $ 49,858 Lavon 27 $ 108 $ 2,916 $ 70,792 $ 73,708 Melissa 29 $ 108 $ 3,132 $ 119,695 $ 122,827 Melissa ISD 8 $ 108 $ 864 $ 16,606 $ 17,470 Princeton Outside Agency Total 57 350 $ $ 108 108 $ 6,156 $ 37,800 $ $ 201,471 1,108,734 $ 207,627 $ 1,146,534 Collin County 1,016 $ 108 $ 109,728 $ 2,513,564 $ 2,623,292 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lif'i7►1'.=01111 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Ray Isom Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an updated interlocal agreement for emergency dispatch services between Collin County and the Anna Fire Department (Fire Chief Ray Isom) SUMMARY: Collin County provides dispatch services for both Anna PD and Anna FD. The County, through the Sheriffs Office, owns and operates communication facilities used in dispatching its law enforcement and emergency service personnel. Collin County provides dispatch services to Anna Fire Rescue as a courtesy, with no fee to the city, and will continue to do so throughout this agreement period. The City desires to continue obtaining dispatch services from the County as it is the only feasible method to accomplish this. Collin County collects and stores the city's data as it relates to dispatch services. This agreement remains in effect through September 30, 2023 and will be renewed at such time. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No cost. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this item. ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY 23 Dispatch —Services _Resolution-AFD 2. FY23 Amendment 1 - Anna Fire Dept 3. Original Collin County Interlocal Dispatch Services Agreement APPROVALS: Stephanie Welch, Adm Assistant Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF THE INTERLOCAL DISPATCH SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna Texas (the "City Council") finds that renewal of the agreement for Dispatch Services with Collin County is vital to support the City of Anna Fire Department's mission to preserve and protect the public health and safety of the City's residents; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Whereas, Recitals Incorporated The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth in full. Section 1. Approval of the Renewal of the Interlocal Dispatch Services Agreement The City Council hereby approves the Interlocal Dispatch Services Agreement attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1, and authorizes, ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of same. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions necessary to finalize, act under, and enforce the Agreement that shall remain in force until September 30, 2023. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this 23t" day of August, 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: Carrie Smith, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor Office of the Purchasing Agent Collin County Administration Building COL L I N COUNTY Contract Modification Document 2300 Bloomdale Rd, Ste 3160 . McKinney, TX 75071 972-548-4165 Vendor: City of Anna Contract No. 2021-295 P.O. Box 776 Contract: Dispatch Services, Anna Fire Anna, TX 75409 Department YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATION TO THIS CONTRACT Item #1 Renew contract for a twelve (12) month period at the same terms and conditions of the contract from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Item #2 Update Section 5.01 Compensation clause of the agreement to the following: The dispatch service charges for FY2023 are in the amount of $0. From: The dispatch service charges for FY2022 are in the amount of $0. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect and may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. Amendment No. 1 has been accepted and authorized by authority of Collin County Commissioners Court by Court Order No. effective on 10/1/2022. ACCEPTED BY SIGNATURE (Print Name) TITLE: DATE: SIGNATURE Michelle Charnoski, NIGP-CPP, CPPB (Print Name) TITLE: DATE: Purchasing Agent HISTORICAL INFORMATION Awarded by Court Order No. 2021-573-06-21 Amendment No. 1 Court Order No. Summary Agreement extended INTERLOCAL DISPATCH SERVICES AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into on. the 21 day of June 2021, by and between. the Anna Fire Department (the "Fire Department") and Collin County, a political subdivision of the State of Texas (the "County"). RECITALS L The County, through the Sheriffs Office, owns and operates communication facilities used in dispatching its law enforcement and emergency service personnel.. 2. The Fire Department desires to obtain certain dispatch services from the County. Therefore, under the authority of Texas Government Code, Title 7, Interlocal Cooperation Act, Section 791 et seq., the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS DISPATCH SERVICES. The term "Dispatch Services" means all services necessary for the Collin County Sheriff s Office to receive calls for Fire/EMS services within the Fire Department's jurisdiction and to dispatch the Fire personnel in response to such calls. HOSTING SERVICES. The term "Hosting Services" means the County will. store the Fire Department's data as it relates to dispatch services. SECTION 2. TERM 2.01 TERM. The term of this agreement shall commence on October 1, 2021, and shall continue in full force and effect through September 30, 2022. This agreement may be renewed for additional one (1) year periods at the rates established and agreed upon by both parties. 2.02 TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this agreement by giving ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. SECTION 3. SERVICES 1 3.01 The County agrees to provide dispatch services through the Sheriff's Office to the Fire Department in the same manner and under the same work schedule as such services are provided in the operation of the County's law enforcement personnel. 3.02 Hosting Services. The County agrees to provide Hosting Services to the Fire Department and that it wilt provide 95% uptime availability of the service as covered herein. 3.03 Scheduled Maintenance: The Fire Department hereby acknowledges that the County may, from time to time, perform maintenance service on the County network, with or without notice to the Fire Department, which may result in the unavailability of the County network. Emergency maintenance and maintenance for which the County has not given the Fire Department notice in accordance with this Agreement shall not be deemed scheduled maintenance for purposes of this Agreement. The County will make every effort to notify the Fire Department prior to scheduled maintenance. Notice may be given in various forms including but not limited to email notice and/or phone call. 3.04 Hosted Data Ownership. The Fire Department shall have sole ownership of the Fire Department's hosted data and the County shall make no claim to ownership of Fire Department's hosted data. 3.05 Hosted Data Back Up. The County will back up the Fire Department's hosted data on a daily basis. All data backups will meet Criminal Justice Information Systems (CJIS) requirements. Every effort is made to ensure the reliability of the backed up data in the event that it would be necessary to restore a database. The County, however, makes no guaranties that the backed up database will be error free. Upon request, the County will provide to the Fire Department a current database backup that 2 can be restored to an alternate location to verify the contents and confirm the quality of the backup. All services required to provide the Fire Department's data and/or verify data will be provided in accordance with the County's current rates. 3.06 Remote Access Agreement. For each user the City is required to complete and return Attachment (A), Connection Policy and Agreement Form for remote access and return to County to the address in 9.02 item (C). No access will be given to user unless County has received a Remote Access Agreement. SECTION 4. NONEXCLUSIVITY OF SERVICE PROVISION The parties agree that the County may contract to perform services similar or identical to those specified in this agreement for such additional governmental or public entities as the County, in its sole discretion, sees fit. SECTION 5. COMPENSATION 5.01 The dispatch set -vice charges for FY2022 are in the amount of $0. SECTION 6. CIVIL LIABILITY 6.01 Any civil liability relating to the furnishing of services under this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Fire Department. The parties agree that the County shall be acting as agent for the Fire Department in performing the services contemplated by this agreement. 6.02 The Fire Department shall hold the County fiee and harmless from any obligation, costs, claims, judgments, attorney's fees, attachments, and other such liabilities arising from or growing out of the services rendered to the Fire Department pursuant to the terms of this agreement or in any way connected with the rendering of said services, except when the same shall arise because of the willful misconduct or culpable negligence of the County, and the County is adjudged to be guilty of willful misconduct or culpable negligence by a court of competent jurisdiction. 3 SECTION 7. AMENDMENT This agreement shall not be amended or modified other than in a written agreement signed by the parties. SECTION 8. CONTROLLING LAW This agreement shall be deemed to be made under, governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. SECTION 9. NOTICES 9.01 FORM OF NOTICE. Unless otherwise specified, all communications provided for in this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered, whether actually received or not, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the United States mail, first class, registered or certified, return receipt requested, with proper postage prepaid or immediately when delivered in person. 9.02 ADDRESSES. All communications provided for in this agreement shall be addressed as follows: (A) Collin County, to: Purchasing Department 2300 Bloomdale 43160 McKinney, Texas 75071 (B) Collin County Administrator, to: Bill Bilyeu 2300 Bloomdale #4192 McKinney, Texas 75071 (C) If to the Fire Department, to: �V rat , 1 C j) G-r OffA i X �� 4 (D) Collin County, Remote Access to: Information Technology Department 2300 Bloomdale #3198 McKinney, Texas 75071 Or to such person at such address as may from time to time be specified in a notice given as provided in this Section 9. In addition, notice of termination of this agreement by the Fire Department shall be provided by the Fire Department to the County Judge of Collin County as follows: The Honorable Chris Hill Collin County Judge Collin County Administration Building 2300 Bloomdale Rd. Suite 4192 McKinney, Texas 75071 SECTION 10. CAPTIONS The headings to the various sections of this agreement have been inserted for the convenient reference only and shall not modify, define, limit or expand the express provision of this agreement. SECTION 11. COUNTERPARTS This agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when taken separately, shall be deemed an original. SECTION 12, OBLIGATIONS OF CONDITION All obligations of each party under this agreement are conditions to further performance of the other party's continued performance of its obligation under the agreement. SECTION 13. EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO ENFORCE THIS AGREEMENT The County and. the Fire Department have the exclusive right to bring suit to enforce this Agreement, and no party may bring suit, as a third -party beneficiary 5 or otherwise, to enforce this agreement. SECTION 14. PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understanding or written oral agreements between the parties respecting the services to be provided under this agreement. SECTION 15. FORCE MAdEURE No party shall be liable or responsible to the other party, nor be deemed to have defaulted under or breached this Agreement, for any failure or delay in fulfilling or performing any term of this Agreement, when and to the extent such failure or delay is caused by or results from acts beyond the affected party's reasonable control, including, without limitation; acts of God; flood, fire or explosion; war, invasion, riot or other civil unrest; actions, embargoes or blockades in effect on or after the date of this Agreement; or national or regional emergency (each of the foregoing, a "Force Majeure Event"). A party whose performance is affected by a Force Majeure Event shall give notice to the other party, stating the period of time the occurrence is expected to continue and shall use diligent efforts to end the failure or delay and minimize the effects of such Force Majeure Event. 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. "COUNTY" COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS B TITLE: DATE: 2—cg—j "FIRE DEPARTMENT" BY: TITLE: AlRe N41 E- F DATE: S '2.cj2.l THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 6.g. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Approve a Resolution entering into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Collin County for Road and Bridge Improvements for 2022-2026. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: This item is to renew the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Collin County for Road and Bridge Construction for another 5-year term (2022-2026). The current ILA is expiring this year. The standard ILA allows the City of Anna to partner with Collin County to complete important road and bridge maintenance and construction projects, which provides for more efficient work and cost savings through the partnership. The agreement does not bind either party to specific projects or obligations, rather it provides for a path forward on projects which benefit both Collin County and the City of Anna. Staff recommends approval of the item. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Interlocal Cooperation Agreement provides the City with the ability to coordinate and partner with Collin County on road and bridge work, resulting in cost savings and construction efficiencies for both entities. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommenda approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Collin County Road & Bridge ILA 2. Collin County Public Works Roadway Policy 2021 APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION FOR 2022 TO 2026; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Title 7, Chapter 791, Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated (the "Act") , and the Constitution of the State of Texas, Article III, Section 64(b) (the "Constitution") specifically authorizes counties and other political subdivisions comprised or located within the county, to contract with one another for the performance of governmental functions and/or services required or authorized by the Constitution, or the laws of this State, under the terms and conditions prescribed in the Act; and, WHEREAS, the functions and/or services contemplated to be performed by THE City of Anna, Texas, as set out herein, are governmental functions and/or services contemplated by the terms of the Act and are functions and/or services which each of the parties hereto have independent authority to pursue, notwithstanding this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, both the City of Anna, Texas and Collin County, Texas are desirous of entering into this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Payment and Funding. That the City Council hereby agrees to timely pay to Collin County, Texas, in accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for work the City requests in the amount and upon the terms and conditions set forth. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of August 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Exhibit "A" Whereas, the Intertocal Cooperation Act, Title 7, Chapter 791,Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated (the "Act"), and the Constitution of the State of Texas, Article III, Section 64(b) (the "Constitution") specifically authorizes counties and other political subdivisions comprised or located within the county, to contract with one another for the performance of gavernmental functions andfor services required or authorized by the Constitution, or the laws of this State, under the terms and conditions prescribed in the Act: and WHEREAS, the functions and,ror services contemplated to I)-e performed by Collin County, Texas, as set out herein, are governmental functions anduor services contemplated by the terms of the Act and are functions andlor services which each of the parties hereto have independent authority to pursue, notwithstanding this Agreement; and WHEREAS, both the county and the political subdivision named herein are desirous of entering into this Interiocal Cooperation Agreement, as is evidenced by the resolutions or orders of their respective goveming bodies approving this Agreement which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. NOW, THEREFOR, THIS AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered into by and between Collin County, Texas a political subdivision of the State of Texas, and the City of Anna, political subdivision of the State of Texas, which is wholly or partially located within Collin County, Tex as . Consideration for this Agreement consist, of the mutual covenants contained herein, as well as arty monetary consideration, which m a y be stated herein_ This agreement is as follows, to wit: 1. As requested by the political subdivision named herein, Collin County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized agents and employees, agrees to provide said political subdivision with the following described governmental functions and)or services: ROAD IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH COURT ORDER NO.2021-1QM2-Q1 (Copy Attached) II. As consideration for the above -described governmental functions andlor services, said political subdivision agrees to timely pay to Collin County, Texas, in accordance with the advance cost estimate submitted to them for work they have requested in the amount and upon the following terms and conditions: 1 ) PAYMENT IN FULL UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AND RECEIPT OF BILL FOR SAME. � ml® �Ba wi� JI36 IM uwcolunconuA wWwxxnx PA aii u 169K Mssn 1121 eWn. wNsu WOOD rvs O(ML bsW HOMs/.s\ rvc NWc yswl0 xym WAO W JEWWCw POO w Vws in cysnas aol<<moscnuo HOVm canr IJ WRJmsne 911 owsL ODWMUI neow aPsa W 9Wwaaoe at wlwMz of eslulsnl to Ruwnsw IW sawOuIOM Isuo105RY PA caasi MlW 000o alqua rvlW M) gWOmuµeu wycs (o rvs qWc esW emysa Wwlo sun 2mlll u;uumu in shay awnaP ibR We 30 rose W,ie PGL o PA sscy 01 Ns SWOUSse wbwxsulSPna %Ns 30141 l WO Inlswn MWO sw i¢gnllwe oc aesw PAW anA6UAR)d PoWle of Ns b9iy¢ ysisw su0 rys s¢cnyw lyln Vayswwl OPMI W seWlns 09OWc 1'30A' a µow rys bQesao 01 susPllua N ODWniWw MIIP rvs I101 rvo 6sW05 se suWume yA ryw Vawsweuj not W slWclse wwsyA sue cysn mull s In W mliq sW ounO"u01510 rvs wuscl oWM nsnwwssws to suA sysnf rvs wwswesi OwR Vawswsw sne rvs SUDII nrysiwlcysll zymle suA bion!x!on 0, N!c Vawswsw Oi 0w III ryewq W ysle wnsl!0 Oc xysll nOlccOaylnls s Mswsi Olmm yaw Oi wwsW wcsuA anyxOanalPwv(POiWwnu Esllnw ols b !A lOOELCIDs sw yayl Oi wwsW lu rvs snsul Oleswnu PAsuAOrysi bsW bsLLauusum olrys aonswwsuwl lnuGlOux 9ue1OL ssulcss nugm Wio Wwswsiy suA usal!asul sq 0i OW1OHOu ry rysP wsbsglAs cwblodssx Oi sasuR In IPs IueswullA IPs 01Wi µOw suA clslwd eswsues' CMja O4neawsuR SO "I onl of In as wli ongoW suomse PA II sscP esW WwIO sacs¢ In eslsue sue III MA Ps USCM A ai sbbLoi In csW oq rys wwul sue bwMax%M2 Vawcnusul EscP InW saw¢ lO bseouu III OW 1W sue srsmlc sue ci 91 WGL eomwGW sx bwwbl bsAuem V" Uex ow G GcicS24) W}a now mysu ai bskmOW sw ens Mql III lWsual sa bwaulPce W W16s WA bgA &W lac Magi Weawre fl Ji ryR W wsurul O sw wl wseO xywu NlW Wtl1EAWE IMIDEo 0AC im wnWA v 6vmW 110 Eonw HziwBnH@zIEN IM H IT EOH M1HM EonIMEI1 WID owopmoo ewcoza Mil Pre w Pop Nsu yw (x) Waluoa es}onull No bpea sews Iww No Co q We mill wwl w Iwuuu to ell suV W to uwAAAe we li lVlz CCCw InVdo'oA(; WWwwlgwtalww(puleconwAsuVNo NPAoa' cWwl u queurneua poi we mill wVwi W uol wmNo No li few No wleoesL ell roll Ne eswea Sell omeweo a sM Iwew.w Va VeVouusuce, dVlz wgsl ewose mil Pw w wwo w u IP jo sW ewe IW loans Imo qpa esW mill Nou pAe s wsaompla (we le speew we mglud qNa VSVAa im iala expel mN wsauusele esPll P Iwuult Ns qpa IDSyA seoea Inw woe Na Selo' Nau IW sSW mill usp1A 1W qpeL pipet ioeu musi ill IW Effi b"pCe uq pollens Nst Nlal pi COuNq' eOCIORIou' sue ouanlud IV!a sdwsu5q' we VSVA MII expel Na opaz winpeou p.w le e!xna We 0. ys VSVApplu�ea Nq Neawe�VsW Vea uq ws� arz wlwaglud' su Poldq!ou nuew Ml g Couwwucs plaLnw peaotglou We wllnw of Pi sue pull We oyola q Sep lwoo ell Enar We Wpoe geese We osonueum a e pq to ampere sue apse me Nl]eul Mops w eue depouusu a la sue lep PAS Ewee wslenw Enew aw II dine uglse ry Ns qpm ds W' VMpp of wdlouq ewwdeuU ( seep of We wwdgud s .Lowe pslsnw Enew,l- V bell mppe sepoua' ewpwdrea ri Pil lu suel ru oL suss We psP of (pie tl pemweu[ omsprml myprg Ilwwwou slaojeory' lj Tpwasu9wlou: msd l urealou' 110toLON6Lellretest: snag pA of Liana Vow See poll IW suWsp b9aa pill le cowwl wewwud' depouu!ud wA Mull q We tldp%wew mpau sue to We GWM ansp P!Irw oL WISA Ie p%ar WeWeq weer of pwsry q Nla ydwewew AL ew Plww oL pole), w NlmIld ri Lase al No IepA Sell W wee of PeMua!pN to we omei mW' ua a peswep to Nuleua Icyuwee rued We s3weweq wnq pe IS su supnp Nq P1A cowWuasPz we W Vouu!Ue MW loi We 2aNa2 a Vaenuew sz%e YW VSA 01 NO VzwI Ao9i of ansp usuSM0beew MI dsAwaR PA IW Veep novel We [cyawlud MVA SwIl po will of we waeppewilgeo mow w,wunoz snsl9plo P We pAUe pp lu We o.wp q s uw-sVVWbwwCU lb y Suco q dsnowwwPl N Wlwe of xauo¢ wnq wpw tWae MAwepz Iww NgmlNgeuewd No topped It a nuVOWo q Nei esry MWA MNud la We A CSA Awes All e«ww su oeaWwl LMIABWIM 1ws Yaisswsw MAW sxsonrye 4«o of MW le Ml«sILNIMe' ssry w ANIN Mill sawowow MA W s!Nsi IMP&MM Wigu A Mepw swawwGM of xst NW a 9 UGM Mwryu IA coo bswsa eoslw Ao wcQyA ry Is tla uMwsw enwa «s W ao wnsl Ruu' suA woslyBWux �ylW wnsl Melwwewal sasz MAJl Vowlo iIll wyaisswsw Is as slew s3 vMwsww No bswsx 1VIs W wswow wsA uw es sW W to suwW\IM c of sww MNW Ywl owswwa aso Wbi MUNN«uxs« VealMlluwsalonPuapNoiopllaspou2nuesirvlu9a WGul wMW5o\IuMW aNlow Mey M Iutap N1W bswou Be oMWucse aA NIB Vaisswsw W sWgoe MLeM sue oesn u uw Ao W Bull uue ouB:" lG to Ne anuoq 6x i usul«ossple to suA 6xil ao wwswesiw a2 Vawswsw sue NG sooIMM N MLNUll amnle ew ewBlgon of ryls Wwsweut ai ao seeecseou W l ps MN InBsle « Ml neon SAM Wwau oL owyA WGL Nsu Ns bsg!w uw s IMWNiA to NIB ~MN( sills sawswsw e«M nw WWI sw caws « yioawa w NIB W wswsw spun =wys sw WNN «ON"wo sa W sw WAN, MW Is Nu=eon W wwllspR to V MI luq gull MOW III pM MamoM of aonswuruwl WmBua IN BA Bill No sawswsu( uo Ma BonMe sw InBuiwA a Wwuzs ast Bone a Gui owellsil MW W BMx%No zPw wloxsx Igvsi ye Bill M ont« Ivry Ne Vawswsur Vow NOI< <aeooeBo WAGNIA Wnes III lVo bswa wdszow Ny No Ingll slanlua Nls Wwswat w NgL WWl loam rye omasoexbwa«Iwl wWL Nsn Ness WMW911A x oN In NO Wwswsw BA suNeua wo NO WLAB No eswsa W ug woW to awry sw Al 1Va sawswat li aogawsplo w GIlw Gnw l leli smil MITI W MMM; sW cwxryxy Bill to Ns Isrz gNs y «lsrsz agWaa oou� GMsa is sgmul We sue cone o p Iurnuoe Iu muusglou mV mry aea«nuel ws IW bWAMM Wwol Ns MABBIpa N A N911 ps swnlW to JB M6\ Ww Ns Will N GMws Ns ItwMSI«a of Nls Vawswsw«Ix wanew N oowwsucs Inasl WiMN" P xwa NG ccxAbBtlou WwGgnLw M NW spws WNoL bi MA elo s gslw XIll III sW Nww WNw tW WWB sis NMWQ ewweni WA, N NIAW l« nob «s t Ami CIU O6 vmwv 1V5:G nuN'I�G� O9R: eA O Flv cwl lE%V2 State of Texas § Court Order Collin County § 2021-109-02-01 Commissioners Court 4 An order of the Collin County Commissioners Court adopting a policy. The Collin County Commissioners Court hereby approves the amended Collin County Road and Right of Way policies, as detailed in the attached documentation. A motion was made, seconded, and carried by a majority of the court members in attendance during a regular session on Monday, February 2, 2021. Chris Hill, County Judge Susan Fletcher, Commissioner, Pct 1 t zN I ' Cheryl W iams, Commissioner, Pct 2 Darrell Hale, Commissioner, Pct 3 41U�JJIV�- uncan Webb, Commissioner, Pct 4 AT ST: Stacey Kemp, County Clerk COL L IN COUNTY P, COLLIN COUNTY ROADWAY POLICY Approved by the Collin County Commissioners Court on February 1, 2021 Court Order Number 2021-109-02-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.01 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 3 A. Purpose............................................................................................................................... 3 B. Applicability.........................................................................................................................3 1.02 DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................3 1.03 EXISTING ROADWAYS —MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................. 6 A. Roadways within an Incorporated Area or within a City .................................................... 6 B. Roadways adjacent to a City............................................................................................... 6 C. Roadways within a Subdivision........................................................................................... 7 D. Abandonment of County Roads.......................................................................................... 7 1.04 EXISTING ROADWAYS — MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE......................................................... 7 A. Roadway Oiling — Residents with Respiratory Conditions .................................................. 7 B. Roadway Oiling — Cemetery Locations............................................................................... 8 C. Roadway Oiling —Additional Applications.......................................................................... 8 D. Temporary Roadway Closures............................................................................................ 8 E. Mowing/Brush Cutting........................................................................................................ 9 F. Herbicide Application........................................................................................................ 10 G. Inspections........................................................................................................................ 10 1.05 EXISTING ROADWAYS - IMPROVEMENTS....................................................................... 10 A. Improvements to Roadways Within City Limits................................................................ 10 B. Major Improvements to Roadways Within City Limits ..................................................... 11 C. Reimbursement for Work Performed by Public Works .................................................... 11 1.06 COUNTY ROADWAY FEATURES AND ADJACENT AREAS ................................................. 11 A. Right of Way...................................................................................................................... 11 B. Temporary Access Agreement.......................................................................................... 12 C. Reimbursement by Property Owners............................................................................... 12 D. Fencing/Gates................................................................................................................... 13 E. Mail Boxes......................................................................................................................... 13 F. Roadway Drainage and Driveway Culverts....................................................................... 14 1.07 MISCELLANEOUS.............................................................................................................. 14 A. Signs.................................................................................................................................. 14 Page 1 1 B. Striping..............................................................................................................................14 C. Guard Rail.......................................................................................................................... 14 D. Speed Bumps.................................................................................................................... 15 E. Parking.............................................................................................................................. 15 F. Historical Markers............................................................................................................. 15 Page 12 1.01 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose This Roadway Policy has been adopted by Commissioners Court to put standards in place by which roadways and right of way in unincorporated Collin County are maintained. Commissioners Court reserves the right to amend any portion of this court order as deemed necessary and/or when required by changes in the law of Texas, state statutes or transportation codes. B. Applicability This Policy applies to roadways within Collin County that are located outside of the corporate limits of a municipality. Additionally, this policy may exclude areas within Collin County that are located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of a municipality, provided that an ETJ has been established by the municipality and the municipality has entered into a written interlocal agreement with the County that identifies the municipality as the entity authorized to maintain roadways and rights of way within their respective ETJ. Collin County will not be responsible for any damage caused by County crews to any facility installed that is not in compliance with this Policy. Any extenuating circumstances not covered under this Policy shall be brought to the attention of Commissioners Court for consideration. 1.02 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Policy, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein. Definitions not expressly prescribed herein are to be determined in accordance with customary usage in planning and engineering practice. The word "shall" is mandatory and the word "may" is permissive. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) - An association of state highway and transportation officials. BUSINESS DAY — the days of the week when County offices are normally open (excludes official holidays and weekends). Collin County holidays may be found online at: https://www.collincountvtx.gov/government/Pages/Holidays.aspx COLLIN COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM — Any roadway maintained by Collin County Public Works. COMMISSIONERS COURT —The Commissioners Court of Collin County. COUNTY — Collin County, Texas. COUNTY CLERK — the County Clerk of Collin County. COUNTY ROADWAY — a public roadway under the control and maintenance of the Page 13 County. DEDICATION — the appropriation of land, or an easement therein, by an Owner, for the use of the public and accepted for such use by or on the behalf of the public. DEVELOPER — any person, partnership, firm association, corporation (or combination thereof), or any officer, agent, employee, servant or trustee thereof, who performs or participates in the performing of any act toward the development of a subdivision, within the intent, scope and purview of the Collin County Subdivision Regulations. DEVELOPMENT — all land modification activity, including grading or construction of buildings, roadways, parking lots and/or other impervious structures or surfaces. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS —where used in this Policy, "Director of Public Works" shall mean the Collin County Director of Public Works and his/her authorized and/or appointed representatives. EASEMENT— an area for restricted use on private property upon which a public or private utility/entity/HOA or Lot Owner responsible for maintenance shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs or other improvements or growth which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance and/or efficiency of its respective systems on or within any of these easements. ENGINEER — a person licensed under the provisions of the Texas Engineering Registration Act to practice the profession of engineering in the State of Texas. EXISTING ROADWAYS — roadways that have been constructed and are in place prior to the passage of this Policy. EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION (ETJ) — the unincorporated land area, not a part of any city, which is contiguous to the corporate limits, as defined in Local Government Code, Chapter 42. FACILITY - any permanent or temporary non -County owned improvement placed within the right of way. Such facilities may involve underground, surface, or overhead facilities, either singularly or in combination. (Accessories are any attachments, appurtenances, or integral parts of the facility such as fire hydrants, valves, gas regulators, etc.). FINAL ACCEPTANCE — formal acceptance by order of the Collin County Commissioners Court. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION — an organized, non-profit corporation with mandatory membership when property is purchased. INCORPORATED AREA — See Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (ILA) — A written contract between local government agencies. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS — Minimum acceptable requirements; such requirements may be modified by the Director of Public Works as may be necessary to protect the public Page 14 health, safety, and welfare. OWNER — the Owner of the parent tract or lot of record. PUBLIC WORKS — Collin County Public Works. RESIDENT — a person who lives somewhere permanently or on a long-term basis. RIGHT OF WAY — a parcel of land that is occupied or intended to be occupied, by a roadway or alley. Where appropriate, "right of way" may include other facilities and/or utilities such as sidewalks; railroad crossings; and/or electrical, telecommunication, oil, gas, water, sanitary sewer and/or storm sewer facilities. The term "right of way" shall also include parkways and medians which are located outside of the actual pavement. The usage of the term "right of way" for land platting purposes shall mean that every public right of way hereafter established and shown on a final plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right of way and shall not be included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. The right of way is the distance between property lines measured at right angles to the centerline of the roadway or alley. ROADWAY — a paved right of way (or easement), whether public or private and however designated, which provides vehicular access to adjacent land and/or connection to other roadways or highways. SUBDIVISION — the division of a tract of land situated within Collin County and outside the corporate limits of any municipality into two (2) or more lots, parcels or tracts for the purpose of sale or development, or for the purpose of laying out roadways, alleys, squares, parks, public utility easements, public rights of way, private ingress/egress easements, drainage or stormwater improvements, or other parts of the tract intended to be dedicated for public use or for the use of purchasers or owners of lots or parcels fronting on or adjacent to such facilities. TAA— a Temporary Access Agreement between Collin County and property owner. TEXAS MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (TMUTCD) - The most recent edition, including any additions or corrections, of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. THOROUGHFARE - a principle traffic artery, carrying higher volumes of traffic, more or less continuously, which is intended to connect remote parts of the area adjacent thereto and to act as a principle connecting roadway with state highways. THOROUGHFARE PLAN — the most recently adopted Collin County Thoroughfare Plan https://www.collincountytx.gov/mobility/Documents/CCThoroughfarePlan.pdf Page 1 5 1.03 EXISTING ROADWAYS— MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES Only public roadways that have been determined by Commissioners Court to be approved County Roads shall be maintained at County expense by Public Works. The County shall not maintain U.S. Highways, state roadways, private roadways, and other roadways or sections of a roadway within the city limits of an incorporated city. A. Roadways within an Incorporated Area or within a City 1. Each city within Collin County is responsible for maintaining the bridges and roadways within their city limits. 2. Commissioners Court may consider making or participating in general maintenance items including rocking, grading, asphalt, leveling, seal coating, oiling for dust control, installation of culverts, warning signs, cleaning of drainage ditches, mowing or brush cutting and emergency repairs to bridges. 3. The following requirements must be met before Public Works can perform maintenance within an incorporated area or within city limits: a. An Interlocal Agreement (ILA) must be presented to and approved by Commissioners Court. This currently executed ILA must be on file with the County. b. Commissioners Court has granted approval of maintenance request(s). c. Schedule will be set forth by Public Works and will be dependent upon the work schedule of County crews. d. Emergency requests will be evaluated by Commissioners Court based upon the merits presented by the requesting city. Commissioners Court authorization is required for work performed within incorporated Cities. B. Roadways adjacent to a City 1. Roads or sections of roadways bordered by a city or cities may be maintained at County expense as follows: a. A portion of a public roadway adjacent to property that has been annexed by a city or cities before 2015, from the centerline of the roadway to the edge of the roadway on the opposite side from the City, may be maintained at County expense. The city's responsibility for maintenance of the roadway shall extend to the centerline of the roadway. b. Any portion of a public roadway adjacent to property that has been annexed by a city or cities after 2015, shall not be maintained at County expense. The city's responsibility for maintenance of the roadway shall extend to the entire roadway. c. Any portion of a public roadway that is bordered by a city or cities on both sides will be considered to lie entirely within an Incorporated Area and shall Page 16 not be maintained at County expense. C. Roadways within a Subdivision 1. Maintenance of roadways in a Subdivision shall be performed by the Developer or Homeowners Association until roadways have been approved for County maintenance by Commissioners Court. See Collin County Subdivision Regulations for further information. D. Abandonment of County Roads 1. The Commissioners Court, by unanimous vote, may abandon a County roadway upon following specific procedures as required by Vernon's Civil Statues and the Texas Transportation Code Section 251.057. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/TN/htm/TN.251.htm#251.057 2. In order for the public to request the relinquishment of the public's right of way and use of a roadway, the following conditions must be met: a. Petition and Notice signed by eight (8) freeholders of land in the Commissioners' Precinct where the roadway is located is required to abandon a roadway. b. Original signatures are needed on three (3) copies of both the Notice and Petition. c. Signatures should be exactly as name appears on tax roll. d. The roadway and its location should be described on the Notice and Petition prior to signatures being obtained. e. Twenty (20) days public notice posted at the County Courthouse and along the subject roadway is required before Commissioners Court can consider taking action to abandon a roadway. Collin County will post the Notice at these locations upon verification of signatures. f. Unanimous consent of Commissioners Court is required to abandon a roadway. g. In some instances, as required by law, Collin County shall be compensated for the abandonment of right of way. 1.04 EXISTING ROADWAYS— MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE A. Roadway Oiling — Residents with Respiratory Conditions 1. The County will oil a 500-foot portion of a County rock roadway for dust control in front of a resident's house whereas: a. The resident has a chronic respiratory condition. b. The condition is documented by a Medical Doctor (MD). Page 1 7 c. The County's Application for Dust Control Oiling is signed by a doctor and submitted once each 36 months or 3 years. d. Application for Dust Control Oiling due to chronic respiratory condition is available by calling Public Works (972-548-3700) and requesting an application. This form can be returned by mail to: Public Works, 700 A. West Wilmeth Road, McKinney, Texas, 75069 (or faxed to (972) 548-3754). Residents may also print the form from the Public Works webpage at: https://www.collincountytx.gov/public works/road bridge/Documents/Heal thLetter.pdf 2. If the house is located at a roadway intersection the roadway will be oiled 500- feet in both directions from the intersection. 3. Road oiling for dust control will be performed one time each year and only between Mid -March and early October. B. Roadway Oiling — Cemetery Locations 1. The County will oil 500 feet of a rock roadway in front of a cemetery for dust abatement at no cost, with approved advanced notice as indicated below: a. Public Works receives 48 hours advanced notice of a graveside service date or; b. Public Works receives 10-day advanced notice of the date scheduled for a recognized cemetery "clean up day" C. Roadway Oiling —Additional Applications 1. Routine roadway grading will not warrant additional applications of oil. All additional applications of oil whether health related or otherwise will be at the requestor's expense. 2. When construction causes heavier than normal truck traffic on a rock road the County may, at the discretion of the Director of Public Works, apply oil. 3. All other requests for oiling in unincorporated areas of the County shall be at the requester's expense. Collin County shall be reimbursed for the cost of materials; requestor to call County for cost estimate based on current price. This process will consist of three (3) separate applications per 500 linear feet, typically two applications on a specific day with the remaining application a day or two thereafter. This service will be performed only between the warmer months of Mid -March through Early October. Requests for roadway oiling during the warmer months shall be made no later than September 30 of the year prior. D. Temporary Roadway Closures Requests for Temporary Road Closures shall be made as far in advance as possible, with minimum submittal dates listed below. Late requests may be denied due to not having enough time to evaluate impacts. Page 18 1. Non -Emergency Temporary Road Closure Request: Complete and submit the County's Roadway Closure Request Form at least 72 hours of the proposed closure. This form can be found on the County's website at: https://www.collincountytx.gov/public works/road bridge/Pages/roadclose.aspx The Director of Public Works will review the request and notify the applicant in writing of their decision within 24 hours of the road closure. If approved, County staff will notify affected parties such as USPS, school districts, law enforcement, emergency responder agencies, and adjacent landowners. Applicant is responsible for deploying and retrieving all necessary equipment including barricades, cones, signs, etc. 2. Special Event Temporary Road Closure Request: Complete and submit the County's Roadway Closure Request Form at least 90 days prior to the special event. This form can be found on the County's website at: https://www.collincountytx.gov/public works/road bridge/Pages/roadclose.aspx The Director of Public Works will review the request and notify the applicant in writing of their decision within 14 days of the road closure. The event sponsor shall be responsible for funding any County personnel and equipment provided for traffic control. 3. Emergency Temporary Road Closure Request: In the event of an Emergency Temporary Road Closure, call 972-548-3700 to submit verbal request. Requests will be executed expeditiously by on -duty Public Works staff or on -call staff during non -business hours. Public Works will promptly deploy barricades, cones, and/or other appropriate equipment to the roadway(s). Once the situation is stabilized (flood waters subside, public safety restored, etc.) and the Director of Public Works has communicated approval, Public Works staff will collect all equipment and re -open the roadway(s). E. Mowing/Brush Cutting 1. Public Works will mow all County right of way property as follows: a. Spring/Summer months —Mow all County Roadways one mower width (8' to 12') once per year. b. Fall/Winter months — Mow all County Roadways total right of way width (including fence lines as instructed by the Director of Public Works) once per year. This may include areas between the pavement and fences where fences are outside of the right of way limits. 2. Brush cutting is typically performed during dormant fall and winter (non- growth) months: a. Tree and limb removal by use of hydraulic boom mowers will serve to minimize vehicle damage from overhanging limbs/brush and improve vehicle/driver line of sight. Branches over the roadway will be trimmed to provide 18' of vertical Page 19 clearance, while branches outside the roadway but within the right of way will be trimmed to a height of 14' vertical clearance. b. Hand cutting and pruning is completed as manpower and scheduling permit. Requests for hand cutting are handled and approved on a case by case basis. 3. Brush and vegetation will be cut anywhere necessary to maintain adequate line of sight on roadways. F. Herbicide Application 1. Public Works will treat all County right of way 2 times per year with contact herbicide at required or allowable rates. This includes facility obstructions (i.e. fire hydrants, water valves, guardrails, pole guy wires, phone pedestals, etc.) to improve visibility of object. 2. All asphalt roadway shoulders are treated with herbicides. 3. Residents and business owners may request that the County not spray the right of way adjacent to their property by calling 972-548-3700. The resident or business owner accepts responsibility for maintaining the right of way according to this Roadway Policy. Non -spray requests may be denied based on the following conditions: a. Where roadway shoulder vegetation encroachment has caused or shows the potential to cause damage to the roadway surface. b. Where herbicide treatment of facility obstructions poses a liability to County maintenance. c. Line of sight and visibility issues. d. Any other condition as deemed by the Director of Public Works. G. Inspections 1. Inspection of County -maintained asphalt and concrete roadways will be conducted on a schedule to be determined by the Director of Public Works. 2. Inspection of city roadways will be conducted as per parameters set forth in the ILA. If inspection parameters are not defined in the ILA, inspections will be conducted on a schedule determined by the Director of Public Works. 3. Inspection of subdivision roadways will be conducted prior to County takeover of maintenance as per Collin County Subdivision Regulations. 4. Additional inspections will be performed as determined by the Director of Public Works. Inspection results will be used as a guide to determine budget and repair/maintenance requirements. 1.05 EXISTING ROADWAYS - IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to Roadways Within City Limits Page 1 10 1. Commissioners Court may consider performing or participating in improvements to roads and bridges within the corporate limits of a city. These improvements include but are not limited to general maintenance items including rocking, grading, asphalt, leveling, seal coating, oiling for dust control, installation of culverts, warning signs, cleaning of drainage ditches, mowing or brush cutting and emergency repairs to bridges. The following requirements must be met before Public Works can perform improvements within city limits: a. An Interlocal Agreement (ILA) must be presented to and approved by Commissioners Court. This currently executed ILA must be on file with the County. b. Schedule will be set forth by Public Works and will be dependent upon the work schedule of County crews. c. Emergency requests will be evaluated by Commissioners Court based upon the merits presented by the requesting city. Commissioners Court authorization is required for work performed within incorporated Cities. B. Major Improvements to Roadways Within City Limits 1. Major improvements such as the construction or reconstruction of roadways will be considered on a case by case basis. 2. All major improvement requests must be submitted in letter format to the Director of Public Works by April 1st of the year prior to the year improvements are anticipated. C. Reimbursement for Work Performed by Public Works 1. Prior to beginning any improvements, the city shall make reimbursement arrangements. If the city is unable to reimburse for the full amount, the city may petition Commissioners Court for a payment schedule including interest. A cost matrix for roadway and bridge repair costs shall be approved by Commissioners Court. The fee schedule shall be reviewed annually or as directed by the Director of Public Works. 2. Reimbursement costs for roadway and bridge repairs or improvements will be as per the Collin County Cost Matrix. The Collin County Cost Matrix for Cities can be found here: https://www.collincountVtx.gov/public works/road bridge/Pages/cost matrix.aspx and is subject to change. Any deviation from this cost matrix must be approved by Commissioners Court. 1.06 COUNTY ROADWAY FEATURES AND ADJACENT AREAS A. Right of Way Page 1 11 1. Right of ways h a I I be donated by transfer of title, easement, or purchased through negotiations and/or eminent domain proceedings. Property owners have the option to donate the same by transfer of title. Public Works does not purchase right of way or utilize condemnation for any roadway improvement. The requested right of way must be acquired prior to the commencement of the project. 2. The minimum right of way width for road projects performed by Public Works shall be 40 ft. The County may require right of way wider than the minimum where it is determined that the existing width and drainage are not adequate for roadway improvements. 3. The required right of way width for subdivision roadways shall be as shown in the Collin County Subdivision Regulations. 4. County right of way shall be kept clear of trees and brush. Collin County has the right to exercise a right of way easement to prevent the planting of trees and shrubs in the right of way and to remove or cause to be removed trees or shrubs growing there by Court Order 2010-722-09-13. 5. An easement will establish the right of the County to enter onto a property in order to perform necessary work but shall not establish the responsibility to do SO. 6. No work may occur in County right of way or easement without obtaining a permit from the County prior to beginning work. See Collin County Right of Way Use Policy for more information. B. Temporary Access Agreement 1. The County may propose to enter into a Temporary Access Agreement (TAA) with the Owner in the event that private property will be needed for roadway improvements. A TAA could grant the County the ability to use private property for the following: a. Parking of County vehicles or equipment b. Stockpile, burn, or chip debris or dirt c. Any other access as approved by the Director of Public Works 2. TAA's that are required in order to place permanent improvements on private property require Commissioners Court approval. 3. The County shall, at its expense, restore private property to substantially the same appearance as previously existed following the expiration of the TAA. 4. A TAA may be used in lieu of a permanent easement to perform minimally intrusive work as part of a right of way issue. C. Reimbursement by Property Owners Page 1 12 1. Upon Commissioners Court approval of roadway maintenance or improvements requiring reimbursement from the adjacent property owner, the required amount of money shall be placed in a non -interest bearing escrow account at a bank located within Collin County. 2. Reimbursement amount may include the cost involved for surveying, preparation of Deed or Easement, re -location of fences, facilities (if in a dedicated easement), culverts or other existing improvements. When property owners are required to incur total cost for the upgrade of a roadway, the above cost shall not be borne by Collin County. D. Fencing/Gates 1. Fences installed inside the right of way will be removed at Owner's expense. 2. Right of way obtained as required for roadway improvements may require an existing fence to be removed. The existing fence will be removed and replaced with a fence of the same size and material at County expense. The new fence will be placed at the property line adjacent to the roadway frontage. Existing gates will be reused and re -hung. 3. Reimbursement for any changes to an existing fence is subject to approval by Director of Public Works and authorization by Commissioners Court. 4. All negotiations regarding fence replacement must be completed prior to right of way easement return to Public Works for recording at the Collin County Clerk's Office. 5. Temporary electric fencing, if warranted, will be provided, installed, maintained, and removed by Collin County as related to any roadway improvement project. E. Mail Boxes 1. Mailboxes and their installation in County right of way shall meet specifications found in both the Texas Department of Transportation Regulations and United States Postal Service Regulations. Further information can be found here: https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/maintenance/mail boxes. htmI https://www.usps.com/manage/maiIboxes.htm 2. Installation of brick/masonry/ornamental metal or other mailboxes that do not conform to these regulations are prohibited inside the right of way. 3. In the event that an existing mailbox is damaged by Public Works crews, the County will replace the damaged mailbox with a standard United States Postal Service approved mailbox on a light weight bendable or break -away pole, regardless of the original construction design. 4. Roadway maintenance or improvements may require the relocation of existing mailboxes within the County right of way. Page 1 13 F. Roadway Drainage and Driveway Culverts Refer to Collin County Drainage Design Manual. 1.07 MISCELLANEOUS A. Signs 1. For installation of regulatory, warning signs and other traffic control devices, Public Works utilizes the most recently adopted versions of the FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the TxDOT Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). 2. Commissioners Court Order Number 2002-247-04-08 Section B was amended regarding signage (both Regulatory and warning) placed adjacent to County roadways November 9th, 2004 to read as follows: a. All roadway signs shall meet the specifications of Public Works. Private roadway signs are the responsibility of the property owner. The property owner shall pay for fabrication and installation, and any necessary future maintenance of the sign. All signs must meet Collin County standards. b. Collin County does not authorize the use or installation any private signs on County Road right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: i. Business Advertisements ii. Real estate signs (house for sale, open house, etc.) iii. Personal signs (garage sale, puppies for sale, etc.) iv. Political signs In addition it has been proven in courts of law throughout the country that the below signs provide a false sense of security to those the signs are intended to benefit. As such, these signs become a liability. Additional signs not allowed on County roadways or their respective right of way include but are not limited to the following: v. Children At Play vi. Watch For Children vii. Cattle Crossing viii. Deaf Child B. Striping 1. The Director of Public Works will determine if a roadway requires striping. 2. Roadway striping shall be installed as per the most recently adopted versions of the FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the TxDOT Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). C. Guard Rail Page 1 14 1. Requests for guardrail installation to be performed by the County are considered on a case -by -case basis. Determining factors for installation depend upon traffic studies, evaluation of the area requested, and availability of applicable warning signs in lieu of guardrail. D. Speed Bumps 1. Speed bumps are not allowed on any County roadway. E. Parking 1. Parking is not allowed within County right of way unless the roadway is designed to include a parking lane. F. Historical Markers 1. Historic persons must be deceased for at least 10 years in order to qualify, unless they are of statewide or national significance. Historic events that changed the course of state or local history must have occurred at least 30 years ago. Most other topics, including institutions, organizations and businesses must date back to at least 50 years in order to qualify. For the Recorded Texas Historic Landmark designation, buildings and structures need to be at least 50 years of age. The topic must also have demonstrated historical significance and, in the case of buildings and structures, possess architectural significance as well. 2. Collin County must receive a written request detailing the historical site and marker specifications and logistics. A request must be made and placed on Commissioners Court. Upon receipt of a signed Court Order, the Marker can be made or received and placed at the site. G. Inclement Weather 1. County forces will apply sand at the discretion of the Director of Public Works. Page 1 15 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lila'i7►1'.vin, City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Lauren Mecke Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to rezone 26.2± acres on the east side of County Road 419, 370± feet north of E. Foster Crossing Road from SF-E Single -Family Residential — Large Lot to 1-2 Heavy Industrial with Specific Use Permit for a permanent concrete, asphalt batching plant. (Planning Manager Lauren Mecke) SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property to Heavy Industrial District (I- 2) with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a permanent concrete batching plant. An SUP application shall be evaluated as to its probable effect on the adjacent property and the community welfare and may be approved or denied as the findings indicate appropriate with regard to the health, safety and welfare of the general public. History On April 14, 2015 the City of Anna incorporated the land area associated with the current zoning request into the city limits. The existing land use at the time of incorporation was a concrete batching plant. Subsection (a) of Section 9.04.006 (Annexed territory) within the Zoning Ordinance states: All territory hereafter annexed to the city shall be temporarily classified as SF-E Single - Family Residential - Large Lot District until permanent zoning is established by the city council. The procedure for establishing permanent zoning on annexed territory shall conform to the procedure established by law for the adoption of the original zoning regulations. North RV Park and Vacant Land, both located in the ETJ East Electric Substation zoned SF-E South Concrete batch plant zoned SF-E & located in the ETJ Nest Vacant land located in the ETJ Land Use - The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to allow for the continued operation of the existing concrete batch plant. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan - The Future Land Use Plan identifies the subject property as Manufacturing and Warehouse. Manufacturing and Warehouse areas provide basic jobs and keep people in the city during different working hours. SUMMARY: The applicant has indicated that site improvements are needed in order for the existing operations to be brought in compliance with requirements of the Texas Commission on Environment Quality (TCEQ). However, the zoning ordinance states that no permit for construction of a building or use of land shall be issued other than a permit which will allow construction of a building permitted in SF-E districts unless and until such territory has been classified in a zoning district other than a Single -Family Residential - Large Lot District. The applicant has submitted a Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Lighting Plan with the zoning and will submit a Plat to bring the entire property up to city standards (i.e. zoning, landscaping requirements, design standards, etc.) and meet TCEQ requirements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 1: Growing Anna Economy Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Burnco Zoning Locator Map 2. Ordinance (Zoning) Burnco Addn, BL A, Lt 1 3. Exhibit 1 Zoning Exhibit & Description 4. Exhibit 2 (SP) Burnco /_1»:Z6I%1It-Is Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Approved - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 i r oning • p z• '� i /j AXJLL-ZJ MA& 5 e /� CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS (Property zoned under this ordinance is generally located on the east side of County Road 419, 370± feet north of E. Foster Crossing Road) 101N111LI1_1LI Is] =11111'1:011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING MAP, AND ZONING ORDINANCE AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, REPEALING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 OR THE HIGHEST PENALTY AMOUNT ALLOWED BY LAW, WHICHEVER IS LESS; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing the zoning in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has received a requested zoning amendment from Tricycle Lane Texas, LLC / Burnco Texas, LLC on Property described in Exhibit 1 ("Property") attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, said Property generally located on the east side of County Road 419, 370± feet north of E. Foster Crossing Road being rezoned from SF-E Single -Family Residential — Large Lot to I- 2 Heavy Industrial with Specific Use Permit for a permanent concrete, asphalt batching plant; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City and the City Council of the City of Anna ("City Council") have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise and have held the public hearings as required by law and afforded a full and fair hearing to all property owners and generally to all persons interested in and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the City Council has concluded that the Zoning Ordinance of the City should be amended as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Section 2. Zoning Change The Anna City Code of Ordinances are hereby amended by changing the zoning of the Property described in Exhibit 1 (Property Description) and as depicted in the Site Plan on the attached Exhibit 2 from SF-E Single -Family Residential - Large Lot to 1-2 Heavy Industrial District zoning with a Specific Use Permit for a permanent concrete batching plant. Section 3. Official Zoning Map The official Zoning Map of the City shall be corrected to reflect the change in zoning described herein. Section 4. Savings, Repealing and Severability Clauses It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, and provisions of this ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, or provision of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or inapplicable by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality, invalidity or inapplicability shall not affect any of the remaining words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional, invalid or inapplicable words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions. Further, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are consistent and do not conflict with the terms and provisions of this ordinance are hereby ratified to the extent of such consistency and lack of conflict, and all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms and provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed only to the extent of any such conflict. Notwithstanding any provision of this ordinance or the Anna Code, it is intended that this ordinance fully comply with Chapter 3000 of the Texas Government Code ("Chapter 3000") and this ordinance shall and the City Code shall be interpreted in a manner to comply with Chapter 3000. For the purposes of this ordinance, any provision of the City Code that does not comply with Chapter 3000 shall be deemed to have been excluded and not a part of this ordinance. Section 5. Penalty Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each day a violation exists is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. Section 6. Publication of the Caption and Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the City Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to implement such posting and/or publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas this 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary APPROVED: Nate Pike, Mayor 2 T Fm m LL O x LU POINT OF INTEREST (9636 CO ROAD 419 I N ANNA, TX) / ANNA r i VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ANNA CITY LIMITS ROAD (CR OR HWY) PROPERTY LINE ANNA PARCELS PROPOSED ALIGNMENT _______ OFCR419 E. FOSTER CROSSING ROAD PROPOSED 90' WIDE ALIGNMENT OF COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 419 (FINAL ALIGNMENT TBD) CEDACEDA=-DOW DR ENOX WILLIAM 11.74 ACRES GUINN MORRISON SURVEY ABS A0559 KEITH LANE JOHNDROE S GRAYSON - G III TRUSTEE COLLIN 1845800 ELECTRIC 0 14.304 ACRES COOPERATIVE/ GUINN INC. /z MORRISON 15 August 2005/ /0 1 SURVEY 20050113535/ / ! ABS A0559 I II� CREEKSIDE ACRES PHASE II "APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CASE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY ASSOCIATED STUDY, PLAT, OR PLAN, APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOWN HEREON, OR THE INITIATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON STUDIES, PLATS, OR PLANS RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACTION SEPARATE FROM ACTION TAKEN ON THIS ZONING CASE." l�CREEKSIDE ACRES PHASE iI I I LU o �� I a >t / / COUNTY _ ROAD 419 rn r}- z 0 0 SITE DATA: ® = SUBJECT PROPERTY LOT AREA: 1,141,263.69 SF (26.200 ACRES) ZONING FROM: "SF-E" (SINGLE -FAMILY -LARGE LOT) EXISTING LAND USE: EXISTING CONC. BATCH PLANT ZONING TO: "HI-2" HEAVY INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: CONCRETE BATCH PLANT BY SUP LOCATION: INSIDE ANNA CITY LIMITS PROPERTY ID: 2734347 GEOGRAPHIC TAX ID: P-9000-216-1183-1 MARK E LOVVORN & LYNN CRAFT 1008411 178.71 ACRES GUINN MORRISON SURVEY ABS A0559 /7777, TRICYLE LANE TEXAS, LLC, 01 October 2014 20141001001073580 26.200 ACRES HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY, Abst. No.30 GOPLIN LAND COMPANY LLC 1 1096316 29.639 ACRES HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY ABS A0030 wmmmmmmm� � Q-mmmmwmmm� � j NICID, LTD. 09 February 2007 20070209000191740 E. OUTER LOOP ROAD DRAWING LIST TABLE DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING TITLE REVISION DATE REVISION# ZE-1 ZONING EXHIBIT 6/15/2022 0 ZE-2 SPEC IALWARRANTY DEED 6/15/2022 0 ZE-3 EXHIBITA 6/15/2022 O TAOMASA EYEDVGTION, JR. ELECTRONIC SEAL DATE: 06/15/2022 EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. F-8189 ZONING EXHIBIT BURNCO TEXAS LLC DEVELOPMENT PLAT HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY SHEET 1, TRACT 38, Abst. No. 30 EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (EEi) BURNCO T ER, L.C. EXASUTILIZED ENGINEER; EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. SURVEYING DATA PREPARED BY COX LAND SURVEYING 9636 COUNTRY ROAD 419 THOMAS A. P.E. CO., JOB #14-10370 TO PREPARE THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE ANNA, TX 75049 3912 JULWN STSUITE 100 .SUI, KELLER, TEXAS 76244 PURPOSES OF THE CITY OF ANNA CONTACT: PAUL ROUSE EMAIL: PAUL.ROUSEDBURNCO.COM CELL: 817-368-0750 PHONE: 972-893-6070 OFFICE: 817-382-6846 TBPE FIRM No. F-8189 Z} °10 N 0w Uj oo� O W W p o. w U W U W IJII K G �o W 0 zy ..I z ' n ° �mq W O d V m y icy zw�LL mW OI" aWI'm � a a, r 0 ; '.4W aawl ZW W W Wl,T 09 y Z y c�1 °� J=w w° _� � wyC w aa3 J EL awe Wa H2 rn 0 v rn ti UvX J q(60 I X Z 0 �z0 O z0J N w co 0 :) m 0 ED Q z z Q ZE-1 Of, No. 14- 1 82758-MfO &DPRASA_QFAN1_QRETQ-., LL9N_T Tricycle Lane Texas, LLC P.O. Box 590 Roanoke, TX 76262 I I OWN R1 pqqlql IN STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF COLLIN That THE NICID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, whether one or more, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N011 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) cash in hand to Grantor paid by TRICYCLE LANE TEXAS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herebyalso acknowledged, HAVE GRANTED, SOLD ANTI CONVEYED and do by these presents GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto the said Grantee all the following described real property ("Property'), to -wit: SEE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ALL PURPOSES. This conveyance is made and accepted subject to validly existing easements, rights -of -way, and prescriptive rights, whether of record or not; all presently recorded and validly existing restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions, oil and gas leases, mineral interests outstanding in persons other than Grantor, and other instruments, other than conveyances of the surface fee estate, that affect the Property; validly existing rights of adjoining owners in any walls and fences situated on a common boundary; any discrepancies, conflicts, or shortages in area or boundary lines; any encroachments or overlapping of improvements. (00M. WAWtM DMA, htc I uw"Q.xx�va,, "APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CASE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY ASSOCIATED STUDY, PLAT, OR PLAN, APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOWN HEREON, OR THE INITIATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON STUDIES, PLATS, OR PLANS RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACTION SEPARATE FROM ACTION TAKEN ON THIS ZONING CASE." TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with fill and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging unto the said Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, And Grantor does hereby bind Grantor, Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said promises unto the said Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the Same or any part thereof by through or under Grantor, but not otherwise. Current ad valorem taxes on said Property have been prorated and the payment thereof is assumed by the Grantee. EXECUTED on the dates of the acknowledgments get out below, to be effective, however, on the 29" (lay of September, 2014. THE NICID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership By: Nicid N;1aw'r riq Inc, ge p etner 1611, M. FIELD, PRESIDENT STATE OFTEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN This instrument was acknowledged before me cni the day of September, 2014, by JOEL M. FIELD, PRESIDENT of Nicid Managment, Inc, general partner of THE NICID LIMITED PARTNERSI 1111, a Texas limited partnership. TWOTHY RSD MAILLIAMS Notary pubjjc— -----_--- STATE OF TEXAS Notary Public, State of Texas Mewll,LIAMS & THOMPSON 2'7I3VwSinmPk.y,5ic.100 Md,n,cy,Toxto 75010 - 'ITIA; WAftqAsTyWTDj--M1. ZONING EXHIBIT BURNCO TEXAS LLC DEVELOPMENT PLAT HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY SHEET 1, TRACT 38, Abst. No. 30 EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (EEi) OWNER, ENGINEER, EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. UTILIZED SURVEYING DATA PREPARED BY COX LAND SURVEYING BURNCO TEXAS, L.L.C. 9636 COUNTRY ROAD 419 THOMAS A. EYEINGTON, P.E. CO., JOB #14-10370 TO PREPARE THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE ANNA, TX 75049 3912 JULIAN ST. SUITE 100 KELLER, TEXAS 76244 PURPOSES OF THE CITY OF ANNA CONTACT: PAUL ROUSE EMAIL: PAUL.ROUSEOBURNCO.COM CELL: 817-368-0750 PHONE: 972-893-6070 OFFICE: B17-382-6846 TBPE FIRM No. F-8189 R z U) z 2 PQ 0 g q O U), SIN z E! Vim Frj z a n 6 >4 z re R ws Lu Lu z-. PH Z. iL IL WM M m O XM LU 1�'�,�ra�iwra� )rt-)szyst.�tni FAIIittt C "A" All that certain tractor parcel of Iand situated in the Hiram Brinlec Survey, Abstract Number 30 , County of Collin, State of Texas, said tract being part of a tract as described in Deed to NICID, LTD., filed 09 February 2007, and Recorded in County Clerks Number 20070209000191740 of the Deed Records of the County of Collin, State of Texas, and being more fully described as follows: Beginning for the northwest comer of the tract being described herein at a found Y, inch Steel Rebar, said rebar being the northwest comer of said NICID tract, and being at a turn In Collin County Road Number 419 (an asphalt surfaced road); Thence: South 88 degrees 42 minutes 08 seconds East, with the north line of said NICID tract, and in said road part of the way, a distance of 867.85 feet to a wood fence corner post for a comer of this tract; Thence. South 88 degrees 16 minutes 32 seconds East, with the north line of said NICID tract, a distance of 689.02 feet to a found 1/2 inch Steel Rebar for the northeast corner of this tract, and the northeast corner of said NICID tract; Tbcnce: South, with the east line of said NICID tract, a distance of 749.82 feet to a set'I inch Steel Square tubing for the southeast corner of this tract, Thence: North 86 degrees 20 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 1453.41 feet to it Hockberry Tree for a corner of tract; Thence: South 88 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds West, passing at 144.61 a pipe fence corner post and continuing on said course for a total distance of 156,34 feet to a set 112 inch Steel Square tubing for the southwest corner of this tract, and being on the west line of said NICID tract, said tubing also being on the cast side of said road; Thence, North 04 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds East, with the west line of said NICID tract, and in said road, a distance of 704.28 feet to the P€DIN`l' OF BEGINNING and containing 26.200 acres of land, "APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CASE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY ASSOCIATED STUDY, PLAT, OR PLAN, APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOWN HEREON, OR THE INITIATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON STUDIES, PLATS, OR PLANS RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACTION SEPARATE FROM ACTION TAKEN ON THIS ZONING CASE." s:11md and Reoardad OP i:a)ai puRl Aa Reaardx SS acey Kapp: Ca4n:k CAark Capin CounAY. T£Xp5 t07011.14 41:49 19 act Lan 00 CF`d01ER 20t41001001013n9tl 7t',.w,F,dl�G���j N�t ZONING EXHIBIT BURNCO TEXAS LLC DEVELOPMENT PLAT HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY SHEET 1, TRACT 38, Abst. No. 30 EYEINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (EEi) BURNCO TEXAS L.L.C.EYEINGTON ENGINEER: ENTERPRISES, INC. UTILIZED SURVEYING DATA PREPARED BY COX LAND SURVEYING 9636 COUNTRY ROAD 419 HOMAS A. EY P.E. CO., JOB #14-10370 TO PREPARE THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE ANNA, TX 75049 3 T. SUIT 912 JULIAN STSURE 100 KELLER, TEXAS 76244 PURPOSES OF THE CITY OF ANNA CONTACT: PAUL ROUSE EMAIL: PAUL.ROUSEOBURNCO.COM CELL: 8 0750 PHONE: 972-893-6070 OFFICE: 17-38 —684 M No. F-8189 TBPE FIRM No. F-8189 0 w z 0 O z W w H U a! O uj O W Q J a' N N z 0 w 0 0 0 a tr U 0 Z N IN F 0 H 9 riJ � a U FO z r se E~ AGo wz 09 z W apa W F z� o >4z Wig aga W W w;'g ��^ ? w y Nau z K 0 Z J u 2 Lao • o wy� ` w W J Ga0 Wa a 0 O O t O L0 _ 1` J x Q }} U o Z Uj I OU O::)Z UO::i Z U J W(a0 AMU m a) Q z z Q ZE-3 OIIE�� GRAYSON COLLIN PP FIP ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. 15 AUGUST 2005 20050113535 Q COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 413 PROPOSED 90' WIDE ALIGNMENT OF ' ' MARK E LO'dVORN & LYNN CRAFT ASPHALT SURFACED ROAD COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 419 PP 1008411 178.71 ACRES PP P��P/ Z' (FINAL ALIGNMENT TBD) dll � GUINN MORRISON SURVEY p+� OHE OHE� OHE- HE- OHE-- OH£ 'OHE PIP OHE-- OHE� PP PP /`- ABS A0559 POB y_ �, OHE—�- QHE-- ❑r�� j — S 88-42'08" E 867.85' �r f x XX ' -xx x� x WFCP 4 (r ! E ONE f �OHE— OHE RKE HE- � PFCP C56 — PP 657 E)F- OHE-- OHE— OHE— ONE— OHE-- 01iE— OHE OHE--OHE Q OHE O1 METAL ELECTRICAL TOWER Texas Power & Lighto 658 ROW Easement {8.312 Ar.j o yys Vol, 1326 Pg- 252 p.R- N z o 4 QIiE—�or�E OHE— OHE-- OHE— OHE— ONE E— OHE— [230' Wide] pHE� OxE� OHE OHE— pHE— py aHE— EXISTING FUEL ISLAND s60, L¢L Z W rn+ -.� 0 a / Z r �1 EXISTING- 1rj j 500KV PAD O + I MOUNT XFMR 1 O ,EXISTING ' GREEN ' SPACE Pw Pw iI ' I ! 36 FRONT ba I YARD ° I SETBACK 1 ' 1 3 ff ' x f� ' �P +CP B64 HB TREE rr SIM S 88,06-42" W 6s3 .73' 158.34' s58 f J 658 1657 s58 - --------------- OME— Of ,xl 6, / / NEW BARB WIRE Lu / FENCE SECTION Z)-- DIir: E OHE EXISTING 660 a EXIST. SITE MAJOR CONTOUR ELEV. —659— = EXIST. SITE MINOR CONTOUR ELEV. PP ■ = EXIST. POWER POLE OSSF AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEM WI30' IRRIGATION ROTORS = EXIST. DOMESTIC WATER METER = LIGHT POLE WICCTV CAMERA {� = EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT POB = POINT OF BEGINNING PFCP Q = EXIST. PROPERTY FENCE CORNER POST WFCP ❑ = EXIST. WIRE FENCE CORNER POST SIP Q = SET IRON POST FIP ❑ = FOUND IRON POST & = EXIST. ATT PEDESTAL © = EXIST. ATT UIGRND 662 ss' -lE EXISTING EXISTING REPAIR MATERIAL & MAINTENANCE STORAGE FACILITY BUNKERS FUTURE �— S� CONCRETE BATCH PLANT r~ e PP - OHO- G}tE— 9HE— ORE t w � I METAL ELECTRICAL TOWER OHE OHE— HE QFfE— OF Of4E— OHE— OHE-t- OHE OHE-- 0HE - OHE---* OHE- ---------- w m 'o 10 6,5B ' oss *' 1141263.698 SQ. FT. 653 26.200 ACRES A. TRICYCLE LANE TEXAS, LLC, ExlsrlNG 01 OCTOBER 2014 2-STORY '�� 20141001001073580 BATCH I EXISTING VINCE OFFICE HAGAN CONCRETE k BATCH PLANT 0 x — Op* 662 SBA 66D ExISTINGf� 6558 EXISTING RECYCLED DOUBLE C&W WATER COLLECTION PIT SLUMP STAND LULL C. 656 �y5 x x x S5 T x 654 _ x 652 GOPLIN LAND COMPANY LLC � �x x 1096316 29.630 ACRES 652 N $�°20'70" W 53.41, 653 HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY 651 ess ~ ABS A0030 _..- fx--�[x-�.%6g%x x� — . sk8 - x — x = 6" CHAIN LINK FENCE (EXIST.) xx xx-- = BARB WIRE FENCE jEXIST.j --------- = TP&L ROW EASEMENT LINE — OSSf�— OSSF— = OSSF LINE OHE— OHE = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PW PW = PRIVATE WATER LINE W W = EX. WATER LINE —OPw OPW— =OVERHEAD PROCESSED WATER (EXISTING) =PROPOSED 24' FIRE LANE FLAUE ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT STRIPED AS PER IFC 2015 W130'R 221 EXHIBIT 2 Pg. 1 of 2 1-j * CEF)-,� OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60' GRAPHIC SCALE 63 0 30 60 120 APPROVED APPROVED AUGUST 23, 2022 AUGUST 1, 2022 CITY COUNCIL P&Z COMMISSION CITY OF ANNA CITY OF ANNA ELEASED FOR CITY PERMITTING ONLY REV.0 64D m Sod GENERAL SITE NOTES (PRIOR TO CR 419 ALIGNMENT) IMPERVIOUS AREA WITHIN SITE BOUNDARIES: 230.392.43 SF 2Q% PERVIOUS AREA WITHIN SITE BOUNDARIES! 91p 871.26 SF 80% OVERALL LOT AREA: 1 141 263.69 SF 100 k P#:Tgs ass a!i y�r:.••..__... �Il 9636 COUNTY r THOMAS A EYEINGTON, JR. ROAR 419 AhM 1Ewss 75409 ................................ L e'. 90931 d. f UO.4 ..11.1. 1. VI-11 U7'CI.N. JR. ELECTRONIC SEAL DATE- f172A'= EyEINGTON ENTERPRISES, 4NC pA1a9 7.1 E-0)- ONE HE OHE� NEW BARB WIRE FENCE SECTION 4" OHE� OHE - OHE- (�IE-- OHE DHE- OHE- OHF- ONE OHE-- ONE- OHE--- ONE ONE- cl Lu Q� it '0 % PROPOSED 90' WIDE ALIGNMENT OF 6s� 0 r I Xi COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 419 0 F'5". �c��x , (FINAL ALIGNMENT TBD) ❑ I p" 0, F P)- `"� ^ U 7B 3C WIDE CONCRETE _ ---- LL ow DRIVE AND APPROACH (6,123 SF) �+r I o; 0 is 5 /,■� 1 0 N 1 j k _ I s"m WATER AV, LINE -NORTH v 2I 0 COLLIN SU❑ ,p V� x • V 20' I LANDSCAPE ' BUFFER 3 x � , 1 j LANDSCAPING 11 , x ARE 3/4'0 x ' IRRIGATION + SERVICE (PRIVATE) W PW PW PW Pw PW Pw I 0 21 II I I I _ 75 Q Aga. 665�— �� 04 ii 30' WIDE CONCRETE 1 DRIVE AND APPROACH x r (6,672 SF) x jj +� f 664 x x = FENCE xx— xx = BARB WIRE FENCE JEXiST.j _--- — — — — — — - = TP&L ROW EASEMENT LIME oSSF CssF— = OSSF LINE ONE ONE = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PW PW = PRIVATE WATER LINE W = EX. WATER LINE —OPW OPW— =OVERHEAD PROCESSED WATER (EXISTING) =PROPOSED FIRE LANE ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT STRIPED AS PER IFC 2015 W)30'R x- FLAUE V I � -AEROBIC 32 25 FIELD & SPRINKLER HEADS it- DSSf OS ,o L2 FLAUE zi 01 31 `` sn O} ELECTRICAL TOWER ONE ONE- ONE ONE-- ONE ONE- OHE- C 72 EXISTING 660 = EXIST. SITE MAJOR CONTOUR ELEV. —659— = EXIST. SITE MINOR CONTOUR ELEV. QQO OSSF AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEM W130' IRRIGATION ROTORS El = EXIST. DOMESTIC WATER METER If = LIGHT POLE WICCTV CAMERA = EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT ® = EXIST. ATT PEDESTAL © = EXIST. ATT UIGRND I M 455 I1 FLAUE 22 SITE AOORESS W9 Y GR 421 +r ROAD AHNk TEKAS 7541 � HrY M12 V 4. 0 , 0 N S" THICK CONCRETE m ViOi N.T_ Map N.T.S. PAVING 214,383 SO. FT. (NEW & EXISTING) 24'-0" F fl 1- E r IL -18 24'-0" 04 14 - os _ 1141263.698 SCE. FT. os �® ~ 26.200 ACRES 03 29 'a TRICYCLE LANE U. TEXAS, LLC, \ 01 OCTOBER 2014 20141001001073580 mm• FLAUE o ^o f u, ENLARGED SITE PLAN �1 SCALE: V = 30' GRAPHIC SCALE 30 a 15 30 60 2211BA RELEASED FOR CITY PERMITTING ONLY REV.0 1 inc4=30 R. u.. nwr� n�cro�onnu n� a�v�nnu r" i EXHIBIT 2 PARKING REQUIRED EXISTING MAINTENANCE BUILDING 2,400 SF EMSTINO BATCH PLANT OPERATIG'NS BLD13 900 SF TOTALAREA-------------------- 3,3OBSF TOTAL ReQ'D PARKING 1ZO0 SF 6 s s PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD ISTC) SPACES 25 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES 02 TOTAL 27 CONCRETE MB[ER SPACES 24 OV ER-THEROAD (OTR) SPACES 2 TOTAL 26 659 65B 657 g56 SITE DATA OVERALL SITE AREA 230,392.00 SF = 12' x 18' ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE = 9' X 1S- STANDARD (STD) SPACE = 12' X 30' CONCRETE MILER SPACE = 12' X SW OVER -THE -ROAD (OTR) SPACE I DRIVE APPROACH TO A BE RE -CONFIGURED UPCN NEW ALIGNMENT OF CR 419 ADJUST CHAIN LINK FENCE & BARBED WIRE FENCE AS REQUIRED f. ............................ • 'tTHOMAS A. EYEINGTON, JR. THORASA. EYFINGTON, JR. ELECTRONIC SEAL DATE- 07l20Y2022 1 EYEINGTpH ENTEZPROU. INC, THE CITY OF Anna �lil M1 0159Vw.01 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Lauren Mecke AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution regarding Burnco Addition, Block A, Lot 1, Site Plan. (Planning Manager Lauren Mecke) SUMMARY: Concrete Batching Plant (Permanent) on one lot on 26.2± acres located on the east side of County Road 419, 370± feet north of E. Foster Crossing Road. This site plan is associated with a rezoning from SF-E Single -Family — Large Lot to 1-2 Heavy Industrial with Specific Use Permit for a permanent concrete batching plant. The purpose of the site plan is to show existing and proposed site improvements for the concrete batching plant. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 1: Growing Anna Economy Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The site plan is in conformance with the city's Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Burnco Site Plan Locator Map 2. RESOLUTION - (SP) Burnco Addn, BL A, Lt 1 3. Exhibit A - (SP) Burnco stamped APPROVALS: Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Approved - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING BURNCO ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 1, SITE PLAN. WHEREAS, In order to provide for the orderly development of land within the Anna city limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the "City Council") has adopted Article 9.02 ("Subdivision Regulation") and Article 9.04 ("Zoning Ordinance") of the Anna City Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, Tricycle Lane Texas, LLC / Burnco Texas, LLC has submitted an application for the approval of the Burnco Addition, Block A, Lot 1, Site Plan; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Approval of Site Plan The City Council hereby approves the Burnco Addition, Block A, Lot 1, Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 23rd day of August, 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike OIIE�� GRAYSON COLLIN PP FIP ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. 15 AUGUST 2005 20050113535 Q COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 413 PROPOSED 90' WIDE ALIGNMENT OF MARK E LO'dVORN & LYNN CRAFT ASPHALT SURFACED ROAD COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 419 PP 1008411 178.71 ACRES PP P��P/ Z' (FINAL ALIGNMENT TBD) dll � GUINN MORRISON SURVEY OHE- HE- OHE-- OH£ 'OHE PIP OHE-- OHE� PP PP /`- ABS A0559 POB HE `O OHE—■- OHE-- ❑r�' j — S 88-42'08" E 867.85' �r f x xti ' -xx x� x WFCP 4 (r ! E ONE f �OHE— OHE RKE HE- � PFCP C56 — PP 657 E)F- OHE-- OHE— OHE— ONE— OHE-- 01iE— OHE OHE--OHE Q OHE O1 rE- METAL ELECTRICAL TOWER Texas Power & Lighto 658 ROW Easement {8.312 Ar.j o 6yg Vol, 1326 Pg- 252 D,R- N z o 4 QIiE—�or�E OHE— OHE-- OHE— OHE— ONE E— OHE— [230' Wide] pHE� OxE� OHE � OHE— pHE— py aHE— � I/ 9NE� QH 0-Q----r r 3EXISTING FUEL ISLAND s&e, L¢L Z W rn+ -.� 0 a / Z r �1 EXISTING- 1rj j 500KV PAD O + I MOUNT XFMR 1 O ,EXISTING ' GREEN ' SPACE Pw Pw iI ' I ! 36 FRONT ba I YARD ° I SETBACK 1 ' 1 3 ff ' x f� ' �P +CP B64 HB TREE rr SIM S 88,06-42" W 6s3 .73' 158.34' ss8 f J 658 1657 s58 - --------------- OME— Of ,xl 6, / / NEW BARB WIRE LU / FENCE SECTION Z)-- DIir: E OHE EXISTING 660 a EXIST. SITE MAJOR CONTOUR ELEV. —659— = EXIST. SITE MINOR CONTOUR ELEV. PP ■ = EXIST. POWER POLE OSSF AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEM WI30' IRRIGATION ROTORS = EXIST. DOMESTIC WATER METER = LIGHT POLE WICCTV CAMERA {� = EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT POB = POINT OF BEGINNING PFCP Q = EXIST. PROPERTY FENCE CORNER POST WFCP ❑ = EXIST. WIRE FENCE CORNER POST SIP Q = SET IRON POST FIP ❑ = FOUND IRON POST & = EXIST. ATT PEDESTAL © = EXIST. ATT UIGRND 662 ss' -lE --------- ♦�i l r r l l l l l l l t EXISTING EXISTING REPAIR MATERIAL & MAINTENANCE STORAGE FACILITY BUNKERS FUTURE �— S� CONCRETE BATCH PLANT r~ e PP - OHO- G}tE— 9HE— ORE t w � I METAL ELECTRICAL TOWER 0 V OHE OHE— HE— OFfE— OH Of4E— OHE— OHE-t- OHE OHE-- 0HE - OHE---* OHE- ---------- w m 'o 10 6,5B oss 1 1141263.698 SQ. FT. 653 26.200 ACRES :PC A. TRICYCLE LANE TEXAS, LLC, ExlsrlNG 01 OCTOBER 2014 2-STORY '�� 20141001001073580 BATCH I EXISTING VINCE OFFICE HAGAN CONCRETE k BATCH PLANT 0 x — Op* 662 66A 66D . ExISTINGf� 6558 EXISTING RECYCLED DOUBLE C&W WATER COLLECTION PIT SLUMP STAND LULL C. 656 y5 x A, x x E �. x x x — X— 654_ s5T GOPLIN LAND COMPANY LLC ��x x x fisz 1096316 29.630 ACRES 652 N 86°20'70" W 53.41' 653 HIRAM BRINLEE SURVEY 651 ess ~ ABS A0030 _..- fx--�[x-�.%6g%x x� — . sk8 - x — x = 6" CHAIN LINK FENCE (EXIST.) xx xx--- = BARB WIRE FENCE (EXIST.) --------- = TP&L ROW EASEMENT LINE — OSSf�— OSSF— = OSSF LINE OHE— OHE = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PW PW = PRIVATE WATER LINE W W = EX. WATER LINE —OPw OPW— =OVERHEAD PROCESSED WATER (EXISTING) =PROPOSED 24' FIRE LANE FLAUE ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT STRIPED AS PER IFC 2015 W130'R 221 EXHIBIT A Pg. 1 of 2 1-j * CEF)-,� OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60' GRAPHIC SCALE GO 0 30 60 120 APPROVED APPROVED AUGUST 23, 2022 AUGUST 1, 2022 CITY COUNCIL P&Z COMMISSION CITY OF ANNA CITY OF ANNA ELEASED FOR CITY PERMITTING ONLY REV.0 64D m Sod GENERAL SITE NOTES (PRIOR TO CR 419 ALIGNMENT) IMPERVIOUS AREA WITHIN SITE BOUNDARIES: 230.392.43 SF 2Q% PERVIOUS AREA WITHIN SITE BOUNDARIES! 91p 871,26 SF 80% OVERALL LOT AREA: 1 141 263.69 SF 100 k P#:Tgs ass a!i y�r:.••..__... �Il 9636 COUNTY r THOMAS A EYEINGTON, JR. ROAR 419 AhM 1Ewss 75409 ................................ L e'. 90931 d. 71I(1:4f.11.1. 1. VI-11 U7'CI.N, JR. ELECTRONIC SEAL DATE- f172A'= EyEINGTON ENTERPRISES, 4NC pA1a9 7.IE-0)- ONE HE OHE� NEW BARB WIRE FENCE SECTION 4" OHE� OHE - OHE-� (�IE-- OHE DIE- OHE- OHF- ONE- ONE-- ONE- OHE--- ONE ONE- cl Lu Q� it '0 % PROPOSED 90' WIDE ALIGNMENT OF 6s� 0 r I Xi COLLIN COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 419 0 F'5". �c��x , (FINAL ALIGNMENT TBD) ❑ I p" 0, F P)- tB 3C' WIDE CONCRETE _ T--- O_ DRIVE AND APPROACH (5,123 SF) S1 � I o; 0 is j ¢ � /,■� 1 0 a. 011 N Q ' f 8"0 WATER AV, v LINE -NORTH 2I 0 3: COLLIN SUD • V , x I 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER — /LANDSCAPING I , f ' ' AREA 7 x j IRRIGATION ' + SERVICE (PRIVATE) W PW PW PW Pw PW Pw II 0 21 II I I I _ �I I 656 t� Q Aga. 665�— �� 04 ii 30' WIDE CONCRETE 1 DRIVE AND APPROACH x r (6,672 SF) x jj +� f 664 x x = FENCE xx— xx = BARB WIRE FENCE JEXIST.j _--- — — — — — — - = TP&L ROW EASEMENT LIME oSSF CssF— = OSSF LINE ONE ONE = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PW PW = PRIVATE WATER LINE W = EX. WATER LINE —OPW OPW— =OVERHEAD PROCESSED WATER (EXISTING) =PROPOSED FIRE LANE ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT STRIPED AS PER IFC 2015 W)30'R x- - � 27 31 O, 0 FLAUE sn �V O It FLAME 24'-D" N 8" THICK CONCRETE � SITE PAVING L$J 214,383 SO. FT. 6- (NEW & EXISTING) AEROBIC FIELD & SPRINKLER F HEADS fl t- D55 DS5♦- OS 1_- � 23 2S D ; I 4 24'-D" i9 A I ==4�> 30 T 03 29 FLAME FLAME o ELECTRICAL TOWER ONE ONE— ONE OHE--- ONE ONE— OHE— C ,2 4'-0" UI a J U. ^o f u, ENLARGED SITE PLAN �1 SCALE: V = 30' GRAPHIC SCALE 30 r! 15 30 60 2211BA RELEASED FOR CITY PERMITTING ONLY REV.0 1 inc4=3O R. u.. nwr� n�cro�onnu n� a�v�nnu r- i EXHIBIT PARKING REQUIRED EXISTING MAINTENANCE BUILDING 2,400 SF EMSTINO BATCH PLANT OPERATIG'NS BLD13 900 SF TOTALAREA-------------------- 3,3OBSF TOTAL REq'D PARKING 1ZO0 SF 6 s s PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD ISTC) SPACES 25 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES 02 TOTAL 27 CONCRETE MB[ER SPACES 24 OV ER-THEROAD (OTR) SPACES 2 TOTAL 26 659 65B 657 g56 EXISTING 660 = EXIST. SITE MAJOR CONTOUR ELEV. —659— = EXIST. SITE MINOR CONTOUR ELEV. QQO OSSF AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEM W130' IRRIGATION ROTORS El = EXIST. DOMESTIC WATER METER If = LIGHT POLE WICCTV CAMERA = EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT ® = EXIST. ATT PEDESTAL © = EXIST. ATT UIGRND I M 455 I1 SITE ADDRESS 9Q6 COUNTY ROAD 419 ANNk TEXAS 7541 1141263.698 SCE. FT. 26.200 ACRES TRICYCLE LANE TEXAS, LLC, 01 OCTCSER 2014 20141001001073580 SITE DATA OVERALL SITE AREA 230,392.00 SF = 12' x 18' ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE = 9' X 1S- STANDARD (STD) SPACE = 12' X 30' CONCRETE MILER SPACE = 12' X SD' OVER -THE -ROAD (OTR) SPACE I DRIVE APPROACH TO A BE RE -CONFIGURED UPCN NEW ALIGNMENT OF CR 419 ADJUST CHAIN LINK FENCE & BARBED WIRE FENCE AS REQUIRED f. ............................ • 'tTHOMAS A. EYEINGTON, JR- rr_.;: FHORASA. EYEINGTfJN, JR- ELECTRONIC SEAL DATE- 07l2(Y2022 1 EYEINGTpH ENTEZPROU, INC, THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: irff,711111►nrAR City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Carrie Land Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance amending Article 5.03 (Alcoholic Beverages) within Chapter 5 (Business Regulations) of the City of Anna Code of Ordinances to allow for a Mixed Beverage Late Hours permit. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: At the July 26, 2022 City Council meeting under Neighbor Comments Mr. Nichols addressed the Council requesting the city consider adopting an ordinance allowing a mixed beverage late hours permit that would allow the ability to serve alcohol until 2:00 a.m.. Under existingTexas Alcoholic Beverage Commission ("TABC") regulations, the holder of a mixed beverage permit may only sell mixed beverages Monday through Friday between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight, on Saturday 7:00 A.M. to Sunday 1:00 a.m., and Sunday 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. with food service, and until 12:00 a.m. otherwise. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A I_'Iir_[d:ILy,140k&I Ord Late Hours Sales 0302920220818CR1 APPROVALS: Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR LATE HOUR SALES OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON -PREMISE CONSUMPTION; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $500; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, City of Anna, Texas (the "City") is a home -rule municipality duly formed under the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council (the "City Council") has investigated and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt a regulation permitting retail establishments that are permitted to sell alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption to apply for late hour permits; and WHEREAS, City Council desires to amend Article 5.03 of the Anna City Code of Ordinance ("Anna Code") as set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The above -referenced recitals are incorporated herein as the findings of the City Council as if set forth in full. Section 2. Anna Code Art. 5.03 Amended. This ordinance amends Article 5.03 of the Anna Code, to add a new Section 5.03.005 as set forth below: ARTICLE 5.03 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES Sec. 5.03.005 Hours of sale The holder of a permit authorizing the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 105 of the Texas Alcoholic CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 of 2 hours permit to sell alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption between midnight and 2 a. m. on any day. (Ordinance adopted 8/23/22) Section 3. Penalty. Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $500 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. Section 4. Savings, Severability and Repealing Clauses. All ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed to the extent of that conflict. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of such ordinance shall continue in full force and effect the same as if such invalid or unconstitutional provision had never been a part hereof. The City declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase be declared unconstitutional or invalid. Section 5. Publication of the Caption Hereof and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, this 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 of 2 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Dalan Walker Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Professional Service Project Orders to amend Master Professional Services Agreement # 2021-2026 with Jacobs for design work associated with four park projects. (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand) SUMMARY: Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Professional Service Project Orders to amend Master Professional Services Agreement # 2021-2026 with Jacobs for design work associated with four park projects.Approve a resolution authorizing the city manager to execute Professional Service Project Orders to amend Master Professional Services Agreement # 2021-2026 with Jacobs for design work associated with four park projects. The four projects are: • Yank Park Phase 2 Improvements • Natural Springs Park Secondary Parking Lot • Slayter Creek Park Parking Expansion • Pickleball and Basketball Courts at Slayter Creek Park FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total cost of professional services is $187,500. Slayter Creek Park Parking Expansion is funded by the 2021 Bond Program ($44,000). The other three projects are funded by the Park Development Fund ($143,500). STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Principal 5 - Value to Neighbors' Lives Goal 3 - Anna -Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution for professional design services for these projects. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for Jacobs PSPO 2. City of Anna - Proposed Scope of Services - Parks 3. Professional Service Project Order - Jacobs PARKS 4. Professional Service Project Order - Jacobs PARKS2 5. Professional Service Project Order - Jacobs PARKS3 6. Professional Service Project Order - Jacobs PARKS4 7. G -Jacobs- 2021 Fully Executed MSA APPROVALS: Dalan Walker, Parks Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING FOUR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PROJECT ORDERS AMENDING MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT #2021-2026 WITH JACOBS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, ("City Council") finds that the professional services of Jacobs are instrumental and necessary to the creation of designs and construction documents for four park projects; and WHEREAS, the City Council considers improvements to Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park, Slayter Creek Park and Natural Springs Park to be beneficial to the neighbors of Anna, Texas, meeting several goals and objectives set forth in the Strategic Plan adopted by City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Master Agreement for Professional Services #2021-2026 with Jacobs effective July 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves the proposed Professional Service Project Orders to include the following fee: "The total amount for fiscal year 2022: $187,500." NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes as set forth in full. Section 2. Approval and Authorization of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves Professional Service Project Order numbers PARKS1, PARKS2, PARKS3 and PARKS4 attached herein as Exhibits 1-4 to amend Master Agreement for Professional Services #2021-2026 with Jacobs and ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of the same. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions necessary to finalize and enforce the professional services agreement with Jacobs. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on first and final reading on this 23rd day of August 2022 ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs 1.0 Scope of Services Overview Jacobs' scope of services includes design and construction documents for several parks within The City of Anna. It is our understanding that these projects will run concurrently, and we will combine meetings to discuss projects simultaneously. The project will include the following meetings: 1. Project kick-off meeting with the client to confirm project goals, objectives, priorities, schedule of work and design considerations. Obtain base information files, background studies and other relevant criteria as provided by the client prior to proceeding with subsequent tasks. 2. Conduct a one -day visual analysis of existing conditions and community characteristics at the project site. Document summary findings in a photographic collage depicting design influences on a summary drawing sheet (documentation will happen after the meeting). 3. Attend a meeting with client and stakeholders to discuss preliminary park design criteria, phasing and related budgets and concepts. 4. Attend bi-weekly virtual meetings with the client for the duration of the project. It is assumed this is a 4 month design process and will include 10 meetings. The following sections will break out the scope of services by project. Overall Assumptions/Clarifications Jacobs' scope is based on the following set of assumptions and clarifications. Additional project specific assumptions are included within each individual project scope. 1. Written approval of design to be provided by client prior to commencement of construction documentation. Changes after approval provided requiring a significant re -design shall be considered additional services and may impact fees and proposed schedule. 2. Additional fees may apply for public meetings and/or presentations. 3. Jacobs assumes The City of Anna will provide existing survey and Geotech files as available. 4. The correction or resolution of erroneous, deficient, or ambiguous easement descriptions is not included within this scope. 5. The resolution of boundary conflicts or gaps discovered during the survey is not included within this scope. 6. This scope of work does not include any form of platting or re -platting exercises. 7. This scope does not include the location or identification of trees. The following sections will break out the scope of services by project. 2.0 Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park — 636 Banbury Drive (PSPO#PARKS1) Scope of work for this park includes survey of the project area, create construction documents from concept plan prepared by City of Anna staff. The work for the park primarily includes a half -court basketball court, pedestrian connection to a new trail around the existing playground, relocation of irrigation heads, benches and trach cans. Some additional site furniture and drinking fountains may be included. Jacobs shall be responsible for undertaking the following the following tasks for the project. Submittals for all tasks shall include electronic pdf copies (unless otherwise noted). [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs Topographic Survey Topographic Survey to include: ■ Boundary Survey / Verification and mapping of easements from abstracting and / or platting information. Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Topographical Survey 60% Design Development Submittal Services to be completed by Jacobs during this phase include: ■ Demolition plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Civil grading and drainage plans ■ Civil water and sewer plans (for drinking fountain only) ■ Hardscape and planting plans (turf replacement only, irrigation head relocation) ■ Structural plans (for post tension slab court only) ■ Preliminary cost estimate 90% Construction Documents Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Civil grading and drainage plans ■ Civil water and sewer plans (for drinking fountain only) ■ Hardscape and planting plans (turf replacement only, irrigation head relocation) ■ Structural plans (for post tension slab court only) ■ Preliminary cost estimate Final Construction Documents Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Civil grading and drainage plans ■ Civil water and sewer plans (for drinking fountain only) ■ Hardscape and planting plans (turf replacement only, irrigation head relocation) ■ Structural plans (for post tension slab court only) ■ Preliminary cost estimate Assumptions/Clarifications Jacobs' scope is based on the following set of assumptions and clarifications: 1. Identification and location of trees in not included in this survey. 2. Scopes of work assumes lighting and electrical plans are not included. 3. Bidding and Construction Administration services are not included in this scope. [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs 4. Client to provide as -built drawings for irrigation system. 5. Geotechnical recommendations for the sports courts, shade structure foundations, and other site structures such as retaining walls should be provided prior to commencement of the design phase. Jacobs will prepare a geotechnical request letter upon request. 6. Meetings and overall assumptions/clarifications are included in section 1.0 of this document. 3.0 Natural Springs Park- 1201 W. White Street (PSPO#PARKS2) Scope of work for this park includes the design of a small parking lot to serve an existing dog park. The parking lot will be curbed, and drainage will be directed to an existing pipe/headwall. Some erosion control may be required. Parking islands must be irrigated and landscaped to conform to City standards. Jacobs will evaluate the existing concept prepared by city staff and reconfigure if a more efficient layout is achievable. Jacobs shall be responsible for undertaking the following the following tasks for the project. Submittals for all tasks shall include electronic pdf copies (unless otherwise noted). Topographic Survey Topographic Survey to include: ■ Boundary Survey / Verification and mapping of easements from abstracting and/or platting information. Alternate- to be approved by city 60% Design Development Submittal Services to be completed by Jacobs during this phase include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Preliminary Cost Estimate 90% Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Preliminary Cost Estimate [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna .jacobs Final Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Preliminary Cost Estimate Assumptions/Clarifications Jacobs scope is based on the following set of assumptions and clarifications: 1. Construction Administration services are not included in this scope 2. The electronic survey documents will be provided by the and City includes all existing property information required. 3. Drainage plans do not include storm drains and inlets in the road. 4. Meetings and overall assumptions/clarifications are included in section 1.0 of this document. 4.0 Slayter Creek Park- 425 W Rosamond Parkway Parking Lot (PSPO#PARKS3) Scope of work for this park includes design of a large parking lot expansion between and existing parking lot and W. Rosamond Parkway. Drainage issues in the southwest corner of the existing parking lot will be addressed. Jacobs will evaluate the existing concept prepared by city staff and reconfigure if a more efficient layout is achievable. Topographic Survey Topographic Survey to include: ■ Boundary Survey / Verification and mapping of easements from abstracting and / or platting information. Alternate- to be approved by city 60% Design Development Submittal Services to be completed by Jacobs during this phase include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Preliminary Cost Estimate [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs 90% Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Structural Plans (as required for light pole foundations) ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Cost Estimate Final Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Structural Plans (as required for light pole foundations) ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Cost Estimate Assumptions/Clarifications Jacobs' scope is based on the following set of assumptions and clarifications: 1. Construction Administration services are not included in this scope 2. The electronic survey documents will be provided by the and City includes all existing property information required. 3. Geotechnical recommendations for the sports courts, shade structure foundations, and other site structures such as retaining walls should be provided prior to commencement of the design phase. Jacobs will prepare a geotechnical request letter upon request. 4. Sports courts are planned to be post -tensioned slab on grade with stiffening ribs. If the geotechnical recommendations require a structural slab on void or other foundation system, additional services will be required. 5. Meetings and overall assumptions/clarifications are included in section 1.0 of this document. [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs 5.0 Slayter Creek Park- 425 W Rosamond Parkway Pickle Ball Courts (PSPO#PARKS4) Scope of work for this park includes design of a Eight to nine pickleball courts and two -full size basketball courts should be located south and west of the existing parking lot. There is consideration for a shade structure over the pickleball courts and potential for the existing gazebo to be removed/relocated. Drainage issues in the southwest corner of the existing parking lot will be addressed. Jacobs will evaluate the existing concept prepared by city staff and reconfigure if a more efficient layout is achievable. Topographic Survey Topographic Survey to include: ■ Boundary Survey / Verification and mapping of easements from abstracting and/or platting information. Alternate- to be approved by city 60% Design Development Submittal Services to be completed by Jacobs during this phase include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Structural plans (for shade structures, post tensioned slabs, light poles and fence foundations) ■ Hardscape Plans (including sport court design) ■ Structural Plans (as required for post -tensioned slabs for courts, fence posts, shade structure and light pole foundations) ■ Preliminary Cost Estimate 90% Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Structural Plans (as required for post -tensioned slabs for courts, fence posts, shade structure and light pole foundations) ■ Electrical Plans (for Pickle Ball Courts only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Cost Estimate Final Construction Documents Submittal Construction documents (drawings and specifications) will be developed to provide the information necessary for bidding and construction. Documents shall include: [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs ■ Demolition Plans showing removal and/or relocation or existing elements as required to accommodate improvements. ■ Erosion Control Plans ■ Civil Grading and Drainage Plans ■ Civil Site Plans ■ Structural Plans (as required for post -tensioned slabs for courts, fence posts, shade structure and light pole foundations) ■ Electrical Plans (for parking lot lighting only) Alternate- to be approved by city ■ Planting Plans (trees and turf replacement and parking island only) ■ Irrigation Plans (required in parking islands) ■ Cost Estimate Assumptions/Clarifications Jacobs' scope is based on the following set of assumptions and clarifications: 6. Construction Administration services are not included in this scope 7. The electronic survey documents will be provided by the and City includes all existing property information required. 8. Geotechnical recommendations for the sports courts, shade structure foundations, and other site structures such as retaining walls should be provided prior to commencement of the design phase. Jacobs will prepare a geotechnical request letter upon request. 9. Sports courts are planned to be post -tensioned slab on grade with stiffening ribs. If the geotechnical recommendations require a structural slab on void or other foundation system, additional services will be required. 10. One prefabricated shade structure is assumed for this proposal. Jacobs will provide foundations based on reactions provided by the manufacturer. These reactions should be provided during the design phase. 11. Meetings and overall assumptions/clarifications are included in section 1.0 of this document. 6.0 Design Fees Based on the detailed project scope listed above, Jacobs will complete this work for a lump sum amount including reimbursable expenses on a per task basis as detailed below, payable in response to monthly invoices during each task of Jacobs' work. Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the compensation for Professional and Technical services and include the cost incurred by Jacobs on behalf of the project. The breakdown of the proposed fee is as listed: Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park — 636 Banbury Drive (PSPO#PARKSI) Meetings, Design & Engineering Topo Survey Expenses (Title Commitments, mileage, printing ect) Natural Springs Park — 1201 W. White Street (PSPO#PARKS2) - Design & Engineering - Electrical Engineering - Expenses (Title Commitments, mileage, printing ect) $36,500.00 $25,000.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $40,500.00 $28,000.00 $10,000.00 $ 2,500.00 [Document number] Scope of Services — Various Park Projects for The City of Anna ,oacobs Slayter Creek Park — 425 W Rosamond Parkway Parking Lot $44,000.00 (PSPO#PARKS3) - Design & Engineering $32,500.00 - Electrical Engineering $ 9,000.00 - Expenses (Title Commitments, mileage, printing ect) $ 2,500.00 Slayter Creek Park — 425 W Rosamond Parkway Pickle Ball $66,500.00 (PSPO#PARKS4) - Design & Engineering $55,000.00 - Electrical Engineering $ 9,000.00 - Expenses (Title Commitments, mileage, printing ect) $ 2,500.00 All expenses shall be billed as a direct cost with no markup. Expenses shown are estimated and shall include items for travel printing title commitments, and equipment for survey costs. Add Services If approved by the city, Jacobs will provide additional services for electrical engineering for lighting only in the park and parking lots within the project limits and for boundary surveys to establish property lines and easements. Henry Clay "Yank" Washington Park — 636 Banbury Drive ■ Electrical Engineering $10,000.00 ■ Survey Cost Boundary and Easements $ 7,500.00 Natural Springs Park— 1201 W. White Street - Survey— Boundary and Easements $14,000.00 Slayter Creek Park — 425 W Rosamond Parkway - Survey— Boundary and Easements $15,000.00 [Document number] 8 EXHIBIT 1 Professional Service Project Order #PARKS1 Pursuant to and subject to the referenced Master Agreement for Professional Services (Master PSA), between the City and Firm, City hereby requests that Firm perform, and Firm agrees to perform, the work described below upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Master PSA, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and in this Professional Service Project Order (PSPO). MPSA# MASTER PSA CATEGORY: F-Landscape Architecture and 2021-2026 Park Planning ANNA PROJECT CODE: 2018-ENG01 FIRM NAME Project Name: # Of Consecutive Business Days to Complete Project: Original Project Fee Jacobs Yank Park Phase 2 Improvements :I $36,500 OWNER OPTIONAL INFORMATION: 1. Date and Time to Commence: Upon Receipt of Signed Professional Services Project Order, City's Purchase Order and Notice to Proceed 2. Other: Architectural Barrier Requirements: Yes X No — INVOICE SUBMITTAL Billing Period: Monthly -Through the end of each month, billed by the 10th of the following month. Mail to: Attn: Dalan Walker City of Anna Neighborhood Services 120W71hSt Anna, TX 75409 Include work order number, PO number, billing period, and project Invoice Mailing Instructions: name. Master PSA# 2021-2026 1 PSPO# PARKSI Documents: The PSPO DOCUMENTS as that term is used herein, shall mean and include the following documents, and expressly incorporates the following by reference for all purposes. A. Master Agreement for Professional Services 2021-2026 effective July 13, 2021; and B. This Professional Services Project Order (PSPO) # PARKS1; and C. Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna (Exhibit A). This PSPO shall incorporate the terms of all the documents in their entirety. To the extent that there are any conflicts with provisions of the Master PSA, this PSPO or each other, the provisions of the Master PSA, then the provisions of this PSPO shall prevail in that order. Scope of Services: Reference Sections 1.0, 2.0 and 10.0 in "Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna" provided by Jacobs and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Schedule of Work and Completion Deadline(s): Work will take approximately 4 months. Acceptance: The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS JACOBS Signature Jim Proce - City Manager Printed Name & Title Date Signature Printed Name & Title Date Master PSA# 2021-2026 PSPO# PARKSI EXHIBIT 2 Professional Service Project Order #PARKS2 Pursuant to and subject to the referenced Master Agreement for Professional Services (Master PSA), between the City and Firm, City hereby requests that Firm perform, and Firm agrees to perform, the work described below upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Master PSA, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and in this Professional Service Project Order (PSPO). MPSA# MASTER PSA CATEGORY: F-Landscape Architecture and 2021-2026 Park Planning ANNA PROJECT CODE: 2020-ENG01 FIRM NAME Jacobs Project Name: Natural Springs Park Secondary Parking Lot # Of Consecutive Business Days to Complete Project: 80 Original Project Fee: $40,500 OWNER OPTIONAL INFORMATION: Date and Time to Commence: Upon Receipt of Signed Professional Services Project Order, City's Purchase Order and Notice to Proceed 2. Other: Architectural Barrier Requirements: Yes X No — INVOICE SUBMITTAL Billing Period: Monthly -Through the end of each month, billed by the 10th of the following month. Mail to: Attn: Dalan Walker City of Anna Neighborhood Services 120W71hSt Anna, TX 75409 Include work order number, PO number, billing period, and project Invoice Mailing Instructions: name. Master PSA# 2021-2026 1 PSPO# PARKS2 Documents: The PSPO DOCUMENTS as that term is used herein, shall mean and include the following documents, and expressly incorporates the following by reference for all purposes. A. Master Agreement for Professional Services 2021-2026 effective July 13, 2021; and B. This Professional Services Project Order (PSPO) # PARKS2; and C. Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna (Exhibit A). This PSPO shall incorporate the terms of all the documents in their entirety. To the extent that there are any conflicts with provisions of the Master PSA, this PSPO or each other, the provisions of the Master PSA, then the provisions of this PSPO shall prevail in that order. Scope of Services: Reference Sections 1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 in "Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna" provided by Jacobs and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Schedule of Work and Completion Deadline(s): Work will take approximately 4 months. Acceptance: The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS JACOBS Signature Jim Proce - City Manager Printed Name & Title Date Signature Printed Name & Title Date Master PSA# 2021-2026 PSPO# PARKS2 EXHIBIT 3 Professional Service Project Order #PARKS3 Pursuant to and subject to the referenced Master Agreement for Professional Services (Master PSA), between the City and Firm, City hereby requests that Firm perform, and Firm agrees to perform, the work described below upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Master PSA, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and in this Professional Service Project Order (PSPO). MPSA# MASTER PSA CATEGORY: F-Landscape Architecture and 2021-2026 Park Planning ANNA PROJECT CODE: 2021-ENG03 FIRM NAME Jacobs Project Name: Slayter Creek Park Parking Lot Expansion # Of Consecutive Business Days to Complete Project: 80 Original Project Fee: $44,000 OWNER OPTIONAL INFORMATION: Date and Time to Commence: Upon Receipt of Signed Professional Services Project Order, City's Purchase Order and Notice to Proceed 2. Other: Architectural Barrier Requirements: Yes X No — INVOICE SUBMITTAL Billing Period: Monthly -Through the end of each month, billed by the 10th of the following month. Mail to: Attn: Dalan Walker City of Anna Neighborhood Services 120W71hSt Anna, TX 75409 Include work order number, PO number, billing period, and project Invoice Mailing Instructions: name. Master PSA# 2021-2026 1 PSPO# PARKS3 Documents: The PSPO DOCUMENTS as that term is used herein, shall mean and include the following documents, and expressly incorporates the following by reference for all purposes. A. Master Agreement for Professional Services 2021-2026 effective July 13, 2021; and B. This Professional Services Project Order (PSPO) # PARKS3; and C. Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna (Exhibit A). This PSPO shall incorporate the terms of all the documents in their entirety. To the extent that there are any conflicts with provisions of the Master PSA, this PSPO or each other, the provisions of the Master PSA, then the provisions of this PSPO shall prevail in that order. Scope of Services: Reference Sections 1.0, 4.0 and 10.0 in "Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna" provided by Jacobs and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Schedule of Work and Completion Deadline(s): Work will take approximately 4 months. Acceptance: The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS JACOBS Signature Jim Proce - City Manager Printed Name & Title Date Signature Printed Name & Title Date Master PSA# 2021-2026 PSPO# PARKS3 EXHIBIT 4 Professional Service Project Order #PARKS4 Pursuant to and subject to the referenced Master Agreement for Professional Services (Master PSA), between the City and Firm, City hereby requests that Firm perform, and Firm agrees to perform, the work described below upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Master PSA, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and in this Professional Service Project Order (PSPO). MPSA# MASTER PSA CATEGORY: F-Landscape Architecture and 2021-2026 Park Planning ANNA PROJECT CODE: 2021-ENG04 FIRM NAME Project Name: # Of Consecutive Business Days to Complete Project: Original Project Fee Jacobs Slayter Creek Park Pickleball Courts :I $66,500 OWNER OPTIONAL INFORMATION: 1. Date and Time to Commence: Upon Receipt of Signed Professional Services Project Order, City's Purchase Order and Notice to Proceed 2. Other: Architectural Barrier Requirements: Yes X No — INVOICE SUBMITTAL Billing Period: Monthly -Through the end of each month, billed by the 10th of the following month. Mail to: Attn: Dalan Walker City of Anna Neighborhood Services 120W71hSt Anna, TX 75409 Include work order number, PO number, billing period, and project Invoice Mailing Instructions: name. Master PSA# 2021-2026 1 PSPO# PARKS4 Documents: The PSPO DOCUMENTS as that term is used herein, shall mean and include the following documents, and expressly incorporates the following by reference for all purposes. A. Master Agreement for Professional Services 2021-2026 effective July 13, 2021; and B. This Professional Services Project Order (PSPO) # PARKS4; and C. Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna (Exhibit A). This PSPO shall incorporate the terms of all the documents in their entirety. To the extent that there are any conflicts with provisions of the Master PSA, this PSPO or each other, the provisions of the Master PSA, then the provisions of this PSPO shall prevail in that order. Scope of Services: Reference Sections 1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 in "Scope of Services -Various Projects for The City of Anna" provided by Jacobs and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Schedule of Work and Completion Deadline(s): Work will take approximately 4 months. Acceptance: The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS JACOBS Signature Jim Proce - City Manager Printed Name & Title Date Signature Printed Name & Title Date Master PSA# 2021-2026 PSPO# PARKS4 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AND JACOBS 2021-2026 Made as of the 13 thday of July __ 20 21 ("Effective Date") Between the City: The City of Anna, Texas 101 S. Powell Parkway Anna, Texas 75409 Telephone: (972) 924-3325 and the Firm: JACOBS 1999 BRYANT ST. SUIKTE 1200 DALLAS, TX 75021 for the following Project: Master Agreement for Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning THIS MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Anna, Texas, a home -rule municipality ("C), and JACOBS [F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning] ("Firm"), to be effective from and after the date as provided above. City and Firm are at times each referred to herein as a "party" or collectively as the "Parties." WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the services of the Firm to provide professional services as describe for Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning on an on -call basis ("Project'); and WHEREAS, the Firm desires to render such professional services for the City upon the terms and conditions provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That for and in consideration of the covenants contained herein, for the mutual benefits to be obtained hereby and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 FIRM'S SERVICES 1.1 Engagement of the Firm — At City's request and in City's sole discretion, City is entitled to engage Firm from time to time to perform professional services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement ("Services'). Firm agrees to perform such Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and with any individual written Project Order issued pursuant to Article 1.2 hereof. City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to hire other firms or Firms for any reason and for any purpose. If any employee of Firm, who is performing the day-to-day Services under this Agreement, is separated, for any reason, from employment with Firm, Firm shall provide City with written City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 1 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 notice thereof at least five (5) business days' prior to said separation unless circumstances reasonably warrant a shorter notice period, which shall not exceed two (2) business days following the separation. 1.2 Scope of Services — The Services to be provided by Firm to City shall be as mutually agreed to in a separate written Project Order, in the format as stated in Exhibit A, executed by City and Firm ("Scope of Services"). Whenever used in this Agreement, the term Services shall mean those services specified in this Agreement and in a Project Order issued pursuant to this Agreement and all related work. Each Project Order shall include, directly or by reference, appropriate cost and pricing data and such other documentation as required by the City. Each Project Order shall be subject to and integrated into this Agreement, and the terms of this Agreement are incorporated into and made a part of each Project Order by reference to this Agreement. All Services within the Scope of Services shall be performed by the employees of Firm or Firm's officers, employees, agents, representatives, sub -contractors or sub -Firms unless otherwise provided in a Project Order. Firm shall be wholly and solely responsible for any Services or subcontracted Services provided by any officer, employee, agent, representative, sub- contractors or sub -Firms of Firm (collectively, "Firm's Personnel"). If at any time after entering into this Agreement, City has any objection to Firm's representative or to any of Firm's Personnel, or any objection to any personnel of sub -Firm retained by Firm and assigned to perform the Services, Firm shall promptly propose substitutes to whom City has no objection. The parties understand and agree that deviations or modifications to the Scope of Services, in the form of written change orders, may be authorized from time to time by City ("Change Order(s)"). 1.2.1 Requirement of Written Change Order — "Extra" work, or "claims" invoiced as "extra" work, or "claims" that have not been issued as a duly executed, written Project Order or Change Order issued by the Anna City Manager, will not be authorized for payment and/or shall not become part of the subcontracts. A duly executed written Change Order shall be preceded by the Anna City Council's authorization for the Anna City Manager to execute said Change Order. 1.2.2 FIRM SHALL NOT PERFORM ANY "EXTRA" WORK AND/OR ADDITIONAL SERVICES WITHOUT A DULY EXECUTED WRITTEN CHANGE ORDER ISSUED BY THE ANNA CITY MANAGER. Firm acknowledges that Project Managers, Superintendents, and/or Inspectors of the City are not authorized to issue verbal or written change orders. 1.3 Schedule of Work — Firm agrees to commence work immediately upon the execution of a Project Order, and to proceed diligently with said work to completion as described in such Project Order. 1.4 Standard of Care — Firm shall perform the Services required hereunder: (1) with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent professionals practicing under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and (2) as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent professional under the same professional license. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 1.5 Term — The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue until 8/1/2021 - 9/30/2026 , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 1.6 Subcontracted Services — When necessary, subcontracted services shall be procured by Firm in connection with the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, subject to City's prior written consent. Firm shall issue subcontracts for such subcontracted services in Firm's own name. Firm shall be compensated for subcontracted services for the actual amount invoiced by the subcontractor. Except as set forth in this Agreement , neither Firm nor City may assign, sublet, transfer, or otherwise convey (together, an "Assignment"), and neither Firm nor City has the power to enter into an Assignment of any or all of the rights, duties and obligations or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an Assignment, no Assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES City shall use reasonable efforts to not delay the Services of Firm as follows: 2.1 Proiect Data — The City shall furnish information that is reasonably requested by Firm and that City has in its possession at the time of Firm's request as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Services, and Firm shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of the information furnished by City under this Article 2.1. 2.2 City Proiect Manager — The City shall designate, when necessary, a representative authorized to act on City's behalf with respect to the Services ("Proiect Manager"). City, or the authorized Project Manager, shall on an as -needed basis, issue Project Orders to Firm in accordance with the Scope of Services, in the format as stated in Exhibit A. City, or the authorized Project Manager shall examine the documents submitted by Firm and shall render any required decisions pertaining thereto as soon as practicable to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Firm's Services. Firm understands and agrees that the Project Manager and his or her authorized designee are not authorized to issue verbal or written Change Orders for "extra" work or "claims" invoiced as "extra" work. ARTICLE 3 FIRM'S COMPENSATION 3.1 Compensation for Firm's Services — Compensation by the City to Firm for Services shall be on a fixed fee or a time and materials basis as specified in the applicable Professional Services Project Order ("Firm's Fee"). All time shall be billed at Firm's labor billing rates agreed upon by City. Said rates shall only be adjusted in writing as may be agreed to between the Parties. 3.1.1 Completion of Record Documents —City and Firm agree that the completion of any Record Documents and/or "As -Built" Documents, including hard copy formatting and electronic formatting, shall be completed, submitted to, and City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 accepted by the City prior to payment of the final five percent (5%) of the Firm's Fee, unless expressly stated otherwise in the applicable Project Order. The electronic formatting shall be consistent with the standards established in Exhibit D, City of Anna Guidelines for Computer Aided Design and Drafting ("CADD"). Completion of the Record Documents and/or "As -Built" documents shall be included in the Firm's Fee and considered to be within the Scope of Services defined under this Agreement. 3.1.2 Disputes between City and Construction Contractor — If the Scope of Services involves the Firm performing Construction Administration Services relating to an agreement between a Construction Contractor (the "Contractor") and the City, and upon receipt of a written request by City, Firm shall research previous and existing conditions of the Services, and make a determination whether or not to certify that sufficient cause exists for the City to declare the Contractor in default of the terms and conditions of the agreement. Firm shall submit his findings in writing to the City, or submit a written request for a specific extension of time (including the basis for such extension), within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the written request from the City. City and Firm agree that if requested by the City, completion of this task shall be included in the Firm's Fee and considered to be within the Scope of Services as defined under this Agreement. 3.1.3 Consultation and Approval by Governmental Authorities and Franchised Utilities — Firm shall be responsible for identifying and analyzing the requirements of governmental agencies and all franchise utilities involved with the Scope of Services, and to participate in consultation with said agencies in order to obtain all necessary approvals and/or permissions. The Firm shall be responsible for preparation and timely submittal of documents required for review, approval, and/or recording by such agencies. The Firm shall be responsible for making such changes in the Construction Documents as may be required by existing written standards promulgated by such agencies at no additional charge to City. 3.1.4 Substantial Compliance with Architectural Barriers Act —Should the Scope of Services fall within the regulatory requirements of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act (the "Barriers Act"), as solely determined by the City, Firm shall comply with the Barriers Act. As part of the Scope of Services, it is the sole responsibility of the Firm to identify and analyze the requirements of the Barriers Act and to become familiar with the governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve Firm's design and/or construction Services. Firm shall participate in consultations with said authorities in order to obtain approval for such design and/or construction. As part of the Services, the Firm shall obtain the Notice of Substantial Compliance for the Services from the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (the "TDLR"). The Firm shall, without additional compensation, immediately correct any errors, omissions, or deficiencies in the design services and/or construction documents identified by TDLR and/or a Registered Accessibility Specialist ("RAS") at any phase of the Services, either by review of the construction documents, or inspection of the design at the commencement of construction, during the construction of the work, or at the completion of construction. City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 4 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 3.1.4.1 Submission of Construction Documents to TDLR — The Firm shall mail, ship, or hand -deliver the construction documents to TDLR not later than five (5) calendar days after the Firm issues the construction documents for the work. 3.1.4.2 Completion of Registration Form to TDLR — Firm shall complete an Elimination of Barriers Project Registration Form for each subject building or facility within the Scope of Services, and submit the registration form(s) along with the applicable fees not later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the Firm completes the submittal of the construction documents to TDLR. 3.1.4.3 TDLR Approval of Construction Documents — After review of the construction documents by TDLR, the Firm shall be notified in writing of the results; however, it is the Firm's responsibility to obtain TDLR's written comments. The Firm shall address all comments that prevent TDLR approval of the construction documents, including comments relating to Conditional Approval that must be addressed in the design and construction of the work. Firm shall resubmit construction documents to TDLR for review prior to the commencement of construction of the work. 3.1.4.4 TDLR Project Inspection — Firm shall request an inspection from TDLR or a TDLR locally approved RAS no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the completion of construction of the work. The Firm shall advise the City in writing of the results of each inspection. City reserves the right to verify the written results with TDLR at any time during design, construction, or at the completion of the work. 3.1.4.5 Corrective Modifications followina TDLR Project Inspection When corrective modifications to achieve substantial compliance are required, the TDLR inspector or the RAS shall provide the Firm a list of deficiencies and a deadline for completing the modifications. Firm shall provide the City with this list within five (5) calendar days of receipt. It is the sole responsibility of the Firm to completely address the deficiencies by the stated deadline or to obtain a written notice of extension from the TDLR. When the corrective measures have been completed, Firm shall provide the TDLR (and/or the RAS who completed the inspection) and the City with written verification of the corrective measures completed. 3.1.4.6 TDLR Notice of Substantial Compliance — TDLR shall provide a Notice of Substantial Compliance to the City after the newly constructed work has had a satisfactory inspection, or Firm has submitted verification of corrective modifications. City and Firm agree that the final five percent (5%) of Firm's Fee, unless expressly stated otherwise in a Project Order, shall not be paid until the City is in receipt of the TDLR's Notice of Substantial Compliance for all components and/or phases of the work. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional services Agreement Page 5 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 3.2 Direct Expenses — Direct Expenses are included in the Firm's Fee as described in Article 3_1 and include actual reasonable and necessary expenditures made by the Firm and the Firm's Personnel in connection with the Services. All submitted Direct Expenses are to be within the amounts as set forth in the applicable Project Order, and consistent with Exhibit E, City of Anna Guidelines for Direct Expenses, General and Administrative Markup, and Travel and Subsistence Expenses. The Firm shall be solely responsible for the auditing of all Direct Expenses prior to submitting to the City for reimbursement, and shall be responsible for the accuracy thereof. Any over -payment by the City for errors in submittals for reimbursement may be deducted from the Firm's subsequent payment for Services; provided, however this shall not be the City's sole and exclusive remedy for said overpayment. 3.3 Invoices — No payment to Firm shall be made until Firm tenders an invoice to the City. Invoices are to be submitted to City immediately upon completion work as set forth in the applicable Project Order. On all submitted invoices, Firm shall include appropriate background materials and sufficient detail for the City to verify the Services performed and Direct Expenses incurred in support of the submitted charges on said invoice. Such background material shall include employee timesheets, invoices for work obtained from other parties, and receipts and/or log information relating to Direct Expenses. Each invoice shall constitute a representation of the Firm that the proportion of the Services has been fully performed in accordance with this Agreement, that the Direct Expenses have been actually incurred and that payment of the indicated amount has been earned by, and is properly due and payable to, the Firm in accordance with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the presentation of any invoice to the City, the amount reflected thereon shall be due and payable to the Firm only to the extent earned by the Firm in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All invoices for payment shall provide a summary methodology for administrative markup and/or overhead charges. 3.4 Timing of Payment — City shall make payment to Firm for said invoices within thirty (30) days following receipt and acceptance thereof. The parties agree that payment by City to Firm is considered to be complete upon mailing of payment by City. Furthermore, the parties agree that the payment is considered to be made and mailed on the date that the payment is postmarked. If the City makes any payment by electronic means, the payment is considered to be made on the date that the City requests and authorizes the payment to be made. 3.5 Disputed Payment Procedures — In the event of a disputed or contested invoice by City, only that portion so contested may be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. City shall notify Firm of a disputed invoice, or portion of an invoice, in writing by the twenty-first (2111 calendar day after the date the City receives the invoice. The written notice shall include a detailed statement of the amount of the invoice which is disputed and the City shall provide Firm an opportunity to cure the basis of the dispute. If a dispute is resolved in favor of the Firm, City shall proceed to process said invoice, or the disputed portion of the invoice, within the provisions of Article 3.4. If a dispute is resolved in favor of the City, Firm shall submit to City a corrected invoice, reflecting any and all payment(s) of the undisputed amounts, documenting the credited amounts, and identifying outstanding amounts on said invoice to aid City in processing payment for the remaining balance. Such revised invoice shall have a new invoice number, clearly City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 6 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 referencing the previous submitted invoice. City agrees to exercise reasonableness in contesting any invoice or portion thereof that has background materials supporting the submitted charges. 3.6 Failure to Pay — Failure of the City to pay an invoice, for a reason other than upon written notification as stated in the provisions of Article 3.5 to the shall grant the Firm the right, in addition to any and all other rights provided, to, upon written notice to the City, suspend performance under this Agreement, and such act or acts shall not be deemed a breach of this Agreement. However, Firm shall not suspend performance under this Agreement prior to the tenth (101) calendar day after the Firm gives written notice of suspension to the City, in accordance with Chapter 2251, Subchapter "D" of the Texas Government Code. The City shall not be required to pay any invoice submitted by the Firm if the Firm is in breach of any provision(s) of this Agreement. 3.7 Adjusted Compensation — If the Scope of Services or if the Firm's Services are materially changed due to no error on behalf of Firm in the performance of Services under this Agreement, the amounts of the Firm's compensation shall be equitably adjusted as approved by City. Any additional amounts paid to the Firm as a result of any material change to the Scope of the Services shall be authorized by written change order duly executed by both parties before the services are performed. 3.8 Project Order Suspension — If the Firm's work is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three (3) months for reasons that are not wholly or partially the Firm's fault, Firm shall be entitled to compensation for any and all work completed to the satisfaction of City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement prior to suspension or abandonment. In the event of such suspension or abandonment, Firm shall deliver to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any other items prepared by Firm in connection with this Agreement prior to Firm receiving final payment. If the work is resumed after being suspended for more than three (3) months, the Firm's compensation shall be equitably adjusted as approved by the City. Any additional amounts paid to the Firm after the work is resumed shall be agreed upon in writing by both parties before the services are performed. ARTICLE 4 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 4.1 Documents Property of the City — The Firm's work in connection with the Services is the property of the City, and Firm may not use the documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any materials for any other purpose not relating to the Services without City's prior written consent. City shall be furnished with such reproductions of the plans, data, documents, maps, and any other information as defined in the applicable Project Order. Upon completion of the work, or any earlier termination of this Agreement under Article 3 and/or Article 7, Firm will revise plans, data, documents, maps, and any other information as defined in the applicable Project Order to reflect changes while performing the Services and promptly furnish the same to the City in an acceptable electronic or other format. All such reproductions shall be the property of the City who may use them without the Firm's permission for any City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 purpose relating to the Services, including, but not limited to, completion of the Services, and/or additions, alterations, modifications, and/or revisions to the Services. 4.1.1 Work for Hire —The agreements and obligations set forth in this Article 4.1.1 are supported by the mutual considerations and covenants set forth in this Agreement and also by consideration of the payment of $10.00 by the City to Firm, and other good and valuable consideration, the payment and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. 4.1.1.1 The term "Work" as used in this Section 4.1.1 means the materials created by Firm as part or in furtherance of the Services including without limitation any and all documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, assessments, memorandums, appraisals and/or any other materials or copies thereof in any reproducible, tangible, or electronic form or medium. The Work conceived, or originated by Firm or others for the Firm, or on behalf of the Firm, or performed in connection with the Services is and will be of original development by Firm and are to be considered works made for hire as that term is defined in the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. §101) and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City, without any consideration paid to Firm beyond that set forth under this Agreement. All rights of Firm with respect to all designs and copyrights, trademarks, trade names, and other proprietary rights relating to the Work are by this Agreement assigned to the City. Firm agrees to promptly support and give all reasonable assistance to enable the City to prepare, file and prosecute any United States or foreign application for all types of design trademark or copyright registrations related to the Work that the City deems appropriate, and Firm will execute all appropriate documents and assignments for such. The City shall have the sole right to determine the treatment of information received from Firm, including but limited to the right to keep the same as a trade secret, to use, disclose, and publish the same with or without prior copyright registration and to file, license or share the same in its own name or the name of an affiliate or to follow any other procedure that the City may deem appropriate. 4.1.1.2 To the extent that any material produced under this Agreement may not be considered works made for hire, or to the extent that Article 4.1.1 or any portion thereof is declared invalid either in substance or purpose, in whole or in part, Firm agrees to irrevocably transfer, grant, convey, assign, and relinquish exclusively to the City all of Firm's right, title, and interest, including ownership of copyright and patent rights, to any material developed by Firm under this Agreement, without the necessity of further consideration. Firm shall have no right to disclose or use any of the Work for any purpose whatsoever except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Further, the rights conveyed by this instrument include the right and authority of the City, at its expense, to make timely application for the renewal and extension of any copyright of the Work as allowed by the laws now or later in force in the United States and in any other country. Firm irrevocably constitutes and appoints the City "attorney in fact" to apply for renewal within one year before the expiration of the initial copyright term, City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 8 Category F - landscape Architecture 6 Park Planning 3199870 and covenants to execute any further instruments that may be necessary to perfect the City's full enjoyment of the renewal right. 4.1.1.3 No rights or licenses, expressed or implied, in any other work or other information is granted to Firm by this agreement, and no license, partnership, or assignment of any right, title, or interest is created, granted or implied by the City under this Agreement. 4.1.1.4 Furthermore, Firm acknowledges and agrees that the Work —to the extent permitted by applicable law —is confidential and proprietary trade secret information of the City, and of substantial value to the City. Firm agrees that it will not use the Work in any way, for its own account or the account of any third party, except as expressly permitted by, or required to achieve the purposes of, this Agreement. Firm also agrees not to disclose to any third party any part of the Work except as is necessary to perform the Services. Firm will take reasonable precautions at least as stringent as it takes to protect its own most highly confidential and proprietary information to protect the confidentiality of the Work. Firm's breach of this obligation will result in irreparable and continuing damage to the City for which there will be no adequate remedy at law, entitling the City to injunctive relief and a decree for specific performance, and such other relief as may be proper (including monetary damages if appropriate). 4.1.1.5 Firm affirms that the Work is original, that all statements asserted as facts are based on careful investigation and research for accuracy, that the Work does not, in whole or part, infringe any copyright or violate any right or privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever, that it has not been published or used in total or in part and is not being submitted or considered for publication or use in total or in part elsewhere, and that Firm has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to make the grants and transfers contained herein. Subject to any limitations stated in Article 10 of this Agreement, Firm will indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, representatives and anyone directly or indirectly employed by it against damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney's fees and related expenses, arising out of infringement of any rights during or after completion of the Work, and will defend all claims in connection with any alleged infringement of those rights utilizing legal counsel approved by the City. 4.1.1.6 The obligations imposed by this Article 4.1.1 shall remain in effect indefinitely and shall survive any termination or expiration of the Agreement, whether by expiration of time, operation of law or otherwise. 4.2 Documents Subject to Laws Regarding Public Disclosure — Firm acknowledges that City is a governmental entity and that all documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any items prepared or furnished by Firm (and Firm's Personnel) under this Agreement are property of the City and upon completion of the Services shall thereafter be subject to the Texas Public Information Act City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional services Agreement Page 9 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 (Texas Government Code, Chapter 552) the ("PIA") and exceptions to the PIA and any other applicable laws requiring public disclosure of the information contained in said items. ARTICLE 5 FIRM'S INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Required General Liability Insurance — Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, a general liability (errors and omissions) insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount not less than One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, and Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate. Such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or non -renewal of any policies. In the event that there is a material modification to such policy, Firm shall provide written notice of such modification to City at least thirty (30) days prior to such material modification. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.2 Required Professional Liability Insurance — Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, a professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount not less than One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, and Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate. Such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or non -renewal of any policies. In the event that there is a material modification to such policy, Firm shall provide written notice of such modification to City at least thirty (30) days prior to such material modification. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.3 Required Workers Compensation Insurance— Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, all Statutory Workers Compensation Insurance as required by the laws of the State of Texas. Such insurance policy shall be with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent service(s), and authorized to transact business in the State of Texas. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 10 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.4 Required Umbrella Coverage or Excess Liability Coverage — Firm shall maintain, at no expense to the City, an umbrella coverage or excess liability coverage insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount of Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies, evidenced by return receipt or United States Certified Mail. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.5 Circumstances Requiring Explosion, Collapse, Underground Property Coverage — If the Scope of Services warrant, and if identified on the checklist located in Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to the City, an explosion, collapse, underground coverage policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount of Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies, evidenced by return receipt or United States Certified Mail. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. ARTICLE 6 FIRM'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS Records of Direct Expenses and expenses pertaining to work performed in conjunction with the Services shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles. Invoices will be sent to the City as indicated in Article 3. Copies of employee time sheets, receipts for direct expense items and other records of expenses will be included in the monthly invoices. ARTICLE 7 AUDITS AND RECORDS / COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS AND CITY CHARTER The Firm agrees that at any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, Firm shall make available to representatives of the City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement, and will permit such Ctty of Anna, Texas — Master Professional services Agreement Page 11 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 representatives of the City to audit, examine, copy and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement, and for a period of four (4) years from the date of final settlement of this Agreement or for such other or longer period, if any, as may be required by applicable statute or other lawful requirement. The Firm agrees that it is aware of the Compliance with Federal, State, Local Laws and City Charter requirements as set forth in Exhibit G, and is in compliance therewith. Firm agrees that it is further aware of the vendor disclosure requirements set forth in Chapter 176, Local Government Code, as amended, and will abide by the same. In this connection, a lawful representative of Firm shall execute the Conflict of Interest Questionnaire, Form CIQ, attached hereto as Exhibit H and incorporated herein for all purposes. ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT / REMEDIES City may, upon thirty (30) days written notice to Firm, terminate this Agreement or any individual Project Order, for any reason or no reason at all, before the termination date hereof, and without prejudice to any other remedy it may have. If City terminates this Agreement or a Project Order due to a default of and/or breach by Firm and the expense of finishing the Services exceeds the Firm's Fee at the time of termination, Firm waives its right to any portion of Firm's Fee as set forth in Article 3 herein and agrees to pay any costs over and above the fee which the City is required to pay in order to finish the Services. On any default and/or breach by Firm, City may elect not to terminate the Agreement or a Project Order, and in such event it may make good the deficiency in which the default consists, and deduct the costs from the Firm's Fee that would otherwise be due to Firm as set forth in Article 3 herein. If City terminates this Agreement and Firm is not in default of the Agreement or a Project Order, Firm shall be entitled to compensation for any and all work completed to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement prior to termination. In the event of any termination, Firm shall deliver to City all finished and/or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs and/or any items prepared by Firm in connection with this Agreement prior to Firm receiving final payment. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are cumulative, and the use of any one right or remedy by either party shall not preclude or waive its rights to use any or all other remedies. These rights and remedies are given in addition to any other rights the parties may have by law, statute, ordinance, or otherwise. ARTICLE 9 DISPUTE RESOLUTION / MEDIATION In addition to all remedies at law, the parties may resolve/mediate any controversy, claim or dispute arising out of or relating to the interpretation or performance of this Agreement, or breach thereof, by voluntary, nonbinding mediation to be conducted by a mutually acceptable mediator. ARTICLE 10 INDEMNITY City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 12 Category F - Landscape Architecture 8 Park Planning 3199870 FIRM SHALL RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND ITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES AND EMPLOYEES (COLLECTIVELY, "INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FROM AND AGAINST ALL DAMAGES, INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH), CLAIMS, PROPERTY DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOSS OF USE), LOSSES, DEMANDS, SUITS, JUDGMENTS AND COSTS, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES INCURRED IN ENFORCING THIS INDEMNITY), CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT, GROSSLY NEGLIGENT, AND/OR INTENTIONAL ACT AND/OR OMISSION OF FIRM, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR ANY OTHER THIRD PARTIES FROM WHOM FIRM IS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE, IN ITS/THEIR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT AND/OR ARISING OUT OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY FIRM PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF THE JOINT OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY (COLLECTIVELY, "CLAIMS"). THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION AND THE USE OF THE TERM "CLAIMS" IS ALSO SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO APPLY TO, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, WHETHER CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, BROUGHT AGAINST CITY BY ANY GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY OR AGENCY RELATED TO ANY PERSON PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT THAT ARE BASED ON ANY FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW AND ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, DAMAGES, ACTIONS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF EVERY KIND AND NATURE, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, EXISTING OR CLAIMED TO EXIST, RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF ANY EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM AND ITS EMPLOYEES OR SUBCONTRACTORS AS A RESULT OF THAT SUBCONTRACTOR'S OR EMPLOYEE'S EMPLOYMENT AND/OR SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT WITH THE FIRM, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM BASED ON SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR PREFERENCE, RACE, RELIGION, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE OR DISABILITY UNDER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, AND/OR ANY CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL TERMINATION, BACK PAY, FUTURE WAGE LOSS, OVERTIME PAY, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, INJURY SUBJECT TO RELIEF UNDER THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT OR WOULD BE SUBJECT TO RELIEF UNDER ANY POLICY FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE, AND ANY OTHER CLAIM, WHETHER IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE. FIRM IS EXPRESSLY REQUIRED TO DEFEND CITY AGAINST ALL SUCH CLAIMS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, IF A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION DETERMINES THAT THE CITY (WITHOUT WAIVING ANY GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY) HAS JOINT, CONCURRENT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE FOR THE CLAIMS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ("JUDGMENT"), THEN FIRM IS NOT REQUIRED TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND THE CITY TO THE EXTENT OF THE NEGLIGENCE APPORTIONED TO THE CITY. IN THE EVENT THE JUDGMENT PROVIDES THAT CITY IS JOINTLY, CONCURRENTLY OR SOLELY NEGLIGENT FOR THE CLAIMS REFERRED TO THEREIN, CITY AGREES TO REIMBURSE FIRM FOR ALL REASONABLE AND NECESSARY COSTS INCURRED AND PAID BY FIRM THAT ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 13 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 CITY'S PERCENTAGE OF JOINT, CONCURRENT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE, AS SET FORTH IN THE JUDGMENT, INCLUDING REASONABLE AND NECESSARY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES, WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE DATE THE JUDGMENT BECOMES FINAL AND NON -APPEALABLE. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, IF THIS AGREEMENT IS A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, THEN FIRM'S INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS ARTICLE 10 ARE LIMITED BY, AND TO BE READ AS COMPLYING WITH, SECTION 271.904 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SUCH THAT THE FIRM SHALL: (1) DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AGAINST LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY OR RESULTS FROM AN ACT OF NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL TORT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT, OR FAILURE TO PAY A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER COMMITTED BY THE FIRM OR THE FIRM'S AGENT, CONSULTANT UNDER CONTRACT, OR ANOTHER ENTITY OVER WHICH THE FIRM EXERCISES CONTROL; AND (2) REIMBURSE THE CITY'S REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES IN PROPORTION TO THE FIRM'S LIABILITY. IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPROVE OR SELECT DEFENSE COUNSEL TO BE RETAINED BY FIRM IN FULFILLING ITS OBLIGATION HEREUNDER TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY CITY, UNLESS SUCH RIGHT IS EXPRESSLY WAIVED BY CITY IN WRITING. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PROVIDE A PORTION OR ALL OF ITS OWN DEFENSE; HOWEVER, CITY IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. ANY SUCH ACTION BY CITY IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF FIRM'S OBLIGATION TO DEFEND CITY OR AS A WAIVER OF FIRM'S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY CITY PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. FIRM SHALL RETAIN CITY -APPROVED DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN SEVEN (7) BUSINESS DAYS OF CITY'S WRITTEN NOTICE THAT CITY IS INVOKING ITS RIGHT TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IF FIRM FAILS TO RETAIN COUNSEL WITHIN SUCH TIME PERIOD, CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO RETAIN DEFENSE COUNSEL ON ITS OWN BEHALF, AND FIRM SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED BY CITY. THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CREATED BY THIS ARTICLE SHALL SURVIVE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 11 NOTICES Firm agrees that all notices or communications to City permitted or required under this Agreement shall be delivered to City at the following addresses: Jim Proce City Manager City of Anna P.O. Box 776 Anna, TX 75409-0776 City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 14 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 Mandatory copy to: Wolfe, Tidwell & McCoy, LLP City of Anna Attorney 2591 Dallas Pkwy, Suite 300 Frisco. Texas 75034 City agrees that all notices or communication to Firm permitted or required under this Agreement shall be delivered to Firm at the following addresses: JACOBS ATTN: CHAD ST. JOHN 1999 BRYANT ST. SUIKTE 1200 DALLAS, TX 75021 Any notice provided in writing under the terms of this Agreement by either party to the other shall be in writing and may be effected by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. All notices or communication required to be given in writing by one party or the other shall be considered as having been given to the addressee on the date such notice or communication is postmarked and deposited in the U.S. mail with proper postage by the sending party. Each party may change the address to which notice may be sent to that party by giving notice of such change to the other party in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 12 MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Complete Agreement —This Agreement, including the exhibits hereto labeled "A" through "H," all of which are incorporated herein for all purposes, constitute the entire Agreement by and between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and/or contemporaneous written and/or oral understandings. This Agreement may not be amended, supplemented, and/or modified except by written agreement duly executed by both parties. The following exhibits are attached below and made a part of this Agreement: 12.1.1 Exhibit A, Professional Services Project Order Form 12.1.2 Exhibit B, City RFQ Category F - La 0d21 ape Architecture & Park Planning and Firm Response dated: 12.1.3 Exhibit C, City of Anna Benchmarks (as amended) hftp://www.Annatexas.gov/departments/l)lanning/benchmarks.phi). 12.1.4 Exhibit D, City of Anna Guidelines for Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD). Per industry standards. 12.1.5 Exhibit E, City of Anna Guidelines for Direct Expenses; General and Administrative Markup; Travel and Subsistence Expenses. 12.1.6 Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements. City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional services Agreement Page 15 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 12.1.7 Exhibit G, City of Anna Compliance with Federal, State, Local Laws and City Charter 12.1.8 Exhibit H, Conflict of Interest Questionnaire, Form CIQ. To the extent that Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F, Exhibit G or Exhibit H are in conflict with provisions of this Agreement or each other, the provisions of this Agreement, then the provisions of Exhibit A, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H or Exhibit B shall prevail in that order. 12.4 Severability — In the event of a term, condition, or provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, void, unenforceable, or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that term, condition, or provision, shall be deleted and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as if such invalid, illegal, void, unenforceable or unlawful provision had never been contained herein. 12.5 Governing Law/Venue — This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to conflict of law principles. The exclusive venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Collin County, Texas. 12.6 Execution / Consideration — This Agreement is executed by the parties hereto without coercion or duress for any substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever confessed. 12.7 Authority — The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. 12.8 Waiver — Waiver by either party of any breach of this Agreement, or the failure of either party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, at any time, shall not in any way affect, limit, or waive such parry's right thereafter to enforce and compel strict compliance. 12.9 Headings — The headings of the various sections of this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and are not to be full or accurate descriptions of the content thereof. 12.10 Multiple Counterparts — This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. An electronic mail and/or facsimile signature will also be deemed to constitute an original if properly executed and delivered to the other party. 12.11 Immunity — The parties acknowledge and agree that, in executing and performing this Agreement, City has not waived, nor shall be deemed to have waived, any defense or City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 immunity, including governmental, sovereign and official immunity, that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein. 12.12 Attorney's Fees — If either party files any action or brings any proceeding against the other arising from this Agreement, then as between City and Firm, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover as an element of its costs of suit, and not as damages, reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and litigation expenses both at trial and on appeal, subject to the limitations set forth in TEx. Loc. GOUT CODE § 271.153, as it exists or may be amended, if applicable. 12.13 Additional Representations — Each signatory represents this Agreement has been read by the party for which this Agreement is executed and that such party has had the opportunity to confer with its counsel. 12.14 Independent Contractor— In performing this Agreement, Firm and Firm's Personnel shall act as an independent contractor with respect to City. In no event shall this Agreement be construed as establishing a partnership, joint venture or similar relationship between the parties and nothing herein shall authorize either party to act as agent for the other. Firm shall be liable for its own debts, obligations, acts and omissions, including the payment of all required withholding, social security and other taxes and benefits with respect to all of Firm's officers, directors, partners, employees and representatives, who shall not be considered City employees and shall not be eligible for any employee benefit plan offered by City. At no time shall the City have any control or direction, direct or indirect, over the Firm's means, methods, sequences, techniques, procedures, supervision, subcontractors or other undertakings utilized to perform the Services. 12.15 Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions — This Agreement shall be deemed drafted equally by all parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any party shall not apply. 12.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries — Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any right in any third party not a signatory to this Agreement, and the parties do not intend to create any third party beneficiaries by entering into this Agreement. 12.17 Duty to Facilitate Compliance with Public Information Act (a) The obligations in this section apply if this Agreement (1) has a stated expenditure of at least $1 million in public funds for the purchase of goods or services by City; or (2) results in the expenditure of at least $1 million in public funds for the purchase of goods or services by City in a fiscal year of the Anna City Council. (b) If this Agreement is described in subsection (a) above, Firm shall comply with the following obligations, which are set forth in Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code: City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 17 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 (1) preserve all contracting information related to this Agreement as provided by the records retention requirements applicable to Anna for the duration of this Agreement; (2) promptly provide to Anna any contracting information related to this Agreement that is in the custody or possession of Firm on request of Anna; and (3) on completion of this Agreement, either: (1) provide at no cost to City all contracting information related to the contract that is in the custody or possession of Firm; or (2) preserve the contracting information related to this Agreement as provided by the records retention requirements applicable to City. (c) As used in this provision, the term "contracting information" shall have the same meaning as that term is defined in Section 552.003, Texas Government Code, as amended. (d) The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code, may apply to this Agreement and the Firm agrees that this Agreement can be terminated if the Firm knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement and caused this Agreement to be effective on the latest day as reflected by the signatures below. Effective Date: July 13, 2021 59" FIRM: JACOBS ��� By: �Jtl, Chad St.John, Manager of Projects Date: September 9, 2021 City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 18 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Jim Proce, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. s/ �3 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE thisa1 day ofSz yr 20_2L. o a Public In an or the State o Texas My commission a it s: 4 r✓ ?a- ------------- d"Y Ors JOANNA GOLLENER Notary 10 #128310086 +,r My Commission Expires June 4, 2025 STATE OF 2 X 4 r COUNTY OF � , I(9 S BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared (shad Sr. , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this _I day of Sea" fe_ b a/, 20 2-I. Notary ublic In and For tfie State of T44.�r M mmission expires: l 6 r-" 2� r? 1 S' ------------- r'Y �°ei� JANE MANLEY +y Notary ID N1 N012107 4 My Commission Exptres ryr February 20, 2025 nna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning EXHIBITS to MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT ORDER FORM: Individual "Professional Services Project Orders" will be issued for each project. Sample PSPO is included in the City's RFQ. EXHIBIT B CITY RFQ and FIRM RESPONSE Exhibit B-1: City RFQ (on file with the City Purchasing Department) Exhibit B-2: Firm's Response (on file with the City Purchasing Department) EXHIBIT C CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYING AND BENCHMARKING City of Anna Benchmarks (as amended) EXHIBIT D CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND DRAFTING (CADD) Per industry standards City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 20 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT E CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR DIRECT EXPENSES; GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MARKUP; TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES I. FIRM'S RESPONSIBILITY. The Firm shall be solely responsible for the auditing of all direct expense, approved markup (general and/or administrative), and approved travel and/or subsistence charges, including those to be included under a sub -contract, prior to the City for reimbursement, and Finn shall be responsible for the accuracy thereof. Any overpayment by the City for errors in submittals for reimbursement may be deducted from the Firm's subsequent payment(s) for services; however, this shall not be the City's sole and exclusive remedy for said overpayment. II. GUIDELINES FOR DIRECT EXPENSES. A. Local Transportation — Transportation in connection with the Services, when such transportation is not a function of routine performance of the duties of the Firm in connection with the Services, and when such transportation exceeds beyond fifty (50) miles from the Services site, shall be reimbursed at a standard mileage rate consistent with that as issued, and periodically revised, by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Under no circumstances shall City reimburse Firm at a higher standard mileage rate or pay additional markup on charges for local transportation. Completion of City's Standard Mileage Log is required for submittal of these charges for reimbursement, including justification for each submitted expense. Under no circumstances are charges associated with rental cars for local transportation eligible for reimbursement by City. Toll road subscriptions or toll plaza receipts are not reimbursable. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. B. Supplies, Material, Equipment — City shall reimburse the actual cost of other similar direct Services -related expenses, which are duly presented in advance and approved by City's Project Manager in writing. C. Commercial Reproduction — City shall reimburse the actual cost of reproductions, specifically limited to progress prints prepared for presentation to City at each phase of progress, and final Construction Documents prepared for distribution at bidding phase, provided that the Firm has duly obtained at least three (3) quotations from commercial firms and has chosen the best value for the City. Firm shall provide such documentation to City for review prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. D. In -House Reproduction - Firm shall make arrangements with the City for prior approval of in- house reproduction rates prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. City shall provide Firm with a standard format for documenting these charges. Completion of the City's reproduction log is required as a prerequisite for payment, including the number or reproductions, the date, time, description, the approved standard rate, and a justification for each submitted expense for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. E. Commercial Plotting — City shall reimburse the actual cost of plots, specifically limited to final documents, provided the Firm has duly obtained at least three (3) quotations from commercial firms and has chosen the best value for the City. Firm shall provide such documentation to City for review prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. F. In -House Plotting —Firm shall make arrangements with City for prior written approval of in-house plotting rates prior to submitting these charges for reimbursement. City shall provide Firm with a standard format for documenting these charges. Completion of the City's reproduction log is City of Anna, Toms— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 21 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 required as a prerequisite for payment, including the number of plots, the date, time, description, the approved standard rate, and a justification for each submitted charge for reimbursement. G. Communications — Reimbursement for expenses relating to electronic communications shall be limited to long-distance telephone or fax toll charges specifically required in the discharge of professional responsibilities related to the Services. Telephone service charges including office or cellular phones, WATTS, or Metro line services or similar charges are not reimbursable. H. Postage, Mail, and Delivery Service City shall reimburse the actual cost of postage and delivery of Instruments of Service, provided the Finn duly considers all circumstances (including available time for assured delivery) of the required delivery and selects the best value for the City, which may require comparison of delivery costs offered by three (3) or more sources or methods of delivery, which at a minimum shall include U.S. Mail. Courier service is acceptable only in circumstances requiring deadline -sensitive deliveries and not for the convenience of the Firm and/or the Firm's employees. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. I. Meals and Other Related Charges — Meals or any other related expenses are not reimbursable unless incurred outside a fifty (50) mile radius of the Service site, and then only reimbursable for the actual cost subject to compliance with the City's currently adopted policy. Non -allowable costs include, but are not limited to, charges for entertainment, alcoholic beverages, and gratuities. III. GUIDELINES FOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MARKUP. 1. Requirement of Prior Approval —Firm maybe allowed to charge a General and/or Administrative Markup on work completed if Firm can clearly define to City specifically what costs are included in the markup calculation. To apply General and/or Administrative Markup, Firm must also document to City what costs would be considered direct costs. City shall issue approval in writing to allow Firm to charge General and/or Administrative Markup. City reserves the right to reject any and all requests for General and/or Administrative Markup. IV. GUIDELINES FOR TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES. 1. Requirement of Prior Approval —City shall reimburse the actual cost of travel and/or subsistence expenses upon prior written approval by the City's Project Manager. 2. Adherence to Currently Adopted City Travel Policy — Reimbursements shall be governed by the same travel policies provided for City employees according to current adopted policy. Prior to the event, Firm shall request, and the City's Project Manager shall provide the provisions and the restrictions that apply to out-of-town reimbursements. END OF SECTION City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 22 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT F CITY OF ANNA CONTRACTOR INSURANCE GUIDELINES Requirement of Insurance — A. All required insurance policies shall name the City, its past, present, and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insured as to all applicable coverage with the exception of workers compensation insurance and professional liability insurance. B. Such policies shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies C. Such policies shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. II. Insurance Company Qualification — All insurance companies providing the required insurance shall be authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, and shall have a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s). III. Certificate of Insurance — A Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements evidencing the required insurance shall be submitted with the contractor's bid or response to proposal. If the contract is renewed or extended by the City a Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements shall also be provided to the City prior to the date the contract is renewed or extended. Insurance Checklist — "X" means that the following coverage is required for this Agreement. Copies of all endorsements for each policy required. Coverage Required X 1. Worker's Compensation & Employers Liability X 2. General Liability 3. XCU Coverage X 4. Professional Liability X Umbrella Coverage or Excess Liability Coverage Limits • Statutory Limits of the State of Texas • Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 each occurrence; • Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence; • Minimum $ 2,000,000.00 aggregate. • Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 each occurrence, • Minimum $ 2,000,000.00 in the aggregate. An amount of $ 2,000,000.00. X 6. City and its past, present, and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees named as additional insured on General Liability Policy and Umbrella or Excess Liability Coverage. This coverage is primary to all other coverage the City may possess. City of Anna, Texas - Master Professional Services Agreement Page 23 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 _2L 7. General Liability Insurance provides for a Waiver of Subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. All insurance policies that are required to name the City as an additional insured must be endorsed to read as primary and non-contributory coverage regardless of the application of other insurance. X 8. Thirty (30) days notice of cancellation, non -renewal, or material change required. X 9. Insurance company has a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s). X 10. Each Policy and Certificate of Insurance must state the project title and Professional Service Project Order number. 11. Other Insurance Requirements (State Below): END OF SECTION City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional Services Agreement Page 24 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER By submitting a response to the solicitation and entering into a contract with the City, the Firm hereby verifies and certifies that he/she/it is in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the City Charter. The Firm also certifies the following: CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY The bidder/proposer certifies that at the time of submission, he/shefit is not on the Federal Government's list of suspended, ineligible, or debarred contractors. In the event of placement on the list between the time of bid/proposal submission and time of award, the bidder/proposer will notify the City of Anna Purchasing Agent. Failure to do may result in terminating this contract for default. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Form 1295) By submitting a bid or proposal in response to this solicitation, the bidder/proposer agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908. Bidder/proposer agrees to provide the City of Anna Finance Department, and/or requesting department, the "Certificate of Interested Parties," FORM 1295 as required, with in ten (10) business days from notification of award, renewal, amended or extended contract. Visit https://www.ethics.state.tx.usAvhatsnew/elf info form1295.htm for more information. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH IMMIGRATION LAWS The bidder/proposer certifies that he/she/it is in compliance with all provisions of Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") and Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA") in regards to his/her/its employees/laborers and that employment eligibility has been verified by the bidder/proposer for all persons who will provide services to City. COMPLIANCE INDEMNIFICATION: INCONSIDERATION FOR THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY OF ANNA, VENDER AGREES TO RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF ANNA AND ITS PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, COUNCIL MEMBERS, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES ("INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, WHETHER CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, BROUGHT AGAINST THE CITY OF ANNA BY ANY GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY OR AGENCY RELATED TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY PROVIDING SERVICES BY, THROUGH OR UNDER VENDOR'S AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ANNA THAT ARE BASED ON ANY FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INA AND IRCA. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, IF THE AGREEMENT IS A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, THEN VENDOR'S INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE OBLIGATIONS UNDER ARE LIMITED BY, AND TO BE READ AS COMPLYING WITH, SECTION 271.904 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SUCH THAT THE VENDOR SHALL: (1) DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AGAINST LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY OR RESULTS FROM AN ACT OF NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL TORT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT, OR FAILURE TO PAY A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER COMMITTED BY THE VENDOR OR THE VENDOR'S AGENT, CONSULTANT UNDER CONTRACT, OR ANOTHER ENTITY OVER WHICH THE VENDOR EXERCISES CONTROL; AND (2) REIMBURSE THE CITY'S REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES IN PROPORTION TO THE VENDOR'S LIABILITY. NO PROHIBITED INTEREST City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 25 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER I, the undersigned, declare and affirm that no person or officer of the submitting firm or its partners are either employed by the City of Anna or is an elected official of the City of Anna and who has a financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contract with the City of Anna or has a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in the sale to the City of Anna of any land, or rights or interest in any land, materials, supplies or service. As per Section 11.02 of the Anna City Charter, interest represented by ownership of stock by a City of Anna employee or official is permitted if the ownership amounts to less than one (1) per cent of the corporation stock. I further understand and acknowledge that the existence of a prohibited interest at any time during the term of this contract will render the contract voidable. DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code requires that any vendor or person considering doing business with a local government entity disclose in the Questionnaire Form CIQ, the vendor or person's affiliation or business relationship that might cause a conflict of interest with a local government entity. By law, this questionnaire must be filed with the records administrator of The City of Anna no later than the 7th business day after the date the person becomes aware of facts that require the statement to be filed. See Section 176.006, Local Government Code. A person commits an offense if the person violates Section 176.006, Local Government Code. An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor. By submitting a response to this request, the vendor represents that it is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code. Form is attached to the bid specifications and to this Agreement as Exhibit H. DISCLOSURE OF COMMERCIAL OR SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH ISRAEL Section 2271.002, Texas Government Code: the Firm entering into a contract with the City verifies that it (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract and any subsequent renewals. DISCLOSURE OF BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH IRAN, SUDAN, OR A FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION Section 2252.153 or Section 2270.0201, Texas Government Code: provides that the City may not enter into a governmental contract with" (1) a Firm that is identified on a list prepared and maintained by the comptroller and that does business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization; or (2) a company that the United States government affirmatively declares to be excluded from its federal sanctions regime relating to Sudan, its federal sanctions regime relating to Iran, or any federal sanctions regime relating to a foreign terrorist organization is not subject to contract prohibition under this subchapter. Authorized Representative: Company Name: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Date: September 9, 2021 Printed Name: Chad St.John City of Anna, Texas— Master Professional services Agreement Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER Tom: Manager off Projects Signature: �r "'' ✓'Yy SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED to before me this q day of S ee t c , 6 .r 20 Z-/ to certify with witness my hand and official seal. Nota P lic in and for the iState of 4PRY P4I JANE MANLEY `� Ny Commission R12n01pire y My Commission Expires or February 20, 2025 City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional services Agreement Page 27 Category F - Landscape Architecture 8 Park Planning 3199870 EXHIBIT H CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORAM CIO For uendor doing business with local goyuernmmint &I 2nlity This cluas1k3rimim rarkmis clnnnnpas rnonsa l01Fm der by N.L M 041h Lag- RrngulerSesaron_ DFFC=Uu=CNLV This q.a horrurc is bmg ilod in ai o nil rnoc with Ckwom IM, Local Go rnr erd Corr. by a vordo'wto has a ben relabonuhip as dahred by Secbm 17EL061(1-aF wrh a local ga,� anal enbly and the wer.]ar rn, is rcquremcnts under Sedxirr 175.D dla). Oy law Ihns Guoslmnaim rnusl be Fed wMq the records a&nini>:ramr of he local govonlrrm tal&Mkty rd L>Nr Fun Tm 71h !: anms nary arts the male the vendor become; awara or fads " roquim H- slarcrnsrr W M irod. SW Sacban 17E.DMar 11, Local GDvunmcrr. CaAc. A yLYlder eomnirts am c4kmw nl rho %mfkJar knnoxrr3ty violate; Sacion Mni%. Local Grwommem Cado. An allcnx under tis xcibn Is a n7sdenworrar. 1j Nelme-or Vendot wine. rims awmnimsrelad8eshipwKhlocal govermenlelem111y. N/A Crock this box If you am flung an 4pdala to a previow* filed gmalilo lmim. [the law regl.rres iriai you hie an updaled G0M*eILM44ueRhGr)naire with llleapplopriate Kling aulhomy nal later than It*7Ml busmess day arler the dale on wP.ch you bemire, aware Thal the crighmily r ed que&b*r)naire was incor1p1ele or rnStcurale.y � NemeotloealgalremmenlalYceraha.riwhamlheiMarmatlanisheingAlsdasrd Name n1 Orfrce. ❑mzrbe each eyllplOyrrrent Or other busleess relellwrship with the lb[al governrnerrt alfloer_ or a tam ily member of the ofRlxr.as tle9orii&edby5eOW11175.0W(SM2)(A}. Also describe any Iemily relaWnshlpwllh the Iooal governnrerrtoilicer. CempWLeSLtbparts Aand 8 for each employmeniorbusirre9s relationship described_ Attach additional pages to1h19 Farm CIO as necessary_ A- 19ll1e local govenvrlenl olfnicer of a lamily merroer of the officer reeeking,x likely In reoe44e tnxamle irowrne_ oMler Than inveslrflem imorrre_ trorn the yErpMr7 oaN0 IL IsthE vYmclorreeefrirlg of likely In recerreta LB lemimme, other Ihm inveslmenl irloorrre, from heat Ihediredion of the Wal ga r:rnme,lt arfiXf cr a teary rnemtrer 01 the elfrxr AND the taxable irhVfw- is not received "m the local amemrnemal entity? 7-1 Yes F3� Na S 6escrRo&ochemplaymentarlurk*t!treleliansMiptMlMewerrdarnamadinSecHanimdntainswllhscorpormlianat alher business elrlitV lxhh respect to lrhleh the IoeaI govern ment ollloer serves a9 are olfleet or d irectar_ or holds an owrersNip Inttrresl of one percent or mo re. N/A 6 Che--k this box M the vendlx haS gkven l ne kcal governme-ii.3 NiceI Ora lamiy member of the 171r.cer 8ne Of rticre gilts ss descrihed in Sadion 176.1]103(aj(2}10), exc ding girls descrihed in Seciicc 176.L10C3(a 1}. r 9/30/2021 ruhracA ve erns sass &m go mn m&nbl endV Fame praidad try Tn Fthn Commission nnrnnew.altnies.stafa.ix.ns Revead 111YMI City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 28 Category F - Landscape Architecture & Park Planning 3199870 THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution adopting a Street Naming Policy for the City of Anna. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: Staff was directed earlier this year to develop a street naming policy for the City Council to consider. The attached policy is being proposed for use on all future requests for naming new streets and re -naming existing streets. The policy is only for major arterials, minor arterials, and collector roads as shown in the City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan. The policy will provide opportunities for honoring the special contributions and gifts of Anna neighbors throughout history and to also provide opportunities to enhance community spirit. Local streets are not a part of this policy. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Street Naming Policy 2. Resolution and Policy - Street Naming Policy APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/3/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 T H F , CITY OF jP10111C Street Naming Policy Overview • Staff has prepared a Street Naming Policy for the City Council to consider adopting via Resolution. • If adopted, staff will utilize the policy in the review, consideration, and recommendation of future street name changes or new street names. • The policy is specifically related to major arterials, minor arterials, and collector roads shown in the City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan. • The policy is not intended for use on local streets. • The City Council may name or re -name without following these procedures. THE CITY OF manna Objectives The objectives of this policy are to: • Provide name identification for individual streets within the City of Anna to ensure that they are not in conflict with street names in neighboring communities. • Provide criteria and procedure for naming streets to ensure that given names are consistent with the values and character of the Anna community. • Assure that the quality of the chosen name/title, so that it will serve the purpose of the City in a permanent manner. • Provide opportunities for honoring the special contributions and gifts of Anna neighbors throughout history and to also provide opportunities to enhance community spirit. THE CITY OF manna Naming Criteria The following criteria may be used in determining the appropriateness of the naming designation: • Geographical location • Historically or culturally significant ideas, places, or entities • Persons of outstanding service to the City, including: • Past Mayors and City Council Members who have successfully completed their full term(s) and served for extensive periods of time or during periods of significant community progress. • Key historical figures in the Anna community who should be recognized posthumously for their contributions to the creation and development of Anna. • Neighbors who, through individual or team excellence, functioned as a special representative of the Anna community to the State of Texas, United States of America, or world at large. • Neighbors or City representatives who gave their life in service to the Anna community, either locally as a first responder or overseas in military combat. • Key organizations which provide significant community services or material contributions. THE CITY OF manna Naming Procedure The following process shall be followed in naming or re -naming City streets: • City residents, staff, community leaders, and community organizations interested in proposing a name for a City street shall submit a written recommendation to the City Mana her er or his/her / designee. Recommendations shall describe in detail whythe g submitted name merits designation. • The City Manager will consider all requests and review the requests with the appropriate City staff. The City will determine if the request meets the criteria and prepare a formal recommendation for names deemed worthy of consideration to the Mayor and the City Council. • The City Council will name or re -name a City Street by Ordinance. • The City Council has final approval and may reject any naming or re- naming request. • The City Council may name or re -name without following these procedures. • The process of naming new streets shall normally be done prior to any business or residence is constructed and given an address on the street. Re -Naming Streets The intent of naming is for permanent recognition. The re- naming of City streets within the City of Anna is generally discouraged. However, there may be specific instances where it is necessary to change a street name. Re -naming of existing City streets shall be discouraged except when: • The existing street name is a number (County Road #, FM #, State Highway #) and has no alpha name designation. • The existing street name causes significant concern in regard to the public easily locating the street or businesses and facilities located on the street. • The City Council finds that an existing street name has become irrelevant or deems it necessary and in the interest of the community to re -name a City street. THE CITY OF manna Next Steps & Staff Recommendation • If adopted, the City will begin utilizing this policy in the process of considering all new street names and any proposals to re -name streets. • Staff recommends approval of the proposed policy. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NAMING AND RE -NAMING OF CITY STREETS. WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to name and re -name streets located within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas; and, WHEREAS, the City has investigated and determined that the policy and procedures in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Naming Policy") provides for a functional and beneficial manner for naming and re -naming City streets; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas has determined that adoption of the Naming Policy will be of benefit to the City and its citizens; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Policy Guidelines That the City Council of the City of Anna hereby approves and adopts the Naming Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A as guidelines for the naming of City streets. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of August 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Exhibit "A" Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to establish a systematic and consistent approach for the official naming of streets located within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas. Objectives: The objectives of this policy are to: • Provide name identification for individual streets within the City of Anna to ensure that they are not in conflict with street names in neighboring communities. • Provide criteria and procedure for naming streets to ensure that given names are consistent with the values and character of the Anna community. • Assure that the quality of the chosen name/title, so that it will serve the purpose of the City in a permanent manner. • Provide opportunities for honoring the special contributions and gifts of Anna neighbors throughout history and to also provide opportunities to enhance community spirit. Definitions: The definition of City Street in this policy is specific to the major arterials, minor arterials, and collector roads located within the corporate limits of the City of Anna as shown on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan, which may be revised from time to time. Naming Criteria: The following criteria may be used in determining the appropriateness of the naming designation: a. Geographical location b. Historically or culturally significant ideas, places, or entities c. Persons of outstanding service to the City, including: i. Past Mayors and City Council Members who have successfully completed their full term(s) and served for extensive periods of time or during periods of significant community progress. ii. Key historical figures in the Anna community who should be recognized posthumously for their contributions to the creation and development of Anna. iii. Neighbors who, through individual or team excellence, functioned as a special representative of the Anna community to the State of Texas, United States of America, or world at large. iv. Neighbors or City representatives who gave their life in service to the Anna community, either locally as a first responder or overseas in military combat. d. Key organizations which provide significant community services or material contributions. Naming Procedure: The following process shall be followed in naming or re -naming City streets: 1. City residents, staff, community leaders, and community organizations interested in proposing a name for a City street shall submit a written recommendation to the City Manager or his/her designee. Recommendations shall describe in detail why the submitted name merits designation. 2. The City Manager will consider all requests and review the requests with the appropriate City staff. The City will determine if the request meets the criteria and prepare a formal recommendation for names deemed worthy of consideration to the Mayor and the City Council. 3. The City Council will name or re -name a City Street by Ordinance. 4. The City Council has final approval and may reject any naming or re -naming request. 5. The City Council may name or re -name without following these procedures. 6. The process of naming new streets shall normally be done prior to any business or residence is constructed and given an address on the street. Renaming: The intent of naming is for permanent recognition. The re -naming of City streets within the City of Anna is generally discouraged. However, there may be specific instances where it is necessary to change a street name. Re -naming of existing City streets shall be discouraged except when: 1. The existing street name is a number (County Road #, FM #, State Highway #) and has no alpha name designation. 2. The existing street name causes significant concern in regard to the public easily locating the street or businesses and facilities located on the street. 3. The City Council finds that an existing street name has become irrelevant or deems it necessary and in the interest of the community to re -name a City street. THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: irff,711111►nrAN City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider/Discuss/Action on the adoption of ordinances implementing updated Roadway, Water, and Wastewater Impact Fees for the City of Anna, Texas. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: Impact Fees are governed by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The City of Anna charges impact fees for roadway, water, and sanitary sewer (wastewater) infrastructure which are paid for by new development at the time of building permit. These one-time fees are used by the City to fund expansion projects to increase the roads, water systems, and sewer systems to accommodate the increased demand placed on the City's infrastructure. The City contracted with Kimley Horn to provide the City with engineering services for updating the City's 10-year Capital Improvement Plan and completing an engineering study and report with recommendations for updated impact fees. The CIAC committee voted unanimously in June to recommend approval of the proposed Impact Fees presented to the City Council last month. The City Council provided feedback indicating an interest in looking at setting the fees higher. As such, staff has increased the Roadway Impact Fee to the maximum allowed, and provided two options (A and B) for the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. In addition, staff set the % of maximum fee by land use higher for the non-residential categories based on feedback provided by the City Council. Staff will present the options for Council consideration. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Impact fees are critical to the funding of public infrastructure required to meet the growing needs of the community. Increasing the impact fees is necessary due to rising construction costs of public infrastructure. Staff is proposing increases to the impact fees as described in the attached presentation and depicted in the proposed ordinances. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of either ordinance option A or B, adopting the updated impact fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2022-07-26 Impact Fees Report 2. Ordinance - Roadway Impact Fees 3. Ord Water and Wastewater Impact Fees - Option A 4. Ord Water and Wastewater Impact Fees - Option B 5. Presentation - Impact Fee Adoption - City Council APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF manna City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study PREPARED BY Kimley)))Horn Expect More. Experience Better. J U LY 2022 �i�e ��-�of►�L�ywasausrisc� oil 'IHC =y Ur Anna Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1 — Land Use Assumptions Chapter 2 — Roadway Impact Fee Study Chapter 3 — Water Impact Fee Study Chapter 4 — Wastewater Impact Fee Study Appendices Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Kimley>))Horn Executive Summary 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF Anna Prepared by: Kimley >> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. +���E•OF. TF;to# �.................:: � TODD L. STROUSE � 107773 ; �® AO'•�/ 0®'F ••.CENS .• ��� ��#e;ZONAL V ON®® ®®�� 07/26/2022 1'HL CITY O[ Anna Executive Summary Introduction Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads, and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for roadway and drainage, water, and wastewater facilities. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development towards new infrastructure needs. Impact Fees are a mathematical calculation that determine a maximum fee that would be equivalent to growth paying for growth. This study's purpose is to calculate the maximum impact fee per service unit of new growth. The Maximum Impact Fee is considered an appropriate measure of the impacts generated by a new unit of development on a City's infrastructure system. An impact fee program is anticipated to be designed so that it is predictable for both the development community and City. An impact fee program is transparent. This report describes in detail how the fee is calculated and how the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) monitors the Impact Fee program. An impact fee program is flexible in that funds can be used on priority projects and not just on projects adjacent to a specific development. An impact fee program is both equitable and proportional in that every new development pays an equal fee that is directly related to its systemwide impact. Impact Fee Basics Service Area A service area is a geographical area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected withing the Service Aera must be spent on eligible improvements withing the same Service Area. For Roadway Impact Fees, the service area may not exceed a 6-mile diameter trip length. In Anna, this results in the creation of two separate Roadway Service Areas. The Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Area for the City of Anna is the Extra - Territorial Justification, this service area was determined based on where the City of Anna will provide service. Land Use Assumptions The Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2022-2032. The 10-year increase in residential units is projected to be 6,902 units withing the city limits, the projected water and wastewater connections are 7,599 and 7,276 respectively. The 2032 projections show an increase of 19,141,000 square feet of non-residential land use over the 10-year window. These projections set the basis for determining loading and demands to serve new growth. The distribution of residential and non-residential growth utilized information from historical building permit data and input from city staff on known future development locations. Service Units The "service area" is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used to quantify the supply and demand for roads and utilities in the City. Service units are attributable to an individual unit of development and utilized to calculate the maximum impact fee of a development. For roadway purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle -mile. A "vehicle -mile" refers to the capacity consumed in a single lane by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length during the PM peak hour. The PM peak hour is the one - hour period during the afternoon/evening when the highest vehicular volumes are observed. In accordance with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. The service unit for water and wastewater impact fees is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the Kimley»)Horn Page 1 1'HL CITY O[ Anna size of the individual water meters used to serve growth related development. The base water SFE is the water demand associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence. The base wastewater SFE is the wastewater flow associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence. The smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence in the City of Anna is a 3/4-inch meter. Capital Improvement Plan The City and project staff have identified the Roadway, Water, and Wastewater projects needed to accommodate the projected growth over the next ten (10) years within the City of Anna. These projects include existing, proposed, and recently completed projects that were determined based on their current or anticipated impact on each defined Service Area and the City as a whole. Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The City of Anna Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for the roadway infrastructure within the City Limits. The projects on the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan were selected from the Thoroughfare Plan and cover existing, proposed, and completed roadway improvements, as well as intersection improvements with 10-year growth potential. Water Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed for the City of Anna based on the growth patterns and trends from the Land Use Assumptions. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet projected water demand through 2032. Elements of the water system, including storage facilities, pumping facilities, and the distribution network were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of Water Impact Fee Chapter of this report. Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan Similar to the Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, the Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed to address system improvements driven by growth. Elements of the wastewater system, including gravity pipes, force mains, lift station and wastewater treatment facilities were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of the Wastewater Impact Fee Chapter of this Report. Recoverable Project Costs Impact Fees are a one-time fee meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs within a ten-year window. With this consideration, the maximum assessable impact fee does not specifically cover the entire cost of a roadway, water, or wastewater project. The calculations that determine the percentage of a project's cost that is impact fee eligible are defined as the project's recoverable cost. Roadway Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for roadway projects are calculated by first determining the net capacity of vehicle -miles supplied to support future growth within a 10-year window. This net capacity is then multiplied by the percentage of roadway capacity added attributable to this 10-year growth. This growth percentage is obtained through the derivation of a transportation demand factor (TDF), which computes the total vehicle -miles associated to a single land use development unit. The TDF is applied to both the net vehicle -miles supplied and the vehicle -mile growth projections to calculate the growth percentage needed to determine the total recoverable project costs, which total $101,948,281 Kimley»)Horn Page 2 1'HL CITY OI Anna (pre -finance) over two (2) Roadway Service Areas. Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax revenues from the new development. Water Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for water projects are calculated by determining the increase in water demand due to growth over the 10-year window. The City's current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional SFEs to determine the maximum fee per SFE. The total recoverable costs for the water distribution system are $232,036,389 (pre -finance). Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax and utility revenues from the new development. Wastewater Recoverable Project Costs The process for calculating the recoverable wastewater costs is similar to the water financial analysis. The recoverable costs for wastewater projects are calculated by determining the increase in wastewater flows due to growth over the 10-year window. The City's current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional SFEs to determine the maximum fee per SFE. The total recoverable costs for the wastewater collection system are $291,665,915 (pre -finance). Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax and utility revenues from the new development. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Calculation In simplest terms, the maximum impact fee allowable by law is calculated by dividing the recoverable cost of the Capital Improvement Plans by the number of new service units of development. In accordance with state law, both the cost of the Capital Improvement Plan and the number of new service units of development used in the equation are based on the growth and corresponding capacity needs projected to occur within a 10-year window. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone Capital Improvement Plan and 10-year growth projection. In practice, there are many factors that complicate this calculation. The maximum impact fee allowable by law for each service area is shown below: Roadway Maximum Fee Water Maximum Fee Per Wastewater Maximum Fee Per Single Family Roadway Service Area Per Service Unit Single Family Equivalent Equivalent (3/4-inch (per Vehicle -Mile) (3/4-inch Meter) Meter 1 $1,845 $9285 $11,671 2 $1,423 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of impact fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Capacity Plan used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee's findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to have adequate representation of the building and development communities. In Anna this is the Planning & Zoning Commission with an ETJ representative. The City Council then conducts a public Kimley»)Horn Page 3 1'HL CHY O[ Anna hearing on the Land Use Assumptions, Capacity Plan, and Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Capacity Plan at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. Kimley»)Horn Page 4 Chapter 1 Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 301 2580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. P E. OF 0# I 06/28/2022 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table of Contents 1 Purpose..................................................................................................................... 2 2 Components of Land Use Assumptions Chapter....................................................... 2 3 Land Use Assumptions Methodology........................................................................ 2 4 Impact Fee Service Areas......................................................................................... 3 5 Data Format.............................................................................................................. 6 6 10- Year Growth Summary........................................................................................ 6 7 Summary................................................................................................................... 7 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1.1 — Roadway Service Area.............................................................................................................4 Exhibit 1.2 — Water & Wastewater Service Area........................................................................................... 5 List of Tables Table 1. Roadway Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032)..................................6 Table 2. Water Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections(2022-2032)........................................7 Table 3. Wastewater Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) .............................. 7 KimlepMorn Page 1 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Purpose Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas political subdivisions must follow in order to assess impact fees for new development. The first step required in updating impact fees is the development of Land Use Assumptions. These Land Use Assumptions, which include both residential and non-residential estimates, form the basis for the development of impact fees for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities. Reasonable future growth estimates are necessary in order to aid the City of Anna in establishing the need for capital improvements required to serve future development. In accordance with Chapter 395, Kimley-Horn has compiled the information required to complete the Land Use Assumptions using the following sources: - City of Anna Future Land Use Plan - Parcel Data Information from Collin Central Appraisal District - Aerial Overview of City Development Potential - City of Anna Staff 2 Components of Land Use Assumptions Chapter Land Use Assumptions included the following components: Land Use Assumption Methodology: Overview of the general methodology used to generate land use assumptions Impact Fee Service Areas: Explanation of the divisions of Anna into service areas for roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees 10-Year Growth Assumptions: Data on residential and non-residential growth within each service area from 2022-2032 Land Use Assumptions Summary: Synopsis of the land use chapter 3 Land Use Assumptions Methodology The residential and non-residential growth projections formulated in this chapter were done using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: - Existing development - Known planned developments - Location of vacant land - Future Land Use Plan - Buildout population projections Existing residential and non-residential data was compiled using parcel data from Collin Central Appraisal District and aerial survey. For the remaining undeveloped area, assumptions were utilized based upon buildout population projections, future land use plan and known developments. Consultation with City staff helped with finalizing growth projections. KimlepMorn Page 2 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 4 Impact Fee Service Areas Service Area Definitions According to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, a Service Area refers to the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivision to be served by the capital improvements or facilities specified in the impact fee. Funds collected in the specific service areas must be spent in the service area collected. Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for roadway facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.1. The roadway service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Anna. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of a political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." The City of Anna is proposed to be divided into two service areas for roadway impact fee purposes, using State Highway 5 to divide the service area boundaries. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) are excluded. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundaries of the proposed impact fee service area for water and wastewater facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.2. The water and wastewater impact fee service areas include the area within the ETJ. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 3 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas _ 0 0.5 1 Miles N r THE CITY OF ra CR 9106 Anna - CR �N r ` - �FM 455/ ), cow - Q m Q�� �— — I C� j J O HACKBERRY LN z {i � I lo CR'513'i � I W WHITE ST I\E-wHITE'S.T-14�----, O ) r O 01 0 �J Cf) - CR 417 i' 4 1 I ir r�I W FM.545 ' 1 Legend ' I` �♦ — Roadway Facilities I - , Service Area I ♦ — Streams Service Area 2 Floodplain ` _ ETJ Railroads EXHIBIT 1.1 �i Rr ,k Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5 Data Format The residential and non-residential estimates were all compiled in accordance with the following categories and format: Impact Fee Service Areas: Large zones, which correspond to proposed roadway, water, and wastewater facilities service areas (as described in previous section) Residential Units: Number of dwelling units or connections, including both single-family and multifamily Non-residential: Square footage of building area or number of connections based on three different classifications: Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented towards the household sector (i.e., grocery stores and restaurants) Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government and other professional and administrative offices Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services, including those exporting outside the local economy (i.e., manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses) 6 10- Year Growth Summary Table 1.1 summarizes residential and non-residential 10-year growth projections within the roadway service areas. Projections for single-family and multifamily growth were made using planned development information provided by the City of Anna. Growth projections made for non-residential building square footage assumed an 8% growth of non- residential businesses per year for the next 10 years. These assumptions are consistent with the water and wastewater connection growth projections presented in Table 1.2 and Table 1.3. Residential water and wastewater connections for the next 10 years were based on development information provided by the City of Anna and the non-residential connections were based on a growth of 8% per year for the next 10 years. Based on historical connection count information, approximately 95.7% of all water customers are also wastewater customers. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 6 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 1. Roadway Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Service Area Year Residential Units Non -Residential Square Feet Single -Family Multifamily Basic Service Retail 2022 5,500 24 380,205 445,328 1,932,411 1 2032 8,261 2,074 1,201,039 1,406,758 6,104,341 Growth 2,761 2,050 820,834 961,430 4,171,930 2022 1,913 120 319,499 18,164 5,063,079 2 2032 4,004 120 1,009,273 57,379 5,954,227 Growth 2,091 0 689,774 39,215 891,148 Overall City Growth 4,852 2,050 1,511,000 1,001,000 5,063,000 Table 2. Water Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Year Residential Connections Non -Residential Connections 2022 8,385 269 2032 15,984 499 Growth 7,599 230 Table 3. Wastewater Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Year Residential Connections Non -Residential Connections 2022 8,029 257 2032 15,305 477 Growth 7,276 220 [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 7 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 7 Summary The following is a summary of land use assumptions for the roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees. The roadway land use assumptions are confined to growth projected within the City Limits, while the water and wastewater land use assumptions are confined to growth projected within the ETJ. The roadway land use assumptions are quantified in terms of dwelling units and building square footage for residential and non-residential growth, respectively. The water and wastewater land use assumptions are quantified in terms of connections for both residential and non-residential growth. - The 10 year (2022-2032) residential growth projection is approximately: o Roadway Service Areas = 6,902 Dwelling Units o Water Service Area = 7,599 Connections o Wastewater Service Area = 7,276 Connections - The 10-Year (2022-2032) non-residential growth projection is approximately: o Roadway Service Areas = 7,574,000 ftz o Water Service Area = 230 Connections o Wastewater Service Area = 220 Connection KimlepMorn Page 8 Chapter2 Roadway Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study Prepared by: Kimlicy >>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. �p(E OF TF��1 BRANDON R. FORSYTHE X 135242 ; (�1� S/C1�n�ei * tm: Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................ 3 2 Land Use Assumptions.............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Summary.............................................................................................................................4 2.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas................................................................................... 4 3 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan ..................................................... 6 4 Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees...................................................................10 4.1 Service Areas.................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Service Units..................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Cost Per Service Units...................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology .......................... 11 4.5 Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs ............................... 14 4.6 Service Unit Calculation.................................................................................................... 16 5 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation............................................................................ 20 5.1 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit.......................................................... 20 5.2 Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit........................................................................... 22 5.3 Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development................................................................. 24 6 Sample Calculations................................................................................................ 27 7 Adoption and Administration of Roadway Impact Fees ............................................ 28 7.1 Adoption Process.............................................................................................................. 28 7.2 Collection and Use of Roadway Impact Fees.................................................................... 28 8 Conclusions.............................................................................................................28 Kimley>))Horn Page 1 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 List of Exhibits Exhibit2.1 — Roadway Service Area..............................................................................................................5 Exhibit 2.2 — Roadway Capital Improvement Plan for Service Area 1.......................................................... 7 Exhibit 2.3 — Roadway Capital Improvement Plan for Service Area 2.......................................................... 8 List of Tables Table 1. Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032)..................................................4 Table 2. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements — Service Area 1..........................................9 Table 3. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements — Service Area 2........................................10 Table 4. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities........................................................................................11 Table 5. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities..........................................................................................11 Table 6. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with....................................................15 Table 7. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with....................................................16 Table 8. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations..................................................................................18 Table 9. 10-Year Growth Projections...........................................................................................................19 Table 10. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation..........................................................20 Table 11. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation (Continued)......................................22 Table 12. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee...............................................................................23 Table 13. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table................................................................................... 25 Table 14. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile)..............................29 Kimley>))Horn Page 2 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Introduction Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Chapter 395 defines an Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." Accordingly, the City of Anna has developed its Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan with which to implement Roadway Impact Fees. The City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update. This chapter includes details of the Roadway Impact Fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the Capital Improvements Plan, and refinement of the Land Use Equivalency Table. This report introduces and references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: 1. Land Use Assumptions 2. Capital Improvements Plan Information from the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan are used extensively throughout the remainder of the report. There is a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion is broken into three components: 1. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 2. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 3. Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit The components of the Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees include development of: - Service Areas - Service Units - Cost Per Service Unit - Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology - Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs - Service Unit Calculation The Roadway Impact Fee Calculation includes the calculation of the: - Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit - Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit outlines a 50% reduction of the Capital Improvements Plan as outlined in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The final section of the report is the Conclusion, which presents the findings of the analysis and summarizes the report. Kimley>Morn Page 3 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 2 Land Use Assumptions 2.1 Summary The methodology for land use assumptions is presented in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. The development of land use assumptions included establishing roadway impact fee service areas (SA), collection/determination of residential and non-residential data by SA, and projection of the 10-year residential and non-residential growth by SA. Table 1 presents the growth projected for the City of Anna from 2022-2032 based on planned development information provided by the City of Anna and the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Table 1. Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Service Area Year Residential Units Non -Residential Square Feet Single -Family Multifamily Basic Service Retail 2022 5,500 24 380,205 445,328 1,932,411 1 2032 8,261 2,074 1,201,039 1,406,758 6,104,341 Growth 2,761 2,050 820,834 961,430 4,171,930 2022 1,913 120 319,499 18,164 5,063,079 2 2032 4,004 120 1,009,273 57,379 5,954,227 Growth 2,091 0 68-9 774 3-9 215 891,148 Overall City Growth 4,852 2,050 1,511,000 1,001,000 5,063,000 2.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 2.1. The City of Anna is proposed to be divided by State Highway 5 into two (2) service areas. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) are excluded from the study. It should be noted that at locations where the service area boundary follows a thoroughfare facility, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway, such as State Highway 5. In cases where a service area boundary follows the City Limits, only those portions of the facility within the City Limits are included in the service area. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 4 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas _ 0 0.5 1 Miles N r THE CITY OF ra CR 9106 Anna - CR �N r ` - �FM 455/ ), cow - Q m Q�� �— — I C� j J O HACKBERRY LN z {i � I lo CR'513'i � I W WHITE ST I\E-wHITE'S.T-14�----, O ff r O 01 0 �J Cf) - a CR 476 1 CR 417 i' 4 1 I 1 1 � I / 1 W FM 545 r Legend 1 7 — Roadway Facilities I - , Service Area I i Streams I Service Area 2 .. Floodplain ` _ ETJ b Railroads EXHIBIT 2.1 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 3 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan The City has identified the roadway projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for roadway infrastructure within City Limits. Only capacity improvements still needed to build out the Master Thoroughfare Plan to accommodate the expected growth within the next 10-years are included in the Capital Improvements Plan. The Capital Improvements Plan includes arterials, collectors, and Downtown class roadway facilities increasing the network capacity and consists of 5 categories of projects. They are as follows: - New — Any future roadway identified by the City to be included in the Capital Improvements Plan - Widening — Existing roadways not currently built to the ultimate classification in the Master Thoroughfare Plan and must be completely reconstructed - 1/2 Widening — Existing roadways that only have half of the ultimate cross section to be built - 1/3 Widening — Existing roadways that only have one-third of the ultimate cross section to be built - 2/3 Widening — Existing roadways that only have two-thirds of the ultimate cross section to be built All the roadway facilities identified are part of the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan. The City uses six -lane and four -lane divided cross sections for their arterial facilities, four -lane and three -lane undivided cross sections for their collector facilities, and a two-lane undivided cross section for their Downtown facilities. The Capital Improvements Plan is listed in Table 2 and Table 3 and mapped in Exhibit 2.2 and Exhibit 2.3. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility's Impact Fee classification. The Capital Improvements Plan was developed in conjunction with input from City of Anna staff and represents those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 6 Downtown Inset � Y HACKBERRY LN Capital Improvements Plan J Service Area 1 J ' no`� Miles N / z ® � THE CITY OF 4 Anna Y iG a'_ CR 373 CR 1106 5 c1 0LU I W WHITE ST co E WHITE ST TF CR 371 IC& 3?6 /� \ 2 0 16 RpSAMOND PKWY\\�t\�`— o Q cnl 1 Q `I See Inset HACKBERRY pR f G W WHITE ST t a r- \ O 0 } rV r a n _ 1 w i � LU - I—_—_— — J d cn U II l i -4 Legend Service Area 1 Project Type Service Area 2 New Streams Widening Floodplain Partial Widening Railroads None — ETJ Not a Thoroughfare in City Limits/Local Road EXHIBIT 2.2 l Capital Improvements Plan Service Area 2 0 0.5 1 Miles N THE CITY OF Anna ---- --- ---- S N CR 373 CR 1106 T CR 371 CR 3j6 L� v I b Downtown In • ' 101 MM���12 ■ 14 ■ ■ 15■ _ AMEN w ■■ ],7 19 .WHITE ST ,•• See Inset Y l CR513-� U) W WHI EST E W ITE ST I�z �0 j } I <' U) e I ) p 1 1 a = J j I ,�- --- —I 1 �� J I Ell - LU a z L. _ (J) o LLJ J I I I - -� CR � ' 1 CR417 1 I � 1 � I 1 W FM 545 Legend 1 Service Area 1 Project Type -- New •-—s I— - -I Service Area 2 Streams Widening • i Floodplain Partial Widening r Railroads None — ETJ Not a Thoroughfare in City Limits/Local Road CXHIBIT2.3] P Roadway Impact Fee Study Update TTC 7TYOF City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 2. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements - Service Area 1 Service Area Proj. # Impact Fee Class Roadway Lhnits Length (-) In Service Area l Miner Arterial CR 373 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 50°/ 2 Major Arterial CR 371 (1) 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.36 100% 3 _ 4_ 5 6 _ _ _ Major Arterial _ _ _ Major Arterial_ _ _ Major Arterial _ Major Arterial _ _ CR 371 (2)_ ____________ _ CR 371 (3)_ _ _ CR 371 4 CR 371 5) __ CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD ___________________________________ BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.24 0.11 _________ 0.71 100% 100% _________ 100%N. 100 7 Major Arterial CR 370 (1) 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 1.10 100% 8 Major Arterial CR 370 (2) CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.18 100% 9 Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 0.22 100% 10 Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) CR 374 to 1,I70' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.86 1000% 11 Major Arterial (213) W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSINGBLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 100% 12 Major Arterial (1/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 0.14 1001/. 13 14 15 16 Major Arterial (213) -Minor Collector Minor Collector Minor Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) ROLLINS RD (1) ROLLINS RD (2� HACKBERRY DR (1) 749 E OF LANGDON DR to N POWELL PKWY _ CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.23 1.01 0.12 0.54 1001/. 100% 100% 100% 17 1% Minor Arterial (1/2) Mmor Arterial _ HACKBERRY DR () HACKBERRY LN (1 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POWELL PKWY 0.26 0.18 10070 100% 19 20 Downtown Tie B Downtown Type B W 2ND ST (1) W 3RD ST (1) 34U W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 0.11 1001/. 100% 21 Downtown Type B HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 100% 22 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (I) 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR 0.04 100% 23 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (2) S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 24 Major Arterial FM 455 (1) 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 1.28 100% 25 Major Arterial FM 455 (2) 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD 0.83 1001/. 26 Major Arterial FM 455 (3) 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 1.21 100% __27 _ _ 28_ 22 __ 30 ______ Major Arterial ... Arterial (1/3) ___ Ma)rA tal (1/3� _ _____ _ Major Collector _ W WHITE ST (1) W WHITE ST (2) ________________________ _ WWHITE ST (3) _____ ___ CR 284 (1) _____________________ FM 455 to CR 286 _____ _ __________________________________ ____________ _CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB .......... _ _ ....... CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NBt SPOWELL PKWY _______________ _________ _____________ ____ ________ ___--- ___ 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 __ 0.51 _ R27_ 198 0.62 100% _____ 100% 100/ 100% 31 32 _ Major Collector_ _ Major Collector _ ___ CR 284 (2) CR 284 (3) _ _ 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 61V W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB_ 0.25 0.18 50% 100% 33 Major Collector TAYLOR BLVD (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.71 50°/ 34 Major Collecmr TAYLOR BLVD (2) 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.16 100% 35 Major Collector TAYLOR BLVD (3) 4,6W E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.04 50% SA 1 36 Minor Collector (4D) W FINLEY BLVD (1) S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.51 50°/ 37 Mmor Collector (4D)(l/2) -(2) BLVD (2) 2,7W E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN 0.08 100"/ ___38 39 Minor Collector (4D)_ Minor Collector W FINLEY BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (4) _ SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.15 100% 100% 40 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) 3,74Y W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 100% _ 4l _ 42 43 Ma' Collecto Majo Collector (1/2j __________ ___ Ma' r Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2 _ W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3L _________ __________________________ _________ W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 1_780_W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON!2 Wn _________________ 1,095 E OF S FERG 91,1 PKWY to ASPEN DR _ _ _ _ ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD 0.34 0.38_ 0.19 50% 50% 50% 44 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 45 Minor Arterial CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 0.03 100% 46 Minor Arterial CR 368 (2) 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 100% 47 Minor Arterial CR 368 (3) FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.12 100%__ 48 Minor Arterial CR 368 (4) 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to I,150' N OF CR 370 0.16 50°/ 49 Minor Arterial CR 368 (5) 1,150' N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 0.36 _ 1007. 50 Miner Arterial CR 368 (6) 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,855' S OF CR 370 0.21 50°/ 51 Mmo Arterial CR 368 (7) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 100% 52 Minor Arterial (1/2) CR 368 (8) 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST to 880' N OF W WHITE ST 0.59 100% 53 Mmor Arterial CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST to 2,801Y S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 100% 54 Minor Arterial CR 286 2) 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST to 3,801Y S OF W WHITE ST 0.19 100% _ 55_ 56 _ _ _ Min.,Arterial_ _ M jor Collector CR 286 (3) ____ ______________________ CR 374 1) 890_N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 90V N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY 0_28 1.52 100% 100% _ 57 Major Collector CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 100% 58 Major Collector CR 374 (3) 24Y S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 50°/ 59 1 Major Collector CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 100% 60 Major Collector CR 374 (5) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.38 100% 61 Major Arterial N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 to ROLLINS RD Lil 100% 62 Major Arterial (213) N FERGUSON PKWY (2) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 100% 63 Major Arterial (1/3) N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 100% 64 Major Arterial (1/3) S FERGUSON PKWY (1) W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST 0.46 100% _______ _ 65 _ 66 _ 67_ 68 Major Arterial (2/3) Major Arterial _ _ Major Arterial Major Arterial S FERGUSON PKWY (2) S FERGUSON PKWY (3) _ _ _ _ S FERGUSON PKWY 4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S FERGUSON PKWY (5) 2,440_ S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD W FINLEY BLVD to 1,7r15' S OF W FINLEY BLVD _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD _ 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.26 0.24 0.19 0.08 _______ 100% 50% _100% 50% 69 Collector W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,660' N OF CR 371 to 197V N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.89 100% 70 _Major Major Collector (4D) (1/2) W CROSSING BLVD (2j ,N OP W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 1970' 0.08 100% Kimley>))Horn Page 9 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update T, E�TY� City of Anna Minna June 2022 Table 3. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements - Service Area 2 In Service Proj. # Impact Fee Class Roadway Limits Length Service Area (., Area 1 Minor Arterial CR 1106 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,089 E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.20 50-1 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) _ _ _ _ _CR 1106 (2) _ _ _ _ 1,089 E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.46 50% 3 CR 376(1) NPOWELL PKWY to 1,675'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.32 100%_ _ 4 _Major _Arterial(2/3) Ma Arterial CR 376 (2) 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 0.29 100- 5 _ _Major Arterial_ OFCR427 .0 .1CR36i1 _ 100% 6 Major Arterial EROSAMOND PKY (1 N POWELL PKWY to 295'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 7 Major Arterial E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.36 100% 8 Major Arterial HOUSTON ST (1) CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 1.11 100% 9 Ma' r Arterial HOUSTON ST (2) 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 0.84 100% 10 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (2) N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 100% 11 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN �3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 100% 12 _ _ Minor Arterial_ HACKBERRY LN (4) _ N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 100% 13 _ _ Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 100% 14 Downtown Type B W 2ND ST (2) _ N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST _ 0.12 1OM. 15 Downtown Type B W 3RD ST (2)N POWELL PKWY to N RIOGINS ST 0.12 100% 16 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (3) S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.12 100°/ 17 Downtown Type B W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S BIGGINS ST 0.14 100% 18 Downtown Type B W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 100% 19 Major Arterial W WHITE ST (4) S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST 0.07 100% ______ 20 _____ ___ ...... Major Arterial _ _ _ E WHITE ST (1) _ _ _ ______________________________-_-_-____________________________- __________________ S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR _ _1.52 100% 21 Minor Arterial CR 419 (1) 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.46 100°/ 22 _mLwCollector E FINLEY BLVD (1) 93Y E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 100°/ SA 2 23 _ _Major Arterial_ _ E WHITE ST L2) _ _ _ _ E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 100% 24 Major Collector (4D) (1/2) E FINLEY BLVD (2) 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 100% 25 Major Collector E FINLEY BLVD 3 LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.65 100% 26 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 5011 27 M Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.76 _ 100% _ 28_ ...... Major Collector _E LQSLKI CROSSING RD (3) LEONARD AVE to 2_l35' E OF LEONARD AVE _ _ _ _ _ 0_40 100% 29 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 100% 30 Ma' r Arterial CR 417 CR 418 to CR 419 0.65 50-1. 31 Minor Collector ............ FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECTIO --------------------------------------------- ----- E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP --------- 0.36 --------- l001/. 32 Minor Collector S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 100% 33 Minor Collector CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 100% 34 Major Arterial CR 425 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 35 _ "r Arterial HOUSTON ST (3) E ROSAMOND_PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 100%_ 36 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (1) HOUSTON ST to 4" S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 1001/. 37 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (2) 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 93Y N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 5001 38 _ Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (3) E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 100%_ 39 Major Arterial (1/3) LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 100°/ 40 Major Arterial (2/3) LEONARD AVE (5) 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 100% 41 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE 6 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 50% 42 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (7) E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 100% 43 _ _ - Minor Arterial CR 419 2) 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.29 100% 44 Minor Arterial CR 419 (3) 1,039 N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 1 0.48 50-1 4 Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 4.1 Service Areas The two (2) service areas used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are shown in the previously referenced Exhibit 2.1. These service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Anna. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." The service areas in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are consistent with the specification of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. 4.2 Service Units The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle -mile. Below is the definition for vehicle - mile. Vehicle -Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Kimley>))Horn Page 10 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Total Vehicle -Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle -Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections. The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). The hourly service volumes used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are based upon Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and generally accepted planning principles. Table 4 and Table 5 show the service volumes as a function of the Impact Fee classification and existing cross sections, respectively. Table 4. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities Roadway Type (Impact Fee Description Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity per Classifications) Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility Major Arterial Six -Lane Divided 775 Minor Arterial Four -Lane Divided 725 Major Collector Four -Lane Undivided 650 Minor Collector Three -Lane Undivided 525 Downtown Type B Two -Lane Undivided 425 Table 5. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities Roadway Type Description Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity per Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility 6D Six -Lane Divided 775 4D Four -Lane Divided 725 4U Four -Lane Undivided 650 3U Three -Lane Undivided 525 2D Two -Lane Divided 2U Two -Lane Undivided 425 4.3 Cost Per Service Units A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle -mile of travel. This cost per service unit is the cost to construct a roadway (lane -mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle -mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the Capital Improvements Plan projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the 10-year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur in the City Limits within the next 10-years. As noted earlier, the units of demand are vehicle -miles of travel. 4.4 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology All of the project costs for a facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the Capital Improvements Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are "...including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; Kimley>Morn Page 11 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY�n City of Anna manna June 2022 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the Capital Improvements Plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the Capital Improvements Plan is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The costs for location - specific items such as bridges, drainage structures, and any other special components are added to each project as appropriate. The following is a detailed description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. Overview of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Worksheets For each project a specific costing worksheet has been developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contains project information, construction pay items, construction component allowances, and a summary of costs and allowances. An example costing sheet can be seen below. City Df Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1Gmiey-Hom and Associates, Inc. updated: &2&'2tY1.2 ' • Neme: CR 373 This project consists of widening the Project Information Limits: 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY existing facility to a four -lane divided Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial arterial. Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Construction Pay Items Construction Component Allowances Summary of Costs and Allowances No. Roadway Iltem Description 4uantity Unit Unit Price Item Cast 102 ldnclass�ed Roadway Excavation 1,851 Cy $ 16.00 5 29,618 202 6' Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,570 By $ 2000. 5 71.400 302 8' Concrete Pavement 3,173 sy $ 100.00 S 317,333 402 6' CoDmrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 5 71,400 502 Curb & Gutter 2 380 If $ 40.00 S 95.200 602 Topsoil 1,983 sy $ 10.00 5 19,833 702 Turn Lanes 201 By $ 120.00 S 24.070 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 628,865 nior Construction Component Allowances-: Item Descrytion Notes Allowance ttam Cost Traffic Control Construm- Phase TA. Control 5% $ 31,443 d Pavement Marklm"arkers 3a S 18,866 -4 R kidvray Drainage Standard Ini—I System 30% S 188,656 Special Drainage Structures NoneAntidpaoed - S - -4 Water rdnorAdjustrnents 5% S 31,443 d sewer Mnor Adjustments 5% S 31,443 -4 Landscaping and Irrigation 5% S 37,731 d Illumination Standard uminalmnSystem 6% S 37,731 Other- So 5 - -Alowa�s based an'.. of Paving Cwnruumn Cast Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 377,313 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,016,168 Construction Contingency: 20% S 201,234 Mobilization Sqa $ 50,308 Prep ROW 5°a S 50,308 Construction Cast TOTAL; $ 1,309,000 ProjectImpact Fee Item Description Hotel: Allowance Item Cast Construction: - $ 1,309000 Engmeeringt8urveyFresting: 16% S 209:440 ROWIEasementAcquisition: EdAngAdignnrent 10% S 130,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,649,0( NCTE: The planning level mstpojecuons sled in this appends hate been developed rat Impact Fee calauladons onlyand should not be used for any future Capital Inpravmhent Planning xithin the City G Anna. The planning level cast projections shall nor supersede the GWs design standards erthe deterrNnaticn of the City Erigneer for a specific prated. Kimley)))Horn Page 12 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: - Project Number — Identifies each project with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. - Name — A unique identifier for each project. - Limits — Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. - Impact Fee Class — The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable based on the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan classification of the roadway. Additional classifications are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be partially widened or the ultimate cross section is assumed to be different than the Master Thoroughfare Plan classification due to field conditions. The following notations are used for these projects: o "(1/2)" for facilities where one-half the facility still needs to be constructed. o "(1/3)" for facilities where one-third of the facility still needs to be constructed. o "(2/3)" for facilities where two-thirds of the facility still needs to be constructed. o "41D" for collector class facilities assuming a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adjacent cross sections. - Length ft— The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. - Service Area — Represents the service area where the project is located. - Description — Used to describe the project type assumed in the costing such as a widening or a new project. Construction Pay Items A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including planning, survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and inspection. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of hundreds of various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The roadway construction components pay items are listed below: - Unclassified Roadway Excavation - Curb & Gutter - Lime -Treated Subgrade - Topsoil - Concrete Pavement - Turn Lanes - Concrete Sidewalk Construction Component Allowances A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include traffic control, pavement markings, roadway drainage, special drainage structures, utility adjustments, landscaping, irrigation, and illumination. Lump sum dollar allowances are provided for special drainage structures and railroad crossings where needs are anticipated. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a twenty percent (20%) contingency, five percent (5%) mobilization, and either five (5%) or one percent (1 %) preparation of right-of-way (ROW) based on whether the project is new or existing to determine the construction cost total. Summary of Costs and Allowances To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, sixteen percent (16%) of the construction cost total is added for engineering, surveying, and testing. Kimley>Morn Page 13 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Percentages are also allotted for ROW/easement acquisition. ROW/easement acquisition was based on whether the project was an existing alignment or future alignment. For an existing alignment, the ROW/easement acquisition cost was provided an allotment equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction cost total. For a new alignment, the ROW/easement acquisition cost was equal to twenty percent (20%) of the constriction cost total. The value for ROW/easement acquisition is an estimated contribution allocation and does not represent actual ROW/easement acquisition needs. TxDOT facilities and partial widening projects assumed no ROW/easement acquisition. The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, testing, and inspection, plus ROW/easement acquisition. Based upon discussions with City of Anna staff, TxDOT facility projects were included with a projected contribution of twenty percent (20%) of the total project cost. 4.5 Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs Table 6 and Table 7 summarize the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan project list for the two (2) service areas with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual -level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are potentially recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be precisely predicted. The Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the Capital Improvements Plan are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 14 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update THE 7TYOP City of Anna Afifil June 2022 Table 6. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections - Service Area 1 9ervlce Area Pmj. # Clasa Roadway Limits Length (�) /n In SArea Total Project Coat Coat in Service Area 1 Minor Arterial CR 373 595'W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 50% $ 1,649,000 $ 824,500 2 Major Attend CR 371 (1) 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.36 100^/ $ 7,132,000 $ 7,132,000 3 Major Arsenal CR 371 (2) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 91U E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.30 100% $ 7,980,000 $ 7,980,000 4 Major Arterial CR 371 (3) 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 0.24 100% $ 4,799,000 $ 4,799,000 5 Major Arterial CR 371 (4) 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD 0.11 100% $ 2,222,000 $ 2,222,000 6 7 Major Arterial Major_Arlerial CR 371 (5) CR 370 (1) BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 0.71 1.10 l00"/0 l00% $ 14,208,000 S 21,639,000 $ 14,208,000 $ 21,639,000 8 Major Arterial CR 370 (2) CR 368 m CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB _ (ITS 100% $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 9 10 Major Arterial Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 CR 374 to LIM W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.22 0.96 l00% l00% $ 4,201,000 S 17,734,000 $ 4,201,000 $ 17,734,000 11 Major Arterial (2/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 l00% $ 5,317,000 $ 5,317,000 12 Major Arterial (1/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 0.14 100% $ 1,337,000 $ 1,337,000 13 Major Arterial (2/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) 740' E OF LANGDON DR m N POWELL PKWY 0.23 l00% $ 1,933,000 $ 1,933,000 14 Nit-Co$ector ROLLINS RD (1) CR 374 to 615'W OF W CROSSING BLVD 1.01 100% S 1.1,510,000 $ 11,510,000 15 Minor Collector ROLLINS RD (2) 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD 0.12 l00% $ 1,244,000 $ 1,214,000 16 Minor Arterial RACKBERRY DR (1) CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.54 100% $ 8,486,000 $ 8,496,000 17 18 Minor Arterial(]/2) I it- Arsenal HACKBERRY DR (2) HACKBERRY LN (1) 1,365'W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 690' W OF N JAMES ST b N POWELL PKWY 0.26 0.18 l00% l00% $ 1,298,000 $ 2,688,000 $ 1,298,000 $ 2,688,000 19 Downtown Type W2ND ST (1) 34U W OF N JAWS DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 l00% $ 1,126,000 $ 1,126,0N1 20 Downtow_n Type B W ED ST (1) HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 100% S 990,000 $ 990,000 21 Downtown Type B HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 100% $ 956,000 $ 956,000 22 23 Downtown Type B Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (1) W SEE ST (2) 2IN W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.04 0.06 L00% 1001/. S 370,000 S 517,000 $ 370,000 $ 517,000 24 Major Arsenal FM 455 (1) 1,33W W OF FM 3356 to 14U W OF CR 289 1.28 100% $ 5,347,000 $ 5,347,000 25 26 Major Arterial Major Arterial FM 455 (2) FM 455 (3) 80' S OF FM 290 to I N OF COWAN RD l8O E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 0.83 1.21 100% l00% $ 3,437,000 $ 5,020,000 $ 3,437,000 $ 5,020,000 27 Major Arterial WWHITE ST (1) FM 455 to CR 286 0.51 100'% $ 1,983,000 $ 1,983,000 28 Major Arterial(]/3) WWHITE ST (2) CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.27 100% S 225,000 $ 225,000 29 Major Artenal(1/3) WWHITE ST (3) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY FIB to S POWELL PKWY 1.98 100% $ 1,643,000 $ 1,643,000 30 Major CnBectnr CR 284 (1) 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 0.62 l00% $ 7,961,000 $ 7,961,000 31 Major Collector CR 284 (2) 1905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610 W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.25 50% $ 3,515,000 $ 1,757,5W 32 33 34 Major Collector _Major CoBccror _ _ _ Major Collecor CR 294 (3) __________ TAYLOR BLVD (1) TAYLOR BLVD (2) 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB m CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB ____________________________________________________________ CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB ro 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY ND 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB a 4,601N E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.18 ____ 0.71 0.16 IOW/ ______ 5W/o 100% $ 4,832,000 ___________ $ 1 �511,000 $ 1979,000 _ $ 4,932,000 _ $ 5,755500 $ 1,979,000 35 36 Major Collector Minor Collector (41)) TAYLOR BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (1) 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,70(V E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.04 0.51 5W/o 50% $ 541,000 $ 7,581,000 $ 270,500 $ 3,790500 SA 1 37 Minor Collector (41)) (12) W FINLEY BLVD (2) 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN (108 100% $ 405,000 $ 405,000 38 39 Minor Collector (41)) Mom Collector W FINLEY BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (4) SILVER LEAF IN to CR 423 CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.15 I00% l00% $ 4,521,000 $ 1,547,000 $ 452L000 $ 1,547,000 40 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (I) 3,740 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 101% $ 6,339,000 $ 6,339,000 41 1 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 1,780 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON PKWY 0.34 5W/o $ 4,270,000 $ 2,135,000 42 Major Collector (12) W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY m ASPEN DR 0.38 SW/o $ 1,793,000 $ 896,500 43 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) ASPEN OFF. HIGHLAND RD 0.19 5W/o $ 2,423,000 $ 1,211,500 44 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 l00% S 708,000 $ 708,000 45 Himo<A-ml CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 0.03 100% S 435,000 $ 435,000 46 47 Minm Arterial Minor Arterial CR 368 (2) CR 368 (3) 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 0.12 100% IOW/ $ 8,043 000 $ 1,731,000 $ 8,043,000 $ 1,731,000 48 49 50 Minor Arterial Minor Arsenal Minor Arterial CR 368 (4) CR 368 (5) CR 368 (6) 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 I,I50' N OF CR 370 N 740' S OF CR 370 _______________ _________ 740' $ OF CR 370 m 1,855' S OF CR 370 0.16 0.36 0.21 5W/o IOW/o SW/o $ 2,300,000 $ 5,645,000 ___ $ $ 1,150,000 $ 5 645,000 $ 1,545,000 51 52 Minor Arterial Minor Arerial (12) CR 368 (7) CR 368 (8) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST to 8W N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 0.59 IOW/o IOW/ _3,090,000 $ 2,976,000 $ 2,984,000 $ 2,976,000 $ 2,984,000 53 Mi.. Arterial CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST m 2,8OY S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 100% $ 7, /57,000 $ 7,757,000 54 55 Minor Arterial Mn. Arterial ______ CR 286 (2) CR 286 (3) 2,8O9 S OF W WHITE ST m 3,800 S OF W WHITE ST 890 N OF CR 284 to 569 S OF CR 294 0.19 0.28 100% l00% $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,OW $ ___2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 56 Major Collector CR 374 (1) 900' N OF CR 371 m W ROSAMOND PKWY 1.52 100% $ 19,996,000 $ 19,996,000 57 Major Collector CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240 S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 100% S 576,000 $ 576,000 58 Major Collector CR 374 (3) 24U S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY m 5251 N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 50% $ 1,032,000 $ 516,000 59 Major Collector CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 l00% $ 1,260,000 $ 1,260,000 60 Major Collector CR 374 (5) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY_ DR 0.38 IOW/ $ 4,899,OW $ 4,899,000 61 Major Arterial _ N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 mROLLINS RD 1.11 IOW/ $22,328,000 $ 22,328,000 62 Major Artcnal (23) N FERGUSON PKWY (2) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 IOW/o $ 4,482,000 $ 4,482,000 63 Major Arterial (1/3) N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBHRRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 IOW/o $ 2,087,000 $ 2,067,000 64 65 Major A te-I (1/3) Major Arsenal (2/3) S FERGUSON PKWY (1) S FERGUSON PKWY (2) W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF-W WHITE ST 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST to 190 N OF TAYLOR BLVD 0.46 0.26 l00"/0 l00% $ 1,922,000.1 $ 2,209,000 1222,000 $ 2,209,000 fib Major Arterial S FERGUSON PKWY (3) W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD 0.24 50% $ 4,650,000 $ 2,325,001 67 66 Major Arterial Major Arsenal S FERGUSON PKWY (4) S FERGUSON PKWY (5) 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.19 0.08 I00% 50/ $ 3,828,000 $ 1,587,000 $ 3,828,000 $ 793,5W 69 Major Collector W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,669 N OF CR 371 to 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.99 100% $ 11,485,000 $ 11,485,000 70 Major Collector (41)) (12) W CROSSING BLVD (2) 1970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530 N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.08 100% $ 419,000 Service Area Pru'ect CS 302,135,000 AStudyCoat Roadwa I ct FeeS 28,161 Total Cost in Servi$302,163,167 Kimley>))Horn Page 15 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update THE 7TYOP City of Anna [hint June 2022 Table 7. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections - Service Area 2 Service Length In Total Project Cost in Se rviee Area ProJ.M Class Roadway Limits ( SAmaa Cost Area _ 1_ Minor Atterial CR 1106 (1)----.............. ..................... N POWELL PKWY m 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 010 5Wo $ 3,812,000 S 1,906,000 2 Minor Anerial(1l2�_ ___ CR 1106 (2) I,080'EOFN POWELL PKWY W3,505 EOFN POWELL PKWY OA6 SW/o $ 3,474,000 S 3 Mao, Arcerial(2/3) _ CR 376 (1) NPOWELL PKWYW1,675 EOFN POWELL PK WY 0_32 100°/a $ 3,474,000 3,474,000 $ 3,474,000 4 M jor Arterial CR 376 (2) 1,675' E OF N POWELL PK W Y to CR 427 0.29 IOW/ $ 5,65Q000 S 5,658,000 5 Me or Arterial CR 376 3 CR 427 to 575' E OF CR 427 0.11 I00°/ $ 2,119,000 S 2,119,000 6 Ma or Arterial EROSAMOND PKWY 1 N POWELL PKWY to 295'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% $ 1,906,000 $ 1,906,000 7 _ Mjor Arterial EROSAMOND PKWY 820'EOFN POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY 036 I00% _ _ _ _ $ 7,151,060 $ 7,151,000 8_ _ Major Arterial____ ___HOUSTON ST Li) ------. _--------..... CR 425 to 5,85W E OF CR 425 --- ________----______ _ 1.11_ 10W/o $ 4'195'000 $ 4,195,000 9___ ______Major Arterial____ __________H ST 0------- 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477___ _ 0.84 10W/ $ 3,317,000 $ 3,317,000 10 Ivtmor Arterial H_OUSTON ACKBERRY IN (2) NPOWELL PKWY toN BIGGINS 57 0.12 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,773,000 I l Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 foo. IOW/o $ 1,545,000 $ 1,545,000 12 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY IN (4) N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 100% $ 711000 $ 71,000 13 Minor A,reml HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 l00% $ 5,826,000 $ 5,826,000 14 Downtown T e B W 2ND ST (2 N POWELL PKWY to N BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,058,000 $ 1,058,000 15 Downtown T c B W 3RD ST 2 N POWELL PKWY to N BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000 16 Downtown TB _ W STH ST 3 S POWELL PKWY to S BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,092,000 $ 1,092,000 17 Downtown Type B W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.14 l00% $ 1,227,000 $ 1,227,000 18 _ Downown Type B W 8TH ST _ S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 IOW/ $ 653,000 $ 653,000 _ 19_ _ _ _ Major Arteral_ _ _ _ _ _ W WHITE ST (4� _ _ _ _ S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN BT 0.07 IOW" $ 241,000 $ 241,000 20 Major Arterial E WHITE ST (1) S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1.52 - IOW/o $ 5,907,000 $ 5,907,000 21 Minor Arteral CR 419 (1) 599S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF EFINLEY BLVD P. $ 1,239,000 $ 1,239,000 22 Major Co0ector E FINLEY BLVD (l) 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 IOW/ $ 2,739,000 $ 2,739,000 23 Major Arterial E WHITE ST 2 E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 IOW/ $ 4,189,000 $ 4,I89,000 SA 2 24 Major Collector(4D) 1/2 E FINLEY BLVD (2) 345E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 100% $ 813.000 $ 813,000 25 Major Co0ector E FINLEY BLVD (3) LEONARD AVE to 3,410 E OF LEONARD AVE R65 100% $ 8289,000 _ $ 8,289,000 26 Co0ector E FOSTER CROSSINGRD 1 S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 50% $ 1,443,000 $ 721,500 _ _ 27 _Major _ _ _Major Co0ecmr _ _ _ _____ _ _ E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2Z_ _ _ _ 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE _ _ _ 0.76 100% $ 10,484,000 ___________________ $ 70,484,000 _ 28_ _ _ _Major Collector ...... ............... E FOSTER CROSSING RD t3L---- _ _ _ LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE _ _ _ 040_ IOW/_ $_ 5,190,000 $ 5,190,000 29 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 IOW/o $ 8,897,000 $ 8,897,000 30 Major Arterial CR 417 CR 418 w CR 419 0.65 50% $ 13,139,000 $ 6,569,500 31 M. Collector 1 FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECT[Ob E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.36 IOW/ $ 3,815,000 $ 3,815,000 32 Mmor Co$eow, S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 IOW. $ 3,603,000 $ 3,603,000 33 Mmor Co0eotor CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 100 $ 1,758,000 $ 1,758,000 34 Major Arterial CR 425 1,549N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 100% $ 6,085,000 $ 6,085,000 35 Mjor Arterial HOUSTON ST(3) E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 10W/. $ 957,000 $ 957,000 36 ........ _ _ M jor Arterial LEONARD AVE (1 HOUSTON ST m 485' S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 ___ 10W/o ___ $ ,812,000 $ 1,812,000 _ 37 _ hi.jcwAroetal ............. ___ LEONARD AVE (2)_ _ _ 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST m 930' N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 SW/ $ 2,372,000 $ 1,186,000 38 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (3) E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 l00% $ 13,947,000 $ 13,947,000 39 MaJor Arterial H/3) LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 100% $ 2,690,000 $ 2,690,000 _ 40 Major Arterial (2/3) LEONARD AVE (5) 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 IOW/ $ 1,096,000 $ 1,096,000 41 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE ( 1,135- N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 50% $ 4,182,000 $ 2,091,000 42 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE E F(1STER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 100% $ 7,431,000 $ 7,431,000 43 Minor Arterial CR 419 2 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 1.29 100% $ 4,268,00_0 $ 4,268,000 _ 44 Mmor Arterial CR 419 3 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 0.48 50% 1 $ 7,841,000 $ 3,920,500 Sertiee Area Project Cost SuMotal $ 155,506,000 Roadway lmact Fee Smdy Cost $ 28,167 Total Cost in Service Area 2 $155,534,167 4.6 Service Unit Calculation The basic service unit for the computation of Anna's Roadway Impact Fee is the vehicle -mile of travel during the PM peak -hour. To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle -miles of travel for the service areas for the 10-year period. The growth in vehicle -miles from 2022 to 2032 is based upon projected changes in residential and non-residential growth for the period. These growth projections are discussed in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. The residential and non-residential statistics in the Land Use Assumptions provide the "independent variables" that are used to calculate the existing (2022) and projected (2032) transportation service units (vehicle -miles) used to establish the roadway impact fee maximum rates within each service area. The roadway demand service units (vehicle -miles) for the service area are the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land use in the service area. For the purpose of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non- residential. For residential land uses, the number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -miles of travel that occur during the PM peak hour. This factor computes the average amount of demand caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The transportation demand factor is discussed in more detail later in this section. For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions provide the projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of non-residential land uses - basic, service, and retail. These Kimley>))Horn Page 16 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and is known at the time of application for any development, or development modification, that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle -miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle - miles of demand for the service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources — the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and trip length information from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. These trips are called pass -by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail rate to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the region -wide travel characteristics survey conducted by NHTS, requirements in Chapter 395, and other generally accepted planning principles. The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: TDF =T *(1—Ph)*L.x where... Lmax = nin (L * OD or SAL) Variables: - TDF = Transportation Demand Factor - T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit) - Pb = Pass -By Discount (% of trips) - L = Average Trip Length (miles) - LMax = Maximum Trip Length (miles) - OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%) - SAL = Maximum Service Area Trip Length The maximum trip length was limited to three (3) miles, or the assumed radius of the service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles in diameter. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin - destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Roadway Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Anna to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips as both residential and non- residential trips, a 50% origin -destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is Kimley>Morn Page 17 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the NHTS. Table 8 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the two (2) residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Table 8. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential Basic Service Retail Single -Family Multifamily T 0.94 0.51 0.65 1.44 3.40 Pb 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% Max* 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 TDF 2.82 1 1.53 1.95 4.32 6.76 The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 9. This table shows the total growth in total vehicle -miles by service area between the years 2022 and 2032. These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle -Miles of Travel for the 10-year period. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 18 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 �U o� �o N � � N � N M � 6 Ol r a C N N @ M � @ � C @ p J � C m @ c c � @ J_ @ L N N N O O @ C � N - @ Q N T =O @ j N T 3 y LL N D L @ C J U @ N O O or or d cm £ c O N p w O R � @ > > H N @ Of S gW C O 4 a W W -o S rn U S w a o c lL E E C@ L U w w g@ 3 O p N `O C U C N 0 0 O N m N C y 0 0 c w w L O J 0 M > T O y O O ly 4y4JJ N t� N O. @ C o @ g 7 .O (5O (n . d 00 r0 �. C O O E j c o a 4 O. O U O@@ U O_ L U c o 0 o m N U U= J O @ @ d o m m o O LL N m U LL m a0 tp U 2 O M N O N N N O N_ yW 6 W LL' U M W N LL J O W V J W U 5 W N H W N .a Kimley>Morn Page 19 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 5.1 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this chapter. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 10 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. Table 10. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation Line Title Description Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity The total number of vehicle -miles added to the service area based on 1 Added by Capital the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Improvements Plan Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply) Each project identified in the Capital Improvements Plan will add a certain amount of capacity to the City's roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities 2 Demand upon which capacity is being added (from Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the Capital Improvements Plan have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Number of vehicle -miles of travel that are not accommodated by the 3 Deficiencies existing roadway system (from Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) In order to ensure that existing deficiencies on the City's roadway network are not recoverable through impact fees, this line is based on the entire roadway network within the service area. Any roadway within the service area that is deficient, even those not identified on the Capital Improvements Plan, will have these additional vehicle - miles removed from the calculation. Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of A measurement of the amount of vehicle -miles added by the Capital 4 Capacity Added Improvements Plan that will not be utilized by existing demand. Line 1 — Line 2 — Line 3) This calculation identifies the portion of the Capital Improvements Plan (in vehicle -miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. Total Cost of Capital The total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan projects within each 5 Improvements Plan Within service area (from Table 6 and Table 7: 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Service Area Capital Improvement Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections This line simply identifies the total cost of all of the roadway projects identified in each service area. Kimley>Morn Page 20 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 The Total Cost of Capital Improvements Plan Within Service Area (Line 6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added (Line 4) to Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added by Capital Improvements Plan Line 1). Line 41 Line 1 Line 5 Using the ratio of vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan available to serve future growth to the total vehicle -miles added, the total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). Cost to Meet Existing Needs The difference between the Total Cost of Capital Improvements Plan 7 and Usage Within Service Area (Line 5) and the Cost of Net Capacity Supplied Line 6). Line 5 — Line 6 This line is provided for information purposes only — it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan that is required to meet existing demand. Based upon the growth projection provided in Chapter 1: Land Use 8 Total Vehicle -Miles of New Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study, an estimate of the number Demand Over 10 Years of new vehicle -miles within the service area over the next ten years from Table 9: 10-Year Growth Projections This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle -miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next 10-years. 9 Percent of Capacity Added The result of dividing Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years Attributable to New Growth (Line 8) by the Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added (Line 4), 10 Chapter 395 Check limited to 100%. This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth. Line 81 Line 4 < 100 /o In order to ensure that the vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the 10-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the amount of vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the Capital Improvements Plan cost is reduced accordingly. Cost of Capacity Added The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Supplied (Line 6) by 11 Attributable to New Growth the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% Line 10). Line 6 * Line 10 This value is the total Capital Improvements Plan project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. Pre -Credit Maximum Fee Per Found by dividing the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New 12 Service Unit (without Growth by the Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years. financing) Line 11 I Line 8 This value is the total pre -credit maximum fee per service unit (without financing costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering limitations to impact fee required by Texas Legislature. Kimley>Morn Page 21 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5.2 Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: "(A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan..." The City of Anna has determined the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit shall be 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the Capital Improvements Plan. Therefore, the Credit Calculation (Line 13) is assumed to be half of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth (Line 11). The sum of these values represents the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan (Line 14). The Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit (Line 15) is then found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan (Line 14) by the Total Vehicle -Miles of Demand Over 10 Years (Line 8). Table 11 summarizes the additional computations carried out to provide the maximum assessable impact fee. Table 11. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation (Continued) Line Title Description 13 Credit Calculation Assumed to be 50% of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth Line 11 as allowed by Chapter 395. Line 11 * 50% 14 Recoverable Cost of Capital The sum of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth Improvements Plan Line 11 and the Credit Calculation Line 13). Line 11 + Line 13 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan 15 Service Unit (Line 14) by the Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years Line 8). Line 141 Line 8 Table 12 summarizes the calculations walked through in Table 10 and Table 11 and provides the maximum assessable impact fee for each service area. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 22 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY� City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 12. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee SERVICE AREA: SA 1 SA 2 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACTTYADDED BYCIP 81,917 54,702 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 2 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTINGDEMAND 1,636 ' c 1,934 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 3 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES 229 229 (FROM EXISTINGROADWAYFACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C) 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITYADDED 80,052 52,539 (LINE 1- LINE 2 - LINE 3) 5 TOTAL COST OF CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA $ 302,163,167 $ 155,534,167 (FROM TABLE 6 AND TABLE 7) 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED $ 295,283,834 $ 149,384,110 (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) 7 COST TO MEET( AND USAGE $ 6,879,333 $ 6,150,057 INESINGS 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER 10 YEARS 44,876 13,433 (FROM TABLE 9 AND LAND USE AS SUMPTIONS ) 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH 56.1% 25.6% (LINE 8 / LINE 4) CHAPTER 395 CHECK 10 OF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%, 56.1 % 25.6% OTHERWISE NO CHANGE) 11 COST OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH $ 165,654,231 $ 38,242,332 (LINE 6 * LINE 10) PRE -CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT 12 ($ PER VEH-MI) $ 3,691 $ 2,846 (LINE 11 / LINE 8) 13 CREDIT CALCULATION $ (82,827,115) $ (19,121,166) (50% OF LINE 11) 14 RECOVERABLE COST OF CIP $ 82,827,115 $ 19,121,166 (LINE 11 + LINE 13) 15 MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI) $ 1,845 $ 1,423 (LINE 14 / LINE 8) *Note: Financing Cost Not Included Kimley>))Horn Page 23 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5.3 Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Roadway Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land UseNehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 13. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Anna. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development's magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip -making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, and industrial. The trip rates presented for each land use are a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the PM peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass -by trips, as previously discussed. The source of the trip generation and pass -by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on land use, as explained in Section 4.6 - Service Unit Calculation. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Kimley>Morn Page 24 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Txc�rror City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 13. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table Land Use Category ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen gate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass -by Source Trip Rate Average Average Trip Length (mi) For O-D MI. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mt) Veh-Mi Per Devi Unit INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF CFA 0.65 0.65 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 1.95 ---- IndustrialPark 130 1,000 SF CFA 0.34 ---- 0.34 14.65 50% 7.33 -- 3.00 ------ 1.02 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF CFA 0.18 018 14.65 5001, 7.33 3.00 0.54 Mini -Warehouse 151 1,000SFCFA 0.15 0.15 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 0.45 High -Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse Sort 155 1,000 SF CFA 1.20 _ 1.20 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 _ 3.60 RESIDENTIAL Single -Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Units 0.94 0.94 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 2.82 Single -Family Attached Housing 215 Dwelling Units 0.57 0.57 15.50 50% 7.75 1 3.00 1.71 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 220 Dwelling Units 0.51 0.51 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.53 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 221 Dwelling Units 0.39 _ 0.39 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.17 Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) 222 Dwelling Units 0.32 0.32 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 0.96 Mobile Home Park 240 Dwelling Units 0.58 0.58 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.74 Senior Adult Housing - Single-Farnily 251 Dwelling Units 0.30 0.30 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 _ 0.90 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily Assisted Livin 252 254 Dwelling Units Beds 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 15.50 15.50 50% 50% 7.75 7.75 3.00 3.00 _ 0.75 0.72 LODGING Hotel 310 Rooms 0.59 0.59 6.43 50% 3.22 3.00 1.77 Motel 320 Rooms 0.36 0.36 6.43 50% 3.22 3.00 _ 1.08 RECREATIONAL Golf Course 430 Holes 2.91 2.91 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 8.73 MiniatureGDlfCourse Golf Driving Range 431 432 Holes Tees/Driving Positions 0.33 1.25 0.33 1.25 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 3.00 3.00 0.99 33-5 Batting Cages 433 Cages 2.22 2.22 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 6.66 Multipurpose Recreational Facility 435 1,000SFCFA 3.58 1 3.58 7.86 1 50% 1 3.93 3.00 1 10.74__ Trampoline Park 436 1,000 SF CFA 1.50 1.50 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 4.50 Movie Theater Ice Skating Rink 445 465 Movie Screens 1,000 SF CFA 13.96 1.33 1 13.96 1.33 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 3.00 3.00 41.88 _ 3.99 Racquet/Tennis Club Health/Fitness Club 491 492 Tennis Courts 1,000 SF CFA 3.82 3.45 3.82 3.45 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 ___ 3.00 3.00 __ 11.46 10.35 Recreational Community Center 495 1,000 SF CFA 2.50 2.50 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 7.50 INSTITUTIONAL Private School (K-8) 530 Students 0.26 0.26 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 0.46 Private High School 534 Students 0.19 0.19 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 _ 0.33 Charter Elementary School 536 Students 0.16 0.16 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 0.28 Junior/Community College University/College 540 550 Students Students 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.15 10.44 10.44 50% 50% 5.22 5.22 3.00 3.00 0.33 0.45 Cburch 560 1,000 SF CFA 0.49 1 1 0.49 8.31 50% 4.16 3.00 1.47 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF CFA 11.12 440% C 6.23 1 3.49 50% 1 1.75 1.75 10.90 MEDICAL Hospital 610 1,000 SF CFA 0.86 0.86 9.85 50% 4.93---..3.00 2.58 ---- Nursingm Hoe -------- Clinic 620 630 ---------------- -- Beds -------------------------- 1,000 SF UFA 0.14 - 3.69 ------ ------ ------- -------- ---- 0.14 ------- 3.69 --- 9.85 ------- 9.85 a 50% 50% 4.93 ---- 4.93 -- 3.00 - -- 3.00 --- -- 0.42 ----- 11.07 Animal Hospital/VeterinaryHospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF CFA 3.53 30% B 2.47 9.85 50% 4.93 3.00 7.41 OFFICE General Office Building 710 -- 1,000 SF CFA - 1.44 ------ ------- 1.44 14.65 50% 7.33 -- 3.00 ------ Small Office Building 712 1,000 SF CFA 2.16 2.16 14.65 50% 1 7.33 3.00 6.48 Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF CFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Singlea Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.76 1.76 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Medical -Dental Office Building 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.93 3.93 9.85 50% 4.93 3.00 �3.90--- 9 Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Key to Sources of Pass -by Rates: A: OE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by IGrdey-Horn based on rfE rates for simlar categories G: 2021 Pass -By Tables for RETripGen Appendices Kimley>))Horn Page 25 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY�r City of Anna ifnna June 2022 Land Use Category 1TE Land Use Code ent Unit Development Trip Gen Rate (PA Pass- by Rate Pass -by Source Trip Rate Average Trip Length (mi) Adj.For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mt Per Devi Unit COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Sales (New) 840 1,000 SF GFA 2.42 201 B 1.94 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 4.32 Automobile Sales (Used) 841 1,000 SF GFA 3.75 20% B 3.00 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 6.69 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF CFA 4.90 43% A 2.79 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 6.23 Tire Store Quick lubrication Vehicle Shop 848 941 1,000 SF GFA Servicing Positions 3.75 4.85 25 % 400 C B 2.81 2.91 4.45 4.45 50% 50% 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 _ 6.27 _ 6.49 Automobile Care Center Gasoline/Service Station 942 944 1,000 SF GFA Vehicle Fueling Positions 3.11 13.91 401 57% B C 1.87 5.98 4.45 1.20 5001 50% 2.23 0.60 _ 2.23 0.60 4.16 3.59 Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 Vehicle Fueling Positions 13.51 56% B 5.94 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 3.57 Self -Service Car Wash 947 Wash Stalls 5.54 401% B 3.32 1.20 50% 0.60 _ 0.60 1.99 Car Wash and Detail Center 949 Wash Stalls 13.60 40% 1 B 8.16 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 __ 4.90 Dining Food Cart Pod 926 Food Carts 6.16 5011. B 3.08 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 8.69 Fast Casual Restaurant Fin e Dining Restaurant 930 931 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 12.55 7.80 43% 44% A A 7.15 4.37 6.07 6.07 50% 50% 3.04 3.04 3.04 3.04 _ 21.75 13.28 High-Tumover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 9.05 43% A 5.16 6.07 50% 3.04 3.04 15.68 ------ Fast -Food Restaurant without Drive -Through Window 933 ----- ----- 1,000 SF CFA ---- 33.21 5011. B 16.61 - 5.64 -- 50% 2.82 - 2.82 -- 46.83 Fast -Food Restaurant 934 1,000 SF CFA 33.03 50% A 16.52 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 46.57 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive -Through Window 937 1,000 SF GFA 38.99 701 A 11.70 4.53 50% 2.27 2.27 26.55 Other Retail Free -Standing Discount Store 815 1,000 SF CFA 4.86 201% C 3.89 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 10.89 Nursery (Garden Center) 817 1,000 SF GFA 6.94 301% B 4.86 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 _ Shopping Center(>150k SF) 820 1,000 SF GFA 3.40 291% C 2.41 5.60 50% 1 2.80 _ 2.80 __13.60__ 6.76 ------ Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 821 1,000 SF CFA 5.19 40% C 3.11 5.60 50% 2.80 -- 2.80 --------- 8.72 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k SF) 822 1,000 SF GFA 6.59 401% B 3.95 5.60 50% 2.80 _ 2.80 11.07 Supermarket Home Improvement Superstore Toy/Children's Superstore 850 862 864 1,000SFCFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 8.95 2.29 5.00 24% 42% 30% C A B 6.80 1.33 3.50 5.60 5.60 5.60 50% 50% 50% 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 19.05 3.72 9.80 Department Store 875 1,000 SF GFA 1.95 30% B 1.37 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 3.82 Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive -Through Window 880 1,000 SF GFA 8.51 53% A 4.00 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 11.20 Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive -Through Window 881 1,000 SF CFA 10.25 491% A 5.23 1 5.60 5001, 1 2.80 2.80 14.64 Medical Equipment Store 897 1,000SFCFA 1.24 20% B 0.99 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 _ 2.78__ Wine Tasting Room 970 1,000 SF GFA 7.31 7.31 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 20.47 SERVICES Walk-in Bank 911 1,000 SF GFA 12.13 401 B 7.28 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 16.23 Drive-in Bank Hair Salon 912 918 Drive-in Lanes 1,000 SF GLA 27.07 1.45 35% 30% A B 17.60 1.02 4.45 4.45 50% 50% 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 39.24 2.26 Key to Sources of Pass -by Rates: A: OE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by IGrriey-Horn based on RE rates for sinilar categories Q. 2021 Pass -By Tables for RETripGen Appendices Kimley>))Horn Page 26 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 6 Sample Calculations The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing in Service Area 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 13 [Land Use — Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table] 1 Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 2.82 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) 2 From Table 12, Line 15 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 1: $1,845 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit 3 Impact Fee = 1 * 2.82 * $1,845 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $5,203 Example 2: Development Type-150,000 Square Foot Home Improvement Store in Service Area 2 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 13 [Land Use — Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table] 1 Development Type: 150,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Units: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.72 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) 2 From Table 12, Line 15 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 2: $1,423 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit 3 Impact Fee = 150 * 3.72 * $1,423 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $794,034 Kimley>))Horn Page 27 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 7 Adoption and Administration of Roadway Impact Fees 7.1 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee's findings for consideration by the City Council. The CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Assumptions (Land Use and Capital Improvements Plan) and Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. 7.2 Collection and Use of Roadway Impact Fees Roadway Impact Fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development - impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can only be used within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. 8 Conclusions The City of Anna has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Roadway Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable Roadway Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Anna, as shown in the previously referenced Table 12. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Roadway Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City's need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee. Table 14 below presents the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study's Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) for the service areas: Kimley>Morn Page 28 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 14. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) Maximum Fee Per Service Area Service Unit (per Vehicle -Mile 1 $ 1,845 2 $ 1,423, Kimley>Morn Page 29 Chapter 3 Water Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. OF *'•xp "*�/®® .,� TODD L. STROUSE g �io� 107773 ; �® ®��' �S:�CENS��•'•��� t�1tliA ®®®o,00 07/26/2022 Water Impact Fee Study Update "l'HC CITY Of a City of Anna Ann July 2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Water Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan.............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report.......................................................................................... 3 2 Design Criteria........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Water Lines......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Storage Tanks..................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Pump Stations..................................................................................................................... 6 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan....................................................................... 6 4 Water Impact Fee Calculation..................................................................................11 List of Exhibits Exhibit 3.1 — Water Service Area Map..........................................................................................................4 Exhibit 3.2 — Water 10-Year Capital Improvement Map................................................................................ 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost ................ 7 Table2 — Meter Capacity Ratios..................................................................................................................11 Table 3 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent(SFE)..................................................................................12 Table 4 — SFE Consumption Calculation.....................................................................................................13 Table 5 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation.............................................................13 Table 6 — Water 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown.............................................................................14 Table 7 — Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters........................................14 Klmiey>))Hof n Page 1 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 1 Introduction The City of Anna retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing impact fees for water system improvements required to serve new development. These fees were developed in accordance with chapter 395 of the Local Government code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvement plan and associated fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; (6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7) plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or Kimley»)Horn Page 2 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 (8) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. This study was comprised of three tasks. These include land use assumptions, evaluation of the current water capital improvement plan and development of the impact fee capital improvement plan as well as impact fee analysis. 1.1 Land Use Assumptions The development of land use assumptions included the following: - Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater - Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and - Projection of the 10-year population and employment by SA This information was determined based on information provided from the City of Anna in regard to planned developments as well as the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee water service area is shown in Exhibit 3.1. Additional information regarding land use assumptions can be found in Chapter 1 of this report. 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Water Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan This task involved reviewing the City's current capital improvement plan and identify the proposed water capital improvements that will be built in the next 10 years. Input from the City helped to develop the impact fee capital improvement plan. Water demand projections were then used to determine the additional single-family equivalents (SFE). 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report This task included calculating the additional single-family equivalent units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per SFE and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley»)Horn Page 3 Rr ,k Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 2 Design Criteria In accordance with Chapter 290 of the Texas Administrative Code (Public Drinking Water) and the American Water Works Associations (AWWA) requirements for the design and operation of potable water systems, as well as communication between Kimley-Horn and the City of Anna, the following design criteria was followed when planning for future water infrastructure. 2.1 Water Lines The transmission system's function is to transfer water across the water system and fill the elevated storage tanks. There are three conditions for which the highest fluctuation in operational pressures is experienced: Peak Hour Demand — this is the maximum demand the system experiences. It is the condition under which lowest operational pressures are experienced. Tank Filling (minimum hour demand) — this is the period during which elevated tanks are replenished. This is the period of lowest demand during peak day. It normally occurs after midnight and is the condition under which highest operational pressures are experienced. Fire flow demand — during the maximum day demand, the local transmission lines are tested to ensure fire protection requirements are met. Pressures can fall below normal operational pressures but should not drop below 20 psi at any point in the system. The transmission system should be sized to maintain a minimum pressure of 40 psi during normal operation conditions and a minimum of 20 psi during extreme operating conditions. The transmission system should also be sized to limit maximum velocity in the pipe to seven feet per second. The maximum pressure in extreme conditions should be limited to 120 psi because high operating pressure will result in increased system maintenance and increased operational cost. 2.2 Storage Tanks The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the State board of Insurance (SBI) have established criteria for the ground and elevated storage. These criteria address volume and height requirements only. The layout of the distribution system, location of the storage facilities, and the interaction with the high service and booster pumps affect the amount of storage necessary for the most efficient and reliable operation of the system. Ground storage serves two purposes: - Equalization for different feed rates between water supply and pumping to the system. - Emergency capacity in the event of temporary loss of water supply. Generally, ground storage facilities are located at water supply points or at each pump station within the water distribution system. Although ground and elevated storage facilities perform separate functions within the system, both are aimed at decreasing the impact of demand fluctuations. Their capacities are established based on knowledge of how demand varies seasonally and daily. Due to inaccuracies in estimating growth and occasional extremes in usage exceeding design values, ground storage must provide sufficient capacity to supply any differences. It is a recommendation from Kimley-Horn that a ground storage capacity requirement of 50% max day demand be maintained in the system. Elevated storage serves three purposes: Kimley»)Horn Page 5 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Functionally, elevated storage equalizes pumping rate to compensate for daily variation in demand and to maintain a constant pumping rate (usually referred to as operational storage), or a pumping rate that conforms to the requirements of the electrical rate structure. Provides pressure maintenance and protection against surges created by instantaneous demands, such as fire flow and main breaks, and instantaneous change in supply, such as pumps turning on and off. Maintains a reserve capacity for fire protection and pressure maintenance in case of power failure to one or more pump stations. Sufficient storage should be maintained to provide for four hours of fire flow demand during a loss of power to a pump station or water treatment plant. Elevated storage is evaluated separately for each pressure plane. Because elevated storage is more expensive than ground storage, an economical balance between elevated storage and pumping should be sought. The design requirement, per TCEQ, for elevated storage capacity is 200 gallons per connection to qualify for the lower TCEQ requirement for pumping of 0.6 gpm per connection. 2.3 Pump Stations Pumping capacity must be able to provide the peak hourly demand with the largest pump out of service at each station, also known as the firm pumping capacity. If 200 gallons of storage per connection is met, then 0.6 gpm per connection is required at each pump station. If 200 gallons of storage per connection cannot be provided, 2.0 gpm per connection must be met. 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The purpose of a capital improvement program is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its water distribution system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. The impact fee capital improvements plan is developed using projects identified during the capital improvement program planning process. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a ten- year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. Twenty-four (24) existing and eighty-four (84) proposed projects identified in the water capital improvements plan are determined eligible for recoverable cost over the next 10 years. The City of Anna's total cost of these projects is $185,629,111. The projected recoverable cost through impact fees is $232,036,389. After debt service costs are added and the credit reduction calculation is complete, $116,018,194 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. A breakdown of these amounts is shown in Table 6. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Exhibit 3.2 and Table 1. Kimley»)Horn Page 6 Grayson Pump Station rl 12 - cy74 0 7 1 12' (O ^ 14 79 18 _ 1 32 � 33 `O 17 ' r a .4 CO - B1 Sherley Pump Station o S _ ,6 5 FN sa 23 1 7 O e 12„ 9-24" �rM~'N O • r 6 16" }- sa 24 - - 3 MG GPM PT z 12" 12" 34 N 20„ a1 ]e o fie 24" (2) (3 450 Pump o 32 O O a 16, 3 T-01 11 N 18 M- 2.00 MG EST ACKBERRY EST 82 1.00 MG EST s 9 - ❑ 3s f, -. 455 {{ 1 N 83 12" MR 24° 9 a --_ { 77 (V 12" 65 O L m % 1 " " 12" N 19 O - Project Number Prof op J 1 65 1 0 L Nam �1215 12 12" N 12" 1s 12' 14 �`L 12" 12" 12" 12"12" 12" 1a P1 O 12 455 r❑==-_- Proposed zozz-zo3zProject un Proposed zaz2-za32ProleRList sz 1 3 MG GST and (2) 3,450 gpm Pumps at Shelley Pump Number CR117712" Water Line Project Nu J Station 46 FM 335612" Water Line �,.-. 12" 4 MG GST, (1) 3,450 GPM & (1) 2,733 GPM Pump at Collin 47 Boudand and 12" Water Line 47 51 2 /53 - 12 w Pump Station 48 CR 20612" Water Line O 13 22 3 T-01-2.00 MG EST 49 CR 20612" Water Line Loop 4 T-02 -2.00 MG EST 50 CR 28616" Water Line 61 g 5 Outer Loop East 36" Water Line 51 CR 206 North 12" Water Line „ ^ - L 6 CR 41916" Water Line 52 Boudand and to CR 28512' Water Line OO z4 a 1'Z ^ iJ 7 Finely East 12" Water Line 53 CR 28612" Water Line N 1 ° 2" 12 1 1 " 8 Outer Loop West 24" Water Line 54 CR 93712" Water Line 48 9 US 75 East 12" Water Line 55 East Outer Loop 24" Water Line 50 - _ N ., 24 9 8 N 'IVo0o iV - s 10 West Crossing Road 12" Water Line 56 Outer Loop 12" Water Line 49 " 16 Y � — _ 24 24„ � 4z 36' O 36 Sa 11 South Ferguson 12" Water line 57 SH 121 12" Water Line COUNTY '-OhWER, - - - - 3 "O 36" .'� _ 12 CR 36512" Water Line 58 SH 121 36" Water Line `N ROAD 286 II —LOOP- - (V 13 CR 422 12" Water Line 59 CR 41912" Water Line - - - - - _ = r Y 56 ss 2 60 14 East Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 60 Sheffield Drive to CR 47212" Water Line II 12" 57 4" 15 West Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 61 Sheffield Drive to CR 42912" Water Line 12„ ss _ 16 West US 75 16" Water Line 62 CR 42912" Water Line 17 Throckmomm Blvd 1B" Water Line 63 CR 42916" Water Line 49 0 0 18 CR 37012" Water Line 64 CR 47816" Water Line ❑ ® ® _ _ H 19 SH 512' & 16" Water line 65 FM 455 16" Water Line- 49 66 CR 2862 to Water Line 49 20 CR 371 16" Water Line Collin Pump Station ®0 21 West 324"ngi rinne Water Line 67 CR 42424"CRer Line Water Line 22 CR 373 24" Water Line 68 CR 424 24" Water Line n . 1/ ® 23 CR 373 48" Water Line 69 FM 455 24" Water Line (1) - 1.5 MG GST ® am 24 CR 369 20" Water Line 70 FM 455 20" Water Line ® 25 CR 371 36" Water Line 71 FM 455 12" Water Line (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump / 26 CR 372 30" Water Line (1) - 1,000 GPM Pump ® 27 CR 1101 24" Water Line 72 CR 286 20" Water Line Phase 1: 28 CR 290 24" Water Line 73 CR 455 to "Water Line ��I 74 FM 455 to CR 2862 12" Water Line 29 CR 290 to FM 455 20"Water Line ® 75 Wildwood Trail 12' Water Line z � 30 CR 28912" Water Line V (1) - 4.0 MG GST ® 76 Le nand East North Water Line 1 - 3,450 GPM Pumps 31 Gowan Road 12'Water ter line 77 FM 455 o C North l2" Water Line ( ) 32 Cowan Road 12" Water Line 78 FM 455 to CR 2862Lin Water Line W (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump n� 33 FM 455 South 12' Water Line 79 CR 2862 24" Water Line a �p 34 CR 286 & FM 455 16" & 20' Water Line 4 MG GST and (2) 5,000 gpm Pumps at Grayson Pump ■ 35 CR 82612" Water Line 80 ® ® _ - '` . Station ® p ® ® 36 CR 1106 37612"" Water Line 81 4th Street 20" Water Line 3 ®� ® 37 CR 37612" Water Line EER RE® 82 Riggins Street 12" Water Line "�® ® 38 CR 42712" Water Line 39 CR Woodland Water Line 83 6ih Street 36" Water Line 40 Wo Street 12" Water Line 84 6ih Street 24" Water Line W I , - ?0 i 41 CR 422 South 12" Water Line 42 Foster Crossing Road 12° Water Line 43 Cain Dr. 12° Water Line 44 CR 21916" Water Line 011 _, 0 2,0004,000 a- rmFeet � Phase 1: . r r 60 (1)-4MGGST (2) - 5,000 GPM Pumps 22 - 23 48„ B„ 2 r ' 15 _'6E' ae _ 16'_ = s South Grayson 1 oo EST 0.30 MG EST rn, 63 -16" v �2 26 30„ 36„ 2s RCO b - al 1 1 cfl 24- „ 20 19 38 - 37 5, ' O - p 1 45 1 4a _ rc z7 �O 76„1 1612" °' 12" 20`�°� 39 1 6 - � N- F1 i �1 2a 1 12" 7� - - 2 20" as - 16" 40 N' as 86 1 _ 12 T-02 ^ cO 6: d , 2asz IL _ - 2.00 MG EST (D 17 _ - _ J N n1 12" 12" O _ _ 74 C° O o zs 12" 1 8 m EST 0.20 MG EST 1 N OO20" ROA6 71 West Crossin N N 12" ' 12" 12" ]3 48 91 - 67 FM 455 ` 16" 16" - ,g �2 _ 1_ _1 Planning Boundary Proposed EST Streams . f Existing Ground Tank & Pump Existing Water Line or Under Construction I Floodplain P® Future Pump Station � 0-Proposed Ground Tank &Pump Existing EST or EST Under Construction — Future Water Pipe Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction Project Number Project Name 1 U.S. 75 Parallel Water Line South of F.M. 455 2 CGMATreated Surface Water System & Treated Supply Line 3 18" Water Line from South Take Point to FM 455 4 East Hackberry 16" Water Line 5 Hackberry EST 6 US 75 Parallel water Line north of FM 455 7 CGMATreated Surface Water System - Bloomdale PS and GSR 8 Collin Take Point - PS 9 Collin Take Point - GSR 10 West Well EST 11 South Grayson -.35 MG EST 12 South Grayson System - CCN Area 13 South Well Surface Water 14 North and West Well Surface water 15 CR 1106 Water Line 16 Disinfection 17 Initial Collin Pump Station 18 South Distribution line from west well EST 19 Water Line from CR 422 20 Water Line for CR 371 to Rosamond Pkwy 21 Ferguson South 12" Water Line 22 South Leonard 12" Water Line 23 Suzie Lane Water Line 24 Foster Crossing Water Line Kimley>>> HorOP n THE°�CITY OF ANNA FIGURE wcIP manna WATER 10-YR CIP PLAN Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 Table 1 — Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost PROPOSED 2022-2032 Project List 1 3 MG GST and (2) 3,450 gpm Pumps at Sherley Pump Station 0% 100% 100% $ 5,600,000 $ 5,600,000 2 4 MG GST, (1) 3,450 GPM & (1) 2,733 GPM Pump at Collin Pump Station 0% 100% 100% $ 6,970,000 $ 6,970,000 3 T-01 — 2.00 MG EST 0% 41 % 41 % $ 4,548,649 $ 11,220,000 4 T-02 — 2.00 MG EST 0% 63% 63% $ 6,537,500 $ 10,460,000 5 Outer Loop East 36" Water Line 0% 26% 26% $ 3,675,759 $ 14,240,000 6 CR 41916" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 3,880,000 $ 3,880,000 7 Finely East 12" Water Line 0% 33% 33% $ 1,053,144 $ 3,170,000 8 Outer Loop West 24" Water Line 0% 72% 72% $ 5,810,211 $ 8,110,000 9 US 75 East 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 690,000 $ 690,000 10 West Crossing Road 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 1,080,000 $ 1,080,000 11 South Ferguson 12" Water line 0% 87% 87% $ 2,756,007 $ 3,170,000 12 CR 36512" Water Line 0% 76% 76% $ 4,279,607 $ 5,650,000 13 CR 422 12" Water Line 0% 32% 32% $ 234,808 $ 740,000 14 East Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 0% 60% 60% $ 3,991,496 $ 6,670,000 15 West Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 0% 55% 55% $ 2,777,197 $ 5,070,000 16 West US 75 16" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 2,175,572 $ 6,370,000 17 Throckmorton Blvd 16" Water Line 0% 43% 43% $ 3,123,835 $ 7,340,000 18 CR 37012" Water Line 0% 46% 46% $ 3,761,954 $ 8,130,000 19 SH 512" & 16" Water line 0% 31 % 31 % $ 2,048,474 $ 6,530,000 20 CR 371 16" Water Line 0% 41 % 41 % $ 1,409,638 $ 3,420,000 21 West Crossing 16" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 1,387,864 $ 4,030,000 22 CR 373 24" Water Line 0% 52% 52% $ 288,738 $ 560,000 23 CR 373 48" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 2,793,376 $ 8,100,000 24 CR 369 20" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 2,428,109 $ 6,530,000 25 CR 371 36" Water Line 0% 42% 42% $ 795,994 $ 1,900,000 26 CR 372 30" Water Line 0% 44% 44% $ 3,479,163 $ 7,990,000 27 CR 1101 24" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 565,901 $ 1,960,000 28 CR 290 24" Water Line 0% 46% 46% $ 2,481,078 $ 5,390,000 29 CR 290 to FM 455 20" Water Line 0% 59% 59% $ 1,606,799 $ 2,740,000 30 CR 28912" Water Line 0% 39% 39% $ 1,106,188 $ 2,820,000 Kimley>Morn Page 8 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost 31 FM 455 16" & 12" Water line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,515,153 $ 31140,000 32 Cowan Road 12" Water Line 0% 95% 95% $ 6,807,575 $ 7,180,000 33 FM 455 South 12" Water Line 0% 57% 57% $ 1,296,672 $ 2,270,000 34 CR 288 & FM 455 16" & 20" Water Line 0% 58% 58% $ 3,114,368 $ 5,350,000 35 CR 82812" Water Line 0% 54% 54% $ 1,980,836 $ 3,690,000 36 CR 110616" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,428,306 $ 2,980,000 37 CR 37612" Water Line 0% 71% 71% $ 2,301,663 $ 3,230,000 38 CR 42612" Water Line 0% 67% 67% $ 1,994,488 $ 2,980,000 39 CR 42712" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,001,763 $ 2,070,000 40 Woodland Street 12" Water Line 0% 49% 49% $ 612,661 $ 1,260,000 41 CR422 South 12" Water Line 0% 65% 65% $ 1,103,063 $ 1,710,000 42 Foster Crossing Road 12" Water Line 0% 53% 53% $ 2,124,232 $ 4,020,000 43 Cain Dr. 12" Water Line 0% 71% 71% $ 602,408 $ 850,000 44 CR 21916" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 1,548,290 $ 4,200,000 45 CR 17712" Water Line 0% 32% 32% $ 957,641 $ 3,020,000 46 FM 3356 12" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 3,127,514 $ 9,140,000 47 Bourland Bnd 12" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 2,762,500 $ 5,780,000 48 CR 20612" Water Line 0% 59% 59% $ 1,460,571 $ 2,470,000 49 CR 20612" Water Line Loop 0% 88% 88% $ 6,572,495 $ 7,470,000 50 CR 28616" Water Line 0% 36% 36% $ 1,985,569 $ 5,470,000 51 CR 206 North 12" Water Line 0% 51 % 51 % $ 1,730,033 $ 3,410,000 52 Bourland Bnd to CR 285 12" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 525,382 $ 3,360,000 53 CR 28612" Water Line 0% 85% 85% $ 4,811,437 $ 5,660,000 54 CR 93712" Water Line 0% 74% 74% $ 1,658,759 $ 2,250,000 55 East Outer Loop 24" Water Line 0% 2% 2% $ 50,158 $ 2,160,000 56 Outer Loop 12" Water Line 0% 19% 19% $ 364,000 $ 1,960,000 57 SH 121 12" Water Line 0% 5% 5% $ 156,896 $ 3,210,000 58 SH 121 36" Water Line 0% 7% 7% $ 212,070 $ 3,130,000 59 CR 41912" Water Line 0% 30% 30% $ 391,736 $ 1,310,000 60 Sheffield Drive to CR 472 12" Water Line 0% 56% 56% $ 4,502,575 $ 8,070,000 61 Sheffield Drive to CR 429 12" Water Line 0% 26% 26% $ 1,890,860 $ 7,380,000 62 CR 42912" Water Line 0% 17% 17% $ 477,920 $ 2,750,000 63 CR 42916" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 1,082,780 $ 3,760,000 64 CR 47816" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 8,900,000 $ 8,900,000 65 FM 455 16" Water Line 0% 30% 30% $ 2,140,735 $ 7,040,000 66 CR 2862 16" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 373,864 $ 2,350,000 67 CR 2862 to CR 477 12" Water Line 0% 13% 13% $ 386,843 $ 2,980,000 Kimley»)Horn Page 9 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost 68 CR 424 24" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 1,567,860 $ 91730,000 69 FM 455 24" Water Line 0% 9% 9% $ 440,199 $ 4,720,000 70 FM 455 20" Water Line 0% 6% 6% $ 351,066 $ 5,620,000 71 FM 455 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 1,190,000 $ 1,190,000 72 CR 427 20'' Water Line 0% 14% 14% $ 768,928 $ 5,410,000 73 CR 2862 12" Water Line 0% 51 % 51 % $ 2,767,076 $ 5,460,000 74 FM 455 to CR 2862 12" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 1,600,642 $ 4,380,000 75 Wildwood Trail 12" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 420,033 $ 1,430,000 76 CR 2862 East 12" Water Line 0% 88% 88% $ 1,163,750 $ 1,330,000 77 Leonard Ave North 12" Water Line 0% 41% 41% $ 857,534 $ 2,090,000 78 FM 455 to CR 2862 30" Water Line 0% 18% 18% $ 476,405 $ 2,720,000 79 CR 2862 24" Water Line 0% 47% 47% $ 2,439,992 $ 5,220,000 80 4 MG GST and (2) 5,000 gpm Pumps at Grayson Pump Station 0% 5% 5% $ 361,000 $ 7,220,000 81 4th Street 20" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 580,000 $ 580,000 82 Riggins Street 12" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 420,000 $ 420,000 83 6th Street 36" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 84 6th Street 24" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 2,270,000 $ 2,270,000 Proposed Subtotal $ 176,115,362 $ 369,430,000 Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction 1 U.S. 75 Parallel Water Line South of F.M. 455 ° 22% 26 /° 4% $ 522,500.00 $ 1,900,000.00 2 CGMA Treated Surface Water System & Treated Supply Line 49% 51 /° ° 2% $ 387,600.00 $ 760,000.00 3 18" Water Line from South Take Point to FM 455 20% 40% 20% $ 155,000.00 $ 620,000.00 4 East Hackberry 16" Water Line 18% 22% 4% $ 266,539.50 $ 1,184,620.00 5 Hackberry EST 82% 100% 18% $ 2,629,000.80 $ 2,629,000.80 6 US 75 Parallel water Line north of FM 455 22% 26% 4% $ 90,420.00 $ 328,800.00 7 CGMA Treated Surface Water System - Bloomdale PS and GSR 49% 51 2% $ 357,000.00 $ 700,000.00 8 Collin Take Point- PS 22% 24% 2% $ 467,500.00 $ 1,700,000.00 9 Collin Take Point - GSR 21 % 42% 21 % $ 397,500.00 $ 1,500,000.00 10 West Well EST 82% 100% 18% $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 11 South Grayson - .35 MG EST 82% 100% 18% $ 525,000.00 $ 525,000.00 12 South Grayson system - CCN Area 19% 38% 19% $ 27,500.00 $ 100,000.00 13 South Well Surface Water 40% 1 60% 1 20% 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 200,000.00 14 North and West Well Surface water 40% 60% 20% $ 425,000.00 $ 850,000.00 15 CR 1106 Water Line 7% 14% 7% $ 37,912.50 $ 303,300.00 Kimley>Morn Page 10 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 2022 Required 2032 2022-2032 Capacity Required Required 2032 Projected Proj. # Description (Percent Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost Utilization) (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization 16 Disinfection 4% 8% 4% $ 25,000.00 $ 500,000.00 17 Initial Collin Pump Station 40% 44% 4% $ 375,000.00 $ 750,000.00 18 South Distribution line from west well EST 20% 24% 4% $ 290,790.75 $ 1,163,163.00 19 Water Line from CR 422 22% 26% 4% $ 347,943.75 $ 1,265,250.00 20 Water Line for CR 371 to Rosamond 22% 26% $ 248,036.25 $ 901,950.00 Pkw 4% 21 Existing Waterline Facility 20 18% 22% 4% $ 751,950.00 $ 3,342,000.00 22 Existing Waterline facility 21 22% 26% 4% $ 75,487.50 $ 274,500.00 23 Suzie Lane Water Line 25% 25% $ 81,083.51 $ 319,003.00 24 Foster Crossing Water Line 55% 55% $ 343,651.41 $ 622,712.92 Impact Fee and Master Plan Updates $ 86,333.00 $ 86,333.00 Existing Subtotal 1 $ 9,427,416 $ 22,939,300 Total I $ 185,629,111 $ 392,455,633 4 Water Impact Fee Calculation Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, "Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years." The service unit for the Anna's wastewater impact fee is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the size of the base water meter. An SFE is the water demand associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family development in the system (3/4-inch meter). The ratio of each larger meter's capacity to the capacity of the base meter determines the SFE multiplier applied to each large meter size. The current SFE equivalency factors are shown in Table 2. Table 2 — Meter Capacity Ratios F Meter Size 3/4" Service Units/Meter 1 ill 1.67 1-1/2" 3.33 2" 5.33 3" 23.33 4" 43.33 6" 93.33 8" 160 10" 233.33 Kimley»)Horn Page 11 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 Multiplying the number of existing connections for each meter size by the SFEs per meter yields the total SFEs for that meter size. Summing for all meter sizes yields the total number of water SFEs connected to the City's water system as shown in Table 3. The current population in the water service area is divided by the total number of SFEs yielding a Persons per SFE number. Table 3 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent (SFE) Size 3/4" ExistingMeter Connections 8,135 1 8,135 1" 112 1.67 187 1-1 /2" 25 3.33 83 2" 68 5.33 362 3" 34 23.33 793 4" 1 43.33 43 6" 1 93.33 93 8" 0 160 0 10" 0 233.33 0 Total Existing Connections: 8,376 Total Service Units: 9,696 Total Population Served: 24,239 Persons per Service Unit: 2.50 The City of Anna defines a single-family equivalent (SFE) based on historical water demand over the past 10 years. The single-family equivalent is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4-inch meter. The measure of consumption per SFE is based on a 3/4-inch meter, and the data shown in Table 4. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley»)Horn Page 12 Water Impact Fee Study Update City of Anna July 2022 Table 4 — SFE Consumption Calculation Year 2011 •., 8,448 Service Unit . i capita/service 3,380 Water Average Day Demand MGD 1.25 per Service Unit 370 2012 8,567 3,427 1.17 343 2013 9,604 3,842 1.32 342 2014 10,615 4,246 0.99 233 2015 11,541 4,617 1.45 315 2016 12,171 4,869 1.42 292 2017 12,782 5,113 1.71 335 2018 14,243 5,698 1.94 340 2019 15,700 6,280 2.12 338 2020 19,750 7,900 2.67 338 Average Historical Demand per Service Unit 325 (1) Data Sources: TWDB Historical Estimates An "1'HL CITY O[ na Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the resulting water demand projections, water service will be required for an additional 12,495 SFEs by the year 2032 as shown in Table 5. The calculation is as follows: - A single-family equivalent, which is a unit of development that consumes approximately 325 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4-inch meter. Table 5 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not to do a financial analysis to determine the credit value, they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen not to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 50 percent of the Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost. Kimley»)Horn Page 13 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is shown in Table 6 and below. Table 6 — Water 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $185,629,111 Debt Service* $46,407,278 Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $232,036,389 Credit for Utility Revenues $116,018,194 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $116,018,194 'Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs Impact f ee per SFE = 10 — year recoverable costs 10 — year additional SFEs Impact f ee per SFE _ $116,018,194 12,495 Impact f ee per SFE = $9,285 Therefore, the maximum assessable impact fee per SFE is $9,285. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4-inch meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the Equivalency Table (Table 7). Table 7 — Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size 3/4" Maximum Continuous Operating CapacityImpact 15 1 Maximum $9,285 1" 25 1.67 $15,506 1-1/2" 50 3.33 $30,919 2" 80 5.33 $59,489 3" 350 23.33 $216,619 4" 650 43.33 $402,319 6" 1400 93.33 $866,569 8" 2400 160 $1,485,600 10" 3500 233.33 $2,166,469 -Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-15 and C-701-15 Kimley»)Horn Page 14 Chapter 3 Wastewater Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 06/28/2022 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update "l'HC CITY Of a City of Anna Ann June 2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan.............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report.......................................................................................... 3 2 Design Criteria........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Pipe Design......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Lift Station and Force Main Design...................................................................................... 5 2.3 Water Reclamation Facility Design...................................................................................... 5 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan....................................................................... 5 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation.......................................................................... 9 List of Exhibits Exhibit 4.1 — Wastewater Service Area Map.................................................................................................4 Exhibit 4.2 — Wastewater 10-Year Capital Improvement Map....................................................................... 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Wastewater Criteria Used.............................................................................................................. 5 Table2 — Minimum Slopes............................................................................................................................ 5 Table 3 — Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost ....... 8 Table4 — Meter Capacity Ratios..................................................................................................................10 Table 5 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent(SFE)..................................................................................10 Table 6 — SFE Consumption Calculation.....................................................................................................11 Table 7 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation.............................................................11 Table 8 — Wastewater 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown....................................................................12 Table 9 — Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters...............................12 Kimley>))Horn Page 1 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Introduction The City of Anna retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing impact fees for wastewater system improvements required to serve new development. These fees were developed in accordance with chapter 395 of the Local Government code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvement plan and associated fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; (6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7) plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, Kimley>Morn Page 2 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr or na City of Anna An June 2022 including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (8) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. This study was comprised of three tasks. These include land use assumptions, evaluation of the current wastewater capital improvement plan and development of the impact fee capital improvement plan as well as impact fee analysis. 1.1 Land Use Assumptions The development of land use assumptions included the following: - Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater - Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and - Projection of the 10-year population and employment by SA This information was determined based on information provided from the City of Anna in regard to planned developments as well as the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee water service area is shown in Exhibit 4.1. Additional information regarding land use assumptions can be found in Chapter 1 of this report. 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan This task involved reviewing the City's current capital improvement plan and identify the proposed wastewater capital improvements that will be built in the next 10 years. Input from the City helped to develop the impact fee capital improvement plan. Wastewater demand projections were then used to determine the additional single-family equivalents (SFE). 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report This task included calculating the additional single-family equivalent units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per SFE and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 3 Rr ,k Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 2 Design Criteria In accordance with Chapter 217 of the Texas Administrative Code (Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems), as well as communication between Kimley-Horn and the City of Anna, the following design criteria was followed when planning for future wastewater infrastructure. These criteria could change over time based on demand patterns and regulatory mandates. The assumptions used throughout this study are shown in Table 1. Table 1 — Wastewater Criteria Used .. Non-residential — Light Office 25 gpcd Non-residential — Manufacturing 20 gpcd Non-residential — School 20 gpcd Non- Residential — Rural/ Open Space 150 gpad Residential Demand 90 gpcd Peaking Factor 4 Single Family Residential Density 3.1 people/ unit Multifamily Residential Density 1.8 people/ unit 2.1 Pipe Design Table 2 shows the minimum slope requirements from the TCEQ. The design of the wastewater lines for the City of Anna utilized the TCEQ minimum slope unless the size of the line was larger than 36", then a slope was determined to maintain a velocity that satisfied the TCEQ requirements. All lines were sized based on the peak flow within each basin and subbasin. Table 2 — Minimum Slopes ..:AwIf-T—IF-re 12 0.20 1.03 15 0.15 1.617 18 0.115 2.302 21 0.095 3.156 24 0.08 4.135 27 0.07 5.296 30 0.06 6.494 2.2 Lift Station and Force Main Design The various proposed lift stations and force mains in the City of Anna allow for wastewater to be conveyed in areas where gravity flow cannot be achieved. Proposed lift stations are sized to meet peak day demands. The force mains are sized to be able to stay between 3-6 fps for peak day demands. 2.3 Water Reclamation Facility Design The proposed water reclamation facilities within the City of were sized based on average daily flow into the water reclamation facility. 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan Kimley>))Horn Page 5 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 The purpose of a capital improvement program is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its wastewater distribution system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. The impact fee capital improvements plan is developed using projects identified during the capital improvement program planning process. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a 10- year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. Eleven (11) existing and twenty-two (22) proposed projects identified in the wastewater capital improvements plan are determined eligible for recoverable cost over the next 10 years. The City of Anna's total cost of these projects is $233,332,732. The projected recoverable cost through impact fees is $291,665,915. After debt service costs are added and the credit reduction calculation is complete, $145,832,957 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. A breakdown of these amounts is shown in Table 8. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Table 3 and illustrated in Exhibit 4.2. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 6 N Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 3 — Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost 2022 2032 2022-2032 Proj. Required Required Required 2032 Projected # Description Capacity Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost (Percent (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization) Utilization) Proposed 2022-2032 Project List 1 East Fork Trinity 30" Interceptor 0% 33% 33% $ 8,801,590 $ 26,290,000 2 East Fork 10", 12", 15", & 21" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 68,913 $ 6,920,000 3 East Fork 10" & 12" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 11,728 $ 1,180,000 4 Hurricane Creek 54" Interceptor 0% 45% 45% $ 5,530,532 $ 15,790,000 5 Hurricane Creek 10", 21", 27" & 30" Interceptor 0% 36% 36% $ 4,862,127 $ 13,520,000 6 Hurricane Creek 18" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 221,000 $ 2,210,000 7 Hurricane Creek 24" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 676,000 $ 6,760,000 8 Hurricane Creek 10" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 396,000 $ 3,960,000 9 Hurricane Creek 48" Interceptor 0% 96% 96% $ 14,920,147 $ 28,890,000 Hurricane Creek 60" Interceptor & 10 Hurricane Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 14 MGD 0% 100% 100% $ 81,118,000 $ 81,118,000 11 Throckmorton Creek 24", 27" & 36" Interceptor 0% 41% 41% $ 2,493,661 $ 6,040,000 12 Throckmorton Creek Lift Station & 14" Force Main 0% 49% 49% $ 2,085,601 $ 4,240,000 13 Slayter Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 3 0.975 MGD Expansion 0% 100% 100% $ 26,910,000 $ 26,910,000 14 Harrington Branch Water Reclamation Facility Phase 1 0% 79% 79% $ 26,026,161 $ 33,010,000 15 West Sister Grove 15" 18" & 27" Interceptor 0% 53% 53% $ 3,977,289 $ 7,510,000 16 West Sister Grove 18" & 21" Interceptor 0% 60% 60% $ 2,585,397 $ 4,300,000 17 Harrington Branch 30" & 36" Interceptor 0% 54% 54% $ 11,180,687 $ 20,590,000 18 Hurricane Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 2 8 MGD Expansion 0% 69% 69% $ 19,502,042 $ 28,422,000 19 East Fork Trinity 18" & 12" Interceptor 0% 8% 8% $ 692,301 $ 9,050,000 Kimley>Morn Page 8 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 2022 2032 2022-2032 Proj. Required Required Required 2032 Projected # Description Capacity Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost (Percent (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization) Utilization 20 East Fork Trinity 21" Interceptor 0% 13% 13% $ 1,039,137 $ 8,070,000 21 Slayter Creek 24", 30" & 36" Interceptor 0% 56% 56% $ 7,548,465 $ 13,390,000 22 Elizabeth Street 2,500 GPM Lift Station and 16" Force Main 0% 100% 100% $ 4,660,000 $ 4,660,000 Proposed Subtotal $ 225,306,777 $ 352,830,000 Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction 1 Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer Lower 7% 100% 93% $ 1,914,700 $ 2,050,000 2 Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper) 12% 100% 88% $ 954,840 $ 1,090,000 3 Elizabeth Street Lift Station and Force Main 40% 100% 60% $ 600,000 $ 1,000,000 4 Clement Creek Trunk Sewer Upper 87% 100% 13% $ 181,660 $ 1,376,210 5 Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant 9% 100% 91 % $ 1,784,975 $ 1,965,832 6 Slayter Creek 18" Interceptor 13% 100% 87% $ 959,140 $ 1,105,000 7 Slayter Creek 24" Interceptor 13% 43% 30% $ 270,000 $ 900,000 8 Clement Creek Trunk Sewer Lower 13% 43% 30% $ 514,500 $ 1,715,000 9 Slayter Creek WWTP Headworks Lift Station 82% 100% 18% $ 117,330 $ 651,832 10 Throckmorton Creek Trunk Sewer Extension 25% 75% 50% $ 607,477 $ 1,214,953 11 Hurricane Creek Sewer Line B 0% 100% 100% $ 4,842,538 $ 4,842,538 Impact Fee and Master Plan Updates $ 121,333 $ 121,333 Existing Subtotal $ 7,904,621 $ 13,068,827 Total $ 233,332,732 $ 366,020,160 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, "Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years." Kimley>Morn Page 9 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update�TY� City of Anna Anna June 2022 The service unit for the Anna's wastewater impact fee is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the size of the base water meter. A SFE is the wastewater flow associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family development in the system (3/4-inch meter). The ratio of each larger meter's capacity to the capacity of the base meter determines the SFE multiplier applied to each large meter size. The current SFE equivalency factors are shown in Table 4. Table 4 — Meter Capacity Ratios Meter Size 3/4" Service Units/Meter 1 1" 1.67 1-1/2" 3.33 2" 5.33 3" 23.33 4" 43.33 6" 93.33 8" 160 10" 233.33 Multiplying the number of existing connections for each meter size by the SFEs per meter yields the total SFEs for that meter size. Summing for all meter sizes yields the total number of wastewater SFEs connected to the City's wastewater system as shown in Table 5. The current population in the wastewater service area is divided by the total number of SFEs yielding a Persons per SFE number. Table 5 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent (SFE) Meter Size 3/4" .Connections' 7,941 1.0 7,941 ill 32 1.7 53 1-1 /2" 12 3.3 40 2" 38 5.3 203 3" 2 23.3 47 4" 3 43.3 130 6" 1 93.3 93 8" 160.0 0 10" 233.3 0 Total Existing Connections: 8,029 Total Service Units: 8,507 Total Population Served: 21,268 Persons per Service Unit: 2.50 (1) Data Sources: City of Anna The City of Anna defines a single-family equivalent (SFE) based on historical wastewater discharge over the past 10 years. The single-family equivalent is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4-inch meter. The measure of consumption per SFE is based on a 3/4-inch meter and the data shown in Table 6. Kimley>))Horn Page 10 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table 6 — SFE Consumption Calculation 2011 Population' 8,448 Service Unit r(IM capita/service 3,379 Wastewater Average Day Flow 1.09 Flow per Service Unit .D 323 2012 8,567 3,427 1.02 298 2013 9,604 3,842 1.15 299 2014 10,615 4,246 0.86 203 2015 11,541 4,616 1.26 273 2016 12,171 4,868 1.24 255 2017 12,782 5,113 1.49 291 2018 14,243 5,697 1.69 297 2019 15,700 6,280 1.85 295 2020 19,750 7,900 2.33 295 Average Historical Flow per Service Unit 296 Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the resulting wastewater flow projections, wastewater service will be required for an additional 12,495 SFEs by the year 2032 as shown in Table 7. The calculation is as follows: - A single-family equivalent, which is a unit of development that discharges approximately 296 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4-inch meter. Table 7 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation MrTopulation Service Unit 11 Service Uni ts 2022 24,350 2.50 9,740 2032 55,588 2.50 22,235 10- ear Additional Service Units 12,495 Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not to do a financial analysis to determine the credit value, they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen not to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 50 percent of the Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost. A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is shown in Table 8 and below. Kimley>))Horn Page 11 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table 8 — Wastewater 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $ 233,332,732 Debt Service* $ 58,333,183 Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 291,665,915 Credit for Utility Revenues $ 145,832,957 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 145,832,957 *Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs Impact fee per SFE _ 10 year recoverable costs 10 year additional SFEs Impact fee per SFE = $145,832,957 12,495 Impact fee per SFE = $11,671 Therefore, the maximum assessable impact fee per SFE is $11,671. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4-inch meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the Equivalency Table (Table 9). Table 9 — Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size k •. •.aximum ilk Assessable , Impact Fee 3/4" 15 1 $11,671 1" 25 1.67 $19,491 1-1 /2" 50 3.33 $38,864 2" 80 5.33 $62,206 3" 350 23.33 $272,284 4" 650 43.33 $505,704 6" 1400 93.33 $1,089,254 8" 2400 160 $1,867,360 101, 3500 233.33 $2,723,194 **Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-20 and C-701-19 Kimley>))Horn Page 12 Appendices Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 373 Limits: 595' W OF N POWELL PKWYto N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,851 3,570 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 29,618 71,400 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 317,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 502 Curb & Gutter 2,380 If $ 40.00 $ 95,200 602 Topsoil 1,983 Sy $ 10.00 $ 19,833 702 Turn Lanes 201 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 24,070 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 628,855 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 31,443 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 18,866 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 188,656 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,443 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,443 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 37,731 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,731 Other: $0 $ $ - 377,313 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,006,168 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 201,234 Mobilization 5% $ 50,308 Prep ROW 5% $ 50,308 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15309,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,309,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 209,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 130,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,649,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR371 (1) Limits: 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,910 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,489 cy $ 16.00 $ 135,822 201 16,553 Sy $ 20.00 $ 331,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,528,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 229,200 501 Curb & Gutter 7,640 If $ 40.00 $ 305,600 601 Topsoil 7,640 Sy $ 10.00 $ 76,400 701 Turn Lanes 658 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 79,005 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,685,093 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,553 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 805,528 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,255 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,255 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 161,106 1j Illumination Standard lluminationSystem 6% $ 161,106 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,476,801 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,161,895 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 832,379 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 208,095 Prep ROW1 % $ 41,619 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,244,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,244,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 839,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,048,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,132,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (2) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,610 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,156 cy $ 16.00 $ 114,489 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 13,953 Sy $ 20.00 $ 279,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,880 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,288,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 19,320 sf $ 10.00 $ 193,200 501 Curb & Gutter 6,440 If $ 40.00 $ 257,600 601 Topsoil 6,440 Sy $ 10.00 $ 64,400 701 Turn Lanes 555 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 66,595 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,263,351 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 113,168 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 67,901 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 679,005 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,168 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,168 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 135,801 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 135,801 1 Other: lGrade Separated Crossing $1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 2,608,011 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,871,362 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 974,272 Mobilization 5% $ 243,568 Prep ROW 5% $ 243,568 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,333,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,333,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,013,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 633,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,980,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (3) Limits: 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,285 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,711 cy $ 16.00 $ 91,378 201 11,137 Sy $ 20.00 $ 222,733 301 10,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,028,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,420 sf $ 10.00 $ 154,200 501 Curb & Gutter 5,140 If $ 40.00 $ 205,600 601 Topsoil 5,140 Sy $ 10.00 $ 51,400 701 Turn Lanes 443 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 53,152 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,806,463 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 54,194 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 541,939 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,323 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,323 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 108,388 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 108,388 Other: $0 $ $ - 993,555 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,800,018 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 560,004 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 140,001 Prep ROW1 % $ 28,000 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,529,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,529,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 564,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 705,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,799,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (4) Limits: 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,644 cy $ 16.00 $ 42,311 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 5,157 Sy $ 20.00 $ 103,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 4,760 Sy $ 100.00 $ 476,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 501 Curb & Gutter 2,380 If $ 40.00 $ 95,200 601 Topsoil 2,380 Sy $ 10.00 $ 23,800 701 Turn Lanes 205 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 24,611 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 836,456 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 25,094 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 250,937 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,823 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,823 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 50,187 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,187 Other: $0 $ $ - 460,051 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,296,507 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 259,301 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 64,825 Prep ROW1 % $ 12,965 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15634,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,634,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 261,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 326,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,222,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (5) Limits: BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,745 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 16,644 cy $ 16.00 $ 266,311 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 32,457 Sy $ 20.00 $ 649,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 29,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,996,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 449,400 501 Curb & Gutter 14,980 If $ 40.00 $ 599,200 601 Topsoil 14,980 Sy $ 10.00 $ 149,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,291 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 154,907 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,264,751 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 263,238 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 157,943 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,579,425 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 263,238 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 263,238 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 315,885 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 315,885 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,408,851 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,673,602 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,734,720 Mobilization 5% $ 433,680 Prep ROW 5% $ 433,680 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 11,276,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 11,276,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,804,160 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 1,127,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 14,208,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 370 (1) Limits: 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,795 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 25,756 cy $ 16.00 $ 412,089 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,223 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,004,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,360 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,636,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 69,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 695,400 501 Curb & Gutter 23,180 If $ 40.00 $ 927,200 601 Topsoil 23,180 sy $ 10.00 $ 231,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,998 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 239,702 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,146,658 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 244,400 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,443,997 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 407,333 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 407,333 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 488,799 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 488,799 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,480,662 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 12,627,320 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,525,464 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 631,366 Prep ROW1 % $ 126,273 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15,911,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 15,911,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,545,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 3,182,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 21,639,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 370 (2) Limits: CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 970 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,311 cy $ 16.00 $ 68,978 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,407 Sy $ 20.00 $ 168,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 7,760 Sy $ 100.00 $ 776,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 116,400 501 Curb & Gutter 3,880 If $ 40.00 $ 155,200 601 Topsoil 3,880 Sy $ 10.00 $ 38,800 701 Turn Lanes 334 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 40,123 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,363,634 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 68,182 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,909 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 409,090 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,182 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,182 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 81,818 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,818 Other: $0 $ $ - 818,180 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,181,814 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 436,363 Mobilization 5% $ 109,091 Prep ROW 5% $ 109,091 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,837,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,837,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 453,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 283,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,575,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,140 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 81,067 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,880 Sy $ 20.00 $ 197,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 9,120 Sy $ 100.00 $ 912,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 136,800 501 Curb & Gutter 4,560 If $ 40.00 $ 182,400 601 Topsoil 4,560 Sy $ 10.00 $ 45,600 701 Turn Lanes 393 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 47,155 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,602,621 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 80,131 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,079 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 480,786 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,131 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,131 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 96,157 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,157 Other: $0 $ $ - 961,573 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,564,194 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 512,839 Mobilization 5% $ 128,210 Prep ROW 5% $ 128,210 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,334,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,334,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 533,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 333,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,201,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) Limits: CR 374 to 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 20,089 cy $ 16.00 $ 321,422 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 39,173 sy $ 20.00 $ 783,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 36,160 sy $ 100.00 $ 3,616,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 54,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 542,400 501 Curb & Gutter 18,080 If $ 40.00 $ 723,200 601 Topsoil 18,080 sy $ 10.00 $ 180,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,558 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 186,964 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,354,253 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 190,628 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,906,276 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 317,713 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 317,713 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 381,255 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 381,255 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,994,839 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 10,349,091 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,069,818 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 517,455 Prep ROW 10 $ 103,491 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 13,040,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 13,040,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,086,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,608,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 17,734,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) Limits: 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 2,810 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,430 cy $ 16.00 $ 134,880 208 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,392 Sy $ 20.00 $ 327,833 14,987 308 8" Concrete Pavement sy $ 100.00 $ 1,498,667 16,860 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk sf $ 10.00 $ 168,600 508 Curb & Gutter 8,430 If $ 40.00 $ 337,200 Topsoil 8,118 608 Sy $ 10.00 $ 81,178 708 Turn Lanes 880 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 105,588 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,653,946 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 132,697 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 79,618 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 159,237 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 871,552 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,525,498 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 705,100 Mobilization 5% $ 176,275 Prep ROW 5% $ 176,275 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,584,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,584,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 733,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,317,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) Limits: LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 740 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,151 cy $ 16.00 $ 18,418 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,220 Sy $ 20.00 $ 44,400 307 8" Concrete Pavement 1,973 sy $ 100.00 $ 197,333 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 1,480 If $ 40.00 $ 10.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal: $ $ $ $ 59,200 - 19,621 338,972 607 Topsoil 0 Sy 707 Turn Lanes 164 sy Paving Construction Cost Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 16,949 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 10,169 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 20,338 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 547,456 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 886,428 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 177,286 Mobilization 5% $ 44,321 Prep ROW 5% $ 44,321 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,153,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,153,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 184,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,337,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) Limits: 740' E OF LANGDON DR to N POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,190 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,570 cy $ 16.00 $ 57,120 208 6,942 sy $ 20.00 $ 138,833 308 8" Concrete Pavement 6,347 sy $ 100.00 $ 634,667 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 508 Curb & Gutter 3,570 If $ 40.00 $ 142,800 608 Topsoil 3,438 sy $ 10.00 $ 34,378 708 Turn Lanes 373 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 44,715 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,123,913 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 56,196 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,717 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,435 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 157,348 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,281,261 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 256,252 Mobilization 5% $ 64,063 Prep ROW 5% $ 64,063 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,666,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,666,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 266,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,933,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: ROLLINS RD (1) Limits: CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 5,355 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 12,495 cy $ 16.00 $ 199,920 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 24,395 Sy $ 20.00 $ 487,900 304 8" Concrete Pavement 22,610 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,261,000 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 64,260 sf $ 10.00 $ 642,600 504 Curb & Gutter 10,710 If $ 40.00 $ 428,400 604 Topsoil 5,950 Sy $ 10.00 $ 59,500 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,079,320 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 203,966 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 122,380 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,223,796 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 203,966 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 203,966 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 244,759 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 244,759 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,947,592 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 7,026,912 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,405,382 Mobilization 5% $ 351,346 Prep ROW 5% $ 351,346 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 9,135,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 9,135,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,461,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 913,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,510,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: ROLLINS RD (2) Limits: 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 615 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,435 cy $ 16.00 $ 22,960 204 2,802 Sy $ 20.00 $ 56,033 304 2,597 sy $ 100.00 $ 259,667 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 73,800 504 Curb & Gutter 1,230 If $ 40.00 $ 49,200 604 Topsoil 683 Sy $ 10.00 $ 6,833 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 468,493 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,055 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 140,548 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,425 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,425 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,110 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,110 Other: $0 $ $ - 257,671 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 726,165 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 145,233 Mobilizationl 5% $ 36,308 Prep ROW1 % $ 7,262 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 915,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 915,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 146,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 183,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,244,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY DR (1) Limits: CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,870 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 8,929 cy $ 16.00 $ 142,862 202 17,220 sy $ 20.00 $ 344,400 302 15,307 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,530,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 34,440 sf $ 10.00 $ 344,400 502 Curb & Gutter 11,480 If $ 40.00 $ 459,200 602 Topsoil 9,567 sy $ 10.00 $ 95,667 702 Turn Lanes 968 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 116,105 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,033,300 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 90,999 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 909,990 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,665 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,665 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 181,998 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 181,998 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,918,315 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,951,615 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 990,323 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 247,581 Prep ROW1 % $ 49,516 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,240,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,240,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 998,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,248,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,486,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY DR (2) Limits: 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 1,365 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,123 cy $ 16.00 $ 33,973 209 4,095 sy $ 20.00 $ 81,900 309 3,640 sy $ 100.00 $ 364,000 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,190 sf $ 10.00 $ 81,900 509 Curb & Gutter 2,730 If $ 40.00 $ 109,200 609 Topsoil 3,337 sy $ 10.00 $ 33,367 709 Turn Lanes 417 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 50,050 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 754,390 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 37,720 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 22,632 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 45,263 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 105,615 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 860,005 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 172,001 Mobilization 5% $ 43,000 Prep ROW 5% $ 43,000 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15119,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,119,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 179,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,298,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (1) Limits: 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 970 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 3,018 cy $ 16.00 $ 48,284 202 5,820 Sy $ 20.00 $ 116,400 302 5,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 517,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 116,400 502 Curb & Gutter 3,880 If $ 40.00 $ 155,200 602 Topsoil 3,233 Sy $ 10.00 $ 32,333 702 Turn Lanes 327 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 39,241 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,025,192 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 51,260 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 30,756 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 307,558 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,260 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,260 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 61,512 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 61,512 Other: $0 $ $ - 615,115 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,640,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 328,061 Mobilization 5% $ 82,015 Prep ROW 5% $ 82,015 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,133,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,133,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 341,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 213,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,688,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 2ND ST (1) Limits: 340' W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 665 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,256 cy $ 16.00 $ 20,098 205 2,438 Sy $ 20.00 $ 48,767 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,217 Sy $ 100.00 $ 221,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,980 sf $ 10.00 $ 79,800 505 Curb & Gutter 1,330 If $ 40.00 $ 53,200 605 Topsoil 591 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,911 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 429,442 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 21,472 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,883 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 128,833 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,472 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,472 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 25,767 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,767 Other: $0 $ $ - 257,665 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 687,108 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 137,422 Mobilization 5% $ 34,355 Prep ROW 5% $ 34,355 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 894,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 894,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 143,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 89,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,126,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 3RD ST (1) Limits: HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 585 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,105 2,145 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 17,680 42,900 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,950 Sy $ 100.00 $ 195,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,020 sf $ 10.00 $ 70,200 505 Curb & Gutter 1,170 If $ 40.00 $ 46,800 605 Topsoil 520 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,200 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 377,780 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 18,889 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 11,333 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 113,334 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,889 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,889 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 22,667 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 22,667 Other: $0 $ $ - 226,668 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 604,448 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 120,890 Mobilization 5% $ 30,222 Prep ROW 5% $ 30,222 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7865000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 786,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 125,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 78,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 990,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HARPER DR Limits: W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 565 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 17,076 205 2,072 Sy $ 20.00 $ 41,433 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,883 Sy $ 100.00 $ 188,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,780 sf $ 10.00 $ 67,800 505 Curb & Gutter 1,130 If $ 40.00 $ 45,200 605 Topsoil 502 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,022 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 364,864 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 18,243 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 10,946 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 109,459 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,243 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,243 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 21,892 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,892 Other: $0 $ $ - 218,919 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 583,783 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 116,757 Mobilization 5% $ 29,189 Prep ROW 5% $ 29,189 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 759,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 759,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 121,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 75,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 956,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (1) Limits: 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 215 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 406 cy $ 16.00 $ 6,498 205 788 sy $ 20.00 $ 15,767 305 8" Concrete Pavement 717 sy $ 100.00 $ 71,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,580 sf $ 10.00 $ 25,800 505 Curb & Gutter 430 If $ 40.00 $ 17,200 605 Topsoil 191 sy $ 10.00 $ 1,911 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 138,842 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,165 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 41,653 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,942 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,942 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 8,331 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 8,331 Other: $0 $ $ - 76,363 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 215,205 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 43,041 Mobilizationl 5% $ 10,760 Prep ROW1 % $ 2,152 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 272,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 272,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 43,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 54,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 370,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (2) Limits: S JAMES DR to S POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 305 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 576 cy $ 16.00 $ 9,218 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,118 Sy $ 20.00 $ 22,367 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,017 Sy $ 100.00 $ 101,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,660 sf $ 10.00 $ 36,600 505 Curb & Gutter 610 If $ 40.00 $ 24,400 605 Topsoil 271 Sy $ 10.00 $ 2,711 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 196,962 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 9,848 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 5,909 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 59,089 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,848 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,848 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 11,818 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 11,818 Other: $0 $ $ - 118,177 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 315,140 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 63,028 Mobilization 5% $ 15,757 Prep ROW 5% $ 15,757 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 410,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 410,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 65,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 41,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 517,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (1) Limits: 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 6,770 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 30,089 cy $ 16.00 $ 481,422 201 58,673 Sy $ 20.00 $ 1,173,467 301 54,160 Sy $ 100.00 $ 5,416,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 81,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 812,400 501 Curb & Gutter 27,080 If $ 40.00 $ 1,083,200 601 Topsoil 27,080 By $ 10.00 $ 270,800 701 Turn Lanes 2,334 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 280,032 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 9,517,321 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 475,866 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 285,520 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,855,196 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing (4) - $ 2,500,000 1( Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 475,866 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 475,866 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 571,039 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 571,039 Other: $0 $ $ - 8,210,392 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 17,727,713 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,545,543 Mobilization 5% $ 886,386 Prep ROW 5% $ 886,386 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 23,047,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 23,047,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 3,687,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,347,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (2) Limits: 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,400 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 19,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 312,889 201 38,133 Sy $ 20.00 $ 762,667 301 35,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 3,520,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 52,800 sf $ 10.00 $ 528,000 501 Curb & Gutter 17,600 If $ 40.00 $ 704,000 601 Topsoil 17,600 Sy $ 10.00 $ 176,000 701 Turn Lanes 1,517 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 182,000 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,185,556 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 309,278 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 185,567 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,855,667 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (3) - $ 1,500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 309,278 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 309,278 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 371,133 1 Illumination Standard lluminationsystem 6% $ 371,133 Other: $0 $ $ - 5,211,333 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 11,396,889 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,279,378 Mobilization 5% $ 569,844 Prep ROW 5% $ 569,844 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,816,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,816,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,370,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 3,437,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (3) Limits: 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 6,400 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 28,444 cy $ 16.00 $ 455,111 201 55,467 Sy $ 20.00 $ 1,109,333 301 51,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 5,120,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 76,800 sf $ 10.00 $ 768,000 501 Curb & Gutter 25,600 If $ 40.00 $ 1,024,000 601 Topsoil 25,600 Sy $ 10.00 $ 256,000 701 Turn Lanes 2,206 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 264,727 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,997,172 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 449,859 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 269,915 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,699,152 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (3), Major Stream Crossing, Bridge Crossing - $ 2,250,000 1( Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 449,859 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 449,859 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 539,830 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 539,830 Other: $0 $ $ - 7,648,303 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 16,645,475 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,329,095 Mobilization 5% $ 832,274 Prep ROW 5% $ 832,274 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 21,640,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 21,640,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 3,462,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,020,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (1) Limits: FM 455 to CR 286 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 2,700 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 12,000 cy $ 16.00 $ 192,000 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 23,400 Sy $ 20.00 $ 468,000 301 8" Concrete Pavement 21,600 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,160,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 32,400 sf $ 10.00 $ 324,000 501 Curb & Gutter 10,800 If $ 40.00 $ 432,000 601 Topsoil 10,800 Sy $ 10.00 $ 108,000 701 Turn Lanes 931 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 111,682 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,795,682 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 189,784 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 113,870 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,138,705 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 189,784 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 189,784 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 227,741 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 227,741 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,777,409 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,573,091 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,314,618 Mobilization 5% $ 328,655 Prep ROW 5% $ 328,655 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,546,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,546,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,367,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,983,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (2) Limits: CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 1,430 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,224 cy $ 16.00 $ 35,591 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 4,290 Sy $ 20.00 $ 85,800 307 8" Concrete Pavement 3,813 Sy $ 100.00 $ 381,333 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 2,860 If $ 40.00 $ 10.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal: $ $ $ $ 114,400 - 37,917 655,041 607 Topsoil 0 Sy 707 Turn Lanes 316 Sy Paving Construction Cost Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 32,752 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,651 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 39,302 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 91,706 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 746,747 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 149,349 Mobilization 5% $ 37,337 Prep ROW 5% $ 37,337 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 971,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 971,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 155,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 225,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (3) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to S POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 10,435 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,232 cy $ 16.00 $ 259,716 207 31,305 Sy $ 20.00 $ 626,100 307 8" Concrete Pavement 27,827 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,782,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 20,870 If $ 40.00 $ 834,800 607 Topsoil 0 Sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 2,306 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 276,686 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,779,968 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 238,998 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 143,399 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 286,798 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 669,195 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,449,163 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,089,833 Mobilization 5% $ 272,458 Prep ROW 5% $ 272,458 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,084,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,084,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,133,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,643,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 284 (1) Limits: 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,275 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 9,461 cy $ 16.00 $ 151,378 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 18,558 sy $ 20.00 $ 371,167 303 8" Concrete Pavement 17,467 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,746,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 39,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 393,000 503 Curb & Gutter 6,550 If $ 40.00 $ 262,000 603 Topsoil 7,278 sy $ 10.00 $ 72,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,996,989 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 89,910 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 899,097 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 149,849 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 149,849 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 179,819 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 179,819 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,648,344 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,645,333 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 929,067 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 232,267 Prep ROW1 % $ 46,453 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,854,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,854,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 936,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,170,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,961,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 284 (2) Limits: 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,295 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,741 cy $ 16.00 $ 59,858 203 7,338 Sy $ 20.00 $ 146,767 303 8" Concrete Pavement 6,907 Sy $ 100.00 $ 690,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 155,400 503 Curb & Gutter 2,590 If $ 40.00 $ 103,600 603 Topsoil 2,878 Sy $ 10.00 $ 28,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,185,069 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 59,253 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 35,552 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 355,521 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,253 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,253 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 71,104 1 Illumination Standard lluminationsystem 6% $ 71,104 Other: $0 $ $ - 961,041 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,146,110 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 429,222 Mobilization 5% $ 107,306 Prep ROW 5% $ 107,306 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,790,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,790,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 446,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 279,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,515,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 284 (3) Limits: 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 930 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,687 cy $ 16.00 $ 42,987 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 5,270 Sy $ 20.00 $ 105,400 303 8" Concrete Pavement 4,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 496,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 111,600 503 Curb & Gutter 1,860 If $ 40.00 $ 74,400 603 Topsoil 2,067 Sy $ 10.00 $ 20,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 851,053 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 25,532 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 255,316 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,553 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,553 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 51,063 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,063 1 Other: lGrade Separated Crossing $1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 1,968,079 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,819,133 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 563,827 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 140,957 Prep ROW 10 $ 28,191 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,553,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,553,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 568,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 710,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,832,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: TAYLOR BLVD (1) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,775 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 10,906 cy $ 16.00 $ 174,489 203 21,392 Sy $ 20.00 $ 427,833 303 20,133 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,013,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 45,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 453,000 503 Curb & Gutter 7,550 If $ 40.00 $ 302,000 603 Topsoil 8,389 Sy $ 10.00 $ 83,889 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,454,544 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 172,727 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 103,636 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,036,363 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2), Bridge Crossing - $ 1,500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 172,727 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 172,727 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 207,273 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 207,273 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,572,727 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 7,027,271 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,405,454 Mobilization 5% $ 351,364 Prep ROW 5% $ 351,364 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 9,136,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 9,136,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,461,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 913,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,511,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 Name: TAYLOR BLVD (2) This project consists of widening the Limits: 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB existing facility to a four -lane undivided Impact Fee Class: Major Collector collector. Length (If): 825 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,383 cy $ 16.00 $ 38,133 203 4,675 Sy $ 20.00 $ 93,500 303 4,400 Sy $ 100.00 $ 440,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 99,000 503 Curb & Gutter 1,650 If $ 40.00 $ 66,000 603 Topsoil 1,833 Sy $ 10.00 $ 18,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 754,967 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 37,748 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 22,649 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 226,490 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,748 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,748 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 45,298 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,298 Other: $0 $ $ - 452,980 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,207,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 241,589 Mobilization 5% $ 60,397 Prep ROW 5% $ 60,397 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15571,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,571,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 251,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 157,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,979,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 Name: TAYLOR BLVD (3) This project consists of widening the Limits: 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB existing facility to a four -lane undivided Impact Fee Class: Major Collector collector. Length (If): 225 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 650 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,400 203 1,275 Sy $ 20.00 $ 25,500 303 1,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 120,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 27,000 503 Curb & Gutter 450 If $ 40.00 $ 18,000 603 Topsoil 500 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,000 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 205,900 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 10,295 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 6,177 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 61,770 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,295 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,295 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 12,354 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,354 Other: $0 $ $ - 123,540 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 329,440 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 65,888 Mobilization 5% $ 16,472 Prep ROW 5% $ 16,472 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4295000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 429,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 68,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 42,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 541,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (1) Limits: S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (413) Length (If): 2,700 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adjacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 111 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,400 cy $ 16.00 $ 134,400 211 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,200 Sy $ 20.00 $ 324,000 311 8" Concrete Pavement 14,400 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,440,000 411 6' Concrete Sidewalk 32,400 sf $ 10.00 $ 324,000 511 Curb & Gutter 10,800 If $ 40.00 $ 432,000 611 Topsoil 9,000 Sy $ 10.00 $ 90,000 711 Turn Lanes 910 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 109,227 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,853,627 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 85,609 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 856,088 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 142,681 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 142,681 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 171,218 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 171,218 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,569,495 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,423,122 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 884,624 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 221,156 Prep ROW1 % $ 44,231 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,574,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,574,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 891,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,114,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,581,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (2) Limits: 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 425 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 112 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 661 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,578 212 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,275 Sy $ 20.00 $ 25,500 312 8" Concrete Pavement 1,133 Sy $ 100.00 $ 113,333 412 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,550 sf $ 10.00 $ 25,500 512 Curb & Gutter 850 If $ 40.00 $ 34,000 612 Topsoil 1,039 Sy $ 10.00 $ 10,389 712 Turn Lanes 130 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 15,583 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 234,883 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 11,744 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,047 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,093 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 32,884 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 267,767 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 53,553 Mobilization 5% $ 13,388 Prep ROW 5% $ 13,388 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 349,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 349,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 55,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 405,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (3) Limits: SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (4D) Length (If): 1,610 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 111 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,009 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,142 211 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,660 Sy $ 20.00 $ 193,200 311 8" Concrete Pavement 8,587 Sy $ 100.00 $ 858,667 411 6' Concrete Sidewalk 19,320 sf $ 10.00 $ 193,200 511 Curb & Gutter 6,440 If $ 40.00 $ 257,600 611 Topsoil 5,367 Sy $ 10.00 $ 53,667 711 Turn Lanes 543 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 65,132 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,701,607 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 51,048 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 510,482 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,080 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,080 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 102,096 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 102,096 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 935,884 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,637,491 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 527,498 Mobilization 5% $ 131,875 Prep ROW 1% $ 26,375 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,324,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,324,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 531,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 664,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,521,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (4) Limits: CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 775 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,808 cy $ 16.00 $ 28,933 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,531 Sy $ 20.00 $ 70,611 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,272 Sy $ 100.00 $ 327,222 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 93,000 504 Curb & Gutter 1,550 If $ 40.00 $ 62,000 604 Topsoil 861 Sy $ 10.00 $ 8,611 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 590,378 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 29,519 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 17,711 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 177,113 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,519 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,519 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 35,423 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,423 Other: $0 $ $ - 354,227 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 944,604 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 188,921 Mobilization 5% $ 47,230 Prep ROW 5% $ 47,230 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15228,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,228,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 196,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 122,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,547,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) Limits: 3,740' W OF S FERGUSON PKWYto 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,960 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,662 cy $ 16.00 $ 90,596 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 11,107 Sy $ 20.00 $ 222,133 303 8" Concrete Pavement 10,453 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,045,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 23,520 sf $ 10.00 $ 235,200 503 Curb & Gutter 3,920 If $ 40.00 $ 156,800 603 Topsoil 4,356 By $ 10.00 $ 43,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,793,618 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 89,681 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 53,809 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 538,085 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing - $ 1,000,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,681 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,681 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 107,617 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 107,617 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,076,171 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,869,788 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 773,958 Mobilization 5% $ 193,489 Prep ROW 5% $ 193,489 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,031,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,031,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 804,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 503,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,339,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) Limits: 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWYto S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,780 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,142 cy $ 16.00 $ 82,276 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 10,087 Sy $ 20.00 $ 201,733 303 8" Concrete Pavement 9,493 Sy $ 100.00 $ 949,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 21,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 213,600 503 Curb & Gutter 3,560 If $ 40.00 $ 142,400 603 Topsoil 3,956 Sy $ 10.00 $ 39,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,628,898 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 81,445 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,867 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 488,669 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,445 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,445 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 97,734 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 97,734 Other: $0 $ $ - 977,339 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,606,236 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 521,247 Mobilization 5% $ 130,312 Prep ROW 5% $ 130,312 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,389,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,389,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 542,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 338,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,270,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) Limits: 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to ASPEN DR Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (1/2) Length (If): 2,015 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 113 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,911 cy $ 16.00 $ 46,569 213 5,709 sy $ 20.00 $ 114,183 313 8" Concrete Pavement 5,373 sy $ 100.00 $ 537,333 413 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 241,800 513 Curb & Gutter 2,015 If $ 40.00 $ 80,600 613 Topsoil 2,239 sy $ 10.00 $ 22,389 713 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,042,874 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 52,144 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 31,286 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 62,572 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 146,002 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,188,877 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 237,775 Mobilization 5% $ 59,444 Prep ROW 5% $ 59,444 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,546,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,546,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 247,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,793,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) Limits: ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,010 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,918 cy $ 16.00 $ 46,684 203 5,723 Sy $ 20.00 $ 114,467 303 5,387 Sy $ 100.00 $ 538,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,120 sf $ 10.00 $ 121,200 503 Curb & Gutter 2,020 If $ 40.00 $ 80,800 603 Topsoil 2,244 Sy $ 10.00 $ 22,444 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 924,262 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 46,213 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 27,728 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 277,279 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,213 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,213 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 55,456 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,456 Other: $0 $ $ - 554,557 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,478,820 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 295,764 Mobilization 5% $ 73,941 Prep ROW 5% $ 73,941 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15923,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,923,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 307,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 192,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,423,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) Limits: 295' W OF S POWELL PKWYto S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 295 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 852 cy $ 16.00 $ 13,636 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,672 Sy $ 20.00 $ 33,433 303 8" Concrete Pavement 1,573 Sy $ 100.00 $ 157,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 35,400 503 Curb & Gutter 590 If $ 40.00 $ 23,600 603 Topsoil 656 Sy $ 10.00 $ 6,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 269,958 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 13,498 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 8,099 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 80,987 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,498 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,498 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 16,197 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,197 Other: $0 $ $ - 161,975 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 431,932 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 86,386 Mobilization 5% $ 21,597 Prep ROW 5% $ 21,597 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 562,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 562,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 89,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 56,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 708,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (1) Limits: CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 155 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 482 cy $ 16.00 $ 7,716 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 930 sy $ 20.00 $ 18,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 827 sy $ 100.00 $ 82,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 1,860 sf $ 10.00 $ 18,600 502 Curb & Gutter 620 If $ 40.00 $ 24,800 602 Topsoil 517 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,167 702 Turn Lanes 52 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 6,270 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 163,819 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,915 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 49,146 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,191 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,191 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 9,829 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 9,829 Other: $0 $ $ - 90,101 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 253,920 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 50,784 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 12,696 Prep ROW1 % $ 2,539 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 320,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 320,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 51,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 64,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 435,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (2) Limits: 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,865 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,913 cy $ 16.00 $ 142,613 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 17,190 Sy $ 20.00 $ 343,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 15,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,528,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 34,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 343,800 502 Curb & Gutter 11,460 If $ 40.00 $ 458,400 602 Topsoil 9,550 Sy $ 10.00 $ 95,500 702 Turn Lanes 966 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 115,902 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,028,016 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 90,840 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 908,405 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,401 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,401 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 181,681 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 181,681 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,665,409 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,693,424 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 938,685 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 234,671 Prep ROW1 % $ 46,934 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,914,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,914,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 946,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,182,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,043,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (3) Limits: FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 625 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,944 cy $ 16.00 $ 31,111 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,750 Sy $ 20.00 $ 75,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,333 Sy $ 100.00 $ 333,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,500 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,000 502 Curb & Gutter 2,500 If $ 40.00 $ 100,000 602 Topsoil 2,083 Sy $ 10.00 $ 20,833 702 Turn Lanes 211 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 25,284 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 660,562 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,028 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,817 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 198,169 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,028 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,028 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 39,634 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,634 Other: $0 $ $ - 396,337 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,899 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 211,380 Mobilization 5% $ 52,845 Prep ROW 5% $ 52,845 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15374,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,374,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 219,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 137,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,731,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (4) Limits: 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 830 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,582 cy $ 16.00 $ 41,316 202 4,980 Sy $ 20.00 $ 99,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 4,427 Sy $ 100.00 $ 442,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,960 sf $ 10.00 $ 99,600 502 Curb & Gutter 3,320 If $ 40.00 $ 132,800 602 Topsoil 2,767 Sy $ 10.00 $ 27,667 702 Turn Lanes 280 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 33,577 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 877,226 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 43,861 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 26,317 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 263,168 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,861 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,861 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 52,634 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,634 Other: $0 $ $ - 526,336 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,403,562 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 280,712 Mobilization 5% $ 70,178 Prep ROW 5% $ 70,178 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15825,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,825,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 292,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 182,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,300,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (5) Limits: 1,150' N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,890 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,880 cy $ 16.00 $ 94,080 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 11,340 Sy $ 20.00 $ 226,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 10,080 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,008,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 226,800 502 Curb & Gutter 7,560 If $ 40.00 $ 302,400 602 Topsoil 6,300 Sy $ 10.00 $ 63,000 702 Turn Lanes 637 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 76,459 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,997,539 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 99,877 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 59,926 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 599,262 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,877 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,877 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 119,852 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 119,852 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,448,523 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,446,063 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 689,213 Mobilization 5% $ 172,303 Prep ROW 5% $ 172,303 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,480,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,480,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 716,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 448,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,645,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (6) Limits: 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,855S OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,115 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,469 cy $ 16.00 $ 55,502 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,690 Sy $ 20.00 $ 133,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,947 Sy $ 100.00 $ 594,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 133,800 502 Curb & Gutter 4,460 If $ 40.00 $ 178,400 602 Topsoil 3,717 Sy $ 10.00 $ 37,167 702 Turn Lanes 376 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 45,107 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,178,442 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 58,922 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 35,353 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 353,533 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,922 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,922 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 70,707 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 70,707 Other: $0 $ $ - 707,065 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,885,508 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 377,102 Mobilization 5% $ 94,275 Prep ROW 5% $ 94,275 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,452,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,452,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 392,320 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 245,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,090,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (7) Limits: 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,060 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,298 cy $ 16.00 $ 52,764 202 6,360 sy $ 20.00 $ 127,200 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,653 sy $ 100.00 $ 565,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,720 sf $ 10.00 $ 127,200 502 Curb & Gutter 4,240 If $ 40.00 $ 169,600 602 Topsoil 3,533 sy $ 10.00 $ 35,333 702 Turn Lanes 357 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 42,882 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,120,313 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,609 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 336,094 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,016 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,016 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,219 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,219 Other: $0 $ $ - 616,172 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,736,485 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,297 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 86,824 Prep ROW1 % $ 17,365 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,188,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,188,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 350,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 437,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,976,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 368 (8) Limits: 4,020' N OF W WHITE STto 880' N OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 3,140 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,884 cy $ 16.00 $ 78,151 209 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,420 sy $ 20.00 $ 188,400 309 8" Concrete Pavement 8,373 sy $ 100.00 $ 837,333 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,840 sf $ 10.00 $ 188,400 509 Curb & Gutter 6,280 If $ 40.00 $ 251,200 609 Topsoil 7,676 sy $ 10.00 $ 76,756 709 Turn Lanes 959 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 115,133 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,735,373 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 86,769 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 52,061 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 104,122 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 242,952 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,978,326 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 395,665 Mobilization 5% $ 98,916 Prep ROW 5% $ 98,916 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,572,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,572,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 411,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,984,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 286 (1) Limits: W WHITE ST to 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,800 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,711 16,800 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 139,378 336,000 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 302 8" Concrete Pavement 14,933 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,493,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 33,600 sf $ 10.00 $ 336,000 502 Curb & Gutter 11,200 If $ 40.00 $ 448,000 602 Topsoil 9,333 Sy $ 10.00 $ 93,333 702 Turn Lanes 944 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 113,273 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,959,317 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 147,966 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 88,780 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 887,795 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 147,966 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 147,966 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 177,559 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 177,559 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,775,590 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,734,907 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 946,981 Mobilization 5% $ 236,745 Prep ROW 5% $ 236,745 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,156,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,156,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 984,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 615,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,757,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 286 (2) Limits: 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST to 3,800' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,000 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,111 cy $ 16.00 $ 49,778 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,000 sy $ 20.00 $ 120,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,333 sy $ 100.00 $ 533,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,000 sf $ 10.00 $ 120,000 502 Curb & Gutter 4,000 If $ 40.00 $ 160,000 602 Topsoil 3,333 sy $ 10.00 $ 33,333 702 Turn Lanes 337 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 40,455 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,056,899 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 31,707 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 317,070 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,845 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,845 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 63,414 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,414 Other: $0 $ $ - 581,294 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,638,193 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 327,639 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 81,910 Prep ROW1 % $ 16,382 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,065,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,065,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 330,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 413,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,808,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 286 (3) Limits: 890' N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,455 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,527 cy $ 16.00 $ 72,427 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,730 sy $ 20.00 $ 174,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 7,760 sy $ 100.00 $ 776,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,460 sf $ 10.00 $ 174,600 502 Curb & Gutter 5,820 If $ 40.00 $ 232,800 602 Topsoil 4,850 sy $ 10.00 $ 48,500 702 Turn Lanes 491 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 58,861 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,537,788 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 46,134 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 461,336 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,889 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,889 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 92,267 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 92,267 Other: $0 $ $ - 845,783 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,383,571 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 476,714 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 119,179 Prep ROW1 % $ 23,836 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,004,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,004,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 480,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 600,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,085,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (1) Limits: 900' N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 8,050 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 23,256 cy $ 16.00 $ 372,089 203 45,617 sy $ 20.00 $ 912,333 303 8" Concrete Pavement 42,933 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,293,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 96,600 sf $ 10.00 $ 966,000 503 Curb & Gutter 16,100 If $ 40.00 $ 644,000 603 Topsoil 17,889 sy $ 10.00 $ 178,889 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 7,366,644 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 220,999 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,209,993 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 368,332 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 368,332 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 441,999 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 441,999 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,301,654 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 11,668,299 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,333,660 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 583,415 Prep ROW 10 $ 116,683 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,703,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,703,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,352,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,940,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 19,996,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (2) Limits: W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 240 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 693 cy $ 16.00 $ 11,093 203 1,360 Sy $ 20.00 $ 27,200 303 1,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 128,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,880 sf $ 10.00 $ 28,800 503 Curb & Gutter 480 If $ 40.00 $ 19,200 603 Topsoil 533 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 219,627 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 10,981 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 6,589 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 65,888 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,981 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,981 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 13,178 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 13,178 Other: $0 $ $ - 131,776 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 351,403 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 70,281 Mobilization 5% $ 17,570 Prep ROW 5% $ 17,570 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4575000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 457,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 73,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 45,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 576,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (3) Limits: 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525N OF ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 430 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,242 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,876 203 2,437 Sy $ 20.00 $ 48,733 303 2,293 Sy $ 100.00 $ 229,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,600 503 Curb & Gutter 860 If $ 40.00 $ 34,400 603 Topsoil 956 Sy $ 10.00 $ 9,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 393,498 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 19,675 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 11,805 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 118,049 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,675 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,675 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 23,610 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 23,610 Other: $0 $ $ - 236,099 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 629,596 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 125,919 Mobilization 5% $ 31,480 Prep ROW 5% $ 31,480 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 819,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 819,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 131,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 81,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,032,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (4) Limits: 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 525 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,517 cy $ 16.00 $ 24,267 203 2,975 Sy $ 20.00 $ 59,500 303 2,800 Sy $ 100.00 $ 280,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 63,000 503 Curb & Gutter 1,050 If $ 40.00 $ 42,000 603 Topsoil 1,167 Sy $ 10.00 $ 11,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 480,433 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 24,022 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,413 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 144,130 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,022 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,022 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,826 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,826 Other: $0 $ $ - 288,260 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 768,693 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 153,739 Mobilization 5% $ 38,435 Prep ROW 5% $ 38,435 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15000,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,000,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 160,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 100,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,260,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (5) Limits: ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 2,015 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,821 cy $ 16.00 $ 93,138 203 11,418 Sy $ 20.00 $ 228,367 303 10,747 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,074,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 241,800 503 Curb & Gutter 4,030 If $ 40.00 $ 161,200 603 Topsoil 4,478 Sy $ 10.00 $ 44,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,843,949 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 55,318 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 553,185 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,197 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,197 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 110,637 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 110,637 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,014,172 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,858,121 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 571,624 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 142,906 Prep ROW1 % $ 28,581 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,602,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,602,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 576,320 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 720,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,899,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (1) Limits: CR 371 to ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,865 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 26,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 417,067 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,830 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,016,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,920 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,692,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 70,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 703,800 501 Curb & Gutter 23,460 If $ 40.00 $ 938,400 601 Topsoil 23,460 sy $ 10.00 $ 234,600 701 Turn Lanes 2,022 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 242,598 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,245,064 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 247,352 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,473,519 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 412,253 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 412,253 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 494,704 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 494,704 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,784,785 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,029,850 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,605,970 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 651,492 Prep ROW 10 $ 130,298 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 16,418,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 16,418,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,626,880 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 3,283,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 22,328,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (2) Limits: ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 2,760 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 8,280 cy $ 16.00 $ 132,480 208 16,100 sy $ 20.00 $ 322,000 308 14,720 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,472,000 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 165,600 508 Curb & Gutter 8,280 If $ 40.00 $ 331,200 608 Topsoil 7,973 sy $ 10.00 $ 79,733 708 Turn Lanes 864 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 103,709 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,606,722 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 130,336 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 78,202 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 156,403 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 364,941 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,971,664 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 594,333 Mobilization 5% $ 148,583 Prep ROW 5% $ 148,583 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,864,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,864,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 618,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,482,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (3) Limits: HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 2,650 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,122 cy $ 16.00 $ 65,956 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 7,950 sy $ 20.00 $ 159,000 307 8" Concrete Pavement 7,067 sy $ 100.00 $ 706,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 5,300 If $ 40.00 $ 212,000 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 586 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 70,265 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,213,887 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 60,694 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 36,417 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 72,833 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 169,944 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,383,832 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 276,766 Mobilization 5% $ 69,192 Prep ROW 5% $ 69,192 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,799,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,799,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 287,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,087,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (1) Limits: W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 2,440 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 3,796 cy $ 16.00 $ 60,729 207 7,320 sy $ 20.00 $ 146,400 307 6,507 sy $ 100.00 $ 650,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 4,880 If $ 40.00 $ 195,200 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 539 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 64,697 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,117,693 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 55,885 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,531 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,062 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 156,477 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,274,169 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 254,834 Mobilization 5% $ 63,708 Prep ROW 5% $ 63,708 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,657,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,657,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 265,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,922,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (2) Limits: 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,360 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 4,080 cy $ 16.00 $ 65,280 208 7,933 Sy $ 20.00 $ 158,667 308 7,253 Sy $ 100.00 $ 725,333 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 81,600 508 Curb & Gutter 4,080 If $ 40.00 $ 163,200 608 Topsoil 3,929 Sy $ 10.00 $ 39,289 708 Turn Lanes 426 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 51,103 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,284,472 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 64,224 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 38,534 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 77,068 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 179,826 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,464,298 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 292,860 Mobilization 5% $ 73,215 Prep ROW 5% $ 73,215 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,904,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,904,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 304,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,209,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (3) Limits: W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,245 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,533 cy $ 16.00 $ 88,533 201 10,790 Sy $ 20.00 $ 215,800 301 9,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 996,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 14,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 149,400 501 Curb & Gutter 4,980 If $ 40.00 $ 199,200 601 Topsoil 4,980 Sy $ 10.00 $ 49,800 701 Turn Lanes 429 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 51,498 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,750,231 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 52,507 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 525,069 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,512 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,512 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 105,014 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,014 Other: $0 $ $ - 962,627 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,712,858 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 542,572 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 135,643 Prep ROW1 % $ 27,129 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,419,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,419,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 547,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 683,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,650,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (4) Limits: 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,025 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 4,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 72,889 201 8,883 Sy $ 20.00 $ 177,667 301 8,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 820,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 123,000 501 Curb & Gutter 4,100 If $ 40.00 $ 164,000 601 Topsoil 4,100 Sy $ 10.00 $ 41,000 701 Turn Lanes 353 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 42,398 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,"0,953 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 43,229 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 432,286 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,048 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,048 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 86,457 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,457 Other: $0 $ $ - 792,524 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,233,478 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 446,696 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 111,674 Prep ROW1 % $ 22,335 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,815,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,815,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 450,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 563,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,828,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (5) Limits: 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 425 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,889 cy $ 16.00 $ 30,222 201 3,683 sy $ 20.00 $ 73,667 301 3,400 sy $ 100.00 $ 340,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,100 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,000 501 Curb & Gutter 1,700 If $ 40.00 $ 68,000 601 Topsoil 1,700 sy $ 10.00 $ 17,000 701 Turn Lanes 146 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 17,580 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 597,468 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 17,924 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 179,241 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,873 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,873 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 35,848 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,848 Other: $0 $ $ - 328,608 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 926,076 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 185,215 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 46,304 Prep ROW 10 $ 9,261 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15167,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,167,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 186,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 233,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,587,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W CROSSING BLVD (1) Limits: 2,660' N OF CR 371 to 1,970' N Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 4,725 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 13,650 26,775 cy sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 218,400 535,500 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 303 8" Concrete Pavement 25,200 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,520,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 56,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 567,000 503 Curb & Gutter 9,450 If $ 40.00 $ 378,000 603 Topsoil 10,500 sy $ 10.00 $ 105,000 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,323,900 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 129,717 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,297,170 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 216,195 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 216,195 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 259,434 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 259,434 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,378,145 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 69702,045 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,340,409 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 335,102 Prep ROW1 % $ 67,020 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,445,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,445,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,351,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,689,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,485,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W CROSSING BLVD (2) Limits: 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 440 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 110 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 684 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,951 210 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,320 Sy $ 20.00 $ 26,400 1,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 117,333 310 8" Concrete Pavement 410 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 26,400 510 Curb & Gutter 880 If $ 40.00 $ 35,200 610 Topsoil 1,076 Sy $ 10.00 $ 10,756 710 Turn Lanes 134 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 16,133 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 243,173 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 12,159 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,295 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,590 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 34,044 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 277,218 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 55,444 Mobilization 5% $ 13,861 Prep ROW 5% $ 13,861 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 361,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 361,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 57,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 419,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 1106 (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWYto 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,080 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,360 cy $ 16.00 $ 53,760 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,480 sy $ 20.00 $ 129,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,760 sy $ 100.00 $ 576,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,960 sf $ 10.00 $ 129,600 502 Curb & Gutter 4,320 If $ 40.00 $ 172,800 602 Topsoil 3,600 sy $ 10.00 $ 36,000 702 Turn Lanes 364 sy $ 120.00 $ 43,691 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,141,451 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 57,073 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 34,244 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 342,435 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,073 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,073 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 68,487 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 68,487 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,184,871 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,326,321 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 465,264 Mobilizationi 5% $ 116,316 Prep ROW 5% $ 116,316 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,025,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,025,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 484,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 302,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,812,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 1106 (2) Limits: 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 2,425 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,772 cy $ 16.00 $ 60,356 209 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 7,275 sy $ 20.00 $ 145,500 309 8" Concrete Pavement 6,467 sy $ 100.00 $ 646,667 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 14,550 sf $ 10.00 $ 145,500 509 Curb & Gutter 4,850 If $ 40.00 $ 194,000 609 Topsoil 5,928 sy $ 10.00 $ 59,278 709 Turn Lanes 741 sy $ 120.00 $ 88,917 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,340,217 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 67,011 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,207 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 80,413 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 687,630 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,027,847 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 405,569 Mobilization 5% $ 101,392 Prep ROW 5% $ 101,392 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,637,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,637,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 421,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,059,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWYto 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,675 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,025 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,400 208 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,771 sy $ 20.00 $ 195,417 308 8" Concrete Pavement 8,933 sy $ 100.00 $ 893,333 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 10,050 sf $ 10.00 $ 100,500 508 Curb & Gutter 5,025 If $ 40.00 $ 201,000 608 Topsoil 4,839 sy $ 10.00 $ 48,389 708 Turn Lanes 524 sy $ 120.00 $ 62,939 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,581,978 jor Ma Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 79,099 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 47,459 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 94,919 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 721,477 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,303,455 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 460,691 Mobilization 5% $ 115,173 Prep ROW 5% $ 115,173 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,995,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,955,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 479,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,474,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (2) Limits: 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,515 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,733 cy $ 16.00 $ 107,733 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 13,130 sy $ 20.00 $ 262,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,120 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,212,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 181,800 501 Curb & Gutter 6,060 If $ 40.00 $ 242,400 601 Topsoil 6,060 sy $ 10.00 $ 60,600 701 Turn Lanes 522 sy $ 120.00 $ 62,666 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,129,799 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 63,894 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 638,940 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,490 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,490 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 127,788 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 127,788 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,171,390 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,301,189 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 660,238 Mobilizationi 5% $ 165,059 Prep ROW 1% $ 33,012 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,160,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,190,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 665,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 832,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,658,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (3) Limits: CR 427 to 575' E OF CR 427 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 575 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 40,889 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 4,983 sy $ 20.00 $ 99,667 301 8" Concrete Pavement 4,600 sy $ 100.00 $ 460,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 69,000 501 Curb & Gutter 2,300 If $ 40.00 $ 92,000 601 Topsoil 2,300 sy $ 10.00 $ 23,000 701 Turn Lanes 198 sy $ 120.00 $ 23,784 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 808,340 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 40,417 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 24,250 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 242,502 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,417 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,417 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 48,500 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 48,500 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 485,004 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,293,343 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 258,669 Mobilizationi 5% $ 64,667 Prep ROW 5% $ 64,667 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,682,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,682,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 269,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 168,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,119,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E ROSAMOND PKWY (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWY to 295' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 295 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,311 cy $ 16.00 $ 20,978 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,557 sy $ 20.00 $ 51,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 2,360 sy $ 100.00 $ 236,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 35,400 501 Curb & Gutter 1,180 If $ 40.00 $ 47,200 601 Topsoil 1,180 sy $ 10.00 $ 11,800 701 Turn Lanes 102 sy $ 120.00 $ 12,202 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 414,713 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,736 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,441 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 124,414 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,736 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,736 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,883 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,883 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 748,828 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,163,541 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 232,708 Mobilizationi 5% $ 58,177 Prep ROW 5% $ 58,177 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,513,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,513,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 242,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 151,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,906,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) Limits: 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,915 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,511 cy $ 16.00 $ 136,178 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 16,597 sy $ 20.00 $ 331,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,532,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,980 sf $ 10.00 $ 229,800 501 Curb & Gutter 7,660 If $ 40.00 $ 306,400 601 Topsoil 7,660 sy $ 10.00 $ 76,600 701 Turn Lanes 660 sy $ 120.00 $ 79,211 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,692,122 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,764 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 807,637 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,606 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,606 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 161,527 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 161,527 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,480,667 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,172,790 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 834,558 Mobilizationi 5% $ 208,639 Prep ROW 1% $ 41,728 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,258,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,258,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 841,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,051,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,151,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (1) Limits: CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,850 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 26,000 cy $ 16.00 $ 416,000 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,700 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,014,000 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,800 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,680,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 70,200 sf $ 10.00 $ 702,000 501 Curb & Gutter 23,400 If $ 40.00 $ 936,000 601 Topsoil 23,400 sy $ 10.00 $ 234,000 701 Turn Lanes 2,016 sy $ 120.00 $ 241,977 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,223,977 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 411,199 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 246,719 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,467,193 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (3) - $ 750,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 411,199 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 411,199 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 493,439 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 493,439 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,684,386 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,908,364 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,781,673 Mobilizationi 5% $ 695,418 Prep ROW 5% $ 695,418 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 18,081,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 18,081,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,892,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 4,195,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (2) Limits: 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,445 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 19,756 cy $ 16.00 $ 316,089 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 38,523 sy $ 20.00 $ 770,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 35,560 sy $ 100.00 $ 3,556,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 53,340 sf $ 10.00 $ 533,400 501 Curb & Gutter 17,780 If $ 40.00 $ 711,200 601 Topsoil 17,780 sy $ 10.00 $ 177,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,532 sy $ 120.00 $ 183,861 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,248,817 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 312,441 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 187,465 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,874,645 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 312,441 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 312,441 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 374,929 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 374,929 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,749,290 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 10,998,107 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,199,621 Mobilizationi 5% $ 549,905 Prep ROW 5% $ 549,905 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,298,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,258,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,287,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 3,317,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 640 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,991 cy $ 16.00 $ 31,858 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,840 sy $ 20.00 $ 76,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,413 sy $ 100.00 $ 341,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 76,800 502 Curb & Gutter 2,560 If $ 40.00 $ 102,400 602 Topsoil 2,133 sy $ 10.00 $ 21,333 702 Turn Lanes 216 sy $ 120.00 $ 25,891 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 676,415 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,821 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,292 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 202,925 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,821 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,821 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,585 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,585 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 405,849 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,082,265 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 216,453 Mobilizationi 5% $ 54,113 Prep ROW 5% $ 54,113 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,407,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,457,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 225,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 140,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,773,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (3) Limits: N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 245 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 762 cy $ 16.00 $ 12,196 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,470 sy $ 20.00 $ 29,400 302 8" Concrete Pavement 1,307 sy $ 100.00 $ 130,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 29,400 502 Curb & Gutter 980 If $ 40.00 $ 39,200 602 Topsoil 817 sy $ 10.00 $ 8,167 702 Turn Lanes 83 sy $ 120.00 $ 9,911 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 258,940 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,768 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 77,682 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,947 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,947 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 15,536 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,536 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 642,417 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 901,357 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 180,271 Mobilizationi 5% $ 45,068 Prep ROW 1% $ 9,014 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,136,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,136,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 181,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 227,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,545,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (4) Limits: N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 140 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 436 cy $ 16.00 $ 6,969 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 840 sy $ 20.00 $ 16,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 747 sy $ 100.00 $ 74,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 1,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 16,800 502 Curb & Gutter 560 If $ 40.00 $ 22,400 602 Topsoil 467 sy $ 10.00 $ 4,667 702 Turn Lanes 47 sy $ 120.00 $ 5,664 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 147,966 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 7,398 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,439 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 44,390 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,398 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,398 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 8,878 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 8,878 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 88,780 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 236,745 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 47,349 Mobilizationi 5% $ 11,837 Prep ROW 5% $ 11,837 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 308,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 358,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 49,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 71,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (5) Limits: 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,075 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,456 cy $ 16.00 $ 103,289 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 12,450 sy $ 20.00 $ 249,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 11,067 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,106,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 249,000 502 Curb & Gutter 8,300 If $ 40.00 $ 332,000 602 Topsoil 6,917 sy $ 10.00 $ 69,167 702 Turn Lanes 700 sy $ 120.00 $ 83,943 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,193,065 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 65,792 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 657,920 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,653 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,653 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 131,584 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 131,584 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,206,186 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,399,251 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 679,850 Mobilizationi 5% $ 169,963 Prep ROW 1% $ 33,993 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,284,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,284,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 685,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 856,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,826,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 2ND ST (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 625 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,181 cy $ 16.00 $ 18,889 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,292 sy $ 20.00 $ 45,833 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,083 sy $ 100.00 $ 208,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,500 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,000 505 Curb & Gutter 1,250 If $ 40.00 $ 50,000 605 Topsoil 556 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,556 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 403,611 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,181 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,108 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 121,083 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,181 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,181 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,217 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,217 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 242,167 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 645,778 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 129,156 Mobilizationi 5% $ 32,289 Prep ROW 5% $ 32,289 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 840,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 840,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 134,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 84,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,058,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 3RD ST (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 630 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,190 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,040 205 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,310 sy $ 20.00 $ 46,200 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,100 sy $ 100.00 $ 210,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,600 505 Curb & Gutter 1,260 If $ 40.00 $ 50,400 605 Topsoil 560 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,600 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 406,840 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,342 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,205 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 122,052 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,342 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,342 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,410 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,410 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 244,104 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 650,944 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 130,189 Mobilizationi 5% $ 32,547 Prep ROW 5% $ 32,547 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 847,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 847,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 135,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 84,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,067,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (3) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 645 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,218 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,493 205 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,365 sy $ 20.00 $ 47,300 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,150 sy $ 100.00 $ 215,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,740 sf $ 10.00 $ 77,400 505 Curb & Gutter 1,290 If $ 40.00 $ 51,600 605 Topsoil 573 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,733 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 416,527 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,826 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,496 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 124,958 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,826 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,826 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,992 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,992 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 249,916 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 666,443 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 133,289 Mobilizationi 5% $ 33,322 Prep ROW 5% $ 33,322 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 867,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 897,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 138,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 86,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,092,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 7TH ST Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 725 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,369 cy $ 16.00 $ 21,911 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,658 sy $ 20.00 $ 53,167 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,417 sy $ 100.00 $ 241,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 87,000 505 Curb & Gutter 1,450 If $ 40.00 $ 58,000 605 Topsoil 644 sy $ 10.00 $ 6,444 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 468,189 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 23,409 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,046 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 140,457 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,409 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,409 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,091 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,091 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,913 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 749,102 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 149,820 Mobilizationi 5% $ 37,455 Prep ROW 5% $ 37,455 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 974,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 974,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 155,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 97,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,227,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 8TH ST Limits: S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 385 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 727 cy $ 16.00 $ 11,636 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,412 sy $ 20.00 $ 28,233 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,283 sy $ 100.00 $ 128,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 46,200 505 Curb & Gutter 770 If $ 40.00 $ 30,800 605 Topsoil 342 sy $ 10.00 $ 3,422 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 248,624 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 12,431 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,459 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 74,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,431 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,431 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,917 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,917 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 149,175 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 397,799 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 79,560 Mobilizationi 5% $ 19,890 Prep ROW 5% $ 19,890 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 518,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 518,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 82,880 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 51,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 653,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (4) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 355 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,578 cy $ 16.00 $ 25,244 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,077 sy $ 20.00 $ 61,533 301 8" Concrete Pavement 2,840 sy $ 100.00 $ 284,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,260 sf $ 10.00 $ 42,600 501 Curb & Gutter 1,420 If $ 40.00 $ 56,800 601 Topsoil 1,420 sy $ 10.00 $ 14,200 701 Turn Lanes 122 sy $ 120.00 $ 14,684 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 499,062 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 24,953 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,972 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 149,719 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,953 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,953 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 29,944 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,944 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 299,437 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,499 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 159,700 Mobilizationi 5% $ 39,925 Prep ROW 5% $ 39,925 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,039,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,039,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 166,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 241,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study updated: 6/28/2022 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Description: Project No. 20 Name: E WHITE ST (1) This project consists of widening the Limits: S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial arterial. Length (If): 8,040 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 35,733 cy $ 16.00 $ 571,733 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 69,680 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,393,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 64,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 6,432,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 96,480 sf $ 10.00 $ 964,800 501 Curb & Gutter 32,160 If $ 40.00 $ 1,286,400 601 Topsoil 32,160 sy $ 10.00 $ 321,600 701 Turn Lanes 2,771 sy $ 120.00 $ 332,564 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 11,302,697 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 565,135 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 339,081 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 3,390,809 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (2) - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 565,135 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 565,135 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 678,162 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 678,162 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,281,618 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 19,584,315 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,916,863 Mobilizationi 5% $ 979,216 Prep ROW 5% $ 979,216 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 25,460,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 25,490,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 4,073,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,907,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (1) Limits: 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,430 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,560 cy $ 16.00 $ 120,960 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 14,580 sy $ 20.00 $ 291,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 12,960 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,296,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 29,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 291,600 502 Curb & Gutter 9,720 If $ 40.00 $ 388,800 602 Topsoil 8,100 sy $ 10.00 $ 81,000 702 Turn Lanes 819 sy $ 120.00 $ 98,305 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,568,265 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 128,413 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 77,048 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 770,479 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 128,413 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 128,413 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 154,096 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 154,096 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,540,959 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,109,223 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 821,845 Mobilizationi 5% $ 205,461 Prep ROW 5% $ 205,461 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,342,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,342,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 854,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,239,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (1) Limits: 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 5,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided TxDOT collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 15,947 cy $ 16.00 $ 255,147 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 31,280 Sy $ 20.00 $ 625,600 303 8" Concrete Pavement 29,440 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,944,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 66,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 662,400 503 Curb & Gutter 11,040 If $ 40.00 $ 441,600 603 Topsoil 12,267 sy $ 10.00 $ 122,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 Sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,051,413 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 252,571 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 151,542 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,515,424 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (2) - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 252,571 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 252,571 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 303,085 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 303,085 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,030,848 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 9,082,261 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,816,452 Mobilization 5% $ 454,113 Prep ROW 5% $ 454,113 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 11,807,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 11,857,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,889,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 2,739,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E WHITE ST (2) Limits: E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,730 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 25,467 cy $ 16.00 $ 407,467 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 49,660 sy $ 20.00 $ 993,200 301 8" Concrete Pavement 45,840 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,584,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 68,760 sf $ 10.00 $ 687,600 501 Curb & Gutter 22,920 If $ 40.00 $ 916,800 601 Topsoil 22,920 sy $ 10.00 $ 229,200 701 Turn Lanes 1,975 sy $ 120.00 $ 237,014 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,055,280 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 402,764 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 241,658 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,416,584 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2), Major Stream Crossing - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 402,764 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 402,764 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 483,317 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 483,317 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,833,168 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,888,448 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,777,690 Mobilizationi 5% $ 694,422 Prep ROW 5% $ 694,422 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 18,055,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 18,055,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,888,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 4,189,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (2) Limits: 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 855 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 110 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,330 cy $ 16.00 $ 21,280 210 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,565 sy $ 20.00 $ 51,300 310 8" Concrete Pavement 2,280 sy $ 100.00 $ 228,000 410 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,130 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,300 510 Curb & Gutter 1,710 If $ 40.00 $ 68,400 610 Topsoil 2,090 sy $ 10.00 $ 20,900 710 Turn Lanes 261 sy $ 120.00 $ 31,350 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 472,530 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 23,627 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,176 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,352 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 66,154 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 538,684 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 107,737 Mobilizationi 5% $ 26,934 Prep ROW 5% $ 26,934 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 701,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 751,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 112,160 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 813,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (3) Limits: LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,410 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 9,851 cy $ 16.00 $ 157,618 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 19,323 sy $ 20.00 $ 386,467 303 8" Concrete Pavement 18,187 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,818,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 40,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 409,200 503 Curb & Gutter 6,820 If $ 40.00 $ 272,800 603 Topsoil 7,578 sy $ 10.00 $ 75,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,120,529 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 93,616 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 936,159 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,026 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,026 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 187,232 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 187,232 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,716,291 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,836,820 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 967,364 Mobilizationi 5% $ 241,841 Prep ROW 1% $ 48,368 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,095,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,055,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 975,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,219,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,289,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 260 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 751 cy $ 16.00 $ 12,018 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,473 sy $ 20.00 $ 29,467 303 8" Concrete Pavement 1,387 sy $ 100.00 $ 138,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,120 sf $ 10.00 $ 31,200 503 Curb & Gutter 520 If $ 40.00 $ 20,800 603 Topsoil 578 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 237,929 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 11,896 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,138 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 71,379 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,896 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,896 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,276 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,276 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 642,757 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 880,686 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,137 Mobilization 5% $ 44,034 Prep ROW 5% $ 44,034 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,145,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,145,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 183,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 114,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,443,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) Limits: 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 4,030 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 11,642 cy $ 16.00 $ 186,276 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 22,837 sy $ 20.00 $ 456,733 303 8" Concrete Pavement 21,493 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,149,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 48,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 483,600 503 Curb & Gutter 8,060 If $ 40.00 $ 322,400 603 Topsoil 8,956 sy $ 10.00 $ 89,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,687,898 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 184,395 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 110,637 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,106,369 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 184,395 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 184,395 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 221,274 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 221,274 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,712,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,400,636 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,280,127 Mobilization 5% $ 320,032 Prep ROW 5% $ 320,032 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,321,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,321,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,331,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 832,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 10,484,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) Limits: LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 2,135 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,168 cy $ 16.00 $ 98,684 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 12,098 sy $ 20.00 $ 241,967 303 8" Concrete Pavement 11,387 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,138,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 25,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 256,200 503 Curb & Gutter 4,270 If $ 40.00 $ 170,800 603 Topsoil 4,744 sy $ 10.00 $ 47,444 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,953,762 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 58,613 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 586,129 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,688 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,688 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 117,226 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 117,226 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,074,569 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,028,331 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 605,666 Mobilizationi 5% $ 151,417 Prep ROW 1% $ 30,283 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,816,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,816,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 610,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 763,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,190,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) Limits: 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,660 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 10,573 cy $ 16.00 $ 169,173 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 20,740 sy $ 20.00 $ 414,800 303 8" Concrete Pavement 19,520 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,952,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 43,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 439,200 503 Curb & Gutter 7,320 If $ 40.00 $ 292,800 603 Topsoil 8,133 sy $ 10.00 $ 81,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,349,307 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 100,479 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,004,792 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 167,465 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 167,465 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 200,958 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 200,958 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,842,119 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,191,425 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,038,285 Mobilizationi 5% $ 259,571 Prep ROW 1% $ 51,914 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,542,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,542,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,046,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,308,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,897,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 417 Limits: CR 418 to CR 419 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,455 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 15,356 cy $ 16.00 $ 245,689 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 29,943 sy $ 20.00 $ 598,867 301 8" Concrete Pavement 27,640 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,764,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 41,460 sf $ 10.00 $ 414,600 501 Curb & Gutter 13,820 If $ 40.00 $ 552,800 601 Topsoil 13,820 sy $ 10.00 $ 138,200 701 Turn Lanes 1,191 sy $ 120.00 $ 142,911 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,857,067 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 242,853 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 145,712 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,457,120 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 242,853 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 242,853 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 291,424 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 291,424 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,164,240 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,021,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,604,261 Mobilizationi 5% $ 401,065 Prep ROW 5% $ 401,065 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 10,428,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 10,428,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,668,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 1,042,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 13,139,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECTION Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 1,885 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,398 cy $ 16.00 $ 70,373 204 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 8,587 sy $ 20.00 $ 171,744 304 8" Concrete Pavement 7,959 sy $ 100.00 $ 795,889 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 226,200 504 Curb & Gutter 3,770 If $ 40.00 $ 150,800 604 Topsoil 2,094 sy $ 10.00 $ 20,944 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,435,951 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 43,079 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 430,785 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,798 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,798 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 86,157 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,157 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 789,773 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,225,724 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 445,145 Mobilizationi 5% $ 111,286 Prep ROW 1% $ 22,257 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,805,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,855,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 448,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 561,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,815,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S VAIL ST Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 1,780 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,153 cy $ 16.00 $ 66,453 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,109 sy $ 20.00 $ 162,178 304 8" Concrete Pavement 7,516 sy $ 100.00 $ 751,556 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 21,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 213,600 504 Curb & Gutter 3,560 If $ 40.00 $ 142,400 604 Topsoil 1,978 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,778 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,355,964 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,679 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 406,789 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,798 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,798 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 81,358 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,358 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 745,780 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,101,745 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 420,349 Mobilizationi 5% $ 105,087 Prep ROW 1% $ 21,017 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,649,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,649,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 423,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 529,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,603,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 427 Limits: 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 880 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,053 cy $ 16.00 $ 32,853 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 4,009 sy $ 20.00 $ 80,178 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,716 sy $ 100.00 $ 371,556 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 10,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 105,600 504 Curb & Gutter 1,760 If $ 40.00 $ 70,400 604 Topsoil 978 sy $ 10.00 $ 9,778 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 670,364 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,518 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,111 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 201,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,518 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,518 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,222 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,222 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 402,219 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,072,583 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 214,517 Mobilization 5% $ 53,629 Prep ROW 5% $ 53,629 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,395,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,355,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 223,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 139,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,758,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 425 Limits: 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWYto E ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,540 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,844 cy $ 16.00 $ 109,511 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 13,347 sy $ 20.00 $ 266,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,232,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,480 sf $ 10.00 $ 184,800 501 Curb & Gutter 6,160 If $ 40.00 $ 246,400 601 Topsoil 6,160 sy $ 10.00 $ 61,600 701 Turn Lanes 531 sy $ 120.00 $ 63,700 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,164,944 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 108,247 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 64,948 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 649,483 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 108,247 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 108,247 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 129,897 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 129,897 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,548,967 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,713,911 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 742,782 Mobilizationi 5% $ 185,696 Prep ROW 5% $ 185,696 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,829,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,829,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 772,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 482,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,085,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (3) Limits: E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,410 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,267 cy $ 16.00 $ 100,267 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 12,220 sy $ 20.00 $ 244,400 301 8" Concrete Pavement 11,280 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,128,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 169,200 501 Curb & Gutter 5,640 If $ 40.00 $ 225,600 601 Topsoil 5,640 sy $ 10.00 $ 56,400 701 Turn Lanes 486 sy $ 120.00 $ 58,323 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,982,189 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 99,109 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 59,466 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 594,657 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,109 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,109 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 118,931 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 118,931 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,189,314 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,171,503 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 634,301 Mobilizationi 5% $ 158,575 Prep ROW 5% $ 158,575 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,123,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,123,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 659,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 957,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (1) Limits: HOUSTON ST to 485' S OF HOUSTON ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 485 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,156 cy $ 16.00 $ 34,489 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 4,203 sy $ 20.00 $ 84,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 3,880 sy $ 100.00 $ 388,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,820 sf $ 10.00 $ 58,200 501 Curb & Gutter 1,940 If $ 40.00 $ 77,600 601 Topsoil 1,940 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,400 701 Turn Lanes 167 sy $ 120.00 $ 20,061 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 681,817 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,455 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 204,545 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,091 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,091 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,909 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,909 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 374,999 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,816 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 211,363 Mobilizationi 5% $ 52,841 Prep ROW 1% $ 10,568 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,332,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,332,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 213,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 266,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,812,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (2) Limits: 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 930' N OF E WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 635 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,822 cy $ 16.00 $ 45,156 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 5,503 sy $ 20.00 $ 110,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 5,080 sy $ 100.00 $ 508,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 76,200 501 Curb & Gutter 2,540 If $ 40.00 $ 101,600 601 Topsoil 2,540 sy $ 10.00 $ 25,400 701 Turn Lanes 219 sy $ 120.00 $ 26,266 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 892,688 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 26,781 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 267,806 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,634 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,634 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 53,561 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,561 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 490,978 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,383,667 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 276,733 Mobilizationi 5% $ 69,183 Prep ROW 1% $ 13,837 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,744,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,744,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 279,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 348,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,372,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (3) Limits: E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,735 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 16,600 cy $ 16.00 $ 265,600 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 32,370 sy $ 20.00 $ 647,400 301 8" Concrete Pavement 29,880 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,988,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,820 sf $ 10.00 $ 448,200 501 Curb & Gutter 14,940 If $ 40.00 $ 597,600 601 Topsoil 14,940 sy $ 10.00 $ 149,400 701 Turn Lanes 1,287 sy $ 120.00 $ 154,493 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,250,693 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 157,521 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,575,208 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 262,535 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 262,535 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 315,042 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 315,042 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,887,881 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,138,574 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,627,715 Mobilizationi 5% $ 406,929 Prep ROW 1% $ 81,386 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 10,255,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 10,255,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,640,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,051,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 13,947,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (4) Limits: E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 3,415 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,312 cy $ 16.00 $ 84,996 207 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 10,245 sy $ 20.00 $ 204,900 307 8" Concrete Pavement 9,107 sy $ 100.00 $ 910,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 6,830 If $ 40.00 $ 273,200 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ - 707 Turn Lanes 755 sy $ 120.00 $ 90,549 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,564,311 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 78,216 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 46,929 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 93,859 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 219,004 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,783,315 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 356,663 Mobilization 5% $ 89,166 Prep ROW 5% $ 89,166 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,319,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,319,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 371,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,690,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study updated: 6/28/2022 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Description: Project No. 40 Name: LEONARD AVE (5) This project consists of the construction of Limits: 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) lane divided arterial. Length (If): 675 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,025 cy $ 16.00 $ 32,400 208 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,938 sy $ 20.00 $ 78,750 308 8" Concrete Pavement 3,600 sy $ 100.00 $ 360,000 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,050 sf $ 10.00 $ 40,500 508 Curb & Gutter 2,025 If $ 40.00 $ 81,000 608 Topsoil 1,950 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,500 708 Turn Lanes 211 sy $ 120.00 $ 25,364 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 637,514 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 31,876 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,125 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 38,251 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 89,252 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 726,766 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 145,353 Mobilizationi 5% $ 36,338 Prep ROW 5% $ 36,338 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 945,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 945,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 151,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,096,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (6) Limits: 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,135 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,044 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,711 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 9,837 sy $ 20.00 $ 196,733 301 8" Concrete Pavement 9,080 sy $ 100.00 $ 908,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 136,200 501 Curb & Gutter 4,540 If $ 40.00 $ 181,600 601 Topsoil 4,540 sy $ 10.00 $ 45,400 701 Turn Lanes 391 sy $ 120.00 $ 46,948 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,595,592 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 79,780 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 47,868 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 478,678 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,780 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,780 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 95,736 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 95,736 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 957,355 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,552,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 510,589 Mobilizationi 5% $ 127,647 Prep ROW 5% $ 127,647 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,319,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,319,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 531,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 331,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,182,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (7) Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,990 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,844 cy $ 16.00 $ 141,511 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 17,247 sy $ 20.00 $ 344,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,920 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,592,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 23,880 sf $ 10.00 $ 238,800 501 Curb & Gutter 7,960 If $ 40.00 $ 318,400 601 Topsoil 7,960 sy $ 10.00 $ 79,600 701 Turn Lanes 686 sy $ 120.00 $ 82,314 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,797,558 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 83,927 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 839,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 139,878 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 139,878 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 167,853 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 167,853 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,538,657 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,336,215 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 867,243 Mobilizationi 5% $ 216,811 Prep ROW 1% $ 43,362 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,464,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,494,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 874,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,092,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,431,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (2) Limits: 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,729 cy $ 16.00 $ 75,662 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,120 sy $ 20.00 $ 182,400 302 8" Concrete Pavement 8,107 sy $ 100.00 $ 810,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 182,400 502 Curb & Gutter 6,080 If $ 40.00 $ 243,200 602 Topsoil 5,067 sy $ 10.00 $ 50,667 702 Turn Lanes 512 sy $ 120.00 $ 61,491 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,606,486 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,195 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 481,946 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,324 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,324 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 96,389 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,389 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,568 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,490,054 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 498,011 Mobilizationi 5% $ 124,503 Prep ROW 1% $ 24,901 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,138,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,138,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 502,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 627,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,268,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (3) Limits: 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,535 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,887 cy $ 16.00 $ 126,187 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 15,210 sy $ 20.00 $ 304,200 302 8" Concrete Pavement 13,520 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,352,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 30,420 sf $ 10.00 $ 304,200 502 Curb & Gutter 10,140 If $ 40.00 $ 405,600 602 Topsoil 8,450 sy $ 10.00 $ 84,500 702 Turn Lanes 855 sy $ 120.00 $ 102,552 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,679,239 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 133,962 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,377 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 803,772 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,962 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,962 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 160,754 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,754 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,107,543 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,786,782 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 957,356 Mobilizationi 5% $ 239,339 Prep ROW 5% $ 239,339 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,223,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,223,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 995,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 622,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,841,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan Plan Units of Supply Service Area 1 6128/20U Project ID # ROADWAY LIMITS LENGTH (MI) LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME* % IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PK-HR PER LN VEH-MI SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL VEH-MI TOTAL DEMAND PK-HR EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA 1 CR 373 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 4 Minor Arterial 92 50% 725 160 5 154 $ 1,649,000 $ 824,500 2 3 CR 371 1 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.36 0.30 6 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,674 0 1,674 $ 7,132,000 $ 7,132,000 CR 371 (2) 298 100% 775 1,395 89 1,306 $ 7,980,000 $ 7,980,000 4 5 CR 371 3 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD 0.24 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,116 0 1,116 $ 4,799,000 $ 4,799,000 CR 371 (4) 0.11 6 New 100% 775 512 0 512 $ 2,222,000 $ 2,222,000 6 CR 371 5 BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 0.71 6 Major Arterial 124 100% 775 3,302 88 3.213 $ 14,208,000 $ 14,208,000 7 CR 370 (1) 5,796 W OF CR 368 to CR 368 1.10 6 Major Arterial New 100%. 775 51115 0 5,115 $ 21,639,000 $ 21,639,000 8 9 CR 370 2 CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 0.18 0.22 6 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial 119 100% 775 837 21 816 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) 6 100% 775 1,023 1 1,022 $ 4,201,000 $ 4,201,000 10 11 W ROSAMOND PKWY 2 CR 374 to 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.86 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial (2/3) New 100% 775 3,999 0 3.999 $ 17,734,000 $ 17,734,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 4 N/A 100% 775 1,643 0 1,643 $ 5,317,000 $ 5,317,000 12 13 W ROSAMOND PKWY 4 LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 740' E OF LANGDON DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.14 2 Major Arterial (1/3 Major Arterial (213) N/A 100% 775 217 0 217 $ 1,337,000 $ 1,337,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) 0.23 4 N/A 100% 775 713 0 713 $ 1,933,000 $ 1,933,000 14 ROLLINS RD 1 CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 1.01 3 Minor Collector 6 100% 525 11591 6 11585 $ 11,510,000 $ 11,510,000 15 ROLLINS RD (2) 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD 0.12 3 Minor Collector New 100% 525 189 0 189 $ 1,244,000 $ 1,244,000 16 HACKBERRY DR 1 CR 374 to 1,36S W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.54 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 1,566 0 1,566 $ 8,486,000 $ 8,486,000 17 HACKBERRY DR (2) 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 0.26 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) N/A 100% 725 377 0 377 $ 1,298,000 $ 1,298,000 18 HACKBERRY LN 1 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POWELL PKWY 0.18 4 Minor Arterial 200 100% 725 522 36 486 $ 2,688,000 $ 2,688,000 19 W 2ND ST (1) 340' W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 111 7 104 $ 1,126,000 $ 1,126,000 20 21 W 3RD ST 1 HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 2 Downtown Type B Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 94 6 88 $ 990,000 $ 990,000 HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 2 50 100% 425 94 6 88 $ 956,000 $ 956,000 22 W 5TH ST 1 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR 0.04 2 Downtown Type B New 100% 425 34 0 34 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 23 W 5TH ST (2) S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 51 3 48 $ 517,000 $ 517,000 24 FM 455 1 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 1.28 6 Ma or Arterial 186 100% 775 5,952 238 5,714 $ 5,347,000 $ 5,347,000 25 FM 455 (2) 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD 0.83 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 3,860 251 3,609 $ 3,437,000 $ 3,437,000 26 FM 455 3 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 1.21 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 5.627 365 5,261 $ 5,020,000 $ 5,020,000 27 W WHITE ST (1) FM 455 to CR 286 0.51 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 2,372 154 2,217 $ 1,983,000 $ 1,983,000 28 29 W WHITE ST 2 CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.27 2 Major Arterial (1/3) 1 Major Arterial(1/3) N/A 100% 775 419 0 419 1 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 WWHITE ST (3) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to S POWELL PKWY 1.98 2 N/A 100% 775 3,069 0 3,069 $ 1,643,000 $ 1,643,000 30 CR 284 1 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 0.62 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 1.612 0 1,612 $ 7,961,000 $ 7,961,000 31 CR 284 (2) 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY S 0.25 4 Major Collector 6 50% 650 325 1 324 $ 3,515,000 $ 1,757,500 32 33 CR 284 3 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY INS 0.18 4 Major Collector Major Collector New 100% 650 468 0 468 $ 4,832,000 $ 4,832,000 $ 5,755,500 TAYLOR BLVD (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.71 4 202 50% 650 923 72 851 $ 11,511,000 34 TAYLOR BLVD 2 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY N 0.16 4 Major Collector 150 100% 650 416 24 392 $ 1,979,000 $ 1,979,000 35 TAYLOR BLVD (3) 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY K 0.04 4 Major Collector 150 50% 650 52 3 49 $ 541,000 $ 270,500 36 W FINLEY BLVD 1 S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.51 4 Minor Collector 4D WA 50% 725 740 0 740 $ 7,581,000 $ 3,790,500 37 W FINLEY BLVD (2) 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN 0.08 2 Minor Collector (4D) (1/2) WA 100% 725 116 0 116 $ 405,000 $ 405,000 38 W FINLEY BLVD 3 SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 0.30 4 Minor Collector 4D WA 100% 725 870 0 870 $ 4,521,000 $ 4,521,000 39 WFINLEY BLVD (4) CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.15 3 Minor Collector 3 100% 525 236 0 236 $ 1,547,000 $ 1,547,000 40 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 1 3,740' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 4 Major Collector 269 100% 650 962 100 862 $ 6,339,000 $ 6,339,000 41 W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON PKWY 0.34 4 Major Collector 269 50 % 650 442 46 396 $ 4,270,000 $ 2,135,000 42 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 3 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to ASPEN DR 0.38 2 Major Collector 1/2 N/A 50% 650 247 0 247 $ 1,793,000 $ 896,500 43 W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD 0.19 4 Major Collector 269 50% 650 247 26 221 $ 2,423,000 $ 1,211,500 44 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 5 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 4 Major Collector 269 100% 650 156 16 140 $ 708,000 $ 708,000 45 CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 156 S OF CR 371 0.03 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 87 0 87 $ 435,000 $ 435,000 46 CR 368 2 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 1,566 0 1,566 $ 8,043,000 $ 8,043,000 47 CR 368 (3) FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.12 4 Minor Arterial 119 100% 725 348 14 334 $ 1,731,000 $ 1,731,000 48 CR 368 4 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 0.16 4 Minor Arterial 119 50% 725 232 10 222 $ 2,300,000 $ 1,150,000 49 50 51 CR 368 (5) 1, 1 50'N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 0.36 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 119 New New 100% 50% 100% 725 725 725 1,044 305 580 43 0 0 11001 $ 5,645,000 $ 5,645,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 2,976%0 CR 368 6 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,856 S OF CR 370 0.21 4 305 580 $ 3:090,101 $ 2,976,000 CR 368 (7) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 4 52 CR 368 8 4,029 N OF W WHITE ST to 880' N OF W WHITE ST 0.59 2 Minor Arterial 1/2 N/A 100% 1 725 856 0 856 $ 2,984,000 $ 2,984,000 53 CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST to 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 4 Minor Arterial 10 100% 725 1,537 5 1,532 $ 7,757,000 $ 7,757,000 54 55 CR 286 2 2,809 S OF W WHITE ST to 3,800' S OF W WHITE ST 0.19 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial New New 100% 100% 725 551 0 551 $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 CR 286 (3) 890' N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284 0.28 4 725 812 0 812 56 CR 374 1 900' N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY 1.52 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 3,952 0 3,952 $ 19,996,000 $ 19,996,000 57 CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 4 Major Collector 6 100% 650 130 0 130 $ 576,000 $ 576,000 58 59 CR 374 3 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 4 4 _ Major Major Collector Collector 6 50% 650 104 0 104 $ 1,032,000 $ 516,000 CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 6 100% 650 260 1 259 $ 1,260,000 $ 1,260,000 60 CR 374 5 ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.38 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 988 0 988 $ 4,899,000 $ 4,899,000 61 N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 to ROLLINS RD 1.11 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 5,162 0 5,162 $ 22,328,000 $ 22,328,000 62 63 N FERGUSON PKWY 2 ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 4 Major Arterial (213) 1 Major Arterial (1/3) N/A 100% 100% 775 1,612 0 1 1,612 $ 4,482,000 $ 4,482,000 N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 2 N/A 775 1 75 0 775 $ 2,087,000 $ 2,087,000 64 S FERGUSON PKWY 1 W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST 0.46 2 Major Arterial 1/3 N/A 100% 775 713 0 713 $ 1,922.000 $ 1,922.000 65 S FERGUSON PKWY (2) 2,449 S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 0.26 4 Major Arterial (2/3) N/A 100% 775 806 0 806 $ 2,209,000 $ 2,209,000 66 67 S FERGUSON PKWY 3 W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD 0.24 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 501/6 775 558 0 558 $ 4,650,000 $ 2,325,000 S FERGUSON PKWY (4) 1,246 S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.19 6 New 100% 775 884 0 884 $ 3,828,000 $ 3,828,000 68 S FERGUSON PKWY 5 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.08 6 Major Arterial New 509/6 775 186 0 186 $ 1,587,000 $ 793,500 69 W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,669 N OF CR 371 to 1,97Y N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.89 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 2,314 0 2,314 $ 11,485,000 $ 11,485,000 70 W CROSSING BLVD 2 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.08 2 Major Collector 4D 112 WA 100% 725 116 0 116 $ 419,000 $ 419,000 SUBTOTAL 81,917 1,636 80,281 $ 325,106,000 $ 302 135 000 `Note: If existing data unavailale for widening projects, the following assumptions were made: Downtown Streets: 25 vphpl Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost It 28,167 TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 1 It 302,163,167 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix B - Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan Plan Units of Supply Service Area 2 6128/20U Project ID # ROADWAY LIMITS LENGTH (MI) LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME' % IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PER LN VEH-MI SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL VEH-MI TOTAL DEMAND PK-HR EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA AREA 1 CR 1106 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.20 4 Minor Arterial 152 50% 725 290 15 275 $ 3,812,000 $ 1,906,000 2 3 CR 1106 2 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.46 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) Major Arterial (2/3) N/A 509/6 725 334 0 334 $ 3,059,000 $ 1,529,500 CR 376 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.32 4 WA 100% 775 992 0 992 $ 3,474,000 $ 3,474,000 4 5 CR 376 2 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 0.29 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,349 0 1,349 $ 5,658,000 $ 5,658,000 CR 376 (3) CR 427 to 57VE OF CR 427 0.11 6 24 100% 775 512 3 509 $ 2,119,000 $ 2,119,000 6 E ROSAMOND PKWY 1 N POWELL PKWY to 295' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 6 Major Arterial 148 100% 775 279 9 270 $ 1,906,000 $ 1,906,000 7 E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,73V E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.36 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,674 0 1,674 $ 7,151,000 $ 7,151,000 8 9 HOUSTON ST 1 CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 1.11 6 Major Arterial 1 Major Arterial 82 100% 1 775 5,162 1 91 5,070 $ 4,195,000 $ 4195000 $ 3:317:000 HOUSTON ST (2) 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 0.84 6 90 100% 775 3,906 76 3,830 $ 3,317,000 10 11 HACKBERRY LN 2 N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 200 100% 725 348 24 324 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,545,000 HACKBERRY LN (3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 4 New 100% 725 145 0 145 $ 1,545,000 12 13 HACKBERRY LN 4 N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 112 100% 725 87 3 84 $ 71,000 $ 71,000 $ 5,826,000 HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 4 New 100% 725 1,131 0 11131 $ 5,826,000 14 W 2ND ST 2 N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,058,000 $ 1,058,000 15 W 3RD ST (2) N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000 16 W 5TH ST 3 S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,092,000 $ 1,092,000 17 W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.14 2 Downtown Type B 14 100% 425 119 2 117 $ 1,227,000 $ 1,227,000 18 W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 2 Downtown Type B 50 100-1 425 60 4 56 $ 653,000 $ 653,000 19 W WHITE ST (4) S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST 0.07 6 Major Arterial 516 100% 775 326 36 289 $ 241,000 $ 241,000 20 21 E WHITE ST 1 S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1.52 6 Major Arterial Minor Arterial 556 100% 1 775 7,068 B45 6,223 $ 5,907,000 $ 5,907,000 CR 419 (1) 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 746 N OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.46 4 280 100% 725 1,334 129 1,205 $ 1,239,000 $ 1,239,000 22 E FINLEY BLVD 1 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 4 Major Collector 280 100% 650 2,730 294 2,436 $ 2,739,000 $ 2,739,000 23 E WHITE ST (2) E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 6 Major Arterial 280 100% 775 5,069 305 4,763 $ 4,189,000 $ 4,189,000 24 E FINLEY BLVD 2 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 2 Major Collector 4131/2 N/A 100% 725 232 0 232 $ 813,000 $ 813,000 25 E FINLEY BLVD (3) LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.65 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 11690 0 1,690 $ 8,289,000 $ 8,289,000 26 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1 S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 4 Major Collector 24 50% 650 65 1 64 $ 1,443,000 $ 721,500 27 E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.76 4 Major Collector 24 100% 650 1,976 18 1,958 $ 10,484,000 $ 10,484,000 28 29 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 3 LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.40 4 Major Collector Major Collector New 100% 650 1,040 0 1,040 $ 5,190,000 $ 5,190,000 E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 4 New 100% 650 1,794 0 1,794 $ 8,897,000 $ 8,897,000 30 CR 417 CR 418 to CR 419 0.65 6 Major Arterial 18 50% 775 1.511 6 1,505 $ 13,139,000 $ 6,569,500 31 3TERCROSSINGTO OUTER LOOP CONNE E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.36 3 Minor Collector New 100% 525 567 0 567 $ 3,815,000 $ 3,815,000 32 33 S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 3 Minor Collector Minor Collector New 100% 525 536 0 536 $ 3,603,000 $ 3,603,000 CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 3 24 100% 525 268 4 264 $ 1,758,000 $ 1,758,000 34 CR 425 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 6 Major Arterial 40 100% 775 1,349 12 1,337 $ 6,085,000 $ 6,085,000 35 HOUSTON ST (3) E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 6 Major Arterial 112 100% 775 1,256 30 1,225 $ 957,000 $ 957,000 36 LEONARD AVE 1 HOUSTON ST to 485' S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 419 0 419 $ 1,812,000 $ 1,812,000 37 LEONARD AVE (2) 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 930' N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 6 Major Arterial New 50% 775 279 0 279 $ 2,372,000 $ 1,186,000 38 LEONARD AVE 3 E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 3,302 0 3,302 $ 13,947,000 $ 13,947,000 39 LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 2 Major Arterial (1/3) WA 100% 775 1,008 0 1,008 $ 2,690,000 $ 2,690,000 40 LEONARD AVE 5 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 4 Major Arterial 2/3 WA 100% 775 403 0 403 $ 1,096,000 $ 1,096,000 41 LEONARD AVE (6) 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 6 Major Arterial 18 50% 775 488 2 486 $ 4,182,000 $ 2,091,000 42 LEONARD AVE 7 E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,767 0 1,767 $ 7,431,000 $ 7,431,000 43 CR 419 (2) 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.29 4 Minor Arterial New, 100% 725 841 0 841 $ 4,268,000 $ 4,268,000 44 CR 419 3 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 0.48 4 Minor Arterial 34 50% 725 696 8 688 $ 7,841,000 $ 3,920,500 SUBTOTAL 54702 1834 52768 $ 173430,000 $ 155506000 "Note: If existing data unavailale for widening projects, the following assumptions were made: Downtown Streets: 25 vphpl Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost $ 28,167 TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 2 $ 155,534,167 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix B - Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area 1 ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH IR) LENGTH (ml) EXISTING LANES NBIEB SBIWB EXISTING SECTION PM PEAK HOUR VOL NWEB SBIWB %IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PK41R PER UN NBIEB SBIWB VEH-MI SUPPLY PK41R TOTAL NWEB SBIWB VEH-MI DEMAND PK41R TOTAL NB/EB SBM/B EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI NB/EB SBMB EXISTING DEFICIENCIES PK-HR VEHWI NBIEB SBM/B CR 284 1,905W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 610'W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 1293 0.24 1 1 2U 3 3 50% 425 425 52 52 0 0 52 52 CR 286 W WHITE ST 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST 2800 0.53 1 1 2U 5 5 100% 425 425 225 225 3 3 223 223 CR 368 FAIRWAY LANE 6268 OF FAIRWAY LANE 627 1152 832 0.12 0.22 0.16 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 69 69 69 50 50 50 100% 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 425 425 50 93 33 50 93 33 8 15 5 6 11 4 42 78 28 45 82 30 CR 368 1, 159 N OF CR 370 CR 370 CR 368 629 S OF FAIRWAY LANE 1,150' N OF CR 370 CR 368 CR 370 74O' S OF CR 370 740 0.14 1 1 2U 0 0 100% 425 425 60 60 0 0 60 60 CR 368 740' S OF CR 370 1,855S OF CR 370 W WHITE ST 880' N OF W WHITE ST CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 1115 878 3140 971 0.21 0.17 0.59 0.18 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2U 4D 2U 2U 0 46 7 50 0 27 11 69 50% 100% 100% 100% 425 725 425 425 425 725 425 425 45 241 253 78 45 241 253 78 0 8 4 9 0 4 7 13 45 234 249 69 45 237 246 65 CR 368 CR 368 CR 370 880' N OF W WHITE ST 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST CR 368 CR 370 CR 370 CR 371 CR 371 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB US 75 WCROSSING BLVD CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB US 75 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB NPOWELL PKWY US 75 298 230 2902 382 0.06 0.04 0.55 0.07 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2D 2D 2U 2U 50 50 62 63 69 69 62 63 100% 100% 100% 100% 525 525 425 425 525 525 425 425 30 23 234 31 30 23 234 31 3 2 34 5 4 3 34 5 27 21 200 26 26 20 200 26 CR 371 CR 371 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB US 75 BRYANT FARM RD 91O'E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB W CROSSING BLVD NPOWELL PKWY 911 319 845 594 0.17 0.06 0.16 0.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 149 63 62 46 149 63 62 46 100% 100% 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 73 26 68 24 73 26 68 24 26 4 26 4 48 22 48 22 58 21 CR 371 CR 373 10 3 10 3 58 21 595'W OF N POWELL PKWY CR 374 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 428 0.08 1 1 2U 3 3 50% 425 425 17 17 0 0 17 17 CR 374 CR 374 FM 3356 525' N OF ROLLINS RD WROSAMOND PKWY 30' N OF FM 455 ROLLINS RD 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY FM 455 523 239 32 0.10 0.05 0.01 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 3 3 48 3 3 48 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 42 19 3 42 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 19 2 42 19 2 FM 455 80' S OF FM 290 180' N OF COWAN RD 4401 0.83 1 1 2U 151 151 100% 425 425 354 354 126 126 228 228 FM 455 180' E OF COWAN RD WWHITE ST 140' W OF CR 289 FM 335' 6398 5"0 1330 1.21 1.03 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 151 90 93 151 90 93 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 515 438 107 515 438 107 183 93 23 183 93 23 332 345 84 332 345 84 FM 455 FM 3356 FM 455 1,330' W OF FM 3356 HACKBERRY DR W CROSSING BLVD 640' W OF N JAMES ST 2115 0.40 2 2 4D 46 58 100% 725 725 581 581 18 23 562 557 HACKBERRY DR CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB CR 374 BANKHURST DR N FERGUSON PKWY 1128 1"I 1365 0.21 0.27 0.28 2 1 1 2 1 1 4D 2U 2U 100 100 100 1. 100 160 100% 100% 100% 725 425 425 725 425 425 310 116 110 310 116 110 21 27 26 21 27 26 288 89 84 288 89 84 HACKBERRY DR NFERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRY DR 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRY DR BANKHURST DR WCROSSING BLVD 710 0.13 2 2 4D 100 100 100% 725 725 195 195 13 13 182 182 HACKBERRYLN NJAMESST NPOWELL PKWY N JAMES ST 328 642 0.06 0.12 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 100 46 100 58 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 26 52 26 52 6 6 6 7 20 46 20 45 HACKBERRYLN WW OF N JAMES ST HARPER DR W 3RD ST N JAMES DR WWHITE ST 567 2649 0.11 0.50 1 2 1 2 2U 4D 25 100 25 100 100% 100% 425 725 425 725 46 727 46 727 3 50 3 50 43 fill 43 677 N FERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRYDR N JAMES DR W 3RD ST W 4TH ST W 18T ST 335 218 0.06 0.04 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 18 27 18 2 1 2 1 25 17 25 1 17 N JAMES DR HACKBERRYLN N JAMES DR N JAMES DR W ST ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 335 327 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 27 26 27 26 2 2 2 2 25 25 25 25 W 2ND ST 1 2U 25 25 100% N POWELL PKWY CR 373 CR 371 HACKBERRYLN 5140 4354 0.97 0.82 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 220 621 220 410 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 207 175 207 175 107 256 107 169 100 -81 100 6 81 N POWELL PKWY WROSAMOND PKWY N POWELL PKWY CR 371 WROSAMOND PKWY 4050 238 0.77 0.05 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 536 498 389 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 163 10 163 10 206 11 149 11 d3 -2 14 -2 43 2 2 N POWELL PKWY HACKBERRYLN W18T ST N POWELL PKWY WIST ST W2ND ST 335 0.06 1 1 2U 498 498 498 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 13 13 13 13 16 16 16 16 -2 -2 -2 -2 2 2 2 2 N POWELL PKWY W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 331 0.06 1 1 2U N POWELL PKW V N THROCKMORTON BLVD W 3RD ST HACKBERRYDR W 4TH ST 335 914 0.06 0.17 1 2 1 2 2U 4U "I 100 "I 100 50% 100% 425 650 425 650 13 225 13 225 14 17 14 17 -1 208 -1 208 1 1 S THROCKMORTON BLVD ROLLINS RD CR 374 N FERGUSON PKWY 2996 0.57 1 1 2U 3 3 100% 425 425 241 241 2 2 239 239 ROLLINS RD N FERGUSON PKWY 615 W OF W CROSSING BLVD 2359 0.45 1 1 2U 3 3 100% 425 425 1. 190 1 1 1. 189 S FERGUSON PKWY IW WHITE ST 2A40' S OF W WHITE ST 2439 0A6 2 2 4D 101 101 100% 725 725 670 670 47 47 623 623 S FERGUSON PKWY 465' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 273 0.05 1 1 2U 101 101 1 100% 425 425 22 1 22 5 5 17 17 S FERGUSON PKWY 595' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 465' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 132 0.02 1 1 2U 101 00% 425 425 11 11 3 3 8 8 S FERGUSON PKWY 2,440'8 OF WHITEST 595N OF TAYLOR BLVD 955 0.18 1 1 2U 101 00% 425 425 77 77 18 18 59 59 S JAMES DR W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 303 0.06 1 1 2U 25 00% 425 425 24 24 1 1 23 23 S POWELL PKWY WWHITE ST WFINLEY BLVD 6024 1.14 1 1 2U 424 50% 425 425 242 242 242 242 1 1 S POWELL PKWY WFINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2806 0.53 1 1 2U 627 50% 425 425 113 113 167 140 -54 -27 54 2] S POWELL PKW V S POWELL PKW V W 4TH ST W 5TH ST W 7TH ST 316 649 0.06 0.12 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 459 459 J459506 50% 425 425 425 425 13 26 13 26 14 28 14 28 -1 -2 -1 -2 1 2 1 2 W 5TH ST SPOWELLPKWV S POWELL PKWY W 7TH ST W WHITEST 82V 8 OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 839 821 0.16 0.16 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 459 385 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 34 33 34 33 36 30 36 30 -3 3 -3 3 3 3 W FOSTER CROSSING RD S THROCKMORTON BLVD TAYLOR BLVD N THROCKMORTON BLVD WALMART DR 3,776 E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 2360 3777 0.45 0.72 2 1 2 1 4U 2U 10000% 101 50% 650 425 650 425 581 152 581 152 45 36 45 36 536 116 536 116 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB TAYLOR BLVD 'OR BLVD 3,775-E DFCENTRALEXPRESSWAYNB 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 4,826 E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 824 223 0.16 0.04 1 1 12U 1 2U 7500% 75 50% 425 425 425 425 66 9 66 9 12 2 12 2 55 7 55 7 d,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB W 18T ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY N JAMES DR 330 339 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 27 27 27 2 2 2 2 25 28 25 28 W 2ND ST 340' W OF N JAMES DR 1 21 25 25 W 2ND ST W 3RD ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY N JAMES DR 327 260 0.06 0.05 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 26 21 26 21 2 1 2 1 25 20 25 20 HARPER DR 1 2U 25 25 100% W 3RD ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY 326 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 W 4TH ST NJAMESDR NPOWELL PKWY 318 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 24 24 W 5TH ST 8JAMES DR SPOWELL PKWY 303 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 24 24 1 1 23 23 W CROSSING BLVD ROLLINS RD HACKBERRY DR 3640 0.69 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 1,000 1,000 128 214 871 786 W CROSSING BLVD HACKBERRYDR WWHITE ST 26" 0.50 2 2 4D 50 50 100% 725 725 726 726 25 25 701 701 W CROSSING BLVD IW ROSAMOND PKWY 290' N OF ROLLINS RD 1182 0.22 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 325 1 325 42 69 283 255 W CROSSING BLVD 290-N OF ROLLINS RD ROLLINS RD 292 0.06 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 80 80 10 17 70 63 W CROSSING BLVD 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY 1529 0.29 2 2 4D 0 0 100% 725 725 420 420 0 0 420 420 W CROSSING BLVD 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 442 0.08 1 1 2U 0 0 100% 425 425 36 36 0 0 36 36 W FINLEY BLVD CR 423 SPOWELL PKWY 776 0.15 1 1 2U 2 1 100% 425 425 62 62 0 0 62 62 W FINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2'700. E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 1,D95'E OF S FERGUSON PKWY SILVER LEAF LN ASPEN DR 427 201] 0.08 0.38 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 3 135 6 134 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 34 81 34 81 0 26 0 26 34 55 34 56 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY SPOWELL PKWY 295 0.06 1 1 2U 135 134 100% 425 425 24 24 8 7 16 16 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 3,749 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 1,780' W OF 8 FERGUSON PKWY 1959 0.37 1 1 2U 135 134 100% 425 425 158 158 50 50 108 108 W FOSTER CROSSING RD W FOSTER CROSSING RD W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY ASPEN DR CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB S FERGUSON PKWY HIGHLAND RD CR 374 1780 10D8 1141 0.34 0.19 0.22 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 135 135 3 134 134 -3 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 72 41 92 72 41 92 23 23 49 49 13 13 28 28 1 1 91 91 W ROSAMOND PKWY 740'E OF LANGDON DR NPOWELL PKWY 1192 0.23 1 1 2U 94 134 100% 425 425 96 96 21 30 75 66 W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD W CROSSING BLVD LANGDON DR W CROSSING BLVD LANGDON DR 749 E OF LANGDON DR 1172 1639 742 0.22 0.31 1 1 2 1 1 2U 2U 16 94 94 17 134 100% 100% 425 425 725 425 425 725 94 132 204 94 132 204 4 29 13 4 42 91 103 191 91 90 185 0.14 2 40 134 100% 19 WWHITE ST W WHITEST W WHITE ST W WHITEST WWHITE ST LWHITEST ITEST WALMART DR NFERGUSON PKWY CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SS CR 286 WALMART DR 4275 1 0.61 2 2 4D 1322 1038 100% 725 725 1.174 1.174 1.070 840 104 334 CR 286 1432 0.27 2 2 4D 261 276 100% 725 725 393 393 71 75 323 318 FM 455 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 2702 1122 0.51 1 1 2U 151 151 100% 425 425 217 217 308 77 193 77 144 140 116 140 164 0.21 2 2 4D 906 676 100% 725 725 308 NFERGUSON PKWY WCROSSING BLVD 2198 0.42 2 2 4D 782 782 100% 725 725 604 604 326 326 278 278 WCROSSING BLVD SPOWELL PKWY 2840 0.54 2 2 4D 811 691 100% 725 725 780 780 436 372ITEST CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SS US 75 253 0.05 3 3 6D 906 676 100% 7]5 7]5 III 111 43 32 68 79 US75CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NS 253 0.05 3 3 6D VX 676 100% 7]57]5 111 111 43 32 68 79 ART DR S THROCKMORTON BLVD WWHITE ST 235 0.04 2 2 4D 100 100 100% 725 725 64 64 4 4 60 60 SUBTOTAL 136161 25.79 16,334 16,334 4,739 4,357 11,596 11,9]e 190 39 132,6691 1 9,095 23,574 229 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix C - Eusthg Roadway Facilities I-ta City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area 2 ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH IR) LENGTH (ml) EXISTING LANES NBIEB SBIWB EXISTING SECTION PM PEAK HOUR VOL NINES SBIWB 11 IN SERVICE AREA VEHdII CAPACITY PK41R PER IN NBIEB SBIWB VEHdII SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL NINES SBIWB 1"-MI DEMAND PK-HR TOTAL NINES SB B EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI NBIEB SB 13 EXISTING DEFICIENCIES PK-HR VEH-MI NBIEB SB/WB 4TH ST NSHERLEYAVE 280' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 281 0.05 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 23 23 1 1 21 21 4TH ST N RIGGINS ST N SHERLEY AVE 183 0.03 1 1 2U 59 59 100% 425 425 15 15 2 2 13 13 CR 1106 1,08V E OF N POWELL PKWY 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 2425 0.46 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U _2U 2U 76 76 149 76 76 149 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 98 43 135 98 43 135 17 8 47 17 8 47 80 36 88 80 36 88 CR 1106 NPOWELL PKWY 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 1080 0.20 CR 376 N POWELL PKWY 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY 1674 0.32 CR 376 CR 427 575' E OF CR 376 573 0.11 1 1 2U 12 12 100% 425 425 46 46 1 1 45 45 CR 417 CR 418 CR 419 3456 1505 1032 2432 0.65 0.29 0.20 OAS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 9 17 17 140 9 17 17 140 50% 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 139 61 42 196 139 61 42 196 3 2 2 64 3 2 2 64 136 58 40 131 136 58 40 131 CR 419 CR 419 CR419 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 595' S OF E WHITE ST CR 417 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD CR425 CR427 CR 476 CR 477 1,540'N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY 880'N OF CR 376 960' W OF HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST EROSAMOND PKWY CR 376 HOUSTON ST 65' S OF HOUSTON ST 1540 882 961 63 0.29 0.17 0.18 0.01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 20 12 2 7 20 12 2 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 124 71 77 5 124 71 77 5 6 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 118 69 77 5 118 69 77 5 CR 513 CR 513 CR 513 E FINLEY BLVD SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY HOUSTON ST 100' E OF HOUSTON ST SHARP ST HOUSTON ST 100' E OF HOUSTON ST 375 E OF HOUSTON ST 1,866 W OF LEONARD AVE 1405 101 274 2OD8 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 4D 5 30 30 335 5 30 100% 100% 425 425 425 725 425 425 425 725 113 8 11 276 113 8 11 276 1 1 1 127 1 1 1 102 112 8 10 148 112 8 10 174 30 268 50% 100% E FINLEY BLVD 93VEOF CR 419 EWHITEST 5520 1.05 1 1 2U 140 140 100% 425 425 444 444 146 146 298 298 E FINLEY BLVD E FINLEY BLVD E FINLEY BLVD 1,865'W OF LEONARD AVE 8POWELL PKWY 345' E OF S POW ELL PKWV LEONARD AVE 345'E OF S POWELL PKWY SHARPST 1866 346 855 0.35 0.07 0.16 2 2 1 2 2 1 4D 4D 2U 335 335 335 268 268 268 100% 100% 100% 725 725 425 725 725 425 512 95 69 512 95 69 118 22 54 95 18 43 394 73 15 418 77 25 E FOSTER CROSSING RD S VAIL ST LEONARD AVE 2678 0.51 1 1 2U 12 12 100% 425 425 216 216 6 6 209 209 E FOSTER CROSSING RD EFOSTER CROSSING RD E FOSTER CROSSING RD 8POWELL PKWY 260'E OF S POWELL PKWY E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP S VAIL ST 262 381 973 0.05 0.07 0.18 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 12 12 12 12 12 12 50% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 11 31 78 11 31 78 0 1 2 0 1 2 10 30 76 10 30 76 260' E OF S POWELL PKWV E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP C E ROSAMOND PKWY NPOWELL PKWY 29V E OF N POWELL PKWY 296 0.06 1 1 2U 86 62 100% 425 425 24 24 5 3 19 20 EWHITEST EWHITEST EWHITEST LEONARD AVE SHEFFIELD DR SINTERURBAN ST HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY SRIGGINS ST 2835 5399 410 0.54 1.0 2 0.08 1 1 1 11 1 1 2U 2U 1 2U 140 99 1 278 140 99 278 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 228 435 33 228 435 33 75 101 22 75 101 22 153 333 11 153 333 11 EWHITEST SRIGGINS ST SSHERLEYAVE 145 0.03 1 1 2U 278 278 100% 425 425 12 12 8 8 4 4 EWHITEST EWHITEST 8SHERLEY AVE LEONARD AVE 3007 1641 0.57 0.31 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 140 140 140 140 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 242 132 242 132 80 44 80 44 162 89 162 89 HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1,640'E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONN EWHITEST HACKBERRYLN EFINLEY BLVD NSHERLEY AVE SHEFFIELD DR 140'E OF N SHERLEY AVE 330 140 0.06 0.03 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 140 56 140 56 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 11 27 11 9 1 9 1 18 10 18 10 HACKBERRYLN HACKBERRYLN NPOWELLPKWY N INTERURBAN ST NINTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 316 325 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 100 100 100 100 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 25 28 25 28 6 6 6 6 19 20 19 20 HOUSTON ST ICR 476 W FM 545 CR 477 6541 1969 1.24 0.37 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 55 40 55 40 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 526 158 526 158 68 15 68 15 458 1" 458 1" HOUSTON ST 1,970'W OF CR 4T HOUSTON ST CR 477 2,475' E OF CR 4]] 5,850' E OF CR 425 2477 5850 OA7 1.11 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 45 41 45 41 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 199 471 199 471 21 45 21 45 178 425 178 425 HOUSTON ST CR 425 HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST E ROSAMOND PKWV LEONARD AVE CR 476 1410 4758 0.27 0.90 1 1 1 2U 58 56 100% 425 425 425 425 113 383 113 383 15 45 15 45 99 338 99 338 OUTER LOOP 1 2U 50 50 100% HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST CR 512 OUTER LOOP 2121 4220 DAD 0.80 1 1 1 2U 50 50 100% 425 425 425 425 171 340 171 340 20 40 20 40 151 300 151 300 CR 513 CR 512 1 2U 50 50 100% HOUSTON ST LEONARD AVE 1,190'N OFCR513 EFINLEY BLVD CR 513 1191 3414 0.23 0.65 1 2 1 2 2U 32 32 100% 425 725 425 725 96 937 96 937 7 6 7 6 89 932 89 932 3,416 S OF E FINLEY BLVD 4D 9 9 100% LEONARD AVE 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 674 0.13 1 1 2U 9 9 100% 425 425 54 54 1 1 53 53 LEONARD AVE 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1137 0.22 1 1 2U 9 9 50% 425 425 46 46 1 1 45 45 N INTERURBAN ST W 3RD ST W 4TH ST 332 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 25 25 N INTERURBAN ST HACKBERRYLN W1ST ST 222 0.04 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 18 18 1 1 17 17 N INTERURBAN ST W 1ST ST W 2ND ST 335 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 25 25 N INTERURBAN ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 325 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 N POWELL PKWY CR 373 CR 371 5140 0.97 1 1 2U 220 220 50% 425 425 207 207 107 107 100 100 N POWELL PKWY WROSAMOND PKWY HACKBERRYLN 4354 0.82 1 1 2U 621 410 50% 425 425 175 175 256 169 -81 6 1 81 N POWELL PKWY CR 371 WROSAMOND PKWY 4050 0.77 1 1 2U 536 389 50% 425 425 163 163 206 149 43 14 43 N POWELL PKWY N POWELL PKWV HACKBERRYLN W18T ST W2ND ST 238 335 0.05 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 21 498 498 498 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 10 13 10 13 11 16 11 16 -2 -2 -2 -2 2 2 2 2 WIST ST N POWELL PKWV N POW ELL PKWV W 2ND ST W 3RD ST _ W 4TH ST 331 335 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 498 "I 498 "I 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 13 13 13 13 18 14 16 14 -2 -1 -2 -1 2 1 2 1 W 3RD ST N RIGGINS ST N RIGGINS ST HACKBERRYLN W18T ST 229 0.04 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 18 25 18 25 1 1 1 1 17 24 17 24 W 1ST ST W 2ND ST 318 0.08 N RIGGINS ST N RIGGINS ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 329 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 26 27 26 27 2 2 2 2 25 25 25 25 W 3RD ST W 4TH ST 331 0.06 1 2U 25 25 100% NSHERLEYAVE NSHERLEYAVE HACKBERRYLN EISTST 224 0.04 1 1 1 2U 56 56 100% 425 425 425 425 18 78 18 78 2 10 2 10 16 68 i6 68 EISTST 4TH ST 970 0.18 1 2U 56 56 100% S INTERURBAN ST W WHITEST 56V8 OF WHITEST 559 0.11 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 45 45 3 3 42 42 S INTERURBAN ST W 4TH ST 5TH ST 321 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 26 26 2 2 24 24 S INTERURBAN ST _W W 7TH ST W 8TH ST 309 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 23 23 S INTERURBAN ST W8TH ST WWHITE ST 523 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 42 42 2 2 40 40 SPOWELLPKWY WWHITE ST WFINLEY BLVD 6024 1.14 1 1 2U 424 424 50% 425 425 242 242 242 242 1 1 SPOWELLPKWY WFINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2806 0.53 1 1 2U 627 526 50% 425 425 113 113 167 140 -54 -27 54 27 S POWELL PKWV W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 316 0.06 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 13 13 14 14 -1 -1 1 1 S POWELL PKWY W 5TH ST W 7TH ST 649 0.12 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 26 26 28 28 -2 -2 2 2 S POW ELL PKWV W 7TH ST W WHITE ST 839 0.16 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 34 34 36 36 -3 -3 3 3 S POWELL PKWV W FOSTER CROSSING RD 820 S OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 821 0.16 1 1 2U 385 395 50% 425 425 33 33 30 30 3 3 S RIGGINS ST EWHITEST 546 S OF WHITE ST 546 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 44 44 3 3 41 41 S RIGGINS ST W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 328 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 S RIGGINS ST S RIGGINS ST W 5TH ST W7TH ST W 7TH ST 671 0.13 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 54 24 54 24 3 1 3 1 51 23 51 23 W8TH ST 299 0.06 S RIGGINS ST W8TH ST EWHITEST 531 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 43 43 3 3 40 40 SSHERLEYAVE 4TH ST EWHITEST 1823 0.35 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 147 147 9 9 138 138 W 1ST ST W IST ST W MOST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 310 0.06 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 25 28 25 25 28 25 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 23 24 24 23 24 24 NPOWELL PKWY N POWELL PKWV NINTERURBAN ST 317 0.08 2U 25 25 100% N INTERURBAN ST 315 0.06 2U 25 25 100% W 2ND ST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 312 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 24 24 W 3RD ST W 3RD ST N POWELL PKWV N INTERURBAN ST IN POWELL PKWV N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST S INTERURBAN ST S RIGGINS ST S RIGGINS ST SINTERURBAN ST S RIGGINS ST 319 0.06 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 26 25 28 25 2 1 2 1 4 24 23 24 23 309 0.06 2U 25 25 100% W 4TH ST 330 0.06 2U 8] 67 100% 27 27 4 22 22 W 4TH ST N INTERURBAN ST 305 0.06 1 1 2U 59 59 100% 425 425 25 25 3 3 21 21 W 5TH ST E POW ELL PKWY 338 0.06 1 1 21.1 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 26 26 W 5TH ST S INTERURBAN ST S INTERURBAN ST 308 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 23 23 W 7TH ST 374 0.07 2U 7 7 100% 425 425 30 30 0 0 30 30 W 7TH ST SPOWELL PKWY 352 0.07 1 1 2U 4 4 100% 425 425 28 28 0 0 28 28 W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST 383 0.07 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 31 31 2 2 29 29 W FM 545 1,015' W OF HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST 1017 0.19 1 1 2U 172 172 50% 425 425 41 41 17 17 24 24 W WHITEST SPOWELL PKWY SINTERURBAN ST 355 0.0] 1 1 2U 258 258 100% 425 425 29 29 17 17 11 11 SUBTOTAL 12676] 24.01 9,863 9,863 2,529 2,293 7,335 7,571 190 39 19,728 4,621 14,905 229 2022 Rwd..y Impact Fee Study City d Anna, Texas Appendix C- EAMing R-Jtl W Facilities Inventory ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES PART IV, ARTICLE 7, SECTION 14 (ROADWAY IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the imposition of roadway impact fees on developments within the City as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and roadway capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Part IV, Article 7, Section 14 (Roadway Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new roadway impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the Impact Fee Update 2022-2032, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The adoption of said land use assumptions and capital improvements plan is cumulative of any land use assumptions and capital improvements plan regarding water and wastewater facilities and this ordinance does not amend or otherwise modify the City's existing water or wastewater impact fees. SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Part 11, Article 1, Section 9 of the Anna Code, Part IV, Article 7, Section 14 is deleted and replaced with the following: CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 OF 3 The City hereby adopts the following assessment rates per service unit for the service areas listed below, to be rounded to the nearest dollar after calculating the total number of service units subject to the assessment, which shall replace the previously adopted assessment rates: Service Area 1 (maximum $1,845.00) = $1,845.00 Service Area 2 (maximum $1,423.00) = $1,423.00 Schedule A - Land Use Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Land Use Category % of Maximum Fee per Service Unit Residential 100 Multifamily 100 Convenience Store 100 Fueling Station 100 Automotive Dealership 100 Auto Repair/Maintenance 100 Warehouse 100 Storage 100 Restaurant with Drive Thru 100 General Commercial 85 Retail 85 Industrial Manufacturing 85 Medical Office 75 Hospital 75 Sit -Down Restaurant 75 Retailer >20,000 SF GFA 75 Employment Center 65 3+ Story Professional Office 65 Corporate Campus 65 These assessment rates shall be effective on new development in the City in accordance with Anna Code and state law. SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 OF 3 SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the day of 12022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 OF 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES PART IV, ARTICLE 7, SECTION 13 (WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing water, sewer and other utility billing rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and water and wastewater capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Part IV, Article 7, Section 13 (Water and Sewer Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new water and wastewater impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the Impact Fee Update 2022-2032, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The adoption of said land use assumptions and capital improvements plan is cumulative of any land use assumptions and capital improvements plan regarding roadway facilities and this ordinance does not amend or otherwise modify the City's existing roadway service area(s) or roadway impact fees. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 OF 3 SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Part 11, Article 1, Section 9 of the Anna Code, Part IV, Article 7, Section 13 is deleted and replaced with the following: Schedule A - Water and Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table Land Use Meter Type Meter Size LUE Water Sanitary Sewer Total Single Family Residential Simple 3/4" 1 $4,750 $4,750 $8,589 Single Family Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $8,075 $8,075 $14,601 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $15,675 $15,675 $28,343 Single Family Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $25,175 $25,175 $45,520 Commercial/Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $25,175 $25,175 $45,520 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 3" 10.7 $50,825 $50,825 $91,898 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 4" 16.7 $79,325 $79,325 $143,430 Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $158,175 $158,175 $286,002 Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $253,175 $253,175 $457,775 Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $728,175 $728,175 $1,316,639 Industrial Turbine 12" 220 $1,045,000 $1,045,000 $1,889,501 Schedule B - Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Rates Service Maximum Impact Fee Adopted Impact Fee Facility Category Area Per Living Unit Per Living Unit Equivalent Equivalent Water Facilities All $4,750 $4,750 Wastewater Facilities All $4,750 $4,750 SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 OF 3 SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the day of 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 OF 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES PART IV, ARTICLE 7, SECTION 13 (WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing water, sewer and other utility billing rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and water and wastewater capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Part IV, Article 7, Section 13 (Water and Sewer Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new water and wastewater impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the Impact Fee Update 2022-2032, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The adoption of said land use assumptions and capital improvements plan is cumulative of any land use assumptions and capital improvements plan regarding roadway facilities and this ordinance does not amend or otherwise modify the City's existing roadway service area(s) or roadway impact fees. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 OF 3 SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Part 11, Article 1, Section 9 of the Anna Code, Part IV, Article 7, Section 13 is deleted and replaced with the following: Schedule A - Water and Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table Land Use Meter Type Meter Size LUE Water Sanitary Sewer Total Single Family Residential Simple 3/4" 1 $5,500 $5,500 $8,589 Single Family Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $9,350 $9,350 $14,601 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $18,150 $18,150 $28,343 Single Family Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $45,520 Commercial/Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $45,520 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 3" 10.7 $58,850 $58,850 $91,898 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 4" 16.7 $91,850 $91,850 $143,430 Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $183,150 $183,150 $286,002 Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $293,150 $293,150 $457,775 Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $843,150 $843,150 $1,316,639 Industrial Turbine 12" 220 $1,210,000 $1,210,000 $1,889,501 Schedule B - Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Rates Service Maximum Impact Fee Adopted Impact Fee Facility Category Area Per Living Unit Per Living Unit Equivalent Equivalent Water Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 Wastewater Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 OF 3 SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the day of 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 OF 3 k t-i f -4� • Me • • m Outline Impact Fee Basics Service Units �ervice Area Land Use Assumptions Impact Fee Basics • What Are They? • One-time fee assessed new development to recover infrastructure costs required to serve • Governed by Chapter 395 of the Texas LGC • Why impact fees? • Provides an additional infrastructure systems funding tool for • Provides for the orderly growth • Allows for a bala recognizes the b of the community � Impact Fee Basics • What Costs Are Recoverable? C] Construction, Planning, Surveying, Legal Services, and Engineering Land Acquisition and Associated Costs • Capital Improvement Planning and/or Financial Consulting • Projected Interest and Finance Costs • Local Share for State and Federal Roadways Impact Fee Basics • What Costs Are Non -Recoverable? • Capital Improvements NOT Identified in the Project List • Operations and Maintenance Costs • Improvements to Remedy Existing Deficiencies • Administrative and Operational Costs of the City • Non -Project List Debt Service Impact Fee: Service Unity Definition • Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code "service unit" definition • Standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development • Water and wastewater utilize standard water meter (3/411) Water and Wastewater Service Units Breakdown 3/4' 2„ lobbobb onn r LIR xxyyyxy 6m xxxxyxyx Shopping Center Water and Wastewater Service Units Breakdown 2if 3/4 FF / l000000 oaol 000a000ro ocrora I 0o00ob o00 xxyyyxy xxxxyxyx , - O Impact Fey components • Service Areas • Land Use Assumptions • Capital Improvements Plan • Maximum Fee and Service Units • Policy • Implementation Service Areas • Funds collected within a service area must be spent on projects within the same service area within 10 years • Water and Wastewater Generally, within current CCN Expanded to include planning boundary set by the Comprehensiv Plan Roadway — 6 mile trip length limit • Limited to City Limits for roadways, cannot include anythi atAr anci wastewater service Arp; i �_����� R •Fr r��17711Y �.. . W?oadwav Service Area Roadway Land Use Assumptions Roadway Residential and Non -Residential LUA Growth Projections (2022-2032) Service Area dear Residential Units Non -Residential Square Feet Single Family Multi -Family Basic Service Retail 2022 5502 24 3 M05 445,3 1,9321203 1 2032 8263 21074 112011039 114060758 61103F6 4 Growth 2761 2,050 820,8.34 961,430 4,171,481 2 2022 1911 120 31 14 9 181164 418641000 2032 4,002 120 11009JF273 lif822,476 51556r51 (310wth 2,0 ]1 0 689 r774 11, 04 312 692,518 Overall City Growth 4, 52 ,050 1,510,60 127765,742 4,8 4p00O Water Land Use Assumptions Water Land Use Assurnptions Year Residential Connections Non-residential Connections 2022 8,385 269 2032 15,984 499 Growth 7,599 230 Wastewater Land Use Assumptions Wastewater Land Use Assumptions Year Residential Connections Non-residential Connections 2022 8,029 257 2032 15,305 477 Growth 7,7 o Roadway 10=Year CIP s RS CARIWRIGl{T Capital Improvements Plan ECCNO x��rdYT Seryke Area 1 w TH1RD 0 0.5 1 1 FOURTH � Miles N w F FIFTH h" ■q■ ram■ + 7 rA SIXTH RPAD _ Z - 52n CCl1N1Y D,�637 V }r 4 N w r d W , MILL Z C TY qqD 311 5 .F_A11-4 IIII 3r 4 r• _ ND '. 'i 17 r F COUNTY AD 370 FER 4 — l CHAT;S RT}f KBERRY l a Clk N ALDER 2 WHIT Y7 DIAYOriIO d ELM 0 E3f` .�ARS NTY RC TAYLOR � / z FIN pyN � 9UR 6015 ORRC pp PENH FOS CR MG V j GOSTER CRO ING = ILL COUNTYROAD288 OUT P Legend — Rout Type S.—A— 1 1iOR° W4 x ILLCW NL— F ion Area 2 1 A&H w 5 Streens ?� z v 'nal wdg,:n z o — % w Not a Thuoughf— in City EAGL Lm35 PAf7OHoe BS COUNTY 284 ~ VLVANTA- { Roadway 19=Year Recoverable Cost... SERVCC E .�iRE.i, SA 1 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE PROJECT PLAN i 1,833 [FROM PROJECT PLAN UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B] TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND 067 [FROM PROJECT PLAN UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B ] $ TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES 57 [FROM EXISTING FACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C ] NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED 19 } [LINE 1- LINE 2 - LINE 3] ' TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT PLAN WITHIN SERVICE AREA,}g p33 382 [FROM TABLE 2.7 ] 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED - 23 94] (LINE 4 0 LINE 1) (LINE 5) 7 COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE c 24,109,716 [LINE 5 - LINE 6] 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS 000 [FROM TABLE 2.11 AND Land Use Assumptions) PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH ; [LINE 8 0 LINE 4]7.6% 10 IF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 8 TO 100%. ; OTHERWISE NO CHANGE'6{° 11 COST OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH - 142,11924 (LINE 6 LINE 10) PRE -CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT 12 [$ PER VEH-MI] 11346 [LINE 110 LINE 8] 13 CREDIT CALCULATION g {51,D39,612} (50% OF LINE 11) 14 RECOVERABLE COST OF IMPACT FEE PROJECT PLAN j1.ff59.61� (LINE 11. LINE 13) 1t MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT [$ PER VEH-MI] 5,673 [LINE 14 0 LINE 8] Water 10=Year CIP 1010 z.000a,000 Feet ming mm-, � P W—I EST """"'" -- ad,Ems&g G—nd Tank 8 Pump mrg WaR unercunOtt cm�str Uon Fb Puh FLLue Pump STalm �t Proposed GrourW T k S Pump Sig E5T rc E5T laitler ConsNellon — FLLue Y12@r Plpe I KimleyoHorn Drina CITY OF ANNA wCRE WATER 10-YR UP PLAN Water 10-Year Recoverable Costs Recoverable I rnact Fee CIP Costs 18 04 J81 Debt Service* 48a5 1 1,5 Pre -Credit Recoverable Copt for I pact Foe 8a557 f6 Credit for Utility Revenues 11 P27851 Maximum Recoverable Coat for Impact Fee 11 a 7851 *Represents the interest costs associated with debtfinancing the new im pact fee projert com Impact fee per SFE = 10 — year reco uerabie costs 10 — year additional SFEs Impact fee per SFE _ 11,67 Impact f ee per SFE = $9,962 J-Year LIP WW 10=Year Recoverable Costs Reccyvera b le Ire pact Fe e C I P Costs 279,033,732 Debt Service* 69,508,433 Pre -Creel it Recoverable Cost for I m pa ct Fee 3470542X165 Cred rt fo r U ti I its+ Reve n ues 173.P771r0 82 M a xi,m u ni Recovers b l e Cost fo r I rnpact Fee 1731-771r-082 *P4apreserftflw interest com associated with debt firtuKirg the new impact fee prood casm Impact fee per SFE _ 10 sae ar r eco verab le costs 10 year addi tfonal SFEs Impact f ce per SFE = 11.672 Impact f cc per SFE = 14,888 I h City Roadway Water Sewer Total Anna -Current $ 2,715.00 $ 4,510.00 $ 4,079.00 $ 11,304.00 Anna —Maximum Allowed $ 5,673.00 $ 9,962.00 $ 14,888.00 $ 30,523.00 Allen $ 1,350.00 $ 2,840.03 $ 1,644.09 $ 5,834.12 Celina $ 5,500.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 15,100.00 Frisco $ 4,257.00 $ 2,120.00 $ 2,344.00 $ 8,721.00 Melissa $ 2,286.00 $ 1,446.67 $ 398.67 $ 4,131.34 McKinney $ 4,484.00 $ 1,754.00 $ 1,643.00 $ 7,881.00 Prosper $ 6,053.00 $ 1,528.00 $ 1,129.00 $ 8,710.00 Sachse $ 2,450.42 $ 2,521.69 $ 1,857.68 $ 6,829.79 Wylie $ 3,995.87 $ 4,137.06 $ 876.35 $ 9,009.28 Potential Maximum, Allowable Impact Fee (Road, Water, & WW) $30 52%*" • The Study Calculates the • The City Council Sets the feedback from the CIAC. Maximum Rates allowed Rates by Ordinance, based on Impact Fee Considerations • Arguments for high fees: • Ensures new development pays their "fair share" Ensures funding for infrastructure expansion necessitated by growth Cost recovery for impacts to the City's infrastructure • Arguments against high fee., • Make us less competitive with C] May slow down development neighboring communities Can discourage high fee developments (commercial/retail/restaurant) Council Feedback From 7/26 Meeting • Staff made some adjustments based on feedback received at the July 26, 2022 meeting. • The adjustments include: • Providing 2 fee options, with one being somewhat higher, including the maximum allowable for roadway. • Increasing the % of Maximum for certain land uses to be higher, with the understanding Council has the authority to choose to incentivize the most desirable projects. 4"'k*aff Recommendations • Roadway • $27715 • Water Option A � $57673 • $4,510 ==> $4,750 • Wastewater • $47079 ===> $47750 $11)3041 151173 *Represents the maximum all Option 6 $5,673* $5)500 $5,500 $16)673 Staff Recommendations • It is common to set the percentage of the maximum roadway impact fees by land use. This can incentivize uses which are community needs, and fully account for the impact of less desirable uses. • Public Works reviewed land uses with EDC staff to develop the proposed percentages. • Proposed % of Maximum Fee by Land Use • 100% - Residential, Convenience Store, Fueling Stations, Auto Dealerships, Auto Repair/Maintenance, Warehouse, Storage, Fast Food • -85% - General Commercial, Retail, Industrial Manufacturing • -75% - Highly Desirable Land Uses (Sit-down restaurant, large retailer greater than 20,000 SF GFA, employment centers) • -65% - Most Desirable Land Uses (3+ Story/Class A Office building, Corporate Campus) Recommendation • In June the Capital Improvement Advisory Council unanimously approved a recommendation to adopt the proposed impact fees. Decision Points for Adoption • City Council Strategic Plan Goal #2 Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth • Objective #6 — Growth Paying for Growth • Maximum Impact Fee to set (Option A or Option B for Water/Wastewater) • Land Use Decisions - % of Maximum • Formal Ordinance Adoption Tonight THE CITY OF manna AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 7.g. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution awarding the subgrade construction of the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train project to WOPAC Construction, Incorporated, in the amount not to exceed $78,875.00. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna is seeking to construct the necessary improvements to Sherley Heritage Park to allow for the placement of a historic train locomotive. This item approves awarding the subgrade work to WOPAC Construction, Incorporated, through their Collin County contract. Through the Collin County Purchasing Program, the City of Anna is able to utilize Collin County contracts to take advantage of their larger purchasing power, providing the City with more competitive pricing than we would receive from a separate bid process. The proposed cost of the subgrade construction is $78,875.00, which includes: • $35,500 for excavation, cement stabilization, and 8" of sub ballast • $33,375 for installing ballast after the rail ties are in place • $10,000 in contingency funds for additional excavation or materials which may be required once construction begins Staff recommends approval of the item. WOPAC will be able to begin the work in the next 60 days if approved. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The estimated cost is $78,875.00. This includes $35,500 for excavation, cement stabilized subgrade, and 8" of sub -ballast. The price also includes $33,375.00 for the top ballast to go around the rail ties after rail tie installation and $10,000 in contingency funds if additional excavation or material is required. The fund source is Park Development Funds. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Wopac - Sherley Heritage Park Track Subgrade 2. Proposal for City of Anna Prepare Subgrade for Train Tracks at Shirley Park_ /_1 a:Z9�%V&S Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AWARDING THE SUBGRADE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHERLEY HERITAGE PARK HISTORIC TRAIN PROJECT TO WOPAC CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED SEVENTY EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($78,875.00); AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Improvement Project is identified as a capital park improvement project in the City of Anna, Texas; and, WHEREAS, the City has identified funding for the project from the Park Development Fund -land, WHEREAS, Wopac Construction, Incorporated has a current contract with Collin County for paving improvements, which includes the construction of subgrade and installation of all materials required for the proposed work; and, WHEREAS, the City of Anna is utilizing the Collin County contract with Wopac Construction, Incorporated in accordance with the Collin County Purchasing Program; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Payment and Funding. That the City Council of the City of Anna hereby awards the Subgrade Construction for the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Project to WOPAC Construction, Incorporated, in an amount not to exceed $78,875.00, which includes $10,000 for contingency. That funding for the project shall come from the Park Development Fund. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of August 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Exhibit A WOPAC Const.Inc. P_a. B=s19 PV-W, TK 75M 97:.562-saw adatnka kwvpw64aa1.ccw wopa¢ot�Lcc n Quote Ta: City OFAma 111 N_ Pa dl Pkoa , Anna} TX T409 Estimate &timao Na: Date: C WOPAC Construction Inc. hereinafoer called the company, offers to furnish all labor, materials and equipment required for the perfom=e of the (allowing desrn'bed ;mrk Jab and Lacatiou= Prepuce Subgade for Train Tracks at Shirley Park - item DnCription Qmamiey Unit Ram Amount €awate dirt to- a depth of T. Instal Centertt Stabilization at a depth of 8" .sitg 401bs 1 LS $ari r.,co_ $M.500.00 Portland Cement pet SY. Instal B' of Re>dir.e {Soh galosh Wabu. ounpact and Srade. 2 hstall E' deep of 3" balast rackafter trantradr. have been irtstAled_ 1 LS $33.37ELOO M376.00 Grand Tatil t%975.OG By: WOPAC Const. Inc. P.O. sox 819 Prosper, TX 75078 972-562-8316 adamleachwopac@aol.com wopacconst.com Quote To: City of Anna 111 N. Powell Pkwy Anna, TX 75409 Estimate Estimate No: Date: we"a"m �CA*AS!A►V 2211 8/17/2022 WOPAC Construction Inc. hereinafter called the company, offers to furnish all labor, materials and equipment required for the performance of the following described work. Job and Location: Prepare Subgrade for Train Tracks at Shirley Park. Item Description Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1 Excavate dirt to a depth of 8". Install Cement Stabilization at a depth of 8" using 40lbs 1 LS $35,500.00 $35,500.00 f Portland Cement per SY. Install 8" of Flexbase (Sub Ballast). Water, compact and Grade. 2 Install 8" deep of 3" ballast rock after train tracks have been installed. 1 LS $33,375.00 $33,375.00 Grand Total By: By: $68,875.00 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lif'i7►159VANI City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution awarding the rail construction for the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Project to Track -Work, Incorporated, for an amount not to exceed $71,448.98. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna is seeking to construct the necessary improvements to Sherley Heritage Park to allow for the placement of a historic train locomotive. This item approves awarding the installation of the train track/rail to Trac-Work, Incorporated. The City completed a reverse auction for the scope of work utilizing the IonWave platform. The reverse auction ended on August 12, 2022. Two bids were receivedas shown in the bid results attached. The lowest qualified bid was received from Trac- Work, Inc. The proposed cost of the rail construction is $71,448.98, which includes: • $61,448.98 for excavation, cement stabilization, and 8" of sub ballast • $10,000 in contingency funds for additional work or materials which may be required once construction begins Staff recommends approval of the item. Trac-Work will begin work upon completion of the subgrade by WOPAC Construction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total project budget is $71,448.98, which includes the base bid of $61,448.98 and $10,000 in contingency funds, which will only be used if necessary. The funding source is Park Development Funds. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Track Works - Sherley Heritage Park Rail Install 2. Bid Tabulation by Line Item Spreadsheet Train Tracks 08.2022 APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/17/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AWARDING THE RAIL CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SHERLEY HERITAGE PARK HISTORIC TRAIN PROJECT TO TRAC-WORK, INCORPORATED, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED SEVENTY-ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND NINETY-EIGHT CENTS ($71,448.98); AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Improvement Project is identified as a capital park improvement project in the City of Anna, Texas; and, WHEREAS, the City has identified funding for the project from the Park Development Fund; and, WHEREAS, the City of Anna conducted a reverse auction ending on August 12, 2022 for the installation of the rail system with the results shown in Exhibit A attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, two bids were received and Trac-Work, Incorporated submitted the lowest qualified bid; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Payment and Funding. That the City Council of the City of Anna hereby awards the rail system installation for the Sherley Heritage Park Historic Train Project to Trac-Work, Incorporated, in an amount not to exceed $71,448.98, which includes the bid amount of $61,448.98 and $10,000 in project contingency for unforeseen costs which may appear after the start of construction. That funding for the project shall come from the Park Development Fund. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of August 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Exhibit A 00 p rn o OO O � p o F ti p _ �cn `J 0 N 0 d Ix N N cu w C N C ❑ � w CD S C N T C U a ¢ H H U U a � � + Q Q p N � Ln N O a C D7 L ti Q ❑ CL � 0 ❑ N N ry N N 0 W w m N N C- C — N Q W W a LL ❑ y.� H V � y L a a y L NA m u x H N 0C ❑ rCCL C .m O = - p 0) T O C ��� g4 Q .+ 61 N 4 [V p = LWn N Cl Q C N d N I Ln y N W w LL/1 d~ 0`0 Ll W N L y� d N C d ❑ a f0 O w a 3 �n J C E V N CL Y N L _ W z p ❑ o a = L Event Number 2021- 0019 Addendum 2 Organization City of Anna, Texas Event Title Sherley Heritage Railroad Track Project Workgroup Purchasing Event Description PURPOSE the City of Anna, Texas wishes to Event Owner Alan Guard Event Type ITB Email aguard@annatexas.gov Issue Date 8/5/2022 02:00:01 PM (CT) Phone Close Date 8/12/2022 02:00:00 PM (CT) Fax Responding Supplier City State Response Submitted Lines Responded Response Total Trac-Work, Inc. ENNIS TX 8/12/2022 10:23:01 AM (CT) 1 $61,448.98 Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Ennis TX 8/12/2022 08:07:24 AM (CT) 1 $120,000.00 Please note: Lines Responded and Response Total only includes responses to specification. No alternate response data is included. 2021- 0019 Addendum 2 - Page 1 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: IIff,1►C.val City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Consider/Discuss/Action a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an impact fee reimbursement agreement to fund the engineering design of Leonard Avenue from Foster Crossing to the Collin County Outer Loop in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: Leonard Avenue is shown in the City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan as a Major Arterial Road which will be 6 lanes at buildout as shown in Exhibit A attached. Currently, the road is constructed as a 4-lane divided roadway through the Anna Town Square residential development. Neighbors in Anna Town Square have reached out to the City with concerns regarding access and traffic congestion in their neighborhood. Currently, the primary entrance/exit is at Flnley and SH 75. There is a local street (Vail Lane) which connects to Foster Crossing, and an unimproved section of Leonard which connects to Foster Crossing. Exhibit B shows the access points. Active development projects will complete the construction of the unimproved section of Leonard to Foster Crossing in the near future. From Foster crossing to the Collin County Outer Loop, the road has yet to be designed. The surrounding land is owned by a single property owner, who is actively working through the early stages of the development process, but is not yet ready to subdivide or develop the property. Neighbors in Anna Town Square have been actively requesting the City to consider moving the extension of Leonard forward, as a solution to their transportation concerns. The City has put together a plan with the landowner to begin the design process of the road so that it can begin to move forward. This agreement accomplishes that goal by establishing an agreement with the landowner to have their engineer design the road. Exhibit C is a cost estimate for the design and construction of the roadway. The anticipated cost of engineering, surveying, and geotechnical work is $323,500.00. Staff is proposing this work be funded through Roadway Impact Fees. When the landowner develops the property, the City will receive these funds back through impact fees paid by the new development. Staff is continuing to work with the City Attorney and the development community to find a path towards construction of the road, which may occur when the property develops, or before, if an agreement can be reached which is in the best interest of the City of Anna as a whole and the affected neighbors. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total cost of the engineering, land surveying, and geotechnical services is budgeted for $323,500.00. The funding source is Roadway Impact Fees. [.3101_rIXr][0016]►1zIx0Ilei 1!61 This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A - Anna MTP 2050 2. Exhibit B - ATS Existing Access Points 3. Exhibit C - ATS Traffic Discussion with developers and ATS neighbors 4. Exhibit D - 20220715 Leonard Avenue Cost Estimate 5. Resolution and Agreement - Roadway Impact Fee Agreement - Leonard Avenue Extension APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 ANNA 2045+ ■ THOROUGHFARE PLAN d4lNNTHWN Ik K2 1 1 AR — Major Nighq — Major C 1eclar (W ROM • Existing Anna Cily Limiits Parks Aovacwn Strftf Types Majar Arterial (12Y ROW) - Ez sling • • • Major COON 1BU ROW] - New i Prapmc-d Downlawn Core Lakes Oawnlawn Ar erW • • Major Arterial (12V ROW) • New — Minor Wleclor (60' ROWS - Existing Anna ETJ Streams 5 w Downlown Type A � � *� Minor Arterial PO' ROW) - �xisliflg • • • Minor Cdloclor CCU ROW] - New �--� Railroads 1 Ooumrown Type 8, • • • Minor Arterial X ROW) - New [ L I{ W 11 T"f i '1 S .. � — 1 I + - 11. ► LD I � IN.+ ��� y*�*i4;+a I- IiDUBrimrf� 2BE4 L I I i f 1 w logo 1 + I �i■ 4.a■Y� � �r 1 1 T�14L ' 11 _ I� }• � L. X�� 1 �' MIX fit,V...2 lit A a� R,a 1lI;JI. Fli'lil° i iki €,ill. �'� � � '��' • I �'{. � f11�J1ilEIN li i1111 �,, : ,,•111111114� , MR j�jll1iVllli 11, � { •'.., 1 � � 11J1111 �illlllll f r � � ` r {''� * it �, �, •;�} t ':+�' . 1 u I ! 'ti`� �111111111 I +.sIIIIIIIII1�1IlEt ,r M1 , ,Ito 116-M �a :p !+ ■ ' - , r . -_■:tom' ' � .. �.a:t' 1 Anna Town Square Transportation Improvement Discussion June 8, 2022 � iil"Jilll�Il!i . 2x `Y" � rJ; 1�• ■i .�:�� � y�• co �" � ��� -. . .r�' I .�• : 1 ��yl111lII llllYl�t .. ... j �. �wYf1 f. ii a� I JIII ! IIt91,s t1 } r " 111M+ . 1111111111 iJti". +lriillIII ii1111Im M•*� 11— _ — ' _ ° i1ia111111111iIS1 + +111111i11111111r111IL _ tr�ii-11y "�� � _ 3� �`x.� ,11 111•� �, = r in1,71•.arlr:r 'rr ��: �- � s • ���rJNr47I F1� Ii1�111a11 t. _ _ k �_ . .- • �i�`}L: a 111 M ! ] ] 1J�� 1 � 11.. I � �•�a... _ ' - yam--' •r�s.- F 'i SH5/Finley Traffic Study Results :If]:iILt Description Analysis Result A Eight Hour Volume - Minimum Vehicular Volume (70% &. 56%) Warrant 1, Condition A Met I B Eight Hour Volume - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (70% & 56%) Condition B Not Evaluated as Condition A is Met 2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant Met 3 Peak Hour Warrant Met 4 Pedestrian Volume Warrant Not Met 5 School Crossing Warrant Not Met 6 Coordinated Signal System Warrant Not Met 7 Crash Ex enence Warrant Not Met 8 Roadway Network Not Applicable 9 Intersection Near a RR Grade Crossing Warrant Met Eight Highest Hours: Include the same 8 hours for the Major and -Minor Time Ends Major St_ - Both App. Minor St_ - M, Vol. A _ Vch_ Total Pod_ Total Vch, Tom] pod. Total 5:00 PM 1518 268 4:00 PM 15153 209 7:00 AM 948 403 8:00 AM 725 202 12:00 PM1 712 173 1 • •Ah •low • • • • :.+'�.'LM Rid ;��►� � ram a r. �: �� _, ► 1. :���11ii� �: I11JiI1L, 1K Ik i TOOT traffic signal installation at SH 5/Finley r (estimated January 2024) Foster Crossing improvements and widening to 4-lanes (no date yet) Future TOOT traffic signal at SH 5/Foster Crossing (no date yet) Industrial Park Road (planned to be built with development) V ,« t� --.,.. - - ..._ ,,.�..... � l ,Ili k ;111 lip .'A Leonard northern extension (with development — zoned, partially in design/construction with Pulte phases) Leonard southern extension (partially in design with Gehan project) Caroline Drive future extension (partially in design with Gehan project) J County Road 418 future improvements (not currently planned) Leonard southern extension (with development — not currently zoned/planned) Dn-site Projects m DWAL LJ -'wAbA.1AAAA die aAAJ WAS �t JE 10mr 'CDMG J MAS qy 2 0 �Ulx: AMP 1A allARETIIST S7 ELLEABEM. . . . . . . . . . . . . OKKMaA OR-CX,OROOKLYN fiR"! Alt - 'LA'P IF ;".A -�-WARp rs E Fa WHIM LM U" cY 34 ROO Leonard Northern Extension — Eastern % Being Constructed with Anna Crossing Phase 8 g N Lor cxrmlxc cxutt ssuxa�r a-ss g TYAICPl C�RADIN�CRDSS SECTION �h 111IPT /\Kv -- -�- - LUInx pauc r „ ,. s . ,. ,e I z �', `MATCH LIHSE SEE SHEET 5�-..�!�l •��. ��. e v ¢{,4,_— � GRADING GENERAL NOTES Uj �,.. y eENCHMAId(S a 3 F n Q TYPICAL BYLOE TYFI WLOT cn��m.�am. .mw. n�wn..runv®x.,.�n a im.cnws.em 7 DIMENSION DETAIL DIMENSIDNDEML R,,,,,AVATIONDETNL ,....c..a...o m m xn Z Paving likely to take place in the next few months • • Ab AIR • m • Ads aw-k ACM tI IWAGA 1113 - ' 1.ar 'y r' a •'':lslllls,ilsls r � II r..,� �ra� ��`" �� H� � l lip, p 1 71 II _ 1 rJ11Y3 �i' Ilk'' 16111 11, I 1111Y1 � lif !III^arll•i �� � _��'�l — - —.�` , f . _ ---• _ r - .. SIN ?*6 .,°',v Leonard Northern Extension —Zoning Case Submitted Today J Notes Context Map w..1-1 wme....,n.�i •'.im. ... Iwrl4. r—dw.M w.lmn.r o'ec .m.ne.e.n.ewnw�em oow.we. eea�w.o. ... QUALICO comm—ifies 613 = — ..,„.... — T Development Team Anna L ro s s i n g- Applicanll Ue Iope I er: Plan nerl Landscape Architect: Engineer: Ouellm Carrm 61— I II- WeWire rrvumnrrt>. V. TrG Permxa Irc. Bff Irc. dMO TM D.- suite. 1Pax lkrow lain 1 &� S"`are69 2EB•. Oellee Pedmy, Euh.M WKi.n TN 7". NA.-T-7H Dell.e,T%]520r Frleeo,l%]603a Confect John ViA fanmot Doug I don Cameet: Merk Meyer CoNem Men Fvblman Phone: 4-%M99r5o Phone: W9j B97.8 PNanY. 121e1 fe an7 Phone: §7214sF•dr2E FM 455 Leonard Trails CONCEPT PLAN Grmderean 9—Survey At .— No. 19r Cityo Anre,f Ilin U", Teee. June r,2= 9.eae Acres WN• Busman Neighbor Requests • Anna Neighbors who live in Anna Town Square desire an outlet provided to the Collin County Outer Loop. • The City does not have adequate funds in our Roadway Impact Fee balance to design and construct such a project. Nearly all of our roadway impact fees collected are reimbursed to developers for their construction of CIP road projects. As such, the project is expected to be built in the future with adjacent development. • The City is seeking feedback from the Development Community on the interest in participating in the construction of Leonard to the Outer Loop to get the project done sooner. • The project cost would be approximately $2.3M to build 2 lanes to the outer loop, including survey/engineering/ROW/storm/paving. Potential Partnership Agreement • Impact Fee Reimbursement/Development Agreement • Developer designs/builds off -site improvements beyond what is required for their development by State Law/proportionality. • City waives all plan review fees and construction inspection fees. • Developer receives reimbursement when City collects impact fees from the properties adjacent to the improvements. This is a concept provided by staff for discussion purposes only. Will require City Council feedback, and formal agreements prepared by the City Attorney. Discussion Topics • Development Timelines • When will each project (apartments and the next single-family phases) come online with residents? • This timing and # of units allows us to estimate traffic growth • Partnership Interest? • Potential agreement to fund design/construction of a project • Reasonable funding/budget for participation? • What is a reasonable amount of funding the development side would be open to putting toward a project? • What is the primary project for us to focus on for funding/construction? • Connection of Leonard to the Collin County Outer Loop? LEONARD AVENUE A. EXCAVATION B. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM C. STORM SEWER SYSTEM D. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM E. STREET & ALLEY PAVING F. RETAINING WALLS G. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS H. LANDSCAPING I. DEVELOPMENT FEES SUB -TOTAL: 70% CONTINGENCY: $ 67,500.00 $ 163,985.00 $ 498,215.00 $ 337,160.00 $ 1,669,186.00 $ 122,389.00 $ 481,992.00 $3,340,42700 $334,500.00 OPC Date: July 15, 2022 Sheet 1 of 6 LEONARD AVENUE GENERAL 1 This estimate of probable cost was prepared for the full right-of-way width of Leonard Avenue between East Foster Crossing Road and Collin County Outer Loop. 2 The tract is located within the City of Anna, within Anna ISD, and is generally described as being south of the East Foster Crossing Road and existing Leonard Avenue intersection. 3 This estimate assumes no improvements are needed to East Foster Crossing Road (CR 421) or Leonard Avenue north of CR 421. 4 This estimate used the current water, sewer, paving, and storm drainage design criteria specified by the City of Anna. 5 This estimate assumes public infrastructure will be conveyed to and accepted by the City of Anna at project completion. Costs for future maintenance of infrastructure has not been considered. 6 This estimate is based on unit prices updated in July 2022. 7 This estimate was prepared with the benefit of geotechnical data provided in preliminary geotechnical report number 20513G by Henley Johnson & Associates dated March 17, 2020, for Leonard Avenue design with Anna Ranch Phase 1. 8 This estimate was prepared without the benefit of an environmental report. 9 This estimate was prepared utilizing topographic assumptions based on 2 ft LIDAR contours sourced from Vargis. 10 This estimate assumes 4% inspection fee for water, sewer, storm, and paving. 11 This estimate assumes Anna Ranch Phase 2 (including Leonard Avenue and East Foster Crossing Road) are existing. 12 This estimate was prepared without any discussions with TxDOT for improvements proposed on the Collin County Outer Loop. GRADING 1 Unit prices do not reflect rock excavation. 2 This estimate assumes overall development site will balance cut, fill, and spoil material at project completion and does not consider costs for interim import or export of material off project. SANITARY SEWER 1 This estimate assumes that the developed sewer basin is served by the City of Anna. 2 This estimate was produced without the benefit of a Sanitary Sewer Study for the site. 3 This estimate assumes no lift station is needed. 4 This estimate assumes sanitary sewer stub -outs to the townhome, multi -family, commercial, and industrial tracts. 5 This estimate assumes no connection to existing sanitary sewer line. 6 This estimate assumes a future connection to an existing 15" gravity line running along the western boundary of the industrial tract will be by others. 7 Sewer testing includes T.V. testing. STORM DRAINAGE 1 This estimate was prepared with the benefit of a flood study. 2 This estimate assumes no FEMA 1% floodplain onsite. 3 This estimate assumes drop inlets sized for existing flows directed from offsite area to the west. The storm pipe connecting to the drop inlets were sized for future proposed flows of the townhome, multi -family, and commercial tracts. 4 This estimate assumes outfall structures to be cast -in -place. 5 This estimate assumes the future construction of a ±8 acres detention pond on the industrial tract by others. No detention is anticipated with this roadway project. 6 This estimate assumes the excavation of two grade -to -drain channels in the industrial tract to outfall into the future detention pond. 7 Additional grade -to -drain quantities may be required based on final design topography. 8 This estimate assumes a dry lane width requirement of 12 feet for the storm inlets along Leonard Avenue. 9 This estimate assumes an existing inlet adjustment along Collin County Outer Loop and includes the removal of existing inlet, construction of new inlet, length of proposed storm and disposal. WATER 1 This estimate assumes that the tract is supplied water by the City of Anna. 2 This estimate assumes one waterline connection to the existing 12" water line within the portion of Leonard Avenue proposed in Anna Ranch Phase 2 construction plans. There is no waterline connection at the south end of the proposed 12" waterline. 3 This estimate assumes waterline stubs for the townhome, multi -family, commercial, and industrial tracts. 4 Water line includes all fittings, tees, crosses, etc. 5 Fire hydrant assembly includes all fittings, tees, and valves. 6 Assumes all waterlines are less than 10' deep. 7 This estimate was performed without the benefit of a water model. 8 This estimate does not include cost to remove and relocate existing waterlines. OPC Date: July 15, 2022 Sheet 2 of 6 PAVING 1 This estimate is based on the following street sections: 120' ROW: 2 x 25' B-B, 7" reinforced concrete with 6" lime subgrade (1" offset) 2 This estimate assumes 36 Ibs per SY for lime quantity. 3 Estimate does not include median paving and/or pavers. 4 This estimate assumes three median breaks and six left turn lanes for the townhome (1), multi -family (1), industrial (2), and commercial (1) tracts and at the intersection of East Foster Crossing Road (1). Median breaks and turn lane spacing is based on the City of Anna design standards and are subject to change. 5 This estimate includes a TxDOT right and left turn lanes with traffic signalization at the intersection of Leonard Avenue and Collin County Outer Loop. 6 Barrier free ramps have been included based on standard placing practice of 4 ramps at a cross intersection and 2 ramps at a tee intersection. Additional ADA ramps may be required byjurisdictions during plan review. This estimate does not contemplate ADA destinations and assumes longitudinal roadway slopes of greater 2% or greater may be used in all residential intersections. 7 Additional pavement markings and traffic signs may also be required. MISCELLANEOUS 1 Streetlights are spaced at a maximum of 200' along Leonard Avenue. 2 Allowance to relocate existing franchise lines are included. 3 Off -site easement and Right -of -Way acquisition is assumed not to be required for this project. 4 This estimate does not include LISPS mailbox clusters. 5 This estimate assumes gas and electric franchise utilities will be provided at cost to the developer. 6 This estimate does not include plat recording fees. LANDSCAPING 1 Hardscaping, landscaping, and irrigation costs are not included in this estimate. DEVELOPMENT 1 Estimate does not include land cost, land maintenance, interest, HOA support, legal, financing, marketing, etc. 2 The municipal and jurisdictional fees listed have been generated based on researched information published by the City of Anna. This estimate holds the following fee assumptions: Applicable & Included Potentially Applicable & Excluded Not Applicable City Inspection fees (Water, Sewer, Paving, Storm) Engineering Plan review fees (other jurisdictions) Zoning/Rezoning fee Final Plat application fee (City) Plat filing fees TCEQ review fee Engineering Plan review fees (City) Tax Certificate fees MUD Engineer review fees Impact fees, assessments, or credits Park fees (City) — see notes Early Grading fees Preliminary Plat fee 3 This estimate does not include Park Fees or similar City of Anna costs. 4 This estimate does not include fees for pro rata or face foot costs to connect to existing water or sewer infrastructure. 5 This estimate does not include FEMA application fees. 6 This estimate does not include costs for permitting and mitigating development within the limits of those jurisdictional features regulated by the LISACE. 7 Professional fees for engineering and surveying are assumed as 10% of projected construction costs. 8 This estimate does not include professional fee assumptions to prepare a flood study or revise floodplain maps. 9 This estimate does not include professional fee assumptions for environmental reports, wetlands determination, and permitting of the removal and mitigation of jurisdictional features. 10 This estimate does not include professional fee assumptions for tree survey or tree mitigations. 11 Franchise costs to deliver gas and/or electricity are not included in this estimate. 12 This estimate does not include cost for the creation of a development agreement between the Owner/Developer and City of Anna for Leonard Avenue engineering and construction. OPC Date: July 15, 2022 Sheet 3 of 6 LEONARD AVENUE LEONARD AVENUE - Master Lots: 0 II Gross Acreage: 4.9 Acres II Streets: 1,785 LF A. EXCAVATION SITE PREPERATION LS $25,000.00 1. $25,000.00 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY $3.50 10,000. $35,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL (EXCAVATION) LS $7,500.00 1. $7,500.00 TOTAL EXCAVATION $ 67,500.00 B. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 8" SDR-26 PVC PIPE LF $65.00 1,190. $77,350.00 10" SDR-26 PVC PIPE LF $80.00 350. $28,000.00 12" SDR-26 PVC PIPE LF $95.00 90. $8,550.00 ADDITIONAL SAN. DEPTH. (1' PER VF) VF $2.00 4,770. $9,540.00 4' DIAMETER MANHOLE EA $5,500.00 2. $11,000.00 5' DIAMETER MANHOLE EA $6,900.00 1. $6,900.00 5' DIAMETER DROP MANHOLE EA $8,100.00 1. $8,100.00 ADDITIONAL MANHOLE DEPTH (> 8') VF $165.00 18. $2,970.00 2000 PSI CONCRETE ENCASEMENT LF $40.00 100. $4,000.00 TRENCH SAFETY LF $1.00 1,630. $1,630.00 TESTING (EXCLUDING GEOTECH) LF $1.50 1,630. $2,445.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 160,485.00 $3,500.00 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ 163,985.00 C. STORM SEWER SYSTEM 18" RCP LF $65.00 1,180. $76,700.00 21" RCP LF $70.00 240. $16,800.00 42" RCP LF $170.00 100. $17,000.00 48" RCP LF $200.00 640. $128,000.00 4'x4' RCB LF $235.00 80. $18,800.00 6'x4' RCB LF $370.00 80. $29,600.00 10' INLET EA $4,750.00 14. $66,500.00 4' x 4' "Y" INLET EA $4,000.00 3. $12,000.00 INLET PROTECTION EA $250.00 17. $4,250.00 6' STORM SEWER MANHOLE EA $16,000.00 2. $32,000.00 MANHOLE RISER EA $1,500.00 2. $3,000.00 18" HEADWALL EA $2,300.00 2. $4,600.00 4'x4' HEADWALL EA $10,000.00 1. $10,000.00 6'x4' HEADWALL EA $6,000.00 1. $6,000.00 12" ROCK RIPRAP SY $75.00 95. $7,125.00 GRADE TO DRAIN CY $15.00 1,568. $23,520.00 EXISTING INLET ADJUSTMENT (COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP) LS $20,000.00 1. $20,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL (UTILITIES) LS $10,000.00 1. $10,000.00 TRENCH SAFETY LF $1.00 2,320. $2,320.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 488,215.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER SYSTEM $ 498,215.00 OPC Date: July 15, 2022 Sheet 4 of 6 LEONARD AVENUE LEONARD AVENUE - Master Lots: 0 II Gross Acreage: 4.9 Acres II Streets: 1,785 LF := D. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 8" PVC WATERLINE LF $65.00 540. $35,100.00 12" PVC WATERLINE LF $90.00 1,940. $174,600.00 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EA $2,200.00 6. $13,200.00 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EA $2,310.00 10. $23,100.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER LINE EA $1,000.00 1. $1,000.00 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EA $7,000.00 7. $49,000.00 2" AIR RELEASE VALVE EA $10,000.00 2. $20,000.00 2" IRRIGATION SERVICE EA $2,300.00 4. $9,200.00 TRENCH SAFETY - WATER LF $0.50 2,480. $1,240.00 TESTING (EXCLUDING GEOTECH) LF $1.50 2,480. $3,720.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 330,160.00 $7,000.00 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM $ 337,160.00 E. STREET & ALLEY PAVING 7" REINF. CONCRETE STREET PAVEMENT SY $48.00 11,920. $572,160.00 6" SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY $5.00 12,680. $63,400.00 HYDRATED LIME TON $185.00 231. $42,735.00 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF $35.00 1,785. $62,475.00 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF $56.00 1,785. $99,960.00 BARRIER FREE RAMPS EA $2,000.00 2. $4,000.00 SAWCUT & REMOVE EXISTING CURB LF $18.00 240. $4,320.00 STRIPING (LEONARD AVENUE) LF $4.80 3,570. $17,136.00 TXDOT DECEL LANE (LEFT LANE) LS $300,000.00 1. $300,000.00 TXDOT DECEL LANE (RIGHT LANE) LS $200,000.00 1. $200,000.00 TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION (COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP) LS $250,000.00 1. $250,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL (PAVING) LS $20,000.00 1. $20,000.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 1,636,186.00 $33,000.00 TOTAL STREET & ALLEY PAVING $ 1,669,186.00 F. RETAINING WALLS None -- See notes for additional information G. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LF $1.90 4,220. $8,018.00 CURLEX LF $1.10 6,880. $7,568.00 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA $3,000.00 2. $6,000.00 EROSION BLANKET SY $1.70 11,290. $19,193.00 ROCK CHECK DAM EA $2,000.00 2. $4,000.00 STREET LIGHTS STREET LIGHT EA $5,000.00 9. $45,000.00 4" ELECTRIC CONDUIT LF $12.00 1,260. $15,120.00 2 - 4" PVC CONDUIT (FRANCHISE) LF $25.00 480. $12,000.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 72,120.00 $1,500.00 STREET SIGNS STREET NAME BLADES EA $245.00 2. $490.00 STOP SIGNS/STREET SIGNS EA $600.00 5. $3,000.00 BONDS PERCENT 2.0% $ 3,490.00 $500.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $ 122,389.00 H. LANDSCAPING None -- See notes for additional information OPC Date: July 15, 1-11 Sheet 5 of 6 LEONARD AVENUE LEONARD AVENUE - Master Lots: 0 II Gross Acreage: 4.9 Acres II Streets: 1,785 LF mm I. DEVELOPMENT FEES MUNICIPALITY & JURISDICTIONAL FEES WATER INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 4.0% $ 337,160.00 $13,500.00 SEWER INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 4.0% $ 163,985.00 $7,000.00 PAVING INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 4.0% $ 1,669,186.00 $67,000.00 DRAINAGE INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 4.0% $ 498,215.00 $20,000.00 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FEE LS $500.00 1. $500.00 ENGINEERING CIVIL PLAN REVIEW FEE LS $492.00 1. $492.00 PROFESSIONAL FEES ENGINEERING/SURVEYING (A-G) PERCENT 10.0% $ 2,858,435.00 $286,000.00 GEOTECH REPORT LS $10,000.00 1. $10,000.00 GEOTECH TESTING (A-E) PERCENT 1.0% $ 2,736,046.00 $27,500.00 FRANCHISE FEES FRANCHISE RELOCATION ALLOWANCE LS $50,000.00 1. $50,000.00 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT FEES $ 481,992.00 A. EXCAVATION $ 67,500.00 B. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ 163,985.00 C. STORM SEWER SYSTEM $ 498,215.00 D. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM $ 337,160.00 E. STREET & ALLEY PAVING $ 1,669,186.00 F. RETAINING WALLS $ - G. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $ 122,389.00 H. LANDSCAPING $ - I. DEVELOPMENT FEES $ 481,992.00 SUB -TOTAL: $3,340,42700 OVERALL CONTINGENCIES: 10% $334,500.00 OPC Date: July 15, 2022 Sheet 6 of 6 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH HARLAN PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED FOR THE DESIGN OF LEONARD AVENUE FROM FOSTER CROSSING ROAD TO THE COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Leonard Avenue is shown in the Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City of Anna, Texas as a major arterial; and, WHEREAS, the City has identified the design of Leonard Avenue from Foster Crossing Road to the Collin County Outer Loop as a critical infrastructure project for the City; and, WHEREAS, Harlan Properties, Incorporated agrees to provide the engineering design for the project, subject to Roadway Impact Fee reimbursement from the City of Anna; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization of Payment and Funding. That the City Council of the City of Anna hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement and fund the project in an amount not to exceed $323,500. That funding for the project shall come from Roadway Impact Fees. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this day of August 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike Exhibit A (see Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement) ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE EXTENSION OF LEONARD AVENUE This Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") and Harlan Properties, Inc., a Texas Corporation (the "Developer"). WHEREAS, Developer and the City are sometimes collectively referenced in this Agreement as the "Parties," or, each individually, as "Party"; and WHEREAS, it is the Parties' mutual intent that this Agreement shall govern only the subject matter specifically set forth herein and that this Agreement shall supersede any previous agreement between the Parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and WHEREAS, Developer desires to develop certain real property in Collin County, Texas, composed of approximately 161.244 acres of land out of a 205 acre tract located entirely within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 1 RECITALS INCORPORATED The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full to further describe the Parties' intent under this Agreement and said recitals constitute representations by the Parties. SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS CityApproval Date has the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 3(a). City Code means the Anna City Code of Ordinances. Ci1y Manager means the current or acting City Manager of the City of Anna or a person designated to act on behalf of the City Manager with respect to this Agreement if the designation is in writing and signed by the current or acting City Manager. City Regulations mean City Code provisions, ordinances, design standards, and uniform codes, duly adopted by the City. Collected Roadwaypact Fees shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 4(b)(1). Developer's Design Cost, with respect to the Roadway Project, means: the dollar amount actually paid by or on behalf of Developer for the engineering, design, and land surveying of the Roadway Project, which shall generally include but not be limited to the items listed in the cost breakdown attached hereto as Exhibit C. City inspection fees shall not be included in Developer's Design Cost. Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Page 1 Final Reimbursement Amount, with respect to the Roadway Project, means a dollar amount equal to Developer's Design Cost. Reimbursement has the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 4(b)(1). Roadway Improvements means right of way preparation, paving excavation, construction of concrete paving, storm drainage, curbs, signage, roadway transitions, turn lanes, pavement markings, sidewalks, irrigation, landscaping, lighting and any other improvements necessary for a complete roadway system for the Roadway Project. Roadway Project means the design of Leonard Avenue Roadway Improvements generally described, without limitation, as the design of a 4-lane divided roadway complete with an underground drainage system and associated public water and sanitary sewer improvements which are located within the road corridor and generally depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and in accordance with construction plan(s) approved by the City. SECTION 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS (a) Documentation of Actual Amount Paid. Once Developer fully completes the Roadway Project, and before the City has approved the Roadway Project construction plans after review, Developer shall provide the City Manager with documentation reasonably acceptable to the City Manager evidencing Developer's Design Cost. The City Manager shall review the documentation provided and shall approve or deny Developer's Design Cost within fifteen (15) business days of receipt thereof (which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld). If the City Manager takes no action within such fifteen (15) day period, the documentation and Developer's Design Cost shall be deemed approved. Upon approval (or deemed approval) of Developer's Design Cost, the City shall issue a written acceptance letter to Developer, which shall signify final acceptance by the City of the Roadway Project (referred to as the "City Acceptance Date"). (b) Approval of Plats/Plans. Approval by the City, the City's engineer or other City employee or representative, of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by Developer pursuant to this Agreement or pursuant to City Regulations shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Developer, its engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Further, any such approvals shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by Developer's engineer, its officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the Parties that approval by the City's engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed and that the design plans and specifications meet the requirements of the City Regulations. (c) Insurance. Developer or its contractor(s) shall acquire and maintain, during the period of time when the Roadway Project is under design: (a) workers compensation insurance in the amount required by law; and (b) commercial general liability insurance including personal injury liability, premises operations liability, and contractual liability, covering, but not limited to, the liability assumed under any indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement- Page 2 with limits of liability for bodily injury, death and property damage of not less than $1,000,000.00. Such insurance shall also cover any and all claims which might arise out of the Roadway Project design contracts, whether by Developer, a contractor, subcontractor, engineer, materialman, or otherwise. Coverage must be on a "per occurrence" basis. All such insurance shall: (i) be issued by a carrier which is rated "A-1" or better by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide and licensed to do business in the State of Texas; and (ii) name the City as an additional insured and contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of the City. Upon the execution of design contracts, Developer shall provide to the City certificates of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage together with the declaration of such policies, along with the endorsement naming the City as an additional insured. Each such policy shall provide that, at least 30 days prior to the cancellation, non -renewal or modification of the same, the City shall receive written notice of such cancellation, non - renewal or modification. (d) Indemnification and Hold Harmless. DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER HIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED EXPENSES, EXPERT WITNESS FEES AND RELATED EXPENSES AND OTHER CONSULTANT FEES AND RELATED EXPENSES) ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT OR OTHERWISE WRONGFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, MATERIAL MEN OR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DESIGN OF THE ROADWAY PROJECT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY. SUCH INDEMNITY SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF THE ROADWAY PROJECT IS CONSTRUCTED BY DEVELOPER AT NO TIME SHALL THE CITY HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER OR CHARGE OF THE DESIGN OF THE ROADWAY PROJECT BY DEVELOPER AND THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT, NOR THE MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES UTILIZED FOR SAID DESIGN. THIS AGREEMENT DOES NOT CREATE A JOINT ENTERPRISE BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER FURTHER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND DEFEND THE CITY AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS, BY ANY PERSON CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY WHO HAS NOT SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT AND WHICH CLAIMS: (1) ARISE IN ANY WAY FROM THE CITY'S RELIANCE UPON DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIONS IN THIS AGREEMENT; OR (2) RELATE IN ANY MANNER OR ARISE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS PROVISION OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATED TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, OR HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS FOR THE CITY'S OWN NEGLIGENCE, Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement- Page 3 GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY IN THIS AGREEMENT, THIS INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION SHALL ONLY APPLY TO DEVELOPER IF DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTS THE ROADWAY PROJECT. SECTION 4 ROADWAY PROJECT (a) Developer Obligations. As a condition to receipt of the impact fee reimbursement set forth herein, Developer agrees to design the Roadway Improvements. Developer agrees to commence design within 60 days of execution of this agreement. (b) City Obligations (1) In accordance with City Regulations and state law, the City shall provide the Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement to Developer in an amount not to exceed $323,500.00 until the Final Reimbursement Amount for engineering design has been paid in full. The City is allowed to utilize Collected Roadway Impact Fees from the future development of the Property to fully refund the City the cost of the Roadway Design Project when the property develops. (2) Notwithstanding Section 4(b)(1) above, the Reimbursement authorized by this Agreement shall expire on December 31 in the tenth year after the City Approval Date. SECTION 5 EFFECTIVE DATE The "Effective Date" of this Agreement is the date that the last of the Parties' signatures to this Agreement is fully and properly affixed to this Agreement and acknowledged by a public notary. The City's duties and obligations hereunder shall not arise unless and until all Parties have duly executed this Agreement. SECTION 6 TERMINATION This Agreement and all obligations of the Parties hereto, shall terminate upon full performance of the terms of this Agreement. SECTION 7 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS (a) All obligations and covenants under this Agreement shall bind Developer and its successors and assigns. (b) Except for future owners of all or a portion of the Property, this Agreement shall not be assignable by Developer without the prior written consent of the City. Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement- Page 4 SECTION 8 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS (a) Authority to execute contract. The undersigned officers and/or agents of the Parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto, and each Party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions or other act extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. (b) Notice. All notices, demands or other communications required or provided hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given on the earlier to occur of actual receipt or three (3) days after the same are given by hand delivery or deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the Parties at the addresses set forth below or at such other addresses as such Parties may designate by written notice to the other Parties in accordance with this notice provision. If to the City: City of Anna Attn: City Manager P.O. Box 776 111 N. Powell Parkway Anna, TX 75409 If to Developer: Harlan Properties, Inc. Attn: Suresh Shridharani 2404 Texas Drive, Ste 103 Irving, TX 75062 (c) Complete Agreement. This Agreement embodies the entire Agreement between the Parties and cannot be varied or terminated except as set forth in this Agreement, or by written agreement of all Parties expressly amending the terms of this Agreement. (d) Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be performable and all compensation payable in Collin County, Texas. Venue and exclusive jurisdiction under this Agreement lies in a court of competent jurisdiction in Collin County, Texas. (e) Severability. If any clause, paragraph, section or portion of this Agreement shall be found to be illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional or void for any reason, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and the unlawful provision shall be replaced with a provision as similar in terms and effect to such unlawful provision as may be valid, legal and enforceable. Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement- Page 5 (f) Representation. Each signatory representing this Agreement has been read by the party for which this Agreement is executed and that such Party has had an opportunity to confer with its counsel. (g) Consideration. This Agreement is executed by the Parties hereto without coercion or duress and for substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. (h) Waiver. Waiver by any Party or any breach of this Agreement, or the failure of any Party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, at any time shall not in any way affect, limit or waive such Parry's right thereafter to enforce and compel strict compliance of the Agreement. (i) Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions. This Agreement was drafted equally by the Parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any Party shall not apply. Headings in this Agreement are for the convenience of the Parties and are not intended to be used in construing this document. (j) No Other Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and is not intended to and shall not confer any rights or benefits on any third party not a signatory hereto. (k) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. (1) No Waiver of Development Ordinances. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement will be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision or any other agreement among the Parties. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement will be deemed to constitute a continuing waiver unless expressly provided for by written amendment to this Agreement; nor will the waiver of any default under this Agreement be deemed a waiver of any subsequent defaults of the same type. Nothing herein shall waive any obligations of Developer under applicable City Regulations. [SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW, REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement- Page 6 Harlan Properties, Inc., a Texas limited partnership By: Harlan Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner Name: Suresh Shridharani Title: Authorized Signer IN WITNESS WHEREOF: STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § Before me, the undersigned notary public, on the day of , 2022, personally appeared Adam J. Buczek, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as Authorized Signer of Anna Crossing 40PGE GP Corporation, a Texas corporation, the general partner of Harlan Properties, Inc., a Texas limited partnership. Notary Public, State of Texas (SEAL) Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Signature Page CITY OF ANNA Jim Proce, City Manager IN WITNESS WHEREOF: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN Before me, the undersigned notary public, on the day of , 2022, personally appeared Jim Proce, known to me (or proved to me) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as City Manager of the City of Anna, Texas. Notary Public, State of Texas (SEAL) Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Signature Page ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - The Property (legal description and drawing) Exhibit B - Roadway Project Exhibit C — Cost Estimate (including design and construction) Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Signature Page EXHIBIT A The Property x`.e T�gl 1 lie N Itsi�l'I � �716 ��1; I L I � 1 1 `I I1 r- g y� w Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit A ZONING DESCRIPTION 205.450 ACRES BEING A 205.450 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CRANDERSON SIARK SURVEY- ABSTR'LCT NO. 798 AND THE DAVID E.W. BABB SCRVEY ABSIRACI N 0. 3 3 - CITY OF ANNA- COLLIN COUNTY- TEXAS- AND BEING PARI OF A 3 60- 54 5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND - CONVEYED TO HARLAN PROPERTIES. INC- BY DEED RECORDED D COUNTY CLERK-S FILE NO. '0131' 3SOQ1650300 OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. COLLIN. TE'YLS_ SAID 205.450 ACRE TRACT- 'W IIH BEARING BASIS BEING THE N IORUyLNEIED NORTH LINE OF SAID 360.545 'ACRE TRACT. BEING NfORE PARTIC'ULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS= BEGD;-N-UiGATA 5'5-- IRON ROD'V�TI-H I'ELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "LJA SUR7'E VING" SET FOR THE SOUTHE-AST CORNER OF A 69.551 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CON E VED TO GEHAN HONfES- LTD.- AS RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK-S FILE NO- 20201012001765080- OFFICLA-L PUBLIC RECORDS. COLLIN COUNTY. TE%AS. SAID POLVI BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID 360.545 ACRE TRACT: THENCE- ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 360-545 ACRE TR .CI THE FOLLO KING COURSES AND DISTANCES= SOUTH 00 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 1? SECONDS WEST- A DISTANCE OF 71 L12 FEET TO A 1 ' IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER - SOUTH 89 DEGREES 5 ' NfINUIES 49 SECONDS %VEST- A DISTANCE OF 2 33 -51 FEET TO A 1 ' IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER - SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 NfINUTES 5? SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 1038.95 FEET TO A 1 ' IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER - SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 742.74 FEET TO A ---- CL7 IN CONCRETE FOUND FOR CORNER ON THE NORTH LII\T OF THE COLLIN COUNTY TOLL ROAD- (A [ _. R I IlLE %TDTH RIGHT -OF -CV A i�: THENCE- ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 3 60-5 45 ACRE TR C.T AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID COLLIN COUNTY TOLL ROAD. THE FOLLO'NTNG COURSES AND DISTANCES= NORTH 89 DEGREES 28 MIN=S 57" SECONDS RTST. A DISTANCE OF 13 80-3 5 FEET TO A 1 2 IRON ROD FOUND FOR COR�TE1- NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20?6-95 FEET TO A 1-'2'- IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER - NORTH 89 DEGREES O4 MINLTI'ES 37 SEC'01\DS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 224-40 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AN 85.5-1 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY DEED TO ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOP.\ fENT CORPORATION RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. 2017-013000004-800. OFFICLA-L PUBLIC RECORDS. COLLIN COUNTY- TEXAS: THENCE- OPERAND ACROSS SAID 360.545 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 85.5?1 ACRES. THE FOLLOATNG COURSES AND DISTANCES: SANT%-LANIAQU20�201 SURVEY%Z30 Legal deSCNpll0nS%D1l ZN01 205 A[RESAaex Roadway impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit A NORTH 00 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 73 SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 224.40 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER NORTH 55 DEGREES "4 MRgl-TTES 03 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 316.51 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; NORTH 00 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 1346-23 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER NORTH 11 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 53 SEC OAT?S'A'EST- A DISTANCE OF 61.85 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 85.271 ACRE TP_-1CT AND BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF &_-LID 360.545 ACRE TRACT: THENCE- SOUTH 89 DEGREES 11 hIINLTTES 32 SECONDS EAST- ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID 360.545 ACRE TRACT- A DISTANCE OF 346.26 FEET TO A 114" IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNED_ THENCE SOUTH 39 DEGREES O1 NMUI'ES 26 SECONDS EAST.- CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID 3 60-5 45 ACRE TRACT. A DISTANCE OF 1933.03 FEET TO A 1.:2" IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER: THENCE. NORTH 00 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST- ALONG THE Ck'EST LIME OF SAID 3 60- 545 ACRE IRAi: _. A DISTANCE OF 811-24FEE T TO A 1:2" IRON ROD FOUND FOIL CORNER: THENCE- NORTH 00 DEGREE 29 ]TIN?-IES 40 SECOND EAST- CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE- A DISTANCE OF 330-2S FEET TO AN --X" CUT IN CONCREIE FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AFORESAID 69.511 ACRE TR-A_CT; THENCE- OVER AND ACROSS SAID ; 60.545 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 69.511 ACRE TRACT. THE FOLLO'Tk!NG COURSE AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 89 DEGREE& 30 MINUTES 20 SEC OND& EAST- A DISTANCE OF 70-00 FEET TO A 5;'8" IRON ROD %V1TH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAIiPED "LJ_A-" SET FOR CORNER.: SOUTH 83 DEGREES 3 7 NfINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 931.67 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER: SOUTH 75 DEGREES 21 NfINUTES 13 SECOND& EAST- A DISTANCE OF 60-15 FEET TO A POINT FORCORI\ER: SOUTH 73 DEGREE 33 ?� Di L,TES 23 SEC OND& EAST- A DISTANCE OF 162-66 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER: SOUTH 74 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 4 7 SEC OND& EAST- A DISTANCE OF 57-51 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER: SOUTH 76 DEGREES 06IwENUTES 47 SECONDS EAST- A DISTANCE OF 58-46 FEET TO A POINT FOR COR-NER: 5:%NT%-tAMDT MM0 200 SURVET�Z30 Legal Desuiptions%DOMMI 1205 MRESAo[x Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit A SOUTH 78 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.46 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER, SOUTH 80 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.46 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER, SOUTH 82 DEGREES 22 MR UTES 22 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.46 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; SOUTH 84 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.47 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; SOUTH S 5 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.21 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER, SOUTH 35 DEGREES 27 K NUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 127.76 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; SOUTH 00 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 17 SECONNDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 192.93 FEET TO A 518" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC OAP STAMPED "LJA" SET FOR CORNER, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A 131STANCE OF 230.49 FEET THE POINT' OF BEGENNING AND CONTAINING 2D5.450 ACRES LAND, MORE OR LESS_ Michael J. Baitu R.P.L.S. f Registered ProLand Surveyor signal Texas Registration No. 4574 f: ..... TLJA Surveying, Inc. r rr#*•,,`6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 400o':Dallas, Texas 75206..........., .469-484-0778 C4�4 J. BMTOP............�..TBPLS Firm No. 1019446574''S9 p*'�p4U �'� R'� s Wrx ur�okoozok2no sua Er4zan 0--0an WMWNue 21)6 AtRM dDa Roadway impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit A July 6, 2021 EXHIBIT B The Road Project Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit B EXHIBIT C Breakdown of Costsl LEONARD AVENUE suMMner f' A, EXCAVATION S 6f.500-46 R. SANTARY SEWER SYSTEM S 163,M 06 C STORM SEWER SYSTEM S d9a21i46 D. WATER DISIRIR MON SYSTEM S 337,16000 E STREET &ALLEY PAVING f 1,669, 1EG.00 F. RETW NI NG WALLS f - G. MIS L ANKMJS ITEMS S 12230.00 FL LANDSCAPING S - I.OEVELOPMEWIF FEES f 481,99200 sue-randL U34g427M 10%OXNWNGBYCT" f334,50100 1 Note, costs are an estimate only and the final construction costs are subject to change. The estimated costs herein shall in no manner limit the eligible reimbursement. Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit C LEONARD AVENUE GENERAL I This estimate of probable aostvras prepared for tfte iufl right-Gf-waywidth of Leonard Amn ue Itimmen East Foster Crossing Road and Colin Comity Outer Loop. 2 The tract is located v& in the Gty of Annna4 within Anna ISI, and isgeneFally described as being south of the East Foster Crossng Road and existing Leonard Avenue intersection. 3 This estimate assumes no improvennentsare needed to East Foster Crossing Road XR421) or Leonhard Arernue north of CR 421. 4 This estimate used the €urrerrtwater. newer. paving. and storm drainage design aiteia specified bythe City of Aural S This estimate assumes pubic infrastructure will be conveyed to and accepted by the cry of Anna at project corrrplOfiM Costs fcF futlre maintenance of irfrastructme has not been considered 6 This esumaw is based on unit prices updated in July= 7 This estimate was prepared with the benefit of geotedhnimf data prrn ided in preliminary gieotednriiml report number 20SM by Herky Johnson & Associates dated March 17. 20M foF Leonard Avenue design vnith Anna Ranch Phase 1. 8 This estimate, was puepamd vvitoo dw benefit of an erwircinmenital report 9 This estimate was prepered util"aingtopcgraphic assumptions based on 2ft LIDAR contours soused horn Vargis. f0 This es4maW assumes 4% inspection fee for water, sewer. storm and paving. I I This estimate assumes Anna Ranch Phase 2 (including Leonard Avenue and East Foster Crossing Road) are Eusdng_ I2 This estimate was prepared vMkKutany discussions with TxDOT for inTmyeernientspropooed on the Collin CamntyOuter Loop. GRADING I Unit prices do not neileet rock ewcavabon_ 2 This estimate assumes overall devdoprrrrt site will balance ant, fill, and spoil mate al at pmject completion and does not consider costs for imyim impart or export of rr t al off project. SANITARY SEWER I This estimate assumes that the developed sewer basin is served by the City of Ara 2 This estfmatevim produced witr=the benefrtof a Sanitary Sevier Study for tw site- 3 This estimate assumes no lift stion is needed. d This estimate assumes sanitary sewer stub, -outs bo the tomhhomp, mllti-family; commerdal and industrial tracts. 5 This estimate assumes no €onrvectionto exis4ng sanitary sewer line- 6 This estimate assumes a future connection to an exisfing 15' gravity line Fuming along theweslein boundary of the industrial ti will be by others. 7 Srehttertestrig incltidesT.V. Wsti ng. STORM DRAINAGE I This estimate was prepared with the benef t of a flood study. 2 This estimate assumes no FEMA 1%flacdplain an itie- 3 This estimate assumes drop islets email far eructing flows directed fFDFn offsite area to the west The storm pipe oarnec4ng to the drop in t2ts were sized for hFhue proposed flaws of thetawnhorne, rni ti-family. andcnnrrlerdal tracts 4 This estimate assumes outfall structures to be cast -in -place. S This estimate assumes the future cxnstn tiz6m of a :bB ayes detention pond on the industrial tract bar others. No detention is anitidpated with this roadway project 5 This estimate assumes the mwzwutim of taro grade -to -drain diwneh in the industrial iradto outfall into the future detention pond. 7 Additional glade-w-drain quantities may be required based on final design topography. 8 This estimate assures a dry lane vuidth requiPment of 12 feet for the storm Wets along Leonard Avenue. 9 This estimate assumes an existing inletadjusmhent along Collin County Outer loop and includes the nenxaval of a dstirog inlet, construction of new inlet, length of proposed storm and disposal. WATER I This estimate assumes that the trail is supplied water by the City of Ara 2 This estimate assmmsGm watefine connection to the edsting 12' water line YMNnthe portion of Leonard Avenue proposed in Ara Ranch phase 2 construction plans -Them is no waterline co nniKtion at the south end of the proposed 12' waterline. 3 This estimate assuneswateriinestubs for thetomihoFme, multi -family, commercial, and industrial tracts_ 4 Water line includes all fittings, tees, crosses, Etc- 5 Fire hydrarit asaemblyindudes allfrntings, tees, and valvres 6 Autmesall viaterinies are Iess than 10' deep. This estimate was perfamnedwithout the benefit of a water model. 9 This estimate does not include cost to remove and rdocateexisting water ires. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - LEONARD AVENUE OXb b sn..r S.*FR7i-l/W YYNp¢lgM LJFNf14M Goat M5 S71fio,tloo—tl .Warr.■ {:astlst rue Yoh,s.tloq{ Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit C PAVING I This estimate is based on the following street sections: 1W ROW: 2 x 25' R-K 7' reirtforced mrrcrete with 6' lime subgrade (1' offset) 2 This estimate assumes 36 Ibs per SY for lime quantity. 3 Estrate does mat include median paring and/or paves. 4 This estimate assumes three median break, and six left turn lanes for thetmvnhome (11 rnultFf mnily (1j industrial (4 and commercial �1) tracts and at the intersection of Fist Foster Crossing Road (1). Median break, and turn, lane sparing is based an the City of Anna design standards and are subject to dnange. 5 This estimate includes aTxDQT rightand kefttun lanes withtrafficsignalrzation at the intersection of Leonard Avenue and Colin County outer Loop_ 3 Barrier free ramps have been itduded based on standard placing practi€e of d ramps at a cross int2ms on and 2 ramps at a tee inbusecuort Addrdonal ADA ramps may be required 13yjuriscilixfons during plan review_ This estimate does not oorrtemplate ADA destinations and assumes kmxltudinal roadway slopes of greater 2% or greater may be used ii all residential inmrssecbons 7 Additional pavement markings and traffic signs may also be required. I ?� I k,!G 2 190 21:1011F. I Streedights are spaced at a rniwii rtum of 20a along Leonard Aorenue. 2 Allowance to rekocate odsdrrg franchise limes are included. 3 Off -site easernerrt and Right-0 4Vay acquisition is assumed natto he requiedfor this project 4 This estimate does not include LISPS mailbox clusters- 5 This estimate assumes gas and electric 5andnise utilities will be provided at cost to the developer- 5 This estimate does not include plat recording fees. LANDSCAPING I Hardseapirg, landscaping) and inigation eosin are not included in this estimate. DEVELOPMENT I Estimate does not include land cosk land maintenance, inheres#. HDA support, legal, financing, marketing etc- 2 The n umi€ipal and jurisdimonal fees istted have been generated based on researched infonrwtion published by the City of Anna This esbmateholds theft uMrkg fee assumptonr, ApP af"dht&dd Pa n&NylpPli S&eDMd rmtApp11ob1. 51y vq-frra lY6dr, Gm— P+F4 ihmfro &r hmrg PYn iwiaw%w G dwpradF]loerl L8rJng0%mring f.. R-1 Phu apP&.d- f- (sty) Prt fwrg rrs TCM mires f- 9rj—drujr1.nrnfrrrimsrM Try C.if kUfa MUD &g--A—fin nfwt krrs,.®mmTff , w mft Pro f. ODtyl - sr,. mobs Erly Gmdig fro h6mff y Ime fir 3 This estirkate does not include Park Fees or similar City of Arina costs. 4 This estimate does not include few for pro ram or face foot cosh to connect to existing neater or sewer Fdrastnrcture. 5 This estimate does not include FEMA, application fees 6 This estirate does not include costs for pemrtutg and mitgatiog development within the lintitsof thosejuisdi€tional features regulated by the USAtCE 7 Profesdaral few for Engineering and surtfWng are assumed as 1f1%of prgecte l oanstnrction costs. 8 The testimme does not include prafesr Anal fee assumptions to prepare a flood study or re isefloodplain maps. 9 This estirate does not include professional fee assumptions for errvirawnentak reports~ we+tlandsdeterrninatia} and pemtitti g of the ren wal and mitigation of jurisdctional feabanas. 10 This estimate does not include professional fee assumptions for tree survey or tree mitigations. I I Franchise eosmto delver gas andlar electricity are not included in this estimate I2 This estimate does not include cost far the creation of a developmerrt agre2mem behween the Owner/Developer a nd City of Anna for Leonard Averrre engineering and construction. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - LEONARD AVENUE SAW X.tNr[10fla01JWCtrs[artfttrrrt$W22-0TjmshrdhanmMaMSCfflk*iaraftd.Wurr_.LastlstraseHohmdo aftb.t. it 2h2f Slrrt of t Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit C LEONARD AVENUE UONARDAYEhWF - Mmbtf A. EXCAVATION SITE PREPIERAT10N LS $25,00D.00 1. $25,OMOD UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY $3.50 10.000. $33,OMOD TRAFFIC CONTROL (EXCAVATION) LS $73MAO 1_ $7,5W00 TOTAL EXCAVATION $ 67.SG4A0 EL SMITANRY SEWER SYSTEM Ir SDR-26 PVC PIPE LF $55.00 1,190_ $77,35aDD 10' SDR-25 PVC PIPE LF $8D.00 35Q $28,0MOD 12' SDR-25 PVC PIPE LF $95.00 90_ $$SSaOD ADDITIONAL SAN. DEPTH. (1' PER VF) VF $2.00 A770_ $9,54aOD 4' DIAMETER MANHOLE EA $S,SOD.00 2 $11.00aw 5' DIAMETER MANHOLE EA $6.90D.00 L $6,9MCK) 5' DIAMETER DROP MANHOLE EA $8,10D.00 L !woaOD ADDITIONAL MANHOLE DEPTH (> 8') VF $165.00 18. $2r97aw 2DDD PSI CONCRETE ENCASEbAENT LF $40.00 100. $410OaOD TRENCH SAFETY LF $1.00 1.630. $1,53aw TESTING (EXCLUDING GEOTECH) LF $1.50 1.630. $Z 45DD 30NDS PERCENT ZC96$ 15DASS00 $3,500O9) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM # 163.9mim C- STORM SEWER SYSTEM 18' RCP LF $55.00 1,18Q M.700.00 21' RCP LF $70.00 Z4Q $16.8w.00 42'RCP LF $170.00 10Q $17.ODO.00 A8' RCP LF $2DD.00 64CL $12Jd,ODO.00 4WRC6 LF 1235.00 80. $1$AD0.00 U)W RC6 LF $370.00 80. MOD0.00 10'INLET EA $475+0.00 14. $65.500.00 4'x4"Y'INLET EA $ DX.00 3_ $12.ODO.00 INLET PROTECTION EA $250.00 17_ $4,250.00 6 STORM SEWER MANHOLE EA $16.CDD.00 2. $32,ODO.00 MMHOLE RISER EA $1.5w.00 2. $3.ODO.00 18' HEADWALL EA $Z,300.00 2. $416W.00 47odG'HEADWALL EA $10.0moo i_ $10.0w.00 6'"r HEADWALL EA $6.00D.00 1_ $6.01)0.00 12' ROCK RIPRAP Sy $75.00 95_ $7.125.00 GRADE TO DRAIN CY $15.00 1,566_ $Z3.520.00 EXISTING INLETADJUSTMENi(COWNCOUNTY OLFrERLOOP) LS $2(kW0.00 1_ $20,ODO.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL (LMLI IIE5j LS $10.M0.00 1. $10.0D0.00 TRENCH SAFETY LF $1.00 Z320. $2,320.00 BONDS PERCENT Z096 $ 48E,Z1S_00 $10.0D0.00 TOTAL STORM SEINER SYSTEM $ 499,21 SAO OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Leonard Avenue PATH MNTX-LJWM27ya LANUA(A Cast C:_Lr na-] MS A,xnl _CoAk nr. i1 k•alx:n 9PC D.1. ).V 1�. 2022 SMit-0 d 6 Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement - Exhibit C LEONARD AVENUE , LSOALARD a WATER DI5T1UB1IMM SYSTEM �, 8' PVCWATERUNE LF $65.00 540. $35.100.00 12' PVC WATERLINE LF $9D.00 1.940. $1746D0.00 8' GATE VALVE & BOX EA $2 20D.00 6. $13.200.00 12' GATE VALVE & BOX EA $2,310.00 10. $23.100.00 CON NE -CT TO EMST1NG WATER LINE EA $1.M0.00 1_ $1.01)0.00 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY FA $7.OX.00 7_ MOD0.00 2" PJ R RELEASE VALVE EA $10.M0.00 2 $20.M..00 2" IRRIGATION SERVICE EA $2,30D.00 4_ $9.2w..00 TRENCH SAFETY - WATER LF $0.50 Z490. V.240.00 TESTING (ENCLU DING GEOTECH, LF $1.50 2,A80. 53.720.00 BONDS PERCENT ZC% $ 330,16W30 V.000.00 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM $ 337,160r00 E STREET&ALLEY PAVING 7' REINF. CONCRETE STREET PAVEMENT SY W.00 11,9M $572,160.00 6' SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY $5.00 12 680 $63.4D0.00 HYDRATED LIME TON $185.00 231_ W735.00 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF $35.00 1,785_ $152.475.00 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF W.00 1,785_ $0.960.00 BARRIER FREE RAMPS EA $7-M0.00 2 S4101)0.00 SAWCUT&.REMOVEEKISTINGCURB LF $18.00 240_ Ullww STRIPING (LEONARDAVENUE) LF $4.80 3,570. $17.136.00 TXDGT DECEL LANE (LEFT LANE) LS $".CDd.00 1. $300,OD0.00 T➢ DCFr DECEL LANE (RIGHT LANE) LS $lW.M0.00 1. $200,OD0.00 TRAFFIC SIGNRLIZATION (DOWN COUNTY OUTER LOOP} LS $250.MD.00 1. $25 .M..00 TRAFFIC CONTROL(PAVING) LS $M.CDD.00 1. $20.M..00 BONDS PERCENT 2096 $ 1.636,186.00 $33.M..00 TOTAL STREET & ALLEY PAVING 1.664.186A0 F. RETAI N ING WALLS hone -- See notes for addir w J in fwrnobon G. MI SCELLANECAJS ITEMS �.I r EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LF $1.90 4.220_ %()1800 CURLEX LF $1.10 O'Na S7.%900 OONSIRUCfIONENTRAMM EA $EL000.00 2 $6,M00 EROSION BLANKET SY $1.70 11,29Q $19.193.00 ROCK CHECK DAM EA $2,070.00 2. $4,OD0.07 STRE ET LIGHTS STREET LIGHT EA $5.M0.00 9_ $45.M..00 4' ELECMICCOIN DUIT LF $12.00 1,260- $15.120.00 2 - 4- PVC CON DUIT FRANCHISE) LF $25.00 Aga $12,OW..07 BONDS PERCENT 2A96 $ 72,120.00 S1.m..00 MEET SIGNS STREET NAME BLADES EA $245.00 2. $490.00 STOP SIGNS/S REETSIGNS EA S60D.00 S. $3.M..07 BONDS PERCENT 2A96 $ 3490.00 MGM TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $ 122,389A0 H. LANDSCAPING None-- See notesPaddi'nwJinftw7nawr? OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Leonard Avenue cPconr,dy,s.21 z PATH V'LMt•LV"P0001{00 LAND" Cart --d A .... NS C'li_c._c_r s^= SYcc[�oFb Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement - Exhibit C LEONARD AVENUE LEONMDAVOW.E Ob..W I. DEVELOPMENT FENS MUNICIPALITY & JUR.ISDICTIONAL FEES WATER INSPECTION &TESTING FEE PERCENT 410% $ 337,160.00 $13.500.00 SEWER INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 410% $ 163,985.00 $7.M.00 PAVING I NSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 410% $ 1.669.186.00 $57.M.00 DRAT NA,GE INSPECTION & TESTING FEE PERCENT 4 0% $ 498 21S{10 $20.OD0.00 FIMAL PLAT APPLICATION FEE LS $50d.00 1_ $500.00 ENGINEERING CM PLAN REVIEW FEE LS W2.00 1. $49Z00 PROFESSIONAL FEES ENGINEERING/SURVEYING (A-G) :ERCEVT 10.0% $ 2.85SA 5.00 $286,0Q0.00 GEOTECH REPORT LS $10.MD.00 1. $10.0D0.00 GEOTECHTESTING (A-E) DERCEVT 1.0%$ Z736.046.00 $27,500.00 FRAMCHISE FEES FRANCHISE RELOCATION ALLOWANCE LS $5Q000.00 1. $50,004.00 TOTAL DEVELOPMEW FEES $ 481,992.00 A EXCAVATION $ 67.5W.00 B. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ 163.985.00 C STORM SEWER SYSTEM $ 498.215.00 D. WATER DISFRI BLrrK* SYSTEM $ 337.16D.00 E STREET &ALLEY PAVING $ 1AK186.00 F. RETAINING WALLS $ G. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $ 122,3E9.00 H. LANDSCAPING $ D�:7=_OPM=N7 FEES $ 431.992.00 9JB-TOTAL $3--;40,42700 OIERA L C0JYMfVGEAJCJEF 10% $334,SOCd00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Leonard Avenue cpc_—,uvl�, PA.NL S5.NTX-LUdIAN27%4Z LA4U.ri,'. C.i =s=r aaY.=722 OF�w7a-] k.e7�e'rK+.3 415 C'•tl:c�-r=r��c Awr�c-{:o-:ik:nr sic k.ucl :;^s SNat 5 or Roadway Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement — Exhibit C THE CITY OF manna AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 7.j. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance changing the name of Throckmorton Boulevard. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan includes Throckmorton Boulevard as a Major Collector Road which parallels US 75 from the northern City limit to Taylor Boulevard. There is a concern that this street name will be confusing when businesses and facilities are addressed off of it due to there begin a Throckmortn Road in Melissa, Texas which has a major exit and overpass on US 75, must south of Anna. The two streets do not intersect or connect to each other, making it likely that future motorists will be confused and unable to get to their desired location in Anna. Staff is recommending that the City Council of the City of Anna re -name Throckmorton Boulevard within the corporate limits of the City of Anna in order to ensure the traveling public are not confused in regards to the address and location of businesses and properties located along Throckmorton Boulevard in Anna, Texas. The Street Naming Policy (also on this agenda as a prior item) establishes specific guidelines for considering new street names and re -naming of existing streets. Staffs recommendation is for the City COuncil to utilize the guidelines identified in the policy to select and approve a new name for the street, by ordinance. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Minimal - replacement of 3 street signs. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A - Throckmorton Map 2. Ord Renaming Throckmorton 0302920220816CR1 APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 8/16/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/17/2022 ExhibitA —Throckmorton Locations Future Throckmorton in a Anna, TX ' ���■ Existing Throckmorton in Anna, TX Future Throckmorton in Anna, TX rmr-A Existing Throckmorton in Melissa, TX .a r: am ■! gi Existing Th roc k rn o rt o n in Melissa, T ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, RENAMING THROCKMORTON BOULEVARD; PROVIDING A SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") is a home -rule municipality; and WHEREAS, Section 311.001 of the Texas Transportation Code grants home -rule municipalities control over their streets and the Texas Department of Transportation recognizes that this control extends to assigning street names to highways within a municipality's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Throckmorton Boulevard is a street in the City's corporate limits that the City maintains; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on the matter, the City Council has found that the name "Throckmorton Boulevard" is problematic with respect to traffic and navigation as there is a similarly named street in a nearby community that has exit signage on U.S. 75 and said similarly named street does not connect to Throckmorton Boulevard in the City of Anna, which can cause confusion to the traveling public and potentially cause disruption to commerce as well as safety issues; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on the matter, the City Council has found that the street previously known as "Throckmorton Boulevard" in the City of Anna should be changed to " "; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. RENAMING STREET. The street previously known as "Throckmorton Boulevard" in the City of Anna is hereby changed to SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL ACTIONS. The Director of Public Works is hereby directed to: (1) remove any City -managed existing signs to the contrary and erect appropriate street signs with the new name as set forth in Section 2; (2) send a copy of this ordinance to TxDOT; and (3) notify the United States Postal Service, existing public utilities, all property owners abutting such segment of street, and all other appropriate persons of the name change enacted hereby. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 OF 2 SECTION 4. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the day of 12022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie L. Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: IImam 0159WAR City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Joey Grisham Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution approving an Incentive Agreement for New Economic Development between the City of Anna and Palladium USA. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) SUMMARY: Palladium is working on a 239-unit multifamily development in partnership with the Anna Public Facility Corporation, located on E. Foster Crossing Rd. The Anna PFC approved approximately $33 million in bonds for the project. Palladium is requesting a partial waiver of Park Development and Park Land Dedication Fees totaling $310,700. The Palladium East Foster Crossing project will include several amenities, including a resort -style pool, a children's playground, a dog park, fitness center, children's playroom, clubroom, business lab, conference room, and EV charging stations plus a ride share area. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Includes a partial waiver of park development fees totaling $310,700. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Palladium Resolution 2. Palladium 380 Agreement APPROVALS: Joey Grisham, Director Economic Development Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AN INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH PALLADIUM EAST FOSTER CROSSING, LTD WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") desires to waive a portion of Park Development and Park Land Dedication fees in support of a community development project that will create and retain jobs, and that will result in new capital investment within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to grant the waiver under Chapter 380 of the Texas Local Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Findings. The findings set forth above are incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth in full. SECTION 2. Approval of Proiect and Agreement The City Council of the City of Anna, Texas hereby approves the Incentive Agreement for New Economic Development with Palladium East Foster Crossing, Ltd. and the City of Anna, Texas ("Agreement") attached hereto as Exhibit 1, incorporated herein for all purposes, and authorizes the Mayor to execute the same on its behalf, subject to approval as to form by legal counsel for the City, said Agreement to be effective upon its passage and as set forth in said Agreement. SECTION 3. Administration The City hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to administer the Agreement. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 23rd day of August 2022. ATTEST: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary Page 1 Nate Pike, Mayor INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THIS INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") and Palladium East Foster Crossing, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership ("Developer"). WHEREAS, Developer owns real property consisting of approximately 8.26 acres and described and depicted in further detail in the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is currently undeveloped and the Developer will develop the Property and use the Property solely as the site for a multifamily development with a minimum of 239 residential units, a clubhouse, and onsite recreational amenities (the "Apartment Project"); and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the positive economic impact that Apartment Project will bring to the City through development and diversification of the economy, reduction of unemployment and underemployment through the production of new jobs, the attraction of new businesses, provision of housing affordable for the workforce, and the additional sales tax revenue from job growth; and WHEREAS, as an incentive to develop the Apartment Project, the Developer has requested a partial waiver of certain development fees otherwise required to be paid to the City (the "Incentive Grant") and the City is willing to allow the Incentive Grant under and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to grant the Incentive Grant under Chapter 380 of the Texas Local Gov't Code; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises, and conditions stated in this Agreement, the City and Developer agree as follows: Section 1. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date that the last of the following events have occurred: (1) the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("City Council") has approved and adopted this Agreement; and (2) Developer has duly executed this Agreement and delivered same to the City. Section 2. Term and Termination. 2.01 The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and it shall continue in effect until such time as the parties have fulfilled their obligations hereunder, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of this Agreement. INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 1 2.02 The City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement if Developer defaults by: (1) failing to timely commence construction of the Apartment Project in accordance with Section 4.01; (2) by failing to timely obtain a Certificate of Occupancy in accordance with Section 4.01; or (3) otherwise breaching its obligations or warranties under this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated by the City, then the City shall have no obligation to allow the Incentive Grant to Developer and the Developer shall pay the City in the amount of $310,700.00 and any amounts due under Section 8.09 within 15 business days of the date of termination and the obligation to pay said amount to the City shall survive the termination of this Agreement. The City may cause this Agreement to terminate by following the notice and cure provisions set forth in Section 8.08 and 8.09 of this Agreement. Section 3. Recitals Incorporated and Definitions. 3.01 The recitals in the preamble to this Agreement are hereby incorporated for all purposes. 3.02 The following words or phrases shall have the following meanings: "Certificate of Occupancy" means a document entitled "Certificate of Occupancy" (or other similar title) issued by City upon substantial completion of the Apartment Project in accordance with applicable City Regulations that permits the Apartment Project to operate. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not include a certificate issued in error, mistake or misrepresentation of facts, and shall not include any temporary certificate of occupancy or other document authorizing temporary or conditional occupancy. "City Code" means the Anna City Code of Ordinances. "City Council" means the governing body of the City of Anna, Texas. "City Manager" means the City Manager of the City of Anna, Texas. "City Regulations" mean City Code provisions, ordinances, design standards, uniform codes, and other policies duly adopted by the City. "Commence Construction" means to obtain a building permit from the City and commence the work of constructing any part of the vertical structure composing any part of the Apartment Project. "Development" means the development of the Property including without limitation the construction of Public Improvements necessary to serve the Property and the construction of the Apartment Project. "Effective Date" means the date described in Section 1 of this Agreement. INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 2 "Incentive Grant" means a fifty percent (50%) reduction of Park Development Fees and a fifty percent (50%) reduction in Park Land Dedication Fees that would otherwise be required to be paid to the City in relation to the Development as follows: Park Development Fees shall be reduced from $478,000.00 to $239,000.00 and Park Land Dedication Fees shall be reduced from $143,400.00 to $71,700.00. "Parties" mean the City and Developer. "Public Improvements" mean those certain utility, roadway, drainage and other improvements that Developer is required to construct/install and dedicate to the City. Section 4. Developer Obligations. Each and every obligation set forth in this Section 4 are conditions for the Developer to receive the Incentive Grant. 4.01. Construction, Location, and Operation of the Apartment Project. The Apartment Project shall be located within the Property. The Deadline for Developer to Commence Construction of the Apartment Project is 90 business days after the Effective Date. The Deadline for Developer to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the Apartment Project is December 1, 2024. 4.02. Public Improvements Generally. Developer shall provide or cause to be provided all Public Improvements, and any required or necessary public improvement not identified in this Agreement that are required by City Regulations in connection with Development, such as streets, utilities, drainage, sidewalks, trails, street lighting, street signage, and all other required improvements, at no cost to the City and in accordance with City Regulations, and as approved by the City's engineer or his or her agent. Developer shall cause the timely installation of such improvements in accordance with the City Regulations unless otherwise approved herein. Developer shall provide engineering studies, plan/profile sheets, and other construction documents at the time of platting as required by City Regulations. Such plans must be approved by the City's engineer or his or her agent prior to approval of a final plat of any portion of the Development. Construction of such improvements shall not be initiated until a preconstruction conference has been held regarding the proposed construction and City has issued a written notice to proceed. 4.03. Approval of Plats/Plans. Approval by the City, the City's Engineer or other City employee or representative, of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by Developer pursuant to this Agreement or pursuant to City Regulations shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Developer, its engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Further, any such approvals shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by Designer's engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees. INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 3 4.04. Insurance. (a) Developer shall or shall cause the construction contractor(s) that will perform the construction work related to the Public Improvements and the Apartment Project to acquire and maintain, during the period of time when any of the Public Improvements are under construction (and until the full and final completion of the Public Improvements and acceptance thereof by the City: (a) workers compensation insurance in the amount required by law; and (b) commercial general liability insurance including personal injury liability, premises operations liability, and contractual liability, covering, but not limited to, the liability assumed under any indemnification provisions of this Agreement, with limits of liability for bodily injury, death and property damage of not less than $2,000,000.00. Such insurance shall also cover any and all claims which might arise out of the Public Improvements construction contracts, whether by Developer, a contractor, subcontractor, materialman, or otherwise. (b) Coverage must be on a "per occurrence" basis. All such insurance shall: (i) be issued by a carrier which is rated "A- I" or better by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide and licensed to do business in the State of Texas; and (ii) name the City as an additional insured and contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of the City. Upon the execution of the Public Improvements and the Apartment Project construction contracts, Developer shall provide to the City certificates of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage together with the declaration of such policies, along with the endorsement naming the City as an additional insured. Each such policy shall provide that, at least 30 business days prior to the cancellation, non -renewal or modification of same, the City shall receive written notice of such cancellation, non -renewal or modification. 4.05. Developer Pays All Fees and Costs. Developer shall timely pay, or cause third parties to timely pay, its engineering, planning, accounting, architectural, legal fees and expenses, survey, testing, laboratory costs, license fees, development fees, land clearing and grading costs, advertising and other bidding costs, amounts due under construction contracts, costs of labor and material, inspection fees, impact fees, insurance premiums, interest, carry cost, financing fees and all other fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the construction of the Public Improvements and the Apartment Project. 4.06. City Regulations. Developer acknowledges that Development must comply with all applicable City Regulations. Except to the extent this Agreement provides for stricter or more restrictive requirements than those in applicable City Regulations, the applicable City Regulations shall control. Section 5. Incentive Grant. INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 4 The reduction in Park Development Fees and Park Land Dedication Fees that constitute the Incentive Grant under this Agreement are contingent on Developer meeting all of its obligations under this Agreement and if the City terminates this Agreement then the Developer shall pay the City as described in Section 2.02. Section 6. Buy Local Provision. 6.01. Developer agrees to use its commercially reasonable efforts to give preference and priority to local manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, and labor, except where not reasonably possible to do so without added expense, substantial inconvenience, or sacrifice in operating efficiency in the normal course of business. 6.02. For the purposes of this section, the term "local" as used to describe manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, and labor includes firms, businesses, and persons who reside in or maintain an office within a 50-mile radius of Collin County. Section 7. Warranties. The accuracy of the warranties set forth in this Section 7 are conditions for the Incentive Grant to continue to be in effect. Developer shall notify the City if and when any of the following warranties are no longer accurate. The failure to so notify the City is a material breach of this Agreement. Developer warrants and represents to the City the following: 7.01. Developer is a limited partnership duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas and is registered to do business in the State of Texas. Developer has all corporate power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted in the State of Texas. 7.02. Developer has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement to the best of its ability. 7.03. Developer has timely filed and will timely file all local, State, and Federal tax reports and returns required by law to be filed and all taxes, assessments, fees, and other governmental charges related to the Development, including applicable ad valorem taxes, have been timely paid, and will be timely paid, during the term of this Agreement. 7.04. Any entity(ies)/individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of Developer. 7.05. Employment of Undocumented Workers. During the term of this Agreement, Developer agrees not to knowingly employ any undocumented workers and if convicted of a violation under 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a (f), Developer shall repay the amount of any Reimbursement Payment or other funds received by Developer from City from the date of this Agreement to the date of such violation within 120 days after the date Developer is notified by City of such violation, plus interest at the rate of 4% INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 5 compounded annually from the date of violation until paid. Developer is not liable for a violation of this section by a subsidiary, affiliate, or franchisee of Developer or by a person with whom Developer contracts. 7.06. No litigation or governmental proceeding is pending or, to the knowledge of Developer and its general partner and officers, is threatened against or affecting Developer, or the Development or the Property, that may result in any material adverse change in Developer's business, properties or operation. 7.07. Developer shall not be in breach of any other contract by entering into and performing this Agreement. Developer shall amend or enter into any other contract that may be necessary for Developer to fully and timely perform its obligations under this Agreement. 7.08 No Boycotting Imo. Developer verifies that the Developer (including any wholly owned subsidiary, majority -owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of the Developer) does not Boycott Israel and agrees that during the term of this Agreement will not Boycott Israel as that term is defined in Texas Government Code Section 808.001, as amended. 7.09 Verification Pursuant to Chapters 2252 and 2270 of the Texas Government Code. As of the Effective Date, the Developer represents that, to the extent this Agreement constitutes a "governmental contract" within the meaning of Section 2252.151 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, solely for purposes of compliance with Chapter 2252 of the Texas Government Code, and except to the extent otherwise required or permitted by or under applicable federal law, neither Developer nor any wholly owned subsidiary, majority -owned subsidiary, parent company or affiliate of the Developer is a company listed by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts under Sections 2270.0201 (as enacted by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., ch. 96, Senate Bill 253) or 2252.153 of the Texas Government Code. 7.10 Verifications Pursuant to Chapter 2274, Texas Government Code. (a) To the extent this Agreement constitutes a contract for goods or services for which a written verification is required under Section 2274.002 (as added by Senate Bill 13 in the 87th Texas Legislature, Regular Session), Texas Government Code, as amended, the Developer hereby verifies that it and its parent company, wholly- or majority -owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates, if any, do not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of this Agreement. The foregoing verification is made solely to enable the Developer to comply with such Section and to the extent such Section does not contravene applicable Texas or federal law. As used in the foregoing verification, " boycott energy companies," a term defined in Section 2274.001(1), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill) by reference to Section 809.001, Texas Government Code (also as enacted by such Senate Bill), shall mean, without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (A) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel - INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 6 based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law; or (B) does business with a company described by (A) above. (b) To the extent this Agreement constitutes a contract for goods or services for which a written verification is required under Section 2274.002 (as added by Senate Bill 19 in the 87th Texas Legislature, Regular Session), Texas Government Code, as amended, the Developer hereby verifies that it and its parent company, wholly- or majority -owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates, if any, do not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association during the term of this Agreement. The foregoing verification is made solely to enable the Developer to comply with such Section and to the extent such Section does not contravene applicable Texas or federal law. As used in the foregoing verification and the following definitions, `discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(3), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill), (A) means, with respect to the firearm entity or firearm trade association, to (i) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, (ii) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, or (iii) terminate an existing business relationship with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association and (B) does not include (i) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories and (ii) a company' s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship (aa) to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency or (bb) for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity' s or association' s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, (b) `firearm entity,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(6), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill), means a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, supplier, or retailer of firearms (defined in Section 2274.001(4), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as weapons that expel projectiles by the action of explosive or expanding gases), firearm accessories (defined in Section 2274.001(5), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as devices specifically designed or adapted to enable an individual to wear, carry, store, or mount a firearm on the individual or on a conveyance and items used in conjunction with or mounted on a firearm that are not essential to the basic function of the firearm, including detachable firearm magazines), or ammunition (defined in Section 2274.001(1), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as a loaded cartridge case, primer, bullet, or propellant powder with or without a projectile) or a sport shooting range (defined in Section 250.001, Texas Local Government Code, as a business establishment, private club, or association that operates an area for the discharge or other use of firearms for silhouette, skeet, trap, black powder, INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 7 target, self-defense, or similar recreational shooting), and (c) ` firearm trade association,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(7), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill), means any person, corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, or business organization that (i) is not organized or operated for profit (and none of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual), (ii) has two or more firearm entities as members, and (iii) is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a), Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as an organization described by Section 501(c) of that code. Section 8. Miscellaneous. 8.01. Compliance with Laws. Developer shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments related to the Development. 8.02. Non -Discrimination. Developer covenants and agrees that Developer will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services for the Development on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 8.03. Time Periods. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 8.04. Force Majeure. Each Party shall use good faith, due diligence and reasonable care in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement, and time shall be of the essence in such performance; however, in the event a Party is unable, due to force majeure, to perform its obligations under this Agreement, then the obligations affected by the force majeure shall be temporarily suspended equal to the time period the Party was delayed, except that the obligation of any Party to make any payments required pursuant to this Agreement shall not be suspended by force majeure. The term "force majeure" shall include any delay due to any of the following acts or events: (a) wars, terrorism, civil disturbances, riots, insurrections, civil unrest, vandalism and sabotage; (b) transportation disasters, whether by sea, rail, air or land; (c) strikes, lockouts, work stoppage or slowdown or other labor disputes or material shortages; (d) adverse weather conditions, including rain of unusual duration or volume, hurricanes, lightning, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods or acts of God; (e) epidemics or pandemics (but not including the COVID 19 pandemic) or any governmental orders, actions, shut -downs, mandates, restrictions or quarantines, or any quasi -governmental orders, actions, shut -downs, mandates, restrictions or quarantines resulting from any epidemics or pandemics, and any public health emergencies, whether declared by local, state or federal governmental authorities or agencies; (f) labor shortages or moratoriums; (g) fire or other material casualty; (h) mechanical failure of equipment; (i) utility delays or interruptions; 0) any emergency event that threatens imminent harm to property or injury to persons; (k) any other causes of any kind whatsoever, whether similar to those enumerated or not, which INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 8 are beyond the control of such Parry in the performance of its obligations hereunder; provided, however, in all cases, only to the extent that the Party claiming force majeure (1) did not cause such force majeure condition, and (2) throughout the pendency of such force majeure condition, utilizes commercially reasonable efforts to minimize the impact and delays caused by such force majeure condition. If a Party is delayed due to force majeure, then such Parry shall provide written notice of the delay and applicable extension of time periods to the other Party. In addition, a Parry that has claimed the right to temporarily suspend its performance under this section shall provide written reports to the other Party at least once every week detailing: (i) the extent to which the force majeure event or circumstance continue to prevent the Party's performance; (ii) all of the measures being employed to regain the ability to perform; and (iii) the projected date upon which the Party will be able to resume performance, which projected date the Parties agree and acknowledge is only an estimate and not a binding commitment by the Party claiming force majeure. 8.05. Assignment. Except as provided below, Developer may not assign all or part of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to a third party without prior written approval of City Council and the City, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The City agrees, however, that Developer may assign all or part of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any entity affiliated with Developer by reason of controlling, being controlled by, or being under common control with Developer or to a third -party lender advancing funds for the construction or operation of Public Improvements. The City expressly consents to any assignment described in the preceding sentence and agrees that no further consent of City Council or the City to such an assignment will be required. Developer agrees to provide the City with written notice of any such assignment. The foregoing notwithstanding, any assignment of Developer's rights under this Agreement shall not release Developer from its obligations hereunder. 8.06. INDEMNITY. DEVELOPER COVENANTS TO FULLY INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, SAVE, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, AND ITS OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AND AGENTS FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS) ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT OR OTHERWISE WRONGFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, MATERIAL MEN OR EMPLOYEES THAT RELATE IN ANY MANNER TO DEVELOPER'S PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT OR TO THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OR INSTALLATION OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS OR CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO THE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 9 DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION INJURY OR DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY. THE INDEMNITY PROVIDED FOR ABOVE SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LIABILITY RESULTING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT OF CITY, ITS OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES OR SEPARATE CONTRACTORS, AND IN THE EVENT OF JOINT AND CONCURRING NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT OF CITY AND DEVELOPER, RESPONSIBILITY AND INDEMNITY, IF ANY, SHALL BE APPORTIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT WAIVING ANY GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY AVAILABLE TO CITY UNDER TEXAS LAW AND WITHOUT WAIVING ANY DEFENSES OF THE PARTIES UNDER TEXAS LAW.DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS SECTION 8.06 SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT. 8.07. Events of Default by Developer. In addition to other events of default by Developer set forth in this Agreement, each of the following events constitute a default of this Agreement by Developer: (a) The City reasonably and in good faith determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of Developer contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the City or the City in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made. (b) Any attachment or other levy against the Development or any portion thereof with respect to a claim, excluding mechanic's and materialman's liens, remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 business days. (c) Developer makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. (d) Developer files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. (e) If taxes owed to the City by Developer become delinquent, and Developer fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. (f) Developer fails to timely, fully and completely comply with any one or more of the deadlines, material requirements, obligations, duties, terms, conditions or warranties of this Agreement. 8.08. Notice of Default. Should the City determine that Developer is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the City shall notify Developer in writing of the event of default, and provide 30 business days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 10 for Developer to cure the event of default; provided, however, in the event if such event of default is not able to be cured within such 30-day period, Developer shall be permitted additional time to effectuate such cure, provided, that in no event shall the Cure Period exceed 60 business days from the date of notice from the City. Should the City fail to timely, fully and completely comply with any one or more of its obligations under this Agreement, such failure shall be an act of default by the City and the City shall have sixty (60) business days to cure and remove the Default after receipt of written notice to do so from Developer. 8.09. Results of Uncured Default by Developer. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the Cure Period, and taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of Developer, as determined by the City, the Developer shall pay the City its reasonable attorney fees, related expenses, and costs of court to collect amounts due to enforce or terminate this Agreement. Upon full payment by Developer of all sums due, the City and Developer shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. Neither the City nor Developer may be held liable for any special or consequential damages. 8.10. No Waiver. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the covenant or condition of this Agreement. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. Any waiver or indulgence of Developer's default may not be considered an estoppel against the City. It is expressly understood that if at any time Developer is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the City to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the City may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the City, but the City may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 8.11. Limitation of Remedies. Developer specifically agrees that the City shall not be liable to Developer for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees or related expenses, or cost of court for any act of default by the City under the terms of this Agreement. 8.12. Notices. Any notice and/or statement required and permitted to be delivered under this Agreement shall be deemed delivered by depositing the same in the United States mail, certified with return receipt requested, proper postage prepaid, addressed to the appropriate party at the following addresses, or at such other addresses provided by the Parties in writing. DEVELOPER: INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 11 CITY: Palladium East Foster Crossing, Ltd. 13455 Noel Rd Ste 1000 Dallas, Texas 75240-6814 City of Anna Attn.: City Manager 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 Clark McCoy Wolfe, Tidwell & McCoy, LLP 2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300 Frisco, Texas 75034 Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 8.13. Incorporation of Other Documents. The Exhibits referenced in this Agreement and attached hereto are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Said Exhibits include the following: Exhibit A, Legal Description of the Property 8.14. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each parry. 8.15. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the City and Developer will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, partners, joint -venturer, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. At no time shall the City or the City have any control over or charge of Developer's design, construction or installation of any of the infrastructure or public improvements that are the subject of this Agreement, nor the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures utilized for said design, construction or installation. This Agreement does not create a joint enterprise between the City and Developer. 8.16. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 8.17. Severability. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 12 person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the Parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 8.18. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Collin County, Texas. 8.19. Interpretation. The Parties have been represented by counsel of their choosing in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. This Agreement was drafted equally by the Parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any Parry shall not apply. 8.20. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole agreement between the City and Developer as relates to the Development. Any other prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations related to the Development, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 8.21. Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to confer any rights, privileges or causes of action upon any third parry. 8.22. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Parties to it and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns. 8.23. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and the binding agreement of each Parry to the terms herein, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 8.24. Recording. The Parties agree that neither this Agreement, nor any memorandum or short form of this Agreement, shall be recorded. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 13 EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES: PALLADIUM EAST FOSTER CROSSING, LTD., a Texas limited partnership By: Palladium East Foster Crossing GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its general partner By: Anna Public Facility Corporation, a Texas public facility corporation U8.2 State of Texas County of Collin Stan Carver II, its President Before me, on this day personally appeared Stan Carver II, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as President of Anna Public Facility Corporation in its capacity as member of Palladium East Foster Crossing GP, LLC, in its capacity as general partner of Palladium East Foster Crossing, Ltd. for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and on behalf of said partnership. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of August 2022. Notary — State of Texas CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS Jim Proce, City Manager State of Texas County of Collin Before me, on this day personally appeared Jim Proce known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as City Manager of the City of Anna, Texas. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of August 2022. Notary — State of Texas INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 14 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property SITUATED in the City of Anna, in the Granderson Stark Survey, Abstract No. 798 of Collin County, Texas and being all of that certain called 1.324 acre tract of land described in a Special Warranty Deed to East Foster LLC., dated April 13, 2021 and recorded in Document No. 20210426000829880, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas (D.R.C.C.T.) and also being all of that certain called 6.932 acre tract of land described as "Tract B" in a Special Warranty Deed to East Foster LLC, dated April 13, 2021 and recorded in Document No. 20210426000829900, D.R.C.C.T. and the consolidation of the two said tracts being more particularly described by metes & bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod, topped with a plastic cap, stamped "RPLS 4838" (hereinafter referred to as "with cap"), found at the southeast corner of the above described 1.324 acre East Foster LLC tract and an inside ell corner for that certain called 2.762 acre tract of land described in a Special Warranty Deed to Anna Crossing 40PGE, Ltd., recorded in Document No. 20210524001039830, D.R.C.C.T. and said point being on the future north right-of-way line of E. Foster Crossing Road (formerly known as County Road 421— variable width public right-of-way); THENCE: North 89 deg. 11 min. 45 sec. West, along the future north right-of-way line of said E. Foster Crossing Road, at a distance of 145.03 feet, passing the southwest corner of said 1.324 acre tract and same being the southeast corner of the above described 6.932 acre East Foster LLC tract and continuing along the future north right-of-way line of E. Foster Crossing Road and the south line of said 6.932 acre tract for a total distance of 789.33 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap, found for the southwest corner of said 6.932 acre tract, at the intersection of the future north right-of-way line of E. Foster Crossing Road and the future east right-of-way line of Vail Lane (proposed 50' wide public right-of-way); THENCE: Departing from the future north right-of-way of E. Foster Crossing Road, along the west line of said 6.932 acre tract and the future east right-of-way line of Vale Lane as follows: North 44 deg. 11 min. 45 sec. West, a distance of 27.38 feet to a point for corner; North 00 deg. 48 min. 56 sec. East, a distance of 166.85 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 325.00 feet, a central angle of 23 deg. 19 min. 32 sec. and a chord that bears North 10 deg. 50 min. 50 sec. West - 131.40 feet; Northwesterly, along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 132.31 feet to a point for corner at the end of said curve and the beginning of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 275.00 feet, a central angle of 22 deg. 19 min. 55 sec. and a chord that bears North 11 deg. 20 min. 38 sec. West - 106.51 feet; Northwesterly, along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 107.19 feet to a point for corner at the end of said curve; North 00 deg. 10 min. 41 sec. West, a distance of 58.30 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap, found for the northwest corner of said 6.932 acre tract, on the south line of that certain called 19.882 acre tract of land described in a Special Warranty Deed With Vendor's Lien to Anna Crossing 40PGE, Ltd, recorded in Document No. 20190114000044870, D.R.C.C.T.; THENCE: North 89 deg. 49 min. 19 sec. East, departing from the future east right-of-way line of Vail Lane, along the common line of said 6.932 acre tract and said 19.882 acre Anna Crossing 40PGE tract, a distance of 514.65 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap, found for the most northerly northeast corner of said 6.932 acre tract and same being the northwest corner of that certain called 0.578 acre tract of land described as "Tract B" in a Special Warranty Deed to Anna Crossing 40PGE, Ltd, recorded in Document No. 20210524001039820, D.R.C.C.T.; THENCE: Departing from the south line of said 19.882 acre Anna Crossing 40PGE tract, along the common line of said 6.932 acre tract and said 0.578 acre Anna Crossing 40 PGE tract as follows: South 02 deg. 07 min. 59 sec. West, a distance of 64.76 feet to a point for an angle corner; South 30 deg. 39 min. 41 sec. East, a distance of 47.85 feet to a point for an angle corner; South 00 deg. 14 min. 58 sec. East, a distance of 23.04 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 11.00 feet, a central angle of 89 deg. 57 min. 12 sec. and a chord that bears South 45 deg. 13 min. 48 sec. East - 15.55 feet; Southeasterly, along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 17.27 feet to a point for corner at the end of said curve; North 89 deg. 47 min. 21 sec. East, a distance of 117.40 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 11.00 feet, a central angle of 38 deg. 48 min. 49 sec. and a chord that bears North 70 deg. 22 min. 50 sec. East - 7.31 feet; Northeasterly, along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 7.45 feet to a point for corner at the end of said curve; North 50 deg. 58 min. 19 sec. East, a distance of 20.10 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 4.00 feet, a central angle of 38 deg. 50 min. 28 sec. and a chord that bears North 70 deg. 25 min. 33 sec. East - 2.66 feet; Northeasterly, along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 2.71 feet to a point for corner: THENCE: North 89 deg. 52 min. 47 sec. East, at a distance of 15.39 feet, passing the southeast corner of said 0.578 acre tract and same being the northerly southwest corner of the above described 2.762 acre Anna Crossing 40PGE, Ltd. tract and the northwest corner of the above described 1.324 acre East Foster LLC tract and continuing along the common line of said 1.324 acre tract and said 2.762 acre tract for a total distance of 131.51 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 4.00 feet, a central angle of 44 deg. 58 min. 38 sec. and a chord that bears South 67 deg. 37 min. 54 sec. East - 3.06 feet; THENCE: Continuing along the common line of said 1.324 acre East Foster LLC tract and said 2.762 acre Anna Crossing 40PGE Ltd. tract as follows: Southeasterly, along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 3.14 feet to a point for corner at the end of said curve; South 45 deg. 04 min. 23 sec. East, a distance of 21.74 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 11.00 feet, a central angle of 44 deg. THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lif'i7►19VAIA City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 8/23/2022 Staff Contact: Joey Grisham Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution of the City of Anna, Texas, determining the costs of certain authorized improvements to be financed by the AnaCapri Public Improvement District; approving a preliminary service plan and assessment plan, including proposed assessment rolls; calling a regular meeting and noticing a public hearing for September 13, 2022, to consider an ordinance levying assessments on property located within the AnaCapri Public Improvement District; directing the filing of the proposed assessment rolls with the City Secretary to make available for public inspection; directing city staff to publish and mail notice of said public hearing; resolving other matters incident and related thereto; and a Resolution approving a minimum value to lien ratio. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) SUMMARY: The developer is ready to move forward with the levying of assessments, so this item sets a Public Hearing for September 13, 2022 to consider an Ordinance to levy assessments for the AnaCapri Public Improvement District. It also includes the Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) and allows for a minimum value to lien ratio of 1.8. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 1: Growing Anna Economy Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve. I_'Iir_[91:I►yil4011& 1 1. 01 - Resolution Determining Costs v4 2. Resolution - DA value to lien C03029D20220818CR1 APPROVALS: Joey Grisham, Director Economic Development Created/Initiated - 8/18/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 8/18/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS DETERMINING THE COSTS OF CERTAIN AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FINANCED BY THE ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; APPROVING A PRELIMINARY SERVICE PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, INCLUDING PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLLS; CALLING A REGULAR MEETING AND NOTICING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; DIRECTING THE FILING OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLLS WITH THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PUBLISH AND MAIL NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC HEARING; AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 372, as amended (the "Act") authorizes the governing body (the "City Council") of the City of Anna, Texas (the "CL") to create a public improvement district within the City; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider a petition received by the City on February 15, 2022 titled "Petition to Establish Anacapri Public Improvement District" requesting the creation of a public improvement district; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-04-1140 (the "Authorization Resolution"), authorizing, establishing and creating the Anacapri Public Improvement District (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the City authorized the creation of the District and funding up to $58,000,000.00 in costs for the District to finance certain public improvements authorized by the Act for the benefit of the property within the District (the "Authorized Improvements"); and WHEREAS, the City Council and the City staff have been presented a "Anacapri Public Improvement District Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan", including the proposed assessment rolls attached thereto (the "Proposed Assessment Rolls") (collectively, the "Preliminary SAP"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary SAP sets forth the estimated total costs of certain Authorized Improvements to be financed by the District for the initial phase of development and the Proposed Assessment Rolls state the assessments proposed to be levied against each parcel of land in the District as determined by the method of assessment chosen by the City; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that the Proposed Assessment Rolls be filed with the City Secretary of the City (the "City Secretary") and be subject to public inspection; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that a public hearing (the "Assessment Hearing") be called to consider proposed assessments and requires the City Council to hear and pass on any objections to the proposed assessments at, or on the adjournment of, the Assessment Hearing; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that notice of the Assessment Hearing be mailed to property owners liable for assessment and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and in the part of the extraterritorial jurisdiction in which the district is to be located or in which the improvements are to be undertaken before the tenth (loth) day before the date of the Assessment Hearing. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. THAT the recitals set forth above in this Resolution are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of the City Council and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. THAT the City Council does hereby accept the Preliminary SAP for the District, including the Proposed Assessment Rolls, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein for all purposes. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 3. THAT the City Council hereby determines that the total costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects (as defined in the Preliminary SAP) to be financed by the District are as set forth in Exhibit 13-1 and the total costs of the Improvement Area #2A Projects (as defined in the Preliminary SAP) to be financed by the District are as set forth in Exhibit B-1 of the Preliminary SAP, which costs do include the payment of expenses incurred in the administration of the District or related to the issuance of any bonds. SECTION 4. THAT the City Council's final determination and approval of the costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects and the Improvement Area #2 Projects, or any portion thereof, shall be subject to and contingent upon City Council approval of a final Service and Assessment Plan which will include final Assessment Rolls, after the properly noticed and held Assessment Hearing. SECTION 5. THAT the Proposed Assessment Rolls state the assessment proposed to be levied against each parcel of land in the District as determined by the method of assessment chosen by the City in the Authorization Resolution and as more fully described in the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 6. THAT the City Council expressly defers the levy of assessments against property within future phases for phase -specific improvements that will benefit only the property within each subsequent phase until such time as the costs of such phase -specific improvements can be determined with certainty as referenced in the Preliminary SAP. SECTION 7. THAT the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the filing of the Proposed Assessment Rolls with the City Secretary and the same shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 8. THAT the City Council hereby authorizes, and calls, a meeting and a public hearing (the Assessment Hearing as defined above) to be held on September 13, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. atAnna City Hall, Council Chambers, 120 W. 7h Street„ Anna, Texas 75409, or such other location as designated by the City and noticed pursuant to the Act, at which the City Council shall, among other actions, hear and pass on any objections to the proposed assessments; and, upon the adjournment of the Assessment Hearing, the City Council will consider an ordinance levying the assessments as special assessments on property within the District (which ordinance shall specify the method of payment of the assessments). SECTION 9. THAT the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Secretary to publish notice of the Assessment Hearing to be held on September 13, 2022, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein for all purposes; provided however, that the location is subject to change as designated by the City, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on or before September 2, 2022, which is before the tenth (1 Oth) day before the date of the Assessment Hearing, as required by Section 372.016(b) of the Act. SECTION 10. THAT when the Proposed Assessment Rolls are filed with the City Secretary, the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Secretary to mail to owners of property liable for assessment notice of the Assessment Hearing to be held on September 13, 2022, on or before September 2, 2022, as required by Section 372.016(c) of the Act. SECTION 11. THAT City staff is authorized and directed to take such other actions as are required (including, but not limited to, notice of the public hearing as required by the Texas Open Meetings Act) to place the public hearing on the agenda for the September 13, 2022 meeting of the City Council. SECTION 12. THAT this Resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage in accordance with law. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 23rd day of August, 2022. ATTEST: Lee Miller, Mayor Pro-Tem Carrie L. Land, City Secretary EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT B CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council of Anna, Texas on September 13, 2022 at 6: 30 p.m.at the at the Anna City Hall, City Council Chambers, 120 W. 7rh Street, Anna, Texas 75409. The public hearing will be held to consider proposed assessments to be levied against the assessable property within the Anacapri Public Improvement District (the "District") pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the "Act"). The general nature of the proposed public improvements (collectively, the "Authorized Improvements") may include: (a) acquisition, construction and improvements, and maintenance of the improvements, consisting of (1) landscaping; (2) erection of fountains, distinctive lighting, and signs; (3) acquiring, constructing, improving, widening, narrowing, closing, or rerouting of sidewalks or of streets, any other roadways, or their rights -of -way, including related landscaping, lighting, traffic control devices, screening walls and retaining walls; (4) construction or improvement of pedestrian malls; (5) acquisition and installation of pieces of art; (6) acquisition, construction, or improvement of off-street parking facilities; (7) acquisition, construction, or improvement of water, wastewater, or drainage facilities or improvements; (8) the establishment or improvement of parks; (9) projects similar to those listed in (1)-(8); (10) acquisition, by purchase or otherwise, of real property or contract rights in connection with an authorized improvement; (11) special supplemental and maintenance services for improvement and promotion of the district, including services relating to advertising, promotion, health and sanitation, water and wastewater, roadways, public safety, security, business recruitment, development, recreation, and cultural enhancement (collectively, the "Authorized Improvements"); and (b) the payment of expenses incurred in the establishment, administration, and operation of the District, including maintenance costs, costs of issuance, funding debt service and capitalized interest reserves and credit enhancement fees of any bonds issued by or on behalf of the District, if necessary. These Authorized Improvements shall promote the interests of the City and confer a special benefit upon the Property. The total costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects and the Improvement Area #2A Projects, including the costs of creating the District and issuing the bonds, is approximately [$35,914,978]. The total costs of Authorized Improvements to benefit future phases within the District cannot be determined with certainty at this time, but shall not exceed an additional [$22,085,022]. The boundaries of the District include approximately 284.952 acres of land generally located immediately to the northwest, west, and southwest of Anna High School, located within the city limits of the City and as more particularly described by a metes and bounds description available for public inspection at the office of the City Secretary, 111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas. All written or oral objections on the proposed assessment within the District will be considered at the public hearing. A copy of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll and the Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll, (collectively, the "Assessment Rolls"), which Assessment Rolls include the assessments to be levied against each parcel in the District for the Improvement Area #1 Projects and the Improvement Area #2A Projects, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Secretary, 120 W.7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409. AnaCapri Public Improvement District PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND AUGUST 23, 2022 - VERSION 1.0 ASSESSMENT PLAN \] TABLE OF CONTENTS Tableof Contents..........................................................................................................................1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................3 SectionI: Definitions..................................................................................................................... 4 Section II: The District.................................................................................................................13 Section III: Authorized Improvements and Bond Issuance Costs.................................................13 SectionIV: Service Plan...............................................................................................................17 Section V: Assessment Plan.........................................................................................................18 Section VI: Terms of the Assessments......................................................................................... 23 Section VII: Assessment Roll....................................................................................................... 29 Section VIII: Additional Provisions............................................................................................... 29 Exhibits........................................................................................................................................32 Appendices.................................................................................................................................33 Exhibit A-1— Map of the District................................................................................................. 34 Exhibit A-2 — Map of Improvement Area#1................................................................................35 Exhibit A-3 — Map of Improvement Area#2................................................................................36 Exhibit A-4 — Map of Improvement Area #2A.............................................................................37 Exhibit A-5 — Map of Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property............................................38 Exhibit B-1 —Authorized Improvements.....................................................................................39 Exhibit B-2 — Appropriation of Costs of Authorized Improvements............................................40 ExhibitC —Service Plan............................................................................................................... 41 Exhibit D — Sources and Uses of Funds........................................................................................42 Exhibit E — Maximum Assessment and Tax Rate Equivalent........................................................43 Exhibit F —TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount.............................................................44 Exhibit G-1— Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll.................................................................45 Exhibit G-2 — Improvement Area #1 Projected Annual Installment.............................................46 Exhibit H-1— Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll...............................................................47 Exhibit H-2 — Improvement Area #2A Projected Annual Installment..........................................48 Exhibit 1-1— Maps of Improvement Area #1 Improvements.......................................................49 Exhibit 1-2 — Maps of Improvement Area #2 Improvements.......................................................56 Exhibit 1-3 — Maps of Improvement Area #2A Improvements..................................................... 62 Exhibit J — Form of Notice of PID Assessment Termination.........................................................66 k ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Exhibit K-1— District Legal Description........................................................................................ 69 Exhibit K-2 — Improvement Area #1 Legal Description................................................................80 Exhibit K-3 — Improvement Area #2 Legal Description................................................................90 Exhibit K-4 — Improvement Area #2A Legal Description..............................................................97 Exhibit K-5 — Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Legal Description ...........................101 Appendix A — Engineer's Report................................................................................................105 Appendix B — Buyer Disclosures................................................................................................191 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Capitalized terms used in this Service and Assessment Plan shall have the meanings given to them in Section I unless otherwise defined in this Service and Assessment Plan or unless the context in which a term is used clearly requires a different meaning. Unless otherwise defined, a reference to a "Section," an "Exhibit," or an "Appendix" shall be a reference to a Section of this Service and Assessment Plan or an Exhibit or Appendix attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes. On April 12, 2022, the City Council passed and approved Resolution No. 2022-04-1140 authorizing the establishment of the District in accordance with the PID Act, which authorization was effective upon publication as required by the PID Act. The purpose of the District is to finance the Actual Costs of Authorized Improvements that confer a special benefit on approximately 279.554 acres located within the corporate limits of the City, as described by the legal description on Exhibit K-1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. The PID Act requires a Service Plan covering a period of at least five years and defining the annual indebtedness and projected cost of the Authorized Improvements and including a copy of the notice form required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended. The Service Plan is contained in Section IV. The PID Act requires that the Service Plan include an Assessment Plan that assesses the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements against the Assessed Property within the District based on the special benefits conferred on such property by the Authorized Improvements. The Assessment Plan is contained in Section V. The PID Act requires an Assessment Roll that states the Assessment against each Parcel determined by the method chosen by the City Council. The Assessment against each Parcel of Assessed Property must be sufficient to pay the share of the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements apportioned to such Parcel and cannot exceed the special benefit conferred on the Parcel by such Authorized Improvements. The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is included as Exhibit G-1. The Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll is included as Exhibit H-1. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SECTION I: DEFINITIONS "Actual Costs" mean with respect to Authorized Improvements, including Owner costs to create the District, the actual costs of constructing or acquiring such Authorized Improvements, (either directly or through affiliates), including : (1) the costs for the design, planning, financing, administration/management, acquisition, installation, construction and/or implementation of such Authorized Improvements; (2) the fees paid for obtaining permits, licenses, or other governmental approvals for such Authorized Improvements; (3) the costs for external professional costs, such as engineering, geotechnical, surveying, land planning, architectural landscapers, appraisals, legal, accounting, and similar professional services; (4) all labor, bonds, and materials, including equipment and fixtures, by contractors, builders, and materialmen in connection with the acquisition, construction, or implementation of the Authorized Improvements; (5) all related permitting and public approval expenses, architectural, engineering, and consulting fees, and governmental fees and charges and (6) costs to implement, administer, and manage the above -described activities including, but not limited to, a construction management fee equal to four percent (4%) of construction costs if managed by or on behalf of the Owners. "Additional Interest" means the amount collected by the application of the Additional Interest Rate. "Additional Interest Rate" means the 0.50% additional interest rate that may be charged on Assessments securing PID Bonds pursuant to Section 372.018 of the PID Act. "Administrator" means the City or independent firm designated by the City who shall have the responsibilities provided in this Service and Assessment Plan, the Indenture, or any other agreement or document approved by the City related to the duties and responsibilities of the administration of the District. The initial Administrator is P3Works, LLC. "Annual Collection Costs" mean the actual or budgeted costs and expenses related to the operation of the District, including, but not limited to, costs and expenses for: (1) the Administrator; (2) City staff; (3) legal counsel, engineers, accountants, financial advisors, and other consultants engaged by the City; (4) calculating, collecting, and maintaining records with respect to Assessments and Annual Installments; (5) preparing and maintaining records with respect to Assessment Rolls and Annual Service Plan Updates; (6) paying and redeeming PID Bonds; (7) investing or depositing Assessments and Annual Installments; (8) complying with this Service and Assessment Plan and the PID Act with respect to the PID Bonds, including the City's continuing disclosure requirements; and (9) the paying agent/registrar and Trustee in connection with PID Bonds, including their respective legal counsel. Annual Collection Costs collected but ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN not expended in any year shall be carried forward and applied to reduce Annual Collection Costs for subsequent years. "Annual Installment" means the annual installment payment of an Assessment as calculated by the Administrator and approved by the City Council, that includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs; and (4) Additional Interest, if applicable. The principal and interest amount of which may be reduced by the TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount. "Annual Service Plan Update" means an update to this Service and Assessment Plan prepared no less frequently than annually by the Administrator and approved by the City Council. "Appropriated Property" means any Parcel within the District against which the costs of the Authorized Improvements are appropriated based on special conferred benefit anticipated to be levied, but not yet levied. Initially, the Appropriated Property includes the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property. "Appropriation" means an amount allocated by this Service and Assessment Plan to a Parcel within the District for future Authorized Improvement costs, other than Non-Benefitted Property, subject to the levy by the City and also subject to reallocation upon the subdivision of such Parcel or reduction according to the provisions herein and in the PID Act. "Assessed Property" means any Parcel within the District against which an Assessment is levied. "Assessment" means an assessment levied against a Parcel within the District, other than Non- Benefitted Property, and imposed pursuant to an Assessment Ordinance and the provisions herein, as shown on an Assessment Roll, subject to reallocation upon the subdivision of such Parcel or reduction according to the provisions herein and in the PID Act. "Assessment Ordinance" means an ordinance adopted by the City Council in accordance with the PID Act that levies an Assessment on Assessed Property within the District, as shown on any Assessment Roll. "Assessment Plan" means the methodology employed to assess the Actual Costs of the Authorized Improvements against the Assessed Property within the District based on the special benefits conferred on such property by the Authorized Improvements, more specifically set forth and described in Section V. "Assessment Roll" means any assessment roll for the Assessed Property within the District, including the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, and the Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll as updated, modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the PID Act, including updates prepared in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds or any Annual Service Plan Update. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Authorized Improvements" means (1) the improvements authorized by Section 372.003 of the PID Act, as depicted on Exhibit 1-1, Exhibit 1-2 and Exhibit 1-3 and described in Section III; (2) Bond Issuance Costs, and (3) District Formation Costs. "Bond Issuance Costs" means the costs associated with issuing PID Bonds, including but not limited to attorney fees, financial advisory fees, consultant fees, appraisal fees, printing costs, publication costs, capitalized interest, reserve fund requirements, underwriter's discount, fees charged by the Texas Attorney General, and any other cost or expense incurred by the City directly associated with the issuance of any series of PID Bonds. "City" means the City of Anna, Texas. "City Council" means the governing body of the City. "County" means Collin County, Texas. "Delinquent Collection Costs" mean costs related to the foreclosure on Assessed Property and the costs of collection of delinquent Assessments, delinquent Annual Installments, or any other delinquent amounts due under this Service and Assessment Plan including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees actually paid, but excluding amounts representing interest and penalty interest. "Development Agreement" means the AnaCapri Development Agreement entered into by and between the City and Owner, approved and adopted by Resolution No. 2022-03-1119 on October 12, 2021. "District" means the AnaCapri Public Improvement District containing approximately 279.554 acres located within the corporate limits of the City, and more specifically described in Exhibit K- 1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. "District Formation Costs" means the costs associated with forming the District, including but not limited to, attorney fees, and any other cost or expense incurred by the City directly associated with the establishment of the District. "Engineer's Report" means a report provided by a licensed professional engineer that describes the Authorized Improvements, including their costs, location, and benefit, and is attached hereto as Appendix A. "Estimated Buildout Value" means the estimated value of an Assessed Property with fully constructed buildings, as provided by the Owner and confirmed by the City Council, by considering such factors as density, lot size, proximity to amenities, view premiums, location, market conditions, historical sales, builder contracts, discussions with homebuilders, reports from third party consultants, or any other factors that, in the judgment of the City, may impact value. The Estimated Buildout Value for each Lot Type is shown on Exhibit E. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 6 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Improvement Area #1" means approximately 97.100 acres located within the District, more specifically described in Exhibit K-2 and depicted on Exhibit A-2. "Improvement Area #1 Annual Installment" means the Annual Installment of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment as calculated by the Administrator and approved by the City Council, that includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs; and (4) Additional Interest, if applicable. The principal and interest amount of which may be reduced by the TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount. Additional Interest is not charged on the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation, but will be included in the event Improvement Area #1 Bonds are issued. "Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property" means any Parcel within Improvement Area #1 against which an Improvement Area #1 Assessment is levied. "Improvement Area #1 Assessment" means an Assessment levied against a Parcel within Improvement Area #1 and imposed pursuant to an Assessment Ordinance and the provisions herein, as shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, subject to reallocation upon the subdivision of such Parcel or reduction according to the provisions herein and in the PID Act. "Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll" means the Assessment Roll for the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property, as updated, modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the PID Act, including any updates prepared in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds or any Annual Service Plan Updates. The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is included in this Service and Assessment Plan as Exhibit G-1. "Improvement Area #1 Bonds" means those certain PID "City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 (AnaCapri Public Improvement District Improvement Area #1 Project)" that are secured by Improvement Area #1 Assessments, and expected to be used in calendar year 2022. "Improvement Area #1 Improvements" means the Authorized Improvements which only benefit the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property, as further described in Section III.A and depicted on Exhibit 1-1. "Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel" means all of the Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property against which the entire Improvement Area #1 Assessment is levied, as described in Exhibit K-2, and depicted on Exhibit A-2. "Improvement Area #1 Projects" means, collectively (1) the Improvement Area #1 Improvements; (2) the pro rata portion of the District Formation Costs allocable to Improvement Area #1 and (3) the Bond Issuance Costs allocable to Improvement Area #1. "Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Agreement" means that certain "AnaCapri Public Improvement District Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Agreement" effective entered into by and between the City and the Owner, as the developer of the Improvement Area ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN #1 Projects, in which the Owner agrees to construct the Improvement Area #1 Projects and to fund certain Actual Costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects and the City agrees to (i) pay directly or reimburse the Owner for Actual Costs of an Improvement Area #1 Projects from the proceeds of Improvement Area #1 Bonds in accordance with the Act, this Service and Assessment Plan and the applicable Indenture, or (ii) reimburse the Owner for certain Actual Costs of Improvement Area #1 Projects not paid by proceeds of Improvement Area #1 Bonds solely from the revenue collected from Improvement Area #1 Assessments, including Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments, but subordinate to the lien on the Improvement Area #1 Assessments pledged to the payment of Improvement Area #1 Bonds. "Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation" means an amount secured by the Improvement Area #1 Assessment to be paid to the Owner pursuant to the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Agreement. The projected Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments for the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation is shown on Exhibit G-2. "Improvement Area #2" means approximately 179.451 acres located within the District, more specifically described in Exhibit K-3 and depicted on Exhibit A-3. "Improvement Area #2 Improvements" means the Authorized Improvements which only benefit Improvement Area #2 and are described in Section 1111.113, and depicted on Exhibit 1-2. "Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property" means approximately 113.100 acres located within the District, more specifically described in Exhibit K-5 and depicted on Exhibit A-5. "Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Appropriated Property" means any Parcel within Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property against which costs of Improvement Area #2 Improvements are appropriated. "Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Initial Parcel" means all of the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Appropriated Property against which Improvement Area #2 Improvements costs are Appropriated, as described in Exhibit K-5, and depicted on Exhibit A-5. "Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Projects" means the pro rata portion of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements costs appropriated to Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property. "Improvement Area #2A" means approximately 66.3 acres located within the District, more specifically described in Exhibit K-4 and depicted on Exhibit A-4. "Improvement Area #2A Annual Installment" means the Annual Installment of the Improvement Area #2A Assessment as calculated by the Administrator and approved by the City Council, that includes: (1) principal; (2) interest; (3) Annual Collection Costs; and (4) Additional Interest, if applicable. The principal and interest amount of which may be reduced by the TIRZ No. 4 Annual ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 8 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Credit Amount. Additional Interest is notch a rged on the Improvement Area #2-A Reimbursement Obligation, but will be included in the event Improvement Area #2A Bonds are issued. "Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property" means any Parcel within Improvement Area #2A against which an Improvement Area #2A Assessment is levied. "Improvement Area #2A Assessment" means an Assessment levied against a Parcel within Improvement Area #2A and imposed pursuant to an Assessment Ordinance and the provisions herein, as shown on the Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll, subject to reallocation upon the subdivision of such Parcel or reduction according to the provisions herein and in the PID Act. "Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll" means the Assessment Roll for the Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property, as updated, modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the PID Act, including any updates prepared in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds or any Annual Service Plan Updates. The Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll is included in this Service and Assessment Plan as Exhibit H-1. "Improvement Area #2A Bonds" means those certain PID "City of Anna, Texas Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 (AnaCapri Public Improvement District Improvement Area #2A Project)" that are secured by Improvement Area #2A Assessments, and anticipated to be issued in calendar year 2022. "Improvement Area #2A Improvements" means the Authorized Improvements which only benefit the Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property, as further described in Section III.0 and depicted on Exhibit 1-3. "Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel" means all of the Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property against which the entire Improvement Area #2A Assessment is levied, as described in Exhibit K-4, and depicted on Exhibit A-4. "Improvement Area #2A Projects" means, collectively (1) the pro rata portion of the Improvement Area #2 Improvements allocable to Improvement Area #2A; (2) the Improvement Area #2A Improvements; (3) the pro rata portion of the District Formation Costs allocable to Improvement Area #2A and (4) the Bond Issuance Costs allocable to Improvement Area #2A. "Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Agreement" means that certain "AnaCapri Public Improvement District Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Agreement" effective entered into by and between the City and the Owner, as the developer of the Improvement Area #2A Projects, in which the Owner agrees to construct the Improvement Area #2A Projects and to fund certain Actual Costs of the Improvement Area #2A Projects and the City agrees to (i) pay directly or reimburse the Owner for Actual Costs of an Improvement Area #2A Projects from the proceeds of Improvement Area #2A Bonds in accordance with the Act, this Service and Assessment Plan and the applicable Indenture, or (ii) reimburse the Owner for certain Actual ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Costs of Improvement Area #2A Projects not paid by proceeds of Improvement Area #2A Bonds solely from the revenue collected from Improvement Area #2A Assessments, including Improvement Area #2A Annual Installments, but subordinate to the lien on the Improvement Area #2A Assessments pledged to the payment of Improvement Area #2A Bonds. "Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation" means an amount secured by the Improvement Area #2A Assessment to be paid to the Owner pursuant to the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Agreement. The projected Improvement Area #2A Annual Installments for the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation is shown on Exhibit H-2. "Indenture" means an Indenture of Trust entered into between the City and the Trustee in connection with the issuance of each series of PID Bonds, as amended from time to time, between the City and the Trustee setting forth terms and conditions related to a series of PID Bonds. "Lot" means (1) for any portion of the District for which a final subdivision plat has been recorded in the Official Public Records of the County, a tract of land described by "lot" in such subdivision plat; and (2) for any portion of the District for which a subdivision plat has not been recorded in the Plat or Official Public Records of the County, a tract of land anticipated to be described as a "Lot" in a final recorded subdivision plat as shown on a concept plan or a preliminary plat. A "Lot" shall not include real property owned by a government entity, even if such property is designated as a separate described tract or lot on a recorded subdivision plat. "Lot Type" means a classification of final building Lots with similar characteristics (e.g. lot size, home product, buildout value, etc.), as determined by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council. In the case of single-family residential Lots, the Lot Type shall be further defined by classifying the residential Lots by the Estimated Buildout Value of the Lot as shown on Exhibit E. "Lot Type 1" means a lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a 40' Lot, with an Estimated Buildout Value of $430,000. "Lot Type 2" means a lot within Improvement Area #1 marketed to homebuilders as a 50' Lot, with an Estimated Buildout Value of $480,000. "Lot Type 3" means a lot within Improvement Area #2A marketed to homebuilders as a 40' Lot, with an Estimated Buildout Value of $430,000. "Lot Type 4" means a lot within Improvement Area #2A marketed to homebuilders as a 50' Lot, with an Estimated Buildout Value of $480,000. "Maximum Assessment" means for each Lot, an Assessment equal to the lesser of (1) the amount calculated pursuant to Section VI.A, or (2) for each Lot Type, the amount shown on Exhibit E. The Maximum Assessment shall be calculated at the time a final plat is recorded. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "Non -Assessed Property" means Parcels that accrue special benefit from the Authorized Improvements, as determined by the City Council, but are not assessed. The Non -Assessed Property includes the lagoon, multifamily and commercial areas adjacent to the District. "Notice of Assessment Termination" means a document that shall be recorded in the Official Public Records of the County the termination of an Assessment, a form of which is attached as Exhibit J. "Owner" means AnaCapri Laguna Azure LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, and any successors or assigns thereof that intends to develop the property in the District for the ultimate purpose of transferring title to such property to end users. "Parcel" or "Parcels" means a specific property within the District identified by either a tax parcel identification number assigned by the Collin Central Appraisal District for real property tax purposes, by legal description, or by lot and block number in a final subdivision plat recorded in the Plat or Official Public Records of the County, or by any other means determined by the City. "PID Act" means Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended. "PID Bonds" means any bonds issued by the City in one or more series and secured in whole or in part by Assessments. "Prepayment" means the payment of all or a portion of an Assessment before the due date of the final Annual Installment thereof. Amounts received at the time of a Prepayment which represent a payment of principal, interest, or penalties on a delinquent installment of an Assessment are not to be considered a Prepayment, but rather are to be treated as the payment of the regularly scheduled Annual Installment. "Prepayment Costs" means interest, including Additional Interest and Annual Collection Costs to the date of Prepayment. "Service and Assessment Plan" means this AnaCapri Public Improvement District Service and Assessment Plan as updated, amended, or supplemented from time to time. "Service Plan" covers a period of at least five years and defines the annual indebtedness and projected costs of the Authorized Improvements, more specifically described in Section IV. "TIRZ No. 4" means the Reinvestment Zone Number Four, City of Anna, Texas. "TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount" is defined in Section V.F, which amount shall not annually exceed the TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount, and which shall be transferred from the TIRZ No. 4 Fund to the applicable pledged revenue fund pursuant to the Development Agreement. "TIRZ No. 4 PID Account" means an account of the TIRZ No. 4 Fund where the TIRZ No. 4 Revenues are deposited. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 11 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN "TIRZ No. 4 Project and Finance Plan" means the Reinvestment Zone Number Four, City of Anna, Texas Project and Finance Plan, dated 12022. "TIRZ No. 4 Fund" means the tax increment fund created pursuant to the TIRZ No. 4 Ordinance where TIRZ No. 4 Revenues are deposited annually. "TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount" means for each Lot Type, the amount of TIRZ No. 4 Revenues provided as a Credit against the Annual Installment, as further defined in Section V.F and shown on Exhibit F. "TIRZ No. 4 Ordinance" means Ordinance No. adopted by the City Council approving the TIRZ No. 4 Project and Finance Plan and authorizing the use of TIRZ No. 4 Revenues for project costs under the Chapter 311, Texas Tax Code as amended, and related to certain public improvements as provided for in the TIRZ No. 4 Project and Finance Plan. "TIRZ No. 4 Revenues" mean, for each year, the amounts which are deposited in the TIRZ No. 4 Fund pursuant to the TIRZ No. 4 Ordinance. "Trustee" means the trustee or successor trustee under an Indenture. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 12 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SECTION II: THE DISTRICT The District includes approximately 279.554 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described by the legal description on Exhibit K-1 and depicted on Exhibit A-1. Development of the District is anticipated to include approximately 1,235 Lots developed with single-family homes. Improvement Area #1 includes approximately 100.103 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described by the legal description on Exhibit K-2 and depicted on Exhibit A-2. Development of Improvement Area #1 is anticipated to include approximately 458 Lots developed with single-family homes (174 single- family homes classified as Lot Type 1, and 284 single-family homes classified as Lot Type 2). Improvement Area #2 includes both Improvement Area #2A and Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property, as described on Exhibit K-3, and depicted on Exhibit A-3, consisting of approximately 179.451 acres. Improvement Area #2A includes approximately 66.262 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described by the legal description on Exhibit K-4 and depicted on Exhibit A-4. Development of Improvement Area #2 is anticipated to include approximately 237 Lots developed with single-family homes (136 single- family homes classified as Lot Type 3, and 101 single-family homes classified as Lot Type 4). Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property includes approximately 113.189 contiguous acres located within the corporate limits of the City, the boundaries of which are more particularly described by the legal description on Exhibit K-5 and depicted on Exhibit A-5. Development of Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property is anticipated to include approximately 540 Lots developed with single-family homes. SECTION III: AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND ISSUANCE COSTS The City, based on information provided by the Owner and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third -party consultants retained by the City, has determined that the Authorized Improvements confer a special benefit on the Assessed Property. Authorized Improvements will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's standards and specifications and will be owned and operated by the City. The budget for the Authorized Improvements is shown on Exhibit B-1. A. Improvement Area #1 Improvements ■ Roadway Improvements ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 13 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for roadways, testing, and handicapped ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, intersections, and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #1. ■ Water Systems Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #1. ■ Sanitary Sewer Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #1. ■ Storm Sewer Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #1. ■ Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape Improvements include all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, signage, utility infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, lighting, landscaping, irrigation and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas. (to be confirmed by Owner) ■ Soft Costs Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #1 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #1 Improvements. B. Improvement Area #2 Improvements ■ Roadways Improvements Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN roadways, testing, and handicapped ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, intersections, and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #2. ■ Water Systems Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2. ■ Sanitary Sewer Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2. ■ Storm Sewer Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #2. ■ Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape Improvements include all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, signage, utility infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, lighting, landscaping, irrigation and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas within Improvement Area #2. (to be confirmed by the Owner) ■ Soft Costs Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #2 Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #2 Improvements. C. Improvement Area #2A Improvements ■ Roadway Improvements Improvements including subgrade stabilization, concrete and reinforcing steel for ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 15 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN roadways, testing, and handicapped ramps. All related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, intersections, and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas within the right-of-way are included. The street improvements will provide benefit to each Lot within Improvement Area #2A. ■ Water Systems Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, and all necessary appurtenances required to provide water service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2A. ■ Sanitary Sewer Improvements including trench excavation and embedment, trench safety, PVC piping, ductile iron encasement, boring, manholes, service connections, testing, related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide wastewater service to all Lots within Improvement Area #2A. ■ Storm Sewer Improvements including earthen channels, swales, curb and drop inlets, RCP piping and boxes, headwalls, concrete flumes, rock rip rap, concrete outfalls, and testing as well as all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control and all necessary appurtenances required to provide storm drainage for all Lots within Improvement Area #2A. ■ Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape Improvements include all related earthwork, excavation, erosion control, retaining walls, signage, utility infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, lighting, landscaping, irrigation and re -vegetation of all disturbed areas within Improvement Area #2A. (to be confirmed by Owner) ■ Soft Costs Costs related to designing, constructing, and installing the Improvement Area #2A Improvements including land planning and design, City fees, engineering, soil testing, survey, construction management, contingency, District Formation Costs, legal costs, consultants, and costs associated with financing the Improvement Area #2A Improvements. D. Bond Issuance Costs ■ Debt Service Reserve Fund Equals the amount to be deposited in a debt service reserve fund under an applicable ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 16 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Indenture in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds. ■ Capitalized Interest Equals the amount required to be deposited for the purpose of paying capitalized interest under an applicable Indenture in connection with the issuance of PID Bonds. ■ Underwriter's Discount Equals a percentage of the par amount of a particular series of PID Bonds related to the costs of underwriting such PID Bonds. ■ Underwriter's Counsel Equals a percentage of the par amount of a particular series of PID Bonds reserved for the underwriter's attorney fees. ■ Cost of Issuance Includes costs of issuing a particular series of PID Bonds, including but not limited to issuer fees, attorney fees, financial advisory fees, consultant fees, appraisal fees, printing costs, publication costs, City costs, fees charged by the Texas Attorney General, and any other cost or expense directly associated with the issuance of PID Bonds. E. Other Costs ■ Deposit to Administrative Fund Equals the amount necessary to fund the first year's Annual Collection Costs for a particular series of PID Bonds. SECTION IV: SERVICE PLAN The PID Act requires the Service Plan to (i) cover a period of at least five years, (ii) define the annual projected costs and indebtedness for the Authorized Improvements undertaken within the District during the five-year period and (iii) include a copy of the notice form required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended. The Service Plan must be reviewed and updated by the City Council at least annually in each Annual Service Plan Update. Exhibit C summarizes the Service Plan for Improvement Area #1, and Improvement Area #2A. The notice form required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code is attached hereto as Appendix B. Exhibit D summarizes the sources and uses of funds required to construct the Authorized Improvements. The sources and uses of funds shown on Exhibit D shall be updated in the Annual Service Plan Update to reflect any budget revisions and Actual Costs. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 17 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN SECTION V: ASSESSMENT PLAN The PID Act allows the City Council to apportion the costs of the Authorized Improvements to the Assessed Property based on the special benefit received from the Authorized Improvements. The PID Act provides that such costs may be apportioned: (1) equally per front foot or square foot; (2) according to the value of property as determined by the City, with or without regard to improvements constructed on the property; or (3) in any other manner approved by the City that results in imposing equal shares of such costs on property similarly benefited. The PID Act further provides that the governing body may establish by ordinance or order reasonable classifications and formulas for the apportionment of the cost between the City and the area to be assessed and the methods of assessing the special benefits for various classes of improvements. This section of this Service and Assessment Plan describes the special benefit received by each Parcel within the District as a result of the Authorized Improvements and provides the basis and justification for the determination that this special benefit equals or exceeds the amount of the Assessments to be levied on the Assessed Property for such Authorized Improvements. The determination by the City Council of the assessment methodologies set forth below is the result of the discretionary exercise by the City Council of its legislative authority and governmental powers and is conclusive and binding on the Owner and all future Owners and developers of the Assessed Property. A. Assessment Methodology The City Council, acting in its legislative capacity based on information provided by the Owner and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third -party consultants retained by the City, has determined that the costs related to the Authorized Improvements shall be allocated as follows: ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects shall be allocated 100% to Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property based on the ratio of the Estimated Buildout Value of each Lot Type designated as Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property to the Estimated Buildout Value of all Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property. Currently, the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel is the only Parcel within Improvement Area #1, and as such, the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel is allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #1 Projects. ■ Improvement Area #2 Improvements allocable to Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Appropriated Property shall be appropriated to Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Appropriated Property pro rata based on the Estimated Buildout ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Value of all Parcels within Improvement Area #2, as depicted on Exhibit B-2. ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #2A Projects shall be allocated 100% to Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property based on the ratio of the Estimated Buildout Value of each Lot Type designated as Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property to the Estimated Buildout Value of all Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property. Currently, the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel is the only Parcel within Improvement Area #2A, and as such, the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel is allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #2A Projects. B. Assessments Assessments are levied on the Assessed Property according to the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll, and Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll attached hereto as Exhibit G-1, and Exhibit H-1, respectively. The projected Annual Installments for Improvement Area #1, and Improvement Area #2A, are shown on Exhibit G-2, and Exhibit H-2, , respectively, and are subject to revisions made in any Annual Service Plan Update. The Maximum Assessment for each Lot Type within Improvement Area #1, and Improvement Area #2A is shown on Exhibit E. In no case will the Assessment for Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, or Lot Type 4 within Improvement Area #1, and Improvement Area #2A, exceed the corresponding Maximum Assessment. C. Findings of Special Benefit The City Council, acting in its legislative capacity based on information provided by the Owner and its engineer and reviewed by the City staff and by third -party consultants retained by the City, has found and determined: ■ Improvement Area #1 ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #1 Projects equal $22,172,772 as shown on Exhibit B-1; ■ The Improvement Area #1 Assessed Property receives special benefit from the Improvement Area #1 Projects equal to or greater than the Actual Cost of the Improvement Area #1 Projects; ■ The Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel will be allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment levied for the Improvement Area #1 Projects, which equals $22,145,000 as shown on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll attached hereto as Exhibit G-1; ■ The special benefit ( >_ $22,172,772) received by the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel from the Improvement Area #1 Projects is equal to or greater than the ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 19 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN amount of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment ($22,145,000) levied on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel for the Improvement Area #1 Projects; and ■ At the time the City Council approved this Service and Assessment Plan, the Owner owned 100% of the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel. The Owner acknowledged that the Improvement Area #1 Projects confer a special benefit on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel and consented to the imposition of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment to pay for the Actual Costs associated therewith. The Owner ratified, confirmed, accepted, agreed to, and approved: (1) the determinations and findings by the City Council as to the special benefits described herein and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; (2) this Service and Assessment Plan and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; and (3) the levying of the Improvement Area #1 Assessment on the Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel. ■ Improvement Area #2A ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #2A Projects equal $13,742,206 as shown on Exhibit B-1; ■ The Improvement Area #2A Assessed Property receives special benefit from the Improvement Area #2A Projects equal to or greater than the Actual Cost of the Improvement Area #2A Projects; ■ The Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel will be allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #2A Assessment levied for the Improvement Area #2A Projects, which equals $11,025,000 as shown on the Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll attached hereto as Exhibit H-1; ■ The special benefit ( >_ $13,742,206) received by the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel from the Improvement Area #2A Projects is equal to or greater than the amount of the Improvement Area #2A Assessment ($11,025,000) levied on the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel for the Improvement Area #2A Projects; and ■ At the time the City Council approved this Service and Assessment Plan, the Owner owned 100% of the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel. The Owner acknowledged that the Improvement Area #2A Projects confer a special benefit on the Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel and consented to the imposition of the Improvement Area #2A Assessment to pay for the Actual Costs associated therewith. The Owner ratified, confirmed, accepted, agreed to, and approved: (1) the determinations and findings by the City Council as to the special benefits described herein and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; (2) this Service and Assessment Plan and the applicable Assessment Ordinance; and (3) the levying of the Improvement Area #2A Assessment on the Improvement Area #2A Initial ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Parcel. ■ Improvement Area #2 -Remainder Property ■ The costs of the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Projects equal $5,005,522 as shown on Exhibit B-2; ■ The Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Assessed Property receives special benefit from the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Projects equal to or greater than the Actual Cost of the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Projects; ■ The Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Initial Parcel will be allocated 100% of the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Appropriation for the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Projects, which equals $5,00S,522 as shown on Exhibit B-2, of which all or a portion of such amount is expected to be levied by the City at a later date; and ■ At the time the City Council approved this Service and Assessment Plan, the Owner owned 100% of the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Initial Parcel. The Owner acknowledged that the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Projects confer a special benefit on the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Initial Parcel and consented to the imposition of the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Appropriation in anticipation of a future levy by the City Council to pay for all or a portion of the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Appropriation of Costs of Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Projects associated therewith. The Owner ratified, confirmed, accepted, agreed to, and approved: (1) the determinations and findings by the City Council as to the special benefits described herein; (2) this Service and Assessment Plan; and (3) the Appropriation of Costs on the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property Initial Parcel. D. Annual Collection Costs The Annual Collection Costs shall be paid for annually by the owner of each Parcel pro rata based on the ratio of the amount of outstanding Assessment remaining on the Parcel to the total outstanding Assessment. The Annual Collection Costs shall be collected as part of and in the same manner as Annual Installments in the amounts shown on the Assessment Roll, which may be revised based on actual costs incurred in Annual Service Plan Updates. E. Additional Interest The interest rate on Assessments securing PID Bonds may exceed the interest rate on the PID Bonds by the Additional Interest Rate. To the extent required by any Indenture, Additional ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 21 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Interest shall be collected as part of each Annual Installment and shall be deposited pursuant to the applicable Indenture. The interest on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment securing the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation shall be collected at rates established under the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Agreement as part of the Improvement Area #1 Annual Installment. Additional Interest cannot be collected on the Improvement Area #1 Assessment securing the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation. The interest on the Improvement Area #2A Assessment securing the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation shall be collected at rates established under the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Agreement as part of the Improvement Area #2A Annual Installment. Additional Interest cannot be collected on the Improvement Area #2A Assessment securing the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation. F. TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount The City Council has agreed to use a portion of TIRZ No. 4 Revenues (the "TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount") generated from each Assessed Property to offset a portion of such property's Assessment, as applicable. 1. The Annual Installment for an Assessed Property shall receive a TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount equal to the TIRZ No. 4 Revenue generated by the Assessed Property for the previous Tax Year (e.g. TIRZ No. 4 Revenue collected from the Assessed Property for Tax Year 2022 shall be applied as the TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount applicable to the Assessed Property's Improvement Area #1 Annual Installment to be collected in Tax Year 2023), but in no event shall the TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount exceed the TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount as calculated on Exhibit F for each Assessed Property. 2. The TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount available to reduce the Annual installment for an Assessed Property is calculated for each Lot Type, as shown on Exhibit F. The TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount is calculated so that the average Annual Installment minus the TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount for each Lot Type does not produce an equivalent tax rate for such Lot Type which exceeds the competitive, composite equivalent ad valorem tax rate ($2.92 per $100 of assessed value) taking into consideration the 2022 tax rates of all applicable overlapping taxing units and the equivalent tax rate of the Annual Installments based on Estimated Buildout Values at the time each applicable Assessment Ordinance is approved or PID Bonds are issued. The resulting TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount for each Lot Type in Improvement Area #1 and Improvement Area #2A is shown below. This section shall be updated as Assessments are levied on the Improvement Area #2 — Remainder Property. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Lot Type 1: $380.96 ii. Lot Type 2: $425.26 iii. Lot Type 3: $436.11 iv. Lot Type 4: $486.82 3. After the TIRZ No. 4 Annual Credit Amount is applied to provide a credit towards a portion of the Annual Installment for the Assessed Property, any excess TIRZ No. 4 Revenues available from the TIRZ No. 4 PID Account shall be held in a segregated account by the City and shall be used in accordance with the TIRZ No. 4 Project and Finance Plan and the TIRZ No. 4 Agreement. SECTION VI: TERMS OF THE ASSESSMENTS A. Reallocation of Assessments 1. Upon Division Prior to Recording of Subdivision Plat Upon the division of any Assessed Property (without the recording of subdivision plat), the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the division among the newly divided Assessed Properties according to the following formula: A=Bx(C=D) Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly divided Assessed Property B = the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to division C = the Estimated Buildout Value of the newly divided Assessed Property D = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value for all of the newly divided Assessed Properties The calculation of the Assessment of an Assessed Property shall be performed by the Administrator and shall be based on the Estimated Buildout Value of that Assessed Property, relying on information from homebuilders, market studies, appraisals, Official Public Records of the County, and any other relevant information regarding the Assessed Property, as provided by the Owner. The Estimated Buildout Value for Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, and Lot Type 4 are shown on Exhibit E and will not change in future Annual Service Plan Updates. The calculation as confirmed by the City Council shall be conclusive. The sum of the Assessments for all newly divided Assessed Properties shall equal the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 23 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN separately for each newly divided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation. Any reallocation pursuant to this section shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. 2. Upon Subdivision by a Recorded Subdivision Plat Upon the subdivision of any Assessed Property based on a recorded subdivision plat, the Administrator shall reallocate the Assessment for the Assessed Property prior to the subdivision among the new subdivided Lots based on Estimated Buildout Value according to the following formula: A = [B x (C - D)]/E Where the terms have the following meanings: A = the Assessment for the newly subdivided Lot B = the Assessment for the Parcel prior to subdivision C = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value of all newly subdivided Lots with same Lot Type D = the sum of the Estimated Buildout Value for all of the newly subdivided Lots excluding Non-Benefitted Property E= the number of newly subdivided Lots with same Lot Type Prior to the recording of a subdivision plat, the Owner shall provide the City an Estimated Buildout Value for each Lot to be create after recording the subdivision plat as of the date of the subdivision plat is anticipated to be recorded. The calculation of the Assessment for a Lot shall be performed by the Administrator and confirmed by the City Council based on Estimated Buildout Value information provided by the Owner, homebuilders, third party consultants, and/or the Official Public Records of the County regarding the Lot. The Estimated Buildout Value for Lot Type 1, Lot Type 2, Lot Type 3, and Lot Type 4 are shown on Exhibit E and will not change in future Annual Service Plan Updates. The sum of the Assessments for all newly subdivided Lots shall not exceed the Assessment for the portion of the Assessed Property subdivided prior to subdivision. The calculation shall be made separately for each newly subdivided Assessed Property. The reallocation of an Assessment for an Assessed Property that is a homestead under Texas law may not exceed the Assessment prior to the reallocation. Any reallocation pursuant to this section shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. 3. Upon Consolidation If two or more Lots or Parcels are consolidated into a single Parcel or Lot, the ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 24 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Administrator shall allocate the Assessments against the Lots or Parcels before the consolidation to the consolidated Lot or Parcel, which allocation shall be reflected in the next Annual Service Plan Update and approved by the City Council. The Assessment for any resulting Lot may not exceed the Maximum Assessment for the applicable Lot Type and compliance may require a mandatory Prepayment of Assessments pursuant to Section VI.C. B. Mandatory Prepayment of Assessments If an Assessed Property or a portion thereof is conveyed to a party that is exempt from payment of the Assessment under applicable law, or the owner causes a Lot, Parcel or portion thereof to become Non-Benefitted Property, the owner of such Lot, Parcel or portion there of shall pay to the City the full amount of the Assessment, plus all Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs for such Assessed Property, prior to any such conveyance or act. Following payment of the foregoing costs in full, the City shall provide the owner with a recordable "Notice of PID Assessment Termination," a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit J. C. True -Up of Assessments if Maximum Assessment Exceeded at Plat Prior to the City approving a final subdivision plat, the Administrator will certify that such plat will not result in the Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type to exceed the Maximum Assessment. If the Administrator determines that the resulting Assessment per Lot for any Lot Type will exceed the Maximum Assessment for that Lot Type, then (1) the Assessment applicable to each Lot Type shall each be reduced to the Maximum Assessment, and (2) the person or entity filing the plat shall pay to the City the amount the Assessment was reduced, plus Prepayment Costs and Delinquent Collection Costs, if any, prior to the City approving the final plat. The City's approval of a plat without payment of such amounts does not eliminate the obligation of the person or entity filing the plat to pay such amounts. D. Reduction of Assessments If as a result of cost savings or the failure to construct all or a portion of an Authorized Improvement, the Actual Costs of completed Authorized Improvements are less than the Assessments, (i) in the event PID Bonds are not issued, the City Council shall reduce each Assessment on a pro rata basis such that the sum of the resulting reduced Assessments for all Assessed Property equals the reduced Actual Costs that were expended, or (ii) in the event that PID Bonds are issued, the Trustee shall apply amounts on deposit in the applicable account of the Project Fund, relating to the PID Bonds, that are not expected to be used for purposes of the Project Fund to redeem outstanding PID Bonds, unless otherwise directed by the applicable Indenture. Excess PID Bond proceeds shall be applied to redeem outstanding PID Bonds. The ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 25 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Assessments shall not, however, be reduced to an amount less than the amount required to pay all debt service requirements on all outstanding PID Bonds. The Administrator shall update (and submit to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update) the Assessment Roll and corresponding Annual Installments to reflect the reduced Assessments. E. Prepayment of Assessments The owner of any Assessed Property may pay, at any time, all or any part of an Assessment in accordance with the PID Act. Prepayment Costs, if any, may be paid from a reserve established under the applicable Indenture. If an Annual Installment has been billed, or the Annual Service Plan Update has been approved by City Council prior to the Prepayment, the Annual Installment shall be due and payable and shall be credited against the Prepayment. If an Assessment on as Assessed Property is prepaid in full, with Prepayment Costs, (1) the Administrator shall cause the Assessment to be reduced to zero on said Assessed Property and the Assessment Roll to be revised accordingly; (2) the Administrator shall prepare the revised Assessment Roll and submit such revised Assessment Roll to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update; (3) the obligation to pay the Assessment and corresponding Annual Installments shall terminate with respect to said Assessed Property; and (4) the City shall provide the owner with a recordable "Notice of PID Assessment Termination." If an Assessment on an Assessed Property is prepaid in part, with Prepayment Costs: (1) the Administrator shall cause the Assessment to be reduced on said Assessed Property and the Assessment Roll revised accordingly; (2) the Administrator shall prepare the revised Assessment Roll and submit to the City Council for review and approval as part of the next Annual Service Plan Update; and (3) the obligation to pay the Assessment will be reduced to the extent of the Prepayment made. For purposes of Prepayments, the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation is and will remain subordinated to (i) the Improvement Area #1 Bonds and (ii) any additional PID Bonds secured by a parity lien on the Improvement Area #1 Assessments issued to refinance all or a portion of the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation. For purposes of Prepayments, additional PID Bonds issued to refinance all or a portion of the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation will be on parity with the Improvement Area #1 Bonds. For purposes of Prepayments, the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation is and will remain subordinated to (i) the Improvement Area #2A Bonds and (ii) any additional PID Bonds secured by a parity lien on the Improvement Area #2A Assessments issued to refinance all or a portion of the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation. For purposes of Prepayments, additional PID Bonds issued to refinance all or a portion of the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation will be on parity with the Improvement Area #2A Bonds. ON, ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 26 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN F. Payment of Assessment in Annual Installments Assessments that are not paid in full shall be due and payable in Annual Installments. Exhibit G- 2 shows the projected Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments, and Exhibit H-2 shows the projected Improvement Area #2A Annual Installments. Annual Installments are subject to adjustment in each Annual Service Plan Update. Prior to the recording of a final subdivision plat, if any Parcel shown on the Assessment Roll is assigned multiple tax parcel identification numbers for billing and collection purposes, the Annual Installment shall be allocated pro rata based on the acreage of the property not including any Non-Benefitted Property or non -assessed property, as shown by the Collin Central Appraisal District for each tax parcel identification number. The Administrator shall prepare and submit to the City Council for its review and approval an Annual Service Plan Update to allow for the billing and collection of Annual Installments. Each Annual Service Plan Update shall include updated Assessment Rolls and updated calculations of Annual Installments. The Annual Collection Costs for a given Assessment shall be paid by the owner of each Parcel pro rata based on the ratio of the amount of outstanding Assessment remaining on the Parcel to the total outstanding Assessment. Annual Installments shall be reduced by any credits applied under an applicable Indenture, such as capitalized interest, interest earnings on account balances, and any other funds available to the Trustee for such purposes. Annual Installments shall be collected by the City in the same manner and at the same time as ad valorem taxes. Annual Installments shall be subject to the penalties, procedures, and foreclosure sale in case of delinquencies as set forth in the PID Act and in the same manner as ad valorem taxes due and owing to the City. The City Council may provide for other means of collecting Annual Installments. Assessments shall have the lien priority specified in the PID Act. Sales of the Assessed Property for nonpayment of Annual Installments shall be subject to the lien for the remaining unpaid Annual Installments against the Assessed Property, and the Assessed Property may again be sold at a judicial foreclosure sale if the purchaser fails to timely pay any of the remaining unpaid Annual Installments as they become due and payable. The City reserves the right to refund PID Bonds in accordance with applicable law, including the PID Act. In the event of a refunding, the Administrator shall recalculate the Annual Installments so that total Annual Installments will be sufficient to pay the refunding bonds, and the refunding bonds shall constitute "PID Bonds." Each Annual Installment of an Assessment, including interest on the unpaid principal of the Assessment, shall be updated annually. Each Annual Installment shall be due when billed and shall be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1 of the following year. The initial Annual Installments shall be due when billed and shall be delinquent if not paid prior to February 1, 2023. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 27 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Failure of an owner of an Assessed Property to receive an invoice for an Annual Installment on the property tax bill shall not relieve said owner of the responsibility for payment of the Assessment. Assessments, or Annual Installments thereof, that are delinquent shall incur Delinquent Collection Costs. The City may provide for other means of collecting the Annual Installments to the extent permitted by the PID Act, or other applicable law. G. Prepayment as a Result of an Eminent Domain Proceeding or Taking Subject to applicable law, if any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is taken from an owner as a result of eminent domain proceedings or if a transfer of any portion of any Parcel of Assessed Property is made to an entity with the authority to condemn all or a portion of the Assessed Property in lieu of or as a part of an eminent domain proceeding (a "Taking"), the portion of the Assessed Property that was taken or transferred (the "Taken Property") shall be reclassified as Non-Benefitted Property. For the Assessed Property that is subject to the Taking as described in the preceding paragraph, the Assessment that was levied against the Assessed Property (when it was included in the Taken Property) prior to the Taking shall remain in force against the remaining Assessed Property (the Assessed Property less the Taken Property) (the "Remaining Property"), following the reclassification of the Taken Property as Non-Benefitted Property, subject to an adjustment of the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. The owner of the Remaining Property will remain liable to pay in Annual Installments, or payable as otherwise provided by this Service and Assessment Plan, as updated, or the PID Act, the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property, subject to an adjustment in the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property after any required Prepayment as set forth below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Assessment that remains due on the Remaining Property exceeds the applicable Maximum Assessment, the owner of the Remaining Property will be required to make a Prepayment in an amount necessary to ensure that the Assessment against the Remaining Property does not exceed such Maximum Assessment, in which case the Assessment applicable to the Remaining Property will be reduced by the amount of the partial Prepayment. If the City receives all or a portion of the eminent domain proceeds (or payment made in an agreed sale in lieu of condemnation), such amount shall be credited against the amount of prepayment, with any remainder credited against the assessment on the Remainder Property. In all instances the Assessment remaining on the Remaining Property shall not exceed the applicable Maximum Assessment. By way of illustration, if an owner owns 100 acres of Assessed Property subject to a $100 Assessment and 10 acres is taken through a Taking, the 10 acres of Taken Property shall be reclassified as Non-Benefitted Property and the remaining 90 acres of Remaining Property shall ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 28 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN be subject to the $100 Assessment (provided that this $100 Assessment does not exceed the Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property). If the Administrator determines that the $100 Assessment reallocated to the Remaining Property would exceed the Maximum Assessment, as applicable, on the Remaining Property by $10, then the owner shall be required to pay $10 as a Prepayment of the Assessment against the Remaining Property and the Assessment on the Remaining Property shall be adjusted to be $90. Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, if the owner of the Taken Property notifies the City and the Administrator that the Taking prevents the Remaining Property from being developed for any use which could support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement, the owner shall, upon receipt of the compensation for the Taken Property, be required to prepay the amount of the Assessment required to buy down the outstanding Assessment to the applicable Maximum Assessment on the Remaining Property to support the Estimated Buildout Value requirement. Said owner will remain liable to pay the Annual Installments on both the Taken Property and the Remaining Property until such time that such Assessment has been prepaid in full. Notwithstanding the previous paragraphs in this subsection, the Assessments shall never be reduced to an amount less than the amount required to pay all outstanding debt service requirements on all outstanding PID Bonds. SECTION VII: ASSESSMENT ROLL The Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll is attached as Exhibit G-1. The Administrator shall prepare and submit to the City Council for review and approval proposed revisions to the Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll and Improvement Area #1 Annual Installments for each Parcel as part of each Annual Service Plan Update. The Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll is attached as Exhibit H-1. The Administrator shall prepare and submit to the City Council for review and approval proposed revisions to the Improvement Area #2AAssessment Roll and Improvement Area #2AAnnual Installments for each Parcel as part of each Annual Service Plan Update. SECTION VIII: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS A. Calculation Errors If the owner of a Parcel claims that an error has been made in any calculation required by this Service and Assessment Plan, including, but not limited to, any calculation made as part of any Annual Service Plan Update, said owner's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to submit a written notice of error to the Administrator by December 15t of the year following City Council's approval k � ON, ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 29 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN of the calculation. Otherwise, said owner shall be deemed to have unconditionally approved and accepted the calculation. The Administrator shall provide a written response to the City Council and the owner not later than 30 days of such receipt of a written notice of error by the Administrator. The City Council shall consider the owner's notice of error and the Administrator's response at a public meeting, and not later than 30 days after closing such meeting, the City Council shall make a final determination as to whether an error has been made. If the City Council determines that an error has been made, the City Council take such corrective action as is authorized by the PID Act, this Service and Assessment Plan, the applicable Assessment Ordinance, the applicable Indenture, or as otherwise authorized by the discretionary power of the City Council. The determination by the City Council as to whether an error has been made, and any corrective action taken by the City Council, shall be final and binding on the owner and the Administrator. B. Amendments Amendments to this Service and Assessment Plan must be made by the City Council in accordance with the PID Act. To the extent permitted by the PID Act, this Service and Assessment Plan may be amended without notice to owners of the Assessed Property: (1) to correct mistakes and clerical errors; (2) to clarify ambiguities; and (3) to provide procedures to collect Assessments, Annual Installments, and other charges imposed by this Service and Assessment Plan. C. Administration and Interpretation The Administrator shall: (1) perform the obligations of the Administrator as set forth in this Service and Assessment Plan; (2) administer the District for and on behalf of and at the direction of the City Council; and (3) interpret the provisions of this Service and Assessment Plan. Interpretations of this Service and Assessment Plan by the Administrator shall be in writing and shall be appealable to the City Council by owners of Assessed Property adversely affected by the interpretation. Appeals shall be decided by the City Council after holding a public meeting at which all interested parties have an opportunity to be heard. Decisions by the City Council shall be final and binding on the owners of Assessed Property and developers and their successors and assigns. D. Form of Buyer Disclosure Per Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code, as amended, this Service and Assessment Plan, and any future Annual Service Plan Updates, shall include a form of the buyer disclosures for the district. The buyer disclosures are attached hereto as Appendix B. Within seven days of approval by the city Council, the City shall file and record in the real property records of the County the executed ordinance of this Service and Assessment Plan, or any future Annual Service Plan Updates. The executed ordinance, including any attachments, approving this Service an ON, ON, ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 30 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Assessment Plan or any future Annual Service Plan Updates shall be filed and recorded in their entirety. E. Severability If any provision of this Service and Assessment Plan is determined by a governmental agency or court to be unenforceable, the unenforceable provision shall be deleted and, to the maximum extent possible, shall be rewritten to be enforceable. Every effort shall be made to enforce the remaining provisions. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 31 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBITS The following Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes: Exhibit A-1 Map of the District Exhibit A-2 Map of Improvement Area #1 Exhibit A-3 Map of Improvement Area #2 Exhibit A-4 Map of Improvement Area #2A Exhibit A-5 Map of Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Exhibit B-1 Authorized Improvements Exhibit C Service Plan Exhibit D Sources and Uses of Funds Exhibit E Maximum Assessment and Tax Rate Equivalent Exhibit F TIRZ No. 4 Maximum Annual Credit Amount Exhibit G-1 Improvement Area #1 Assessment Roll Exhibit G-2 Improvement Area #1 Projected Annual Installments Exhibit H-1 Improvement Area #2A Assessment Roll Exhibit H-2 Improvement Area #2A Projected Annual Installments Exhibit 1-1 Maps of Improvement Area #1 Improvements Exhibit 1-2 Maps of Improvement Area #2 Improvements Exhibit 1-3 Maps of Improvement Area #2A Improvements Exhibit J Form of Notice of PID Assessment Termination Exhibit K-1 District Legal Description Exhibit K-2 Improvement Area #1 Legal Description Exhibit K-3 Improvement Area #2 Legal Description Exhibit K-4 Improvement Area #2A Legal Description Exhibit K-5 Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Legal Description ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDICES The following Appendices are attached to and made a part of this Service and Assessment Plan for all purposes: Appendix A Engineer's Report Appendix B Buyer Disclosures ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 33 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-1- MAP OF THE DISTRICT u wrew�t. T 1 r r • xrr - MW ►enrc.ww w � .. ■ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 34 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-2 - MAP OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 L � 1 F.T.DkffAl atwEr 9 h 9 i I I I ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 35 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-3 — MAP OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 4 ; Eff # :UP..}E _t 1 A TiaTA6.7 a �. eJ W VfWr S �r saes ++�dR ixarr oea ,ti ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 36 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-4 - MAP OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A W1— -- ! C 1111 � � 1 I II I u — e W _WI ;WI "If III II�II11 II■WI IIII■I � � Ijjl� �_ [IIRf i! — I I WI � WAl !1IR W r= j T— [Developer to provide updated maps.] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 37 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT A-5 - MAP OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 - REMAINDER PROPERTY VW � Y ■ 1r i�n G — iur [Developer to provide updated maps.] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 38 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT B-1- AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Non -Assessed Improvement Area #11 Improvement Area #2A Improvement Area #2 - PropertY2 Remainder Property Improvement Area #1 Improvements Roadway Improvements $ 6,043,595 $ 460,226 $ $ 5,583,370 100.00% $ 5,583,370 0.00% $ 0.00% $ Water Systems 1,969,400 88,557 1,880,843 100.00% 1,880,843 0.00% 0.00% Sanitary Sewer 1,447,746 - 1,447,746 100.00% 1,447,746 0.00% 0.00% Storm Sewer 3,312,295 93,304 3,218,991 100.00% 3,218,991 0.00% 0.00% Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape 1,632,574 233,970 1,398,604 100.00% 1,398,604 0.00% 0.00% Soft Co5t54 5,289,506 290,938 4,998,569 100.00% 4,998,569 0.00% 0.00% $ 19,695,116 $ 1,166,994 $ $ 18,528,122 $ 18,528,122 $ $ Improvement Area #2A Improvements Roadway Improvements $ 4,149,405 $ - $ $ 4,149,405 0.00% $ 100.00% $ 4,149,405 0.00% $ Water Systems 921,494 921,494 0.00% 100.00% 921,494 0.00% Sanitary Sewer 767,152 767,152 0.00% 100.00% 767,152 0.00% Storm Sewer 841,028 841,028 0.00% 100.00% 841,028 0.00% Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape 592,655 592,655 0.00% 100.00% 592,655 0.00% Soft Costs4 2,447,957 2,447,957 0.00% 100.00% 2,447,957 0.00% $ 9,719,692 $ - $ $ 9,719,692 $ $ 9,719,692 $ - Improvement Area #2 Improvements 3 Roadway Improvements $ 1,211,323 $ 178,791 $ $ 1,032,532 0.00% $ 30.39% $ 313,829 69.61% $ 718,703 Water Systems $ 599,434 $ 88,476 510,957 0.00% 30.39% 155,301 69.61% 355,656 Sanitary Sewer $ 2,478,104 $ 365,768 2,112,336 0.00% 30.39% 642,026 69.61% 1,470,309 Storm Sewer $ 1,415,844 $ 208,979 1,206,865 0.00% 30.39% 366,816 69.61% 840,049 Site Fencing, Retaining Walls, Landscape $ 1,145,165 $ 169,026 976,139 0.00% 30.39% 296,689 69.61% 679,450 Soft Costs4 $ 1,586,589 $ 234,180 1,352,408 0.00% 30.39% 411,053 69.61% 941,355 $ 8,436,458 $ 1,245,221 $ - $ 7,191,237 $ $ 2,185,714 $ 5,005,522 Private Improvements Private Improvements $ 5,574,053 $ - $ 5,574,053 $ 0.00% $ 0.00% $ - 0.00% $ - $ 5,574,053 $ $ 5,574,053 $ - $ $ - $ Bond Issuance Costs Debt Service Reserve Fund $ 2,415,700 $ $ - $ 2,415,700 $ 1,611,600 $ 804,100 $ Capitalized Interest - - - - Underwriter's Discount 663,500 663,500 442,900 220,600 Underwriter's Counsel 331,750 331,750 221,450 110,300 Cost of Issuance 1,990,500 1,990,500 1,328,700 661,800 $ 5,401,450 $ $ $ 5,401,450 $ 3,604,650 $ 1,796,800 $ Other Costs Deposit to Administrative Fund 80,000 80,000 40,000 40,000 $ 80,000 $ $ $ 80,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ - Total $ 48,906,768 $ 2,412,215 $ 5,574,053 $ 40,920,501 $ 22,172,772 $ 13,742,206 $ 5,005,522 Footnotes: (1) Costs based on Engineer's Report, attached hereto as Appendix A. (2) Non -Assessed Property allocated 14.76% of Improvement Area #1 Improvements that benefit the Non -Assessed Property ($7,906,461 * 14.76% = $1,166,994); and 14.76% of all Improvement Area #2 Improvements ($8,436,458 * 14.76%= $1,245,221) based on Estimated Buildout Value. (3) Allocation of Improvement Area #2 Improvements based on Estimated Buildout Value. (4) Soft Costs includes Soft Costs and Contingency as detailed in the Engineer's Report. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 39 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT B-2 - APPROPRIATION OF COSTS OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Footnotes: (1) Reimbursable in part or in full from future Assessments levied in the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property. (2) The costs of Improvement Area #2 Improvements appropriated to the Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property are calculated based on Estimated Buildout Value. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 40 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C - SERVICE PLAN Principal $ 555,538.41 $ 586,370.79 $ 618,914.37 $ 653,264.11 $ 689,520.27 Interest 1,229,047.50 1,198,215.12 1,165,671.54 1,131,321.79 1,095,065.63 (1) $ 1,784,585.91 $ 1,784,585.91 $ 1,784,585.91 $ 1,784,585.91 $ 1,784,585.91 Annual Collection Costs (2) $ 40,000.00 $ 40,800.00 $ 41,616.00 $ 42,448.32 $ 43,297.29 Additional Interest' (3) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Annual Installment (4) _ (1) + (2) + (3) $ 1,824,585.91 $ 1,825,385.91 $ 1,826,201.91 $ 1,827,034.23 $ 1,827,883.19 Improvement Principal $ 276,577.60 $ 291,927.66 $ 308,129.64 $ 325,230.84 $ 343,281.15 Interest 611,887.50 596,537.44 580,335.46 563,234.26 545,183.95 (1) $ 888,465.10 $ 888,465.10 $ 888,465.10 $ 888,465.10 $ 888,465.10 Annual Collection Costs (2) $ 40,000.00 $ 40,800.00 $ 41,616.00 $ 42,448.32 $ 43,297.29 Additional Interest' (3) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Annual Installment (4) _ (1) + (2) + (3) $ 928,465.10 $ 929,265.10 $ 930,081.10 $ 930,913.42 $ 931,762.39 Footnotes: (1) Additional Interest will not be charged on the Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation, or the Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation. In the event PID Bonds are issued, the Service Plan and Assessment Roll shall be updated to reflect the Additional Interest collected for the PID Bonds. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 41 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT D - SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Improvement Area #1 Reimbursement Obligation Improvement Area #1 Owner Contribution' Improvement Area #2A Reimbursement Obligation Improvement Area #2A Owner Contribution' Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property Owner Contribution Owner Contribution - Non -Assessed Property1,3 Owner Contribution - Private Improvements' Total Sources Improvement Area #1 Improvements Improvement Area #2A Improvements Improvement Area #2 Improvements Private Improvements Bond Issuance Costs 4 Debt Service Reserve Fund Capitalized Interest Underwriter's Discount Underwriter's Counsel Cost of Issuance Other Costs 4 Deposit to Administrative Fund Total Uses Footnotes: $ - $ 22,145,000 $ - $ - - 27,772 - - - - 11,025,000 - - - 2,717,206 - - - - 5,005,522 2,412, 215 - - - 5,574,053 - - - $ 7,986,268 $ 22,172,772 $ 13,742,206 $ 5,005,522 Uses $ of Funds 1,166,994 $ 18,528,122 $ - $ - - - 9,719,692 - 1,245,221 - 2,185,714 5,005,522 5,574,053 - - - $ 7,986,268 $ 18,528,122 $ 11,905,406 $ 5,005,522 $ - $ 1,611,600 $ 804,100 $ - - 442,900 220,600 - 221,450 110,300 - - 1,328,700 661,800 - $ - $ 3,604,650 $ 1,796,800 $ - - 40,000 40,000 - $ - $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ - $ 7,986,268 $ 22,172,772 $ 13,742,206 $ 5,005,522 (1) Non -reimbursable to Owner from Assessments. (2) Reimbursable in part or in full to Owner from levy of Assessments in Improvement Area #2 - Remainder Property. (3) Non -Assessed Property allocated 14.76% of Improvement Area #1 Improvements that benefit the Non -Assessed Property ($7,906,461 * 14.76% = $1,166,994); and 14.76% of all Improvement Area #2 Improvements ($8,436,458 * 14.76% = $1,245,221) based on Estimated Buildout Value. Such Improvements to be funded by Owner Contribution for Non -Assessed Property. (4) Preliminary estimate only, to be updated if PID Bonds are issued. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 42 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT E - MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT AND TAX RATE EQUIVALENT Estimated Buildout Valugamnt Average Installment Annual Lot Type Units'Per Unit Total Per Unit Total Per Unit TotalGross TRE Improvement Area #1 Lot Type 1 (40') 174 $ 430,000 $ 74,820,000 $ 45,100 $ 7,847,347 $ 3,137 $ 545,801 $ 0.7295 Lot Type 2 (50') 284 $ 480,000 $ 136,320,000 $ 50,344 $ 14,297,653 $ 3,502 $ 994,435 $ 0.7295 Improvement Area #1 Subtotal 458 $ 211,140,000 $ 22,145,000 $ 1,540,236 Improvement Area #2A Lot Type 3 (40') 136 $ 430,000 $ 58,480,000 $ 44,323 $ 6,027,880 $ 3,192 $ 434,104 $ 0.7423 Lot Type 4 (50') 101 $ 480,000 $ 48,480,000 $ 49,476 $ 4,997,120 $ 3,563 $ 359,872 $ 0.7423 Improvement Area #2A Subtotal 237 $ 106,960,000 $ 11,025,000 $ 793,976 Total 695 $ 318,100,000 $ 33,170,000 Footnotes: (1) Per information provided by the Owner. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 43 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT F - TIRZ NO. 4 MAXIMUM ANNUAL CREDIT AMOUNT low TIRZ .- Maximum Annual Credit Net Tax Lot Type Improvement Area #1 Units' Gross TRE Amount Net TRE Stack Lot Type 1 (40') 174 $ 0.7295 $ (380.96) $ 0.6409 $ 2.9200 Lot Type 2 (50') 284 $ 0.7295 $ (425.26) $ 0.6409 $ 2.9200 Improvement Area #1 Subtotal 458 $ (187,059) Improvement Area #2A Lot Type 3 (40') 136 $ 0.7423 $ (436.11) $ 0.6409 $ 2.9200 Lot Type 4 (50') 101 $ 0.7423 $ (486.82) $ 0.6409 $ 2.9200 Improvement Area #2A Subtotal 237 $ (108,479) Footnotes: (1) Per information provided by the Owner. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 44 EXHIBIT G-1- IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 ASSESSMENT ROLL Footnotes: (1) The entire Improvement Area #1 is contained within Property ID 2770352. For billing purposes, the Annual Installment due 1/31/2023 shall be allocated pro rata based on acreage. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 45 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT G-2 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 PROJECTED ANNUAL INSTALLMENT 2023 555,538.41 1,229,047.50 40,000.00 1,824,585.91 2024 586,370.79 1,198,215.12 40,800.00 1,825,385.91 2025 618,914.37 1,165,671.54 41,616.00 1,826,201.91 2026 653,264.11 1,131,321.79 42,448.32 1,827,034.23 2027 689,520.27 1,095,065.63 43,297.29 1,827,883.19 2028 369,660.42 1,056,797.26 44,163.23 1,470,620.91 2029 390,176.57 1,036,281.11 45,046.50 1,471,504.17 2030 411,831.37 1,014,626.31 45,947.43 1,472,405.10 2031 434,688.01 991,769.67 46,866.38 1,473,324.05 2032 458,813.20 967,644.48 47,803.70 1,474,261.38 2033 484,277.33 942,180.35 48,759.78 1,475,217.45 2034 511,154.72 915,302.96 49,734.97 1,476,192.65 2035 539,523.81 886,933.87 50,729.67 1,477,187.35 2036 569,467.38 856,990.30 51,744.27 1,478,201.94 2037 601,072.82 825,384.86 52,779.15 1,479,236.83 2038 634,432.36 792,025.32 53,834.73 1,480,292.41 2039 669,643.35 756,814.32 54,911.43 1,481,369.10 2040 706,808.56 719,649.12 56,009.66 1,482,467.33 2041 746,036.44 680,421.24 57,129.85 1,483,587.53 2042 787,441.46 639,016.22 58,272.45 1,484,730.12 2043 831,144.46 595,313.22 59,437.90 1,485,895.57 2044 877,272.98 549,184.70 60,626.65 1,487,084.33 2045 925,961.63 500,496.05 61,839.19 1,488,296.86 2046 977,352.50 449,105.18 63,075.97 1,489,533.65 2047 1,031,595.56 394,862.12 64,337.49 1,490,795.17 2048 1,088,849.11 337,608.56 65,624.24 1,492,081.92 2049 1,149,280.24 277,177.44 66,936.72 1,493,394.40 2050 1,213,065.29 213,392.38 68,275.46 1,494,733.14 2051 1,280,390.42 146,067.26 69,640.97 1,496,098.64 2052 1,351,452.09 75,005.59 71,033.79 1,497,491.46 Total $ 22,145,000.00 $ 22,439,371.44 $1,622,723.17 $ 46,207,094.61 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 46 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT H-1- IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A ASSESSMENT ROLL Footnotes: (1) The entire Improvement Area #2A is contained within Property ID 2759616, and 2759795. For billing purposes, the Annual Installment due 1/31/2023 shall be allocated pro rata based on acreage. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 47 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT H-2 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A PROJECTED ANNUAL INSTALLMENT 2023 276,577.60 611,887.50 40,000.00 928,465.10 2024 291,927.66 596,537.44 40,800.00 929,265.10 2025 308,129.64 580,335.46 41,616.00 930,081.10 2026 325,230.84 563,234.26 42,448.32 930,913.42 2027 343,281.15 545,183.95 43,297.29 931,762.39 2028 184,037.30 526,131.85 44,163.23 754,332.38 2029 194,251.37 515,917.78 45,046.50 755,215.65 2030 205,032.33 505,136.83 45,947.43 756,116.58 2031 216,411.62 493,757.53 46,866.38 757,035.53 2032 228,422.46 481,746.69 47,803.70 757,972.86 2033 241,099.91 469,069.24 48,759.78 758,928.93 2034 254,480.96 455,688.20 49,734.97 759,904.12 2035 268,604.65 441,564.50 50,729.67 760,898.82 2036 283,512.21 426,656.94 51,744.27 761,913.42 2037 299,247.14 410,922.02 52,779.15 762,948.30 2038 315,855.35 394,313.80 53,834.73 764,003.89 2039 333,385.32 376,783.83 54,911.43 765,080.58 2040 351,888.21 358,280.94 56,009.66 766,178.81 2041 371,418.00 338,751.15 57,129.85 767,299.00 2042 392,031.70 318,137.45 58,272.45 768,441.60 2043 413,789.46 296,379.69 59,437.90 769,607.05 2044 436,754.78 273,414.37 60,626.65 770,795.81 2045 460,994.67 249,174.48 61,839.19 772,008.34 2046 486,579.87 223,589.28 63,075.97 773,245.12 2047 513,585.06 196,584.10 64,337.49 774,506.64 2048 542,089.03 168,080.13 65,624.24 775,793.39 2049 572,174.97 137,994.19 66,936.72 777,105.88 2050 603,930.68 106,238.47 68,275.46 778,444.61 2051 637,448.83 72,720.32 69,640.97 779,810.12 2052 672,827.24 37,341.91 71,033.79 781,202.94 Total S 11.025.000.00 S 11.171.554.31 S 1.622.723.17 S 23.819.277.47 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 48 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 1-1- MAPS OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 IMPROVEMENTS PID EXHIBIT - ANACAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS WATER -SOUTH in the F.T. ❑AFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2$8 CITY OF ANNA 4 COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS f11 lriCHr {M1bek tlV! mm fm �.1R� =FF 3 DRAW-N BY: SM DATE: 08/03/22 SCA _:1_ — 5DD' JOB. N0.202137007 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 49 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 50 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 51 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 52 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 53 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 54 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANAAPFI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS LANDSCAPE -SOUTH in the F.T. DAFFAIJ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 288 CITY OF ANNA 4 COLUN COUNTY, TEXAS 177 hiiYCKf Uwkidk%l MU ,Z.ri� 7xy �70.fM� l'7� ��'yy ** �� �� LiTLJ./1'l M �!C'10tr21ML�id1i1l� ` ^F DRAWN Bv.'3MDATE: M8f03f2022 SCALE:1" wMO' OB. 02021?1l0078 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 55 EXHIBIT 1-2 - MAPS OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 IMPROVEMENTS I r 288 CITY OF ANNA OOLUN COUNTY, TEXAS - HRAWN BY: BS DATE: 08 f 03/2022 SCALE:1' - 500' JOB. NO.MEH22002 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 56 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANACAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER - NORTH TH in the F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA OOLUN COUNTY, TEXAS k-1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 58 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN I I I I I I � I I 40, PID EXHIBIT MASTER IMPROVEMENT SANITARY - MIDDLE in the F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 88 CITY OF ANNA w OOLUN COUNTY, TEXAS = ice, 11rJeYpRr �� 1WY ipF qq16 ��7� f0.� . s e�w, Y - NDPFI ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 59 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI IMPROVEMENT =1►Ikf 1 in the :AU SURVEY, ABSTRACT CITY OF ANNA OOLUN COUNTY, TEXAS NO. 288 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 60 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANAAPFI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS ��dl=Id4:mill [0]:i0:� in the F.T. DAFFAIJ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 288 CITY OF ANNA OOLUN COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 61 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 1-3 - MAPS OF IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A IMPROVEMENTS PID EXHIBIT - ANACAPRI PHASE II - DIRECT COST WATER - NORTH in the F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA COLON COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 62 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANAAPFI 5 11M=cob OI* l&I SANITARY in the F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA COLON COUNTY, TEXAS ell ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 63 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANAAPFI 59110*Ai STORM SEWER - NORTH in the F.T. DA,FFA,IJ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA COLON COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 64 FBI r III Lim F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA COLON COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 65 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CEXHIBIT J — FORM OF NOTICE OF PID ASSESSMENT TERMINATION P3Works, LLC 9284 Huntington Square, Suite 100 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 [Date] Collin County Clerk's Office Honorable [County Clerk] Collin County Administration Building 2300 Bloomdale Rd, Suite 2106 McKinney, TX 75071 Re: City of Anna Lien Release documents for filing Dear Ms./Mr. [County Clerk] Enclosed is a lien release that the City of Anna is requesting to be filed in your office. Lien release for [insert legal description]. Recording Numbers: [Plat]. Please forward copies of the filed documents to my attention: City of Anna Attn: City Secretary 120 W. 7th Street Anna, TX 75409 Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, [Signature] P3Works, LLC (817)393-0353 Admin&P3-Works.com www.P3-Works.com ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 66 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: [City Secretary Name] 120 W. 7t1 Street Anna, TX 75409 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. FULL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LIEN STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF COLLIN § THIS FULL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LIEN (this "Full Release") is executed and delivered as of the Effective Date by the City of Anna, Texas, a Texas home rule municipality (the "City"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the governing body (hereinafter referred to as the "City Council") of the City of Anna, Texas is authorized by Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), to create public improvement districts within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022 the City Council of the City approved Resolution No. 2022-04-1140 creating the AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the District consists of approximately 279.554 contiguous acres within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, on , the City Council, approved Ordinance No. , (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment Ordinance") approving a service and assessment plan and assessment roll for the real property located with the District, the Assessment Ordinance being recorded on , as Instrument No. in the Official Public Records of Collin County, TX; and WHEREAS, the Assessment Ordinance imposed an assessment in the amount of [amount] (hereinafter referred to as the "Lien Amount") and further imposed a lien to secure the payment of the Lien Amount (the "Lien") against the following property located within the District, to wit: ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 67 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN [legal description], an addition to the City of [City], [County], Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded as Instrument No. in the Map Records of Collin County, Texas (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Lien Amount has been paid in full. RELEASE NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the full payment of the Lien Amount, the City/County hereby releases and discharges, and by these presents does hereby release and discharge, the Lien to the extent that is affects and encumbers the Property. EXECUTED to be EFFECTIVE this the day of , 20_ CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, A Texas home rule municipality, By: [Manager Name], City Manager ATTEST: [Secretary Name], City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 20_, by [City Manager], City Manager for the City of Anna, Texas, a Texas home rule municipality, on behalf of said municipality. Notaiy Public, State of Texas ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 68 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CEXHIBIT K-1— DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.1.Gt; k1. DESCIUPTION OF THE PROPFRTTY' Tract 1 0.682 Ac all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, situated in the Martin Moore Survey, Abstract Number 649 Collin County, Texas, and being hart of that certain tract of land described by deed to Kayasa Holdings LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20190807000946750, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows, COMMENCING at 5/W capped reharfound stamped "UA Surveying, at the northeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Bloomfield Homes LP, recorded in Instrument Number 20200117000076380, Real Property Records, Collet County, Texas, and being the northwest comer of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Oakwood Village Apartments Inc., recorded in Insbu meat Number 20171241001594200, Real Property records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the south line of that certain tract of land described by deed to QJR Partnership LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 20020214000237330, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas; THENa 5 89'14'43" E, with the north line of said Oakwood Village Apartments trad, and the south Ilne of said OJR tract, a distance of 33.88 feet to a 1" rebar found at the southeast comer thereof, and being on the west line of said Kayasn Holdings tract; THENCE N Or16'34" E, with the common line of said Kayasa Holdings tract, and said OJR tract, a distance of 745.53 feet to a point, from which a 5/8' capped rebar found at the northeast corner thereof bears N 01'16'34" E, a distance of 279.03 feet; THENCE Southeasterly with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1260.00 feet, a astral angle of 14'39'56", an arc length of 32251 feet, and whose chord bears 506-2W13� E, a distance of 321.63 feet* THENCE S 00'53'45" W, a distance of460.27 fee to the common line of said Oakwood Village apartments tract, and said Kayasa Holdings tract; THENCE with the common line of said Oakwood Tillage Apartments tract, and said Kayasa Holdings tract, the following: S 87'53'54" W, a distance of 46.30 beet to a 5f 8" rebar found; N Or16'34" E, a distance of 36.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and cozlWning approximately 0.62 acres ofland- ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 69 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Tract 2 2.10Z AC all that certain lot, tract or pwml of land, situated in the John Ellett Survey, Abstract Number 296, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract of land described by deed to QJR Partnership LTD, recorded in Instrument Plumber 20020214000237330, Real Property fords, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 518" capped r2bar found stamped "U►lSurveying", at the northeastcarner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Bloomfield Horner LP, recorded in Instrument Number 20200117000076180, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the northwest corner of a *erWn tract of land, described by deed to Oakwood Village Apartments Inc., recorded in [Instrument Plumber 2.01712010015942.00, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the south line of said QJR tract; THENCE N 88154'1.8" W, with the south line of Laid QJR tract, and the north line of said Bloomfield tract, adisUnce of40.12 feet; THENCE ;Northwesterly, with the arc of curve to the left, having a radius of 1140.00 feet, a central angle of 15'38'20", and an are length of 3111-16 feet, whose chord lbears N 05'55'26' 1N, 310.20 feet; 'IF HENCE Norkhvmoe•rly, with the an of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1260.00 feet, a flcrmal angle of 1r12'4r, an arc length of 290,53 feet, whose chard bears N 08'W15' W, 299,99 feet to the north line of said QJR tract, and the south line of that certain tract of land, described by deed to DR Marton -Texas LTD, recorded in [rest imimt Number 2.021021200031{1470, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas: THENCE N 8723'38" I_ with the north line of said QJR. tract, and tht south line of said DR Horton -Texas LTD, a dWance of 120.02 feet, from which a 51r capped re bar found at the ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 70 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN southeast corner thereof, being the northeast corner of said QJR tract, and being on the west line of that certain tract of land dewri bed by deed to Kayasa Holdings LLC, recorded in Instnanont Number 20190807000946750. Rcal Property Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE Southeasterly with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of It 40.00 feet, a central angle of 13"05'50", an arc length of 260.93 feet, anti whose chord hears S 08'11'11" E, a distance of 260.36 feet; THENCE Southeasterly with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1260.00 feet; a central angle of00"58`25", an arc length of 21.41 feet, and whose chord bears S 14'15'23"' E, distance of 21,41 feet to the commons line of said QJR tract and said Kayasa Holdings tract; THENCE 5 01°16'34" W, with the common line of said QJR tract and said Kayasa Holdings tract, a distance of 745.53 feet to the POINT OF aEGINNING and containing approximately 2.192 acres of land- 2 Tract 3 2.909 Ac all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, situated in the Eli W_ Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, Collin County, Texas and being part of that certain tract of land, described by deed to DR 1loi'tonTexas LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 202102120bb314470, Reai Property Records, Collin County. Texas, and being more particularly described as follows, COMMENCING at a 5/8" capped rebar found stamped "UA Surveying', at the northeast comer of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Bloomfield Hornes LP, recorded in instrument Number 20200117000076380, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the northwest corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Oakwood Village apartments Inc., recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the south line of that certain t wt of land described by deed too QJR Partnership LTD, recorded in Insh men t Number 20020214000237330, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE 5 89'14'4F E, with the north line of said Oakwood Village Apartments track, and said ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 71 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN OJR tract, a distance of 33.88 feet to a 1" rebar found at the southeast corner thereof, and being on the west line of that oertain tract of land described by deed to Kayasa HoIdings LL , recorded in instrument Number 20190807000R46754, Real Property Reoards, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 01415'34" E, with the common [Ina of said Kayasa tract, and Said Q,IR tract, a dlstanre of 1024,56 feet to a 5f 9" capped rebar found at the northeast comer thereof, and being the southeast comer of said DR Horton -Texas tract; THENCE S B9"23'38" W, with the common line of said OJR tract, and said OR Horton -Texas tract, a distance of4S_56 feet to the POINT OF REGMNIN ; THENCE 5 89"23'38" W, with the common line of said QJR tract, grid said 0R Horton -Texas tract, a distance of 120.02 feet; THENCE over, across and through said DR Horton -Texas tract the following; Northwesterly with the arc of a ctuve to the right, having a radius of 1260.00 fee, a oentW angle of O2"48'W, an arc length of 51,75 feet, and whose chord bears N 00`OT41" W, a distance of 61.74 feet; N 01015'34", a distance of 478,02 feet; Nortbeasterly with the are of a curve to the left, having a radim of 1144.00 feet, a central angle of 0159"W, an arc lengthy of 39.51 feet, and whose chord bears N WITOO" E, a distance of 39_50 ffet; N 00+42'34" W, a distance of475.25 feet; Northeasterly with the arc of a curvc to the right, hawing a radius of 11 _00 foot, a central angle of 03"35'22", an ere length of 71.42 feet, and whose chord bears N 89'04'31" E, a distance of 71.41 feet; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 72 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 5 89'07'47' E, a distance of 48,61 feet, from which a 1/2" capped rebar found stamped 'JBI' at an outer ell comer of said DR Horton -Texas tract bears N 49°15'11" E, a distance of 90.49 feet, S 00"42'34" E, a distance of 475.25 feet; Southwestcrly with the arc of curve to the right, having a radius of 1260.00 feet, a central angle of 01'59'or, an arc length of 43.66 feet, and whose chard bears 5 00'1700" W, a distance of 43,66; 5 01" 16'34" W, a d ista n ce of 478.02 feet; Southeasterly with the are of a curve to the left, having a radius of 1140,00 feet, a central angle of 02'54'19", an arc length of 57_81 feet, and whose chord bears 5 00'10W E, a distance of 5710 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 2.909 acres of land, LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract 4 0.590 AC BEING all that mtairt lot. tact or parcel of land, situated in the Eli V Witt Sumey, Abstract Number 997, Collin County, Texas and being part of that oertain tract of land, described by deed Anna Texas Land Ltd, recorded in 20140'71900 50570, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1I2" capped rebar W stamped "MCAI}A SR at the northwest ,corner of said Anna Texas Laud tract, and being on the east Line of that certain bract of lard described by deed to DR Hortm-Texu LTD, recorded in lnshumentNumber 20210212000310470, Rml property Records, Coffin County, Texas msd be-ing the southwest corner of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Anacapri Laguna A2ure, LL , re "4ed in 20210319001679920, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 73 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE S 88024'07" E, with the comnxm tine of aid Anna Terms Lid tract, and said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, a distance of 40.15 feet; THENCE S 00°34'0' E, a distance of 641.93 feet; THENCE N 8 °07'47'tr W, a distance of 20.19 feet; THENCE Northwesterly with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 1260.00 feet a central angle of 000545", an arc length of 19.82 feet, and whost chord bears N 89034'50" W, a distance of A92 feet to the common line of said Anna Texas Land tract, and said OR Horton - Texas tract, from which a 1/2" capped =bar found stamped "J$I" at a southwest comer of said Anna Texas Land tract bears S 00"34'00" E, a distance of 20.17 feet; THENCE N 0V34TD" W, with the common line of said Aetna Texas Land tract. and said DR Horton -Texas tract, a distance of 642 M feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and contaiT ing approximately 0.590 acres of land. IAMESFA� STOWELL 1/28 -022 LEGAL DESCRIRTION Tract 5 1.290 AC BEING ail that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, situated in the Eli W, Witt Sumey, Abstract Nwnber 997, Collin County, Texas and being part of that certain tract of land, described by deed to DR HortonTexaLs LTD, recorded in Instrument Nwnber 20210212000310470,1'1.ea1 Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1f2" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS' on the east lime of said Dl- Horton -Texas tract, and being the southwest corner of that certain tract of land, described m deed to Anaeapri La Ana Amm, Li . recorded in 20210819001679920, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being tht northwest wrnelr of that certain tract of land, d nbed in deed to Anna Texas Land Ltd, recorded in 20140719000750570, Read Property Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 00034'44'" E, with the eommon line of said Anita Tcxaa Land tract, and said DR Horton -Texas tract, a distance of 642.60 feet to a point, from which a 112' capped rebar found stamped "JBI" at the southwest comer of the aforementioned Anna Texas Land tract bears S ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 74 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 00°34'OO" E, a distance of 20.17 feet; THENCE Southwesterly with the an of a curve to the left having radius of 1260.00 feet, a cmtral angle of 01 °49109", an are. length of 40.00 feet, and whasc chord bears S 89T3'34" W, a distance of 40.00 feet; THENCE IN W34'00" W, a distance of 1404.42 feet to a noTQh I ine of said DR Horton -Texas tract, and being on a southwest line of said Anacapri Laguna Awe tract-, THENCE N $8 W56" E, with the common line of said DR Horton -Texas tract, and said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, a distance of 40.01 feet., to a 1 Y2" capped rebar found at a northeasterly oorner thereof; THENCE S 00°34'OO" E, with the common line of said DR Horton -Texas tract, and said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, a distance of 762.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 1.290 acres of land, C? p isrFE 4 ,off_ � �•c15 JAMES A_ S70WELL ..,..».•••8513•�.,r� 1 L12812022 PID LEGAL DESCRIPTION 97.716 Acres Phase IAA, IB, IC BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the R Daffau Survey, Abstract Number 298, Collin Oomly, Texas, and being part that certain called t 11.666 acre tract of land, described in deed to Oakwood Village Aparnnents, recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, OffwW Public Records, Cola County, Texas, and being part of that certain 60.549 acre tract of land, de ribed in deed to Tina-J Parinen, recorded in lmgrment Nwnber 20080509000562490, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain called 51.195 acre tract of land described in deed to Two-J Parftim recorded in Instrument Number 20080509000562500, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, BEGINNING at a V pipe found at the northeast Corner of said 60.549 acre tract, being the approximate northeast coiner of said Daffau Survey, being the northwest corner of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Jose Facundo and wife, Josef= O. Facundo, recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being on the south line of County Road 370, and the south line of a variable width right -of --way dedication, as dedicated by ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 75 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN plat of Anna High School Addition, an addition to the City of Anm, according to the plat thereof, recorded in lnstrua=t Number 2011-177, Plat Records, Collin (county, Texas; THENCE 5 `31'10" W, with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract;, and the west line of said Facundo tract, a distance of 246.52 feet to a 3/8' rehar found at the southwest comer thereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 9, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Aluruber 2020-243, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE s 00"27'59" W, +n th the east line of said 111.666 acre tract;, and the wrest ling of said West Crossing Phase 9, passing the southwest corner thereof, and being the nortkrwcst corr►er of West Crossing Phase 7, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, rerded in Instrument Number 2018-609, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, continuing with the west line thereof, a total distance of 1574.DS feet to a 1f2" capped rebarset stamped "McAdams?' at the southwest comer thereof, and being the riorthwest corner of'4 eat Crwaing Phase 5, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in [art Slumber 2016-554, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE 5 00"24'48" W, with the east line of.5aid 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said West Grossing Phase 5, a distance of 868_25 feet to a 112' capped rehar found stamped "13I" at the southeast corner ofthe aforementioned 111.666 acre tracts and being the southwest corner of a 40' right -*[<way dedication, as shown on said West Crossing Phase 5, and being on the north line of Hackberry Drive as dedicated by plat of Avery Pointe Phase 1, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Lnstnntnent Number 2016-454, Plot Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 89"08'24" W, with the south line of said 111.666 acre tract~, and the north line of said Hackberry Drive, a distance of 988.77 feet to a 112" capped rehar found stamped "JBI" at the co m mon south corner of said Two-J Partners tracts of land; THENCE N ST49'39'" LSD, with the south line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the north line of said Hackberry Drive,, a distance of 316.19 feet to a 1j2" capped rehar set stamped "MIcAdams", from wh Ich the southwest comer of said 111,666 acre tract, acid the southeast comer ofthat certain tract of land, described in deed to QJR Partnership, Ltd, recorded in Volume 5106, Page 2380, heed Records, Collin County, Texas, bears N 138"49'39f' W, a distance of535.51 feet, from which a 1/2" rehar found disturbed bears S W31' E, 0,5 flat; TH EN CE aver, across, and through said 111.666 acre tract, the fallowing: N 00'00'00" E, a distance of 398.32feet to a 1J2" capped rehar set starnped "McAdams" at a Point of curvature, of a curve to the left; Northwesterly with the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 1200M feet, a omtml angle of 30"27'50", an are length of 638,03 feet, and whose chord bears N 15013'55" W, a distance of 530.55 feet to a 1/2" capped rpbar set stamped " McAdams"; N 3W27'50" W, a distance of 391.27 feet to a 1/2" capped rehar set stamped 'McAd a ms" A a paint of curvature, of a curve to the right; Nortbwestffly, with the arc of said curve to the n ght, having a radius of 1000,00 feet, a central angle of 31"21'W, an arc length of 547.S3 feet, and whose chord bears N 14"47'03" W, a ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 76 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN dlstante of 540,52 feet to a 1f2u capped rebar set stamped'McAdam5'; 89"26'24" W, a distance of 15.28 feet to the west line of said 111.666 acre tract and to the east line of that certain tract of land, described in deed to QJR Partnership, Ltd, recorded in Volume 5106, Page 2380, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 00"33'36" E, with the west line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the east line of said QJR Partnership tract, a distance of 784.11 feet to a 5f8" capped rebar found stamped "UA" at the northeast wrner thereof, being the northwest corner of said 111.666 acre tract, and being on the south line of QJR Partnership tract recorded in Document Number 200202140DO237330, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 89'14'43" E. with the north line of said 111.666 acre traa, and the south line of said QJR Partnership tract, a distance of 33.88 feet to a i" rebar found, and being on the west line of that certain called 59.534 acre tract of land, 4ascribed in deed to Ionic Investments, recorded in LnkmmcTA Number 20150605000666010, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 01'16'34" W, with the north line of said 111.566 and the west line of said Ionic I nvestm eats tract, a d iskance of 36,17 feet to a 5/r rebar found on the south line of said County Road 370; THENCE N 87053'S4" E, with the north line of said 111.666 =e bwL said the south line of said Jonic rnv+estments tract, passing at a distance of 680,35 feet, a 5J8" rebar found in said County Road 370, being the southwest corner of that certain called 2.460 Mere tut of land, described in deed to the City of Anna, recorded in Volume 4792, Page 2386, Did Records, Collin County, Texas, continuing with the south line thereof, a total distance of 813.32 feet to a 5J8" rebar found in said County Road 370, from which a 5f8"' rebar found for witness bears 5 00"25' E, a disUnce of 30,0 feet; THENCE N 87036'W E with the south line of said City of Anna Tract, passing at 167.15 feet the southeast corner thereof, continuing with the south Line of said Jonic Investrnents tract, a total distance of472,80 feet to a 1f2" rebar found at the south-east corner thereof, being the southwest comer of said right -of --way dedication shown on Anna Hight School Addition; THENCE N ST35'09" E, with the north Ilne of said Wetch tract, and the south line of said right- of-way dedication, a distance of517.45 fe tt to flit POINT OF BEGINNING and containing appmimately 917.716 ores of land ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 77 PID LEGAL DESCRIPTION 179.573 Acres Phase III BEING all that certain lot, tract, or pKocl of land, situated in the Eli W, Witt Survey, Abs#act Number 997, and the S. E. Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 786, Collin County, Texas, and being all of that certain called 80.000 acre tract of land, described in deed to Anncapri Laguna Azure, LLC, recorded in Document Number 20210819001 79940, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being all of that otrtain cal led 95.444 acre tract of land described in deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure, LLC, recorded in aocurnent Number 20210819001679920, Real. Property Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows= BEGINNING at a PK Nall found in at the intersection of County Road No, 369, and County Road No. 371, and being the northwest corner of #hat rtain tract of land described in deed to Howard J Cox eta[, recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 01 1:2V21" W, with the east bw of said 80,000 acre tract, and with the approximate center of the abandoned county goad 369, a distance of 3021.11 feet to a 1)2" rebar found (disturbed), and being the northeast corner of drat certain tract of land, described in deed to Anna Texas Land, LTD, recorded in Document Plumber 201407180007505 70, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas; TH ENCE N 88°2VO3" W. wA the north line of said Anna Texas Land tract, and the soutb line of squid 80.000 acre tract, passing at a distance of 1211.75 Feet the southwest corner thereof, and be 4 t1he southeast comer of said 95.444 acre tract, continuing with the south line thereof, a total distance of 1804.50 feet to a 1l2" capped rebar set stamped "1v1CADAMS" on the east line of that certain tract of land, described in deed to DR Horton -Texas LTD, recorded in Document Number, 202102120000310470, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE with the comman line of said 95,444 a= tract, and said DR Horton -Texas tract, the following: N 00'34'00" W, a distance of 762.32 feet to a 1/2" Capped rebar found; S 88°20`56' W, a distance of 967,09 feet; N 00°46F28" W, a distanoe of 1103A4 fect; N 01'1706' W, a distance of 118539 feet to a point in the approximate Center of County Road 3 71; THENCE 9 89"17' 15' E, with tfie north line of said 95,444 acre tract, and with sail County Road 371, a distance of 1496.53 feet; THENCE S 88041'44" E, with sand Country Road 371, and with the north line of said 95,444 acre tract of land, passing at a distance of 190,26 feet a PK nail found a1 the, northeast corner thereof, and being the northwest corner of said 80.000 acre tract, and continuing with the north line thereof, a total distance of 59 L09 feet to a PK Nail found; THENCE S 88°38' 19" F, with the north line of said 80.000 acre tract, and said County Road 371, a distance of 810.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 179.573 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 78 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN acres of land. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT K-2 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 1A BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the F_ Daffau Survey, Abstract Number 288, Collin County, Texas, and being part that certain called 111.666 acre tract of land, described in deed to Dakwood Village Apartments, recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain 60.549 acre tract of land, described in deed toTwo-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 20090509000562490, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain called 51.195 acre tract of land described in deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 20OB0509000562500, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas: COMMENCING at 1" pipe found at the northeast corner of said 60.549acretract, being the approximate northeast corner of said Daffau Survey, being the northwest turner of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Jose Facundo and wife, Josefina D_ Facundo, recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being on the south line of County Road 370, and the south line of a variable width right-of-way dedication, as dedicated by plat of Anna High School Addition, an addition to the City of Anna, accordingto the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2011-177, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S OO"31'10" W, with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said Facundo tract, a distance of 246.52 feet to a 3f8" rebar found at the southwest comer thereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 9, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number2020-243, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S W2759" W. with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said West Crossing Phase 9, passing the southwest corner thereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossi ng Phase 7, an add itio n to th a City of Anna, according to the plat the reaf, reco rded i n I nstrume nt Number2018-609, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, continuing with the west line the reof,a total distance of 1096.45 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" at the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00°27'59" W, with the west line of said West Crossing Phase 7, a distance of 477.60 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" at southwest corner th ereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 5, an add ition to th e City cfAnna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number2016-554, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas,, THENCE S W24'48" W. with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said West Crossing Phase 5, a distance of 869-25 feet to a 1/2' capped rebarfound stamped "JBI" at the southeast corne r of th a afore menti o ned 111.666 a cre tract, an d being the south west co rner of a 40' right-of-way dedication, as shown on said West Crossing Phase 5, and being on the north line of Hackberry Drive as dedicated by plat of Avery Pointe P hase 1, an add itio n to th e City of Anna, according to the p lat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2016-454, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 89008'24" W, with the south line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the north line of said Hackberry Drive, a distance of988.77 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar found stamped "JBI" at the oommon south corner of said Two-J Partners tracts of land; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 80 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 89049'39" w, with the south line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the north I ine of said H ackberry Drive, a distance of 316.19 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams', from which the southwest turner of said 111.666 acre tract and the so uth east corner of that certain tract of I and, described indeed to CUR Partnership, Ltd, recorded in Val ume 5106, Page 2380, Deed Rerords, Collin County, Texas, bears N 8804939" W, a distance of 535.51 feet, from which a 1/2" rebar found disturbed bears S W31' E, 0.5 feet; THENCE over, across, and through said 111.666 acre tract, the following: N WOO'00" E, a distance of 398.32 feettD a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" at a paint of curvature, of a curve to the left; Northwesterly with the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 1200.00 fet, a central angle of 30027'5Cr, an arc length of 638-03 feet, and whose chord bears N ITIT55" W, a distance of 630.55 feet to 1/2"capped rebar set stamped 'McAdams"; N 30°27'50" W, a distance of 70.55 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; N 59°32'1O" E, a distance of 315.07 feettD a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; S 31057'15" E. a distance of 15-Olfeet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped'McAdams", N 59*32710" E, a distance of920.31 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; S 31*57'15" E, a distance of 353.27 fleet to a 1/2" capped re ba r set Stam ped "MCAda ms" at th a point of curvature of a curve to the right, Southeasterly with the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of IW14'08", an arc length of 147.38 feet, and whose chord bears S 26°50'11" E, a distance of 147.18 feet to 1/2" capped rebar set stamped 'McAdams"; N 68037'O7" E, a distance of 204.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately+ 44.177 acres of land_ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 81 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE iB BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the F. Daffau Survey, Abstract Number 288, Collin County, Texas, and being part that certain called 111.666 acre tract of land, described in deed to Oakwood Village Apartments, recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin Co unty, Texas, and being part of that certain 60.549 acre tract of land, described in deed toTwo-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 20080509000562490, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain called 51.195 acre tract of land described in deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in InstrumentNumber 2C08+75C9000562500, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas and being part of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Rebecca Welch, recorded in Volume R, Page 560, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1" pipe found at the northeast comer of said 60- 49 acretract, beingthe approximate northeast comer of said Daffau Survey, being the northwest corner of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Jose Facundo and wife, Josefina O_ Facundo, recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being on the south line of County Road 370, and the south line of a variable width right-of-way dedication, as dedicated by plat of Anna High School Addition, an addition to theCityof Anna, accordingtothe platthereof, recorded in Instrument Number2011-177, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 00°31'10" W, with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said Facundo tract, a distance of 246.52 feet to a 3/8" rebar found at the southwest corner thereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 9, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2020-243, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S OD°27'59" W, with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said West CrossingPhase9, passingthe southwest comerthereof, and beingthe northwest cornerof West Crossing Phase7, an additiontathe City of Anna, according to the plat -thereof, recorded in Instrument Number2018-609, Plat Records, Collin flaunty, Texas, continuing withthewest linethereof, a total distance of 1101.68 feetto a 1/2" capped rebarset stamped "McAdams"; THENCE S 68°3r07" W, a distance of 204.22 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" THENCE n o rthwesterly with the a rc of a cu rve to the left, havi ng a radius of 82 5.00 feet, a cc ntral a ngle of 09024'45", an arc length cf 135.53 feet, and whose chord bears N 26025'30" W, a distance of 135.38 feet to a 1/2" capped rebarsetstamped "McAdams", - THENCE N 31°5T15" W, a distance of353.27feetto a 1/2" capped re bar set stamped "McAdams" THENCE S 59°32'10" Wpadistance of800.27feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set starrped "McAdams"; THENCE N 31°57'15" W, a distance of 140.01 feet to a 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams' THENCE N 31°31'27" W, a distance of 42.14 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 29°49'35" W, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "MCAdams"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 82 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 28001'44" W, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 26°13'53" W, a distance of43.14 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 24°26'02" W, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 22037'18" W, a distance of43.63 feet to a V2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 20°48'29" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 18°58'39" W, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 17009'05" W, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 15°19'30" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 13°29'56" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 11°40'21" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 10°02'24" W, a distance of 34.53 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 09007'37" W, a distance of 9.30 feet to a 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 08001'12" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a V..2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 06'11'38" W, a distance of43.82 feet to a V..2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 04°37'45" W, a distance of43.83 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 01-58'05" W, a distance of 58.50 feet to a V..2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 01°01'36" W, a distance of 25.01 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; N O0°53'45" E, a distance of 494.84 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" to the north line of said 111.566 acre tract, and thesouth line of that certaintract of land, described indeed to Kayasa Holdings LLC, recorded in Instrument Nu mber 20190807000946750. OfFicial Public Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 87053'54" E, with the north line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the south line of said Kayasa Holdings tract, passing at a distance of 303.60 feet, a 5/8" rebarfound in said County Road 370, being the southwest corner of that certain called 2.460 acre tract of land, described in deed to the City of Anna, recorded in Volume 4792, Page 2386, Oeed Records, Collin County, Texas, continuing with the south line thereof, a total distance of 436.56 feet to a 5/8" rebarfound in said County Road 370, from which a 5/8" rebarfound for witness bears S 00°26' E, a distance of 30.0 feet; THENCE N 87°36'59" E with the south line of said City of Anna Tract, passing at 167.15 feet the southeast comerthe reof, continuing with the south line of said Kayasa Holdings tract, a total distance of 472.80 feet to a 1/2" rebarfound at the southeast co rner the reof, being the southwest corner of said right-of-way dedication shown on Anna High School Addition; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 83 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 89°35'09" E, with the north line of said Welch track and the south line of said right-of-way dedication, a distance of 517-45feet tothe POINTOF BEGIN NINGand containing approximately38-822 acres of land- ................. J.AMES A - STOWE I L ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 84 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 1B TRACT 2 BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the F_ Daffau Survey, Abstract Number289, Collin County, Texas, and being part that certain called 111.666acre tract of land, described indeed to Oakwood Village Apartments, recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain 60.549 acre tract of land, described -indeed toTwo-1 Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 20084509000562490, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain called 51.195 acre tract of land described in deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in Instrumerit Number 20090509000562500, Official Public Records,fiollin County, Texas and being part of that certain tract of land, described indeed to Rebecca Welch, recorded in Volume R, Page 560, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 1" pipe found at the northeast corner of said 60.549 acre tract being the approximate northeast comer of said Daffau Survey, being the northwest comer of that certain tract of land, described in deed to lose Facundo and wife, Josefina O_ Facundo, recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being on the south line of County Road 370, and the south line of a variable width right-of-way dedication, as dedicated by plat of Anna High School Addition, an addition to the City of Anna, accordingto the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2011-177, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S OW31'10" W, with the east line of said 111_666 acre tract, and the west line of said Facundo trams a distance of 246.52 feet to a 3/8" rebarfound at the southwest cornerthereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 9, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number2020-243, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S OO°27'59" W, with the east line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the west line of said West Crossing Phase 9, passing the southwest comer thereof, and being the northwest corner of West Crossing Phase 7, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2018-609, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, continuing with the west line thereof, a total distance of 1101.68 feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset stamped "McAdams"; THENCE S W370r W, a distance of 204.22 feettDa 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" THENCE northwesterly with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 825.M feet, a central angle of 09°2445", an arc length of 135.53 feet, and whose chord bears N 25'2530" W, a distance of 135.38 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 31057'15" W, a distance of353.27 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams" THENCE S 59032'10" W, a distance of 920.31 to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 31°57'15" W, a distance of 15.01 feet to the POI NTOF BEGINNING, being a 112" capped rebar set sta m pe d "McAd ams"; THENCE S 59°32'10" WP a distance of 50.02 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 85 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 31'57'15" W, a distance of 133-23 feet to a 1/2" upped rebar set stamped "McAdams''; THENCE northwesterly with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1545.00 feet, a central angle of 119'40'59", an arc length of 530-76 feed, and whose chord bears N 22006'45" W, a distance of 528-16 fleet to a 1/2" cap ped rebar set stamped "McAda ms"; THENCE S 77°43'44" W, a distance of M-00 feetta a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE southeasterly with th a arc of a curve to the lef, f, having a radius of 1665-00 feet, a ce ntral a ngie of 4'2741", an arc length of 129.65 feet and whose chord bears S 14'30'06"' E, a distance of 129-61 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE S 73016'03" W, a distance of 72-92 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE northwesterly with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1110.00 feet a central angle of 13058'13", an arc length of 270-65 feet, and whose chord bears N 06025'31" W, a dicta nce of 269-98 feet toa 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 00'33'36" E, a distance of 178-28 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE S 89'26'24" E, a distance of 28.69 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 8800B'20" E, a d istan ce of 170-00 feet to a 1/2" ca Peed re bar set stamped "McAda ms"; THENCE southeasterly with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 1495-00 feet, a central angle of 30'05'35", a n arc length of 795-21 feet, and whose chord bears S 16'54'27" E, a d istan ce of 776-22 feet to a W" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE S BV57'15" E, a distance of 134-53 feetta the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing ap proxi rnately 2.387 Acres (103,970 Square Feet) of land. ...:... ................... .... JAMES A. STOWELL .G51 3..,;,' 9?2022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 86 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE IC BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the F. Daffau survey,Abstract Number 288, Collin County, Texas, and being part that certain called 111.666 acre tract of land, described in deed to Oakwood Village Apartments, recorded in Instrument Number20171201MI594200, Official Public Records, Co I I i n Co unty, Texas, and being part of that certa i n 60.549 acre tract of I and, d escribed i n deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 20080509000562490, Official Public Records, Collin County,Texas, and bei ng part of that certa i n called 51.195 acre tract of Ian described in deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in InstrumentNumber 20080509-O00562500, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being all of Lot ix, Block S, Anacapri, Phase 1B, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Document Number, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 5f 8" capped rebarfound, at the northwest corner of said Oakwood tract same being the northeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Bloomfield Homes LP, recorded in InstrumentNumber 202-0011700007680, Deed Records, Collin Cou nty, Texas, and being in the south line of a certain trait of land, described by deed to QJR Partnership, LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 200202 14000237330, Deed Records, Collin County,Texas; THENCE S 89"14'43" E, with the north line of said Oakwood tract, same being the south line of said CUR tract, a distance of 33.89 feet to a 1" rebar found, at the southeast comer thereof, being in the north line of said Oakwood tract, same being the west line of a certain tract of land described by deed to ILayasa Holdings, LLC, recorded in Instrument Nu mber 20190807000946750, Deed Records, Collin Ca unty, Texas, THENCE S 01°16'W W, with the north line of said Oakwood tract, same being the west line cf said kayasa tract, a distance of 36.17 feet to a 5/8" rebar fou nd at th a so uthwest co rner the reof, and being in the north line of said oakwood tract; THENCE N 97053'5e E, with th e n o rth 11 ne of sai d Oa kwood tract, and th a south line of said Kayasa tract, a distance of 142.23 to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", at the northwest corner of a certain called 0.773 acre Variable Width Right-of-way Dedication to the City of Anna, according to said Anacapri, Phase 1B, and being in the north line of said Oakwood tract; THENCE with the west line of said Anacapri, Phase iB the following 21 bearings and distances: S 00°53'45" W, a distance of 460.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°01'36" E a distance of 25.01 feet to a V2" capped rebar set;, stamped "M DAMS"; S 01058'05" E, a distance of 58.50feet to a V2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS-, S 0403745" E, a distance of 43.83 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "NICADANIS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 06°11'38" E, a distance of 43.82feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 08°01'12" E, ad istance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 09°07'37" E, a distance of 9.30 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S W02'24" E, a distance of 34.53 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 1140'21" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 13°29'56" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 15°19'30" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 17°09'05" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 18°58'39" E, a distance of 43.92 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 2048'29" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 22m37'18" E, a distance of 43.63 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 24°26'42" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S W13'53" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMV, S 28°01'44" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar sett' stamped "MCADAMS"; S 29°49'35" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 31m31'27" E, a distance of 42.14feet to a 1/2' capped rebar set;, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 31°57'15" E, a distance of 140.01 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the southwest comer of Lot 1 cf said Anacapri, Phase 113, and being in the north line of Caps Verde Drive (called Variable Width (tight -of -way), according to plat of Anacapri phase 1A, an ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 88 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN addition to the City of Anna, awarding to the plat thereof recorded in Instrument Number, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 59'32'10"` W, with the north line of said Capo Verde Drive, a distance of 120_04 feet to a 1/2" capped rehar set, stamped "MCADAW, THENCE N 31°57'15" W, with the north line of said Capo Verde Drive, a distance of 15.01 feetto a 1/2" capped rehar set, stamped "MCALDAMS" at the southeast corner of said Lot 1X, THENCE S 59032'10" W, with the north line of said Capo Verde Drive, and the most southeasterly south I ine of said Lot 1X, passing the most southeasterly southwest comerthereaf at a distance of 50.02 feet, passingthe northeast intersection of said Capo Verde drive and Ferguson Parkway atadistance of 255.08, continuing a total distance of 315.07 feet to a 1/2" capped rehar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE N 30°27'50" W, a distance of 320_72feet toa 1f2" tapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS', THENCE northwesterly with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1000.00 feet, a central angle of 31°21'34", and an arc length of 547.33 feet, whose chord bears N 1404703" W, 540.52 feetto a 112" capped rehar set, stamped "MCADAMS", THENCE N 89026'24" W, a distance of 15-28 feetto a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" in the west line of said Oakwood tract, and being in the east line of said Bloomfield tract; THENCE N 00°33'36" E, with the west line of said Oakwood tract, and the east line ofsaid Bloomfield tract distance of 7,34.11 feet to the POI NTOF BEGINNING and containingapproximately14.717 acres of land. T� ................. JAMES A. STOWELL 7i2912022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 89 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT K-3 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 2 66.262 ACR ES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the S_ E_ Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli W_ Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, called 95.444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679920, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract of land, called 84.D00 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679940, Deed Regards, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a PK Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said 84.000 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of a certain tract of land, described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Cunningham and Howard Joseph Cox, Jr_, recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577r Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, same being the southwest corner of a certain 45-foot right-of-way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C� Page 668, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J. Cox ET AL, recorded in Instrument Number 1995000000577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, THENCE N 88°38'19" W, with the north line of said 84.000 acre tract, and the south line of said Cox ETAL tract, and County Road 371, a distance of 795.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING being a V2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE over across and through said 84.000 acre tract the following twenty-six (25) calls: S 01'34'27" W. a distance of 230.33 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 65.00 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01'34'27" W. a distance of 495.79 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet a central angle of 26°37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 14*53'18" W, 23.03 feet, to a if 2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 60"40'22", and an arc length of 52.95 feet, whose chord bears S 02*08'03" E, 50.51 feet, to a 1f2" capped re bar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 57°31'46" W. a distance of 24.65 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01'34'27" W. a distance of 117.60 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 90 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88025'33" E, a distance of 609.92 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°2-3'20" W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", N 880'25'33" W, a distance of 560.00feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 111.02 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "IVICADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, hawing a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 101°58'39", and an arc length of 88.99 feet, whose chord bears 5 25'56'05" W, 77.70 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a centra I angle of 2M7 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 11°4424" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 171.57 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26°37417, and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears S 14'53'18" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143"15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears S 43°25'33" E, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS , Northeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curvets the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a centra l a ngle of 26*37 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, wh ose cho rd bea rs N 78°15'36" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar seek, stamped "MCADAMSu; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 78.94 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "IVICADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 240.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 88°25'33" W, a distance of 83.09 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet a central angle of 26°37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears N 75'06'42" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 13448'58", and an arc length of 117.65 feet, whose chord bears S 50047'40" W, 92.33 feetr to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAIVIS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 91 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 111.99 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 815.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar sett stamped "MCADAMS", N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 163.38 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01'34r27" W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE over across and through said 84.000 acre tract, and said 95.444 acre tractthe following five (5) calls: N 88*25'33' W, passing the west line of said 84.000 acre tract, same being the east line of said 95.444 acre tract, continuing a distance of 140.87 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 00'42r34" E, a distance of 302_85'to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26*37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 14'01'25" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143'15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears S 44017'26" W, 94.90 feet, to a 112" capped reba r set stamped "MCADAMS", S 01035'53" W, a distance of 24.48 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" in the easterly south line of said 95.444 acre tract, same beingthe north line of a certain tract of land described by deed to Anna Texas Land, LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 20140718000750570, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, from which a 1/2" rebar found, at the southeast corner of said 95.444 acre tract same being the southwest comer of said 84_DOO acre tract, bears S 88'24'07" Er 126.55 feet; THENCE N W24'07" W, with the easterly south line of said 95.444 acre tract and the north line of said An na Texas Land tract, a distance of 466.08 feet to a 1/2" ca p ped re bar set, stamped "MCAIDAMS" at the most easterly southwest corner of said 95.444 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of said An na Texas Land tract, a nd be i ng in the east line of a certain tract of la nd, d escri bed by deed to DR Horton -Texas, LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 202 10212CO03 10470, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 00'34r0iJ" , with the most southerly west line of said 95.444 acre tract, and being the most southerly east line of said DR Horton tract, a distance of 762.32 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar found (yellow cap) atthe inner ell of said 95.444 acre tract, same beingthe most southerly northeast comer of said HR Horton tract; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 92 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE S 88°20'56" W, with the most westerly south line of said 95.444 acre tract, and the most easterly north line of said DR Horton tract, a distance of38.41 feet to a 112" rapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE N 00°42'34" W, a distance of 2250.12 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" being in the north line of said 95.444 acre tract, and the south line of certain tract of land, described by deed to Laura Collins, recorded in Instrument Number 19940310000236490, Deed Records, Collin Co unty, Texas; THENCE S 89°17'15" E, with the north line of said 95.44 acre tract, and the south line of said Laura Collins tract, and the south line of County Road 37t a distance of 554- 3 tD a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the southeast corner of said Laura Collins tract, being in the north line of said 95.444 acre track, being in County Road 37t and being the southwest comer of a called 60-foot right- f- way dedication to the City cfAnna, recorded in Cabinet Ck Page 604, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 8W41'44" E, with the south line of said 60' ROW d edimtian, County Road 37t and the north line of said 95.444 acre tract, passing a PK Nail Found at the northeast corner thereof, same being the northwest comer of said 84.000 acre track, at a distance of 190.26 feet, continuing with the north line thereof, passing the southeast corner of said 60' ROW dedication, same being the southwest comer of Bryant Farm Road, passing a PK Nail with shiner, stamped J_F_ Smith 3700, at a distance of 587.18 feet, a continuing a total distance of 591.09 feet to a 1/2" capped reba r set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the southeast co rn er of said Bryant Farm Road, same being the southwest corne r of said Cox ETAL tract; THENCE S 88038'19" E, with the north line of said 84.000 acre tract and the south line of said Cox ETAL tract, a distance of 15.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and being approximately 66.262 acres of land- F.' n )� ...:... ................. DAMES A. STOWELL E.- 7/2912022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 93 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION Phase 3 48,585 ACRES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the S- E- Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli W- Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, called 95-444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679920, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularlydescribed as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS" at the northwest corner of said Anacapri Laguna Azure track, and being in County Road 371; THENCE S 89°17'15" E, %Vrth the north line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, and with the approxi mate center of Country Roa d 371, a distan ce of 941.99 feet to a W" capped reba r set sta m ped "MCADAMS"; THENCE S 0004234" W. a distance of 2250-12 feet to a 1/2" capped reba r set sta m ped "MCADAMS" on a south line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, from which a 1/2" capped rebar found at an inner eIle corner thereof hears N S.8°20'56" E, 38-41 feet~ THENCE S 88'20'56" W, with a south line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, and a north line of that certain tract of land, described in deed to DR Horton -Texas LTD, recorded in Document Number 20210212000310470, Rea Property Records, Collin County, Texas, a distance of 928-68 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE N 00046'28" W, with the common line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure trait, and said DR Horton tract, a distance of 11103-04feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped 'MCADAMS" THENCE N 01-17'06" W, continuing with the common line thereof, a distance of 1185-78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 48.585 acres of land- . 7 022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 94 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 4 64,604 ACRES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the 3_ E_ Roberts Surrey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli _ Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, railed 95.444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument N urn be r 20210819001679920, Deed Records, Caiiin County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract of Ian d, called 84.000 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 202 1081900 1679S40, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly desrri bed as follows: BEGINNING at a PK Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said 84.000 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of a certain tract of land, described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Cunninghamand Howard Joseph Cox, Jr_, recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, same being the southwest corner of a certain 45-foot right-of-way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C. Page 66% Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J_ Cox ET AL, recorded in Instrument Number1995000000577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 01029r20" W, with the east line of said Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819001679920, and with the west line of said Tract 1, passing the southwest corner thereof, being the northwest corner of that certain tract of land, described in deedtD LGI Homes -Texas, LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 2019082000010D9780, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and continuing with the west line thereof, a total distance of 302 1. 11 feet to a 1/2" rebar tound at the southwest corner of the aforementioned Anacapri tract; THENCE N 88029'03" W, with the south 11 ne of sa i d Anacapri tract reco rded in 20210819001679920, a distance of 1211.75 feet 1/2" rebar found at th e so uth west co rner thereat, and being the southeast corner of said Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819001679940; THENCE N 88°24'07" W, with the south Iine of said Anacapri tract, recorded in 2O210819001679940, a distance of 126.55 feet; THENCE over across a nd th rough sai d 84.000 acre tract, an d said 95.444 ac re tract th a fol lowi ng: N 01*35'53" E, a distance of 24.48 feettD a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143°15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears N 44°17'26" E, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve tD the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26'3741", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears N 14"01'25" W, 23.03 feet, to a 112" rapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS'"; N X042'34" W, a distance of 302.85'to a 1/2" capped rebar seek, stamped "MCADAMS , ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 95 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88°2533" E, a distance of 14-0,37feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset,stamped "MCADAW-I N 01*3427" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 112' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 163.38 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "M CADA W -1 N 01*34'27" E, a distance of M-00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88°25'33" E, a distance of 111-89 feet to a 1/2" ca peed rebar set, stamped "M CADAINtS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, haVinga radius of 50.00feet, a central angle of 134°48'58", and an arc length of 117.65 feet! whose chord bears N 50°47'40" E, 92.33 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, vAth the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central a ngle of 26°37'41", an d a n arc length of 23.24 feet' wh ose ch o rd bea rs S 75006742" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 83.08 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"i N 01*34"27" E, a distance of 24O.0O feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped 'MCADAMS"; N 88*25'33" Vey, a distance cf 78.94feet ta a 1/2" capped rebar set,stamped "MCADAW-, Southwesterly, with the arr of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26*37'41", and an a rc le ngth of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 78'15'36" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.0Q feet, a central angle of 143°15`23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears N 43*25'33" W, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped reba r set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the lefs;, having a radius of 50_00 feet, a central angle of 26*37 41", an d a n arc length of 23.24 feet, whose ch o rd bea rs N 14°53' 18" E, 23.03 feet, to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"'; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 171.57feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the Ift, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26"37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears N 11*44'24" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCAD.AMS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 96 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT K-4 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 2 66.262 ACRES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the S_ E_ Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli W_ Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, called 95.444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679920, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract of land, called 84.000 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 202 10819DO 1679940, Deed Regards, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a PK Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said 84_D00 acre tract' same being the northwest corner of a certain tract of land, described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Crunningharnand Howard Joseph Cox, Jr_, recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Collin {:aunty, Texas, same being the southwest corner of a certain 45-foot right-of-way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C, Page 669, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J. Cox ET AL, recorded in Instrument Number 1995000000577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, THENCE N 88°38'19" W, with the north line of said 84.000 acre tract, and the south line of said Cox ETAL tract' and County Road 371, a distance of 795.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING being a V2" capped re ba r set sta m ped "MCADAMS"; THENCE over across and through said 84.000 acre tract the following twenty-six (25) calls: S 01°34'27" W. a distance of 230,33 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 65.00 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°34'27" W. a distance of 495.79 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.0o feet a central angle of 26°37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 14*53'18" W, 23.03 feet, to a if 2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a cerrtraI angle of 60`40'22", and an arc length of 52.95 feet, whose chord bears S 02*0903" E, 50.51 feet, to a 1f2" capped re bar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 57°31'46" W. a distance of 24.65 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°34'27" W. a distance of 117.60 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 97 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88025'33" E, a distance of 609.92 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°2-3'20" W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", N 880'25'33" W, a distance of 560.00feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 111.02 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "IVICADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, hawing a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 101°58'39", and an arc length of 88.99 feet, whose chord bears 5 25'56'05" W, 77.70 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a centra I angle of 2M7 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 11°4424" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 171.57 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26°37417, and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears S 14'53'18" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143"15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears S 43°25'33" E, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS , Northeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curvets the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a centra l a ngle of 26*37 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, wh ose cho rd bea rs N 78°15'36" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar seek, stamped "MCADAMSu; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 78.94 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "IVICADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 240.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 88°25'33" W, a distance of 83.09 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet a central angle of 26°37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears N 75'06'42" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 13448'58", and an arc length of 117.65 feet, whose chord bears S 50047'40" W, 92.33 feetr to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAIVIS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 98 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 111.99 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01034'27" W, a distance of 815.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar sett stamped "MCADAMS", N 88*25'33" W, a distance of 163.38 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01'34r27" W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE over across and through said 84.000 acre tract, and said 95.444 acre tractthe following five (5) calls: N 88*25'33' W, passing the west line of said 84.000 acre tract, same being the east line of said 95.444 acre tract, continuing a distance of 140.87 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 00'42r34" E, a distance of 302_85'to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26*37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 14'01'25" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143'15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears S 44017'26" W, 94.90 feet, to a 112" capped reba r set stamped "MCADAMS", S 01035'53" W, a distance of 24.48 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" in the easterly south line of said 95.444 acre tract, same beingthe north line of a certain tract of land described by deed to Anna Texas Land, LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 20140718000750570, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, from which a 1/2" rebar found, at the southeast corner of said 95.444 acre tract same being the southwest comer of said 84_DOO acre tract, bears S 88'24'07" Er 126.55 feet; THENCE N W24'07" W, with the easterly south line of said 95.444 acre tract and the north line of said An na Texas Land tract, a distance of 466.08 feet to a 1/2" ca p ped re bar set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the most easterly southwest corner of said 95.444 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of said An na Texas Land tract, a nd be i ng in the east line of a certain tract of la nd, d escri bed by deed to DR Horton -Texas, LTD, recorded in Instrument Number 202 10212CO03 10470, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 00'34r0iJ" , with the most southerly west line of said 95.444 acre tract, and being the most southerly east line of said DR Horton tract, a distance of 762.32 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar found (yellow cap) atthe inner ell of said 95.444 acre tract, same beingthe most southerly northeast comer of said HR Horton tract; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 99 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE S 88°20'56" W, with the most westerly south line of said 95.444 acre tract, and the most easterly north line of said DR Horton tract, a distance of38.41 feet to a 112" rapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE N 00°42'34" W, a distance of 2250.12 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" being in the north line of said 95.444 acre tract, and the south line of certain tract of land, described by deed to Laura Collins, recorded in Instrument Number 19940310000236490, Deed Records, Collin Co unty, Texas; THENCE S 89°17'15" E, with the north line of said 95.44 acre tract, and the south line of said Laura Collins tract, and the south line of County Road 37t a distance of 554- 3 tD a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the southeast corner of said Laura Collins tract, being in the north line of said 95.444 acre track, being in County Road 37t and being the southwest comer of a called 60-foot right- f- way dedication to the City cfAnna, recorded in Cabinet Ck Page 604, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 8W41'44" E, with the south line of said 60' ROW d edimtion, County Road 37t and the north line of said 95.444 acre tract, passing a PK Nail Found at the northeast corner thereof, same being the northwest comer of said 84.000 acre track, at a distance of 190.26 feet, continuing with the north line thereof, passing the southeast corner of said 60' ROW dedication, same being the southwest comer of Bryant Farm Road, passing a PK Nail with shiner, stamped J_F_ Smith 3700, at a distance of 587.18 feet, a continuing a total distance of 591.09 feet to a 1/2" capped reba r set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the southeast co rn er of said Bryant Farm Road, same being the southwest corne r of said Cox ETAL tract; THENCE S 88038'19" E, with the north line of said 84.000 acre tract and the south line of said Cox ETAL tract, a distance of 15.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and being approximately 66.262 acres of land- F.' n -) ...:... ................. DAMES A. STOWELL 7/2912022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 100 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT K-5 - IMPROVEMENT AREA #2 - REMAINDER PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Phase 3 49.585 ACR ES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the S- E- Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli W- Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, railed 95-444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679920, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particu la dy described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS" at the northwest corner of said Anacapri Lagu na Azu re tract, a nd bei ng in County Road 371; THENCE S 89°1715" E, with the north line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, and with the approximate center of Country Road 371, a distance of 941.99 feet to a In" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS"; THENCE S 00042'34" W, a distance of 2250.12 feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset stamped "MCADAMS" on a south line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure track, from which a 1/2' capped rebar found at an inner eIle corner thereof bears N 98020'56" E, 38-41 feet; THENCE S 8802C'f56" W, with a south line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, and a north line of that certain tract of land, described in deed to DR Horton -Texas LTD, recorded in Document Number 202110212000310470, Real Property Records, Collin County, Texas, a distance of 928-68 feet to a 1/2" tapped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS -r THENCE N 00046'28" W, with the common line of said Anacapri Laguna Azure tract, and said DR Horton trams a distance of 1103-04feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS" THENCE N 01017'06" W, continuing with the common line thereof, a distance of 1185.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGIKNING and containing approximately 48.585 acres of land- �� TE ..................... -- JAMES A. STOWEI _ ....., G513.:' 7022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 101 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 4 64.604 ACRES BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the S_ E_ Roberts Surrey, Abstract Number 786, and the Eli _ Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being partof that certain tract of land, called 95.444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679920, deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract of land, called 84.000 acres and described by deed ito Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210819001679340, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a PK Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said 84.000 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of a certain tract of land, described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Cunninghamand Howard JosephCox,Jr_, recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, same being the southwest corner of a certain 45-foot right-Df-way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C, Page 66% Plat Records, Collin County, Texas, and being the southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J. Cox ET ALP recorded in Instrument Number 1995000000577, Deed Records, Catlin County, Texas; THENCE S 01°29'20" W, with the east line of said Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819001679920, and with the west line of said Tract 1, passing the southwest corner thereof, being the northwest corner of that certaintract of land, described in deedto LGI Homes -Texas, LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20190820000100-9780, Deed Rerords, Collin County, Texas, and continuing with the west line thereof, a total distance of 3021.11 feet to a 1/2" rebarfound at the southwest corner of the aforementioned Anacapri tract; THENCE N 88°29'03" W, with the south line of sa i d Anaca pri tract recorded in 20210819001679920, a distance of M1.75feeta 1/2" rebarfound atthesouthwest cornerthereof,and beingthe southeast corner of said Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819001679940; THENCE N 88°24'07" W, with the south line of said Anacapri tract, recorded in 20210819001679940, a distance of 126.55 feet; THENCE over across a nd th rough sai d 84.000 acre tract, an d said 95.444 ac re tract th a fol lowi ng: N 01'35'53" E, a distance of 24.48 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAKW; Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143°15'23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears N 44°17'26" E, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCACAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26'3741", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears N 14"01'25" W, 23.03 feet, to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MICADAMS"; N 00042'34" W, a distance of 302.85'to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 102 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88025'33" E, a distance of 140.87 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS -, N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAKW-, S 98025'33" E, a distance of 163.38 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 815.0Ofeet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCA DAMS"; S 88°25'33" E, a distance of 111.89 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 134°48'S8", and an arc length of 117.65 feet! whose chard bears N 50"47'40" E, 92.33 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26- 37 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet whose chard bears 5 75*0642" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 83.08 feet to a 1/2" tapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 24O.0Ofeet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 880'25'33" W, a distance of 78.94 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26*37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chord bears S 78°15'36" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 143°15`23", and an arc length of 125.01 feet, whose chord bears N 43*25'33" W, 94.90 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curvets the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26-°37 41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears N 14"53'18" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 171.57 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 26*37'41", and an art length sf 23.24 feet, whose chord bears N 11*44724" W, 23.03 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 103 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 101'58'39", and an arc length of 88_99 feet, whose chord bears N 25 W05" E, 77.70 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 111.02 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", S 88'25'33" E, a distance of 550.00 feetto a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MC:AD A4SS"-, N 01*29'20" E, a distance of 50.00 feetto a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 8S*25'33" W, a distance of 509.92 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 117.60 feet to a 1f2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 57*31'46' E, a distance of 24.65 feet to a 1/2" capped rehar set, stamped "MCADAW-, Northwesterly, with the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feel; a central angle of 60'40'22", and an arc length of 52.95 feet, whose chard bears N 02'08'03" W, 50.51 feet, to a 1/2" capped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS", Northeasterly, with the arc of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central a ngle of 26*37 41", an d a n arc length of 23.24 feet whose chord bears N 14'53' 18" E, 23.03 feet, to a 1127 upped rebar set, stamped "MCI4DAM5"'; N 01*34'27" E, a distance of 495.79 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88025'33" E, a distance of 65.00 fleet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped uMCADAMS% N 01*3427" E, a distance of 230.33 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stam ped 'MCADAMS" to the north line of said 84.000 acre tract, and being in said County Raced 371, THENCE S W38'19" E, with the north line of said 84.000 acre tract, and with said County Road 371, a distance of 795.08feettothe POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 64.604acres of land. ................... .......... JAMES A. STOWELL 7'29P2022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 104 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDIX A — ENGINEER'S REPORT [Remainder of page left intentionally blank.] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 105 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN McADAMS Engineer's Report for AnaCarlpri phases I, II, III & IV City of Anna; Collin County, Texas August 9, 2022 Prepared for OWNER/DEVELOPER. ANACAPRI LAGUNA AZURE, LLC, 2101 CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD, SUITE 700; DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 111 HillsHp. D--rP. + Letx' Rvilk TX 7&;a67 F P: r?r2.1?r'..97'1 * F: A72ASS.�F1 7111 1:oijn • vin.v 1 z oiT • I ognW!, I X 7H7; S • j. 9T1.4:i:i..L17 "1 • . 47J) 4:1K.4719 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN DATE; August 9, 2022 ENGINEER: The John R. McAdams Compamr, Inc. c/o Mr. Matthe'm G, St. Marie, R. E. 111 Hillside I)r IVP I WAd sville, I X t.'30!3 f 4ffI-i1 J-I141{] OWNER/DEVELOPER; A iiaCap ri Laguna luurL-, LLC. 2101 Cedar Spring; , SuiLe 700 Dallas, Texas 75201 INTRODUCTION: The Project, known as AnaCapri, is a proposed single family residential development located within the City of Anna, Collin County, Texas with a proposed approximate build out of 1,235 lots as depicted herein on Exhibit "A", The total residential property is 279.554 acres to be developed across 4 phases, The purpose of this report is to present the backup documentation for the PID and the creation and execution of the PIP by the City crf Anna lea finance the Public Infrastructure necessary to Ser'1e the Project. Excavation, Water, Wastewater, Storm Sewer, PaUinp, Erosion Control and Hardscape / Landscape f Irrigation Impaovements are all PI13 Authorized Improvements within the Project. PROJECT PHASING; Phase I is made up of 3 separate sub -phases, Phases IA, 16 and IC. Phase IA is 4-4.177 acres, Phase I& is 41.209 acres and Phase IC is 141,717 acres, fora total of 100.103 acres. Phase IA contains 191 sinoe family residential lots, Phase IB— 205 lots and Phase IC— 62 Ints, for aintal of T')9 single family rp-;idQntial lots- Refer to Fxhibit "A". Phase 11 rs made. of a single. tract of land tntaIing fifi.J16) ar.rEn and rontains Jail singlQ family residential lots. This is comhinod with Phase I for the initial PI hand sale, Refer to Exhibit "A". The intent is for Phases I & 11 to be initially developed with one direct bond and one master Improvement bond sale, to betumledwith the develop mentotthese phases Phase III is antir.ipatedto hea single tractnf land totaling 4M..'39.`)ar.resand rcntains' 449 single family residential lots. PEfer to }xhibit "A". rhis is a flJtLJre phase and the budgets vri11 he r,pdate. d A -hen developed. Phase IV isaiiLicipaLed Lu be a single Lratt orlarid totalingfA.60 4 acres and tunLaius 291 single rarnily residential IuLs. Refer to Exhibit "A". This is a ruLure phase and Llic, budgets vrill be updated when developed. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ALL INCLUSIVE OPINION OF PROBABLE COST AND PID SUM MARY BUDGET: An all-inclusive Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probalkle Cost has been prepared for all phases and additionally contains a RID Surnman; Budget for the PID {authorized IniprovemeIA5. The PID 5urnrnary Budget is broken out between RID Direct and PID R41 Irnprovements far Phases I and II and Phases III Rg I'd are all shov;n as 13JI} IArert and all are herein inr.luded a4 Fxhihit "K'. PID AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AND DEFINED'. Exc.avatiuII. WaLNI. Wa3LewaLEI r Stu rru SewvI, Rdvirig, ErusiupI Control and 1-12rdst8pe f Lap I d SLid Pt:! f liligaLicrrr knpiovements have been ideniiIII Ed ror buLh DireLL as Id Mils Ler ImprovemeiTu and are shown in the PID Summary builget, The PID eligible items include all erosion -,onirol (construction entrances, silt fence, etc,), Exhibits `&J" depict the PID Direct and RID Master Improvements for the initial I}and offering In Phases I & 11, the PID Master ImprOvemerrts includes Water, Wastewater and Storm Sewer, an half of a fourdane divided Roadway fFergusan Parkway) along the western boundary of Phase IA and IC and t<orrtinuirig north past Rasamond Parkway up to and adjacent to Phasu- 11, terminating at CR 371 at the north end Of Phase H, one haFF of a four -lane divided Roadway ll-Iarkherry Drive} along the southern boundary OF Phase IA, all OF a hvu lane Collector Street (Cape Verde Dr iveI separating Phase EA with Phases I and IC, the reronstrurtion of the sub -standard roadway along the North boundary of Phase IB and IC (Rollins Raad), The City of Anna's Master Throughfarc Pl@n shows the four lame divided Roadways to be required for the sing]c family development. The number of vehicle trips generated from th-e single farnilV development necessitates this Roadway. The waiter mains are also required to serve the demand and pressures necessary for fire flour based on the number of sinnle-famihy residP.rrtiel lots to be %Fu ed within the projert- The sanitary sewer rnairr is sized based on slopes that are necessary to provide sewer service to all the single-farrkilV lots within the Project. This includes an extension of a sanitarV sewer rinaln Ilne from thesouthwest of Phase I, continue northeastto Fergu3un and there along Ferguson to the south limits of Phase II and then through Phase II to serve future phases. From an engineering standpoint all the ahove stated I311) Mast Pr Imprmements are nPr.essary to serve the Single- Family Development only and were not oversi7Pd dug to the Iaguna nr Mldti-Family Sites withinthP Project. ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The Zorririg, Pr eliruinary PlaL, DevelupmenL AgreurrlenL For !z`nidC'apri Phase I, 11, III & IV I ave beers prepared, subruiLLed and final idpproval has beers reLeivad From thuAiIrla City ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Council, The+ Final Plats for Ana Capri Phase I and Ir have been prepared, suhmitted and final approval has been recelved from the Anna City Council, The zoning for Phases 3 and 4 has been prepared, submitted and final approval h7a5 been received tram the An na City Cou nc iI, Anai:apri Phase IA is rirrrently under development and exrevetiran has br?en suh,;tantially completed on the lql Irats, I�uhlir kifidities are sirhstantially rnrnplete. Raving operations are exported to heigin in mid -August 70)?. An anticipated overall Project uornpletiori daLe i5the fourth quarter vf2022. AriaCapri Phase I is cur rerrEly under dE!velcrprrienL and exr:avaLiuri has been substantiaH+}completed on the 205lot5, Ptibli< utilities are CLIrrently being installed, .An anticipated overall Projectcompletion date is thefnurth7 tluarterof 2022, Aria Capri Phase IC is currently under dPwelppment and excavation has begun on the 62 lots and is approximately halfway completed. Public utilities will be starting late third quarter to early fourth quarter of 2022 and the anticipated overall Project completion date is the first quarter of 2023. Ana Capri Phase II enl;jneering curishuction plans have been submitted to the City or Anna for review with an anticipated approval date of bdober 2022_ Construction is anticipated to begin in September 2022 with an anticipated completion date of August 2023. All of the above phases arc` anticipated to he funded through the first issuance of direct anti master improvement bon dssat es Ana Capri Phrase III final Plat and-10WRICiOn plans are anticipated to be prepared anti approved by in the first OF secrind quarter of 2023_ Lanstruction is anticipated to begin in thesummQr of'lf371 with an anticipated completion date ofthe.summerraf 7U'l4. AnaCapri Phase IV Final Plat and construction plans are anticipated to be prepared and approved by in the flrst quarter of 2024. Construction is anticipated to begin in the fourths quarter of 2024 or first quarter of 2025 with an anticipated completion date of thefourth quarterof 2025. FIELD NOTES AND EXHIBITS BY PHASE; Field Notes and Fxhihits frar !'hasp. I Ihree I rants, Phase II i}ne. rrart, Phase III — One. Trart and Phase4— One. Iract are dPlaicted herein an Fxhihits "G-1" ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN TABLE OF EXHIBITS: EX1 IIBIT "A" OVERALL Pl IASING EXI IIBIT EXHIBIT "B' - -- PID AUTHORIZED ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST EXHIBIT "C" - - PHASE I & II WATER DIRECTAND MASTER IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT "D" ----- PHASE I & II SANITARY SE'aV2ER DIRECT AND MASTER IMI'R(]VFMFN I.S F}{H3R11 "F" ---- PHASF I Fe II DRAINA(iF I)IHF{:I AND MASIFR IM13ROVFMFNLS F}{HIBII"F" ---- PHASF 1 Fe II ROAUWAY DIRF1:1 AND MASIFR IM13RC3VFMFN 15 EX1 IIBIT "G" - PHASE I & II LAN DSCAPIE MASTER IP3PROVE h9ENTS EXHIBIT "I I" ----- PHASE IA— FIELD NOTES AND EXHIBIT EXIlilBIT "I" ----- PHASE ID— FIELD NOTES AND EXI ABET EXHIBIT "J" - - PHASE IC— FIELD NOTES AND EXHIBIT EXHIBIT "IC" - PHASE II — FIELD NOTES AND EXHIBIT EXHIBIT "L" PHASE III — FIELD NOTES AND EXHIBIT FMHIRIT "M' ---- PHASF IV—FIFI n N()I1-S ANr) FKHlRhl ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "A"' OVFRAI I I'HASINC; FXHIBiI ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ..i I• , , . 4.1_L.IJ I RE - -- I AEd IF IEIW F:_ W-fl IIII I - �rissk�cra; S,,Illuwxr - II HUJJH3 R 7 I --I {3 : s=� - I F 2'� 11 N`,l06FlRY AFL l ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "B" PII} ALJ IHORIIFI} F.SI IMA IF OF PKO HAHI F CON ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANA CAM I - A % % ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 114 ANACIAPRI - ANNA IlWaL i P. IAN I' I im mriL-r mri is rmisEllmmoIrmmu TDWRECT r1m)AT -V14VA'A7 [`%,frr,t'.--.--i,1-1,73 %. I I ?F�.—FR 9Y�,7FIV3 22 9x!DM SAMT`RY -17,71i.: n KI'.h It. '-4%i WAI .1.4 -, I.M, ),4. .."I:F 1 f..:l 11:Ui'ALLVh9fAUCllCXN UOR' 111.5 11%,%9 1 7.IX7-dlll rlmDTREf7 PID MT PHANF. 1 AND 2 - C.VINSTIRT rf:TFON (WiT 1-1.b;57.1118 P'W 11TlZFX.T TIM 14r .LW I . K-x 1%41t.H- 71,85FOU fllShT n-TkME FHWJ� --I I IPV rm DTR'R(.T ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 115 N PFBI - ANN 2+VNJ21 OFF= '1'H 1.1K 51 l%VKH A O1TUYE J711J�K !i KWER H -4rTim FRE.-NE F.Fl4Rx rt VTS('fT.f ,.VT.:l S COST - 7NCTNF.f'lZNG. i +fN STIT.'rR;G., L.-fY Fr.T T?l('.AVATk0N .a147� FR(]3T N fffNT-40T. 1 J.3. 7= IR::.r. 49.176 1 4," 51,atr r^1)1 S:'141T• RYST VTR STORM ST�SER I,:t , 12R 0 43.4,67.5 11 294,R10 ¢ 1'.Sk`L`i{i 4 0 fl RTTP T FNt'l'K, . RFTATVTK{1 WAl.1 S ! T AVTliC.'RPT 0 •:I 0 0 1.1 :1 DRY [ rf` UTIES SL-E:Ii'LkLUMSYLUI-10V:.:L7kf 1,16{,9J3 499.4;46 355,142E J'rj I ALPi .1 fl 0 0 $15 .673 Ic% Col'Tr1w."twi%, I Fi.lI.l1 1.1.K— TOTAT, C..CSVSTRT.X..TT0K. a'.3-iT 1.607.01? `4@,731 391.410 949,1 11 CUYp;-rKl,C'1'10l C'£]PT P F1:l%Ir, 1 CONS1'FLLCTIOC , C'ON'1' 1,607,U37 x4d,^3J 391.410 :'17138 C0YS1'FUCT101 C'iA'f COANT RL CT10:1 CU?;'' 1.607.W'f I x-M--nl 1 391.410 2.51 ,lii1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 116 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ARACAYRI-AbNA AIh1:KIA ILLIK:I'.I' .N-42121 t IIVI}Il CLf{: L'V.'11LLJP I:..L'1}}C_•7 FF[V.K GL-+,TI=X7 kWT =vrLnu -WM2 T}TFl F.'i='_ YX= .'01 MC::C I rl rA4 Fl:]ILFLLFJ}_ NC P.C:sRHC LY. }I 4 _w5 . 1 "MHA Av,SK.m S -ZA V-'' 4 Y a i Y e Y Y a i IVJIua s i i I �IDM :fl`_';.YJ=Lrk1\C L 4 J[JI[1[ 1 I}.1(3.1p 4 OFA S 4 t=p LY. .{I E S 1 4 L a i "X.. L -I s x/uu F L I nlin 11 Y 1 1 nV III F 1 F F N F=1)0 LJ.Y!7f_7L' x L 4 :A[1F 1 I:AAv 4 S;Fx s !:%LL 4 11 0."r1=]IL'Fifil- LY. J. L .WY i I }Y L :K +G }.} i}jx:li{} 1 11j.*A YI L L__. ■ S •:,vOF L 1+ LLy ]PCl f_N%if7GV."s L F vmA I 1 G'1 V F _mx S R"m F —.— A—. up..;&LIGAIL { RLJUL'JAAJJ'JR IRY.4Y [ �ITAI 4MT _?V,7G _4nf11.2 T lM T� .m= -u,..-- r.l>tKnrx x.A'n. — MUT. ....... lYJ V W M L'UMTU Y. I SCTrLK= L- IN 1I_ SL'.C% 13uza 4}:} ZA WNW 5k+ J;'lFIL LI'I 1WI FII FI I 1{��11 FI I i1':su i1'30. Ls„ YS 2.'3F}[i;l L_=>tJi i}x YdG :�YdfY Y]pOhi} LS'ri Y]I I S LJI I 1l LI�o F/0P R]1 ZLL} ti. m ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 117 W21 VAL UMN rl[rtrr-a,��=r-,elP Wlr dal:a.•: �alw:: R' A 'vl>S Rs�l n IT-0ir7t5 L'111 iI LrJM LL:WJf iI LSi IG mm 5:m Y x•.TF rks' E.4111 x k-dl'A S' XIN i6!;i_55 SEA 7A 1'.l, ilxllz II F:ts• II F:st• II i,u 1 p: tr .1 i "'TEE r;Al 'IX:x SL{"M Ax'..':} Y11 SEA rrY'7u iu.a iu.,l iu.a Y� Y� II Y5Y'75L-:L1 LIiil 11xa LSxai i;IYY iS YS Ft 'Y-0 17 r;,3l P&,7 )P 5.'.}%% "ND Y;1 SEA W S{•GL_L{II" =:Ail A i+{% r•;% Ntv } SS ]1 7A 1} _ _ Y._�=x. um�x11 __ __— itiY ir. Iti:ff .. iv:.[ Y]1 Y]1 Iz zrriez^L�+uzeFflc =ral :z1 lx xl 1lv xla ils acx sra x}1 1r mm�_xi E:w11 ll IIYY SX arif ,In Y]I YA ;} }7p-LN Cw11. _I OG iYCL;If inn Y]1 ZA FI:I klll rr1 •, V w . w.l. at I L�.Lv .n.xsslnLLv � >. 5 Flul a -�ILi'.}L}67x0.4LL'x 6�ii1, -A i;r&Y y:Y-00 {x P. =w l HIIAIn £_.CJf i7_7kn zrn '[n % I I :A '{:t I ils Y:Y . i.t i SE 41 a Y: L:LIY :• MAX F, o R,A vY 1+ 7 BRAG i}Qx z x Ilax i10CAC jvx Z;1 Y]1 _w Ina. I Ll Iv x.'w v.3, n® x ., FIIII a 7i^i' 1L,A, 7ti 5s s Tao- a ir}r:ll air rr. 1 TGw[IF{7 L' 9 mX 11i tl+Af ila<SN}L SSA Y;1 11'G.w[Ik{T L' =7A Lri0 11M2t]f iIM }.:% SSn Y]1 Fri; r x1 w I; Stih: Ib•iY I: SS ]1 SS 11 il. � Ir II it 0 IV 1-Km 1-x x SS A z A 17 } xWE r_}�,11 � l 111 Sf 1`]f LC 1?x YA YA It Wx 11W 1: )'Fri -�x11 ily_x KAx LC iidf% Y11 Y]I 1w: sw 11 1w1 . Ld il•v lr•w rn•rrr 117x Im lx lary a>, I: II'-SC77=7C+r• :�Al i Ili!x s_mx k.:}{:} Y1i Y]1 iix 1 L. , m::, 11•,u 11.:a1 lr 1 1a1 a 1+i . ;k )r_FOG=m -Nfil il.+fX Imix IxX FEA Y;1 I1{+1C=]rl_ =w,ll i< LM%1G 1 111lAAf illlwO 7A Y]1 IY1wki ]f�'. �aN L{4aA urt Ixun Y� i:rXG}rl r:�fil L7.Ix 1G Sx,IXA idC 511A Y]1 SS]1 ;r iILlM3L• '�x11 xn :.Y �f of IAn Y;1 YA ;r i;LIICX= '�x11 N,:3_1G :7 ]xY i ." m Y;1 ZA ]I IffL� E.'al Ira E' 17:1'x 1zlu 7A 7A '.2 irrL.—) C:lPI 1w mJK 77A SS SS N SS N _ L: 1 n.lillm. rl.lrr:wa k• .1 .11 kV 1 is=LG1=_ 71m740' SLIM s_I 1d ilA. f li3 00) Y]1 .WIL 7r: JT.E P:: Y3LLS1Li.1 r?U x•I: n kllll r YLL}T. i'].IN ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 118 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN {r: FI:11 Fal m.I SI0f};f,FJ&FX71d!nCTfa119 = !I JD! tiIX S_IS. '!% IK;;d!1� Wf:_'HJi R]I S"IIX},M F214MMD!�ITro1 )-u L!4 —x 1;!:_NIX W!} FX.Ji J} RA YL3f9.T-LMUDkh CL't L33n it i4- L+ICLI .a tx. W.aJ1 :Ix%c. Ill SL}r—E:LM=M:FAD11Yld Sal x-71 :X II.A:A M. pI7 9:]7 [IF. T�PLC J. .Jf.IX SIX lOf ai Wah Si}SiY Yi 17 '-K; aHTULFJLCICFMM L- T!: ^IS A{} z.A: 1K11 r r:F T:.^LM L' 3.1 :IC% W:} S.Cx YA - - •_h\r..SRs 2: r} srL'w A'i Frl�'t RT 1 irt Flra FLnta 1: R=L]lf S=H;:.L^I: JL ti {} lilf LC WW 1L'}J} ZA i<a 11 k1111 KIFI a1 r. 11` 1rv. ;k IJ4710LTJ.T FJ70K �1-I}xa'_!{=LSCACT L' !mm r_-WE ix_-xa 55 R]F R]I Tr:121XC= I-N)A 2m:x W.IX ZA Z.3 _ ".—L, k—F tu 11 ' _ F F - YS S" I111 .. Im=. L- E I}IXI 167f Jf{ ifdf }{I Y;1 R]I RIC I.LLL: Y. 61.4c u 17 d" 55 W" 11 L 7a Y;1 7L A ZLL}T s.1 }rIx x!n rmT 1xn k1T{Is'Ir�, aF wl LL 1aFnzr W! F}II III I 1111 Fa 1• 51fSZ FTS_Y.1L1^J=TLi S'!L: L' :Yf '.IC{I iM�OCAf ixIX iM }%]{ R]I HYl ]F. }rJl-T J]! 12�IIX i'{.IXJf 1}IX iPL.�I ]} R]I lilu�r.xlswc w.111rSw G.a ..Liu i!u irfpw Li iui iai aiY L� '1 MIS �t111111 y 11t 111 i19C%• IA9P 11 N 1"ShIIRFi:['.'NC Ka-RL' 3L 1;AfIW 1}IX R]1 IS YVxTFRHF: L'_' NL"FFrL=RC A it r} ScmJ{ Ila mm Y]I li F1•-yT+:ylL' LY. }I .. '_tik{t j1..311 it %.4klf IR%. i}IX a1Ie L340 -�IIi1— L:ia Sil} I: STFJl IXICaS~TM 'lS !+S'{I WGP R]F ^':J[ 41=rS=1L:AL4k T.t C. SWtlL1LLl 11LW 1: 1;.+!?%]{ L:xW} LiC Uf_ =1LLx. s;�11 1�9 FFIMM 5.7..-1A I VIr 111 t I I ItL {u1} 'YS_IFFIr L}T' SI 1}IX R% 1}IX WOp R]I :SFaJ"�.kl: l: i}IX 9SY i,u LT00 Yil 7Fii: �LkT LS.SL�_i 1, Ybf IkIX :!YYJ[ YidOhi} Wpry Y]I S:t-CLT Ll1!RS 9L'IXJI i•7AOPS} AdP R]I ZLL}T LL•:A[ KuLLLKIKK1�J27s IRL?HC r3--JT%I 591:'r n Zir!{1R TmL F'J_'_ _^[=T m= *mrm I F]I •..r L:Lw v —3 1 tLam weiv 1w P05 11?�fS t F. La.rL ra_ns 0 JJIL LI'u .ell■ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 119 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN -&KACx FRI - AMU MT rat}•. ,91 Tt rirKx.r SYCC�6.A,C, {�3L'LSIIQL.nMkPE85 Ar Yf + L 1 5 f F.XLL'. XLS FIf{1M AC T %1 + .. 5 ]pSA x{ S 1L11 5 LA;;; ' .Mr ivr.i�. vr,c �,rx._.nrv♦w.n T M. I Y L YJ.LYL':.�YL' ii 7i Y�YAIIA14.lY FTr xl'a1f.7 ��x-T!o- ar nR•r.• I F�:SAF Z 1:. { = x: Sk{} Y]{ 5k !X3 :LI:R�IC a1C OFAS1tl0 r,L' ,��} SIIfx FYL1p I.'}t} P}Lf ='!=M F . _._ r:i"L�Al1•Ir}C:"r�r:rY ._...... ..1....._-..clFTnT {v ..A_.T. R�l7 ._7_)_ +k I} __.S.. 1'.';"'.'x 1,T.4S=: ..__ S} F1VOf _._.... _, FSLWF� •}... • ' XLY I{T' ACT %1 }{} 5}{} m 'm LF �lwy7 3 K T .Tl4 V.1•.q_—aPF-.! Tr1r - lr Fr IYv-rr 2 LiJ-t=� I KI.: !i ._L :x} 1_1f 2::L1p r ML!. smR 2xin iiA X) 'VaUv iii]pi} Pk9f Fh9f =}S} •,}{} 1p IL.W: Ew �}{} Will - I:Vr� 7•a,r, ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 120 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN u'Rr,rrn.,T,1s L' 7J T IL11L1 p•1. S11'1 i,.k,•1I sLnlvx iy.•, Lr•1 i11,1 i'�:.1 k� .. L.'•:11. i11:1 F EMU =1mAL'gwK1 Sr_l1 Xf '_:YL21 i_%'xy !.R'xr iu} i}{S - Ydwh S'11SL Lill 1k i i..}_J} iil}LS kkSl�ii ki JIs011 }i;ay L+r,si, ilfs i}ta i}i3 IJLJ k Y.1 `:GL L W %A!'71 ?kll 11 •SFl{} SF_11P K='k{F '}A} '.}{T IF —Y'r-1IFG :.11 '. i:S{} 5; _;il1P W; M i}A} !}{S -!_r `il.511 r, P. F ]F _ _ I,, v Fix-- .... ,T{} ... •}tiT 1't F,• F. 1 I,.t1, I Ikil I '.i_IS: };}. y; k'__i' I _}{S k ;JN2!T_"'J=:{1 X:}I m kl^C w::l '" i1 T:+ '.H:xf S;x11P 1 I(}{a L• ". v,:P _ RRS,P F,'., I�:.{r% F.,r ApS I1 !}{S F I"fF;+ rtw:s 1Tr0 ,TAP :,ST "0 I ti'_�._I L^f ,:3 ik11_S iaiiltA[ I�L11% ism i1[s k c':N111 kH -- "I !111=F iaoe;Px Lfi;i:i IT S}{S {IS !1"y III ;1:3_ 1N]I_O i}AP !}{S -r ,SP k._F Fl<_F L':A1+;' F'F1i:' L:{512;5 1TFJ IV) '.PST 'TST F. ' L11 i1' Ki 1 i5x U,X jV5 ,Ica Is Lr_N j 51,5LJ iy., IJLJ ':a LL SJLJ IILJ 1` 11'A=LIG7 aA.11 5 y1;Si} S.-An 4LJS{I i}AP DO 11 }'-t X}P LILD ] 11 1 •Hu) UT L_51! ,}A} !}{S 1I ;1 IC:V;=:4S: WXT FXb Mr 511 !A11 _'1 11 1>1 J1 ,:ROUT iJ Xi1fY ?194x!K 41"mx RMJAVI iLM 410 DO •.TST f:,G,G:Y7 !A11 Il IINXJ} 11}Jmx kXJX!01 410 !}{S il- I. 11 11-11 - vt Fia alp Sim I R"LPXF l511 - p'RT S.:!PA ' FI.'.'TSF ,T;FT !TST , p.11 Fla 11 r.. F, 1 I11o1 „I;y 4wa Ls+a iyy sacs r.+5 x t. w .s xr:w.ru Q 1 1 1111 > 11 1 =LYf: ili_I" —AL va -ILlalul ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 121 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN M 1"."iCI -k" ..'- __Ihwx_Rx_x_h _LL�ur. _._ Ir;3 .. _ .. __-. _ ._..._._ l� _.__. .. 3�L} :Zm rS:—C{iAC!VJITM 4�0'_Fz {If.- 4A It.I_L'}{ 9J} FL'_SL'J} SX3 4 "LL"3'. iDSLZ'AK-U D1 UV..' LTr 1{} Lei.k1]{ NJ} L-%.A K S}{e d 'T: .' r.: 37} 7cm.- 3 L]'t-' =. -L.. 3"r: t'} IP}11X LI'71'. FIM 71; :}S} TII .[S ISS% ISI�l�[% RSJLOI FIp,Su{ }S} j. {II. 1 11{I 1 r -., I N 11 Fr:.'1- 1 Jr.. 11 F. F-d 1"I T ill I ill I • s+•.i41 k1 .— • N 3=4,%1 LLA71; G I%X S.S!ill '1J} 11,,nGd i}[} Ii ALULx.1—..Wk L, .Mill li5 :Ir:{od S}[} :13,1 allV) MW=r'_r%r:.lI CS -IL KC tlr o.l] }.} 1-1.k-1% k1_H01 !X3 I' I• :." rI LA;fC:h'JI '%1_H=, h, v k]MG 1_A I.f1Y SSf3) _ Wif}{Y L.SAf1% F:3JA0k IV) !}.} !}O .}S} I .S Ax '0 filefx FR:,: •It1�Twa1 ►l.+':' 3.; 1}n �1 ATf f'1'kTfhT. flf.TiC•fiflV il.l 1.' f hhTiPC_}TT ec w- eo =,L T:'.11Z1_:#rA1 T TL YL:J.71J4 Wk!?.'k 1Y Xx I�k�i:54 vm rTITTI'10!;VIS TNY} G1L`:C'IICH 71Cf L_'1: f.'JL^_ �Lkl1fK=1 Y[f'�C: KK 4Y L'fC 7 l'�SSR71C[ �C'T %J i1A S}S} 5<% F7VOf 7}S} jt+11t1 jl., _1:6-111 nm o e,,.1111 1111 1111 �N�} L-Y FL'IICX ;HT L' TeG lL'Ik :': �:arF_I mw LYL'rc I :.}'I n.-K:J6X33 'R 1 :11 1 _* ]I}{ 1 1?"Aft]{ I 51]{ I S}i{ ??':z-rr.Y LTILnEp Pl0.SJP !1% Sm F'S,r%]S Tl L7r: S]:: ,T I 1344k `kLY' I Ski] '1"< I1d4" `_`r.l} ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 122 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAM - -kNNA Vrl49Tl' 1C - I;FM(".RT W-vm2l ENWhEEW Nc:, ":MrING..'O(D rEM lTr4'4:) -".-.Prrprllf -.rm -T :.E-E- I IT- P-1c.7 T-WA'. P.-M -r. T)r.-Vl -IDT- rK.r-Fr. I T,- Cc' :I ID61A-J—'L1Ljl, I Ly,: s 11.1- 1M1 1 I 1M1.' N P. M I I %'.5:: r.: f I S IPA, .7. s 'ifa. ro Tff) r-Ir. I.C:-, 5 # 5 4 7 -2 1 I 35M,&W,-.4 I I ' I ig JO-36 CXAM,'C ,L�,b HIM PPMlAAAT3CpN IA4AVAY 143h Im WISLY IL=- I,= SL ICAI'= -r ICIBU Mla PrM1 ma !pl p Knm 6. p:)l kil, l.c" % I"- 1111xi Ix f, In.rl rF III;{. :7., W K. X YD A-i.:)l S..bc-ubc; Lk'-' U -,.:,Uu --l' JULLVI w 1 tmxvKo L jml,Y P HEAN".. a �GL�l.'JJ_' Ur., 13CZ. IMIL. Ell.im Cr lcltil -z K aw-E-r: qJA6m7 i 'IL-I-'J--kc---.)-j LLCI --&:,w AV A:{' kc k,;1:,w I -m 1 $1 V... -o F, 7,- m F.�� 4-N ykmm -U,..I--: .51 rvmuu M 1;: 11 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 123 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN WVI L Fil IFNIA JTPAT.-. ANAAM.' CL4:1-lillm T UESZ- lrx: r. _-r I rsclT Ds-E-t =A '� tl.." y 3lfx�, L3) tlA A VA-H 16 K.x t! 77: f—r-Mci 7c I -F I in. t 1 A I '.,n I - I I; H. M;.1M - WA.il *:yzpam"F. 3L-"M-" -Im r, k 4 0 T, wrvr V.- I I --! .1r.1 C.A 17.71-1. -f. ?m -r +jl: - =.. !? Y. Lr,-x '2 3E;,0o mmc* sfc.-,, � .00 13' - Cislo acT :,E 2.11% 7 W sm.1m.0 Km E.1 1 10 Q0 ZL I[KALA'.'ALAJIQ� �:XAL ;4,:w -ki :4 1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 124 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PAVINU IT"'4:) rrw.Rrprrc v 7'KqT mr-r= Trll-.S. F-.-(7. --r,r)mlr -IDI.- w.r-vr. Y2 60 ;in K-m I -q If! r.*;-. $4kll!! I f;XA 2pxw :I%X.-Lm t2WAV, I %:Iuu Fic-ep'' F7 7."n YWAL.PAI J. VL300M .-.?m --A 9TIErE?(CLt;C.'RIETADMUGW,kILl.'L,LVDICAPE JrLL -7 L Jjx.AA'A -2r.lLur.w.1 —.— L-- I— .- —IJ I L;-^w :k.,} x I.L.Vi I.;l -- :.:1uu t'-'!: fWW :k-", — %1-2- LAw `suu Al $" .fw m 'Al:} mI m tnffl 4imi -v i rri:viK. MY .:X. :X pl I-y-v Lo 1-0: f. D: ArJIM -c;L Am l5pwar w zR 3,---. M, D POLCT hm PAP 7A 4n-q w-r 'r p7n 1.1 77 % AL - ?.YffJ WA -"-I: DRY I. I'l 1.1 I'l t N 13111: jyiXll%, Dlik LILL -4L-&A.M kw.wx.:. .".rTrrr i -k�,'MACE 1 L'r 1 z :' 1 I.-kLn.TT. v mr. I.C.- H. -r:-,l -.Rr-mrrrF7 * - "' -.? p -p. f:X0 0"A' RCTLBACK TA= j TEA Mg --L, rr TE =r--.s ioisz, �-•s -r M7.CT 71-3C L-K-E-r I 2L-- E* I UMW I T?IB--G I ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 125 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ?KAEaFRI- Ad,-ax I Vr2 {:1,�[ Ifti l•.11l F i1r.i �' I'I r.1FR Y117LAI EnEmErni. Lw3im %.AbT Ms I I"� I I-— I1„AiLk9Ii �i_143 .FI. J +n rni_vu. w ru_.'ri ♦r1n ImY:L.K RY, IU; MM :}{S 1: YJ.LY6{: J}II}gJi Yd�L'Al1AY1L Y E.LLx3'a7LD9 ZN'J7 C3+GSPIICX ,KT e:�Lano- vx F.i--l:-Ar1`:1 murx: rC FC FYi'-rC CA 1 =V!Z ii Ln X! Wxm =1i1 : Lf:lCIC a1L dFILi:n.l uC v3 i*j]lY 53L111 'LY F321i1 31i1 a 4U54AY LV Fixi •i MU) iLT r"7'LanG {t,_^_r rK:F -r-i ra: -1-- Pc 4YF rC o m0® ®® I a 'Jo- xx 1 i.ucla 1 =x1 Wn uLwJ'JLx TLNYi L ILEFICu JH:, e.:iiano- LL'1: Fm- -L:lLrN-'L Yr.mm: mhL t,: rr i LSFT=" II X.=�,L-lt 1✓_ll 1{%`IJ} 4k ..fix Yx i.{3:{10- S}{S 1. :xlar TH iLMD 11i40ix Rx 13'x1A :}i 13 L7 IM r. JS F=^Jv %x F-nM :}S7 14 :a7r 7xM S I 1A)IXJ} vx" Rx L'x}{} _}{7 11 :}i,a-.-=mSIr':G 3A.11 1_i9fJ} S.*L1p Yx KAM :}{7 'rly'!rrnn' li'F' Fla „11'P aT F41110 f111�h4H C7MP '- !I'21'A: F:7F.'7 SST 1 F13"'_S '7S} rhll �IAt :L]fIG � JS,.S�nf .SISH 'LY 431=_, 31i1 S.Sf_"wL:tilflY. S=RYLLTI: FILJJIPI+ Rx ir'kl:ff 3• _}{S vw r:rv]F l=- sc' Fr s x x'rn.'x �M ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 126 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN M NIM Mw1� FJ(5L+[FCN lI4T CTYaTLG LM_F.'=:= T{_a FFS_F mw FYF'FC I r. 1' 11{ —1-2 - -Y I :1} 5.'17 I 1I liX 5L{ 1if All[X 5}{3 it•�J�bca�.S ' 1{} 5"M3R Ax FXA6 " 'li} - =•J11'.,•n- eF� 7,TJ1S i':_I }} R]S 4'=SkS} •,}{} ta1l II ;t11F1F P.. 11 pli o 7.'am F P]— �L'r.1L1e{kwx1 rnt.�J� ahvl ,o- tiLLC ki YC'JFI:'tlk:l'AL]LiV �5'ALlii: G.Fti4'�`l.kl 1SWU LJC: mm :1LT V=1: F,1': •I["11FF3_4 fi LFVC: 9C YL t�OF'F4. 11 TIf�Z 7:N5 Fr . Xl'Y SI�i 11 JS( JI7i1 P}i] �+:L' ST:.'.ISIS'F1T+iYW T:..L'{,• 9YJ SCY JI7i1 5}i] A-7 A 1'45" l -11TI W ;1T11 MM) _ ZX:L+ 11 ':ILT iS.AFZ� � ivl=.^..:_ .^:Am:i "r Im: PC PC 4Yi FC a mo ®® ® gym® ®® �N. _�..rwu-nw� air•. x. ka �� o-u� r.,k 01. - .1 u fYll.l:lV"If �L110i MCI) E=KF1'71CN IICT i"J4np 4]I=F.L:= T{=jJ rK:i -rim: "L 1L vu FC Sk{} R% I 5; �}{} t+t' 51Y.'i';]SI IkGt'n "J ]5I Ii01 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 127 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN -&NACx FRI - AJ,-U }MEi TIRf]V Tl tTW%i,.xV\t Heil l f]F W. h1'neMF 81]CCMEM1. LW3 LM%.NTMS I I .rt I I L 0 I i -21= .I +n r,ll_vu. w• ru._. ,�., ♦r1n 101IJJYrI M-l( I 11-Y.IL:}I I _}{] i YJ.LYFt: J}II}gJi Yd�L'Al1AY1L Y E.LL�x3AM-q ZN'J7 C3+GSP m ,KT e:�•Lano- vx r.T.- '. -A rR=r 2O-x F: ri FC FYi{C I ]}{:= ]LJAFCIC nIL dFILi:n.l uC I}3 i*j]1Y i3lin xY V32 L:} 31i} Y_�.�.I._ h.Ct ia3 iJ s� LY4Ii ix L:}d.n s1�3 i1Jti1511 IY Il IF rul}l .M11Y.IJ Ilsr I I r�L. .I. utic-h n.I.KM. n.. .4t tL. wm uLwJ:JLz 1L73) rat M-gXN ,iLT L':1ia1iG LCI=r.".r TS=u m:i rCr m: "G F[ FYi rC �! r, I I 7'•xl.. 71.x1. . U- .S'A- Fill JNXx 1.s La zx JK: n 3]e} 13 nl R0. j cy ux n ux 1] cs i}{] 13 :Ls' WmJ'}III.t -- 1XI L;X i.�f.1p _ Yx SxSn [Y A• L , %x hSIM :}c li 11 �Si: srd :7:1r]C:-.-�maml'v 'J' LA•ll I - 13. YiJ5 7: 3P:Ja KY}i5 F:,I M :Se] 11 t i_i9fJ} g}ta fix sm :}{] :1 �JIIOG lT' - lx) F11f LXL)) Yx F.xv) DO sxr�.eL;�Jrtis.x. lesac*r,•1e zr�m:x ffx �a-�rex Baca �f...rt.il.,rkw i,l,l ily.a ill•I.. _] �JF+L==✓_7 T' - I1<} sF11f1 ii]1p Yx 4.Jd}{} :}{} YA]I�AF =i](iG � Jni{}K iYli Y, xY F_Ylsii :}{} FJF,I�Jff fix iii 3R JF It '.}{a ]arJi r:rcmrJ¢r ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 128 1.KY; M :>{FL'rrL11 '_ILT L'.7NL: LD Sq:.^..:� �f:u=s :CL= :cF 4Yi rC 'J=l' i 9'LFn]Ia.eLi'xfw �I'F i{} lajx xx ul"A _}{] F ra<4i Lwa.f:l Trl F] ;rx kr/ x xx IAm _}{] rJll.-.i. r'.-'?d S.AP _ xx _ P;..M} :}{7 I+ 1Y =AFZ DDHD - M 3r;A.IX M=:J7 xx IS__{+} '.}{} 11IL UlL'I UR; I LILIALIL'16 WALM LAFL MU'L• u �CLYiSiLI aL"'• I I lJLl l�1'Z�Rfl62 iYl'� 1'.74aTID I is�c�xoa::e I :CT I I I uA I sxa xx I sm I ao -r.:c-rtir L�ll.ns niol■ a% I.SS}s} �aS} WAa L XLLTCx Jxi I I.SJ.DL�If :A;:M wC ..I_ 12 I -.4ik Lr Lm Lmm i}41 xx 5M =}{] my� xn Shc.' ]m IM ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 129 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ?EACx FRI- AMU frt uia}.t IF.'h.x@1. � I,!1Aorirmr wArmiNh Flman K117PA, Sl:CCmErni. LWXIM%.n73i Ms +n rni_vu. w ru._. iri ♦r1n Hl�_2 I Tx 1i!� _}{S 1: YJ.LYFt: J}II}gJi Yd�L'A11A11L Y E.LLx3'a1'LD9 ZN'J7 C3+GSPIICX ;KT e:�Lano- vx F.i--I:-Arm:1 me-F-x: rC FC &,w-rc : Lf:lCIL ,JL dFILi:n.l uC Ii1 i*j]IY SYLa YY VY1i1 31i1 . Y_�.�.i� h.Ct •h3 i,M ice:• iY L:If b s10 a 4U54AY LV dlxi •i MU) _IL'r L'7ianG LICi1:r= -c:ji rK:i Yr ra: YK vu rC o m0® ®® Wn uLluuLx TWA.i LKL4n m im L':KAnp L1_'1: Fm- x:jLr N-'L Yr.mm: mhL t,: rL i LSFT=" Laa� L.�.�a i�ixru II X.=�,L—lt Wwl s}t1 1. :-P— T11 j iLMJ} k3A_OLx Yx i xiA :}i 1] 13 Lf.-0..L j {.. L- I 1'1 -koi1 F;A s.x 11 YY s.sIJIv Ax i.'JO{I I.PM :Si] :1S} 14 :x7r:xM S I 1A10fJ} vx1p Ax 1.'x}{} DO 11 :}iTa-.-=mnr':G 3.kll 1_L9fJ} s;Af11) Yx KAM DO iri1 �rly'!rrnn' r1r Trw 1 rl f111�h4H vmcl '- i'F '6'i"r{ a I L:;'1'_{ r]S} 1 1 III qx _ s111 - x':l`n0ri" '_] :: •} I If Y_::x Yx iKS:.'a =}{S rhll �IAt :L]fIG _A,..*s4 .:YisS 'LY VY>:3 31i1 S.Sr_"wL:tilrlY. S=RYLLTI: ImC]b�} Tx _}t1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 130 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN H5\l:YJ T L1:1} L^JQSL+ m =1Cf CT]�aTLG l4l: F.'=:= T{:a rF3_F rcll: IYv rc I + 1. 1""rr•S'-}7rCF]•Y'PiP�1 :2" ,C0 7S1.]S AR liS S. FR]S "ll r TLf AWbSi'.b W ;lP V) i_I!:."AC R]{ i.11:?41 !}{] LwaLf:l TH !] ;IC i_}_9}{ !L}{ i 3A m !}{] r.5 r",-- FI �•,r, d +L•.1*.rk A}.,k+'!01] zr "4, "I F:'S9Prx RR }•ZXA" '}S, I] P I ;Afl}S R}{iA R}S R}S}S} ']S} Sir L'Ll'I - lIL'iAL}4YL' ri'A VLi.F LMGC'AIL IHT rL-K'r. L. i:. -X H % 117{] •111 La'A1'x� -f" rTIJ rrpn xrl1 �IL1Y] C'i{;L'IICH 'HT K]np m-T Y_llrr!:L -Cr r'!r- rC ll: FYC-rC LLUT.' IIIIIIII� IIIIIII� Ri 11.T.xvC'C -. FICI TLLr'J} LNULFmw Jul I.:Jian4 u.'i-Fk`_: rL-. LrN-'L momm: rcL ,%: rr kS I. '.2Sx x. I. t}S}—,_ F. }S S1VOf _]S} ] ]' —rLYL�LmS ilp 9]{ Pk9f =}{] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 131 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ?EACa FRI- Ah-7h Yll:L, vbJh l:, L'{IFSLLTILA:,JSFJ}iYYs 7 1 NL-xnJx His s LI, C • s _{ii}; i' s y ]fR wriJC�.TIXi Fib ]9 I + ]SLWY s 1FY s 1 YJY s I{1pi] = a-- L # y-- - xG rFLILYXA=R9'.ISG Aa 1LN'11C [LLB �L �' =CT i dW }{ s ICY]%% + s I.M13 } xI:A_IFTG.]XL1o1�L Yr { i I�OF}{ 4 L s I• T=1{x-J SXL1IIZI�. '.L S --- I 'mi ]S i IL ]S F I s =�Jf�x •z :31fXR } s •--_-- 1 I. R 4]f LZ Ul1 . -Ci 13 :W Y4 SJm = 1 k I - l .kllr 3VIAr rusvmrru ia+YJPl R'.7.+1lS:�IGY. Jx: �, .. 1 'M1 ci"�11 sli,.fI— L si I ... rm-.Txm.1Yf}7f Tl TTr-%Tm TT7i I.YL-x"anLxi Cw 1. %I Ia:JI r Lw I #n... } ACT }t] s}t] tY na i]t] L•—La eY L— J— L 5L4sa rt ,nnsnTxmi,Tnrn SML 25,SL%.':'_tiJCr^: 117�i11d ii'`S.{] i1IX ?]i] XI+.'%; M M. ll}_ z 1Y— 3SLf 31i] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 132 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN u'R„rnr.,,,rs L'VT G,r1 J—+.1 kzk+1 r1 ,i..I I v k.. Nil FI{_1 a W. LJ 14.4;, i,1 .t a ii1•i Y. r� 5 Wr. Sr_ll I{ 13Y}fJ} L'Sf}b wx 541 110 i};S YFF� F YI i_i0fJ} I.ki:L )< Li J1001 is,cs i5i3 hx=Fiuuatl-• iAll 14 1{%`IJ} k' 4X kYJN01 1}M _}{3 11x_ .N 1A11ft 1{}'IJ} ki.;:a]{ xJ} FK: F•R !}{3 ,H iL1IXJ} F]`�W!]{ W:L100! 1M,, !}{3 -•-11 - - 5.511 1::9fJ} ,S45S }{ �'sF_11=Y_II I_ iJCT -- :{Sf F!A 1=:_II% F;{_I" 4w _M r+ L':1Y1 FK11a F.k L••i F.; •.a1 •-1 »rt 11.r i. r1.1 #�ca5 F:y-• r111 J.rc`_.— b.ci ix{:aa s a ii. !F1{!1Q Z EmidaJLv— Fi—W -- !i'} Id: J} 111h{[x xJ} MLMf J} !}{, 1 rc Mxr Nr- . LUI 1!3,1Y0 135-!gX L'_'J L Ci iLW S}{, Si 6.t+v Nradl'J' 1S kr14rNf+k 5�L ___ lhll _ _._..� '_} i:]21 Y00 .._..__._ 71 SRJ} -Ipx xJ} _ 7=7.1'S }{ _.:..IS[ iJl3.'3fx 7:35 Lj;Iir !}{} k4l. R} S5i5 T !}S] M3 14par.WNL*,k-33 2Al1 Il— -il {YJ} 4 A? !�!i LI Ar-'?775 L, y:!3 1M5 !}{3 F1 + �1,m• Fsr Fl,•ir F1x,nn Fllx7K •}r} ,j it11 :14'a. i11.1 _.�1 it_Y2 110 ,1ta,tu L11 � •_ its t, L.wrsr s1L� - ,r_r._1x ��i�ta... --.� siioti ii:x�s1 ulenae aius sio 2 '7: Y-AvlY1K -' I{I} '.i4:Jf7 _ 16::=]S 7 J}_ F. OMJ} !}S} r:Y.k1L1{-1Fi;3c C4—..-F{ it *M} 13.MKX %J} Fi XKJ} !}{3 4 V:kll1 L)C -- .Y1 =Ic--D ++:5:dx KS.1�01 IW DO 5 R.-kl:=1 L', :F =l'} p!A} 1:1.vw 9W7[R ,}S} ,]S} 1!'=H11=1 k71. H1 - t5 W!1) I:}S:S J: xJ} FOS,TR :70 Id al 7'S: 1 ,dal 11 4' iaJ mil pi,:.a ,-11 ,'a. •.J1 F51..Ja yi ix+a 11 #r.,l. rYr11. 1111a 1_ 7-Y A?,L'.Cj10?.3.CJrr.rka :+r_YI i�.'fiJ} S!Af110 Ltii l 110 M5 13 Y_Y A9,W:,Y}; 3a{J...FLl W I i,A Js S.Alln L11lcll S.Y.b Lkxjc. ism SSis �^ Fr, Y w iY l ism s10 14 cy1 '{ iAll 11}IXJ} +_200 1.;J1001 1M} !}{3 Ii 7-m AIHLYW 'L 1J.11 1j} VO +5M01]{ xJ} k5 xx !}{3 I+ f-YPof [ 1LI HLYW l' 1r_ll I 1.' J} S'3{Ln O J} S,i}p:i 1, !}{3 !}S} ••11 L'+ :.11:1M1s[ M7N! 'All 4}7JJ} 12: J} F}_" F:{_A{c gx}p 0 X)0 11 It'^ya1111hsL lAll i 1=1IXJ} k5 lx k:L10{! +,}{} !}{} F1+ - Pr.<i 4111 F �L'r,1L VArcminls �4.511x y1sr11 siLi M. ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 133 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN M 1'.-iSI .KiJ:Llilw _. _ y[I{ ,rA isxlYY 1�1 Ln{.}:i� 3,}LS Fi-M— Or+ X A {'A ki .lx 1..A W} _}{J mars-I—ax tl.i £A iSY_Cx x i}M 5}{3 nlarYci-1}[ pi. IC -T :A!{ £A 1J`wx ':J} F_{ Y'J} 5}{3 F:{r7 r.ax +t FFx A Ra'iry 7}rp -.70 S PLY-nR&J.J7It C_`J :J} A 110 �}{J WN--ry+.:IL}TTXt.' 1:. I `_Mix L_;.Ax OLD{ im Do I F....... R.— Li+II.L Lh t SI{Y 13s&:iX L".9: {U iix, M5 I13 ,asL 4as{LL i,... s�i3 13 i+ A 5 111 I-s{.:{1 1AA :}{] 13 IS' 11 :}{] N YL -' 1W \'+ 13 YS} i3_SA _ _'X_J} }T SIIA 7A} S.:;IA 7f J} iFAh 510 I+ +'Y•Jx{rll_w LL - FSl11FP1 FI: aOi :}S} �}{} I' hir AJ .F[ 1A 1} :xx V3' J} MmJ �}{} t'J II '�irrw ,r r„„y-'.'I L'S/rr Sri FWrr ir} .I�ny �Lti Lr.:llr illl xu+y'.Ma ey'.I.z>t iiF".x �}o rn+as. Ml LJI. 1-11di JIL a1'1 6J.— sus YJL kJLK:ZU'=ZALX0G WALLVLAALXKAJ'h k . I L{IR'r.W. La S li}r... LLua LY*a {,ii} L fT.IIF]iL'.Yh-1 Gf_.Y_TIIST.'nL- - i_} SIIf ]p iih{Yx ' J} NIIK<J} 5}{3 } ILl..Y:: }JJNIL 1A i] S4;gT iJ 'i.'x IXJJ L{ 24'J} _}{J 4 16p:s L'i 1LiS 1A 5I* w it SO ' J} xl[ 5}{3 : F _ :.'M ]4-?Y -x7'rv{'•-:vxr-1 nr• IS— ;7 - mu.Rx IXFA 7:A 11A• 7+.:.SRA 7f J} 5}S} IXJ} R117W 1W - LJ/Ork=!ll}7::::AlCll[I-IML 07 7MIX 11.3 11':_Jfx "I'._'MR i}Jf} DO lla W U... FJ jr III• FT{I 1. -'J1r In S'::J,lai+� Kiry 7'+JSrr GI'Iwn 4, r.J qua-7 irvl }t'l� illl #'�Vn 1 iv 1 14y JIX I YRC.7UA: L.. I,+..La LSiL01 110 SIos . i.} �7b.. Lti_+xLi,arJtl stair, xrJiWAJa }:F:3:{A Il.la-{Y iJ: i, %IY. MIN .f=M. L:1_9 1>,FxiF I -Jam. SIXFN MY naair Xa�' M71} tnx;UMN ]1LT [_aa nu Lo: = -4:J1 rNn-r-iF=: mY[ LYL'rr I = =L_S ACT I 11A 5Y.{} T l5}Hr?re FT�f_YIE 'fT YA 1SA Fsri ar 5}S} fl ]S a}R F1IX 7ir} Sll—f_=11::1%SA..6 = ='1! I ISA I-'MAx 1i'X}S} I S •,}S} ,Y. _I.LYI,ll.ra� o 1+,. I I rlll rll I ww . al �ry Fat• ��a �s Lirt iri Rif JAV•K 1 L71} L^it{;L'IL:M ;wr L',n' wr r---�f:J1 rN:L -r-i m: -c hL .Yi rL I F.}l ptilf :J}f iS w0 :!{ =* Yx 1_ ilfx Hx SkIX I_Ik:IX}: }?':�-G1YIlILTl9 F]IIA6JP TX 1A1 I Is r SSJS Im I. r }l1J1{2VJF I 134xj .71 I}IA*S4G.#I }gyp IJ:IJ} ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 134 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANACAPRI - —kNNA TFR(WISON NITIRTF IT AT% F.9. RFMC.F.T IYA12W2, EMMiZERLNG, CQH:3ULrlNG..'0(D rE93 IT174 '4:) -".-.Prrprllf -.rm 2TE I IT- P-1c.7 T-WA'. F-.-M -17. T)r.-Vl -IDT- rK.r-Fr. MW. -F.vMkTFFa-.%R? {XIJWM7e-W.AVPFEF&' 1 51 1.1;3d2 I I X: =',W I CALAM3Q A2,D 911M = %PATIDY LX4AVA 1 143H 1.11LAX.. D--.»:rvaw, ALL L L:di— L'—.'= -1: i—;.j -1l.-K- 4 .0 c i ::UA-4': -J,- ML—C' Lc 1,WN, k),u V, z ;c. 'X.', t, IV.' -7.'. : h-A Lr.,-A.A::j :tl gpAw ew; lt I.:N - -k C lit ci r.k K1r1 C1)N M101. AIX .4�L r L c III in , :v -.r J�A-. tm -•Im55 'J. m W. -p. '(A I LUX y lmy, x LL-W 4 4 L%LK—t *u uu t"m 7A 1 pxp�G ?nffl Y�171il XiLM I I ovxmuu I I T...y I ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 135 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN WVI L Fil IFNIA JTPAN". CL4:1-lillm T CASL lrx: r. _-r ir.SLIT Ds—E-t I IlLu. 92 uh t�ePAW tc 11 - 'AFA V, zsw 4 -2 :1l L.; M.u-- 3IdYL-- L3; ou rp Inm A-6; 51 e, n. V,-.- I , ! F.U: -16j14 4 y- — pf" 'm "?m m F:..Y. -.nfA b1c 71 nrx- V.f" ST&-.7 - WA?— 14Wmf =14: i W ]iw 8_2-- Lt:r.-- :UJU 1, L--- adL :E -'6CC *(,u : Ka :)Oo L. 0 ?{'CCIF ! 56 L-- Mll—'AlJj MAX 6 30& 4 p 1, k." v.' r n -I.kx ftc1 wIX -:,Uu IF Q !QCc S7. Co :-oo n, MH Hil.: �i." 4hM -0 '4:-A.W. r- 7. inm YWAL WZYVULMMU, =;64 kJm in, %;4-'-MV, -,UU ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 136 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PAVIN43 1T1S'4'47 rrw.Rrp-.lc r lkqT ur-r= TrT.S. P.-0.7 --r, rlm Ir -IDI.— mc. r-v r. I T' I W. 4; M fw:.%.m m „m 4.. w A Aim Z-vc -"W,. VENM : W Z—Ilk k h M4 ALku, :L:m jw S%;-Am Sq,'Cl p. !-fr.. !:5ml YWA? ELlAYk xurgZ.04 M*-�54 10 f:=.N -.-.Oo MIEIFNrINC.'RETAI154T;WAaL9.'LA-wD4CAPE : —AF= III:'{{': .,.GK:mM-lct it II V11 AL LX-Uk:l Aul'. Ncllvl.� jJ lTre I LLT'- • ALA I LIU Lv.%: zl.,:. f, i A W -,A% :k-,s k,-%: -:,Uu — -.nm ril.y. rr.:. -prmu,mri-, pivr.� A3%D Calk l -F-- --ioo 27, jj=I.A'A LI1?'.'I:Uu%1ct a LL LVL}— V.LC_ ..L: "-k:J •IDJ'� I JILL. x 1T•flf -T i.11i r u{ =ld. ::RT=IE3 ROUXAC K TA= I lk.. U-k.-Klza� i:- )u t"f0 • .6A, :k,) I i.x -x , ..I. . :m e , r , I !pI -] E.:: 1 MWA6,Lw 1 sn-wU22 ISLZJ aiB.wI ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 137 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN -WArr ral-AJ,-U 3h1�.3 TFrh7. UWFl ATrr]rf''r ¢ki]r vk?r.rmr:p rmy&)i IPn) ILtj-?bA' +n rni_vu. w ru._. iri ♦r1nI M1 JRJ. F RY', 11-S.Ii3+ _}{] �4U54A1 LLN! W?i TN]J =FCT r:l,IT' Ltn:. _-c:jirr:F `C Cra: r£Fc FYF'rc 7 s try. ii i } aLrC�fGFP aii4] uL' L}i} S:YSC SAfLb 'L% L'Af 1i} :}{} i P]F•r+ Y.Nfi [ NSi F1i} i% s}i} PSLf riu _rt3 S [ iiM14Y .']-J:�r_tiJS -: m Jp Y% 1_ii:r)? _}{} Wm Vz= M 14.17 Q+Gr=m ,KT S".l-f.Lz T:a rr:r 'C rmc: -C Ur. rcv-rc [LSJT'v F :}31IX:��fIG-fl lAll I 111IXJ} S; ]{L10 9]{ F}{] - F,f 6.axr N� .C— W..11 IF 7,�3Ap 11 ,+l Y]{ fir 1l4 ]{ :}{] 12 li —pr..[: - :7} Z% FIR .=11!;- F.'ZFA S:X I:-..-:]R 9x F.'--'�}S} 1_'A:17F vr&lnmlarqm o, ] p... ,111 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 138 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AKAEaFRI - AMU 131Y&7'lW I 191W: KPWklR lkl-N:Rl K117PA, EnEmErni. LwicLm%.AbT Ms J.L � lnsxxs I IX3 ==m -,KT m: rr.-- --Arr-:z mc-m: ry Pc &,w-rc CA ZALn Wam 510 r-W �TA -.I-'r.W laTA-Z;-, %.X 'X3 _vrxlwammr= waaak IE-X ICV--!A- DO I Fmuw I -lio I HAAEK 1 1101 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 139 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ANAL AM - --%-NNA WFiT CR(lC%9F4C RIAT . RFrD(-.TF.T IYA12W21 EMGlhXERLNG, CQH:3ULrlNG..'0(D r[93 IT174 '4:) -".-.Prrprllf -.rm }'7 li= I IT- P-1c.7 T-71A'. F-.-M -17. T)r.-Vl -IDT- rK.r-Fr. .TIA=T 'I,- . n I s V MNC. {XIJWMMWAIVPFEF*' I m-•l 2' m I I x :',W I CALAM3Q k2,D 511E = %PATIDY LX4AVA1143H 1.11LAX.. D--.»:rvaw, ALL !.:,Li- 1—.= --- i—;.j -il.-K- ltI.:N - -k C lit ci :c� 5L:M-U I I W :r• I S.117 I I. k I I s i r 1 C lf 5 N F k 10 1. AYL L V-1-i.= -l' I—U I LUX.A:lk:—� LL-W p $7xpx rp�. p -.n n n ffl Y1711l XiLM I I amm 1 15.-.woc 1 T...y . ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 140 JTPAN". oltlaff--,D ' MITW.�A—MrA WVI L Fil IFNIA CL4:1-lillm T MFL BL r. _-r I rsclT Ds-E-t I k. :W: — -�w Al.— A-6; 7 pr.ry F:..Y. -.nfA :1 1 XA -4lm too-, Ka =i00 Lr�l I- m "'. ,nlu - WA?— snJu 0a: k'x �sw 2 - f, -,, . �'.r. -, t e '" xo L u a d L :E 6 --:,w -.6a $L-.U: Ka �)oo I V 111. �r.P- �; Cry ry J, :,F 1.701 -,700 MAX 0* Ziw p 4D r n ^P:: M uu ---.'.UULU L;. IX %,;,uu_ 9:-R r� 3p r ly- F teh.: :F Q sklcc IM. S'. m "00 �� T.', nT,F - �,W I �,W- -, L� i .i r -1 —.' —%' ;i . 11 i ;!.— 1; --4— r r A 1Z. P,:- r - is inm YWAL WlWV2iLJY3&,U,- ,k-", -,UU ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 141 EXHIBIT "C"' I'HAS} I& II WA I F R DIRFI: IANI) MAS I E R IMPRUVF MFN I S ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN RID EXHIBIT - ANA APRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS WATER - NORTH :UT -Fr- P.Ji6k- in t l$ :.1 F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA {aft LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS �'i, J 7w cvffvNv. I'm 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH Tse� T6HT i mac" —. m" J �'+/� T18 SAC W12A3.iuu :S'-r1 . .: - 2927194478 1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 143 PID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS a WATER — SOUTH In t r,e .. F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M r CITE' OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS ��'i, '� 4 111 H trNc Cnc� LeWXH Tse� T6HT 6TL 43k C?I2 - I��w, Ise 1S17Y a�a su. iou k T18 SAC MCA LI'�JJAMS ' -�f•7Pr: ti'S' �,`.7-. 'IF?:• - ;.., f: — :�7,'1' .1-.f# hn292151 21 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 144 alE sa i HID EXHIBIT-ANAAPII PHASE II - DIRECT COST WATER - NORTH FUT_R" 1. ;. in t'l6 F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA {aft LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS �w fvNv. Ila 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH Tse� T6HT 97F Q& VN2 Rld—dg4L N.. �JJ��'''++/%�� T1-1�88 S�AACC iou V -4,J Pr: V -: "7F?:•'^',; - ; ..', f:' — .1M h n 292151 4 1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 145 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 'T" FHASF I $ 11 S.ANI IAHY SFWFR IYKI-CI AN I) MA-SEFF; IMI'ROVI- 1FNi.� ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN :� � �' wax. .�-'•�J.r+�x��, k `� k� _ — II,I,,I I I I — RID EXHIBIT - ANAAPRI PHASE I - DIRECT COSTS SANITARY - SOUTH in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288 CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS cny�y, In � 111 H trNc Cnc� ��'i, LeWXH Tse� T6HT 6TL 43k C?I2 I� 2 Ise TOFU su. i'3 ou lYlti.+ADAMS ISM a�a 'mww W r.?•,I a r: y s r. r,�r: r.�,,r;,, �npa ,r•...r: — ... - I. n,24� 131 �4 T rh ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 147 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN TT. TT,{-'1 lir PID EXHIBIT - ANAAPRI PHASE II - DIRECT COSTS SANITARY - NORTH in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 148 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LL - I �•' V-4 F F-Tl T 1 III RID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY — NORTH in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 149 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 40' II ER 40, PID EXHIBIT - ANACAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY - MIDDLE In tle F.T. DAFFAIJ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA j COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS cny�y, In ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 150 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "E" IIHASF I & II I)HAINAOF I)IRFI:I APII) MAS1FK I M IIRC]VFMFN 1.4 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN � III II �, - ILL 1.7� PID EXHIBIT - ANA APRI PHASE I - DIRECT COST STORM SEWER -SOUTH in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M - CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS � 111 H htic G,he LeYnlle Ts mmir OM M IM2 X14)b..rn4L. Wd nu!w J �`'� J�ti.+Aa 23 mu lYlDAMS �w¢tw +� a" 1t r•:.�a ar: ys r.r,�r:r.�,r;r, npa,r•...r: — ... i.n24�131�4T rh ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 152 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PHASE 11 - DIRECT COST STORM SEWER NORTH in t F.T. DAFFAIJ SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS ISM TOFU MCADAMS m xmAcxpmPUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 153 [F- ::4 III - x- y 1+ 1+r - Il�h — I c' �. II PID EXHIBIT - ANA APRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER -SOUTH in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M - CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS :: � 1 � �w,a►,hu cnyary, In � 111 H trNc Cnc� LeYnlle Ts mmir OM M IM2 X14)b..rn4L W. ft—% is. nu:w J �`'� J�ti.+Aa 23 mu lYlDAMS �w¢tw +� 'mww 1d r•:.r'a ar: y s r.r,�r:r.�,r;r, npa,r•...r: — ... I.n4�131�4T rh ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 154 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN lmmm® _m PID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEDER - NORTH in t ge F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 155 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN RID EXHIBIT -ANA APRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER - MIDDLE in t le F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS 111 H htic Crhe ��'i, LeWXH Tse� T6HT 97F Q& VN2 �cw, is� icea� �J�`'� J�ti.+Aa�a su. iou lYlDAms �w¢tw +� mww r•:. r a a r: y s r. r,�r: r.�, r;r, npa .4zC,r•...r: " — 1s1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 156 EXHIBIT "F" IIHA1 F & II PODIA-'-.�AY I)IK-(:; Ar%I) IVIA1 I FF. IP,rll}I?C]`.'Fru1FPlI S ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT - ANACAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS PAVING - NORTH in t DAFFAIJ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS J �w�� cvffvNv. Ila 111HIsMI)d�a Lewalla Tse�mmir 97F Q& WN2 ft% 1— nu W2 A3.1013 Tip Q ISM TOFU 'WWC McADAm s R *-- is DF.?.AA P.-: P. rA-7:7:P/r.2/7-71o2 S;C-.A 17:11" - !-3r!r:- X-1-2. .._..mEH22j)02 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 158 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN .f i i . j I I � I I� r PID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS PAVING - MIDDLE in t �,e 4 F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS � ��'i, may, In 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH Tse� T6HT 6rL 43k Ca`I2 - % 1 mac2 is.'3 a�asu. iou �. �J�+/�T1 �1 lYlx,.I DAMS �w¢umiuAs mwwo Dr..?.'n'V P..-: l.+ i':`, ."r}f2,!'"7"2 ri,.' C:1" — Srr- .Ire"�. ...242131447$ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 159 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN f �j L--r r �.y .l �F �f Y••x'C' S�` }yam + -- r I I II �rl � RID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS PAVING - SOUTH 4 r in trio 4' = F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS 111 H htic Crhe ��'i, LeWXH Tse� T6HT aic 4W C?I2 2[i �b..in rhwrM.. — �cw, rs� icear lYlti.+ADAms Dr..?,'n'V P..-: :V PA--: S;C.A C:1" - yrr, rh ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 160 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ' RID EXHIBIT - ANA APRI - PHASE II - DIRECT COSTS PAVING - NORTH -- ---F,T, in tle z DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M ITYF hNNlk CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS !l � i r �'i, 1 � �w,a►,�eu 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH Tse� T6HT - 6TL 43k C?I2 Ise i 2 su. i'3 a�amww lYlti,+ou ADAMS �w¢tw +� TOFU ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 161 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN � I PID EXHIBIT - ANA APRI PHASE I - DIRECT COSTS PAVING - SOUTH r in t r* 5 F.T. DAFFAII SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M �= CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS � 1 � �w,a►,�eu cny�y, In � 111 H htic Crhe ��'i, LeWXH Tse� T6HT 97F Q& WN2 — I��w, Ise 1S17Y i a�la su. iou f ADAMS �w¢tw +�� lYlti. 'a" 22 Dr..?,'n'V P..-: ":,v PA--: 2/7 -D2 S;C.A C:1" — 5rr' ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 162 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT f'G" I'HA-SF 1 & II IANII.SCI4F'F MASIFR IM11ROVI-MFN I.S J� ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN ' PID EXHIBIT - ANA APf I MASTER IMPROVEMENTS LANDSCAPE - NORTH in tle -- ---F,T, DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 164 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PID EXHIBIT -ANA APRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS LANDSCAPE - MIDDLE in t �,e F.T. DAFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS TwJ;tr It w cvffgwv. I'm �'i, J 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH Tse� T6HT 97F Q& WN2 �J�`'� J�iou lYlti. ADAms �w¢tw +� mww ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 165 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN --- `r III M, T—T _ �'�--� l 4 PID EXHIBIT-ANAAPRI MASTER IMPROVEMENTS LANDSCAPE - SOUTH in t rie F.T. L)AFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2M ` CITY OF ANNA CO LLI N COUNTY, TEXAS 111 H htic Crhe LeWXH T� T6HT 6iL 43k Ca`I2 TOFU 2 Ise su. i'3 lYlti.ou ADAMS �w¢tw +� a�amww DF..?.AA P..-: :V PA--: S;C.A C:1" - yrr, rh ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 166 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "H" I+ASS IA F :-I I; hJ0l F�! AN } F�HIHII ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 1A BFING all that certain Int, tract, or parcel at land, situated in the F. Dat-au Sun*?, Ahstract NumtK--r 28R, Collin County, 1 Cxa s, and being Part that acrtai n called 111.{ibb acre tract of land, described in deed to Oakwmd Allage Apartments, recorded In Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain GQ549 acre tractofland, described in deed roT,vn-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 2D0845C00D4562119D, Othcial Public Records, Collin County, I cxas, and bring part of that ccrtain called 51,195 acre track of land described in deed to I wo J Partners, recorded in Mstriument Numbe r 20080509CC0562500, Official Public Records, Cal lin County. Texas; CON161FNCING at a i" pips found at rho nnrthe ast rnrnei-GI said 60.54r) arre. tract, hein8 tha approximate no rtheast Corner of sa id Uaffa u Survey, being the northwest corner of that oertain tract of land, described indeed to Jose I-acunda and wik, Josefina 0. I-aoundo, recorded in Volume 4G23, Page 759, Deed Records, Coll In County, Texas, and being on the south I Ioe of County Road 370, and the sou di IinS. of a Variahla width right-of-wny dedication. as deAiraVld b? platot Anna Higlr Schrxsl Addition, an addition to the City of Anna, accord ingtothe plat themcifr recorded in Instrument Number )D11 1 f 1, Fla tHimords, Coll inCaunty, Iexas; THENCE S V0'31'10" W, with the east line of said 111-GGGacre tract, and the west line of said Facundo tract, a distarhtc rat 246.52 €eeL Lra a 3{8„ mbar found a Lhr SauthwrsL turner threrur, arhd beinh Lhr northwest CnFrke r of YJesr Crossing Pha se 9, a n addition to the Otyr a1 Anna, arrnrd ing to thr: plat thereof, retarded in Instrument Number 2020.243, Plat Records, Collin (:aunty, I exas; THENCE S D4"27'59" 1t'1, with the east line of said 121-666a.Cre tract, and the west line of said West Crhrssinh, Phase 9, passin, Lhc wuLhwnL curnrr 1frcta1, arhd bririd Lfkr northwrsL currrrr of W'tst Crm4 ing P ha se 7. a n additir�n to the City of Anna, acowding to the plat thereof, recorded i n Instnim�nr Nurnk.er 2018-6{1g, Plat R�cnrds, Collin County. Texas, continuing with the west ling thereof, a total 6istanceof3.096.45 feet to a 2f2"capped rebarset stamped 'NicAdarms'atthe POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00°2754" W, VALh Lhr wesL line of said 1'ti to Cius ;! irrG Ph,asu 7, a dbl.anEc of 477,60 fccl La a L'2" eapptd rcbar sct slarrhpcd'McAdams" at souUiwnL comer Lhcrrvr, and being Urc nvrthv.resL corner of West Crossin.S Ph,ss,e 5, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Instrument Number 2DS6-SS4, Plat Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 00°24'48" 1h', with the cast line of said 111XCPGacrc Lraot, and the west line oI said Wrst Crossing Phase 5, a distance of869.25 feet to a 1r2" Capped rcbar found stamped "JBI" at the southeast corner of t1w aforementioned 111.666 acre tract. and being the southwest corner of a 40' right-of-way dedica tion, a s shown on said West Crossing PFrase 5, and being an the north I ine of Hack berry Drive as dedicated by plat of Avery Pa ink Phase lr an addition to qw City of Anna, acLmrding to the plaL Lhcrevf, recorded in Instrument Number 2016-454, PlaL Records, Collin County, Texas; TH ENCE N 89°08'24" W. with the south li ne of said 111.666 a ere tract, a nd the north line of said Hackberry Drive, a distance of '388.77 feet to a 1f 2" Capped reba r fou rid stamped "JBI' at the co mmon south come r of said TwD-J PartnENtracts aFland; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 168 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 7HF.2dCE N 89"49'39" W, with the south line of said 111.666 acre tract, and the. north line of safo Haelcbcrrq Drivcra distan€eot 31G.19fectto a 112" capped rebar sctAampcd "McAdams".. from tvh ch Lhu souLh!r;esl Burner of said 111.C,66 nuiv haul, grid Lhu soulhuaslcornerof LhaLeerLain Lracl.of land, described in deed to OJR Poirtnership, Ltd, recorded'n Volume 5106, Page 238D. Deed Records, (�olIin County, Texas, bears N 89-49'39: W. a divante of 5.3.9.53 teet, trom which a 1r'2" rebar tound disturbed bears 5 56"31' E, 0.5 teat; THENCEover, across, and through said 111.GGG acre tract, the following: N 00"0)'00'° E. a distance cf 398.32 feat to a W" capped rebarset stamped "McAdams" at a point of cu i vatu i r, of a r:u rvr to thr lef l; Nor ihv;ratcrl� milli Llic ors: cif aald umw W Lhc IcR, Iwvind a radiva of 120Q.0 J fet, a centr,l uritjt of 'JU'27'50'. on ar< Iength of 634i 03 feet, and whose 67crrd bears N 15'1355' W, a dIstonce uf6, LG.55 feet to a 'I f 7" napped rehar set stamped "rvlrfLJams"; N 30"]7'S0" W, a distance ot 70..55 teet to a I f 7" capped rehar set stainpe+d "W.Ada m s"; N 5'3"32'10" E. a distance of 3L5.07 feat to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped '`M€Adams"; 5 31"57'_5" E, a distance at 15.OL teat to a 1.- 2" €apoed rebar Set stamped 'McAdams-,- N 59"32'10" E, a distance at920.31 feetto a1f2" capped re:aarset stomped'WcAdams"; 5 31'57'15" E. a di-Aarrcc Lrf 353.27 fcrL Lu a _(2" capped rebar scl Aarripud "IAcAdilms`' dL Lhti Wint'if curvaLurc of a curve Lv Lhu righL; South caskuiIVwLh Lhu arc or said curvu Lj Lhu right, h;ainga radtusuf 825.00 fucL, a rxnLral ariglcuf 10'14'08", ern arc IenRth of 147.39 feet, and whose chord I)eoi- 26'50'11" E, a dfst7nee of 147.18 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "lvlcAdams"; N WW'07" E. a distance at 204.22 feat to the. POINTOF REGINN ING and cont ainingappraxfmaiely 44.177 acres of I and. JMA. ;TOh'ELL ..._5.�..9Erls3 �NF_,.[ a �292022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 169 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT I" I'H,9S� IH FIFA] NOIFw!ANI] FxHIB:I ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DE5CRIMON PHASE ID EFING all that certain Int, tract, or parcel at land, situated in the F. DatFau Suney, Abstract Number 2.8R, Collin County, 1 CM s, and hcing Part that acrtai n called 111.{ibb a rc tra ct of land, des€ri bcd in derd to Oakwood Alla.ge Apartments, recorded In Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain GQ549 acre tract of land, described in deed roT,vn-J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 2D0905COCICC667119D, Oth6al Public Records, Collin County, I cxas, and hcing part of that ccrtain called 51.19� acrc track of land described in d€cd to I wo J Partners, recorded in Instrument Numbe r 20080509CC0562500, Official Public Records, Cal lin County. Texas and being part of that certain tract of land, described in deed to Rebecca Wel€h, reao riled in Volume R, Page S6D, Deed Records, Cal lin County, Texas, and being mare particularly described as follaxos: ULGINNINU at a 1" pipe found at the northeast corner of said GD_A'9 acre tract, being the approximate northeast oar ner of sa id Daffau Survey, being the northwest wrneer of that certain tract of ]and, described in deed to lases Fa,rundo and wife: lore -na 1). Farundn, remrded in Volume 467.5, Page 7511, Uccd Ifcoardsr Collin County, Icxas, and hcing an the south line of {kunty f{oad a1% and the south ling of a variable width right of way dcdi€ation, as dedicatcd by plat of Anna High Schaal Addition, an addition to the (Sty of Anna, accord ing to the plat thereof, recorded i n Instrument N um ber 2p11-177, Plat Pe -cords, Collin Om ntyr, Texas; THFNCF S 00"31'10'r'OV, with thr: eat Iin4-. ofsaid 111.Fi66 arse tract, and the west line nfsaid Facunda tract, a distance of 2415_51 Feetto a 3r'E" rebarfnund at the southwest corner thereof, and beingthe northwest corner of West Crossing Phase Sr an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat theimF, iewrded Iri lrrsirurririiI Number 2020-243, PldL Bm0fd5, Collin CQurity, Trxds; THFNCF S W?7 .99'r'VV, Mrith thr: east lint: of Said 111.656ac.re tract, anti the west line. of Said Wait Cm,,Jng Ptlase 9, passing the southwmt rAwwr thereof, and krein.g the ncrthwr.sr nnrner of Wmr Crossing Phase 7, a n addition to the City of Anna, ac ord ing to the plat thereof, recorded i n Instrument Wunibrr 2018-CO9, PlaL Rturnds, Collin Cuuriky, Texas, arntirruiub with Lhr wnL lint lhrrrur, a WLaI distance nf11all - R Feettn a 1 f7" capiwd rgharset stamped " K4r&.1am "; THENCE 5 68"37'07'-W, a distance of2C4.?2 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdarns" THENCE narthwesterl-� uith the arcofa curve tD the left, having a radius of82S.DD feet, a central anp]e vF W'24'45", an arc length of 135.53 ImL, drib whose chord bcars N 26'25:30" W, a disLdritc of 1.15.39 fccL Lo a 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams'; TI IENCE N 315715" W. a distance of 353.27 feet to a 112' capped rebar setstarnped "McAdams„ TI IENCE S 59°32'10'r W, a distance of 8.00,27feet to a V2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THFNCF N 31"S7'1 S" W, a distance of 1dt101 feer to a 1 f7" rapped r�-.har set stamped "111cAdams' THENCE N 31°3i'27r' W. a distance of 42.14 feet to a 1j2,r capped rebar F,0st,rnped "McAdams"; THENCE N 79"r19'3S" W, a distance of 43.14 feet tD a 112" capped rebar sex stamped "PAcAdams"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 171 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 28°01'41" W, a distarice of 4114 fuck tD a 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCI N 26°13'53" W. a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1 2" capped rebar setstamped "McAdams"; TI IENCE N 24°26'02" 15+, a distance of 43.14 Irrt to a V2" capped rrljdr set starriprd "McAdams"; THFNCF N 77-37'1R" W, ad i,,taincL-.of 4.1.&1 tsar to a 1 j7" capped rebar setstarnped "Mr.Adams"; THENCE N 20°48'29" W. a distance of 43.82 feet to a 112" capped rebar set stamped "Mr.Ad,inF."; THENCE N 18°S8r39" W, a distance of 43.22 feet tD a 112" capped rebar sat stamped ''NkAdaMS"; THFNCF N 17"09'OS" W, a distance of 43.87 teat to a 1.f 2" rapped rebar s,at stamped "McAda ms"; I HENCE N IS°19'3U W, a distance of4182 feet to a 1[)" capped rebar &et.stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 13°29'56" W, a distance of 43.S2 feet to a 1f2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 11°4Cr'21" W, a dislanix oI43.82 feet to a ]i2" rapped rrtrdr suet stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 10°02'21" W, a distan€e of 34.53 fuck tD a 1J2" capped rebar set. stamped "McAdams"; TI IENCE N 09°077' W. a distance of 9.30 feet to a 112" capped rebar set stamped `McAdams"; TI IEN( C N 06°01'12" W, a dlstarice of 43.82 feet to a 1J2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THFNCF N OF1 F.M" W, a distance of 4.�.R7 fair to a 1 0" capped rebar setsramped "Mr.Adams"; THENCE N 04°3745" W, a distance of 43.83 feet to a 112" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE N 01"S8'05" W, a distance of 59.90 feet tD a 1/2" capped rebar SetStarnped 'McAdams"; THENCE N 01"01'.36" W, a distance of 25.01 feet tD a 112" napped rebar set starnped "McAda ms"; N UO'S 3'4S" E, a dicta nix Df 494.84 feet tD a 1 f 2" ca Aped re ba r sit sta roped 'McAda ms" tD the north line of said 111.(jCG acre tract, and the south line Df that rurtain tract of land, desuibed in deed to Kawasa Ilaldinip LLC; recorded in Instrument Number 2019080700094675(r, Official PublicPec:ordx, Collin CDuntt, Teas; TH FNCF N R 7 W54" F. w irh rho north lime of sa id 111-1366 arse tract, and the :.ew7th li na of said Kaya u HDIdi rigs tract, pami ng at a dicta nce of 303. W feet, a 5/9" reba r fou nd i n sa id CDu my Rrrad 3 A), bei rb the southwrslixiner uI thdt certain willed 2AW acre UaCIOf Idled, dekfifred In dyed to the Oily yr Anna, rernrded in'dnlunra 47W, Page 7396, Deed Rannrds, Crillin Cnunty, Taxas, rxintinuingwith the smith ling ther�nt, a tntaI distance nt 4.16.56feettn a 5fR rahar tntind in said Cnrmty Road .370, trrrrn whicl7 a S f8" rebar faun d far witness bea rs S OU'2Y E, a d ista rice of 3U.0 feet; TI ENU N 8 7°36'59" E with lhr sou Ih lint of said Ci ly of Arum Tra u� rm3sir%b a 1167.15 11:e l thq� southedA corrirr lhe'reol, wriLirwinU with lht gvulh lirre of Said Kayasd fluldirk rs tract, a loldI disldricr of 47j.Rafret to a 1 f 7 n-.har fnund at rho southeast nnrnesr t}v-ranF, hainB t}3e<.uuthAw.sf corner of said right-of-xvayr dedication shown on Anna High School Addition; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 172 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE N 89"3S'49�`' E, with the north line at said Welch iract, and the south line as aid right-af-way dedication, a distance of 517.45 feet to tha POI1 fT OF BEGINNING and containing approxirnatclp 38.877 acres of Idnd_ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 173 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE 10 TRACT2 BLIKi all that certain 14t, tract, or parcel of land, situakcd in the F. Daffau Survuy, Abstract Plumber 2B3, Collin Cou ntyr Texas, and being part that oertai n ca I led 111.666 acre Ua ct of la nd, descri bed indeed to Oakwood Allage Apartments,recorded in Instrument Number 20171201001594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, arrd being part of that certain EO.W) acre trartotland, described indeed to Ivfo J Partners, recorded in Instrument Number 21)(JS0S0901A)s62491), Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part ofthatcertain called 51,195 acre tract of land described in deed to Two-J Partners, recorded in Mstrumen t Nurnbe r 20W05N000562500, Official Public Records, Collin County. Texas and beinS part of that Certain tract of land; described in dead to Rebecca bWelch, recorded in Volumc R, Page SM). Deed RceDrdsr Collin County, Icxas, and being more particularly describcd as fallovn' COMMENCING at a 1" pipe found at the northeast corner of said 60.549 acre tract, being the approximate nnftl�ast Corner Of said Daffa a Su riey, being the, northwest rorner aE that Certain tract ❑F land, described in deed to Jose Facunda and wifer ksefina 0. Faeundo, rccordc-d in Volume 4C12S, Pagc 159, Uced Records, Collin County, 1 exasr and being an the south line of County Road 310, and the south line of a variable widths right-of-way dedication, as dedicated by plat of Anna I ligh. School Addition, an addition to the CItV of Anna, accord ingto the plat thereof, recorded In Instrument Number 2011-177, PlatRemTds, Cn1linCnurive, Texas; I HLNCL S UI]°31'20" L4, with the east line Dfsaid 111.6GGacretrart, and the west line of said Facundo track, ad istanceof 2415_52 Feet to a 3+'B" rebar found at the southwest Comer thereof, and being the norlliwest earner of Vdrst Crossing Phdsr 9, ark addition Lo Lhe CiLy of Anna, a€vjrdinE LU thr plat th,-.rent, remrdFrl in lnstrumf,.nt NumLxr 707❑-?49, Plat RFc:nrrls, C,nllin Count{, Texas; THFNCE S f10°77 SD" 0!, with the past line ofsaid 111,656acretract, and the we —A line of skid West Crossing Phase 9, passing the southwest corner thereof, and being the northwest comer of Ydest C'rvs�-inr, Plia,�c 7, an addiLivn Lo llrc City ref Anna, auwrdin, Lo Lhr plat Llwrrv1, rrtordrti in InslrumrnL Nurntspr 701 R^FM. Plat &k.cords, Collin County, Texas, Continuing with the west line therpnt, a total distannP ofl101.ES Feettn a 1/7" raPlwd r,-.harset stamped " K& Adams, THENCE S E8"37'07` L4, a dista nce of 241.22 feet to a 1 f 2" ca Aped rebar set stamped "McRda rns" THENCE northwesterly with the arc of a curve Lo Lhc kft, having d radius crF825.00 feet, a mntraE angle DF 09°24'45'r, an arc Icngkh of 185.53 feet, and whose chord bears Pl 2V25'8U' W, a distancc -DF 135.88 feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset 5nmped `McAdams"; THENCE N 310Sl'15" bW, a distance of 3S3.27 Eeetto a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "l rAclarns'' THFNCFS 59"37r10"L4,a distanreot! CAll to a 1/7"r3PFk-.dr�-.har setstamt,ed `McAdams"; THENCE N 31'57'15" bW, a distance of 15.01 feet to- the POINT OF BEGINNING, being a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "I,rlcAdarns"; THENCE S 59°32'10" Ohl, d disLancc of 5tL02 IreL to a 1I2" capped rrbar set sLarnped'WAdams"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 174 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THFWE N 31"57''I.5" trd, a distance of 133.23 teetto a 1/2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THE-NCE norlhvfesterly with tfre arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of LS-15.00 feet, a central angle of L9-4 C'59", an are length of 530.76 feet, and whose chord bears N 22"06'45" 'M. a distance of feet to a 11'2" capped rebar set stamped WcAdanis"; I HENCE S 77a4344" W. a dlste nce of 120.00 feet to a 1}2" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; 7Htvct southeasterlywith the arc of a curve to the left, havlrkC a radius of 164},0o feet, a central angle c f 497'41", an arr. IpnRth of 1J9.65 feet, and whose rhnrd bears S 14:1WO6" F, a d+' tan€e. of 17f-61 feet to a 1/2" capped rebarset stamped "M€Adam s"; THENCE S 73-16'03" W, a dist:3nce of 72.92 feat to a L/2" €apped rebar set starnsed "McAdams"; THENCE northwesterly with the arr: of a curve to the right, having a radius ot=110-00 feet, a €entraI diiglc of Lj'58'13", ern arc:Iingltt cif 2/U_bi ftcl, and whobu uliord kHis N O6"Lh'31" W. d di-Aanru of 2b9.9a IFQuL lj d Ile capped ot�bdf st!laldiript:d WLAdarns"; THENCE N 00°3316' E, a di5tanre of 178.28 feet to a 112" capped rebar set staIII u�d "fvlcAdarns"; TI IENCE S 89°26'24' E, a distance of 28.69 feet to a 1/2" capped rebiI, set stamped "N1cAdams"; TI IENCE N 88'08-'20" E, a distance of 170.K feet to a 112" capped rebar sit stamped "McAdams"; TH FNCE m utheasterl•yr with t he arr. of a cu rve to the. left, having a rad his of 1495.00 feet, a rentra I angle. of 30"4595", an a ri Ien gth at 7&5.21 feet, and whose chord bea rs S 16"54'27" E, a distance of 776.22 fucttva VZ" capped rebar set stamped "McAdams"; THENCE 5 31'5 V15" Er a distance of 134.53 feet to the PG NT OF BEG INNING and containirkQ approximately 2.387 Acres (103,970 Square feet} of I and, ,2 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 175 EXHI BIT "J" 11HASF IC FIFI D N01 F4AND FXHIHI I ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PH ASE 1C BFIFIG all thatcertain lot, tract, or parcel otland, situated intha F. Dat-au Sun•e'y,Ahrmar:tNumLWer 78ft, Collin CDu ntp, 1 exa s, and being Part that certain cal led 111.{ibb acre tract DF land, described in deed to Oakwood Allage Apartments, recorded In Instrument Nurn ter 20171201E101594200, Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas, and being part of that certain GQ549 acre tract of land, described in deed toT,vn-J Pawners, recorded in Instrument Number 2D0805D9CICC6C32/l}D, Official Public Records, Collin County, I cxas, and being part of that ccrtain called `�1,I9S acrc track Df land described in dccd to I wo d Partners, recorded in Instrument Humbe r 20480509CC0562500, Official Public Records, Cal lin County. Texas, and bein8 all of Lot ix, Block S, Anacapri. Phase 1B, an addition to the City of Anna, according to the plat thereof, recorder) in Document Numher, Plat Records, Coll in Cou nty, Texasr a nd bEinRmore particularly described as follows; Beginning at a 5f 8" capped rebar found, at the northwest corner of said Oakwood tract, same being tlic northeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to pfaamFeld I lonies LP, recorded in Instrument Number 2O700117CA0007680, fiend Recnrdsr Collin County, Texas: and bmng in the south line DF a certain track Df land, described by deed to CIJR Fla rtnership, LI D, retarded in Instrument Number ZW)021400L123133V, Deed Records, CollinCountp, Icxas; THENCE 5 89°1443" Er with the north line ofsaid Oakwood tract, same being the south line ofsaid QJR tract, adistaritro43189 fret Lbd 1" recur loured: dt Lhr soulhrdsltarner 0wrro4, beingiai the north I inn of SR id Oakwcnd tra rt, same hei ng the. weSt fine of a nertai n tract nt land de-w.rihed by deed to Kayasa HDldings, LLC, retarded in Instrument Number 2019D8(JAK)0946fS0r Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCi S 01°1G'14" W, wiLh Lhr north line of said udkwLAxi tract, sdrwr bring dir west lirir vrmid kayasa tract, a distance of 36,17 teat to a .SfB" rehar found at the va uthwe5t rornet thererrf, and Lming in the north line. of said Oa k.vcxid tra ct; THENCE N 87"53'51" E, with the north line of said Oakwood tract, and the south line of said Kayasa tract, a di5WFWc ur142.23 to a V2'r s:appcd rebar x:L, xldrnprd "MCADAMS", dL Llw narrLhwnt corner of a wr Lairr called a773 aura Vaiiablr Vaidlh Ritkit-u4-way Oniicatian Lo ihr Cily ul'Anria, arxvrdirig Lo said Anacapri, Phase 1B, and being in the north line of said Oakwood tract; THENCE with the west line ofsaid Anacapri, Phase IBthe fDlIDvring 71 bearings and distances! S0CPS3',1i' W. a distanee ot4G4ADtnettoa 1f7" rapped reharspt, stamped "MCALIAMS"; S 01`01'36" C a distance of 25,01 feet to a 1,12"' capped rebar Set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 01°.SSt'0S" F, a distance of 4R-.5fi feet to A 1/7" napped rehar set, stamped ^rw�C�uaMs�'; 50r1°37'r15" E a distance of r13-83 feet tD a 1J2" rapped rebar set, stamped "M CADAMS'r., ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 177 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S L) 11'38" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1{2" rapped rchar Set, Stempod "rnCADAms ; S O8'01'12" [?a distance of 43.82 feet to a 1{2" rapped rebar set, stamped "NICADAMS"; S 05?01'31' E, a distance of 9.30 feet tD a 112" capped rchar sct, stamped "ro1CAAUAMS"; S 10`02'24" E, a disLarice of 34.53 feel Lv a 1j2" capped rriadr Set, sLarriped "rylICADAMS"; 511'40'21" E, a distance of 43-82 feet to a 7{7" capped rebar seG stamped "r 1CADArl1S"; S 13'29'55" E, ad is tance at r13.82 teet tb a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped S 15'19'3T E, a distnnxe of 43,82 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAW,, S 17'O'3'OS" F, a riistanre of 43.97 t2,et to a 112' rapped r�isar ser, stamped "h1C'A LIAM5"; S 18'S8'39" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a 2/2" napped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S20`4B'29" E,a disLanceof 43.82 frrltoa 1j2" capped rrbai srl, sLarnped "MCADAMS"; S 223718" E, a distance of 43.63 feet to a 1{2" capped rebar set, stamped "r 1CADAMS', S 2426'U2" E, a distance of 43.14 fret to a 1{2" rapped rchar set, stamped 'MCAUAMS"; S 26'1.3'53" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "r.,117ADAMS'; S 7R'01'44" F, a rHstanre nt 43.14 t�et trs a 1{7" rapped rchar see, stamped "r 1C'AUAMS"; 5 79'+49'35" E, a distance of 43.14 feet to a 1{2" rapped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; 5 3r31'27" E, a dicta nee of 42-14 feet to a W." capped rebar car, sta lylpe l 'NICADAMS"; S 31'57'1rS" E, a distance of 140.01 feet to a 1{2' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADhM1S" at the soukhwesttarner of tat 17(, oFsaid Ana capri, Phase 18, and being in Lhc north line of CapD Verde Drive (called finable'Widtlt Right-of-wayj. according to plat of Anacapri Phase 1A. an ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 178 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN addition to the City of Anna, according tb the plat thereat rarnrded in Instrument NUinber, Plat Records: CDIIin C3unty,Texes; THENCE S 59'32'10" tor, with the north line of said Capo Verde Drive, a distance of 120.04 feet to a 112" capped re -bar set, stalnped "MCADAM "; IIItNCt N !1'S t'iti" W, wrlth the north Ilne of said Capo Verde Drive. a dlstanoe of 15,U1 feet to a 1/2" rapped rehar s-.t, stamped "MCADAMS" at the ;nuthewt r,nrner of said I nt 17i; THFNCF S 59"3P'10' W, with the north 3in� of said Capo Verdi Driye, and the mnst snurtheasterly south I ine of said Lot 175, passing the mast southeasterly southwest ca roar theraof at a dicta nce of 5 4.02 feet, passing the northeast intarsertion of said Capo Verde DrNe and FergusDn Par$vmay at a distance Df Zt-5.013, contl nufrW' a totul distance of -f lt; U1 feet to a 112- capped rebar set, stamped "ML_:ADAMY ; IHLNC:L N'3U'2PtiU"" W, a dlstareoeof.32U,fL feet Loe 1/2" capped rrbAr se L, starriped'MCADAMS"; IHLNC;LncirkhweatarlywiLhthe arc of a uUive Lathe HOA. havlr5U a radiur�ur LL`UO,uej fcaL, a ccrntraI angle of .J1371 1.9d", and an are. length of W.1. fFet, -.whose r.hnrd N N W, W_S 2 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAIV13', THENCE N 89"26'2,1" W, a distance of 15.28 feat to a Sj2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" ire Lhu vresL line of said Uokvruud LracL, and king in lhu casL lino of said bloornficld LriluL; 1 HL'NC;L N W'33'36" L, wiLh Lhc we-L line of said CJakwovd LracL, dnd Lhc cast line of said 131wmfiuld Lraci- o disLancu ur 184,11 feet Lo Lhc POIN I OF BLGIANIWi and cuntoinirtg appruxirnalcly 24.11f aures of land. ..... ......,„ --. �dEri A. S10wE: L '022 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 179 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT `OK" I'HA.SFII FIFlDNfJFFSANDFXHlhll ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DE5CRIMON PHA$E2 66.262 ACRES BEING all that certain tat, tract, or easel of land situatud in the S. E. RDbcrtS Survey, Abstract Nurnbcr 786, and the Eli W. ' itt Survew, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, called 95,44-4 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 2021U81900167992 a, Deed Records, CDI Iin County, Texas, and being park of that certain tract of land, calied 84.Od0 acres and dcscrrbcd by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azurc LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210619001679940, Deed Records, Coll in County, Texas, and being mare particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a PIC Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said "WO acre tract. same being the northwest corner ara certain tract of land. described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Cunningham and Howard Joseph Cox, Jr., recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Catlin County, Texas, same being the southLa-est corner of a certain I5-feat right -cif -way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C, Page 668, PlaL Records, CulIiin C;uunty, T€cxas, and being the southuasl corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J. Cox ET AL, recorded in Instrument Humber 1,995000000577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE N 88'35'19" W, with thin north line r?f said 84,000 acrc tract, and Lfre 5uuth line of said Cox ETA tract, and bounty Road 371, a di*tance of 795,08 feet to Che P01NT OF BEG INNING5 beings 1 ' capped rebar set, stam ped " 10CA DAMS"; THENCE over across and through said 84.DOO aurc tiacL Lht 1QIIQvfing twenty-six (2G) calls. S W34'27" W. a distance of 290.33 feet to a 112' capped rebar set stamped "MCADAMS"; N 88'25'33" W, a distarite o1 65,00 Fret Lu d V2" capped rchdr set, starripcd "WADAMS", 5 01°34'27" W. a distance of 495.79 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MC.ADAMS"; SvuLhwesLri IV, with thr arc of a Fury La the ris Kr havir7g a radius or 50,00 Fret, a oamtrdI ari.�lr crf 26'37r41", and an art.lrript i cnr23,24 rrrL. xiiiosr churd brans S 14'5T18" 23,03 Fart, tQ a 117." ca pped rebar set, ntann pad "h'1CADAMS"; S+ru tIirasLrr Iy, wi Lh Lhc a rt ej f d n cvrrse cu rvr: Lo the Itft, Navin} a ra d ius of 5(k 00 fee t,. a 4cntrd l a riot of 60'4922"r a rid an a r r It ri.3Ui err 52,9 5 rcr L, vrhvsr i hor d hear a S 02'08'W" E, 54,51 frcl, to a 312' 4.d3PPed rebar sex,,rornp-PA'MCADAMS"; S 57.1146" W. a disLdriu4 of 24.65 Fret tQ a V2'r capper{ rebar srL, sLdrntred "WADAMS"; 501`.;4'77"W. a di, ranrx nt 117.60 feet to a 10., riplud rahar -Ft, stanipF+r1 "MC'Ar)ANIS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 181 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88'2 '3d" E, a distance of YJ9.9L Fret to a 1</2" capped rebar setr stamped "MCAUAMS", S 01'29'20" W. a distance of 50.00 feet to a 112" capped rebar set. stamped "MCA DAMS", Pa 8&'25'33" W, a distance of 561U.01) feet to a 1,.'2" capped rebar set, stamped 'MCADAMS"; 5 01'34'27" W. a distance of 111.02 feet to a 1}Z' capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; SQuth%vcsterly, with the arc of a curve to khc left, having a radius of 50,01) ftrL, a central angle of 101'S8' 39", a nd an arc lervs#h of 99.99 feet. whose chord bears S 25'56'05" W. 77.70 feet, to a 112' tapped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc 9 F a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of SOAU 1,2 t, a centra l a ngle of 2 F37'4r, a rW a n are length of 23.24 feet, whose cho rd bea rs 511'44'24" E. 23.03 feet, to a 1j2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAM5"; S 01'34'27" W. a distance of 171.57 feel to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; 50u1bWe5ter1y, with the are of a curve to the right, having a radius of5D.00 feet. a central angle of 26'3741", a nd an a rc length of 23.21 feet, tivhose chord hears S 24'5 3' 18" 161, 23.03 feetr to a la" ca pped rebar stl starn prd "MCADAMS", Southeasterly, with the a rc of a reverse cu rve to the left, having a ra d ius of 50.04 feet, a {entry I angle of 113'25'23", and an arc length of125.01 feet, vrhose chard bears S 43"25'33" E, 91.90 r"L, Lo d 1r2" capped rt!Lmr sit, sWrripad "MCADAW',- Northeasterly, with the a rc of a reverse cu rve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 fpat, a central angle of 26"37'd1",and an arc length of 23.24 feet, whose chard bears A78"15'36" E. 23.W reel,. Loa 1f2" capped rebar se4 stamp-ed "MCADAMS"; 5 88"25'33" E, a distance of 7,3-94 Feet to a 112" capped rebar wtG stamped 'NICADAMS", S 01'34'27" W, a distdrux u1240.O0 frrl to a 1/2" r;apprd rebar set, sLanrpcd "MCADAMS"; N 882333" W, a distance of 9108 Beet to a If?'r.appefl relmr set, stamped "MCADAMS"; NwLhwesLerly,witii Lhr a i u Q I a survtr to Llir ri;hL, havinga radiusur5D,00 rtet,a s)rnLrAariIIt yr 26'37r41", and an art:Itnglh srr23,24 reel, xelivst thvrd brags W 75'10642" bVr 23,03 rttl, LQ a 11T" capped rebar set, stamped "Mr-ADAMS"; SuulliwesLraly, with the arc of a reverse curve Lu Lhe irFL, Navin, a radius of 50.00 fevL, d cenUai anpjr t«f 1d4`48'S8", and ar%art:Irnr.6 or117.65 feel, whose chord bears S 5034740" W, 92.33 fr-.P.t. to 1 f7" capped rpLmrwt, starnlwd "WALDAMS"; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 182 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN N 8& 25'33" W, a distance of 111,8S feet to a 1?2" capped mbar set, sLarriped "b1C'ALWAS"; 5 0r34'27" W. a distance of 815.00 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set. stamped "MCADAM5"; 1`1 88`2533" W, a distance of 163,3E fect to a 1; 2" rapped rebar set, stamped 'MC'ADAMS"; 5 01'34'27" Yd, a distance of 5D,04 feet to.] 1}2" capped rebo r set, stamped "MCADAW'; THENCE uvcr across and through said 84A)00 acre tract, and said 9 S.444 a cm bract the full roving five (S) calls: N 88`25'33" W, passing the west line of said 8.1.400 a ere tract, same hei n.- the east line of said 95.444 acre b ac L, continuing a dicta rrcc of 140.87 fuck to a le'2" capped ruha r set, std m pud "IACADAW'; S OCr42'3r1" Era distanr•e of 302.85'm a 1/2' capped rebar set. stamped 'FACADAMS"; Southeasterly, with the arc ofa curve to the left having a radius of 50,00 feet, a central an8le of 26°37'41", and an arc length of 2124 Feet, whow chord bears 5 14°01'25" E, 2M3 feet, to a 1 f 2" capped rebar set stamped 'Fv1CADAMS"; 5outhwe5teriy, with the arc of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 50,00 fee, a €entraI angle of 14.3°15r23", and an arc length of 125,41 feet, whose chard bear55 44`17'25" W, 134.90 feet, tD a 1/2" capped rebar Setr stamped 'MCAD,Vv15"; S 01°35'53" W, a diskarrur of 24.48 fort in a 1,+2'r capped rebar set, sLdrnprd "MCA DAMS" in the easte dy south li ne of said 95.444 acre tract, sa me being the north I ine of a certain tract of land descrl bed by deed to Anna Texas Landr LTD, recorded in hstrum ent Flu m her 20140718000750570, Deed Rrcords,CollirrCraLill LyrTexas, from whic:ha 1;`2"1ebar found, a Lhe soulheasL vDrner oI said 95.444aere Lrdety same Lain ; the suuLhwesL uurnrr ursaid 84.D00 acre tract, bears 5 88°24'07" E. 126-55 fact; THENCE N 88°24'07 W, vvith the tdster ly south Ilne of said 95.444 dare LrdiLr and the rKnLli liar vrsaid Anna Texas Land LiacL, a diistanoc of 466,0E f"L Lu a 1J2'r capped rrlmr srLr stdrnprd "MCA DAMS" at the must easterly southwest corner of sa id 95.444 acre tract, sr me being the norrlrwest corner of said Anna Texas Land tract, and being in the east line of a certain tract of land, described by deed to DR HorLun-Texas, LTD, rmurduci in InsLrurrirnt %nrlbtr 20214212000310471), Drrd Rtfwrds,Cvllin CbunLy, Texas; TH ENCE N 00"34'00" bW, with the recast Southerly west line of sa id 35-444 acre tram and hei ng the most suuthri ly easL I ine u I sd id DR Hut tun Lr aut, a d isLa rice u 1762.32 1"L Lu a 1/2" ca pl,cd i,bar fuurrd (Velluwcalr)dt Lhe inner elIursaid 95.444acry Lrur: same bringthe nKstsuuLiierIV riurLfsrasLturner of said DR Horton tract; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 183 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THENCE 5 8$"20'S6' W, with the most westerly south line of said 95.444 acre tract, and the most easterly north line of said DR Horbon tract, a distance of 36.41 feet to a Ie'2' capped rcbar set,. stamped "MCADAM S"; THENCE N 00"42'34" W, a distance at 2250.12 feet to a 1/2' rapped rcbar set, stamped "MCA DAM S" being in the north line of said 9S.444 acre tract, and the south line of a certain tract otIand, described by decdto Laura Cotlins; recorded in InstrurncnL Numbcr19940310fJ0423G494, Decd Rccurds, Ca11in County, Texas; THENCE 5 89"17'15- E, with the north line of said 95.d4 acre tract, and the south I ine nt sai d Laura Collins tra€t, and the south line of County Road 371, a distance of 55-1.53 to a 1/2" capped rcbar set, sLanlped "MC:ADAM5" aL LFrL! souLhwasl corner of said Laura Cull iris track. being in the north line of paid 95.444 acre tract, be irW. in County Road �71. and being the southwest corner of a called 60-foot right-of- Y-w deriicatiorl W the CO of Anna, m.erFrded in Calf inet C� PaV. 6DA, Plat Records, Co 111n County, TF!rhS; 1 HL'NC.L S; M'41'41' L. wiLh Lhc south line pl said 60' ROA1 dud icaLiun, C'uunly Road 371; and Lhc north I InC of said 95.444 auru Lra4L, pashing a PK Na II FiJ14nd aL LI7c nur LIica:A ulx riv Lhcr uo 1, Sa IT is being Lhc nrwthta.st r,n mpr of sa id R4_000 arse tram, at a di stance raf 190.96 fee#, €ontinu in with the no rth lines thereof, passinR the snuthgast nnrn,-.r if said 60' ROW dedi€atirm, same beinR the srmthwpst corner rsf Bryant Farm Road, passin- a PIC Nail with shiner, stamped J_F. Smith 3700, at a distance of 5,97.12 feet, a uunLinuing a LuLal dh U-mi-c ul !.291.(1E' furl to d 1/2" capped rubar mA. sLarrip2d "MCADAMS" al Ltic suuLheasl corner of Said Bryant FarITl Rudd, s8ITIC being lllr aouLhwest corner +ufs8id Cox L IAL tract; THENCE S 82'38'19' E, with the north line of said 21.000 acre tract and the south line of said Cox ETAL tract, a distance of L5.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and being approximately 66.262 acres of I and, ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 184 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "L" I}HAtiF III FIFA] NC, IFSr NI) FXH1WI ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTI ON Phone 3 48.SM ACRES BEING all that certain Iot, tract, a parcel at land situated ii3 the S. E. Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 78B5r and the Eli W. Witt Survey, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of Lhat €crLain tract of land, called 95-444 acres and duscribed by dLed to Anacagri Laguna Azure LLC; recorded in Instrument Number20210919001679920. Deed Records, Coll ll7 GOunty,Te-xas,.)ndbeing more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a 1/2" capped rehar set stamped "MCADAMS° at the northwest corner of said Anacapri Laguna Acuru track. and bcirig in C ounLy Road 3I1; THFN[_F S 89'17'1 S" F, with the north line of s.3id Anacapri 17Runa A?.urg tract, and with the approximate Center of Country Road 371, a distance of 9+11-97 feet to a 1/2' napped rehar set stamped "MCADAM 5"; 7HFHC_F.SM"421d" W. a distaanre ref 2]9n.ufeettn a 1/2" rapped rehsrrsetstamped WCADAMS" nn a south ling of said Anarnpri I aRuna Azure tract, from whirh a 117" rapped reharfnund at an inner elle corner thereof bears N 93"20'SG" E. 38.11 feet; IHLNC:L! BM'2U'hb" W. with a south Iirleofsaid kria[aprI LdrgurlaAawt� traut, arid a north line of Chat r.ertaintra€tcif land,dazsrrhed in deMto DR Hnrrnn-Texas ITD, rer.nrded in Doraime.m.Hurnber 2021021200031,3470, Real Property Records, Collin Caunty, Texas, a distance of 925.63 fleet to a 1 j2" capped rehar sat stamped "MCADANIS", THENCE N 00'4b'2K W. w11th the oommon Ilne of said Anaraprl Laguna Azure -tract, and said DR Horton tract, a distance of 110.3.04feet to a 1 j? rapped mbar set stamped "MC,' DAMS" THENCE N 41°17'O6" Wt+, continuing with tha cammon line thereof, a distance of 1185-79 feet Le the POINT CIF kGINN ING end cantelning appiomIm tely 48.S8b aces of land, .JAMES A GTCM;=t.L }9 r7 02^ ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 186 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN EXHIBIT" " I'HASF IV FIFI D N{]I FSAND F}{HIHI 1 ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIMON PHA$E4 64.604 ACRES BEING all that certain tat, tract, or paracl of land situaLrd iri the S. E. RDbcrtS Survey, Abstract Nurnber 786, and the Eli W. ' itt Survew, Abstract Number 997, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, being part of that certain tract of land, called 95,444 acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azure LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 2021081900167992D, Deed Records, CDItin County, Texas, and being park of that certain tract of land, calied 84.OW acres and described by deed to Anacapri Laguna Azurc LLC, recorded in Instrument Number 20210619001679940, Deed Records, Coll in County, Texas, and being mare particulafly described as follows; BEGINNING at a PIC Nail Found in County Road 371, same being the northeast corner of said 84.WO acre tract. same being the northwest corner ara oertain tract of land. described as Tract 1 by deed to Eleanor Katherine Cox Cunningham and Howard Joseph Cox, Jr., recorded in Volume 1995, Page 577, Deed Records, Catlin County, Texas, same being the southLa-est corner of a certain I5-foot right-of-way dedication, recorded in Cabinet C, Page 668, PlaL Records, Collin CuunLy, T€cxas, and being Lhe southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to Howard J. Cox ET AL, recorded in Instrument Humber 1995000009577, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas; THENCE S 01'29'2W IN, with the cast line of said Anacapri Lract rctaidrd iri 2021D819W1679920, and with the west line of said Tra ct 1, passing the so uthwest corner thereof, being the tr4rthwest corner of that certain tract of land, described in deed to LGf Horner -Texas, I.I.C. recorded in Instrument Number 2019U82D00D1DG9780, deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and continuing with the west'line [hereof, a total disLarice of 3021.11 freL Lu a 1/2" rcbar found a Lhr souLhwesL iu ner of ihv akmerrirnLiuned Anacapri tract; THENCZ N W29'03' W. with Uhe south line of said Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819001679920, a distance of1211-7S feeta 1/2" rcbar found at the southwest corner thereof, and being the southeast earner afsaid Anacapri tract recorded in 20210819401679!340; HL:NCL N 88°24'Dr W, with the south line oFsaid Anacapri tract, recorded in 2021CG290D2 ;1°9940, a distance of126.55 feet; TI I ENCL over across a nd through se id 84. DOO acre tract, and sa Id 95.444 a cre L(act th& foltowir)g; N (]1*35'.53" F, a distance nF 74AR t .Pt to a 1 f 7• rApppd r�har sit, stamped "MCADANIS"; Northeasterly, with the arc of curve to the heft, having a r.-idkha ref SO.00 feet, a central angle of 143'1S'23", and an are length of 12S-01 feet, whose chard bears IJ,14"17'26" E, 943D feet, to a 1/2'tapped rebar scL stamped "MCADAMS"; Nortbwesterly, with the arc of a reveres comp. to the left. baring a radius of 5A03 feet, a central angle of 26"37'41", and an arc length of 23.24 feet, vh7Dse chard bears N 14'Dl'25' W, 23.03 rrrL, Lu d 14'2" rapped rrber 3rL, 3L;dr11prd "W-ADAMS"; N (]0°47.'34" W, a d istano,, of 302.85'to a IP' capped r�h7r set, ,t inrlxd " MCA DANIS'; ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 188 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN S 88' '3d" E, a distance• of 140.81 feat to a 1 f 2` ca Aped rebar set, sta rn pr•d "MCAUAMS", N 01'34"27" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a 112' capped rebar Set, Stamped "MtiADAMS"; S 88`LS'dd" Er a distancz of 163,38 Fcct to a 1/2" capped rcbar set, stamped "MCAUAMS", N 01-34'27" E, a distance Of815.W feet to a 112" tapped rebar yet stamped "MCADAMS"; S 89'25'33" Er a distance of 111.89 Feat to a 112" capped rebar sffT stamped "MCADAMS" Northeasterly, with the arc oFa curve to the right. having a Fad iusof 50.00 feet, a central angle of 134'4B'SB", and an arc length of 117.65 feet, whose chard hears N 5CP+ 7'W E, 92.33 feet, tO a I.,2'r capped rcbar set, sEa rnWd "MCADAMS", Southeasterly. with the arc aFa reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 5000 feet a central a ngle of 25"3 Tell ", a rid an arc le nth of 23.24 feetr vrhase chard hears 5 75"a6'42" Er 23.03 feet, Lo a 1/2" capped Mbar sal, st mpt!d "MCADAMS", S 8S"25'3a" E, a distance of 83,08 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "DICADAM5% N O1'34'27" E, a distance of 240, A fret Lo it 1/2" tapped rcbar 5u� Aarript-ti "MCADAW; N 88'25'33" W. a distancr- of 78,94 feet to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS", SuuLhwrslrfly, with the arc of a curve Lu Lhr left, having a radius 0150.01) heck, a rxrrtrah angle ul 25'37'41'r and an arc 1mgLhr of 23,24 Feet, whose chord hears S 78'1S'30' bW, 23,03 fret, to a O' capped rebar set stamped "h+1CADAMS"; Northwesterly, with the asc sal a reverse curvy lu Lhe ti.5h7t, h7avint a radius or SO.DO feels a tenLral angle of 143'15'23", and an arc IrngLh of 125.01 reel, whusc chord bedrs N 43'25'33" Wr 94.50 feet, to a 1/2'r capped rebar set, stamped "MCA DAMS"; Nor Lheiup rr ly, wi lh Lhr d rc of a averse cu rvy to the Irt, havi np, a radi us u 150.00 frcL, a writral d n,lr of 26'3741", a rid an ar c It rig1-ur 23.24 fry 1, whusr char d hear 2, N 14'53'18' E, 23.03 fleet, to a 112" capped rebar set, stamped "rylCADAMS"; N O1'34'27" E, a distance of 171,57 fret W it 1/2" tapped rcbar seq. slarupeci "MC.4DAMS", Norttrwe4terly, with the a m of a r.srrv,- to th ,- IL -.Ft, having a radius of .Sn.00 feet, a oerktrar angle of 2G'37'42"r a rid an arr 121ngill of 23.24 Feet, whose chord hearS N 11"44'24" W, 23.03 feetr tD a M"tapped rcbar starnptsd "MCADAMS", ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 189 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Northeasterly, with the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius at S10.00 teet, a central angle nt 101`58'39", and an arc length of 88.99 feet, whose chord bears N 25°56'05" E. 77.70 foot. to a 112" rrdppcd mbar seL, stampcd "MCA DAMS"; N01"34'27" E, adistance at 111.02 teettoa'1f2" capped rebar set, stamped "MC DAMS":- 5 98°25'33" C; a disldricc o1560.00 lc!LA W a V2" capped rub�pr scL. s[am pcd "MCA DAMS"; N 01`29' 20" E, a d istan ce of 50,00 feet to a 112" capped m1mr set, stamped "MC:4DA�1S": N S8°25'33" W. a distance crf 609.92 feet to a 1 f 2" €a pped rcbar set. stamped "MCADAMS"; "01"34'27" E, adistanceof 117.60 feet toa 1f2" cappped rebarset, stamped "MCADAMS'"; N 57°31',t6" E, ad istan ❑eat 2+1.65 teet to a 112" €a pped .rcbar set, stamped "MCADArO5"; LyvrLinvt;slcrIV, with ll,c drc of a uurvu lv Lhc rij�hl, having a radius of SU.OD 1=e a ccnlral ariglE rFf h0°il+'1'? j", and an arr. length of 5?_95 feel, xwhrece rhnrd bear% NO) Vd, 5n.51 feet, to a 1JP" rapped reharset, "am ped"MCADAMS"; IyorLhcdsLcrIy, wiLh Lhc aru of d rL-v,L:rsc c wr wu to the IL!1 . havrrtg a radius of 5O-W fccl, a ccrrlral arr�lr of 26'J 1'41", and dri Hie IcngLh of 13.24 fccL, whust chord bears N 14°5318" L-, 23_H feet, to a f 7" napped rehar yet, stamped "MCADAMS"; N01"3'I'27" E, adistaneeof 495.79 feettoa 1/2" capped rebar sat, Stamped "MCADAMS"; 5 88°253i" E, a distance of bti,ilp feet to a 112" capped rebar setr stamped "MCADAMd ; rt01"3.1'27" E, adistanceof 23D_33 feet toa 1f2" capped rebarset, stampad "MCADAMS"to the nflrth line of said 94.DOC acre tract, and being in said County Road 3711- THFNCF S W919" F, with the north line of said R4.OA0 arrp trar.t, and -.with said C'nunty Rrmd 371. a distance. of 7-15.08 teat to the POINT OF RFC INNIN6 and onntaining appmximately fi4.604 acres of land_ JAMEfi ri 3F0 Fl-L ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 190 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN APPENDIX B - BUYER DISCLOSURES Forms of the buyer disclosures for the following Lot Types are found in this appendix: • Improvement Area #1 o Improvement Area #1 Initial Parcel o Lot Type 1 o Lot Type 2 • Improvement Area #2A o Improvement Area #2A Initial Parcel o Lot Type 3 o Lot Type 4 [Remainder of page left intentionally blank.] ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 191 PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE IMPROVEMENT AREA #1- INITIAL PARCEL NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 INITIAL PARCEL PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $22,145,000.00 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS — IMPROVEMENT AREA #1 INITIAL PARCEL 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 Total Footnotes: 555,538.41 586,370.79 618,914.37 653,264.11 689,520.27 369,660.42 390,176.57 411,831.37 434,688.01 458,813.20 484,277.33 511,154.72 539,523.81 569,467.38 601,072.82 634,432.36 669,643.35 706,808.56 746,036.44 787,441.46 831,144.46 877,272.98 925,961.63 977,352.50 1,031,595.56 1,088,849.11 1,149,280.24 1,213,065.29 1,280,390.42 1,351,452.09 $ 22,145,000.00 1,229,047.50 1,198,215.12 1,165,671.54 1,131,321.79 1,095,065.63 1,056,797.26 1,036,281.11 1,014,626.31 991,769.67 967, 644.48 942,180.35 915,302.96 886,933.87 856,990.30 825,384.86 792,025.32 756,814.32 719,649.12 680,421.24 639,016.22 595,313.22 549,184.70 500,496.05 449,105.18 394,862.12 337,608.56 277,177.44 213,392.38 146,067.26 75,005.59 $ 22,439,371.44 40,000.00 40,800.00 41,616.00 42,448.32 43,297.29 44,163.23 45,046.50 45,947.43 46,866.38 47,803.70 48,759.78 49,734.97 50,729.67 51,744.27 52,779.15 53,834.73 54,911.43 56,009.66 57,129.85 58,272.45 59,437.90 60,626.65 61,839.19 63,075.97 64,337.49 65,624.24 66,936.72 68,275.46 69,640.97 71,033.79 $1,622,723.17 1,824,585.91 1,825,385.91 1,826,201.91 1,827,034.23 1,827,883.19 1,470,620.91 1,471,504.17 1,472,405.10 1,473,324.05 1,474,261.38 1,475,217.45 1,476,192.65 1,477,187.35 1,478,201.94 1,479,236.83 1,480,292.41 1,481, 369.10 1,482,467.33 1,483,587.53 1,484,730.12 1,485,895.57 1,487,084.33 1,488,296.86 1,489,533.65 1,490,795.17 1,492,081.92 1,493,394.40 1,494,733.14 1,496,098.64 1,497,491.46 $ 46,207,094.61 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE LOT TYPE 1 1 NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT TYPE 1 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $45,099.70 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - LOT TYPE 1 2023 1,131.39 2,503.03 81.46 3,715.88 2024 1,194.18 2,440.24 83.09 3,717.51 2025 1,260.46 2,373.96 84.75 3,719.18 2026 1,330.41 2,304.01 86.45 3,720.87 2027 1,404.25 2,230.17 88.18 3,722.60 2028 752.84 2,152.23 89.94 2,995.01 2029 794.62 2,110.45 91.74 2,996.81 2030 838.72 2,066.35 93.57 2,998.65 2031 885.27 2,019.80 95.45 3,000.52 2032 934.40 1,970.67 97.36 3,002.43 2033 986.26 1,918.81 99.30 3,004.37 2034 1,041.00 1,864.07 101.29 3,006.36 2035 1,098.77 1,806.30 103.31 3,008.39 2036 1,159.76 1,745.32 105.38 3,010.45 2037 1,224.12 1,680.95 107.49 3,012.56 2038 1,292.06 1,613.01 109.64 3,014.71 2039 1,363.77 1,541.30 111.83 3,016.90 2040 1,439.46 1,465.61 114.07 3,019.14 2041 1,519.35 1,385.72 116.35 3,021.42 2042 1,603.67 1,301.40 118.68 3,023.75 2043 1,692.68 1,212.39 121.05 3,026.12 2044 1,786.62 1,118.45 123.47 3,028.54 2045 1,885.78 1,019.29 125.94 3,031.01 2046 1,990.44 914.63 128.46 3,033.53 2047 2,100.91 804.16 131.03 3,036.10 2048 2,217.51 687.56 133.65 3,038.72 2049 2,340.58 564.49 136.32 3,041.39 2050 2,470.48 434.59 139.05 3,044.12 2051 2,607.60 297.48 141.83 3,046.90 2052 1 21752.32 152.75 144.66 3,049.74 Total 1 $ 45,099.70 $ 45,699.20 $ 3,304.78 $ 94,103.68 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE LOT TYPE 2 NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT TYPE 2 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $50,343.85 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - LOT TYPE 2 Installment Annual Collection Annual Due 1/31 PrincipalAnnual 2023 1,262.95 2,794.08 90.93 4,147.96 2024 1,333.04 2,723.99 92.75 4,149.78 2025 1,407.02 2,650.01 94.61 4,151.64 2026 1,485.11 2,571.92 96.50 4,153.53 2027 1,567.54 2,489.49 98.43 4,155.46 2028 840.38 2,402.49 100.40 3,343.27 2029 887.02 2,355.85 102.41 3,345.28 2030 936.25 2,306.62 104.46 3,347.33 2031 988.21 2,254.66 106.54 3,349.42 2032 1,043.05 2,199.82 108.68 3,351.55 2033 1,100.94 2,141.93 110.85 3,353.72 2034 1,162.05 2,080.83 113.07 3,355.94 2035 1,226.54 2,016.33 115.33 3,358.20 2036 1,294.61 1,948.26 117.63 3,360.50 2037 1,366.46 1,876.41 119.99 3,362.86 2038 1,442.30 1,800.57 122.39 3,365.26 2039 1,522.35 1,720.52 124.83 3,367.70 2040 1,606.84 1,636.03 127.33 3,370.20 2041 1,696.02 1,546.85 129.88 3,372.75 2042 1,790.15 1,452.72 132.48 3,375.35 2043 1,889.50 1,353.37 135.12 3,378.00 2044 1,994.37 1,248.50 137.83 3,380.70 2045 2,105.06 1,137.81 140.58 3,383.45 2046 2,221.89 1,020.98 143.40 3,386.27 2047 2,345.20 897.67 146.26 3,389.13 2048 2,475.36 767.51 149.19 3,392.06 2049 2,612.74 630.13 152.17 3,395.04 2050 2,757.75 485.12 155.22 3,398.09 2051 2,910.81 332.07 158.32 3,401.19 2052 1 3,072.35 170.52 161.49 3,404.36 Total 1 $ 50,343.85 $ 51,013.06 $ 3,689.06 $ 105,045.97 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment FANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A - INITIAL PARCEL NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A INITIAL PARCEL PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $11,025,000.00 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS — IMPROVEMENT AREA #2A INITIAL PARCEL 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 Total Footnotes: 276,577.60 291,927.66 308,129.64 325,230.84 343,281.15 184,037.30 194,251.37 205,032.33 216,411.62 228,422.46 241,099.91 254,480.96 268,604.65 283,512.21 299,247.14 315,855.35 333,385.32 351,888.21 371,418.00 392,031.70 413,789.46 436,754.78 460,994.67 486,579.87 513,585.06 542,089.03 572,174.97 603,930.68 637,448.83 672,827.24 $ 11,025,000.00 611,887.50 596,537.44 580,335.46 563,234.26 545,183.95 526,131.85 515,917.78 505,136.83 493,757.53 481,746.69 469,069.24 455,688.20 441,564.50 426,656.94 410,922.02 394,313.80 376,783.83 358,280.94 338,751.15 318,137.45 296,379.69 273,414.37 249,174.48 223,589.28 196,584.10 168,080.13 137,994.19 106,238.47 72,720.32 37,341.91 $ 11,171,554.31 40,000.00 40,800.00 41,616.00 42,448.32 43,297.29 44,163.23 45,046.50 45,947.43 46,866.38 47,803.70 48,759.78 49,734.97 50,729.67 51,744.27 52,779.15 53,834.73 54,911.43 56,009.66 57,129.85 58,272.45 59,437.90 60,626.65 61,839.19 63,075.97 64,337.49 65,624.24 66,936.72 68,275.46 69,640.97 71,033.79 $1,622,723.17 928,465.10 929,265.10 930,081.10 930,913.42 931,762.39 754,332.38 755,215.65 756,116.58 757,035.53 757,972.86 758,928.93 759,904.12 760,898.82 761,913.42 762,948.30 764,003.89 765,080.58 766,178.81 767,299.00 768,441.60 769,607.05 770,795.81 772,008.34 773,245.12 774,506.64 775,793.39 777,105.88 778,444.61 779,810.12 781,202.94 $ 23,819,277.47 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE LOT TYPE 3 NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: I) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT TYPE 3 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $44,322.64 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - LOT TYPE 3 2023 1,111.90 2,459.91 160.81 3,732.61 2024 1,173.61 2,398.20 164.02 3,735.83 2025 1,238.74 2,333.06 167.30 3,739.11 2026 1,307.49 2,264.31 170.65 3,742.45 2027 1,380.06 2,191.75 174.06 3,745.87 2028 739.87 2,115.15 177.54 3,032.56 2029 780.93 2,074.09 181.10 3,036.11 2030 824.27 2,030.75 184.72 3,039.74 2031 870.02 1,985.00 188.41 3,043.43 2032 918.30 1,936.72 192.18 3,047.20 2033 969.27 1,885.75 196.02 3,051.04 2034 1,023.06 1,831.96 199.94 3,054.96 2035 1,079.84 1,775.18 203.94 3,058.96 2036 1,139.77 1,715.24 208.02 3,063.04 2037 1,203.03 1,651.99 212.18 3,067.20 2038 1,269.80 1,585.22 216.43 3,071.44 2039 1,340.27 1,514.74 220.75 3,075.77 2040 1,414.66 1,440.36 225.17 3,080.19 2041 1,493.17 1,361.85 229.67 3,084.69 2042 1,576.04 1,278.97 234.27 3,089.28 2043 1,663.51 1,191.50 238.95 3,093.97 2044 1,755.84 1,099.18 243.73 3,098.75 2045 1,853.29 1,001.73 248.61 3,103.62 2046 1,956.15 898.87 253.58 3,108.60 2047 2,064.71 790.31 258.65 3,113.67 2048 2,179.30 675.71 263.82 3,118.84 2049 2,300.25 554.76 269.10 3,124.12 2050 2,427.92 427.10 274.48 3,129.50 2051 2,562.67 292.35 279.97 3,134.99 2052 1 21704.90 150.12 285.57 3,140.59 Total 1 $ 44,322.64 $ 44,911.82 $ 6,523.66 $ 95,758.13 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANACAPRI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUYER DISCLOSURE LOT TYPE 4 1 NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) under a court order or foreclosure sale; 2) by a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) to a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) by a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court -ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) by a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent's estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) from one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) to a spouse or a person in the lineal line of consanguinity of the seller; 8) to or from a governmental entity; or 9) of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest The following notice shall be given to a prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchaser, subject to certain exceptions, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchaser and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. AFTER RECORDING' RETURN TO: ' To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT TYPE 4 PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT: $49,476.44 As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to the City of Anna, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within AnaCapri Public Improvement District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from the City of Anna. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by the Anna City Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from the City of Anna. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County when updating for the Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment. [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER]2 2 To be included in copy of the notice required by Section 5.014, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed by seller in accordance with Section 5.014(a-1), Tex. Prop. Code. Signature Page to Initial Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. DATE: DATE: SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]3 3 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Purchaser Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment [The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN DATE: SIGNATURE OF SELLER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by and , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this , 20_ Notary Public, State of Texas]4 4 To be included in separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.0143, Tex. Prop. Code, to be executed at the closing of the purchase and sale and to be recorded in the deed records of Collin County. Seller Signature Page to Final Notice with Current Information of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS - LOT TYPE 4 Installment Annual Collection Annual Due 1/31 PrincipalAnnual 2023 1,241.19 2,745.94 179.51 4,166.63 2024 1,310.07 2,677.06 183.10 4,170.22 2025 1,382.78 2,604.35 186.76 4,173.89 2026 1,459.53 2,527.60 190.49 4,177.62 2027 1,540.53 2,446.60 194.30 4,181.43 2028 825.90 2,361.10 198.19 3,385.19 2029 871.73 2,315.26 202.15 3,389.15 2030 920.12 2,266.88 206.20 3,393.19 2031 971.18 2,215.82 210.32 3,397.32 2032 1,025.08 2,161.91 214.53 3,401.52 2033 1,081.97 2,105.02 218.82 3,405.81 2034 1,142.02 2,044.97 223.19 3,410.19 2035 1,205.41 1,981.59 227.66 3,414.65 2036 1,272.31 1,914.69 232.21 3,419.21 2037 1,342.92 1,844.08 236.85 3,423.85 2038 1,417.45 1,769.55 241.59 3,428.59 2039 1,496.12 1,690.88 246.42 3,433.42 2040 1,579.15 1,607.84 251.35 3,438.35 2041 1,666.80 1,520.20 256.38 3,443.38 2042 1,759.30 1,427.69 261.51 3,448.50 2043 1,856.95 1,330.05 266.74 3,453.73 2044 1,960.01 1,226.99 272.07 3,459.07 2045 2,068.79 1,118.21 277.51 3,464.51 2046 2,183.60 1,003.39 283.06 3,470.06 2047 2,304.79 882.20 288.72 3,475.72 2048 2,432.71 754.29 294.50 3,481.50 2049 2,567.73 619.27 300.39 3,487.39 2050 2,710.23 476.76 306.40 3,493.39 2051 2,860.65 326.34 312.52 3,499.52 2052 1 3,019.42 167.58 318.78 3,505.77 Total 1 $ 49,476.44 $ 50,134.13 $ 7,282.23 $ 106,892.79 Footnotes: 1) Interest is calculated at 7.00% for years 1-5, and 5.55% for the remaining term, as described in the Reimbursement Agreement. 2) The figures shown above are estimates only and subject to change in Annual Service Plan Updates. Changes in Annual Collection Costs, reserve fund requirements, interest earnings, or other available offsets could increase or decrease the amounts shown. Annual Installment Schedule to Notice of Obligation to Pay Improvement District Assessment CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING A LIEN TO VALUE RATIO WITH RESPECT TO THE ANACAPRI DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") entered into that certain Anacapri Development Agreement with Anacapri Laguna Azure, LLC (the "Developer") having an Effective Date of on or about October 18, 2021 (the "Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement allows for the City to issue PID Bonds and establishes a minimum value to lien ratio of 2:1 unless the Council approves a lower ratio; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a minimum value to lien ratio as set forth in this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Approval The City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, pursuant to Section 4.1(n) of the Development Agreement, as amended, hereby approves a minimum value to lien ratio of 1.8. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary APPROVED: Lee Miller, Mayor Pro-Tem