Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z 2023-02-06 Regular Meeting PacketW FOSTER CROSSING RD W WHITE ST E FM 455SFERGUSONPKWY FM 2862 HACKBERRY DR E WHITE ST E FOSTER CROSSING RD W ROSAMOND PKWY W FM 455 E OUTER LOOP RD SAM R A Y B U R N H W Y W OUTER LOOP RD NPOWELLPKWYSPOWELLPKWYSAM RAY B U R N ME M ORI AL H WY ¬«5 ¬«121 £¤75 8 & 9 13 & 14 15 & 16 7 10 11 12 City of Anna, February 6, 2023 Planning & Zoning Meeting Map Source: City of Anna GIS Date: 1/30/2023 DISCLAIMER: This map and information contained in it were developed exclusively for use by the City of Anna. Any use or reliance on this map by anyone else is at that party's risk and without liability to the City of Anna, its officials or employees for any discrepancies, errors, or variances which may exist.Document Path: H:\Notification Maps\P&Z Overview Maps\P&Z Overview Maps.aprx 0 0.5 1 Miles´ Agenda Items City Limits ETJ Parcels 1:48,000 Item No. 5. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Kimberly Winarski AGENDA ITEM: 2022 Report of Results for the City of Anna. (Assistant to the City Manager Kimberly Winarski) SUMMARY: Provide the Planning & Zoning Commission with the 2022 National Community Survey results for the City of Anna. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Neighborly STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ATTACHMENTS: 1. The NCS Report - Anna TX 2022 Anna, TX The National Community Survey Report of Results 2022 Report by: Visit us online! www.polco.us About The NCS™ The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Anna. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community:  • Economy  • Mobility  • Community Design  • Utilities  • Safety  • Natural Environment  • Parks and Recreation  • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture  • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 375 residents of the City of Anna collected from September 21, 2022 to November 9, 2022. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2021 survey was 12%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Anna. How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Anna's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Anna residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Anna's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Anna's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we provide comparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to the pandemic. This may impact how your City's 2021 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Conducting the survey The 3,200 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on September 21, 2022 and the survey remained open for seven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. About 2% of the 3,200 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,152 households that received the invitations to participate, 375 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Anna survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (375 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Anna. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates;  it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Anna and a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on October 26. The survey remained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python, and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Anna funded this research. Please contact Kimberly Winarski of the City of Anna at kwinarski@annatexas.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Anna. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. . Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Anna were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Anna was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Anna households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Anna boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. Conducting the surveyThe 3,200 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on September 21, 2022 and the survey remained open forseven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained acover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link togive residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.About 2% of the 3,200 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,152 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 375 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Anna survey is no greater than plus or minusfive percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (375 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Anna. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates;  it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Anna and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on October 26. The survey remainedopen for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the endprovides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python, and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Anna funded this research. Please contact Kimberly Winarski of the City of Anna at kwinarski@annatexas.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ 19% 41% 40% 18% 42% 40% 48% 39% 13% 23% 77% 25% 75% 11% 89% 26% 74% 21% 79% 8% 92% 88% 12% 94% 6% 99% 1% 59% 41% 58% 42% 76% 24% 49% 51% 49% 51% 57% 43% 10% 21% 18% 9% 20% 22% 9% 21% 19% 8% 21% 22% 28% 21% 8% 20% 18% 4% Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Anna. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. . MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Anna were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Anna was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some ofthe zip codes that serve the City of Anna households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exactgeographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundaryfile. Addresses located outside of the City of Anna boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with aunit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey. Conducting the surveyThe 3,200 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on September 21, 2022 and the survey remained open forseven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained acover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link togive residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.About 2% of the 3,200 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,152 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 375 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Anna survey is no greater than plus or minusfive percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (375 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Anna. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates;  it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Anna and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on October 26. The survey remainedopen for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the endprovides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python, and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Anna funded this research. Please contact Kimberly Winarski of the City of Anna at kwinarski@annatexas.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target*Age 18-3435-5455+Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoSpanish, Hispanic, or LatinoHousing tenure OwnRentHousing type AttachedDetachedRace & Hispanicorigin Not white aloneWhite alone, not Hispanic or LatinoSexManWomanSex/age Man 18-34Man 35-54Man 55+Woman 18-34Woman 35-54Woman 55+Analyzing the dataResponses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses areentered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Rangechecks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco weredownloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American CommunitySurvey estimates for adults in the City of Anna. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the surveyrespondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race,Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated usingan iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for theprobability sample are presented in the following table.NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g.,age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups..MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Anna were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Anna was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some ofthe zip codes that serve the City of Anna households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exactgeographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundaryfile. Addresses located outside of the City of Anna boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with aunit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey. Key Findings Most residents feel a strong sense of safety in Anna. Residents offered high ratings of importance (94% essential or very important) and quality (85% excellent or good) to the overall feeling of safety in Anna, suggesting that safety is a priority and a strength for the community. About 9 in 10 residents said they felt very or somewhat safe in the City’s downtown/commercial area, in their neighborhoods during the day, from violent crime, and from fire, flood or other natural disaster. Similarly, about 8 in 10 reported feeling safe from property crime. The City’s safety services also received high marks from respondents. About 9 in 10 gave positive reviews to fire services, ambulance or emergency medical services, police/sheriff services, and crime prevention. All safety-related items on the survey were on par with national benchmark comparisons.   Anna’s economic health is important to residents. About 94% of residents indicated that economic health should be an area of focus for the City of Anna in the next two years. Three-quarters of residents rated the overall economic health of the City as excellent or good, scoring similar to the national average.  The overall quality of business and service establishments and overall economic development were favorably evaluated by roughly 6 in 10 participants, while cost of living was rated positively by just under half (48%) of residents, all rating similar to benchmark comparisons. Like many other cities of comparable size and proximity to larger metropolitan areas, Anna received lower marks for the variety of business and service establishments, employment opportunities, vibrancy of downtown/commercial areas, and shopping opportunities, all of which fell below benchmark comparisons. When asked what impact, if any, the economy would likely have on their family income in the next six months, only 16% of residents expected the impact to be somewhat or very positive, scoring lower than the national benchmark.   Residents feel Anna's natural environment and recreational opportunities are important and have room for growth. Ratings for survey items related to the City's natural environment tended to be positive, with 70% of residents giving excellent or good reviews to the overall quality of natural environment in Anna. About 7 in 10 offered positive evaluations of the City's cleanliness, recycling services, and air quality, while at least half were pleased with Anna’s open space and preservation of natural areas. However, water resources were positively rated by only 24% of residents, scoring much lower than benchmark comparisons. Results related to parks and recreation also showed room for attention and growth, with most results being lower or much lower than national averages. About 7 in 10 residents were pleased with city parks, scoring similar to benchmark comparisons. Close to 6 in 10 residents positively rated the overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, while 50% or less favorably rated recreation programs/classes, fitness opportunities, and the availability of walking paths or trails, all falling lower than the national average. About 3 in 10 residents were pleased with recreational opportunities and recreation centers or facilities, scoring much lower than benchmark comparisons.   Residents value the City’s utility infrastructure but have concerns about quality. When asked which aspects of the community Anna should focus on in the next two years, 92% of residents identified the overall utility infrastructure as a priority. Less than half of participants (47%) gave high marks to the quality of the utility infrastructure in Anna, scoring below the national average. Garbage collection had positive reviews by 86% of residents. About 7 in 10 residents offered excellent or good reviews for power (electric and/or gas), storm water management, and sewer services. Only 37% of residents positively reviewed Anna’s drinking water, indicating that this could be an area of focus for the City. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 52% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 52% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 82% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 82%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Lower Similar Lower Similar Similar Lower Lower Much lower Similar 75% 26% 52% 47% 85% 70% 57% 52% 29% 45% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar 94% 63% 83% 92% 94% 84% 82% 71% 72% 69% Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) Facets of livability Resident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview of community strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation. The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark). vs. benchmark* Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 52% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 52% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 82% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 82%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercial areasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with their communityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole.(% excellent or good)Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercial areasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the comingtwo years.(% essential or very important)Facets of livabilityResident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview ofcommunity strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation. The chartsbelow show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority(importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communitiesacross the country (the national benchmark). 60%70%80%90%100% Importance 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%QualityMobility Community design Economy Education, arts, and culture Health and wellness Inclusivity and engagement Natural environment Parks and recreation Safety Utilities Median Median vs.benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.  Excellent  20%  Good  59%  Fair  18%  Poor  3% The overall quality of life in Anna Quality of life Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. Anna as a place to live The overall quality of life Similar Similar 86% 79% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. (% excellent or good) Recommend living in Anna to someone who asks Remain in Anna for the next five years Similar Similar 83% 78% Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) Overall image or reputation Similar70% Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent  14% Good  41% Fair  33% Poor  12% Overall confidence in Anna government Governance Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. Treating residents with respect Treating all residents fairly Being honest Being open and transparent to the public The overall direction that Anna is taking Generally acting in the best interest of the community The job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvement Informing residents about issues facing the community Overall confidence in Anna government The value of services for the taxes paid to Anna Similar Higher Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar 80% 79% 66% 63% 60% 60% 58% 57% 55% 41% Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. (% excellent or good) The City of Anna The Federal Government Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) Overall customer service by Anna employees Public information services Similar Similar 83% 56% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Overall confidence in AnnagovernmentGovernanceStrong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residentswhile making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to thepresent and future needs of the community as a whole.Treating residents with respectTreating all residents fairlyBeing honestBeing open and transparent to the publicThe overall direction that Anna is takingGenerally acting in the best interest of the communityThe job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvementInforming residents about issues facing the communityOverall confidence in Anna governmentThe value of services for the taxes paid to AnnaPlease rate the following categories of Anna government performance.(% excellent or good) The City of Anna The Federal Government Similar Lower 75% 28% Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) Overall customer service by Anna employeesPublic information servicesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna.(% excellent or good)vs.benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative 13% 38% 34% 12% 3% What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Excellent 16% Good 58% Fair 20% Poor 6% Overall economic health of Anna Economy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. Overall quality of business and service establishments Cost of living Variety of business and service establishments Employment opportunities Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Shopping opportunities Similar Similar Lower Lower Much lower Much lower 55% 48% 31% 21% 19% 15% Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Anna as a place to visit Anna as a place to work Much lower Much lower 26% 25% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. (% excellent or good) Economic development Similar60% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) Overall economic health Similar75% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Very positiveSomewhat positiveNeutralSomewhat negativeVery negativeWhat impact, if any, do you think theeconomy will have on your family incomein the next 6 months? Do you think theimpact will be:Overall economic health ofAnnaEconomyLocal governments work together with privateand nonprofit businesses, and with thecommunity at large, to foster sustainablegrowth, create jobs, and promote a thrivinglocal economy.Overall quality of business and service establishmentsCost of livingVariety of business and service establishmentsEmployment opportunitiesVibrancy of downtown/commercial areaShopping opportunitiesPlease rate each of the following in the Anna community.(% excellent or good)Anna as a place to visitAnna as a place to workPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna.(% excellent or good)Economic developmentPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna.(% excellent or good) What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Lower16% What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) Overall economic healthPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole.(% excellent or good)vs.benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 5% Good 21% Fair 33% Poor 41% Overall quality of the transportation system in Anna Mobility The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. Ease of travel by car Ease of public parking Ease of walking Traffic flow on major streets Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of travel by public transportation Similar Similar Lower Similar Much lower Much lower 69% 59% 43% 42% 26% 8% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Walked or biked instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Used public transportation instead of driving Lower Similar Lower 44% 43% 4% Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) Sidewalk maintenance Street cleaning Traffic enforcement Snow removal Street repair Street lighting Traffic signal timing Bus or transit services Similar Similar Similar 66% 62% 60% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of the transportation system Lower26% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Overall quality of the transportationsystem in AnnaMobilityThe ease with which residents can move about their communities, whetherfor commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of lifefor all who live, work, and play in the community.Ease of travel by carEase of public parkingEase of walkingTraffic flow on major streetsEase of travel by bicycleEase of travel by public transportationPlease also rate each of the following in the Anna community.(% excellent or good)Walked or biked instead of drivingCarpooled with other adults or children instead of driving aloneUsed public transportation instead of drivingPlease indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.(% yes)Sidewalk maintenance Street cleaning Traffic enforcement Snow removal Street repair Street lighting Traffic signal timing Bus or transit services Similar Lower Similar Similar Similar Much lower 60% 53% 50% 49% 45% 10% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of the transportation systemPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole.(% excellent or good)vs.benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 13% Good 39% Fair 32% Poor 17% Overall design or layout of Anna's residential and commercial areas Community design A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. Overall appearance Overall quality of new development Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Variety of housing options Well-planned residential growth Availability of affordable quality housing Well-planned commercial growth Public places where people want to spend time Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Much lower 64% 59% 54% 52% 46% 46% 44% 43% 32% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Your neighborhood as a place to live Similar79% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. (% excellent or good) Code enforcement Land use, planning and zoning Similar Similar 40% 36% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar52% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 12% Good 35%Fair 31% Poor 22% Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Anna Utilities Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. Garbage collection Power (electric and/or gas) utility Storm water management Sewer services Utility billing Affordable high-speed internet access Drinking water Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Much lower 86% 74% 74% 69% 64% 63% 37% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Lower47% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 34% Good 51% Fair 12% Poor 3% Overall feeling of safety in Anna Safety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to residents' quality of life. Fire services Ambulance or emergency medical services Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Fire prevention and education Animal control Emergency preparedness Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar 93% 91% 89% 87% 84% 70% 55% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Overall feeling of safety Similar85% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day In your neighborhood during the day From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster From property crime Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar 96% 95% 93% 87% 83% Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 24% Good 47% Fair 26% Poor 4% Overall quality of natural environment in Anna Natural environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. Recycling Yard waste pick-up Anna open space Preservation of natural areas Similar Similar Similar Similar 76% 64% 55% 53% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Air quality Cleanliness Water resources Similar Similar Much lower 71% 70% 24% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of natural environment Similar70% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 20% Good 38% Fair 31% Poor 11% Overall quality of the parks and recreation opportunitiesParks and recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Similar Lower Much lower 72% 50% 33% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Lower Lower Much lower 46% 43% 32% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Lower57% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 10% Good 41% Fair 30% Poor 18% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Anna Health and wellness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. Health services Lower53% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Please rate your overall health.Similar77% Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Lower Lower Lower Lower 45% 43% 41% 18% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Overall health and wellness opportunities Lower52% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 4% Good 25% Fair 33% Poor 38% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts Education, arts, and culture Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. Public library services Much lower17% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. (% excellent or good) Opportunities to attend special events and festivals K-12 education Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Adult educational opportunities Similar Lower Similar Lower Much lower Much lower 58% 54% 34% 34% 30% 15% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Much lower29% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good)vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Excellent 11% Good 33% Fair 46% Poor 9% Residents' connection and engagement with their community Inclusivity and engagement Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. Anna as a place to raise children Sense of community Anna as a place to retire Similar Similar Similar 78% 61% 57% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. (% excellent or good) Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar45% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. (% excellent or good) Making all residents feel welcome Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Similar Similar Similar Similar 70% 70% 70% 56% Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good) Neighborliness of residents Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Opportunities to participate in community matters Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Sense of civic/community pride Similar Similar Similar 67% 65% 59% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark* * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Residents' connection and engagementwith their communityInclusivity and engagementInclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging;residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feelmore included, involved, and engaged than those who do not.Anna as a place to raise childrenSense of communityAnna as a place to retirePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna.(% excellent or good)Residents' connection and engagement with their communityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole.(% excellent or good)Making all residents feel welcomeValuing/respecting residents from diverse backgroundsAttracting people from diverse backgroundsTaking care of vulnerable residentsPlease rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following.(% excellent or good)Neighborliness of residentsOpenness and acceptance of the community toward people of diversebackgrounds Opportunities to participate in community matters Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Sense of civic/community pride Similar Similar Similar 56% 50% 49% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community.(% excellent or good)vs.benchmark* Voted in your most recent local election Contacted the City of Anna for help or information Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Contacted Anna elected officials to express your opinion Lower Similar Similar Similar Lower Similar Similar 60% 48% 27% 21% 18% 14% 12% Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Use or check email Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Shop online Share your opinions online Similar Similar Similar Similar Higher Similar 99% 99% 98% 88% 70% 38% In general, how many times do you: (% a few times a week or more) Residents' participation levels vs... % positiveRankNumber ofcommunitiesPercentilePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. Anna as a place to live Similar Your neighborhood as a place to live Similar Anna as a place to raise children Similar Anna as a place to work Much lower Anna as a place to visit Much lower Anna as a place to retire Similar The overall quality of life Similar Sense of community Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Lower Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Lower Overall feeling of safety Similar Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Lower Overall health and wellness opportunities Lower Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Much lower Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Anna to someone who asks Similar Remain in Anna for the next five years Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Similar From property crime Similar 3236224486% 2231424479% 3536623678% 135735125% 031531326% 2936225557% 3438725479% 4531417161% 5630213175% 319619026% 2429522352% 819117647% 5535215685% 3030421270% 919617957% 929726952% 129929729% 3319312945% 3830618983% 1830324778% 5333315795% 693179796% National benchmark tables This table contains the comparisons of Anna's results to those from other communities. The first column shows the comparison of Anna's rating to the benchmark. Anna's results are noted as being “higher”, “lower” or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Anna residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Anna's “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Anna's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Anna's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Anna. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Similar From property crime Similar From violent crime Similar From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Similar Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Similar Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Similar Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Similar Taking care of vulnerable residents Similar Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Similar Variety of business and service establishments Lower Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Much lower Employment opportunities Lower Shopping opportunities Much lower Cost of living Similar Overall image or reputation Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Traffic flow on major streets Similar Ease of public parking Similar Ease of travel by car Similar Ease of travel by public transportation Much lower Ease of travel by bicycle Much lower Ease of walking Lower Well-planned residential growth Similar Well-planned commercial growth Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Similar Public places where people want to spend time Much lower Variety of housing options Similar Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar Overall appearance Similar Cleanliness Similar Water resources Much lower Air quality Similar 782014583% 762014893% 611917587% 551999070% 761964870% 701976070% 501939656% 1530325755% 519318431% 228327719% 831829121% 330929915% 6329611048% 3535723370% 3332922142% 5327813159% 4531717369% 12782768% 531930426% 932029043% 551958746% 541958943% 481929954% 2219114952% 329028032% 4930215546% 743248444% 693149659% 3033623364% 3732520570% 517616824% Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Water resources Much lower Air quality Similar Availability of paths and walking trails Lower Fitness opportunities Lower Recreational opportunities Much lower Availability of affordable quality food Lower Availability of affordable quality health care Lower Availability of preventive health services Lower Availability of affordable quality mental health care Lower Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Lower Community support for the arts Much lower Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Similar K-12 education Lower Adult educational opportunities Much lower Sense of civic/community pride Similar Neighborliness of residents Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Similar Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Similar Opportunities to volunteer Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse ..Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Anna for help or information Similar Contacted Anna elected officials to express your opinion Similar Attended a local public meeting Similar Watched a local public meeting Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity Lower Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Similar Voted in your most recent local election Lower Used public transportation instead of driving Lower Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Similar Walked or biked instead of driving Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna.services in Anna. Public information services Similar Economic development Similar 2129023071% 1332027946% 429027743% 231130532% 1128525245% 1729424543% 1528023941% 328127118% 730728634% 519218330% 2029223234% 2129423154% 028728615% 2919213649% 5229213967% 3229920450% 3229620258% 1729524556% 3729718659% 723148765% 6133213048% 1729024012% 872933827% 3527417721% 829627218% 1928523114% 819417960% 62652484% 5728712243% 1929123444% 3030921556% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Public information services Similar Economic development Similar Traffic enforcement Similar Traffic signal timing Similar Street repair Similar Street cleaning Similar Street lighting Similar Snow removal Lower Sidewalk maintenance Similar Bus or transit services Much lower Land use, planning and zoning Similar Code enforcement Similar Affordable high-speed internet access Similar Garbage collection Similar Drinking water Much lower Sewer services Similar Storm water management Similar Power (electric and/or gas) utility Similar Utility billing Similar Police/Sheriff services Similar Crime prevention Similar Animal control Similar Ambulance or emergency medical services Similar Fire services Similar Fire prevention and education Similar Emergency preparedness Similar Preservation of natural areas Similar Anna open space Similar Recycling Similar Yard waste pick-up Similar City parks Similar Recreation programs or classes Lower Recreation centers or facilities Much lower 6030312160% 4335119960% 2429522545% 5734514850% 4430917462% 2033826949% 1625621553% 753067666% 127527110% 3131121536% 2834424640% 861892763% 5432815186% 130730437% 1731025869% 5032216174% 2625118574% 3327618464% 6637812989% 773508087% 4332118370% 6431611491% 4934117493% 5030615184% 3330520355% 2228822553% 2428021255% 5033016376% 2528621564% 2532324372% 631629650% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Recreation programs or classes Lower Recreation centers or facilities Much lower Health services Lower Public library services Much lower Overall customer service by Anna employees Similar Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Anna Similar The overall direction that Anna is taking Similar The job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar Overall confidence in Anna government Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar Being open and transparent to the public Similar Informing residents about issues facing the community Similar Treating all residents fairly Higher Treating residents with respect Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each .. The City of Anna Similar The Federal Government Lower Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Similar Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Similar Access the internet from your cell phone Similar Visit social media sites Similar Use or check email Similar Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Higher 129929733% 1427523553% 032031917% 5836615383% 2037029641% 5833514160% 6933310358% 6030012155% 5830412760% 732957966% 661986763% 662036957% 943011779% 851953080% 5336216875% 128428028% 882783294% 2619114163% 842784383% 97190692% 652789694% 4527815384% 571918282% 3727817571% 4127816372% 4127816369% 921911599% 96191798% 98190388% 921911599% 911911838% In general, how many times do you: Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Higher Please rate your overall health.Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family..Lower 921901570% 702868477% 1628824216% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. Anna as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor 2% N=6 12% N=46 61% N=227 25% N=93 5% N=18 16% N=60 51% N=191 28% N=104 5% N=14 18% N=55 50% N=154 28% N=87 36% N=83 39% N=89 12% N=27 13% N=31 40% N=137 34% N=117 20% N=70 6% N=19 17% N=50 26% N=78 36% N=106 21% N=62 3% N=10 18% N=68 59% N=221 20% N=73 Complete set of frequencies This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. The overall quality of life Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair 3% N=10 7% N=25 33% N=115 42% N=151 18% N=64 6% N=18 20% N=61 58% N=181 16% N=51 41% N=138 33% N=113 21% N=73 5% N=17 17% N=63 32% N=117 39% N=143 13% N=47 22% N=79 31% N=115 35% N=128 12% N=44 3% N=13 12% N=44 51% N=189 34% N=127 4% N=14 26% N=96 47% N=172 24% N=87 31% N=110 38% N=133 20% N=70 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Anna to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Anna for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 11% N=40 31% N=110 18% N=60 30% N=101 41% N=138 10% N=35 38% N=131 33% N=112 25% N=84 4% N=14 9% N=33 46% N=161 33% N=115 11% N=39 6% N=21 12% N=42 46% N=168 37% N=136 12% N=43 10% N=37 32% N=118 46% N=167 1% N=2 4% N=14 0% N=1 18% N=68 77% N=289 0% N=1 1% N=5 3% N=10 24% N=83 71% N=242 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor 0% N=1 2% N=6 7% N=25 8% N=30 36% N=134 47% N=172 1% N=4 2% N=7 4% N=16 29% N=108 63% N=234 0% N=1 4% N=15 9% N=33 39% N=142 48% N=173 5% N=18 25% N=87 48% N=164 22% N=77 12% N=37 18% N=57 44% N=139 26% N=80 9% N=27 21% N=66 47% N=144 23% N=73 16% N=32 28% N=56 36% N=71 20% N=39 Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. Taking care of vulnerable residents Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair 16% N=32 13% N=49 32% N=119 42% N=155 13% N=47 31% N=114 37% N=137 22% N=79 10% N=35 47% N=164 33% N=116 16% N=54 4% N=13 37% N=92 42% N=105 16% N=39 5% N=12 50% N=180 35% N=129 11% N=41 4% N=13 18% N=65 35% N=129 37% N=136 10% N=39 8% N=30 22% N=82 58% N=213 11% N=41 37% N=138 36% N=135 6% N=21 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Traffic flow on major streets Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good 21% N=76 37% N=138 10% N=37 31% N=110 41% N=147 17% N=62 6% N=24 25% N=94 49% N=182 20% N=73 88% N=186 4% N=8 4% N=7 4% N=9 43% N=115 30% N=81 20% N=53 6% N=17 24% N=76 33% N=107 33% N=104 10% N=33 19% N=60 36% N=117 30% N=96 15% N=49 21% N=66 37% N=115 31% N=99 11% N=34 39% N=139 16% N=56 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 12% N=43 34% N=122 39% N=139 16% N=39 32% N=77 39% N=95 13% N=30 33% N=116 35% N=121 24% N=85 7% N=25 19% N=67 36% N=125 32% N=114 13% N=45 23% N=77 34% N=114 30% N=100 13% N=44 10% N=36 31% N=108 45% N=157 14% N=47 4% N=14 33% N=120 51% N=187 13% N=47 5% N=20 25% N=94 47% N=175 22% N=81 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Cleanliness Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor 38% N=120 38% N=117 18% N=57 6% N=18 6% N=22 24% N=83 54% N=190 16% N=55 19% N=63 35% N=118 29% N=97 17% N=59 24% N=78 32% N=105 32% N=104 11% N=37 29% N=96 39% N=130 24% N=81 7% N=25 17% N=64 38% N=141 33% N=121 12% N=42 23% N=68 34% N=100 29% N=85 13% N=38 21% N=59 38% N=106 30% N=82 11% N=30 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Availability of preventive health services Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair 21% N=59 56% N=93 26% N=44 12% N=21 5% N=9 37% N=116 29% N=89 26% N=82 7% N=23 37% N=94 33% N=85 22% N=56 8% N=20 32% N=53 34% N=57 24% N=40 9% N=15 16% N=36 29% N=64 42% N=93 13% N=29 63% N=103 22% N=36 10% N=16 5% N=8 9% N=28 41% N=125 37% N=112 12% N=37 24% N=87 50% N=177 17% N=61 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Neighborliness of residents Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Anna for help or information No Yes Contacted Anna elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes 9% N=31 24% N=87 11% N=35 39% N=130 33% N=109 17% N=56 9% N=32 33% N=111 42% N=142 16% N=55 11% N=26 34% N=79 39% N=92 16% N=39 12% N=34 29% N=82 43% N=121 15% N=43 10% N=28 25% N=74 44% N=128 22% N=63 49% N=179 51% N=190 12% N=44 88% N=326 27% N=100 73% N=271 21% N=78 79% N=293 18% N=67 82% N=303 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 18% N=67 14% N=50 86% N=321 60% N=222 40% N=146 4% N=14 96% N=354 43% N=159 57% N=211 44% N=164 56% N=207 10% N=26 35% N=96 35% N=98 21% N=58 15% N=45 26% N=77 44% N=130 16% N=47 11% N=37 29% N=94 44% N=144 16% N=51 22% N=79 33% N=118 34% N=123 11% N=41 18% N=63 32% N=112 36% N=126 13% N=45 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Street repair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Snow removal Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor 11% N=37 27% N=88 43% N=141 19% N=64 14% N=51 37% N=132 37% N=136 12% N=44 26% N=39 21% N=31 37% N=55 16% N=24 6% N=19 28% N=82 48% N=143 17% N=51 81% N=136 9% N=16 3% N=5 7% N=11 24% N=67 41% N=114 26% N=72 10% N=28 27% N=80 33% N=100 33% N=98 7% N=22 17% N=59 20% N=70 34% N=116 28% N=96 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Affordable high-speed internet access Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair 17% N=59 4% N=17 10% N=35 52% N=193 34% N=126 39% N=137 24% N=83 26% N=91 11% N=40 7% N=24 24% N=83 51% N=173 18% N=63 7% N=21 19% N=61 55% N=176 19% N=60 8% N=31 17% N=61 49% N=181 25% N=93 9% N=32 27% N=98 43% N=156 21% N=78 4% N=13 7% N=22 54% N=172 36% N=115 10% N=29 62% N=184 26% N=77 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Crime prevention Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good 3% N=9 10% N=29 8% N=17 21% N=45 55% N=116 16% N=33 0% N=1 8% N=18 45% N=97 46% N=100 2% N=5 5% N=12 48% N=115 45% N=107 6% N=10 10% N=16 55% N=90 29% N=48 11% N=21 34% N=68 31% N=63 24% N=48 18% N=50 30% N=85 37% N=105 15% N=43 16% N=49 28% N=84 41% N=121 15% N=45 51% N=168 25% N=84 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Anna employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 6% N=19 18% N=60 51% N=168 12% N=35 23% N=69 43% N=127 22% N=63 4% N=14 23% N=76 51% N=169 22% N=73 26% N=56 23% N=51 38% N=82 13% N=29 42% N=94 26% N=57 24% N=53 9% N=20 21% N=46 26% N=59 41% N=91 12% N=27 72% N=139 12% N=23 8% N=16 8% N=16 4% N=11 13% N=38 55% N=161 28% N=83 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna.Overall customer service by Anna employees Poor Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Anna Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Anna is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor The job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Anna government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor 21% N=63 38% N=116 33% N=101 8% N=23 17% N=56 23% N=79 42% N=142 18% N=60 12% N=33 31% N=89 43% N=124 15% N=43 12% N=40 33% N=108 41% N=134 14% N=47 14% N=44 27% N=87 43% N=141 16% N=53 11% N=29 23% N=63 43% N=118 22% N=61 14% N=41 23% N=66 44% N=125 18% N=52 15% N=46 28% N=86 38% N=116 18% N=55 Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. Informing residents about issues facing the community Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Anna Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important 15% N=46 7% N=19 14% N=39 52% N=142 26% N=71 7% N=21 13% N=39 52% N=155 28% N=82 5% N=16 21% N=74 54% N=189 20% N=70 38% N=120 35% N=111 26% N=84 1% N=3 1% N=2 5% N=19 41% N=144 53% N=190 5% N=20 32% N=117 29% N=105 34% N=125 0% N= 18% N=65 43% N=160 39% N=143 8% N=29 27% N=99 65% N=234 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Very important Somewhat important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day 8% N=29 1% N=2 6% N=22 37% N=135 57% N=210 2% N=6 15% N=54 49% N=182 35% N=128 0% N=2 18% N=68 50% N=185 31% N=115 1% N=3 28% N=102 41% N=153 30% N=111 4% N=13 24% N=90 40% N=146 32% N=119 1% N=5 29% N=108 47% N=173 23% N=84 1% N=2 1% N=3 5% N=16 5% N=20 89% N=324 4% N=14 92% N=331 In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral 0% N=2 2% N=6 2% N=8 4% N=14 9% N=34 3% N=11 7% N=25 10% N=37 71% N=260 0% N=1 1% N=3 3% N=10 11% N=41 85% N=311 47% N=171 14% N=52 19% N=69 5% N=19 14% N=50 7% N=26 23% N=84 38% N=140 11% N=41 20% N=73 2% N=6 3% N=13 18% N=67 50% N=183 27% N=99 38% N=138 13% N=47 3% N=10 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative How many years have you lived in Anna?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more 12% N=45 34% N=121 38% N=138 4% N=15 8% N=28 16% N=57 39% N=144 34% N=123 1% N=6 1% N=3 5% N=20 92% N=340 79% N=291 21% N=77 4% N=15 2% N=6 11% N=40 29% N=104 33% N=122 12% N=45 7% N=25 2% N=7 48% N=176 52% N=192 14% N=50 86% N=318 19% N=67 37% N=134 19% N=69 12% N=45 10% N=35 3% N=9 How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino?Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Woman Man Identify in another way 19% N=67 25% N=88 75% N=271 6% N=22 82% N=294 10% N=35 7% N=25 1% N=4 3% N=10 5% N=20 9% N=34 19% N=71 23% N=84 39% N=143 2% N=6 0% N= 51% N=185 49% N=181 Methods (open participation) As part of its participation in The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™), the City of Anna conducted a survey of 375 residents. Survey invitations were mailed to randomly selected households and data were collected from September 21, 2022 to November 9, 2022. The results from this main survey effort represent the most robust estimate of your residents’ opinions. After the above data collection period was underway, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Anna. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates;  it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Anna and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on October 26, 2022. The survey remained open for two weeks and there were 213 responses. The open participation survey data were not collected through a random sample and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the survey; therefore, a level of confidence in the representativeness of the sample cannot be estimated. However, to reduce bias where possible, these data were statistically weighted to match the demographic characteristics of the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Anna. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the open participation survey are presented in the following table. * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Hispanic No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispa.. Housing type Attached Detached race Not white White Race/ethnicity Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ Tenure Own Rent 19% 41% 40% 17% 40% 42% 27% 52% 21% 23% 77% 25% 75% 14% 86% 88% 12% 95% 5% 99% 1% 77% 23% 78% 22% 83% 17% 59% 41% 60% 40% 75% 25% 49% 51% 46% 54% 66% 34% 10% 21% 18% 9% 20% 22% 8% 19% 19% 9% 21% 23% 15% 38% 13% 11% 14% 8% 26% 74% 24% 76% 7% 93% Do you live within the city limits of Anna?Yes No I don't know Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. Anna as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good 2% N=4 4% N=7 94% N=195 4% N=9 24% N=50 61% N=125 11% N=22 10% N=21 22% N=45 54% N=111 14% N=29 8% N=14 30% N=54 44% N=79 19% N=34 47% N=62 39% N=52 8% N=11 6% N=8 39% N=79 41% N=83 17% N=35 3% N=5 26% N=47 28% N=51 32% N=58 13% N=23 49% N=101 8% N=17 Open participation survey results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good 9% N=19 33% N=67 49% N=101 18% N=38 29% N=59 35% N=73 18% N=37 11% N=20 37% N=70 46% N=87 6% N=11 58% N=111 30% N=58 10% N=20 1% N=2 43% N=90 26% N=53 27% N=55 4% N=9 38% N=73 31% N=60 28% N=53 3% N=6 3% N=6 33% N=69 48% N=99 16% N=33 9% N=18 43% N=86 40% N=80 8% N=16 34% N=68 11% N=22 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Anna to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Anna for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very safe 17% N=33 38% N=76 34% N=68 20% N=38 39% N=74 38% N=71 3% N=5 39% N=72 35% N=63 21% N=39 5% N=10 18% N=34 35% N=67 43% N=84 5% N=10 16% N=33 22% N=45 37% N=76 25% N=51 18% N=35 14% N=28 34% N=68 35% N=69 1% N=2 1% N=2 3% N=6 38% N=76 58% N=116 7% N=13 16% N=29 36% N=63 41% N=72 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In Anna's downtown/commercial area during the day Somewhat unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good 3% N=5 12% N=25 13% N=28 44% N=91 27% N=56 2% N=3 5% N=10 9% N=18 37% N=75 48% N=97 1% N=2 12% N=24 23% N=47 32% N=66 32% N=65 18% N=36 31% N=64 34% N=69 17% N=33 18% N=30 24% N=41 41% N=69 17% N=29 14% N=24 30% N=51 37% N=63 18% N=31 23% N=29 39% N=50 27% N=35 10% N=13 32% N=64 4% N=8 Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good 24% N=47 41% N=82 32% N=64 49% N=98 35% N=70 15% N=29 1% N=1 57% N=114 33% N=66 9% N=19 0% N=1 51% N=74 33% N=48 15% N=22 0% N=1 67% N=131 23% N=46 9% N=18 0% N= 34% N=70 38% N=79 21% N=43 6% N=13 16% N=33 32% N=63 43% N=86 9% N=17 40% N=83 35% N=72 21% N=44 4% N=8 38% N=73 8% N=15 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair 20% N=39 35% N=67 38% N=73 12% N=23 30% N=61 47% N=94 12% N=23 87% N=109 10% N=13 3% N=3 42% N=58 30% N=41 23% N=31 4% N=6 37% N=65 35% N=62 23% N=39 5% N=9 39% N=77 29% N=57 27% N=53 5% N=10 37% N=69 38% N=70 20% N=37 5% N=9 25% N=48 40% N=78 32% N=64 4% N=7 37% N=59 33% N=53 9% N=14 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair 22% N=35 37% N=59 40% N=78 41% N=80 13% N=26 6% N=12 27% N=51 46% N=88 20% N=39 7% N=13 39% N=73 35% N=65 21% N=40 6% N=10 31% N=62 25% N=50 35% N=70 9% N=17 16% N=34 40% N=83 38% N=78 6% N=12 23% N=49 30% N=62 37% N=76 10% N=20 54% N=98 27% N=50 14% N=26 5% N=8 36% N=67 41% N=76 14% N=27 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Air quality Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair 9% N=17 36% N=67 24% N=45 47% N=90 21% N=40 8% N=14 24% N=43 42% N=77 32% N=58 3% N=5 33% N=61 37% N=69 27% N=50 3% N=6 29% N=61 34% N=71 34% N=70 2% N=4 25% N=42 45% N=74 28% N=46 2% N=3 33% N=51 33% N=51 31% N=47 3% N=4 70% N=76 24% N=26 6% N=6 0% N= 32% N=58 14% N=26 8% N=14 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair 46% N=84 32% N=58 51% N=71 33% N=46 14% N=19 2% N=3 35% N=41 34% N=40 25% N=30 6% N=7 35% N=43 25% N=31 31% N=39 9% N=11 60% N=65 31% N=34 8% N=9 1% N=1 17% N=33 47% N=92 28% N=54 8% N=16 21% N=41 30% N=58 40% N=78 9% N=17 10% N=19 42% N=78 40% N=73 8% N=16 30% N=60 38% N=76 19% N=37 Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Anna for help or information No Yes Contacted Anna elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes No 13% N=25 30% N=60 12% N=17 39% N=53 36% N=48 12% N=17 13% N=21 36% N=58 37% N=60 13% N=22 28% N=45 24% N=38 37% N=60 11% N=18 55% N=114 45% N=92 34% N=69 66% N=138 39% N=81 61% N=126 37% N=77 63% N=130 24% N=49 76% N=158 21% N=43 79% N=164 83% N=173 17% N=34 4% N=9 96% N=198 47% N=98 53% N=109 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Snow removal Excellent Good Fair 33% N=68 67% N=138 18% N=30 40% N=69 30% N=51 12% N=21 21% N=38 43% N=78 25% N=45 10% N=18 24% N=45 30% N=58 36% N=69 10% N=19 31% N=62 31% N=62 33% N=66 5% N=9 32% N=66 31% N=63 32% N=65 5% N=9 26% N=49 28% N=53 38% N=73 8% N=16 22% N=44 41% N=84 27% N=56 10% N=20 28% N=26 26% N=24 13% N=12 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Snow removal Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair 34% N=31 28% N=26 25% N=41 29% N=47 38% N=63 8% N=14 89% N=74 7% N=6 2% N=2 2% N=1 50% N=88 31% N=55 16% N=29 2% N=3 36% N=65 35% N=63 27% N=49 3% N=5 36% N=72 21% N=43 22% N=44 20% N=41 11% N=24 17% N=34 44% N=89 28% N=58 54% N=109 19% N=38 21% N=42 6% N=11 27% N=50 40% N=76 16% N=30 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Sewer services Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair 17% N=32 27% N=50 16% N=29 24% N=43 40% N=71 20% N=36 11% N=20 30% N=57 37% N=71 22% N=42 23% N=45 31% N=58 29% N=55 17% N=33 5% N=8 18% N=31 43% N=75 34% N=60 4% N=7 30% N=53 44% N=79 22% N=40 22% N=31 34% N=48 28% N=39 16% N=23 9% N=12 15% N=20 46% N=62 30% N=41 12% N=18 52% N=75 35% N=51 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Fire services Good Fair Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Anna open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor 12% N=18 16% N=20 22% N=27 39% N=48 23% N=28 19% N=21 38% N=43 34% N=38 9% N=11 35% N=59 38% N=63 20% N=34 6% N=9 33% N=53 40% N=65 23% N=38 4% N=7 14% N=26 27% N=48 42% N=76 17% N=31 22% N=36 36% N=60 33% N=55 9% N=15 8% N=14 39% N=74 40% N=76 14% N=27 29% N=38 37% N=49 28% N=37 6% N=8 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Recreation programs or classes Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Anna employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Anna Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Anna is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor The job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Anna government Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 29% N=38 57% N=78 21% N=29 18% N=25 3% N=5 29% N=38 41% N=53 28% N=36 1% N=1 79% N=96 8% N=10 12% N=15 9% N=16 31% N=55 37% N=66 23% N=40 42% N=81 29% N=56 25% N=47 4% N=7 35% N=68 26% N=50 26% N=51 14% N=26 36% N=65 24% N=43 29% N=53 11% N=19 33% N=66 26% N=51 30% N=60 11% N=21 Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. Overall confidence in Anna government Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Anna Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Essential 32% N=61 27% N=51 34% N=64 7% N=14 28% N=47 27% N=46 37% N=63 8% N=14 26% N=48 34% N=63 31% N=57 9% N=16 29% N=51 33% N=58 30% N=54 8% N=14 18% N=27 33% N=50 28% N=42 21% N=31 13% N=23 33% N=58 35% N=63 19% N=34 18% N=36 32% N=63 32% N=63 17% N=34 45% N=81 40% N=72 11% N=20 3% N=5 Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?The Federal Government Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important 11% N=22 40% N=81 50% N=102 6% N=12 32% N=65 29% N=58 32% N=65 1% N=2 9% N=19 37% N=75 53% N=109 0% N= 6% N=13 28% N=58 65% N=134 0% N= 9% N=18 42% N=86 49% N=101 3% N=7 17% N=35 49% N=100 31% N=64 0% N= 25% N=51 47% N=95 28% N=57 2% N=4 31% N=64 50% N=103 17% N=35 32% N=64 35% N=71 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week 8% N=15 25% N=50 32% N=64 7% N=14 32% N=66 31% N=65 30% N=62 1% N=1 2% N=5 2% N=5 7% N=15 87% N=181 0% N= 0% N= 1% N=1 99% N=205 1% N=3 0% N= 5% N=10 12% N=25 82% N=168 0% N= 3% N=7 10% N=20 87% N=179 43% N=88 11% N=22 25% N=51 4% N=8 17% N=35 31% N=63 8% N=16 28% N=57 In general, how many times do you:Shop online Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative How many years have you lived in Anna?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more No 3% N=6 31% N=65 31% N=63 1% N=2 2% N=5 24% N=50 50% N=103 23% N=47 14% N=29 37% N=76 31% N=65 13% N=27 5% N=11 6% N=13 9% N=18 15% N=31 38% N=80 31% N=65 2% N=5 1% N=2 5% N=10 92% N=190 76% N=157 24% N=50 1% N=3 6% N=13 13% N=26 35% N=73 28% N=57 9% N=19 6% N=13 1% N=2 About how much is your monthlyhousing cost for the place you live(including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? About how much is your monthly housing cost forthe place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)?$3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household?No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino?Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Woman Man Identify in another way How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that apply.) The City's website The City's social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,.. Received an email from the City In a city newsletter or utility bill Received a postcard or letter from the City Nextdoor 56% N=116 44% N=91 16% N=33 84% N=173 18% N=37 37% N=74 23% N=47 11% N=23 8% N=16 2% N=5 25% N=50 75% N=155 8% N=17 85% N=174 6% N=13 5% N=10 4% N=9 1% N=2 9% N=18 8% N=16 21% N=44 19% N=39 36% N=74 6% N=13 0% N= 54% N=111 46% N=94 1% N=2 3% N=6 3% N=6 24% N=49 35% N=72 10% N=22 How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that apply.) Received a postcard or letter from the City Nextdoor In my Facebook feed Saw a flier or poster about it Heard about it from a family member, friend or neighbor Heard about it from a business or social organization in my co.. Polco's weekly email Polco social media post Other 0% N= 0% N=1 0% N= 0% N=1 7% N=14 0% N= 27% N=56 1% N=2 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Anna 2022 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Anna. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Anna as a place to live ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Anna as a place to raise children ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Anna as a place to work ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Anna as a place to visit .......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Anna as a place to retire ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Anna ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Anna as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall economic health of Anna ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Anna ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Anna’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Anna (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ........................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Anna ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Anna ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Anna .................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .......................... 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Anna to someone who asks ..............................1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Anna for the next five years ....................................................1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Anna’s downtown/commercial area during the day ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Anna community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Making all residents feel welcome ................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Anna community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Anna ........................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Anna ........................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Anna .............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Anna ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Anna community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Anna ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Anna ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Anna ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Anna ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned residential growth ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned commercial growth .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-designed neighborhoods ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Anna ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Anna ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Anna ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails .......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) ... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Anna ................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Contacted the City of Anna (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information ..................................... 1 2 Contacted Anna elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion ........................ 1 2 Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ............................................................................................... 1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Anna .................................................................................................. 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .................................................................................. 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving ............................................................... 1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .............................................................................. 1 2 Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Anna 2022 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Anna. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Economic development ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Street repair ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Snow removal ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Bus or transit services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed internet access ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection ............................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Drinking water ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) .................... 1 2 3 4 5 Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Utility billing .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Police/Sheriff services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Fire services ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ..... 1 2 3 4 5 Anna open space................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up.............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 City parks................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Health services ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Anna employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Anna government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Anna .................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Anna is taking .................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The job Anna government does at welcoming resident involvement ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Anna government ................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being honest ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. Page 4 of 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The City of Anna ................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Anna community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Anna .........................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Anna ........................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Anna’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Anna (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ..........................................1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Anna ...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Anna ............................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ...............................................1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Anna .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .............................1 2 3 4 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Anna 2022 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer ......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the internet from your cell phone .......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. .......................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Use or check email ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Share your opinions online ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Shop online ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health.  Excellent  Very good  Good  Fair  Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:  Very positive  Somewhat positive  Neutral  Somewhat negative  Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Anna?  Less than 2 years  2-5 years  6-10 years  11-20 years  More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in?  One family house detached from any other houses  Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment, or condominium)  Mobile home  Other D6. Do you rent or own your home?  Rent  Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)?  Less than $500  $2,000 to $2,499  $500 to $999  $2,500 to $2,999  $1,000 to $1,499  $3,000 to $3,499  $1,500 to $1,999  $3,500 or more D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household?  No  Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older?  No  Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.)  Less than $25,000  $75,000 to $99,999  $25,000 to $49,999  $100,000 to $149,999  $50,000 to $74,999  $150,000 or more D11. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?  No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino  Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.)  American Indian or Alaskan Native  Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander  Black or African American  White  Other D13. In which category is your age?  18-24 years  55-64 years  25-34 years  65-74 years  35-44 years  75 years or older  45-54 years D14. What is your gender?  Female  Male  Identify in another way Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 Item No. 6. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Salena Tittle AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action to approve minutes of the January 3, 2023 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. SUMMARY: January 3, 2023 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Excellent STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 01-03-2023 PZ Minutes Page 1 of 5 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 3, 2023 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Anna held a meeting at 7:0 0 p.m. on January 3, 2023, at the Municipal Complex located at 120 W. 7th Street, to consider the following items. 1. Call to Order and Establishment of Quorum The meeting was called to order at 6:59 p.m. Commissioners present were Kelly Patterson-Herndon, Dennis Ogan, Paul Wenzel, Michelle Clemens, David Nylec, and Staci Martin. Commissioner Douglas Hermann was absent. Staff present was Ross Altobelli, Lauren Mecke, and Salena Tittle. Councilman Atchley and Councilman Cain were also in attendance. 2. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance Commissioner Ogan gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Citizen Comments: At this time, any person may address the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding an item on this meeting agenda that is not scheduled for public hearing. Also, at this time any person may address the Commission regarding an item that is not on this meeting agenda. Each person will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to speak. No discussion or action may be taken at this meeting on items not listed o n this agenda, other than to make statements of specific factual information in response to a citizen’s inquiry or to recite existing policy in response to the inquiry. There were no speakers. 4. Location Map Consent Items A motion was made by Commissioner Ogan seconded by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon to recommend approval of consent items 5-10. The vote was unanimous. 5. Consider/Discuss/Action to approve minutes of the December 5, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. 6. Consider/Discuss/Action on the M&M Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Development Plat. Applicant: Marquin Miller. 7. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Munipalle Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Development Plat. Applicant: Praveen a nd Praina Munipalle. 8. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Cedar Ridge Estates, Phase 1, Final Plat. Applicant: Saginaw 106, LTD. 9. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Anna Retail Addition, Block A, Lot 8R and Block B, Lot 1R, Preliminary Replat. Applicant: Anna Retail 31, LP. 10. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Dreamville Anna, Block A, Lot 1, Preliminary Plat. Applicant: Alvin Johnson / HHF Dreamville Anna, LLC. Items for Individual Consideration 11. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Sky View, Block A, Lots 1-11 & Block B, Lot 1X, Preliminary Plat. Applicant: Juan Ramos / Cidrax Texas, LLC. Page 2 of 5 Mr. Altobelli introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat with a waiver to the maximum cul-de-sac street length in order to subdivide the existing tract of land into multiple 1+ acre lots. The Preliminary Plat is recommended for approval. A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Ogan to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat. The vote was unanimous. 12. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request to rezone 82.0± acres located on the south side of E. Foster Crossing Boulevard, 195± feet east of S. Powell Parkway from Planned Development (Ord. No. 743 -2017 & Ord. No. 933-2021) to Planned Development-LI-1 Light Industrial with modified development standards. Applicant: PC5 Properties, LLC C/O Michael Puryear, Secretary. Mr. Altobelli introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval for a new Planned Development zoning district with modified development standards to accommodate the Holt Cat dealership and Texas First Rentals development. Commissioner Clemens asked staff to explain a little more about the signage that is being proposed. Mr. Altobelli described the height and location of the signs that are being proposed and what our ordinance allows. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:08 p.m. The applicant’s representative, Nick Hobbs with BG, gave a brief presentation regarding the proposed project and the requested development standards. Commissioner Nylec asked if any of the heavy equipment will be utilizing E. Foster Crossing. Mr. Hobbs advised that the main ingress/egress will be Collin County Outer Loop. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked where the trash collection will be onsite. Mr. Hobbs explained that the dumpsters will be tucked behind the building, not in street view. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked if they were going to be screened from view. Mr. Hobbs advised that they will not be screened from view at that particular location but that the tree line along E. Foster Crossing that is being proposed will block any view from the right-of-way. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked for clarification as to why they are choosing crushed limestone instead of concrete. Mr. Hobbs explained that the crushed limestone will hold out better than concrete will for the type of equipment that will be onsite. The type of equipment onsite will destroy concrete. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked about the dust factor with residential homes along the side of the proposed. Mr. Hobbs explained that they water the crushed gravel to assist with the dust factor. Mr. Hobbs also advised that will only be storing the vehicles on that side so there is not a lot of movement going on in that particular area. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked if the fuel island area was going to be solid gravel and how they would clean up any sort of spillage. Mr. Hobbs explained that they have an environmental team that follows TCQ guidelines for cleaning any kind of spillage. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:19 p.m. Page 3 of 5 Commissioner Clemens explained that it meets the 2050 Comprehensive Plan but her only concern was regarding signage. She explained that what they allow at this location will be setting the example for the remainder tracts along the frontage. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked staff if the signage portion of the request can be brought back up at a later time. Mr. Altobelli explained that the city’s regulations state City Council has the authority to approve any sort of signage variance. He also explained that the Commission could include it in their recommendation by recommending signage be a variance request when it goes before Council. Commissioner Ogan asked what the plans are for the water storage tank adjacent to the site. Mr. Altobelli advised that the city is looking into do some improvements for possibly expanding the capacity but that the water tower is not on this proposed development’s tract of land. He also explained that with this proposed development, the city will be obtaining right-of-way access. A motion was made by Commissioner Nylec, seconded by Commissioner Clemens to recommend approval of the Planned Development zoning request. The motion passed unanimously. 13. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Holt Subdivision, Block A, Lots 1-4, Concept Plan. Applicant: PC5 Properties, LLC C/O Michael Puryear, Secretary. Mr. Altobelli introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval of the Concept Plan associated with the rezoning case, item #12. The request is contingent on the Zoning. A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Ogan to recommend approval of the Concept Plan. The motion passed unanimously. 14. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Holt Subdivision, Block A, Lots 1-4, Preliminary Plat. Applicant: PC5 Properties, LLC C/O Michael Puryear, Secretary. Mr. Altobelli introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval of the Preliminary Plat associated with the rezoning case, item #12. The request is contingent on the Zoning. A motion was made by Commissioner Nylec, seconded by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat. The motion passed unanimously. 15. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request for a specific use permit for a communications tower on one lot on 3.6± acres located on the east side of the Dallas Area Rapid Transit right -of-way, 380± feet north of E. Outer Loop Road. Zoned: Planned Development-Anna Business Park (Ord. No. 323-2007 & Ord. No. 743-2017). Applicant: City of Anna Economic Development Corporation. Mrs. Tittle introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval for a Specific Use Permit to allow for a communications tower with a 130 foot maximum height. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:27 p.m. The project representative, Chris Prescott, gave a brief presentation regarding the communications tower. Commissioner Nylec asked if this was going to be a 5G tower. Mr. Prescott answered yes. Page 4 of 5 Commissioner Nylec asked if there will also be a tornado sirens provided on this tower as well. Mr. Prescott advised that there has not been any sort of request for that on this specific tower but if the city eventually requests something like that, they will accommodate by providing space. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:29 p.m. A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Martin to recommend approval of the Specific Use Permit request. The motion passed unanimously. 16. Consider/Discuss/Action on the City of Anna Water Storage Tank Addition, Block A, Lot 2, Site Plan. Applicant: City of Anna Economic Development Corporation. Mrs. Tittle introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval of the Site Plan associated with the Specific Use Permit request, item #15. The request is contingent on the Specific Use Permit. A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Martin to recommend approval of the Site Plan. The motion passed unanimously. 17. Conduct a public hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request for a specific use permit for a gas metering station on one lot on 27.4± acres located on the north side of Rosamond Parkway, 830± feet west of West Crossing Boulevard. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 285-2006). Applicant: Anna Texas Land, LTD. Mrs. Tittle introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval for a Specific Use Permit to allow for a gas metering station. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:32 p.m. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:32 p.m. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon acknowledged that Commissioner Clemens brought up a good point the last time type of request came through and that it will be in someone’s backyard at some point. She also acknowledged that at this time, there are no existing houses at this location, but once the adjacent neighborhood is built, it will be the buyers choice to purchase a home next to the site. Mrs. Tittle advised the Commission that the previous applicant, Atmos Energy, for a different site is not the current applicant for this specific site. The applicant for this specific site is a separate company that will be leasing the site from Atmos. Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon asked if the only chemical stored onsite will be the one that makes it smell if there is a gas leak. The applicant, Richard Bard, explained that Atmos is the Transmission Utility and they are they are the distribution utility. A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Clemens to recommend approval of the Specific Use Permit request. The motion passed unanimously. 18. Consider/Discuss/Action on the Shadowbend Atmos Energy Tap, Site Plan. Applicant: Anna Texas Land, LTD. Mrs. Tittle introduced the item. The applicant is requesting approval of the Site Plan associated with the Specific Use Permit request, item #17. The request is contingent on the Specific Use Permit. Page 5 of 5 A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Martin to recommend approval. The motion passed unanimously. Adjourn A motion was made by Chairwoman Patterson-Herndon, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel to adjourn the meeting. The vote was unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. ___________________________________ Chairwoman Kelly Patterson-Herndon ATTEST: _________________________________ Salena Tittle, Planner II Item No. 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Miranda Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Development Plat. Applicant: Moises Miranda. SUMMARY: One lot on 1.5± acres located on the west side of Old Valdasta Road, 1,740± feet south of La Paloma Drive. Located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Development Plat is in conformance with the city’s Subdivision Regulations. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Miranda Estates, Block A, Lot 1 Locator Map 2. EXHIBIT A - DP (Miranda Estates Bl A, Lt 1) 3. P&Z Application COUNTY ROAD 500 COUNTY ROAD 1 039FM 545 OLD VALDASTA R D Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 300 600150 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Development Plat - Miranda Estates, Block A, Lot 1 Item No. 8. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R, Replat. Applicant: Jack Rowe / BTR at Throckmorton LLC. SUMMARY: Multiple-family residences on one lot on 14.9± acres located on the east side of Throckmorton Boulevard, 38± feet south of Hackberry Drive. Zoned Planned Development (Ord. No. 648-2014 & Ord. No. 974-2022). The purpose for the Replat is to dedicate easements necessary for the proposed multiple-family residence development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommended for approval subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R Locator Map 2. EXHIBIT A - R (Anna Town Center, Bl A, Lt 5R) 3. Signed Application N CENTRAL EXPYHELMOKEN FALLS DR CREEK MEADOW DR LAKESHORE DR US HIGHWAY 75FIELDSVIEWDR SCENTRALEXPYWESTFALL DR KAIETEURDRAVERY POINTE DR DEERCHASE DRSPRINGVALLEY WAYH A R D W O O D C T STANLEYFALLSDRNSTANDRIDGEBLVDPARKCHASEDRH A C KBERRY DR HILLSIDE DR W WHITE ST WILEY FARM PENTON LINNS DR WESTPARKDRNIAGARA FALLS DRVICTORIAFALLSDRPARKVIEW DR S B UDDYHAYESBLVDHILLTOPDRCREEKSIDEDRTANUR CASCADE DRCREEKVIEWDRATHABASCA FALLS DR HANAKOA FALLS DRH ARDWOODTRLRHYMERS GLEN DR SUZIE LN S S T A N D R ID G E B LVDCopyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 600 1,200300 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Replat - Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R CALLED 51.195 ACRES TWO-J PARTNERS, LLLP INST. NO. 20080509000562500 O.P.R.C.C.T. LOT 3 BLOCK G CREEKSIDE PHASE 3 CAB. P, PG. 623 P.R.C.C.T. CALLED 1.809 ACRES CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS INST. NO. 20150623000757290 O.P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 7 ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 8 ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 6R ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2020, PG. 822 P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.894 ACRES 648,794 SQ. FT. 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' D.E. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. (80' RIGHT OF WAY) HACKBERRY DRIVE 25' B.L. 25' B.L. 25' B.L.25' B.L.25' B.L.25' B.L.25' B.L.20' PERMANENT WATER EASEMENT CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS INSTR. NO. 20150623000757320 R.P.R.C.C.T. 20' PERMANENT WATER EASEMENT CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS INSTR. NO. 20150623000757320 20' PERMANENT WATEREASEMENT CITY OF ANNA, TEXASINST. NO. 20150623000757320O.P.R.C.C.T.10' WATER ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.10' UTILITY ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.10' UTILITY ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 20' LANDSCAPE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T.VOL. 2019, PG. 77620' LANDSCAPE ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.20' LANDSCAPE ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.P.R.C.C.T.TEMPORARY 15' DRAINAGEEASEMENT INST. NO.20170828001147040O.P.R.C.C.T.3/8" IRF 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" P.O.B. 5/8" IRSC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" BLOCK A, LOT 5 ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T.30' SANITARY SEWER ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.S0°28'48"W793.34'S89°20'45"E 165.07' ∆=46°57'45" R=335.00' L=274.58' CB=N24°03'40"E C=266.96' N47°32'33"E 81.01' ∆=47°03'45" R=395.00' L=324.45' CB=N24°00'40"E C=315.41' CALLED 107.52 ACRES BTR AT THROCKMORTON LLC INST. NO. 2022000083368 O.P.R.C.C.T.W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752F. T. DUFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 288S0°13'51"W1248.17'N0°34'48"E905.97' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 15' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT (BY THIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY &DRAINAGE ESMT.(BY THIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY &DRAINAGE ESMT. (BYTHIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY &DRAINAGE ESMT. (BYTHIS PLAT)BUDDY HAYES BOULEVARD(60' RIGHT OF WAY)LINE TABLE NO. L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L7 L8 L9 L10 L14 L15 L16 BEARING S68°38'47"W S68°38'47"W S89°25'12"E N89°25'12"W N89°25'12"W N45°14'47"E N44°46'18"W N45°13'42"E S44°46'18"E S89°46'09"E N89°46'09"W S89°31'12"E LENGTH 40.09' 36.66' 44.13' 44.13' 18.67' 22.84' 3.25' 14.42' 6.77' 8.00' 8.00' 8.00' CURVE TABLE NO. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C19 DELTA 40°32'30" 42°56'15" 90°00'00" 68°24'56" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 90°20'56" 90°00'00" 92°18'06" 40°32'30" 40°32'30" 90°00'00" 68°24'56" 83°59'25" 90°00'00" 89°39'04" 13°39'04" RADIUS 30.00' 54.00' 30.00' 54.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.04' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 30.00' 325.00' LENGTH 21.23' 40.47' 47.12' 64.48' 47.12' 47.12' 47.31' 47.12' 48.40' 21.23' 21.23' 47.12' 35.82' 43.98' 47.12' 46.94' 77.43' CHORD BEARING S22°11'12"E N20°59'20"W S44°25'12"E N34°26'19"E N45°34'48"E N45°13'51"E S44°35'40"E N44°46'09"W N43°14'01"W S70°18'33"W S69°08'57"E N45°34'48"E N34°26'19"E N41°30'55"W S45°34'48"W N44°35'40"W S16°54'31"W CHORD 20.79' 39.53' 42.43' 60.72' 42.43' 42.43' 42.56' 42.43' 43.33' 20.79' 20.79' 42.43' 33.73' 40.14' 42.43' 42.30' 77.25'V.A.M. ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 20' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)WATER ESMT (BY THIS PLAT) LINE TABLE NO. L17 L18 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 L30 L33 BEARING S00°28'48"W N89°31'12"W N00°34'48"E S89°25'12"E S00°34'48"W N89°31'12"W S00°28'48"W N89°31'12"W N89°25'12"W N00°34'48"E S89°25'12"E S89°25'12"E LENGTH 20.50' 8.00' 7.71' 15.00' 8.00' 8.00' 25.54' 90.25' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 8.00' LINE TABLE NO. L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L39 L40 L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 BEARING N00°34'48"E N89°25'12"W S89°45'15"E N89°45'25"W S00°14'37"W S89°46'09"E S00°13'51"W N89°46'09"W S00°13'51"W S89°46'09"E S00°13'51"W N89°46'09"W LENGTH 10.00' 8.00' 6.99' 8.23' 10.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' LINE TABLE NO. L46 L47 L48 L49 L50 L51 L52 L53 L54 L55 L56 L57 BEARING N89°31'12"W S45°34'48"W S23°04'48"W S45°34'48"W N89°31'12"W S00°28'48"W S89°31'12"E N00°34'48"E S89°25'12"E S00°34'48"W N89°31'12"W N00°34'48"E LENGTH 94.12' 8.61' 70.72' 10.30' 8.00' 15.00' 8.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 8.02' 15.00'N0°28'48"E426.86'S89°25'24"E 111.87' N89°25'12"W 106.87'S0°34'48"W140.50'C1C2C3 L5 C14C15C1648.00' 5.29'177.53'62.01'310.50'31.11'38.58'261.62'10.98'191.50'236.34'C543.00' 4.14'10.87'S0°28'48"W426.84'206.51'L16 L17 L18 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28N28°24'29"E267.47'L49 35.54'L46 L47 L48C19 L50 L51L52 L53 L54 L55 LINE TABLE NO. L58 L59 L60 L61 L62 L63 L64 L65 L66 L67 BEARING S89°31'12"E N00°13'51"E N89°46'09"W S00°13'51"W S89°46'09"E S00°13'51"W N89°46'09"W S21°21'13"E N68°38'47"E N21°21'13"W LENGTH 8.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00' 8.00' 10.00' 8.00'88.67'DWG NAME: K:\FRI_SURVEY\069264918-ANNA BTR - ANNA\DWG\069264918 FINAL PLAT VER18.DWG PLOTTED BYNAGLE, JACKSON 1/6/2023 10:28 AM LAST SAVED1/6/2023 10:27 AMScale Drawn by MBM1" = 60' Checked by Date Project No.Sheet No. KHA JAN. 2023 069264918 1 OF 3 NORTH GENERAL NOTES: 1.All corners set are monumented with a 5/8 inch iron rod with red plastic cap stamped "KHA", unless otherwise noted. 2.All bearings shown are based on grid north of the Texas Coordinate System, NAD83, North Central Zone 4202. All dimensions shown are ground distances. To obtain a grid distance, multiply the ground distance by the Project Combined Factor (PCF) of 0.999856573. Vertical Datum NAVD 88. 3.The purpose of the Preliminary Replat is for the development of a multi-family development. APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 13455 Noel Road, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75240 Ph: 972.770.1300 Fax: 972.239.3820 Contact: Joseph Hornisher, P.E. FLOOD STATEMENT: According to Community Panel No. 48085C0155J dated June 02, 2009 of the National Flood Insurance Program Map, Flood Insurance Rate Map of Collin County, Texas, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, this property is within Zone "X", which is not a special flood hazard area. If this site is not within an identified special flood hazard area, this flood statement does not imply that the property and/or the structures thereon will be free from flooding or flood damage. On rare occasions, greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the surveyor. REPLAT ANNA TOWN CENTER BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.894 ACRES OUT OF THE FRANCIS T. DUFFAU, ABSTRACT NO. 288 AND W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752, CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY, 2023 OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. PLAT RECORDS OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS P.R.C.C.T. LEGEND "X" CUT IN CONCRETE FOUNDXF POINT OF BEGINNINGP.O.B. MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 2 OF 3) VISIBILITY, ACCESS & VAM MAINTENANCE EASEMENT OWNER: BTR at Throckmorton LLC 4900 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 6000 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Ph: 469.424.8824 Contact: Jack Rowe ANNA FM 455 (WHITE ST)US HIGHWAY 75CR 368CR 286CREEKSIDE DRVICTORIA FALLS DRCREEKVIEW DRCR 368CR 370 CR 370 N.T.S.VICINITY MAP NORTH LOT 2 BLOCK G CREEKSIDE PHASE 2 CAB. P, PG. 60 P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 LOT 1, BLOCK A WALMART ANNA ADDITION VOL. 2017, PG. 549 P.R.C.C.T. CALLED 107.52 ACRES Q SEMINOLE ANNA TOWN CENTER, L.P. INST. NO. 20080128000100640 O.P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 5 ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T.W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752 THOMAS RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 782 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ABSTRACT LINE APPROXIMATELOCATION OFABSTRACT LINEF. T. DUFFAU SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 28830' SANITARY SEWER ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.40' DRAINAGE EASEMENTVOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INST. NO. 20151103001390360 O.P.R.C.C.T.BUDDY HAYES BOULEVARDBUDDY HAYES BOULEVARD60' RIGHT-OF-WAY(60' RIGHT OF WAY)25' B .L .25' B .L .10' WATER ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.10' UTILITY ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.10' WATER ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T.20' LANDSCAPE ESMT.VOL. 2019, PG. 776P.R.C.C.T.20' LANDSCAPE ESMT. VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 2 0 ' L A N D S C A P E E SM T . V O L . 2 0 1 9 , PG . 7 7 6 P . R . C . C . T . 5/8" IRSC "KHA" XF XF 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" 5/8" IRSC "KHA" 5/8" IRFC "KHA" BLOCK A, LOT 6R ANNA TOWN CENTER VOL. 2020, PG. 822 P.R.C.C.T. BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.894 ACRES 648,794 SQ. FT. LOT 3 BLOCK G CREEKSIDE PHASE 3 CAB. P, PG. 623 P.R.C.C.T. 25' FIRELANE, ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT VOL.2017, PG. 549 P.R.C.C.T. 24' FIRELANE, ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT VOL.2017, PG. 549 P.R.C.C.T. 15' X 20.4' W.E. VOL.2017, PG. 549 P.R.C.C.T. 15' W.E. VOL.2017, PG. 549 P.R.C.C.T.S0°13'51"W1248.17'N89°46'13"W 215.17' ∆=48°31'41" R=395.00' L=334.55' CB=N24°02'02"W C=324.64' ∆=48°52'40" R=335.00' L=285.78' CB=N23°51'32"W C=277.19'N0°34'48"E905.97'ZONE A (1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN) ZONE A (1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY &DRAINAGE ESMT.(BY THIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY &DRAINAGE ESMT.(BY THIS PLAT)24' FIRE LANE, UTILITY & DRAINAGE ESMT. (BY THIS PLAT)WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)WATER ESMT (BY THIS PLAT) CALLED 107.52 ACRES BTR AT THROCKMORTON LLC INST. NO. 2022000083368 O.P.R.C.C.T.S0°34'48"W448.29'S0°34'48"W307.18'S89°46'09"E 109.60' S89°46'09"E 163.93'S0°13'51"W912.58'N0°13'51"E447.63'C4L1 C 8 L3C10 C11 L4 C12 L7L8 L9L10 130.71'35.76'100.25'101.00'225.02'102.50'344.64'64.40'2.07'93.00'45.82'316.00'194.68'109.59'1.47' 8.65' 3 8 .4 8'C6C 7C914.64' 16.40' 5.89' 10.20' 1.27' 4.13'C137.55' L28 L29 L30 L33 L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L39 L40 L41 L14 L15 L42 L43 L44 L45 L2 N0°13'51"E326.27'8' X 10' WATER ESMT (BY THIS PLAT)8' X 15' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)8' X 10' WATER ESMT(BY THIS PLAT)20' WATER EASEMENT INST.NO. 20151103001390320 O.P.R.C.C.T. L56 L57 L58 L59 L60 L61 L62 L63 L64 L65L66 L67 100.43'53.50'DWG NAME: K:\FRI_SURVEY\069264918-ANNA BTR - ANNA\DWG\069264918 FINAL PLAT VER18.DWG PLOTTED BYNAGLE, JACKSON 1/6/2023 10:28 AM LAST SAVED1/6/2023 10:27 AMScale Drawn by MBM1" = 60' Checked by Date Project No.Sheet No. KHA 069264918 2 OF 3 NORTH APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 13455 Noel Road, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75240 Ph: 972.770.1300 Fax: 972.239.3820 Contact: Joseph Hornisher, P.E. FLOOD STATEMENT: According to Community Panel No. 48085C0155J dated June 02, 2009 of the National Flood Insurance Program Map, Flood Insurance Rate Map of Collin County, Texas, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, this property is within Zone "X"(unshaded), which is not a special flood hazard area. If this site is not within an identified special flood hazard area, this flood statement does not imply that the property and/or the structures thereon will be free from flooding or flood damage. On rare occasions, greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the surveyor. REPLAT ANNA TOWN CENTER BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.894 ACRES OUT OF THE FRANCIS T. DUFFAU, ABSTRACT NO. 288 AND W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752, CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY, 2023 MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 1 OF 3) OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. PLAT RECORDS OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS P.R.C.C.T. LEGEND "X" CUT IN CONCRETE FOUNDXF POINT OF BEGINNINGP.O.B. VISIBILITY, ACCESS & VAM MAINTENANCE EASEMENT GENERAL NOTES: 1.All corners set are monumented with a 5/8 inch iron rod with red plastic cap stamped "KHA", unless otherwise noted. 2.All bearings shown are based on grid north of the Texas Coordinate System, NAD83, North Central Zone 4202. All dimensions shown are ground distances. To obtain a grid distance, multiply the ground distance by the Project Combined Factor (PCF) of 0.999856573. Vertical Datum NAVD 88. 3.The purpose of the Preliminary Replat is for the development of a multi-family development. JAN. 2023 OWNER: BTR at Throckmorton LLC 4900 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 6000 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Ph: 469.424.8824 Contact: Jack Rowe ANNA FM 455 (WHITE ST)US HIGHWAY 75CR 368CR 286CREEKSIDE DRVICTORIA FALLS DRCREEKVIEW DRCR 368CR 370 CR 370 N.T.S.VICINITY MAP NORTH Copyright © 2021 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. All rights reserved DWG NAME: K:\FRI_SURVEY\069264918-ANNA BTR - ANNA\DWG\069264918 FINAL PLAT VER18.DWG PLOTTED BYNAGLE, JACKSON 1/6/2023 10:28 AM LAST SAVED1/6/2023 10:27 AMScale Drawn by N/A Checked by Date Project No.Sheet No. 3 OF 3 STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF COLLIN § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That I, Michael B. Marx, do hereby certify that I prepared this plat and the field notes made a part thereof from an actual and accurate survey of the land and that the corner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my supervision. _____________________________________________ Michael B. Marx Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration No. 5181 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 6160 Warren Pkwy., Suite 210 Frisco, TX 75034 (972) 335-3580 michael.marx@kimley-horn.com STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF COLLIN § Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared Michael B. Marx, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of ________________________________, 2022. ________________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas __________________________________ Printed Name __________________________________ My Commission Expires REPLAT ANNA TOWN CENTER BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.894 ACRES OUT OF THE FRANCIS T. DUFFAU, ABSTRACT NO. 288 AND W. S. RATTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 752, CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY, 2023 PRELIMINARY THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FOR ANY PURPOSE AND SHALL NOT BE USED OR VIEWED OR RELIED UPON AS A FINAL SURVEY DOCUMENT OWNER'S CERTIFICATION NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT BTR AT THROCKMORTON LLC; acting herein by and through their duly authorized officers, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as ANNA TOWN CENTER, BLOCK A, LOT 5R, an addition to the City of Anna, Texas, and does hereby dedicate, in fee simple, to the public use forever, the streets and alleys shown thereon. The streets and alleys are dedicated for street purposes. The easements and public use areas, as shown, are dedicated for the public use forever, for the purposes indicated on this plat. In addition, utility easements may also be used for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or using the same unless the easement limits the use to particular utilities, said use by public utilities being subordinate to the public's and City of Anna's use thereof. The City of Anna and public utility entities shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which may in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of their respective systems in said easements. The City of Anna and public utility entities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to or from their respective easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, reading meters, and adding to or removing all or parts of their respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring permission from anyone. That the undersigned does hereby covenant and agree that he (they) shall construct upon the fire lane easements, as dedicated and shown hereon, a hard surface and that they shall maintain the same in a state of good repair at all times and keep the same free and clear of any structures, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or obstruction, including but not limited to the parking of motor vehicles, trailers, boats, or other impediments to the access of fire apparatus. The maintenance of paving on the fire lane easements is the responsibility of the owner, and the owner shall post and maintain appropriate signs in conspicuous places along such fire lanes, stating "Fire Lane, No Parking." The police or his duly authorized representative is hereby authorized to cause such fire lanes and utility easements to be maintained free and unobstructed at all times for Fire Department and emergency use. The undersigned does covenant and agree that the access easement may be utilized by any person or the general public for ingress and egress to other real property, and for the purpose of General Public vehicular and pedestrian use and access, and for Fire Department and emergency use, in, along, upon, and across said premises, with the right and privilege at all times of the City of Anna, its agents, employees, workmen, and representatives having ingress, egress, and regress in, along, upon, and across said premises. This approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City of Anna, Texas. WITNESS, my hand at ____________, ___________________, this the _______ day of ___________, 2022. BTR at Throckmorton LLC By: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ (Printed Name) _____________________________________________ (Title) STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF ________________§ Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared _______________________ of BTR at Throckmorton LLC, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of ________________________________, 2022. ________________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas __________________________________ Printed Name __________________________________ My Commission Expires Approved this _______ day of ______________________. 2022, by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas. ________________________ Mayor ________________________ City Secretary MBM KHA 069264918 APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 13455 Noel Road, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75240 Ph: 972.770.1300 Fax: 972.239.3820 Contact: Joseph Hornisher, P.E. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § WHEREAS BTR AT THROCKMORTON LLC is the sole owners of the following described tract of land: BEING a tract of land situated in the F. T. Duffau Survey, Abstract No. 288 and the W. S. Ratton Survey, Abstract No. 752, City of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being all of Block A, Lot 5 of Anna Town Center Addition, Block A, Lots 5-8, an Addition to the City of Anna, Texas, according to the final plat, recorded in Volume 2019, Page 776 of the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for the northernmost corner of said Block A, Lot 5, same being on the easterly right of way line of Throckmorton Boulevard, a 60' wide right of way, same also being on the westerly line of a called 51.195-acre tract of land, described in a deed to Two-J Partners, LLLP, as recorded in Instrument No. 2008050900056262500 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE South 00°28'48" West, along the easterly line of said Block A, Lot 5 and the westerly line of said 51.195-acre tract, a distance of 793.34 feet to a wooden fence corner post found for the southwest corner of said 51.195-acre tract; THENCE South 89°20'45" East, continuing along the easterly line of said Block A, Lot 5 and along the southerly line of said 51.195-acre tract, a distance of 165.07 feet to a 3/8-inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block G of Creekside Phase 3, an Addition to the City of Anna, Texas, according to the final plat recorded in Cabinet P, Page 623 of the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE South 00°13'51" West, continuing along the easterly line of said Block A, Lot 5 and along the westerly line of said Lot 3, Block G, passing the southwest corner of said Lot 3 and the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block G of Creekside Phase 2, an Addition to the City of Anna, Texas, according to the final plat recorded in Cabinet P, Page 60 of the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas, continuing for a distance of 1,248.17 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for the southeast corner of said Lot 5; THENCE North 89°46'13" West, along the southerly line of said Block A, Lot 5, a distance of 215.17 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for the southerly, southwest corner of said Lot 5, same being on the easterly right of way line of aforesaid Throckmorton Boulevard, same being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left with a radius of 395.00 feet, a central angle of 48°31'41", and a chord bearing and distance of North 24°02'02" West, 324.64 feet; THENCE in a northerly direction, along the westerly line of said Block A, Lot 5 and the easterly right of way line of said Throckmorton Boulevard, the following: In a northwesterly direction, with said non-tangent curve to the left, an arc distance of 334.55 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for the beginning of a reverse curve to the right with a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 48°52'40", and a chord bearing and distance of North 23°51'32" West, 277.19 feet; In a easterly direction, with said reverse curve to the right, an arc distance of 285.78 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for corner; North 00°34'48" East, a distance of 905.97 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for the beginning of a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 46°57'45", and a chord bearing and distance of North 24°03'40" East, 266.96 feet; In a northerly direction, with said tangent curve to the right, an arc distance of 274.58 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for corner; North 47°32'33" East, a distance of 81.01 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a red plastic cap, stamped “KHA” found for corner at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 395.00 feet, a central angle of 47°03'45", and a chord bearing and distance of North 24°00'40" East, 315.41 feet; In a northerly direction, with said tangent curve to the left, an arc distance of 324.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 14.894 acres (648,794 square feet) of land, more or less. JAN. 2023 OWNER: BTR at Throckmorton LLC 4900 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 6000 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Ph: 469.424.8824 Contact: Jack Rowe ANNA FM 455 (WHITE ST)US HIGHWAY 75CR 368CR 286CREEKSIDE DRVICTORIA FALLS DRCREEKVIEW DRCR 368CR 370 CR 370 N.T.S.VICINITY MAP NORTH Item No. 9. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R, Site Plan. Applicant: Jack Rowe / BTR at Throckmorton LLC. SUMMARY: Multiple-family residences on one lot on 14.9± acres located on the east side of Throckmorton Boulevard, 38± feet south of Hackberry Drive. Zoned Planned Development (Ord. No. 648-2014 & Ord. No. 974-2022). The purpose of the Site Plan is to show the proposed multiple-family residence development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Site Plan is in conformance with the adopted Planned Development standards and the city’s Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R Locator Map 2. EXHIBIT A - SP (Anna Town Center, Bl A, Lt 5R) 3. Signed Application N CENTRAL EXPYHELMOKEN FALLS DR CREEK MEADOW DR LAKESHORE DR US HIGHWAY 75FIELDSVIEWDR SCENTRALEXPYWESTFALL DR KAIETEURDRAVERY POINTE DR DEERCHASE DRSPRINGVALLEY WAYH A R D W O O D C T STANLEYFALLSDRNSTANDRIDGEBLVDPARKCHASEDRH A C KBERRY DR HILLSIDE DR W WHITE ST WILEY FARM PENTON LINNS DR WESTPARKDRNIAGARA FALLS DRVICTORIAFALLSDRPARKVIEW DR S B UDDYHAYESBLVDHILLTOPDRCREEKSIDEDRTANUR CASCADE DRCREEKVIEWDRATHABASCA FALLS DR HANAKOA FALLS DRH ARDWOODTRLRHYMERS GLEN DR SUZIE LN S S T A N D R ID G E B LVDCopyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 600 1,200300 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Replat - Anna Town Center, Block A, Lot 5R S F S W U S S U S F S U S UU W U FL 96 H=673.4±S TEEEE2A 2C 2C 2C-M 2C 2C 2C 2C-M 2C-M 2C 2C 2C 2C 2C 2C 2C2A 2C2C 2B2C 2C 2C 2C 2C2C-S 2C 2C 2C 2C-W 2C 2C-W 2C-M 2C-M 1A-S 1A-S 1A-S 1A-S 1A 1B 1B 1B-S 1B-S 1B-S 1B-S 1B 1C 1C-S 1C-S 1C-S 1C1C 2B 2B-M 2B-M2B-M 2B 2B 2B2B 2B2B2A-M 2B-M 2B-S 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B-S 2B 2B2B2B2C2B2B2C 2A 2B 2A 2A 2A 2C 2C 2A 2A 2A 2A-M 2A 2A 2C 2A 2A 2A2A2A2B2B 2B 2A2A 706.20 FF 705.43 FF 703.90 FF 703.33 FF 702.63 FF 707.81 FF 712.90 FF 710.92 FF 708.62 FF 707.56 FF 707.50 FF 706.25 FF 706.25 FF 705.50 FF 705.50 FF 710.00 FF 709.50 FF 709.50 FF 709.25 FF 708.75 FF 708.25 FF 707.75 FF 707.75 FF 707.25 FF 707.25 FF 706.75 FF 706.50 FF 706.00 FF 705.50 FF 705.00 FF 705.00 FF 704.50 FF 704.50 FF 704.00 FF 704.00 FF 703.50 FF 703.50 FF 704.00 FF 703.75 FF 711.25 FF 711.25 FF 711.50 FF 708.11 FF 708.50 FF708.50 FF709.50 FF 710.75 FF 710.25 FF 710.25 FF 709.75 FF 710.00 FF712.00 FF712.00 FF 710.50 FF 710.50 FF 712.25 FF713.25 FF713.25 FF714.00 FF714.00 FF715.25 FF 713.25 FF714.00 FF714.00 FF714.75 FF714.75 FF715.50 FF715.50 FF 710.00 FF710.00 FF 715.75 FF 715.50 FF 715.00 FF 714.75 FF 714.50 FF 714.00 FF 713.50 FF 713.00 FF 712.75 FF 712.50 FF 714.50 FF 714.00 FF 713.25 FF 712.75 FF 712.25 FF 711.50 FF 710.50 FF 710.50 FF 710.00 FF 710.00 FF 709.50 FF 708.75 FF 707.50 FF 704.25 FF 709.50 FF 709.25 FF 708.25 FF 708.00 FF 707.75 FF 707.00 FF 706.50 FF 706.00 FF 705.75 FF 705.25 FF 705.00 FF 704.50 FF 704.50 FF 709.00 FF 709.25 FF 708.75 FF 708.50 FF 708.00 FF 708.25 FF 707.50 FF 711.50 FF 711.25 FF 710.50 FF 710.25 FF 709.50 FF 708.75 FF 708.25 FF 707.50 FF 706.75 FF 706.00 FF 705.25 FF UNIT 100 UNIT 101 UNIT 102 UNIT 103 UNIT 104 UNIT 105 UNIT 106 UNIT 107 UNIT 108 UNIT 109 UNIT 110 UNIT 111 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 UNIT 12 704.50 FF 704.25 FF 703.75 FF 704.50 FF UNIT 200 UNIT 201 UNIT 202 UNIT 203 UNIT 204 UNIT 205 UNIT 206 UNIT 207 UNIT 208 UNIT 209 UNIT 210 UNIT 211 UNIT 212 UNIT 213 UNIT 214 UNIT 215 UNIT 216 UNIT 217 UNIT 218 UNIT 219 UNIT 220 UNIT 221 UNIT 222 UNIT 223UNIT 224UNIT 225UNIT 226UNIT 227UNIT 228UNIT 229UNIT 230UNIT 231UNIT 232UNIT 233UNIT 234 UNIT 300 UNIT 301 UNIT 302 UNIT 303 UNIT 304 UNIT 305 UNIT 306 UNIT 307 UNIT 308 UNIT 309 UNIT 310 UNIT 311 UNIT 312 UNIT 313 UNIT 314 UNIT 315 UNIT 316 UNIT 317 UNIT 318 UNIT 319 UNIT 320 UNIT 321 UNIT 322 UNIT 323 UNIT 400 UNIT 401 UNIT 402 UNIT 403 UNIT 404 UNIT 405 UNIT 406 UNIT 407 UNIT 408 UNIT 409 UNIT 410 UNIT 411 UNIT 412 UNIT 413 UNIT 414 UNIT 415 UNIT 416 UNIT 417 UNIT 418 UNIT 419 UNIT 420 UNIT 421 UNIT 422 UNIT 423 UNIT 424 UNIT 425 UNIT 426 UNIT 427 UNIT 428 UNIT 429 UNIT 430 UNIT 516 UNIT 518 UNIT 520 521 UNIT 522 UNIT 523 UNIT 524 UNIT 525 UNIT 526 UNIT 527 UNIT 528UNIT 529 UNIT 530 UNIT 531 UNIT 532 603 UNIT 605 UNIT 607 608 UNIT 609 UNIT 610 UNIT 611 UNIT 612 UNIT 613 UNIT 614 UNIT 615 UNIT 616 UNIT 617 UNIT 618 UNIT 619 UNIT 620 UNIT 621 UNIT 20 UNIT 21 UNIT 22 UNIT 60 UNIT 61 UNIT 23 UNIT 51 UNIT 24 CI CI CI CI CI CI DDDWWW W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W W WWWSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLF L FLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLC C C C FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLCCXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBARBARBARBARBARBAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BARBARBARBARBARBARBAR BAR E50 GALWH208010.0'S89°46'13"E215.17'S0°13'51"W 1248.17'S89°20'45"E165.07'N0°34'48"E905.97' R =3 3 5 .0 0 '∆=4 8 °5 2 '4 0 "L =2 8 5 .7 8 'C B =N 2 3 °5 1 '3 2 "W C =2 7 7 .1 9 'R=395.00'∆=48°31'41"L=334.55'CB=N24°02'02"W C=324.64'10' 24.0'291.9'460.2'36.9'20'20'24'9' 2 3 4 4 4 6 2 5 2 4 2 4 6 2 311 4 5 4 2 6 86.0' 6 6 6 6 66 6 666 2 44 6 4 3 4444 4 4 66 5 3 4466 6 16 6 6 226365 1 2 3 6 3 34 4 271371 2 7 1 1 710 709 707 705 70270 3 704 690 695700688 689 691 692 6 9 3 69 4 6 9 6 6 9 7 6986 9 9 711 710 711 70 9 70 8 706 707 700 705 69 6 697698699701702703704 706707 708 695 700 696 697 698 699 690 695 691692 693694696697698699 EXIST. 15" SSWR PROP. DOG RUN (39,050 SF)6957007056936946966976986997017027 0 3704706 707708695 694 696 6 8 5 69 0 6 8 6 6 8 7 68 868969 1692 705 71 0 701 702 703 704 706 70 770 8 70 9 71 1 71 2 71 5 7 1 6 7 1 7 710 711 712 713 714710707708709 710 706 707 708 709 POOL EXISTING 30' UTILITY EASEMENT VOL.2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 25' REAR SETBACK 20' REAR SETBACK EXISTING 40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT VOL. 2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 10' SIDE SETBACK 10' x 14' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) 6' FENCE BETWEEN UNITS GATED ENTRY CALL BOX 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.)GARAGE(TYP.)GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.)GARAGE(TYP.)8' MASONRY FENCE EXISTING 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER VOL.2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T.FENCED IN PRIVATE YARD TO EXTEND TO LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP.) 25' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT VOL.2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 8' MASONRY FENCE FENCED IN PRIVATE YARD TO EXTEND TO LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP.) RESIDENT ONLY SLIDING GATE W/ KNOX BOX AND OPTICOM W/ 25' CAR STACKING ZONE 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 10' x 14' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) 10' x 26' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PROPOSED 24' F.L.U.D EASEMENT PROPOSED 24' F.L.U.D EASEMENT PROPOSED 24' F.L.U.D EASEMENT GARAGE (TYP.) 0'-10' RETAINING WALL PROPOSED 6' ORNAMENTAL FENCING 758' BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS 6' ORNAMENTAL FENCING WHEN CROSSING EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6' ORNAMENTAL FENCING W/ 20' GATE WHEN CROSSING EXISTING DRAINAGE & SEWER EASEMENT REF. LA PLANS FOR DETAIL MASONRY WALL PROPOSED POINT OF ENTRY FOR DOG RUN (TYP.) PROPOSED POINT OF ENTRY FOR DOG RUN (TYP.) NO V.A.M. REQUIRED DUE TO ROADWAY GEOMETRY NO V.A.M. REQUIRED DUE TO ROADWAY GEOMETRY GARAGE (TYP.) 3,500 S.F. DOG PARK PROP. REMOTE FDC'S RESIDENT ONLY SLIDING GATE W/ KNOX BOX AND OPTICOM RESIDENT ONLY SLIDING GATE W/ KNOX BOX AND OPTICOM S F S U S S U S S E1A 2C 2B 2C 2C 2C-M 2C 2C-M 2C 1B1A 1B 1C 2C 2B2A 2B-S 2B 2B-M 2A-M 2A 714.36 FF 715.25 FF716.00 FF716.00 FF716.75 FF716.75 FF717.25 FF 717.00 FF 715.50 FF716.00 FF716.00 FF716.75 FF 716.50 FF 716.00 FF 715.75 FF 717.50 FF 717.50 FF 716.75 FF 716.25 FF 715.75 FF 715.25 FF 714.50 FF UNIT 500 UNIT 501 UNIT 502 UNIT 503 UNIT 504 UNIT 505 UNIT 506 UNIT 507 UNIT 508 UNIT 509 UNIT 510 UNIT 511 UNIT 512 UNIT 513 UNIT 514 UNIT 515 UNIT 517 UNIT 519 UNIT 521 UNIT 600 UNIT 601 UNIT 602 UNIT 603 UNIT 604 UNIT 606 UNIT 608 UNIT 50 WWWWWWW W W W SS SS SS SSS WWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLCCXXXXXXXXX5.0' S0°28'48"W 793.34' R = 3 9 5 . 0 0 '∆ = 4 7 ° 0 3 '4 5 "L = 3 2 4 . 4 5 'C B = N 2 4 ° 0 0 ' 4 0 " E C = 3 1 5 . 4 1' R = 3 3 5.00' ∆ = 4 6°5 7'45" L = 2 7 4.58' C B = N 2 4°03'40"E C = 2 6 6.96' 2 4 . 0 '5.5'18'24'18'10.0'10.0'20.0'4.5'2 4 119.6' 66 661 3 3 4 4 715714716 10'71 8 718 716 717 715 714 FENCED IN PRIVATE YARD TO EXTEND TO PROPERTY (TYP.) SIDEWALK EXTENDING TO EACH UNIT (TYP.) CAR PORT (TYP.) FRONT OF BUILDING BACK PATIO 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) RESIDENT ONLY SLIDING GATE W/ KNOX BOX AND OPTICOM W/ 25' CAR STACKING ZONE 10' x 26' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PROPOSED 24' F.L.U.D EASEMENT 745' BET W E E N D R I V E W A Y S PROPOSED V.A.M. EASEMENT - REMAINING V.A.M. EASEMENTS LOCATED IN RIGHT OF WAY 8' MASONRY WALL 8' MASONRY FENCE ALONG V.A.M. 25' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER VOL.2019, PG. 776 P.R.C.C.T. 8' MASONRY FENCE EX. SIDEWALK NO APPURTENANCE BETWEEN THE HEIGHT OF 2.5' & 10' MAY BE PLACED IN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE S 2C 2C-M 2C 2B-M 2A-M 715.25 FF 715.50 FF716.00 FF 716.00 FF 715.75 FF 715.25 FF 714.50 FF UNIT 514 519 UNIT 521 601 UNIT 603 606 UNIT 608 WW SS WSFL FLX4.5'6 4 71 8 716 717 714 U 2A 2C 2B-M 2A-M 712.90 FF 715.25 FF 715.50 FF715.50 FF 715.75 FF 715.50 FF 714.50 FF 714.00 FF UNIT 516 521 UNIT 523 603 UNIT 605 608 UNIT 610 UNIT WW SS WFL FLX10.0' 2 6 2 4713 7 1 7 2B 714.00 FF UNIT 613 XXX1C-S 708.62 FF 710.50 FF UNIT 229UNIT 230 XXX4 710.92 FF UNIT 61 SS SS SS 20.0'45.0' 11.25' 11.25'11.25' 11.25'This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.BYDATEAS SHOWNREVISIONSNo.DATESHEET NUMBER CHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECTLAST SAVED1/6/2023 9:59 AMPLOTTED BYDELLS, CHRIS 1/6/2023 1:23 PMDWG PATHK:\DAL_CIVIL\069264918-ANNA BTR\CAD\PLAN SHEETSDWG NAMEC-SITE-F.DWG , [ 24x36 ]IMAGESXREFS x2436 : xBase : xBndy_069264918 : xExUtil_069264918 : xSswr : xWatr : xHatch : xStrm : oFG_069264918 : xEsmt : xLabel : xExBase : xHscp : xLscpCITY OF ANNA, TEXAS01/06/2023069264918CTC AT ANNATOWN CENTERPREPARED FORTAYLOR MORRISON© 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PHONE: 972-770-1300 FAX: 972-239-3820WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM TX F-92813455 NOEL RD. TWO GALLERIA OFFICE TOWERSUITE 700 DALLAS, TX 75240CMDCMDJWHSITE PLANC-101NORTHMATCH LINE STAA-ASITE PLAN ANNA TOWN CENTER BLOCK A, LOT 5R 14.89 A.C. FRANCIS T. DAFFAU SURVEY, A-288 W.S. RATTON SURVEY, A-752, CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 13455 NOEL ROAD, TWO GALLERIA OFFICE TOWER, SUITE 700 DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 TEL. NO. 972-770-1300 CONTACT: JOSEPH HORNISHER, P.E. THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. DEVELOPER: TAYLOR MORRISON 6735 SALT CEDAR WAY BUILDING 1, SUITE 200 FRISCO, TEXAS 75034 PHONE: 469-252-2194 CONTACT: JACK ROWE BUDDY HAYES BOULEVARD ThrockmortonCreekLair 75 455 KEERCEN VICINITY MAP SUBJECT SITE US 75FM 455 MATCH LINE STAA-APROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FIRE LANE PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED PARKING COUNT PROPOSED CARPORT PROPOSED FIRE, UTILITY, AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGEND FL 12 WATER METER WATER METER SCHEDULE PROPOSED NUMBER OF METERS - 2" DOMESTIC PROPOSED NUMBER OF METERS - 1" IRRIGATION 10 1 STANDARD 2 - BEDROOM 37.9'10'10' MIN30.2'10'4' SIDEWALK BACKYARD STANDARD 1 - BEDROOM 10' MIN29.7'10'5' SIDEWALK AT BACK OF PARKING BACKYARD 10.0'27.0'10.0'27.0' F.L.U.D. STANDARD GARAGE 10' BUILDING NUMBER 1 = 1 BEDROOM DUPLEX 2 = 2 BEDROOM A,B,C = ELEVATION STYLE M = MIRRORED UNIT S = ALTERNATE SANITARY CONNECTION (BACK) W = ALTERNATE WATER CONNECTION ( FLIPPED) NOTES NORTH ACCORDING TO FLOOD PLAIN INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM), MAP #48085C0160J PREPARED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGENET AGENCY (FEMA) FOR COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN ZONE X FLOODPLAIN NOTE Item No. 10. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Salena Tittle AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Serenity at the Square, Block A, Lot 1, Preliminary Plat. Applicant: Baseer, LLC & Clear Water Commons, LLC. SUMMARY: Multiple-family residences on one lot on 11.0± acres located at the northeast corner of E. Finley Boulevard and Sharp Street. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 129- 2004, Ord. No. 691-2015, & Ord. No. 980-2022). The purpose of the Preliminary Plat is to propose lot and block boundaries and easements necessary for the future construction of the multiple-family residential development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Preliminary Plat is in conformance with the adopted Planned Development standards and the city’s Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Serenity at the Square, Block A, Lot 1 Locator Map 2. Exhibit A - PP - Serenity at the Square 3. P&Z Application SOFI ALNJE S SIC A LY N N L N LILIANA LN ELENA DRMASTON DRCAINDRSHARP ST W A R N E R D R BROCK DR ADELYNSTROCKETBENDDRINDIANOLA TRLGRAHAMRDMA T H E W D R H AVEN DR SU S A N S T E L IZ A B E T H S T AM Y B L V D NUEHOFFDRF L O R ENCE WAY WILSONDRR O B E R T S T P E N N Y ST NELSONSTBURGERT DRANNECTERROL STCOUNTY ROAD 422 THAYNEDRHILLRICHDRDEYADRSUNBEAM CVLEONARDAVEASKEWDRS POWELL PKWYE FINLEY BLV D BROOK DR Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 400 800200 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Preliminary Plat - Serenity at the Square, Block A, Lot 1 0 N 10050 1" = 50' SCALE IN FEET SHEET 1 OF 2 TBPELS NO. 10194303 PJB SURVEYING, LLC 972-649-6669 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE D SURVEYOR LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE R.O.W. PG. VOL. INST. NO. P.R.C.C.T. D.R.C.C.T. O.P.R.C.C.T. (C.M.) FIP FIR Right-of-Way Page Volume Instrument Number County Texas Plat Records Of Collin County Texas Deed Records Of Collin Of Collin County Texas Official Public Records Controlling Monument Found Iron Pipe (as noted) Found Iron Rod (as noted) Unless otherwise noted (W/Red PJB SURVEYING Cap) 1/2" Set Iron Rod Monument Found (as noted) SITE (60 Feet Width Right-of-Way) (Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 P.R.C.C.T.) (Vol. 2016, Pg. 780, P.R.C.C.T.)(80 Feet Width Right-of-Way)(Vol. 2018, Pg. 693 P.R.C.C.T.)ABSTRACT NO. 798 GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY Deed LineO.P.R.C.C.T. Instrument No. 2022010000334 Anna Crossing Villas (50 Feet Width Right-of-Way) LILIANA LANE (Inst. No. 2022010000334, O.P.R.C.C.T.) CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP (C.M.) "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP (C.M.) "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/260.36'16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 PLAT PRELIMINARY BEGINNING POINT OF CAP (C.M.) "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BLOCK 1 P.R.C.C.T. Vol. 2020, Pg. 272 Anna Crossing Phase 5 15' U.E. TRACT 3 H.O.A. LOT UTILITY EASEMENT LANDSCAPE, ACCESS & TRACT 2 H.O.A. LOTDRAINAGE EASEMENTH.O.A. TRACT 6XINST. NO. 2022010000334 EASEMENT 5' WALL MAINTENANCEN 31°18'05" E 413.64'S 47°41'46" E 415.17' = 381.89' = S64°55'07"E = 387.70' = 645.00' = 34°26'23" CH CB L R D S 82°08 '18" E 263 .42 'S 00°34'03" W 234.31'N 89°26'10" W 828.43' CH CB L R D = 36.00' = S88°22'08"W = 36.01' = 470.00' = 04°23'23" BLOCK A LOT 1 479,917 Sq. Ft. 11.0174 Acres 11.0174 ACRES BEING A PLAT OF LOT 1 BLOCK A CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ = 429.95' = N67°16'45"W = 440.85' = 570.00' = 44°18'51" CH CB L R D 10.00' N 44°15'26" W = 227.27'= N38°29'58"E= 227.88'= 900.00'= 14°30'26"CHCBLRD(BY THIS PLAT) UTILITY EASEMENT 26' FIRE LANE & (BY THIS PLAT)UTILITY EASE MENT 26' FIRE LANE & (BY THIS PLAT) UTILITY EASEMENT 26' FIRE LANE & (BY THIS PLAT) UTILITY EASEMENT 26' FIRE LANE & (BY THIS PLAT) UTILITY EASEMENT 26 ' FIRE LANE & 702-373-2993 Frisco, TX 75035 13861 Adare Manor Lane ENGINEER Urban Engineers Group, Inc. 214-252-1600 Dallas, TX 75207 167 Trurtle Creek Blvd. Ste. A P.R.C.C.T. Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 Phase 1A Anna Crossing SHARP STREET THAYME DRIVE(50 Feet Width Right-of-Way)(Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 P.R.C.C.T.)MASTON DRIVE(Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 P.R.C.C.T.)(Variable Width Right-of-Way)N SHARPFINLEYDARTPOWELLC.R. 423LEONARDLILIA N A DEYA ELENAERROL(BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT)EASE MENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15 ' DRAINAGE ERROL STREET(Vol. 2020, Pg. 272 P.R.C.C.T.)(50 Feet Width Right-of-Way)(BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 15' WATER prepared September 19, 2022. "PJB SURVEYING" caps set were established with a Boundary Survey building certificates. statutes and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and a violation of the city Subdivision Ordinance and State platting Selling off a portion of this addition by metes and bounds is Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 48085C0160J, dated June 2, 2009. be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain, as identified on Property is located in non-shaded Zone X, areas determined to Adjustment Realization 2011. North Texas Zone 4202, North American Datum of 1983, Bearings are referenced to the State Plane Coordinate System, tract of land. out of one (1) 9.919 acre tract of land and one 1.096 acre The purpose of this replat is to create one (1) lot 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. General Notes: 156.67'671.76' 194 .22 '69.20 'UPON AS A FINAL SURVEY DOCUMENT ANY PURPOSE AND SHALL NOT BE USED OR VIEWED OR RELIED PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FORS 00°00'00" W 120.00'N 00°00'00" E 118.70'CH CB L R D = 29.41' = N29°20'57"W = 30.73' = 30.00' = 58°41'55"31.65'23.59' 23.59'15.00'CH CB L R D = 42.43' = S45°00'00"W = 47.12' = 30.00' = 90°00'00" N 90°00'00" W 110.08' S 90°00'00" E 174.13'137.07'10.76'17.56'15.00'5.22'19.78'16.58'N 5 8°4 1'5 4" W 1 5 4.5 3'9.81'29.59'15.00'S 5 8°4 1'5 4" E 1 2 7.9 3' = 79.20' = N13°41'54"W = 87.96' = 56.00' = 90°00'00" CH CB L R D = 42.43' = S13°41'54"E = 47.12' = 30.00' = 90°00'00" CH CB L R D 12.00' S 76°18'06" W 10.12' N 76°18'06" E 19.67'15.28'12.17'15.00' S 13°41'54" EN 31°18'06" E 215.81'S 31°18'06" W 199.10'= 16.19' = S74°20'57"E = 16.39' = 30.00' = 31°18'05" CH CB L R D (BY THIS PLAT) UTILITY EASEMENT 26' FIRE LANE &140.47'1 2.0 0' 1 2.0 0'43.63'N 47°42'02" W 97.46' S 47°42'02" E 395.59'34.65'26.49'37.18'13.03'15.0'13.53' 13.53' 321.25' 69.44'15.0'14.00' 14.00' CH CB L R D = 38.17' = N08°11'58"W = 41.37' = 30.00' = 79°00'08" 0.26'15.75'25.36'14.42'15.0'18.59' N 42°17'58" E 15.00' N 47°42'02" W 14.42' S 42°17'58" W CH CB L R D = 46.30' = S81°48'02"W = 52.88' = 30.00' = 100°59'52" N 47°42'02" W 205.47'58.38' 12.00'12.00'15.0' 13.53'13.53'30.00'3.48' (BY THIS PLAT)EASE MENT 30' WATER C H CB LR D = 1.02'= S48°40'35"E = 1.02'= 30.00'= 01°57'07" S 49°39'08" E 168.82'N 49°39'08" W 168.82'= 1.91' = N48°40'35"W = 1.91' = 56.00' = 01°57'07" CH CB L R D 132.08' 128.45' 15.0'11.73' N 42°17'58" E 42.01' N 47°42'02" W 12.25' S 42°17'58" W 15.64'CH CB L R D = 10.25' = S59°29'05"E = 10.30' = 30.00' = 19°39'53"= 19.13'= N59°29'05"W= 19.22'= 56.00'= 19°39'53"CHCBLRDN 69°19'02" W 137.11'S 69°19'02" E 137.11'9.71'5.36'S 33°50'26" W 82.82'N 33°50'26" E 78.06'8.20' S 78°50'26" W 4.53' N 78°50'26" E 3 9.6 1'' 1 1.3 3' = 29.54' = S74°42'20"E = 29.90' = 56.00' = 30°35'18" CH CB L R D CH CB L R D = 15.83' = N74°42'20"W = 16.02' = 30.00' = 30°35'18"101.35'15.00'S 20°40'58" W 87.94'N 20°40'58" E 90.68'3.13' S 00°00'00" W 15.00' 5.87' N 00°00'00" E 20.76' = 29.54' = N74°42'20"W = 29.90' = 56.00' = 30°35'18" CH CB L R D 15.14' = 15.83' = S74°42'20"E = 16.02' = 30.00' = 30°35'18" CH CB L R D N 90°00'00" W 270.58' S 90°00'00" E 270.58' = 12.50' = N75°43'40"W = 12.53' = 56.00' = 12°49'16" CH CB L R D 21 .56 '13.95'13.95'4.87' 157 .24 '82 .37 '15 .00 '(BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT WATER S 82°08 '18" E 183 .67 'N 82°08 '18" W 183 .67 'CH CB L R D = 6 .70 '= S75°43 '40"E = 6 .71 '= 30 .00 '= 12°49 '16" 240.44' 9.50' N 30°35'19" E N 82°08 '18" W 96 .59 '12 .46 'N 36°30 '53" W 6 .10 'N 08°29 '07" E 150 .01 'S 59°02'07" W 58.49' 44.28'16 .38 'N 30°57 '53" W 14.21' 35 .93 '= 45.33' = S29°31'04"W = 47.40' = 46.00' = 59°02'07" CH CB L R D S00°00'00"E 150.01'S 00°00'00" W 170.01'= 73.58' = S41°04'09"E = 80.28' = 56.00' = 82°08'18" CH CB L R D 130.01'130.01'20.00'40.00'CH CB L R D = 36.00' = N88°16'16"E = 36.01' = 450.00' = 04°35'07" S 89°26'10" E 69.97' 27.91' N89°26'10"W 27.73' S 59°24'41" E S 5 9° 2 4'4 1" E 1 6 5.6 8'N 5 9° 2 4'4 1" W 1 6 5.6 8' 86 .30 '12.00'12.00'N 00°00'00" E 93.61'26.00'41.08'15.00'16.58' 16.58'37.53'10.76' 19.78' 17.56'15.00'1 6 .5 8'20.06'= 42.43'= N45°00'00"W= 47.12'= 30.00'= 90°00'00"CHCBLRD= 30.30' = S59°39'53"W = 31.77' = 30.00' = 60°40'14" CH CB L R D CH CB L R D = 19.87' = S00°00'00"W = 20.79' = 20.00' = 59°34'11" CH CB L R D = 26.51' = S55°54'57"E = 31.77' = 30.00' = 52°26'40" CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT 20' UTILITY (BY THIS PLAT) EASEMENT DRAINAGE 214.25'JANUARY 23, 2023 26.00'' N 90°00'00" W 11.0'15.0'63.72'63.72'15.0' 29.59'38.76'62.67'EAST FINLEY BLVD.CAP "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ CAP (C.M.) "RPLS 4838" 5/8" FIR w/ (BY THIS PLAT) 30' FRONT YARD SETBACK 1 2 3 1 2 3 17 16 18 19 1 2 7 8 9 10 BLOCK A OPEN SPACE B-1 BLOCK B BLOCK BBLOCK C ASKEW DRIVE(Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 P.R.C.C.T.)(50 Feet Width Right-of-Way)10' OPEN SPACE B-1 10' OPEN SPACE A-1 OPEN SPACE C-1 WILSON DRIVE(Vol. 2015, Pg. 262 P.R.C.C.T.)(50 Feet Width Right-of-Way)P.R.C.C.T. Vol. 2018, Pg. 253 Anna Elementary No. 3 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 O.P.R.C.C.T. Inst. No. 20211217002551410 Grand at Anna II Owner, LLC O.P.R.C.C.T. Inst. No. 20211208002488310 Grand at Anna II Owner, LLC (CALLED 9.919 ACRES) O.P.R.C.C.T. Inst. No. 20210830001757590 BASEER LLC (3%) CLEARWATER COMMONS, LLC (41%) GB PARTNERS, LLC (56%) (CALLED 1.096) O.P.R.C.C.T. 20210830001757600 Inst. No. & BASEER LLC (3%) COMMONS, LLC (41%) CLEARWATER GB PARTNERS, LLC (56%) 702-373-2993 Frisco, TX 75035 13861 Adare Manor Lane DEVELOPEROWNERS Baseer, LLC Clearwater Commons, LLC GB Partners, LLC (BY THIS PLAT) MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 10' PEDESTRIAN, ACCESS AND RADIUSNO. CURVE TABLE DELTA LENGTH CHORD DIST.CHORD BRG. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C 1218.23'105.72'27°45'21"104.69'S 68°04'59" E C2268.39'102.28'21°50'02"101.66S 66°41'20" E C3 173.84'110.90'36°33'09"109.03'S 81°00'50" E C4 273.41'103.99'21°47'34"103.37'S 87°08'49" E C5 89.82'199.38'S 88°45'40" E25°48'45"89.07' C6 283.43'148.02'29°55'23"146.35'S 89°28'07" E C7 267.27'116.96'25°04'25"116.03'N 88°27'43" E C8 230.12'21°44'57"C8 87.35'86.83'N 89°59'32" E 26.19' S 79°36'36" E C9 26°11'20"211.21'96.54'S 88°24'43" E 95.70' C9 28.92' N 80°16'32" E C10 15°01'08"229.91'60.27'N 86°41'45" E 60.09'C10 10.03' C11 C11 15°14'06"219.91'58.47'S 86°46'45" W 58.30' 28.86' S 80°16'32" W C12 C12 26°03'00"222.21'N 88°26'26" W 99.71'100.58' 25.86' N 79°36'36" W C13 C13 21°41'19"220.12'N 89°58'01" W 82.83'83.32' C14 C14 15°03'30"277.27'72.87'S 83°30'47" W 72.66' 9.26'S 46°22'22" E9.35'26°45'38"C15 C15 14.55' 20.01' C16 C16 14°26'36"30.01'7.56'N 27°36'51" W 7.54' C17 C17 07°41'33"37.23'N 82°45'54" W 37.20'277.27' C18 C18 30°03'11"277.43'N 89°27'11" W143.42'141.78' C19 N 88°47'59" W209.38'25°52'13"C19 94.54'93.74' C20 C20 21°45'45"263.41'N 87°08'20" W 99.45'100.05' C21 C21 36°42'43"183.84'117.79'N 80°53'58" W 115.79'C22C22 21°53'00"258.39'N 66°34'54" W98.69'98.09' C23 17.05'N 79°43'21" W17.06'228.23'04°16'56"C23 7.05' S 13°40'26" WC2 4 C24 01°02'36"570.00'10.40'N 60°47'59" W 10.38' C25 04°23'13"228.23'17.48'N 72°52'38" W 17.47' C 254.19' N 13°40'26" E 1.74' N 38°04'24" E 67.69' 34.68'2.59'SH 5E FOSTER CROSSING DR WARNER THAYNECOLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS THE CITY OF ANNA ABSTRACT NO. 798 GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY, \ SITUATED IN THE Partners, LLC. Anna Town Square AT THE SQUARE SERENITY FULLY WITHIN THE ROW MAINTENANCE EASEMENT VISIBILITY, ACCESS AND FULLY WITHIN THE ROW MAINTENANCE EASEMENT VISIBILITY, ACCESS AND (BY THIS PLAT) MAINTENANCE EASEMENT VISIBILITY, ACCESS AND 101.38'9.12'FULLY WI THI N THE ROWMAI NTENANCE EASEMENTVI SI BI LI TY, ACCESS ANDFULLY WITHIN THE ROWMAINTENANCE EASEMENTVISIBILITY, ACCESS ANDFULLY WITHIN THE ROWMAINTENANCE EASEMENTVISIBILITY, ACCESS AND101.13'39.63'(BY THIS PLAT)MAINTENANCE EASEMENTVISIBILITY, ACCESS AND City Secretary _____________________________________ Mayor ____________________________________ Council, City of Anna, Texas. APPROVED on this the ________day of ____________, 2023, by the City CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL SHEET 2 OF 2 PLAT PRELIMINARY COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS THE CITY OF ANNA GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 798 SITUATED IN THE 11.0174 ACRES BEING A PLAT OF LOT 1 BLOCK A State of Texas Notary Public in and for ________________________ __________________2023 Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated instruement and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and Copeland, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Dwayne H. COUNTY OF DALLAS } STATE OF TEXAS } Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 5504 Patrick J. Baldasaro ______________________ Dated this the __________day of ________________, 2022. representation of this Signed Final Plat. (d) & (e); and that the digital drawing files accompanying this plat is a precise placed in compliance with the City of Dallas Development Code, Sec. 51-A8.617 (a) (b) (c) Code, Chapter 212. I further affirm that monumentation shown hereon was either found or Development Code (Ordinance No. 19455, as amended) and the Texas Local Government the Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, the City of Dallas documentation; and that this plat substantially complies with the Rules and Regulations of documentation, evidence collected on the ground during field operations and other reliable Texas, affirm that this plat was prepared under my direct supervision, from recorded I, Patrick J. Baldasaro, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, licensed by the State of SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: DERETSIGER P R O FES S IONALSAXETFOETATSL ANDSURVEYORPATRICK J. BALDASARO 5504 UPON AS A FINAL SURVEY DOCUMENT ANY PURPOSE AND SHALL NOT BE USED OR VIEWED OR RELIED PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FOR JANUARY 23, 2023 TBPELS NO. 10194303 PJB SURVEYING, LLC 972-649-6669 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE D SURVEYOR Anna Town Square Partners, LLC. 702-373-2993 Frisco, TX 75035 13861 Adare Manor Lane ENGINEER Urban Engineers Group, Inc. 214-252-1600 Dallas, TX 75207 167 Trurtle Creek Blvd. Ste. A 702-373-2993 Frisco, TX 75035 13861 Adare Manor Lane DEVELOPEROWNERS Baseer, LLC Clearwater Commons, LLC GB Partners, LLC this plat designating the herein above described property as THAT, GB Partners, LLC, Clearwater Commons, LLC and Baseer, LLC, do hereby adopt NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: OWNERS DEDICATION feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 11.0174 acres of land. Crossing Phase 5 addition and the east line of said 1.096 acre tract, a distance of 234.31 THENCE South 00 degrees 34 minutes 03 seconds West, with the west line of said Anna the west line of said Anna Crossing Phase 5 addition; 4838”(controlling monument) found at the northeast corner of said 1.096 acre tract, being in addition, a total distance of 263.42 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS said 9.919 acre tract, and continuing with the south line of said Anna Crossing Villas passing a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838”found at the northeast corner of THENCE South 82 degrees 08 minutes 18 seconds East, at a distance of 69.22 feet monument) found; East, 381.89 feet) to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838” (controlling an arc distance of 387.70 feet (Chord Bearing South 64 degrees 55 minutes 07 seconds THENCE with the south line of said Anna Crossing Villas addition and said curve to the left, degrees 26 minutes 23 seconds; non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 645.00 feet and a central angle of 34 distance of 415.17 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838” found on a East Finley Boulevard and with the south line of said Anna Crossing Villas addition, a THENCE South 47 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East, departing the east line of said Instrument No. 2022010000334, O.P.R.C.C.T.; the southwest corner of Anna Crossing Villas, an addition to the City of Anna, recorded in feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap set at the northwest corner of said 9.919 acre tract and said East Finley Boulevard and the west line of said 9.919 acre tract, a distance of 413.64 THENCE North 31 degrees 18 minutes 05 seconds East, continuing with the east line of “PJB SURVEYING” (herein after referred to as “with cap”) set ; degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East, 227.27 feet) to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped acre tract and said curve to the left, an arc distance of 227.88 feet (Chord Bearing North 38 THENCE with the east line of said East Finely Boulevard and the west line of said 9.919 angle of 14 degrees 30 minutes 26 seconds; and being on a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 900.00 feet and a central 9.919 acre tract and being in the east line of East Finley Boulevard (80 foot Right-Of-Way) 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838” found at the southwest corner of said said Sharp Street and south line of said 9.919 acre tract, a distance of 10.00 feet to a THENCE North 44 degrees 15 minutes 26 seconds West, continuing with the north line of monument) found at the point of tangency; West, 429.95 feet) to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838” (controlling an arc distance of 440.85 feet (Chord Bearing North 67 degrees 16 minutes 45 seconds THENCE continuing with the north line of said Sharp Street and with said curve to the right, feet and a central angle of 44 degrees 18 minutes 51 seconds; monument) found at the point of curvature of a curve to the right, having a radius of 570.00 distance of 828.43 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838”(controlling the north line of said Sharp Street and the south line of said 9.919 acre tract, a total said 1.096 acre tract and the southeast corner of said 9.919 acre tract, and continuing with passing a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838”found at the southwest corner of THENCE North 89 degrees 26 minutes 10 seconds West, at a distance of 156.72 feet a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838”found at the point of tangency; of 36.01 feet (Chord Bearing South 88 degrees 22 minutes 08 seconds West, 36.00 feet) to THENCE with the north line of said Sharp Street and said curve to the right, an arc distance a central angle of 04 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds; Street (60 foot Right-Of-Way) and on a curve to the right having a radius of 470.00 feet and in the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas, (P.R.C.C.T.), being in the north line of Sharp Crossing Phase 5, an addition to the City of Anna, as recorded in Volume 2020, Page 272, found at the southeast corner of said 1.096 acre tract and the southwest corner of Anna BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped “RPLS 4838”(controlling monument) 20210830001757600, O.P.R.C.C.T., and being more particularly described as follows: Commons, LLC. (41%), and Baseer, LLC. (3%), recorded in Instrument No. of land described in special warranty deed to GB Partners, LLC. (56%), and Clearwater Public Records of Collin County, Texas (O.P.R.C.C.T.), and all of a called 1.096 acre tract and Baseer, LLC. (3%), recorded in Instrument No. 2021083000175790, in the Official special warranty deed to GB Partners, LLC. (56%), and Clearwater Commons, LLC. (41%), of Anna, Collin County, Texas, and being all of a called 9.919 acre tract of land described in Being a tract of land situated in the Granderson Stark Survey, Abstract No. 798, in the City COUNTY OF COLLIN STATE OF TEXAS OWNER'S CERTIFICATE rights and privileges set forth herein. times to enter upon the VAM easement or any part thereof for the purposes and with all thereon. The city, its successors, assigns, or agents, shall have the right and privilege at all any traffic control devices or signs on the VAM easement, and to remove any obstruction but not the obligation, to add any landscape improvements to the VAM easement, to erect constructed in, on, over, or across the VAM easement. The city shall also have the right, improvements or growths, which in any way endanger or interfere with the visibility, shall be responsibility for the VAM shall rest with the owners. No building, fence, shrub, tree or other may withdraw maintenance of the VAM easement at any time. The ultimate maintenance including without limitation, any trees, shrubs, flowers, ground cover, and fixtures. The city shall be premitted to remove and dispose of any and all landscaping improvements, landscaping within the VAM easement. Should the city exercise this maintenance right, it easement. The city shall have the right, but not the obligation, to maintain any and all easement to provide visibility, right of access, and maintenance upon and across said VAM easements are hereby given and granted to the city, its successors and assigns, as an The area or areas shown on the plat as "VAM" (Visibility, Access, and Maintenance) VAM Easements SERENITY AT THE SQUARE failure of any structure, or structures, within the Easement. nature resulting from the occurrence of these natural phenomena, or resulting from the cannot be definitely defined. The City shall not be held liable for any damages of any Easement is subject to storm water overflow and natural bank erosion to an extent which conditions which may occur. The natural drainage through the Drainage and Detention supervision of maintenance work by the property owner to alleviate any undesirable the City shall have the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of inspection and substance which would result in unsanitary conditions or obstruct the flow of water, and keep the Drainage and Detention Easement clean and free of debris, silt, and any any drainage facility deemed necessary for drainage purposes. Each property owner shall Easement at any point, or points, to investigate, survey or to erect, construct and maintain occasioned by the City shall have the right to enter upon the Drainage and Detention erecting any type of drainage structure in order to improve the storm drainage that may be understood that in the event it becomes necessary for the City to erect or consider hereinabove defined, unless approved by the City Engineer. Provided, however, it is building, fence, or any other structure within the Drainage and Detention Easement as natural flow of storm water run-off shall be permitted by construction of any type of results from conditions in the Easement, or for the control of erosion. No obstruction to the and operation of said Easement or for any damage to private property or person that Drainage and Detention Easement. The City will not be responsible for the maintenance sanitary condition by the owners of the lot or lots that are traversed by or adjacent to the limits of this addition, will remain open at all times and will be maintained in a safe and “Drainage and Detention Easement.” The Drainage and Detention Easement within the heirs, grantees and successors: The portion of Block 1, as shown on the plat is called “City”) subject to the following conditions which shall be binding upon the Owners, their This plat is hereby adopted by the Owners and approved by the City of Anna (called CITY OF ANNA COUNTY OF COLLIN STATE OF TEXAS DRAINAGE AND DETENTION EASEMENT for Fire Department and emergency use. such fire lanes and utility easements to be maintained free and unobstructed at all times Parking.” The police or his duly authorized representative is hereby authorized to cause appropriate signs in conspicuous places along such fire lanes, stating “Fire Lane, No lane easements is the responsibility of the owner, and the owner shall post and maintain other impediments to the access of fire apparatus. The maintenance of paving on the fire obstruction, including but not limited to the parking of motor vehicles, trailers, boats, or free and clear of any structures, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or (they) shall maintain the same in a state of good repair at all times and keep the same the fire lane easements, as dedicated and shown hereon, a hard surface and that he That the undersigned does hereby covenant and agree that he (they) shall construct upon Fire Lane Easement premises. representatives having ingress, egress, and regress in, along, upon, and across said and privilege at all times of the City of Anna, its agents, employees, workmen, and Department and emergency use, in, along, upon, and across said premises, with the right purpose of general public vehicular and pedestrian use and access, and for Fire any person or the general public for ingress and egress to other real property, and for the The undersigned does covenant and agree that the access easement may be utilized by Access Easement BLOCK A, LOT 1 SERENITY AT THE SQUARE, State of Texas Notary Public in and for ________________________ __________________2023 Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of expressed, and in the capacity therein stated acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instruement and Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared OWNER NAME, COUNTY OF COLLIN } STATE OF TEXAS } By: Baseer, LLC ______________________ State of Texas Notary Public in and for ________________________ __________________2023 Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of expressed, and in the capacity therein stated acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instruement and Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared OWNER NAME, COUNTY OF COLLIN } STATE OF TEXAS } By: Clearwater Commons, LLC ______________________ State of Texas Notary Public in and for ________________________ __________________2023 Given under my hand and seal of office, this _______________ day of expressed, and in the capacity therein stated acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instruement and Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared OWNER NAME, COUNTY OF COLLIN } STATE OF TEXAS } By: GB Partners, LLC ______________________ Witnees my hand this ___________ day of ____________2023 of the City of Anna, Texas This plat approved subject to all Platting Ordinances, Rules, Regulations and Resolutions Fire Department and emergency use. such fire lanes and utility easements to be maintained free and unobstructed at all times for Parking.” The police or his duly authorized representative is hereby authorized to cause appropriate signs in conspicuous places along such fire lanes, stating “Fire Lane, No easements is the responsibility of the owner, and the owner shall post and maintain impediments to the access of fire apparatus. The maintenance of paving on the fire lane including but not limited to the parking of motor vehicles, trailers, boats, or other clear of any structures, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or obstruction, shall maintain the same in a state of good repair at all times and keep the same free and the fire lane easements, as dedicated and shown hereon, a hard surface and that he (they) That the undersigned does hereby covenant and agree that he (they) shall construct upon respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring permission from anyone. patrolling, maintaining, reading meters, and adding to or removing all or parts of their their respective easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, and public utility entities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to or from maintenance, or efficiency of their respective systems in said easements. The City of Anna improvements or growths which may in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, and keep removed all or parts of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs, or other Anna's use thereof. The City of Anna and public utility entities shall have the right to remove particular utilities, said use by public utilities being subordinate to the public's and City of public utilities desiring to use or using the same unless the easement limits the use to addition, utility easements may also be used for the mutual use and accommodation of all improvements may be placed in landscape easements, if approved by the City of Anna. In placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown, except that landscape buildings, fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths shall be constructed or shown, are dedicated for the public use forever, for the purposes indicated on this plat. No and alleys are dedicated for street purposes. The easements and public use areas, as in fee simple, to the public use forever, the streets and alleys shown thereon. The streets , an addition to the City of Anna, Texas, and does hereby dedicate, Item No. 11. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Salena Tittle AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Villages of Hurricane Creek North, Phase 1A, Block W, Lot 26X, Site Plan. Applicant: CADG Hurricane Creek LLC. SUMMARY: Amenity center on one lot on 2.2± acres located on the west side of Stockport Drive, 260± feet north of Chasebrook Drive. Zoned: Planned Development (Ord. No. 932- 2021). The purpose of the Site Plan is to show the proposed amenity center site improvements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Active STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Site Plan is in conformance with the adopted Planned Development standards and the city’s Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Villages of Hurricane Creek North, Phase 1A, Block W, Lot 26X Locator Map 2. Exhibit A - SP (Villages of Hurricane Creek North, Phase 1A) 3. P&Z Application CROSSING DR FORESTMANOR LNC R O S S S H O REDRM O R NIN G D E W DR URBAN WAYRIVERLAWN DR Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 300 600150 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Site Plan - Villages of Hurricane Creek North, Phase 1A, Block W, Lot 26X SSSS36"0,92M72"1,83M72"1,83M36"0,92MLOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALESITE PLANVILLAGES OF HURRICANECREEK NORTH, PH. 1ABlock W, Lot 26X~AMENITY CENTER~SITE NOTES:·NO 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN EXISTS ON PROPERTY.·NO PROTECTED TREES EXIST ON DEVELOPMENT SITE.·STRUCTURE IS A NON AIR CONDITIONED SPACE, NO HVACEQUIPMENT WILL BE LOCATED ON SITE.·MECHANICAL AND HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENTIN NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW FROMTHE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIALPROPERTIES.·THE LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BECONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 58 OF THE CITYOF ANNA CODE OF ORDINANCES.·ALL POOL EQUIPMENT AND TRASH CAN TOTES SHALL BE SCREENEDWITH A 6'-0' HT. WOODEN FENCE. A 5'-0" WIDE SOLID WOOD GATESHALL ALLOW ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT.·FOR ALL BARRIER FREE RAMPS NOTED ON PLAN, REFERENCE SHEETSD2 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.HANDICAP PARKING IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA STANDARDSLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALBARRIER FREE RAMPPROPOSED PARKING COUNTPROPOSED TOP OF PAVEMENT CONTOUREXISTING FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED DETECTOR CHECK VAULTPROPOSED IRRIGATION METERPROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER METERPROPOSED CURB INLETEXISTING POWER POLEBFREXISTING WATER MAIN W/ VALVEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEEXISTING POWER POLE W/ GUY WIREEXISTING LIGHTPOLEFINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFFBLOCK W, LOT 26X SITE INFORMATIONZONING:SINGLE FAMILYPROPOSED USE:PRIVATE RECREATION CENTERLAND AREA:96,182.06 S.F. OR 2.2 ACRESBUILDING AREA:2,572 SFRESTROOM: 286.6 SFATTACHED OUTDOOR: 10,910 SFBUILDING HEIGHTS:22' (1 STORY)FLOOR TO AREA:0.026:1 [2,572/96,182]LOT COVERAGE:2.67%PARKING REQUIRED:MIN 5 SPACES, 8 FOR SHARED AMENITIESPARKING PROVIDED:21 TOTAL, (w/ 2 HANDICAP)TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:21,657 SF, 22.5%EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORMRIGHT-OF-WAYVISIBILITY, ACCESS, & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT(VAM)EXISTING BARRIER FREE RAMPEXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAINSubmittal 1-23-2023LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:STUDIO 13 DESIGN GROUP, PLLC.386 W. MAIN STREETLEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75057PH. (469) 635-1900CONTACT: LEONARD REEVES, RLA, LIOWNER/DEVELOPER:CADG HURRICANE CREEK, LLC1800 VALLEY VIEW LN. SUITE 300FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS 75234PH.(469) 892-7200CONTACT: TREVOR KOLLINGERCIVIL ENGINEER:PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS11000 FRISCO ST. SUITE 400FRISCO, TEXAS 75033PH.(469) 213-1800CONTACT: MARC PAQUETTE, PESP1BFRWATER METER SCHEDULE*A 2" TO 1" REDUCER SHALL BE PLACED ON BOTHWATER SERVICE LINES PRIOR TO WATER METER INSTALLATIONIF REQUIRED.BLOCK W, LOT 26X2.21 ACRES, 96,182.06 SF Item No. 12. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Villages of Hurricane Creek, Phase 1B, Block R, Lot 1X, Site Plan. Applicant: CADG Hurricane Creek LLC. SUMMARY: Amenity center on one lot on 4.3± acres located at the southwest corner of Forest Hill Lane and Brookside Lane. Zoned Planned Development (Ord. No. 886-2020). The purpose of the Site Plan is to show the proposed amenity center development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Active STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Site Plan is in conformance with the adopted Planned Development standards and the city’s Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinances and is subject to additions and/or alterations to the engineering plans as required by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Villages of Hurricane Creek, Phase 1B, Block R, Lot 1X Locator Map 2. EXHIBIT A - SP (Hurricane Creek Ph 1B Amenity Center) 3. Signed Application HIDDEN VALLE Y D R LAKESHORE DR ROLL I N G MEADOW D R SSHADYBROOKTRLROLLINGMEADOWCTN S H A D Y BROOKTRLP A R K V I EW L N WANDERINGWAYCREEK MEADOW DR Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 400 800200 Feet January 2023 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Site Plan - Villages of Hurricane Creek, Phase 1B, Block R, Lot 1X 1031291011TOWERAMENITY CENTER BY OTHERSSSSSSSR1031291011TOWERAMENITY CENTER BY OTHERS36"0,92M48"1,22M60"1,53M72"1,83M114444WCWCWCWCLOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALESITE PLANTHE VILLAGES OFHURRICANE CREEK, PH. 1BBlock R, Lot 1X~AMENITY CENTER~SITE NOTES:·NO 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN EXISTS ON PROPERTY.·NO PROTECTED TREES EXIST ON DEVELOPMENT SITE.·STRUCTURE IS A NON AIR CONDITIONED SPACE, NO HVACEQUIPMENT WILL BE LOCATED ON SITE.·MECHANICAL AND HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENTIN NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEWFROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND FROM ADJACENTRESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES.·ALL POOL EQUIPMENT AND TRASH CAN TOTES SHALL BESCREENED WITH A 6'-0' HT. WOODEN FENCE. A 5'-0" WIDESOLID WOOD GATE SHALL ALLOW ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT.·FOR ALL BARRIER FREE RAMPS NOTED ON PLAN, REFERENCESHEET SD2 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.HANDICAP PARKING IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADASTANDARDSLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALBARRIER FREE RAMPPROPOSED PARKING COUNTPROPOSED TOP OF PAVEMENT CONTOUREXISTING FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED DETECTOR CHECK VAULTPROPOSED IRRIGATION METERPROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER METERPROPOSED CURB INLETEXISTING POWER POLEBFREXISTING WATER MAIN W/ VALVEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEEXISTING POWER POLE W/ GUY WIREEXISTING LIGHTPOLEFINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFFWATER METER SCHEDULEBLOCK R, LOT 1X SITE INFORMATIONPROPOSED USE:PRIVATE RECREATION CENTERLAND AREA:188,396.86 S.F. OR 4.32 ACRESBUILDING AREA:6,154.3 SFRESTROOM: 416.5 SFATTACHED OUTDOOR: 2,491.9 SFBUILDING HEIGHTS:25' (1 STORY)FLOOR TO AREA:0.329:1 [6154/188,397]LOT COVERAGE:3.26%PARKING REQUIRED:MIN 5 SPACES, 8 FOR SHARED AMENITIESPARKING PROVIDED:AMENITY CENTER-20 TOTAL, (w/ 2 HANDICAP)TENNIS COURT-11 TOTAL, (w/ 2 HANDICAP)TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:56,404.1 SF, 30%EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORMRIGHT-OF-WAYVISIBILITY, ACCESS, & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT(VAM)EXISTING BARRIER FREE RAMPEXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN*A 2" TO 1" REDUCER SHALL BE PLACED ON WATER SERVICELINES PRIOR TO WATER METER INSTALLATION.Submittal 1/23/2023LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:STUDIO 13 DESIGN GROUP, PLLC.386 W. MAIN STREETLEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75057PH. (469) 635-1900CONTACT: LEONARD REEVES, RLA, LIOWNER/DEVELOPER:CADG HURRICANE CREEK, LLC1800 VALLEY VIEW LN. SUITE 300FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS 75234PH.(469) 892-7200CONTACT: TREVOR KOLLINGERCIVIL ENGINEER:PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS11000 FRISCO ST. SUITE 400FRISCO, TEXAS 75033PH.(469) 213-1800CONTACT: MARC PAQUETTE, PESP1 of 1BLOCK R, LOT 1X4.32 ACRES / 188,396.86 SF Item No. 13. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request to establish zoning on 16.5± acres located on the south side of County Road 427, 530± feet east of County Road 425 to Planned Development to allow for a multiple-family residential development with modified development standards. Applicant: Thinkk Big Investments, LLC. SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing multiple-family zoning and design standards that would allow for a development that consists of one and two-story buildings, maximum height of 29 feet, with one and two-bedroom units on one lot. A Planned Development (PD) district is intended to provide for combining and mixing of uses allowed in various districts with appropriate regulations and to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific provisions of this article is not contrary to its intent and purpose or significantly inconsistent with the planning on which it is based and will not be harmful to the community. A PD district may be used to permit new and innovative concepts in land utilization. While great flexibility is given to provide special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted, procedures are established herein to insure against misuse of the increased flexibility. A concept plan (Exhibit A) for Woodland Estates, Block A, Lot 1, accompanies this request. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning – the subject property and all surrounding properties are located within the ETJ. The City of Anna does not regulate land uses for properties within the ETJ. North Residences and vacant tract – located in the ETJ East Vacant land – located in the ETJ South Residence – located in the ETJ West Residences – located in the ETJ Proposed Planned Development Stipulations The requested zoning is PD-MF-1. This Planned Development is to allow for a medium-density, multiple-family residence. There are two primary parts to this request: land use and design standards. Land Use - The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the subject property to allow for multiple-family residences on one lot. Design Standards - The language in the proposed PD district would allow for modified development standards associated with the multiple-family residence development. Height and area regulations – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance contains a provision regarding the setback for buildings that exceed one- story in height. The height of any multifamily building sited on a lot adjacent to an area zoned for single-family dwellings or where single-family dwellings of one story in height exist shall be limited to one story for a distance of 60 feet from the single-family district boundary or the lot on which the single-family dwelling is located. ￿ The applicant is requesting to waive the 60-foot setback for two-story buildings and include a planned development standard limiting structures to a maximum height of 29 feet. Parking - Sec. 9.04.037 (Parking space regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for multiple-family dwellings, plus 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit for visitor parking. Additionally, 75% of the required parking is required to be covered. ￿ The applicant is proposing to reduce the required parking for one-bedroom units from two (2) spaces per unit to one (1) space per unit. ￿ The applicant is requesting to reduce the required covered parking 75% to 50%. Screening fence – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires border fencing of masonry construction no less than eight feet in height be installed along the property line on any perimeter not abutting a public street-right-of- way. This fence shall be maintained throughout the existence of the multifamily complex by the owner of the complex. ￿ The applicant is requesting to install the six-foot board on board wood fencing. Conformance with the Anna2050 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan The Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Ranching & Agriculture (RA). Character & Intent: Agricultural areas are characterized by very large tracts of undeveloped land utilized for agricultural production, wildlife management or ranching, including the raising of livestock. There are opportunities for additional uses that support the character and economic viability of agriculture. Land Use Considerations Primary Land Use Farming, ranching and wildlife management Secondary Land Use Single-family detached homes and supporting structures, agriculture related tourism, local food production and distributed energy generation. Cluster Residential may be permitted within a larger Ranching and Agriculture property if an amount of open space equal to the platted lots is preserved and water and wastewater requirements can be met. The Anna 2050 Future Land Use Plan identifies areas that require significant infrastructure improvements as Ranching & Agricultural but could develop as Cluster Residential if the amount of open space equals that of the platted lots (50% open space). The proposed development is exceeding the open space requirements of the MF-1 zoning based on number and type of units proposed (required 2.9± acres / provided 3.9± acres). However, if the development was to meet the 50% open space requirement for a cluster residential development per the Future Land Use Plan description the project would be required to provide 8.2± acres of open space (total acreage would be dependent on the amount of right-of-way needed to create individual platted lots). Staff’s zoning review comments provided to the applicant recommended SF-72 Single-Family Residence District (SF-72) zoning to match recent Annexation and Zoning approvals for properties located to the west of the subject property. Additionally, staff informed the applicant that the SF-60 Single-Family Residence District (SF-60) may be appropriate due to the amount of floodplain and undevelopable area on the property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The requested zoning is not in conformance with the Anna2050 Future Land Use Plan which requires 50% open space for a cluster residential product and is not consistent with zoning of recently annexed properties to the west and northwest of the subject property (SF-72 Single-Family Residence District). 1. 03/23/2021 (Somerset Farms) 2. 07/27/2021 (Cedar Ridge Estates, Ph 1) 3. 10/26/2021 (Cedar Ridge Estates, Ph 2) RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission votes in favor of the zoning request below are recommended restrictions to place on the Planned Development zoning: Restrictions: 1. The location of the planned development zoning district shall be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan (Exhibit A). 2. Definitions: Except as otherwise provided herein, the definitions in Appendix 3 of Article 9.04 shall apply. Multiple-family residence: Any building or portion thereof which is designed, built, rented, leased, or let to be occupied as two or more dwelling units or apartments or which is occupied as a home or place of residence by two or more families living in independent dwelling units. 3. Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. i. Maximum height (feet): 29 ii. Side Yard, interior (feet): 25 iii. Parking: A. One-bedroom: One space per unit; B. Two- & Three-bedroom: Two (2) spaces per unit; C. Covered Parking: 50% of the residence required parking must be covered; and D. Visitor Parking: 0.25 per unit. iv. Screening Fence: Screening and fencing on any perimeter not abutting a public right-of-way shall consist of a 6-foot board on board wood fencing. v. Buffer: To prohibit indiscriminate clear cutting and to preserve the natural tree line a 10-foot-tree preservation easement and landscape area shall be provided along the entire eastern, southern, and western property boundaries. In areas where no trees exist the developer shall be required to plant one large tree (minimum of three-inch caliper and seven feet high at time of planting) per 40 linear feet, or portion thereof. The 10-foot tree preservation easement as identified on the Concept Plan (Exhibit A) is designated as a non-disturbance area in which no construction or tree removal will occur. Removal of any trees in these areas are subject to restriction under Sec.9.07.003 (Permit required; exceptions) of Article 9.07 (Tree Preservation) within the City of Anna Code of Ordinances. 4. Plats and/or site plans submitted for the development of the PD shall conform to the data presented and approved on the Concept Plan. Non-substantial changes of detail on the final development plan(s) that differ from the Concept Plan may be authorized by the City Council with the approval of the final development plan(s) and without public hearing. 5. The Concept Plan will expire after two (2) years of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Zoning Locator Map 2. PZ - STAFF REPORT (Zoning) -Woodland Estates, Bl A, Lt 1 3. EXHIBIT A - CP (Woodland Estates, Bl A, Lt 1) 4. Signed Application OAK CIRS OONERCTCOUNTY ROAD 427 LAZY LNP U R DUE RD NORMANDYAVEPARSLEY W AY INDIAN CREEK ELM GROVE W E S T G R O V E C IR COUNTYROAD425BRIARCOVERDWOLFRUNCAMBRI DGE A V E RODEO DRFM 2862 Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property 200' Notice Boundary City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 500 1,000250 Feet December 2022 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Zoning - 2640 County Road 427 ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 1 OF 6 CITY OF ANNA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION February 6, 2023 Public Hearing: Zoning – Woodland Estates, Block A, Lot 1 Applicant: Thinkk Big Investments, LLC DESCRIPTION: Request to annex and zone 16.5± acres located on the south side of County Road 427, 530± east of County Road 425 (future Leonard Avenue) to Planned Development to allow for a multiple-family residence development with modified development standards. Located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The proposed zoning will be Planned Development-MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential Medium Density. REMARKS: The applicant is proposing multiple-family zoning and design standards that would allow for a development that consists of one and two-story buildings, maximum height of 29 feet, with one and two-bedroom units on one lot. A Planned Development (PD) district is intended to provide for combining and mixing of uses allowed in various districts with appropriate regulations and to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific provisions of this article is not contrary to its intent and purpose or significantly inconsistent with the planning on which it is based and will not be harmful to the community. A PD district may be used to permit new and innovative concepts in land utilization. While great flexibility is given to provide special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted, procedures are established herein to insure against misuse of the increased flexibility. A concept plan (Exhibit A) for Woodland Estates, Block A, Lot 1, accompanies this request. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning – the subject property and all surrounding properties are located within the ETJ. The City of Anna does not regulate land uses for properties within the ETJ. North Residences and vacant tract – located in the ETJ East Vacant land – located in the ETJ South Residence – located in the ETJ West Residences – located in the ETJ ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 2 OF 6 Proposed Planned Development Stipulations The requested zoning is PD-MF-1. This Planned Development is to allow for a medium- density, multiple-family residence. There are two primary parts to this request: land use and design standards. Land Use - The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the subject property to allow for multiple-family residences on one lot. Design Standards - The language in the proposed PD district would allow for modified development standards associated with the multiple-family residence development. Height and area regulations – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance contains a provision regarding the setback for buildings that exceed one-story in height. The height of any multifamily building sited on a lot adjacent to an area zoned for single- family dwellings or where single-family dwellings of one story in height exist shall be limited to one story for a distance of 60 feet from the single-family district boundary or the lot on which the single-family dwelling is located. ➢The applicant is requesting to waive the 60-foot setback for two-story buildings and include a planned development standard limiting structures to a maximum height of 29 feet. Parking - Sec. 9.04.037 (Parking space regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for multiple-family dwellings, plus 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit for visitor parking. Additionally, 75% of the required parking is required to be covered. ➢The applicant is proposing to reduce the required parking for one-bedroom units from two (2) spaces per unit to one (1) space per unit. ➢The applicant is requesting to reduce the required covered parking 75% to 50%. Screening fence – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires border fencing of masonry construction no less than eight feet in height be installed along the property line on any perimeter not abutting a public street-right-of-way. This fence shall be maintained throughout the existence of the multifamily complex by the owner of the complex. ➢The applicant is requesting to install the six-foot board on board wood fencing. ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 3 OF 6 Conformance with the Anna2050 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan The Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Ranching & Agriculture (RA). Character & Intent Agricultural areas are characterized by very large tracts of undeveloped land utilized for agricultural production, wildlife management or ranching, including the raising of livestock. There are opportunities for additional uses that support the character and economic viability of agriculture. Land Use Considerations Primary Land Use Farming, ranching and wildlife management Secondary Land Use Single-family detached homes and supporting structures, agriculture related tourism, local food production and distributed energy generation. Cluster Residential may be permitted within a larger Ranching and Agriculture property if an amount of open space equal to the platted lots is preserved and water and wastewater requirements can be met. The Anna 2050 Future Land Use Plan identifies areas that require significant infrastructure improvements as Ranching & Agricultural but could develop as Cluster Residential if the amount of open space equals that of the platted lots (50% open space). The proposed development is exceeding the open space requirements of the MF-1 zoning based on number and type of units proposed (required 2.9± acres / provided 3.9± acres). However, if the development was to meet the 50% open space requirement for a cluster residential development per the Future Land Use Plan description the project would be required to provide 8.2± acres of open space (total acreage would be dependent on the amount of right-of-way needed to create individual platted lots). Staff’s zoning review comments provided to the applicant recommended zoning of SF-72 Single-Family Residence District (SF-72) to match recent Annexation and Zoning approvals for properties located to the west of the subject property. Additionally, staff informed the applicant that the SF-60 Single-Family Residence District (SF-60) product may be appropriate due to the amount of floodplain and undevelopable area on the property. ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 4 OF 6 SUMMARY: Request to zone 16.5± acres to Planned Development-MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential Medium Density to allow for multiple-family residence with modified development standards. The requested zoning is not in conformance with the Anna2050 Future Land Use Plan which requires 50% open space for a cluster residential product and is not consistent with zoning of recently annexed properties to the west and northwest of the subject property (SF-72 Single-Family Residence District). 1. 03/23/2021 (Somerset Farms) 2. 07/27/2021 (Cedar Ridge Estates, Ph 1) 3. 10/26/2021 (Cedar Ridge Estates, Ph 2) RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission votes in favor of the zoning request below are recommended restrictions to place on the Planned Development zoning: Restrictions: 1. The location of the planned development zoning district shall be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan (Exhibit A). ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 5 OF 6 2. Definitions: Except as otherwise provided herein, the definitions in Appendix 3 of Article 9.04 shall apply. Multiple-family residence: Any building or portion thereof which is designed, built, rented, leased, or let to be occupied as two or more dwelling units or apartments or which is occupied as a home or place of residence by two or more families living in independent dwelling units. 3. Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. i. Maximum height (feet): 29 ii. Side Yard, interior (feet): 25 iii. Parking: A. One-bedroom: One space per unit; B. Two- & Three-bedroom: Two (2) spaces per unit; C. Covered Parking: 50% of the residence required parking must be covered; and D. Visitor Parking: 0.25 per unit. iv. Screening Fence: Screening and fencing on any perimeter not abutting a public right-of-way shall consist of a 6-foot board on board wood fencing. v. Buffer: To prohibit indiscriminate clear cutting and to preserve the natural tree line a 10-foot-tree preservation easement and landscape area shall be provided along the entire eastern, southern, and western property boundaries. In areas where no trees exist the developer shall be required to plant one large tree (minimum of three-inch caliper and seven feet high at time of planting) per 40 linear feet, or portion thereof. The 10-foot tree preservation easement as identified on the Concept Plan (Exhibit A) is designated as a non-disturbance area in which no construction or tree removal will occur. Removal of any trees in these areas are subject to restriction under Sec.9.07.003 (Permit required; exceptions) of Article 9.07 (Tree Preservation) within the City of Anna Code of Ordinances. 4. Plats and/or site plans submitted for the development of the PD shall conform to the data presented and approved on the Concept Plan. Non-substantial changes ANNEXATION & ZONING – WOODLAND ESTATES, BLOCK A, LOT 1 PAGE 6 OF 6 of detail on the final development plan(s) that differ from the Concept Plan may be authorized by the City Council with the approval of the final development plan(s) and without public hearing. 5. The Concept Plan will expire after two (2) years of approval. 690688689 6756806726736746 7 6677678679681 6756806856856856716726736746766776786796816826836846866876885' wide drainage Easement 113 116 125 128 119 120 123 124 121 122117118 115 114 127 126 139 140 143 144 137 138 141 142 135 134 147 146 149 150 129 130 131 132 133 136 145 148 BIRD KEITH DOUGLASINSTR #20081014001223710PROP ID: 2646323 THE DUER FAMILY TRUSTPROP ID: 2121441SMITH JULIAN M JR &PATSY L INSTR#19730507086507270PROP ID: 1008590BIRD KEITH DOUGLASINSTR #20081014001223710PROP ID: 2646323 SMITH JULIAN M JR& PATSY LPROP ID: 21240463 MC JOINT VENTURE ETAL PROP ID: 1003452 Visibility TriangleVisibility TriangleN86°05'12.93"E 458.76N86°05'12.93"E 458.76N00°16'12.12"W 145.70S85°50'38.60"W 87.45N00°25'38.05"E 393.39 S01°08'09.72"W 1261.32 S06°00'12.18"W 11.20N89°58'03.15"E 28.38582.1' TO CR 427 x CR 425 INTERSECTION362.8' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY1559.9' TO CR 425 x BRIARCOVE ROAD INTERSECTION25.00'25.00'469.48' BETWEEN PROPOSED DRIVES10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical)237.98' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY58.98' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY45.00'Maximum20.00'LandscapeBuffer20.00' Landscape Buffer FM 42730' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION Stream Stream2604 County Road R.O.W.(60' from FM 427 centerline;width varies; 45' maximum)25.00' Building Setback StreamStream 1 0 0 - Y e a r F l o o d A r e a 100-Year Flood Area1 0 0 - Y e a r F l o o d A r e a 100-Year Flood Area100-Year Flood AreaStream Stream2604 County Road R.O.W.(60' from FM 427 centerline;width varies; 45' maximum)FM 427 CenterlineFM 427 CenterlineApproximate FM 427 pavement extentsApproximate FM 427 pavement extentsRequired 5' Sidewalk(to be installed within R.O.W. dedication per design requirements)SidewalkSidewalkSidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk 25.00' Building Setback10.00' Drainage Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation Easement52.00'65.00'62.00'30.00' 32.00' 17.00'780 SF780 SF1,040 SF1,054 SF1,040 SFA PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / ONE BEDROOM PER UNITB PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / TWO BEDROOM PER UNITC PRODUCT - TWO UNITS (ONE UPSTAIRS/ONE DOWNSTAIRS)TWO STORYONE BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRSTWO BEDROOM UPSTAIRS10.00' MINIMUM SPACING REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGSTHE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756PAGE 1 OF 2THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756SITE DATA SUMMARY TABLEGENERAL SITE DATAZoning (from zoning map)ETJLand Use (from zoning ordinance)UndevelopedProposed Land UsePD-MF-1Lot Area (square feet & acres, includes dedication)701,185 s.f.16.1 acresTotal Building Footprint Area (square feet, within site;total products)133,020 s.f. - Product A - 1 Bedroom (2 units per product; 1,560 x 45 products)70,200 s.f.(min. 780 sf per unit) - Product B - 2 Bedroom (2 units per product; 2,080 x 15 products)31,200 s.f.(min. 1,040 sf per unit) - Product C - 1 & 2 Bedroom (2 units per product; 1,054 x 30 products)31,620 s.f.(min. 1,054 sf per unit)Building Height (feet - distance to tallest building element) - Product A1 STORY - Product B1 STORY - Product C2 STORY/29' MAXLot Coverage (percent - X.XX%; 133,020 sf / 720,589)18.5%Total Unit Count180 units% of 1 Bedrooms67%% of 2 Bedrooms33%PARKINGRequired Parking (1 parking space per one-bedroomdwelling unit & 2 parking spaces per two-bedroom dwelling unit)120 + (60 x 2)240 spacesRequired Visitor Parking (25% visitor parking)240 x 0.2560 spacesTotal Required Parking (required parking plus requiredvisitor parking; 240 + 60)300 spacesRequired Covered Parking (50% of parking must becovered; 300 x 0.5)150 spacesTotal Provided Parking302 spacesTotal Pavement Area149,317 s.f.OPEN SPACE600 S.F. Required per 1-Bedroom Unit(120 units x 600 s.f.)72,000 s.f.900 S.F. Required per 2-Bedroom Unit(60 units x 900 s.f.)54,000 s.f.Total Required Open Space126,000 s.f.Total Provided Open Space(as shown with open space hatch; see legend)170,514 s.f.IN COMPLIANCE WITH:- COUNTY ROAD 1106 (CR 1106) IS LISTED AS APRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (120' R.O.W.)- SITE ALLOWS FOR A 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION(MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE R.O.W.)PROPERTY LINECOVERED PARKING SPACEUNCOVERED PARKING SPACEFIRE LANE (generally located withineasement dedication)LEGENDNote: Development assumes one lotfor the entire developmentREFUSE FACILITYNote:Bearings and distances were created from county parcels,not with survey data.VICINITY MAPSCALE = NOT TO SCALEBUILDING TYPESSCALE 1" = 30'-0"ZONE A 100-YEAR FLOOD AREAPER FIRM PANEL 48085C0160JSISTER GROVE CREEK TRIBUTARYPER NWI DATASETMATCHLINE: REFERENCE PG 2 OF 2OPEN SPACEFM 427Houston StreetFM 425N State Highway 5 Briarcove Road SCALE: 1" = 40' - 0"Feet04080OPEN SPACE SUMMARY:Original tract lot acreage- 701,185 square feet- 16.1 acresOpen space provided- 170,514 square feet- 3.9 acres- 24.3%CONCEPT PLANWOODLAND ESTATESBLOCK A, LOT 1ANNA, TEXAS | COLLIN COUNTY'16.1 ACRE TRACT'SHEET 1, TRACT 5516.1 ACRESGUINN MORRISON SURVEYABS A0559JANUARY 25, 2023 52.00'65.00'62.00'30.00'32.00'17.00'780 SF780 SF1,040 SF1,054 SF1,040 SFA PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / ONE BEDROOM PER UNITB PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / TWO BEDROOM PER UNITC PRODUCT - TWO UNITS (ONE UPSTAIRS/ONE DOWNSTAIRS)TWO STORYONE BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRSTWO BEDROOM UPSTAIRS10.00' MINIMUM SPACING REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS6 8 5690695 6816 8 2 6 8 3 6 8 468668768868969 169269369469669069069069568868969169269369469669769869930 322829 26 272223 24 25 31 34 35 38 39 40 41363720 19 18 21 33 1 3 2 4 10 12 9 11 76 5 8 13 1615 14 17 64 675657 54 555051 52 53 66 72 73 76 77 78 797475 48 70 84 65 7149 62 63 58 60 6159 80 81 82 83 45 43 4746 44 42 89 91 92 90 94 9695 93 101 103 104 102 106 108107 105 8885 97 100 109 112 68 69 86 87 98 99 110 111 3 MC JOINT VENTURE ETAL PROP ID: 1003452 YOUGLAS ABEL RAMIRO INSTR #470-50443-2021 PROP ID: 1008607 THE DUER FAMILY TRUSTINSTR# 19990106000021500PROP ID: 2121440STILTZ WILLIAM J & CAROLYN J INSTR# 19830614000277820 PROP ID: 1003489 Stub for future connection MULLETT LIVING TRUST INSTR #1549080 PROP ID: 2636514 S89°38'39.83"W 523.07N00°16'58.55"W 698.28 S01°08'09.72"W 1261.32 S01°08'10.72"W 62.21 N00°13'08.25"W 63.79 15.00' Drainage Easement25.00' BuildingSetback25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical) 10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical)10.00' Minimum BuildingSeparation (typical)147.43'147.27'15.00' Drainage Easement10.00' TreePreservation Easement30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION Lift Station 25.00' Building Setback 25.00' Building Setback25.00' Building Setback25.00' Building Setback 15.00' Drainage Easement 15.00' Drainage Easement 10.00' Drainage Easement S t r e amStream100-Year Flood Area 100-Ye a r F lood A r e a 100-Year Flood AreaSidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk SidewalkSidewalk0.5 Acre Amenity& Detention(Amenity Center & Pool)10.00' Tree Preservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' BuildingSetback15.00' Drainage Easement10.00' TreePreservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' Building Setback 10.00' Drainage Easement 10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation Easement25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation EasementBUILDING TYPESSCALE 1" = 30'-0"THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756PAGE 2 OF 2THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756REFUSE FACILITYGENERAL SITE DATAMaximum Distance (every dwelling unitshall be located within 250 feet of a refuse facility)250 feetSize of each container (in cubic yards)6 c.y.Quantity (minimum of 1 container per 30dwelling units)5Note: Development assumes one lotfor the entire developmentMATCHLINE: REFERENCE PG 1 OF 2Note:Bearings and distances were created from county parcels,not with survey data.PROPERTY LINECOVERED PARKING SPACEUNCOVERED PARKING SPACEFIRE LANE (generally located withineasement dedication)LEGENDREFUSE FACILITYZONE A 100-YEAR FLOOD AREAPER FIRM PANEL 48085C0160JSISTER GROVE CREEK TRIBUTARYPER NWI DATASETOPEN SPACEVICINITY MAPSCALE = NOT TO SCALEFM 427Houston StreetFM 425N State Highway 5 Briarcove Road Feet04080SCALE: 1" = 40' - 0"CONCEPT PLANWOODLAND ESTATESBLOCK A, LOT 1ANNA, TEXAS | COLLIN COUNTY'16.1 ACRE TRACT'SHEET 1, TRACT 5516.1 ACRESGUINN MORRISON SURVEYABS A0559JANUARY 25, 2023 Item No. 14. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Ross Altobelli AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the Woodland Estates, Block A, Lot 1, Concept Plan. Applicant: Thinkk Big Investments, LLC. SUMMARY: Multiple-family residences on one lot on 16.5± acres located on the south side of County Road 427, 530± east of County Road 425 (future Leonard Avenue). This concept plan is associated with the zoning case and is contingent upon approval of the zoning case. The purpose of the concept plan is to show the conceptual layout and related site improvements associated with the future multiple-family residential development. The concept plan complies with the Planning and Development regulations as requested by the zoning case. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: If the zoning amendment is recommended for approval, Concept Plan approval shall be subject to City Council approval of the zoning request. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Concept Plan Locator Map 2. EXHIBIT A - CP (Woodland Estates, Bl A, Lt 1) 3. Signed Application OAK CIRS OONERCTCOUNTY ROAD 427 LAZY LNP U R DUE RD NORMANDYAVEPARSLEY W AY INDIAN CREEK ELM GROVE W E S T G R O V E C IR COUNTYROAD425BRIARCOVERDWOLFRUNCAMBRI DGE A V E RODEO DRFM 2862 Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 500 1,000250 Feet December 2022 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Concept Plan - 2640 County Road 427 690688689 6756806726736746 7 6677678679681 6756806856856856716726736746766776786796816826836846866876885' wide drainage Easement 113 116 125 128 119 120 123 124 121 122117118 115 114 127 126 139 140 143 144 137 138 141 142 135 134 147 146 149 150 129 130 131 132 133 136 145 148 BIRD KEITH DOUGLASINSTR #20081014001223710PROP ID: 2646323 THE DUER FAMILY TRUSTPROP ID: 2121441SMITH JULIAN M JR &PATSY L INSTR#19730507086507270PROP ID: 1008590BIRD KEITH DOUGLASINSTR #20081014001223710PROP ID: 2646323 SMITH JULIAN M JR& PATSY LPROP ID: 21240463 MC JOINT VENTURE ETAL PROP ID: 1003452 Visibility TriangleVisibility TriangleN86°05'12.93"E 458.76N86°05'12.93"E 458.76N00°16'12.12"W 145.70S85°50'38.60"W 87.45N00°25'38.05"E 393.39 S01°08'09.72"W 1261.32 S06°00'12.18"W 11.20N89°58'03.15"E 28.38582.1' TO CR 427 x CR 425 INTERSECTION362.8' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY1559.9' TO CR 425 x BRIARCOVE ROAD INTERSECTION25.00'25.00'469.48' BETWEEN PROPOSED DRIVES10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical)237.98' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY58.98' TO NEAREST DRIVEWAY45.00'Maximum20.00'LandscapeBuffer20.00' Landscape Buffer FM 42730' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION Stream Stream2604 County Road R.O.W.(60' from FM 427 centerline;width varies; 45' maximum)25.00' Building Setback StreamStream 1 0 0 - Y e a r F l o o d A r e a 100-Year Flood Area1 0 0 - Y e a r F l o o d A r e a 100-Year Flood Area100-Year Flood AreaStream Stream2604 County Road R.O.W.(60' from FM 427 centerline;width varies; 45' maximum)FM 427 CenterlineFM 427 CenterlineApproximate FM 427 pavement extentsApproximate FM 427 pavement extentsRequired 5' Sidewalk(to be installed within R.O.W. dedication per design requirements)SidewalkSidewalkSidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk 25.00' Building Setback10.00' Drainage Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation Easement52.00'65.00'62.00'30.00' 32.00' 17.00'780 SF780 SF1,040 SF1,054 SF1,040 SFA PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / ONE BEDROOM PER UNITB PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / TWO BEDROOM PER UNITC PRODUCT - TWO UNITS (ONE UPSTAIRS/ONE DOWNSTAIRS)TWO STORYONE BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRSTWO BEDROOM UPSTAIRS10.00' MINIMUM SPACING REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGSTHE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756PAGE 1 OF 2THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756SITE DATA SUMMARY TABLEGENERAL SITE DATAZoning (from zoning map)ETJLand Use (from zoning ordinance)UndevelopedProposed Land UsePD-MF-1Lot Area (square feet & acres, includes dedication)701,185 s.f.16.1 acresTotal Building Footprint Area (square feet, within site;total products)133,020 s.f. - Product A - 1 Bedroom (2 units per product; 1,560 x 45 products)70,200 s.f.(min. 780 sf per unit) - Product B - 2 Bedroom (2 units per product; 2,080 x 15 products)31,200 s.f.(min. 1,040 sf per unit) - Product C - 1 & 2 Bedroom (2 units per product; 1,054 x 30 products)31,620 s.f.(min. 1,054 sf per unit)Building Height (feet - distance to tallest building element) - Product A1 STORY - Product B1 STORY - Product C2 STORY/29' MAXLot Coverage (percent - X.XX%; 133,020 sf / 720,589)18.5%Total Unit Count180 units% of 1 Bedrooms67%% of 2 Bedrooms33%PARKINGRequired Parking (1 parking space per one-bedroomdwelling unit & 2 parking spaces per two-bedroom dwelling unit)120 + (60 x 2)240 spacesRequired Visitor Parking (25% visitor parking)240 x 0.2560 spacesTotal Required Parking (required parking plus requiredvisitor parking; 240 + 60)300 spacesRequired Covered Parking (50% of parking must becovered; 300 x 0.5)150 spacesTotal Provided Parking302 spacesTotal Pavement Area149,317 s.f.OPEN SPACE600 S.F. Required per 1-Bedroom Unit(120 units x 600 s.f.)72,000 s.f.900 S.F. Required per 2-Bedroom Unit(60 units x 900 s.f.)54,000 s.f.Total Required Open Space126,000 s.f.Total Provided Open Space(as shown with open space hatch; see legend)170,514 s.f.IN COMPLIANCE WITH:- COUNTY ROAD 1106 (CR 1106) IS LISTED AS APRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (120' R.O.W.)- SITE ALLOWS FOR A 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION(MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE R.O.W.)PROPERTY LINECOVERED PARKING SPACEUNCOVERED PARKING SPACEFIRE LANE (generally located withineasement dedication)LEGENDNote: Development assumes one lotfor the entire developmentREFUSE FACILITYNote:Bearings and distances were created from county parcels,not with survey data.VICINITY MAPSCALE = NOT TO SCALEBUILDING TYPESSCALE 1" = 30'-0"ZONE A 100-YEAR FLOOD AREAPER FIRM PANEL 48085C0160JSISTER GROVE CREEK TRIBUTARYPER NWI DATASETMATCHLINE: REFERENCE PG 2 OF 2OPEN SPACEFM 427Houston StreetFM 425N State Highway 5 Briarcove Road SCALE: 1" = 40' - 0"Feet04080OPEN SPACE SUMMARY:Original tract lot acreage- 701,185 square feet- 16.1 acresOpen space provided- 170,514 square feet- 3.9 acres- 24.3%CONCEPT PLANWOODLAND ESTATESBLOCK A, LOT 1ANNA, TEXAS | COLLIN COUNTY'16.1 ACRE TRACT'SHEET 1, TRACT 5516.1 ACRESGUINN MORRISON SURVEYABS A0559JANUARY 25, 2023 52.00'65.00'62.00'30.00'32.00'17.00'780 SF780 SF1,040 SF1,054 SF1,040 SFA PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / ONE BEDROOM PER UNITB PRODUCT - TWO UNITSSINGLE STORY / TWO BEDROOM PER UNITC PRODUCT - TWO UNITS (ONE UPSTAIRS/ONE DOWNSTAIRS)TWO STORYONE BEDROOM DOWNSTAIRSTWO BEDROOM UPSTAIRS10.00' MINIMUM SPACING REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS6 8 5690695 6816 8 2 6 8 3 6 8 468668768868969 169269369469669069069069568868969169269369469669769869930 322829 26 272223 24 25 31 34 35 38 39 40 41363720 19 18 21 33 1 3 2 4 10 12 9 11 76 5 8 13 1615 14 17 64 675657 54 555051 52 53 66 72 73 76 77 78 797475 48 70 84 65 7149 62 63 58 60 6159 80 81 82 83 45 43 4746 44 42 89 91 92 90 94 9695 93 101 103 104 102 106 108107 105 8885 97 100 109 112 68 69 86 87 98 99 110 111 3 MC JOINT VENTURE ETAL PROP ID: 1003452 YOUGLAS ABEL RAMIRO INSTR #470-50443-2021 PROP ID: 1008607 THE DUER FAMILY TRUSTINSTR# 19990106000021500PROP ID: 2121440STILTZ WILLIAM J & CAROLYN J INSTR# 19830614000277820 PROP ID: 1003489 Stub for future connection MULLETT LIVING TRUST INSTR #1549080 PROP ID: 2636514 S89°38'39.83"W 523.07N00°16'58.55"W 698.28 S01°08'09.72"W 1261.32 S01°08'10.72"W 62.21 N00°13'08.25"W 63.79 15.00' Drainage Easement25.00' BuildingSetback25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical) 10.00' Minimum Building Separation (typical)10.00' Minimum BuildingSeparation (typical)147.43'147.27'15.00' Drainage Easement10.00' TreePreservation Easement30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 30' PROPOSED FIRE LANE, ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION Lift Station 25.00' Building Setback 25.00' Building Setback25.00' Building Setback25.00' Building Setback 15.00' Drainage Easement 15.00' Drainage Easement 10.00' Drainage Easement S t r e amStream100-Year Flood Area 100-Ye a r F lood A r e a 100-Year Flood AreaSidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk SidewalkSidewalk0.5 Acre Amenity& Detention(Amenity Center & Pool)10.00' Tree Preservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' BuildingSetback15.00' Drainage Easement10.00' TreePreservation Easement10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 25.00' Building Setback 10.00' Drainage Easement 10.00' Tree Preservation Easement 10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation Easement25.00' BuildingSetback10.00' DrainageEasement10.00' TreePreservation EasementBUILDING TYPESSCALE 1" = 30'-0"THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756PAGE 2 OF 2THE SITE PLAN IS FOR CITY REVIEW ONLY TOILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ANDDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS NOTINTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.OWNER:THINKK BIG INVESTMENTS LLC421 COUNTRY CLUB RDFAIRVIEW, TX 75069-1572DEVELOPER:VALIANT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.5900 SOUTH LAKE FOREST DR, STE 300MCKINNEY, TX 75070PHONE: 469.569.1044CONTACT: CHARLES BRANCHENGINEER:WESTWOOD P.S.PARKWAY CENTRE 12901 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 400PLANO, TX 75093PHONE: 214.473.4640CONTACT: TIM MULROONEYPhone(214) 473-46402901 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400Toll Free(888) 937-5150Plano, TX 75093Firm No. F-11756REFUSE FACILITYGENERAL SITE DATAMaximum Distance (every dwelling unitshall be located within 250 feet of a refuse facility)250 feetSize of each container (in cubic yards)6 c.y.Quantity (minimum of 1 container per 30dwelling units)5Note: Development assumes one lotfor the entire developmentMATCHLINE: REFERENCE PG 1 OF 2Note:Bearings and distances were created from county parcels,not with survey data.PROPERTY LINECOVERED PARKING SPACEUNCOVERED PARKING SPACEFIRE LANE (generally located withineasement dedication)LEGENDREFUSE FACILITYZONE A 100-YEAR FLOOD AREAPER FIRM PANEL 48085C0160JSISTER GROVE CREEK TRIBUTARYPER NWI DATASETOPEN SPACEVICINITY MAPSCALE = NOT TO SCALEFM 427Houston StreetFM 425N State Highway 5 Briarcove Road Feet04080SCALE: 1" = 40' - 0"CONCEPT PLANWOODLAND ESTATESBLOCK A, LOT 1ANNA, TEXAS | COLLIN COUNTY'16.1 ACRE TRACT'SHEET 1, TRACT 5516.1 ACRESGUINN MORRISON SURVEYABS A0559JANUARY 25, 2023 Item No. 15. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Salena Tittle AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request to rezone 24.3± acres located at the northwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423 from SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot to Planned Development to allow for a multiple- family residential development with modified development standards. Applicant: Ann Hayslett. SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing a multiple-family residential development on one lot with modified development standards consisting of one- and two-unit buildings, maximum height of one story/35 feet, consisting of one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three- bedroom units. A Planned Development (PD) district is intended to provide for combining and mixing of uses allowed in various districts with appropriate regulations and to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific provisions of this article is not contrary to its intent and purpose or significantly inconsistent with the planning on which it is based and will not be harmful to the community. A PD district may be used to permit new and innovative concepts in land utilization. While great flexibility is given to provide special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted, procedures are established herein to insure against misuse of the increased flexibility. A Concept Plan (Exhibit A), NexMetro CR 423, and an Open Space Exhibit (Exhibit B) accompany this request. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning North: Vacant tract zoned SF-E Single-Family Residential - Large Lot (SF-E) (currently used for an access drive for the adjacent northwestern property). East: Across State Highway 5, vacant land zoned SF-E Single-Family Residential - Large Lot (SF-E). South: Single-family residential lot zoned SF-1 Single-Family Residential District (SF- 1). West: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Proposed Planned Development Stipulations The requested zoning is Planned Development. This Planned Development is to allow for MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density with modified development standards. There are two primary parts to this request: land use and design standards. Land Use - The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to allow for multiple one and two unit multiple-family residential buildings on one lot. Design Standards – The language in the proposed PD district would allow for modified development standards associated with the multiple-family residential development request. MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. 1. Parking- Sec. 9.04.037 (Parking space regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for multiple-family dwellings, plus 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit for visitor parking. Additionally, 75% of the required parking is required to be covered. • The applicant is requesting not to provide the required visitor parking (0.25 per dwelling unit). • The applicant is requesting to reduce the required covered parking 75% to 50%. 2. Refuse facilities. Every dwelling unit in a multifamily complex shall be located within 250 feet of a refuse facility, measured along the designated pedestrian and vehicular travel way. • The applicant is proposing four enclosed dumpster locations for the development as well as a valet service to offset the requirement. 3. Screening fence – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires border fencing of masonry construction no less than eight feet in height be installed along the property line on any perimeter not abutting a public street-right-of- way. • The applicant is requesting to install the following: a. Six-foot masonry screening wall along State Highway 5 to ensure residents' privacy and create a sound barrier from traffic. b. Six-foot board on board wood fence with masonry columns every 50 linear feet along County Road 423, the northern property boundary, and the southern property boundary line. c. Six-foot wood fence along the western property boundary line. 4. Screening requirements- Sec. 9.04.039 (Screening device requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits solid fences in the required front yard setback of any district. Additionally, no fence shall exceed 3 feet in height in the front yard of any district. • The applicant is proposing a 6-foot masonry screening wall within the required 50-foot front yard setback along State Highway 5 (THOR Overlay District requirement) to assist with traffic noise and provide privacy for future residents. 5. Minimum Building Separation (feet): 8 • The fire department requires a minimum 10-foot building separation but has agreed to the 8-foot separation as long as all units are sprinklered per NFPA, NCTCOG, and our local fire code amendments. 6. Minimum Side Yard Setback (feet): 20 • The applicant is requesting to reduce the required side yard setback to 20 feet along all property boundary not adjacent to right-of-way. The city's ordinance requires 25 feet. To help support and justify the modified standards the applicant has provided additional information (Exhibit C). Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Plan Future Land Use Plan – The Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Cluster Residential (CR). Character & Intent Cluster Residential neighborhoods are intended to provide smaller single family detached and attached residential lots. Home sites are located in platted subdivisions with all utilities, residential streets and sidewalks. The applicant is proposing one and two unit multiple-family residential dwellings on a single lot with interior vehicular circulation being provided by 24-foot fire lanes. The proposed development form does not meet the Character & Intent as defined within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan nor do the unit types being proposed meet the city’s zoning regulations descriptions/definitions associated with single-family dwelling, detached or attached. 3.1.22 Single-family dwelling, attached: A dwelling that is part of a structure containing three or more dwellings, each designed and constructed for occupancy by one family, with each dwelling unit attached by a common wall to another with a minimum length of attachment of 20 feet, in which each dwelling is located on a separate platted lot. 3.1.23 Single-family dwelling, detached: A detached building designed exclusively for occupancy by one family, excluding manufactured housing, located on a lot or separate building tract and having no physical connection to a building on any other lot. CONCLUSION: Request to rezone 24.3± acres located at the northwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423 from SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot to Planned Development which will allow for a multiple-family residential development with modified development standards. Although the proposed layout and development standards offer a diverse housing option within the City of Anna, the proposed residential development form does not meet the Character & Intent of the Cluster Residential PlaceType within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan or as defined within the City of Anna Zoning Ordinance. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The proposed zoning is not in conformance with the Future Land Use Plan of the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Below are the recommended restrictions if the Commission votes in favor of the zoning request: 1. The location of the planned development zoning district shall be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan (Exhibit A). 2. Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple- Family Residential – Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. i. Parking: a. 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit b. Visitor parking not required c. 50% of required parking must be covered (Garage or Carport) ii. Refuse Facilities: Multiple-family buildings will be served by valet trash service with four enclosed dumpster locations contained onsite. iii. Screening: a. Six-foot masonry screening wall, within the front yard setback, along State Highway 5 to ensure resident privacy and create a sound barrier from traffic. b. Six-foot board on board wood fence with masonry columns every 50 linear feet along County Road 423 and the northern property boundary and southern property boundary lines. c. Six-foot wood fence along the western property boundary line. iv. Building separation (feet): minimum 8 feet. All buildings that are separated by less than 10 feet must be sprinklered per NFPA, NCTCOG, and local fire code amendments. v. Side Yard Setback (feet): minimum 20 feet along all property boundary not adjacent to right-of-way. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Zoning Locator Map 2. PZ - STAFF REPORT (Zoning) - NexMetro CR 423 3. Exhibt A - NexMetro CR423 Concept Plan 4. Exhibit B - NexMetro CR 423 Open Space Exhibit 5. Exhibit C - NexMetro CR423-Justification Memo 6. Proposed Zoning Change NexMetro Reply - The Greers 7. P&Z Application STARS DR COUNTY ROAD 1036 S POWELL PKWYMAVERICK STSLATERCREEKRD DRYCREEKWASHFLORENCEWA Y COWBOY WAYABIGAIL LNGENOVEVALNEDWARD ST S RIGGINSSTCUNNINGHAM BLVDCOUNTYROAD423Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property 200' Notice Boundary City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 400 800200 Feet December 2022 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Zoning - NexMetro CR 423 ZONING – NEXMETRO CR 423 PAGE 1 OF 5 CITY OF ANNA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION February 6, 2023 Public Hearing: Zoning – NexMetro CR 423 Applicant: Ann Hayslett DESCRIPTION: Request to rezone 24.3± acres located at the northwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423 from SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot to Planned Development (PD) to allow for a multiple-family residential development with modified development standards. REMARKS: The applicant is proposing a multiple-family residential development on one lot with modified development standards consisting of one- and two-unit buildings, maximum height of one story/35 feet, consisting of one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units. A Planned Development (PD) district is intended to provide for combining and mixing of uses allowed in various districts with appropriate regulations and to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific provisions of this article is not contrary to its intent and purpose or significantly inconsistent with the planning on which it is based and will not be harmful to the community. A PD district may be used to permit new and innovative concepts in land utilization. While great flexibility is given to provide special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted, procedures are established herein to insure against misuse of the increased flexibility. A Concept Plan (Exhibit A), NexMetro CR 423, and an Open Space Plan (Exhibit B) accompany this request. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning North Vacant tract zoned SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot (SF-E) (currently used for an access drive for the adjacent northwestern property). East Across State Highway 5 vacant land zoned SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot (SF-E). South Single-family residential lot zoned SF-1 Single-Family Residential District (SF-1). West Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Proposed Planned Development Stipulations The requested zoning is Planned Development. This Planned Development is to allow for MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density with modified development standards. There are two primary parts to this request: land use and design standards. Land Use - The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to allow for multiple one and two unit multiple-family residential buildings on one lot. ZONING – NEXMETRO CR 423 PAGE 2 OF 5 Design Standards – The language in the proposed PD district would allow for modified development standards associated with the multiple-family residential development request. MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. 1. Parking - Sec. 9.04.037 (Parking space regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for multiple-family dwellings, plus 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit for visitor parking. Additionally, 75% of the required parking is required to be covered. ➢The applicant is requesting not to provide the required visitor parking (0.25 per dwelling unit). ➢The applicant is requesting to reduce the required covered parking 75% to 50%. 2. Refuse facilities. Every dwelling unit in a multifamily complex shall be located within 250 feet of a refuse facility, measured along the designated pedestrian and vehicular travel way. ➢The applicant is proposing four enclosed dumpster locations for the development as well as a valet service to offset the requirement. 3. Screening fence – Sec. 9.04.019 (MF-1 zoning regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance requires border fencing of masonry construction no less than eight feet in height be installed along the property line on any perimeter not abutting a public street-right-of- way. ➢The applicant is requesting to install the following: a.Six-foot masonry screening wall along State Highway 5 to ensure residents’ privacy and create a sound barrier from traffic. b.Six-foot board on board wood fence with masonry columns every 50 linear feet along County Road 423, the northern property boundary, and the southern property boundary line. c.Six-foot wood fence along the western property boundary line. 4. Screening requirements - Sec. 9.04.039 (Screening device requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits solid fences in the required front yard setback of any district. Additionally, no fence shall exceed 3 feet in height in the front yard of any district. ZONING – NEXMETRO CR 423 PAGE 3 OF 5 ➢The applicant is proposing a 6-foot masonry screening wall within the required 50- foot front yard setback along State Highway 5 (THOR Overlay District requirement) to assist with traffic noise and provide privacy for future residents. 5. Minimum Building Separation (feet): 8 ➢The fire department requires a minimum 10-foot building separation but has agreed to the 8-foot separation as long as all units are sprinklered per NFPA, NCTCOG, and our local fire code amendments. 6. Minimum Side Yard Setback (feet): 20 ➢The applicant is requesting to reduce the required side yard setback to 20 feet along all property boundary not adjacent to right-of-way. The city’s ordinance requires 25 feet. To help support and justify the modified standards the applicant has provided additional information (Exhibit C). Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Plan Future Land Use Plan – The Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Cluster Residential (CR). Character & Intent Cluster Residential neighborhoods are intended to provide smaller single family detached and attached residential lots. Home sites are located in platted subdivisions with all utilities, residential streets and sidewalks. The applicant is proposing one and two unit multiple-family residential dwellings on a single lot with interior vehicular circulation being provided by 24-foot fire lanes. The proposed development form does not meet the Character & Intent as defined within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan nor do the unit types being proposed meet the city’s zoning regulations descriptions/definitions associated with single-family dwelling, detached or attached. 3.1.22 Single-family dwelling, attached: A dwelling that is part of a structure containing three or more dwellings, each designed and constructed for occupancy by one family, with each dwelling unit attached by a common wall to another with a minimum length of attachment of 20 feet, in which each dwelling is located on a separate platted lot. 3.1.23 Single-family dwelling, detached: A detached building designed exclusively for occupancy by one family, excluding manufactured housing, located on a lot or separate building tract and having no physical connection to a building on any other lot. ZONING – NEXMETRO CR 423 PAGE 4 OF 5 SUMMARY: Request to rezone 24.3± acres located at the northwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423 from SF-E Single-Family Residential – Large Lot to Planned Development which will allow for a multiple-family residential development with modified development standards. Although the proposed layout and development standards offer a diverse housing option within the City of Anna, the proposed residential development form does not meet the Character & Intent of the Cluster Residential PlaceType within the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan or as defined within the City of Anna Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed zoning is not in conformance with the Future Land Use Plan of the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Below are the recommended restrictions if the Commission votes in favor of the zoning request: 1. The location of the planned development zoning district shall be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan (Exhibit A). 2. Standards and Area Regulations: Development must comply with the development standards for use, density, lot area, lot width, lot depth, yard depths and widths, building height, building elevations, coverage, floor area ratio, parking, access, screening, landscaping, accessory buildings, signs, and lighting, set forth in the MF-1 Multiple-Family Residential – Medium Density (MF-1) zoning district and the Planning and Development Regulations except as otherwise specified herein. i. Parking: a. 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit b. Visitor parking not required c. 50% of required parking must be covered (Garage or Carport) ii. Refuse Facilities: Multiple-family buildings will be served by valet trash service with four enclosed dumpster locations contained onsite. iii. Screening: a. Six-foot masonry screening wall, within the front yard setback, along State Highway 5 to ensure resident privacy and create a sound barrier from traffic. b. Six-foot board on board wood fence with masonry columns every 50 linear feet along County Road 423 and the northern property boundary line and the southern property boundary line. c. Six-foot wood fence along the western property boundary line. ZONING – NEXMETRO CR 423 PAGE 5 OF 5 iv. Building separation (feet): minimum 8 feet. All buildings that are separated by less than 10 feet must be sprinklered per NFPA, NCTCOG, and local fire code amendments. v. Side Yard Setback (feet): minimum 20 feet along all property boundary not adjacent to right-of-way. 24.274 Acres ( 1,057,362 Sq. Ft.) Lot 1, Block A EXHIBIT A CONCEPT PLAN - NORTH NEXMETRO CR423 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 1,057,362 Sq. Ft./24.274 Acres S N W E LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A CONCEPT PLAN - SOUTH NEXMETRO CR423 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 1,057,362 Sq. Ft./24.274 Acres S N W E LOCATION MAP Lot 1, Block A EXHIBIT B OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT NEXMETRO CR423 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 1,057,362 Sq. Ft./24.274 Acres S N W E LOCATION MAP 1 2221 Lakeside Blvd, Suite 1210, Richardson, TX 75082 NexMetro.com January 30, 2023 NexMetro CR423 – PD Justification Memo Below, please find all variances included in the PD Development Regulations and their support justification. We believe the PD to be fair and restrictive to our use, while providing flexibility in some areas that would not drive value for our unique product type. We did our best to provide examples rather than theories and would be open to providing additional support by touring our existing product or providing design parameters if applicable. ACCESSORY USE VARIANCE: • Covered parking structures to be maximum ±54’; code states “carports” to be max 24’ long. JUSTIFICATION: • The term “Carports” lends itself to be for only 2 parking stalls in a residential setting, while it’s more common to have covered parking structures/awnings for MF anywhere from 4 to 6 spaces long/wide. Our ask would be to allow for max 6 -stall covered parking structures. We would be happy to provide an example of our other projects if needed, but this request seems common to most MF product. BUILDING/YARD SETBACK VARIANCE: • Proposing 20’ building setback along adjacent single-family zoning (south & north parcels), Code requires 25’ building setback. • Proposed masonry screening wall along Hwy 5 is allowed to be within 50’ building setback; Code requires screening to be located outside of building setback. JUSTIFICATION: • Will be providing a 6’ board-on-board wood fence w/ masonry pilasters abutting the adjacent single-family zoning to the north and south with the provided building setback as a part of the unit backyards. Adjacent property to the north is a flag lot with no adjacent homes (just an access drive). Providing masonry screening wall along Hwy 5 frontage (east) within the provided building setback as part of unit backyards. Masonry screening wall provides noise reduction from highway and location relative to the units is intended to provide additional buffer from highway noise. Also, additional 5’ building setback provided along west property line – 15’ required, 20’ provided; 25’ building setback provided along CR423 – 25’ required, 25’ provided; 50’ building setback provided along Hwy5 – 50’ required, 50’ provided. • To provide desired “landscape buffer” along frontage and non-frontage boundaries with fence located in the building setback, canopy tree plantings will be provided in accordance with the “Perimeter Landscape” stipulations below. 2 2221 Lakeside Blvd, Suite 1210, Richardson, TX 75082 NexMetro.com PERIMETER LANDSCAPE VARIANCE: • Required 10’ landscape buffer along adjacent single-family zoning (south & north parcels) able to be within unit backyards, with wood privacy fences allowed in buffer. JUSTIFICATION: • Will be providing a 6’ board-on-board wood fence w/ masonry pilasters abutting the adjacent single-family zoning to the north and south with the required 10’ buffer as a part of the unit backyards. Adjacent property to the north is a flag lot with no adjacent homes (just an access drive). A 10’ buffer outside either screening wall/fence would turn into a “no man’s land” and be cumbersome to maintain especially if adjacent developments had fences installed at property line. Also, additional 5’ yard setback provided along west property line – 15’ required, 20’ provided; 25’ yard setback provided along CR423 – 25’ required, 25’ provided; and 40’ yard setback provided along Hwy5 – 50’ required, 40’ provided. Tree plantings to be provided within unit backyards along north and south property line to appease intent of landscape buffer in addition to screening proposed along all property lines. OPEN SPACE/INTERIOR LANDSCAPE VARIANCE: • Pool, Event Areas, and Open Space areas onsite to be considered 3:1 for required open space requirements – available landscape area onsite that is outside of LS buffer is more than double requirement of Open Space area (not all said landscape area has been included in calculation on concept plan). • Development proposes 10-foot landscape buffer along north and south property lines to be contiguous with abutting unit backyards. JUSTIFICATION: • Pool, Event Areas, and other Open Spaces areas are programmed for usage (grills, fire pits, seating, games, etc.) and not just wide-open spaces. • Additional landscape area is provided ad jacent to NRCS floodplain but not all said landscape area is included in open space calculations. PARKING VARIANCE: • 2 parking spaces per unit included resident and visitor allowance; code required 2/unit for residents and 0.25/unit for visitors. • Proposed covered parking at rate of 50%. JUSTIFICATION • An independent parking study was conducted on existing Avilla developments and yielded a parking demand of 1.85 per unit (resident and visitor). NexMetro commits to provide a minimum 2 spaces per unit but may exceed this ratio once final site planning and engineering occurs. • Parking study is attached as Exhibit A. 3 2221 Lakeside Blvd, Suite 1210, Richardson, TX 75082 NexMetro.com DUMPSTERS VARIANCE: • Dumpster locations will exceed allowed 250’ from each unit. JUSTIFICATION • Development will utilize a valet trash service in which residents will have trash pickup at unit front door 7 days a week. SIGNAGE VARIANCE: • Two signs for development JUSTIFICATION • Development would like to utilize screening wall signage as a part of th e hardscape design, which would flank both sides of main entry at CR423 with another sign option interfacing with the masonry screening wall and/or board -on-board wood fence along Hwy 5. This is to be masonry with metal lettering, consistent with other NexMetro projects. We can provide a picture if necessary. SCREENING VARIANCE: • 6’ board-on-board wood fence w/ masonry pilasters along public ROW. • Ornamental fence along portion of public ROW. • 6’ board-on-board wood fence w/ masonry pilasters along the north, adjacent to a single-family zoned flag lot currently used for an access drive. • Required masonry screening wall to be 6’ in height, located only to the south adjacent to single-family zoning. • 6’ wood fence along the west property line (county). JUSTIFCATION: • Screening is not required along public ROW. In effort to secure development, we propose a mixture of 6’ board-on-board w/ masonry pilasters and ornamental fencing along CR423 and Hwy5. Masonry screening along the south can also have tree plantings in 10’ backyards contributing to screening. Board-on-board fence w/ masonry pilasters along the north can also have tree plantings in 10’ backyards contributing to screening. Northern property line does not abut homes on the single- family zoned property, this portion of flag lot is utilized for an access drive from Hwy5. The distance between the future CR423 ROW back of curb and our property would be utilized as a mixture of trail, landscaping, and screening wall. This would be the best use of land whether dedicated or privately owned. BUILDING SEPARATION VARIANCE: • 8’ Separation between buildings JUSTIFICATION • Buildings construction will utilize NFPA -13D sprinkler requirements and will be minimum of 8’ apart. In reviewing the PD Site Plan, the typical distance between homes is around 10’. The average is even higher. 4 2221 Lakeside Blvd, Suite 1210, Richardson, TX 75082 NexMetro.com EXHIBIT A Item No. 16. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2023 Staff Contact: Salena Tittle AGENDA ITEM: Consider/Discuss/Action on the NexMetro CR 423, Concept Plan. Applicant: Ann Hayslett. SUMMARY: Multiple-family residences on one lot on 24.3± acres located at the northwest corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 423. This concept plan is associated with the zoning case and is contingent upon approval of the zoning case. The purpose of the concept plan is to show the conceptual layout and related site improvements associated with the future multiple-family residential development. The concept plan complies with the Planning and Development regulations as requested by the zoning case. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Financial Impact STATEGIC CONNECTIONS: This item supports the City of Anna Strategic Plan, specifically advancing: Unique STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: If the zoning amendment is recommended for approval, Concept Plan approval shall be subject to City Council approval of the zoning request. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Concept Plan Locator Map 2. Exhibt A - NexMetro CR423 Concept Plan 3. P&Z Application STARS DR COUNTY ROAD 1036 S POWELL PKWYMAVERICK STSLATERCREEKRD DRYCRE E KW A S H FLORENCEWA Y COWBOY WAYABIGAIL LNGENOVEVALNEDWARD ST S RIGGINSSTCUNNINGHAM BLVD COUNTYROAD423Copyright nearmap 2015 Subject Property City Limits ETJ ¯ 0 400 800200 Feet December 2022 H:\Notification Maps\Notification Maps\ Concept Plan - NexMetro CR 423 24.274 Acres ( 1,057,362 Sq. Ft.) Lot 1, Block A EXHIBIT A CONCEPT PLAN - NORTH NEXMETRO CR423 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 1,057,362 Sq. Ft./24.274 Acres S N W E LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A CONCEPT PLAN - SOUTH NEXMETRO CR423 IN THE CITY OF ANNA, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS GRANDERSON STARK SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 798 1,057,362 Sq. Ft./24.274 Acres S N W E LOCATION MAP