HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 2018-11-510 PHDates for Water and Wastewater Impact FeesCITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
2018-11-510
RESOLUTION NO. 40IN / I-- C-4- 11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS, SETTING A
DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PURPOSES OF AMENDING THE CITY'S
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND WATER &
WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES.
WHEREAS, Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code has outlined the procedure for
updating impact fees periodically; and,
WHEREAS, it is desirable to update the impact fees assessed by the City of Anna; and
WHEREAS, an engineering study has been completed on the existing and proposed water
and wastewater infrastructure to meet the needs of the City for future development;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANNA, TEXAS, THAT A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE HELD TO APPROVE
AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, LAND USE
ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPACT FEES, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 395 OF THE
TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
The public hearing will be held at 7:00 pm at 111 N. Powell Parkway, Anna, TX 75409 on
January 8, 2019.
Section 2.
Any member of the public has the right to appear at the public hearing and present evidence
for or against the plan and proposed fees.
Section 3.
A public notice shall be posted for the public hearing meeting all the requirements of Chapter
395 of the Texas Local Government Code for the amendment of impact fees.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Anna, Texas, on this 13th day
of November 2018.
ATTEST: OF A
City Secretary Carrie L. Smith * Ma
RESOLUTION: Set Public Hearing— Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update PAGE 1 OF 1 11/13/18
WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
2018 - 2028
Prepared For
THE CITY OF
manna
Prepared By
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS — TBPE Firm No. 526
DALLAS, TEXAS
September 2018 i * *,A
GARY C. HENDRICI:S 10,...o
;..
-o -. ,9 65226 Q .''�,;
Sc'o,ST �e
NOV
CITY OF ANNA
V14,TER AND 1 I 1
Page No.
I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1
• Table No. I — Historic Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided by City of Anna) ....................................................... 3
Table No. 2 — 2018 -2028 Population Projections
III. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT — WATER AND WASTEWATER ............................... 3
Table No. 3 — LUE for Various Types & Sizes of Water Meter
IV. CALCULATION OF WATER & WASTEWATER — LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS ............ 4
• Table No. 4 — 2018-2028 Water Living Unit Equivalents by Meter Size
• Table No. 5 — 2018-2028 Wastewater Living Unit Equivalents by Meter Size
V. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM......................................................................................... 6
A. Existing Facilities................................................................................................................. 6
B. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects .................................................. 6
• Figure No. 1 — Water Distribution System: Existing Facility Recovery
• Figure No. 2 — Water Distribution System: Capital Improvement Plan
• Table No. 6 — 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan
C. Utilized Capacity................................................................................................................ 1 I
• Table No. 7 — Summary of Eligible Capital Cost & Utilized Capacity Cost
• Table No. 8 — Existing Facility Recovery — Water Lines & Water Facilities
• Table No. 9 — Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Water Lines
• Table No. 10 — Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Water Distribution Facilities
jAcle ac canna\2018-133 w&im impact fee update 20Mreports\03-index.docx - 1 -
Page No.
VI. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. General............................................................................................................................... 16
B. Existing Wastewater System.............................................................................................. 16
C. Proposed Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan.............................................................. 17
• Figure No. 3 —Wastewater Collection System: Existing Facility Recovery
• Figure No. 4 — Wastewater Collection System: Capital .Improvement Plan
• Table No. 10 — 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan
D. Utilized Capacity................................................................................................................ 20
• Table No. I 1 — Summary of Eligible Capital Cost & Utilized Capacity Cost
• Table No. 12 — Existing Facility Recovery — Wastewater Lines & Facilities
• Table No. 13 — Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater Lines
• Table No. 14 — Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater Facilities
VII. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES —
WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM............................................................................. 26
• Table No. 15 — Allowable Maximum Fee Per LUE and Per Meter Size & Type
jAclericaNmma12018-133 w&ww impact fee update 20Mjeports\03-index.docx - !! -
Birk{mff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
CITY OF ANNA
2018-2028 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Anna retained the services of Birkhoff, Hendricks and Carter, L.L.P for the purpose
of updating the impact fees for the water distribution system and the wastewater collection
system. These impact fees are required for funding the construction of specific capital
improvement projects to serve new development. The Table 1 below shows previous maximum
impact fees calculated and the impact fees imposed by the City:
Table 1
Historic Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
2008
2014
2017
2018
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Maximum
Fees
Maximum
Fees
Maximum
Fees
Maximum
Fees
Fee
Imposed
Fee
Imposed
Fee
Imposed
Fee
Imposed
Water
$2,712.50
$2,000
$4,674.00
$2,000
$3,984.89
$3,200
$4,510.14
TBD
Wastewater
$2,643.50
$2,000
$4,610.00
$2,000
$3,999.05
$3,200
$4,078.50
TBD
Since the 2014 and 2017 updates of the Impact Fee, the City of Anna has expanded its water and
sewer service. The Water Distribution System Master Plan and Wastewater Collection Master
Plan were refined in 2017 by Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P., and are consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
In accordance with the requirements of Chapter 395.052 of the Local Government Code, this
impact fee update report reflects the City of Anna's Land Use Assumptions, Water Capital
Improvement Plan and Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan.
Chapter 395, of the Local Government Code is an act that provides guidelines for financing
capital improvements required for new development in municipalities, counties, and certain other
local governments. Based on the most current Master Plan documents for the Water Distribution
and Wastewater Collection Systems; 10-year Capital Improvement Plans were developed to
reflect projected infrastructure needs. The City's Future Land Use Plan was unchanged from the
j:'•clericnhun))&2018J33 urfimv impact fee up hae 2(115`repmlv''•ol-repnr7.doca' lValer and Wasteivuler Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 1 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
previous evaluation, and population growth assumption, provided by the City Planning
Department, was the basis for the maximum impact fees calculated.
The Act allows the maximum impact fee to be charged if revenues from future ad valorem taxes,
and water and sewer bills are included as a credit in the analysis. If not, the Act allows the
maximum fee to be set at 50% of the calculated maximum fee. Calculations herein provide for
the 50% reduction.
The following items were included in the impact fee calculation:
A. The cost of the new infrastructure that is to be paid by the City, including engineering,
property acquisition and construction cost.
B. Existing excess capacity in lines and facilities that will serve future growth and which were
paid for in whole or part by the City.
C. Engineering and quality control fees for construction projects.
D. Interest and other finance charges on bonds issued by the City to cover its portion of the cost.
E. Planning Cost.
The engineering analysis portion of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee evaluation determines
utilized capacity cost of the major water distribution and wastewater collection facilities between
the year 2018 and the year 2028. Facilities in this analysis include, water pump stations, water
storage tanks, water disinfection systems, water transmission lines, water distribution lines,
wastewater lift stations, wastewater collection lines, the Slayter Creek wastewater treatment plant
and the regional water and wastewater systems. The study period is a ten-year period with 2018
as the base year. Impact fee calculations for the water and wastewater systems account for a
portion, or entirety, of costs of new projects required to serve new developments as well as a
portion of the cost of existing infrastructure that is to be utilized to serve new developments.
Growth and usage rates are standardized in calculations by applying living unit equivalency
factors, which in this analysis conform to the latest American Water Works Association
Standards (C700 - C703).
j:lclerJcalam id2018-133 iv env impac{fee uphae 2018�reparlv�04-repm-r.rlocr - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 2 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (BY THE CITY OFANNA)
The City of Anna Planning Department prepared the Land Use Assumptions used for the 2018 impact fee
update, and they were not modified since the past evaluation. A revised 10-year population growth
projection was provided by the City for this update as shown in Table 2
Table 2
2018-2028 Population Projections.
2018
2028
Buildout
Population
13,240
26,045
250,000
% of Buildout
5.3%
10.4%
100.0%
2018 to 2028 Population Growth: 11 96.7% JI
Note:
Population Projections provided by the City of Anna Planning Department
III. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT — WATER AND WASTEWATER
Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires that impact fees be based on a defined service unit.
A "service unit" means a standardized measure of consumption, use generation, or discharge attributable
to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or
planning standards. This update defines a water and wastewater service unit to be a 3/4-inch water meter
and has referred to this service unit as a Single Family Living Unit Equivalent (SFLUE). The SFLUE is
based on the continuous duty capacity of a 3/4-inch water meter. This is the typical meter used for a
single family detached dwelling, and therefore is considered to be equivalent to one "living unit". Other
meter sizes can be compared to the 3/4-inch meter through a ratio of water flows as published by the
American Water Works Association as shown in Table No. 3 below. This same ratio is then used to
determine the proportional water and wastewater impact fee amount for each water meter size.
j:Iclerical'tuu &2018-133 u•&mv impact fee apdaie 20] reparA'01-repot7.docr - IValer and IVastelrater Impacl Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 3 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 3
LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENCIES
FOR VARIOUS TYPES AND SIZES OF WATER METERS
Continuous Duty
Meter Type
Meter Size
Maximum Rate rn)
Ratio to 1/" Meter
Simple
3/a"
15
1.0
Simple
1"
25
1.7
Sim le
1 Yz"
50
3.3
Simple
2"
80
5.3
Compound
2"
80
5.3
Turbine
2"
100
6.7
Compound
3"
160
10.7
Turbine
3"
240
16.0
Compound
4"
250
16.7
Turbine
4"
420
28.0
Compound
6"
500
33.3
Turbine
6"
920
61.3
Compound
8"
800
53.3
Turbine
8"
1,600
106.7
Compound
10"
2,300
153.3
Turbine
10"
2,500
166.7
Turbine
12"
3,300
220.0
I') Source: AiVYVA Standard C700 (1995) - C703 (1996)
IV. CALCULATION OF WATER & WASTEWATER - LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS
The City of Anna provided the existing water meter count by size category as of July 2018. In
total, there were 5,032 water meters serving the existing population of 13,240 residents and
businesses. Table No. 4 shows the number of existing water meters and Single Family Living
Unit Equivalents (SFLUE) conversions. The table also shows the projected meter counts and
SFLUEs for 2028 which were based on the population growth assumption.
Similarly, the City provided meter counts by size of the 4,428 water service accounts that also
utilize the wastewater collection system. Table No. 5 illustrates the existing wastewater account
and SFLUE's.
Using the growth rate provided by the City, water meters and wastewater accounts were
extrapolated to the year 2028. The City's Planning Department projects the population of the
City of Anna to nearly double over the next ten years; anticipating a residential population of
26,045 in 2028.
j:lctericat'annd'201X-133 vfiuv impacifee i p kite 201&),eporly^04-repori.rloc.r - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 4 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
Living unit equivalents were then applied to the water meters and wastewater accounts for 2018
and 2028 resulting in a total number of living units for the beginning and end of this fee period.
The difference in the total number of 2018 and 2028 SFLUE's results in the new living unit
equivalents during the impact fee period.
TABLE NO. 4
2018 — 2028 WATER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS BY METER SIZE
2018
2028
New
Meter Size
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used(a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used (a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
living Units
During
Impact Fee
Period
a/"
4,868
1.0
4,868
9,576
1.0
9,576
4,708
1"
69
1.7
115
136
1.7
226
111
1%:"
11
3.3
37
22
3.3
72
35
2"
56
6.7
373
110
6.7
734
361
3"
23
16.0
368
25
16.0
400
32
4"
4
28.0
112
4
28.0
112
0
6"
1
61.3
61
1
61.3
61
0
Totals
5,032
5,934 IL
9,874
1
11,182
5,248
(a) Source: AWWA Standard C700 (1995) - C703 (1996)
TABLE NO. 5
2018 — 2028 WASTEWATER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS BY WATER METER SIZE
2018
2028
New
Meter Size
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" (a)
Total
Number of
Living
Units
Number
of
Water
Meters
Living Unit
Equivalent
Ratio for
3/4" Used (a)
Total
Number
of Living
Units
Living Units
During
Impact Fee
Period
a/"
4,284
1.0
4,284
8,427
1.0
8,427
4,143
1"
61
1.7
101
119
1.7
199
98
1%:"
10
3.3
32
19
3.3
63
31
2"
49
6.7
329
97
6.7
646
318
3"
20
16.0
324
25
16.0
400
76
4"
4
28.0
99
4
28.0
112
13
6"
1
61.3
54
1
61.3
61
7
Totals
4,428
5,222
8,692
9,909
4,687
j:lclerieal'annd2018-133 u-&-mv impac! fire upekne 2018'repor(s101-repoadoca - lVater and 11'asteivater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Pcrge 5 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks d Carter, L.L.P.
V. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
This update includes additional capital improvement plan (CIP) projects that will tentatively serve
new developments, and modifies previous CIP projects that have since been constructed. The
proposed CIP projects are shown schematically in Figure No. 2, and are summarized in Table
No. 6. Existing facilities, applicable for reimbursement under Chapter 395 of the Local
Government Code are shown in Figure No. 1. Eligible facilities include major distribution lines,
pump stations, treatment facilities, ground and elevated storage reservoirs as well as regional
systems participation. Utilized capacities were based on ten-year growth system demands.
A. Existing Facilities
As of 2018, the City of Anna has participated financially in the construction of the facilities
shown on Figure No. 1, the Existing Facility Recovery Map. These distribution lines and
facilities have capacity to serve new developments, and the portion of capacity expected to be
absorbed by the new developments has been included, as a percentage of the total 20-year
project cost, in the value of the maximum impact fee calculation.
Actual capital costs, including construction, engineering and easements of the various
elements of the existing water distribution system, were utilized where the information was
known. The existing costs of facilities were determined from records provided by the City of
Anna. Where actual costs were not known, an average cost in 2018 dollars was calculated.
B. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects
In order to meet the demands of the anticipated growth over the next 10-years to 2028,
certain water distribution system improvements are required. Figure No. 2 shows the
recommended system improvements and Table No. 6 itemizes each project and the project
cost. These recommended improvements, along with certain existing facilities, form the
basis for the Water System Impact Fee Calculation.
Costs for CIP projects were estimated using average unit costs from projects which have
been bid recently, plus an estimated cost for engineering and easements, and were amortized
to include the additional cost of issuing 20-year bonds at 5% annual interest rate. Projects
determined to involve developer financing were estimated with a lesser unit value. In these
j:lclerical'-annd2018-133 it-&-mv tampactfee ap kile 2018ireportv!104-,-epart(iocr - lValer and YPastewaler hnpacl Fee Updale 2018-2028
Page 6 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
cases, the developer will be responsible for the cost of the first 8-inches and the City will be
responsible for the additional cost associated to construct the larger -diameter line to the size
shown on the CIP exhibit.
j:ldericalann&20ld-133 a-&-mv inipacifee apdau+2018+repals'.01-repnrLdocr Water and Waslewater hnIma Fee Updale 2018-2028
Page 7 of 27
Birkbgf,, Hendricks &Carter, LLP.
FIGURE 1
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY
t
im
�G�AL - j 1 A
"�
UTH PUNT
1 SLOOMDALE
P.S. k G.S.F.
UNP 4TAiIDN
/
1B
THE CITY OF
inn
�
a
WATER DIBTRIBUTION SYSTEM
2018-2028 IMPACT FEE UPDATE
EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY
®LBHO". HFIiDRIM & CARM4 L.LP.
T�vfun FAY•
191UGamdb.Me-. S.,;vao
Davao TMF NlFI O11):Ri-T;+.,i
/"a k.koF M.Sef9-133 ukuv impxtJx kbig+ �.aroa �ndoc.T - Water and Waswaler Impact ree Update 2018-2028
Page 8 oj27
Birkhoff Hendricks & Caner, LLP.
FIGURE 2
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
a V_�
/:�rkrkalmun'-�0l9dii rhwi ifiv pM/r blS�nporN06 �rtdors - Water and IS§-teuaier lln/Mei Rev Update 2018-2028
Page 9 oj27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 6
10-YEAR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Water Lines
Project
Size
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Cost t11
Debt
Service
Total
Project
Cost
Water Line#1
12"
$2,344,650
$1,418,166
$3,762,816
Water Line #2
12"
X
$1,403,400
$848,849
$2,252,249
Water Line #3
12"
X
$421,700
$255,066
$676,766
Water Line #4
12"
X
$632,750
$382,720
$1,015,470
Water Line #5
12"
$1,618,950
$979,225
$2,598,175
Water Line#6
24"
$1,880,800
$1,137,605
$3,018,405
Water Line #7
12"
X
$422,950
$255,822
$678,772
Water Line #8
12"
X
$82,100
$49,658
$131,758
Water Line #9
12"
X
$694,900
$420,311
$1,115,211
Water Line # 10
12"
X
$172,950
$104,609
$277,559
Water Line #12
12"
X
$60,100
$36,352
$96,452
Water Line #13
12"
X
$807,650
$488,509
$1,296,159
Water Line #14
8",1211,16"
$2,149,100
$1,299,887
$3,448,987
Water Line #15
1211,16"
$2,105,080
$1,273,261
$3,378,341
Water Line #17
12"
X
$165,700
$100,224
$265,924
Water Line #19
12"
X
$255,000
$154,237
$409,237
Water Line #20
12"
$2,623,200
$1,586,647
$4,209,847
Water Line#21
12"
X
$1,017,500
$615,437
$1,632,937
Water Luie #22
12"
$996,000
$602,432
$1,598,432
Water Line#23
12"
X
$1,403,150
$848,698
$2,251,848
Water Line #24
24"
$1,282,800
$775,904
$2,058,704
Water Line#25
12"
X
$633,800
$383,355
$1,017,155
Water Line#26
16"
X
$117,950
$71,342
$189,292
Water Line #27
18"
X
$1,776,330
$1,074,416
$2,850,746
Water Line#28
18"
$1,424,685
$861,723
$2,286,408
Water Line#29
18"
$1,718,465
$1,039,417
$2,757,882
Water Line #30
12"
X
$162,450
$98,258
$260,708
Water Line #31
18"
$15146,260
$693,317
$1,839,577
Water Line #32
12"
$895,350
$541,554
$1,436,904
Water Line #33
12"
$226,500
$136,999
$363,499
Water Line #34
12"
X
$65,200
$39,436
$104,636
Water Line #35
12"
$585,000
$353,838
$938,838
Water Line #36
12"
X
$380,100
$229,904
$610,004
Water Line #37
12"
X
$217,400
$131,495
$348,895
Water Line #38
12"
X
$228,250
$138,057
$366,307
Water Line #39
16"
X
$192,990
$116,730
$309,720
Water Line #40
16"
$690,030
$417,366
$1,107,396
Water Line #41
12"
$154,950
$93,722
$248,672
Water Line #42
16"
X
$407,120
$246,247
$653,367
Water Line #43
18"
X
1 $482,460
1 $291,817
1 $774,277
Subtotal: Water Lines
1 $34,045,720
$20,592,613
1 $54,638,333
j: Werlcat anna12018-133 "&"w to pacr fee update 2ONreporr004-reporr.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 10 of 27
Birklroff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
Utilized Capacity
The portion of City -funded project costs that may be reimbursed by impact fee revenue is
relative to the portion of facility capacity that is anticipated to be absorbed by new
developments during the fee period. This portion, or utilized capacity, was determined for
existing facilities and for proposed CIP projects. For existing facilities, available capacities
were found under current, 2018, demands, and were compared to the available capacity
remaining under the predicted 2028 demand scenario. The difference in available capacities,
by percentage, was applied to the 20-year total project cost to determine the allowable
recovery dollar amount. The same procedure was utilized to determine utilized capacity
during fee period for proposed CIP projects, however, in this case, the 2018 demand is null.
Table No. 7 below summarizes project costs and utilized costs over the impact fee period,
2018 — 2028, for each element of the Water Distribution System. The utilized capacity for
each water distribution facility, both existing and proposed, is presented in detail in Impact
Fee Capacity Calculation Table No. 8 through Table No. 10.
TABLE NO. 7
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST & UTILIZED CAPACITY COST
Water Sys to w
Total 20-Year Project Cost
($)
Utilized Capacity Dwing
Fee Petiod
($)
Existing Water Facilities
$35,380,857
$17,519,298
Planning Expenses
$94,000
$94,000
Existing Water System Subtotal:
$35,474,857
$17,613,298
Proposed Water Lines
$54,638,333
$21,378,225
Proposed Water Facilities
$15,567,062
$8,345,229
Proposed Water System Subtotal:
$70,205,395
$29,723,454
TOTAL:
$105,680,252
$47,336,752
Notes:
r (1) Opinion of Cost includes:
a) Fngineei's Opinion of Construction Cost
b) Professional Services Fees (Survey, Engineering, Testing, Legal)
c) Cost ofEasement or Land Acquisitions
(2) Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 5%
(3) Planning Egnense includes current and all past impact fee evaluations.
j:lderic•al'an))&2018-133 ir&inv impaci fee ipekne 2018,.reporl.v'04-repor•l.docr - }rater and Uastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page I I of 27
Birkho/f, Hendricks & Carter, LLP.
TABLE NO. 8
EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY - WATER LINES & WATER FACILITIES
MIe
".1i
Tad
[Sryc11J
(JICJSI(a) Dale a(('auL
Taal (3)i1il
C'a,(S)
20 yearlXLL
Senlce li=
Sh ehaler.1
Tah1301'ear
Iti
Cm15)
,IGD9r
J16 1111hed11
d
F
41,
tlilhrd(lb dl
2018
2029
Itning
Fee Pi
2013
2028
❑ it
Fie Pod
3UI3
2a23
Mang
lee redact
Ecislin \Valedine
Facility
]A"1B
0_
1.25
275
155:
IitP♦
95!'
SI]2a5O
3173,fi10
Si
SI, 11Jj96
595',
SArq.
t'1:\L\TrratrJ Sur4.<\l'alar SS,Irm - BlmmJalet:SR
3.23 103 1 $700,000 SJ2l,3Y, Sl,i2U
Satlaal: Is HIS STag000 3J25J96 51,121,1
Fabtir \Valcrline Faeilit' 1C
05'>
321
2.75
15!i
JO!.
13%
SI87,6[J
3181,6N
SL219,637
SI 119,6Y')
SI.0320U
SI,OI;OU
L'c)UTrutee S.M. \\'aln3)atem-Treated Me, 1.10, ❑.,
3.21 JNr3 $760,000 -, 107 S1319,63,
Satlaal: }15 100J S)60,000 SJMm, 51,319,60)
ETbtin Waterline Facility 2A
OW
n1
2
U:
53!:
53%
S0
SO
SI_rW,336
SI 500 V6
SLi005
SI.SOO,"
Suuth hte Rlnt- PS
JIn NOS $1,700,000 SI.02$2J8 S27Ja2
Satlaal: 100 lO4 $1,)00,000 51,02a,?18 Si
Fabtin Waterline Facility 2B
01a1
Oki
0.
U.
53l:
$31
S
SO
SI.2SISSI
$.,WAS,
S1.2ami
SI,Iffi,d91
S.Ih T.te Wim - GSR
LSO Jk)5 $1,500.000 1911_r70 S2J022
31 1: i_V 2005 51.W,000 S%7,31i SS,J07,1
F,sisting Waterline Facility
Olr:
2 il
225
01
Wi
W
Y
$N'2301
"7_50I
5197,SM
3J9] W
I8' \It From S.mh Tate ri 1. FJI JC5
a50 1 Nos 1 $620,000 S375-04 S9)5,0
S.tla N: 1:0 2003 562g000 SJ75,aon S"-"
atiB Watcdlnc Facia V.,
O10
ON
0
IOU:
I0:04
U'
M911
5962911
S)62911
Si
5
5
1\'eat \fell & Q%R
030 2001 $G00,000 56291I SY�911
SuMaal: al0 SOai 1600,Oa0 5561,911 596;911
E.isting \Vatedino F-iliky5
035
030
0.1
7U:
Ifxr
aft
SKI,6S0
$%I,699
SW14X
3802.J16
S2J172
S3Jg7
aen Will lsr
050 lay $500,000 SV)2,JM S301
S.tla N: aSO 20ae S-e00w 5302,116 Si
ETbtin Waterline Facili' 6A
0.91
091
Off
RU:
10'A:
U
SI.fi01,S2
51,601RS1
31,601,85E
51.60J,831
A
S
South -yaOn S)etem-\I'mer Helh
091 2001 $1,OOf3000 SbN,S2 SIb31,a5
SU1taa1: a91 2003 MAK000 S60J,M 1.,6MYSI
ETbtin Waterline Facility'6B
_
U35
0.11
Xf:
IOU:
3e.'
SR9,7ai
S$,7ai
S
S Z-1
S 2--
525E
52s2i-
Somh (0a)..n Sp--.35 \IG mr
0.35 3105 $525,000 SI),53] 38JZ117
Svtlail: O35 2005 512t000 S3tl,5J) SBJi.yJ'I
&0bn Waterline Facilits' 6C
-
-
-
5!:
JU:
JS!
SS,02J
S8,03J
564t91
36J,19J
S6,lX
5141
SwW Ih.)aee Snlrm -CC\ ,4ea
I.00 SVS $300,000 S60,J85 SIfA,J55
svtlaal: 1.00 ]Wli 5100,000 Si 5160.ay.
Eabtin Waterline FacOih' 7
001
p
0':
IOUi
10R'
S0
SO
Si
SJ10,970
Si
W!O.
S.vth lt'ell Surfan \\'aaer
0.50 NIJ $200,000 SIS),9A S3;
Satlaal: a50 SaU SE00,000 SI?0,9M 5J30,9
Existing Waterline Facility 8
0.
I r,
11<
U.
IOU:
hi
5n
SO
S136LIN
31361,12J
3136L12J
SI?6L12J
\.nh & t\'eat \\ll Sarfa,e tl'Ner
1. a3 3uJ $A50,000 S11y12J 51361:EJ
Sahtr.l: L]5 SOIJ SY'L.000 331J,13J 31361,12J
EA,iting Waterline Facility 9
021
OJ:
f
3!:
IU:
5!'
S_i,Tn
$2s. M
Si17IU
SrO,)10
S2t9Jl
SM911
II. Av edl.e
Satlaal:
J.M NI6 SA"* SIt3U SI3i73
1100 ?016 M05,300 S183,J33 SJ86.712
Existing \Valeditle Facility 10
OX)
I,U
030
7U:
IOP.:
3U'
S2929,
52929.11J
SJ,ISS,301
SJ,ISt30J
31,255,591
SI,SSSaII
Ilaahhrty 6T-1.0\Ili
I W NIb $2.607,907 S1317,191 SLIas,33
Satlaal: 1.00 1016 3260),00] 51317.39) '-t & J
ETblin R'alcdille Facilit'II
-
-
0'i
10!.
IU'
90
30
W.W
Ltl,lU
SR24
Sag1U
unmrrm9.
R/A NI6 SSOOffA S102J26 Sn12J..
Satlaal: N/A ]016 SS - 3302J26 La ,421
Fsistin \\'atedine Facility 12
O0)
I'll
If.'�
U:
[or.
IOU
9)
SO
SL1ll.631
Sr,201,6J9
$IS1363.
31,2W;.1
Initial South Fump5ta0o.
I.fn N16 $750,000 S453,f 5130143'
Satlaal: I.W 2016 SiSJCI,G59 s1,Sm,U
EStstin \Vaterline Facility 13
O1y3
125
12
U:
W:
W'
9)
S0
19ll.352
39y,551
S91ll5
5933351
South Di,WLunen Il.. From \lent ivd, MI (aDLI)
2N '�16 $1, 163,163 $70341 51,866
Satlaal: 230 1016 SI,IfJ,lf� S]a141 Sr,S66,7d
E blip \\'ateLne Facility 14
0iy1
I.It
1.13
t
451.
_
1P.
9)
SO
5853513
SSCSSII
SSSS511
Satt313
ti,o\l'c0 \1'Ner Due .rune f-ii, Ilahlerty In. trot
250 N101la $1,384,620 5116.i19 SI,011.13
Satlaal: 250 6 SI,IW,610 5716519 51,901,1
ETbtin WatiI ine Facility 15
061
110
I.I�i
V',
>
33!'
91
SO
S2A121
?•N1,111
&NI1I
$r i11
1"S. ]S Parallel D'aar Dne N.ieh.(FSLJ3 .DM)
2d1 Will $3211- 5195875 Si]5
Satlaal: 200 3016 S2m.)" 219ag)5 S311 .
Eybtin \\'atedine Facility 16
ON
1.10
1.1
Ui
53!'
S5!'
S)
SO
SI,6171111
SI,07,070
51,617,
21,M'Ir
t'S �]311raIIN \Pater IlOe 3nulh of F.3L JCS
200 N16 $],900,000 SI,IJ9,218 S.W9,21
Satlaal: 20U 2016 51,900,000 SI,IJ9,SI8 5/,019,51
ESbtin N'atnline Facility 17
00)
1.10
I.i
O'.
55'.
9i
SO
SI.fi7,31
31,197,351
SI,fi7213
31,14I,2V
Fi,l-\\'eat \131er Lne alOn3l\eat FOner (w DE\')
200 NI6 $I,JH),NN 5553,917 $2155611
-.-A: L00 1016 3LJ69,69I SMtl,9J) 51,39WJi
Eylsti \\'a1ed01e Facili ' 18
0Ai
1.10
I.I0
1,
55ti
55!'
So
SO
SI,116.796
SI, 116,795
SI,116
S.14
\1'a4, D.e for L-.RJS] (w.D11)
'_ai N16 $1,265,250 17h3L9 520J033
Satlaal: 100 1016 SLiSti.SO 376,t1a'J 31,0J0,9
Ecislin \\'atcrline Facility 19
011)
L11
I.It
55'.
35!
9)
SO
s7.16,121
SiSatlaal:
3195,1m
Meter Dee '11. RmamouJ rLUy. Iw.DE\)
200 N16 $901,950 S515,5J6 SI.aLI,J
300 1016 '1S--- SI,JJ),J
Existing Waterline Facility 20
OA)
I.IO
I.la
w.
J5!:
J3!.
S
SO
52J6,9S7
52461
S24VA
S146i4e
200 20I6 $3d2,t700 S3)5,839 SJS
Svtagal: 100 ]Of6 SJI.OaO Si06.859 S5Jg9.
ETblin \Vatedine Facilit'2t
00)
it
1.1
U:
53!i
SS!'
SO
SO
S?J2292
1.2,191
S2J2_
SiJ2192
200 N16 $27d,500 SI66,01 SJJO.SJ
Satlaal: 200 ]Ot6 3311300 31 1 SJJO,Si1
Water Facilities - ProjectCIPTotal
S22,046,1841 S13,334,6731 S35,38n-9%71
J 57,043,2341
Si
S17,519,2981
j:4 krlrarmmn12029-f33 xk,nr imp,rlJreipkle SOl3tnparli 0!•rtpnrt does - Water andWinteR'arer Impact fee Update 2018-2028
Page !2 of 27
Birkllof,, Hendric'2s & Carter, LLP.
TABLE NO. 9
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPRO17ENIENT PLAN - WATER LINES
•.4r..zzr Coa roar o,e n,,.:a t, )n)s dorv,:.,,t„ or�,:,a;:: n,.f.,ad a.wla:ktr, 243:lorrozlm�<,hz o ar.,rr
D
LL•mificmi�m
Irngth
Fc)Inches
Dienrel.•r
Ikteloper
Partici pion
Alg. tfilt Cmt
S/R
To1W GIi1W
Casl
30 \4ar be
Service r-5;4
SIm a lnleresl
TotW20Year
Pn,jert
Cuxt ISI
(%
UtilmdCa cfh
(S) tk1li.edCf..1ly
21115
2018
During
Fee l?"ial
2018
21128
Met g
Fee I'criad
Water
Line #1
J'.o
I5•:
IS':
S)
SU
S561.422
S564,422
5561.422
S56I,422
12" wakr line dung (WHO (lute, Lmp and FAL455 m South plant
S uhe,lil:
13,IS)I
:"fill
12
S15)m
$1 t47,65J
52,3J{6N
SI.41$166
SI,JI$166
S3.7628I
S_ 762A1
Water Line #2
12" water IN, - ):\L 455 emohen, of is Smppng
hack to Sit S sresf o/CR 419
iuMutil:
9,I51
6m
9,761
12
12
X
SlS ()U
SiOA)
St372950
Sm,450
51,403,400
S$30A31
SISA 18
ma,A49
S2203,J81
S18&1A
S2,112,24`
n'�
0'-
W.
II°:
11"
II!:
Sd
S)
50
_ _SM2372
S5,375
S247,747
S2a237_
S5.373
S247,741
Wsuer
Line #3
12^ mlerline n,ah of the outer lane, eImg CR42-1
Subtalil:
2673
406
3,079
12
12
X
S150.0)
S50 O1
S101,700
S20.0m
5121,7m
S242969
S12097
S253,066
W4,
S72097
S676,766
0'.
0`:
15•:
15°:
15!'
15•.
S0
So
so
5%.700
S4,815
$101,515
S>o,7m
S4.815
Slol"l
Water
line 44
le
W.
235i
2HL
--
2Y.'
211
----
a)
SI
SO
5159;)OI
'73,657
5233,1V
SI59,901
S73.657
12" Rite, llne north or the Outer lmit toln,bAtma('rwing
Suhdi4Am
subtotal:
2889
3.991
6879
12
12
X
SISO.m
S50.A)
SI33,2W
S199.550
so ,750
S'Ji_^,022
SID),698
5392720
1611,
"21,241
SI,III$J70
Water
Line 45
n';,
1I'.
131'
SO
So
S137.763
S11',]61
S337,763
$337,7
12" merline rdlaxing RS116, east offi.P.Rlt
SuMolal:
IO,N3
10,79J
I2
51.S0.m
51.61$95J
SI,fiIBy50
SY792'S
S977j25
52,593.175
S2y9Y,1]?
:Pater Line #6
itki'.,
Ifxi•,
Si
SO
S3,018.405
S3,0184ws
S3,01k,[W
S3,013,405
24",-h-sawth mterline along CR369,fmn, Sad, Gei)-',NoNrflantImatda
Suhm1W:
9,4M 24
9,JW
S200fA
51,XWI$W
51,eA0,8m
SI,137,(A5
31,137,603
S3,aI$4U5
S3,01Q40.
Water Line #7
U':
0
61',
S0
s0
S427,626
5427,626
--
SI27A26
SA127,6110
12' north -south mterline fia T,)ioe Dhd h,outerImp
SuMolil:
$4c9
$J39
12
X SSOm
S422930
S"]lm%
S255,822
S253e22
S67$772
S67$773
Water Line #8
W:
SO
$O
S126A20
SUIS,6110
12^mterline rvnuhgamth f Tayim Not. anaS.d, Rrgusm Hvy. to 0uter1mp
16!:
S126,620
S12(S620
Sowo.l:
L612
I,W2
12
X S30.m
5321m
$821m
519,658
SJ9,659
SIJ 1,75
SIJI.7W
W.,
:Pater line 09
0•.^
W:
93`4
Y3•..
vie:
03'•
SO
SO
SO
-
SX)7,037
- -
S907.037
5125.W9
12",can-nestuater line fmm S.P.R.R. mSIa}2er('m,k,,mth
of Tasf-lard
SaM,h1:
4.069
I,b)l
5,7m
12
12
SI5001
$610350
4,550
S69J,900
S369,171
S3I12Uf ,IJ0
S11
SY79.521
SIJ3.6A
SI, I15,2I1
3125,6/9
31432,(A6
SIAMM6
Water
Line 410
p•,X
So
WM9
12" mlerline WmeTa310r 01ad hemeen t1S. 75 vr,d S. Feet,000 Pksry.
BuMatil:
90
SI725
SWH
SIM,6H
5277,5-'
7v
S63,$M
SMA3344S39912
Water Line 411
Not used
Water Line 412
211.
-
21•
__-
S0
S2,li5
S20,LS:
Miss
S20,2_
12" Hater I(nr along ('11I106 betmen Dumn Dr. and CR426
.S'u6Mhl:
1.202
1,202
12
X SY)m
I I
Sm.lm
S60,Im
£+!y{52
Sibj52
S)6.452
596,152
Water Line #13
W.
0::
52r1
Sri
52
._
10
Sl
Su
S6i2180
521.823
S674,.3
S632180
521.873
- � -- S674,
12" mterline Wmg C.R J26, Smth (rwn ('R l lm to near Camden Falk SuhOsSsim
Sub6uW:
5,210
521
�733
12
12
X
S150m
S50.0)
S781,5m
526150
SA071650
S472692
515,8I7
SI8$5m
S1,2$4,192
SI1,96
51,2%15
Wales,
Line #14
0•:
IN
p:
62•:
26%
2y!:
6r."
26.4
297
so
S)
5O
SO
S147.759
$127.557
S76$8t8
S1,061,134
SI47,759
- S127,357
A", 12^ @ 16" nncr lino Wmg 311 S south fnm CR ❑m and
mt8nuingmm rem
Sb near lligh aehad
Subtotal:
1,491
2m8
9.970
13,493
8
12
to
Slm.m
S150.m
SI7U.00
S14$Sm
S103,7m
51,694,900
14149,100
S&w'
518J,927
S233a
$490,601
S27213u D
S3,44$93
S1,025,163
S1,299,887
S788,a[$
SIA64,134
%Vale,
Line 415
0'•�
:
44',
J-I'•
441'
44°'
S)
S0
S0
SI,00,416
12^ & 16- Haler Iines.hng Rnsanwnd, Heil of S11 S and mming
amlh m CR370
SI,000,/16
Subtotal:
9,1tt
4,W9
13,494
12
16
SI50.m
5170.m
S1,416,7SO
S68"30
S2,1o5,030
)y56,924
$4 1A-3
51,273,261
S2.273.674
31,104,66
S337$311
SIKOS1
SIM6,470
S186,054
S1,486,47
W'atc
r Line 416
Not used
\Valet Lin, 917
t
S3'o
13'.
S)
SO
_ _ SL+0,717
S220,717
--_-_ - S220,717
12^mlerline dmg l.S. 75. moth o(t'I(3]J
Sukahl:
31I4
3}IJ
12
X SNI.m
SI65,70U
II S' 00
SIIY)rbi
S100,224
5265.924
S2&%924
S220,71
Water Line #18
Not used
Water Line 419
W.
25',
2P,
S')
SO
----
S102.309
5102,309
Q",nanlr-south mterline batmen wear MaammdPkwS'. and Cltl7l,westd\{'est\fell
_-
S102MM
SI
ti ufu�In:
5,100
Sim
12
X S50.00 $255,000
sw000
SI54,137
SI.4,237
Slo"2
W9,23
Water Line #20
63%
631
S9
SU
$4632,204
S2,652,2W
12" mlerline tntedng4mem Inlened0 CR 290 and('R288 to CR284and U.S. 75
0S4
S2652,2W
SuMoeil:
17,48S
17,488
12
SISrI.W
52623,X)0
526--
SI,SSti,W7
SI,.CS6W7
S4,20).94
"209,PA
S2,652,
Water Line H21
-�-
Jra
Jr:
-
4r'
Jr
S0
Stl
SI66.7W
5219.U0
-----------
SI6004
-_ 5219.130
12"mterline r-Ald mCR36AandM2g4mstofUS. 75,frum(R3'OmCR2s4
SuMoeW:
4,616
6302
11,118
12
12
X
SI5000
SA3m
56924m
5325.Im
51,017,Sm
Stl$T))
5196,637
S6MS437
3i.l1I,19
1.11u3
SI.M.
0%
05:
SO
S�SB31SMAN
f1tk,kafmmo120J3-J33 x'kuv i l-I f,Y uphh 20J5+ jai Ol-r poK - Mater and Washrit-ter llniva Fee lWafe 2018-2028
Page 13 of 27
Blrkhoff Hendricks & Cater, L L A
TABLE NO. 9 (Continued)
Ircnt t7nYMfa urt MreJ,n 2019 MVO unkn ne6ervix nJYureJunJlr,:lY4s 20i: h.:n¢m<ennz
ISne
I,knlircathn
length
FL)
Dianzt<r
nehes4
DrSelsryer
Parllci tin.
JAag. Lint C,ttt
1R
TahlC rU.1
Cml
S
2O Ytar DeH
Srn`cr'if 5•.6
Slm etnln'nl
T-1120 Year
PraJoct
Cast S
Lhllirra CauciM
(S) LBilired Cv h)
2018
2028
During
Fe<Perind
2018
2028
During
Pet NOW
IY
15',
SO
so
111911
S719,295
S719.25
S719,293
Water Line #22
12",rut-rest xaler Iine Iz:x<rn CR 36Y and ('R370 to CR 2W and (-R 288
BuM,dil:
6040
664o
i2
$Iw.w b)96.Ow
A�C
SI,59811
SSA432
p
Water Line#23
J
r
f±
So
S315,259
S315,259
S315,L
12^ mterlinu aaaninasauth dlvxpued xretem T-02 BT
SuMotil:
28.063
2tl,06t
1
SSOw I S
SI,,I
X .,
5848,698
S2i5I.Jt18
,
Water Line #24
P,
S',
Sl
so
$164.696
S164,696
SI6.6M
24^ xatrr line eumlina xcst fmm 5mtl, Gta)sm a \nrtls flans In near 1?5. 75
5udutil:
64
441
s2w.0S1,2828
,222dw
TX
$77S904
S2O8
sOS704
Water Line #25
01:
5
551:
9)
50
-
S559,435
SSS9,435
555�)4)i
S5511,434
12^, nonh-axulh hater line, g-Ml3' pnlld la ald eut ufl'.5.7$ Iztxeen C'R371 and FAL 4-45
Suheohl:
12.676
i676
12
X S1010 S633,9a0
563J,Ro0
S83355
S.183355
SI,OI7,135
51,017,IS
Water Line 026
SO
SO
-
----SI5.IJ1
SI5,143
SI5.111
515,143
16' xaterllnr a<naina (C$. 75 vt C'R371
suMalil:
1,683
1,(d5
IG
); S7o00 S117,9w
5II7950
$7I 3J2
$71.i42
5189,29E
3187,29'
Water Line 427
Oti
2Sll
25!:
So
S71;687
S712,697
>71?r•�7
S'I_',i.'ti
18" xalrrltne a1ma6uu,<x<sl<m Cdlln C k, Dulrrls .dnarthh CR295-
Suhahi:
20,89%
L1,891
IN
x S85a)
S1,776330
51,77r,33n
51,07J,J 16
S1,074,4 6
S�Sw,l4
S2,M,746
Water Line#28
W.
':
4Y:
SO
s0
S1,028
S1,028,8
S1,028,894
$;97888401
19^inter Iine a,ndnua0m, along fuhrr xcshm C'dlin C'oanb' Outer Iwa nest of S.H.5
Mbw.l;
7,01 IS
7.7
S185.00
S1,,4244,65
5426
SM 1,,727
M61
S228:.0
$;296,
Water Line#29
iP!
151+
0-1
S•i
I
S1,241!N7
S1 24LO47
SI.241.017
11.241,114.
18n xalrr line dma F.SL 4S5 b-- the meek near Cn 4191anrar S.IL 121
S uGrntd:
9,219
9,2Y9
IS
S1851a1
S1,71S165
51,719,J65
$1,039,4I7
SI,039.417
S2,731.81
S2,757,882
Water Line 930
0':
4r'=
Yi',
Y1
SO
SM367
swkm7
S2ri1,5G7
SVII,56.
12" interline dma 8.I1. 5 and CR423,awlh of F.SL 4S5
SuMotil:
3.249
3,249
12
X Mao
SI6;4w
S16;450
S9S258
S9812S8
M,71
S260,708
Water Line #31
0!i
40!.
40!.
S0
SO
s7 . S31
5'35;'UI
184-h P-7S8
Suhlntil:
41v6
6,196
I%
S18511
SI, 146260
1:1 An
5693,317
5693,317
s1,&19.57
S1,819,57
S715,a31
5735,R31
Water Line #32
0•:
455i
JS!:
SO
SO
5�Jl C.t)i
SC.16,417
124nd, PbiO, P4i11, P4M7
SUMuhI:
S9n9
�969
12
Slw*1
S895Jw
589�350
5311.sS!
S41,S54
51.4369w
51,136y0J
S646607
$w607
Waterline 433
wm_i
_ Iw'
SO
So
M,499
S1644"
_
M3,4'
S30,
INnrh P-931
Sumot.l:
I,>I0
0
12
Sou W
$
SI3G999
SJ63,4
Water Line #34
fi`.,
lai'i
SIw,6
SJUAM
124nds PA28
SUMOtil:
I,Jw
1,3w
12
X SSO.W 565 xJ)
5652w
539.d:W
519,4M
SIw,6
5104
100!'
SO
so
Slw,hi6
S104,636
Water Line #35
,
,-
73'
S7
SO
S7w,129
4129
S7w.1
S704.1
124nd, P-742
sulvotal:
3.9a)
3,900
12
SISQM
5385.nW
SM5,a0o
5353.131
S153"
$978839
5938935
Water Line #36
I
li•.
Is-
YJ
SO
-_- S911501
59 AI
591,301
S91,501
124nds P+241'-790, P-M
5uMalil:
7,602
7,60E
12
X SAIw 538U,Iw
5380,100
5229,)w
5229,9JJ
5610,001
S6ID,Ow
Water Line #37
(P.
15'1
1P.
s0
$0
--
S3;334
3521134
_
S31334
SS2-134
124nd, P409
SuMn19:
4.348
434Y
12
1 X S50011S±17.4
S217,400
Sll1A95
S131,495
5145995
534YJ1 -
Water Line 038
0!:
15!:
131:
SO
So
S54.916
55{9J6
S54,946
S54,
12-Ind1 J-723, X727
suMam:
4,363
y565
I±
X Sw.a)
S=50
S228,M
S138,057
S138,057
516630
&W07
Water Line P39
0%
SO
So
S46458
s46r4®
S4643
w4sa
164nd1 P-w
SuMahl:
2757
I X757
Ifi
1 X I SN.00 S19;9W
5192,990
S1167313
$116,730
5309.
S309,720
15ti
13%
Water Line #40
o•,
_.
25'.
SO
SO
S276849
5276,8J9
5276,84
52
164.,h P-S38
SuMahl:
4b59
4.051
16
1 S170.0,1
S.W1'.i
SC,W,3o
$4)7366
S417,366
S1,107.39(
S1,1073
Water Line 941
23`4
25!:
SO
SO
S6;168
S62.168
S62,I6
SQ,168,
Suhhlil:
3.019
3.O:
12
$win SI SJ;1vl
SISJ,9.
153.72E
S93,722
S241,671
S248,672
Water Line #42
'
13%
is`:.
S)
S0
S98,tl33
593,005
M005
S93,0)5
164nd, P-769
euM=bl:
s,816
5816
16
X 570.0o
$4o7,I20
$J07,110
$2462J7
52442J7
S653.36i
S653,36'
Water Line #43
I5.-A
-
151:
SO
SI 14142
1116.14E
S116 I4_0
SI11,142&d,
PA28, MCA
_ 6
5 ,
S4914
7
ASudotil:
S774,±77
$7747iSeJ6
Water lines - CIP Total
TOTAL 1299,2251 1$34,045,7201$20,592,6131$54,638,333
121,378,225
$21,378,225
Pagtl:Rcfercnw to Wa4erSyatenalJlcr lMan Mrp•W attrtinc NWrStr _ j _ _ i i
IAgB:R<fercnu to WalaSvatemklmkrflan Map-Nudt Nuni,n �',
'X•: Q:rcbperPad'eipvli0n ! __ _ �__ _ _ i _ � _ _�_
J'kk.ka/mun'.±0!$ li3 ukw lmryzff.'t ,pLsk 2o131npnrfi 0l n<pnrl - Water and WnsteWater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 14 of 27
Birk-hoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 10
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WATER FACILITIES
• Areraee Unit costs are Rased in 2018 dollars unless othendse indicated and includes• 209a for ennineerine and easements.
Pipe
Number
Total
Capacity
(MG/i1IGD)
Total Capital
Cast (S)
20 Year Debt
Semiee a 5%
Simple blterest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost (S)
(MGD or MG) Utilized
Capaeity
4ilizedCa ci '
(S) Utilized Ca iacity
2018
2028
During
sec
Period
2018
2028
During
Fee Period
2018
2028
During
Pee Period
1 MG EST
0.00
0.75
0.75
09'u
80%
80%
$0
So
$3,851,644
53,851,644
$3,851,ti44
53,851,644
Subtotal•
L00
1.00
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$1814555
51:814:555
$4,814,555
54,814,555
South Punt Puml) Station Exl)aws ion
0.00
1.00
1.00
0°•0
20%
20 %
$0
SO
$481,456
$481,456
$481,456
$481,456
Subtotal:
5.00
5.00
$ I, 500,000
51,500,000
$907,278
5907,278
$2,407,278
52,407,278
CGNIA Sherman Connection
0.00
2.00
2.00
0?,.
10°/
10%
SO
So
$160,485
$160,485
$160,485
$160,435
Subtotal:
N/A
N/A
1 $1,000,000
$1,000,000
1 $604,852
$604:852
$1,604,852
$1,604,852
CGN1A Blooindale Pump Station
0.00
2.00
2.00
0%
1090
10%
$0
$0
$320,970
S3205970
$320,970
$320,970'
Subtotal
N/A
NIA,
I $2,000,000
$1,209703
$1,209:703
$3,209,703
53,209,703
South Grayson Tale Point - 1.5 MGD Punlp
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.50
1.io
0.50
09%
011.
100%
100%
1(H)%
100%
$0
$o
$0
SO
$2,407,278
$2,407,278
$1,123,396
51,123,396
52,-107278
52,407,27E
$1,123,396
SI,123,396
ISO $1,500,000 $907,278 $2,4107,278
Subtotal: 1.50 51,500,000 $907,278 $2,407,278
South Grays on Take Point - 0.5 GSR
0.50 $700,000
Subtotal: 0.50 5700,000
$423,396
5423,396
$1,123,396
$1,123,396
Water Facilities
- CIP Total
$5,867,062
S15,567,062
-T-]
=1
$0
1$9,700,000 $8,345,229
$8,345,229
J:IclerlcallannaU018-133 a-&uw i pacifee update 20181reporlr104-repori.doex - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 15 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks d Carter, L.L.P.
VI. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
General
At this time, based on projections provided by the City, the City of Anna will approximately
double in population over the ten-year period. The most significant growth, that affects the
wastewater collection needs of the City, will occur in the Slayter Creek Basin, along the US
75 corridor, east of SH 5 and along Hurricane Creek west of US 75.
The wastewater collection system is partially in place to serve the new development. The
existing Slayter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), as well as the Point Of Entry
(POE) to the NTWMD system, provide treatment for the sewage. Conveyance from the new
developments to these existing facilities will be required. The City of Anna's flow is
metered at the W WTP and at two Points of Entry into the regional NTMWD lines.
New developments in certain areas of the City will require wastewater lift stations and force
mains to convey sewage towards the existing collection system
A. Existing Wastewater System
Figure No. 3, the Existing Wastewater Facility Recovery Map, shows projects that have been
constructed in part by the City, and are eligible for some financial recovery. Summaries of
major project undertakings for the City are listed below.
• Throckmorton Creek 21-inch Collection: In approximately 2003, the City staff
entered into a contract to construct approximately 4,500 linear feet of 21-inch PVC
collection line. This facilitated the construction of single family homes adjacent to
FM 455. It also picked up flow from the commercial development located at the
intersection of US 75 and FM 455.
• Slayter Creels 24-inch Collection Line: In approximately 2005, the City staff entered
into a contract to construct approximately 7,000 linear feet of 24-inch PVC
collection line. This facilitated the construction of single family homes in the Slayter
Creek basin north of FM 455.
• Clemmons Creek Point of Entry: In approximately 2005, the City staff entered into a
joint contract with the City of Melissa to construct a 15-inch regional sanitary sewer
collector line. The existing line terminated approximately one-half mile south of the
j: (clerical=annd2018-133 ++Au a impact fee update 2018'reporly'104-a•eparrdocr - IValer and fMastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 16 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
City of Anna City Limit lines. Around 2016, this line was extended into the City of
Anna to facilitate growth east of SH 5.
® Throckmorton Creek Point of Entry: In approximately 2009, the City staff entered
into a joint contract with the City of Melissa to construct a 21-inch regional sanitary
sewer collector line. A large percentage of the projected growth will be conveyed to
the Throckmorton Creek POE.
B. Proposed Wastewatei- Capital Improvement Plan
Figure No. 4 illustrates the proposed wastewater system improvements based on meeting the
10-year, future demands of new developments for the City of Anna. The expectation is that
each line will be engineered based on the demands associated with the current land use plan
and any special circumstances particular to a business or operation that might potentially
overload the system due to specific demand issues.
j: `clerieal'anna12018-133 uRuv impact fee upJule 2018'reporiv,04-repor•tdoc - Water and Wasleivaler Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 17 of 27
Ali
iu::
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE 1`\\1®. 10
10-YEAR WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Project
Size
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Costtrl
Debt
Service(2)
Total Project
Cost(S)
Throckmorton Creek Parallel Line # 1
VARIES (27)""
$3,788,325
$2,291,375
$6,079,700
Sanitary Sewer Line#2
36""
X
$7,895,360
$4,775,522
$12,670,882
Sanitary Sewer Line #3
18"
X
$2,399,265
$1,451,200
$3,850,465
Sanitary Sewer Line #4A
$3,087,500
$1,867,480
$4,954,980
Sanitary Sewer Line #413
12""
X
$3,935,000
$2,380,092
$6,315,092
Sanitary Sewer Line#5
121."
X
$684,900
$414,263
$1,099,163
Sanitary Sewer Line #6
12""
X
$490,950
$296,952
$787,902
Sanitary Sewer Lure#7
15""
X
$1,445,000
$874,011
$2,319,011
San itarySewerLine #8
8""
X
$326,700
$197,605
$524,305
San itary Sewer Une #9
18""
$241,425
$146,026
$387,451
Sanitary Sewer Line # 10
12""
$639,450
$386,772
$1,026,222
San itary Sewer Line #II(CamdenPark Offs iteGravity)
8",12""
X
$304,780
$194,347
$489,127
Sanitary Sewer Line # 12 (Sweetwater F.M.)
101."
X
$504,000
$304,845
$808,845
Sanitary Sewer Line # 14 (F.M.)
12""
X
$1,479,850
$895,090
$2,374,940
San itary Sewer Line # 15 (F.M.)
20""
X
$2,544,000
$1,538,743
$4,082,743
Sanitary Sewer Line # 16
12"
$1,150,000
$695,580
$1,845,580
Sanitary Sewer Line 417
12"
$700,000
$423,396
$1,123,396
Subtotal: Wastewater Collection Lines
$31,616,505
$19,123,298
S50,739,803
$50,739,803
Wastewater Svstem Facilities
Project
Size
(MGIAIGD)
Developer
Participation
Total
Capital
Costal
Debt
Service(�)
Total Project
Cost($)
Sweetwater Lift Station (#18)
1.30
X
S498,200
$301,337
$799,537
Jacobs Lift Station (# 19)
1.60
$750,000
$453,639
$1,203,639
WS21rft Station (#20)
9.01
X
$2,250,000
$1,360,916
$3,610,916
NTMWD Meter Station (#22)
N/A
$350,000
$211,698
$561,698
Trinity Meter Station (423)
N/A
$500,000
$302,426
$802,426
Subtotal: Wastmiter Collection Facilities
I
I
I S4,348,200
S2,630,016
$6,978,216
Wastewater Master Plan
Wastewater CIP Grand Total
C. Utilized Capacity
$50,000 $0 $50,000
$36,014,705 $21,753,315 $57,768,020
Utilized capacity for the wastewater collection system was calculated based on land
absorption from population growth projections provided by the City. The population and
employment growth in each wastewater drainage basin was determined utilizing the City's
growth projections. These growth rates were utilized to calculate 2018 and 2028 design
flows.
J.Wericahanna12018-133 uAuw impactfee update 20181reporl.004-reportdocx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 20 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
The following summarizes each design flow component utilized to calculate the wastewater
design flows.
1) Population Based Flow: For the purpose of this wastewater impact fee study an average
per capita flow of 100 gallons per day (gpcd) is a reasonable basis for the design of the
wastewater collection and treatment facilities.
2) Non -Population Based Flow: Non-residential average flows are estimated based on an
average flow per acre for each non-residential land use category. Commercial base unit
flows were estimated to be 1,500 gallons per acre per day (gpad) to simulate dry weather
conditions. The City also has a public component to consider. The unit for public
components was estimated to be 1,000 gpad.
3) Infiltration and Inflow: Groundwater can infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system through
faulty sewer pipe joints, breaks in sewer pipes and manholes and faulty service lines.
This infiltration creates an average day flow related burden on the wastewater collection
system and the wastewater treatment plant. Infiltration is a constant that is not
necessarily based on temporary storm based environmental conditions. Normal plant
capacity must be designed to handle these infiltration related conditions. The City can
embark on programs to rehabilitate lines that contribute significant infiltration volumes
when economically and environmentally feasible, and/or desirable.
Inflow is generally related to storm based events that increase groundwater and surface
water flow into the sanitary system. The additional flow is generally recognized to enter
through manholes, service lines, roof drains and storm drains. Inflow related surges
could cause surcharged sewers, overflows at manholes and peak flows that surpass the
capacity of the treatment plant. It is estimated, for wastewater collection system
planning purposes, that the combined infiltration and inflow is 800 gallons per acre per
day (gpad) for the existing wastewater collection system and 600 gpad for the new lines
proposed in the build -out wastewater collection system.
j:I,dericalann&2015'-133 u•&mv Lupacifee update 2018!repor/s'104-a-eporLeiocr - TValer and Jfaslewater Impaet Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 21 of27
Birkhoff, Hendricks d Carter, L.L.P.
4) The calculation of peak flows requires the development of a unit hydrograph (Diurnal
Curve). At the time of this report, a sufficient amount of wastewater flow data was not
available to allow for a feasible approach for the development of a diurnal curve specific
to the City of Anna. However, unit hydrographs from other cities monitored in the past
were evaluated and'compiled into a diurnal curve that reasonably represents the peak
flow in the City of Anna. Diurnal curves are applied to the hydraulic model to simulate
a 24-hour temporal cycle in a wastewater system. The diurnal curve was applied system
wide to the base flows. The base flow calculated for inflow and infiltration is an
independent variable that is not affected by the Diurnal Pattern.
The percent utilized capacity was calculated for the design flow of each study year based on
the build -out capacity. The utilized capacity for each facility during the Impact Fee period is
the difference between the year 2028 available capacity and the year 2018 available capacity.
Table No. 11 below summarizes the project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period
of 2018 - 2028 for each element of the wastewater system (impact fee eligible). The utilized
capacity for each existing and proposed wastewater collection line is presented in detail in
Impact Fee Capacity Calculation Tables No. 13, No. 14, and No. 15.
TABLE NO. 11
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST & UTILIZED CAPACITY COST
Wastewater System
Total 20-Year Project Cost
M
Utilized Capacity Dining
Fee Period
($)
Existing Wastewater Facilities
$24,945,474
$8,167,784
Existing Wastewater System Subtotal:
$24,945,474
$8,167,784
Proposed Wastewater Collection Sewer Lines
$50,739,803
$24,292,009
Proposed Wastewater Facilities
$6,978.216
$5,723,222
Wastewater System Master Plan
$50,000
$50,000
Proposed Water System Subtotal:
$57,768,020
$30,065,231
TOTAL:
$82,713,493
$38,233,015
j:Vclerieal'anna'2018-133 ii-Smi, impact fee upJule 2018'reporls'.04-reportdocr - FValer and lV aslelrater Impael fee Update 2018-2028
Page 22of27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 12
EXISTING FACILITY RECOVERY - WASTEWATER LINES & FACILITIES
.. x,. „1:� +nu d�re,� ,a.•. �,r„ •„r„ ..,r:,��a; .1,,,1,. ,nx::r. ,,,t,
Pipe
Nmnber
Total
CalucitJ•
IGD
Date ofConst.
Total Capital
Cost S
20 Year Debt
Sersicenq5%
Sim einleresl
TotA 20 Yen,.
Project
Cost S
\IGD 11tili-cl Ca cit •
(%) Llilu"I Cn
tacit y
(S) Uilized Ca Yicity
2018
2028
During
Pee
Period
20I8
2028
During
Fee Perio
2018
2028
During
Fee Period
Faistino Sanitat ' Se33erracilit{' 01
0.13
IAO
1.2
I"<;
IS'%
13%
SJG.O51
S46,I1i1
5179.7:N
5479,7M
?a33.733
S433,733
Th n;clinunion Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Inwer)
Subinlul:
l.c,O
9.6n
2005
2005
$2,050,000
S2,O50,n011
51.237)M6
SI,239,'14fi
S3:_'8' 1W,
V,289,946
E.\is fing Satlifal ' Sewer racifity li2
IAA
Ll
4%
25°'0
21'/4
$71,957
_ S71,957
$437,32-1
S437,322
S36i,36i
-- S365,365
TbmcknioiloIn Crock Regional Trunk Scucr (Upiler)
0.23
1_L
Subtotal:
5.60
- - 5.60
2008
1 $1,090,000
sl$190,II110
S659,288
5659,288
S1,749,-088
S1,749,288
2009
Exisling Sanitary Sci er racility #3
0.00
1.52
152
fP/o
25%
-
SO
SO
$583,021
S583,021
S583,021
S.583,021
Thmcla...Un LS. Wlicf Trunk Scuer
Subtotal:
6,07 2016
6.07 2016
S1,4i3,145
S1,453,1451
S878,937
5878,9371
$2,332,08
S2,332,082
Existing, Saniaul' Semi racHity 04
O.IXI
4.80
4.80
0'/e
IUn";,
bs7;;,
$0
SO
_
SI.444,367
S1,444,367
� � �S1,444.367
S1,444,367
Slade. C.-k Trunk Setter
Su Luu:d:
4.811
4.80
2015
2015
$900,000
s960,600
5544367
S544,367
SI.441.367
S1,444,367
Existing Sanitat ' Selcer racility #5
0.94
091
0.0
84%
9_1%
TSL
S1,486,980
S1,486,981)
$1,615,481
S1,615,484
SIAM
S118504
lJpperSla)ler Creek Trunk Sewer
Suhlnl:d:
L00
1.00
2005
2005
$1,105,1)(10
S1,105,M)o
$668,361
5668,i61
S1,773,361
51,77J,361
Exis ting SaWtaty SCWerFacility #6
0.00
- 0.70
- 23%
I
- $O
I SOI
SCA2,2W
S642,208
5642,20•
S642,208
Cleminons Creek Regional Trunk S racer (hoer)
Subtotal:
3.00
3,00
2003
2008
1 $1,715,000
51,715,0011
S1,037,321
51,037,321
S2,752,321
S2,752,321I
V
--��(P/o
23%
Exisfin.aSanitaiy Se1Perracill #7
0.06
0.90
WIN
2•;5
Xr,,L
2S'%
S44.172
S44,172
S662584
S662,SM
$618,41
5618.412
Clemnruns Crock Regional T,uok Scuer(Upper)
Subtotal:
3.00
J.UO
20I6
2Ui6
$1,376.210
S1,376,210
$332,403
S832,403
$2.2,18,613
S2;2118,613
ESistin,- Sanitat ' Seccerracili #8
0.04
0."
216
31Y';n
289'.
$21,826
S21,826
$327,390
S327,390
$305,3.
S305,%6i
Anna Cmssing LS. Form Main
Subtotal:
2.00
,.no
2015
2015
1 $680,000
S680,000
S41L2'J9
5411,2i9D
S1,0'J1,29J
Si,091,299
0.60
Fxisting Sanitary SelcerFaciliq' #9
0.01
0.60
OS
2'.0
31%
_ 2R"b
-
---
-
Anna Cmssing lift Station
Subtotal:
2.001
200
2015
1 $320,000
5193,ii3
S793,553
_ $313,353
S513,5.9
$10,271
S10,2711
_ _ $154,066
S154,0661
_
_-_--_$143,795
S143,79
2015
S320,000
_
ExistiRg Sanitary Sewer Facility 410
0.35
0.5H
70%
loop/
_.
30%
5220.474
-2,2117,474
S3, 1i31,4
S3,153,534
9i-t40G1
S946,060
S lask•rCreek p{VIP
Subtotal:
O.50
U.511
1 2005
20U5
$1,965,000
51965,UUI1
1 S138R.534
S1,188 �1A
S3353,534
V,IS3,531
ExistingSanitalvSeWerEili '#11
0.35
0_
7(Pl
lW/
3011
57322uk
1732,211
S1046,094
%016,U')4
S313,828
S313,828
S la)te r C ivel, {{9YrP Head corks lift S lation
Subtotal:
0.50
O.iu
2014 S(51,832
2014 5651,832
S3A.26'_
5314 �62
S1,041,fr11
51,046,1194
Existing Sanitary Server racili ' #12
USU
3,00
2.50
S'%
509�
424L
5202, 54i
5202,SA5
S1.26i.907
51.265;107
SI f163,1(2
51,063,J62
16 inch Farce, Main
Subtotal:
6,30
6.00
1 2018 51,577,6(N)
N118 SI,S77,(,00
5954.2I4
5954,214
52.531,814
52,S31,814
Existing Sanitary Smer racility #13
0.50
3,01)
2.50
81
5(r-
4'_°i
S224,679.24
S224,679
51.404,24i
S1,404,245
SlA79,566
S7,179i66
WAS 1 lift Station
Submlal:
6.00
6.00
2018
2U18
SI.750.000
51,750,000
SE058.491
SI,OSS,49]
S2,80.4,491
52,808,491
Wastewater Facilities - Project Recovery Total
1 $4,976,263
S13,216,005
$8,167,784
S16,633,7871 $10,060,9751 $24,945,4741
J.Wericallaimd2018-133 u-Mviv inlpacifee apdine 2018bepor1s1O4-repor1.docx - Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 23 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter-, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 13
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WASTEWATER LINES
-A--
Pipe
Number
Total
Capacity
IGD
Date of Const.
Total Capital
Cost S
20 Year Debt
Senice@5%
Shuttle interest
Total 20 fear
Project
Cost 's
(DIGT) Utilizedl Cancitp
(90 Utilized Cancity
$ UtilizedCalvicity
2018
2028
During
Pee
Period
2018
2028
During
Fee Pc- i0d
2018
2028
During
Fee Period
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility tkl
o.0
1.40
1,27
11u
15'y.
13%
$46,051
546,051
S479,784
S479,784
$433,733
S433,733
Throcknrorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtut"k
960
9.60
2005
2005
$2,050,000
52,050,000
$1,239,946
S1,239,946
53,289,9-16
53,239,946
Existing Sanitize `SewerFacility42
0.23
1.40
1.1
4%
25%
211
$71,957
S71,957
S437,322
S437,322
$365,365
S365,365
Throckmorton Creek Regional Trunk Sewer(Upper)
Subtotal:
5.60
5.60
1 2008
2008
$1,090,000
S1,090,000
$659,288
S659,288
S1,749,288
S1,749,288
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility43
0,00
1-52
152
W
25%
2596
50
SO
$593,021
S583,021
5583,021
5593,02I
Thrackatortun LS. Relief Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
6.07
6.07
2016 _
2016
$1,453,145
$1,453,145
S874937
S873,937
a2.332082
S2,332,082
Existing Sanitary Seller Facility #4
O.OII
4.SO
4S0
t0,;,
100'i6
1(10",0
$0
SO
$1,444,367
S1,444,367
$1,444,367
S1,444,367
Slayter Creek Trvnk Sewer
Subtotal:
4.80
4.80
1 2015
2015
$900,000
5900,000
SS44,367
S544,367
$1,444,367
S1,444,367
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facilit • #5
OS-1
0.91
0.07
84%
91",,
71;
$1,486,980
S1,486980
$1,615,494
$1,615,484
$128,504
$128,504
Upper Slayter Creek Trunk Sewer
Subtotal:
I.00
1.00
2005
$1,105,000
S1,105,000
SGCi8,361
S668,361
$1,773,361
S1,773,361
I 2005
Existing Sanitary SewerFaciG #6
0
0.70
0.70
W
231
2B
$0
SO
$641-208
S642,208
S642,208
S642,203
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Lower)
Subtotal:
3.00 2008
3.00 2008
1 $1,715,000
S1,715,000
$1.037,321
$1,037,321
$2,752,321
$2,752,321
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility 47
006
09ir
0.8-1
_
3(Pr,,
23,
S-14.172
S44,172
S662,584
S662,534
S618,412
S618,412
Clemmons Creek Regional Trunk Sewer (Upper)
Subtatal:
3,00
3.00
1 2016 $1,376,210 S832,403
2016 S1,376,210 S832,403
S>203,613
S2,203,613
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #8
ti 0-1
0.60
0.56
2
Yf' ;
_81-0
_ $21,826
S21,826
_ _ $327,390
S327,390
_ _ S305,564
S305,564
Anna Crossing LS. Force Main
Subtotal:
2.00
2.00
2015
$680,000
$411,299
S411,299
$1,091; 99
2015
$680,000
_
$1,091,299
Existing Sanitary Sewer Facility #9
OIlI
0.60
056
,.
3(710
28":o
S10,271
SIU,271
S15-1,066
SI54,066
S143,79i
SN3,795
Anna Crossing lift Station
Subtotal:
2.00
2.W
1 2015 $320,000
2015 S320,000
S193,553
S193,553
SS115-1
513,553
Existing Sanita `SewerFacilit`410
0.35
0.50
0.15
70?a
10'T
30"d
$2,207A74
S2,207.474
S3,Ii3,S34
S3,153,i34
$946,060
S946,060
Slayter Creek W\1TP
Subtotal:
0.50 1
0.50
2005 $1,965,000
2003 S1,965,000
$1,188,534
$1,188,534
$3,153,534
$3,153,534
Exis fing SaRita l Se we r Fa c ifity #111
03;
05t1
_
0.1
7u"
5732,266
$1,046,094
S1,046,094
S313,828
S313,828
Slayter Creek W W TP Heathvorks lift Station
Subtotal:
0.50 1
0.50
2014
2014
S651,832
S651,1W
S394,262
S394,262
SI,U-It�091
SI,OA6,094
Existing Sanitary Se Niel' Facility ti12
OS0
33111
2"1
84n
i0`5h
42°,
S202=45
S202,545
SI265907
S1,265,907
SI.063361
S1,063,362
16 inch Force Hain
Subtotal:
6110 1
6.00
2018 S1.577.60U
2018 S1,577,600
S954.214
S954,214
S2.SL8W
S2,531,8 4
Existing Sanital `SewerFacility913
0.5(t
_
3.00
----
2.50
8",L
-
50%
-
42%
--- ---
$224,679.24
-
S224,679
$l,4W,245
--
Sl,4W,245
SI,179.566
---
SI,179,566
WAS t lift Station
i
Subtotal:
6.00
-00
6.00
2018
S1,750,000
-
SI,750,000
$1,058,491
S1,058,491
S2,808,491
------ -
S2,808,491
-- ----
2018
Wastewater Facilities - Project Recovery Total
1-[�4,976,2631
$13,216,005
$8,167,784
$16,633,787 $10,060,975 $24,945,474
J.Wericahanna12018-133 n`&mw impacifee update 201ffireporl.004-reporrdocx - Water and JEastewater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 24 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 14
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WASTEWATER FACILITIES
• dsrnige Unit cosis arc bawd In 2014 dollars untess othenviss indicated and includes 20% for engineering and easements.
Pipe
Number
Total
Capacity
Total Capital
Cost (S)
20 Year Debt
Senice(it?5%
Simple interest
Total 20 Year
Project
Cost ($)
(NiGD)
Utilized Capacity
(%)
Utilized
Capacity
(S)
Utilizedcapacity
2018
0.00
2028
1.30
During
ree Period
1.3
2018
0%
2028
100%
During
Fee Period
IOITa
2018
$U
so
2028
$799,537
S799,537
During
ree Period
S799,537
S799,537
Sweet- aterLiftStation(418)
Subtotal:
I,30
1.30
S498,200 $301,337
5498,200 5301,337
57,) "-17
5799,537
Jacobs lift Station (#19)
0.00
1.60
I eu
04o
IoWo
I(Yr%
$0
So
$1,203,639
S1,203,639
$1,203,63
$1,203,639
Subtotal•
1.60
1.60
S750,000
S750,000
$453,639
S453,639
$1,203,63_
S1,203,639
NVS2 Lift Station (920)
0.00
9.01
9.01
(P
10(fl,
I(X}.'o
SO
SU
$3,610,916
S3,6I Q916
$3,610,91
53,610,916
S ubtolal:
201
9.U1
S2,250,000
S2,25U,000
$1,360,916
S1,360,916
$3,610,916
S3,610,916
NTiMWE) Meter Station (#22)
N, A
N/A
N/A
0 6
S",-
81, a
$0
SO
S44,936
544,936
$44,93
544,936
Subtotal:
N/A $350,000
N/AS350,ODD
$211,698
$211,698
S561,698
5561,698
Trinity, Meter Station (423)
N,A
N/A
NIA
(P
S°o
895
$0
so
$64,194
$64,194
S64,194
S64,194
Subtotal:
N/A
N/AS50o,000
S500,000
$302,426 $802,426
$302,426 S302,426
Wastewater Facilities - Project CIP Total
$4,348,2001 $2,630,0161 $6,978,216
1
1
11
1
1
1 SO
$5,723,222
$5,723,222
j.-Werlcedlanna12018-133 uAmv Inipacifee update 20181reports104-reportdoex - Water and Wasteivater Impact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 25 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
VII. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES - WATER & WASTEWATER
SYSTEM
The maximum impact fees for the water and wastewater systems are calculated separately by
dividing the cost of the capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated and attributable
to new development in the service area within the ten year period by the number of living units
anticipated to be added to City within the ten year period as shown on the following tables. To
simplify collection, we recommend the fee remain fixed throughout the 5-year period, unless
changed by Council.
Calculated Water Impact Fee = Eligible Existing Utilized Cost + Eligible Proposed Utilized Cost
umber of New LUE's over the Next 10 Yea i
_ $17,613,298 + $29,723,454 = $47,336,752
5,248 5,248
$9,020.28 Use: $9,020
Maximum Water Impact Fee Allowable: $9,020 x 50% _
Calc. Wastewater Impact FeE = Eligible Existing Utilized Cost + Eligible Proposed Utilized Cost
umber of New LUE's over the Next 10 Yea
$8,167,784 + $30,065,231 = $38,233,015
4,687 4,687
$8,157.46 Use: $8,157
aximum Wastewater Impact Fee Allowed $8,157 x 50% IF$4,0797
Based on the Allowable Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Water and Wastewater, Table
No. 15 calculates the maximum water and wastewater (sewer) impact fee for the various sizes of
water meters.
j:Iclerical'.ann&2018-133,rfi,nr in,paci(ee update 20lb".reporls'0-1-repar,.rfncr - l hater and Wastewater Impact Fee Updale 2018-2028
Page 26 of 27
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter, L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 15
ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM FEE PER LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENT
AND
PER METER SIZE AND TYPE
Maximum Water Impact fee per LUE $4,510
Maximum Wastewater Impact fee per U $4,079
Land Use
Meter
Type
Meter
Size
Maximum Impact Fee
Total
LUE
Water
Wastewater
Single Family Residential
Simple
3/4"
1
$4,510
$4,079
$8,589
Single Family Residential
Simple
1"
1.7
$7,667
$6,933
$14,601
Single Family Residential
Simple
1-1/2"
3.3
$14,883
$13,459
$28,343
Single Family Residential
Simple
2"
5.3
$23,904
$21,616
$45,520
Commercial/Retail
Compound
2"
5.3
$23,904
$21,616
$45,520
Commercial/Retail
Turbine
2"
6.7
$30,218
$27,326
$57,544
Commercial/Retail/Multi Fan
Compound
3"
10.7
$48,259
$43,640
$91,898
Commercial/Retail/Multi Fa
Turbine
3"
16
$72,162
$65,256
$137,418
Commercial/Retail/Multi Fan
Compound
4"
16.7
$75,319
$68,111
$143,430
Commercial/Retail/Multi Fan
Turbine
4"
28
$126,284
$114,198
$240,482
Industrial
Compound
6"
33.3
$150,188
$135,814
$286,002
Industrial
Turbine
6"
61.3
$276,472
$250,012
$526,484
Industrial
Compound
8"
53.3
$240,391
$217,384
$457,775
Industrial
Turbine
8"
106.7
$481,232
$435,176
$916,408
Industrial
Compound
10"
153.3
$691,405
$625,234
$1,316,639
Industrial
Turbine
10"
166.7
$751,840
$679,886
$1,431,726
Industrial
Turbine
12"
220
$992,231
$897,270
$1,889,501
Note: Selection of the meter size and type shall be dependent on application, and with the input of both
the applicant and City staff.
j:'derical'annd'.2018-133 r Xiiw impacifee update 2018 report004-repon.docr - }Dater and lVastewater hnpact Fee Update 2018-2028
Page 27 of 27
2018-2028
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE
THE CITY OF
manna
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, L.L.P.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS - TBPE Firm No. 526
11910 Greenville Ave., Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75243
Phone (214) 361-7900
September 2018