Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-09-27 Regular Meeting PacketAGENDA City Council Meeting i Tuesday, September 27, 2022 @ 6:30 PM Anna Municipal Complex, Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet at 6:30 PM, on September 27, 2022 at the Anna Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. Welcome to the City Council meeting. If you wish to speak on an Open Session agenda item, please fill out the Opinion/Speaker Registration Form and turn it in to the City Secretary before the meeting starts. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Neighbor Comments. At this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item on this meeting Agenda that is not scheduled for public hearing. Also, at this time, any person may address the City Council regarding an item that is not on this meeting Agenda. Each person will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to speak. No discussion or action may be taken at this meeting on items not listed on this Agenda, other than to make statements of specific information in response to a citizen's inquiry or to recite existing policy in response to the inquiry. 4. Reports. Receive reports from Staff or the City Council about items of community interest. Items of community interest include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen (but not including a change in status of a person's public office or public employment); a reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the municipality, and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the Agenda. a. Proclamation Declaring October 9-15 as Fire Prevention Week for the City of Anna (Fire Chief Ray Isom) b. Staff will present an update on the design of Anna Fire Station #2. (CIP Manager Justin Clay) k, C.1 7 C. Introduction of Deputy City Secretary Jeovanna Rubio. (City Secretary Carrie Land) d. Introduction of Assistant Finance Director Aimee Ferguson. (Assistant City Manager Ryan Henderson) e. Report on the September 19th Parks Advisory Board meeting and neighbor input and planning session for the new splash pad at Slayter Creek Park. (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand) Work Session. a. Zoning Discussion - Northwest and southwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) b. Discuss appointment to the Diversity and Inclusion Commission. (City Secretary Carrie Land) Consent Items. These items consist of non -controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be considered individually by any Council Member making such request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Items. a. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for September 6, 2022 and September 13, 2022. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review Minutes of the July 21, 2022, Joint Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation Board Meetings. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) C. Review Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending August 31, 2022. (Budget Manager Terri Doby) d. Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept and approve a quote from National Fitness Campaign for the purchase of equipment to be installed on a fitness court at Slayter Creek Park. (Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker) e. Approve a Resolution re -appointing Robert Hallberg as City of Anna representative on the Greater Texoma Utility Authority Board of Directors for the term to expire December 31, 2024. (City Secretary Carrie Land) f. Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve a contract with Tyler Technologies of Plano, TX for Municipal Justice powered by Incode for use in Municipal Court. (Finance Director Alan Guard) g. Approve corrected versions of the Ordinances Adopting New Roadway, Water, & Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees, correcting scrivener's errors, for execution by the Mayor and City Secretary as corrected versions of Ordinance 997-2022 and Ordinance 999-2022 adopted at the August 23, 2022 City Council Meeting. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) h. Approve an Ordinance abandoning a portion of public right-of-way for County Road 369 deemed unnecessary for use by the public and authorizing the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed to transfer the property to the adjacent landowner in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) Items For Individual Consideration. a. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to rezone 98.0± acres located on the south side of E. White Street, 500± feet east of S. Interurban Street from AG Agricultural District, SF-E Single -Family Residential and Planned Development (Ord. No. 145-2004) to Planned Development. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) b. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to amend zoning on 28.0± acres located at the southwest corner of W. White Street and Slayter Creek Road. The property is currently zoned Planned Development (961-2022). (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) C. Discuss/Consider/Approve the final concept plan for a Wheeled Sports Park at Slayter Creek Park. (Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker, RLA) d. Consider/Discuss/Approve a Resolution approving a Use Agreement with the City of Anna, Texas and a Special Warranty Deed for the transfer of real property to the Anna Economic Development Corporation (Assistant Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough). e. Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Project Specific Purchase Order with Quiddity Engineering for the design of the next expansion to the Collin Pump Station in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) f. Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Project Specific Purchase Order and AIA agreement with BRW Architects for the design of the exterior shell and the structural engineering design of the Anna Community Library, in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) g. Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Project Specific Purchase Order with Teague Nall & Perkins, Incorporated, for the landscape design associated with the Anna Community Library Project in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) 8. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071).Bond Issuance; "Bunetto v. City of Anna, Civil Action No. 4:21-cv- 00413, United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division." b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072). C. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087).Proposed Development d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov't Code §551.074). The Council further reserves the right to enter into Executive Session at any time throughout any duly noticed meeting under any applicable exception to the Open Meetings Act. 9. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - work session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. 10. Adjourn. This is to certify that I, Carrie L. Land, City Secretary, posted this Agenda on the City's website (www.annatexas.gov) and at a place readily accessible to the public at the Anna City Hall and on the City Hall bulletin board at or before 5:00 p.m. on 09/23/2022. Carrie L. Land, City Secretary 1. The Council may vote and/or act upon each of the items listed in this agenda. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meeting Act. 3. Persons with a disability who want to attend this meeting who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary at 972 924-3325 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Ray Isom AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation Declaring October 9-15 as Fire Prevention Week for the City of Anna (Fire Chief Ray Isom) SUMMARY: For the betterment of the City of Anna, Chief Isom ensures that the fire department implement the highest quality fire prevention activities and community programs for its residents. Fire prevention and safety is a serious public safety concern and, unfortunately, residences are where people are at greatest risk from fire. Chief Isom and the entire Anna Fire Department are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and protection education. Fire Prevention Week, an annual occurrence organized by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), is scheduled for the week of October 9th through the 15th. This year's Fire Prevention Week theme is, "Fire won't wait. Plan your escape." The program focuses on educating the public and our school age children regarding smoke alarms, knowing your way out of a dangerous environment, planning, and practicing a home fire escape plan so that families are more prepared and more likely to survive a fire, and to making sure their carbon monoxide (CO) alarms meet the needs of all their family members, including those with sensory or physical disabilities. Working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in reported home fires in half and can sense smoke well before a person can, alerting them to the fire danger where they may have as little as 2 minutes to safely escape. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna - A Great Place to Live Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Fire Prevention Week 2022 Proclamation APPROVALS: Stephanie Welch, Adm Assistant Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Citp of Anna, Em.5 Proclamation Fire Prevention Week (October 9-15, 2022) WHEREAS, the City of Anna is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in and visiting our city; and WHEREAS, fire is a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and homes are the locations where people are at greatest risk from fire; and WHEREAS, home fires caused 2,580 civilian deaths in the United States in 2020, according to the National Fire Protection Association® (NFPA®), and fire departments in the United States responded to 356,500 home fires; and WHEREAS, smoke alarms sense smoke well before you can, alerting you to danger in the event of fire in which you may have as little as 2 minutes to escape safely; and WHEREAS, working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in reported home fires in half, and WHEREAS, City of Anna residents should be sure everyone in the home understands the sounds of the smoke alarms and knows how to respond; and WHEREAS, City of Anna residents who have planned and practiced a home fire escape plan are more prepared and will therefore be more likely to survive a fire; and WHEREAS, City of Anna residents will make sure their smoke and carbon monoxide (CO) alarms meet the needs of all their family members, including those with sensory or physical disabilities; and WHEREAS, City of Anna first responders are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and protection education; and WHEREAS, City of Anna residents that are responsive to public education measures are better able to take personal steps to increase their safety from fire, especially in their homes; and WHEREAS, the 2022 Fire Prevention WeekTM theme, "Fire won't wait. Plan your escape.TM," effectively serves to remind City of Anna it is important to have a home fire escape plan. THEREFORE, I, Mayor Nate Pike, City of Anna, do hereby proclaim October 9-15, 2022, as Fire Prevention Week throughout this city, and I urge all the people of the City of Anna to plan and practice a home fire escape for Fire Prevention Week 2022 and to support the many public safety activities and efforts of the City of Anna fire and emergency services. In witness, whereof I have hereunto set my hand this day of September 27, 2022, and called this seal to be affixed. Nate Pike, Mayor THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: iIff,711111►r.X■a City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Staff will present an update on the design of Anna Fire Station #2. (CIP Manager Justin Clay) SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: 1+3IFMa0N=10101LhI►Ti1=1z117_11Is] LIF I_'I i r_[91:I►y,14011 &1 I_1»:Z61TI-1W"5 Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Carrie Land AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of Deputy City Secretary Jeovanna Rubio. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: Jeovanna Rubio is a dedicated and strong-willed individual who is looking forward to being able to serve the people of this community. She grew up within this community and graduated from Anna High School. Jeovanna then went on to receive a Bachelor's Degree in Supply Chain, Logistics, and Transportation Management from Bellevue University. She also has previous experience in Management, Human Resources, and Government. Jeovanna will step up to any task or challenge that is given to her. FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Carrie Land, City Secretary Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Alan Guard AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of Assistant Finance Director Aimee Ferguson. (Assistant City Manager Ryan Henderson) SUMMARY: Following a rigorous selection process, Aimee Ferguson has been selected as the new Assistant Finance Director. Aimee comes to Anna from the City of Celina where she has served as the Budget Manager for the last two years. Aimee has more than 15 years of accounting experience, previously serving as a Staff Accountant and Senior Accountant with the Morial Convention Center in New Orleans, LA, where she was responsible for financial reporting, implementing a new ERP system, and completed the FEMA project worksheet reconciliation for $15 million of Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation following Hurricane Katrina. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: GOAL 4 HIGH PERFORMING PROFESSIONAL CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Alan Guard, Director of Finance Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 THE CITY OF Anna Ili 001'.X9-3 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Marc Marchand AGENDA ITEM: Report on the September 19th Parks Advisory Board meeting and neighbor input and planning session for the new splash pad at Slayter Creek Park. (Director of Neighborhood Services Marc Marchand) SUMMARY: The report will highlight the discussion had at the last Parks Advisory Board Meeting related to the renovated Splash Pad at Slayter Creek Park. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the Council has previously approved the Design/Build process for this project, and time is of the essence to get the project completed before the next season, this is only an informational update. No direction or input is being sought. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Marc Marchand, Director of Neighborhood Services Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/22/2022 THE CITY OF Anna Item No. 5.a. City Council Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Discussion - Northwest and southwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) SUMMARY: Land Use discussion and direction for a tract of land is located at the northwest and southwest corns of State Highway 5 and County Road 423. The Future Land Use Plan within the Anna205O Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Cluster Residential. CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL (CR) Character & Intent Cluster residential neighborhoods are intended to provide smaller single family detached and attached residential lots. Home sites are located in platted subdivisions with all utilities, residential streets and sidewalks. Land Use Considerations Primary Land Use Single-family detached homes, townhomes and other single-family attached homes Secondary Land Use Civic and institutional uses, parks and open space Indicators & Assumptions Lot size (range) 5,0fl0 — 7,500 SF f FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. S Powell Pkwy County Road 423 Locator Map 2. 9-27-22 Council workshop memo - NexMetro 3. NexMetro_Avilla Anna Presentation- workshop Proposed Project - S Powell Pkwy & County Road 423 • ��; � ,�;# -- -=#= �r,��� ,� F i �- �� fr;fit ,. �. ....arty � �,'°. ; � - - — - - a � 1 , t '.k�,p„��, • 7. - 1 - 1 ► 1 �i - i t i r Vv 'j Y !-is~'Wt�A'`':i,v E n.,7 >>f� L �• '���` THE CITY OF N Subject _ ! EM City Limits '► ��• �. t t Property ETJ { t' 0 200 400 800 11,60 Feet September 2022 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps' NExmetro Communities September 26, 2022 ZC Memo- NexMetro Hwy 5 We are proposing a Zoning Change from SF-E (Estate Lots) to a Mixed Use PD. The current tracts are 44.73 acres and our proposal includes 24.2 acres of Single Family For Rent, 2.3 acres of Retail, and the remaining 14.2 acres zoned for future Single Family For Rent use (although not part of the current development scope). Additionally, there is a proposed realignment of CR-423 that would occur with abandonment and rededication of ROW. This will create a much improved intersection and valuable hard corner for insulated Retail use. The Retail land is being retained by the Seller and the 14.2 acre tract to the South are not under contract at this time. The goal was to handle the zoning for both of these tracts concurrent with our plans to develop the Northernmost 24.2 acres. The NexMetro tract currently shows 202 homes for a density of 10.2 units per acre and 412 parking spaces which is over a 2:1 ratio. 50% of all parking spaces will be covered. This site plan is comprised of 1bd, 2bd, and 3bd detached homes with open spaces and amenities. There is significant FEMA and NRCS flood on this site which limits development opportunities and provides for great natural buffer and amenities. Our desire is to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by providing "Cluster Residential" homes while also allowing for Retail along the Highway 5 corridor. NexMetro Anna r1 F _~ Al � f � i , � r:_3. ,1 .;^ ej �_ :fir]'_ . .�•' �� r._... Preliminary Site Plan 9-- 19.a net 0= lw. �x. a . —.l 1 p.$ yrtfnel nc. Po klnq Req. (2 po —): 404 C Mqq 55 6arport: 12s Oben,-2a Pakng Prc,;eed: 412 Proposed SFFR Elevations gRoil may � • �A - __- _ - ' � - %t'_ _ � y * .i R' •. �rA �4 �t Nja ;� 4r A �. �• r I :APPPI _ t r ri s. �:, x M :_ . i ��•y._..._ ` ^.:ems- _... ®` aaeca� -a _ Iyp�I^I a r IW SFFR Leasing Office and Amenity Areas • Single story, detached cottage style homes • Lifestyle Choice- Our Residents are individuals and families that can afford to live in other housing options but instead choose the Avilla concept • Maintenance free living • Professional Onsite Management • Single Family style living with neighborhood amenities • Private Backyards • Extensive resident background and income screening 'AN IIIA\Oki 26110 Avilla residents represent a diverse consumer base. • Majority of residents are Millennials, Young Professionals and Boomers. • About 21% are 55+, and 50% are 40+ • About 62% of Avilla residents are women • Avilla average household income is $157,000 and average individual income is $132,000 • About 15% of households have children. • 50% of residents lived in a single -family -home prior to leasing their Avilla home. • The average length of stay for a resident at an Avilla property is 28 months r RENTERS BY CHOICE • Avilla residents are renters by choice — many have the financial means to buy a home but choose not to at this point in their lives. • Avilla residents value privacy, enjoy individual expression and quality of life that comes with living in a home without a mortgage or the burden of home ownership • NexMetro targets markets fueled by robust economic fundamentals such as job and population growth, transportation infrastructure, and supportive demographic metrics. • Specific submarkets are identified based upon detailed achievable rent and absorption studies, and, upon comprehensive demographic and competitive housing analysis. J }A } r W J Y r ' � � � tt i� U � •� .. - n n _ r - a A ` i a �r o® i Similar SFFR Project Aerial THE CITY OF Anna �IMM1 ►1'.W011111:7 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Carrie Land AGENDA ITEM: Discuss appointment to the Diversity and Inclusion Commission. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: City Charter Article 8 (e) Any member of a board, commission or committee who is absent from three consecutive regular meetings, or 25% of regularly scheduled meetings during the 12- month period immediately preceding and including the absence in question, without explanation acceptable to a majority of the other members, must forfeit his or her position on the board, commission, or committee. Place 6 is deemed vacant due to attendance. The term is set to expire May 31, 2024. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res 2020-07-757 Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission Creation 2. Res 2022-03-1124 Amending Number of Members on D&I Board APPROVALS: Carrie Land, City Secretary Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 4000*-O`) r W 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS CREATING THE ANNA DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION ADVISORY COMMISSION, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF MEMBERS, AND ESTABLISHING DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna (the "City Council") has determined that there exists a need in the City of Anna (the "City") for facilitation of community dialog, representation of diverse neighbor voices, review of policies and services as they pertain to supporting all members of the community, and creation of events and programming within the City that purposefully engages with all neighbors; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the creation of a diversity and inclusion advisory commission will assist the City in its efforts to engage with and support its community; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the adoption and enforcement of these regulations will significantly increase and enhance the quality of life for residents of the City; Section 1. Commission Created. The Anna Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission (the "Commission") is hereby created. Section 2. Membership; Organization; Compensation. 2.01 Membership. The Commission shall consistent of 11 members. Each member must be a resident of the City and a qualified voter in the City. Members are appointed by the City Council for a term of two years, but serve strictly at the pleasure of the City Council, who may remove any member at any time with or without cause. A person may not serve on the Commission for more than three full terms. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired term of any member whose place becomes vacant for any cause in the same manner as the original appointment was made. The terms of members filling places 1, 31 51 71 9, and 11 shall expire on May 31 of each odd -numbered year and the terms of members filling places 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 shall expire on May 31 of each even -numbered year. Commission members may be appointed to succeed themselves. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, a Commission member shall continue to serve after the expiration of the member's term until the Council removes the member or appoints a succeeding City of Anna, Texas Resolution No. JF- Page 1 of 2 member. Newly appointed members shall be installed at the first Commission meeting after their appointment. The City Council may appoint one or more liaisons to attend meetings of the Commission and the liaisons shall be considered ex-officio members and shall not vote on matters considered by the Commission. 2.02 Organization. The Commission shall hold an organizational meeting in July of each year or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable. The Commission shall adopt its own rules of procedure and keep a record of its proceedings consistent with the provisions of this resolution and the requirements of law. The Commission shall elect a chairperson and vice chairperson from its own membership at its annual organizational meeting. Meetings of the Commission may be held at the call of the chair, or in his/her absence, the vice -chair. The Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact. The minutes shall become official records of the City upon approval of the minutes by the City Council. A quorum for the conduct of business shall consist of six members of the Commission. 2.03 Compensation. Members shall serve without compensation, except for reimbursement of authorized expenses attendant to the performance of their duties and authorized by the City Council or City Manager, Section 3. Duties and Responsibilities. The Commission is purely advisory in nature with no decision -making or policy -making authority, and any action or omission by the Commission is not binding on the City. The Commission is hereby charged with the duties and responsibilities to provide recommendations to the City Council and City staff as requested from time to time in matters relating to the City's diversity and equity strategies that strengthen connections among diverse community groups with City government. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 14th day of July 2020. ATTEST: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary 'AP,,PROVED: GOV WWW le Nate Pike, Mayor R •y ' T is OTT TEX P.,o`��,. City of Anna, Texas Resolution Page 2 of 2 Page 163 of 385 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO.�;�--C�?�-- �... E.k�. .... ............. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2020w07w 757 CREATING THE ANNA DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION ADVISORY COMMISSION; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF MEMBERS; AND ESTABLISHING DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna (the "City Council") iasPrev0 ous1v determined that there exists a need in the City of Anna (the "City") for the facilitation of representation of diverse neighbor voices supporting all members of the community, review of pollicies and services and creation of events and oroarammi'na within City that purposefully engages with all neighbors and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously created a diversity commission will assist the City in its efforts to engage with and support community dialog, as they pertain to the and inclusion advisory its community; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a need to amend City of Anna Resolution No. 2020- IF It 07ww757, which created the Anna Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission (the "Commission") in order to change the number of persons serving as members on the Commission; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Amendment. Section 2 and Section 3 o as set forth below. f City of Anna Resolution No. 2020*m07vm757 is hereby amended to read Section 2. Membership; Organization; CompensatIF ion. 2.01 Membership. The Commission shall consist of 7 members. Each member must be a resident of the City and a qualified voter in the City. Members are appointed by the City Council for a term of two years, but serve strictly at the pleasure of the City Council, who may remove any member at any time with or N' without cause. A person may not serve on the Commission for more than three full terms. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired term of any member whose place becomes vacant for any cause in the same manner 0 as the onginal appointment was made. The terms of members filling places 1, 3, 5, and 7 shall expire on May 31 of each odd -numbered year and the terms of members filling places 2, 4, and 6 shall expire on May 31 of each even -numbered year. Commission members may be appointed to succeed themselves. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, a Commission member shall continue to serve after the expiration of the member I s term until the Council removes the member or appoints a succeeding member. Newly appointed members shall be installed at the first Commission meeting after their appointment. The City Council may appoint one or more I iaisons to attend meetings of t he Commission and the liaisons shall be considered exomofficio members and shall not vote on matters considered by the Commission. 2.02 Organization. The Commission shall hold an organizational meeting in July of each ye or as soon thereafte adopt its awn rules r as reasonably practicable. The Commission sha ai procedure and keep a record OT its proceedings a r II consistent with the provisions of this resolution and the requirements of law. The Commission shall elect a chairperson and vice chairperson own membership at its annual organizational meeting. Meetings of the Commission may be held at the call of the cha vice, -.chair. ir, or in his/her from its absence, the The Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact. The min utes shall become IF official records of the City approval of the minutes by the City Council. upon A quorum for the conduct of business shall consist of four members of the Commission. 2.03 Compensation. Members shall serve without compensation, except for reimbursement of authon authori zed expenses attendant to the performance of their duties and zed by the City Counc il or City Manager. Section 3. Duties and Responsibilities. The Commission is purely advisory in nature with no decision -making or policy -making authority, and any action or omission by the Commission is not binding on the City. The Commission is hereby charged with the duties and responsibilities to provide recommendations to the City Council and City staff as requested from time to time in matters relating to the City's diversity and equity strategies that strengthen connections among diverse community groups with City government. Section 2. Savings. I _xcept as amended as set forth in Section 1 of this resolution, Resolution No,, 2020*wO7-757 shall emain i n full force and effect. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 22nd day of March 2022. � _ City Secretary Ca rne L. Land t I I I H I i A,'Ai Mavb*gte 40 �''C -14 ` THE CITY OF Anna City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Carrie Land AGENDA ITEM: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes for September 6, 2022 and September 13, 2022. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: Approve meeting minutes for September 6th and September 13th. FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Minutes 9-06-2022 2. Draft Minutes 9-13-2022 APPROVALS: Carrie Land, City Secretary Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Regular City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes THE CITY OF Ahha Tuesday, September 6, 2022 @ 6:30 PM Anna Municipal Complex, Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, Texas 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet at 6:30 PM, on September 6, 2022, at the Anna Municipal Complex, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. Mayor Pike called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM. Council Member Atchley was absent. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Pike led the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Neighbor Comments. William Morgan had comments about the tax rate. 4. Reports. a. Proclamation - September 17, 2022 Constitution Week September 17, 2022, marks the two hundred thirty-fifth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention. 5. Work Session. a. Discussion on revising the City Ordinances pertaining to construction hours within the corporate limits of the City of Anna, Texas. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters P.E.) Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council on potential changes to the language and the regulations in order to provide a consistent and streamlined set of guidance for all construction activity in the City. Clear and consistent standards will benefit Anna Neighbors, the construction industry, and City staff. b. Discuss a potential Memorandum of Understanding with Anna ISD pertaining to construction and inspection responsibilities. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) The incredible growth the City is experiencing has necessitated the construction of many new Anna ISD facilities - they anticipate at least 8 new major facility construction projects over the next 5 years. Timelines are critical for public school construction, as the school calendar requires a school to be ready to open on -time before the fall semester begins. Anna ISD and City of Anna staff have been in discussions on ways the City and School District can work together to ensure that new school facilities are streamlined as much as possible and are always able to open on -schedule. Staff gave a brief presentation on potential ways the City can work with Anna ISD through some unique processes and policies which are mutually agreed upon in a Memorandum of Understanding. Staff is seeking feedback on the potential items to include in an MOU. Once feedback is received, City staff will work with Anna ISD staff to reach a consensus on a final document which can be approved by both the City Council and the School Board. 6. Items For Individual Consideration. a. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Proposed FY2023 Budget (City Manager Jim Proce) The proposed budget is funded by a property tax rate of $0.539750, which is lower than the current tax rate. When compared with other cities in our area, the City of Anna continues to have one of the lowest per -capita property tax levies. Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 7:07 PM. William Morgan discussed his concerns about the proposed budget. Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 7:11 PM. b. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Proposed FY2023 Tax Rate. (City Manager Jim Proce) The proposed budget is supported by a tax rate of $0.539750. Under the Texas Property Tax Reform and Transparency Act of 2019 . Mayor Pike opened the public hearing at 7:33 pm. William Morgan discussed his concerns about the proposed tax rate. Mayor Pike closed the public hearing at 7:39 PM. C. Consider/Discuss/Action on the TMLIRP Board of Trustees Election Council Member Lee Miller left the meeting. The City Manager was authorized to submit the Official Ballot on behalf of the City of Anna for the TMLIRP Board of Trustees Election for 2022. MOTION: Council Member Toten moved to approve. Council Member Ussery seconded. Motion carried 5-0 d. Consider/Discuss/Act on the Parks Board and potential appointments, reappointments, or removals The purpose of this item was to provide the Council with an opportunity to review the configuration of the Parks Board and allow for any appointments or reappointments to be discussed and implemented. Council discussion ensued. No action was taken. e. Discuss/Consider making a motion to direct the City Manager to end Stage 2 drought restrictions and return to Stage 1 drought restrictions. This item allows Anna Neighbors to return to being allowed twice per week watering, with voluntary once per week watering recommended. MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to approve. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 5-0. 7. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071). b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072). C. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087). d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov't Code §551.074). City Attorney Annual Evaluation 8. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - work session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. No action was taken. 9. Adjourn. Mayor Pike adjourned the meeting at 8:11 PM. Regular City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes THE CITY OF Ahifta Tuesday, September 13, 2022 @ 6:30 PM Anna Municipal Complex, Council Chambers 120 W. 7th Street, Anna, TX 75409 The City Council of the City of Anna will meet at 6:30 PM, on September 13, 2022, at the Anna Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum. Mayor Pike called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM. All Council Members were present. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Pike led the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Neighbor Comments. Alan Guard presented City Manager, Jim Proce, with a poster for his 40 years of municipal service. 4. Reports. a. Report on September 6, 2022 Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission meeting (Assistant to the City Manager Kimberly Winarski). The purpose of this item is to give the Anna City Council routine updates on business from the Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission meetings. b. Recognition of City -County Communications & Marketing Association (3CMA) Savvy Award. The Savvy Awards competition recognizes outstanding local government achievements in communications, public -sector marketing and citizen - government relationships. The Savvies salute skilled and effective city, county, agency or district professionals who have creatively planned and carried out successful innovations in communications and marketing. Each year, the number of entries in 3CMA's Savvy Awards competition increases in quality, array and scope of programs submitted. The program reflects the growing skills of communication and marketing professionals, as more local governments and agencies embrace and employ the concepts of enhanced marketing and communication with residents. C. City's Investment Policy Certified (Finance Director Alan Guard) The Government Treasurers' Organization of Texas (GTOT) awarded the Certificate of Distinction to the City of Anna for its Investment Policy. This is the second year the City has received this recognition. d. Notification of Bond Rating Agency results (Finance Director Alan Guard) Moody's affirmed the Aa2 rating and S&P provided an equivalent Aa, and both ratings came with a Stable Outlook. These strong ratings will be used by investors when they bid on the Series 2022 General Obligation Bonds and Certificates of Obligation. e. Report on Fall recreation programs and the upcoming Annafest. 5. Consent Items. Item I. was removed from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Miller moved to approve consent items a - k and m - q.. Council Member Atchley seconded. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Council Member Miller moved to enter closed session. Council Member Carver seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pike recessed the meeting at 7:05 PM. Mayor Pike recused himself during the closed session. Mayor Pro Tern Miller reconvened the meeting. a. Approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for August 23, 2022. (City Secretary Carrie Land) b. Review Minutes from the July 7, 2022 and August 2, 2022 Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Commission Meetings. (Assistant to the City Manager Kimberly Winarski) C. Review Minutes of the July 5, 2022 and the August 1, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission Meetings. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) d. Approve a Resolution approving a negotiated settlement between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC") and Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division regarding the company's 2022 Rate Review Mechanism filing. (City Manager Jim Proce) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, APPROVING A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE ("ACSC") AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION REGARDING THE COMPANY'S 2022 RATE REVIEW MECHANISM FILING; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT; FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED SETTLEMENT TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE AND IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; APPROVING AN ATTACHMENT ESTABLISHING A BENCHMARK FOR PENSIONS AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS; REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE ACSC'S REASONABLE RATEMAKING EXPENSES; DETERMINING THAT THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND THE ACSC'S LEGAL COUNSEL. e. Approve a Resolution regarding The H.M. Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Development Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING THE H.M. ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1, DEVELOPMENT PLAT. Approve a Resolution regarding The Melgar Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Development Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING THE MELGAR ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1, DEVELOPMENT PLAT. g. Approve a Resolution regarding the J & T Moore Addition, Block A, Lots 1 & 2, Final Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING J & T MOORE ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOTS 1 & 2, FINAL PLAT h. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anna 455 Addition, Block A, Lots 5 & 6, Final Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANNA 455 ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOTS 5 & 6, FINAL PLAT. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anna 455 Addition, Block A, Lot 6, Site Plan. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANNA 455 ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 6, SITE PLAN. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anna Crossing, Phase 10, Preliminary Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANNA CROSSING, PHASE 10, PRELIMINARY PLAT. k. Approve a Resolution regarding the Strickland Brothers Center Addition, Block A, Lots 1-3, Preliminary Plat. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING STRICKLAND BROTHERS CENTER ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOTS 1-3, PRELIMINARY PLAT. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anacapri Laguna, Block A, Lots 1 & 3, Site Plan. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) Mayor Pike recused himself. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANACAPRI LAGUNA, BLOCK A, LOTS 1 & 3, SITE PLAN. MOTION: Council Member moved to approve. Council Member seconded. Motion carried 6-0. M. Approve a Resolution regarding the Anna Ranch, Phase 1B, Block P, Lot 1X, Site Plan. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING ANNA RANCH, PHASE 1B, BLOCK P, LOT 1X, SITE PLAN. n. Approve a Resolution regarding the Villages of Waters Creek, Block B, Lot 1, Site Plan. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING VILLAGES OF WATERS CREEK, BLOCK B, LOT 1, SITE PLAN. o. Approve Resolution approving extension of the Agreement with Collin County for Animal Sheltering Services. (Code Compliance Kevin Martin) 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENTS WITH COLLIN COUNTY FOR ANIMAL SHELTERING SERVICES. P. Approve Resolution approving extension of the Agreement with Collin County for Animal Control Services. (Code Compliance Kevin Martin) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENTS WITH COLLIN COUNTY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES. q. Approve a Resolution Amending the City of Anna Personnel Policy Manual Regarding Fire Department Holiday Worked Pay (Alan Guard / Stephanie Beitelschies) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF ANNA PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL. Items For Individual Consideration. a. Conduct a Public Hearing on levying of assessments in Improvement Area #2 of the Anacapri Public Improvement District and Consider/Discuss/Action on adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas accepting and approving a Service and Assessment Plan and Assessment Rolls for the Anacapri Public Improvement District; making a finding of special benefit to the property in the District; levying special Assessments against property within the District and establishing a lien on such property; providing for the method of assessment and the payment of the Assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended, providing penalties and interest on delinquent Assessments, providing for severability, and providing an effective date. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) Mayor Pike had recused himself. This item includes a Public Hearing and the corresponding Ordinance to be adopted related to the Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) for the Anacapri Public Improvement District and the levying of assessments for Improvement Area #2. Mayor Pro Tern Miller opened the public hearing at 8:16 PM. No public comments were given. Mayor Pro Tern Miller closed the public hearing at 8:17 PM. MOTION: Council Member Carver moved to approve. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 6-0. b. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a design/build contract with Kraftsman Commercial Playgrounds & Waterparks for work associated with the renovation of the splash pad at Slayter Creek Park. (Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker, RLA). Mayor Pike re-entered the meeting. The project cost is $2.5 million. Ongoing maintenance including labor, testing and chemicals will be required. However, the new splash pad will require less staff time to maintain than has been expended over the past several years. MOTION: Council Member Toten moved to approve. Council Member Carver seconded. Motion carried 7-0. C. Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates for the design of temporary treatment systems at the Hurricane Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant which will be utilized as permanent rehabilitation and upgrades at the John R. Geren Wastewater Treatment Plant (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) The City is moving forward with the design of the Hurricane Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Based on the growth of the community, the City is planning for the likely event that it will make sense to have a temporary small treatment plant in place while the 4 Million Gallon treatment facility in Phase 1 is under construction. The City is seeking to design any temporary treatment facilities such that they can be moved over to permanent treatment facilities at the John R. Geren Wastewater Treatment Plant. The existing John R., Geren Wastewater Treatment Plant (formerly Slayter Creek WWTP), is an older treatment facility which is in need of significant rehabilitation. The temporary treatment facilities used at the Hurricane Creek Plant would be of a size to be able to completely replace a significant portion of the existing facilities at the John R. Geren WWTP. In this way, the City would not lose money through implementing temporary treatment - as the facilities would replace aging equipment which is already identified for replacement over the next 5 years. Staff believes this effort will address two needs with one project - providing the quick sewer treatment needed west of US 75, and replacing equipment at the John R. Geren WWTP which will require replacement in the very near future. As such, staff recommends approval of the design and planning scope as presented. The total cost is anticipated to be $185,000. The funding source will be Wastewater Impact Fees. MOTION: Council Member Carver moved to approve. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0. d. Consider all matters incidental and related to the Greater Texoma Utility Authority Contract Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 (Collin/Grayson Water Transmission Project), including the adoption of an ordinance approving the execution of a Contract of Indemnification in connection therewith. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) MOTION: Mayor Plke moved to approve. Council Member Ussery seconded. Motion carried 7-0. e. Discuss/Consider/Approve an Ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract of Indemnification with the Greater Texoma Utility Authority for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for the Collin/Grayson Water Transmission Project in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to approve. Council Member Ussery seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Consider/Discuss/Action of an Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of City of Anna, Texas Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2022; Levying an annual ad valorem tax and providing for the security for and payment of said Certificates of Obligation; approving an Official Statement; and enacting other provisions relating to the subject. (Finance Director Alan Guard) Mayor Pike had recused himself. These Certificates of Obligation will be used to pay for design and construction of the Hurricane Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. A variety of funding sources will be used to repay this debt including impact fees and wastewater rates charged to our retail customers. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Miller moved to approve. Council Member Atchley seconded. Motion carried 6-0. g. Consider/Discuss/Action of an Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of City of Anna, Texas General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022; levying an annual ad valorem tax and providing for the security for and payment of said Bonds; approving an Official Statement; and enacting other provisions relating to the subject. (Finance Director Alan Guard) Mayor Pike had recused himself. This bond sale is for the completion of the fire station, initial construction of the library/community center, and construction of parks and recreation facilities. The total amount of the sale is approximately $34 million. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Miller moved to approve. Council Member Atchley seconded. Motion carried 6-0. h. First Reading of a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Anna Community Development Corporation Annual Budget. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RATIFYING AND APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET FOR THE ANNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Second Reading of a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Anna Community Development Corporation Annual Budget. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RATIFYING AND APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET FOR THE ANNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Anna Community Development Corporation Annual Budget. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) Staff proposed a $2,922,673 FY 2023 Budget, and it was approved by the CDC Board on July 21, 2022. Sales tax revenues remain strong, giving the CDC more funding for projects. The FY 2023 Budget is focused heavily on the Downtown Master Plan implementation and continuing to attract new businesses and developments to Anna. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RATIFYING AND APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET FOR THE ANNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Miller moved to approve. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0. k. Consider/Discuss/Action on a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Anna Economic Development Corporation Annual Budget. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) Staff proposed a $786,350 Annual EDC Budget for FY 2023, and it was approved by the EDC Board on July 21, 2022. Most of the EDC funds will be used for the implementation of an Economic Development Grant Program for Anna Businesses. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RATIFYING AND APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET FOR THE ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Miller moved to approve. Council Member Toten seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Consider/Discuss/Action approving an Ordinance adopting the FY2023 Budget. (City Manager Jim Proce) Fund Amount General Fund $19,743,279 Debt Service Fund 3,464,186 Utility Fund 14,425,479 Grant Fund - Special Revenue Fund 11,125 Park Development Fund 2,662,294 Fire Capital Fund - Seizure Fund - Community Development Corporation 2,922,532 Economic Development Corporation 736,350 Community Investment Program 73,140,000 Total $117,155,245 AN ORDINANCE MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF ANNA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2022 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023; APPROPRIATING MONEY TO AN INTEREST AND SINKING FUND TO PAY INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON THE CITY'S INDEBTEDNESS; AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET OF THE CITY OF ANNA FOR THE 2022 — 2023 FISCAL YEAR. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Miller moved to approve. Council Member Carver seconded. Motion carried 7-0. M. Consider/Discuss/Action regarding a Resolution ratifying the property tax revenue increase reflected in the City of Anna FY2023 Budget. (City Manager Jim Proce) The budget is funded by a tax rate of $0.539750, which is less than the tax rate adopted last year. The total amount of revenue generated from property taxes will increase by $2,933,047 which is a 29.3 percent increase from last year's budget. The property tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year is $1,456,946. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, ACKNOWLEDGING AND RATIFYING THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 ANNUAL BUDGET WILL REQUIRE RAISING MORE REVENUE FROM PROPERTY TAXES THAN IN THE PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to approve. Mayor Pro Tern Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. n. Consider/Discuss/Action approving an Ordinance adopting the FY2023 Tax Rate. (City Manager Jim Proce) MOTION: Mayor Pike stated, "I move that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of $0.539750, which is effectively an 16.3% percent increase in the tax rate". Mayor Pro Tern Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. 7. Closed Session (Exceptions). Under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 551, the City Council may enter into Closed Session to discuss any items listed or referenced on this Agenda under the following exceptions: a. Consult with legal counsel regarding pending or contemplated litigation and/or on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071). b. Discuss or deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072). C. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087). d. Discuss or deliberate personnel matters (Tex. Gov't Code §551.074). City Attorney Annual Review; City Manager Annual Review MOTION: Mayor Pike moved to enter closed session. Mayor Pro Tern Miller seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pike recessed the meeting at 8:53 PM. Mayor Pike reconvened the meeting at ? PM. 8. Consider/Discuss/Action on any items listed on any agenda - work session, regular meeting, or closed session - that is duly posted by the City of Anna for any City Council meeting occurring on the same date as the meeting noticed in this agenda. No action was taken. Adjourn. Mayor Pike adjourned the meeting. THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Review Minutes of the July 21, 2022, Joint Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation Board Meetings. (Director of Economic Development Joey Grisham) SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. July 21 2022 CDC EDC Joint Meeting Minutes_Signed APPROVALS: Kimberly Garduno, Economic Development Coordinator Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Officers: Bruce Norwood, President Shane Williams, Vice -President Rocio Gonzalez, Secretary Staff: Joey Grisham, Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough, Assistant Director of Economic Development Kimberly Garduno, Economic Development Coordinator THE CITY OF manna CDC G R O U N D B R E A K I N G P O S S I B I L I T I E S THE CITY OF manna °� EDC G R O U N D B R E A K I N G P O S S I B I L I T I E S Anna Community Development Corporation and Anna Economic Development Corporation Special -Called Meeting Minutes Thursday, July 21, 2022, at 6:00 pm City of Anna Fire Station EOC Conference Room 305 S. Powell Parkway, Anna, Texas 75409 The Anna Community Development Corporation and the Anna Economic Development Corporation conducted a special -called meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 21, 2022, at the Anna Fire Station EOC Conference Room, located at 305 S. Powell Parkway (Highway 5) Anna, Texas 75409. A video recording of the open session portions of the meeting may be viewed online at the City of Anna's website: https://www.annaiexas.gov/962/AgenaasMinutes CDC and EDC Board Members Present: Bruce Norwood, Rocio Gonzalez, Kylee Kelley, Shane Williams, Ronnie Kerr, Gina Maria Ottavio and Michelle Hawkins CDC and EDC Board Members Absent: None, Others Present: Joey Grisham (Director of Economic Development), Taylor Lough (Assistant Director of Economic Development), Kimberly Garduno (Economic Development Coordinator), Chris Talbot (IT Manager), Lee Miller (Mayor Pro Tem), and Pete Cain (Councilmember). 1. Call to Order. Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum. The meeting was called to order by Board President Bruce Norwood at 6:03 p.m. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance were led by Bruce Norwood. 3. Neighbor Comments. None. 4. Consent Agenda. a. Consider/Discuss/Act on approving minutes from the July 7, 2022, Joint City Council, Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation Special -Called Meeting. (CDC) b. Consider/Discuss/Act on approving minutes from the July 7, 2022, Joint City Council, Community Development Corporation and Economic Development Corporation SpeciakCalled Meeting. (EDC) Officers: Bruce Norwood, President Shane Williams, Vice -President Rocio Gonzalez, Secretary Staff: Joey Grisham, Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough, Assistant Director of Economic Development Kimberly Garduno, Economic Development Coordinator Rocio Gonzalez made a motion on behalf of Lite CDC and EDC to approve the consent agenda. Ronald Kerr seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. 5. Individual Consideration a. Hear a presentation from the City of Anna's Finance Director and: 1. Consider/Discuss/Act on a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to: (a) invest funds for the Anna Community Development Corporation including the opening of accounts per the City of Anna Investment Policy, and (b) update signatories for the Anna CDC. (CDC) 2. Consider/Discuss/Act on a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to: (a) invest funds for the Anna Economic Development Corporation including the opening of accounts per the City of Anna Investment Policy, and (b) update signatories for the Anna CDC. (EDC) Joey Grisham introduced Finance Director Alan Guard. Per the CDC and EDC bylaws, the Corporations work with the City of Anna's Finance Department related to the investment of funds. Mr. Guard described the City's investment policy and a recommendation for the EDC and CDC to place a portion of the Business Park sales proceeds in 12- and 18-month Certificates of Deposit (CDs) and another portion in the TexPool investment fund. Mr. Guard also explained that the CDC's and EDC's signatories at the bank needed to be updated to reflect current staff and Board leadership. Bruce Norwood made a motion on behalf of the CDC Board to approve and authorize the City of Anna Finance Director to invest funds per the City of Anna Investment Policy and to update bank signatories for the Community Development Corporation to add Alan Guard, Rocio Gonzalez, and Bruce Norwood. Shane Williams seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. Bruce Norwood made a motion on behalf of the EDC Board to approve and authorize the City of Anna Finance Director to invest funds per the City of Anna Investment Policy and to update bank signatories for the Economic Development Corporation to include Alan Guard, Rocio Gonzalez, and Bruce Norwood. Shane Williams seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. b. Conduct a Public Hearing and act on a Resolution approving the Anna CDC Fiscal Year 2023 Budget and authorizing publication of the adopted budget. (CDC) Bruce Norwood opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Based on discussions last meeting, Joey Grisham explained the CDC budget is a total of $2,922,673. The Fiscal Year 2023 budget will focus heavily on Downtown Master Plan implementation and continue to attract new businesses and development to the City of Anna. Officers: Bruce Norwood, President Shane Williams, Vice -President Rocio Gonzalez, Secretary Staff: Joey Grisham, Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough, Assistant Director of Economic Development Kimberly Garduno, Economic Development Coordinator Bruce Norwood closed the public hearing at 6:31 p.m. Rocio Gonzalez made a motion on behalf of the Community Development Corporation approving a resolution to adopt the fiscal year 2022-2023 budget and authorizing publication of notice of projects. Shane Williams seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. c. Consider/Discuss/Act on a resolution approving the EDC Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget. (EDC) Joey Grisham explained the total budget for the EDC is $786,350. Rocio Gonzalez made a motion on behalf of the Economic Development Corporation Board approving a resolution to adopt the Anna Economic Development Corporation 2022-2023 fiscal year budget. Michelle Hawkins seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. d. Consider/Discuss/Act on a resolution approving an agreement with Swimming Duck, LLC for digital media services. (CDC) Joey Grisham reminded the Board that the Marketing Plan done by Cooksey Communications recommended engaging in digital media services. Staff explained that over the past year, digital ads were viewed 3.7 million times and caused 7,637 targeted consumers to click through to the EDC website. Michelle Hawkins made a motion on behalf of the CDC Board to approve a resolution with Swimming Duck, LLC for digital media services not to exceed $35,000 from the CDC's promotional item. Gina Maria Ottavio seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. e. Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution amending an Incentive Agreement with Zablink Hospitality. (CDC) Joey Grisham shared that back in March the Board approved an agreement with Zablink Hospitality for a Holiday Inn Express. Zablink Hospitality has asked for an extension as they were delayed. Kylee Kelley made a motion on behalf of the Community Development Board to approve a resolution for amending the incentive agreement with Zablink Hospitality for hospitality services. Gina Maria Ottavio seconded the motion. The vote was 6- 1 with Shane Williams voting against. Motion passed. 6. Director's Report a. Development Forum Update Joey Grisham shared the second annual forum was held today, Thursday, July 21 and was very successful. The event was sponsored by Carey Cox Company. At least 90 people were in attendance, including several new developers. Officers: Bruce Norwood, President Shane Williams, Vice -President Rocio Gonzalez, Secretary Staff: Joey Grisham, Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough, Assistant Director of Economic Development Kimberly Garduno, Economic Development Coordinator b. Special Meeting September 8t" and Cancel September I Meeting Staff will send a poll via e-mail to understand Board travel plans and availability for a late August / early September meeting. 7. CLOSED SESSION (exceptions): a. Deliberate regarding the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. (Tex. Gov't Code §551.072) possible property acquisition; possible land sale/purchase; Anna Business Park. b. Consult with legal counsel on matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code (Tex. Gov't Code §551.071); Grant program; Lease agreement and professional services contract. c. Discuss or deliberate Economic Development Negotiations: (1) To discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the Board of Directors has received from a business prospect that the Board of Directors seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Anna and with which the Board is conducting economic development negotiations; or, (2) To deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect described by subdivision (1). (Tex. Gov't Code §551.087) Anna Business Park Property; potential retail and medical projects. Kylee Kelley made a motion to enter closed session. Shane Williams seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. CDC Board entered closed session at 6:55 p.m. 8. Reconvene into open session and take any action on closed session items. Bruce Norwood made a motion to reconvene into open session. Ronald Kerr seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. The CDC reconvened into open session at 7:15 p.m. 9. Receive reports from staff or Board Members about items of community interest. Bruce Norwood shared that Saturday night the Anna Boosters will have a dinner and bingo at the High School at 6:00 p.m. 10. Adjourn. Gina Maria Ottavio made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Kylee Kelley seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion passed. APPROVED: Bruce Norwood President of CDC/EDC ATTESTED: Rocio Gonzalez Secretary of CDC/EDC THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �Iff,i1►15OW:1 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Terri Doby Review Monthly Financial Report for the Month Ending August 31, 2022. (Budget Manager Terri Doby) SUMMARY: The City of Anna's financial policies require the publication of a financial report monthly. This report covers the financial performance for Fiscal Year 2022 through August 31, 2022. Enclosed in the report is an executive dashboard that provides a high level look at major funds along with detailed reporting of sales tax collections. The financial condition of the City remains strong and the reported funds adhere to fund balance requirements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: information only STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY2022 City Council Monthly Financial Report August APPROVALS: Terri Doby, Budget Manager Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA GENERAL & UTILITY FUNDS DASHBOARD Through August 31, 2022 Positive variance compared to historical trends Warning Negative variance of 3%-5% compared to historical trends �- Negative variance of >5% compared to historical trends REVENUES General Fund Property Taxes $ 8,015,000 $ 8,036,228 100.3 % Sales Tax 3,296,370 3,155,264 95.7 % Franchise and Local Taxes 485,000 630,405 130.0 % Charges for Services 111,600 122,635 109.9% Fines 90,000 220,121 244.6% Licenses, Permits & Fees 3,703,060 5,406,997 146.0% Investment Income 30,000 43,427 144.8% Other Revenues 16,300 41,696 255.8% Intergovernmental 48,395 47,640 98.4% Revenue Total $ 15,795,725 $ 17,704,413 112.1% EXPENDITURES General Fund Expense Total $ 15,309,784 $ 13,208,138 86.3 % Utility Fund REVENUES Water Sales $ 6,000,000 $ 6,584,028 109.7% Sewer Charges 3,600,000 4,243,748 117.9% Sanitation Revenue 1,100,000 1,656,239 150.6% Other Charges for Services 745,000 616,364 82.7% Licenses, Permits & Fees 505,000 2,027,058 401.4% Investment Income 20,000 31,843 159.2% Other Revenues 188,700 246,681 130.7% Utility Fund Total $ 12,158,700 $ 15,405,961 126.7% EXPENDITURES Administration $ 1,219,038 $ 1,340,779 110.0% Water 5,654,073 5,340,630 94.5% Sewer 4,712,683 3,717,540 78.9% Sanitation 1,100,000 1,648,401 149.9% Utility Billing 560,311 297,548 53.1% Utility Fund Total $ 13,246,105 $ 12,344,898 93.2% October November December January February March April May June July August September R 417,343 483,556 552,138 435,037 416,044 583,700 494,472 511,309 583,874 570,950 $ 5,048,423 Budget: 4,926,370 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100, 000 $0 24.4% $ 335,454 42.2% 340,156 31.7% 419,319 28.4% 338,879 42.3% 292,405 32.4% 441,021 31.6% 375,823 32.7% 385,457 24.8% 467,686 32.1 % 432,097 406,214 453,292 $ 4,687,804 102.5% 4,300,000 Monthly Sales Tax Collections: 3 Year Comparison H FY2021-22 u FY2020-21 U FY2019-20 OF ANNA BuildingCITY • Fiscal Year i2020-21 Monthly Monthly October 75 98 November 89 124 December 68 83 January 102 53 February 208 125 March 141 104 April 137 117 May 44 60 June 19 95 July 25 114 August 126 154 September 120 1,034 1,247 .Budget FY2022 Budget: 1,100 94.0% Monthly Building Permits Received: 2 Year Comparison 250 200 150 100 50 #hA 0 Lin 0'. ���Jac1 � ■ FY2021-22 0 FY2020-21 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: iIff,711111►r9=11541 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Dalan Walker Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept and approve a quote from National Fitness Campaign for the purchase of equipment to be installed on a fitness court at Slayter Creek Park. (Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker) SUMMARY: The equipment included in the quote from National Fitness Campaign in the amount of $92,350 will be installed on a fitness court at Slayter Creek Park by a contractor who has not yet been selected. It will be delivered to the maintenance building at Natural Springs Park and stored until such time that a concrete pad has been constructed southeast of the splashpad at Slayter Creek Park. The equipment will be ordered early to insure that it is available for installation as soon as a contractor is ready to install it. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of the equipment is $92,350. There will be additional costs to construct a concrete pad and install the equipment, but funding for all work associated with the project is included in the FY2023 annual budget. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Principal 5 - Value to Neighbors' Lives Goal 3 - Anna -Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept and approve the quote from National Fitness Campaign. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for National Fitness Campaign Equipment 091522 2. National Fitness Campaign Quote for Equipment 3. NFC Customer Packing List Tile Rev 7.2 2022-03-09 APPROVALS: Dalan Walker, Parks Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ACCEPTING AND APPROVING A QUOTE FROM NATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGN FOR EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLAED ON A FITNESS COURT AT SLAYTER CREEK PARK. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, ("City Council") finds that the equipment provided by National Fitness Campaign (NFC) is instrumental and necessary to the installation of a fitness court at Slayter Creek Park; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the receipt of a grant in the amount of $50,000 to assist in the funding of said fitness court; and WHEREAS, the City Council considers providing neighbors in Anna opportunities to improve their health and fitness a priority; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that the equipment provided by NFC is proprietary; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves the quote provided by NFC for the following amount: "The total amount for fiscal year 2023: $92,350." NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes as set forth in full. Section 2. Approval and Authorization of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the quote from NFC and ratifies and approves the City Manager's execution of the same. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents and to take all other actions necessary to finalize and enforce the quote from NFC. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on first and final reading on this 27t" day of September 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie Land Mayor, Nate Pike * EST. Inn * NATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGN FITNESS COURT QUOTE Bill To Name Anna, TX Bill To 111 North Powell Parkway Anna, PO Box 776 75409 Freight, Packing and Insurance for shipment Terms National Fitness Campaign LP For all questions regarding this quote, contact: info@nfchq.com Created Date 8/17/2022 Expiration Date 9/19/2022 Quote Number 00000379 Tax IN, 0.0000% Grand Total $92,350.00 $4,350.00 1. PAYMENT TERMS Purchaser will pay Seller 100% of the Purchase Price upon receipt of delivery. Purchaser is responsible for payment of shipping costs, including packing, insurance and freight. These payment terms will apply unless other approved payment terms have been agreed to by both parties 2. TAX EXEMPTION This quoted total is based upon Purchaser's tax exempt status, for which verifying documentation must be provided to Seller. If Purchaser is not tax exempt, sales tax will be applied before Purchase Price is to be considered final or binding. Registered Office: PO Box 2367, San Francisco, CA, 94126, USA. THE FITNESS COURT PARTS LIST ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY LOCATION ON TRUCK ANCHOR A SET WALL ANCHOR 30 BOX IN CRATE ANCHOR A CONSISTS OF: 1/2"X 7"ALLTHREAD 1 1/2"HEX NUT HDG 2 112" FLAT WASHER HDG 2 314" FLAT WASHER HDG 2 ANCHOR B SET DROP IN ANCHOR 28 BOX IN CRATE ANCHOR B CONSISTS OF: 3/8"-16 X 2" TAMPER PROOF SECURITY SCREW SS 1 T-45 TORX BIT DRIVER TAMPER PROOF 1 318" LOCK WASHER SS 1 318" FLAT WASHER SS 1 318" CONFAST DROP IN ANCHOR SS 1 DROP IN ANCHOR SETTING TOOL 1 ANCHOR C SET MECHANICAL ANCHOR 48 BOX IN CRATE ANCHOR C CONSISTS OF: 318"X 5" CONFAST WEDGE ANCHOR 1 318" HEX NUT HDG 1 318 " FLAT WASHER HDG 2 FLOOR ANCHOR PAPER TEMPLATES WALL ANCHOR MARKED TAPE MEASURE 1 IN BOX WITH ANCHORS BEND STATION TEMPLATE 1 BOX IN CRATE PLYO BOX TEMPLATE 1 BOX IN CRATE FLOOR MARKING VINYL STENCILS CORE STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE SQUAT STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE PUSH STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE LUNGE STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE PULL STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE AGILITY STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE BEND STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE DOT SET STENCIL 2 BOX IN CRATE LADDER STENCIL 1 BOX IN CRATE FITNESS COURT TILE REGUPOLADA REDUCER REGUPOL ADHESIVE CONSISTS OF: TWO PART ADHESIVE-A-COMPONENT/RESIN (4 GALLON) TWO PART ADHESIVE-B-COMPONENT/HARDENER (1 GALLON) REGUPOL TILE 258 2 PALLETS 26 1 PALLET 5 5 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE TUBE512 BOX IN CRATE ANCHOR BOLT EPDXY SIKA ANCHOR FIX-2, 10.1 OZ CARTRIDGE 2 BOX IN CRATE FLOOR MARKING PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS TM2152, 1QT 1 BOX IN CRATE LUNGE STATION 1 (LARGE) 2 BOXES (EACH WITH TOP/BOTTOM/HARDWARE) 2 PALLET TORX BIT DRIVER T-45 TORX BIT DRIVER TAMPER PROOF 1 BAG IN BOX LUNGE STATION HARDWARE INCLUDES 318" LOCK WASHER SS 8 (4 PER BOX) BAG I N BOX 3/8"-16 X 1-1/2" TAMPER PROOF SECURITY SCREW SS 8 (4 PER Box) BAG I N BOX CS PHOSPHATE 318-16 SPEED NUT 8 (4 PER BOX) BAG I N BOX LU NG E STATI ON 2 (SMALL) 6 BOXES (EACH WITH TOP/BOTTOM/HARDWARE) 6 PALLET LUNGE STATION HARDWARE INCLUDES 318" LOCK WASHER SS 24 (4 PER BOX) BAG I N BOX 3/8"-16 X 1-112" TAMPER PROOF SECURITY SCREW SS 24 (4 PER BOX) BAG I N BOX CS PHOSPHATE 318-16 SPEED NUT 24 (4 PER BOX) BAG I N BOX BEND STATION SHORT 1 PALLET BLIND RIVETS 304 3/16"x3/8" BLIND RIVETS 8 BAG IN BOX TORX BIT DRIVER T-45 TORX BIT DRIVER TAMPER PROOF 1 BAG IN BOX BEND STATION TALL 1 PALLET BLIND RIVETS 304 3/16"x3/8" BLIND RIVETS 8 BAG IN BOX PLYO BOX 11 PALLET ON TRUCK PLYO BOX 2 1 PALLET ON TRUCK PLYO BOX 3 1 PALLET ON TRUCK PLYO BOX 4 1 PALLET ON TRUCK PLYO BOX 4 HARDWARE INCLUDES CS GRS ZINC PLATED 112-13 x 1 112" HEX HEAD BOLT 2 BAG INSIDE BOX 112" GALVANIZED FLAT WASHERS 4 BAG INSIDE BOX CS GR5 ZINC PLATED 112" SPLIT LOCK WASHER 2 BAG INSIDE BOX CS GR5 ZINC PLATED 112-13 HEX NUT 2 BAG INSIDE BOX TORX BIT DRIVER T40, 1/4" HEX SHANK TAMPER RESISTANT 1 BAG INSIDE BOX PLYO BOX 5 1 PALLET ON TRUCK PLYO BOX 6 1 PALLET ON TRUCK ROW STATION LEFT 2 FLOOR OF TRUCK ROW STATION RIGHT 2 FLOOR OF TRUCK PUSH STATION 2 TOP OF CRATE INTERNAL WALL FRAME NFC-WA-WF 15 PALLET ROW HANDLE 2 CRATE PUSH RING 4 CRATE PULL RING 8 CRATE WALL SKINS EXTERNAL WALL CRATE NFC-F-SEA END PANEL ATTACHMENT ANGLE 4 NFC-F-SEL WALL SKIN END PANEL LEFT 1 NFC-F-SER WALL SKIN END PANEL RIGHT 1 NFC-F-SFC WALL SKIN FRONT CENTER 1 NFC-F-SFL WALL SKIN FRONT LEFT 1 NFC-F-SFLC WALL SKIN FRONT LEFT CENTER 1 NFC-F-SFR WALL SKIN FRONT RIGHT 1 NFC-F-SFRC WALL SKIN FRONT RIGHT CENTER 1 NFC-F-SRC WALL SKIN REAR CENTER 1 NFC-F-SRL WALL SKIN REAR LEFT 1 NFC-F-SRLC WALL SKIN REAR LEFT CENTER 1 NFC-F-SRR WALL SKIN REAR RIGHT 1 NFC-F-SRRC WALL SKIN REAR RIGHT CENTER 1 NFC-F-STC WALL SKIN TOP CENTER 1 NFC-F-STL WALL SKIN TOP LEFT 1 NFC-F-STLC WALL SKIN TOP LEFT CENTER 1 NFC-F-STR WALL SKIN TOP RIGHT 1 NFC-F-STRC WALL SKIN TOP RIGHT CENTER 1 NFC-F-SEA2 END PANEL ATTACHMENT ANGLE UPPER 2 RIVETS BLIND RIVETS 304 3/16"x3/8" BLIND RIVETS 300 BOX IN CRATE POP RIVETS 304 3/16"x1/4" POP RIVETS 100 BOX IN CRATE FOOT WALL CRATE NFC-SA-FSR FOOT WALL RIGHT 1 NFC-SA-FSRC FOOT WALL RIGHT CENTER 1 NFC-SA-FSC FOOT WALL CENTER 1 NFC-SA-FSLC FOOT WALL LEFT CENTER 1 NFC-SA-FSL FOOT WALL LEFT 1 INTERNAL WALL RIBS CRATE NFC-F-RL WALL RIB LEFT 4 NFC-F-RLC WALL RIB LEFT CENTER 4 NFC-F-RRC WALL RIB RIGHT CENTER 4 NFC-F-RR WALL RIB RIGHT 4 RIB TIE ANGLES 12 BOX IN CRATE WALL BRACKET 12 SETS CRATE WALL BRACKET 2 1 SET CRATE WALL BRACKET 3 1 SET CRATE WALL BRACKET 4 1 SET CRATE WALL BRACKET 5 1 SET CRATE WALL BRACKET 1 HARDWARE 2 BOX IN CRATE WALL BRACKET 2 HARDWARE 1 BOX IN CRATE WALL BRACKET 3 HARDWARE 1 BOX IN CRATE WALL BRACKET 4 HARDWARE 1 BOX IN CRATE WALL BRACKET 5 HARDWARE 1 BOX IN CRATE MAI NTENANCE KIT TOUCH UP PAINT (l CAN PER COLOR, 4 CANS TOTAL)1 BOX IN CRATE SPARE HARDWARE/FASTENERS 1 BOX IN CRATE 3/4"x1/8" ACETAL FLAT ROUND WASHER W/ADHESIVE 100 BAG IN CRATE MISC HARDWARE CRATE SPLIT LOCK WASHERS C.S. GR5 ZINC PLATED 1/2" 108 BOX IN CRATE 1 1/4" HEX HEAD BOLT 1/2-13x1 1/4" HEX HEAD BOLT 48 BOX IN CRATE 2 1/2" HEX HEAD BOLT 1/2-13x2 1/2" HEX HEAD BOLT 60 BOX IN CRATE NEOPRENE ROLL 2 BOX IN CRATE VERTICAL WALL COVERS 8 BOX IN CRATE THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lira'i7►rowm City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Carrie Land Approve a Resolution re -appointing Robert Hallberg as City of Anna representative on the Greater Texoma Utility Authority Board of Directors for the term to expire December 31, 2024. (City Secretary Carrie Land) SUMMARY: The City is a member of the Greater Texoma Utility Authority. GTUA is a special -law district organized under Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas constitution and operates under Chapter 49 of the Texas Water Code. GTUA is governed by a Board of Directors appointed by its member cities. Place 8 on the GTUA Board is appointed by the City Council of Anna. Currently, Robert Hallberg sits on the board, in Place 8, with a term expiring December 31, 2022. Mr. Hallberg has expressed an interest in continuing to serve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City 1+3r_1a0:7x0101Lhl►yi1=1Z117_11Is] LIF /_,Iir_[d:ILy,140k&I GTUA—Board—Resolution 2022 APPROVALS: Carrie Land, City Secretary Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE GREATER TEXOMA UTILITY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") is a member of the Greater Texoma Utility Authority ("GTUA" or the "Authority"); and, WHEREAS, GTUA is a special -law district organized under Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas constitution and operates under Chapter 49 of the Texas Water Code; and, WHERAS, GTUA is governed by a Board of Directors appointed by its member cities; and, WHEREAS, Place 8 on the GTUA Board is appointed by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the "City Council"); and, WHEREAS, the term of current GTUA Board member serving in Place 8 expires at the end of 2022. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Appointment to the GTUA Board of Directors. The City Council hereby appoints Robert Hallberg to serve a two-year term in Place 8 on the GTUA Board of Directors. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this day of 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie L. Land Mayor Nate Pike f- AGENDA ITEM: City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Alan Guard Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve a contract with Tyler Technologies of Plano, TX for Municipal Justice powered by Incode for use in Municipal Court. (Finance Director Alan Guard) SUMMARY: The Finance Department has been modernizing and upgrading its software over the last two years. Previously, the core financial systems and utility billing have been converted from Asyst to the Incode product supplied by Tyler Technologies. Municipal Court is the final piece to be converted. Court has been using MCRS by Utility Data Systems since at least 2005. The new system will interface seamlessly with the financial system and the Brazos ticket writing system used by the Anna Police Department. It will also generate needed reports for the Municipal Court, the Police Department, and the State of Texas more efficiently. The Incode solution is provided as a Software as a Service (SaaS) or Cloud -based service. FINANCIAL IMPACT: One-time fees for the implementation total $70,877. Annual fees are $25,019. Funding has been provided in the FY 2023 budget. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: GOAL #4 HIGH PERFORMING PROFESSIONAL CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution. I-,'% a r-IT91 : I Ly, 14 kiIII & 1 1. City of Anna TX - Court Final - 091922 2. Resolution approving purchase of Incode for Court APPROVALS: Alan Guard, Director of Finance Created/Initiated - 9/19/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 • .�.�•� i tty ecer hnologies Sales Quotation For: City of Anna PO Box 776 Anna TX 75409 Tyler Annual Software — SaaS Municipal Justice 10 Suite Quoted By: Quote Expiration: Quote Name: John Hardin 10/31/22 City of Anna TX - Court Add -On Criminal Case Manager $ 10,352 $ 518 $ 9,834 Cash Collections $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Court Payment Import Interface $ 1,608 $ 80 $ 1,528 Jury Data Import $ 1,769 $ 88 $ 1,681 Output Director $ 2,122 $ 106 $ 2,016 Citation Issuing Device Interface (Enforcement Mobile) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Virtual Court $ 2,600 $ 0 $ 2,600 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 1 of 7 Municipal Jury Manager $ 4,951 $ 248 $ 4,703 Collection Agency Export Interface $ 1,769 $ 88 $ 1,681 Content Manager Suite Core $0 $0 $0 TOTAL: Term # of Years: 3 $ 25,171 $ 1,128 $ 24,043 Municipal Justice 10 Suite Court Case Resolution Bundle $ 0.00 r4X@TTqW Payments Municipal Justice Payments $ 0.00 Hardware Epson TMH6000V Thermal Receipt Printer White USB NEW 2 $ 1,050 $ 2,100 $ 406 Topaz Signature Pad T-1-462 - USB w/ Serial Emulation TLBK462-BSB Hosted Court Sites 2 $ 525 $ 1,050 $ 210 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 2 of 7 Payments Lane 3000 Terminal Purchase PCI Service Fee (Per Device) Services Municipal Justice 10 Suite Professional Services Case Management Data Conversion Fee Instance, Payment Plans, Restitution Data Conversion Project Management Warrants & Judgements Data Analysis Warrants & Judgments Data Conversion Content Manager Suite Professional Services Other Services Project Management 2 $419 $838 $0 2 $0 $0 $360 TOTAL: $ 3,988 $ 976 168 $ 21,840 $ 0 1 $ 7,500 $ 0 1 $ 4,500 $ 0 1 $ 1,600 $ 0 4 $520 $0 1 $ 1,500 $ 0 32 $ 4,160 $ 0 1 $250 $0 TOTAL: $ 41,870 $ 0 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 3 of 7 Summary Total SaaS Total Third Party Hardware, Software, Services Total Tyler Services Summary Total Contract Total Municipal Justice 10 Suite Cash Collections Case Manager Data Analysis Criminal Case Manager Implementation Fees Fee Instance, Payment Plans, Restitution Data Analysis Municipal Jury Manager Output Director Court Payment Import .._ Content Manager Suite Core One Time Fees $ 3,988 $ 41,870 $ 45,858 $ 70,877 Recurring Fees $ 24,043 $ 976 $ 25,019 4 $520 $0 16 $ 2,080 $ 0 88 $ 11,440 $ 0 8 $ 1,040 $ 0 40 $ 5,200 $ 0 8 $ 1,040 $ 0 4 $520 $0 Sub -Total 168 $ 21,840 $ 0 32 $ 4,160 $ 0 Sub -Total 32 $ 4,160 $ 0 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 4 of 7 TOTAL: Municipal Justice 10 Suite Court/Police Third -Party Interface (Import or Export of Citations/Warrants/Dispositions) TOTAL: Term # of Years: 3 Comments 200 $ 26,000 $0 $ 3,537 $ 177 $ 3,360 $ 3,537 177 $ 3,360 Work will be delivered remotely unless otherwise noted in this agreement. Expenses associated with onsite services are invoiced as incurred according to Tyler's standard business travel policy. SaaS is considered a term of one year unless otherwise indicated. Your use of Tyler Payments and any related items included on this order is subject to the terms found at: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/payment-card-processing-agreement. By signing this order or the agreement in which it is included, you agree you have read, understand, and agree to such terms. Please see attached Tyler Payments fee schedule. 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 5 of 7 Implementation includes interface with Texas Omnibase Court Case Management conversion includes Name Information (Address, phone, name notes), Vehicle Information, Officer Information, Offense Code Information, Case Information (violation date, comments, citation), Witness Information, Disposition Information Court Case Resolution Bundle includes: Court Defendant Access, Court IVR and Notifications for Court. A fee is paid by the defendant for each transaction processed through Court Defendant Access or Court IVR: $1.00 for payments under $100, $2.50 for payments over $100, and $3.50 for advanced online transactions. A $0.20 fee is paid by the client for each violation for which a phone notification is attempted. Text message notifications are free of charge provided the client 1) enables the standard campaigns that include a link to Court Defendant Access, and 2) enables advanced online transactions that are currently available or defendants at the counter or by mail. This contract replaces existing Court Defendant Access annual fees. By signing this order, you acknowledge that the items listed here are hereby added to the agreement between you and us and subject to its terms. Your access or use of Virtual Court is subject to additional terms (the "VC Terms") found here: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/virtual- court-terms-of-use. Unless otherwise indicated, the VC Terms and any comments specific to Virtual Court herein take precedence over conflicting comments on this order. Client agrees that items in this sales quotation are, upon Client's signature or approval of same, hereby added to the existing agreement ("Agreement") between the parties and subject to its terms. Additionally, payment for said items, as applicable but subject to any listed assumptions herein, shall conform to the following terms, subject to payment terms in an agreement, amendment, or similar document in which this sales quotation is included: • License fees for Tyler and third -party software are invoiced upon the earlier of (i) delivery of the license key or (ii) when Tyler makes such software available accessible. • Fees for hardware are invoiced upon delivery. • Fees for year one of hardware maintenance are invoiced upon delivery of the hardware. • Annual Maintenance and Support fees, SaaS fees, Hosting fees, and Subscription fees are first payable when Tyler makes the software accessible to the Client (for Maintenance) or on the first day of the month following the date this quotation was signed (for SaaS, Hosting, and Subscription), and any such fees are prorated to align with the applicable term under the agreement, with renewals invoiced annually thereafter in accord with the Agreement. • Fees for services included in this sales quotation shall be invoiced as indicated below. o Implementation and other professional services fees shall be invoiced as delivered. o Fixed -fee Business Process Consulting services shall be invoiced 50% upon delivery of the Best Practice Recommendations, by module, and 50% upon delivery of custom desktop procedures, by module. 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 6 of 7 o Fixed -fee conversions are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of the converted data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load the converted data into Live/Production environment, by conversion option. Where conversions are quoted as estimated, Tyler will invoice Client the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. o Except as otherwise provided, other fixed price services are invoiced upon complete delivery of the service. For the avoidance of doubt, where "Project Planning Services" are provided, payment shall be invoiced upon delivery of the Implementation Planning document. Dedicated Project Management services, if any, will be invoiced monthly in arrears, beginning on the first day of the month immediately following initiation of project planning. o If Client has purchased any change management services, those services will be invoiced in accordance with the Agreement. o Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated above, the following payment terms shall apply to fees specifically for migrations: Tyler will invoice Client 50% of any Migration Services Fees listed above upon Client approval of the product suite migration schedule. The remaining 50%, by line item, will be billed upon the go -live of the applicable product suite. Tyler will invoice Client for any Project Management Fees listed above upon the go -live of the first product suite. Annual SaaS Fees will be invoiced upon availability of the hosted environment. Any SaaS or hosted solutions added to an agreement containing Client -hosted Tyler solutions are subject to Tyler's SaaS Services terms found here: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/tyler-saas-services. Unless otherwise indicated in the contract or amendment thereto, pricing for optional items will be held For six (6) months from the Quote date or the Effective Date of the Contract, whichever is later. Customer Approval: Print Name: Date: P.O.#: 2022-314245-F1V3W0 Page 7 of 7 Tyler Payments Fee Schedule Payer Electronic Payment Costs (Service Fee Model) If passing transaction costs to the payer Payer Card Cost— per card transaction with Visa, MasterCard, Discover, and American Express 3.95% $2.50 minimum Applies to: • Court: Online and In Person Client Electronic Payment Costs (Cost Plus Fee Model) If absorbing the transaction costs AM Miscellaneous Costs Credit Card Chargebacks — if a card payer disputes a transaction at the card issuing $15.00 bank (e.g. stolen card) eCheck Reiects —when an eCheck transaction comes back as declined (e.g. $5.00 bounced check) Monthly Gateway Fee — Per merchant account $10.00 Annual PCI Compliance Fee — Per merchant account $99 annually Card Terminal Purchase — per device, per month. Covers cost of PCI compliance, Lane 3000: $419 (one-time fee per device) service, maintenance, real-time integration and support Plus $180 annual per device PCI service fee CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SASS) AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL JUSTICE POWERED BY INCODE SOFTWARE FROM TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC OF PLANO, TX IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE-TIME FEES OF $70,887, AND RECURRING FEES OF $25,019, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Anna, Texas (the "City Council") finds that the City Court technology has been in use since 2004; and WHEREAS, the City staff recommends the City upgrade its Municipal Court software to improve efficiency and effectiveness in service to its neighbors; and WHEREAS, Tyler Technologies provides the Municipal Justice Powered by Incode system that meets many of the City's Court requirements at a reasonable cost, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The facts and recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Acknowledgement The City Council hereby approves the purchase of Incode as a Software As a Service Agreement from Tyler Technologies, Inc of Plano, TX in the amount of one-time fees of $101,476 recurring fees of $25,019, and includes the agreement attached as Exhibit A, and authorizes, ratifies, and approves the City Manager to execute the agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this 27th day of September, 2022. I_1=100512193 Carrie L. Land, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor RES. PAGE 1 OF 1 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 6.g. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Approve corrected versions of the Ordinances Adopting New Roadway, Water, & Sanitary Sewer Impact Fees, correcting scrivener's errors, for execution by the Mayor and City Secretary as corrected versions of Ordinance 997-2022 and Ordinance 999- 2022 adopted at the August 23, 2022 City Council Meeting. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: Upon final review of the signed impact fee ordinances adopted last month, there were several minor errors found in the documents which did not result in material changes to the application of the ordinances, but should be corrected. These minor changes are considered scrivener's errors. Adoption of the corrected documents is not adopting land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, or impact fees. All of those items were formally adopted in August. The "correcting" ordinances attached merely identify the errors in the original ordinances and correct them by directing the Mayor and City Secretary to execute new "corrected" ordinances. In addition, the "correcting" ordinance for 999-2022 repeals Ordinance 998-2022, as it is not required. The impact fee study, which is the basis for the adopted fees, is attached as Exhibit A and will be attached to both corrected ordinances. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ord Correcting 997-2022 C03029D20220921 CR1 2. Ord Corrected 997-2022 PDF 3. Ord Correcting 999-2022 C03029D20220921 CR1 4. Ord Corrected 999-2022 PDF 5. Exhibit A - Impact Fees Report :ZSI%1 Ws Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/22/2022 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AMENDING AND CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN ORDINANCE NO. 997- 2022 GOVERNING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing roadway impact fee rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and on August 23, 2022 adopted updated land use assumptions and roadway capital improvement plans and amended Chapter 9 of The Anna City Code of Ordinances ("Anna Code") as well as Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new rates for roadway impact fees; and WHEREAS, on or about August 23, 2022, the wrong version of the ordinance was executed by the Mayor and it contained scrivener's errors as identified and corrected herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. IDENTIFICATION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. The City Council hereby identifies the following scrivener's errors in Ordinance No. 997-2022 and orders that said errors be corrected as set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance. Text that is struck through was in error and text that is underlined should have been included in the ordinance as set forth here: ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE, A6.000 UTILITY FEES, SECTION A6.014 PART IVY ARTICLE 7, SECTION 44(ROADWAY IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. [ ... ] WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 Part IV, A14iGle 7, eGtieR 13-(Roadway Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new roadway impact fee rates; [ ... ] SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater roadway facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the Impact Foe Update 2022 2032 City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The adeptien of sand land use assumptions and Gapital improvements plan is Gurnulative of any land use assumptions and Gapital improvements plan regarding water and wastewater faGilities and this erdinanGe does not amend or ethepwose medify the Gity's- existing water and wastewater imnort f8eS SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9 PART III OF THE ANNA CODE AND APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE. SECTION 3.A. In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Section 9.08.005(b) (Roadway Impact Fees) is deleted and replaced with the following: (b) Roadway impact fees. Roadway impact fees shall be determined and assessed as set forth in Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of this Code as amended. SECTION 3.13. AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE In accordance with Section 1.01.007 part "�Rrk�Qeot;��-of the Anna Code, port lV °rtiGle 7 SeGtie Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees is deleted and replaced with the following: In accordance with Appendix A FEE SCHEDULE, Article A6.000 UTILITY FEES, Section A6.014 (Roadway impact fees) is deleted and replaced with the following: I ... I CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 SECTION 3. CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; EXECUTION OF CORRECTED ORDINANCE. In order to correct the scrivener's errors identified in Section 2, the City Council hereby directs the Mayor and the City Secretary to execute the document attached hereto as Exhibit A and titled "Ordinance No. 997-2022 (CORRECTED)" which shall replace and supersede Ordinance 997-2022 for all purposes. SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 27t" day of September 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, CORRECTING ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 REGARDING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the imposition of roadway impact fees on developments within the City as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and roadway capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Chapter 9, Article 9.08 Impact Fees, Section 9.08.005(b) (Roadway Impact Fees) and Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of The Anna City Code of Ordinances ("Anna Code") to specify new roadway impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to roadway facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1 This ordinance replaces and supersedes Ordinance No. 997-2022 in its entirety. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 1 SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE ANNA CODE AND APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE. SECTION 3.A. In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Section 9.08.005(b) (Roadway Impact Fees) is deleted and replaced with the following: "(b) Roadway impact fees. Roadway impact fees shall be determined and assessed as set forth in Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of this Code as amended." SECTION 3.113. AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees is deleted and replaced with the following: "Service Area 1 (maximum $1,845.00) = $1,845.00 Service Area 2 (maximum $1,423.00) = $1,423.00 Schedule A - Land Use Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Land Use Category % of Maximum Fee per Service Unit Residential 100 Multifamily 100 Convenience Store 100 Fueling Station 100 Automotive Dealership 100 Auto Repair/Maintenance 100 Warehouse 100 Storage 100 Restaurant with Drive Thru 100 General Commercial 85 Retail 85 Industrial Manufacturing 85 Medical Office 75 Hospital 75 Sit -Down Restaurant 75 Retailer >20,000 SF GFA 75 Employment Center 65 3+ Story Professional Office 65 Corporate Campus 65 These assessment rates shall be effective on new development in the City in accordance with Anna Code and state law." CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 2 SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 3 ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, CORRECTING ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 REGARDING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the imposition of roadway impact fees on developments within the City as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and roadway capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Chapter 9, Article 9.08 Impact Fees, Section 9.08.005(b) (Roadway Impact Fees) and Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of The Anna City Code of Ordinances ("Anna Code") to specify new roadway impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to roadway facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE ANNA CODE AND APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE. SECTION 3.A. In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Section 9.08.005(b) (Roadway Impact Fees) is deleted and replaced with the following: 1 This ordinance replaces and supersedes Ordinance No. 997-2022 in its entirety. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 1 "(b) Roadway impact fees. Roadway impact fees shall be determined and assessed as set forth in Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.014 (Roadway Impact Fees) of this Code as amended." SECTION 3.113. AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE ANNA CODE In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Appendix A Fee Schedule, Article A6.000 Utility Fees is deleted and replaced with the following: "Service Area 1 (maximum $1,845.00) = $1,845.00 Service Area 2 (maximum $1,423.00) = $1,423.00 Schedule A - Land Use Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Land Use Category % of Maximum Fee per Service Unit Residential 100 Multifamily 100 Convenience Store 100 Fueling Station 100 Automotive Dealership 100 Auto Repair/Maintenance 100 Warehouse 100 Storage 100 Restaurant with Drive Thru 100 General Commercial 85 Retail 85 Industrial Manufacturing 85 Medical Office 75 Hospital 75 Sit -Down Restaurant 75 Retailer >20,000 SF GFA 75 Employment Center 65 3+ Story Professional Office 65 Corporate Campus 65 These assessment rates shall be effective on new development in the City in accordance with Anna Code and state law." SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 2 violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: City Secretary Carrie Land Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 997-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AMENDING AND CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN ORDINANCE NO. 999- 2022 GOVERNING WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.998-2022; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing water, sewer and other utility billing rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and on August 23, 2022 adopted updated land use assumptions and capital improvement plans and amended Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 (Water and sewer impact fees) of The Anna City Code of Ordinances ("Anna Code") to specify new rates for water and wastewater impact fees; and WHEREAS, on or about August 23, 2022, the wrong version of the ordinance was executed by the Mayor and it contained scrivener's errors as identified and corrected herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. IDENTIFICATION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. The City Council hereby identifies the following scrivener's errors in Ordinance No. 999-2022 and orders that said errors be corrected as set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance. Text that is struck through was in error and text that is underlined should have been included in the ordinance as set forth here: ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE, A6.000 UTILITY CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 FEES, SECTION A6.013 DART IVY ARTICLE 7, SECTION 13 (WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 Part W; Article 7, SeGtien 13 (Water and Sewer Impact Fees) of the Anna Code to specify new water and wastewater impact fee rates; SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the 'm, aGt-Fee Update 2022-2032 City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The. SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE, A6.000 UTILITY FEES, SECTION A6.013 OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Section 1.01.007 of the Anna Code, Part 11, Art+tFl 1, deGti^r'vn 9 of the Anna Code Dort lV °�REIe SGGtOGR 1 Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 of the Anna Code is deleted and replaced with the following: Schedule A - Water and Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table Meter Sanitary Land Use Meter Type Size LUE Water Sewer Total Single Family Simple 3/4" 1 $5,500 $5,500 $11,000 Residential Single Family Simple 1" 1.7 $9,350 $9,350 $1 4,601 $18,700 Residential Single Family Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 S18,150 $18,150 $2 8,343 $36,300 Residential Single Family Simple 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 S4 5,5-20 $58,300 Residential Commercial/Retail Compound 2" 5.3 S29,150 $29,150 S45,5-20 $58,300 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 2 Commercial/Retail/Mutt Compound i Fam Commercial/Retail/Mutt Compound i Fam Industrial Compound Industrial Compound Industrial Compound Industrial Turbine 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 10.7 $58,850 16.7 $91,850 33.3 $183,150 53.3 $293,150 153.3 $843,150 220 $1,210,00 0 $58,850 $117,700 8 $91,850 $143,430 $183,700 $183,150 $296,002 $366,300 $293,150 $457,775 $586,300 $843,150 $1,686,300 $1,210,000 I $2,420,000 Schedule B - Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Rates Service Maximum Impact Fee Adopted Impact Fee Facility Category Area Per Living Unit Per Living Unit Equivalent Equivalent Water Facilities All 5 500 c"� 5 500 c" Wastewater Facilities All 5 500 t^� 5 500 c" SECTION 3. CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; EXECUTION OF CORRECTED ORDINANCE. In order to correct the scrivener's errors identified in Section 2, the City Council hereby directs the Mayor and the City Secretary to execute the document attached hereto as Exhibit A and titled "Ordinance No. 999-2022 (CORRECTED)" which shall replace and supersede Ordinance 999-2022 for all purposes. SECTION 4. REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 998-2022. Ordinance No. 998-2022 contained scrivener's errors and the City Council finds that said ordinance is superfluous and is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 5. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 6. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 27th day of September 2022. ATTESTED: City Secretary Carrie Land APPROVED: Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 4 ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE, A6.000 UTILITY FEES, SECTION A6.013 (WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing water, sewer and other utility billing rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and water and wastewater capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 (Water and sewer impact fees) of the Anna Code to specify new water and wastewater impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1 This ordinance replaces and supersedes Ordinance No. 999-2022 in its entirety. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 1 SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Anna Code Sec. 1.01.007: Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 (Water and sewer impact fees) of the Anna Code is deleted and replaced with the following: Schedule A - Water and Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table Land Use Meter Type Meter Size LUE Water Sanitary Sewer Total Single Family Residential Simple 3/4" 1 $5,500 $5,500 $11,000 Single Family Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $9,350 $9,350 $18,700 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $18,150 $18,150 $36,300 Single Family Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $58,300 Commercial/Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $58,300 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 3" 10.7 $58,850 $58,850 $117,700 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 4" 16.7 $91,850 $91,850 $183,700 Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $183,150 $183,150 $366,300 Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $293,150 $293,150 $586,300 Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $843,150 $843,150 $1,686,300 Industrial Turbine 12" 220 $1,210,000 $1,210,000 $2,420,000 Schedule B - Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Rates Service Maximum Impact Fee Adopted Impact Fee Facility Category Area Per Living Unit Per Living Unit Equivalent Equivalent Water Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 Wastewater Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 2 SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: City Secretary Carrie Land APPROVED: Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 3 ORDINANCE NO. 9-2022 (CORRECTED) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AMENDING THE ANNA CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE, A6.000 UTILITY FEES, SECTION A6.013 (WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY, AND REPEALING CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("the City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing water, sewer and other utility billing rates, payments, and related procedures, including provisions related to impact fees as authorized under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas City Council ("the City Council") has held a public hearing and determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to adopt updated land use assumptions and water and wastewater capital improvement plans, and to impose amended impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it would be advantageous and beneficial to the City and its citizens to amend Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 (Water and sewer impact fees) of the Anna Code to specify new water and wastewater impact fee rates; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. As relates to water and wastewater facilities, the City Council hereby adopts updates to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan as set forth in the City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1 This ordinance replaces and supersedes Ordinance No. 999-2022 in its entirety. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 1 SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO PART IV OF THE ANNA CODE. In accordance with Anna Code Sec. 1.01.007: Appendix A Fee Schedule, A6.000 Utility Fees, Section A6.013 (Water and sewer impact fees) of the Anna Code is deleted and replaced with the following: Schedule A - Water and Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table Land Use Meter Type Meter Size LUE Water Sanitary Sewer Total Single Family Residential Simple 3/4" 1 $5,500 $5,500 $11,000 Single Family Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $9,350 $9,350 $18,700 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $18,150 $18,150 $36,300 Single Family Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $58,300 Commercial/Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $29,150 $29,150 $58,300 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 3" 10.7 $58,850 $58,850 $117,700 Commercial/Retail/Multi Fam Compound 4" 16.7 $91,850 $91,850 $183,700 Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $183,150 $183,150 $366,300 Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $293,150 $293,150 $586,300 Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $843,150 $843,150 $1,686,300 Industrial Turbine 12" 220 $1,210,000 $1,210,000 $2,420,000 Schedule B - Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Rates Service Maximum Impact Fee Adopted Impact Fee Facility Category Area Per Living Unit Per Living Unit Equivalent Equivalent Water Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 Wastewater Facilities All $5,500 $5,500 SECTION 4. PENALTY Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each violation is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. SECTION 5. SAVINGS, SEVERABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSES. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 2 SECTION 6. PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage and upon the posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to implement such posting and/or publication. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on this the 23rd day of August 2022. ATTESTED: City Secretary Carrie Land APPROVED: Mayor Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 999-2022 (CORRECTED) PAGE 3 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF manna City of Anna 2022 Roadway, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study PREPARED BY Kimley)))Horn Expect More. Experience Better. J U LY 2022 �i�e ��-�of►�L�ywasausrisc� oil 'IHC =y Ur Anna Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1 — Land Use Assumptions Chapter 2 — Roadway Impact Fee Study Chapter 3 — Water Impact Fee Study Chapter 4 — Wastewater Impact Fee Study Appendices Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Kimley>))Horn Executive Summary 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF Anna Prepared by: Kimley >> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. +���E•OF. TF;to# �.................:: � TODD L. STROUSE � 107773 ; �® AO'•�/ 0®'F ••.CENS .• ��� ��#e;ZONAL V ON®® ®®�� 07/26/2022 1'HL CITY O[ Anna Executive Summary Introduction Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads, and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for roadway and drainage, water, and wastewater facilities. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development towards new infrastructure needs. Impact Fees are a mathematical calculation that determine a maximum fee that would be equivalent to growth paying for growth. This study's purpose is to calculate the maximum impact fee per service unit of new growth. The Maximum Impact Fee is considered an appropriate measure of the impacts generated by a new unit of development on a City's infrastructure system. An impact fee program is anticipated to be designed so that it is predictable for both the development community and City. An impact fee program is transparent. This report describes in detail how the fee is calculated and how the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) monitors the Impact Fee program. An impact fee program is flexible in that funds can be used on priority projects and not just on projects adjacent to a specific development. An impact fee program is both equitable and proportional in that every new development pays an equal fee that is directly related to its systemwide impact. Impact Fee Basics Service Area A service area is a geographical area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected withing the Service Aera must be spent on eligible improvements withing the same Service Area. For Roadway Impact Fees, the service area may not exceed a 6-mile diameter trip length. In Anna, this results in the creation of two separate Roadway Service Areas. The Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Area for the City of Anna is the Extra - Territorial Justification, this service area was determined based on where the City of Anna will provide service. Land Use Assumptions The Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2022-2032. The 10-year increase in residential units is projected to be 6,902 units withing the city limits, the projected water and wastewater connections are 7,599 and 7,276 respectively. The 2032 projections show an increase of 19,141,000 square feet of non-residential land use over the 10-year window. These projections set the basis for determining loading and demands to serve new growth. The distribution of residential and non-residential growth utilized information from historical building permit data and input from city staff on known future development locations. Service Units The "service area" is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used to quantify the supply and demand for roads and utilities in the City. Service units are attributable to an individual unit of development and utilized to calculate the maximum impact fee of a development. For roadway purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle -mile. A "vehicle -mile" refers to the capacity consumed in a single lane by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length during the PM peak hour. The PM peak hour is the one - hour period during the afternoon/evening when the highest vehicular volumes are observed. In accordance with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. The service unit for water and wastewater impact fees is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the Kimley»)Horn Page 1 1'HL CITY O[ Anna size of the individual water meters used to serve growth related development. The base water SFE is the water demand associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence. The base wastewater SFE is the wastewater flow associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence. The smallest water meter issued for a new single-family residence in the City of Anna is a 3/4-inch meter. Capital Improvement Plan The City and project staff have identified the Roadway, Water, and Wastewater projects needed to accommodate the projected growth over the next ten (10) years within the City of Anna. These projects include existing, proposed, and recently completed projects that were determined based on their current or anticipated impact on each defined Service Area and the City as a whole. Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The City of Anna Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for the roadway infrastructure within the City Limits. The projects on the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan were selected from the Thoroughfare Plan and cover existing, proposed, and completed roadway improvements, as well as intersection improvements with 10-year growth potential. Water Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed for the City of Anna based on the growth patterns and trends from the Land Use Assumptions. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet projected water demand through 2032. Elements of the water system, including storage facilities, pumping facilities, and the distribution network were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of Water Impact Fee Chapter of this report. Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan Similar to the Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, the Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed to address system improvements driven by growth. Elements of the wastewater system, including gravity pipes, force mains, lift station and wastewater treatment facilities were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of the Wastewater Impact Fee Chapter of this Report. Recoverable Project Costs Impact Fees are a one-time fee meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs within a ten-year window. With this consideration, the maximum assessable impact fee does not specifically cover the entire cost of a roadway, water, or wastewater project. The calculations that determine the percentage of a project's cost that is impact fee eligible are defined as the project's recoverable cost. Roadway Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for roadway projects are calculated by first determining the net capacity of vehicle -miles supplied to support future growth within a 10-year window. This net capacity is then multiplied by the percentage of roadway capacity added attributable to this 10-year growth. This growth percentage is obtained through the derivation of a transportation demand factor (TDF), which computes the total vehicle -miles associated to a single land use development unit. The TDF is applied to both the net vehicle -miles supplied and the vehicle -mile growth projections to calculate the growth percentage needed to determine the total recoverable project costs, which total $101,948,281 Kimley»)Horn Page 2 1'HL CITY OI Anna (pre -finance) over two (2) Roadway Service Areas. Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax revenues from the new development. Water Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for water projects are calculated by determining the increase in water demand due to growth over the 10-year window. The City's current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional SFEs to determine the maximum fee per SFE. The total recoverable costs for the water distribution system are $232,036,389 (pre -finance). Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax and utility revenues from the new development. Wastewater Recoverable Project Costs The process for calculating the recoverable wastewater costs is similar to the water financial analysis. The recoverable costs for wastewater projects are calculated by determining the increase in wastewater flows due to growth over the 10-year window. The City's current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional SFEs to determine the maximum fee per SFE. The total recoverable costs for the wastewater collection system are $291,665,915 (pre -finance). Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by 50% to account for future ad valorem tax and utility revenues from the new development. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Calculation In simplest terms, the maximum impact fee allowable by law is calculated by dividing the recoverable cost of the Capital Improvement Plans by the number of new service units of development. In accordance with state law, both the cost of the Capital Improvement Plan and the number of new service units of development used in the equation are based on the growth and corresponding capacity needs projected to occur within a 10-year window. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone Capital Improvement Plan and 10-year growth projection. In practice, there are many factors that complicate this calculation. The maximum impact fee allowable by law for each service area is shown below: Roadway Maximum Fee Water Maximum Fee Per Wastewater Maximum Fee Per Single Family Roadway Service Area Per Service Unit Single Family Equivalent Equivalent (3/4-inch (per Vehicle -Mile) (3/4-inch Meter) Meter 1 $1,845 $9285 $11,671 2 $1,423 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of impact fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Capacity Plan used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee's findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to have adequate representation of the building and development communities. In Anna this is the Planning & Zoning Commission with an ETJ representative. The City Council then conducts a public Kimley»)Horn Page 3 1'HL CHY O[ Anna hearing on the Land Use Assumptions, Capacity Plan, and Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Capacity Plan at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. Kimley»)Horn Page 4 Chapter 1 Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 301 2580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. P E. OF 0# I 06/28/2022 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table of Contents 1 Purpose..................................................................................................................... 2 2 Components of Land Use Assumptions Chapter....................................................... 2 3 Land Use Assumptions Methodology........................................................................ 2 4 Impact Fee Service Areas......................................................................................... 3 5 Data Format.............................................................................................................. 6 6 10- Year Growth Summary........................................................................................ 6 7 Summary................................................................................................................... 7 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1.1 — Roadway Service Area.............................................................................................................4 Exhibit 1.2 — Water & Wastewater Service Area........................................................................................... 5 List of Tables Table 1. Roadway Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032)..................................6 Table 2. Water Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections(2022-2032)........................................7 Table 3. Wastewater Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) .............................. 7 KimlepMorn Page 1 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Purpose Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas political subdivisions must follow in order to assess impact fees for new development. The first step required in updating impact fees is the development of Land Use Assumptions. These Land Use Assumptions, which include both residential and non-residential estimates, form the basis for the development of impact fees for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities. Reasonable future growth estimates are necessary in order to aid the City of Anna in establishing the need for capital improvements required to serve future development. In accordance with Chapter 395, Kimley-Horn has compiled the information required to complete the Land Use Assumptions using the following sources: - City of Anna Future Land Use Plan - Parcel Data Information from Collin Central Appraisal District - Aerial Overview of City Development Potential - City of Anna Staff 2 Components of Land Use Assumptions Chapter Land Use Assumptions included the following components: Land Use Assumption Methodology: Overview of the general methodology used to generate land use assumptions Impact Fee Service Areas: Explanation of the divisions of Anna into service areas for roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees 10-Year Growth Assumptions: Data on residential and non-residential growth within each service area from 2022-2032 Land Use Assumptions Summary: Synopsis of the land use chapter 3 Land Use Assumptions Methodology The residential and non-residential growth projections formulated in this chapter were done using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: - Existing development - Known planned developments - Location of vacant land - Future Land Use Plan - Buildout population projections Existing residential and non-residential data was compiled using parcel data from Collin Central Appraisal District and aerial survey. For the remaining undeveloped area, assumptions were utilized based upon buildout population projections, future land use plan and known developments. Consultation with City staff helped with finalizing growth projections. KimlepMorn Page 2 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 4 Impact Fee Service Areas Service Area Definitions According to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, a Service Area refers to the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivision to be served by the capital improvements or facilities specified in the impact fee. Funds collected in the specific service areas must be spent in the service area collected. Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for roadway facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.1. The roadway service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Anna. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of a political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." The City of Anna is proposed to be divided into two service areas for roadway impact fee purposes, using State Highway 5 to divide the service area boundaries. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) are excluded. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundaries of the proposed impact fee service area for water and wastewater facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.2. The water and wastewater impact fee service areas include the area within the ETJ. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 3 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas _ 0 0.5 1 Miles N r THE CITY OF ra CR 9106 Anna - CR �N r ` - �FM 455/ ), cow - Q m Q�� �— — I C� j J O HACKBERRY LN z {i � I lo CR'513'i � I W WHITE ST I\E-wHITE'S.T-14�----, O ) r O 01 0 �J Cf) - CR 417 i' 4 1 I ir r�I W FM.545 ' 1 Legend ' I` �♦ — Roadway Facilities I - , Service Area I ♦ — Streams Service Area 2 Floodplain ` _ ETJ Railroads EXHIBIT 1.1 �i Rr ,k Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5 Data Format The residential and non-residential estimates were all compiled in accordance with the following categories and format: Impact Fee Service Areas: Large zones, which correspond to proposed roadway, water, and wastewater facilities service areas (as described in previous section) Residential Units: Number of dwelling units or connections, including both single-family and multifamily Non-residential: Square footage of building area or number of connections based on three different classifications: Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented towards the household sector (i.e., grocery stores and restaurants) Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government and other professional and administrative offices Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services, including those exporting outside the local economy (i.e., manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses) 6 10- Year Growth Summary Table 1.1 summarizes residential and non-residential 10-year growth projections within the roadway service areas. Projections for single-family and multifamily growth were made using planned development information provided by the City of Anna. Growth projections made for non-residential building square footage assumed an 8% growth of non- residential businesses per year for the next 10 years. These assumptions are consistent with the water and wastewater connection growth projections presented in Table 1.2 and Table 1.3. Residential water and wastewater connections for the next 10 years were based on development information provided by the City of Anna and the non-residential connections were based on a growth of 8% per year for the next 10 years. Based on historical connection count information, approximately 95.7% of all water customers are also wastewater customers. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 6 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 1. Roadway Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Service Area Year Residential Units Non -Residential Square Feet Single -Family Multifamily Basic Service Retail 2022 5,500 24 380,205 445,328 1,932,411 1 2032 8,261 2,074 1,201,039 1,406,758 6,104,341 Growth 2,761 2,050 820,834 961,430 4,171,930 2022 1,913 120 319,499 18,164 5,063,079 2 2032 4,004 120 1,009,273 57,379 5,954,227 Growth 2,091 0 689,774 39,215 891,148 Overall City Growth 4,852 2,050 1,511,000 1,001,000 5,063,000 Table 2. Water Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Year Residential Connections Non -Residential Connections 2022 8,385 269 2032 15,984 499 Growth 7,599 230 Table 3. Wastewater Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Year Residential Connections Non -Residential Connections 2022 8,029 257 2032 15,305 477 Growth 7,276 220 [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] KimlepMorn Page 7 Land Use Assumptions �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 7 Summary The following is a summary of land use assumptions for the roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees. The roadway land use assumptions are confined to growth projected within the City Limits, while the water and wastewater land use assumptions are confined to growth projected within the ETJ. The roadway land use assumptions are quantified in terms of dwelling units and building square footage for residential and non-residential growth, respectively. The water and wastewater land use assumptions are quantified in terms of connections for both residential and non-residential growth. - The 10 year (2022-2032) residential growth projection is approximately: o Roadway Service Areas = 6,902 Dwelling Units o Water Service Area = 7,599 Connections o Wastewater Service Area = 7,276 Connections - The 10-Year (2022-2032) non-residential growth projection is approximately: o Roadway Service Areas = 7,574,000 ftz o Water Service Area = 230 Connections o Wastewater Service Area = 220 Connection KimlepMorn Page 8 Chapter2 Roadway Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study Prepared by: Kimlicy >>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. �p(E OF TF��1 BRANDON R. FORSYTHE X 135242 ; (�1� S/C1�n�ei * tm: Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................ 3 2 Land Use Assumptions.............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Summary.............................................................................................................................4 2.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas................................................................................... 4 3 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan ..................................................... 6 4 Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees...................................................................10 4.1 Service Areas.................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Service Units..................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Cost Per Service Units...................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology .......................... 11 4.5 Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs ............................... 14 4.6 Service Unit Calculation.................................................................................................... 16 5 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation............................................................................ 20 5.1 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit.......................................................... 20 5.2 Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit........................................................................... 22 5.3 Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development................................................................. 24 6 Sample Calculations................................................................................................ 27 7 Adoption and Administration of Roadway Impact Fees ............................................ 28 7.1 Adoption Process.............................................................................................................. 28 7.2 Collection and Use of Roadway Impact Fees.................................................................... 28 8 Conclusions.............................................................................................................28 Kimley>))Horn Page 1 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 List of Exhibits Exhibit2.1 — Roadway Service Area..............................................................................................................5 Exhibit 2.2 — Roadway Capital Improvement Plan for Service Area 1.......................................................... 7 Exhibit 2.3 — Roadway Capital Improvement Plan for Service Area 2.......................................................... 8 List of Tables Table 1. Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032)..................................................4 Table 2. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements — Service Area 1..........................................9 Table 3. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements — Service Area 2........................................10 Table 4. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities........................................................................................11 Table 5. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities..........................................................................................11 Table 6. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with....................................................15 Table 7. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with....................................................16 Table 8. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations..................................................................................18 Table 9. 10-Year Growth Projections...........................................................................................................19 Table 10. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation..........................................................20 Table 11. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation (Continued)......................................22 Table 12. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee...............................................................................23 Table 13. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table................................................................................... 25 Table 14. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile)..............................29 Kimley>))Horn Page 2 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Introduction Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Chapter 395 defines an Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." Accordingly, the City of Anna has developed its Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan with which to implement Roadway Impact Fees. The City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update. This chapter includes details of the Roadway Impact Fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the Capital Improvements Plan, and refinement of the Land Use Equivalency Table. This report introduces and references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: 1. Land Use Assumptions 2. Capital Improvements Plan Information from the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan are used extensively throughout the remainder of the report. There is a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion is broken into three components: 1. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 2. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 3. Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit The components of the Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees include development of: - Service Areas - Service Units - Cost Per Service Unit - Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology - Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs - Service Unit Calculation The Roadway Impact Fee Calculation includes the calculation of the: - Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit - Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit outlines a 50% reduction of the Capital Improvements Plan as outlined in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The final section of the report is the Conclusion, which presents the findings of the analysis and summarizes the report. Kimley>Morn Page 3 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 2 Land Use Assumptions 2.1 Summary The methodology for land use assumptions is presented in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. The development of land use assumptions included establishing roadway impact fee service areas (SA), collection/determination of residential and non-residential data by SA, and projection of the 10-year residential and non-residential growth by SA. Table 1 presents the growth projected for the City of Anna from 2022-2032 based on planned development information provided by the City of Anna and the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Table 1. Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections (2022-2032) Service Area Year Residential Units Non -Residential Square Feet Single -Family Multifamily Basic Service Retail 2022 5,500 24 380,205 445,328 1,932,411 1 2032 8,261 2,074 1,201,039 1,406,758 6,104,341 Growth 2,761 2,050 820,834 961,430 4,171,930 2022 1,913 120 319,499 18,164 5,063,079 2 2032 4,004 120 1,009,273 57,379 5,954,227 Growth 2,091 0 68-9 774 3-9 215 891,148 Overall City Growth 4,852 2,050 1,511,000 1,001,000 5,063,000 2.2 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 2.1. The City of Anna is proposed to be divided by State Highway 5 into two (2) service areas. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) are excluded from the study. It should be noted that at locations where the service area boundary follows a thoroughfare facility, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway, such as State Highway 5. In cases where a service area boundary follows the City Limits, only those portions of the facility within the City Limits are included in the service area. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 4 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas _ 0 0.5 1 Miles N r THE CITY OF ra CR 9106 Anna - CR �N r ` - �FM 455/ ), cow - Q m Q�� �— — I C� j J O HACKBERRY LN z {i � I lo CR'513'i � I W WHITE ST I\E-wHITE'S.T-14�----, O ff r O 01 0 �J Cf) - a CR 476 1 CR 417 i' 4 1 I 1 1 � I / 1 W FM 545 r Legend 1 7 — Roadway Facilities I - , Service Area I i Streams I Service Area 2 .. Floodplain ` _ ETJ b Railroads EXHIBIT 2.1 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 3 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan The City has identified the roadway projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The City of Anna Master Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for roadway infrastructure within City Limits. Only capacity improvements still needed to build out the Master Thoroughfare Plan to accommodate the expected growth within the next 10-years are included in the Capital Improvements Plan. The Capital Improvements Plan includes arterials, collectors, and Downtown class roadway facilities increasing the network capacity and consists of 5 categories of projects. They are as follows: - New — Any future roadway identified by the City to be included in the Capital Improvements Plan - Widening — Existing roadways not currently built to the ultimate classification in the Master Thoroughfare Plan and must be completely reconstructed - 1/2 Widening — Existing roadways that only have half of the ultimate cross section to be built - 1/3 Widening — Existing roadways that only have one-third of the ultimate cross section to be built - 2/3 Widening — Existing roadways that only have two-thirds of the ultimate cross section to be built All the roadway facilities identified are part of the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan. The City uses six -lane and four -lane divided cross sections for their arterial facilities, four -lane and three -lane undivided cross sections for their collector facilities, and a two-lane undivided cross section for their Downtown facilities. The Capital Improvements Plan is listed in Table 2 and Table 3 and mapped in Exhibit 2.2 and Exhibit 2.3. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility's Impact Fee classification. The Capital Improvements Plan was developed in conjunction with input from City of Anna staff and represents those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 6 Downtown Inset � Y HACKBERRY LN Capital Improvements Plan J Service Area 1 J ' no`� Miles N / z ® � THE CITY OF 4 Anna Y iG a'_ CR 373 CR 1106 5 c1 0LU I W WHITE ST co E WHITE ST TF CR 371 IC& 3?6 /� \ 2 0 16 RpSAMOND PKWY\\�t\�`— o Q cnl 1 Q `I See Inset HACKBERRY pR f G W WHITE ST t a r- \ O 0 } rV r a n _ 1 w i � LU - I—_—_— — J d cn U II l i -4 Legend Service Area 1 Project Type Service Area 2 New Streams Widening Floodplain Partial Widening Railroads None — ETJ Not a Thoroughfare in City Limits/Local Road EXHIBIT 2.2 l Capital Improvements Plan Service Area 2 0 0.5 1 Miles N THE CITY OF Anna ---- --- ---- S N CR 373 CR 1106 T CR 371 CR 3j6 L� v I b Downtown In • ' 101 MM���12 ■ 14 ■ ■ 15■ _ AMEN w ■■ ],7 19 .WHITE ST ,•• See Inset Y l CR513-� U) W WHI EST E W ITE ST I�z �0 j } I <' U) e I ) p 1 1 a = J j I ,�- --- —I 1 �� J I Ell - LU a z L. _ (J) o LLJ J I I I - -� CR � ' 1 CR417 1 I � 1 � I 1 W FM 545 Legend 1 Service Area 1 Project Type -- New •-—s I— - -I Service Area 2 Streams Widening • i Floodplain Partial Widening r Railroads None — ETJ Not a Thoroughfare in City Limits/Local Road CXHIBIT2.3] P Roadway Impact Fee Study Update TTC 7TYOF City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 2. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements - Service Area 1 Service Area Proj. # Impact Fee Class Roadway Lhnits Length (-) In Service Area l Miner Arterial CR 373 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 50°/ 2 Major Arterial CR 371 (1) 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.36 100% 3 _ 4_ 5 6 _ _ _ Major Arterial _ _ _ Major Arterial_ _ _ Major Arterial _ Major Arterial _ _ CR 371 (2)_ ____________ _ CR 371 (3)_ _ _ CR 371 4 CR 371 5) __ CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD ___________________________________ BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.24 0.11 _________ 0.71 100% 100% _________ 100%N. 100 7 Major Arterial CR 370 (1) 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 1.10 100% 8 Major Arterial CR 370 (2) CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.18 100% 9 Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 0.22 100% 10 Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) CR 374 to 1,I70' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.86 1000% 11 Major Arterial (213) W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSINGBLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 100% 12 Major Arterial (1/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 0.14 1001/. 13 14 15 16 Major Arterial (213) -Minor Collector Minor Collector Minor Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) ROLLINS RD (1) ROLLINS RD (2� HACKBERRY DR (1) 749 E OF LANGDON DR to N POWELL PKWY _ CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.23 1.01 0.12 0.54 1001/. 100% 100% 100% 17 1% Minor Arterial (1/2) Mmor Arterial _ HACKBERRY DR () HACKBERRY LN (1 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POWELL PKWY 0.26 0.18 10070 100% 19 20 Downtown Tie B Downtown Type B W 2ND ST (1) W 3RD ST (1) 34U W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 0.11 1001/. 100% 21 Downtown Type B HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 100% 22 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (I) 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR 0.04 100% 23 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (2) S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 24 Major Arterial FM 455 (1) 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 1.28 100% 25 Major Arterial FM 455 (2) 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD 0.83 1001/. 26 Major Arterial FM 455 (3) 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 1.21 100% __27 _ _ 28_ 22 __ 30 ______ Major Arterial ... Arterial (1/3) ___ Ma)rA tal (1/3� _ _____ _ Major Collector _ W WHITE ST (1) W WHITE ST (2) ________________________ _ WWHITE ST (3) _____ ___ CR 284 (1) _____________________ FM 455 to CR 286 _____ _ __________________________________ ____________ _CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB .......... _ _ ....... CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NBt SPOWELL PKWY _______________ _________ _____________ ____ ________ ___--- ___ 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 __ 0.51 _ R27_ 198 0.62 100% _____ 100% 100/ 100% 31 32 _ Major Collector_ _ Major Collector _ ___ CR 284 (2) CR 284 (3) _ _ 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 61V W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB_ 0.25 0.18 50% 100% 33 Major Collector TAYLOR BLVD (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.71 50°/ 34 Major Collecmr TAYLOR BLVD (2) 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.16 100% 35 Major Collector TAYLOR BLVD (3) 4,6W E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.04 50% SA 1 36 Minor Collector (4D) W FINLEY BLVD (1) S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.51 50°/ 37 Mmor Collector (4D)(l/2) -(2) BLVD (2) 2,7W E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN 0.08 100"/ ___38 39 Minor Collector (4D)_ Minor Collector W FINLEY BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (4) _ SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.15 100% 100% 40 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) 3,74Y W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 100% _ 4l _ 42 43 Ma' Collecto Majo Collector (1/2j __________ ___ Ma' r Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2 _ W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3L _________ __________________________ _________ W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 1_780_W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON!2 Wn _________________ 1,095 E OF S FERG 91,1 PKWY to ASPEN DR _ _ _ _ ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD 0.34 0.38_ 0.19 50% 50% 50% 44 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 45 Minor Arterial CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 0.03 100% 46 Minor Arterial CR 368 (2) 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 100% 47 Minor Arterial CR 368 (3) FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.12 100%__ 48 Minor Arterial CR 368 (4) 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to I,150' N OF CR 370 0.16 50°/ 49 Minor Arterial CR 368 (5) 1,150' N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 0.36 _ 1007. 50 Miner Arterial CR 368 (6) 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,855' S OF CR 370 0.21 50°/ 51 Mmo Arterial CR 368 (7) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 100% 52 Minor Arterial (1/2) CR 368 (8) 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST to 880' N OF W WHITE ST 0.59 100% 53 Mmor Arterial CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST to 2,801Y S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 100% 54 Minor Arterial CR 286 2) 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST to 3,801Y S OF W WHITE ST 0.19 100% _ 55_ 56 _ _ _ Min.,Arterial_ _ M jor Collector CR 286 (3) ____ ______________________ CR 374 1) 890_N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 90V N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY 0_28 1.52 100% 100% _ 57 Major Collector CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 100% 58 Major Collector CR 374 (3) 24Y S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 50°/ 59 1 Major Collector CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 100% 60 Major Collector CR 374 (5) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.38 100% 61 Major Arterial N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 to ROLLINS RD Lil 100% 62 Major Arterial (213) N FERGUSON PKWY (2) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 100% 63 Major Arterial (1/3) N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 100% 64 Major Arterial (1/3) S FERGUSON PKWY (1) W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST 0.46 100% _______ _ 65 _ 66 _ 67_ 68 Major Arterial (2/3) Major Arterial _ _ Major Arterial Major Arterial S FERGUSON PKWY (2) S FERGUSON PKWY (3) _ _ _ _ S FERGUSON PKWY 4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S FERGUSON PKWY (5) 2,440_ S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD W FINLEY BLVD to 1,7r15' S OF W FINLEY BLVD _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD _ 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.26 0.24 0.19 0.08 _______ 100% 50% _100% 50% 69 Collector W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,660' N OF CR 371 to 197V N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.89 100% 70 _Major Major Collector (4D) (1/2) W CROSSING BLVD (2j ,N OP W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 1970' 0.08 100% Kimley>))Horn Page 9 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update T, E�TY� City of Anna Minna June 2022 Table 3. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements - Service Area 2 In Service Proj. # Impact Fee Class Roadway Limits Length Service Area (., Area 1 Minor Arterial CR 1106 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,089 E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.20 50-1 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) _ _ _ _ _CR 1106 (2) _ _ _ _ 1,089 E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.46 50% 3 CR 376(1) NPOWELL PKWY to 1,675'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.32 100%_ _ 4 _Major _Arterial(2/3) Ma Arterial CR 376 (2) 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 0.29 100- 5 _ _Major Arterial_ OFCR427 .0 .1CR36i1 _ 100% 6 Major Arterial EROSAMOND PKY (1 N POWELL PKWY to 295'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% 7 Major Arterial E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.36 100% 8 Major Arterial HOUSTON ST (1) CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 1.11 100% 9 Ma' r Arterial HOUSTON ST (2) 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 0.84 100% 10 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (2) N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 100% 11 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN �3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 100% 12 _ _ Minor Arterial_ HACKBERRY LN (4) _ N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 100% 13 _ _ Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 100% 14 Downtown Type B W 2ND ST (2) _ N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST _ 0.12 1OM. 15 Downtown Type B W 3RD ST (2)N POWELL PKWY to N RIOGINS ST 0.12 100% 16 Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (3) S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.12 100°/ 17 Downtown Type B W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S BIGGINS ST 0.14 100% 18 Downtown Type B W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 100% 19 Major Arterial W WHITE ST (4) S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST 0.07 100% ______ 20 _____ ___ ...... Major Arterial _ _ _ E WHITE ST (1) _ _ _ ______________________________-_-_-____________________________- __________________ S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR _ _1.52 100% 21 Minor Arterial CR 419 (1) 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.46 100°/ 22 _mLwCollector E FINLEY BLVD (1) 93Y E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 100°/ SA 2 23 _ _Major Arterial_ _ E WHITE ST L2) _ _ _ _ E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 100% 24 Major Collector (4D) (1/2) E FINLEY BLVD (2) 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 100% 25 Major Collector E FINLEY BLVD 3 LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.65 100% 26 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 5011 27 M Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.76 _ 100% _ 28_ ...... Major Collector _E LQSLKI CROSSING RD (3) LEONARD AVE to 2_l35' E OF LEONARD AVE _ _ _ _ _ 0_40 100% 29 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 100% 30 Ma' r Arterial CR 417 CR 418 to CR 419 0.65 50-1. 31 Minor Collector ............ FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECTIO --------------------------------------------- ----- E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP --------- 0.36 --------- l001/. 32 Minor Collector S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 100% 33 Minor Collector CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 100% 34 Major Arterial CR 425 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 35 _ "r Arterial HOUSTON ST (3) E ROSAMOND_PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 100%_ 36 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (1) HOUSTON ST to 4" S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 1001/. 37 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (2) 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 93Y N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 5001 38 _ Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (3) E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 100%_ 39 Major Arterial (1/3) LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 100°/ 40 Major Arterial (2/3) LEONARD AVE (5) 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 100% 41 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE 6 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 50% 42 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (7) E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 100% 43 _ _ - Minor Arterial CR 419 2) 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.29 100% 44 Minor Arterial CR 419 (3) 1,039 N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 1 0.48 50-1 4 Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 4.1 Service Areas The two (2) service areas used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are shown in the previously referenced Exhibit 2.1. These service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Anna. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." The service areas in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are consistent with the specification of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. 4.2 Service Units The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle -mile. Below is the definition for vehicle - mile. Vehicle -Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Kimley>))Horn Page 10 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Total Vehicle -Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle -Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections. The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). The hourly service volumes used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are based upon Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and generally accepted planning principles. Table 4 and Table 5 show the service volumes as a function of the Impact Fee classification and existing cross sections, respectively. Table 4. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities Roadway Type (Impact Fee Description Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity per Classifications) Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility Major Arterial Six -Lane Divided 775 Minor Arterial Four -Lane Divided 725 Major Collector Four -Lane Undivided 650 Minor Collector Three -Lane Undivided 525 Downtown Type B Two -Lane Undivided 425 Table 5. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities Roadway Type Description Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity per Lane -Mile of Roadway Facility 6D Six -Lane Divided 775 4D Four -Lane Divided 725 4U Four -Lane Undivided 650 3U Three -Lane Undivided 525 2D Two -Lane Divided 2U Two -Lane Undivided 425 4.3 Cost Per Service Units A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle -mile of travel. This cost per service unit is the cost to construct a roadway (lane -mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle -mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the Capital Improvements Plan projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the 10-year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur in the City Limits within the next 10-years. As noted earlier, the units of demand are vehicle -miles of travel. 4.4 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Methodology All of the project costs for a facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the Capital Improvements Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are "...including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; Kimley>Morn Page 11 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY�n City of Anna manna June 2022 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the Capital Improvements Plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the Capital Improvements Plan is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The costs for location - specific items such as bridges, drainage structures, and any other special components are added to each project as appropriate. The following is a detailed description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. Overview of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costing Worksheets For each project a specific costing worksheet has been developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contains project information, construction pay items, construction component allowances, and a summary of costs and allowances. An example costing sheet can be seen below. City Df Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection 1Gmiey-Hom and Associates, Inc. updated: &2&'2tY1.2 ' • Neme: CR 373 This project consists of widening the Project Information Limits: 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY existing facility to a four -lane divided Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial arterial. Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Construction Pay Items Construction Component Allowances Summary of Costs and Allowances No. Roadway Iltem Description 4uantity Unit Unit Price Item Cast 102 ldnclass�ed Roadway Excavation 1,851 Cy $ 16.00 5 29,618 202 6' Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,570 By $ 2000. 5 71.400 302 8' Concrete Pavement 3,173 sy $ 100.00 S 317,333 402 6' CoDmrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 5 71,400 502 Curb & Gutter 2 380 If $ 40.00 S 95.200 602 Topsoil 1,983 sy $ 10.00 5 19,833 702 Turn Lanes 201 By $ 120.00 S 24.070 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 628,865 nior Construction Component Allowances-: Item Descrytion Notes Allowance ttam Cost Traffic Control Construm- Phase TA. Control 5% $ 31,443 d Pavement Marklm"arkers 3a S 18,866 -4 R kidvray Drainage Standard Ini—I System 30% S 188,656 Special Drainage Structures NoneAntidpaoed - S - -4 Water rdnorAdjustrnents 5% S 31,443 d sewer Mnor Adjustments 5% S 31,443 -4 Landscaping and Irrigation 5% S 37,731 d Illumination Standard uminalmnSystem 6% S 37,731 Other- So 5 - -Alowa�s based an'.. of Paving Cwnruumn Cast Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 377,313 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,016,168 Construction Contingency: 20% S 201,234 Mobilization Sqa $ 50,308 Prep ROW 5°a S 50,308 Construction Cast TOTAL; $ 1,309,000 ProjectImpact Fee Item Description Hotel: Allowance Item Cast Construction: - $ 1,309000 Engmeeringt8urveyFresting: 16% S 209:440 ROWIEasementAcquisition: EdAngAdignnrent 10% S 130,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,649,0( NCTE: The planning level mstpojecuons sled in this appends hate been developed rat Impact Fee calauladons onlyand should not be used for any future Capital Inpravmhent Planning xithin the City G Anna. The planning level cast projections shall nor supersede the GWs design standards erthe deterrNnaticn of the City Erigneer for a specific prated. Kimley)))Horn Page 12 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: - Project Number — Identifies each project with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. - Name — A unique identifier for each project. - Limits — Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. - Impact Fee Class — The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable based on the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan classification of the roadway. Additional classifications are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be partially widened or the ultimate cross section is assumed to be different than the Master Thoroughfare Plan classification due to field conditions. The following notations are used for these projects: o "(1/2)" for facilities where one-half the facility still needs to be constructed. o "(1/3)" for facilities where one-third of the facility still needs to be constructed. o "(2/3)" for facilities where two-thirds of the facility still needs to be constructed. o "41D" for collector class facilities assuming a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adjacent cross sections. - Length ft— The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. - Service Area — Represents the service area where the project is located. - Description — Used to describe the project type assumed in the costing such as a widening or a new project. Construction Pay Items A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including planning, survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and inspection. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of hundreds of various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The roadway construction components pay items are listed below: - Unclassified Roadway Excavation - Curb & Gutter - Lime -Treated Subgrade - Topsoil - Concrete Pavement - Turn Lanes - Concrete Sidewalk Construction Component Allowances A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include traffic control, pavement markings, roadway drainage, special drainage structures, utility adjustments, landscaping, irrigation, and illumination. Lump sum dollar allowances are provided for special drainage structures and railroad crossings where needs are anticipated. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a twenty percent (20%) contingency, five percent (5%) mobilization, and either five (5%) or one percent (1 %) preparation of right-of-way (ROW) based on whether the project is new or existing to determine the construction cost total. Summary of Costs and Allowances To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, sixteen percent (16%) of the construction cost total is added for engineering, surveying, and testing. Kimley>Morn Page 13 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Percentages are also allotted for ROW/easement acquisition. ROW/easement acquisition was based on whether the project was an existing alignment or future alignment. For an existing alignment, the ROW/easement acquisition cost was provided an allotment equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction cost total. For a new alignment, the ROW/easement acquisition cost was equal to twenty percent (20%) of the constriction cost total. The value for ROW/easement acquisition is an estimated contribution allocation and does not represent actual ROW/easement acquisition needs. TxDOT facilities and partial widening projects assumed no ROW/easement acquisition. The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, testing, and inspection, plus ROW/easement acquisition. Based upon discussions with City of Anna staff, TxDOT facility projects were included with a projected contribution of twenty percent (20%) of the total project cost. 4.5 Summary of Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Costs Table 6 and Table 7 summarize the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan project list for the two (2) service areas with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual -level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are potentially recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be precisely predicted. The Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the Capital Improvements Plan are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 14 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update THE 7TYOP City of Anna Afifil June 2022 Table 6. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections - Service Area 1 9ervlce Area Pmj. # Clasa Roadway Limits Length (�) /n In SArea Total Project Coat Coat in Service Area 1 Minor Arterial CR 373 595'W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 50% $ 1,649,000 $ 824,500 2 Major Attend CR 371 (1) 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.36 100^/ $ 7,132,000 $ 7,132,000 3 Major Arsenal CR 371 (2) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 91U E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.30 100% $ 7,980,000 $ 7,980,000 4 Major Arterial CR 371 (3) 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 0.24 100% $ 4,799,000 $ 4,799,000 5 Major Arterial CR 371 (4) 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD 0.11 100% $ 2,222,000 $ 2,222,000 6 7 Major Arterial Major_Arlerial CR 371 (5) CR 370 (1) BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 0.71 1.10 l00"/0 l00% $ 14,208,000 S 21,639,000 $ 14,208,000 $ 21,639,000 8 Major Arterial CR 370 (2) CR 368 m CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB _ (ITS 100% $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 9 10 Major Arterial Major Arterial W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 CR 374 to LIM W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.22 0.96 l00% l00% $ 4,201,000 S 17,734,000 $ 4,201,000 $ 17,734,000 11 Major Arterial (2/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 l00% $ 5,317,000 $ 5,317,000 12 Major Arterial (1/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 0.14 100% $ 1,337,000 $ 1,337,000 13 Major Arterial (2/3) W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) 740' E OF LANGDON DR m N POWELL PKWY 0.23 l00% $ 1,933,000 $ 1,933,000 14 Nit-Co$ector ROLLINS RD (1) CR 374 to 615'W OF W CROSSING BLVD 1.01 100% S 1.1,510,000 $ 11,510,000 15 Minor Collector ROLLINS RD (2) 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD 0.12 l00% $ 1,244,000 $ 1,214,000 16 Minor Arterial RACKBERRY DR (1) CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.54 100% $ 8,486,000 $ 8,496,000 17 18 Minor Arterial(]/2) I it- Arsenal HACKBERRY DR (2) HACKBERRY LN (1) 1,365'W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 690' W OF N JAMES ST b N POWELL PKWY 0.26 0.18 l00% l00% $ 1,298,000 $ 2,688,000 $ 1,298,000 $ 2,688,000 19 Downtown Type W2ND ST (1) 34U W OF N JAWS DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 l00% $ 1,126,000 $ 1,126,0N1 20 Downtow_n Type B W ED ST (1) HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 100% S 990,000 $ 990,000 21 Downtown Type B HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 100% $ 956,000 $ 956,000 22 23 Downtown Type B Downtown Type B W 5TH ST (1) W SEE ST (2) 2IN W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.04 0.06 L00% 1001/. S 370,000 S 517,000 $ 370,000 $ 517,000 24 Major Arsenal FM 455 (1) 1,33W W OF FM 3356 to 14U W OF CR 289 1.28 100% $ 5,347,000 $ 5,347,000 25 26 Major Arterial Major Arterial FM 455 (2) FM 455 (3) 80' S OF FM 290 to I N OF COWAN RD l8O E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 0.83 1.21 100% l00% $ 3,437,000 $ 5,020,000 $ 3,437,000 $ 5,020,000 27 Major Arterial WWHITE ST (1) FM 455 to CR 286 0.51 100'% $ 1,983,000 $ 1,983,000 28 Major Arterial(]/3) WWHITE ST (2) CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.27 100% S 225,000 $ 225,000 29 Major Artenal(1/3) WWHITE ST (3) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY FIB to S POWELL PKWY 1.98 100% $ 1,643,000 $ 1,643,000 30 Major CnBectnr CR 284 (1) 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 0.62 l00% $ 7,961,000 $ 7,961,000 31 Major Collector CR 284 (2) 1905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610 W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.25 50% $ 3,515,000 $ 1,757,5W 32 33 34 Major Collector _Major CoBccror _ _ _ Major Collecor CR 294 (3) __________ TAYLOR BLVD (1) TAYLOR BLVD (2) 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB m CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB ____________________________________________________________ CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB ro 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY ND 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB a 4,601N E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.18 ____ 0.71 0.16 IOW/ ______ 5W/o 100% $ 4,832,000 ___________ $ 1 �511,000 $ 1979,000 _ $ 4,932,000 _ $ 5,755500 $ 1,979,000 35 36 Major Collector Minor Collector (41)) TAYLOR BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (1) 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,70(V E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.04 0.51 5W/o 50% $ 541,000 $ 7,581,000 $ 270,500 $ 3,790500 SA 1 37 Minor Collector (41)) (12) W FINLEY BLVD (2) 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN (108 100% $ 405,000 $ 405,000 38 39 Minor Collector (41)) Mom Collector W FINLEY BLVD (3) W FINLEY BLVD (4) SILVER LEAF IN to CR 423 CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.30 0.15 I00% l00% $ 4,521,000 $ 1,547,000 $ 452L000 $ 1,547,000 40 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (I) 3,740 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 101% $ 6,339,000 $ 6,339,000 41 1 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 1,780 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON PKWY 0.34 5W/o $ 4,270,000 $ 2,135,000 42 Major Collector (12) W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY m ASPEN DR 0.38 SW/o $ 1,793,000 $ 896,500 43 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) ASPEN OFF. HIGHLAND RD 0.19 5W/o $ 2,423,000 $ 1,211,500 44 Major Collector W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 l00% S 708,000 $ 708,000 45 Himo<A-ml CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 0.03 100% S 435,000 $ 435,000 46 47 Minm Arterial Minor Arterial CR 368 (2) CR 368 (3) 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 0.12 100% IOW/ $ 8,043 000 $ 1,731,000 $ 8,043,000 $ 1,731,000 48 49 50 Minor Arterial Minor Arsenal Minor Arterial CR 368 (4) CR 368 (5) CR 368 (6) 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 I,I50' N OF CR 370 N 740' S OF CR 370 _______________ _________ 740' $ OF CR 370 m 1,855' S OF CR 370 0.16 0.36 0.21 5W/o IOW/o SW/o $ 2,300,000 $ 5,645,000 ___ $ $ 1,150,000 $ 5 645,000 $ 1,545,000 51 52 Minor Arterial Minor Arerial (12) CR 368 (7) CR 368 (8) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST to 8W N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 0.59 IOW/o IOW/ _3,090,000 $ 2,976,000 $ 2,984,000 $ 2,976,000 $ 2,984,000 53 Mi.. Arterial CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST m 2,8OY S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 100% $ 7, /57,000 $ 7,757,000 54 55 Minor Arterial Mn. Arterial ______ CR 286 (2) CR 286 (3) 2,8O9 S OF W WHITE ST m 3,800 S OF W WHITE ST 890 N OF CR 284 to 569 S OF CR 294 0.19 0.28 100% l00% $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,OW $ ___2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 56 Major Collector CR 374 (1) 900' N OF CR 371 m W ROSAMOND PKWY 1.52 100% $ 19,996,000 $ 19,996,000 57 Major Collector CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240 S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 100% S 576,000 $ 576,000 58 Major Collector CR 374 (3) 24U S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY m 5251 N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 50% $ 1,032,000 $ 516,000 59 Major Collector CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 l00% $ 1,260,000 $ 1,260,000 60 Major Collector CR 374 (5) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY_ DR 0.38 IOW/ $ 4,899,OW $ 4,899,000 61 Major Arterial _ N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 mROLLINS RD 1.11 IOW/ $22,328,000 $ 22,328,000 62 Major Artcnal (23) N FERGUSON PKWY (2) ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 IOW/o $ 4,482,000 $ 4,482,000 63 Major Arterial (1/3) N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBHRRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 IOW/o $ 2,087,000 $ 2,067,000 64 65 Major A te-I (1/3) Major Arsenal (2/3) S FERGUSON PKWY (1) S FERGUSON PKWY (2) W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF-W WHITE ST 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST to 190 N OF TAYLOR BLVD 0.46 0.26 l00"/0 l00% $ 1,922,000.1 $ 2,209,000 1222,000 $ 2,209,000 fib Major Arterial S FERGUSON PKWY (3) W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD 0.24 50% $ 4,650,000 $ 2,325,001 67 66 Major Arterial Major Arsenal S FERGUSON PKWY (4) S FERGUSON PKWY (5) 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.19 0.08 I00% 50/ $ 3,828,000 $ 1,587,000 $ 3,828,000 $ 793,5W 69 Major Collector W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,669 N OF CR 371 to 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.99 100% $ 11,485,000 $ 11,485,000 70 Major Collector (41)) (12) W CROSSING BLVD (2) 1970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530 N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.08 100% $ 419,000 Service Area Pru'ect CS 302,135,000 AStudyCoat Roadwa I ct FeeS 28,161 Total Cost in Servi$302,163,167 Kimley>))Horn Page 15 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update THE 7TYOP City of Anna [hint June 2022 Table 7. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections - Service Area 2 Service Length In Total Project Cost in Se rviee Area ProJ.M Class Roadway Limits ( SAmaa Cost Area _ 1_ Minor Atterial CR 1106 (1)----.............. ..................... N POWELL PKWY m 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 010 5Wo $ 3,812,000 S 1,906,000 2 Minor Anerial(1l2�_ ___ CR 1106 (2) I,080'EOFN POWELL PKWY W3,505 EOFN POWELL PKWY OA6 SW/o $ 3,474,000 S 3 Mao, Arcerial(2/3) _ CR 376 (1) NPOWELL PKWYW1,675 EOFN POWELL PK WY 0_32 100°/a $ 3,474,000 3,474,000 $ 3,474,000 4 M jor Arterial CR 376 (2) 1,675' E OF N POWELL PK W Y to CR 427 0.29 IOW/ $ 5,65Q000 S 5,658,000 5 Me or Arterial CR 376 3 CR 427 to 575' E OF CR 427 0.11 I00°/ $ 2,119,000 S 2,119,000 6 Ma or Arterial EROSAMOND PKWY 1 N POWELL PKWY to 295'E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 100% $ 1,906,000 $ 1,906,000 7 _ Mjor Arterial EROSAMOND PKWY 820'EOFN POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY 036 I00% _ _ _ _ $ 7,151,060 $ 7,151,000 8_ _ Major Arterial____ ___HOUSTON ST Li) ------. _--------..... CR 425 to 5,85W E OF CR 425 --- ________----______ _ 1.11_ 10W/o $ 4'195'000 $ 4,195,000 9___ ______Major Arterial____ __________H ST 0------- 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477___ _ 0.84 10W/ $ 3,317,000 $ 3,317,000 10 Ivtmor Arterial H_OUSTON ACKBERRY IN (2) NPOWELL PKWY toN BIGGINS 57 0.12 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,773,000 I l Minor Arterial HACKBERRY LN (3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 foo. IOW/o $ 1,545,000 $ 1,545,000 12 Minor Arterial HACKBERRY IN (4) N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 100% $ 711000 $ 71,000 13 Minor A,reml HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 l00% $ 5,826,000 $ 5,826,000 14 Downtown T e B W 2ND ST (2 N POWELL PKWY to N BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,058,000 $ 1,058,000 15 Downtown T c B W 3RD ST 2 N POWELL PKWY to N BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000 16 Downtown TB _ W STH ST 3 S POWELL PKWY to S BIGGINS ST 0.12 100% $ 1,092,000 $ 1,092,000 17 Downtown Type B W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.14 l00% $ 1,227,000 $ 1,227,000 18 _ Downown Type B W 8TH ST _ S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 IOW/ $ 653,000 $ 653,000 _ 19_ _ _ _ Major Arteral_ _ _ _ _ _ W WHITE ST (4� _ _ _ _ S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN BT 0.07 IOW" $ 241,000 $ 241,000 20 Major Arterial E WHITE ST (1) S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1.52 - IOW/o $ 5,907,000 $ 5,907,000 21 Minor Arteral CR 419 (1) 599S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF EFINLEY BLVD P. $ 1,239,000 $ 1,239,000 22 Major Co0ector E FINLEY BLVD (l) 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 IOW/ $ 2,739,000 $ 2,739,000 23 Major Arterial E WHITE ST 2 E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 IOW/ $ 4,189,000 $ 4,I89,000 SA 2 24 Major Collector(4D) 1/2 E FINLEY BLVD (2) 345E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 100% $ 813.000 $ 813,000 25 Major Co0ector E FINLEY BLVD (3) LEONARD AVE to 3,410 E OF LEONARD AVE R65 100% $ 8289,000 _ $ 8,289,000 26 Co0ector E FOSTER CROSSINGRD 1 S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 50% $ 1,443,000 $ 721,500 _ _ 27 _Major _ _ _Major Co0ecmr _ _ _ _____ _ _ E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2Z_ _ _ _ 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE _ _ _ 0.76 100% $ 10,484,000 ___________________ $ 70,484,000 _ 28_ _ _ _Major Collector ...... ............... E FOSTER CROSSING RD t3L---- _ _ _ LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE _ _ _ 040_ IOW/_ $_ 5,190,000 $ 5,190,000 29 Major Collector E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 IOW/o $ 8,897,000 $ 8,897,000 30 Major Arterial CR 417 CR 418 w CR 419 0.65 50% $ 13,139,000 $ 6,569,500 31 M. Collector 1 FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECT[Ob E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.36 IOW/ $ 3,815,000 $ 3,815,000 32 Mmor Co$eow, S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 IOW. $ 3,603,000 $ 3,603,000 33 Mmor Co0eotor CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 100 $ 1,758,000 $ 1,758,000 34 Major Arterial CR 425 1,549N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 100% $ 6,085,000 $ 6,085,000 35 Mjor Arterial HOUSTON ST(3) E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 10W/. $ 957,000 $ 957,000 36 ........ _ _ M jor Arterial LEONARD AVE (1 HOUSTON ST m 485' S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 ___ 10W/o ___ $ ,812,000 $ 1,812,000 _ 37 _ hi.jcwAroetal ............. ___ LEONARD AVE (2)_ _ _ 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST m 930' N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 SW/ $ 2,372,000 $ 1,186,000 38 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE (3) E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 l00% $ 13,947,000 $ 13,947,000 39 MaJor Arterial H/3) LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 100% $ 2,690,000 $ 2,690,000 _ 40 Major Arterial (2/3) LEONARD AVE (5) 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 IOW/ $ 1,096,000 $ 1,096,000 41 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE ( 1,135- N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 50% $ 4,182,000 $ 2,091,000 42 Major Arterial LEONARD AVE E F(1STER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 100% $ 7,431,000 $ 7,431,000 43 Minor Arterial CR 419 2 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 1.29 100% $ 4,268,00_0 $ 4,268,000 _ 44 Mmor Arterial CR 419 3 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 0.48 50% 1 $ 7,841,000 $ 3,920,500 Sertiee Area Project Cost SuMotal $ 155,506,000 Roadway lmact Fee Smdy Cost $ 28,167 Total Cost in Service Area 2 $155,534,167 4.6 Service Unit Calculation The basic service unit for the computation of Anna's Roadway Impact Fee is the vehicle -mile of travel during the PM peak -hour. To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle -miles of travel for the service areas for the 10-year period. The growth in vehicle -miles from 2022 to 2032 is based upon projected changes in residential and non-residential growth for the period. These growth projections are discussed in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. The residential and non-residential statistics in the Land Use Assumptions provide the "independent variables" that are used to calculate the existing (2022) and projected (2032) transportation service units (vehicle -miles) used to establish the roadway impact fee maximum rates within each service area. The roadway demand service units (vehicle -miles) for the service area are the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land use in the service area. For the purpose of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non- residential. For residential land uses, the number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -miles of travel that occur during the PM peak hour. This factor computes the average amount of demand caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The transportation demand factor is discussed in more detail later in this section. For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions provide the projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of non-residential land uses - basic, service, and retail. These Kimley>))Horn Page 16 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and is known at the time of application for any development, or development modification, that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle -miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle - miles of demand for the service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources — the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and trip length information from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. These trips are called pass -by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail rate to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the region -wide travel characteristics survey conducted by NHTS, requirements in Chapter 395, and other generally accepted planning principles. The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: TDF =T *(1—Ph)*L.x where... Lmax = nin (L * OD or SAL) Variables: - TDF = Transportation Demand Factor - T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit) - Pb = Pass -By Discount (% of trips) - L = Average Trip Length (miles) - LMax = Maximum Trip Length (miles) - OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%) - SAL = Maximum Service Area Trip Length The maximum trip length was limited to three (3) miles, or the assumed radius of the service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles in diameter. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin - destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Roadway Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Anna to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips as both residential and non- residential trips, a 50% origin -destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is Kimley>Morn Page 17 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the NHTS. Table 8 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the two (2) residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Table 8. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential Basic Service Retail Single -Family Multifamily T 0.94 0.51 0.65 1.44 3.40 Pb 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% Max* 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 TDF 2.82 1 1.53 1.95 4.32 6.76 The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 9. This table shows the total growth in total vehicle -miles by service area between the years 2022 and 2032. These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle -Miles of Travel for the 10-year period. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 18 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 �U o� �o N � � N � N M � 6 Ol r a C N N @ M � @ � C @ p J � C m @ c c � @ J_ @ L N N N O O @ C � N - @ Q N T =O @ j N T 3 y LL N D L @ C J U @ N O O or or d cm £ c O N p w O R � @ > > H N @ Of S gW C O 4 a W W -o S rn U S w a o c lL E E C@ L U w w g@ 3 O p N `O C U C N 0 0 O N m N C y 0 0 c w w L O J 0 M > T O y O O ly 4y4JJ N t� N O. @ C o @ g 7 .O (5O (n . d 00 r0 �. C O O E j c o a 4 O. O U O@@ U O_ L U c o 0 o m N U U= J O @ @ d o m m o O LL N m U LL m a0 tp U 2 O M N O N N N O N_ yW 6 W LL' U M W N LL J O W V J W U 5 W N H W N .a Kimley>Morn Page 19 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 5.1 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this chapter. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 10 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. Table 10. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation Line Title Description Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity The total number of vehicle -miles added to the service area based on 1 Added by Capital the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Improvements Plan Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply) Each project identified in the Capital Improvements Plan will add a certain amount of capacity to the City's roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities 2 Demand upon which capacity is being added (from Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the Capital Improvements Plan have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. Total Vehicle -Miles of Existing Number of vehicle -miles of travel that are not accommodated by the 3 Deficiencies existing roadway system (from Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) In order to ensure that existing deficiencies on the City's roadway network are not recoverable through impact fees, this line is based on the entire roadway network within the service area. Any roadway within the service area that is deficient, even those not identified on the Capital Improvements Plan, will have these additional vehicle - miles removed from the calculation. Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of A measurement of the amount of vehicle -miles added by the Capital 4 Capacity Added Improvements Plan that will not be utilized by existing demand. Line 1 — Line 2 — Line 3) This calculation identifies the portion of the Capital Improvements Plan (in vehicle -miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. Total Cost of Capital The total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan projects within each 5 Improvements Plan Within service area (from Table 6 and Table 7: 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Service Area Capital Improvement Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections This line simply identifies the total cost of all of the roadway projects identified in each service area. Kimley>Morn Page 20 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 The Total Cost of Capital Improvements Plan Within Service Area (Line 6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added (Line 4) to Total Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added by Capital Improvements Plan Line 1). Line 41 Line 1 Line 5 Using the ratio of vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan available to serve future growth to the total vehicle -miles added, the total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). Cost to Meet Existing Needs The difference between the Total Cost of Capital Improvements Plan 7 and Usage Within Service Area (Line 5) and the Cost of Net Capacity Supplied Line 6). Line 5 — Line 6 This line is provided for information purposes only — it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Capital Improvements Plan that is required to meet existing demand. Based upon the growth projection provided in Chapter 1: Land Use 8 Total Vehicle -Miles of New Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study, an estimate of the number Demand Over 10 Years of new vehicle -miles within the service area over the next ten years from Table 9: 10-Year Growth Projections This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle -miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next 10-years. 9 Percent of Capacity Added The result of dividing Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years Attributable to New Growth (Line 8) by the Net Amount of Vehicle -Miles of Capacity Added (Line 4), 10 Chapter 395 Check limited to 100%. This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth. Line 81 Line 4 < 100 /o In order to ensure that the vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the 10-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the amount of vehicle -miles added by the Capital Improvements Plan exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the Capital Improvements Plan cost is reduced accordingly. Cost of Capacity Added The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Supplied (Line 6) by 11 Attributable to New Growth the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% Line 10). Line 6 * Line 10 This value is the total Capital Improvements Plan project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. Pre -Credit Maximum Fee Per Found by dividing the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New 12 Service Unit (without Growth by the Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years. financing) Line 11 I Line 8 This value is the total pre -credit maximum fee per service unit (without financing costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering limitations to impact fee required by Texas Legislature. Kimley>Morn Page 21 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5.2 Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: "(A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan..." The City of Anna has determined the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit shall be 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the Capital Improvements Plan. Therefore, the Credit Calculation (Line 13) is assumed to be half of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to Growth (Line 11). The sum of these values represents the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan (Line 14). The Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit (Line 15) is then found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan (Line 14) by the Total Vehicle -Miles of Demand Over 10 Years (Line 8). Table 11 summarizes the additional computations carried out to provide the maximum assessable impact fee. Table 11. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation (Continued) Line Title Description 13 Credit Calculation Assumed to be 50% of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth Line 11 as allowed by Chapter 395. Line 11 * 50% 14 Recoverable Cost of Capital The sum of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth Improvements Plan Line 11 and the Credit Calculation Line 13). Line 11 + Line 13 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of Capital Improvements Plan 15 Service Unit (Line 14) by the Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over 10 Years Line 8). Line 141 Line 8 Table 12 summarizes the calculations walked through in Table 10 and Table 11 and provides the maximum assessable impact fee for each service area. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 22 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY� City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 12. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee SERVICE AREA: SA 1 SA 2 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACTTYADDED BYCIP 81,917 54,702 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 2 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTINGDEMAND 1,636 ' c 1,934 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 3 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES 229 229 (FROM EXISTINGROADWAYFACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C) 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITYADDED 80,052 52,539 (LINE 1- LINE 2 - LINE 3) 5 TOTAL COST OF CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA $ 302,163,167 $ 155,534,167 (FROM TABLE 6 AND TABLE 7) 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED $ 295,283,834 $ 149,384,110 (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) 7 COST TO MEET( AND USAGE $ 6,879,333 $ 6,150,057 INESINGS 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER 10 YEARS 44,876 13,433 (FROM TABLE 9 AND LAND USE AS SUMPTIONS ) 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH 56.1% 25.6% (LINE 8 / LINE 4) CHAPTER 395 CHECK 10 OF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%, 56.1 % 25.6% OTHERWISE NO CHANGE) 11 COST OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH $ 165,654,231 $ 38,242,332 (LINE 6 * LINE 10) PRE -CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT 12 ($ PER VEH-MI) $ 3,691 $ 2,846 (LINE 11 / LINE 8) 13 CREDIT CALCULATION $ (82,827,115) $ (19,121,166) (50% OF LINE 11) 14 RECOVERABLE COST OF CIP $ 82,827,115 $ 19,121,166 (LINE 11 + LINE 13) 15 MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI) $ 1,845 $ 1,423 (LINE 14 / LINE 8) *Note: Financing Cost Not Included Kimley>))Horn Page 23 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 5.3 Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Roadway Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land UseNehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 13. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Anna. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development's magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip -making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, and industrial. The trip rates presented for each land use are a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the PM peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass -by trips, as previously discussed. The source of the trip generation and pass -by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on land use, as explained in Section 4.6 - Service Unit Calculation. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Kimley>Morn Page 24 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Txc�rror City of Anna manna June 2022 Table 13. Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table Land Use Category ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen gate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass -by Source Trip Rate Average Average Trip Length (mi) For O-D MI. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mt) Veh-Mi Per Devi Unit INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF CFA 0.65 0.65 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 1.95 ---- IndustrialPark 130 1,000 SF CFA 0.34 ---- 0.34 14.65 50% 7.33 -- 3.00 ------ 1.02 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF CFA 0.18 018 14.65 5001, 7.33 3.00 0.54 Mini -Warehouse 151 1,000SFCFA 0.15 0.15 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 0.45 High -Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse Sort 155 1,000 SF CFA 1.20 _ 1.20 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 _ 3.60 RESIDENTIAL Single -Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Units 0.94 0.94 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 2.82 Single -Family Attached Housing 215 Dwelling Units 0.57 0.57 15.50 50% 7.75 1 3.00 1.71 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 220 Dwelling Units 0.51 0.51 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.53 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 221 Dwelling Units 0.39 _ 0.39 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.17 Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) 222 Dwelling Units 0.32 0.32 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 0.96 Mobile Home Park 240 Dwelling Units 0.58 0.58 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 1.74 Senior Adult Housing - Single-Farnily 251 Dwelling Units 0.30 0.30 15.50 50% 7.75 3.00 _ 0.90 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily Assisted Livin 252 254 Dwelling Units Beds 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 15.50 15.50 50% 50% 7.75 7.75 3.00 3.00 _ 0.75 0.72 LODGING Hotel 310 Rooms 0.59 0.59 6.43 50% 3.22 3.00 1.77 Motel 320 Rooms 0.36 0.36 6.43 50% 3.22 3.00 _ 1.08 RECREATIONAL Golf Course 430 Holes 2.91 2.91 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 8.73 MiniatureGDlfCourse Golf Driving Range 431 432 Holes Tees/Driving Positions 0.33 1.25 0.33 1.25 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 3.00 3.00 0.99 33-5 Batting Cages 433 Cages 2.22 2.22 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 6.66 Multipurpose Recreational Facility 435 1,000SFCFA 3.58 1 3.58 7.86 1 50% 1 3.93 3.00 1 10.74__ Trampoline Park 436 1,000 SF CFA 1.50 1.50 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 4.50 Movie Theater Ice Skating Rink 445 465 Movie Screens 1,000 SF CFA 13.96 1.33 1 13.96 1.33 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 3.00 3.00 41.88 _ 3.99 Racquet/Tennis Club Health/Fitness Club 491 492 Tennis Courts 1,000 SF CFA 3.82 3.45 3.82 3.45 7.86 7.86 50% 50% 3.93 3.93 ___ 3.00 3.00 __ 11.46 10.35 Recreational Community Center 495 1,000 SF CFA 2.50 2.50 7.86 50% 3.93 3.00 7.50 INSTITUTIONAL Private School (K-8) 530 Students 0.26 0.26 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 0.46 Private High School 534 Students 0.19 0.19 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 _ 0.33 Charter Elementary School 536 Students 0.16 0.16 3.49 50% 1.75 1.75 0.28 Junior/Community College University/College 540 550 Students Students 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.15 10.44 10.44 50% 50% 5.22 5.22 3.00 3.00 0.33 0.45 Cburch 560 1,000 SF CFA 0.49 1 1 0.49 8.31 50% 4.16 3.00 1.47 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF CFA 11.12 440% C 6.23 1 3.49 50% 1 1.75 1.75 10.90 MEDICAL Hospital 610 1,000 SF CFA 0.86 0.86 9.85 50% 4.93---..3.00 2.58 ---- Nursingm Hoe -------- Clinic 620 630 ---------------- -- Beds -------------------------- 1,000 SF UFA 0.14 - 3.69 ------ ------ ------- -------- ---- 0.14 ------- 3.69 --- 9.85 ------- 9.85 a 50% 50% 4.93 ---- 4.93 -- 3.00 - -- 3.00 --- -- 0.42 ----- 11.07 Animal Hospital/VeterinaryHospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF CFA 3.53 30% B 2.47 9.85 50% 4.93 3.00 7.41 OFFICE General Office Building 710 -- 1,000 SF CFA - 1.44 ------ ------- 1.44 14.65 50% 7.33 -- 3.00 ------ Small Office Building 712 1,000 SF CFA 2.16 2.16 14.65 50% 1 7.33 3.00 6.48 Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF CFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Singlea Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.76 1.76 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Medical -Dental Office Building 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.93 3.93 9.85 50% 4.93 3.00 �3.90--- 9 Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.33 3.00 Key to Sources of Pass -by Rates: A: OE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by IGrdey-Horn based on rfE rates for simlar categories G: 2021 Pass -By Tables for RETripGen Appendices Kimley>))Horn Page 25 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update�TY�r City of Anna ifnna June 2022 Land Use Category 1TE Land Use Code ent Unit Development Trip Gen Rate (PA Pass- by Rate Pass -by Source Trip Rate Average Trip Length (mi) Adj.For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mt Per Devi Unit COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Sales (New) 840 1,000 SF GFA 2.42 201 B 1.94 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 4.32 Automobile Sales (Used) 841 1,000 SF GFA 3.75 20% B 3.00 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 6.69 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF CFA 4.90 43% A 2.79 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 6.23 Tire Store Quick lubrication Vehicle Shop 848 941 1,000 SF GFA Servicing Positions 3.75 4.85 25 % 400 C B 2.81 2.91 4.45 4.45 50% 50% 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 _ 6.27 _ 6.49 Automobile Care Center Gasoline/Service Station 942 944 1,000 SF GFA Vehicle Fueling Positions 3.11 13.91 401 57% B C 1.87 5.98 4.45 1.20 5001 50% 2.23 0.60 _ 2.23 0.60 4.16 3.59 Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 Vehicle Fueling Positions 13.51 56% B 5.94 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 3.57 Self -Service Car Wash 947 Wash Stalls 5.54 401% B 3.32 1.20 50% 0.60 _ 0.60 1.99 Car Wash and Detail Center 949 Wash Stalls 13.60 40% 1 B 8.16 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 __ 4.90 Dining Food Cart Pod 926 Food Carts 6.16 5011. B 3.08 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 8.69 Fast Casual Restaurant Fin e Dining Restaurant 930 931 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 12.55 7.80 43% 44% A A 7.15 4.37 6.07 6.07 50% 50% 3.04 3.04 3.04 3.04 _ 21.75 13.28 High-Tumover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 9.05 43% A 5.16 6.07 50% 3.04 3.04 15.68 ------ Fast -Food Restaurant without Drive -Through Window 933 ----- ----- 1,000 SF CFA ---- 33.21 5011. B 16.61 - 5.64 -- 50% 2.82 - 2.82 -- 46.83 Fast -Food Restaurant 934 1,000 SF CFA 33.03 50% A 16.52 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 46.57 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive -Through Window 937 1,000 SF GFA 38.99 701 A 11.70 4.53 50% 2.27 2.27 26.55 Other Retail Free -Standing Discount Store 815 1,000 SF CFA 4.86 201% C 3.89 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 10.89 Nursery (Garden Center) 817 1,000 SF GFA 6.94 301% B 4.86 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 _ Shopping Center(>150k SF) 820 1,000 SF GFA 3.40 291% C 2.41 5.60 50% 1 2.80 _ 2.80 __13.60__ 6.76 ------ Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 821 1,000 SF CFA 5.19 40% C 3.11 5.60 50% 2.80 -- 2.80 --------- 8.72 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k SF) 822 1,000 SF GFA 6.59 401% B 3.95 5.60 50% 2.80 _ 2.80 11.07 Supermarket Home Improvement Superstore Toy/Children's Superstore 850 862 864 1,000SFCFA 1,000 SF GFA 1,000 SF GFA 8.95 2.29 5.00 24% 42% 30% C A B 6.80 1.33 3.50 5.60 5.60 5.60 50% 50% 50% 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 19.05 3.72 9.80 Department Store 875 1,000 SF GFA 1.95 30% B 1.37 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 3.82 Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive -Through Window 880 1,000 SF GFA 8.51 53% A 4.00 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 11.20 Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive -Through Window 881 1,000 SF CFA 10.25 491% A 5.23 1 5.60 5001, 1 2.80 2.80 14.64 Medical Equipment Store 897 1,000SFCFA 1.24 20% B 0.99 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 _ 2.78__ Wine Tasting Room 970 1,000 SF GFA 7.31 7.31 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 20.47 SERVICES Walk-in Bank 911 1,000 SF GFA 12.13 401 B 7.28 4.45 50% 2.23 2.23 16.23 Drive-in Bank Hair Salon 912 918 Drive-in Lanes 1,000 SF GLA 27.07 1.45 35% 30% A B 17.60 1.02 4.45 4.45 50% 50% 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 39.24 2.26 Key to Sources of Pass -by Rates: A: OE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by IGrriey-Horn based on RE rates for sinilar categories Q. 2021 Pass -By Tables for RETripGen Appendices Kimley>))Horn Page 26 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 6 Sample Calculations The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing in Service Area 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 13 [Land Use — Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table] 1 Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 2.82 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) 2 From Table 12, Line 15 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 1: $1,845 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit 3 Impact Fee = 1 * 2.82 * $1,845 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $5,203 Example 2: Development Type-150,000 Square Foot Home Improvement Store in Service Area 2 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 13 [Land Use — Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table] 1 Development Type: 150,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Units: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.72 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) 2 From Table 12, Line 15 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 2: $1,423 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit 3 Impact Fee = 150 * 3.72 * $1,423 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $794,034 Kimley>))Horn Page 27 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 7 Adoption and Administration of Roadway Impact Fees 7.1 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee's findings for consideration by the City Council. The CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Assumptions (Land Use and Capital Improvements Plan) and Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. 7.2 Collection and Use of Roadway Impact Fees Roadway Impact Fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development - impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can only be used within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. 8 Conclusions The City of Anna has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Roadway Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable Roadway Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Anna, as shown in the previously referenced Table 12. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Roadway Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City's need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee. Table 14 below presents the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study's Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) for the service areas: Kimley>Morn Page 28 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 14. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle -Mile) Maximum Fee Per Service Area Service Unit (per Vehicle -Mile 1 $ 1,845 2 $ 1,423, Kimley>Morn Page 29 Chapter 3 Water Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. OF *'•xp "*�/®® .,� TODD L. STROUSE g �io� 107773 ; �® ®��' �S:�CENS��•'•��� t�1tliA ®®®o,00 07/26/2022 Water Impact Fee Study Update "l'HC CITY Of a City of Anna Ann July 2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Water Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan.............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report.......................................................................................... 3 2 Design Criteria........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Water Lines......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Storage Tanks..................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Pump Stations..................................................................................................................... 6 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan....................................................................... 6 4 Water Impact Fee Calculation..................................................................................11 List of Exhibits Exhibit 3.1 — Water Service Area Map..........................................................................................................4 Exhibit 3.2 — Water 10-Year Capital Improvement Map................................................................................ 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost ................ 7 Table2 — Meter Capacity Ratios..................................................................................................................11 Table 3 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent(SFE)..................................................................................12 Table 4 — SFE Consumption Calculation.....................................................................................................13 Table 5 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation.............................................................13 Table 6 — Water 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown.............................................................................14 Table 7 — Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters........................................14 Klmiey>))Hof n Page 1 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 1 Introduction The City of Anna retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing impact fees for water system improvements required to serve new development. These fees were developed in accordance with chapter 395 of the Local Government code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvement plan and associated fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; (6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7) plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or Kimley»)Horn Page 2 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 (8) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. This study was comprised of three tasks. These include land use assumptions, evaluation of the current water capital improvement plan and development of the impact fee capital improvement plan as well as impact fee analysis. 1.1 Land Use Assumptions The development of land use assumptions included the following: - Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater - Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and - Projection of the 10-year population and employment by SA This information was determined based on information provided from the City of Anna in regard to planned developments as well as the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee water service area is shown in Exhibit 3.1. Additional information regarding land use assumptions can be found in Chapter 1 of this report. 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Water Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan This task involved reviewing the City's current capital improvement plan and identify the proposed water capital improvements that will be built in the next 10 years. Input from the City helped to develop the impact fee capital improvement plan. Water demand projections were then used to determine the additional single-family equivalents (SFE). 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report This task included calculating the additional single-family equivalent units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per SFE and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley»)Horn Page 3 Rr ,k Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 2 Design Criteria In accordance with Chapter 290 of the Texas Administrative Code (Public Drinking Water) and the American Water Works Associations (AWWA) requirements for the design and operation of potable water systems, as well as communication between Kimley-Horn and the City of Anna, the following design criteria was followed when planning for future water infrastructure. 2.1 Water Lines The transmission system's function is to transfer water across the water system and fill the elevated storage tanks. There are three conditions for which the highest fluctuation in operational pressures is experienced: Peak Hour Demand — this is the maximum demand the system experiences. It is the condition under which lowest operational pressures are experienced. Tank Filling (minimum hour demand) — this is the period during which elevated tanks are replenished. This is the period of lowest demand during peak day. It normally occurs after midnight and is the condition under which highest operational pressures are experienced. Fire flow demand — during the maximum day demand, the local transmission lines are tested to ensure fire protection requirements are met. Pressures can fall below normal operational pressures but should not drop below 20 psi at any point in the system. The transmission system should be sized to maintain a minimum pressure of 40 psi during normal operation conditions and a minimum of 20 psi during extreme operating conditions. The transmission system should also be sized to limit maximum velocity in the pipe to seven feet per second. The maximum pressure in extreme conditions should be limited to 120 psi because high operating pressure will result in increased system maintenance and increased operational cost. 2.2 Storage Tanks The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the State board of Insurance (SBI) have established criteria for the ground and elevated storage. These criteria address volume and height requirements only. The layout of the distribution system, location of the storage facilities, and the interaction with the high service and booster pumps affect the amount of storage necessary for the most efficient and reliable operation of the system. Ground storage serves two purposes: - Equalization for different feed rates between water supply and pumping to the system. - Emergency capacity in the event of temporary loss of water supply. Generally, ground storage facilities are located at water supply points or at each pump station within the water distribution system. Although ground and elevated storage facilities perform separate functions within the system, both are aimed at decreasing the impact of demand fluctuations. Their capacities are established based on knowledge of how demand varies seasonally and daily. Due to inaccuracies in estimating growth and occasional extremes in usage exceeding design values, ground storage must provide sufficient capacity to supply any differences. It is a recommendation from Kimley-Horn that a ground storage capacity requirement of 50% max day demand be maintained in the system. Elevated storage serves three purposes: Kimley»)Horn Page 5 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Functionally, elevated storage equalizes pumping rate to compensate for daily variation in demand and to maintain a constant pumping rate (usually referred to as operational storage), or a pumping rate that conforms to the requirements of the electrical rate structure. Provides pressure maintenance and protection against surges created by instantaneous demands, such as fire flow and main breaks, and instantaneous change in supply, such as pumps turning on and off. Maintains a reserve capacity for fire protection and pressure maintenance in case of power failure to one or more pump stations. Sufficient storage should be maintained to provide for four hours of fire flow demand during a loss of power to a pump station or water treatment plant. Elevated storage is evaluated separately for each pressure plane. Because elevated storage is more expensive than ground storage, an economical balance between elevated storage and pumping should be sought. The design requirement, per TCEQ, for elevated storage capacity is 200 gallons per connection to qualify for the lower TCEQ requirement for pumping of 0.6 gpm per connection. 2.3 Pump Stations Pumping capacity must be able to provide the peak hourly demand with the largest pump out of service at each station, also known as the firm pumping capacity. If 200 gallons of storage per connection is met, then 0.6 gpm per connection is required at each pump station. If 200 gallons of storage per connection cannot be provided, 2.0 gpm per connection must be met. 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The purpose of a capital improvement program is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its water distribution system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. The impact fee capital improvements plan is developed using projects identified during the capital improvement program planning process. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a ten- year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. Twenty-four (24) existing and eighty-four (84) proposed projects identified in the water capital improvements plan are determined eligible for recoverable cost over the next 10 years. The City of Anna's total cost of these projects is $185,629,111. The projected recoverable cost through impact fees is $232,036,389. After debt service costs are added and the credit reduction calculation is complete, $116,018,194 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. A breakdown of these amounts is shown in Table 6. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Exhibit 3.2 and Table 1. Kimley»)Horn Page 6 Grayson Pump Station rl 12 - cy74 0 7 1 12' (O ^ 14 79 18 _ 1 32 � 33 `O 17 ' r a .4 CO - B1 Sherley Pump Station o S _ ,6 5 FN sa 23 1 7 O e 12„ 9-24" �rM~'N O • r 6 16" }- sa 24 - - 3 MG GPM PT z 12" 12" 34 N 20„ a1 ]e o fie 24" (2) (3 450 Pump o 32 O O a 16, 3 T-01 11 N 18 M- 2.00 MG EST ACKBERRY EST 82 1.00 MG EST s 9 - ❑ 3s f, -. 455 {{ 1 N 83 12" MR 24° 9 a --_ { 77 (V 12" 65 O L m % 1 " " 12" N 19 O - Project Number Prof op J 1 65 1 0 L Nam �1215 12 12" N 12" 1s 12' 14 �`L 12" 12" 12" 12"12" 12" 1a P1 O 12 455 r❑==-_- Proposed zozz-zo3zProject un Proposed zaz2-za32ProleRList sz 1 3 MG GST and (2) 3,450 gpm Pumps at Shelley Pump Number CR117712" Water Line Project Nu J Station 46 FM 335612" Water Line �,.-. 12" 4 MG GST, (1) 3,450 GPM & (1) 2,733 GPM Pump at Collin 47 Boudand and 12" Water Line 47 51 2 /53 - 12 w Pump Station 48 CR 20612" Water Line O 13 22 3 T-01-2.00 MG EST 49 CR 20612" Water Line Loop 4 T-02 -2.00 MG EST 50 CR 28616" Water Line 61 g 5 Outer Loop East 36" Water Line 51 CR 206 North 12" Water Line „ ^ - L 6 CR 41916" Water Line 52 Boudand and to CR 28512' Water Line OO z4 a 1'Z ^ iJ 7 Finely East 12" Water Line 53 CR 28612" Water Line N 1 ° 2" 12 1 1 " 8 Outer Loop West 24" Water Line 54 CR 93712" Water Line 48 9 US 75 East 12" Water Line 55 East Outer Loop 24" Water Line 50 - _ N ., 24 9 8 N 'IVo0o iV - s 10 West Crossing Road 12" Water Line 56 Outer Loop 12" Water Line 49 " 16 Y � — _ 24 24„ � 4z 36' O 36 Sa 11 South Ferguson 12" Water line 57 SH 121 12" Water Line COUNTY '-OhWER, - - - - 3 "O 36" .'� _ 12 CR 36512" Water Line 58 SH 121 36" Water Line `N ROAD 286 II —LOOP- - (V 13 CR 422 12" Water Line 59 CR 41912" Water Line - - - - - _ = r Y 56 ss 2 60 14 East Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 60 Sheffield Drive to CR 47212" Water Line II 12" 57 4" 15 West Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 61 Sheffield Drive to CR 42912" Water Line 12„ ss _ 16 West US 75 16" Water Line 62 CR 42912" Water Line 17 Throckmomm Blvd 1B" Water Line 63 CR 42916" Water Line 49 0 0 18 CR 37012" Water Line 64 CR 47816" Water Line ❑ ® ® _ _ H 19 SH 512' & 16" Water line 65 FM 455 16" Water Line- 49 66 CR 2862 to Water Line 49 20 CR 371 16" Water Line Collin Pump Station ®0 21 West 324"ngi rinne Water Line 67 CR 42424"CRer Line Water Line 22 CR 373 24" Water Line 68 CR 424 24" Water Line n . 1/ ® 23 CR 373 48" Water Line 69 FM 455 24" Water Line (1) - 1.5 MG GST ® am 24 CR 369 20" Water Line 70 FM 455 20" Water Line ® 25 CR 371 36" Water Line 71 FM 455 12" Water Line (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump / 26 CR 372 30" Water Line (1) - 1,000 GPM Pump ® 27 CR 1101 24" Water Line 72 CR 286 20" Water Line Phase 1: 28 CR 290 24" Water Line 73 CR 455 to "Water Line ��I 74 FM 455 to CR 2862 12" Water Line 29 CR 290 to FM 455 20"Water Line ® 75 Wildwood Trail 12' Water Line z � 30 CR 28912" Water Line V (1) - 4.0 MG GST ® 76 Le nand East North Water Line 1 - 3,450 GPM Pumps 31 Gowan Road 12'Water ter line 77 FM 455 o C North l2" Water Line ( ) 32 Cowan Road 12" Water Line 78 FM 455 to CR 2862Lin Water Line W (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump n� 33 FM 455 South 12' Water Line 79 CR 2862 24" Water Line a �p 34 CR 286 & FM 455 16" & 20' Water Line 4 MG GST and (2) 5,000 gpm Pumps at Grayson Pump ■ 35 CR 82612" Water Line 80 ® ® _ - '` . Station ® p ® ® 36 CR 1106 37612"" Water Line 81 4th Street 20" Water Line 3 ®� ® 37 CR 37612" Water Line EER RE® 82 Riggins Street 12" Water Line "�® ® 38 CR 42712" Water Line 39 CR Woodland Water Line 83 6ih Street 36" Water Line 40 Wo Street 12" Water Line 84 6ih Street 24" Water Line W I , - ?0 i 41 CR 422 South 12" Water Line 42 Foster Crossing Road 12° Water Line 43 Cain Dr. 12° Water Line 44 CR 21916" Water Line 011 _, 0 2,0004,000 a- rmFeet � Phase 1: . r r 60 (1)-4MGGST (2) - 5,000 GPM Pumps 22 - 23 48„ B„ 2 r ' 15 _'6E' ae _ 16'_ = s South Grayson 1 oo EST 0.30 MG EST rn, 63 -16" v �2 26 30„ 36„ 2s RCO b - al 1 1 cfl 24- „ 20 19 38 - 37 5, ' O - p 1 45 1 4a _ rc z7 �O 76„1 1612" °' 12" 20`�°� 39 1 6 - � N- F1 i �1 2a 1 12" 7� - - 2 20" as - 16" 40 N' as 86 1 _ 12 T-02 ^ cO 6: d , 2asz IL _ - 2.00 MG EST (D 17 _ - _ J N n1 12" 12" O _ _ 74 C° O o zs 12" 1 8 m EST 0.20 MG EST 1 N OO20" ROA6 71 West Crossin N N 12" ' 12" 12" ]3 48 91 - 67 FM 455 ` 16" 16" - ,g �2 _ 1_ _1 Planning Boundary Proposed EST Streams . f Existing Ground Tank & Pump Existing Water Line or Under Construction I Floodplain P® Future Pump Station � 0-Proposed Ground Tank &Pump Existing EST or EST Under Construction — Future Water Pipe Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction Project Number Project Name 1 U.S. 75 Parallel Water Line South of F.M. 455 2 CGMATreated Surface Water System & Treated Supply Line 3 18" Water Line from South Take Point to FM 455 4 East Hackberry 16" Water Line 5 Hackberry EST 6 US 75 Parallel water Line north of FM 455 7 CGMATreated Surface Water System - Bloomdale PS and GSR 8 Collin Take Point - PS 9 Collin Take Point - GSR 10 West Well EST 11 South Grayson -.35 MG EST 12 South Grayson System - CCN Area 13 South Well Surface Water 14 North and West Well Surface water 15 CR 1106 Water Line 16 Disinfection 17 Initial Collin Pump Station 18 South Distribution line from west well EST 19 Water Line from CR 422 20 Water Line for CR 371 to Rosamond Pkwy 21 Ferguson South 12" Water Line 22 South Leonard 12" Water Line 23 Suzie Lane Water Line 24 Foster Crossing Water Line Kimley>>> HorOP n THE°�CITY OF ANNA FIGURE wcIP manna WATER 10-YR CIP PLAN Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 Table 1 — Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost PROPOSED 2022-2032 Project List 1 3 MG GST and (2) 3,450 gpm Pumps at Sherley Pump Station 0% 100% 100% $ 5,600,000 $ 5,600,000 2 4 MG GST, (1) 3,450 GPM & (1) 2,733 GPM Pump at Collin Pump Station 0% 100% 100% $ 6,970,000 $ 6,970,000 3 T-01 — 2.00 MG EST 0% 41 % 41 % $ 4,548,649 $ 11,220,000 4 T-02 — 2.00 MG EST 0% 63% 63% $ 6,537,500 $ 10,460,000 5 Outer Loop East 36" Water Line 0% 26% 26% $ 3,675,759 $ 14,240,000 6 CR 41916" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 3,880,000 $ 3,880,000 7 Finely East 12" Water Line 0% 33% 33% $ 1,053,144 $ 3,170,000 8 Outer Loop West 24" Water Line 0% 72% 72% $ 5,810,211 $ 8,110,000 9 US 75 East 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 690,000 $ 690,000 10 West Crossing Road 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 1,080,000 $ 1,080,000 11 South Ferguson 12" Water line 0% 87% 87% $ 2,756,007 $ 3,170,000 12 CR 36512" Water Line 0% 76% 76% $ 4,279,607 $ 5,650,000 13 CR 422 12" Water Line 0% 32% 32% $ 234,808 $ 740,000 14 East Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 0% 60% 60% $ 3,991,496 $ 6,670,000 15 West Taylor Blvd 12" Water Line 0% 55% 55% $ 2,777,197 $ 5,070,000 16 West US 75 16" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 2,175,572 $ 6,370,000 17 Throckmorton Blvd 16" Water Line 0% 43% 43% $ 3,123,835 $ 7,340,000 18 CR 37012" Water Line 0% 46% 46% $ 3,761,954 $ 8,130,000 19 SH 512" & 16" Water line 0% 31 % 31 % $ 2,048,474 $ 6,530,000 20 CR 371 16" Water Line 0% 41 % 41 % $ 1,409,638 $ 3,420,000 21 West Crossing 16" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 1,387,864 $ 4,030,000 22 CR 373 24" Water Line 0% 52% 52% $ 288,738 $ 560,000 23 CR 373 48" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 2,793,376 $ 8,100,000 24 CR 369 20" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 2,428,109 $ 6,530,000 25 CR 371 36" Water Line 0% 42% 42% $ 795,994 $ 1,900,000 26 CR 372 30" Water Line 0% 44% 44% $ 3,479,163 $ 7,990,000 27 CR 1101 24" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 565,901 $ 1,960,000 28 CR 290 24" Water Line 0% 46% 46% $ 2,481,078 $ 5,390,000 29 CR 290 to FM 455 20" Water Line 0% 59% 59% $ 1,606,799 $ 2,740,000 30 CR 28912" Water Line 0% 39% 39% $ 1,106,188 $ 2,820,000 Kimley>Morn Page 8 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost 31 FM 455 16" & 12" Water line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,515,153 $ 31140,000 32 Cowan Road 12" Water Line 0% 95% 95% $ 6,807,575 $ 7,180,000 33 FM 455 South 12" Water Line 0% 57% 57% $ 1,296,672 $ 2,270,000 34 CR 288 & FM 455 16" & 20" Water Line 0% 58% 58% $ 3,114,368 $ 5,350,000 35 CR 82812" Water Line 0% 54% 54% $ 1,980,836 $ 3,690,000 36 CR 110616" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,428,306 $ 2,980,000 37 CR 37612" Water Line 0% 71% 71% $ 2,301,663 $ 3,230,000 38 CR 42612" Water Line 0% 67% 67% $ 1,994,488 $ 2,980,000 39 CR 42712" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 1,001,763 $ 2,070,000 40 Woodland Street 12" Water Line 0% 49% 49% $ 612,661 $ 1,260,000 41 CR422 South 12" Water Line 0% 65% 65% $ 1,103,063 $ 1,710,000 42 Foster Crossing Road 12" Water Line 0% 53% 53% $ 2,124,232 $ 4,020,000 43 Cain Dr. 12" Water Line 0% 71% 71% $ 602,408 $ 850,000 44 CR 21916" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 1,548,290 $ 4,200,000 45 CR 17712" Water Line 0% 32% 32% $ 957,641 $ 3,020,000 46 FM 3356 12" Water Line 0% 34% 34% $ 3,127,514 $ 9,140,000 47 Bourland Bnd 12" Water Line 0% 48% 48% $ 2,762,500 $ 5,780,000 48 CR 20612" Water Line 0% 59% 59% $ 1,460,571 $ 2,470,000 49 CR 20612" Water Line Loop 0% 88% 88% $ 6,572,495 $ 7,470,000 50 CR 28616" Water Line 0% 36% 36% $ 1,985,569 $ 5,470,000 51 CR 206 North 12" Water Line 0% 51 % 51 % $ 1,730,033 $ 3,410,000 52 Bourland Bnd to CR 285 12" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 525,382 $ 3,360,000 53 CR 28612" Water Line 0% 85% 85% $ 4,811,437 $ 5,660,000 54 CR 93712" Water Line 0% 74% 74% $ 1,658,759 $ 2,250,000 55 East Outer Loop 24" Water Line 0% 2% 2% $ 50,158 $ 2,160,000 56 Outer Loop 12" Water Line 0% 19% 19% $ 364,000 $ 1,960,000 57 SH 121 12" Water Line 0% 5% 5% $ 156,896 $ 3,210,000 58 SH 121 36" Water Line 0% 7% 7% $ 212,070 $ 3,130,000 59 CR 41912" Water Line 0% 30% 30% $ 391,736 $ 1,310,000 60 Sheffield Drive to CR 472 12" Water Line 0% 56% 56% $ 4,502,575 $ 8,070,000 61 Sheffield Drive to CR 429 12" Water Line 0% 26% 26% $ 1,890,860 $ 7,380,000 62 CR 42912" Water Line 0% 17% 17% $ 477,920 $ 2,750,000 63 CR 42916" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 1,082,780 $ 3,760,000 64 CR 47816" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 8,900,000 $ 8,900,000 65 FM 455 16" Water Line 0% 30% 30% $ 2,140,735 $ 7,040,000 66 CR 2862 16" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 373,864 $ 2,350,000 67 CR 2862 to CR 477 12" Water Line 0% 13% 13% $ 386,843 $ 2,980,000 Kimley»)Horn Page 9 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 Proj. # Description 2022 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2022-2032 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization 2032 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost 68 CR 424 24" Water Line 0% 16% 16% $ 1,567,860 $ 91730,000 69 FM 455 24" Water Line 0% 9% 9% $ 440,199 $ 4,720,000 70 FM 455 20" Water Line 0% 6% 6% $ 351,066 $ 5,620,000 71 FM 455 12" Water Line 0% 100% 100% $ 1,190,000 $ 1,190,000 72 CR 427 20'' Water Line 0% 14% 14% $ 768,928 $ 5,410,000 73 CR 2862 12" Water Line 0% 51 % 51 % $ 2,767,076 $ 5,460,000 74 FM 455 to CR 2862 12" Water Line 0% 37% 37% $ 1,600,642 $ 4,380,000 75 Wildwood Trail 12" Water Line 0% 29% 29% $ 420,033 $ 1,430,000 76 CR 2862 East 12" Water Line 0% 88% 88% $ 1,163,750 $ 1,330,000 77 Leonard Ave North 12" Water Line 0% 41% 41% $ 857,534 $ 2,090,000 78 FM 455 to CR 2862 30" Water Line 0% 18% 18% $ 476,405 $ 2,720,000 79 CR 2862 24" Water Line 0% 47% 47% $ 2,439,992 $ 5,220,000 80 4 MG GST and (2) 5,000 gpm Pumps at Grayson Pump Station 0% 5% 5% $ 361,000 $ 7,220,000 81 4th Street 20" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 580,000 $ 580,000 82 Riggins Street 12" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 420,000 $ 420,000 83 6th Street 36" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 84 6th Street 24" Water Line 0% 40% 40% $ 2,270,000 $ 2,270,000 Proposed Subtotal $ 176,115,362 $ 369,430,000 Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction 1 U.S. 75 Parallel Water Line South of F.M. 455 ° 22% 26 /° 4% $ 522,500.00 $ 1,900,000.00 2 CGMA Treated Surface Water System & Treated Supply Line 49% 51 /° ° 2% $ 387,600.00 $ 760,000.00 3 18" Water Line from South Take Point to FM 455 20% 40% 20% $ 155,000.00 $ 620,000.00 4 East Hackberry 16" Water Line 18% 22% 4% $ 266,539.50 $ 1,184,620.00 5 Hackberry EST 82% 100% 18% $ 2,629,000.80 $ 2,629,000.80 6 US 75 Parallel water Line north of FM 455 22% 26% 4% $ 90,420.00 $ 328,800.00 7 CGMA Treated Surface Water System - Bloomdale PS and GSR 49% 51 2% $ 357,000.00 $ 700,000.00 8 Collin Take Point- PS 22% 24% 2% $ 467,500.00 $ 1,700,000.00 9 Collin Take Point - GSR 21 % 42% 21 % $ 397,500.00 $ 1,500,000.00 10 West Well EST 82% 100% 18% $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 11 South Grayson - .35 MG EST 82% 100% 18% $ 525,000.00 $ 525,000.00 12 South Grayson system - CCN Area 19% 38% 19% $ 27,500.00 $ 100,000.00 13 South Well Surface Water 40% 1 60% 1 20% 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 200,000.00 14 North and West Well Surface water 40% 60% 20% $ 425,000.00 $ 850,000.00 15 CR 1106 Water Line 7% 14% 7% $ 37,912.50 $ 303,300.00 Kimley>Morn Page 10 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY OI City of Anna Anna July 2022 2022 Required 2032 2022-2032 Capacity Required Required 2032 Projected Proj. # Description (Percent Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost Utilization) (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization 16 Disinfection 4% 8% 4% $ 25,000.00 $ 500,000.00 17 Initial Collin Pump Station 40% 44% 4% $ 375,000.00 $ 750,000.00 18 South Distribution line from west well EST 20% 24% 4% $ 290,790.75 $ 1,163,163.00 19 Water Line from CR 422 22% 26% 4% $ 347,943.75 $ 1,265,250.00 20 Water Line for CR 371 to Rosamond 22% 26% $ 248,036.25 $ 901,950.00 Pkw 4% 21 Existing Waterline Facility 20 18% 22% 4% $ 751,950.00 $ 3,342,000.00 22 Existing Waterline facility 21 22% 26% 4% $ 75,487.50 $ 274,500.00 23 Suzie Lane Water Line 25% 25% $ 81,083.51 $ 319,003.00 24 Foster Crossing Water Line 55% 55% $ 343,651.41 $ 622,712.92 Impact Fee and Master Plan Updates $ 86,333.00 $ 86,333.00 Existing Subtotal 1 $ 9,427,416 $ 22,939,300 Total I $ 185,629,111 $ 392,455,633 4 Water Impact Fee Calculation Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, "Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years." The service unit for the Anna's wastewater impact fee is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the size of the base water meter. An SFE is the water demand associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family development in the system (3/4-inch meter). The ratio of each larger meter's capacity to the capacity of the base meter determines the SFE multiplier applied to each large meter size. The current SFE equivalency factors are shown in Table 2. Table 2 — Meter Capacity Ratios F Meter Size 3/4" Service Units/Meter 1 ill 1.67 1-1/2" 3.33 2" 5.33 3" 23.33 4" 43.33 6" 93.33 8" 160 10" 233.33 Kimley»)Horn Page 11 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 Multiplying the number of existing connections for each meter size by the SFEs per meter yields the total SFEs for that meter size. Summing for all meter sizes yields the total number of water SFEs connected to the City's water system as shown in Table 3. The current population in the water service area is divided by the total number of SFEs yielding a Persons per SFE number. Table 3 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent (SFE) Size 3/4" ExistingMeter Connections 8,135 1 8,135 1" 112 1.67 187 1-1 /2" 25 3.33 83 2" 68 5.33 362 3" 34 23.33 793 4" 1 43.33 43 6" 1 93.33 93 8" 0 160 0 10" 0 233.33 0 Total Existing Connections: 8,376 Total Service Units: 9,696 Total Population Served: 24,239 Persons per Service Unit: 2.50 The City of Anna defines a single-family equivalent (SFE) based on historical water demand over the past 10 years. The single-family equivalent is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4-inch meter. The measure of consumption per SFE is based on a 3/4-inch meter, and the data shown in Table 4. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley»)Horn Page 12 Water Impact Fee Study Update City of Anna July 2022 Table 4 — SFE Consumption Calculation Year 2011 •., 8,448 Service Unit . i capita/service 3,380 Water Average Day Demand MGD 1.25 per Service Unit 370 2012 8,567 3,427 1.17 343 2013 9,604 3,842 1.32 342 2014 10,615 4,246 0.99 233 2015 11,541 4,617 1.45 315 2016 12,171 4,869 1.42 292 2017 12,782 5,113 1.71 335 2018 14,243 5,698 1.94 340 2019 15,700 6,280 2.12 338 2020 19,750 7,900 2.67 338 Average Historical Demand per Service Unit 325 (1) Data Sources: TWDB Historical Estimates An "1'HL CITY O[ na Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the resulting water demand projections, water service will be required for an additional 12,495 SFEs by the year 2032 as shown in Table 5. The calculation is as follows: - A single-family equivalent, which is a unit of development that consumes approximately 325 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4-inch meter. Table 5 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not to do a financial analysis to determine the credit value, they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen not to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 50 percent of the Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost. Kimley»)Horn Page 13 Water Impact Fee Study Update "1'HL CITY O[ City of Anna Anna July 2022 A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is shown in Table 6 and below. Table 6 — Water 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $185,629,111 Debt Service* $46,407,278 Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $232,036,389 Credit for Utility Revenues $116,018,194 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $116,018,194 'Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs Impact f ee per SFE = 10 — year recoverable costs 10 — year additional SFEs Impact f ee per SFE _ $116,018,194 12,495 Impact f ee per SFE = $9,285 Therefore, the maximum assessable impact fee per SFE is $9,285. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4-inch meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the Equivalency Table (Table 7). Table 7 — Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size 3/4" Maximum Continuous Operating CapacityImpact 15 1 Maximum $9,285 1" 25 1.67 $15,506 1-1/2" 50 3.33 $30,919 2" 80 5.33 $59,489 3" 350 23.33 $216,619 4" 650 43.33 $402,319 6" 1400 93.33 $866,569 8" 2400 160 $1,485,600 10" 3500 233.33 $2,166,469 -Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-15 and C-701-15 Kimley»)Horn Page 14 Chapter 3 Wastewater Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study THE CITY OF manna Prepared by: Kimley>>> Horn Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 260 East Davis Street, Suite 100 McKinney, TX 75069 Phone: 469 3012580 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Kimley-Horn Project Number: 064512909 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 06/28/2022 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update "l'HC CITY Of a City of Anna Ann June 2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan.............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report.......................................................................................... 3 2 Design Criteria........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Pipe Design......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Lift Station and Force Main Design...................................................................................... 5 2.3 Water Reclamation Facility Design...................................................................................... 5 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan....................................................................... 5 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation.......................................................................... 9 List of Exhibits Exhibit 4.1 — Wastewater Service Area Map.................................................................................................4 Exhibit 4.2 — Wastewater 10-Year Capital Improvement Map....................................................................... 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Wastewater Criteria Used.............................................................................................................. 5 Table2 — Minimum Slopes............................................................................................................................ 5 Table 3 — Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost ....... 8 Table4 — Meter Capacity Ratios..................................................................................................................10 Table 5 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent(SFE)..................................................................................10 Table 6 — SFE Consumption Calculation.....................................................................................................11 Table 7 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation.............................................................11 Table 8 — Wastewater 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown....................................................................12 Table 9 — Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters...............................12 Kimley>))Horn Page 1 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 1 Introduction The City of Anna retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing impact fees for wastewater system improvements required to serve new development. These fees were developed in accordance with chapter 395 of the Local Government code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvement plan and associated fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; (6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7) plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, Kimley>Morn Page 2 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr or na City of Anna An June 2022 including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (8) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. This study was comprised of three tasks. These include land use assumptions, evaluation of the current wastewater capital improvement plan and development of the impact fee capital improvement plan as well as impact fee analysis. 1.1 Land Use Assumptions The development of land use assumptions included the following: - Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater - Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and - Projection of the 10-year population and employment by SA This information was determined based on information provided from the City of Anna in regard to planned developments as well as the future land use plan utilized in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee water service area is shown in Exhibit 4.1. Additional information regarding land use assumptions can be found in Chapter 1 of this report. 1.2 Evaluation of the Current Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans and Development of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan This task involved reviewing the City's current capital improvement plan and identify the proposed wastewater capital improvements that will be built in the next 10 years. Input from the City helped to develop the impact fee capital improvement plan. Wastewater demand projections were then used to determine the additional single-family equivalents (SFE). 1.3 Impact Fee Analysis and Report This task included calculating the additional single-family equivalent units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per SFE and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 3 Rr ,k Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 2 Design Criteria In accordance with Chapter 217 of the Texas Administrative Code (Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems), as well as communication between Kimley-Horn and the City of Anna, the following design criteria was followed when planning for future wastewater infrastructure. These criteria could change over time based on demand patterns and regulatory mandates. The assumptions used throughout this study are shown in Table 1. Table 1 — Wastewater Criteria Used .. Non-residential — Light Office 25 gpcd Non-residential — Manufacturing 20 gpcd Non-residential — School 20 gpcd Non- Residential — Rural/ Open Space 150 gpad Residential Demand 90 gpcd Peaking Factor 4 Single Family Residential Density 3.1 people/ unit Multifamily Residential Density 1.8 people/ unit 2.1 Pipe Design Table 2 shows the minimum slope requirements from the TCEQ. The design of the wastewater lines for the City of Anna utilized the TCEQ minimum slope unless the size of the line was larger than 36", then a slope was determined to maintain a velocity that satisfied the TCEQ requirements. All lines were sized based on the peak flow within each basin and subbasin. Table 2 — Minimum Slopes ..:AwIf-T—IF-re 12 0.20 1.03 15 0.15 1.617 18 0.115 2.302 21 0.095 3.156 24 0.08 4.135 27 0.07 5.296 30 0.06 6.494 2.2 Lift Station and Force Main Design The various proposed lift stations and force mains in the City of Anna allow for wastewater to be conveyed in areas where gravity flow cannot be achieved. Proposed lift stations are sized to meet peak day demands. The force mains are sized to be able to stay between 3-6 fps for peak day demands. 2.3 Water Reclamation Facility Design The proposed water reclamation facilities within the City of were sized based on average daily flow into the water reclamation facility. 3 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan Kimley>))Horn Page 5 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 The purpose of a capital improvement program is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its wastewater distribution system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. The impact fee capital improvements plan is developed using projects identified during the capital improvement program planning process. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a 10- year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. Eleven (11) existing and twenty-two (22) proposed projects identified in the wastewater capital improvements plan are determined eligible for recoverable cost over the next 10 years. The City of Anna's total cost of these projects is $233,332,732. The projected recoverable cost through impact fees is $291,665,915. After debt service costs are added and the credit reduction calculation is complete, $145,832,957 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. A breakdown of these amounts is shown in Table 8. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Table 3 and illustrated in Exhibit 4.2. [Remainder of this page intentionally blank] Kimley>Morn Page 6 N Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 Table 3 — Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost 2022 2032 2022-2032 Proj. Required Required Required 2032 Projected # Description Capacity Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost (Percent (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization) Utilization) Proposed 2022-2032 Project List 1 East Fork Trinity 30" Interceptor 0% 33% 33% $ 8,801,590 $ 26,290,000 2 East Fork 10", 12", 15", & 21" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 68,913 $ 6,920,000 3 East Fork 10" & 12" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 11,728 $ 1,180,000 4 Hurricane Creek 54" Interceptor 0% 45% 45% $ 5,530,532 $ 15,790,000 5 Hurricane Creek 10", 21", 27" & 30" Interceptor 0% 36% 36% $ 4,862,127 $ 13,520,000 6 Hurricane Creek 18" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 221,000 $ 2,210,000 7 Hurricane Creek 24" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 676,000 $ 6,760,000 8 Hurricane Creek 10" Interceptor 0% 10% 10% $ 396,000 $ 3,960,000 9 Hurricane Creek 48" Interceptor 0% 96% 96% $ 14,920,147 $ 28,890,000 Hurricane Creek 60" Interceptor & 10 Hurricane Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 14 MGD 0% 100% 100% $ 81,118,000 $ 81,118,000 11 Throckmorton Creek 24", 27" & 36" Interceptor 0% 41% 41% $ 2,493,661 $ 6,040,000 12 Throckmorton Creek Lift Station & 14" Force Main 0% 49% 49% $ 2,085,601 $ 4,240,000 13 Slayter Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 3 0.975 MGD Expansion 0% 100% 100% $ 26,910,000 $ 26,910,000 14 Harrington Branch Water Reclamation Facility Phase 1 0% 79% 79% $ 26,026,161 $ 33,010,000 15 West Sister Grove 15" 18" & 27" Interceptor 0% 53% 53% $ 3,977,289 $ 7,510,000 16 West Sister Grove 18" & 21" Interceptor 0% 60% 60% $ 2,585,397 $ 4,300,000 17 Harrington Branch 30" & 36" Interceptor 0% 54% 54% $ 11,180,687 $ 20,590,000 18 Hurricane Creek Water Reclamation Facility Phase 2 8 MGD Expansion 0% 69% 69% $ 19,502,042 $ 28,422,000 19 East Fork Trinity 18" & 12" Interceptor 0% 8% 8% $ 692,301 $ 9,050,000 Kimley>Morn Page 8 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update �rxc �-�rr rm na City of Anna An June 2022 2022 2032 2022-2032 Proj. Required Required Required 2032 Projected # Description Capacity Capacity Capacity Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost (Percent (Percent (Percent Utilization) Utilization) Utilization 20 East Fork Trinity 21" Interceptor 0% 13% 13% $ 1,039,137 $ 8,070,000 21 Slayter Creek 24", 30" & 36" Interceptor 0% 56% 56% $ 7,548,465 $ 13,390,000 22 Elizabeth Street 2,500 GPM Lift Station and 16" Force Main 0% 100% 100% $ 4,660,000 $ 4,660,000 Proposed Subtotal $ 225,306,777 $ 352,830,000 Existing Facilities or Facilities Under Construction 1 Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer Lower 7% 100% 93% $ 1,914,700 $ 2,050,000 2 Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper) 12% 100% 88% $ 954,840 $ 1,090,000 3 Elizabeth Street Lift Station and Force Main 40% 100% 60% $ 600,000 $ 1,000,000 4 Clement Creek Trunk Sewer Upper 87% 100% 13% $ 181,660 $ 1,376,210 5 Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant 9% 100% 91 % $ 1,784,975 $ 1,965,832 6 Slayter Creek 18" Interceptor 13% 100% 87% $ 959,140 $ 1,105,000 7 Slayter Creek 24" Interceptor 13% 43% 30% $ 270,000 $ 900,000 8 Clement Creek Trunk Sewer Lower 13% 43% 30% $ 514,500 $ 1,715,000 9 Slayter Creek WWTP Headworks Lift Station 82% 100% 18% $ 117,330 $ 651,832 10 Throckmorton Creek Trunk Sewer Extension 25% 75% 50% $ 607,477 $ 1,214,953 11 Hurricane Creek Sewer Line B 0% 100% 100% $ 4,842,538 $ 4,842,538 Impact Fee and Master Plan Updates $ 121,333 $ 121,333 Existing Subtotal $ 7,904,621 $ 13,068,827 Total $ 233,332,732 $ 366,020,160 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, "Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years." Kimley>Morn Page 9 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update�TY� City of Anna Anna June 2022 The service unit for the Anna's wastewater impact fee is the "single family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the size of the base water meter. A SFE is the wastewater flow associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new single-family development in the system (3/4-inch meter). The ratio of each larger meter's capacity to the capacity of the base meter determines the SFE multiplier applied to each large meter size. The current SFE equivalency factors are shown in Table 4. Table 4 — Meter Capacity Ratios Meter Size 3/4" Service Units/Meter 1 1" 1.67 1-1/2" 3.33 2" 5.33 3" 23.33 4" 43.33 6" 93.33 8" 160 10" 233.33 Multiplying the number of existing connections for each meter size by the SFEs per meter yields the total SFEs for that meter size. Summing for all meter sizes yields the total number of wastewater SFEs connected to the City's wastewater system as shown in Table 5. The current population in the wastewater service area is divided by the total number of SFEs yielding a Persons per SFE number. Table 5 — Capita per Single -Family Equivalent (SFE) Meter Size 3/4" .Connections' 7,941 1.0 7,941 ill 32 1.7 53 1-1 /2" 12 3.3 40 2" 38 5.3 203 3" 2 23.3 47 4" 3 43.3 130 6" 1 93.3 93 8" 160.0 0 10" 233.3 0 Total Existing Connections: 8,029 Total Service Units: 8,507 Total Population Served: 21,268 Persons per Service Unit: 2.50 (1) Data Sources: City of Anna The City of Anna defines a single-family equivalent (SFE) based on historical wastewater discharge over the past 10 years. The single-family equivalent is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4-inch meter. The measure of consumption per SFE is based on a 3/4-inch meter and the data shown in Table 6. Kimley>))Horn Page 10 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table 6 — SFE Consumption Calculation 2011 Population' 8,448 Service Unit r(IM capita/service 3,379 Wastewater Average Day Flow 1.09 Flow per Service Unit .D 323 2012 8,567 3,427 1.02 298 2013 9,604 3,842 1.15 299 2014 10,615 4,246 0.86 203 2015 11,541 4,616 1.26 273 2016 12,171 4,868 1.24 255 2017 12,782 5,113 1.49 291 2018 14,243 5,697 1.69 297 2019 15,700 6,280 1.85 295 2020 19,750 7,900 2.33 295 Average Historical Flow per Service Unit 296 Based on the City's 10-year growth projections and the resulting wastewater flow projections, wastewater service will be required for an additional 12,495 SFEs by the year 2032 as shown in Table 7. The calculation is as follows: - A single-family equivalent, which is a unit of development that discharges approximately 296 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4-inch meter. Table 7 —10-year Additional Single -Family Equivalent Calculation MrTopulation Service Unit 11 Service Uni ts 2022 24,350 2.50 9,740 2032 55,588 2.50 22,235 10- ear Additional Service Units 12,495 Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not to do a financial analysis to determine the credit value, they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen not to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 50 percent of the Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost. A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is shown in Table 8 and below. Kimley>))Horn Page 11 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update rxc �-rr or City of Anna Anita June 2022 Table 8 — Wastewater 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $ 233,332,732 Debt Service* $ 58,333,183 Pre -Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 291,665,915 Credit for Utility Revenues $ 145,832,957 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 145,832,957 *Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new impact fee project costs Impact fee per SFE _ 10 year recoverable costs 10 year additional SFEs Impact fee per SFE = $145,832,957 12,495 Impact fee per SFE = $11,671 Therefore, the maximum assessable impact fee per SFE is $11,671. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4-inch meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the Equivalency Table (Table 9). Table 9 — Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size k •. •.aximum ilk Assessable , Impact Fee 3/4" 15 1 $11,671 1" 25 1.67 $19,491 1-1 /2" 50 3.33 $38,864 2" 80 5.33 $62,206 3" 350 23.33 $272,284 4" 650 43.33 $505,704 6" 1400 93.33 $1,089,254 8" 2400 160 $1,867,360 101, 3500 233.33 $2,723,194 **Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-20 and C-701-19 Kimley>))Horn Page 12 Appendices Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Appendix A — Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 373 Limits: 595' W OF N POWELL PKWYto N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,851 3,570 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 29,618 71,400 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 317,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 502 Curb & Gutter 2,380 If $ 40.00 $ 95,200 602 Topsoil 1,983 Sy $ 10.00 $ 19,833 702 Turn Lanes 201 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 24,070 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 628,855 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 31,443 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 18,866 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 188,656 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,443 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,443 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 37,731 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 37,731 Other: $0 $ $ - 377,313 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,006,168 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 201,234 Mobilization 5% $ 50,308 Prep ROW 5% $ 50,308 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15309,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,309,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 209,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 130,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,649,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR371 (1) Limits: 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,910 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,489 cy $ 16.00 $ 135,822 201 16,553 Sy $ 20.00 $ 331,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,528,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 229,200 501 Curb & Gutter 7,640 If $ 40.00 $ 305,600 601 Topsoil 7,640 Sy $ 10.00 $ 76,400 701 Turn Lanes 658 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 79,005 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,685,093 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,553 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 805,528 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,255 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,255 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 161,106 1j Illumination Standard lluminationSystem 6% $ 161,106 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,476,801 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,161,895 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 832,379 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 208,095 Prep ROW1 % $ 41,619 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,244,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,244,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 839,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,048,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,132,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (2) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,610 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,156 cy $ 16.00 $ 114,489 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 13,953 Sy $ 20.00 $ 279,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,880 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,288,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 19,320 sf $ 10.00 $ 193,200 501 Curb & Gutter 6,440 If $ 40.00 $ 257,600 601 Topsoil 6,440 Sy $ 10.00 $ 64,400 701 Turn Lanes 555 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 66,595 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,263,351 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 113,168 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 67,901 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 679,005 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,168 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 113,168 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 135,801 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 135,801 1 Other: lGrade Separated Crossing $1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 2,608,011 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,871,362 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 974,272 Mobilization 5% $ 243,568 Prep ROW 5% $ 243,568 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,333,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,333,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,013,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 633,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,980,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (3) Limits: 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,285 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,711 cy $ 16.00 $ 91,378 201 11,137 Sy $ 20.00 $ 222,733 301 10,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,028,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,420 sf $ 10.00 $ 154,200 501 Curb & Gutter 5,140 If $ 40.00 $ 205,600 601 Topsoil 5,140 Sy $ 10.00 $ 51,400 701 Turn Lanes 443 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 53,152 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,806,463 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 54,194 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 541,939 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,323 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 90,323 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 108,388 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 108,388 Other: $0 $ $ - 993,555 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,800,018 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 560,004 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 140,001 Prep ROW1 % $ 28,000 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,529,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,529,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 564,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 705,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,799,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (4) Limits: 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 595 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,644 cy $ 16.00 $ 42,311 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 5,157 Sy $ 20.00 $ 103,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 4,760 Sy $ 100.00 $ 476,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 501 Curb & Gutter 2,380 If $ 40.00 $ 95,200 601 Topsoil 2,380 Sy $ 10.00 $ 23,800 701 Turn Lanes 205 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 24,611 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 836,456 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 25,094 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 250,937 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,823 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,823 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 50,187 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,187 Other: $0 $ $ - 460,051 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,296,507 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 259,301 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 64,825 Prep ROW1 % $ 12,965 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15634,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,634,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 261,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 326,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,222,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 371 (5) Limits: BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,745 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 16,644 cy $ 16.00 $ 266,311 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 32,457 Sy $ 20.00 $ 649,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 29,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,996,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 449,400 501 Curb & Gutter 14,980 If $ 40.00 $ 599,200 601 Topsoil 14,980 Sy $ 10.00 $ 149,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,291 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 154,907 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,264,751 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 263,238 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 157,943 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,579,425 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 263,238 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 263,238 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 315,885 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 315,885 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,408,851 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,673,602 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,734,720 Mobilization 5% $ 433,680 Prep ROW 5% $ 433,680 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 11,276,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 11,276,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,804,160 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 1,127,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 14,208,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 370 (1) Limits: 5,795' W OF CR 368 to CR 368 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,795 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 25,756 cy $ 16.00 $ 412,089 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,223 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,004,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,360 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,636,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 69,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 695,400 501 Curb & Gutter 23,180 If $ 40.00 $ 927,200 601 Topsoil 23,180 sy $ 10.00 $ 231,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,998 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 239,702 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,146,658 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 244,400 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,443,997 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 407,333 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 407,333 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 488,799 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 488,799 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,480,662 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 12,627,320 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,525,464 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 631,366 Prep ROW1 % $ 126,273 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15,911,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 15,911,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,545,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 3,182,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 21,639,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 370 (2) Limits: CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 970 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,311 cy $ 16.00 $ 68,978 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,407 Sy $ 20.00 $ 168,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 7,760 Sy $ 100.00 $ 776,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 116,400 501 Curb & Gutter 3,880 If $ 40.00 $ 155,200 601 Topsoil 3,880 Sy $ 10.00 $ 38,800 701 Turn Lanes 334 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 40,123 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,363,634 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 68,182 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,909 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 409,090 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,182 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,182 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 81,818 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,818 Other: $0 $ $ - 818,180 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,181,814 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 436,363 Mobilization 5% $ 109,091 Prep ROW 5% $ 109,091 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,837,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,837,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 453,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 283,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,575,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,140 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 81,067 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,880 Sy $ 20.00 $ 197,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 9,120 Sy $ 100.00 $ 912,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 136,800 501 Curb & Gutter 4,560 If $ 40.00 $ 182,400 601 Topsoil 4,560 Sy $ 10.00 $ 45,600 701 Turn Lanes 393 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 47,155 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,602,621 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 80,131 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,079 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 480,786 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,131 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,131 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 96,157 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,157 Other: $0 $ $ - 961,573 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,564,194 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 512,839 Mobilization 5% $ 128,210 Prep ROW 5% $ 128,210 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,334,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,334,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 533,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 333,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,201,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (2) Limits: CR 374 to 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 20,089 cy $ 16.00 $ 321,422 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 39,173 sy $ 20.00 $ 783,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 36,160 sy $ 100.00 $ 3,616,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 54,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 542,400 501 Curb & Gutter 18,080 If $ 40.00 $ 723,200 601 Topsoil 18,080 sy $ 10.00 $ 180,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,558 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 186,964 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,354,253 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 190,628 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,906,276 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 317,713 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 317,713 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 381,255 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 381,255 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,994,839 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 10,349,091 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,069,818 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 517,455 Prep ROW 10 $ 103,491 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 13,040,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 13,040,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,086,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,608,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 17,734,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) Limits: 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 2,810 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,430 cy $ 16.00 $ 134,880 208 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,392 Sy $ 20.00 $ 327,833 14,987 308 8" Concrete Pavement sy $ 100.00 $ 1,498,667 16,860 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk sf $ 10.00 $ 168,600 508 Curb & Gutter 8,430 If $ 40.00 $ 337,200 Topsoil 8,118 608 Sy $ 10.00 $ 81,178 708 Turn Lanes 880 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 105,588 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,653,946 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 132,697 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 79,618 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 159,237 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 871,552 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,525,498 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 705,100 Mobilization 5% $ 176,275 Prep ROW 5% $ 176,275 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,584,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,584,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 733,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,317,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (4) Limits: LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 740 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,151 cy $ 16.00 $ 18,418 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,220 Sy $ 20.00 $ 44,400 307 8" Concrete Pavement 1,973 sy $ 100.00 $ 197,333 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 1,480 If $ 40.00 $ 10.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal: $ $ $ $ 59,200 - 19,621 338,972 607 Topsoil 0 Sy 707 Turn Lanes 164 sy Paving Construction Cost Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 16,949 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 10,169 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 20,338 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 547,456 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 886,428 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 177,286 Mobilization 5% $ 44,321 Prep ROW 5% $ 44,321 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,153,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,153,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 184,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,337,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) Limits: 740' E OF LANGDON DR to N POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,190 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,570 cy $ 16.00 $ 57,120 208 6,942 sy $ 20.00 $ 138,833 308 8" Concrete Pavement 6,347 sy $ 100.00 $ 634,667 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,140 sf $ 10.00 $ 71,400 508 Curb & Gutter 3,570 If $ 40.00 $ 142,800 608 Topsoil 3,438 sy $ 10.00 $ 34,378 708 Turn Lanes 373 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 44,715 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,123,913 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 56,196 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,717 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,435 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 157,348 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,281,261 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 256,252 Mobilization 5% $ 64,063 Prep ROW 5% $ 64,063 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,666,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,666,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 266,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,933,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: ROLLINS RD (1) Limits: CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 5,355 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 12,495 cy $ 16.00 $ 199,920 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 24,395 Sy $ 20.00 $ 487,900 304 8" Concrete Pavement 22,610 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,261,000 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 64,260 sf $ 10.00 $ 642,600 504 Curb & Gutter 10,710 If $ 40.00 $ 428,400 604 Topsoil 5,950 Sy $ 10.00 $ 59,500 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,079,320 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 203,966 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 122,380 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,223,796 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 203,966 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 203,966 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 244,759 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 244,759 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,947,592 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 7,026,912 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,405,382 Mobilization 5% $ 351,346 Prep ROW 5% $ 351,346 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 9,135,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 9,135,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,461,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 913,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,510,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: ROLLINS RD (2) Limits: 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 615 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,435 cy $ 16.00 $ 22,960 204 2,802 Sy $ 20.00 $ 56,033 304 2,597 sy $ 100.00 $ 259,667 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 73,800 504 Curb & Gutter 1,230 If $ 40.00 $ 49,200 604 Topsoil 683 Sy $ 10.00 $ 6,833 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 468,493 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,055 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 140,548 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,425 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,425 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,110 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,110 Other: $0 $ $ - 257,671 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 726,165 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 145,233 Mobilizationl 5% $ 36,308 Prep ROW1 % $ 7,262 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 915,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 915,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 146,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 183,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,244,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY DR (1) Limits: CR 374 to 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,870 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 8,929 cy $ 16.00 $ 142,862 202 17,220 sy $ 20.00 $ 344,400 302 15,307 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,530,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 34,440 sf $ 10.00 $ 344,400 502 Curb & Gutter 11,480 If $ 40.00 $ 459,200 602 Topsoil 9,567 sy $ 10.00 $ 95,667 702 Turn Lanes 968 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 116,105 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,033,300 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 90,999 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 909,990 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,665 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,665 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 181,998 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 181,998 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,918,315 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,951,615 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 990,323 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 247,581 Prep ROW1 % $ 49,516 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,240,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,240,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 998,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,248,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,486,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY DR (2) Limits: 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 1,365 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,123 cy $ 16.00 $ 33,973 209 4,095 sy $ 20.00 $ 81,900 309 3,640 sy $ 100.00 $ 364,000 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,190 sf $ 10.00 $ 81,900 509 Curb & Gutter 2,730 If $ 40.00 $ 109,200 609 Topsoil 3,337 sy $ 10.00 $ 33,367 709 Turn Lanes 417 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 50,050 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 754,390 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 37,720 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 22,632 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 45,263 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 105,615 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 860,005 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 172,001 Mobilization 5% $ 43,000 Prep ROW 5% $ 43,000 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15119,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,119,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 179,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,298,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (1) Limits: 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 970 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 3,018 cy $ 16.00 $ 48,284 202 5,820 Sy $ 20.00 $ 116,400 302 5,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 517,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 116,400 502 Curb & Gutter 3,880 If $ 40.00 $ 155,200 602 Topsoil 3,233 Sy $ 10.00 $ 32,333 702 Turn Lanes 327 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 39,241 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,025,192 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 51,260 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 30,756 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 307,558 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,260 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 51,260 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 61,512 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 61,512 Other: $0 $ $ - 615,115 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,640,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 328,061 Mobilization 5% $ 82,015 Prep ROW 5% $ 82,015 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,133,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,133,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 341,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 213,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,688,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 2ND ST (1) Limits: 340' W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 665 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,256 cy $ 16.00 $ 20,098 205 2,438 Sy $ 20.00 $ 48,767 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,217 Sy $ 100.00 $ 221,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,980 sf $ 10.00 $ 79,800 505 Curb & Gutter 1,330 If $ 40.00 $ 53,200 605 Topsoil 591 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,911 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 429,442 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 21,472 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,883 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 128,833 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,472 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,472 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 25,767 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,767 Other: $0 $ $ - 257,665 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 687,108 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 137,422 Mobilization 5% $ 34,355 Prep ROW 5% $ 34,355 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 894,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 894,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 143,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 89,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,126,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 3RD ST (1) Limits: HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 585 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,105 2,145 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 17,680 42,900 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,950 Sy $ 100.00 $ 195,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,020 sf $ 10.00 $ 70,200 505 Curb & Gutter 1,170 If $ 40.00 $ 46,800 605 Topsoil 520 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,200 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 377,780 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 18,889 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 11,333 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 113,334 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,889 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,889 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 22,667 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 22,667 Other: $0 $ $ - 226,668 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 604,448 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 120,890 Mobilization 5% $ 30,222 Prep ROW 5% $ 30,222 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7865000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 786,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 125,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 78,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 990,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HARPER DR Limits: W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 565 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 17,076 205 2,072 Sy $ 20.00 $ 41,433 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,883 Sy $ 100.00 $ 188,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,780 sf $ 10.00 $ 67,800 505 Curb & Gutter 1,130 If $ 40.00 $ 45,200 605 Topsoil 502 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,022 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 364,864 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 18,243 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 10,946 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 109,459 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,243 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 18,243 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 21,892 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,892 Other: $0 $ $ - 218,919 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 583,783 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 116,757 Mobilization 5% $ 29,189 Prep ROW 5% $ 29,189 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 759,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 759,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 121,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 75,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 956,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (1) Limits: 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 215 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 406 cy $ 16.00 $ 6,498 205 788 sy $ 20.00 $ 15,767 305 8" Concrete Pavement 717 sy $ 100.00 $ 71,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,580 sf $ 10.00 $ 25,800 505 Curb & Gutter 430 If $ 40.00 $ 17,200 605 Topsoil 191 sy $ 10.00 $ 1,911 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 138,842 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,165 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 41,653 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,942 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 6,942 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 8,331 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 8,331 Other: $0 $ $ - 76,363 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 215,205 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 43,041 Mobilizationl 5% $ 10,760 Prep ROW1 % $ 2,152 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 272,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 272,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 43,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 54,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 370,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (2) Limits: S JAMES DR to S POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 305 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 576 cy $ 16.00 $ 9,218 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,118 Sy $ 20.00 $ 22,367 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,017 Sy $ 100.00 $ 101,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,660 sf $ 10.00 $ 36,600 505 Curb & Gutter 610 If $ 40.00 $ 24,400 605 Topsoil 271 Sy $ 10.00 $ 2,711 705 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 196,962 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 9,848 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 5,909 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 59,089 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,848 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 9,848 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 11,818 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 11,818 Other: $0 $ $ - 118,177 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 315,140 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 63,028 Mobilization 5% $ 15,757 Prep ROW 5% $ 15,757 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 410,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 410,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 65,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 41,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 517,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (1) Limits: 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 6,770 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 30,089 cy $ 16.00 $ 481,422 201 58,673 Sy $ 20.00 $ 1,173,467 301 54,160 Sy $ 100.00 $ 5,416,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 81,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 812,400 501 Curb & Gutter 27,080 If $ 40.00 $ 1,083,200 601 Topsoil 27,080 By $ 10.00 $ 270,800 701 Turn Lanes 2,334 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 280,032 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 9,517,321 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 475,866 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 285,520 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,855,196 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing (4) - $ 2,500,000 1( Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 475,866 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 475,866 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 571,039 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 571,039 Other: $0 $ $ - 8,210,392 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 17,727,713 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,545,543 Mobilization 5% $ 886,386 Prep ROW 5% $ 886,386 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 23,047,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 23,047,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 3,687,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,347,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (2) Limits: 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,400 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 19,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 312,889 201 38,133 Sy $ 20.00 $ 762,667 301 35,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 3,520,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 52,800 sf $ 10.00 $ 528,000 501 Curb & Gutter 17,600 If $ 40.00 $ 704,000 601 Topsoil 17,600 Sy $ 10.00 $ 176,000 701 Turn Lanes 1,517 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 182,000 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,185,556 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 309,278 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 185,567 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,855,667 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (3) - $ 1,500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 309,278 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 309,278 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 371,133 1 Illumination Standard lluminationsystem 6% $ 371,133 Other: $0 $ $ - 5,211,333 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 11,396,889 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,279,378 Mobilization 5% $ 569,844 Prep ROW 5% $ 569,844 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,816,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,816,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,370,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 3,437,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: FM 455 (3) Limits: 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 6,400 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 28,444 cy $ 16.00 $ 455,111 201 55,467 Sy $ 20.00 $ 1,109,333 301 51,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 5,120,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 76,800 sf $ 10.00 $ 768,000 501 Curb & Gutter 25,600 If $ 40.00 $ 1,024,000 601 Topsoil 25,600 Sy $ 10.00 $ 256,000 701 Turn Lanes 2,206 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 264,727 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,997,172 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 449,859 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 269,915 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,699,152 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (3), Major Stream Crossing, Bridge Crossing - $ 2,250,000 1( Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 449,859 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 449,859 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 539,830 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 539,830 Other: $0 $ $ - 7,648,303 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 16,645,475 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,329,095 Mobilization 5% $ 832,274 Prep ROW 5% $ 832,274 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 21,640,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 21,640,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 3,462,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,020,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (1) Limits: FM 455 to CR 286 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 2,700 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 12,000 cy $ 16.00 $ 192,000 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 23,400 Sy $ 20.00 $ 468,000 301 8" Concrete Pavement 21,600 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,160,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 32,400 sf $ 10.00 $ 324,000 501 Curb & Gutter 10,800 If $ 40.00 $ 432,000 601 Topsoil 10,800 Sy $ 10.00 $ 108,000 701 Turn Lanes 931 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 111,682 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,795,682 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 189,784 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 113,870 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,138,705 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 189,784 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 189,784 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 227,741 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 227,741 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,777,409 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,573,091 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,314,618 Mobilization 5% $ 328,655 Prep ROW 5% $ 328,655 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,546,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,546,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,367,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,983,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (2) Limits: CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIB Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 1,430 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,224 cy $ 16.00 $ 35,591 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 4,290 Sy $ 20.00 $ 85,800 307 8" Concrete Pavement 3,813 Sy $ 100.00 $ 381,333 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 2,860 If $ 40.00 $ 10.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal: $ $ $ $ 114,400 - 37,917 655,041 607 Topsoil 0 Sy 707 Turn Lanes 316 Sy Paving Construction Cost Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 32,752 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,651 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 39,302 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 91,706 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 746,747 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 149,349 Mobilization 5% $ 37,337 Prep ROW 5% $ 37,337 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 971,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 971,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 155,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 225,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (3) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to S POW ELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 10,435 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,232 cy $ 16.00 $ 259,716 207 31,305 Sy $ 20.00 $ 626,100 307 8" Concrete Pavement 27,827 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,782,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 20,870 If $ 40.00 $ 834,800 607 Topsoil 0 Sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 2,306 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 276,686 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,779,968 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 238,998 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 143,399 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 286,798 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 669,195 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,449,163 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,089,833 Mobilization 5% $ 272,458 Prep ROW 5% $ 272,458 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 7,084,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 7,084,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,133,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxDOT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,643,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 284 (1) Limits: 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,275 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 9,461 cy $ 16.00 $ 151,378 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 18,558 sy $ 20.00 $ 371,167 303 8" Concrete Pavement 17,467 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,746,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 39,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 393,000 503 Curb & Gutter 6,550 If $ 40.00 $ 262,000 603 Topsoil 7,278 sy $ 10.00 $ 72,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,996,989 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 89,910 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 899,097 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 149,849 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 149,849 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 179,819 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 179,819 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,648,344 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,645,333 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 929,067 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 232,267 Prep ROW1 % $ 46,453 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,854,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,854,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 936,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,170,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,961,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 284 (2) Limits: 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,295 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,741 cy $ 16.00 $ 59,858 203 7,338 Sy $ 20.00 $ 146,767 303 8" Concrete Pavement 6,907 Sy $ 100.00 $ 690,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 155,400 503 Curb & Gutter 2,590 If $ 40.00 $ 103,600 603 Topsoil 2,878 Sy $ 10.00 $ 28,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,185,069 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 59,253 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 35,552 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 355,521 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,253 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 59,253 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 71,104 1 Illumination Standard lluminationsystem 6% $ 71,104 Other: $0 $ $ - 961,041 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,146,110 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 429,222 Mobilization 5% $ 107,306 Prep ROW 5% $ 107,306 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,790,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,790,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 446,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 279,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,515,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 284 (3) Limits: 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 930 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,687 cy $ 16.00 $ 42,987 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 5,270 Sy $ 20.00 $ 105,400 303 8" Concrete Pavement 4,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 496,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 11,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 111,600 503 Curb & Gutter 1,860 If $ 40.00 $ 74,400 603 Topsoil 2,067 Sy $ 10.00 $ 20,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 851,053 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 25,532 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 255,316 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,553 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,553 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 51,063 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 51,063 1 Other: lGrade Separated Crossing $1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 1,968,079 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,819,133 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 563,827 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 140,957 Prep ROW 10 $ 28,191 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,553,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,553,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 568,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 710,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,832,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: TAYLOR BLVD (1) Limits: CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,775 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 10,906 cy $ 16.00 $ 174,489 203 21,392 Sy $ 20.00 $ 427,833 303 20,133 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,013,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 45,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 453,000 503 Curb & Gutter 7,550 If $ 40.00 $ 302,000 603 Topsoil 8,389 Sy $ 10.00 $ 83,889 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,454,544 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 172,727 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 103,636 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,036,363 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2), Bridge Crossing - $ 1,500,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 172,727 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 172,727 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 207,273 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 207,273 Other: $0 $ $ - 3,572,727 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 7,027,271 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,405,454 Mobilization 5% $ 351,364 Prep ROW 5% $ 351,364 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 9,136,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 9,136,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,461,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 913,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,511,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 Name: TAYLOR BLVD (2) This project consists of widening the Limits: 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB existing facility to a four -lane undivided Impact Fee Class: Major Collector collector. Length (If): 825 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,383 cy $ 16.00 $ 38,133 203 4,675 Sy $ 20.00 $ 93,500 303 4,400 Sy $ 100.00 $ 440,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 99,000 503 Curb & Gutter 1,650 If $ 40.00 $ 66,000 603 Topsoil 1,833 Sy $ 10.00 $ 18,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 754,967 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 37,748 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 22,649 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 226,490 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,748 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 37,748 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 45,298 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 45,298 Other: $0 $ $ - 452,980 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,207,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 241,589 Mobilization 5% $ 60,397 Prep ROW 5% $ 60,397 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15571,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,571,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 251,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 157,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,979,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 Name: TAYLOR BLVD (3) This project consists of widening the Limits: 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB existing facility to a four -lane undivided Impact Fee Class: Major Collector collector. Length (If): 225 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 650 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,400 203 1,275 Sy $ 20.00 $ 25,500 303 1,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 120,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 27,000 503 Curb & Gutter 450 If $ 40.00 $ 18,000 603 Topsoil 500 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,000 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 205,900 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 10,295 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 6,177 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 61,770 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,295 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,295 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 12,354 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,354 Other: $0 $ $ - 123,540 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 329,440 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 65,888 Mobilization 5% $ 16,472 Prep ROW 5% $ 16,472 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4295000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 429,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 68,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 42,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 541,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (1) Limits: S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (413) Length (If): 2,700 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adjacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 111 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,400 cy $ 16.00 $ 134,400 211 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 16,200 Sy $ 20.00 $ 324,000 311 8" Concrete Pavement 14,400 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,440,000 411 6' Concrete Sidewalk 32,400 sf $ 10.00 $ 324,000 511 Curb & Gutter 10,800 If $ 40.00 $ 432,000 611 Topsoil 9,000 Sy $ 10.00 $ 90,000 711 Turn Lanes 910 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 109,227 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,853,627 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 85,609 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 856,088 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 142,681 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 142,681 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 171,218 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 171,218 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,569,495 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,423,122 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 884,624 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 221,156 Prep ROW1 % $ 44,231 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,574,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,574,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 891,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,114,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,581,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (2) Limits: 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 425 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 112 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 661 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,578 212 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,275 Sy $ 20.00 $ 25,500 312 8" Concrete Pavement 1,133 Sy $ 100.00 $ 113,333 412 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,550 sf $ 10.00 $ 25,500 512 Curb & Gutter 850 If $ 40.00 $ 34,000 612 Topsoil 1,039 Sy $ 10.00 $ 10,389 712 Turn Lanes 130 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 15,583 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 234,883 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 11,744 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,047 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,093 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 32,884 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 267,767 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 53,553 Mobilization 5% $ 13,388 Prep ROW 5% $ 13,388 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 349,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 349,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 55,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 405,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (3) Limits: SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector (4D) Length (If): 1,610 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 111 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,009 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,142 211 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,660 Sy $ 20.00 $ 193,200 311 8" Concrete Pavement 8,587 Sy $ 100.00 $ 858,667 411 6' Concrete Sidewalk 19,320 sf $ 10.00 $ 193,200 511 Curb & Gutter 6,440 If $ 40.00 $ 257,600 611 Topsoil 5,367 Sy $ 10.00 $ 53,667 711 Turn Lanes 543 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 65,132 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,701,607 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 51,048 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 510,482 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,080 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 85,080 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 102,096 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 102,096 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 935,884 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,637,491 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 527,498 Mobilization 5% $ 131,875 Prep ROW 1% $ 26,375 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,324,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,324,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 531,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 664,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,521,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FINLEY BLVD (4) Limits: CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 775 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,808 cy $ 16.00 $ 28,933 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,531 Sy $ 20.00 $ 70,611 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,272 Sy $ 100.00 $ 327,222 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 93,000 504 Curb & Gutter 1,550 If $ 40.00 $ 62,000 604 Topsoil 861 Sy $ 10.00 $ 8,611 704 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 590,378 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 29,519 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 17,711 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 177,113 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,519 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,519 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 35,423 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,423 Other: $0 $ $ - 354,227 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 944,604 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 188,921 Mobilization 5% $ 47,230 Prep ROW 5% $ 47,230 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15228,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,228,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 196,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 122,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,547,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) Limits: 3,740' W OF S FERGUSON PKWYto 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,960 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,662 cy $ 16.00 $ 90,596 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 11,107 Sy $ 20.00 $ 222,133 303 8" Concrete Pavement 10,453 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,045,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 23,520 sf $ 10.00 $ 235,200 503 Curb & Gutter 3,920 If $ 40.00 $ 156,800 603 Topsoil 4,356 By $ 10.00 $ 43,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,793,618 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 89,681 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 53,809 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 538,085 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing - $ 1,000,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,681 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 89,681 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 107,617 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 107,617 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,076,171 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,869,788 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 773,958 Mobilization 5% $ 193,489 Prep ROW 5% $ 193,489 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,031,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,031,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 804,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 503,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,339,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) Limits: 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWYto S FERGUSON PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,780 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,142 cy $ 16.00 $ 82,276 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 10,087 Sy $ 20.00 $ 201,733 303 8" Concrete Pavement 9,493 Sy $ 100.00 $ 949,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 21,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 213,600 503 Curb & Gutter 3,560 If $ 40.00 $ 142,400 603 Topsoil 3,956 Sy $ 10.00 $ 39,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,628,898 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 81,445 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,867 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 488,669 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,445 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 81,445 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 97,734 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 97,734 Other: $0 $ $ - 977,339 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,606,236 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 521,247 Mobilization 5% $ 130,312 Prep ROW 5% $ 130,312 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,389,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,389,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 542,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 338,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,270,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) Limits: 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to ASPEN DR Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (1/2) Length (If): 2,015 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 113 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,911 cy $ 16.00 $ 46,569 213 5,709 sy $ 20.00 $ 114,183 313 8" Concrete Pavement 5,373 sy $ 100.00 $ 537,333 413 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 241,800 513 Curb & Gutter 2,015 If $ 40.00 $ 80,600 613 Topsoil 2,239 sy $ 10.00 $ 22,389 713 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,042,874 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 52,144 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 31,286 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 62,572 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 146,002 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,188,877 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 237,775 Mobilization 5% $ 59,444 Prep ROW 5% $ 59,444 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,546,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,546,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 247,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,793,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) Limits: ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 1,010 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 2,918 cy $ 16.00 $ 46,684 203 5,723 Sy $ 20.00 $ 114,467 303 5,387 Sy $ 100.00 $ 538,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,120 sf $ 10.00 $ 121,200 503 Curb & Gutter 2,020 If $ 40.00 $ 80,800 603 Topsoil 2,244 Sy $ 10.00 $ 22,444 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 924,262 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 46,213 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 27,728 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 277,279 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,213 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,213 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 55,456 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 55,456 Other: $0 $ $ - 554,557 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,478,820 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 295,764 Mobilization 5% $ 73,941 Prep ROW 5% $ 73,941 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15923,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,923,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 307,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 192,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,423,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W FOSTER CROSSING RD (5) Limits: 295' W OF S POWELL PKWYto S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 295 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 852 cy $ 16.00 $ 13,636 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,672 Sy $ 20.00 $ 33,433 303 8" Concrete Pavement 1,573 Sy $ 100.00 $ 157,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 35,400 503 Curb & Gutter 590 If $ 40.00 $ 23,600 603 Topsoil 656 Sy $ 10.00 $ 6,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 269,958 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 13,498 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 8,099 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 80,987 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,498 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 13,498 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 16,197 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 16,197 Other: $0 $ $ - 161,975 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 431,932 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 86,386 Mobilization 5% $ 21,597 Prep ROW 5% $ 21,597 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 562,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 562,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 89,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 56,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 708,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (1) Limits: CR 371 to 155' S OF CR 371 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 155 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 482 cy $ 16.00 $ 7,716 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 930 sy $ 20.00 $ 18,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 827 sy $ 100.00 $ 82,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 1,860 sf $ 10.00 $ 18,600 502 Curb & Gutter 620 If $ 40.00 $ 24,800 602 Topsoil 517 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,167 702 Turn Lanes 52 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 6,270 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 163,819 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,915 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 49,146 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,191 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 8,191 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 9,829 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 9,829 Other: $0 $ $ - 90,101 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 253,920 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 50,784 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 12,696 Prep ROW1 % $ 2,539 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 320,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 320,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 51,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 64,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 435,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (2) Limits: 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,865 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,913 cy $ 16.00 $ 142,613 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 17,190 Sy $ 20.00 $ 343,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 15,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,528,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 34,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 343,800 502 Curb & Gutter 11,460 If $ 40.00 $ 458,400 602 Topsoil 9,550 Sy $ 10.00 $ 95,500 702 Turn Lanes 966 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 115,902 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,028,016 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 90,840 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 908,405 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,401 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 151,401 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 181,681 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 181,681 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,665,409 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,693,424 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 938,685 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 234,671 Prep ROW1 % $ 46,934 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,914,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,914,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 946,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,182,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,043,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (3) Limits: FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 625 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,944 cy $ 16.00 $ 31,111 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,750 Sy $ 20.00 $ 75,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,333 Sy $ 100.00 $ 333,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,500 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,000 502 Curb & Gutter 2,500 If $ 40.00 $ 100,000 602 Topsoil 2,083 Sy $ 10.00 $ 20,833 702 Turn Lanes 211 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 25,284 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 660,562 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,028 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,817 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 198,169 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,028 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,028 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 39,634 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 39,634 Other: $0 $ $ - 396,337 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,899 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 211,380 Mobilization 5% $ 52,845 Prep ROW 5% $ 52,845 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15374,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,374,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 219,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 137,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,731,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (4) Limits: 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 830 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,582 cy $ 16.00 $ 41,316 202 4,980 Sy $ 20.00 $ 99,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 4,427 Sy $ 100.00 $ 442,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,960 sf $ 10.00 $ 99,600 502 Curb & Gutter 3,320 If $ 40.00 $ 132,800 602 Topsoil 2,767 Sy $ 10.00 $ 27,667 702 Turn Lanes 280 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 33,577 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 877,226 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 43,861 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 26,317 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 263,168 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,861 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 43,861 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 52,634 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 52,634 Other: $0 $ $ - 526,336 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,403,562 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 280,712 Mobilization 5% $ 70,178 Prep ROW 5% $ 70,178 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15825,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,825,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 292,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 182,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,300,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (5) Limits: 1,150' N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,890 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,880 cy $ 16.00 $ 94,080 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 11,340 Sy $ 20.00 $ 226,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 10,080 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,008,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 226,800 502 Curb & Gutter 7,560 If $ 40.00 $ 302,400 602 Topsoil 6,300 Sy $ 10.00 $ 63,000 702 Turn Lanes 637 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 76,459 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,997,539 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 99,877 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 59,926 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 599,262 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,877 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,877 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 119,852 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 119,852 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,448,523 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,446,063 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 689,213 Mobilization 5% $ 172,303 Prep ROW 5% $ 172,303 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,480,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,480,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 716,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 448,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,645,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (6) Limits: 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,855S OF CR 370 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,115 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,469 cy $ 16.00 $ 55,502 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,690 Sy $ 20.00 $ 133,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,947 Sy $ 100.00 $ 594,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 133,800 502 Curb & Gutter 4,460 If $ 40.00 $ 178,400 602 Topsoil 3,717 Sy $ 10.00 $ 37,167 702 Turn Lanes 376 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 45,107 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,178,442 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 58,922 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 35,353 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 353,533 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,922 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 58,922 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 70,707 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 70,707 Other: $0 $ $ - 707,065 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,885,508 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 377,102 Mobilization 5% $ 94,275 Prep ROW 5% $ 94,275 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,452,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,452,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 392,320 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 245,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,090,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 368 (7) Limits: 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,060 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 3,298 cy $ 16.00 $ 52,764 202 6,360 sy $ 20.00 $ 127,200 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,653 sy $ 100.00 $ 565,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,720 sf $ 10.00 $ 127,200 502 Curb & Gutter 4,240 If $ 40.00 $ 169,600 602 Topsoil 3,533 sy $ 10.00 $ 35,333 702 Turn Lanes 357 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 42,882 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,120,313 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,609 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 336,094 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,016 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 56,016 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,219 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 67,219 Other: $0 $ $ - 616,172 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,736,485 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 347,297 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 86,824 Prep ROW1 % $ 17,365 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,188,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,188,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 350,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 437,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,976,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 368 (8) Limits: 4,020' N OF W WHITE STto 880' N OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 3,140 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,884 cy $ 16.00 $ 78,151 209 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,420 sy $ 20.00 $ 188,400 309 8" Concrete Pavement 8,373 sy $ 100.00 $ 837,333 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,840 sf $ 10.00 $ 188,400 509 Curb & Gutter 6,280 If $ 40.00 $ 251,200 609 Topsoil 7,676 sy $ 10.00 $ 76,756 709 Turn Lanes 959 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 115,133 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,735,373 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 86,769 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 52,061 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 104,122 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 242,952 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,978,326 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 395,665 Mobilization 5% $ 98,916 Prep ROW 5% $ 98,916 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,572,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,572,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 411,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,984,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 286 (1) Limits: W WHITE ST to 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,800 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,711 16,800 cy Sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 139,378 336,000 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 302 8" Concrete Pavement 14,933 Sy $ 100.00 $ 1,493,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 33,600 sf $ 10.00 $ 336,000 502 Curb & Gutter 11,200 If $ 40.00 $ 448,000 602 Topsoil 9,333 Sy $ 10.00 $ 93,333 702 Turn Lanes 944 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 113,273 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,959,317 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 147,966 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 88,780 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 887,795 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 147,966 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 147,966 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 177,559 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 177,559 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,775,590 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,734,907 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 946,981 Mobilization 5% $ 236,745 Prep ROW 5% $ 236,745 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,156,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,156,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 984,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 615,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,757,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: CR 286 (2) Limits: 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST to 3,800' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,000 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,111 cy $ 16.00 $ 49,778 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,000 sy $ 20.00 $ 120,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,333 sy $ 100.00 $ 533,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,000 sf $ 10.00 $ 120,000 502 Curb & Gutter 4,000 If $ 40.00 $ 160,000 602 Topsoil 3,333 sy $ 10.00 $ 33,333 702 Turn Lanes 337 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 40,455 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,056,899 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 31,707 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 317,070 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,845 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 52,845 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 63,414 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 63,414 Other: $0 $ $ - 581,294 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,638,193 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 327,639 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 81,910 Prep ROW1 % $ 16,382 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,065,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,065,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 330,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 413,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,808,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 286 (3) Limits: 890' N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,455 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction• No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,527 cy $ 16.00 $ 72,427 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,730 sy $ 20.00 $ 174,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 7,760 sy $ 100.00 $ 776,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,460 sf $ 10.00 $ 174,600 502 Curb & Gutter 5,820 If $ 40.00 $ 232,800 602 Topsoil 4,850 sy $ 10.00 $ 48,500 702 Turn Lanes 491 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 58,861 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,537,788 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 46,134 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 461,336 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,889 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 76,889 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 92,267 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 92,267 Other: $0 $ $ - 845,783 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,383,571 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 476,714 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 119,179 Prep ROW1 % $ 23,836 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,004,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,004,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 480,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 600,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,085,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (1) Limits: 900' N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 8,050 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 23,256 cy $ 16.00 $ 372,089 203 45,617 sy $ 20.00 $ 912,333 303 8" Concrete Pavement 42,933 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,293,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 96,600 sf $ 10.00 $ 966,000 503 Curb & Gutter 16,100 If $ 40.00 $ 644,000 603 Topsoil 17,889 sy $ 10.00 $ 178,889 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 7,366,644 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 220,999 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,209,993 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 368,332 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 368,332 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 441,999 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 441,999 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,301,654 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 11,668,299 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,333,660 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 583,415 Prep ROW 10 $ 116,683 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,703,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,703,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,352,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,940,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 19,996,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (2) Limits: W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 240 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 693 cy $ 16.00 $ 11,093 203 1,360 Sy $ 20.00 $ 27,200 303 1,280 Sy $ 100.00 $ 128,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,880 sf $ 10.00 $ 28,800 503 Curb & Gutter 480 If $ 40.00 $ 19,200 603 Topsoil 533 Sy $ 10.00 $ 5,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 219,627 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 10,981 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 6,589 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 65,888 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,981 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,981 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 13,178 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 13,178 Other: $0 $ $ - 131,776 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 351,403 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 70,281 Mobilization 5% $ 17,570 Prep ROW 5% $ 17,570 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4575000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 457,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 73,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 45,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 576,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (3) Limits: 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525N OF ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 430 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,242 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,876 203 2,437 Sy $ 20.00 $ 48,733 303 2,293 Sy $ 100.00 $ 229,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,600 503 Curb & Gutter 860 If $ 40.00 $ 34,400 603 Topsoil 956 Sy $ 10.00 $ 9,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 393,498 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 19,675 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 11,805 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 118,049 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,675 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 19,675 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 23,610 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 23,610 Other: $0 $ $ - 236,099 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 629,596 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 125,919 Mobilization 5% $ 31,480 Prep ROW 5% $ 31,480 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 819,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 819,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 131,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 81,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,032,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (4) Limits: 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 525 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,517 cy $ 16.00 $ 24,267 203 2,975 Sy $ 20.00 $ 59,500 303 2,800 Sy $ 100.00 $ 280,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 63,000 503 Curb & Gutter 1,050 If $ 40.00 $ 42,000 603 Topsoil 1,167 Sy $ 10.00 $ 11,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 480,433 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 24,022 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,413 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 144,130 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,022 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,022 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,826 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,826 Other: $0 $ $ - 288,260 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 768,693 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 153,739 Mobilization 5% $ 38,435 Prep ROW 5% $ 38,435 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15000,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,000,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 160,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 100,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,260,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 374 (5) Limits: ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 2,015 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,821 cy $ 16.00 $ 93,138 203 11,418 Sy $ 20.00 $ 228,367 303 10,747 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,074,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 241,800 503 Curb & Gutter 4,030 If $ 40.00 $ 161,200 603 Topsoil 4,478 Sy $ 10.00 $ 44,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,843,949 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 55,318 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 553,185 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,197 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 92,197 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 110,637 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 110,637 Other: $0 $ $ - 1,014,172 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,858,121 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 571,624 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 142,906 Prep ROW1 % $ 28,581 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,602,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,602,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 576,320 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 720,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,899,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (1) Limits: CR 371 to ROLLINS RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,865 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 26,067 cy $ 16.00 $ 417,067 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,830 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,016,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,920 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,692,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 70,380 sf $ 10.00 $ 703,800 501 Curb & Gutter 23,460 If $ 40.00 $ 938,400 601 Topsoil 23,460 sy $ 10.00 $ 234,600 701 Turn Lanes 2,022 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 242,598 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,245,064 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 247,352 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,473,519 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 412,253 1 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 412,253 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 494,704 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination system 6% $ 494,704 Other: $0 $ $ - 4,784,785 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,029,850 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,605,970 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 651,492 Prep ROW 10 $ 130,298 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 16,418,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 16,418,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,626,880 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 3,283,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 22,328,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (2) Limits: ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 2,760 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 8,280 cy $ 16.00 $ 132,480 208 16,100 sy $ 20.00 $ 322,000 308 14,720 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,472,000 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 165,600 508 Curb & Gutter 8,280 If $ 40.00 $ 331,200 608 Topsoil 7,973 sy $ 10.00 $ 79,733 708 Turn Lanes 864 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 103,709 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,606,722 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 130,336 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 78,202 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 156,403 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 364,941 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,971,664 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 594,333 Mobilization 5% $ 148,583 Prep ROW 5% $ 148,583 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,864,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,864,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 618,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,482,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: N FERGUSON PKWY (3) Limits: HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 2,650 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,122 cy $ 16.00 $ 65,956 207 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 7,950 sy $ 20.00 $ 159,000 307 8" Concrete Pavement 7,067 sy $ 100.00 $ 706,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 5,300 If $ 40.00 $ 212,000 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 586 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 70,265 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,213,887 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 60,694 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 36,417 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 72,833 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 169,944 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,383,832 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 276,766 Mobilization 5% $ 69,192 Prep ROW 5% $ 69,192 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,799,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,799,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 287,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,087,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (1) Limits: W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 2,440 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 3,796 cy $ 16.00 $ 60,729 207 7,320 sy $ 20.00 $ 146,400 307 6,507 sy $ 100.00 $ 650,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ 507 Curb & Gutter 4,880 If $ 40.00 $ 195,200 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ 707 Turn Lanes 539 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 64,697 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,117,693 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 55,885 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 33,531 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 67,062 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 156,477 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,274,169 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 254,834 Mobilization 5% $ 63,708 Prep ROW 5% $ 63,708 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,657,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,657,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 265,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,922,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (2) Limits: 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,360 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 4,080 cy $ 16.00 $ 65,280 208 7,933 Sy $ 20.00 $ 158,667 308 7,253 Sy $ 100.00 $ 725,333 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 81,600 508 Curb & Gutter 4,080 If $ 40.00 $ 163,200 608 Topsoil 3,929 Sy $ 10.00 $ 39,289 708 Turn Lanes 426 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 51,103 Construction Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,284,472 Major Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 64,224 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 38,534 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 77,068 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ $ - 179,826 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,464,298 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 292,860 Mobilization 5% $ 73,215 Prep ROW 5% $ 73,215 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,904,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,904,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 304,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,209,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (3) Limits: W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,245 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 5,533 cy $ 16.00 $ 88,533 201 10,790 Sy $ 20.00 $ 215,800 301 9,960 Sy $ 100.00 $ 996,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 14,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 149,400 501 Curb & Gutter 4,980 If $ 40.00 $ 199,200 601 Topsoil 4,980 Sy $ 10.00 $ 49,800 701 Turn Lanes 429 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 51,498 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,750,231 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 52,507 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 525,069 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,512 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 87,512 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 105,014 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 105,014 Other: $0 $ $ - 962,627 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,712,858 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 542,572 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 135,643 Prep ROW1 % $ 27,129 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,419,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,419,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 547,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 683,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,650,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (4) Limits: 1,245' S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,025 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 4,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 72,889 201 8,883 Sy $ 20.00 $ 177,667 301 8,200 Sy $ 100.00 $ 820,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,300 sf $ 10.00 $ 123,000 501 Curb & Gutter 4,100 If $ 40.00 $ 164,000 601 Topsoil 4,100 Sy $ 10.00 $ 41,000 701 Turn Lanes 353 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 42,398 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,"0,953 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 43,229 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 432,286 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,048 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 72,048 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 86,457 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,457 Other: $0 $ $ - 792,524 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,233,478 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 446,696 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 111,674 Prep ROW1 % $ 22,335 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,815,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,815,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 450,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 563,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,828,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S FERGUSON PKWY (5) Limits: 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 425 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway Construction No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8" Concrete Pavement 1,889 cy $ 16.00 $ 30,222 201 3,683 sy $ 20.00 $ 73,667 301 3,400 sy $ 100.00 $ 340,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,100 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,000 501 Curb & Gutter 1,700 If $ 40.00 $ 68,000 601 Topsoil 1,700 sy $ 10.00 $ 17,000 701 Turn Lanes 146 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 17,580 Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 597,468 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 17,924 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 179,241 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,873 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,873 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 35,848 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,848 Other: $0 $ $ - 328,608 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 926,076 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 185,215 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 46,304 Prep ROW 10 $ 9,261 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 15167,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,167,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 186,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 233,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,587,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Name: W CROSSING BLVD (1) Limits: 2,660' N OF CR 371 to 1,970' N Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 4,725 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 13,650 26,775 cy sy $ 16.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 218,400 535,500 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 303 8" Concrete Pavement 25,200 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,520,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 56,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 567,000 503 Curb & Gutter 9,450 If $ 40.00 $ 378,000 603 Topsoil 10,500 sy $ 10.00 $ 105,000 703 Turn Lanes 0 1 sy 1 $ 120.00 $ - Component Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,323,900 Major Construction Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 129,717 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,297,170 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - 1j Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 216,195 1j Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 216,195 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 259,434 1j Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 259,434 Other: $0 $ $ - 2,378,145 -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 69702,045 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,340,409 Mobilizatioril 5% $ 335,102 Prep ROW1 % $ 67,020 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,445,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,445,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,351,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,689,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 11,485,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W CROSSING BLVD (2) Limits: 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 440 Service Area(s): Service Area 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 110 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 684 cy $ 16.00 $ 10,951 210 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,320 Sy $ 20.00 $ 26,400 1,173 Sy $ 100.00 $ 117,333 310 8" Concrete Pavement 410 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,640 sf $ 10.00 $ 26,400 510 Curb & Gutter 880 If $ 40.00 $ 35,200 610 Topsoil 1,076 Sy $ 10.00 $ 10,756 710 Turn Lanes 134 1 Sy 1 $ 120.00 $ 16,133 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 243,173 Major Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 12,159 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,295 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,590 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 34,044 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 277,218 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 55,444 Mobilization 5% $ 13,861 Prep ROW 5% $ 13,861 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 361,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 361,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 57,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 419,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 1106 (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWYto 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,080 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,360 cy $ 16.00 $ 53,760 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 6,480 sy $ 20.00 $ 129,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 5,760 sy $ 100.00 $ 576,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 12,960 sf $ 10.00 $ 129,600 502 Curb & Gutter 4,320 If $ 40.00 $ 172,800 602 Topsoil 3,600 sy $ 10.00 $ 36,000 702 Turn Lanes 364 sy $ 120.00 $ 43,691 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,141,451 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 57,073 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 34,244 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 342,435 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,073 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 57,073 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 68,487 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 68,487 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,184,871 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,326,321 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 465,264 Mobilizationi 5% $ 116,316 Prep ROW 5% $ 116,316 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,025,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,025,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 484,000 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 302,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,812,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 1106 (2) Limits: 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial (1/2) Length (If): 2,425 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate four - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 109 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 3,772 cy $ 16.00 $ 60,356 209 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 7,275 sy $ 20.00 $ 145,500 309 8" Concrete Pavement 6,467 sy $ 100.00 $ 646,667 409 6' Concrete Sidewalk 14,550 sf $ 10.00 $ 145,500 509 Curb & Gutter 4,850 If $ 40.00 $ 194,000 609 Topsoil 5,928 sy $ 10.00 $ 59,278 709 Turn Lanes 741 sy $ 120.00 $ 88,917 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,340,217 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 67,011 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,207 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water None Anticipated 0% $ - Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 80,413 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 687,630 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,027,847 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 405,569 Mobilization 5% $ 101,392 Prep ROW 5% $ 101,392 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,637,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,637,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 421,920 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,059,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWYto 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) Length (If): 1,675 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,025 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,400 208 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,771 sy $ 20.00 $ 195,417 308 8" Concrete Pavement 8,933 sy $ 100.00 $ 893,333 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 10,050 sf $ 10.00 $ 100,500 508 Curb & Gutter 5,025 If $ 40.00 $ 201,000 608 Topsoil 4,839 sy $ 10.00 $ 48,389 708 Turn Lanes 524 sy $ 120.00 $ 62,939 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,581,978 jor Ma Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 79,099 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 47,459 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 94,919 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 721,477 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,303,455 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 460,691 Mobilization 5% $ 115,173 Prep ROW 5% $ 115,173 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,995,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,955,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 479,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,474,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (2) Limits: 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,515 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,733 cy $ 16.00 $ 107,733 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 13,130 sy $ 20.00 $ 262,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,120 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,212,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,180 sf $ 10.00 $ 181,800 501 Curb & Gutter 6,060 If $ 40.00 $ 242,400 601 Topsoil 6,060 sy $ 10.00 $ 60,600 701 Turn Lanes 522 sy $ 120.00 $ 62,666 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,129,799 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 63,894 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 638,940 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,490 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,490 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 127,788 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 127,788 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,171,390 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,301,189 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 660,238 Mobilizationi 5% $ 165,059 Prep ROW 1% $ 33,012 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,160,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,190,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 665,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 832,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,658,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 376 (3) Limits: CR 427 to 575' E OF CR 427 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 575 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,556 cy $ 16.00 $ 40,889 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 4,983 sy $ 20.00 $ 99,667 301 8" Concrete Pavement 4,600 sy $ 100.00 $ 460,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 69,000 501 Curb & Gutter 2,300 If $ 40.00 $ 92,000 601 Topsoil 2,300 sy $ 10.00 $ 23,000 701 Turn Lanes 198 sy $ 120.00 $ 23,784 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 808,340 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 40,417 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 24,250 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 242,502 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,417 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 40,417 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 48,500 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 48,500 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 485,004 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,293,343 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 258,669 Mobilizationi 5% $ 64,667 Prep ROW 5% $ 64,667 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,682,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,682,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 269,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 168,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,119,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E ROSAMOND PKWY (1) Limits: N POWELL PKWY to 295' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 295 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,311 cy $ 16.00 $ 20,978 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,557 sy $ 20.00 $ 51,133 301 8" Concrete Pavement 2,360 sy $ 100.00 $ 236,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,540 sf $ 10.00 $ 35,400 501 Curb & Gutter 1,180 If $ 40.00 $ 47,200 601 Topsoil 1,180 sy $ 10.00 $ 11,800 701 Turn Lanes 102 sy $ 120.00 $ 12,202 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 414,713 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,736 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,441 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 124,414 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,736 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,736 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,883 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,883 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 748,828 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,163,541 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 232,708 Mobilizationi 5% $ 58,177 Prep ROW 5% $ 58,177 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,513,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,513,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 242,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 151,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,906,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) Limits: 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,735' E OF N POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,915 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,511 cy $ 16.00 $ 136,178 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 16,597 sy $ 20.00 $ 331,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,532,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,980 sf $ 10.00 $ 229,800 501 Curb & Gutter 7,660 If $ 40.00 $ 306,400 601 Topsoil 7,660 sy $ 10.00 $ 76,600 701 Turn Lanes 660 sy $ 120.00 $ 79,211 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,692,122 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,764 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 807,637 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,606 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 134,606 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 161,527 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 161,527 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,480,667 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,172,790 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 834,558 Mobilizationi 5% $ 208,639 Prep ROW 1% $ 41,728 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,258,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,258,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 841,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,051,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,151,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (1) Limits: CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,850 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 26,000 cy $ 16.00 $ 416,000 201 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 50,700 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,014,000 301 8" Concrete Pavement 46,800 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,680,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 70,200 sf $ 10.00 $ 702,000 501 Curb & Gutter 23,400 If $ 40.00 $ 936,000 601 Topsoil 23,400 sy $ 10.00 $ 234,000 701 Turn Lanes 2,016 sy $ 120.00 $ 241,977 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,223,977 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 411,199 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 246,719 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,467,193 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (3) - $ 750,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 411,199 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 411,199 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 493,439 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 493,439 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,684,386 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,908,364 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,781,673 Mobilizationi 5% $ 695,418 Prep ROW 5% $ 695,418 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 18,081,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 18,081,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,892,960 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 4,195,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (2) Limits: 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 4,445 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 19,756 cy $ 16.00 $ 316,089 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 38,523 sy $ 20.00 $ 770,467 301 8" Concrete Pavement 35,560 sy $ 100.00 $ 3,556,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 53,340 sf $ 10.00 $ 533,400 501 Curb & Gutter 17,780 If $ 40.00 $ 711,200 601 Topsoil 17,780 sy $ 10.00 $ 177,800 701 Turn Lanes 1,532 sy $ 120.00 $ 183,861 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 6,248,817 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 312,441 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 187,465 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,874,645 Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 312,441 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 312,441 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 374,929 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 374,929 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,749,290 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 10,998,107 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,199,621 Mobilizationi 5% $ 549,905 Prep ROW 5% $ 549,905 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 14,298,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 14,258,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,287,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 3,317,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 640 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,991 cy $ 16.00 $ 31,858 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,840 sy $ 20.00 $ 76,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 3,413 sy $ 100.00 $ 341,333 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 76,800 502 Curb & Gutter 2,560 If $ 40.00 $ 102,400 602 Topsoil 2,133 sy $ 10.00 $ 21,333 702 Turn Lanes 216 sy $ 120.00 $ 25,891 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 676,415 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,821 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,292 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 202,925 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,821 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,821 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,585 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,585 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 405,849 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,082,265 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 216,453 Mobilizationi 5% $ 54,113 Prep ROW 5% $ 54,113 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,407,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,457,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 225,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 140,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,773,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (3) Limits: N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 245 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 762 cy $ 16.00 $ 12,196 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,470 sy $ 20.00 $ 29,400 302 8" Concrete Pavement 1,307 sy $ 100.00 $ 130,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 2,940 sf $ 10.00 $ 29,400 502 Curb & Gutter 980 If $ 40.00 $ 39,200 602 Topsoil 817 sy $ 10.00 $ 8,167 702 Turn Lanes 83 sy $ 120.00 $ 9,911 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 258,940 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,768 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 77,682 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,947 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,947 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 15,536 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 15,536 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 642,417 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 901,357 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 180,271 Mobilizationi 5% $ 45,068 Prep ROW 1% $ 9,014 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,136,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,136,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 181,760 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 227,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,545,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (4) Limits: N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 140 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 436 cy $ 16.00 $ 6,969 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 840 sy $ 20.00 $ 16,800 302 8" Concrete Pavement 747 sy $ 100.00 $ 74,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 1,680 sf $ 10.00 $ 16,800 502 Curb & Gutter 560 If $ 40.00 $ 22,400 602 Topsoil 467 sy $ 10.00 $ 4,667 702 Turn Lanes 47 sy $ 120.00 $ 5,664 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 147,966 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 7,398 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 4,439 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 44,390 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,398 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 7,398 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 8,878 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 8,878 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 88,780 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 236,745 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 47,349 Mobilizationi 5% $ 11,837 Prep ROW 5% $ 11,837 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 308,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 358,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 49,280 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 71,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HACKBERRY LN (5) Limits: 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,075 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,456 cy $ 16.00 $ 103,289 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 12,450 sy $ 20.00 $ 249,000 302 8" Concrete Pavement 11,067 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,106,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,900 sf $ 10.00 $ 249,000 502 Curb & Gutter 8,300 If $ 40.00 $ 332,000 602 Topsoil 6,917 sy $ 10.00 $ 69,167 702 Turn Lanes 700 sy $ 120.00 $ 83,943 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,193,065 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 65,792 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 657,920 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,653 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 109,653 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 131,584 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 131,584 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,206,186 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,399,251 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 679,850 Mobilizationi 5% $ 169,963 Prep ROW 1% $ 33,993 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,284,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,284,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 685,440 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 856,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,826,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 2ND ST (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 625 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,181 cy $ 16.00 $ 18,889 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,292 sy $ 20.00 $ 45,833 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,083 sy $ 100.00 $ 208,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,500 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,000 505 Curb & Gutter 1,250 If $ 40.00 $ 50,000 605 Topsoil 556 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,556 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 403,611 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,181 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,108 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 121,083 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,181 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,181 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,217 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,217 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 242,167 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 645,778 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 129,156 Mobilizationi 5% $ 32,289 Prep ROW 5% $ 32,289 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 840,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 840,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 134,400 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 84,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,058,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 3RD ST (2) Limits: N POW ELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 630 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,190 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,040 205 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,310 sy $ 20.00 $ 46,200 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,100 sy $ 100.00 $ 210,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 75,600 505 Curb & Gutter 1,260 If $ 40.00 $ 50,400 605 Topsoil 560 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,600 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 406,840 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,342 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,205 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 122,052 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,342 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,342 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,410 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,410 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 244,104 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 650,944 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 130,189 Mobilizationi 5% $ 32,547 Prep ROW 5% $ 32,547 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 847,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 847,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 135,520 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 84,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,067,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 5TH ST (3) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 645 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,218 cy $ 16.00 $ 19,493 205 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,365 sy $ 20.00 $ 47,300 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,150 sy $ 100.00 $ 215,000 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,740 sf $ 10.00 $ 77,400 505 Curb & Gutter 1,290 If $ 40.00 $ 51,600 605 Topsoil 573 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,733 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 416,527 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 20,826 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 12,496 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 124,958 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,826 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 20,826 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 24,992 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 24,992 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 249,916 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 666,443 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 133,289 Mobilizationi 5% $ 33,322 Prep ROW 5% $ 33,322 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 867,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 897,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 138,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 86,700 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,092,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 7TH ST Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 725 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,369 cy $ 16.00 $ 21,911 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 2,658 sy $ 20.00 $ 53,167 305 8" Concrete Pavement 2,417 sy $ 100.00 $ 241,667 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 8,700 sf $ 10.00 $ 87,000 505 Curb & Gutter 1,450 If $ 40.00 $ 58,000 605 Topsoil 644 sy $ 10.00 $ 6,444 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 468,189 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 23,409 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,046 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 140,457 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,409 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 23,409 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,091 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 28,091 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 280,913 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 749,102 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 149,820 Mobilizationi 5% $ 37,455 Prep ROW 5% $ 37,455 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 974,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 974,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 155,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 97,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,227,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W 8TH ST Limits: S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST Impact Fee Class: Downtown Type B Length (If): 385 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a two-lane undivided Downtown street. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 727 cy $ 16.00 $ 11,636 205 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,412 sy $ 20.00 $ 28,233 305 8" Concrete Pavement 1,283 sy $ 100.00 $ 128,333 405 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 46,200 505 Curb & Gutter 770 If $ 40.00 $ 30,800 605 Topsoil 342 sy $ 10.00 $ 3,422 705 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 248,624 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 12,431 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,459 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 74,587 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,431 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 12,431 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,917 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,917 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 149,175 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 397,799 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 79,560 Mobilizationi 5% $ 19,890 Prep ROW 5% $ 19,890 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 518,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 518,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 82,880 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 51,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 653,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: W WHITE ST (4) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 355 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,578 cy $ 16.00 $ 25,244 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,077 sy $ 20.00 $ 61,533 301 8" Concrete Pavement 2,840 sy $ 100.00 $ 284,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,260 sf $ 10.00 $ 42,600 501 Curb & Gutter 1,420 If $ 40.00 $ 56,800 601 Topsoil 1,420 sy $ 10.00 $ 14,200 701 Turn Lanes 122 sy $ 120.00 $ 14,684 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 499,062 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 24,953 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,972 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 149,719 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,953 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,953 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 29,944 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,944 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 299,437 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 798,499 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 159,700 Mobilizationi 5% $ 39,925 Prep ROW 5% $ 39,925 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,039,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,039,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 166,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 241,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study updated: 6/28/2022 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Description: Project No. 20 Name: E WHITE ST (1) This project consists of widening the Limits: S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial arterial. Length (If): 8,040 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 35,733 cy $ 16.00 $ 571,733 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 69,680 sy $ 20.00 $ 1,393,600 301 8" Concrete Pavement 64,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 6,432,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 96,480 sf $ 10.00 $ 964,800 501 Curb & Gutter 32,160 If $ 40.00 $ 1,286,400 601 Topsoil 32,160 sy $ 10.00 $ 321,600 701 Turn Lanes 2,771 sy $ 120.00 $ 332,564 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 11,302,697 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 565,135 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 339,081 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 3,390,809 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (2) - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 565,135 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 565,135 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 678,162 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 678,162 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,281,618 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 19,584,315 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 3,916,863 Mobilizationi 5% $ 979,216 Prep ROW 5% $ 979,216 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 25,460,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 25,490,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 4,073,600 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 5,907,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (1) Limits: 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,430 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,560 cy $ 16.00 $ 120,960 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 14,580 sy $ 20.00 $ 291,600 302 8" Concrete Pavement 12,960 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,296,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 29,160 sf $ 10.00 $ 291,600 502 Curb & Gutter 9,720 If $ 40.00 $ 388,800 602 Topsoil 8,100 sy $ 10.00 $ 81,000 702 Turn Lanes 819 sy $ 120.00 $ 98,305 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,568,265 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 128,413 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 77,048 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 770,479 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 128,413 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 128,413 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 154,096 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 154,096 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,540,959 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,109,223 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 821,845 Mobilizationi 5% $ 205,461 Prep ROW 5% $ 205,461 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,342,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,342,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 854,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 1,239,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (1) Limits: 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 5,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided TxDOT collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 15,947 cy $ 16.00 $ 255,147 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 31,280 Sy $ 20.00 $ 625,600 303 8" Concrete Pavement 29,440 Sy $ 100.00 $ 2,944,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 66,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 662,400 503 Curb & Gutter 11,040 If $ 40.00 $ 441,600 603 Topsoil 12,267 sy $ 10.00 $ 122,667 703 Turn Lanes 0 Sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,051,413 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 252,571 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 151,542 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,515,424 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing (2) - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 252,571 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 252,571 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 303,085 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 303,085 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,030,848 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 9,082,261 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,816,452 Mobilization 5% $ 454,113 Prep ROW 5% $ 454,113 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 11,807,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 11,857,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,889,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 2,739,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E WHITE ST (2) Limits: E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 5,730 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 25,467 cy $ 16.00 $ 407,467 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 49,660 sy $ 20.00 $ 993,200 301 8" Concrete Pavement 45,840 sy $ 100.00 $ 4,584,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 68,760 sf $ 10.00 $ 687,600 501 Curb & Gutter 22,920 If $ 40.00 $ 916,800 601 Topsoil 22,920 sy $ 10.00 $ 229,200 701 Turn Lanes 1,975 sy $ 120.00 $ 237,014 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 8,055,280 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 402,764 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 241,658 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 2,416,584 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2), Major Stream Crossing - $ 1,000,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 402,764 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 402,764 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 483,317 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 483,317 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,833,168 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 13,888,448 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 2,777,690 Mobilizationi 5% $ 694,422 Prep ROW 5% $ 694,422 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 18,055,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 18,055,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 2,888,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 4,189,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (2) Limits: 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST Impact Fee Class: Major Collector (4D) (1/2) Length (If): 855 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the four -lane collector. The costing assumes a four -lane divided ultimate section in continuity with the adiacent cross -sections. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 110 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 1,330 cy $ 16.00 $ 21,280 210 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 2,565 sy $ 20.00 $ 51,300 310 8" Concrete Pavement 2,280 sy $ 100.00 $ 228,000 410 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,130 sf $ 10.00 $ 51,300 510 Curb & Gutter 1,710 If $ 40.00 $ 68,400 610 Topsoil 2,090 sy $ 10.00 $ 20,900 710 Turn Lanes 261 sy $ 120.00 $ 31,350 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 472,530 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 23,627 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 14,176 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 28,352 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 66,154 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 538,684 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 107,737 Mobilizationi 5% $ 26,934 Prep ROW 5% $ 26,934 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 701,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 751,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 112,160 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 813,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FINLEY BLVD (3) Limits: LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,410 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 9,851 cy $ 16.00 $ 157,618 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 19,323 sy $ 20.00 $ 386,467 303 8" Concrete Pavement 18,187 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,818,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 40,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 409,200 503 Curb & Gutter 6,820 If $ 40.00 $ 272,800 603 Topsoil 7,578 sy $ 10.00 $ 75,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,120,529 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 93,616 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 936,159 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,026 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 156,026 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 187,232 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 187,232 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,716,291 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,836,820 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 967,364 Mobilizationi 5% $ 241,841 Prep ROW 1% $ 48,368 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,095,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,055,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 975,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,219,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,289,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (1) Limits: S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 260 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 751 cy $ 16.00 $ 12,018 203 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 1,473 sy $ 20.00 $ 29,467 303 8" Concrete Pavement 1,387 sy $ 100.00 $ 138,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 3,120 sf $ 10.00 $ 31,200 503 Curb & Gutter 520 If $ 40.00 $ 20,800 603 Topsoil 578 sy $ 10.00 $ 5,778 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 237,929 Ma jor Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 11,896 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 7,138 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 71,379 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,896 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 11,896 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 14,276 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 14,276 Other: Railroad Crossing $500,000 $ 500,000 —Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 642,757 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 880,686 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 176,137 Mobilization 5% $ 44,034 Prep ROW 5% $ 44,034 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,145,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,145,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 183,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 114,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,443,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) Limits: 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 4,030 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 11,642 cy $ 16.00 $ 186,276 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 22,837 sy $ 20.00 $ 456,733 303 8" Concrete Pavement 21,493 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,149,333 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 48,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 483,600 503 Curb & Gutter 8,060 If $ 40.00 $ 322,400 603 Topsoil 8,956 sy $ 10.00 $ 89,556 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,687,898 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 184,395 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 110,637 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,106,369 Special Drainage Structures Major Stream Crossing - $ 500,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 184,395 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 184,395 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 221,274 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 221,274 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,712,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 6,400,636 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,280,127 Mobilization 5% $ 320,032 Prep ROW 5% $ 320,032 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 8,321,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 8,321,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,331,360 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 832,100 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 10,484,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (3) Limits: LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 2,135 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,168 cy $ 16.00 $ 98,684 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 12,098 sy $ 20.00 $ 241,967 303 8" Concrete Pavement 11,387 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,138,667 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 25,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 256,200 503 Curb & Gutter 4,270 If $ 40.00 $ 170,800 603 Topsoil 4,744 sy $ 10.00 $ 47,444 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,953,762 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 58,613 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 586,129 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,688 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 97,688 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 117,226 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 117,226 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,074,569 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,028,331 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 605,666 Mobilizationi 5% $ 151,417 Prep ROW 1% $ 30,283 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,816,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,816,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 610,560 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 763,200 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 5,190,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) Limits: 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 Impact Fee Class: Major Collector Length (If): 3,660 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 10,573 cy $ 16.00 $ 169,173 203 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 20,740 sy $ 20.00 $ 414,800 303 8" Concrete Pavement 19,520 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,952,000 403 6' Concrete Sidewalk 43,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 439,200 503 Curb & Gutter 7,320 If $ 40.00 $ 292,800 603 Topsoil 8,133 sy $ 10.00 $ 81,333 703 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 3,349,307 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 100,479 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,004,792 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 167,465 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 167,465 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 200,958 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 200,958 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,842,119 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,191,425 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,038,285 Mobilizationi 5% $ 259,571 Prep ROW 1% $ 51,914 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,542,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,542,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,046,720 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,308,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 8,897,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 417 Limits: CR 418 to CR 419 Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,455 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 15,356 cy $ 16.00 $ 245,689 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 29,943 sy $ 20.00 $ 598,867 301 8" Concrete Pavement 27,640 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,764,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 41,460 sf $ 10.00 $ 414,600 501 Curb & Gutter 13,820 If $ 40.00 $ 552,800 601 Topsoil 13,820 sy $ 10.00 $ 138,200 701 Turn Lanes 1,191 sy $ 120.00 $ 142,911 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 4,857,067 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 242,853 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 145,712 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,457,120 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 242,853 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 242,853 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 291,424 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 291,424 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,164,240 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,021,307 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,604,261 Mobilizationi 5% $ 401,065 Prep ROW 5% $ 401,065 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 10,428,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 10,428,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,668,480 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 1,042,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 13,139,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP CONNECTION Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 1,885 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,398 cy $ 16.00 $ 70,373 204 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 8,587 sy $ 20.00 $ 171,744 304 8" Concrete Pavement 7,959 sy $ 100.00 $ 795,889 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 226,200 504 Curb & Gutter 3,770 If $ 40.00 $ 150,800 604 Topsoil 2,094 sy $ 10.00 $ 20,944 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,435,951 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 43,079 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 430,785 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,798 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 71,798 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 86,157 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 86,157 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 789,773 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,225,724 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 445,145 Mobilizationi 5% $ 111,286 Prep ROW 1% $ 22,257 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,805,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,855,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 448,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 561,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,815,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: S VAIL ST Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 1,780 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,153 cy $ 16.00 $ 66,453 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 8,109 sy $ 20.00 $ 162,178 304 8" Concrete Pavement 7,516 sy $ 100.00 $ 751,556 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 21,360 sf $ 10.00 $ 213,600 504 Curb & Gutter 3,560 If $ 40.00 $ 142,400 604 Topsoil 1,978 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,778 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,355,964 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 40,679 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 406,789 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,798 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 67,798 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 81,358 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,358 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 745,780 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,101,745 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 420,349 Mobilizationi 5% $ 105,087 Prep ROW 1% $ 21,017 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,649,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,649,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 423,840 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 529,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 3,603,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 427 Limits: 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 Impact Fee Class: Minor Collector Length (If): 880 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a three -lane undivided collector. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,053 cy $ 16.00 $ 32,853 204 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 4,009 sy $ 20.00 $ 80,178 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,716 sy $ 100.00 $ 371,556 404 6' Concrete Sidewalk 10,560 sf $ 10.00 $ 105,600 504 Curb & Gutter 1,760 If $ 40.00 $ 70,400 604 Topsoil 978 sy $ 10.00 $ 9,778 704 Turn Lanes 0 sy $ 120.00 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 670,364 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 33,518 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,111 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 201,109 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,518 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 33,518 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,222 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,222 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 402,219 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,072,583 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 214,517 Mobilization 5% $ 53,629 Prep ROW 5% $ 53,629 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,395,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,355,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 223,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 139,500 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,758,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 425 Limits: 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWYto E ROSAMOND PKWY Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,540 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,844 cy $ 16.00 $ 109,511 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 13,347 sy $ 20.00 $ 266,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 12,320 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,232,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,480 sf $ 10.00 $ 184,800 501 Curb & Gutter 6,160 If $ 40.00 $ 246,400 601 Topsoil 6,160 sy $ 10.00 $ 61,600 701 Turn Lanes 531 sy $ 120.00 $ 63,700 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,164,944 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 108,247 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 64,948 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 649,483 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing - $ 250,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 108,247 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 108,247 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 129,897 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 129,897 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,548,967 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,713,911 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 742,782 Mobilizationi 5% $ 185,696 Prep ROW 5% $ 185,696 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,829,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,829,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 772,640 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 482,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 6,085,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: HOUSTON ST (3) Limits: E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,410 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided TxDOT arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 6,267 cy $ 16.00 $ 100,267 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 12,220 sy $ 20.00 $ 244,400 301 8" Concrete Pavement 11,280 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,128,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,920 sf $ 10.00 $ 169,200 501 Curb & Gutter 5,640 If $ 40.00 $ 225,600 601 Topsoil 5,640 sy $ 10.00 $ 56,400 701 Turn Lanes 486 sy $ 120.00 $ 58,323 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,982,189 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 99,109 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 59,466 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 594,657 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,109 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 99,109 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 118,931 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 118,931 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,189,314 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,171,503 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 634,301 Mobilizationi 5% $ 158,575 Prep ROW 5% $ 158,575 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,123,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 4,123,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 659,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: TxooT Roadway 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution) $ 957,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (1) Limits: HOUSTON ST to 485' S OF HOUSTON ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 485 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,156 cy $ 16.00 $ 34,489 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 4,203 sy $ 20.00 $ 84,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 3,880 sy $ 100.00 $ 388,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,820 sf $ 10.00 $ 58,200 501 Curb & Gutter 1,940 If $ 40.00 $ 77,600 601 Topsoil 1,940 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,400 701 Turn Lanes 167 sy $ 120.00 $ 20,061 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 681,817 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 20,455 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 204,545 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,091 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 34,091 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 40,909 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 40,909 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 374,999 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,056,816 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 211,363 Mobilizationi 5% $ 52,841 Prep ROW 1% $ 10,568 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,332,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,332,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 213,120 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 266,400 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,812,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (2) Limits: 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 930' N OF E WHITE ST Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 635 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,822 cy $ 16.00 $ 45,156 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 5,503 sy $ 20.00 $ 110,067 301 8" Concrete Pavement 5,080 sy $ 100.00 $ 508,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 76,200 501 Curb & Gutter 2,540 If $ 40.00 $ 101,600 601 Topsoil 2,540 sy $ 10.00 $ 25,400 701 Turn Lanes 219 sy $ 120.00 $ 26,266 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 892,688 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 26,781 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 267,806 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,634 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 44,634 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 53,561 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 53,561 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 490,978 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,383,667 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 276,733 Mobilizationi 5% $ 69,183 Prep ROW 1% $ 13,837 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,744,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 1,744,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 279,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 348,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,372,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (3) Limits: E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 3,735 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 16,600 cy $ 16.00 $ 265,600 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 32,370 sy $ 20.00 $ 647,400 301 8" Concrete Pavement 29,880 sy $ 100.00 $ 2,988,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,820 sf $ 10.00 $ 448,200 501 Curb & Gutter 14,940 If $ 40.00 $ 597,600 601 Topsoil 14,940 sy $ 10.00 $ 149,400 701 Turn Lanes 1,287 sy $ 120.00 $ 154,493 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 5,250,693 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 157,521 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 1,575,208 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 262,535 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 262,535 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 315,042 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 315,042 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,887,881 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 8,138,574 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 1,627,715 Mobilizationi 5% $ 406,929 Prep ROW 1% $ 81,386 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 10,255,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 10,255,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 1,640,800 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 2,051,000 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 13,947,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (4) Limits: E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (1/3) Length (If): 3,415 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of the additional two lanes of the ultimate six - lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,312 cy $ 16.00 $ 84,996 207 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 10,245 sy $ 20.00 $ 204,900 307 8" Concrete Pavement 9,107 sy $ 100.00 $ 910,667 407 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf $ 10.00 $ - 507 Curb & Gutter 6,830 If $ 40.00 $ 273,200 607 Topsoil 0 sy $ 10.00 $ - 707 Turn Lanes 755 sy $ 120.00 $ 90,549 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,564,311 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 78,216 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 46,929 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 93,859 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 219,004 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,783,315 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 356,663 Mobilization 5% $ 89,166 Prep ROW 5% $ 89,166 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,319,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 2,319,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 371,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 2,690,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study updated: 6/28/2022 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Description: Project No. 40 Name: LEONARD AVE (5) This project consists of the construction of Limits: 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD the additional four lanes of the ultimate six - Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial (2/3) lane divided arterial. Length (If): 675 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 2,025 cy $ 16.00 $ 32,400 208 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 3,938 sy $ 20.00 $ 78,750 308 8" Concrete Pavement 3,600 sy $ 100.00 $ 360,000 408 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,050 sf $ 10.00 $ 40,500 508 Curb & Gutter 2,025 If $ 40.00 $ 81,000 608 Topsoil 1,950 sy $ 10.00 $ 19,500 708 Turn Lanes 211 sy $ 120.00 $ 25,364 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 637,514 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 31,876 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 19,125 Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0% $ - Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ Water None Anticipated 0% $ Sewer None Anticipated 0% $ - Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 38,251 Illumination None Anticipated 0% $ - Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 89,252 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 726,766 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 145,353 Mobilizationi 5% $ 36,338 Prep ROW 5% $ 36,338 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 945,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 945,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 151,200 ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0% $ - Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 1,096,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (6) Limits: 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,135 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 5,044 cy $ 16.00 $ 80,711 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 9,837 sy $ 20.00 $ 196,733 301 8" Concrete Pavement 9,080 sy $ 100.00 $ 908,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 13,620 sf $ 10.00 $ 136,200 501 Curb & Gutter 4,540 If $ 40.00 $ 181,600 601 Topsoil 4,540 sy $ 10.00 $ 45,400 701 Turn Lanes 391 sy $ 120.00 $ 46,948 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,595,592 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 79,780 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 47,868 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 478,678 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,780 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 79,780 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 95,736 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 95,736 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 957,355 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,552,947 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 510,589 Mobilizationi 5% $ 127,647 Prep ROW 5% $ 127,647 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,319,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,319,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 531,040 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 331,900 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,182,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: LEONARD AVE (7) Limits: E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP Impact Fee Class: Major Arterial Length (If): 1,990 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new six -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 8,844 cy $ 16.00 $ 141,511 201 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 17,247 sy $ 20.00 $ 344,933 301 8" Concrete Pavement 15,920 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,592,000 401 6' Concrete Sidewalk 23,880 sf $ 10.00 $ 238,800 501 Curb & Gutter 7,960 If $ 40.00 $ 318,400 601 Topsoil 7,960 sy $ 10.00 $ 79,600 701 Turn Lanes 686 sy $ 120.00 $ 82,314 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,797,558 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 83,927 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 839,267 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 139,878 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 139,878 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 167,853 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 167,853 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,538,657 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,336,215 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 867,243 Mobilizationi 5% $ 216,811 Prep ROW 1% $ 43,362 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,464,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 5,494,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 874,240 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 1,092,800 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,431,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (2) Limits: 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 1,520 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 4,729 cy $ 16.00 $ 75,662 202 8" Lime -Treated Subgrade 9,120 sy $ 20.00 $ 182,400 302 8" Concrete Pavement 8,107 sy $ 100.00 $ 810,667 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,240 sf $ 10.00 $ 182,400 502 Curb & Gutter 6,080 If $ 40.00 $ 243,200 602 Topsoil 5,067 sy $ 10.00 $ 50,667 702 Turn Lanes 512 sy $ 120.00 $ 61,491 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,606,486 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 48,195 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 481,946 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated - $ - Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,324 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 80,324 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 96,389 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 96,389 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 883,568 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,490,054 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 498,011 Mobilizationi 5% $ 124,503 Prep ROW 1% $ 24,901 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,138,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 3,138,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 502,080 ROW/Easement Acquisition: New Roadway Alignment 20% $ 627,600 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 4,268,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Anna 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: CR 419 (3) Limits: 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 Impact Fee Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,535 Service Area(s): Service Area 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 6/28/2022 This project consists of widening the existing facility to a four -lane divided arterial. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Roadway Excavation 7,887 cy $ 16.00 $ 126,187 202 8"Lime-Treated Subgrade 15,210 sy $ 20.00 $ 304,200 302 8" Concrete Pavement 13,520 sy $ 100.00 $ 1,352,000 402 6' Concrete Sidewalk 30,420 sf $ 10.00 $ 304,200 502 Curb & Gutter 10,140 If $ 40.00 $ 405,600 602 Topsoil 8,450 sy $ 10.00 $ 84,500 702 Turn Lanes 855 sy $ 120.00 $ 102,552 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,679,239 Major Construction Component Allowances": Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5% $ 133,962 Pavement Markings/Markers 3% $ 80,377 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 30% $ 803,772 Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing (2) - $ 500,000 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,962 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,962 Landscaping and Irrigation 6% $ 160,754 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,754 Other: $0 $ - -Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,107,543 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,786,782 Construction Contingency: 20% $ 957,356 Mobilizationi 5% $ 239,339 Prep ROW 5% $ 239,339 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,223,000 Impact Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost Construction: - $ 6,223,000 Engineering/Survey/Testing: 16% $ 995,680 ROW/Easement Acquisition: Existing Alignment 10% $ 622,300 Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 7,841,000 NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Anna. The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix B — Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan Plan Units of Supply Service Area 1 6128/20U Project ID # ROADWAY LIMITS LENGTH (MI) LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME* % IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PK-HR PER LN VEH-MI SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL VEH-MI TOTAL DEMAND PK-HR EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA 1 CR 373 595' W OF N POWELL PKWY to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 4 Minor Arterial 92 50% 725 160 5 154 $ 1,649,000 $ 824,500 2 3 CR 371 1 245' W OF CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.36 0.30 6 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,674 0 1,674 $ 7,132,000 $ 7,132,000 CR 371 (2) 298 100% 775 1,395 89 1,306 $ 7,980,000 $ 7,980,000 4 5 CR 371 3 910' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 1,075' E OF CR 374 595' W OF BRYANT FARM RD to BRYANT FARM RD 0.24 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,116 0 1,116 $ 4,799,000 $ 4,799,000 CR 371 (4) 0.11 6 New 100% 775 512 0 512 $ 2,222,000 $ 2,222,000 6 CR 371 5 BRYANT FARM RD to N POWELL PKWY 0.71 6 Major Arterial 124 100% 775 3,302 88 3.213 $ 14,208,000 $ 14,208,000 7 CR 370 (1) 5,796 W OF CR 368 to CR 368 1.10 6 Major Arterial New 100%. 775 51115 0 5,115 $ 21,639,000 $ 21,639,000 8 9 CR 370 2 CR 368 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to CR 374 0.18 0.22 6 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial 119 100% 775 837 21 816 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (1) 6 100% 775 1,023 1 1,022 $ 4,201,000 $ 4,201,000 10 11 W ROSAMOND PKWY 2 CR 374 to 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 0.86 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial (2/3) New 100% 775 3,999 0 3.999 $ 17,734,000 $ 17,734,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (3) 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to LANGDON DR 0.53 4 N/A 100% 775 1,643 0 1,643 $ 5,317,000 $ 5,317,000 12 13 W ROSAMOND PKWY 4 LANGDON DR to 740' E OF LANGDON DR 740' E OF LANGDON DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.14 2 Major Arterial (1/3 Major Arterial (213) N/A 100% 775 217 0 217 $ 1,337,000 $ 1,337,000 W ROSAMOND PKWY (5) 0.23 4 N/A 100% 775 713 0 713 $ 1,933,000 $ 1,933,000 14 ROLLINS RD 1 CR 374 to 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD 1.01 3 Minor Collector 6 100% 525 11591 6 11585 $ 11,510,000 $ 11,510,000 15 ROLLINS RD (2) 615' W OF W CROSSING BLVD to W CROSSING BLVD 0.12 3 Minor Collector New 100% 525 189 0 189 $ 1,244,000 $ 1,244,000 16 HACKBERRY DR 1 CR 374 to 1,36S W OF N FERGUSON PKWY 0.54 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 1,566 0 1,566 $ 8,486,000 $ 8,486,000 17 HACKBERRY DR (2) 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY to N FERGUSON PKWY 0.26 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) N/A 100% 725 377 0 377 $ 1,298,000 $ 1,298,000 18 HACKBERRY LN 1 640' W OF N JAMES ST to N POWELL PKWY 0.18 4 Minor Arterial 200 100% 725 522 36 486 $ 2,688,000 $ 2,688,000 19 W 2ND ST (1) 340' W OF N JAMES DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.13 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 111 7 104 $ 1,126,000 $ 1,126,000 20 21 W 3RD ST 1 HARPER DR to N POWELL PKWY 0.11 2 Downtown Type B Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 94 6 88 $ 990,000 $ 990,000 HARPER DR W 3RD ST to N JAMES DR 0.11 2 50 100% 425 94 6 88 $ 956,000 $ 956,000 22 W 5TH ST 1 215' W OF S JAMES DR to S JAMES DR 0.04 2 Downtown Type B New 100% 425 34 0 34 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 23 W 5TH ST (2) S JAMES DR to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 51 3 48 $ 517,000 $ 517,000 24 FM 455 1 1,330' W OF FM 3356 to 140' W OF CR 289 1.28 6 Ma or Arterial 186 100% 775 5,952 238 5,714 $ 5,347,000 $ 5,347,000 25 FM 455 (2) 80' S OF FM 290 to 180' N OF COWAN RD 0.83 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 3,860 251 3,609 $ 3,437,000 $ 3,437,000 26 FM 455 3 180' E OF COWAN RD to W WHITE ST 1.21 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 5.627 365 5,261 $ 5,020,000 $ 5,020,000 27 W WHITE ST (1) FM 455 to CR 286 0.51 6 Major Arterial 302 100% 775 2,372 154 2,217 $ 1,983,000 $ 1,983,000 28 29 W WHITE ST 2 CR 286 to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 0.27 2 Major Arterial (1/3) 1 Major Arterial(1/3) N/A 100% 775 419 0 419 1 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 WWHITE ST (3) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to S POWELL PKWY 1.98 2 N/A 100% 775 3,069 0 3,069 $ 1,643,000 $ 1,643,000 30 CR 284 1 2,860' W OF CR 286 to 415' E OF CR 286 0.62 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 1.612 0 1,612 $ 7,961,000 $ 7,961,000 31 CR 284 (2) 1,905' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY S 0.25 4 Major Collector 6 50% 650 325 1 324 $ 3,515,000 $ 1,757,500 32 33 CR 284 3 610' W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB to CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY INS 0.18 4 Major Collector Major Collector New 100% 650 468 0 468 $ 4,832,000 $ 4,832,000 $ 5,755,500 TAYLOR BLVD (1) CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 0.71 4 202 50% 650 923 72 851 $ 11,511,000 34 TAYLOR BLVD 2 3,775' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY N 0.16 4 Major Collector 150 100% 650 416 24 392 $ 1,979,000 $ 1,979,000 35 TAYLOR BLVD (3) 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB to 4,825' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY K 0.04 4 Major Collector 150 50% 650 52 3 49 $ 541,000 $ 270,500 36 W FINLEY BLVD 1 S FERGUSON PKWY to 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.51 4 Minor Collector 4D WA 50% 725 740 0 740 $ 7,581,000 $ 3,790,500 37 W FINLEY BLVD (2) 2,700' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to SILVER LEAF LN 0.08 2 Minor Collector (4D) (1/2) WA 100% 725 116 0 116 $ 405,000 $ 405,000 38 W FINLEY BLVD 3 SILVER LEAF LN to CR 423 0.30 4 Minor Collector 4D WA 100% 725 870 0 870 $ 4,521,000 $ 4,521,000 39 WFINLEY BLVD (4) CR 423 to S POWELL PKWY 0.15 3 Minor Collector 3 100% 525 236 0 236 $ 1,547,000 $ 1,547,000 40 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 1 3,740' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 0.37 4 Major Collector 269 100% 650 962 100 862 $ 6,339,000 $ 6,339,000 41 W FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY to S FERGUSON PKWY 0.34 4 Major Collector 269 50 % 650 442 46 396 $ 4,270,000 $ 2,135,000 42 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 3 1,095' E OF S FERGUSON PKWY to ASPEN DR 0.38 2 Major Collector 1/2 N/A 50% 650 247 0 247 $ 1,793,000 $ 896,500 43 W FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) ASPEN DR to HIGHLAND RD 0.19 4 Major Collector 269 50% 650 247 26 221 $ 2,423,000 $ 1,211,500 44 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 5 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY to S POWELL PKWY 0.06 4 Major Collector 269 100% 650 156 16 140 $ 708,000 $ 708,000 45 CR 368 (1) CR 371 to 156 S OF CR 371 0.03 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 87 0 87 $ 435,000 $ 435,000 46 CR 368 2 2,865' N OF FAIRWAY LANE to FAIRWAY LANE 0.54 4 Minor Arterial New 100% 725 1,566 0 1,566 $ 8,043,000 $ 8,043,000 47 CR 368 (3) FAIRWAY LANE to 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE 0.12 4 Minor Arterial 119 100% 725 348 14 334 $ 1,731,000 $ 1,731,000 48 CR 368 4 625' S OF FAIRWAY LANE to 1,150' N OF CR 370 0.16 4 Minor Arterial 119 50% 725 232 10 222 $ 2,300,000 $ 1,150,000 49 50 51 CR 368 (5) 1, 1 50'N OF CR 370 to 740' S OF CR 370 0.36 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 119 New New 100% 50% 100% 725 725 725 1,044 305 580 43 0 0 11001 $ 5,645,000 $ 5,645,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 2,976%0 CR 368 6 740' S OF CR 370 to 1,856 S OF CR 370 0.21 4 305 580 $ 3:090,101 $ 2,976,000 CR 368 (7) 1,855' S OF CR 370 to 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST 0.20 4 52 CR 368 8 4,029 N OF W WHITE ST to 880' N OF W WHITE ST 0.59 2 Minor Arterial 1/2 N/A 100% 1 725 856 0 856 $ 2,984,000 $ 2,984,000 53 CR 286 (1) W WHITE ST to 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST 0.53 4 Minor Arterial 10 100% 725 1,537 5 1,532 $ 7,757,000 $ 7,757,000 54 55 CR 286 2 2,809 S OF W WHITE ST to 3,800' S OF W WHITE ST 0.19 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial New New 100% 100% 725 551 0 551 $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 $ 2,808,000 $ 4,085,000 CR 286 (3) 890' N OF CR 284 to 560' S OF CR 284 0.28 4 725 812 0 812 56 CR 374 1 900' N OF CR 371 to W ROSAMOND PKWY 1.52 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 3,952 0 3,952 $ 19,996,000 $ 19,996,000 57 CR 374 (2) W ROSAMOND PKWY to 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.05 4 Major Collector 6 100% 650 130 0 130 $ 576,000 $ 576,000 58 59 CR 374 3 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 0.08 4 4 _ Major Major Collector Collector 6 50% 650 104 0 104 $ 1,032,000 $ 516,000 CR 374 (4) 525' N OF ROLLINS RD to ROLLINS RD 0.10 6 100% 650 260 1 259 $ 1,260,000 $ 1,260,000 60 CR 374 5 ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.38 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 988 0 988 $ 4,899,000 $ 4,899,000 61 N FERGUSON PKWY (1) CR 371 to ROLLINS RD 1.11 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 5,162 0 5,162 $ 22,328,000 $ 22,328,000 62 63 N FERGUSON PKWY 2 ROLLINS RD to HACKBERRY DR 0.52 4 Major Arterial (213) 1 Major Arterial (1/3) N/A 100% 100% 775 1,612 0 1 1,612 $ 4,482,000 $ 4,482,000 N FERGUSON PKWY (3) HACKBERRY DR to W WHITE ST 0.50 2 N/A 775 1 75 0 775 $ 2,087,000 $ 2,087,000 64 S FERGUSON PKWY 1 W WHITE ST to 2,440' S OF W WHITE ST 0.46 2 Major Arterial 1/3 N/A 100% 775 713 0 713 $ 1,922.000 $ 1,922.000 65 S FERGUSON PKWY (2) 2,449 S OF W WHITE ST to 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 0.26 4 Major Arterial (2/3) N/A 100% 775 806 0 806 $ 2,209,000 $ 2,209,000 66 67 S FERGUSON PKWY 3 W FINLEY BLVD to 1,245' S OF W FINLEY BLVD 0.24 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 501/6 775 558 0 558 $ 4,650,000 $ 2,325,000 S FERGUSON PKWY (4) 1,246 S OF FINLEY BLVD to 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.19 6 New 100% 775 884 0 884 $ 3,828,000 $ 3,828,000 68 S FERGUSON PKWY 5 425' N OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD to W FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.08 6 Major Arterial New 509/6 775 186 0 186 $ 1,587,000 $ 793,500 69 W CROSSING BLVD (1) 2,669 N OF CR 371 to 1,97Y N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.89 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 2,314 0 2,314 $ 11,485,000 $ 11,485,000 70 W CROSSING BLVD 2 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY to 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 0.08 2 Major Collector 4D 112 WA 100% 725 116 0 116 $ 419,000 $ 419,000 SUBTOTAL 81,917 1,636 80,281 $ 325,106,000 $ 302 135 000 `Note: If existing data unavailale for widening projects, the following assumptions were made: Downtown Streets: 25 vphpl Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost It 28,167 TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 1 It 302,163,167 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix B - Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan Plan Units of Supply Service Area 2 6128/20U Project ID # ROADWAY LIMITS LENGTH (MI) LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME' % IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PER LN VEH-MI SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL VEH-MI TOTAL DEMAND PK-HR EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA AREA 1 CR 1106 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.20 4 Minor Arterial 152 50% 725 290 15 275 $ 3,812,000 $ 1,906,000 2 3 CR 1106 2 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.46 2 Minor Arterial (1/2) Major Arterial (2/3) N/A 509/6 725 334 0 334 $ 3,059,000 $ 1,529,500 CR 376 (1) N POWELL PKWY to 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.32 4 WA 100% 775 992 0 992 $ 3,474,000 $ 3,474,000 4 5 CR 376 2 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY to CR 427 0.29 6 Major Arterial Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,349 0 1,349 $ 5,658,000 $ 5,658,000 CR 376 (3) CR 427 to 57VE OF CR 427 0.11 6 24 100% 775 512 3 509 $ 2,119,000 $ 2,119,000 6 E ROSAMOND PKWY 1 N POWELL PKWY to 295' E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.06 6 Major Arterial 148 100% 775 279 9 270 $ 1,906,000 $ 1,906,000 7 E ROSAMOND PKWY (2) 820' E OF N POWELL PKWY to 2,73V E OF N POWELL PKWY 0.36 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,674 0 1,674 $ 7,151,000 $ 7,151,000 8 9 HOUSTON ST 1 CR 425 to 5,850' E OF CR 425 1.11 6 Major Arterial 1 Major Arterial 82 100% 1 775 5,162 1 91 5,070 $ 4,195,000 $ 4195000 $ 3:317:000 HOUSTON ST (2) 1,970' W OF CR 477 to 2,475' E OF CR 477 0.84 6 90 100% 775 3,906 76 3,830 $ 3,317,000 10 11 HACKBERRY LN 2 N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 200 100% 725 348 24 324 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,773,000 $ 1,545,000 HACKBERRY LN (3) N RIGGINS ST to N SHERLEY AVE 0.05 4 New 100% 725 145 0 145 $ 1,545,000 12 13 HACKBERRY LN 4 N SHERLEY AVE to 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.03 4 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 112 100% 725 87 3 84 $ 71,000 $ 71,000 $ 5,826,000 HACKBERRY LN (5) 140' E OF N SHERLEY AVE to 2,215' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 0.39 4 New 100% 725 1,131 0 11131 $ 5,826,000 14 W 2ND ST 2 N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,058,000 $ 1,058,000 15 W 3RD ST (2) N POWELL PKWY to N RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000 16 W 5TH ST 3 S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.12 2 Downtown Type B 50 100% 425 102 6 96 $ 1,092,000 $ 1,092,000 17 W 7TH ST S POWELL PKWY to S RIGGINS ST 0.14 2 Downtown Type B 14 100% 425 119 2 117 $ 1,227,000 $ 1,227,000 18 W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST to S RIGGINS ST 0.07 2 Downtown Type B 50 100-1 425 60 4 56 $ 653,000 $ 653,000 19 W WHITE ST (4) S POWELL PKWY to S INTERURBAN ST 0.07 6 Major Arterial 516 100% 775 326 36 289 $ 241,000 $ 241,000 20 21 E WHITE ST 1 S INTERURBAN ST to 1,640' E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1.52 6 Major Arterial Minor Arterial 556 100% 1 775 7,068 B45 6,223 $ 5,907,000 $ 5,907,000 CR 419 (1) 595' S OF E WHITE ST to 746 N OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.46 4 280 100% 725 1,334 129 1,205 $ 1,239,000 $ 1,239,000 22 E FINLEY BLVD 1 930' E OF CR 419 to E WHITE ST 1.05 4 Major Collector 280 100% 650 2,730 294 2,436 $ 2,739,000 $ 2,739,000 23 E WHITE ST (2) E FINLEY BLVD to SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY 1.09 6 Major Arterial 280 100% 775 5,069 305 4,763 $ 4,189,000 $ 4,189,000 24 E FINLEY BLVD 2 345' E OF S POWELL PKWY to SHARP ST 0.16 2 Major Collector 4131/2 N/A 100% 725 232 0 232 $ 813,000 $ 813,000 25 E FINLEY BLVD (3) LEONARD AVE to 3,410' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.65 4 Major Collector New 100% 650 11690 0 1,690 $ 8,289,000 $ 8,289,000 26 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1 S POWELL PKWY to 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY 0.05 4 Major Collector 24 50% 650 65 1 64 $ 1,443,000 $ 721,500 27 E FOSTER CROSSING RD (2) 260' E OF S POWELL PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.76 4 Major Collector 24 100% 650 1,976 18 1,958 $ 10,484,000 $ 10,484,000 28 29 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 3 LEONARD AVE to 2,135' E OF LEONARD AVE 0.40 4 Major Collector Major Collector New 100% 650 1,040 0 1,040 $ 5,190,000 $ 5,190,000 E FOSTER CROSSING RD (4) 375' W OF OUTER LOOP to CR 419 0.69 4 New 100% 650 1,794 0 1,794 $ 8,897,000 $ 8,897,000 30 CR 417 CR 418 to CR 419 0.65 6 Major Arterial 18 50% 775 1.511 6 1,505 $ 13,139,000 $ 6,569,500 31 3TERCROSSINGTO OUTER LOOP CONNE E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.36 3 Minor Collector New 100% 525 567 0 567 $ 3,815,000 $ 3,815,000 32 33 S VAIL ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.34 3 Minor Collector Minor Collector New 100% 525 536 0 536 $ 3,603,000 $ 3,603,000 CR 427 880' N OF CR 376 to CR 376 0.17 3 24 100% 525 268 4 264 $ 1,758,000 $ 1,758,000 34 CR 425 1,540' N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY to E ROSAMOND PKWY 0.29 6 Major Arterial 40 100% 775 1,349 12 1,337 $ 6,085,000 $ 6,085,000 35 HOUSTON ST (3) E ROSAMOND PKWY to LEONARD AVE 0.27 6 Major Arterial 112 100% 775 1,256 30 1,225 $ 957,000 $ 957,000 36 LEONARD AVE 1 HOUSTON ST to 485' S OF HOUSTON ST 0.09 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 419 0 419 $ 1,812,000 $ 1,812,000 37 LEONARD AVE (2) 1,565' N OF E WHITE ST to 930' N OF E WHITE ST 0.12 6 Major Arterial New 50% 775 279 0 279 $ 2,372,000 $ 1,186,000 38 LEONARD AVE 3 E WHITE ST to E FINLEY BLVD 0.71 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 3,302 0 3,302 $ 13,947,000 $ 13,947,000 39 LEONARD AVE (4) E FINLEY BLVD to 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.65 2 Major Arterial (1/3) WA 100% 775 1,008 0 1,008 $ 2,690,000 $ 2,690,000 40 LEONARD AVE 5 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.13 4 Major Arterial 2/3 WA 100% 775 403 0 403 $ 1,096,000 $ 1,096,000 41 LEONARD AVE (6) 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to E FOSTER CROSSING RD 0.21 6 Major Arterial 18 50% 775 488 2 486 $ 4,182,000 $ 2,091,000 42 LEONARD AVE 7 E FOSTER CROSSING RD to OUTER LOOP 0.38 6 Major Arterial New 100% 775 1,767 0 1,767 $ 7,431,000 $ 7,431,000 43 CR 419 (2) 3,965' S OF E FINLEY BLVD to 5,485' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 0.29 4 Minor Arterial New, 100% 725 841 0 841 $ 4,268,000 $ 4,268,000 44 CR 419 3 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD to CR 417 0.48 4 Minor Arterial 34 50% 725 696 8 688 $ 7,841,000 $ 3,920,500 SUBTOTAL 54702 1834 52768 $ 173430,000 $ 155506000 "Note: If existing data unavailale for widening projects, the following assumptions were made: Downtown Streets: 25 vphpl Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost $ 28,167 TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 2 $ 155,534,167 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix B - Capital Improvements Plan Units of Supply Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area 1 ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH IR) LENGTH (ml) EXISTING LANES NBIEB SBIWB EXISTING SECTION PM PEAK HOUR VOL NWEB SBIWB %IN SERVICE AREA VEH-MI CAPACITY PK41R PER UN NBIEB SBIWB VEH-MI SUPPLY PK41R TOTAL NWEB SBIWB VEH-MI DEMAND PK41R TOTAL NB/EB SBM/B EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI NB/EB SBMB EXISTING DEFICIENCIES PK-HR VEHWI NBIEB SBM/B CR 284 1,905W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 610'W OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 1293 0.24 1 1 2U 3 3 50% 425 425 52 52 0 0 52 52 CR 286 W WHITE ST 2,800' S OF W WHITE ST 2800 0.53 1 1 2U 5 5 100% 425 425 225 225 3 3 223 223 CR 368 FAIRWAY LANE 6268 OF FAIRWAY LANE 627 1152 832 0.12 0.22 0.16 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 69 69 69 50 50 50 100% 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 425 425 50 93 33 50 93 33 8 15 5 6 11 4 42 78 28 45 82 30 CR 368 1, 159 N OF CR 370 CR 370 CR 368 629 S OF FAIRWAY LANE 1,150' N OF CR 370 CR 368 CR 370 74O' S OF CR 370 740 0.14 1 1 2U 0 0 100% 425 425 60 60 0 0 60 60 CR 368 740' S OF CR 370 1,855S OF CR 370 W WHITE ST 880' N OF W WHITE ST CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB 1115 878 3140 971 0.21 0.17 0.59 0.18 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2U 4D 2U 2U 0 46 7 50 0 27 11 69 50% 100% 100% 100% 425 725 425 425 425 725 425 425 45 241 253 78 45 241 253 78 0 8 4 9 0 4 7 13 45 234 249 69 45 237 246 65 CR 368 CR 368 CR 370 880' N OF W WHITE ST 4,020' N OF W WHITE ST CR 368 CR 370 CR 370 CR 371 CR 371 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB US 75 WCROSSING BLVD CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SB US 75 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB NPOWELL PKWY US 75 298 230 2902 382 0.06 0.04 0.55 0.07 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2D 2D 2U 2U 50 50 62 63 69 69 62 63 100% 100% 100% 100% 525 525 425 425 525 525 425 425 30 23 234 31 30 23 234 31 3 2 34 5 4 3 34 5 27 21 200 26 26 20 200 26 CR 371 CR 371 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB US 75 BRYANT FARM RD 91O'E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB W CROSSING BLVD NPOWELL PKWY 911 319 845 594 0.17 0.06 0.16 0.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 149 63 62 46 149 63 62 46 100% 100% 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 73 26 68 24 73 26 68 24 26 4 26 4 48 22 48 22 58 21 CR 371 CR 373 10 3 10 3 58 21 595'W OF N POWELL PKWY CR 374 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 525' N OF ROLLINS RD 428 0.08 1 1 2U 3 3 50% 425 425 17 17 0 0 17 17 CR 374 CR 374 FM 3356 525' N OF ROLLINS RD WROSAMOND PKWY 30' N OF FM 455 ROLLINS RD 240' S OF W ROSAMOND PKWY FM 455 523 239 32 0.10 0.05 0.01 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 3 3 48 3 3 48 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 42 19 3 42 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 19 2 42 19 2 FM 455 80' S OF FM 290 180' N OF COWAN RD 4401 0.83 1 1 2U 151 151 100% 425 425 354 354 126 126 228 228 FM 455 180' E OF COWAN RD WWHITE ST 140' W OF CR 289 FM 335' 6398 5"0 1330 1.21 1.03 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 151 90 93 151 90 93 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 515 438 107 515 438 107 183 93 23 183 93 23 332 345 84 332 345 84 FM 455 FM 3356 FM 455 1,330' W OF FM 3356 HACKBERRY DR W CROSSING BLVD 640' W OF N JAMES ST 2115 0.40 2 2 4D 46 58 100% 725 725 581 581 18 23 562 557 HACKBERRY DR CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB CR 374 BANKHURST DR N FERGUSON PKWY 1128 1"I 1365 0.21 0.27 0.28 2 1 1 2 1 1 4D 2U 2U 100 100 100 1. 100 160 100% 100% 100% 725 425 425 725 425 425 310 116 110 310 116 110 21 27 26 21 27 26 288 89 84 288 89 84 HACKBERRY DR NFERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRY DR 1,365' W OF N FERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRY DR BANKHURST DR WCROSSING BLVD 710 0.13 2 2 4D 100 100 100% 725 725 195 195 13 13 182 182 HACKBERRYLN NJAMESST NPOWELL PKWY N JAMES ST 328 642 0.06 0.12 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 100 46 100 58 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 26 52 26 52 6 6 6 7 20 46 20 45 HACKBERRYLN WW OF N JAMES ST HARPER DR W 3RD ST N JAMES DR WWHITE ST 567 2649 0.11 0.50 1 2 1 2 2U 4D 25 100 25 100 100% 100% 425 725 425 725 46 727 46 727 3 50 3 50 43 fill 43 677 N FERGUSON PKWY HACKBERRYDR N JAMES DR W 3RD ST W 4TH ST W 18T ST 335 218 0.06 0.04 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 18 27 18 2 1 2 1 25 17 25 1 17 N JAMES DR HACKBERRYLN N JAMES DR N JAMES DR W ST ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 335 327 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 27 26 27 26 2 2 2 2 25 25 25 25 W 2ND ST 1 2U 25 25 100% N POWELL PKWY CR 373 CR 371 HACKBERRYLN 5140 4354 0.97 0.82 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 220 621 220 410 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 207 175 207 175 107 256 107 169 100 -81 100 6 81 N POWELL PKWY WROSAMOND PKWY N POWELL PKWY CR 371 WROSAMOND PKWY 4050 238 0.77 0.05 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 536 498 389 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 163 10 163 10 206 11 149 11 d3 -2 14 -2 43 2 2 N POWELL PKWY HACKBERRYLN W18T ST N POWELL PKWY WIST ST W2ND ST 335 0.06 1 1 2U 498 498 498 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 13 13 13 13 16 16 16 16 -2 -2 -2 -2 2 2 2 2 N POWELL PKWY W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 331 0.06 1 1 2U N POWELL PKW V N THROCKMORTON BLVD W 3RD ST HACKBERRYDR W 4TH ST 335 914 0.06 0.17 1 2 1 2 2U 4U "I 100 "I 100 50% 100% 425 650 425 650 13 225 13 225 14 17 14 17 -1 208 -1 208 1 1 S THROCKMORTON BLVD ROLLINS RD CR 374 N FERGUSON PKWY 2996 0.57 1 1 2U 3 3 100% 425 425 241 241 2 2 239 239 ROLLINS RD N FERGUSON PKWY 615 W OF W CROSSING BLVD 2359 0.45 1 1 2U 3 3 100% 425 425 1. 190 1 1 1. 189 S FERGUSON PKWY IW WHITE ST 2A40' S OF W WHITE ST 2439 0A6 2 2 4D 101 101 100% 725 725 670 670 47 47 623 623 S FERGUSON PKWY 465' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 190' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 273 0.05 1 1 2U 101 101 1 100% 425 425 22 1 22 5 5 17 17 S FERGUSON PKWY 595' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 465' N OF TAYLOR BLVD 132 0.02 1 1 2U 101 00% 425 425 11 11 3 3 8 8 S FERGUSON PKWY 2,440'8 OF WHITEST 595N OF TAYLOR BLVD 955 0.18 1 1 2U 101 00% 425 425 77 77 18 18 59 59 S JAMES DR W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 303 0.06 1 1 2U 25 00% 425 425 24 24 1 1 23 23 S POWELL PKWY WWHITE ST WFINLEY BLVD 6024 1.14 1 1 2U 424 50% 425 425 242 242 242 242 1 1 S POWELL PKWY WFINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2806 0.53 1 1 2U 627 50% 425 425 113 113 167 140 -54 -27 54 2] S POWELL PKW V S POWELL PKW V W 4TH ST W 5TH ST W 7TH ST 316 649 0.06 0.12 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 459 459 J459506 50% 425 425 425 425 13 26 13 26 14 28 14 28 -1 -2 -1 -2 1 2 1 2 W 5TH ST SPOWELLPKWV S POWELL PKWY W 7TH ST W WHITEST 82V 8 OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 839 821 0.16 0.16 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 459 385 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 34 33 34 33 36 30 36 30 -3 3 -3 3 3 3 W FOSTER CROSSING RD S THROCKMORTON BLVD TAYLOR BLVD N THROCKMORTON BLVD WALMART DR 3,776 E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 2360 3777 0.45 0.72 2 1 2 1 4U 2U 10000% 101 50% 650 425 650 425 581 152 581 152 45 36 45 36 536 116 536 116 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB TAYLOR BLVD 'OR BLVD 3,775-E DFCENTRALEXPRESSWAYNB 4,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 4,826 E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 824 223 0.16 0.04 1 1 12U 1 2U 7500% 75 50% 425 425 425 425 66 9 66 9 12 2 12 2 55 7 55 7 d,600' E OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB W 18T ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY N JAMES DR 330 339 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 27 27 27 2 2 2 2 25 28 25 28 W 2ND ST 340' W OF N JAMES DR 1 21 25 25 W 2ND ST W 3RD ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY N JAMES DR 327 260 0.06 0.05 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 26 21 26 21 2 1 2 1 25 20 25 20 HARPER DR 1 2U 25 25 100% W 3RD ST N JAMES DR N POWELL PKWY 326 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 W 4TH ST NJAMESDR NPOWELL PKWY 318 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 24 24 W 5TH ST 8JAMES DR SPOWELL PKWY 303 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 24 24 1 1 23 23 W CROSSING BLVD ROLLINS RD HACKBERRY DR 3640 0.69 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 1,000 1,000 128 214 871 786 W CROSSING BLVD HACKBERRYDR WWHITE ST 26" 0.50 2 2 4D 50 50 100% 725 725 726 726 25 25 701 701 W CROSSING BLVD IW ROSAMOND PKWY 290' N OF ROLLINS RD 1182 0.22 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 325 1 325 42 69 283 255 W CROSSING BLVD 290-N OF ROLLINS RD ROLLINS RD 292 0.06 2 2 4D 186 310 100% 725 725 80 80 10 17 70 63 W CROSSING BLVD 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY 1529 0.29 2 2 4D 0 0 100% 725 725 420 420 0 0 420 420 W CROSSING BLVD 1,970' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,530' N OF W ROSAMOND PKWY 442 0.08 1 1 2U 0 0 100% 425 425 36 36 0 0 36 36 W FINLEY BLVD CR 423 SPOWELL PKWY 776 0.15 1 1 2U 2 1 100% 425 425 62 62 0 0 62 62 W FINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2'700. E OF S FERGUSON PKWY 1,D95'E OF S FERGUSON PKWY SILVER LEAF LN ASPEN DR 427 201] 0.08 0.38 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 3 135 6 134 100% 50% 425 425 425 425 34 81 34 81 0 26 0 26 34 55 34 56 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 295' W OF S POWELL PKWY SPOWELL PKWY 295 0.06 1 1 2U 135 134 100% 425 425 24 24 8 7 16 16 W FOSTER CROSSING RD 3,749 W OF S FERGUSON PKWY 1,780' W OF 8 FERGUSON PKWY 1959 0.37 1 1 2U 135 134 100% 425 425 158 158 50 50 108 108 W FOSTER CROSSING RD W FOSTER CROSSING RD W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,780' W OF S FERGUSON PKWY ASPEN DR CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB S FERGUSON PKWY HIGHLAND RD CR 374 1780 10D8 1141 0.34 0.19 0.22 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 135 135 3 134 134 -3 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 72 41 92 72 41 92 23 23 49 49 13 13 28 28 1 1 91 91 W ROSAMOND PKWY 740'E OF LANGDON DR NPOWELL PKWY 1192 0.23 1 1 2U 94 134 100% 425 425 96 96 21 30 75 66 W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY W ROSAMOND PKWY 1,170' W OF W CROSSING BLVD W CROSSING BLVD LANGDON DR W CROSSING BLVD LANGDON DR 749 E OF LANGDON DR 1172 1639 742 0.22 0.31 1 1 2 1 1 2U 2U 16 94 94 17 134 100% 100% 425 425 725 425 425 725 94 132 204 94 132 204 4 29 13 4 42 91 103 191 91 90 185 0.14 2 40 134 100% 19 WWHITE ST W WHITEST W WHITE ST W WHITEST WWHITE ST LWHITEST ITEST WALMART DR NFERGUSON PKWY CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SS CR 286 WALMART DR 4275 1 0.61 2 2 4D 1322 1038 100% 725 725 1.174 1.174 1.070 840 104 334 CR 286 1432 0.27 2 2 4D 261 276 100% 725 725 393 393 71 75 323 318 FM 455 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NB 2702 1122 0.51 1 1 2U 151 151 100% 425 425 217 217 308 77 193 77 144 140 116 140 164 0.21 2 2 4D 906 676 100% 725 725 308 NFERGUSON PKWY WCROSSING BLVD 2198 0.42 2 2 4D 782 782 100% 725 725 604 604 326 326 278 278 WCROSSING BLVD SPOWELL PKWY 2840 0.54 2 2 4D 811 691 100% 725 725 780 780 436 372ITEST CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SS US 75 253 0.05 3 3 6D 906 676 100% 7]5 7]5 III 111 43 32 68 79 US75CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY NS 253 0.05 3 3 6D VX 676 100% 7]57]5 111 111 43 32 68 79 ART DR S THROCKMORTON BLVD WWHITE ST 235 0.04 2 2 4D 100 100 100% 725 725 64 64 4 4 60 60 SUBTOTAL 136161 25.79 16,334 16,334 4,739 4,357 11,596 11,9]e 190 39 132,6691 1 9,095 23,574 229 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Anna, Texas Appendix C - Eusthg Roadway Facilities I-ta City of Anna - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area 2 ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH IR) LENGTH (ml) EXISTING LANES NBIEB SBIWB EXISTING SECTION PM PEAK HOUR VOL NINES SBIWB 11 IN SERVICE AREA VEHdII CAPACITY PK41R PER IN NBIEB SBIWB VEHdII SUPPLY PK-HR TOTAL NINES SBIWB 1"-MI DEMAND PK-HR TOTAL NINES SB B EXCESS CAPACITY PK-HR VEH-MI NBIEB SB 13 EXISTING DEFICIENCIES PK-HR VEH-MI NBIEB SB/WB 4TH ST NSHERLEYAVE 280' E OF N SHERLEY AVE 281 0.05 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 23 23 1 1 21 21 4TH ST N RIGGINS ST N SHERLEY AVE 183 0.03 1 1 2U 59 59 100% 425 425 15 15 2 2 13 13 CR 1106 1,08V E OF N POWELL PKWY 3,505' E OF N POWELL PKWY 2425 0.46 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U _2U 2U 76 76 149 76 76 149 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 98 43 135 98 43 135 17 8 47 17 8 47 80 36 88 80 36 88 CR 1106 NPOWELL PKWY 1,080' E OF N POWELL PKWY 1080 0.20 CR 376 N POWELL PKWY 1,675' E OF N POWELL PKWY 1674 0.32 CR 376 CR 427 575' E OF CR 376 573 0.11 1 1 2U 12 12 100% 425 425 46 46 1 1 45 45 CR 417 CR 418 CR 419 3456 1505 1032 2432 0.65 0.29 0.20 OAS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 9 17 17 140 9 17 17 140 50% 50% 50% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 139 61 42 196 139 61 42 196 3 2 2 64 3 2 2 64 136 58 40 131 136 58 40 131 CR 419 CR 419 CR419 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1,030' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 595' S OF E WHITE ST CR 417 E FOSTER CROSSING RD 745' N OF E FINLEY BLVD CR425 CR427 CR 476 CR 477 1,540'N OF E ROSAMOND PKWY 880'N OF CR 376 960' W OF HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST EROSAMOND PKWY CR 376 HOUSTON ST 65' S OF HOUSTON ST 1540 882 961 63 0.29 0.17 0.18 0.01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 2U 20 12 2 7 20 12 2 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 124 71 77 5 124 71 77 5 6 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 118 69 77 5 118 69 77 5 CR 513 CR 513 CR 513 E FINLEY BLVD SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY HOUSTON ST 100' E OF HOUSTON ST SHARP ST HOUSTON ST 100' E OF HOUSTON ST 375 E OF HOUSTON ST 1,866 W OF LEONARD AVE 1405 101 274 2OD8 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 4D 5 30 30 335 5 30 100% 100% 425 425 425 725 425 425 425 725 113 8 11 276 113 8 11 276 1 1 1 127 1 1 1 102 112 8 10 148 112 8 10 174 30 268 50% 100% E FINLEY BLVD 93VEOF CR 419 EWHITEST 5520 1.05 1 1 2U 140 140 100% 425 425 444 444 146 146 298 298 E FINLEY BLVD E FINLEY BLVD E FINLEY BLVD 1,865'W OF LEONARD AVE 8POWELL PKWY 345' E OF S POW ELL PKWV LEONARD AVE 345'E OF S POWELL PKWY SHARPST 1866 346 855 0.35 0.07 0.16 2 2 1 2 2 1 4D 4D 2U 335 335 335 268 268 268 100% 100% 100% 725 725 425 725 725 425 512 95 69 512 95 69 118 22 54 95 18 43 394 73 15 418 77 25 E FOSTER CROSSING RD S VAIL ST LEONARD AVE 2678 0.51 1 1 2U 12 12 100% 425 425 216 216 6 6 209 209 E FOSTER CROSSING RD EFOSTER CROSSING RD E FOSTER CROSSING RD 8POWELL PKWY 260'E OF S POWELL PKWY E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP S VAIL ST 262 381 973 0.05 0.07 0.18 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 2U 12 12 12 12 12 12 50% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 11 31 78 11 31 78 0 1 2 0 1 2 10 30 76 10 30 76 260' E OF S POWELL PKWV E FOSTER CROSSING TO OUTER LOOP C E ROSAMOND PKWY NPOWELL PKWY 29V E OF N POWELL PKWY 296 0.06 1 1 2U 86 62 100% 425 425 24 24 5 3 19 20 EWHITEST EWHITEST EWHITEST LEONARD AVE SHEFFIELD DR SINTERURBAN ST HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL HWY SRIGGINS ST 2835 5399 410 0.54 1.0 2 0.08 1 1 1 11 1 1 2U 2U 1 2U 140 99 1 278 140 99 278 100% 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 228 435 33 228 435 33 75 101 22 75 101 22 153 333 11 153 333 11 EWHITEST SRIGGINS ST SSHERLEYAVE 145 0.03 1 1 2U 278 278 100% 425 425 12 12 8 8 4 4 EWHITEST EWHITEST 8SHERLEY AVE LEONARD AVE 3007 1641 0.57 0.31 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 140 140 140 140 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 242 132 242 132 80 44 80 44 162 89 162 89 HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONNECTOR 1,640'E OF HOUSTON TO E WHITE CONN EWHITEST HACKBERRYLN EFINLEY BLVD NSHERLEY AVE SHEFFIELD DR 140'E OF N SHERLEY AVE 330 140 0.06 0.03 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 140 56 140 56 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 27 11 27 11 9 1 9 1 18 10 18 10 HACKBERRYLN HACKBERRYLN NPOWELLPKWY N INTERURBAN ST NINTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 316 325 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 100 100 100 100 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 25 28 25 28 6 6 6 6 19 20 19 20 HOUSTON ST ICR 476 W FM 545 CR 477 6541 1969 1.24 0.37 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 55 40 55 40 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 526 158 526 158 68 15 68 15 458 1" 458 1" HOUSTON ST 1,970'W OF CR 4T HOUSTON ST CR 477 2,475' E OF CR 4]] 5,850' E OF CR 425 2477 5850 OA7 1.11 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 45 41 45 41 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 199 471 199 471 21 45 21 45 178 425 178 425 HOUSTON ST CR 425 HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST E ROSAMOND PKWV LEONARD AVE CR 476 1410 4758 0.27 0.90 1 1 1 2U 58 56 100% 425 425 425 425 113 383 113 383 15 45 15 45 99 338 99 338 OUTER LOOP 1 2U 50 50 100% HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST CR 512 OUTER LOOP 2121 4220 DAD 0.80 1 1 1 2U 50 50 100% 425 425 425 425 171 340 171 340 20 40 20 40 151 300 151 300 CR 513 CR 512 1 2U 50 50 100% HOUSTON ST LEONARD AVE 1,190'N OFCR513 EFINLEY BLVD CR 513 1191 3414 0.23 0.65 1 2 1 2 2U 32 32 100% 425 725 425 725 96 937 96 937 7 6 7 6 89 932 89 932 3,416 S OF E FINLEY BLVD 4D 9 9 100% LEONARD AVE 3,415' S OF E FINLEY BLVD 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD 674 0.13 1 1 2U 9 9 100% 425 425 54 54 1 1 53 53 LEONARD AVE 1,135' N OF E FOSTER CROSSING RD E FOSTER CROSSING RD 1137 0.22 1 1 2U 9 9 50% 425 425 46 46 1 1 45 45 N INTERURBAN ST W 3RD ST W 4TH ST 332 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 25 25 N INTERURBAN ST HACKBERRYLN W1ST ST 222 0.04 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 18 18 1 1 17 17 N INTERURBAN ST W 1ST ST W 2ND ST 335 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 25 25 N INTERURBAN ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 325 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 N POWELL PKWY CR 373 CR 371 5140 0.97 1 1 2U 220 220 50% 425 425 207 207 107 107 100 100 N POWELL PKWY WROSAMOND PKWY HACKBERRYLN 4354 0.82 1 1 2U 621 410 50% 425 425 175 175 256 169 -81 6 1 81 N POWELL PKWY CR 371 WROSAMOND PKWY 4050 0.77 1 1 2U 536 389 50% 425 425 163 163 206 149 43 14 43 N POWELL PKWY N POWELL PKWV HACKBERRYLN W18T ST W2ND ST 238 335 0.05 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 21 498 498 498 498 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 10 13 10 13 11 16 11 16 -2 -2 -2 -2 2 2 2 2 WIST ST N POWELL PKWV N POW ELL PKWV W 2ND ST W 3RD ST _ W 4TH ST 331 335 0.06 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 498 "I 498 "I 50% 50% 425 425 425 425 13 13 13 13 18 14 16 14 -2 -1 -2 -1 2 1 2 1 W 3RD ST N RIGGINS ST N RIGGINS ST HACKBERRYLN W18T ST 229 0.04 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 18 25 18 25 1 1 1 1 17 24 17 24 W 1ST ST W 2ND ST 318 0.08 N RIGGINS ST N RIGGINS ST W 2ND ST W 3RD ST 329 0.06 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 26 27 26 27 2 2 2 2 25 25 25 25 W 3RD ST W 4TH ST 331 0.06 1 2U 25 25 100% NSHERLEYAVE NSHERLEYAVE HACKBERRYLN EISTST 224 0.04 1 1 1 2U 56 56 100% 425 425 425 425 18 78 18 78 2 10 2 10 16 68 i6 68 EISTST 4TH ST 970 0.18 1 2U 56 56 100% S INTERURBAN ST W WHITEST 56V8 OF WHITEST 559 0.11 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 45 45 3 3 42 42 S INTERURBAN ST W 4TH ST 5TH ST 321 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 26 26 2 2 24 24 S INTERURBAN ST _W W 7TH ST W 8TH ST 309 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 23 23 S INTERURBAN ST W8TH ST WWHITE ST 523 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 42 42 2 2 40 40 SPOWELLPKWY WWHITE ST WFINLEY BLVD 6024 1.14 1 1 2U 424 424 50% 425 425 242 242 242 242 1 1 SPOWELLPKWY WFINLEY BLVD W FOSTER CROSSING RD 2806 0.53 1 1 2U 627 526 50% 425 425 113 113 167 140 -54 -27 54 27 S POWELL PKWV W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 316 0.06 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 13 13 14 14 -1 -1 1 1 S POWELL PKWY W 5TH ST W 7TH ST 649 0.12 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 26 26 28 28 -2 -2 2 2 S POW ELL PKWV W 7TH ST W WHITE ST 839 0.16 1 1 2U 459 459 50% 425 425 34 34 36 36 -3 -3 3 3 S POWELL PKWV W FOSTER CROSSING RD 820 S OF W FOSTER CROSSING RD 821 0.16 1 1 2U 385 395 50% 425 425 33 33 30 30 3 3 S RIGGINS ST EWHITEST 546 S OF WHITE ST 546 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 44 44 3 3 41 41 S RIGGINS ST W 4TH ST W 5TH ST 328 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 26 26 2 2 25 25 S RIGGINS ST S RIGGINS ST W 5TH ST W7TH ST W 7TH ST 671 0.13 1 1 1 1 2U 2U 25 25 25 25 100% 100% 425 425 425 425 54 24 54 24 3 1 3 1 51 23 51 23 W8TH ST 299 0.06 S RIGGINS ST W8TH ST EWHITEST 531 0.10 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 43 43 3 3 40 40 SSHERLEYAVE 4TH ST EWHITEST 1823 0.35 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 147 147 9 9 138 138 W 1ST ST W IST ST W MOST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 310 0.06 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 25 28 25 25 28 25 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 23 24 24 23 24 24 NPOWELL PKWY N POWELL PKWV NINTERURBAN ST 317 0.08 2U 25 25 100% N INTERURBAN ST 315 0.06 2U 25 25 100% W 2ND ST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST 312 0.06 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 24 24 W 3RD ST W 3RD ST N POWELL PKWV N INTERURBAN ST IN POWELL PKWV N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST N INTERURBAN ST N RIGGINS ST S INTERURBAN ST S RIGGINS ST S RIGGINS ST SINTERURBAN ST S RIGGINS ST 319 0.06 1 1 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 425 425 425 425 26 25 28 25 2 1 2 1 4 24 23 24 23 309 0.06 2U 25 25 100% W 4TH ST 330 0.06 2U 8] 67 100% 27 27 4 22 22 W 4TH ST N INTERURBAN ST 305 0.06 1 1 2U 59 59 100% 425 425 25 25 3 3 21 21 W 5TH ST E POW ELL PKWY 338 0.06 1 1 21.1 25 25 100% 425 425 27 27 2 2 26 26 W 5TH ST S INTERURBAN ST S INTERURBAN ST 308 0.06 1 1 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 25 25 1 1 23 23 W 7TH ST 374 0.07 2U 7 7 100% 425 425 30 30 0 0 30 30 W 7TH ST SPOWELL PKWY 352 0.07 1 1 2U 4 4 100% 425 425 28 28 0 0 28 28 W 8TH ST S INTERURBAN ST 383 0.07 1 1 2U 25 25 100% 425 425 31 31 2 2 29 29 W FM 545 1,015' W OF HOUSTON ST HOUSTON ST 1017 0.19 1 1 2U 172 172 50% 425 425 41 41 17 17 24 24 W WHITEST SPOWELL PKWY SINTERURBAN ST 355 0.0] 1 1 2U 258 258 100% 425 425 29 29 17 17 11 11 SUBTOTAL 12676] 24.01 9,863 9,863 2,529 2,293 7,335 7,571 190 39 19,728 4,621 14,905 229 2022 Rwd..y Impact Fee Study City d Anna, Texas Appendix C- EAMing R-Jtl W Facilities Inventory THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lif'i7►19=101 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Approve an Ordinance abandoning a portion of public right-of-way for County Road 369 deemed unnecessary for use by the public and authorizing the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed to transfer the property to the adjacent landowner in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: County Road 369 is a former county road in the City of Anna which used to run north/south, terminating at Rosamond Parkway near Anna High School. The road now serves no public purpose, as newer streets have been constructed with the development of Anna High School and the West Crossing subdivision. There is a small portion of remaining County Road 369 right of way located on the south side of County Road 370. This sliver of right-of-way serves no public purpose, and is being mowed by the adjacent property owner. Staff recommends abandoning the right- of-way and dedicating it to the adjacent landowner via a quitclaim deed. The City Attorney has prepared the attached Ordinance and Quitclaim Deed for City Council approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. Abandoning the right-of-way will remove a future maintenance obligation on the City for mowing and maintaining the land. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 4: High Performing, Professional City STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 1 - Ordinance Abandoning 369 2. 2 - Exhibit A & B (ROW Abaondoment) CR369-Facundo 3. 3 - Exhibit C (QUITCLAIM DEED) CR 369 Facundo 4. 4 - Exhibit 1 & 2 (ROW Abaondoment) CR369-Facundo APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS VACATING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE MARTIN MOORE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 649 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING PART OF COUNTY ROAD 369; DECLARING THAT THE PROPERTIES ARE UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING THE PUBLIC OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND CONTROL IN THE PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF THE ORDINANCE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("City") is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to vacate and abandon a portion of the right-of-way along County Road 369, as more fully described and depicted in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (said portion being hereinafter referenced as the "Right -of -Way"); and WHEREAS, the City Council, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the Right - of -Way is no longer required for use by the general public, nor convenient to the public in general and, therefore, constitute a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment; and WHEREAS, in association with the City's abandonment of the Right -of -Way, the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all of the City's right, title and interest in a certain portion of the Right -of -Way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Section 2. Abandonment The Right -of -Way, as further described in the attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B," said Right - of -Way being heretofore held by the City of Anna, Texas in the public's trust is hereby vacated and abandoned. Section 3. Quitclaim Deed Authorization The Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and empowered to execute, on behalf of the City, a quitclaim deed releasing to an abutting property owner(s) all of the City's right, title and interest of a certain portion the Right -of -Way, said portion being further described in a Quitclaim Deed, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C." Section 4. Savings, Repealing and Severability Clauses It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, and provisions of this ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, or provision of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or inapplicable by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality, invalidity or inapplicability shall not affect any of the remaining words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional, invalid or inapplicable words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions. Further, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are consistent and do not conflict with the terms and provisions of this ordinance are hereby ratified to the extent of such consistency and lack of conflict, and all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms and provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed only to the extent of any such conflict. Section 5. Publication of the Caption and Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the City Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to implement such posting and/or publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas this 27th day of September 2022. ATTESTED: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary APPROVED: Nate Pike, Mayor 2 EXHIBIT "A" RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS Being a 4,922 square foot tract of land, situated in the Martin Moore Survey, Abstract No. 449, in the City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a part of that right—of—way dedication for County Road No. 370, as shown in the plat of ANNA HIGH SCHOOL #1 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2011, Page 176, of the Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas (O.P.R.C.C.T.), said tract being more particularly described, as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found for an "ell" corner of said County Road No. 370 right—of—way, some being the northeasterly corner of a tract of land, described in deed to Jose Facundo and wife, Josefino I. Facundo, as recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, of the Deed Records, Collin County, Texas (D.R.C.C.T.); THENCE North 8939'04" East, over and across said County Road No. 370 right—of—way, a distance of 37.47' to a 1/2" iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "RPLS 5686" set for the northeasterly corner of the herein described tract, some being in the most northerly west line of WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2020, Page 467, O.P.R.C.C.T., some being in the westerly monumented line of Rollins Road; THENCE South 00°04'27" West, along the most northerly west line of said WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, some being partially along a replat of WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2020, Page 750, O.P.R.C.C.T., a distance of 262.72' to a 1/2" iron rod with a plastic cap stamped "GOODWIN" found for the southerly corner of the right—of—way dedication for County Road No. 370, some being the southeasterly corner of said Facundo tract, said corner also being an "ell" corner of said WEST CROSSING PHASE 11 (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467); THENCE North 08'03'06" West, along the common line between said Facundo tract and County Road No. 370 right—of—way, a distance of 265.10' to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4,922 square feet or 0.113 acres of land, more or less. ABBREVIATIONS I.R.F. = Iron Rod Found (R.M.) = Reference Monument C.I.R.F. = Capped Iron Rod Found C.I.R.S. = 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RPLS 5686" set M.R.C.C.T. = Map Records, Collin County, Texas D.R.C.C.T. = Deed Records, Collin County, Texas O.P.R.C.C.T. = Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas This metes and bounds description is accompanied by a survey plat of even date. F T� MICHAEL B. ARTHUR ............................................ 5686 sstR�cs��/" Bearings are based on the Texas State Plane System, North Central Zone (4202), NAD83. DATE: 09/06/2022 ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 370 North Texas Surveying, L.L.C. REVISED: Registered Professional Land Surveyors 0.113 ACRES IN THE MARTIN MOORE SURVEY 1010 West University Drive & SCALE: 1" = 60' ABSTRACT NO.649 McKinney, Tx. 75069 CHK'D. BY: M.B.A. Ph. (469) 424-2074 Fax: (469) 424-1997 CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS www.northtexassurveying.com Firm Registration No. 10074200 JOB NO.: 2022-0069 EXHIBIT "B" 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement (Vol. 2011, Pg. 176) Lot 1, Block 1 ANNA HIGH SCHOOL #1 ADDITION Vol. 2011, Pg. 176, 0.P.R.C.C.T. County Road No. 370 (a variable width right—of—way) a ,pF S89`3 1,— 682.1-7 (R. M.) I I I N89039'04"E 37.47'- 1/2" I.R.F. (R. M. ) POINT OF GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 1 inch = 60 ft. Lot 27 (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467) Lot 28R, Block KK WEST CROSSING PHASE 11 Vol. 2020, Pg. 750, 0.P.R.C.C.T. Rollins Road (50' right—of—way) C. I. R. S. BEGINNING Lot 29 1 I vE� I G� N1STRAORR� N4.5 9 AB Abandonment of a Portion of 1 County Road No. 370 Z 4,922 Sq. Ft. / 0.113 Acres 00 ti Lot 28 I O N W 1C.0 �1 N — r — h s co z Y cn ti O ~ Jose Facundo and Y o a - wife, Josefino 0. Facundo N ti Lot 27 1,T4 o Vol. 4625, Pg. 759, 0)N 0 x o a D.R.C.C.T. jl t o °' a N o O — CD Vw U > 1 I I Lot 26 Right —of —Way Dedicction1 5' Drainage Easement �Y Vol. 2011, Pg. 176, (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467) RTINMONO ABSTRORES� 649 0.P.R.C.C.T. — — — ACT 11 I Lot 25R, Block KK WEST CROSSING 1/2" C.I. R." 2020, 11 I G(R M )NVol. 2020, Pg. 750, 11489 04 03 W 225.42 — — — — — — — — — — 1/2" C.I.R.F. 1/2" C.I.R.F. T — "GOODWIN" "GOODWIN" (R.M.) (R.M.) n E a I I l 0 I Q Y C9 Lo Uj CL O Y r Lot 18 Lot 19 Lot 20 0 C a � '" ci Lot 21 c o Lot 22 I m a w c3 a Lot 24 o X �U��� I Block KK o� I NE"aNa �y WEST C�OS11NG ;o " o l w o I NRY BRAN 1,Y SUR PiiA P 467, -' 0 O o p,BSTRA T Nam• 71 Vol. 2020 9 > O.P. .C.C.T. Holcombe Drive This survey plat is accompanied by a metes (50' right—of—way) and bounds description of even date. DATE: 09/06/2022 ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 370 North Texas Surveying, L.L.C. REVISED: Registered Professional Land Surveyors 0.113 ACRES IN THE MARTIN MOORE SURVEY 1010 West University Drive SCALE: 1" = 60' ABSTRACT NO. 649 McKinney, Tx. 75069 CHK'D. BY: M.B.A. Ph. (469) 424-2074 Fax: (469) 424-1997 CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS www.northtexassurveying.com Firm Registration No. 10074200 JOB NO.: 2022-0069 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Anna, Texas ("Grantor") located at 120 W Seventh Street, Anna, Texas 75409, Collin County, Texas, does hereby bargain, sell, convey and forever quitclaim unto: Jose Facundo ("Grantee"), property owner of a parcel of land situated in the Martin Moore Survey, Abstract No. 649 in the City of Anna, Collin County, Texas 75409 in a deed recorded in volume 2011, page 176 of the Collin County deed records, more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit 1" and Exhibit "2" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes and any and all of Grantee's legal representatives, successors or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in save and except that such portions are hereby reserved by Grantor as public utility easements and Grantee consents and agrees to said reservation. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above described land unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor Grantor's legal representatives, successors or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid land, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof, save and except that such rights -of -way and easements are hereby reserved by the City of Anna as public utility easements. EXECUTED this day of , 2022 by the Mayor of the City of Anna in accordance with the authority granted him by the City Council of the City of Anna through passage of City of Anna Ordinance No. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS Bv: Nate Pike, Mayor Before me on this day personally appeared Nate Pike, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he is the Mayor of Anna, Texas, he acted on and by the authority of the City Council and executed this deed for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 12022. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas QUITCLAIM DEED Page 1 of 4, including exhibits Agreed and accepted: Jose Facundo, Grantee Before me on this day personally appeared Jose Facundo, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed this deed for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 2022. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas QUITCLAIM DEED Page 2 of 4, including exhibits EXHIBIT " 1 " RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS Being a 4,922 square foot tract of land, situated in the Martin Moore Survey, Abstract No. 449, in the City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being a part of that right—of—way dedication for County Road No. 370, as shown in the plat of ANNA HIGH SCHOOL #1 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2011, Page 176, of the Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas (O.P.R.C.C.T.), said tract being more particularly described, as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found for an "ell" corner of said County Road No. 370 right—of—way, some being the northeasterly corner of a tract of land, described in deed to Jose Facundo and wife, Josefino I. Facundo, as recorded in Volume 4625, Page 759, of the Deed Records, Collin County, Texas (D.R.C.C.T.); THENCE North 8939'04" East, over and across said County Road No. 370 right—of—way, a distance of 37.47' to a 1/2" iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "RPLS 5686" set for the northeasterly corner of the herein described tract, some being in the most northerly west line of WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2020, Page 467, O.P.R.C.C.T., some being in the westerly monumented line of Rollins Road; THENCE South 00°04'27" West, along the most northerly west line of said WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, some being partially along a replat of WEST CROSSING PHASE 11, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2020, Page 750, O.P.R.C.C.T., a distance of 262.72' to a 1/2" iron rod with a plastic cap stamped "GOODWIN" found for the southerly corner of the right—of—way dedication for County Road No. 370, some being the southeasterly corner of said Facundo tract, said corner also being an "ell" corner of said WEST CROSSING PHASE 11 (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467); THENCE North 08'03'06" West, along the common line between said Facundo tract and County Road No. 370 right—of—way, a distance of 265.10' to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4,922 square feet or 0.113 acres of land, more or less. ABBREVIATIONS I.R.F. = Iron Rod Found (R.M.) = Reference Monument C.I.R.F. = Capped Iron Rod Found C.I.R.S. = 1/2" iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "RPLS 5686" set M.R.C.C.T. = Map Records, Collin County, Texas D.R.C.C.T. = Deed Records, Collin County, Texas O.P.R.C.C.T. = Official Public Records, Collin County, Texas This metes and bounds description is accompanied by a survey plat of even date. F T� MICHAEL B. ARTHUR ............................................ 5686 sstR�cs��/" Bearings are based on the Texas State Plane System, North Central Zone (4202), NAD83. DATE: 09/06/2022 ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 370 North Texas Surveying, L.L.C. REVISED: Registered Professional Land Surveyors 0.113 ACRES IN THE MARTIN MOORE SURVEY 1010 West University Drive & SCALE: 1" = 60' ABSTRACT NO.649 McKinney, Tx. 75069 CHK'D. BY: M.B.A. Ph. (469) 424-2074 Fax: (469) 424-1997 CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS www.northtexassurveying.com Firm Registration No. 10074200 JOB NO.: 2022-0069 EXHIBIT "2" 1 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement (Vol. 2011, Pg. 176) Lot 1, Block 1 ANNA HIGH SCHOOL #1 ADDITION Vol. 2011, Pg. 176, 0.P.R.C.C.T. County Road No. 370 (a variable width right—of—way) a ,pF S89`3 1,— 682.1-7 (R. M.) I I I N89039'04"E 37.47'- 1/2" I.R.F. (R. M. ) POINT OF GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 1 inch = 60 ft. Lot 27 (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467) Lot 28R, Block KK WEST CROSSING PHASE 11 Vol. 2020, Pg. 750, 0.P.R.C.C.T. Rollins Road (50' right—of—way) C. I. R. S. BEGINNING Lot 29 1 I vE� I G� N1STRAORR� N4.5 9 AB Abandonment of a Portion of 1 County Road No. 370 Z 4,922 Sq. Ft. / 0.113 Acres 00 ti Lot 28 I O N W 1C.0 �1 N — r — h s co z Y cn ti O ~ Jose Facundo and Y o a - wife, Josefino 0. Facundo N ti Lot 27 1,T4 o Vol. 4625, Pg. 759, 0)N 0 x o a D.R.C.C.T. jl t o °' a N o O — CD Vw U > 1 I I Lot 26 Right —of —Way Dedicction1 5' Drainage Easement �Y Vol. 2011, Pg. 176, (Vol. 2020, Pg. 467) RTINMONO ABSTRORES� 649 0.P.R.C.C.T. — — — ACT 11 I Lot 25R, Block KK WEST CROSSING 1/2" C.I. R." 2020, 11 I G(R M )NVol. 2020, Pg. 750, 11489 04 03 W 225.42 — — — — — — — — — — 1/2" C.I.R.F. 1/2" C.I.R.F. T — "GOODWIN" "GOODWIN" (R.M.) (R.M.) n E a I I l 0 I Q Y C9 Lo Uj CL O Y r Lot 18 Lot 19 Lot 20 0 C a � '" ci Lot 21 c o Lot 22 I m a w c3 a Lot 24 o X �U��� I Block KK o� I NE"aNa �y WEST C�OS11NG ;o " o l w o I NRY BRAN 1,Y SUR PiiA P 467, -' 0 O o p,BSTRA T Nam• 71 Vol. 2020 9 > O.P. .C.C.T. Holcombe Drive This survey plat is accompanied by a metes (50' right—of—way) and bounds description of even date. DATE: 09/06/2022 ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 370 North Texas Surveying, L.L.C. REVISED: Registered Professional Land Surveyors 0.113 ACRES IN THE MARTIN MOORE SURVEY 1010 West University Drive SCALE: 1" = 60' ABSTRACT NO. 649 McKinney, Tx. 75069 CHK'D. BY: M.B.A. Ph. (469) 424-2074 Fax: (469) 424-1997 CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS www.northtexassurveying.com Firm Registration No. 10074200 JOB NO.: 2022-0069 THE CITY OF Anna irMM1►nrin, City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to rezone 98.0± acres located on the south side of E. White Street, 500± feet east of S. Interurban Street from AG Agricultural District, SF-E Single -Family Residential and Planned Development (Ord. No. 145-2004) to Planned Development. (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) SUMMARY: The applicant has requested the public hearing item be tabled until the Tuesday, October 25, 2022 City Council meeting. Attached is a memo from the applicant with the table request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend City Council hold open and table the public hearing item until the Tuesday, October 25, 2022 City Council meeting at 6:30 PM within the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 120 W 7th Street, Anna, TX. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Leonard Trails Locator Map 2. Tabling Request - Leonard Trails zoning APPROVALS: Ross Altobelli, Director of Development Services Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Ross Altobelli From: John Vick <John.Vick@Qualico.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 11:37 AM To: Ross Altobelli Subject: Leonard Trails Ross: Please allow this email to serve as our written request that City Council tables our zoning request for Leonard Trails until October 25th. We need this additional time to revise the street grid on our concept plan so that the project is viable. John John Vick Vice President VALIC,. communities 2 Greenside at Craig Ranch 6950 TPC Drive, Suite 350 McKinney, Texas 75070 Direct: (469) 659-6150 Cell: (817) 876-8447 Email: iohn.vick@gualico.com is AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 7.b. City Council Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on an Ordinance to amend zoning on 28.0± acres located at the southwest corner of W. White Street and Slater Creek Road. The property is currently zoned Planned Development (961-2022). (Director of Development Services Ross Altobelli) SUMMARY: The subject property was rezoned in February 2022 as a Planned Development to allow for a single-family dwelling, detached and attached subdivision and to preserve the northern portion, along W. White Street, for commercial development. A Concept Plan was approved along with the rezoning request. Included on the Concept Plan was a typical lot details for the SF-TH product type. TYPICAL sF-TH LOT DETAIL SCALE T - ear The SF-TH detail identified a 10-foot side yard, corner lot, street side setback whereas zoning requires 15 feet. As part of the Final Plat review for Phase 1, staff noticed the discrepancy. A stipulation was not approved as part of the original zoning allowing a 10-foot side yard, corner lot street side setback for the SF-TH project as shown on the approved Concept Plan. REMARKS: The applicant is requesting to amend the existing SF-TH Townhome District development standards to include: a. SF-TH Side yard, corner lot, street side (feet): 10 To help support and justify the modified standards the applicant has provided additional information (Exhibit A). CONCLUSION: Request to amend Ordinance No. 961-2022 in order to amend Development Standards associated with the SF-TH Townhome District on 28.0± acres located at the southwest corner of W. White Street and Slater Creek Road. Zoned: Planned Development-SF-Z Single -Family Residence District — Zero Lot Line Homes, C-1 Restricted Commercial, and Planned Development-SF-TH Townhome District (SF-Z, C-1, and PD-SF-TH). FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval as follows: Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with development standards listed under Ordinance No. 961-2022 except as otherwise specified herein. A. SF-TH Side Yard Setback, Corner Lot, Street Side: 10 feet. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Arden Park Zoning Locator Map 2. Ordinance - (PD Amendment) Arden Park 3. Ordinance Exhibit 1 (Ord. Legal Description) 4. Ordinance Exhibit 2 - Arden Park Concept Plan 5. Exhibit A - PD Amendment Request Letter WIS 11M FEM Alf, r.�11i �O MM 0 U lA ■ i� M i■d6 �tJW [■■■■SLR �IE�l aG���w. .®� - 1rrrZoning -Arden Park 4 TIMBERp w ��" _ ��� SEQUOIAIDR �" �SDR �'�� �:;� �■ft��fIQ7V }�'' .2 �U G�uoZlsl�'i�G � �� T-M �aarr®rl A��l�m N �o °���,�oIP11111 Pilo' It 7 ■� HOLLIDAYDR Q 0 D HAMIDRr'EW Q)IALDERJDR�� EARP DR 1 < `• BAMBOO]DR LW W WHITE ST ek,. "WESTGATE CT �j I MIS �1•� � �II� i iv Kim Rid MW i■ GIOy � i t�° � mE�i!!I N�G�IiW� - i t•i. F=!mod I7•!arm MW i� 1® r L Ili I>� ■!ALW „� WESITWWOODE CITY OF IC�T �PARKQ'LISTAIDR � �� � I BRENTF.IELD]DR Q y+ ;. W . tID"GEP_OR�T�DR � Subject City Limits Property N%J . r �� o ROCKRID _E _ CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS (Property rezoned under this ordinance is generally located at the southwest corner of W. White Street and Slater Creek Road) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING MAP, AND ZONING ORDINANCE AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS, REPEALING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000 OR THE HIGHEST PENALTY AMOUNT ALLOWED BY LAW, WHICHEVER IS LESS; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas ("City") has previously adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing the zoning in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has received a requested zoning amendment from Arden Park Owner TX LLC, a Delaware limited liability company on Property described in Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 ("Property") attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, said Property generally located at the southwest corner of W. White Street and Slater Creek Road was zoned by Ordinance No. 961-2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City and the City Council of the City of Anna ("City Council") have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise and have held the public hearings as required by law and afforded a full and fair hearing to all property owners and generally to all persons interested in and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the City Council has concluded that the Zoning Ordinance of the City should be amended as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Section 2. Zoning Change The Anna City Code of Ordinances (the "Anna Code") are hereby amended by amending the zoning of the Property described in Exhibit 1 and as depicted in the Concept Plan on the attached Exhibit 2. 1. Purpose. 1 The purpose of the Planned Development District is to facilitate the development of high - quality Single -Family Attached and Detached products located within the SF-TH Townhome District and SF-Z Single Family Residence District — Zero Lot Home district areas and to establish phasing requirements associated with non-residential development within the C-1 zoning district. 2. Definitions. Except as otherwise provided herein, the definitions in Appendix 3 of the City's Zoning Ordinance shall apply. 3. Development Standards. A. Development must comply with the development standards as adopted by Ordinance No. 961-2022 with the addition of the following; iv. SF-TH Side Yard Setback, Corner Lot, Street Side (feet): 10 B. Plats and/or site plans submitted for the development shall conform to the data presented and approved on the Conceptual Development plan. Non -substantial changes of detail on the final development plan(s) that differ from the Conceptual Development plan may be authorized by the City Council with the approval of the final development plan(s) and without public hearing. C. The Conceptual Development Plan will expire after two (2) years of approval. Section 3. Zoning Change The Anna City Code of Ordinances are hereby amended by establishing the zoning of the Property described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B to Planned Development — SF-TH Townhome District (PD- SF-TH), SF-Z Single -Family Residence District — Zero Lot Line Homes (SF-Z), and C-1 Restricted Commercial (C-1) zoning. Section 4. Official Zoning Map The official Zoning Map of the City shall be corrected to reflect the change in zoning described herein. Section 5. Savings, Repealing and Severability Clauses It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, and provisions of this ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, or provision of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or inapplicable by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality, invalidity or inapplicability shall not affect any of the remaining words, sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional, invalid or inapplicable words, 2 sentences, paragraphs, subdivisions, clauses, phrases, or provisions. Further, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are consistent and do not conflict with the terms and provisions of this ordinance are hereby ratified to the extent of such consistency and lack of conflict, and all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective that are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms and provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed only to the extent of any such conflict. Section 6. Penalty Any violation of any of the terms of this ordinance, whether denominated in this ordinance as unlawful or not, shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Any person convicted of any such violation shall be fined in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for each incidence of violation. Each day a violation exists is considered a separate offense and will be punished separately. Section 7. Publication of the Caption and Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the City Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting and/or publication, if required by law, of its caption. The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to implement such posting and/or publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas this 27th day of September, 2022. ATTESTED: APPROVED: Carrie L. Land, City Secretary Nate Pike, Mayor C Exhibit A Legal Description 27.967 Acres BEING all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, situated in the Joseph Schluter Survey, Abstract Number 856, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being all that certain tract of land, described by deed to Colby Harlow, Trustee of the Sheryl Harlow Family Trust, recorded in Document Number 20110721000760500, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" capped rebar found, stamped "RPLS 5633", at the northwest corner of said Harlow tract, same being the southwest corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed as Parcel 25 to the State of Texas, recorded in Document Number 20120608000684090, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, being the northeast corner of that certain tract of land, described by deed to Aziz Hassan, recorded in Document Number 20190322000298780, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the south line of West White Street (FM 455, called 90-foot right-of-way); THENCE S 89°27'29" E, with the north line of said Harlow tract, and the south line of West White Street, a distance of 765.88 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS" at the northeast corner of said Harlow tract, same being the southeast corner of said Parcel 25, and being in the west line of Slater Creek Road (Private Road), called 1.496 Acres to the Slater Creek Association, recorded in Volume 1158, Page 316, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the south line of West White Street; THENCE S 01°25'53" W, with the east line of said Harlow tract, and the west line of said Slater Creek Road, a distance of 1593.99 feet to a 1/2" rebar found, at the southeast corner of said Harlow tract, same being the southwest corner of said Slater Creek Road, and being in the north line of a certain tract of land, described by deed to William and Andrea Henry, recorded in Document Number 20100528000541220, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, from which a 5/8" rebar found, bears S 87°17'25" E, 39.26 feet; THENCE with the south line of said Harlow tract, and the north line of said Henry tract, the following 6 (six) calls: N 87°18'25" W, a distance of 55.67 to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 87°46'59" W, a distance of 78.50 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar found; S 88°13'01" E, a distance of 145.10 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 88°53'01" E, a distance of 227.80 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; S 89°21'01" E, a distance of 209.30 feet to a 1/2" capped rebar set, stamped "MCADAMS"; N 89°35'01" W, a distance of 48.70 feet to a 1/2" rebar found at the southwest corner of said Harlow tract, same being the southeast corner of a certain tract of land, described by deed to the City of Anna, recorded in Document Number 20060714000982730, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas, and being in the north line of said Henry tract; THENCE N 01°23'53" E, with the west line of said Harlow tract, and the east line of said City of Anna tract, passing at a distance of 1283.62 feet a 1/2" capped rebar found, stamped "BRENNAN 5360" at the northeast corner thereof, same being the southeast corner of said Hassan tract, continuing a total distance of 1589.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 27.967 acres of land. 11 EXHIBIT A HASSAN AZIZ ABS A0331 JOHN C FARRIS SURVEY, TRACT 6, 1.915 ACRES ZONING: C-1 LAND -USE: VACANT YELLOW W. LAND CO, LLC ABS A0331 JOHN C FARRIS SURVEY, TRACT 7, 3.826 ACRES ZONING: PD-C LAND -USE: VACANT WEST CROSSING, PHASE 1 BL E & BL D ZONING: PD-R LAND -USE: SINGLE FAMILY ANNA EYE CARE SETTLERS WAY, BL B, LT 32R-2 ZONING: C-1 LAND -USE: RETAIL nPP'11 I v Al ITn oA07c o. Qo ,o Q Jo VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 500' 0 �m �s o� �T o� x 60 0 60 120 180 Feet �o SCALE: 1 " = 60' EE LOT 6 N 01'23'53" E 1593. e •5 - - INC • I LOT 7 LUINIIN ': F'U-H LAND -USE: SINGLE FAMI Y LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 15 Slater Creek _ Road — _ Private e Road T16 1 LOT17 T 20 1 LOT 21 LOT 22 T�C LOT 24 LOT 26 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 5,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4356 0.126 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 4,5SF 4,7444 SF 55 54 1 48 43 0.109 Ac. 0.104 Ac. 5,036 SF 5,175 SF 5,186 SF 5,184 SF 5,183SF 5,15° SF 4,895 SF 4,641 SF 4,689 SF 46 45 44 5,645 SF 0.116 Ac. 1 i 55.0' 0.119 Ac. 0.119 Ac. 0.119 Ac. 0.119 Ac. 0.118 Ac. 0.112 Ac. 0.107 Ac. 0.108 Ac. 4,901 SF 5,113 SF 5,081 SF 0.130 Ac. BLOC D 0.113 Ac. 0.117 Ac. 0.117 Ac. 5 3,240 SF 4 Ac. 68.0' 4 Ln 2,700 SF N N 3 108.0 2,700 SF 2 0 2,700 SF N 1 +� o C-)— 0_( - o � O - - �- — _ MN 100.0O 141.0' (� 4 2 BL SETB CK 0 0 4,: 0.0 �f N `. 30 I 68.0' of 21 J CO Ol 20 8.0 l BLDG 1 Commercial/Medical 7 24. Office/General 2 '0 Office/Retail a 1-Story 7.0 3 l 23,630 SF � z m 0 z o LL J 1 0 LL N V 93,625 SF N. . V No O 2.149 Ac. 0 M z � J ox z c O N I N 0 Sri HASSAN AZIZ ABS A0856 JOSEPH SLATER SCHLUTER SURVEY, TRACT 2, 1.843 ACRES ZONING: C-1 LAND -USE: VACANT MEN 1111 ao 0 25.0' 0 122.5 TYPICAL SF-TH LOT DETAIL SCALE: 1" = MY > - 0 0.0' ROW 0 0 N 0, 45.0 5.0� 1 1 l l l l L_ -1 L- —1 L- —1 L_ -1 TYPICAL SF-Z LOT DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 60' CT 14 15 3,780 SF 3,780 SF 0.087 Ac. 0.087 Ac. ' 13 16 2,700 SF 2,700 SF 14 13 68.0'12 68.0' 17 6,344 SF I 5,103 SF 4 84? SF 4,84 11 1o� 9 $ 2,700 SF 2,700 SF 0.146 Ac. 0.117 Ac. I Ac. I 4,588 SF I 4,5030 I 4,501 SF 5,501 SF 8.992 11 ' 0.105 Ac. 0.103 Ac. I 0.103 Ac. 0.126 Ac. 108. 18 108. LL I I 2,700 SF 2,700 SF ' 10 0 19 0 2,700 SF U V 2,700 SF LO O _ _ 9 Ci 0 m 55.0' Z 2,700 SF No (� 2,700 SF N $ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 J 21 F 7_3,456 SF Ib 3,456 SF 5,501 SF 0.126 Ac. 4,501 SF 0.103 Ac. 4,501 SF 0.103 Ac. 4,501 SF 0.103 Ac. 4,501 SF 0.103 Ac. 4,501 SF 5,501 SF c. Green c ' 0.103 Ac. 0.126 Ac. u7 U Space/Common Neighborhood Area Lot 10.0 r Q — ----� °° � V 2,500 SF � O 29 15.o Pool — — SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE ZONING 0 N m 8,804 SF 0.202 Ac. 797 SF $$ LOTS — — -� I Lv I O 7 22 Z 3,456 SF 0.079 Ac. 45 0 079 Ac. 0 7 6 ' �23 498 SF 2,700 SF 2,700 SF 5,501 SF 10 I 4,501 SF I 4,501 SF 4,501 SF 195 Ac. 0 N 68, 0 24 0.126 Ac. 0.103 Ac. I I 0.103 Ac. i 0.103 Ac. I 0 SF 68.0 700 SF W � 6 2,700 SF108 2,700 SF 108. ' — — 8,266 SF j 0 55.0' O 0.190 Ac. ' 2,700 SF r 2,700 SF 0 7 Q 3,240 SF 4 Ac. (� 6 o 0 2,700 SF N CO 5 2,700 SF 68.0' 4 LO 2,700 SF 3 108.0' 2,700 SF 2 _ 2,700 SF 0.962 AS-- 13_780 SF 0 2 0 27 0 1 N 2,700 SF N 2,700 SF N 5,501 SF 4,501 SF 4,5 0 SF 4,4 SF 5 0 . ' 0.126 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.102 Ac. 7,507 SF 1 28 0.172 Ac. SF SF 0.087 Ac. 0.087 Ac. I AC -- TRA['T 0 / 55.0' 1 2 3 4 5,501 SF 4,501 SF 4,501 SF 4,501 SF 0.126 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. N 01 °23'53" E 1589.95' LOC D 0 0 J 5 6 a°� 7 8 5.0 9X-¢` 10 11 12 501 SF 4,501 SF 4,501 SF 4,501 SF 4, 1 S� 4,51 SF 4,700 SF 4,992 SF 103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.103 Ac. 0.1 A� 0.104 Ac. 0.108 Ac. 0.115 Ac. E O U ANNA CITY OF ABS A0856 JOSEPH SLATER SCHLUTER SURVEY, TRACT 43, 19.309 ACRES ZONING: SF-E LAND -USE: VACANT 6 C' r Cd I UT-1 TYPICAL HEAD IN PARKING STALL SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 N N �s TYPICAL PARALLEL PARKING STALL SCALE: 1" = 30' Site Data Summary Table General Site Data Tract 1 Tract 2 Tract 3 Commercial Townhome Single Family Zoning C-1 SF-TH SF-Z Land -Use Commercial/ Medical/ General office/ Reta i I Townhome Single Family Minimum Lot Area 20,000sf N/A 4,500sf Building Size 49,130sf 2,700sf 1,200sf Maximum Height 25.0 ft / 1 story 35 ft 35 ft Max. Lot Coverage 16% 21% 63% Total Land Area 4.57 ac 5.93 ac 17.47 ac Minimum Lot Width 60' 25' 45' Minimum Lot Depth 100, 108' 100, Number of Lots 2 53 1 88 Parki ng Parking Ratio (Medical Office) 5 per 1,000GSF N/A N/A Required (49,130sf) 244 Provided 249 13 4,722 SF 0.108 Ac. 0 25 p 6,850 SF co 0.157 Ac. r 26 ^r 27 28 nn 24 ' 4,725 SF 0.108 Ac. — — 23 30 4,725 SF 7,203 SF 0.108 Ac. 0.165 Ac. 105.0' 22 31 4,725 SF 5,721 SF 0.108 Ac. 0 0.131 Ac. 0 �6P Y 21 (� Y 32 4,725 SF 0 ; 6,236 SF 0.108 Ac. J 0.143 Ac. 20 I L6 33 4,762 SF I 4) 7,874 SF 65X 0.109 Ac. 0 0.181 Ac. Q. �11 598 F Common Area Lot 289 c' 19 Proposed 5.0' Sidewalk 5,055 SF 0.116 Ac. 18 5,617 SF 0.129 Ac. VA 17 5,820 SF 0.134 Ac. 31� 16 9,449 SF Proposed 5.0' Sidewalk 66X 0.217 Ac. 99,291 SF 2.279 Ac. Common Area Lot Detention Basin Proposed Dog Park 15 14 12,101 SF 6,573 SF 0.278 Ac. 0.151 Ac. TRACT 3 TRACT LINE TRACT 1: SHALL FOLLOWING THE ZONING STANDARDS PER SECTION 9.04.021, C-1 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ZONING ORDINANCE. TRACT 2: SHALL FOLLOW THE ZONING STANDARDS PER SECTION 9.041,0114 SF-Z SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS ZONING ORDINANCE. TRACT 3. SHALL FOLLOWING THE ZONING STANDARDS PER SECTION 9.04,015, SF-TH SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOME DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ANN& TEXAS ZONING ORDINANCE LOT 27 42 9,542 SF 0.219 Ac. 41 7,347 SF 0.169 Ac. 40 4,695 SF 0.108 Ac. 39 4,893 SF 0.112 Ac. 38 5,002 SF 0.115 Ac. 37 5,001 SF 0.115 Ac. 36 5,153 SF 0.118 Ac. 5r. VN 35 5,94, SF 0.137 Ac.0 Sri v an N 34 0 a 055 SF D- C1185 Ac. I � I w > Cn w ~ J J w g o=C) a QOQi,,I� �LJ0)V)CD w �� z 6Cn �< QC _z __j 0 Cn N W ~ WU �0� z Z Z ~ J O w Ln H _00 C) w IZ o IO U J H I IIDJ1 ,O'O L 67X 'bol F Ono Notes: 1. All dumpster's will be screened with a T masonry screening wall and gates with metal gates. 2. Parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 9.04.037. Parking ratio is shown at most intense proposed use per City of Anna Zoning Ordinanca 3. Detention basis sized to accommodate both commercial and residential portions of the development Revisions: 01 /21 /2022 The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 111 Hillside Drive Lewisville Texas 75057 972. 436. 9712 201 Country View Drive Roanoke, Texas 76262 OWNER DEVELOPER APPLICANT 940. 240. 1012MCADAMS Harlow Capitol Management, LLC Bridge Tower GP McAdams TBPE:19762 TBPLS:10194440 Colby Harlow - Trustee 12801 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1675 111 Hillside Drive www.gacon.com www.mcadamsco.com P.O. Box 190136 Dallas, Texas 75243 Lewisville, Texas 75077 Dallas, Texas 75219 Ph. 214.440.5606 Ashton Miller Ph 214.754.0800 Contact: Adam Green Ph. 214.250.8066 DRAWN BY: AM DATE: 11-10-2021 SCALE: 1" = 60' JOB. No. Contact. colbyharlowogmail.com agreenobridgetowerhome com Contact amilleromcadamsco com CONCEPT PLAN Bridge Tower GP Residential & Commercial 88 SF-Z Lots 53 SF-TH Lots & 2 Commercial Lots 4 Common Area Lots 27.96 Acres in the THOMAS RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 782 TRACT 10 CITY OF ANNA COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 1 Block A 3,780 0.087 2 Block A 2,700 0.062 3 Block A 2,700 0.062 4 Block A 2,700 0.062 5 Block A 2,700 0.062 6 Block A 2,700 0.062 7 Block A 3,240 0.074 8 Block A 3,240 0.074 9 Block A 2,700 0.062 10 Block A 2,700 0.062 11 Block A 2,700 0.062 12 Block A 4,320 0.099 1 Block B 3,510 0.081 2 Block B 2,700 0.062 3 Block B 2,700 0.062 4 Block B 2,700 0.062 5 Block B 3,240 0.074 6 Block B 3,240 0.074 7 Block B 2,700 0.062 8 Block B 2,700 0.062 THMMH� Z-ela Drive Westfield Dry ree oa - U) L W. cross, Blvd. VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 5W LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 9 Block B 2,700 0.062 10 Block B 2,700 0.062 11 Block B 2,700 0.062 12 Block B 2,700 0.062 13 Block B 3,576 0.082 1 Block C 3,780 0.087 2 Block C 2,700 0.062 3 Block C 2,700 0.062 4 Block C 2,700 0.062 5 Block C 2,700 0.062 6 Block C 2,700 0.062 7 Block C 3,456 0.079 8 Block C 3,456 0.079 9 Block C 2,700 0.062 10 Block C 2,700 0.062 11 Block C 2,700 0.062 12 Block C 2,700 0.062 13 Block C 2,700 0.062 14 Block C 3,780 0.087 15 Block C 3,780 0.087 LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 1 Block D 5,501 0.126 2 Block D 4,501 0.103 3 Block D 4,501 0.103 4 Block D 4,501 0.103 5 Block D 4,501 0.103 16 Block C 2,700 0.062 17 Block C 2,700 0.062 18 Block C 2,700 0.062 19 Block C 2,700 0.062 20 Block C 2,700 0.062 21 Block C 3,456 0.079 22 Block C 3,456 0.079 23 Block C 2,700 0.062 24 Block C 2,700 0.062 25 Block C 2,700 0.062 26 Block C 2,700 0.062 27 Block C 2,700 0.062 28 Block C 3,780 0.087 29 Block C 8,804 0.202 30 Block C 8,797 0.202 LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 1 Block D 5,501 0.126 2 Block D 4,501 0.103 3 Block D 4,501 0.103 4 Block D 4,501 0.103 5 Block D 4,501 0.103 6 Block D 4,501 0.103 7 Block D 4,501 0.103 8 Block D 4,501 0.103 9X Block D 4,501 0.103 10 Block D 4,529 0.104 11 Block D 4,700 0.108 12 Block D 4,992 0.115 13 Block D 4,722 0.108 14 Block D 6,573 0.151 15 Block D 12,101 0.278 16 Block D 9,449 0.217 17 Block D 5,820 0.134 18 Block D 5,617 0.129 19 Block D 5,055 0.116 20 Block D 4,762 0.109 LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 21 Block D 4,725 0.108 22 Block D 4,725 0.108 23 Block D 4,725 0.108 24 Block D 4,725 0.108 25 Block D 6,850 0.157 26 Block D 5,026 0.115 27 Block D 4,803 0.110 28 Block D 4,581 0.105 29 Block D 6,231 0.143 30 Block D 7,203 0.165 31 Block D 5,721 0.131 32 Block D 6,236 0.143 33 Block D 7,874 0.181 34 Block D 8,055 0.185 35 Block D 5,949 0.137 36 Block D 5,153 0.118 37 Block D 5,001 0.115 38 Block D 5,002 0.115 39 Block D 4,893 0.112 40 Block D 4,695 0.108 LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 41 Block D 7,347 0.169 42 Block D 9,542 0.219 43 Block D 5,645 0.130 44 Block D 5,081 0.117 45 Block D 5,113 0.117 46 Block D 4,901 0.113 47 Block D 4,689 0.108 48 Block D 4,641 0.107 49 Block D 4,895 0.112 50 Block D 5,155 0.118 51 Block D 5,183 0.119 52 Block D 5,184 0.119 53 Block D 5,186 0.119 54 Block D 5,175 0.119 55 Block D 5,036 0.116 56 Block D 4,744 0.109 57 Block D 4,543 0.104 58 Block D 4,500 0.103 59 Block D 4,500 0.103 60 Block D 4,500 0.103 LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 61 Block D 4,500 0.103 62 Block D 4,500 0.103 63 Block D 4,500 0.103 64 Block D 5,500 0.126 65X Block D 12,598 0.289 66X Block D 99,291 2.279 67X Block D 15,303 0.351 1 Block E 5,501 0.126 2 Block E 4,501 0.103 3 Block E 4,500 0.103 4 Block E 4,444 0.102 5 Block E 7,507 0.172 6 Block E 8,266 0.190 7 Block E 8,498 0.195 8 Block E 4,501 0.103 9 Block E 4,501 0.103 10 Block E 4,501 0.103 11 Block E 5,501 0.126 1 Block F 5,501 0.126 2 Block F 4,501 0.103 OWNER Harlow Capitol Management, LLC Colby Harlow - Trustee P.O. Box 190136 Dallas, Texas 75219 Ph. 214.754.0800 Contact colbyharlowogmail.com DEVELOPER Bridge Tower GP 12801 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1675 Dallas, Texas 75243 PK 214A40.5606 Contact Adam Green agreenobridgetowerhomecom LOT / BLOCK ANALYSIS LOT BLOCK SQUARE FEET ACRES 3 Block F 4,501 0.103 4 Block F 4,501 0.103 5 Block F 4,501 0.103 6 Block F 4,501 0.103 7 Block F 5,501 0.126 8 Block F 5,501 0.126 9 Block F 4,501 0.103 10 Block F 4,503 0.103 11 Block F 4,588 0.105 12 Block F 4,842 0.111 13 Block F 5,103 0.117 14 Block F 6,344 0.146 APPLICANT McAdams 111 Hillside Drive Lewisville, Texas 75077 Ashton Miller Ph. 214.250.8066 Contact amilleromcadamsco oom 60 0 60 120 180 Feet SCALE: 1 " = 60' J MCADAMS August 12, 2022 Ross Altobelli Director of Development Services City of Anna, Texas 75409 Mr. Altobelli: This letter is to address our request for a PD Amendment requesting an exception to the City's requirement that lots adjacent to a City street or alley shall have a 15' and 10', respectively, side yard setback. The basis for which we are asking for this change is due to the following reasons: ➢ The approved concept plan and preliminary plat depicted a 10' side yard setback for all lots adjacent to a City street or alley. Because of this reason, we believe that the proposed development should be granted the PD Amendment. We appreciate your help in reviewing our request and preparing it for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Josh Barton, P.E. Senior Project Manager MCADAMS creating experiences through experience 111 Hillside Drive, Lewisville, TX 75057 / 972. 436. 9712 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: irff,7111111►nrAR City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Dalan Walker Discuss/Consider/Approve the final concept plan for a Wheeled Sports Park at Slayter Creek Park. (Park Planning and Development Manager Dalan Walker, RLA) SUMMARY: A three dimensional concept for a Wheeled Sports Park at Slayter Creek Park will be presented by New Line Skateparks. Public input was received from neighbors that attended a Parks Advisory Board meeting in May as well as from online surveys. Several concepts were developed and reviewed by neighbors in August, and small revisions were recommended. A concept plan was presented to the Parks Advisory Board in August, and a recommendation was made to move forward with design. The estimated construction budget for the project is $1.8 million. The lighting and landscaping will be funded separately. Once the final concept is approved, New Line Skateparks will develop construction documents. Construction is scheduled to begin in February 2023. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction budget for the project is $1.5 million. Lighting, landscaping and irrigation will be designed under the current professional services agreement, but construction of these amenities may be supplemented with additional funding. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Principal 5 - Value to Neghbors' Lives Goal 3 - Anna -Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the final concept for the Wheeled Sports Park. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVALS: Dalan Walker, Parks Created/Initiated - 9/22/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/22/2022 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Taylor Lough Consider/Discuss/Adopt a Resolution approving a Use Agreement with the City of Anna, Texas and a Special Warranty Deed for the transfer of real property to the Anna Economic Development Corporation (Assistant Director of Economic Development Taylor Lough). SUMMARY: The City Council Strategic Plan lists activation of Downtown Anna as a top priority and the Economic Development Strategic Plan calls for transforming Downtown Anna into a vibrant district. On June 3, 2021, the Anna Economic Development Corporation (EDC) Board recommended that the City Council convey 101 S. Powell Parkway to the EDC as the EDC has the ability to lease to a private entity. The Economic Development team is working with a brewery concept and preparing to renovate the former bank building and property to improve pedestrian access, parking, and allow for an outdoor gathering space. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The EDC and City will receive an estimated $100,000 annually from rent and tax revenue. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Growing Anna Economy STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution and exhibits within. ATTACHMENTS: Res City Sale to EDC C08010D20220826CR1 with exhibits APPROVALS: Taylor Lough, Economic Development Administrator Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, APPROVING A USE AGREEMENT WITH ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND APPROVING A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED FOR THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") is a duly formed home -rule municipality with an elected governing body (the "City Council"); and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") has a population of less than 20,000; and WHEREAS, the Anna Economic Development Corporation ("AEDC") is a duly formed nonprofit Type A corporation governed by Chapter 504 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, under Texas Local Government Code § 253.012, the City is authorized to transfer to an economic development corporation, for certain consideration, real property or an interest in real property without complying with the notice and bidding requirements of Section 272.001(a) or other law; and WHEREAS, consideration for a transfer authorized under Texas Local Government Code § 253.012 is in the form of an agreement between the parties that requires the economic development corporation to use the property in a manner that primarily promotes a public purpose of the municipality; and WHEREAS, under Texas Local Government Code § 501.004, the Legislature has found that the present and prospective right to gainful employment and the general welfare of the people of this state require as a public purpose the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises; and WHEREAS, if the economic development corporation at any time fails to use the property in for a public purpose, ownership of the property automatically reverts to the municipality; and WHEREAS, the City and AEDC desire that the City transfer its ownership in the real property located at 101 South Powell Parkway Anna, Texas 75409 (the "Property") to CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. Page 1 AEDC in accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 253.012 and as further set forth in this resolution; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization to execute agreement and sell real property. The City Council hereby approves, subject to approval by the City Attorney as to legal form, the Use Agreement Between the City of Anna, Texas and Anna Economic Development Corporation (the "Use Agreement") attached hereto as Exhibit A and authorizes the Mayor to execute a special warranty deed substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and all other required instruments and related documents necessary to accomplish sale of the Property to AEDC. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this the day of 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 EXHIBIT A USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION This Use Agreement (this "Agreement") Between the City of Anna, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipality (the "City") and Anna Economic Development Corporation, a nonprofit Type A development Corporation ("AEDC") is effective as of the date of the execution by both parties. WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") is a duly formed home -rule municipality with an elected governing body (the "City Council"); and WHEREAS, the City of Anna, Texas (the "City") has a population of less than 20,000-1 and WHEREAS, the Anna Economic Development Corporation ("AEDC") is a duly formed nonprofit Type A corporation governed by Chapter 504 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, under Texas Local Government Code § 253.012, the City is authorized to transfer to an economic development corporation, for certain consideration, real property or an interest in real property without complying with the notice and bidding requirements of Section 272.001(a) or other law; and WHEREAS, consideration for a transfer authorized under Texas Local Government Code § 253.012 is in the form of an agreement between the parties that requires the economic development corporation to use the property in a manner that primarily promotes a public purpose of the municipality; and WHEREAS, under Texas Local Government Code § 501.004, the Legislature has found that the present and prospective right to gainful employment and the general welfare of the people of this state require as a public purpose the promotion and development of new and expanded business enterprises; and WHEREAS, if the economic development corporation at any time fails to use the property in for a public purpose, ownership of the property automatically reverts to the municipality; and WHEREAS, the City and AEDC desire that the City transfer its ownership in the real property located at 101 South Powell Parkway Anna, Texas 75409 (the "Property") to USE AGREEMENT Page 1 AEDC in accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 253.012 and as further set forth in this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, FOR THE MUTUAL CONSIDERATION SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Sale of Property; Public Purpose; Reversion. The City agrees to sell the Property to AEDC under a special warranty deed subject to the title of the Property automatically reverting to the City's ownership should AEDC fail to use the Property for a public purpose as the City may determine in its sole discretion. Promptly after any such reversion the City shall adopt a resolution memorializing the reversion and recording the resolution and any other instruments as may be deemed necessary by the City to have the land recordings of Collin County reflect the City's fee simple ownership of the Property and all rights incident thereto including without limitation all improvements and fixtures. Section 3. Warranties. The accuracy of the warranties set forth in this Section 3 and other provisions of this Agreement are conditions for the sale of the Property to AEDC. AEDC shall notify the City if and when any of the following warranties are no longer accurate. The failure to so notify the City is a material breach of this Agreement. AEDC warrants and represents to the City the following: 3.01. Authority. AEDC has the authority to enter into and perform, and will perform, the terms of this Agreement to the best of its ability. 3.02. Employment of Undocumented Workers. During the term of this Agreement, AEDC agrees not to knowingly employ any undocumented workers and if convicted of a violation under 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a (f), AEDC shall repay the amount of any Reimbursement Payment or other funds received by AEDC from City from the date of this Agreement to the date of such violation within 120 days after the date AEDC is notified by City of such violation, plus interest at the rate of 4% compounded annually from the date of violation until paid. AEDC is not liable for a violation of this section by a subsidiary, affiliate, or franchisee of AEDC or by a person with whom AEDC contracts. 3.03. Litigation. No litigation or governmental proceeding is pending or, to the knowledge of AEDC, is threatened against or affecting AEDC, or the Property, that may result in any material adverse change in AEDC's business, properties or operation. 3.04. Breach of Contract. AEDC shall not be in breach of any other contract by entering into and performing this Agreement. AEDC shall amend or enter into any other contract that may be necessary for AEDC to fully and timely perform its obligations under this Agreement. USE AGREEMENT Page 2 3.05. No Boycotting Israel. AEDC verifies that the AEDC (including any wholly owned subsidiary, majority -owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of the AEDC) does not Boycott Israel and agrees that during the term of this Agreement will not Boycott Israel as that term is defined in Texas Government Code Section 808.001, as amended. 3.06. Verification Pursuant to Chapters 2252 and 2270 of the Texas Government Code. As of the Effective Date, the AEDC represents that, to the extent this Agreement constitutes a "governmental contract" within the meaning of Section 2252.151 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, solely for purposes of compliance with Chapter 2252 of the Texas Government Code, and except to the extent otherwise required or permitted by or under applicable federal law, neither AEDC nor any wholly owned subsidiary, majority - owned subsidiary, parent company or affiliate of the AEDC is a company listed by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts under Sections 2270.0201 (as enacted by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., ch. 96, Senate Bill 253) or 2252.153 of the Texas Government Code. 3.07. Verifications Pursuant to Chapter 2274, Texas Government Code. (a) To the extent this Agreement constitutes a contract for goods or services for which a written verification is required under Section 2274.002 (as added by Senate Bill 13 in the 87th Texas Legislature, Regular Session), Texas Government Code, as amended, the AEDC hereby verifies that it and its parent company, wholly- or majority -owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates, if any, do not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of this Agreement. The foregoing verification is made solely to enable the AEDC to comply with such Section and to the extent such Section does not contravene applicable Texas or federal law. As used in the foregoing verification, " boycott energy companies," a term defined in Section 2274.001(1), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill) by reference to Section 809.001, Texas Government Code (also as enacted by such Senate Bill), shall mean, without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (A) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel -based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law; or (B) does business with a company described by (A) above. (b) To the extent this Agreement constitutes a contract for goods or services for which a written verification is required under Section 2274.002 (as added by Senate Bill 19 in the 87th Texas Legislature, Regular Session), Texas Government Code, as amended, the AEDC hereby verifies that it and its parent company, wholly- or majority -owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates, if any, do not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association during the term of this Agreement. The foregoing verification is made solely to enable the AEDC to comply with such Section and to the extent such Section does not contravene applicable Texas or federal law. As used in the foregoing verification and the following definitions, `discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(3), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate USE AGREEMENT Page 3 Bill), (A) means, with respect to the firearm entity or firearm trade association, to (i) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, (ii) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, or (iii) terminate an existing business relationship with the firearm entity or firearm trade association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association and (B) does not include (i) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories and (ii) a company' s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship (aa) to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency or (bb) for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity' s or association' s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association, (b) `firearm entity,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(6), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill), means a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, supplier, or retailer of firearms (defined in Section 2274.001(4), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as weapons that expel projectiles by the action of explosive or expanding gases), firearm accessories (defined in Section 2274.001(5), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as devices specifically designed or adapted to enable an individual to wear, carry, store, or mount a firearm on the individual or on a conveyance and items used in conjunction with or mounted on a firearm that are not essential to the basic function of the firearm, including detachable firearm magazines), or ammunition (defined in Section 2274.001(1), Texas Government Code, as enacted by such Senate Bill, as a loaded cartridge case, primer, bullet, or propellant powder with or without a projectile) or a sport shooting range (defined in Section 250.001, Texas Local Government Code, as a business establishment, private club, or association that operates an area for the discharge or other use of firearms for silhouette, skeet, trap, black powder, target, self-defense, or similar recreational shooting), and (c) ` firearm trade association,' a term defined in Section 2274.001(7), Texas Government Code (as enacted by such Senate Bill), means any person, corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, or business organization that (i) is not organized or operated for profit (and none of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual), (ii) has two or more firearm entities as members, and (iii) is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a), Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as an organization described by Section 501(c) of that code. Section 4. Miscellaneous. 4.01. Compliance with Laws. AEDC shall observe and obey all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules of the Federal, State, county, and city governments related to the Development. USE AGREEMENT Page 4 4.02. Non -Discrimination. AEDC covenants and agrees that AEDC will not discriminate nor permit discrimination against any person or group of persons, with regard to employment and the provision of services for the Development on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Texas. 4.03. Time Periods. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 4.04. Force Majeure. Each Party shall use good faith, due diligence and reasonable care in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement, and time shall be of the essence in such performance; however, in the event a Party is unable, due to force majeure, to perform its obligations under this Agreement, then the obligations affected by the force majeure shall be temporarily suspended equal to the time period the Party was delayed, except that the obligation of any Party to make any payments required pursuant to this Agreement shall not be suspended by force majeure. The term "force majeure" shall include any delay due to any of the following acts or events: (a) wars, terrorism, civil disturbances, riots, insurrections, civil unrest, vandalism and sabotage; (b) transportation disasters, whether by sea, rail, air or land; (c) strikes, lockouts, work stoppage or slowdown or other labor disputes or material shortages; (d) adverse weather conditions, including rain of unusual duration or volume, hurricanes, lightning, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods or acts of God; (e) epidemics or pandemics (but not including the COVID 19 pandemic) or any governmental orders, actions, shut -downs, mandates, restrictions or quarantines, or any quasi -governmental orders, actions, shut -downs, mandates, restrictions or quarantines resulting from any epidemics or pandemics, and any public health emergencies, whether declared by local, state or federal governmental authorities or agencies; (f) labor shortages or moratoriums; (g) fire or other material casualty; (h) mechanical failure of equipment; (i) utility delays or interruptions; 0) any emergency event that threatens imminent harm to property or injury to persons; (k) any other causes of any kind whatsoever, whether similar to those enumerated or not, which are beyond the control of such Party in the performance of its obligations hereunder; provided, however, in all cases, only to the extent that the Party claiming force majeure (1) did not cause such force majeure condition, and (2) throughout the pendency of such force majeure condition, utilizes commercially reasonable efforts to minimize the impact and delays caused by such force majeure condition. If a Party is delayed due to force majeure, then such Party shall provide written notice of the delay and applicable extension of time periods to the other Party. In addition, a Party that has claimed the right to temporarily suspend its performance under this section shall provide written reports to the other Party at least once every week detailing: (i) the extent to which the force majeure event or circumstance continue to prevent the Party's performance; (ii) all of the measures being employed to regain the ability to perform; and (iii) the projected date upon which the Party will be able to resume performance, which projected date the Parties agree and acknowledge is only an estimate and not a binding commitment by the Party claiming force majeure. USE AGREEMENT Page 5 4.05. Assignment. Except as provided below, AEDC may not assign all or part of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to a third party without prior written approval of City Council and the City, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The City agrees, however, that AEDC may assign all or part of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any entity affiliated with AEDC by reason of controlling, being controlled by, or being under common control with AEDC or to a third -party lender advancing funds for the construction or operation of Public Improvements. The City expressly consents to any assignment described in the preceding sentence and agrees that no further consent of City Council or the City to such an assignment will be required. AEDC agrees to provide the City with written notice of any such assignment. The foregoing notwithstanding, any assignment of AEDC's rights under this Agreement shall not release AEDC from its obligations hereunder. 4.06. INDEMNITY. AEDC COVENANTS TO FULLY INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, SAVE, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, AND ITS OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AND AGENTS FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS) ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT OR OTHERWISE WRONGFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF AEDC, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, MATERIAL MEN OR EMPLOYEES THAT RELATE IN ANY MANNER TO AEDC'S PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT OR TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION INJURY OR DAMAGE TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY. THE INDEMNITY PROVIDED FOR ABOVE SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LIABILITY RESULTING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES OR SEPARATE CONTRACTORS, AND IN THE EVENT OF JOINT AND CONCURRING NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT OF CITY AND AEDC, RESPONSIBILITY AND INDEMNITY, IF ANY, SHALL BE APPORTIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT WAIVING ANY GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY AVAILABLE TO THE CITY UNDER TEXAS LAW AND WITHOUT WAIVING ANY DEFENSES OF THE PARTIES UNDER TEXAS LAW. AEDC'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS SECTION 4.06 SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT. 4.07. Events of Default by AEDC. In addition to other events of default by AEDC set forth in this Agreement, each of the following events constitute a default of this Agreement by AEDC: (a) The City reasonably and in good faith determines that any representation or warranty on behalf of AEDC contained in this Agreement or in any financial statement, USE AGREEMENT Page 6 certificate, report, or opinion submitted to the City or the City in connection with this Agreement was incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made. (b) Any attachment or other levy against the Property or any portion thereof with respect to a claim, excluding mechanic's and materialman's liens, remains unpaid, undischarged, or not dismissed for a period of 120 business days. (c) AEDC makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. (d) AEDC files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt. (e) If taxes owed to the City by AEDC become delinquent, and AEDC fails to timely and properly follow the legal procedures for protest or contest. (f) AEDC fails to timely, fully and completely comply with any one or more of the deadlines, material requirements, obligations, duties, terms, conditions or warranties of this Agreement. (g) AEDC sells or attempts to sell the Property or any interest in the Property to any third party. It shall not be a default under this Agreement if AEDC leases or licenses the use of the Property or any part thereof to a third party provided that the lease or license constitutes a public purpose. A "public purpose" under this Section 4.07(g) includes but is not limited to a use that promotes new or expanded business enterprises. 4.08. Notice of Default. Should the City determine that AEDC is in default according to the terms of this Agreement, the City shall notify AEDC in writing of the event of default, and provide 30 business days from the date of the notice ("Cure Period") for AEDC to cure the event of default; provided, however, in the event if such event of default is not able to be cured within such 30-day period, AEDC shall be permitted additional time to effectuate such cure, provided, that in no event shall the Cure Period exceed 60 business days from the date of notice from the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement, any default related to or associated with AEDC failing to use the Property for a Public Purpose as determined by the City in its sole discretion shall result in title to the Property immediately and automatically reverting to the City, and the City shall thereafter be the sole owner of the Property in fee simple title. 4.09. Results of Uncured Default by AEDC. After exhausting good faith attempts to address any default during the Cure Period and, taking into account any extenuating circumstances that might have occurred through no fault of AEDC, as determined by the City, the AEDC shall pay the City its reasonable attorney fees, related expenses, and costs of court to collect amounts due to enforce or terminate this Agreement. Upon full payment by AEDC of all sums due, the City and AEDC shall have no further obligations to one another under this Agreement. Neither the City nor AEDC may be held liable for any special or consequential damages. 4.10. No Waiver. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of any subsequent breach of the USE AGREEMENT Page 7 covenant or condition of this Agreement. No waiver of any covenant or condition, or the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, justifies or authorizes the nonobservance on any other occasion of the covenant or condition or any other covenant or condition of this Agreement. Any waiver or indulgence of AEDC's default may not be considered an estoppel against the City. It is expressly understood that if at any time AEDC is in default in any of its conditions or covenants of this Agreement, the failure on the part of the City to promptly avail itself of the rights and remedies that the City may have, will not be considered a waiver on the part of the City, but the City may at any time avail itself of the rights or remedies or elect to terminate this Agreement on account of the default. 4.11. Limitation of Remedies. AEDC specifically agrees that the City shall not be liable to AEDC for any actual or consequential damages, direct or indirect, interest, attorney fees or related expenses, or cost of court for any act of default by the City under the terms of this Agreement. 4.12. Notices. Any notice and/or statement required and permitted to be delivered under this Agreement shall be deemed delivered by depositing the same in the United States mail, certified with return receipt requested, proper postage prepaid, addressed to the appropriate party at the following addresses, or at such other addresses provided by the Parties in writing. AEDC: Anna Economic Development Corporation Attn: Director of Economic Development 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 CITY: City of Anna Attn: City Manager 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 Notice is effective upon deposit in the United States mail in the manner provided above. 4.13. Incorporation of Other Documents. The Exhibits referenced in this Agreement and attached hereto are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Said Exhibits include the following: Exhibit 1, Legal Description of the Property 4.14. Amendments or Modifications. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement may be made, nor any provision waived, unless in writing signed by a person duly authorized to sign Agreements on behalf of each party. 4.15. Relationship of Parties. In performing this Agreement, both the City and AEDC will act in an individual capacity, and not as agents, representatives, employees, employers, USE AGREEMENT Page 8 partners, joint -venturer, or associates of one another. The employees or agents of either party may not be, nor be construed to be, the employees or agents of the other party for any purpose. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, at no time shall the City or the City have any control over or charge of AEDC's ownership or use of the Property or design, construction or installation of any infrastructure or improvements on or related to the Property, nor the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures utilized for said design, construction or installation. This Agreement does not create a joint enterprise between the City and AEDC. 4.16. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4.17. Severability. If for any reason, any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase or word of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to any person or circumstance is, to any extent, held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law or by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, will not be affected by the law or judgment, for it is the definite intent of the Parties to this Agreement that every section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, provision, phrase, or word of this Agreement be given full force and effect for its purpose. To the extent that any clause or provision is held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future law effective during the term of this Agreement, then the remainder of this Agreement is not affected by the law, and in lieu of any illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision, a clause or provision, as similar in terms to the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause or provision as may be possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable, will be added to this Agreement automatically. 4.18. Venue. Venue for any legal action related to this Agreement is in Collin County, Texas. 4.19. Interpretation. The Parties have been represented by counsel of their choosing in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. This Agreement was drafted equally by the Parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any Party shall not apply. 4.20. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole agreement between the City and AEDC as relates to the Development. Any other prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations related to the Development, verbal or otherwise, not expressly stated in this Agreement, are of no force and effect. 4.21. Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to confer any rights, privileges or causes of action upon any third party. USE AGREEMENT Page 9 4.22. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Parties to it and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns. 4.23. Counterparts. This Agreement maybe executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and the binding agreement of each Party to the terms herein, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 4.24. Recording. The Parties agree that this Agreement, or any memorandum or short form of this Agreement, may be recorded. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY; SIGNATURE PAGE(S) FOLLOW] USE AGREEMENT Page 10 ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Texas Type A development corporation in State of Texas County of Collin Bruce Norwood, its President Before me, on this day personally appeared, Bruce Norwood, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as President of Anna Economic Development Corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of Notary — State of Texas 2022. USE AGREEMENT Page 11 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, a Texas home -rule municipality Nate Pike, Mayor State of Texas County of Collin Before me, on this day personally appeared Nate Pike, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Anna, Texas. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 2022. Notary — State of Texas USE AGREEMENT Page 12 EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY Lot 1 of Independent Bank Addition, an Addition to the City of Anna, Texas, according to the Map thereof recorded in Volume P, Page 209, of the Map Records of Collin County, Texas. EXHIBIT 1 to USE AGREEMENT Page Solo EXHIBIT B NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVERS' LICENSE NUMBER. After Recording Return to: City of Anna Attention: City Manager 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF COLLIN § As used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Grantor: City of Anna, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipality Grantor's Mailing Address: City of Anna, Texas Attention: City Manager 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 Grantee: Anna Economic Development Corporation, a Texas Type A development corporation Grantee's Mailing Address: Anna Economic Development Corporation Attention: Director of Economic Development 120 W. 7th Street Anna, Texas 75409 Consideration: In accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 253.012, consideration for the sale of the Property is Grantee's unconditional promise to Property in a manner that primarily promotes a public purpose of the Grantor. Special Warranty Deed Page 1 Property (including any improvements): Real property situated in Collin County, Texas, being Lot 1 of Independent Bank Addition, an Addition to the City of Anna, Texas, according to the Map thereof recorded in Volume P, Page 209, of the Map Records of Collin County, Texas. Conveyance: Subject the reversion clause set forth below, Grantor, for the Consideration stated above, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the Property in fee simple title, together will all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any way belonging to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's successors and assigns to warrant and forever defend all and singular the Property to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof when the claim is by, through or under Grantor or Grantor's successors and assigns but not otherwise. Reversion: The Property shall automatically revert to Grantor if the Grantee at any time fails to use the Property in a manner that primarily promotes a public purpose of the Grantor. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE on the date(s) of the acknowledgment(s) below: GRANTOR: CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, a Texas home -rule municipality By: THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § Nate Pike, Mayor BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared, Nate Pike, known to me to be one of the persons whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein stated and in the capacity therein stated as the act and deed of the City of Anna, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipality. (Seal) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal of the office this day of 20 Notary Public- State of Texas My Commission Expires: Special Warranty Deed Page 2 Agreed and Accepted: GRANTEE: ANNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Texas Type A development corporation AN THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § Bruce Norwood, its President BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared, Bruce Norwood, known to me to be one of the persons whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein stated and in the capacity therein stated as the act and deed of the Anna Economic Development Corporation, a Texas Type A development corporation. (Seal) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal of the office this day of 20 Notary Public- State of Texas My Commission Expires: Special Warranty Deed Page 3 THE CITY OF manna AGENDA ITEM: 1011111►150VA-3 City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Project Specific Purchase Order with Quiddity Engineering for the design of the next expansion to the Collin Pump Station in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City recently brought the Collin Pump Station online, including the 1.5 million gallon ground storage tank. In addition, 2 new wells are under construction. This current project will increase the total City water supply by approximately 20%. However, as the City continues to expand and grow, it is important to continue to increase water supply and storage to ensure neighbor needs are met for potable water. The Public Works Department ran an analysis of the public water system using our water model, and found that the largest need is additional storage and pumping capacity. As an existing pump station with the necessary connections and land area, Colin Pump Station represents the lowest cost location to significantly increase storage and pumping. The City's Water Master Plan shows the next phase for Collin Pump Station to include a 4 million gallon ground storage tank and additional pumps. The City engaged Quiddity Engineering, LLC to prepare a proposal for the engineering design needed to design and bid the large ground storage tank and pump improvements. Quiddity was selected in the City's multidisciplinary RFQ process for Utility Facilities Design. The total cost for surveying, engineering design, bid, and construction administration is $783,000.00. The funding source is Water Impact Fees. Staff recommends moving forward with this design project in order to ensure the City continues to meet the growth needs of the community when it comes to public water supply. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total estimated design cost, including construction administration, is $783,000. The funding source is Water Impact Fees. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 2: Sustainable Anna Community Through Planned Managed Growth STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A - Water Master Plan 2. RES. Professional Services - Quiddity 3. City of Anna Collin Pump Station Expansion Cost Estimate APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Grayson Pump Station ��-_ -- Phase 1: ❑�- !-1-� 4 MG GST - Pumps (2) 5,, 000 GPM 1 Phase 2: I (1) - 4 MG GST 4 2 -'rrrrl rrr � (1) - 5,000 GPM Pumps Phase 3: 1 (1)-4MGGST (1) - 5,000 GPM Pumps - - Phase 4: r CDU N - - N (1) - 5,000 GPM Pumps N Ao 73 - , o m < „ 1 16" _ 16...... 1.... „�161 e N U� --- I �; �� . 2.00 MG EST ,� ♦ '` - N, m- m m . �'. 20 � „ — _ - N FM 1 \ ♦ 12" 12' \ N — N - T 02 _ a,. 6,. 2.00 MG EST _ io L �6` N 2862 7s N 72 \ N " 12„ 12„ 1212z a z ia� s _ 16° �� 1 N 20" ti r,.n = 12, 1 ROAD3TY 12 e m 12 v 12" = 12" 12" �? s` 1 i Fm455 16", " L 's N T-O6 1 a4. - O N m - e., w N _ 2.00 MG EST 1 _ N - 12 FO ^ HACKBERRY EST s s _ 1 1 1.00 MG EST CO C) N ,. ..1.. s,. c' .. COP N p2 ,s, m e• ,e. a m 5 a• N „ 24" 12 2 - 4w w'.- � '., O N z _ n�0 12 12 �' 16„ T-01 N m a. ,-' m m a. g _ 0 M 2�r� 12" 12 12„ " "$,z. 2.00 MG EST m e12. v _ e " e,.12" 6„ N r _ J. ❑ 455 - , M 24" 24" 24„J T 05 N 121 ` N �. ,. ,z,. a.. e 2.00 MG EST N N a a. d. 2" 2.0000 MG EST �� a' 12" 1 N ^ 12„ 2„ 12, i' 1I„ 12„ ti 12" 2„ 24 ' " „ e„ 2, 12" N 12" 455 16" 3 20" w 1 N " � N m g, a, ._- 12" 1 �U 0 2,0004,000 q�M a- Feet R Nm = z " 12"12 - � T cli N N � e - 2 J NL ^2 12" ^ 12" T ❑ N iv 4^ 4 24„ - N m = 12" `. � 16„ 1 I - - 24„ N 36„ 36„ 24" c COUNTY L — — —OUTER — — — — - - 36 _ __ ROAD 286 - LOOP 36" — A — — — — — — — — — —_ — — — — — - 7 (V 1 12„ -A 2q,. iV 1 1 12" Colin Pump Station ® gg " (1) - 1.5 MG GST ` t� Sherley Pump Station (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump (1) - 1,000 GPM PumpI Phase 1: (3) - 3 MG GST • 0-0- y ® (1) - 4 MG GST ® (5) - 3,450 GPM Pumps (1) - 3,450 GPM Pumps ® ® (1) - 2,733 GPM Pump ��so- Ic Phase 2:ul (1)-4MGGST [� I (1) - 3,450 GPM PumpsLq Existing Elevated Tank M Future Pump Station Minimum 8" Upgrades _ —, Planning Boundary Existing 24" GTUA Water Pipe Future Water Pipe t Existing Ground Tank & Puml Future Elevated Tank Existing Water Pipe Floodplain f Proposed Ground Tank & Put CITY OF ANNA FIGURE Kimle >>>Horn THE°rcY°F y Anna WATER MASTER PLAN WMP CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROJECT SPECIFIC PURCHASE ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND QUIDDITY ENGINEERING, LLC, FOR ENGIONEERING DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO THE EXPANSION OF THE COLLIN PUMP STATION, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City brought the Collin Pump Station online in August of 2022; and, WHEREAS, the continued growth of the City of Anna requires continuous improvements to the City's public water system, including capital projects which increase water supply and storage; and, WHEREAS, the City has completed an analysis of the current water system and has determined that the most cost-effective way to increase supply and storage is to construct a new ground storage tank at the Collin Pump Station; and, WHEREAS, the Master Water Plan for the City of Anna shows the construction of a 4 million gallon ground storage tank with pump improvements to be the next phase of expansion for the Collin Pump Station; and, WHEREAS, Quiddity Engineering was pre -selected in the City of Anna multi -disciplinary Request for Qualifications process completed last year; and, WHEREAS, the City is seeking to contract with Quiddity Engineering for engineering and land surveying professional services pertaining to the project; and, WHEREAS, the services provided by Quiddity Engineering will be funded through Water Impact Fees; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization. A. That the funding shall be $783,000 in Water Impact Fees. B. That the City Council hereby approves entering into and authorizes the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Quiddity Engineering, LLC, for the scope of services identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this day of 12022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike EXHIBIT "A" T15UO%%ncc rwp5uJdi. Sub M WWY 4J;dd -e 2Y1 September 11, 2022 Mr. Greta P+--Mrs, PE dty or Anna 3M N. Powell Parkway A na. TeKw 35404-0776 Re: Collin Pump Statiiam Phase 1 Ertoansion Deer Mr. P+chcrs: we ere pleased to su rnit this prapasal far the eneneerirg senricrs related to the dcsijn of the Cahn Pum o Station P base ' EMpansion far the "or Anna Ithe City). Project UnderFtandin g Quiddty Eroneerirf. LLC [Quiddity] understands: that the City needs to increase their water stora6e capacitor and serrioe purr o ❑saaot� at their Collin Pump Station Site to oruvide water for future dery lopment within the: City. The existin6 pump station fad itr is Grated on a 4.18E-amc dte. The praposed Smund storalc teal will be kKateA north at the existin6 f rived srte within the 4.1aB-acre site. The prajert will he a sigle hid padsa6e that will include the des& at a 4,GM,U70-4,pllan prexast, preMreswad concrete gerund stora6e tank or a 4,DDDJwO-pIIon welded steel Ground starole tent, two 2,733r6pm vertiml turbine: 000ster Sumps, an e:mergmcy diesel Generator, electrical modifications incrudirg:, a new MCC ouildin6, SCADA integration with the existin6 My!; SCADA Istcmr s5ecuHty m, pi oin6 includimS a new corirecf an in D the emistinG welded steel Ground storap tank, and site drainag includinG Swale:s that will flaw into nk&% roadside dibdres. Quiddity will evaluate the Fft cycle costs for eedh tape of 6rownd storase tank, it requesteq, to he 1p the Citr' determine the mD:st feasi ole and oast-effectre eftemotiMe. Electrical m D&fi duns: include reokeonS the a kctriml Gearwith new M CC Saar otaecd in a rtiew climate-curtrulled cinder hlDck tru kiinG. The City requested that Quiddity evaluate which feo Ries that the existinG Genendar will oe able to operate, and the rao (ties the new Generator writ oe able to operate. It is our unde:rstandinS that the: City will oe construcfina two new water wells, under s5coarote mntrac% which could affect the siring ofthe new gnerator. The new water wells will he construcbad prior to the pmpased empansian. The e: is ng generatDr is only desipled to operate the: three 13) existin6 baDstcr pumps. As part of our scope or work, load caIrulatifln will tic pe:irrmed to determ ine if the: Generator cau Id operate the futrs+e wed with five 171 traaster purr or, Ifthe sene star carmot o oerate the plsnned fecifities, the Fne:Fatar wi II creed to be replaced and upsiaed to handle the additional loads. The City also requested that Quiddity evaluate afhematira chlorination equiom ent manufacturers, other than Real Ind'ustriesr Inc. and make recomme:nd.5 ons far suture enfvanee:meTrts or rep deem ents to the chlarinotio n equipment. This actual desi6r. cmnstrucEor, end?flr reofaeement or the cnIorireaon equipment is not 3art at th's scope.5t this *nl!. -cell Oc d WPryiuonl ry rw� and LwAsuvrim Ryrrasff haL r OZDA -MOLOO " " P, ow,, "IR ,v a L 1'; 2 L � L r IG IGL�� It I I I L I I I I I I Im L I I I f I f JOM L ;1 '2 'Lq 1 11 vL I v I It, L I D v k GI 'f 11 CDLI F DL D D mI v v I I v 1 11 1 1 1 � I III ;IttttIIW� W�Gm� v I om I D I Lf I mL I I I D Im I III, I j I D v L It "I uunL 3f Ot D I I I I I %,IlIm I vL I L� f I It It v L rl UZ IIJ;2 UG � D vCF Uf;GLIF DL CA. L It I It 'G L I LC 'Il I L I I C. t L rl 17 r It l.vfJ7 v IlIm I III I I I I I. ILI D� I I C vL 'G I 2C C L L, 2LI MQA�� ro' i onlDDllk � a M U� �11 bE FYI onIDDUA r% Ofll DDIIA LOW b"Wom LOG ELVILL an u:EVIL a Off ar OIL I AV Ofll DDIIA 1"'PIPPOIN, pi tm Ina G aniooiia ��� .can II Dq ?TIama MY XMXQlOkmwqnmmmmwR F,i aniooue CLASS 3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COLLIN PUMP STATION EXPANSION - PHASE 1 CITY OF ANNA September 15, 2022 Item Unit No. Description Unit Qty. Price Total 1. Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance L.S. 1 $350,000 $350,000 2. 4,000,000-gallon Precast, Prestressed Concrete Ground L.S. 1 3,680,000 3,680,000 (3) Storage Tank 3. Two (2) 2,733-gpm Vertical Turbine Booster Pumps L.S. 1 510,000 510,000 (4) 4. Plant Piping & Protective Coatings, etc. L.S. 1 1,650,000 1,650,000 5. Electrical Modifications L.S. 1 650,000 650,000 (5) 6. Emergency Diesel Generator L.S. 1 550,000 550,000 7. SCADA Improvements L.S. 1 120,000 120,000 8. Security Improvements L.S. 1 100,000 100,000 9. Site Work L.S. 1 150,000 150,000 (6) SUBTOTAL $7,760,000 (7) Contingencies (30%) TOTAL 2 330 000 $10,090,000 Notes: (1) This estimate represents my best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. Quiddity Engineering has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or equipment; over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices; or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, we cannot and do not guarantee that bids will not vary from this cost estimate. (2) This cost estimate assumes the water plant site is not located within the 1% annual chance floodplain or within existing wetlands. This estimate does not include any costs for wetland mitigation, detention basins, mitigation basins, or any other work related to compensating for wetlands or floodplain impact. (3) The cost for the precast, prestressed concrete ground storage tank includes subgrade preparation, foundation, and construction of the tank. The cost for a 4 MG welded steel ground storage tank with a standard loose rafter cone roof is $3,890,000 and the cost for a 4 MG welded steel ground storage tank with a seal welded flat bar roof is $4,236,000. The tank dimensions are 28' tall by 156' in diameter. (4) The cost for the booster pumps includes pump, motor, VFDs, and coatings. (5) Electrical modifications include replacing existing electrical gear with new MCC gear placed in a new climate controlled cinderblock building. The existing generator is only designed to operate the 3 booster pumps. A load calculation will be performed to determine if the generator could operate the future water wells and 5 booster pumps. If the generator cannot operate the facilities, the generator would need to be replaced to handle the additional loads. (6) Site work includes drainage and chain link fencing. (7) This cost estimate does not include costs associated with inflation; land and easement acquisition; platting; detention; offsite drainage; distribution waterlines outside the water plant; aesthetic upgrades; electrical underground service entrance; bringing electrical power to the site; or temporary access road. (8) This estimate does not include inflation or escalation. Market conditions remain volatile due to, but not limited to, labor shortages, material shortages, and supply chain disruptions since the start of the pandemic. More recently, market conditions due to recent and ongoing global conflicts. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Index reported an overall inflation of 9.1% over the last 12 months. The unknown decision of federal government monetary policy, in connection with the events noted above, may increase or decrease the current inflation rates. In addition to inflation, Quiddity has seen a significant market escalation, on the order of 30-40%, over the past 24 months due to the significant deficit in supply versus demand in the local construction industry in connections with the events noted above. It is recommended the District take these items in considerations when preparing the budget for the project. This Document is Released for the Purpose of: General Financial Planning Under the Authority of: Engineer: Toby W. MCQueary, P.E. License No.: 93710 It is Preliminary in Nature and not to be Used for Feasibility of Land Purchases, Bond Applications, Loans or Grants. TW M/vss V:\Practice Workspace\Water\Facilities & Treatment Division\Cost Estimates\City of Anna Collin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Cost Estimate L--1 QUIDDITY Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Registration Nos. F-23290 & 10046100 THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: �lif'i7►19VAN City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Project Specific Purchase Order and AIA agreement with BRW Architects for the design of the exterior shell and the structural engineering design of the Anna Community Library, in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna is moving forward with the design of the Anna Community Library in downtown Anna. The City interviewed the three architecture firms short listed in the City's multidisciplinary RFQ process for professional services, and found Brown Reynolds Watford Architects (BRW) to be the best fit for the project. BRW will provide the architectural design for the exterior shell of the building, and will also provide the structural engineering for the building with the structural engineer working as a sub -consultant to them. BRW is committed to providing their architectural design of the shell in accordance with the Project Charter adopted by the City Council in May of this year and the conceptual design and renderings presented to the Anna Public Library Engagement Task Force and the City Council in July of this year. The total fee for the proposed services is $562,000, which is within the identified project budget for the exterior architecture and structural engineering. Funding is from the voter approved 2021 Bond funds. If approved, BRW will join the team immediately and begin work. Staff recommends approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fee of $562,000 is within the project budget identified for the scope of services. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. RES. Professional Services - BRW 2. D - BRW - 2021 Fully Executed MSA 3. DRAFT AIA B101-2017 BRW APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/21/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROJECT SPECIFIC PURCHASE ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED AIA CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS FOR ARCHITECTURE AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO THE EXTERIOR SHELL OF THE ANNA COMMUNITY LIBRARY, IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, PER THE PROPOSAL SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in May of 2021 Anna neighbors approved $22,000,000 in 2021 Bond Funds for the construction of a new public library in the City of Anna, Texas; and, WHEREAS, the exterior architectural design and building structural design are a key component to the Library project, which is a capital project identified in the City of Anna Strategic Plan to redevelop and energize downtown Anna; and, WHEREAS, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects was pre -selected in the City of Anna multi- disciplinary Request for Qualifications process completed last year; and, WHEREAS, the City is seeking to contract with Brown Reynolds Watford Architects for architecture and structural engineering professional services pertaining to the project; and, WHEREAS, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects will design the exterior building shell in accordance with the Project Charter for the Anna Public Library project as adopted by Resolution of the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas on May 10, 2022; and, WHEREAS, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects will design the exterior building shell in accordance with the conceptual design and renderings presented to the Anna Public Library Task Force and Anna City Council in July of 2022; and, WHEREAS, the services provided by Brown Reynolds Watford Architects will be funded through 2021 Bond Funds; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization. A. That the funding shall be $562,000 in 2021 Bond Funds. B. That the City Council hereby approves entering into and authorizes the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Brown Reynolds Watford Architects for the scope of services identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this day of 12022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike EXHIBIT "A" CONTRACT EXHIBIT A BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS NLi 3M5 TRAViS STREET 9tllrE 2.50 DALLfS, TEXAS 7570A y1d-sga-e713a W WW.9RWARC.H.COM Se pte mbe r 12, 2022 City of Anna 201 E. 711' Street Anna, TX 75407 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF ANNA ANNA COMMUNITY LIBRARY - ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESIGN SERVICES brown Reynolds Watford Archlteets ore please-d to submit this professional serwlees proposal for the new Anna Cornm mity Llbrary- The project scope and budgWr a lard with our proposed ream, scope of serriees, project schedule, and compensation are deserlbed below - Protect Scope We understand that the Gryr of Ama has previously procured ardhlrectural and engineering design ter rites to provide concept design and va riots portions of the design services for the project- The Anna C mn verity Library le a new ranetructian Ilbrary according to the torxept design for the prorett, as a Iloweble within the temtnx4on budget_ Brown Reynolds Watford Arrhliede' proposed services include services as deflned in the M❑trix of Responslb1IiHe&, general prbjero eoordinatlon ae ragoired for the Archlieci of Reeordr and ether services ❑s Indie❑ted in this prapaieaL Rrvjed Cvnsfrudian Budget and Consirudivn Delivery M-Ethod ■ The Dwner's Con0rn lon Budget is approximately $1 3,420�mr excluding parking lot pevina and certain other site utllliies rhai are pluivted io be designed ❑nd constructed as part of r, separate project rand paid for from ❑ separate budget. Cw,diiLHoo between the she prole -et and the Anna Cemrnunify Library prof" is ftvleip❑led i¢ be reguii ed os 3ci r of the Arehitert'e &,cope of servleee for rhle project. ■ The project is-emwidpaied to Mve a single General CortraePor, seleci%ad dwftpgh a CarnpeHiive -Sealed Prepesals delivery method The Architect will prepare one set of Contract Dacwnents, ai opposed to a "feat-tracV construction method with multlple document parka -get. and consrrurrlon phases. Rrvjeci Design Team Owner's Consullanf-s: In addition to Brawn Reynolds Watford Arrhka ts, the Owner has the following direct consultants: + Prolecr Advocates: — Phil biller — Akno Zamora 720 Design! — Maureen Arndt = MIchelle Hayes 720 Deslgn'i Sub-ComsultantS Include: o Reed Welk Benson Dwrmr% Pro�jert Manciger & Cast E0+no16g Prinelpal Proleci Manager Design Architect I Inierlor Desagn Prinelpal Prof" Monager Medhonleol I Eledrkal I Plumbing ,,N,.w a bLmi :. pu oe m miq jua mill vw.nayvv wwi v a.q vw!Iw vi Fmw u ewox. fx.l�l �lw Ix x pw` I DO nNw . 10 El m .wi Fill _pyv limit —Y Nil eelwe wlae _wl my .l hLimiml papwpa maviww w b.m;ae1 xwa a LL vm� wLn vop wanJFvw p ,,b yyxpvaIIW ywyvw ewnw.n pL[ RbNW vop wnn ev W bi 10.1 W w�lnuw rvu peewan`wv plw wvviww • C.., bi on waiwxw • iwom mn IF WNW i wwme•al1o•+A- wl Miallw.mixNa mbO W uo NO. mb. v Imp van l u a•man lz 4,A Ybwww. jY 5055 bm�ulml e.^Sv.^I w.0 ..a..xa rlaa.a CML9T a EXHIMT b �::u cal F :11 � C 'l-IMU Hap , —_,.,.., U,..w w.�...�. w w�.; 9V;:w =e: M. QM...w .w,....• :o. �w,�•,� �,,Mill pa of-11 �Plo „m.. .,. ,.w M. gi ;:' MpjIlHraa al Mv oIM,a,�. lmm ...,kMM_ rve Mim wawa n•+A. 0.1.mawr Mow.. u.i..w Mi ial �e;.D IN..,r5ol b.amalm.l • 01.1 • nn\Cm W rcn ie.lir,,,w.,.m„iLwpi. ewewwaw�raw Am PAN ANN, IL vw 0111 Pillwwnw AL W •a W W. pw w wmp xw egav • C^u www v+w++ NA mill ANNUAL w Al UUJ rvx ew.pv NVAP rvIUJ NU+vww C^ w • Cv MPAL evq 3U;ALL mvLOU pwym nagea pr UgUiN avm`I1LOU PULL WIw NAJ mi QLANAL Y NALUAN Nil r•'ovs xmvia�A pa »www bAW11iww vwa litimwso� �tivwwMwww .I AN 0i ALCALL Nil NAM UP wig 50, JUL I �l ggI,rmotAmNP L µll millN WALL wxoloWGm�wll}po PLAIMULL µ Qow • C'^ww'I i a o womoopis Url aw••e o w ALLUIPPLA pm. Am w•p.ie. nw«L✓YVw H oAm•. AmnM=n? Co.:awa: '�o'a•xe•><wa.ow ceie vaa.w. bi Ybwww. j550n 2UNcw u��l w.caoi -..u. P), PPUI Caxisaa nHIM V im 'eWw imry iixx WOOD e�Wuvwn iiw e iiexm evx -164ilgb v Wiiw 3h L of 138Ym dw�L emvwvew ly ye.vl ii a iMNgr a ppi pa w� vw�q vue nyyµmi iwry o� rwiunywv w wv ewlw vmev a. ewpagmi vwry pavq w a yy w9oyaw �xY o+td oo'eWwur ]OM tcW'aFcwB� ixY yw.y.wyµ[-ea •<<vuanvvm MIDOO J+ hLDIGI w.. vW-Iia jry.ewyr nww piwewww wmva ybewpagX2 w- I IMCY��3 ✓rw9Wnmwmivl MnwW a^B i�•3o5x o•w�wcaw d'i0nw� e obbl"w.y.vwyomwwo bly bi of pp nwvw yewwPL IT m33 aw. zne.b.1 Ca w.w ..W enlace Caxirau nxima �., ow 00 Q� .a a1gw Qna a1Ww Qiw VAW Qua Mnw wuFvi�wq Q5jo 51a 50a m wl pL �p Euayvwva �b�wL IT 5055 wvi i..w f�j w c .n crwa Ca LgTu MIMLa MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, AND BRW ARCHITECTS 2021-2026 Made as of the 13 th day of Between the City and the Firm July 20 21 ("Effective Date") The City of Anna, Texas 101 S. Powell Parkway Anna, Texas 75409 Telephone: (972) 924-3325 BRW ARCHITECTS 3535 TRAVIS ST. SUITE 250 DALLAS, TX 75204 for the following Project: Master Agreement for Category D - Architecture THIS MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Anna, Texas, a home -rule municipality ("City"), and BRW ARCHITECTS [D - Architecture] ("Firm"), to be effective from and after the date as provided above. City and Firm are at times each referred to herein as a "party" or collectively as the "Parties." WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the services of the Firm to provide professional services as describe for Category D - Architecture on an on -call basis ("Proiect"); and WHEREAS, the Firm desires to render such professional services for the City upon the terms and conditions provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That for and in consideration of the covenants contained herein, for the mutual benefits to be obtained hereby and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 FIRM'S SERVICES 1.1 Engagement of the Firm — At City's request and in City's sole discretion, City is entitled to engage Firm from time to time to perform professional services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement ("Services"). Firm agrees to perform such Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and with any individual written Project Order issued pursuant to Article 1.2 hereof. City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to hire other firms or Firms for any reason and for any purpose. If any employee of Firm, who is performing the day-to-day Services under this Agreement, is separated, for any reason, from employment with Firm, Firm shall provide City with written notice thereof at least five (5) business days' prior to said separation unless circumstances City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 1 Category D - Architecture 3199870 reasonably warrant a shorter notice period, which shall not exceed two (2) business days following the separation. 1.2 Scope of Services — The Services to be provided by Firm to City shall be as mutually agreed to in a separate written Project Order, in the format as stated in Exhibit A, executed by City and Firm ("Scope of Services"). Whenever used in this Agreement, the term Services shall mean those services specified in this Agreement and in a Project Order issued pursuant to this Agreement and all related work. Each Project Order shall include, directly or by reference, appropriate cost and pricing data and such other documentation as required by the City. Each Project Order shall be subject to and integrated into this Agreement, and the terms of this Agreement are incorporated into and made a part of each Project Order by reference to this Agreement. All Services within the Scope of Services shall be performed by the employees of Firm or Firm's officers, employees, agents, representatives, sub -contractors or sub -Firms unless otherwise provided in a Project Order. Firm shall be wholly and solely responsible for any Services or subcontracted Services provided by any officer, employee, agent, representative, sub- contractors or sub -Firms of Firm (collectively, "Firm's Personnel"). If at any time after entering into this Agreement, City has any objection to Firm's representative or to any of Firm's Personnel, or any objection to any personnel of sub -Firm retained by Firm and assigned to perform the Services, Firm shall promptly propose substitutes to whom City has no objection. The parties understand and agree that deviations or modifications to the Scope of Services, in the form of written change orders, may be authorized from time to time by City ("Change Order(s)"). 1.2.1 Requirement of Written Change Order — "Extra" work, or "claims" invoiced as "extra" work, or "claims" that have not been issued as a duly executed, written Project Order or Change Order issued by the Anna City Manager, will not be authorized for payment and/or shall not become part of the subcontracts. A duly executed written Change Order shall be preceded by the Anna City Council's authorization for the Anna City Manager to execute said Change Order. 1.2.2 FIRM SHALL NOT PERFORM ANY "EXTRA" WORK AND/OR ADDITIONAL SERVICES WITHOUT A DULY EXECUTED WRITTEN CHANGE ORDER ISSUED BY THE ANNA CITY MANAGER. Firm acknowledges that Project Managers, Superintendents, and/or Inspectors of the City are not authorized to issue verbal or written change orders. 1.3 Schedule of Work — Firm agrees to commence work immediately upon the execution of a Project Order, and to proceed diligently with said work to completion as described in such Project Order. 1.4 Standard of Care — Firm shall perform the Services required hereunder: (1) with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent professionals practicing under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and (2) as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent professional under the same professional license. 1.5 Term — The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue until 8/1/2021 - 9/30/2026 , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 2 Category D - Architecture 3199870 1.6 Subcontracted Services — When necessary, subcontracted services shall be procured by Firm in connection with the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, subject to City's prior written consent. Firm shall issue subcontracts for such subcontracted services in Firm's own name. Firm shall be compensated for subcontracted services for the actual amount invoiced by the subcontractor. Except as set forth in this Agreement, neither Firm nor City may assign, sublet, transfer, or otherwise convey (together, an "Assignment"), and neither Firm nor City has the power to enter into an Assignment of any or all of the rights, duties and obligations or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an Assignment, no Assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES City shall use reasonable efforts to not delay the Services of Firm as follows: 2.1 Proiect Data — The City shall furnish information that is reasonably requested by Firm and that City has in its possession at the time of Firm's request as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Services, and Firm shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of the information furnished by City under this Article 2.1. 2.2 City Proiect Manager — The City shall designate, when necessary, a representative authorized to act on City's behalf with respect to the Services ("Project Manager"). City, or the authorized Project Manager, shall on an as -needed basis, issue Project Orders to Firm in accordance with the Scope of Services, in the format as stated in Exhibit A. City, or the authorized Project Manager shall examine the documents submitted by Firm and shall render any required decisions pertaining thereto as soon as practicable to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Firm's Services. Firm understands and agrees that the Project Manager and his or her authorized designee are not authorized to issue verbal or written Change Orders for "extra" work or "claims" invoiced as "extra" work. ARTICLE 3 FIRM'S COMPENSATION 3.1 Compensation for Firm's Services — Compensation by the City to Firm for Services shall be on a fixed fee or a time and materials basis as specified in the applicable Professional Services Project Order ("Firm's Fee"). All time shall be billed at Firm's labor billing rates agreed upon by City. Said rates shall only be adjusted in writing as may be agreed to between the Parties. 3.1.1 Completion of Record Documents — City and Firm agree that the completion of any Record Documents and/or "As -Built" Documents, including hard copy formatting and electronic formatting, shall be completed, submitted to, and accepted by the City prior to payment of the final five percent (5%) of the Firm's Fee, unless expressly stated otherwise in the applicable Project Order. The City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 3 Category D - Architecture 3199870 electronic formatting shall be consistent with the standards established in Exhibit D, City of Anna Guidelines for Computer Aided Design and Drafting ("CADD" ). Completion of the Record Documents and/or "As -Built" documents shall be included in the Firm's Fee and considered to be within the Scope of Services defined under this Agreement. 3.1.2 Disputes between City and Construction Contractor — If the Scope of Services involves the Firm performing Construction Administration Services relating to an agreement between a Construction Contractor (the "Contractor") and the City, and upon receipt of a written request by City, Firm shall research previous and existing conditions of the Services, and make a determination whether or not to certify that sufficient cause exists for the City to declare the Contractor in default of the terms and conditions of the agreement. Firm shall submit his findings in writing to the City, or submit a written request for a specific extension of time (including the basis for such extension), within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the written request from the City. City and Firm agree that if requested by the City, completion of this task shall be included in the Firm's Fee and considered to be within the Scope of Services as defined under this Agreement. 3.1.3 Consultation and Approval by Governmental Authorities and Franchised Utilities — Firm shall be responsible for identifying and analyzing the requirements of governmental agencies and all franchise utilities involved with the Scope of Services, and to participate in consultation with said agencies in order to obtain all necessary approvals and/or permissions. The Firm shall be responsible for preparation and timely submittal of documents required for review, approval, and/or recording by such agencies. The Firm shall be responsible for making such changes in the Construction Documents as may be required by existing written standards promulgated by such agencies at no additional charge to City. 3.1.4 Substantial Compliance with Architectural Barriers Act — Should the Scope of Services fall within the regulatory requirements of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act (the "Barriers Act"), as solely determined by the City, Firm shall comply with the Barriers Act. As part of the Scope of Services, it is the sole responsibility of the Firm to identify and analyze the requirements of the Barriers Act and to become familiar with the governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve Firm's design and/or construction Services. Firm shall participate in consultations with said authorities in order to obtain approval for such design and/or construction. As part of the Services, the Firm shall obtain the Notice of Substantial Compliance for the Services from the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (the "TDLR"). The Firm shall, without additional compensation, immediately correct any errors, omissions, or deficiencies in the design services and/or construction documents identified by TDLR and/or a Registered Accessibility Specialist ("RAS") at any phase of the Services, either by review of the construction documents, or inspection of the design at the commencement of construction, during the construction of the work, or at the completion of construction. 3.1.4.1 Submission of Construction Documents to TDLR — The Firm shall mail, ship, or hand -deliver the construction documents to TDLR not City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 4 Category D - Architecture 3199870 later than five (5) calendar days after the Firm issues the construction documents for the work. 3.1.4.2 Completion of Registration Form to TDLR — Firm shall complete an Elimination of Barriers Project Registration Form for each subject building or facility within the Scope of Services, and submit the registration form(s) along with the applicable fees not later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the Firm completes the submittal of the construction documents to TDLR. 3.1.4.3 TDLR Approval of Construction Documents — After review of the construction documents by TDLR, the Firm shall be notified in writing of the results; however, it is the Firm's responsibility to obtain TDLR's written comments. The Firm shall address all comments that prevent TDLR approval of the construction documents, including comments relating to Conditional Approval that must be addressed in the design and construction of the work. Firm shall resubmit construction documents to TDLR for review prior to the commencement of construction of the work. 3.1.4.4 TDLR Project Inspection — Firm shall request an inspection from TDLR or a TDLR locally approved RAS no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the completion of construction of the work. The Firm shall advise the City in writing of the results of each inspection. City reserves the right to verify the written results with TDLR at any time during design, construction, or at the completion of the work. 3.1.4.5 Corrective Modifications following TDLR Project Inspection - When corrective modifications to achieve substantial compliance are required, the TDLR inspector or the RAS shall provide the Firm a list of deficiencies and a deadline for completing the modifications. Firm shall provide the City with this list within five (5) calendar days of receipt. It is the sole responsibility of the Firm to completely address the deficiencies by the stated deadline or to obtain a written notice of extension from the TDLR. When the corrective measures have been completed, Firm shall provide the TDLR (and/or the RAS who completed the inspection) and the City with written verification of the corrective measures completed. 3.1.4.6 TDLR Notice of Substantial Compliance — TDLR shall provide a Notice of Substantial Compliance to the City after the newly constructed work has had a satisfactory inspection, or Firm has submitted verification of corrective modifications. City and Firm agree that the final five percent (5%) of Firm's Fee, unless expressly stated otherwise in a Project Order, shall not be paid until the City is in receipt of the TDLR's Notice of Substantial Compliance for all components and/or phases of the work. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 5 Category D - Architecture 3199870 3.2 Direct Expenses — Direct Expenses are included in the Firm's Fee as described in Article Ti and include actual reasonable and necessary expenditures made by the Firm and the Firm's Personnel in connection with the Services. All submitted Direct Expenses are to be within the amounts as set forth in the applicable Project Order, and consistent with Exhibit E, City of Anna Guidelines for Direct Expenses, General and Administrative Markup, and Travel and Subsistence Expenses. The Firm shall be solely responsible for the auditing of all Direct Expenses prior to submitting to the City for reimbursement, and shall be responsible for the accuracy thereof. Any over -payment by the City for errors in submittals for reimbursement may be deducted from the Firm's subsequent payment for Services; provided, however this shall not be the City's sole and exclusive remedy for said overpayment. 3.3 Invoices — No payment to Firm shall be made until Firm tenders an invoice to the City. Invoices are to be submitted to City immediately upon completion work as set forth in the applicable Project Order. On all submitted invoices, Firm shall include appropriate background materials and sufficient detail for the City to verify the Services performed and Direct Expenses incurred in support of the submitted charges on said invoice. Such background material shall include employee timesheets, invoices for work obtained from other parties, and receipts and/or log information relating to Direct Expenses. Each invoice shall constitute a representation of the Firm that the proportion of the Services has been fully performed in accordance with this Agreement, that the Direct Expenses have been actually incurred and that payment of the indicated amount has been earned by, and is properly due and payable to, the Firm in accordance with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the presentation of any invoice to the City, the amount reflected thereon shall be due and payable to the Firm only to the extent earned by the Firm in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All invoices for payment shall provide a summary methodology for administrative markup and/or overhead charges. 3.4 Timing of Payment — City shall make payment to Firm for said invoices within thirty (30) days following receipt and acceptance thereof. The parties agree that payment by City to Firm is considered to be complete upon mailing of payment by City. Furthermore, the parties agree that the payment is considered to be made and mailed on the date that the payment is postmarked. If the City makes any payment by electronic means, the payment is considered to be made on the date that the City requests and authorizes the payment to be made. 3.5 Disputed Payment Procedures — In the event of a disputed or contested invoice by City, only that portion so contested may be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. City shall notify Firm of a disputed invoice, or portion of an invoice, in writing by the twenty-first (21 st) calendar day after the date the City receives the invoice. The written notice shall include a detailed statement of the amount of the invoice which is disputed and the City shall provide Firm an opportunity to cure the basis of the dispute. If a dispute is resolved in favor of the Firm, City shall proceed to process said invoice, or the disputed portion of the invoice, within the provisions of Article 3.4. If a dispute is resolved in favor of the City, Firm shall submit to City a corrected invoice, reflecting any and all payment(s) of the undisputed amounts, documenting the credited amounts, and identifying outstanding amounts on said invoice to aid City in processing payment for the remaining balance. Such revised invoice shall have a new invoice number, clearly referencing the previous submitted invoice. City agrees to exercise reasonableness in City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 6 Category D - Architecture 3199870 contesting any invoice or portion thereof that has background materials supporting the submitted charges. 3.6 Failure to Pay — Failure of the City to pay an invoice, for a reason other than upon written notification as stated in the provisions of Article 3.5 to the shall grant the Firm the right, in addition to any and all other rights provided, to, upon written notice to the City, suspend performance under this Agreement, and such act or acts shall not be deemed a breach of this Agreement. However, Firm shall not suspend performance under this Agreement prior to the tenth (10th) calendar day after the Firm gives written notice of suspension to the City, in accordance with Chapter 2251, Subchapter "D" of the Texas Government Code. The City shall not be required to pay any invoice submitted by the Firm if the Firm is in breach of any provision(s) of this Agreement. 3.7 Adjusted Compensation — If the Scope of Services or if the Firm's Services are materially changed due to no error on behalf of Firm in the performance of Services under this Agreement, the amounts of the Firm's compensation shall be equitably adjusted as approved by City. Any additional amounts paid to the Firm as a result of any material change to the Scope of the Services shall be authorized by written change order duly executed by both parties before the services are performed. 3.8 Project Order Suspension — If the Firm's work is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three (3) months for reasons that are not wholly or partially the Firm's fault, Firm shall be entitled to compensation for any and all work completed to the satisfaction of City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement prior to suspension or abandonment. In the event of such suspension or abandonment, Firm shall deliver to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any other items prepared by Firm in connection with this Agreement prior to Firm receiving final payment. If the work is resumed after being suspended for more than three (3) months, the Firm's compensation shall be equitably adjusted as approved by the City. Any additional amounts paid to the Firm after the work is resumed shall be agreed upon in writing by both parties before the services are performed. ARTICLE 4 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 4.1 Documents Property of the City — The Firm's work in connection with the Services is the property of the City, and Firm may not use the documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any materials for any other purpose not relating to the Services without City's prior written consent. City shall be furnished with such reproductions of the plans, data, documents, maps, and any other information as defined in the applicable Project Order. Upon completion of the work, or any earlier termination of this Agreement under Article 3 and/or Article 7, Firm will revise plans, data, documents, maps, and any other information as defined in the applicable Project Order to reflect changes while performing the Services and promptly furnish the same to the City in an acceptable electronic or other format. All such reproductions shall be the property of the City who may use them without the Firm's permission for any purpose relating to the Services, including, but not limited to, completion of the Services, and/or additions, alterations, modifications, and/or revisions to the Services. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 7 Category D - Architecture 3199870 4.1.1 Work for Hire —The agreements and obligations set forth in this Article 4.1.1 are supported by the mutual considerations and covenants set forth in this Agreement and also by consideration of the payment of $10.00 by the City to Firm, and other good and valuable consideration, the payment and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. 4.1.1.1 The term "Work" as used in this Section 4.1.1 means the materials created by Firm as part or in furtherance of the Services including without limitation any and all documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, assessments, memorandums, appraisals and/or any other materials or copies thereof in any reproducible, tangible, or electronic form or medium. The Work conceived, or originated by Firm or others for the Firm, or on behalf of the Firm, or performed in connection with the Services is and will be of original development by Firm and are to be considered works made for hire as that term is defined in the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. §101) and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City, without any consideration paid to Firm beyond that set forth under this Agreement. All rights of Firm with respect to all designs and copyrights, trademarks, trade names, and other proprietary rights relating to the Work are by this Agreement assigned to the City. Firm agrees to promptly support and give all reasonable assistance to enable the City to prepare, file and prosecute any United States or foreign application for all types of design trademark or copyright registrations related to the Work that the City deems appropriate, and Firm will execute all appropriate documents and assignments for such. The City shall have the sole right to determine the treatment of information received from Firm, including but limited to the right to keep the same as a trade secret, to use, disclose, and publish the same with or without prior copyright registration and to file, license or share the same in its own name or the name of an affiliate or to follow any other procedure that the City may deem appropriate. 4.1.1.2 To the extent that any material produced under this Agreement may not be considered works made for hire, or to the extent that Article 4.1.1 or any portion thereof is declared invalid either in substance or purpose, in whole or in part, Firm agrees to irrevocably transfer, grant, convey, assign, and relinquish exclusively to the City all of Firm's right, title, and interest, including ownership of copyright and patent rights, to any material developed by Firm under this Agreement, without the necessity of further consideration. Firm shall have no right to disclose or use any of the Work for any purpose whatsoever except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Further, the rights conveyed by this instrument include the right and authority of the City, at its expense, to make timely application for the renewal and extension of any copyright of the Work as allowed by the laws now or later in force in the United States and in any other country. Firm irrevocably constitutes and appoints the City "attorney in fact" to apply for renewal within one year before the expiration of the initial copyright term, and covenants to execute any further instruments that may be necessary to perfect the City's full enjoyment of the renewal right. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 8 Category D - Architecture 3199870 4.1.1.3 No rights or licenses, expressed or implied, in any other work or other information is granted to Firm by this agreement, and no license, partnership, or assignment of any right, title, or interest is created, granted or implied by the City under this Agreement. 4.1.1.4 Furthermore, Firm acknowledges and agrees that the Work —to the extent permitted by applicable law —is confidential and proprietary trade secret information of the City, and of substantial value to the City. Firm agrees that it will not use the Work in any way, for its own account or the account of any third party, except as expressly permitted by, or required to achieve the purposes of, this Agreement. Firm also agrees not to disclose to any third party any part of the Work except as is necessary to perform the Services. Firm will take reasonable precautions at least as stringent as it takes to protect its own most highly confidential and proprietary information to protect the confidentiality of the Work. Firm's breach of this obligation will result in irreparable and continuing damage to the City for which there will be no adequate remedy at law, entitling the City to injunctive relief and a decree for specific performance, and such other relief as may be proper (including monetary damages if appropriate). 4.1.1.5 Firm affirms that the Work is original, that all statements asserted as facts are based on careful investigation and research for accuracy, that the Work does not, in whole or part, infringe any copyright or violate any right or privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever, that it has not been published or used in total or in part and is not being submitted or considered for publication or use in total or in part elsewhere, and that Firm has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to make the grants and transfers contained herein. Subject to any limitations stated in Article 10 of this Agreement, Firm will indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, representatives and anyone directly or indirectly employed by it against damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney's fees and related expenses, arising out of infringement of any rights during or after completion of the Work, and will defend all claims in connection with any alleged infringement of those rights utilizing legal counsel approved by the City. 4.1.1.6 The obligations imposed by this Article 4.1.1 shall remain in effect indefinitely and shall survive any termination or expiration of the Agreement, whether by expiration of time, operation of law or otherwise. 4.2 Documents Subject to Laws Regarding Public Disclosure — Firm acknowledges that City is a governmental entity and that all documents, plans, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, and/or any items prepared or furnished by Firm (and Firm's Personnel) under this Agreement are property of the City and upon completion of the Services shall thereafter be subject to the Texas Public Information Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 552) the ("PIA") and exceptions to the PIA and any other applicable laws requiring public disclosure of the information contained in said items. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 9 Category D - Architecture 3199870 ARTICLE 5 FIRM'S INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Required General Liability Insurance — Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, a general liability (errors and omissions) insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount not less than One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, and Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate. Such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or non -renewal of any policies. In the event that there is a material modification to such policy, Firm shall provide written notice of such modification to City at least thirty (30) days prior to such material modification. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.2 Required Professional Liability Insurance — Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, a professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount not less than One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, and Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate. Such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or non -renewal of any policies. In the event that there is a material modification to such policy, Firm shall provide written notice of such modification to City at least thirty (30) days prior to such material modification. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.3 Required Workers Compensation Insurance — Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to City, all Statutory Workers Compensation Insurance as required by the laws of the State of Texas. Such insurance policy shall be with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent service(s), and authorized to transact business in the State of Texas. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 10 Category D - Architecture 3199870 5.4 Required Umbrella Coverage or Excess Liability Coverage — Firm shall maintain, at no expense to the City, an umbrella coverage or excess liability coverage insurance policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount of Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies, evidenced by return receipt or United States Certified Mail. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. 5.5 Circumstances Requiring Explosion, Collapse, Underground Property Coverage — If the Scope of Services warrant, and if identified on the checklist located in Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements, Firm shall maintain, at no expense to the City, an explosion, collapse, underground coverage policy with a company that maintains a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s), authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, in an amount of Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Consistent with the terms and provisions of Exhibit F, such policy shall name the City, its past, present and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insureds as to all applicable coverage. Such policy shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. Such policy shall require the provision of written notice to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies, evidenced by return receipt or United States Certified Mail. Firm shall furnish City with certificates evidencing such coverage prior to commencing work on the Services. ARTICLE 6 FIRM'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS Records of Direct Expenses and expenses pertaining to work performed in conjunction with the Services shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles. Invoices will be sent to the City as indicated in Article 3. Copies of employee time sheets, receipts for direct expense items and other records of expenses will be included in the monthly invoices. ARTICLE 7 AUDITS AND RECORDS / COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS AND CITY CHARTER The Firm agrees that at any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, Firm shall make available to representatives of the City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement, and will permit such representatives of the City to audit, examine, copy and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement, and City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 11 Category D - Architecture 3199870 for a period of four (4) years from the date of final settlement of this Agreement or for such other or longer period, if any, as may be required by applicable statute or other lawful requirement. The Firm agrees that it is aware of the Compliance with Federal, State, Local Laws and City Charter requirements as set forth in Exhibit G, and is in compliance therewith. Firm agrees that it is further aware of the vendor disclosure requirements set forth in Chapter 176, Local Government Code, as amended, and will abide by the same. In this connection, a lawful representative of Firm shall execute the Conflict of Interest Questionnaire, Form CIQ, attached hereto as Exhibit H and incorporated herein for all purposes. ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT / REMEDIES City may, upon thirty (30) days written notice to Firm, terminate this Agreement or any individual Project Order, for any reason or no reason at all, before the termination date hereof, and without prejudice to any other remedy it may have. If City terminates this Agreement or a Project Order due to a default of and/or breach by Firm and the expense of finishing the Services exceeds the Firm's Fee at the time of termination, Firm waives its right to any portion of Firm's Fee as set forth in Article 3 herein and agrees to pay any costs over and above the fee which the City is required to pay in order to finish the Services. On any default and/or breach by Firm, City may elect not to terminate the Agreement or a Project Order, and in such event it may make good the deficiency in which the default consists, and deduct the costs from the Firm's Fee that would otherwise be due to Firm as set forth in Article 3 herein. If City terminates this Agreement and Firm is not in default of the Agreement or a Project Order, Firm shall be entitled to compensation for any and all work completed to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement prior to termination. In the event of any termination, Firm shall deliver to City all finished and/or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs and/or any items prepared by Firm in connection with this Agreement prior to Firm receiving final payment. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are cumulative, and the use of any one right or remedy by either party shall not preclude or waive its rights to use any or all other remedies. These rights and remedies are given in addition to any other rights the parties may have by law, statute, ordinance, or otherwise. ARTICLE 9 DISPUTE RESOLUTION / MEDIATION In addition to all remedies at law, the parties may resolve/mediate any controversy, claim or dispute arising out of or relating to the interpretation or performance of this Agreement, or breach thereof, by voluntary, nonbinding mediation to be conducted by a mutually acceptable mediator. ARTICLE 10 INDEMNITY FIRM SHALL RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND ITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES AND EMPLOYEES (COLLECTIVELY, City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 12 Category D - Architecture 3199870 "INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FROM AND AGAINST ALL DAMAGES, INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH), CLAIMS, PROPERTY DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOSS OF USE), LOSSES, DEMANDS, SUITS, JUDGMENTS AND COSTS, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES INCURRED IN ENFORCING THIS INDEMNITY), CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT, GROSSLY NEGLIGENT, AND/OR INTENTIONAL ACT AND/OR OMISSION OF FIRM, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR ANY OTHER THIRD PARTIES FROM WHOM FIRM IS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE, IN ITS/THEIR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT AND/OR ARISING OUT OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY FIRM PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF THE JOINT OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY (COLLECTIVELY, "CLAIMS"). THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION AND THE USE OF THE TERM "CLAIMS" IS ALSO SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO APPLY TO, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, WHETHER CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, BROUGHT AGAINST CITY BY ANY GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY OR AGENCY RELATED TO ANY PERSON PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT THAT ARE BASED ON ANY FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW AND ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, DAMAGES, ACTIONS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF EVERY KIND AND NATURE, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, EXISTING OR CLAIMED TO EXIST, RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF ANY EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM AND ITS EMPLOYEES OR SUBCONTRACTORS AS A RESULT OF THAT SUBCONTRACTOR'S OR EMPLOYEE'S EMPLOYMENT AND/OR SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT WITH THE FIRM, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM BASED ON SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR PREFERENCE, RACE, RELIGION, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE OR DISABILITY UNDER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, AND/OR ANY CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL TERMINATION, BACK PAY, FUTURE WAGE LOSS, OVERTIME PAY, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, INJURY SUBJECT TO RELIEF UNDER THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT OR WOULD BE SUBJECT TO RELIEF UNDER ANY POLICY FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE, AND ANY OTHER CLAIM, WHETHER IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE. FIRM IS EXPRESSLY REQUIRED TO DEFEND CITY AGAINST ALL SUCH CLAIMS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, IF A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION DETERMINES THAT THE CITY (WITHOUT WAIVING ANY GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY) HAS JOINT, CONCURRENT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE FOR THE CLAIMS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ("JUDGMENT"), THEN FIRM IS NOT REQUIRED TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND THE CITY TO THE EXTENT OF THE NEGLIGENCE APPORTIONED TO THE CITY. IN THE EVENT THE JUDGMENT PROVIDES THAT CITY IS JOINTLY, CONCURRENTLY OR SOLELY NEGLIGENT FOR THE CLAIMS REFERRED TO THEREIN, CITY AGREES TO REIMBURSE FIRM FOR ALL REASONABLE AND NECESSARY COSTS INCURRED AND PAID BY FIRM THAT ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CITY'S PERCENTAGE OF JOINT, CONCURRENT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE, AS SET FORTH IN THE JUDGMENT, INCLUDING REASONABLE AND NECESSARY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES, WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 13 Category D - Architecture 3199870 OF THE DATE THE JUDGMENT BECOMES FINAL AND NON -APPEALABLE. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, IF THIS AGREEMENT IS A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, THEN FIRM'S INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS ARTICLE 10 ARE LIMITED BY, AND TO BE READ AS COMPLYING WITH, SECTION 271.904 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SUCH THAT THE FIRM SHALL: (1) DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AGAINST LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY OR RESULTS FROM AN ACT OF NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL TORT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT, OR FAILURE TO PAY A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER COMMITTED BY THE FIRM OR THE FIRM's AGENT, CONSULTANT UNDER CONTRACT, OR ANOTHER ENTITY OVER WHICH THE FIRM EXERCISES CONTROL; AND (2) REIMBURSE THE CITY'S REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES IN PROPORTION TO THE FIRM'S LIABILITY. IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPROVE OR SELECT DEFENSE COUNSEL TO BE RETAINED BY FIRM IN FULFILLING ITS OBLIGATION HEREUNDER TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY CITY, UNLESS SUCH RIGHT IS EXPRESSLY WAIVED BY CITY IN WRITING. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PROVIDE A PORTION OR ALL OF ITS OWN DEFENSE; HOWEVER, CITY IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. ANY SUCH ACTION BY CITY IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF FIRM's OBLIGATION TO DEFEND CITY OR AS A WAIVER OF FIRM'S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY CITY PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. FIRM SHALL RETAIN CITY -APPROVED DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN SEVEN (7) BUSINESS DAYS OF CITY'S WRITTEN NOTICE THAT CITY IS INVOKING ITS RIGHT TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IF FIRM FAILS TO RETAIN COUNSEL WITHIN SUCH TIME PERIOD, CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO RETAIN DEFENSE COUNSEL ON ITS OWN BEHALF, AND FIRM SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED BY CITY. THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CREATED BY THIS ARTICLE SHALL SURVIVE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 11 NOTICES Firm agrees that all notices or communications to City permitted or required under this Agreement shall be delivered to City at the following addresses: Jim Proce City Manager City of Anna P.O. Box 776 Anna, TX 75409-0776 Mandatory copy to: Wolfe, Tidwell & McCoy, LLP City of Anna Attorney City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 14 Category D - Architecture 3199870 2591 Dallas Pkwy, Suite 300 Frisco, Texas 75034 City agrees that all notices or communication to Firm permitted or required under this Agreement shall be delivered to Firm at the following addresses: BRW ARCHITECTS ATTN: MARK E. WATFORD 3535 TRAVIS ST. SUITE 250 DALLAS, TX 75204 Any notice provided in writing under the terms of this Agreement by either party to the other shall be in writing and may be effected by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. All notices or communication required to be given in writing by one party or the other shall be considered as having been given to the addressee on the date such notice or communication is postmarked and deposited in the U.S. mail with proper postage by the sending party. Each party may change the address to which notice may be sent to that party by giving notice of such change to the other party in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 12 MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Complete Agreement —This Agreement, including the exhibits hereto labeled "A" through "H," all of which are incorporated herein for all purposes, constitute the entire Agreement by and between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and/or contemporaneous written and/or oral understandings. This Agreement may not be amended, supplemented, and/or modified except by written agreement duly executed by both parties. The following exhibits are attached below and made a part of this Agreement: 12.1.1 Exhibit A, Professional Services Project Order Form 12.1.2 Exhibit B, City RFQ Category D - Architecture and Firm Response dated: 7/13/2021 12.1.3 Exhibit C, City of Anna Benchmarks (as amended) http://www.Annatexas.gov/departments/planning/benchmarks.php . 12.1.4 Exhibit D, City of Anna Guidelines for Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD). Per industry standards. 12.1.5 Exhibit E, City of Anna Guidelines for Direct Expenses; General and Administrative Markup; Travel and Subsistence Expenses. 12.1.6 Exhibit F, City of Anna Contractor Insurance Requirements. 12.1.7 Exhibit G, City of Anna Compliance with Federal, State, Local Laws and City Charter City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 15 Category D - Architecture 3199870 12.1.8 Exhibit H, Conflict of Interest Questionnaire, Form CIQ. To the extent that Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F, Exhibit G or Exhibit H are in conflict with provisions of this Agreement or each other, the provisions of this Agreement, then the provisions of Exhibit A, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H or Exhibit B shall prevail in that order. 12.4 Severability — In the event of a term, condition, or provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, void, unenforceable, or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that term, condition, or provision, shall be deleted and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as if such invalid, illegal, void, unenforceable or unlawful provision had never been contained herein. 12.5 Governing Law/Venue — This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to conflict of law principles. The exclusive venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Collin County, Texas. 12.6 Execution / Consideration — This Agreement is executed by the parties hereto without coercion or duress for any substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever confessed. 12.7 Authority — The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the other party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. 12.8 Waiver — Waiver by either party of any breach of this Agreement, or the failure of either party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, at any time, shall not in any way affect, limit, or waive such party's right thereafter to enforce and compel strict compliance. 12.9 Headings — The headings of the various sections of this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and are not to be full or accurate descriptions of the content thereof. 12.10 Multiple Counterparts — This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. An electronic mail and/or facsimile signature will also be deemed to constitute an original if properly executed and delivered to the other party. 12.11 Immunity — The parties acknowledge and agree that, in executing and performing this Agreement, City has not waived, nor shall be deemed to have waived, any defense or immunity, including governmental, sovereign and official immunity, that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 16 Category D - Architecture 3199870 functions. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein. 12.12 Attorney's Fees — If either party files any action or brings any proceeding against the other arising from this Agreement, then as between City and Firm, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover as an element of its costs of suit, and not as damages, reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and litigation expenses both at trial and on appeal, subject to the limitations set forth in TEx. Loc. GOV'T CODE § 271.153, as it exists or may be amended, if applicable. 12.13 Additional Representations — Each signatory represents this Agreement has been read by the party for which this Agreement is executed and that such party has had the opportunity to confer with its counsel. 12.14 Independent Contractor— In performing this Agreement, Firm and Firm's Personnel shall act as an independent contractor with respect to City. In no event shall this Agreement be construed as establishing a partnership, joint venture or similar relationship between the parties and nothing herein shall authorize either party to act as agent for the other. Firm shall be liable for its own debts, obligations, acts and omissions, including the payment of all required withholding, social security and other taxes and benefits with respect to all of Firm's officers, directors, partners, employees and representatives, who shall not be considered City employees and shall not be eligible for any employee benefit plan offered by City. At no time shall the City have any control or direction, direct or indirect, over the Firm's means, methods, sequences, techniques, procedures, supervision, subcontractors or other undertakings utilized to perform the Services. 12.15 Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions — This Agreement shall be deemed drafted equally by all parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any party shall not apply. 12.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries — Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any right in any third party not a signatory to this Agreement, and the parties do not intend to create any third party beneficiaries by entering into this Agreement. 12.17 Duty to Facilitate Compliance with Public Information Act (a) The obligations in this section apply if this Agreement (1) has a stated expenditure of at least $1 million in public funds for the purchase of goods or services by City; or (2) results in the expenditure of at least $1 million in public funds for the purchase of goods or services by City in a fiscal year of the Anna City Council. (b) If this Agreement is described in subsection (a) above, Firm shall comply with the following obligations, which are set forth in Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code: (1) preserve all contracting information related to this Agreement as provided by the records retention requirements applicable to Anna for the duration of this Agreement; City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 17 Category D - Architecture 3199870 (2) promptly provide to Anna any contracting information related to this Agreement that is in the custody or possession of Firm on request of Anna; and (3) on completion of this Agreement, either: (1) provide at no cost to City all contracting information related to the contract that is in the custody or possession of Firm; or (2) preserve the contracting information related to this Agreement as provided by the records retention requirements applicable to City. (c) As used in this provision, the term "contracting information" shall have the same meaning as that term is defined in Section 552.003, Texas Government Code, as amended. (d) The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code, may apply to this Agreement and the Firm agrees that this Agreement can be terminated if the Firm knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement and caused this Agreement to be effective on the latest day as reflected by the signatures below. Effective Date: July 13, 2021 CITY: FIRM: BRWARCHITECTS �i��1/�/`���r"T /i�c, By: City of Anna, Texas —Master Professional Services Agreement Page 18 Category D -Architecture 3199370 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Jim Proce, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of 20'� Notary Public In and For t e State oe s l� n KAREN LAVERY My commission expires: -' 4`1 Notary ID #132840568 Is My Commission Expires December 24, 2024 BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared A2nw^k ,known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day 7 Q Notary Public In and For the State of p® Notary PATRICIA01 2811REID, M commission expires: A to Notary lD p1528178 y p My Commission Expires °j^amw"x DKember27,2021 City of Anna, Texas —Master Professional Services Agreement Page 19 Category D -Architecture 3199870 EXHIBITS to MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT ORDER FORM: Individual "Professional Services Project Orders" will be issued for each project. Sample PSPO is included in the City's RFQ. EXHIBIT B CITY RFQ and FIRM RESPONSE Exhibit B-1: City RFQ (on file with the City Purchasing Department) Exhibit B-2: Firm's Response (on file with the City Purchasing Department) EXHIBIT C CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYING AND BENCHMARKING City of Anna Benchmarks (as amended) EXHIBIT D CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND DRAFTING (CADD) Per industry standards City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 20 Category D - Architecture 3199870 EXHIBIT E CITY OF ANNA GUIDELINES FOR DIRECT EXPENSES; GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MARKUP; TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES I. FIRM'S RESPONSIBILITY. The Firm shall be solely responsible for the auditing of all direct expense, approved markup (general and/or administrative), and approved travel and/or subsistence charges, including those to be included under a sub -contract, prior to the City for reimbursement, and Firm shall be responsible for the accuracy thereof. Any overpayment by the City for errors in submittals for reimbursement may be deducted from the Firm's subsequent payment(s) for services; however, this shall not be the City's sole and exclusive remedy for said overpayment. Ill. GUIDELINES FOR DIRECT EXPENSES. A. Local Transportation — Transportation in connection with the Services, when such transportation is not a function of routine performance of the duties of the Firm in connection with the Services, and when such transportation exceeds beyond fifty (50) miles from the Services site, shall be reimbursed at a standard mileage rate consistent with that as issued, and periodically revised, by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Under no circumstances shall City reimburse Firm at a higher standard mileage rate or pay additional markup on charges for local transportation. Completion of City's Standard Mileage Log is required for submittal of these charges for reimbursement, including justification for each submitted expense. Under no circumstances are charges associated with rental cars for local transportation eligible for reimbursement by City. Toll road subscriptions or toll plaza receipts are not reimbursable. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. B. Supplies, Material, Equipment — City shall reimburse the actual cost of other similar direct Services -related expenses, which are duly presented in advance and approved by City's Project Manager in writing. C. Commercial Reproduction — City shall reimburse the actual cost of reproductions, specifically limited to progress prints prepared for presentation to City at each phase of progress, and final Construction Documents prepared for distribution at bidding phase, provided that the Firm has duly obtained at least three (3) quotations from commercial firms and has chosen the best value for the City. Firm shall provide such documentation to City for review prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. D. In -House Reproduction - Firm shall make arrangements with the City for prior approval of in- house reproduction rates prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. City shall provide Firm with a standard format for documenting these charges. Completion of the City's reproduction log is required as a prerequisite for payment, including the number or reproductions, the date, time, description, the approved standard rate, and a justification for each submitted expense for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. E. Commercial Plotting — City shall reimburse the actual cost of plots, specifically limited to final documents, provided the Firm has duly obtained at least three (3) quotations from commercial firms and has chosen the best value for the City. Firm shall provide such documentation to City for review prior to submitting these expenses for reimbursement. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. F. In -House Plotting —Firm shall make arrangements with City for prior written approval of in-house plotting rates prior to submitting these charges for reimbursement. City shall provide Firm with a standard format for documenting these charges. Completion of the City's reproduction log is City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 21 Category D - Architecture 3199870 required as a prerequisite for payment, including the number of plots, the date, time, description, the approved standard rate, and a justification for each submitted charge for reimbursement. G. Communications — Reimbursement for expenses relating to electronic communications shall be limited to long-distance telephone or fax toll charges specifically required in the discharge of professional responsibilities related to the Services. Telephone service charges including office or cellular phones, WATTS, or Metro line services or similar charges are not reimbursable. H. Postage, Mail, and Delivery Service — City shall reimburse the actual cost of postage and delivery of Instruments of Service, provided the Firm duly considers all circumstances (including available time for assured delivery) of the required delivery and selects the best value for the City, which may require comparison of delivery costs offered by three (3) or more sources or methods of delivery, which at a minimum shall include U.S. Mail. Courier service is acceptable only in circumstances requiring deadline -sensitive deliveries and not for the convenience of the Firm and/or the Firm's employees. Firm agrees to place these standards in all subcontracts for work on the Services. I. Meals and Other Related Charges — Meals or any other related expenses are not reimbursable unless incurred outside a fifty (50) mile radius of the Service site, and then only reimbursable for the actual cost subject to compliance with the City's currently adopted policy. Non -allowable costs include, but are not limited to, charges for entertainment, alcoholic beverages, and gratuities. III. GUIDELINES FOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MARKUP. 1. Requirement of Prior Approval — Firm may be allowed to charge a General and/or Administrative Markup on work completed if Firm can clearly define to City specifically what costs are included in the markup calculation. To apply General and/or Administrative Markup, Firm must also document to City what costs would be considered direct costs. City shall issue approval in writing to allow Firm to charge General and/or Administrative Markup. City reserves the right to reject any and all requests for General and/or Administrative Markup. IV. GUIDELINES FOR TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES. 1. Requirement of Prior Approval —City shall reimburse the actual cost of travel and/or subsistence expenses upon prior written approval by the City's Project Manager. 2. Adherence to Currently Adopted City Travel Policy — Reimbursements shall be governed by the same travel policies provided for City employees according to current adopted policy. Prior to the event, Firm shall request, and the City's Project Manager shall provide the provisions and the restrictions that apply to out-of-town reimbursements. END OF SECTION City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 22 Category D - Architecture 3199870 EXHIBIT F CITY OF ANNA CONTRACTOR INSURANCE GUIDELINES I. Requirement of Insurance — A. All required insurance policies shall name the City, its past, present, and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees as additional insured as to all applicable coverage with the exception of workers compensation insurance and professional liability insurance. B. Such policies shall require the provision of written notice to City at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, non -renewal, or material modification of any policies C. Such policies shall provide for a waiver of subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent the same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. II. Insurance Company Qualification — All insurance companies providing the required insurance shall be authorized to transact business in the State of Texas, and shall have a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s). III. Certificate of Insurance — A Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements evidencing the required insurance shall be submitted with the contractor's bid or response to proposal. If the contract is renewed or extended by the City a Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements shall also be provided to the City prior to the date the contract is renewed or extended. Insurance Checklist — "X" means that the following coverage is required for this Agreement. Copies of all endorsements for each policy required. Coverage Required X 1. Worker's Compensation & Employer's Liability X 2. General Liability 3. XCU Coverage X 4. Professional Liability X Umbrella Coverage or Excess Liability Coverage Limits ■ Statutory Limits of the State of Texas ■ Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 each occurrence; ■ Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence; ■ Minimum $ 2,000,000.00 aggregate. ■ Minimum $ 1,000,000.00 each occurrence; ■ Minimum $ 2,000,000.00 in the aggregate. ■ An amount of $ 2,000,000.00. X 6. City and its past, present, and future officials, officers, agents, representatives, and employees named as additional insured on General Liability Policy and Umbrella or Excess Liability Coverage. This coverage is primary to all other coverage the City may possess. City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 23 Category D - Architecture 3199870 X 7. General Liability Insurance provides for a Waiver of Subrogation against the City for injuries, including death, property damage, or any other loss to the extent that same is covered by the proceeds of the insurance. All insurance policies that are required to name the City as an additional insured must be endorsed to read as primary and non-contributory coverage regardless of the application of other insurance. X 8. Thirty (30) days notice of cancellation, non -renewal, or material change required. X 9. Insurance company has a minimum rating of "A" by A.M. Best's Key Rating Guide, or other equivalent rating service(s). X 10. Each Policy and Certificate of Insurance must state the project title and Professional Service Project Order number. 11. Other Insurance Requirements (State Below): END OF SECTION City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 24 Category D - Architecture 3199870 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER By submitting a response to the solicitation and entering into a contract with the City, the Firm hereby verifies and certifies that he/she/it is in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the City Charter. The Firm also certifies the following: CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY The bidder/proposer certifies that at the time of submission, he/she/it is not on the Federal Government's list of suspended, ineligible, or debarred contractors. In the event of placement on the list between the time of bid/proposal submission and time of award, the bidder/proposer will notify the City of Anna Purchasing Agent. Failure to do may result in terminating this contract for default. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Form 1295) By submitting a bid or proposal in response to this solicitation, the bidder/proposer agrees to comply with Texas Government Code Section 2252.908. Bidder/proposer agrees to provide the City of Anna Finance Department, and/or requesting department, the "Certificate of Interested Parties," FORM 1295 as required, with in ten (10) business days from notification of award, renewal, amended or extended contract. Visit.https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/whatsnew/elf info form1295.htm for more information. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH IMMIGRATION LAWS The bidder/proposer certifies that he/she/it is in compliance with all provisions of Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") and Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA") in regards to his/her/its employees/laborers and that employment eligibility has been verified by the bidder/proposer for all persons who will provide services to City. COMPLIANCE INDEMNIFICATION: IN CONSIDERATION FOR THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY OF ANNA, VENDER AGREES TO RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF ANNA AND ITS PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, COUNCIL MEMBERS, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES ("INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, WHETHER CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, BROUGHT AGAINST THE CITY OF ANNA BY ANY GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY OR AGENCY RELATED TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY PROVIDING SERVICES BY, THROUGH OR UNDER VENDOR'S AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ANNA THAT ARE BASED ON ANY FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INA AND IRCA. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, IF THE AGREEMENT IS A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, THEN VENDOR'S INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE OBLIGATIONS UNDER ARE LIMITED BY, AND TO BE READ AS COMPLYING WITH, SECTION 271.904 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SUCH THAT THE VENDOR SHALL: (1) DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES AGAINST LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY OR RESULTS FROM AN ACT OF NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL TORT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT, OR FAILURE TO PAY A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER COMMITTED BY THE VENDOR OR THE VENDOR'S AGENT, CONSULTANT UNDER CONTRACT, OR ANOTHER ENTITY OVER WHICH THE VENDOR EXERCISES CONTROL; AND (2) REIMBURSE THE CITY'S REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES IN PROPORTION TO THE VENDOR'S LIABILITY. NO PROHIBITED INTEREST City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 25 Category D - Architecture 3199870 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER I, the undersigned, declare and affirm that no person or officer of the submitting firm or its partners are either employed by the City of Anna or is an elected official of the City of Anna and who has a financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contract with the City of Anna or has a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in the sale to the City of Anna of any land, or rights or interest in any land, materials, supplies or service. As per Section 11.02 of the Anna City Charter, interest represented by ownership of stock by a City of Anna employee or official is permitted if the ownership amounts to less than one (1) per cent of the corporation stock. I further understand and acknowledge that the existence of a prohibited interest at any time during the term of this contract will render the contract voidable. DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code requires that any vendor or person considering doing business with a local government entity disclose in the Questionnaire Form CIQ, the vendor or person's affiliation or business relationship that might cause a conflict of interest with a local government entity. By law, this questionnaire must be filed with the records administrator of The City of Anna no later than the 7th business day after the date the person becomes aware of facts that require the statement to be filed. See Section 176.006, Local Government Code. A person commits an offense if the person violates Section 176.006, Local Government Code. An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor. By submitting a response to this request, the vendor represents that it is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code. Form is attached to the bid specifications and to this Agreement as Exhibit H. DISCLOSURE OF COMMERCIAL OR SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH ISRAEL Section 2271.002, Texas Government Code: the Firm entering into a contract with the City verifies that it (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract and any subsequent renewals. DISCLOSURE OF BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH IRAN, SUDAN, OR A FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION Section 2252.153 or Section 2270.0201, Texas Government Code: provides that the City may not enter into a governmental contract with" (1) a Firm that is identified on a list prepared and maintained by the comptroller and that does business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization; or (2) a company that the United States government affirmatively declares to be excluded from its federal sanctions regime relating to Sudan, its federal sanctions regime relating to Iran, or any federal sanctions regime relating to a foreign terrorist organization is not subject to contract prohibition under this subchapter. Authorized Representative: Company Nary Date: Printed Name: City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 26 Category D - Architecture 3199870 xr, EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL LAWS and CITY CHARTER Title: Signature: SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED to before me this ,�,Q day of 20AI to certify with witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for the ate of PATRICIA A REID Notary ID 41528118 My Commission Expires +„c*� December27,2021 City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 27 Category D - Architecture 3199870 EXHIBIT H CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIO For vendor doing businei with local govemmemat entity Ibis ques rinalm reflects charges r®de fo the law by ILL. 2L Oft Leg., Regular Gessilum OFi10E tlSE17NLY This is b" ilod in acmmtanm wari (cru{aer 176, tonal Ciarernnwal Coin: by a wrnda whc cam P�i.aj has a tr.zur mladur hip as dafned try Scalar 17Gn(1,1(1a) with a kcal gaceinnadal anuty and the vcrdar rtwcts requirements under Secbsn 176.006(a). Bylaw the quaslnrnatre must be tied writ the records arirtini8attx of ere local gev¢rnr¢nkd inert) rrn War Bart lice 7sn business dal after the clarin hem wr7Jor becomes award of facts trial rogWro the statement In be Wed. See Seclnn Iya' Eta U, Leval Garvemnium Cade. A aria mmrrr� an oMmtso t ilia aced¢r kmwuntjy violates Sa�nre n76S106, tonal Gtrwmmerd Coda. Ar. allansa under Ors %omen is a nesdormamr. t Name of vendor who hes a business relationship with local gevemmenW enlilyL L2VW/, � , 71 Check Ihfs box ftyalt an filing an updnle to a prewiasy flied questionnaire. (t nit law regt,ures ghat you fle an updated conV. elad quesbonnaife with the appropriate fling authodly flat Gaper than the AM business ray arts[ the date on which you became aware that the adglnally filed questionnaire was incomplete or >/lacoirate.) 8 Bane of local goWminent aMeer about whom the irtfairntatton Is being disclosed. Mania of tftew • Describe each emplayanenl or other blsiluess relelloash9p wllh the local governmeart ontaer, er a tamtiy member of the ol9oer, as Eesett8ed by Section 176.t1084ai(2)(A). Also describe any fanfly relationship with the local govemmtrrt officer. CampletawbpaNSAartd8fereachempbrymentorbusinessrelationshlpdescnisi. Aftchaddittonatpages tpOft Few. CIO as necessary! Jl Is the total govenmlent at6eer or a family member at the after recemrg or likely to receive taxable income„ other than Investment Income. from the vrendoi? ® Yes ® No 9_ Is the vendor recelvir7g or Iftety to feceme taxable ulcome, other than Investment Income, from or et the direction of It* Irk government officer of a falttity member o1 the after AN13 the taxable income is not received from the aacal governmental entity? ® Y`t. ® No jj Deserbe eachernpbyrnenh or business relelbontipthatflre vendor nand In Section 1 maintains with a corporation or otter business onMy w%h respect to which the local govemmenl Wear serves as an officer or direMos or holds an ownership interest of one percent or more. 6 _Eli Check this tax If the vendor has men the local government officer or a family meriber of the officer one at mare grits as deseribed in section 178.OM(e)(2)(8), ewcitttding girls described in section 176.DM(a-1). 1' gnaw¢ at vellida dtv g busi n i wr am g en entity at Form prewded by Team fthirs Ca mmi www.ethies state the t.s Revised t/Lt2021 City of Anna, Texas — Master Professional Services Agreement Page 28 Category D - Architecture 3199870 DRAFT FT AIA" Document B101" - 2017 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect AGREEMENT made as of the « » day of g" in the year gy (In words, indicate day, month and year.) BETWEEN the Architect's client identified as the Owner: (Name, legal status, address and other information) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document City Of Anna, T0X8S »« » has added information needed for its completion. a201 E.7th Street » The author may also have «Anna, Texas 75409 » revised the text of the �» original AIA standard form. An Additions and Deletions Report that notes added and the Architect: information as well as (Name, legal status, address and other information) revisions to the standard form text is available from the a��Yhnr and should be reviewed. This document has important legal cq4equences. Consu a 'on with an attorne is encouraged with respect to its completion for the following Project: gro or modification. (Name, location and detailed description) The Owner and Architect agree as follows. 17 ELECTRONIC COPYING of any portion of this AIA® Document to another electronic file is prohibited and constitutes a violation of copyright laws as set forth in the footer of this document. AIA Document B101' - 2011. Copyright m 1974, 1978, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r rved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registeretl tratlemarks antl may not be Bused without permission. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on o8/05/2022 under _der No.2114351196 which expires on 1 o8/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be u,ad in accord- with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: Error! Unknoen document property name. (1900110132) TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 INITIAL INFORMATION 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 6 COST OF THE WORK 7 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11 COMPENSATION 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1 INITIAL INFORMATION § 1.1 This Agreement is based on the Initial Information set forth in this Section 1.1. (For each item in this section, insert the information or a statement such as "not applicable" execution.') § 1.1.1 The Owner's program for the Project: (Insert the Owner's program, identify documentation that establishes the Owner's program, which the program will be developed.) § 1.1.2 The Project's physical characteristics: (Identify or describe pertinent information about the Project's physical characteristics, such dimensions; geotechnical reports; site boundaries; topographic surveys; traffic and utility st public and private utilities and services; legal description of the site, etc) § 1.1.3 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, as defined in Section 6.1: (Provide total and, if known, a line item breakdown) § 1.1.4 The Owner's anticipated design and construction milestone dates: .1 Design phase milestone dates, if any: at time of the manner in Of AIA Document E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 19']9, 19"/8, 198"], 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA,, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires o 2 01/13/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) .2 Construction commencement date: M .3 Substantial Completion date or dates: M .4 Other milestone dates: M § 1.1.5 The Owner intends the following procurement and delivery method for the Project: (Identify method such as competitive bid or negotiated contract, as well as any requirements fq� accelerated or fast - track design and construction, multiple bid packages, or phased construction.) I I n § 1.1.6 Intentionally Deleted. 1» § 1.1.6.1 Intentionally Deleted. § 1.1.7 The Owner identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 5.3: a (List name, address, and other contact information.) 1 § 1.1.8 The persons or entities, in addition to the Owner's representative, who are required to submittals to the Owner are as follows: (List name, address, and other contact information) § 1.1.9 The Owner shall retain the following consultants and contractors: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) .1 Geotechnical Engineer: I <1'll .2 Civil Engineer: r the Architect's Commented [PMI]: Need to add that BRW will track sustainability points to their respective design. Per BRW's proposal, the tracking of points is included. AIA Document B101' - 201'. Copyright ® 19']9, 19']8, 198'], 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA,, and 'AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires o 3 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Bsros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) 1 .3 Other, if any: (List any other consultants and contractors retained by the Owner.) N § 1.1.10 The Architect identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 2.3: (List name, address, and other contact information) tr » « » c< » § 1.1.11 The Architect shall retain the consultants identified in Sections 1.1.11.1 and 1.1.11.2: LJ (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) § 1.1.11.1 Consultants retained under Basic Services: .1 Structural Engineer: a « » N .2 Mechanical Engineer: I9M t » « » .3 Electrical Engineer: « » « » § 1.1.11.2 Consultants retained under Supplemental Services: § 1.1.12 Other Initial Information on which the Agreement is based: § 1.2 The Owner and Architect may rely on the Initial Information. Both parties, however, recognize that the Initial Information and the construction schedule may materially change, are not conditions of the Agreement and, in that AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 4 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) event, the Owner and the Architect shall appropriately adjust the Architect's services, schedule for the Architect's services, and the Architect's compensation for additional site visits as defined in 4.2.3.2 below; excluding virtual meetings. The Owner may adjust the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work and the Owner's anticipated design and construction milestones, as necessary, to accommodate material changes in the Initial Information. § 1.3 The parties shall agree upon protocols governing the transmission and use of information or documentation in digital form. ARTICLE 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 2.1 The Architect shall provide professional services as set forth in this Agreement. The Arcsents that it is properly licensed in the jurisdiction where the Project is located to provide the services req Agreement, or shall cause such services to be performed by appropriately licensed design pro § 2.2 The Architect, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, sub consultants, and any persops or entities for whom the Architect is responsible shall provide all services under this Agreement konsistent with the normal and customary standard of care ordinarily provided by those who provide such services for project of I e type, scope and complexity of the Project (including its contracting mode). The Architect shall perform its qry s as expeditiously as is consistent with the normal and customary quality professional skill and car an the orderly progress of the Project The architect shall be duly licensed in the state of Texas. § 2.2.1 The Architect shall serve as the professional technical advisor and consultant to the Owner in m tters arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Contract and in that capacity, the Architect shall not in contractual duty or responsibility to any other person or party or individual regarding the services under this C tr t, except as that duty may arise under the laws of the State of Texas. The parties agree that this Contract is f exclusive benefit and convenience of the Owner and the Architect. Nothing contained herein shall be co s e as granting or conferring any right of action or any other right or benefit upon any other third -party. § 2.3 The Architect shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Architect with s t to the Project. § 2.4 Except with the Owner's knowledge and consent, the Architect shall not engage in any VMhe ccept any employment, interest or contribution that would reasonably appear to compromise the Architeonal judgment with respect to this Project. § 2.5 The Architect shall maintain the following insurance until termination of this Agreementhe requirements set forth below are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maiwner shall pay the Architect as set forth in Section 11.9. § 2.5.1 Commercial General Liability. The Architect and its consultants retained under the terms o his Contract shall procure and maintain during the life of this Contract, Commercial General Liability In sur cc. imam coverage shall be $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general laggregate Such coverage shall be of the "occ ence" a form and shall include the employees of the Architect as insureds. Insurance shall be primary and nonc buto 1 § 2.5.2 Automobile Liability. The Architect and its consultants retained under terms of this C act sh procure and maintain Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance for all owned, non -owned, and hire I vehicles Coverage { shall be $2,000,000 combined single limit. Insurance shall be primary and noncontributory. § 2.5.3 The Architect may achieve the required limits and coverage for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability through a combination of primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance, provided such primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance policies result in the same or greater coverage as the coverages required under Sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, and in no event shall any excess or umbrella liability insurance provide narrower coverage than the primary policy. The excess policy shall not require the exhaustion of the underlying limits only through the actual payment by the underlying insurers. § 2.5.4 Workers' Compensation at statutory limits Commented [SH2]: Our insurance carrier strongly objects to this language. Professional liability insurance covers normal standard of care and legally is relatively well defined, as opposed to highest standard which is not well defined and open-ended. Highest standard of care is uninsurable and therefore in neither the City's nor Architect's best interest to use that as the standard of care. Commented [PM3R2]: CoA to respond. Commented [SH4]: Delete our previous comment on this item, the insurance carrier's comment was in error and our policy covers these limits without relying upon umbrella insurance. Commented [PM5R4]: PA is not sure what "previous comment" is being talked about. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 5 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 2.5.5 Employers' Liability with policy limits not less than $500,000 per occurrence, $1,000,000 per policy, and $500,000 per employee. § 2.5.6 Professional Liability. The Architect and its consultants retained under the terms of this Contract, shall procure and maintain professional liability insurance providing for payment of the insured's liability for errors, omissions, or negligent acts arising out of the performance of professional services required under this Contract. Minimum coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in the ag99egate; however "unique" or "high risk" projects and/or those with architect and/or engineering icontracIshremain r $10 000 000 will require a minimum coverage of $5,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in the aggervices as defined in the insurance policy of the Architect, should include, and correspond with throvi d by the Architect in this agreement. Professional liability insurance shall not have any exclusion and/or environmental liabilities. Professional Liability Coverage shall be provided on a claims, the insurance shall be effective as to this project prior to the Architect and its consultants commencing woremain in force for three years after the project's completion. Upon request by Owner, the Architect shall furnish th Owner with a Certificate of Insurance showing the type, amount, deductible, effective date, and date of expire n such policy.. § 2.5.7 Additional Insured Obligations. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Architect sha 11 ca a the primary and excess or umbrella polices for Commercial General Liability, Employer's Liability, and A u to bile Liability to include the Owner, its officials, officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds. The ad ured coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any of the Owner's insurance policies and to both ongoing and completed operations. § 2.5.8 The Architect shall provide certificates of insurance to the Owner that evidence compliance i the requirements in this Section 2.5. § 2.5.9 The Architect and its consultants retained under the terms of this Contract shall provid e 'ficate of Insurance with the required coverages and limits of insurance as specified in this Section 2.5. In e must be issued by an insurance company with a minimum A.M. BEST Rating of A-1 or better, is authorize o o business in the State of Texas, and is signed by an authorized agent. Insurance covered by this Certificate shall be cancelled, non -renewed by endorsement by the insurance company except after 60 calendar days writte notice has been received by the Owner. § 2.5.10 Waiver of Subrogation Provision. All insurance required of the Architect and its con t including Professional Liability and Workers Compensation, shall contain a waiver of subrogation in fa to the City of Anna, Texas, its officials, officers, employees, and agents." § 2.5.11 The Architect hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Owner, and any subsidia , paren or affiliate corporations of the Owner and their respective directors, officials, officers, emp oyees co ectively, the "Indemnitees") harmless on a comparative basis from all legally recoverable Oamages ar ex enses including reasonable attorneys' fees and related expenses, that the Indemnitees may incur y re. on of any injury or damage sustained to any person or property (including, but not limited to any'n a of the Indemnitees) arising out of or occurring in connection with the negligent performance orformanc by the Architect of its duties and obligations under or pursuant to this Contract, whethe y other party contributes to such performance or lack of performance by the Architect, includin Imitation on or more of the Indemnitees. ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in this Article 3, the RFQ dated XX/XX/XXXX and detailed in the Architect's attached proposal dated XX/XX/XXYX, and include usual and customary structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Supplemental or Additional Services unless expressly stated otherwise in this Contract. § 3.1.1 The Architect shall manage the Architect's services, research applicable design criteria, attend Project meetings, communicate with members of the Project team, and report progress to the Owner and Owner's Representative. Commented [SH6]: Project Advocates confirmed that these are not the limits that apply to this project, and will provide the limits (lower than $5 and $10 M that will be required. BRW suggests $ 1 M and $3M listed seems to agree with this project and is more typical for a project of this scale and therefore may be the correct limits as intended by the City's standard contract form.. Commented [PM7R6]: PA agrees that the $1M/$3M is more applicable, but the article has "and/or" so the $5M/$IOM does not seem applicable Commented [SH8]: Our insurance carrier requests to delete these words. Commented [PM9R8]: CoA to respond. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 111/ by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 6 11/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 3.1.1.1 Travel to and from project meetings and the site shall be considered Basic Services, and are not considered Reimbursable Expenses. All other expenses, not listed in 11.8 (Compensation for Reimbursable Expenses), shall be considered a Basic Service. § 3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner and the Owner's consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of, services and information furnished by the Owner and the Owner's consulta . The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error, omis ' n, or inconsistency in such services or information. § 3.1.3 Within 14 calendar days after the date of this Agreement, the Architect shall submit fiii he Owner's approval a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services. The schedule initially shall include micipated dates for the commencement of construction and for Substantial Completion of the Work as set forth in[ ie Initial Information. The schedule shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner' review, for the performance of the Owner's consultants, and for approval of submissions by authorities havin diction over the Project. Once approved by the Owner, time limits established by the schedule shall not, excep or reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect or Owner. With the Owner's approval, the Architect shall adjust t ie;hedule, if necessary, as the Project proceeds until the commencement of construction. § 3.1.4 The Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner's directive or substitution, or for t acceptance of non -conforming Work, made or given without the Architect's written approval. § 3.1.4.1 Review, approval or acceptance of the Architect's work whether by the Owner or others a9dVether during Schematic Design Phase, Design Development Phase, Construction Documents Phase, Bidding Construction Phase, or otherwise, shall not relieve the Architect from responsibility for errors and omission i h Architect's work. § 3.1.5 The Architect shall contact governmental authorities required to approve the Construction NcbTents and entities providing utility services to the Project. The Architect shall respond to applicable design requ ents imposed by those authorities and entities. § 3.1.6 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Proj ect. § 3.1.7 Subcontracts for services under this Contract, including contracts for consultants retai b Architect, shall provide that work performed under such subcontract shall be subject to provisions of this Con ct d shall also provide that any professional duty or responsibility pertaining thereto, shall be accomplished t the bene rt of the Owner as a third -party beneficiary. Upon request, an electronic copy of each such subcontract s a e iihed to the Owner. § 3.1.8 Included in the provisions of this Contract that apply to Architect is the right for the O r to e west the Architect replace an employee, a consultant, and/or consultant's employee on this Project; Ar tect sh I I comply with such requests to immediately replace an employee, a consultant, or a consultant's emplo from is Project. § 3.2 Schematic Design Phase Services § 3.2.1 The Architect shall review the program and other information furnished by the Owner, and shall -eview laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. § 3.2.2 The Architect shall prepare a preliminary evaluation of the Owner's program, schedule, budget for the Cost of the Work, Project site, the proposed procurement and delivery method, and other Initial Information, each in terms of the other, to ascertain the requirements of the Project. The Architect shall notify the Owner of (1) any inconsistencies discovered in the information, and (2) other information or consulting services that may be reasonably needed for the Project. AIA Document E101' - 201'. Copyright ® 19']9, 19']8, 198'], 199'/, 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and 'AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 7 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 3.2.3 The Architect shall present its preliminary evaluation to the Owner and shall discuss with the Owner alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. The Architect shall reach an understanding with the Owner regarding the requirements of the Project. § 3.2.4 Based on the Project requirements agreed upon with the Owner, the Architect shall prepare and present, for the Owner's approval, a preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components. § 3.2.5 Based on the Owner's approval of the preliminary design, the Architect shall prepare S c hematic Design Documents for the Owner's approval. The Schematic Design Documents shall consist of draw gs and other documents including a site plan, if appropriate, and preliminary building plans, sections and e • nd may include some combination of study models, perspective sketches, or digital representations. P limin elections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or descri d in writing. § 3.2.5.1 The Architect shall consider sustainable design alternatives, such as material choices La ad building orientation, together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics, in developing design that is consistent with the Owner's program, schedule and budget for the Cost of the Work. The Ow obtain more advanced sustainable design services as a Supplemental Service under Section 4.1.1. § 3.2.5.2 The Architect shall consider the value of alternative materials, building systems andb uipinent, together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics, in developing a design for the Proj ' onsistent with the Owner's program, schedule, and budget for the Cost of the Work. § 3.2.6 The Architect shall submit to the Owner an estimate of the Cost of the Work prepared Jacc with Section 6.3. § 3.2.7 The Architect shall submit the Schematic Design Documents to the Owner, and reques's approval. § 3.3 Design Development Phase Services § 3.3.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owneation of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shal repare Design Development Documents for the Owner's approval. The Design Development Docum[tsha lustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist ofd other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatbuilding systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, and electrical systems, and other appropriate elements. The Design Development Documents shale outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish, in general, their qualitDesign Development Documents must include an initial list of items that will need third -party testing, or monitoring during construction. § 3.3.2 The Architect shall update the estimate of the Cost of the Work prepared in accordance ith tion 6.3. § 3.3.3 The Architect shall submit the Design Development Documents to the Owner, advise t Own f any adjustments to the estimate of the Cost of the Work, and request the Owner's approval. § 3.4 Construction Documents Phase Services LJ § 3.4.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents, and on the O er's aut orization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Archi ec s a prepare Construction Documents for the Owner's approval. The Construction Documents shall illustrate and describe the further development of the approved Design Development Documents and shall consist of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the quality levels and performance criteria of materials and systems and other requirements for the construction of the Work. Architect shall provide list of items that will need third -party testing, inspection, or monitoring during construction. The Owner and Architect acknowledge that, in order to perform the Work, the Contractor will provide additional information, including Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples and other similar submittals, which the Architect shall review in accordance with Section 3.6.4. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 19']9, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1117 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 8 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 3.4.2 The Architect shall incorporate the design requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project into the Construction Documents. § 3.4.3 During the development of the Construction Documents, the Architect shall assist the Owner, in accordance with applicable laws of the State of Texas, in the development and preparation of (1) procurement information that describes the time, place, and conditions of bidding, including bidding or proposal forms; (2) the form of agreement between the Owner and Contractor; and (3) the Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary and other Conditions). The Architect shall also compile a project manual that Ludes the Conditions of the Contract for Construction and Specifications, and may include bidding requ ments and sample forms. § 3.4.4 The Architect shall submit the Construction Documents to the Owner, advise the Ownel of any adjustments to the estimate of the Cost of the Work, take any action required under Section 6.5, and reque he Owner's approval. With respect to Paragraph 3.4.4 of the Agreement, as part of the Architect's Basic Sei vices (and not as a Change in Service), the Drawings and Specifications provided by the Architect shall include a data, drawings and other material necessary or proper to be provided for the Project by engineers or other consult i its. § 3.4.5 Architect shall be responsible for all drawings and design documents relating to Arc ct design and used on the Project, prepared and performed by the Architect or the Architect's Consultants. Arc itei I shall coordinate with but is not responsible for Drawings and Design Documents relating to Architect's design a d used the Project, prepared and performed by the Owner's Consultants. Architect shall be responsible for the re mpleteness and accuracy of Drawings and Specifications prepared by or through Architect and Architect Consult nts, and for their compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, laws and statutes in effect at the tt issuance as reasonably interpreted. § 3.4.6 Architect shall provide a Bid Documents Set that comply with the bidding methodol e led to meet the applicable laws of the State of Texas and related regulations. II § 3.5 Procurement Phase Services [NOTE: This Section 3.5 may need revision depending on procureme"ethod] § 3.5.1 General The Architect shall assist the Owner in establishing a list of prospective contractors. FollowinMt is approval of the Construction Documents, the Architect shall assist the Owner in (1) obtainingpetitive bids or negotiated proposals; (2) confirming responsiveness of bids or proposals; (3) determincessful bid or proposal, if any; and, (4) awarding and preparing contracts for construction. § 3.5.2 Competitive Bidding § 3.5.2.1 Bidding Documents shall consist of bidding requirements and proposed Contract § 3.5.2.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in bidding the Project by: .1 facilitating the distribution of Bidding Documents to prospective bidders; .2 organizing and conducting a pre -bid conference for prospective bidders; .3 preparing responses to questions from prospective bidders and providing clarifi@gan)dtributing interpretations of the Bidding Documents to the prospective bidders in the fo ; and, .4 organizing and conducting the opening of the bids, and subsequently document the bidding results, as directed by the Owner. § 3.5.2.3 If the Bidding Documents permit substitutions, upon the Owner's written authorization, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, consider requests for substitutions and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective bidders. § 3.5.3 Negotiated Proposals § 3.5.3.1 Proposal Documents shall consist of proposal requirements and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in obtaining proposals by: .1 facilitating the distribution of Proposal Documents for distribution to prospective contractors and requesting their return upon completion of the negotiation process; AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 1987, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 9 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) .2 organizing and participating in selection interviews with prospective contractors; .3 preparing responses to questions from prospective contractors and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Proposal Documents to the prospective contractors in the form of addenda; and, .4 participating in negotiations with prospective contractors, and subsequently preparing a summary report of the negotiation results, as directed by the Owner. § 3.5.3.3 If the Proposal Documents permit substitutions, upon the Owner's written authorization, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, consider requests for substitutions and prepare and distribute a enda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective contractors. § 3.6 Construction Phase Services § 3.6.1 General § 3.6.1.1 The Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and t ffContractor as set forth below and in AIA Document A201Tm-2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Cof the Owner and Contractor modify AIA Document A201-2017, those modifications shall not affect the A hitect's services under this Agreement unless the Owner and the Architect amend this Agreement. § 3.6.1.2 The Architect shall advise and consult with the Owner during the Construction Phasc ferces. The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this 4gr ment. The Architect shall not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for the construction means, chniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, nor shall Ihe Architect be responsible for the Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the require -is of the Contract Documents. The Architect shall be responsible for the Architect's negligent acts or omission , ut shall not have control over or charge of, and shall not be responsible for, acts or omissions of the Contractor r any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.2 and except as provided in Section 3.6.6.5, the Architect's resp bi to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and to r es on the date the Architect issues the final Certificate for Payment if the Owner has agreed that no work is outsta 1 § 3.6.2 Evaluations of the Work § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as oth r�- vise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quanf o he Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the p s and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations frMon he Co tract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the ac or, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. § 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contractr Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect shall have the authority to requon or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether ork is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decis good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility ofct to the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities p portions of the Work. § 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. § 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner and Contractor, shall not show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 19']9, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 10 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) rendered in good faith. The Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A201-2017, the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor § 3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and shall issue ertificates in such amounts within a reasonable time after receiving payment application from the Contractor, burheWork han 7 calendar days.. The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to thased on the Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2 and on the data comprising thr's Application for Payment, that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belie has progressed to the pointindicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract and that the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. The foregoing representations are so Z'ect to (1) an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Comp Vic (2) results of subsequent tests and inspections, (3) correction of minor deviations from the Contract Docum is ior to completion, and (4) specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. § 3.6.3.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Archi made exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) 1 evi ewed c nstruction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor's r' to payment, or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously pai o 11ccount of the Contract Sum. § 3.6.3.3 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payme to § 3.6.3.4 The Architect's certification for payment referred to therein constitutes a recommendatio o net but is not legally binding on Owner. § 3.6.4 Submittals which the item is a component. § 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Contractor's submittal schedule and shall not unreaso Eblay or withhold approval of the schedule. The Architect must render approval ornon-approval ofthe 's submittal schedule within 14 calendar days of receipt unless otherwise authorized by the Owner's Repre he Architect's action in reviewing submittals shall betaken in accordance with the approved sub ule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness while allowing su a to permit adequate review. § 3.6.4.2 The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of chec ormance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review mittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such Cimensi s, quantities, and installation or performance of equipment or systems, which are the Contracto ility. The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or construction means, hniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate appro embly of § 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials, or equipment, the Architect shall specify the appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review and take appropriate action on Shop Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the Contractor's design professional, provided the submittals bear such professional's seal and signature when submitted to the Architect. The Architect's review shall be for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. The Architect shall be entitled to rely upon, and shall not be responsible for, the adequacy and accuracy of the services, certifications, and approvals AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 111 1117 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 11 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) performed or provided by such design professionals. Architect shall not permit such aspects of Work to proceed if Architect believes such drawings do not comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, orders, rules and regulations. § 3.6.4.4 Subject to Section 4.2, the Architect shall review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents within 7 calendar days of receipt, unless an extension is authorized by the Owner's Representative. The Architect shall set forth, in the Contract Documents, the requirements for requests for information. Requests for information shall include, at a minimum, a detailed written stateme t that indicates the specific Drawings or Specifications in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification uested. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed u rwise with reasonable promptness. If appropriate, the Architect shall prepare and issue supplemental Dra in s and Specifications in response to the requests for information. § 3.6.4.5 The Architect shall maintain a record of submittals and copies of submittals supplied y the Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5 Changes in the Work § 3.6.5.1 The Architect may order minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the inte Ac Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time. Subject to Section 4.2, the Architect shall prepare Change Orders and Construction Change Directives for the Ow Is approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. Architect shall follow Owner's prodesses and documentation for Change Orders. § 3.6.5.2 The Architect shall maintain records relative to changes in the Work. § 3.6.6 Project Completion § 3.6.6.1 The Architect shall: .1 conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of Substantial Completion an e to of final completion (with respect to Architect's inspections for Substantial Completion, the c ' ects has a duty to provide Owner a written list of observed items, materials, omissions, or other c tions requiring modification or replacement or additional Work or other undertakings); .2 issue Certificates of Substantial Completion; .3 forward to the Owner's Representative, for the Owner's review and records, written4-ties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and received from the Contractor; and, .4 issue a final Certificate for Payment based upon a final inspection indicating that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information, and belief, the Work complies with the re ire ents of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.2 The Architect's inspections shall be conducted to check conformance of the Work wl t e requirements of the Contract Documents and to verify the accuracy and completeness of the list submitted by thn/—\ tor of Work to be completed or corrected; Owner shall be permitted to be present for all inspections and Atall give advance notice to Owner's Representative of all inspections. § 3.6.6.3 WhenSubstantial Completion has been achieved, the Architect shall inform the O 's Rep entative about the balance of the Contract Sum remaining to be paid the Contractor, including the amo t to be tamed from the Contract Sum, if any, for final completion or correction of the Work. § 3.6.6.4 The Architect shall forward to the Owner's Representative the following information receiv�$om the Contractor: (1) consent of surety or sureties, if any, to reduction in or partial release of retainage or the making of final payment; (2) affidavits, receipts, releases and waivers of liens, or bonds indemnifying the Owner against liens; and (3) any other documentation required of the Contractor under the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.5 Upon request of the Owner, and prior to the expiration of one year from the date of Substantial Completion, the Architect shall, without additional compensation, conduct a meeting with the Owner to review the facility operations and performance. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 19']9, 1978, 1987, 199'/, 1117] and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 12 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 3.7 After the Completion Date, the Architect shall provide assistance to the Owner of up to L_ ours of time by the Architect or its consultants in connection with troubleshooting, analysis, evaluation, and consultation in the utilization of any system or equipment installed in the Project. § 3.8 The Architect shall incorporate a requirement within the Plans and Specifications that the Construction Manager and all subcontractors accurately and completely mark the sepias of the working drawings, and the large and full-scale detail drawings and the specifications to show field changes thereon and to describe in sufficient detail any deviation so as to evidence the "as -built" construction of the Improvements. The Architect shall review such Drawings and Specifications and promptly notify the Owner and the Construction Manager, if any, and the a licable subcontractor of any deficiencies observed by the Architect. § 3.9 Compliance with Architectural Barriers Act § 3.9.1 General Should the Scope of Services fall within the regulatory requirements of the Teffhance ctural Barriers Act (the "Barriers Act" ), as solely determined by the City, Architect shall ensure co th the Barriers Act. As part of the Basic Services, it is the sole responsibility of the Architect to ide 'fy and analyze the requirements of the Barriers Act and to become familiar with the governmental authorities haN i g M esdiction to approve Architect' s design and construction documents. Architect shall participate in consul io with said authorities in order to obtain approval for such design and/or construction. As part of the Bas' Se ices, the Architect shall obtain the Notice of Substantial Compliance for the Services from the Texas D ent of Licensing and Regulation (the "TDLR" ). The Architect shall, without additional compensate 'ately correct any errors, omissions, or deficiencies in the design services and/or construction docu red by TDLR and/or a Registered Accessibility Specialist ("RAS" ) at any phase of the Architect's services, eit er by review of the construction documents, or inspection of the design at the commencement of constructs uring the construction of the work, or at the completion of construction. § 3.9.2 General Submission of Construction Documents to TDLR — Architect shall mail, sh fXr Wnd-deliver the construction documents to TDLR not later than five (5) calendar days after the Architect ' s s e construction documents for the Work. § 3.9.3 Completion of Registration Form to TDLR — Architect shall complete an Elimination of Niers Project Registration Form for each subject building or facility within Architect's design and submit the registr ton form(s) along with the applicable fees not later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the Architect come s e submittal of the construction documents to TDLR. n / \ § 3.9.4 TDLR Approval of Construction Documents — After review of the construction doe e by TDLR, the Architect shall be notified in writing of the results; however, it is the Architect' s responsibi obtain TDLR' s written comments. The Architect shall address all comments that prevent TDLR approv o the construction documents, including comments relating to Conditional Approval that must be address d in the design and construction of the work. Architect shall resubmit construction documents to TDLR for review prior o e completion of construction of the Work. § 3.9.5 TDLR Project Inspection —Architect shall request an inspection from TDLR or a TDLMis roved RAS no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the completion of construction of the Work. Thhall advise the City in writing of the results of each inspection. City reserves the right to verify the writth TDLR at any time during design, construction, or at the completion of the work. § 3.9.6 Corrective Modifications following TDLR Project Inspection - When corrective mto achieve substantial compliance arc required, the TDLR inspector or the RAS shall provide the Architdeficiencies and a deadline for completingthe modifications. Architect shall provide the City with this list within five (5) calendar days of receipt. It is the sole responsibility of the Architect to completely address the deficiencies by the stated deadline or to obtain a written notice of extension from the TDLR. When the corrective measures have been completed, Architect shall provide the TDLR (and/or the RAS who completed the inspection) and the City with written verification of the corrective measures completed. § 3.9.7 TDLR Notice of Substantial Compliance — Architect will undertake all reasonable measures to ensure that TDLR issues a Notice of Substantial Compliance to the City after the newly constructed Work has had a satisfactory inspection, or Architect has submitted verification of corrective modifications. Commented [SH10]: Please indicate the hours that are required as part of this provision? Say up to 8 hours per system? Commented [PM11]: Should note that if it is a troubleshooting subject, due to design error and/or omission, that the hours are not to be limited nor will additional fees be paid. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 19u, 111 1117 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 13 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 3.10 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following nonexclusive list constitutes "Basic Services" and do not constitute Additional Services or any other nature of services beyond or more extensive than the Basic Services or with respect to which any compensation or other payment is due by Owner to Architect other than the basic compensation provided for in Section 11.1 of the Agreement (reference 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7): (a) Services rendered by Architect prior to execution of this Agreement; (b) Providing documents for alternative bids; (c) Preparing reasonable and routine Change Orders or Change Orders resulting from any defriencies conflicts in the Construction Documents prepared by the Architect (reference 6.Z 6.3, 6.4,6.5, 6.6, 6.7); (d) Providing services to observe existing site conditions or existing facilities or to verify the drawings or other information furnished by the Owner as may be required by the Architect in performin i its services; (e) A walk-through to observe readily visible conditions and understand the general character th existing conditions; (f) At the conclusion of construction and based upon information furnished by the Contractor, p d furnishing to Owner a complete set of record Drawings and Specifications; (g) Providing usual and reasonable field representation throughout the construction process as per 3.6 (h) Attending Contractor/Architect coordination meetings as required by construction activity; a (i) Preparing field observation reports; 0) Reviewing submittals and shop drawings from the Contractor as required by the Contract Docu a and as per 3.6.4; (k) Reviewing the Contractor's requests for payment and other proposals; (1) Reviewing, making recommendations and providing certifications with respect to progress Wd. ayments; as per 3.6.3. (m) The Architect and its consultants, subcontractor's, agents, employees and officers shall promptly, upon notice or discovery, during any phase of the Project, make necessary revisions or corrections of errors, ambiguities or omissions in the Drawings and Specifications without additional compensation; (o) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary expressed elsewhere in this Agreement, no are t cturales made necessary, in whole or in part, by any fault or omission of the Architect to perform its du s, respItsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, shall be compensated as a Change in Service under this A ment; (p) Using reasonable diligence and the Architect's own skill and knowledge in construction and Specifications in a manner which attempts to meet the budget of Owner; kr) All Basic Services described in Article 3. Drawings Commented [SH12]: If a contractor has a major failure of performance then this means in regards to following the requirements of the contract or construction documents. This provision appears to weaken the Owner's ability to recover costs for the Architect's reasonable additional services that might be caused by the Contractor's defects or nonconforming work, and therefore is detrimental both to the Owner and the Architect. We believe this is better defined by the basic AIA contract form and suggest that (n) be deleted. Commented [PMI3RI2]: PA recommends further discussion on this comment. Not sure why BRW is looking to strike/delete. Commented [SH14]: BRW is not proposed to have construction cost estimating responsibility and therefore this responsibility belongs to others? Project Advocates requested alternate language that may make more sense in light of discussion of how review of estimating is anticipated to occur. Another alternative to deleting (q) might be something to the effect of: The Architect will review construction cost estimates provided by the Owner's project management consultant, and notify the Owner if it appears based upon said estimates that the construction costs will exceed the Owner's construction budget. Commented [PM15R14]: PA is in agreement to this statcmcnt AIA Document B101' - 2011. Copyright ® 19']9, 19']8, 1111, 1111, 1111 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s eved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be uo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 14 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Bsros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) ARTICLE 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES § 4.1 Supplemental Services § 4.1.1 The services listed below are not included in Basic Services but may be required for the Project. The Architect shall provide the listed Supplemental Services only if specifically designated in the table below as the Architect's responsibility, and the Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2. Unless otherwise specifically addressed in this Agreement, if neither the Owner nor the Architect is designated, the parties agree that the listed Supplemental Service is not being provided for the Project. (Designate the Architect's Supplemental Services and the Owner's Supplemental Services req redfor the Project by indicating whether the Architect or Owner shall be responsible for providing the identified upplemental Service. Insert a description of the Supplemental Services in Section 4.1.2 below or attach the descrip esas an exhibit to this Agreement.) Supplemental Services Responsi Architect, Owner, o i ty ofprovided) 4.1.1.1 Programming 4.1.1.2 Multiple preliminary designs 4.1.1.3 Measured drawings 4.1.1.4 Existing facilities surveys 4.1.1.5 Site evaluation and planning § 4.1.1.6 Building Information Model management responsibilities § 4.1.1.7 Development of Building Information Models for post construction use 4.1.1.8 Civil engineering 4.1.1.9 Landscape design 4.1.1.10 Architectural interior design 4.1.1.11 Value analysis § 4.1.1.12 Detailed cost estimating beyond that required in Section 6.3 4.1.1.13 On -site project representation 4.1.1.14 Conformed documents for construction 4.1.1.15 As -designed record drawings 4.1.1.16 As -constructed record drawings 4.1.1.17 Post -occupancy evaluation 4.1.1.18 Facility support services 4.1.1.19 Tenant -related services § 4.1.1.20 Architect's coordination of the Owner's consultants 4.1.1.21 Telecommunications/data design 4.1.1.22 Security evaluation and planning 4.1.1.23 Commissioning § 4.1.1.24 Sustainable Project Services pursuant to Section 4.1.3 4.1.1.25 Fast -track design services 4.1.1.26 Multiple bid packages 4.1.1.27 Historic presmation 4.1.1.28 Furniture, furnishings, and equipment design 4.1.1.29 Other services provided by specialty Consultants 4.1.1.30 Other Supplemental Services AIA Document E101' - 2011. Copyright ® 19']9, 19']8, 1111, 1111, 1111 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o is 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) Supplemental Services Responsibility (Architect, Owner, or not provided) § 4.1.2 Description of Supplemental Services § 4.1.2.1 A description of each Supplemental Service identified in Section 4.1.1 as the Architect's responsibility is provided below. (Describe in detail the Architect's Supplemental Services identified in Section 4.1.1 or, ifset f th in an exhibit, identify the exhibit. The AIA publishes a number of Standard Form of Architect's Services doc ems that can be included as an exhibit to describe the Architect's Supplemental Services) § 4.1.2.2 A description of each Supplemental Service identified in Section 4.1.1 as the Owner'Wresponsibilit) provided below. (Describe in detail the Owner's Supplemental Services identified in Section 4.1.1 or, ifsetforII II�i in r exhibit, identify the exhibit.) § 4.1.3 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1, the Architect shall providd as 2t 51.1,elemental Service, the Sustainability Services required in AIA Document E204TM-2017, Sustainable Projects Ex ' it, attached to this Agreement. The Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2. § 4.2 Architect's Additional Services The Architect may provide Additional Services after execution of this Agreement without inv ' a ' the Agreement. Except for services required due to the fault of the Architect, any Additional Sery vided in accordance with this Section 4.2 shall entitle the Architect to compensation pursuant to Section 3 d an appropriate adjustment in the Architect's schedule. § 4.2.1 Upon recognizing the need to perform the following Additional Services, the Architect s 11 no the Owner and Owner's Representative with reasonable promptness and explain the facts and circ ms a giving rise to the need. The Architect shall not proceed to provide the following Additional Services until a itect receives the Owner's written authorization: .1 Services necessitated by a change in the Initial Information, previous instructio o pprovals given by the Owner, or a material change in the Project including size, quality, comp i , the Owner's schedule or budget for Cost of the Work, or procurement or delivery method; .2 Services necessitated by the unforeseen enactment or revision of codes, laws, o gulaf s, including changing or editing previously prepared documents or plans; .3 Changing or editing previously prepared documents or plans necessitated by officJal interpretations of applicable codes, laws or regulations that are either (a) contrary to specific inte etations by the applicable authorities having jurisdiction made prior to the issuance of the buil g peg ' , or (b) contrary to requirements of the documents or plans when documents or plans me re prep din accordance with the applicable standard of care; .4 Services necessitated by decisions of the Owner not rendered in a timely mann or any her failure of performance on the part of the Owner or the Owner's consultants or contract .5 Preparing digital models or other design documentation for transmission to the nsultants and contractors, or to other Owner -authorized recipients; .6 Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests proposed by the Owner; .7 Preparation for, and attendance at, a public presentation, meeting or hearing; .8 Preparation for, and attendance at, a dispute resolution proceeding or legal proceeding, except where the Architect is party thereto; .9 Evaluation of the qualifications of entities providing bids or proposals; .10 Consultation concerning replacement of Work resulting from fire or other cause during construction; or, All Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect. AIA Donument E101" - 2017. Copyright ® 1974, 19"/8, 1987, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r e ,ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not beused without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order Ne.2114331196 which expires o 16 0 "3/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and mayuseaccordaccordanceDocumDocuments®— only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Uses Notes: E-1 Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 4.2.2 To avoid delay in the Construction Phase, the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness, and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. If, upon receipt of the Architect's notice, the Owner determines that all or parts of the services are not required, the Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Architect of the Owner's determination. The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the services provided prior to the Architect's receipt of the Owner's notice. .1 Reviewing a Contractor's submittal out of sequence from the submittal schedule approved by the Architect; .2 Responding to the Contractor's requests for information that are not prepared it iccordance with the Contract Documents or where such information is available to the Contractor 1 study and comparison of the Contract Documents, field conditions, other Owner -pro ided info ation, Contractor -prepared coordination drawings, or prior Project correspondence or cumentation; .3 Preparing Change Orders and Construction Change Directives that require eval tion of Contractor's proposals and supporting data, or the preparation or revision of documents or p s; .4 Evaluating an extensive number of Claims as the Initial Decision Maker; or, .5 Evaluating substitutions proposed by the Owner or Contractor and making sub u t revisions to documents or plans resulting therefrom. § 4.2.3 The Architect shall provide Construction Phase Services exceeding the limits set forth to as Additional Services. When the limits below are reached, the Architect shall notify the Owner: .1 « » ( « » ) reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and sim is of the Contractor .2 FM ( ) visits to the site by the Architect during construction 3 « » (« >) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such porti he Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Docu e .4 « » ( « » ) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completi n § 4.2.4 Except for services required under Section 3.6.6.5 and those services that do not exceed a its set forth in Section 4.2.3, Construction Phase Services provided more than 00 days after 1 the date of Subs om letion of the Work or (2) the initial date of Substantial Completion identified in the agreement between the 04er and Contractor, whichever is earlier, nayI be compensated as Additional Services to the extent the Architect curs additional cost in providing those Construction Phase Services. § 4.2.5 If the services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within <� (<< ) months of the date of this Agreement, through no fault of the Architect, extension of the Architect's services beyond hat time shall be compensated as Additional Services. § 4.2.6 Supplemental and Additional Services listed above, or in the Architect's Proposal shal not com ence until notification from Owner's Representative. ARTICLE 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 5.1 Unless otherwise provided for under this Agreement, the Owner shall provide informatiaeo manner regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project, including a written program, whichthe Owner's objectives; schedule; constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relatbility; expandability; special equipment; systems; and site requirements. § 5.2 The Owner shall establish the Owner's budget for the Project, including (1) the budget the Work as defined in Section 6.1;(2) the Owner's other costs; and, (3) reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. The Owner shall update the Owner's budget for the Project as necessary throughout the duration of the Project until final completion. If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall notify the Architect. The Owner and the Architect shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the Project's scope and quality. § 5.3 The Owner shall identify the Owner's Representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner shall render decisions and approve the Architect's submittals in a timely manner in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. The Owner may change Commented [SH16]: We understand the intent to allow an extra month beyond the typical for uncompensated services should the contractor be late. We would suggest that this not be shared with the Contractor since many contractors might interpret this as a additional month that they are allowed to take, which is not in the Owner's best interest. We have not adjusted our fee upward for this extra month of services and therefore we would be taking a loss due to the Contractor's failure to perform in timely fashion. Commented [PMI7R16]: PA takes no issue with this statement Commented [SH18]: We would prefer that this remain as "shall" but do not insist upon it. CA phase hours and therefore costs tend to track very strongly with the construction duration, and it would be unusual if the Architect did not incur losses due to extension of the construction duration. Commented [PMI9RI8]: PA recommends using "may" in lieu of "shall". AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 111 1117 and 111/ by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 17 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Error' Unknown document property name. (1900110132) the Owner's Representative at any time. The Owner's Representative will not have authority to modify the cost, timing, or the Architect's scope of the work, unless the person is duly authorized by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas. Person(s) with signatory authority will be provided upon request. § 5.4 The Owner shall furnish [surveys to describe physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures designated wetlands; adjacent drainage; rights -of -way, restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrict Ions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions, and other necessary data with respect to existing b ' Idings, other improvements and trees; and information concerning available utility services and lines, both rivate, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the survey shall t a referent d to a Project benchmark. § 5.4.1 The use of Owner provided data by the Architect shall be without contractual or legal s nificance unless otherwise established elsewhere in this Agreement. However, providing of data by Owner sh 1 not relieve the Architect from the responsibility for soliciting or conducting field surveys to verify existing cc Lditions as specified herein. § 5.5 Unless otherwise established to be part of the Architect's reimbursables for this Agreem t, De Owner shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers, which may include test borings, test pits, determinE t ons of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, seismic evaluation, ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions, with written reports and appropriate recommendations. § 5.6 The Owner shall provide the Supplemental Services designated as the Owner's responsA�Action 4.1.1. § 5.7 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1, the Owner shall fulfill its res as required in AIA Document E204TM-2017, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, attached to this Agre§ 5.8 The Owner, with the Architect's assistance, shall coordinate the services of its own conh those services provided by the Architect. Upon the Architect's request, the Owner may furnish copope of services in the contracts between the Owner and the Owner's consultants. The Owner may furnish the s ices of consultants other than those designated as the responsibility of the Architect in this Agreement or ut o *ze the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service, when the Architect requests such services strates that they are reasonably required by the scope of the Project. The Owner shall require that its cons a d contractors maintain insurance, including professional liability insurance, as appropriate to the services or or rovided. § 5.9 The Owner shall furnish tests, inspections and reports required by law or the Contract D u nts, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazar ous mate § 5.10 The Owner shall furnish all legal, insurance and accounting services, including auditinOsu 'hat maybe reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner's needs and interests. § 5.11 The Owner shall provide prompt written notice to the Architect if the Owner becomesy fault or defect in the Project, including errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect's docume § 5.12 Intentionally deleted. § 5.13 Before executing the Contract for Construction, the Owner shall coordinate the Architeand responsibilities set forth in the Contract for Construction with the Architect's services set forth in this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreement between the Owner and Contractor, including the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 5.14 The Owner shall provide the Architect access to the Project site prior to commencement of the Work and shall obligate the Contractor to provide the Architect access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. § 5.15 Within 15 days after receipt of a written request from the Architect, the Owner shall furnish the requested information as necessary and relevant for the Architect to evaluate, give notice of, or enforce lien rights. Commented [SH2O]: Suggest to delete these words, they are confusing since the surveying scope is not proposed to be provided under the Architect's scope of services. This appears to be an edit option where both options were inadvertently selected? Commented [PM21 R20]: Survey will be procured separately from the architects services. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 19u, 111 1117] and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 18 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) ARTICLE 6 COST OF THE WORK § 6.1 For purposes of this Agreement, the Cost of the Work shall be the total cost to the Owner to construct all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect and shall include contractors' general conditions costs, overhead and profit. The Cost of the Work also includes the reasonable value of the labor, materials, and equipment, donated to, or otherwise furnished by, the Owner. The Cost of the Work does not include the compensation of the Architect; the costs of the land, rights -of -way, financing, or contingencies for changes in the Work; or other costs that are the responsibility of the Owner. For the purposes of this Agreement, the Project Budget is the sum of the Cost of the Work, all Architect fees and Architect consultant fees, other Owner fees and costs, equipment, Furniture Fixtures and Equipment, and contingencies. § 6.2 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work is provided in Initial Information, and sheffadjusled throughout the Project as required under Sections 5.2, 6.4 and 6.5. Evaluations of the Owner' the Cost of the Work, and the preliminary estimate of the Cost of the Work and updated estimates of the Work, prepared by the Architect, represent the Architect's judgment as a design professional. It is re gnized, however, that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor, materials, or equipi t he Contractor's methods of determining bid prices; or competitive bidding, market, or negotiating conditions. 4 cc dingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary i orr i he Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, or from any estimate of the Cost of the Work, or evaluation, ri ep ed or agreed to by the Architect. contingencies for design, bidding, and price escalation; and will work together with the Architect to d n rc ine what materials, equipment, component systems, and types of construction are to be included in the Cot ocuments; to recommend reasonable adjustments in the program and scope of the Project; and to include design lternates as may be necessary to adjust the estimated Cost of the Work to meet the Owner's budget. The Owner's Project Management Consultant's estimate of the Cost of the Work shall be based on current area, volume or similar conceptual estimating techniques. The Owner's Project Management Consultant will provide detailed estimates of the Cost of the Work for the Architect's review and comment, and to inform recommendations for adjustment to the scope of the Project. Architet, Owner, and Owner's Project Management Consultant will work together to adjust the project scope and program as early in project development as possible to maintain the budget through design. § 6.4 If, through no fault of the Architect, the Procurement Phase has not commenced within 9 days after the Architect submits the Construction Documents to the Owner, the Owner's budget for the Cost the Work shall be adjusted to reflect changes in the general level of prices in the applicable construction market. § 6.5 If at any time the Owner's Project Management Consultant's estimate of the Cost of the Wor exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall make appropriate recommendations to the Owner to adjust the Project's size, quality, or budget for the Cost of theWork[ The Architect will make major adjustments to the design through 100% Design Development without additional compensation, as determined to be required to adjust to the Owner's budget. § 6.6 If the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Construction Do nrequire ase Services is exceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal, the Owner shall .1 give written approval of an increase in the budget for the Cost of the Work; .2 authorize rebidding or renegotiating of the Project within a reasonable time; .3 terminate in accordance with Section 9.5; .4 in consultation with the Architect, revise the Project program, scope, or qualityto reduce the Cost of the Work; or, .5 implement any other mutually acceptable alternative. § 6.7 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.6.4, the Architect shall modify the Construction Documents as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase Services, or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.6.1. If the Owner requires the Architect to modify the Construction Documents because the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work due to errors in the Owner's Project Management Consultant's 100% DD cost estimate, or due to unanticipated market conditions, the Owner shall compensate the Architect for modifications as an Additional Service pursuant to Section 11.3; otherwise the Architect's services for modifying the Construction Commented [SH22]: Project Advocates requested BRW to provide possible rewording of 6.3 and other articles indicating estimating by BRW, for the City's consideration, to align with the actual responsibilities for estimating under this contract. Commented [PM23R22]: PA is handling the cost planning, but will require BRW's review and comments of said cost planning, coming to an "agreement" that the cost planning is as accurate as the markets and information provided allows. Commented [SH24]: 6.5 & 6.6: Requiring the Architect to provide unlimited redesign services after project bid does not seem fair, especially since the construction cost estimating services are not provided under Architect's contract. The Architect should be able to reasonably rely upon the cost estimating of the Owner's direct consultant. This is also not in keeping with the spirit of the list of decisions made to be approved at the completion of design phases that was discussed in relation to the Responsibilities Matrix. We respectfully request to revise this to a limitation to revisions at DD phase. Commented [PM25R24]: If BRW fails to follow the budget recommendations within their design, BRW shall bear the costs associated with redesign. BRW shall provide accurate, timely, and adequate information for the cost planning. at all intervals. AIA Document E101" - 2017. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r eved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft ... produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 19 11/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, andmayusedaccordContraDocuments®— may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) Documents shall be without additional compensation. In any event, the Architect's modification of the Construction Documents shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility under this Article 6. ARTICLE 7 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS § 7.1 All drawings and specifications, renderings, models, scale details, approved copies of shop drawings and other such documents prepared by the Architect or any consultant pursuant to this Agreement (collectively the "Project Materials") shall become the property of Owner on completion or upon termination of this Agreement, and shall be delivered to Owner upon request. Architect fully and irrevocably assigns to Owner all copyrig and other intellectual property rights to the Project Materials. § 7.2 Owner's unilaterally construction of additional, identical building(s) based on the archite tural/en ' eering work of this Agreement without written agreement by the Architect shall be at Owner's sole r' . Documents prepared under this Agreement may be issued by Owner for informational purposes without a itional compensation to the Architect. § 7.3 Specifications and isolated, detail drawings inherent to the architectural/engineering desigi i o he Project, whether provided by Owner or generated by the Architect, shall be available to either party an I eawl i party shall have the right to use this work product for other purposes. Each party agrees to be responsible ffir y liability incurred by their use of this work product for other purposes. § 7.4 Except as otherwise stated in Section 7.3, the provisions of this Article 7 shall survive the n of this Agreement. ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 8.1 General § 8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims and causes of action, whether in qre4ents rt, or otherwise, against the other arising out of or related to this Agreement in accordance with the of Texas law. § 8.1.2 T To the extent permitted within the Owner's authority, and to the extent damages are covered by property insurance, the Owner and Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractor , consultants, agents, and employees of the other for damages, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds ch insurance. The Owner or the Architect, as appropriate, shall require of the contractors, consultants, agents, an employees of any of them, similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. § 8.1.3 Architect and Owner will strive to resolve claims. Issues not settled are to be presented -tin to the Owner for review and resolution. If the Architect's claim is rejected by the Owner, the parties hall, as a ondition precedent to filing suit, attend non -binding mediation equally sharing the mediator's fees and re a e costs. § 8.1.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this (Section 8.2` dispute resolution shall be litigation in a state court of competent jurisdiction with exclusive County, Texas. § 8.2 Intentionally Deleted. § 8.1.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this (Section 8.2� dispute resolution shall be litigation in a state court of competent jurisdiction with exclusive County, Texas. ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION of binding Commented [PM26]: Section 8.2 is deleted. Need in Collin discussion with CoA it binding Commented [PM27]: Section 8.2 has been deleted. in Collin Further discussion with CoA needed. § 9.1 If the Owner fails to make payments to the Architect in accordance with this Agreement, such failure shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination or, at the Architect's option, cause for suspension of performance of services under this Agreement. If the Architect elects to suspend services, the Architect shall give seven days' written notice to the Owner before suspending services. In the event of a suspension of services, the Architect shall have no liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of AIA Dooument E101" - 20171. Copyright ® 1974, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 1117 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may net be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires on 20 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) services. Before resuming services, the Owner shall pay the Architect all sums due prior to suspension and any expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.2 If the Owner suspends the Project, the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Architect shall be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.3 If the Owner suspends the Project for more than 90 cumulative days for reasons other th of the Architect, the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than seven days' wri en notice § 9.4 Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written noticeould the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault the party initiating the termination. § 9.5 The Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written noticett Architect for the Owner's convenience and without cause. § 9.6 If the Owner terminates this Agreement for its convenience pursuant to Section 9.5, or trchn, t terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect for service prior to termination, Reimbursable Expenses incurred, and costs attributable to termination when agreed to by O er. This includes the costs attributable to the Architect's termination of consultant and sub consultant agreeme already in place prior to termination notice. All such costs are limited to accepted industry standards, and in e t may such costs include consequential damages. § 9.7 Intentionally deleted. a § 9.8 Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement shall terminate one year from a to of Substantial Completion. § 9.9 The Owner's rights to use the Project Materials in the event of a termination of this Agre t e set forth in Article 7 and Section 9.7. I I ARTICLE 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ([NOTE: TO BE FURTHER DETERMINED AND THIS ARTICLE REVISED ACCORDINGLY BEFORE EXECUTION] u 11 Commented [PM28]: PA and CoA should discuss. § 10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas § 10.2 Unless otherwise expressed herein, terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as ose in the Owner's version of the AIA Document A201-2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Co tract n. § 10.3 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their agents, successors, assigbentwi l representatives to this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign this Agreut the written consent of the other, except that the Owner may assign this Agreement to a lender procing for the Project if the lender agrees to assume the Owner's rights and obligations under this Agreeing any payments due to the Architect by the Owner prior to the assignment. § 10.4 If the Owner requests the Architect to execute certificates, the proposed language of such certificates shall be submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to the requested dates of execution. If the Owner requests the Architect to execute consents reasonably required to facilitate assignment to a lender, the Architect shall execute all such consents that are consistent with this Agreement, provided the proposed consent is submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to execution. The Architect shall not be required to execute certificates or consents that would require knowledge, services, or responsibilities beyond the scope of this Agreement. § 10.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or a cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the Owner or Architect. AIA Dooument E101" - 20171. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 111 1117 and 111/ by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 21 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) 10.5.1 Nothing herein shall be construed to create any express or implied contractual relationship between Owner and any of the Architect's sub consultants. This Agreement supersedes all other pre-printed or standard provision that may otherwise appear as supporting documentation or attached to this Agreement or future Amendments. This Agreement is primary and controls over any prior or supplemental agreement unless this Agreement is amended to include such other agreements to the extent set forth in any such amendment. § 10.6 Unless otherwise required in this Agreement, the Architect shall have no responsibility r the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials or t is substances in any form at the Project site. § 10.7 The Architect shall have the right to include photographic or artistic representations of a design of the Project among the Architect's promotional and professional materials. The Architect shall be ' en reasonable access to the completed Project to make such representations. However, the Architect's mate s shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the hitect in writing of the specific information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary. The Owne h provide professional credit for the Architect in the Owner's promotional materials for the Project. Thi e n 10.7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement unless the Owner terminates this Agreement for cau s, p suant to Section 9.4. § 10.8 If the Architect or Owner receives information specifically designated as "confidential' ss proprietary," the receiving party shall keep such information strictly confidential and shall not disclose it to any other person except as set forth in Section 10.8.1. This Section 10.8 shall survive the termination of ' greement. § 10.8.1 The receiving party may disclose 'confidential" or "business proprietary" information a er days' notice to the other party, when required by law, arbitrator's order, or court order, including a subpoena or of form of compulsory legal process issued by a court or governmental entity, or to the extent such information is reasonably necessary for the receiving party to defend itself in any dispute. The receiving party may also dis los such information to its employees, consultants, or contractors in order to perform services or work solce�i�iti�. elusively for the Project, provided those employees, consultants and contractors are subject to the restrictions o e disclosure and use of such information as set forth in this Section 10.8. § 10.9 The invalidity of any provision of the Agreement shall not invalidate the Agreement or a ing provisions. If it is determined that any provision of the Agreement violates any law, or is othe is alid or unenforceable, then that provision shall be revised to the extent necessary to make that provisi 1 1 and enforceable. In such case the Agreement shall be construed, to the fullest extent permitted by give effect to the parties' intentions and purposes in executing the Agreement. § 10.10 The Owner and the Architect understand, acknowledge, and agree that the Architect sha a ac ing as an independent contractor at all times during the performance of this Agreement and no provision or ligation expressed or implied in this Agreement shall create an employment, agency, or fiduciary relatio ship. t no time shall Owner have any control over Architect's services or the means, methods, sequences, pro es, techniques of Architect in performing such services. ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATION [NOTE: TO BE FURTHER DETERMINED AND THIS ARTICLE REVISED ACCORDINGLY BEFORE EXECUTION] § 11.1 For the Architect's Basic Services described under Article 3, the Owner shall compensa a e Qiitect as follows: Stipulated Sum (Insert amount) E .2 Percentage Basis (Insertpercentage value) AIA Document E101" - 201/. Copyright ® 198'], 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA,, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires o 22 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) « » (« )) ) % of the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, as calculated in accordance with Section 11.6. .3 Other (Describe the method of compensation) M § 11.2 For the Architect's Supplemental Services designated in Section 4.1.1 and for any Sust ervices required pursuant to Section 4.1.3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation. If necessary, list specific services to which part lar methods of compensation apply.) § 11.3 For Additional Services that may arise during the course of the Project, including those 1, on 4.2, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation.) L § 11.4 Compensation for Supplemental and Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when n eluded in Section 11.2 or 11.3, shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus = percent ( « »»%), or as 11 s: (Insert amount of, or basis for computing, Architect's consultants' compensation for Supplemen Additional Services) § 11.5 When compensation for Basic Services is based on a stipulated sum or a percentage basis, the ortion of compensation for each phase of services shall be as follows: Schematic Design Phase percent ( %) Design Development Phase percent ( %) Construction Documents percent ( %) Phase Procurement Phase percent ( %) Construction Phase « » percent ( %) Total Basic Compensation one hundred percent ( 100 %) § 11.6 When compensation identified in Section 11.1 is on a percentage basis, progress payme Atrfof h phase of Basic Services shall be calculated by multiplying the percentages identified in this Article by Own s most recent budget for the Cost of the Work. Compensation paid in previous progress payments sh not be i justed based on subsequent updates to the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work. § 11.6.1 When compensation is on a percentage basis and any portions of the Project are delet d or othe ise not constructed, compensation for those portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on those portions. The Architect shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with this Agreement for all services performed whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. § 11.7 The hourly billing rates for services of the Architect and the Architect's consultants are set forth below. The rates shall be adjusted in accordance with the Architect's and Architect's consultants' normal review practices. (If applicable, attach an exhibit of hourly billing rates or insert them below.) AIA Document E101' - 201'!. Copyright ® 198'], 199'/, 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 23 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) Employee or Category Rate $0.00 § 11.8 Compensation for Reimbursable Expenses § 11.8.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic, Supplemental, and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants directly related to the Project, as follows: .1 Transportation and authorized out-of-town travel and subsistence; .2 Long distance services, dedicated data and communication services, teleconfert ces, Project web sites, and extranets; .3 Permitting and other fees required by authorities having jurisdiction over the Pi ect; .4 Printing, reproductions, plots, and standard form documents; .5 Postage, handling, and delivery; .6 Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, if authorized in a ance by the Owner; .7 Renderings, physical models, mock-ups, professional photography, and present ion materials requested by the Owner or required for the Project; .8 If required by the Owner, and with the Owner's prior written approval, the Arc] i: tec s consultants' expenses of professional liability insurance dedicated exclusively to this Projec , or Ae expense of additional insurance coverage or limits in excess of that normally maintained by thrchitect's consultants; .9 All taxes levied on professional services and on reimbursable expenses; .10 Site office expenses; .11 Registration fees and any other fees charged by the Certifying Authority or by other e i s as necessary to achieve the Sustainable Objective; and, 12 Other similar Project -related expenditures. § 11.8.2 For Reimbursable Ex enses the co ensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Alf 'te k and the Architect's consultants plus percent (�%) of the expenses incurred. \ l § 11.9 Architect's Insurance. If the types and limits of coverage required in Section 2.5 are in additionN+e types and limits the Architect normally maintains, the Owner shall pay the Architect for the additional costs nAurred by the Architect for the additional coverages as set forth below: (Insert the additional coverages the Architect is required to obtain in order to satisfy the requ' n set forth in Section 2.5, and for which the Owner shall reimburse the Architect.) § 11.10 Payments to the Architect L� § 11.10.1 Initial Payments § 11.10.1.1 An initial payment of _ ($ M) shall be made upon execution of this Agreeme and is the minimum payment under this Agreement. It shall be credited to the Owner's account in the fin lnvol 11.10.1.2 If a Sustainability Certification is part of the Sustainable Objective, an initial payrr t to th rchitect of ($ M ) shall be made upon execution of this Agreement for registration fees and other fe payab to the Certifying Authority and necessary to achieve the Sustainability Certification. The Architect's aymen to the Certifying Authority shall be credited to the Owner's account at the time the expense is incurr § 11.10.2 Progress Payments § 11.10.2.1 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid F ( « » ) days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert rate of monthly or annual interest agreed upon) % ■ AIA Document E101' - 201'. Copyright ® 19']9, 19']8, 198'], 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s —ed. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA,, and 'AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot beeuo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 24 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) § 11.10.2.2 The Owner shall not withhold amounts from the Architect's compensation to impose a penalty or liquidated damages on the Architect, or to offset sums requested by or paid to contractors for the cost of changes in the Work, unless the Architect agrees or has been found liable for the amounts in a binding dispute resolution proceeding. § 11.10.2.3 Records of Reimbursable Expenses, expenses pertaining to Supplemental and Additional Services, and services performed on the basis of hourly rates shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. § 11.10.2.4 On or before the tenth day of each month during the performance of the Agreem t, the Architect shall submit to Owner for approval a request for payment ('Request for Payment") in form and su tisfactory to Owner. Each such Request for Payment shall set forth the amount which the Architect belie es to be a for Basic Services rendered by the Architect (subsequent to the last payment by the Owner), and at the quest of the Owner a detailed breakdown of the constituents of such amount, and the sum of all prior payments ma I by the Owner to the Architect. The Owner shall be required to review each such Request for Payment and notit the Architect of any exceptions Owner believes to be appropriate; and, within ten (30) days after the Owner's ceipt of the relevant Request for Payment, Owner shall pay Architect the amount properly required to be paid i *n ction with such Request for Payment. The above procedures shall be followed by the Owner and the Architect throughout the progrc A of he Project, with the final Request for Payment being submitted by the Architect to the Owner after completion ect. At the request of the Owner, the final Request for Payment submitted by the Architect to the O er shall be accompanied by the Affidavit of an executive officer of the Architect that such affrant believes that al ices of the Architect provided for under the Agreement have been fully performed in accordance with the A e ent and that construction of the Project has been completed in accordance with the Drawings and Specificatio other Contract Documents. Architect shall not be entitled to receive payment hereunder until Architect has provided such li vers, including lien waivers from Architect's consultants, detailed description of services, and sworn stateme certificates regarding Architect's services and compliance with the requirements of this Agreement as Owner reasonably require in connection with Architect's request for payment. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Owner shall not be obligatedtrves y payment (whether a Progress Payment or Final Payment) to Architect hereunder if anyone or more of t conditions exist: (1) Architect is in material default of any of its obligations hereunder or otherwisunder this Agreement or any of its Contract Documents; (2) Any part of such payment is attributable toich are not performed in accordance with this Agreement; provided, however, that payment shall bart thereof attributable to services which were performed in accordance with this Agreement; (3) Arched to make payments promptly to consultants or other third parties used in connection with the serviceOwner has made payment to Architect; or (4) Owner, in its good faith judgment, determines that the portion o e compensation then remaining unpaid for a particular phase of the services of the Architect shall not be suffic nt to omplete such phase in accordance with the Agreement, no additional payments will be due Architect here er ss and until Architect, at its sole cost, performs a sufficient portion of the services so that such portion of a corn sation then remaining unpaid is determined by Owner to be sufficient to so complete the services. No partial or final payment by the Owner to the Architect is to be treated as a waiver of any o e Ow 's rights. § 11.10.2.5 Architect shall present each month a statement of all Changes in Services rendere an reimbursable expenses incurred for the preceding month. Architect expressly waives any right to payment for any Change in Services rendered if Architect does not give written notice of its claim that the services are additional within thirty (30) days of rendering the services and if such services are not billed as a Change in Servic es within sixty (60) days following their rendition. § 11.10.2.6 Owner also shall have the right to inspect and copy all other records of the Architect relating to the Project. All of such records should be preserved by the Architect for a period of three (3) years after final payment. AIA Dooument E101" - 201'!. Copyright 01974, 1978, 19u, 1117, 1111 and 111/ by The American Institute of Architects. All rights r ved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and -AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be used without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 14:32:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2119351196 which expires on 25 O1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ Service. To report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) ARTICLE 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS [NOTE: TO BE FURTHER DETERMINED AND THIS ARTICLE REVISED ACCORDINGLY BEFORE EXECUTION], Commented [PM29]: PA and CoA should discuss Special terms and conditions that modify this Agreement are as follows: (Include other terms and conditions applicable to this Agreement.) ARTICLE 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT § 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and 4eArch�itect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Aay be amended only by written instrument signed by both the Owner and Architect. § 13.2 This Agreement is comprised of the following documents identified below: .1 AIA Document B101Tm-2017, Standard Form Agreement Between Owner and j Lrchitect [ ] Other Exhibits incorporated into this Agreement: (Clearly identify any other exhibits incorporated into this Agreement i ch c ing any exhibits and scopes of services identified as exhibits in Section 4.1.2.) .4 Other documents: (List other documents, if any, forming part of the Agreement.) E This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. a OWNER (Signature) a W< » (Printed name and title) ARCHITECT (Signature) e »« » (Printed name, title, and licen n r, if required) AIA Document E101' - 201'!. Copyright ® 198'], 199'/, 200'] and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights s eved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and 'AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may rot be uo.d without permission. This draft w s produced by AIA software at 11:12:37 ET on 08/05/2022 under Order No.2114351196 which expires o 26 0 1/03/2023, i not for r sale, is licensed for o e-time u only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms o£ SeryTo report copyright violations, e- ail copyright@aia.org. Ores Notes: Esros! Unknown document property name. (1900110132) THE CITY OF Anna AGENDA ITEM: Item No. 7.g. City Council Agenda Staff Report Meeting Date: 9/27/2022 Staff Contact: Gregory Peters Discuss/Consider/Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Project Specific Purchase Order with Teague Nall & Perkins, Incorporated, for the landscape design associated with the Anna Community Library Project in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Director of Public Works Greg Peters, P.E.) SUMMARY: The City of Anna is moving into the design development process for the Anna Community Library, and is ready to begin landscape design for the area surrounding the building. The design will be done by Teague Nall & Perkins (TNP), who completed the conceptual landscape design in the schematic phase. The design of the adjacent plaza will be a separate contract which will be brought forward at a future meeting for approval. The overall concept showing the split between the plaza and the library landscaping is attached as Exhibit A - Site Map. TNP has been working on the project team and is prepared to move forward with formal design as soon as the contract is executed. The contract cost is $103,000, and funding will come from the Library Bond Funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fee for the design is $103,000, with funding from the Library Bond Funds. STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Goal 3: Anna — Great Place to Live STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. EXHIBIT A - SITE MAP 2. RES. Professional Services - TNP APPROVALS: Gregory Peters, Director of Public Works Created/Initiated - 9/20/2022 Jim Proce, City Manager Final Approval - 9/21/2022 Pky - L-4-)IE -*, Ill�llllr�llll I1111 Irlll Irlll IIIIIJ11110IIIIMIIIIMII1111W EffLIBRARY _= ii i 4 i i i s R PLAZA (FUTURE) PHASE East Patio Chary 80sque Hamm Hangout Community Table 10ir Anna Community Library rnmwnl#y Event Space ff Roof Deck CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROJECT SPECIFIC PURCHASE ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS AND TEAGUE NALL & PERKINS, INCORPORATED, FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO THE ANNA COMMUNITY LIBRARY, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in May of 2021 Anna neighbors approved $22,000,000 in 2021 Bond Funds for the construction of a new public library in the City of Anna, Texas; and, WHEREAS, the landscaping improvements are a key component to the Library project, which is a capital project identified in the City of Anna Strategic Plan to redevelop and energize downtown Anna; and, WHEREAS, Teague Nall & Perkins was pre -selected in the City of Anna multi -disciplinary Request for Qualifications process completed last year; and, WHEREAS, the City is seeking to contract with Teague Nall & Perkins for landscape architecture professional services pertaining to the project; and, WHEREAS, the services provided by Teague Nall & Perkins will be funded through 2021 Bond Funds -land, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals above are incorporated herein as if set forth in full for all purposes. Section 2. Authorization. A. That the funding shall be $103,000 in 2021 Bond Funds. B. That the City Council hereby approves entering into and authorizes the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Teague Nall & Perkins for the scope of services identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this day of 12022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary, Carrie L. Land Mayor, Nate Pike EXHIBIT "A" ," tnp AHTHCIRIZATI014 FOR RROFESS10"AL SERVICES (FIXED FEE} PROJECT NAME.: Anna Library CD Phasa THP PROJECT NUMBER: ANN 22233 DLIEHT: Clily oTAnna_ Attn: Delan Walker ADDRESS: 111 Worth PoY Nil Pkwy Anna, TX 75Ari9 City od Anna, Tuae {khu- CLIENT] hrerebg requests and aukhaMea Ti eagm Hall and Parklnm, Inc., MN CONSULTANT] to perform tha rollawln$ services: Artrcm I. SCOP E: Pro413e design, canslru=n docLrn errs and construction phase services ror a new LJbraq In Anna. TIC. Al detaled scope oT serelces Is Included as At 3Mmeni 'A' and Is made a parthere:a. Art7ole ■ DD M PEN SATICN 10 bE t`ased Qn 1he Wlowing: A. Tim CONSU LTANTs eornpensaMn Tu Basle 3ervloes Included In Atlaw%menl 'A' steal be based on a Fixed Fee or $1 D3s DDD.DD fCne Hundred Three ThDusand Doftusj as listed In Attachment A, wlMcM Includes me enaes such as prints. plots, photocoples, plans or documents an Ca, aVD or mernmyr demem, mileage, air Tare, and lodging. Paymeril la lnrl CONSULTANT shall be due In monthly Imslallrrents based on lhrl CONSULTANTS esurnale or the pmemar ar Vre conlad eGmplE:Ed during the blilrt4 period. E. FEes: Any permit feEs, 11ing Kees, or oMer Tees rE •ated to the project and paid on betraR o' he clerri by the CONS u LTAMT io cdher entitles sha be Vivoiced at 1.1 D lJrnm acWal cost C_ ASddiional Servk & Any s+ervire prCedded by tW CONSULTANT which % nutspeciflcallyr de6Crlt]ed In the s€Mpe of wort ror this contract as defined above or dfellneated In an attachment stroll be considered adHticnai serdlces. Addllomai serd€es ahail Include, blot EWII not be Ilmfted lo: 1_ Work beyond the prq]ectlimits shown In Atlaclrrnenl •E' 2_ Eaning applic rWra, zoning exhlbfts 3- Allyemdamce at or pnepsaratlon Df LLYNblfs her meetings Mond Voila- Is Ilsled In A tKMmeM 'A'_ 4- 3D Renderi0q& & 5ile inrr-h3Uutture 31rA*gi2S fOr SGbrMw&Ler Uid gr.RdiN BAY L3. fi- Detalled parting studies be+yMd Me pged Wnn "Fri * F!'. n Ta Mmwd a hm&— I treys sd Iardl lmrmrm Eraarrg Fm N& F•230 r irAyy Fm N& 1 011dd0 r 1131943e1 r 1 W11&M �+�YPa 6adNa�._..__IR�ary ten +{i P!l03�i71 r "iasr {amid `-`-•-��---Ittn N�{43673 v,j ub vviub C�UW 21M2 �jub I vs warmsAwInown E `2 „Wb dub dub jub v1W� aagpok 3 am zmmm� me zmkrv,� am mw�vl,w am uumvimr am mILmavQ,w am amplow am mlLa��mMIW am D�L am mlLm��L am am am R%�LNI am R%�Lllaaa am mILERmL am m'L�mrvm� am mW�L am V lub vviub V,, Hwy. 4. vv1ub V JW o .ifc5i�lftlp pi .w1 .s- WL �.�E L0114 „►ub